CA2248007A1 - Ensilage agent - Google Patents

Ensilage agent Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CA2248007A1
CA2248007A1 CA002248007A CA2248007A CA2248007A1 CA 2248007 A1 CA2248007 A1 CA 2248007A1 CA 002248007 A CA002248007 A CA 002248007A CA 2248007 A CA2248007 A CA 2248007A CA 2248007 A1 CA2248007 A1 CA 2248007A1
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
ensiling
composition
acid
green forage
silage
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
CA002248007A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Bruno Kasler
Gunter Gaus
Hans Muschen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BASF SE
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of CA2248007A1 publication Critical patent/CA2248007A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K30/00Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K30/10Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs of green fodder
    • A23K30/15Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs of green fodder using chemicals or microorganisms for ensilaging

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Fodder In General (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
  • Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)

Abstract

An ensilage agent containing an active quantity of at least one methanogenic bacteria inhibitor.

Description

.

Ensiling composition The present invention relates to an ensiling composition contain-5 ing an effective amount of at least one inhibitor of methanogenicbacteria. The present invention also relates to a process for the preparation of the ensiling composition and its use for ensiling green forage and preventing aerobic and anaerobic degradation processes in the silage.
The production of silage is of extremely great commercial impor-tance in animal nutrition. A number of additives and processes for improving the fermentation process and for improving the si-lage quality are known. Thus, the currently valid list of the en-15 siling compositions tested by the Deutsche LandwirtschaftlicheGesellschaft (DLG) describes the use of salts of formic acid and of propionic acid, nitrite compounds, sorbic acid, formaldehyde-generating compounds and sugar-containing substances, eg. mo-lasses.
DE-A 39 16 563 describes the addition of lactic acid-producing bacteria for improving the silage quality. The use of effective ensiling compositions reduces the feed losses due to nutrient degradation and prevents partial or complete spoilage through in-25 correct fermentation.
In general, in order to obtain a very good silage, it is neces-sary for a sufficient amount of lactic acid to be produced very rapidly and to be maintained in the silage for the stated storage 30 period.

Important parameters for good ensiling are, for example, the buffer capacity of the forage plants, the contents of antimicro-bial secondary ingredients in the plants, the acid- and osmosis-35 tolerance of the naturally occurring and of added lactic acid-producing bacteria, the metabolic efficiency of the natural epi-phyte population, the presence of a sufficient amount of ferment-able carbohydrates and anaerobic conditions in the feedstock.

40 There are close interactions between these parameters. In the presence of atmospheric oxygen, fermentable carbohydrates can be degraded by plant parts which are not yet dead or enzymes thereof and by aerobic microorganisms. This process involves a consider-able nutrient loss, which inhibits development of lactic acid 45 bacteria and at the same time makes it possible for silage pests to grow. This process continues until the atmospheric oxygen has been consumed. Under unfavorable conditions, this results in failure to reach the rapid and necessary pH reduction in the ma-terial being ensiled. These are favorable growth conditions for Clostridia. Butyric acid bacteria (Clostridia) are anaerobic bacteria which, in the absence of oxygen, degrade organic sub-5 strates to alcohols, acids, CO2 and N2. The acid formed is prefer-ably butyric acid. The growth of the Clostridia and the associated formation of butyric acid considerably ;mrA; r the quality of the silage. This butyric acid fermentation can lead to complete spoilage of the silage.
Clostridia are known to spoil feeds and foods.

German Laid-Open Application DOS 2,613,503 discloses organic acids for ensiling green forage. Lactic acid bacteria for ensil-15 ing green forage and a combination of organic acids and lacticacid bacteria are described in EP 369 198 B1 and EP 399 385 Bl, respectively.

It is possible to suppress Clostridia by adding nitrite. However, 20 the addition of nitrite is problematic from the toxicological point of view.

In spite of this use of nitrite or nitrate in ensiling, silages suffer a constant weight and quality loss due to respiration of 25 the sugars and starch by these undesirable microorg~nism~. This leads to considerable economic damage.
It is an object of the present invention to prevent the develop-ment of butyric acid-forming bacteria (Clostridia) in the silage, 30 without the abovementioned disadvantages, and thus to suppress anaerobic degradation processes of the silage in a controlled manner.

We have found that this object is achieved and that, by adding 35 inhibitors of methanogenic bacteria to the silage, the growth of the Clostridia can be suppressed in a controlled r~nner and the fermentation and quality losses of silages can thus be substan-tially reduced. The present invention relates to an ensiling com-position containing an effective amount of at least one inhibitor 40 of methanogenic bacteria.

The present invention also relates to a process for the prepara-tion of the ensiling composition and its use for ensiling green forage and preventing aerobic and anaerobic degradation processes 45 in the silage.

Inhibitors of methanogenic bacteria which are suitable for the novel ensiling composition are all substances which selectively inhibit the growth of methanogenic bacteria. Methanogenic bacteria are to be understood as meaning, for example, the fol-5 lowing families and genera of Archaea: Methanobacteriacae, Me-thanobacterium, Meth~nobrevibacter, Methanospaera; Methanotherma-ceae, Methanotherumus; Methanococcaceae, Methanococcus; Methano-sarcinaceae, Halomethanococcus, Methanococcoides, Methanohalo-bium, Methanohalophilus, Methanolobus, Methanosarcina, Methano-10 saeta; Meth~n~ ;crobiaceae, Methanoculleus, Methanogenium, Metha-nolacinia, Meth~nomicrobium~ Methanoplanus, Methanospirillum; Me-thanocorpusculaceae, Methanocorpusculum.

Inhibitors of methanogenic bacteria are, for example, antibiotics 15 such as puromycin and/or bacitracin, bacteriocins and/or methano-genesis inhibitors, such as bromoethanesulfonic acid and/or monensin. Preferably used inhibitors are methanogenesis inhibi-tors, very ptrticularly preferably bromoethanesulfonic acid and/
or monensin.
Individual inhibitors or combinations of different inhibitors may be used.

The inhibitors may be used alone for ensiling green forage and 25 preventing anaerobic degradation processes in silage or in com-bination with other ensiling agents, lactic acid-producing bacteria and/or assistants for ensiling green forage and prevent-ing aerobic and anaerobic degradation processes in silage.

30 The inhibitors of methanogenic bacteria are used in an amount of from 0.01 to 99.9, preferably from 0.05 to 90, particularly from 0.5 to 70, % by weight, based on the total ensiling amount lsic]
(= 100 % by weight).

35 The inhibitors of methanogenic bacteria can advantageously be used in an amount of from 0.001 to 10, in particular from 0.05 to 8, very preferably from 0.1 to 5, kg, based on one metric ton of material being ensiled.

40 Suitable ensiling agents are all known inorganic and organic en-siling agents. Inorganic ensiling agents are, for example, cal-cium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, cobalt carbonate, sodium sulfate, ammonium sulfate, manganese sulfate, cobalt sulfate, iron sulfate, zinc sulfate and/or copper sulfate, sodium metabi-45 sulfite, orthophosphoric acid, sodium nitrate, sodium nitrite,sodium chloride, potassium chloride, calcium phosphate, calcium silicate, kieselguhr and mineral acids, such as hydrochloric acid . . . , ~

and/or sulfuric acid. Sodium nitrite, sodium metabisulfite, so-dium chloride and/or potassium chloride are preferred.

Organic ensiling agents are to be understood as meaning, for ex-5 ample, formaldehyde, paraformaldehyde, hexamethylenetetramine, organic acids and/or agriculturally useful salts thereof, without being restricted to these. Aliphatic Cl-C7-mono-, di- and tricar-boxylic acids, benzoic acid and/or agriculturally useful salts thereof, for example formic acid, acetic acid, glycolic acid, 10 propionic acid, lactic acid, valeric acid, caproic acid, heptan-oic acid, acrylic acid, maleic acid, fumaric acid, citric acid and sorbic acid, are preferably used. Particularly preferred acids and/or agriculturally useful salts thereof are citric acid, formic acid and/or propionic acid. Particularly preferred salts 15 are calcium formate, sodium formate, sodium propionate and/or calcium propionate.

Agriculturally useful salts of the abovementioned acids are salts of those bases which do not impair the ensiling effect.
Particularly suitable basic salts are those of the alkali metals, preferably the sodium and potassium salts, those of the alkaline earth metals, preferably calcium, magnesium and/or barium salts, and those of the transition metals, preferably manganese, copper, 25 zinc, cobalt and/or iron salts, and the ammonium salts.
The ensiling agents can advantageously be used in an amount of from 0.1 to 99.99, preferably from 10 to 99.95, in particular from 25 to 99.5, % by weight, based on the total amount of ensil-30 ing composition (= 100 % by weight).

The ensiling agents may be added individually or in combinationwith the ensiling composition.

35 Strains of lactic acid-producing bacteria (LAB) which may be add-ed to the novel ensiling composition are in principle all those which grow under the conditions prevailing in the silage and pro-duce sufficient lactic acid, ie. form lactic acid in such an amount that the resulting decrease in pH is so rapid that no un-40 desirable microorganisms can develop.

Suitable LAB are advantageously those of the genera Lactobacil-lus, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Leuconostoc, Carnobacterium, Staphylococcus, Aerococcus and/or Pediococcus. Microorg~nis~ of 45 the genera Lactococcus, Lactobacillus and/or Leuconostoc are particularly suitable. The genus and species Lactobacillus plantarum is very particularly suitable. The bacteria may be used in fluid, frozen or lyophilized form. Before use, they may be applied to a substrate and/or mixed with further assistants and/or granulated.

5 Examples of suitable substrates are calcium carbonate, bran, sem-olina, granulated sugar, bone feed meal, bole, talc, stearates of alkaline earth metals, sodium chloride, rock salt or other miner-als suitable for feeding. When the bacteria are mixed with or ap-plied to the substrate, it should be ensured that the bacteria 10 are not damaged. Individual bacterial strains or combinations of different strains may be used.

The bacteria can advantageously be used in an amount of from 0 to 10, preferably from 0 to 5, in particular from 0 to 1, % by 15 weight, based on the total amount of ensiling composition (= 100 % by weight).

For the purposes of the present invention, assistants are sub-stances which promote the growth of microorganisms, such as fer-20 mentable carbohydrate-contA; n; ng products, for example molasses, boiled potatoes, cereal meal, dried whey, green spelt meal, dried sugar beet pulp, sugar, starch hydrolysis products or wood hydro-lysis products.
25 The addition of cellulolytic, amylolytic and/or other carbohy-drate-degrading enzymes or nitrogen in bound form, for example urea or ammonium compounds, such as ammonium sulfate, also has a growth-promoting effect.

30 Assistants may advantageously be added to the ensiling composi-tion prepared according to the invention in an amount of from 0 to 60, preferably from 0 to 50, very particularly preferably from 0 to 30, % by weight, based on the total amount of ensiling com-position (= 100 % by weight).
The silage which can be used according to the invention is not subject per se to any particular restriction. All readily ensil-able feeds (slightly wilted grass and other feed plants contain-ing more than 3 % of sugar in the fresh matter, wilted grass con-40 taining > 30 % of dry matter, wilted leguminosae contA;~;ng> 35 % of dry matter, silo corn and corn cob products contAin;ng > 25 % of dry matter, whole-plant cereals, moist cereals and moist corn, pressed sugar beet pulp), feeds which are moderately difficult to ensile (grass containing from 20 to 25 % of dry mat-45 ter, leguminosae containing from 25 to 30 % of dry matter andother feed plants having sugar contents of from 1.5 to 3 % in the fresh matter) or feeds which are difficult to ensile (grass con-.. . ~ . . ..

taining < 20 % of dry matter or leguminosae cont~ining < 20 % of dry matter with less than 1.5 % of sugar in the fresh matter and grass or leguminosae which have been unsuccessfully wilted) are suitable. The material being ensiled preferably has a moisture 5 content of at least 50 %, very preferably from 60 to 90 % ~corre-sponding to 40-10 % of dry substance).

The novel ensiling composition is added to the material being en-siled in an amount of from 0.01 to 20, in particular from 0.05 to 10 10, very preferably from 0.1 to 5, kg per metric ton of material being ensiled. The ensiling composition may be provided to the farmer as individual components or as a prepared mixture. In this case, it is advantageous to use the components in a form such that the components do not mutually influence one another in an 15 adverse manner. This can be achieved, for example, by microniza-tion. It is added to the material to be ensiled advantageously in the form of a distributable mixture of the components. However, the components may also be added separately to the material being ensiled. The ensiling composition is applied either manually or 20 by means of applicator or a metering apparatus, during chaff-cutting and/or during or after storage of the green forage.

The examples which follow illustrate the invention and are pre-ferred embodiments of the invention.
Example 1 Alfalfa containing 19 % of dry matter was ensiled, and 4 g of en-siling composition per kg of material being ensiled were added in 30 all examples. Batch 1 ~Table 1) is the control without the addi-tion of ensiling compositions. Batch 2 shows the effect of a con-ventional ensiling composition comprising 50 % by weight of so-dium propionate and 50 % by weight of sodium formate.

35 Table I: Ensiling of alfalfa Batch Weight loss in g/kg of material being ensiled 1 16.2 2 7.1 45 Batch 3 shows the dry weight losses in the case of an ensiling composition comprising 45 % by weight of sodium propionate, 50 %
by weight of sodium formate and 5 % by weight of bromoethanesul-fonic acid as a methanogenesis inhibitor. Table 1 shows the mean values from three independent experiments in each case.

The use of methanogenesis inhibitors significantly reduces the 5 weight loss of the material being ensiled.

Example 2 Mixed meadow grass contA;ning 23 % of dry substance was ensiled.
10 Batch 1 (control) in Table II shows a weight loss of 5.8 g.

A mixture of 50 % by weight of sodium propionate and 50 % by weight of sodium formate ~batch 2) showed a loss of 3.0 g.-The same mixture contA;n;ng 5 % by weight of bromoethanesulfonic acid 15 had a weight loss of only 2.0 g. Here too, the mean values of three independent experiments are shown.

Table II: Ensiling of mixed meadow grass Batch Weight loss in g/kg of material being ensiled 1 5.8 2 3.0 3 2.0

Claims (14)

We claim:
1. An ensiling composition containing an effective amount of at least one methanogenesis inhibitor and ensiling agents, lactic acid-producing bacteria or assistants.
2. An ensiling composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein bromoethanesulfonic acid or monensin is used as the methanogenesis inhibitor.
3. An ensiling composition as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein an inorganic or organic ensiling agent is used as the ensiling agent.
4. An ensiling composition as claimed in any of claims 1 to 3, wherein the ensiling agent used is an organic acid or an agriculturally usable salt thereof.
5. An ensiling composition as claimed in any of claims 1 to 4, wherein the ensiling agent used is an aliphatic C1-C7-mono-, di- or tricarboxylic acid, benzoic acid or an agriculturally usable salt thereof.
6. An ensiling composition as claimed in any of claims 1 to 5, wherein the lactic acid-producing bacteria used are those of the genera Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Leuconostoc, Carnobacterium, Staphylococcus, Aerococcus or Pediococcus.
7. A process for the preparation of an ensiling composition as claimed in any of claims 1 to 6, wherein inhibitors of methanogenic bacteria, ensiling agents, lactic acid-producing bacteria and assistants are mixed.
8. A process for the preparation of an ensiling composition as claimed in claim 7, wherein the individual components are granulated before or after mixing.
9. A material being ensiled, containing an ensiling composition as claimed in any of claims 1 to 6.
10. A material being ensiled, containing from 0.01 to 20 kg of an ensiling composition as claimed in claim 9 per metric ton of silage.
11. A method for preventing anaerobic degradation processes in green forage silages, wherein an effective amount of an ensiling composition as claimed in any of claims 1 to 6 is added to the green forage plants.
12. A method for preventing anaerobic degradation processes in green forage silages as claimed in claim 11, wherein one or more inhibitors of methanogenic bacteria are added to the green forage plants in an amount of from 0.001 to 10 kg per metric ton of material being ensiled.
13. Use of an ensiling composition as claimed in any of claims 1 to 6 for ensiling green forage and preventing aerobic and anaerobic degradàtion processes in silage.
14. Use of one or more methanogenesis inhibitors for ensiling green forage and preventing anaerobic degradation processes in silage.
CA002248007A 1996-03-04 1997-02-28 Ensilage agent Abandoned CA2248007A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE19608263.3 1996-03-04
DE19608263A DE19608263A1 (en) 1996-03-04 1996-03-04 Ensiling agent

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2248007A1 true CA2248007A1 (en) 1997-09-12

Family

ID=7787145

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA002248007A Abandoned CA2248007A1 (en) 1996-03-04 1997-02-28 Ensilage agent

Country Status (13)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0884954A1 (en)
AU (1) AU712872B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2248007A1 (en)
CZ (1) CZ275698A3 (en)
DE (1) DE19608263A1 (en)
HU (1) HUP9901816A3 (en)
IL (1) IL125252A0 (en)
MX (1) MX9806176A (en)
NO (1) NO984043L (en)
PL (1) PL328860A1 (en)
SK (1) SK116898A3 (en)
WO (1) WO1997032487A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA971807B (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10105347A1 (en) * 2001-02-05 2002-08-22 Nutrinova Gmbh Sorbic acid preparation containing probiotics as a feed additive in livestock rearing
DE10110431A1 (en) * 2001-03-05 2002-09-19 Nutrinova Gmbh Bacteriocin-containing sorbic acid preparation as a feed additive in livestock rearing
NZ591040A (en) * 2008-07-21 2012-08-31 Erber Ag Method for treating feed silage for ruminants by treatment with at least two microbes selected from specific Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Trichosporon strains

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2940857A (en) * 1958-12-19 1960-06-14 Purdue Research Foundation Preservation of silage
DE1234504B (en) * 1960-09-03 1967-02-16 Biehl & Co Farm feed preparation
US4423224A (en) * 1980-09-08 1983-12-27 Sds Biotech Corporation 4-Me-1-(2-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)ethyl)benzene sulfonate and N-2-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)ethyl methanesulfonamide
US4764510A (en) * 1986-04-11 1988-08-16 Eli Lilly And Company Antibiotic A42125 and process for its production
JP3126147B2 (en) * 1992-10-22 2001-01-22 バイオ−テクニカル・リソーシズ・エルピー Anthraquinone inhibition of methane production in methanogens
GB9512106D0 (en) * 1995-06-14 1995-08-09 Norsk Naeringsmiddelforskning Animal feed

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO1997032487A1 (en) 1997-09-12
MX9806176A (en) 1998-10-31
PL328860A1 (en) 1999-03-01
NO984043L (en) 1998-11-03
CZ275698A3 (en) 1999-02-17
SK116898A3 (en) 1999-01-11
AU1878797A (en) 1997-09-22
EP0884954A1 (en) 1998-12-23
NO984043D0 (en) 1998-09-03
AU712872B2 (en) 1999-11-18
IL125252A0 (en) 1999-03-12
ZA971807B (en) 1998-09-03
HUP9901816A2 (en) 1999-09-28
DE19608263A1 (en) 1997-09-11
HUP9901816A3 (en) 2000-03-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Kung Jr et al. Silage additives
Henderson Silage additives
US6221381B1 (en) Enhancing milk production by adding to feed a nonionic surfactant coated on a carrier
Muck Silage microbiology and its control through additives
Van Nevel et al. 17 Feed additives and other interventions for decreasing methane emissions
Kung A review on silage additives and enzymes
CA2357265C (en) Improved additive for livestock feeds
WO1992001389A1 (en) Enzymatic treatment of silage
WO1984001694A1 (en) Composition and method for ensilaging fodder and grain
FI83151B (en) FERMENTATIVT FOERFARANDE OCH TILLAEGSAEMNE FOER KONSERVERING AV FODER.
US4015018A (en) Silage process and product
Fellner et al. Effects of a bacterial inoculant and propionic acid on preservation of high-moisture ear corn, and on rumen fermentation, digestion and growth performance of beef cattle
US4073889A (en) Method for preventing aerobic decomposition processes in fermentated fodder
AU712872B2 (en) Ensiling composition
US6120810A (en) Bacterial composition to reduce the toxic effects of high nitrate consumption in livestock
CA1110987A (en) Method for preserving silage and related compositions
AUERBACH¹ et al. Chemical additives for silages: When to use it and what are the options?
US6132778A (en) Method of producing a composite preparation for making silage from green fodder
US3184314A (en) Method for the preservation of silage
Getabalew et al. Silage and enzyme additives as animal feed and animals response
US3961079A (en) Ensiling of green fodder with hexamethylene tetramine and sodium nitrite
Tauqir et al. Impact of varying moisture levels, different additives and fermentation periods on nutritive value of leguminous and non-leguminous fodder silages in lactating nili-ravi buffaloes
EP0234921A2 (en) Silage additives
Ogunade et al. Lactic Acid Bacteria and Silage Fermentation
JP2521305B2 (en) Feed composition and method for producing the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FZDE Discontinued