CA2186000A1 - Cyclic triamine chelating agents - Google Patents
Cyclic triamine chelating agentsInfo
- Publication number
- CA2186000A1 CA2186000A1 CA 2186000 CA2186000A CA2186000A1 CA 2186000 A1 CA2186000 A1 CA 2186000A1 CA 2186000 CA2186000 CA 2186000 CA 2186000 A CA2186000 A CA 2186000A CA 2186000 A1 CA2186000 A1 CA 2186000A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- barrier
- panel
- net
- configuration
- cloth
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01G—HORTICULTURE; CULTIVATION OF VEGETABLES, FLOWERS, RICE, FRUIT, VINES, HOPS OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; WATERING
- A01G13/00—Protecting plants
- A01G13/02—Protective coverings for plants; Coverings for the ground; Devices for laying-out or removing coverings
- A01G13/0206—Canopies, i.e. devices providing a roof above the plants
Abstract
The present invention provides compounds of formula (I) wherein Z1 and Z2 each represent the atoms necessary to complete a monocyclic or polycyclic carbocyclic or heterocyclic ring system, said Z1 and Z2 independently optionally substituted with R6 and R7, respectively; R1, R2, R3 and R4 are independently carboxyalkyl (C1-C2), -(CH2)n-C(=O)-NH-R8, or -(CH2)n-C(=O)-O-R8, R5 is carboxyalkyl (C1-C2); R6 and R7 are independently, hydrogen, benzyl, or benzyloxy, said benzyl or benzyloxy optionally substituted with one, two or three substituents selected from the group consisting of amino, isocyanato (-N=C=O), isothiocyanato (-N=C=S), -NH-C(=O)-X or -NH-C(=S)-X; R8 is alkyl (C1-C20), -(CH2)m-Ar, or polyhydroxyalkyl (C1-C20); n is 1 or 2; m is 1 to 15; X
is a targeting moiety; and Ar is phenyl optionally substituted with one, two or three substituents selected from the group consisting of amino, acylamino, hydroxy, alkyl (C1-C5) and halogen. The compounds of the invention can be chelated with a metal ion and used as contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging and for other applications. The present invention also provides pharmaceutical compositions comprising a compound of the invention and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent. The invention further provides a method of providing an image of an internal region of a patient comprising administering to a patient a compound of the invention and scanning the patient using magnetic resonance imaging to obtain visible images of the region.
is a targeting moiety; and Ar is phenyl optionally substituted with one, two or three substituents selected from the group consisting of amino, acylamino, hydroxy, alkyl (C1-C5) and halogen. The compounds of the invention can be chelated with a metal ion and used as contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging and for other applications. The present invention also provides pharmaceutical compositions comprising a compound of the invention and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent. The invention further provides a method of providing an image of an internal region of a patient comprising administering to a patient a compound of the invention and scanning the patient using magnetic resonance imaging to obtain visible images of the region.
Description
wo 95/25424 Pcrn~zssl0oo2s , - 2 1 8600~0 PROTECTIVE CANOPY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the field of providing a protective canopy and has particular application to the provision of retractable protective coverings for plants and/or ~nim~l~
IS in an outside space, or inside a greenhouse or other permanent structure such as a shadehouse.
BACKGROUND
20 Damage affecting pip-fruit trees in particular but also many other crops is likely as a result of adverse weather; particularly from hailstorms. One severe hailstorm, not an infrequent event, can totally destroy a crop and hence the income from it, or damage a crop by bruising so that it is downgraded to a less remunerative grade.
25 Other damage by wind, bats, insects, birds, frost and the like is also a problem for gardeners and horticulturists, and while it is possible to put up or grow windbreaks to catch horizontal winds these have no effect on vertically oriented hazards like hailstones. One could build a roof over the crop, but this is expensive and furthermore as it is desirable to retract the protection when not required, a constructed roof is 30 inal)plu~liate. Retraction aids in protecting the structure itself during winds and snow, and lets more light, and desirable insects such as bees arrive at the plants below.
Plants respond to an improved environment but the op~ ulll environment for a given plant changes with the weather, the time of day, and over the seasons. Hail protection 35 for example is important when fruit is developing, but is not needed over winter. In winter, snow (to take one example) could overload a structure arranged to catch hail.
- ' i;'` "~ ` r3 ~ t"' - 2 - 2 ~ 8 ~ 0 3 0 To avoid these types of overloads, and to be able to modify the environment on aseasonal or daily basis if useful in particular ci~ ces, it is useful to be able to take away or re-install the generally horizontal canopies now used to provide sun, hail, bird, 5 insect or wind protection.
DE~INITIONS
Area: We generally use this term in relation to the area covered by a horizontal10 retractable barrier, thus the term area is more correctly the plan area. However the retractable barrier may be used in a vertical plane for example as a windbreak, and then the area is not the plan area.
OBJECT
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved means for protecting plants or anim~ls from adverse environmental conditions or one which will at least provide the public with a useful choice.
In one aspect the invention provides aretractablebarriertoatleastpartiallyshieldan area, wherein the barrier is comprised of a deformable panel supported along its length by a pair of elongate flexible elements, and wherein each elongate flexible 25 element is attachedto one ormore supports at a required distance above the ground so that the barrier can bepositioned above ground in afirst shielding configuration with the panel assuming a first extended substantially parallelogram shape, and wherein in use the barrier can be deformed into a contracted configuration of lesser area by relatively moving opposite edges of the panel along 30 the edges in opposite directions to distort the panel from the ext--n-le~l subst~nti~lly parallelogram configuration to a much narrower substantially parallelogram configuration.
Preferably the panel includes at least one deformable open-mesh fabric or net and more 35 preferably the panel consists of a woven net having a loose weave allowing for movement or pivoting at the intersections.
wo 9st25424 PCr~Z95/00028 3 2 1 8 6 û O O
Alternatively, a knotted or knitted net may be used.
Alternatively the panel may be made up of a plurality of separate strips of flexible S m~t~ri~l.
In another aspect the invention provides abarrierto at leastpartially surround an object and protect it from particulate material, characterised in that the barrier is comprised of elongated support means in duplicate and at least one array of linear 10 elements supported on the elongated support means at at least two points; the array being capable of being oriented at angles ranging from a first contracted position (wherein the barrier has a minimised area) where the elements of the array are substantially parallel to the support means to a second expanded position where the elements of the array are substantially perpendicular to the support means and the 15 barrier ~su.,.~.s a configuration having a maximised area.
An example application for the barrier is in protecting vegetation from damage by hailstones and here the barrier is provided in the form of an elongated parallelogram ~uppolled horizontally above the vegetation to be ~loteeLed.
Preferably each element of the at least one array of linear elements comprises a sheet of fibrous material; preferably a woven fabric comprised of material resistant to environmental degradation. The p~selllly preferred materials include polypropylene and polyethylene with applupliate fillers and dyes.
Preferably the weaving method used provides a loose interlocking between the warp and weft threads so that in use the fabric or textile can be easily deformed into parallelograms of various configurations. One preferred weaving method is known as the "leno" process.
Optionally the fabric or textile may be created by a knitting process or other means, providing a material in which the threads are held together at crossing points by a type of loose knot.
35 Optionally the threads are held together at crossing points by adhesion or fusion.
Wo 95/25424 Pcr~NZ95/00028 ~f ~ 4 2 1 86000 Optionally the fabric may be a flexible sheet such as a sheet of plastic film like a polyethylene sheet.
S Preferably the support means of the barrier comprises wires or cables passing along the longer opposite sides of the parallelogram, and rigid struts or poles passing along the shorter sides of the parallelogram.
Optionally (or in combination) the support means along the longer sides may be the 10 (optionally selvedged) edges of the sheet or sheets of fabric.
Preferably the fabric is attached along its longer edges to the adjacent wire or cable and preferably this att~chment is made by means of a clip, securing the cable to the fabric by clhllpillg the clip to the wire or cable and then penetrating the weave of the fabric 15 with protruding and interlocking projections from the clip.
Preferably the support means of the barrier provides for controlled lateral movement of the support means so that variation of the relative tensions applied to at least one support means of the ~.u~polled barrier causes the parallelogram to alter its shape from a 20 ~.ub~ 11y conlldcled configuration to a subst~nti~lly e~p~nded configuration.
Preferably, in the case of those shades in which the material itself is not easily distorted or deformable within its plane (such as knitted cloths or plastics sheets) the material is mounted so that a combination of stretching and/or buckling and/or sliding along the 25 support wires permits the material to follow the lateral movement of the support means.
Optionally the material may be attached at at least one end to a bar, the bar being attached at one end to the support means.
30 In an alternative aspect the invention provides a protective shield including a linear array comprising a series of flexible strips, anchored at each end to one of twosubstantially parallel cables which strips are capable of overlapping or Iying side by side, and which in use provide a sun shade or a rain shield when the barrier is in its expanded configuration, and which overlap when the barrier is in its contracted 35 configuration so that it provides a minim~l obstruction to a desired e.~vilo~ ental input such as s~lnli~ht wo ss/2s424 Pcrn~zss/00028 ~ ~ ' 5 ~ 1 86000 In a subsidiary aspect the strips may run parallel to the edge or control cables and be held in a configuration by attachments to a series of cross members running between the edge cables.
Preferably the cross members are ~tt~ hçd to or form part of the structure of the flexible strips.
In a further aspect the invention provides a protective shield including intermediate 10 ~U~pOl~ to ~ its position above a tree or a row crop.
Preferably these intermç~ tç ~u~poll~ m~int~in the barrier in a substantially horizontal plane.
15 Optionally these interm~ tç ~u~po~ls may impose an arched profile to the barrier so that its edges are lower than its centre.
Optionally further supports may provide the barrier with at least one free edge extending substantially downwards, where the free edge serves as protection against 20 obliquely oriented ~m~ging materials.
Optionally further supports may provide the barrier with at least one free edge extending substantially upwards, where the free edge, in apposition to a free upwards-extending edge of an adjacent barrier, forms a bird, bat, or insect exclusion ?5 filter.
Preferably the barrier is supported by spreaders which normally hold the fabric in a substantially horizontal plane yet are capable of undergoing downwards deflection at their outer edges as a result of applied forces, in order to dump a built-up load of hail or 30 the like.
Preferably the configuration of the barrier is under control of a winch which can wind up or unwind one or more edge cables.
35 Preferably the winch takes the form of an elongated pipe at one end of one or several rows of the crop under protection.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the field of providing a protective canopy and has particular application to the provision of retractable protective coverings for plants and/or ~nim~l~
IS in an outside space, or inside a greenhouse or other permanent structure such as a shadehouse.
BACKGROUND
20 Damage affecting pip-fruit trees in particular but also many other crops is likely as a result of adverse weather; particularly from hailstorms. One severe hailstorm, not an infrequent event, can totally destroy a crop and hence the income from it, or damage a crop by bruising so that it is downgraded to a less remunerative grade.
25 Other damage by wind, bats, insects, birds, frost and the like is also a problem for gardeners and horticulturists, and while it is possible to put up or grow windbreaks to catch horizontal winds these have no effect on vertically oriented hazards like hailstones. One could build a roof over the crop, but this is expensive and furthermore as it is desirable to retract the protection when not required, a constructed roof is 30 inal)plu~liate. Retraction aids in protecting the structure itself during winds and snow, and lets more light, and desirable insects such as bees arrive at the plants below.
Plants respond to an improved environment but the op~ ulll environment for a given plant changes with the weather, the time of day, and over the seasons. Hail protection 35 for example is important when fruit is developing, but is not needed over winter. In winter, snow (to take one example) could overload a structure arranged to catch hail.
- ' i;'` "~ ` r3 ~ t"' - 2 - 2 ~ 8 ~ 0 3 0 To avoid these types of overloads, and to be able to modify the environment on aseasonal or daily basis if useful in particular ci~ ces, it is useful to be able to take away or re-install the generally horizontal canopies now used to provide sun, hail, bird, 5 insect or wind protection.
DE~INITIONS
Area: We generally use this term in relation to the area covered by a horizontal10 retractable barrier, thus the term area is more correctly the plan area. However the retractable barrier may be used in a vertical plane for example as a windbreak, and then the area is not the plan area.
OBJECT
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved means for protecting plants or anim~ls from adverse environmental conditions or one which will at least provide the public with a useful choice.
In one aspect the invention provides aretractablebarriertoatleastpartiallyshieldan area, wherein the barrier is comprised of a deformable panel supported along its length by a pair of elongate flexible elements, and wherein each elongate flexible 25 element is attachedto one ormore supports at a required distance above the ground so that the barrier can bepositioned above ground in afirst shielding configuration with the panel assuming a first extended substantially parallelogram shape, and wherein in use the barrier can be deformed into a contracted configuration of lesser area by relatively moving opposite edges of the panel along 30 the edges in opposite directions to distort the panel from the ext--n-le~l subst~nti~lly parallelogram configuration to a much narrower substantially parallelogram configuration.
Preferably the panel includes at least one deformable open-mesh fabric or net and more 35 preferably the panel consists of a woven net having a loose weave allowing for movement or pivoting at the intersections.
wo 9st25424 PCr~Z95/00028 3 2 1 8 6 û O O
Alternatively, a knotted or knitted net may be used.
Alternatively the panel may be made up of a plurality of separate strips of flexible S m~t~ri~l.
In another aspect the invention provides abarrierto at leastpartially surround an object and protect it from particulate material, characterised in that the barrier is comprised of elongated support means in duplicate and at least one array of linear 10 elements supported on the elongated support means at at least two points; the array being capable of being oriented at angles ranging from a first contracted position (wherein the barrier has a minimised area) where the elements of the array are substantially parallel to the support means to a second expanded position where the elements of the array are substantially perpendicular to the support means and the 15 barrier ~su.,.~.s a configuration having a maximised area.
An example application for the barrier is in protecting vegetation from damage by hailstones and here the barrier is provided in the form of an elongated parallelogram ~uppolled horizontally above the vegetation to be ~loteeLed.
Preferably each element of the at least one array of linear elements comprises a sheet of fibrous material; preferably a woven fabric comprised of material resistant to environmental degradation. The p~selllly preferred materials include polypropylene and polyethylene with applupliate fillers and dyes.
Preferably the weaving method used provides a loose interlocking between the warp and weft threads so that in use the fabric or textile can be easily deformed into parallelograms of various configurations. One preferred weaving method is known as the "leno" process.
Optionally the fabric or textile may be created by a knitting process or other means, providing a material in which the threads are held together at crossing points by a type of loose knot.
35 Optionally the threads are held together at crossing points by adhesion or fusion.
Wo 95/25424 Pcr~NZ95/00028 ~f ~ 4 2 1 86000 Optionally the fabric may be a flexible sheet such as a sheet of plastic film like a polyethylene sheet.
S Preferably the support means of the barrier comprises wires or cables passing along the longer opposite sides of the parallelogram, and rigid struts or poles passing along the shorter sides of the parallelogram.
Optionally (or in combination) the support means along the longer sides may be the 10 (optionally selvedged) edges of the sheet or sheets of fabric.
Preferably the fabric is attached along its longer edges to the adjacent wire or cable and preferably this att~chment is made by means of a clip, securing the cable to the fabric by clhllpillg the clip to the wire or cable and then penetrating the weave of the fabric 15 with protruding and interlocking projections from the clip.
Preferably the support means of the barrier provides for controlled lateral movement of the support means so that variation of the relative tensions applied to at least one support means of the ~.u~polled barrier causes the parallelogram to alter its shape from a 20 ~.ub~ 11y conlldcled configuration to a subst~nti~lly e~p~nded configuration.
Preferably, in the case of those shades in which the material itself is not easily distorted or deformable within its plane (such as knitted cloths or plastics sheets) the material is mounted so that a combination of stretching and/or buckling and/or sliding along the 25 support wires permits the material to follow the lateral movement of the support means.
Optionally the material may be attached at at least one end to a bar, the bar being attached at one end to the support means.
30 In an alternative aspect the invention provides a protective shield including a linear array comprising a series of flexible strips, anchored at each end to one of twosubstantially parallel cables which strips are capable of overlapping or Iying side by side, and which in use provide a sun shade or a rain shield when the barrier is in its expanded configuration, and which overlap when the barrier is in its contracted 35 configuration so that it provides a minim~l obstruction to a desired e.~vilo~ ental input such as s~lnli~ht wo ss/2s424 Pcrn~zss/00028 ~ ~ ' 5 ~ 1 86000 In a subsidiary aspect the strips may run parallel to the edge or control cables and be held in a configuration by attachments to a series of cross members running between the edge cables.
Preferably the cross members are ~tt~ hçd to or form part of the structure of the flexible strips.
In a further aspect the invention provides a protective shield including intermediate 10 ~U~pOl~ to ~ its position above a tree or a row crop.
Preferably these intermç~ tç ~u~poll~ m~int~in the barrier in a substantially horizontal plane.
15 Optionally these interm~ tç ~u~po~ls may impose an arched profile to the barrier so that its edges are lower than its centre.
Optionally further supports may provide the barrier with at least one free edge extending substantially downwards, where the free edge serves as protection against 20 obliquely oriented ~m~ging materials.
Optionally further supports may provide the barrier with at least one free edge extending substantially upwards, where the free edge, in apposition to a free upwards-extending edge of an adjacent barrier, forms a bird, bat, or insect exclusion ?5 filter.
Preferably the barrier is supported by spreaders which normally hold the fabric in a substantially horizontal plane yet are capable of undergoing downwards deflection at their outer edges as a result of applied forces, in order to dump a built-up load of hail or 30 the like.
Preferably the configuration of the barrier is under control of a winch which can wind up or unwind one or more edge cables.
35 Preferably the winch takes the form of an elongated pipe at one end of one or several rows of the crop under protection.
4 PCI~IZ95/00028 ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ 6 2 1 8 6 0 û 1~
Preferably the winch is under the control of an electric motor which is in turn controlled by an ext~rn~l sensor of i.. ,il-enl hail or snow.
Preferably the winch is under the control of an electric motor which is in turn controlled by an ext~rn~l sensor of i.. ,il-enl hail or snow.
5 Optionally the barrier can be oriented vertically at the side of a crop to be protected if a hazard, such as wind, wind-blown items or a swarm of flying insects is expected to arrive from a holizonlal direction.
In a yet further aspect the invention provides a method for protecting a horticultural 10 crop or area with protection against hailstorms or the like, comprising the steps of erecting one or more barriers above the crop and causing the barriers to become subst~nti~lly exp~nrle~l at least during periods of risk.
In a related aspect the invention includes the steps of c~etecting an imminent hailstorm 15 and responding to that event by expanding the or each barrier by applying a tension along the elongated support means so that the barrier covers a wider area of the crop to be protected.
In a still further aspect, the invention comprises an orchard comprising rows of trees, at 20 least one row of trees being protected by a retractable barrier as claimed in any one of the preceding claims.
In a related aspect, the invention comprises an orchard comprising ~ub~lantially parallel rows of trees, with each row of trees being protected by a retractable barrier as claimed 25 in any one of claims I to 13.
In a still further aspect the invention provides means for deploying a flexible protective shield around or over items to be protected.
The following is a description of some ~Icfcll~,d forms of the invention, given by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying diagrams. When terms such as"holi~.onlal" are used it is ~c.cllmto.~l that the item under iiccuc.cion is on subst~nti~lly flat 35 land.
Wo 95/25424 PcrtNzgstooo28 S 7 2 1 86~00 Fig 1: is a plan view of a llulllber of barriers according to the invention, placed over trees in an orchard.
Fig 2: is a closer plan view of a barrier according to the invention, illustrating the various configurations of a parallelogram ~c~.. P~ by each barrier.
Fig 3: illustrates a prefe-l-,d woven cloth for use in the barrier.
Fig 4: is a perspective view along the length of a barrier according to the invention, placed over trees.
Fig 5: illustrates some terminations for edge or control cables.
Fig 6: is an elevation view of some alternative arrangements for hail barriers according to the invention.
Fig 7: illustrates a clip for supporting a woven fabric from the cables or wires of the invention.
Fig 8: is an elevation view of a preferred barrier support including means todump heavy loads of accumulated material off the barrier to either the side of the protected area.
2S Fig 9: illustrates a preferred sun shade type of barrier including a linear array of flexible strips.
Fig 10: illustrates further means for supporting a material above an item to be protected, adapted for use with a knitted material or the like.
Fig 11: illustrates details of the means illustrated in Fig 10.
Fig 12: illustrates an example of means to hook the ends of adjacent poles together, in order to give the shade greater structural integrity.
Fig 13 illustrates hail slots in a knitted shade cloth.
wo 95/2s424 Pcr/Nzss/00028 dJ~ ~ -8- 2 ~ 860~)0 Fig 14 illustrates the operation of a beam mount for a knitted cloth.
Fi~ 15 illu~ldl~s a typical knitted cloth.
PREFF.RRFn EMBODI~IENTS
EXAMPLE 1 - Hail Barrier 10 The invention in this application is intended to prevent particles such as hailstones from colliding at full speed with plants under protection by the barrier and it is especially intended to protect developing fruit carried by the plants. The fabric which comprises the pr~fel,~d barrier has a weave which is tight enough to catch larger hailstones, and at least slow down small ones, while flakes of snow will also be trapped. (Spring falls of 15 snow may damage growing tips of plants, flowers and developing fruit. Spring falls are difficult to predict). The existing practice is for conventional structures to be erected in the Spring to protect the crop, but these are at risk of overload from unseasonal snows.
A collapse at this time presents financial problems as the crop may be lost if the damaged protection cannot be quickly replaced. Means are provided in at least some 20 forms of the present invention to deposit acc~ ted ice, snow or other detritus onto the ground at the sides-of the barrier when the accumulated weight exceeds a preset amount.
The barrier of this invention has been devised to provide for subst~nti~lly in~t~nt~neous 25 deployment. It is retained in a closed or contracted form Iying above and along the length of a row of trees or other crop to be protected, and may be expanded to its full size simply by pulling on one or both edge-su~?ol Lhlg cables.
Fig 1 shows in plan view 100 the overall arrangement of protective barriers of this 30 invention protecting an orchard comprising rows of trees 104. This view is at one end of five rows. The barrier 101 is fully extended; three barriers (102) are partially extended, and 103 is a substantially contracted barrier. The actual barrier fabric 114 is suppoll~d along each edge by elongated control wires or cables 106, which we call edge wires. These are preferably 12.5 gauge high tensile galvanised steel fence wire, or 35 alternatively plastic-coated cable; preferably 1/8 inch VHT (very high tensile) steel, plastic-coated to 1/8 inch depth with a UV-resistant plastic. The barrier fabric is WO 9~/25424 PCI/NZ95/00028 _ particularly ~uppolled by a central cable 109, preferably plastic-coated if cloth is to drape over it, otherwise it is a galvanised high-tensile cable preferably 7.5 mm (5/16 inch) high tensile 7 strand galvanised steel cable, held in tension from anchors at each S end. The safe working load of the preferred cable is 9,500 Ib force (45 kN). Larger constructions are also supported from side to side by cross cables as shown in later drawings.
Details of the fabric itself are provided in relation to Fig 3.
Tensioning of the central cable is provided by cables such as cable 109, comprising a loop of 7.5 mm (5/16 inch) high tensile 7 strand galvanised steel cable, anchored by pulleys to a pole and in turn to a deadm~n or anchor 111, which is one or a pair of anchors in the ground. Anchors may be driven timber posts (for example 8 inches diameter and 8 feet long), or screw anchors with for example a 7 inch plate. The post 110 is a galvanised steel pipe sloping to the left of the drawing as it rises. The preferred pipe has an outer ~ mrter of 3 1/2 inches; wall thir~nrs~ 0.22 inch and uses 60,000 psi steel. It is mounted on a 4 foot long screw anchor with a 4 inch base plate and a 6 inch ground-level plate.
The control wires 107 are preferably one or two flexible ropes, having a safe load of about 2 kN (400 Ib force). If one rope is pulled to one extreme it results in a totally contracted barrier as in 103, while if the other rope is pulled, or the rope at the other end on the first side is pulled, it provides a profile of maximum expansion as shown at 101.
Alternatives for controlling the deployment of the barrier are given in Figs 4 and 5 which show one method for controlling the configuration of a number of barriers from one end of the rows.
Post 113 is a pivot post, made of galvanised steel pipe of for example an outer diameter of 3.5 inches; wall thi(~nçss 0.11 inch and again made of 60,000 psi steel. A preferred pivot frame 112 is a length of 2 inch x 2 inch x 1/4 inch steel angle reinforced with 5/16ths inch rod bent into a wide "V" shape to create a truss in the horizontal and vertical planes.
.
35 Fig 2 illustrates the manner 200 in which the preferred woven barrier fabric can undergo profound alterations in surface area as it is taken from its maximum extension wo 95/25424 Pcr/NZss/00028 `::'J~iG3~ o- 21~6~00 state 203 through a partial extension state 202 to a collLIa~;led state 201. The arrow 206 in-lic~tes the direction in which a pull may be applied to one edge of the barrier in order to cause it to pivot on the support 204, and hence also the other support 205. Lines 207 S and 208 r~,~,se-ll intPrmPAi~te ~uppo.ls which are su~o,led by a central strain-bearing cable, which in turn is ~,uppolled on poles. The grid of lines l~;pl~senlillg the fabric in Fig 2 does not ~cpresent individual fibres of the fabric - which are seen only at a much finer scale as in Fig 3.
10 Fig 3 shows a preferred woven fabric or cloth in detail, as it would be produced by the "leno" weaving process. One suitable product is Australian (Sarlon Industries' hail cloth). (It is interesting to note that manufacture of this type of fibre has largely been discontinued in favour of knitted fibres, and we describe variants of this invention suitable for use with knitted fibres and the like later in this document). It has a warp of 13 yarn pairs per 100 mm and a weft of 31 yarn pairs per 100 mm, and is made of ultra-violet stabilised polyethylene fibres, ~ m~ter 55 to 65 tex. One p,Gfcl,~d width is 4420 mm wide, with selvedge reinforcing comprising a 50 mm wide strip at each side having approximately 60 yarn pairs per 100 mm. One, or two adjacent strips may be used on a barrier.
As previously explained it is preferable that the elements of the linear array (here comprising the weft tkreads 302, 306, 310) can swivel easily within the structure of the fabric. This is so that the barrier as a whole can undergo the transition from acontracted to an expanded state without undue stresses, as may be experienced if the ?5 weft fibres have to be bent partially into a "S" shape when the angle between the warp 301, also 305 with 307 of the fabric is other than perpendicular. Bending one fibre is easy; bending all the fibres in a long barrier requires much more force.
In 300, representing the preferred woven fabric or material at about a 1: 1 scale, the warp threads are shown as 301 and the weft threads as 302. The weft threads may be thicker as indicated in the drawing, or they may be of the same diameter as the remainder of the cloth. The strip 303 indicates an optional anchoring member which may be used to maintain the location of the warp fibres in the cloth. It has been observed that fabric of the "leno" weave tends to open out - as where for example birds have forced their way through it and left holes, or where a locally applied load has distorted the cloth. We have found that altering the barrier from its contracted to its Wo 95/25424 Pcr/NZss/00028 11 - 2 ~ 8 60~0 expanded state and back again - i.e. "working" the cloth - will restore the original - orientation of the fibres and reduce the size of holes in a short time. Hence an incidental advantage of the invention when in use is to re-seal the cloth. The swelling S 309 illustrates another optional way to maintain warp position and fabric integrity. In this part of Fig 3, the weft fibres are provided with swellings between each of the warp fibres. These swellings may be produced by techniques known in the artificial textile industry such as using a previously stretched fibre, and locally heating it using contact or radiant heat to cause it to shorten and swell, or by knotting it.
Fig 4 illustrates at 400 an installed hail barrier according to the invention, covering one row 430 of possibly many rows of trees 402 in perspective view, with a protective fabric barrier 401 supported by intermediate poles 403, 413 and slung between anchored poles 404 (the other end is not visible). An anchor 405 holds the central ~UppOl~ cable 409 in tension, and also carries a lesser tension from the intermediate cable 406. The two edge or control cables are 410 and 411, running from a winch pipe 41~ past a swivel 417 and along each side of the fabric barrier 401. (For tçrmin~tions of these control cables see Fig 5). Lateral stability is provided by a number of crossways support cables 412, 414, and optionally also cables across anchored poles 404. A~Icfel~cd cable material for the cross cables is 3/8 inch VHT galvanised 7 strand steel.
A portion of the fabric 401 has been deleted in order to show the spreaders 422 extending each side of the central support cable and which are held in position by internal spring pres~ule (see Fig 8) with ties 408 attached to the interm~ te cable 406.
The fabric of the shield may be skewed or twisted into various parallelogram shapes (as per Fig 2) by means of the winch pipe 415, supported on a bearing (not shown) at each row of trees (or other crops). This is an elongated winder that runs along the end of a number of rows. We have found that if one control rope 411 is wound clockwise onto the pipe, which is preferably a galvanised steel pipe of rli~mstçr 2 or 3 inches, and the other control cable 410 is wound on in the opposite or anticlockwise direction, then rotating the pipe in the clockwise direction has the effect of loosening one control cable while tightening the other cable, thus providing the deployment or contraction of the barrier. The reversible motor/gearbox unit 419, preferably on an elevated stand 418, provides rotation in either direction. Limit sensors may also be provided. A power source for the motor 421 may be operated remotely, perhaps by radio or telephone WO 9S/2S424 PCTnNZ95/00028 3 ! :~ 12- 2186000 wires, or may itself detect the onset of a hailstorm and cause rotation of the winch pipe 415 in the al)pro~liate direction.
S Fig S illustrates at 500 one method for allowing relative movement of the edge or control cables. Each cable 502 iS provided with a substantially constant tension by means of a weight 505 suspended over a pulley 503. held above the ground on an anchor pole 504. One alternative method 501 is to use tension springs 510, between the movable cables and a fixed support pole 513, which is held in position by the anchored cable 511 connected to an anchor 512.
Cross cables are preferred as means to provide extra support in the case of larger structures. In the case of smaller barriers, the cross cables would obstruct the passage of vehicles along the rows, and in particular m~ in.os for harvesting which straddle the crops. They may be made removable, or may be uncoupled and dropped to the ground, but in many cases a straddle harvester can also straddle the (contracted) barrier as it is used to harvest a crop.
Alternatively the support posts 403,413 may be set deeper into the ground to provide individual stability and thereby render cross-cables superfluous.
Inside posts (403) if two trees apart would preferably be of steel pipe, of for example 2.5 inch OD 60,000 psi steel, 0.09 wall, but if used adjacent to each tree would be 2 inches not 2.5 inches. This is adequate for snow loads up to 1 foot, although if over 1 foot snowfalls are expected, more substantial posts are recommended.
Fig 6 shows early versions of frames used as supporting devices for the fabric of the barrier. (Improved supports are shown in Figure 8). Poles 600,601, and 602 are intermt.f~i~te. poles made of galvanised steel pipe, for example 2.5 inch OD, 0.09 inch wall thickness, 60,000 pSi steel, if placed at every second tree, but if at every tree would be 2 inches (li~m~ter not 2.5 inches. These poles are expected to be adequate for snow loads of up to 1 foot, but if over 1 foot snowfalls are expected, more substantial posts are recommended.
The edge cables controlling the shape of the barrier are shown at 610,611, and 612.
The actual barrier is shown at 603, or 607 (several layers of barriers to provide wo 95125424 PCI~/NZ95/00028 additional ~h~ 1ing and ~h~iing flexibility. Note that these can be in any orientation to the horizontal. A preferred cross piece 608, 606 would be made of 25 mm (1 inch)bore PVC waste-pipe as this is flexible enough for arching as shown in 608 (held under tension by ties 609 to a lower central cable.).
The optional raised or lowered edges shown at 604 and 605 would be held by rods, for example fibreglass rods of approximately 1/4 inch dia and a length of 2 feet. These rods support a usually separate cloth strip. The purpose of raised edges is that birds on the inside can fly out more easily than birds on the outside flying in - they would not be able to find the gap at the apex of an edge. If the raised or lowered edgers were to be used as a bird net, preferably one would add tclllpOI~uy links bclwccn adjacent barriers.
Bats (such as fruit bats) and insects may also be controlled in this way.
A standard "Agrinova" plastic hail clip (700 in Fig 7) has been modified to provide a preferred clip to attach the barrier fabric to the edge wires 701. These clips can be attached from the side (without any threading-on step) and are folded over from the opened-out state as supplied (see 712) to a closed state (as 713) in which a pattern of protrusions 705 on one leaf 703 pass through the cloth and through correspondingape,lules 704 in the opposite leaf 702, where they lock in place owing to the provision of somewhat dilated ends. These clips have been modified with a central cutout slot 714 in which we place an insert 706 of aluminium or copper. The insert can be crimped over the edge wire (as shown in the crimped state 711 and the uncrimped state 710), and in use it engages with the plastic of the folded-over hail clip to transfer tension to the cloth. The slot running along the length of the insert neatly fits the wire and may have a granular gripping material applied to its inside such as a sand/paint mixture to aid in gripping. Our preferred insert has dilated ends 707 and section 708 to maximise contact with the hail clip, and a constricted middle 709 for crimping purposes. The insert can be made in bulk from sheet material by a sequence of a folding and a p,es~u,e deforming action.
Fig 8 shows one improved form of mounting for the barrier, which provides it with means to discard loads which may build up on the upper surface of a horizontallyorientated barrier - as during hail or snow. The left diagram shows a deployed barrier 806 in its normal ~,o~cclive position, in front of a support pole (shown as disco~ louc lines 800. The deflected barrier 801 is in the act of shedding a load to each side of the wo gs/25424 ~cr~zs5/00028 t ~ 14 - 2 1 8 6 û O O
line of crops. Details of the central hinge which is one means to provide a resilient connection between the split spreader are shown in the other two diagrams. In these mounts, the horizontal spreader 804 is split at its centre and a resilient section is S included. This is preferably a coiled wire spring 807, 810 . When deployed, each half of the spreader is separately held against spring pressure in a substantially horizontal position by a tie 805 of light rope to a lower support cable 811 (411 in Fig 4). The ties may be of any durable or easily tied material preferably having a safe load above about 100 Ib force.
As alternatives for the resilient section, one might use a single strip of fibreglass, optionally with an arcuate shape used with the concave side facing upwards as a replacement for both spreaders and the central spring, or use a leaf-spring arrangement between pipe spreaders. A ~lcrGllGd length for the fibreglass arc is 5 metres.
If sufficient snow or hail accllm--l~tes, the weight will cause the spring to give way and the barrier will slope downwards as shown at 801, thereby dropping the material to the ground but out to either side of the crop or tree under protection, and then spring back to its prolt;.;lillg snbst~nti~lly horizontal orientation 806.
Note that two separate strips of cloth, one on each side of the central support cable are used in this example; one strip is labelled 803.
The spring 807, 810 is preferably 3t8 inch spring steel formed into a I ' circle with one 25 turn or a 6 inch circle with 2 turns. The ends are preferably coupled to the plastic pipe 808 used as spreaders by bending them to fit inside a preferred 1.25 inch bore waste pipe of PVC.
A reinforcing collar 809 is placed over the outside of the pipe, over the spring ends.
30 Note that we prefer to provide the spring 807 with obliquely bent ends so that when the barrier is contracted (and here the preferred direction of movement for contraction is clockwise) the spreaders lie parallel to and beside the central support cable 810 (like 409 in Fig 4) and the wide apellule inside the spring allows it freedom to twist about the central cable. A one or two-turn spring is easy to thread over the cable at any point 35 without having ~o pass it over the cable from one free end.
" .,, '~ 15- ~ 1 ~60~0 For hail protection the barrier may be in its co~ ed state until an i ~ t hailstorm or the like requires its expansion to cover the trees, as in-iic~ted in Fig 1 and elsewhere.
The actuator causing expansion is means to apply extra tension to one of the elongated 5 support cables in relation to the other. This may preferably be a winch or pulley driven by an electric motor and a typical transition time from a conL~ ed to an exp~n~e~ state may be of the order of 30 seconds. A series of electric motors driven in parallel from a common supply line may be controlled remotely, for example in response to a weather radar report of hail forming in the vicinity, or by local observation, or on a more local 10 scale by a device including a microphone sensitive to the noise made by hailstones hitting a sounding board such as a metal sheet.
If bird or wind protection is the primary purpose of the barrier, it may be left in its extended state throughout much of the growing season; though exercising the cloth may 15 assist in sealing holes made by birds.
EXAMPLE 2 - Sun Shade The invention in this application is intended to provide a readily deployable shade over 20 plants or ~nim~lc yet be easily reduced to a minimllm size if the ambient light falls. It may be stored in a closed or contracted form Iying above and along the length of an elongated area to be protected, which may be a row of trees or other crop, or may be along water troughs in a feedlot for cattle, or may optionally be placed along a fenceline along which ~nim~lc like to congregate. The sun shade may be expanded to its full size 25 simply by pulling on one or both edge-supporting cables. Intermediate settings will provide a "dappled" shade with strips or patches of light passing between partially con~ ed strips of shade fabric.
Fig 9 illustrates one preferred embodiment of a sun shade. A fabric which blocks30 substantially all of the direct light incident on it is preferred although some light may pacs through without detracting from the effectiveness of the inct~ tion. The shade is shown in its expanded configuration at 900, a partially co~ ac;led configuration at 901, and a contracted configuration at 902. The preferred shade comprises a series of 300 mm wide strips 905 of preferably a woven fabric capable of resisting environmental 35 degradation, such as one of the horticultural plastics, black-dyed polyethylene or polypropylene. Any suitable size of strip may be used, depending on availability, but a WO 95/25424 rCT/NZ9~i/0002%
r - 16 - 2 ~ -- 8 ~ 0 0 0 plef~ d size is 4420 mm wide (colllpalible with support cables put up to accommodate the "leno" cloth width), and 2000 mm across. Each strip 905 is preferably sewn with a hem to include a rather wide, floppy loop at each end like 908 and is clipped or ~tt~c~l~d at diagonally opposite corners (906, 907) to a ~uppGIling cable (903 and 904). Means to allow replacelllen~ strips to be in~t~llecl easily include providing crimpable collectors similar to that of Fig 7 (but preferably narrower), and the use of a similar press-through fastener, or a rapidly setting glue, or simply sewing a hem on-site to form the loop (908) at each end of the strip. The wide hem allows the strip to pivot about itsattachment point without distortion and excessive forces as the shade approaches its conll~cl~d state.
As the shade contracts (as shown in 901 and 902) there is some distortion of the strips as this fabric is less easily twisted into a parallelogram shape than the hail barrier fabric of Example 1.
Advantages of the strip approach, apart from the easy deployment which is as described for example 1, include that it may be easily repaired by on-site replacement of a damaged strip; the rest of the structure need not be brought down for repair.
Optionally a ~ hlleter windbreak may be installed and may be ~tt~rhe~l to the structure.
This can also serve to keep birds, bats, and large insects out of the enclosed space.
EXAMPLE 3 - A.la~ or ~ to comply with properties of Knitte-l Shade Cloth Although we prefer woven cloth of the "leno" type, the majority of shade cloths presently available are knitted. Two distinguishing features of this type over "leno"
cloths are that the strain-bearing fibres run diagonally across the length of the fabric, and that they are locked together, albeit loosely, at each intersection. A typical barrier fabric uses 5 or 6 single fibres to form each diagonal strain-bearing strand, which are separated by about 12 mm, and fills the spaces with a mesh of single strands in order to reduce hail damage, obstruct wind, and reduce invasion by insects or birds. Fig 15 shows a portion of such a cloth, at about 3.5X original size. The width of a roll is typically about 4 m and its length may be 100 or 200m, though it can be made in any suitable size.
WO 95/25424 PCI~/r'lZ95100028 ~ I ~ f ; ~ 17 2 1 8 6 0 () O
In this invention, the protective barrier or shade cloth panel is reversibly converted into a lesser area by relatively moving opposite edges of the panel along the edges in opposite directions to distort the panel from the extended, substantially S parallelogram configuration to a much narrower substantially parallelogramconfiguration. If a strip of knitted cloth is so forced the diagonal strands will rapidly become tensed and the cloth will oppose the closing movement.
Therefore we support and use a knitted cloth according to the following preferred embodiment or method (as shown in Fig 10):
(1) The cloth panel 1004 is held to support wires 1001 along its long edges by slidable clips 1003 for example of the "Agrinet" type, so that sliding movement along thesupport cables is pe~ d over a reasonable Ai~t~nce (2) The cloth is held along its ends to fixed (rotatable) ~u~poll~ 1002.
lS (3) During closure (as in 1007), tension developed within the cloth causes tension lines 1006 to develop bcl~ n the ~tt~r~ed end portions and the free edge, and the cloth may slide along the support cables until the tension reverts to a low level. Some buckling occurs and thus s~gging is seen, as shown in the sectional view 1100, of Fig 11, which is from the line S--S of Fig 10.
Finally the cloth covers a narrow area, as shown at 1008.
(4) On re-opening the cloth slides back along the support wires 1001 until it forms a usually rectangular, fully spread-out cover as in 1000.
As a variation, (see (2) above) the cloth is held along its ends by firm ~tt~cl""~l-l to bars pivoted at the obtuse-angled joints A, C, as shown in Fig 14.
Fig 12 illustrates another improvement. This is the use of detachable catches orconnections between the end of one spacer bar 1202 and the start of another 1203, at the site in-lic~ted at 1201. An example catch is comprised of a hook 1204 and an eye 1205 (seen also in top view at 1206).
Fig 13 illustrates at 1300 a further improvement that is made possible by this combination of a knitted shade cloth and this type of support. It is the addition of slots through which accllm~ ted hail or snow may be released. The material tends to slide wo ss/2s424 PCr~;~5~ 2~
~f~ 18- ~ t86~Q
into and be dropped relatively slowly from these slots, and inflicts less damage on underlying vegetation than hail falling from a cloud. (In this Figure, 1302 is a rigid end support pivotable around the pole 1301, and there are a number of cloth attachment points 1305 along part of the end support 1302.
Fig 14 again indicates at 1400, 1407, 1409, and 1411, the behaviour of a knitted cloth during closure, and in this case the cloth is suspended at one side from ~uppoll~ 1404 and only one edge is pulled (as suggested by the arrows 1406, 1410, and 1412. We have 10 not illustrated the side clips holding the cloth to the support wires at the periphery in this illustration. The cloth 1401 is held along the full extent of its ends to swung bars like 1405 (also shown in an enlarged version) which are able to swing as shown, as the support wires are pulled as shown by the arrows. This approach has the advantage that the cloth is held along all of the end and so is less likely to tear away in a strong wind.
15 In addition, movement of the swung bars provides "give" of a sort not possible with edge sup~ol~ g wires.
When the support wire is fully stretched (as at 1412) the cloth provides a Ill;l.illll--., of coverage or protection.
This arrangement is also capable of supporting (instead of a knitted fabric) a sheet of flexible material, such as a plastics film. In use, the film buckles as described for the knitted fabric. Examples of suitable horticultural films include "Agphane 150 ~lm"
(Agpac, Christchurch, new 7P~l~nd) or "Solargro" (Sarlon, Australia).
In conclusion, it may be seen that the preferred embodiments described herein provide useful exarnples of the principles of the invention.
Finally, it will be appreciated that various alterations and modifications may be made to 30 the foregoing without departing from the scope of this invention as set out in the following claims.
In a yet further aspect the invention provides a method for protecting a horticultural 10 crop or area with protection against hailstorms or the like, comprising the steps of erecting one or more barriers above the crop and causing the barriers to become subst~nti~lly exp~nrle~l at least during periods of risk.
In a related aspect the invention includes the steps of c~etecting an imminent hailstorm 15 and responding to that event by expanding the or each barrier by applying a tension along the elongated support means so that the barrier covers a wider area of the crop to be protected.
In a still further aspect, the invention comprises an orchard comprising rows of trees, at 20 least one row of trees being protected by a retractable barrier as claimed in any one of the preceding claims.
In a related aspect, the invention comprises an orchard comprising ~ub~lantially parallel rows of trees, with each row of trees being protected by a retractable barrier as claimed 25 in any one of claims I to 13.
In a still further aspect the invention provides means for deploying a flexible protective shield around or over items to be protected.
The following is a description of some ~Icfcll~,d forms of the invention, given by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying diagrams. When terms such as"holi~.onlal" are used it is ~c.cllmto.~l that the item under iiccuc.cion is on subst~nti~lly flat 35 land.
Wo 95/25424 PcrtNzgstooo28 S 7 2 1 86~00 Fig 1: is a plan view of a llulllber of barriers according to the invention, placed over trees in an orchard.
Fig 2: is a closer plan view of a barrier according to the invention, illustrating the various configurations of a parallelogram ~c~.. P~ by each barrier.
Fig 3: illustrates a prefe-l-,d woven cloth for use in the barrier.
Fig 4: is a perspective view along the length of a barrier according to the invention, placed over trees.
Fig 5: illustrates some terminations for edge or control cables.
Fig 6: is an elevation view of some alternative arrangements for hail barriers according to the invention.
Fig 7: illustrates a clip for supporting a woven fabric from the cables or wires of the invention.
Fig 8: is an elevation view of a preferred barrier support including means todump heavy loads of accumulated material off the barrier to either the side of the protected area.
2S Fig 9: illustrates a preferred sun shade type of barrier including a linear array of flexible strips.
Fig 10: illustrates further means for supporting a material above an item to be protected, adapted for use with a knitted material or the like.
Fig 11: illustrates details of the means illustrated in Fig 10.
Fig 12: illustrates an example of means to hook the ends of adjacent poles together, in order to give the shade greater structural integrity.
Fig 13 illustrates hail slots in a knitted shade cloth.
wo 95/2s424 Pcr/Nzss/00028 dJ~ ~ -8- 2 ~ 860~)0 Fig 14 illustrates the operation of a beam mount for a knitted cloth.
Fi~ 15 illu~ldl~s a typical knitted cloth.
PREFF.RRFn EMBODI~IENTS
EXAMPLE 1 - Hail Barrier 10 The invention in this application is intended to prevent particles such as hailstones from colliding at full speed with plants under protection by the barrier and it is especially intended to protect developing fruit carried by the plants. The fabric which comprises the pr~fel,~d barrier has a weave which is tight enough to catch larger hailstones, and at least slow down small ones, while flakes of snow will also be trapped. (Spring falls of 15 snow may damage growing tips of plants, flowers and developing fruit. Spring falls are difficult to predict). The existing practice is for conventional structures to be erected in the Spring to protect the crop, but these are at risk of overload from unseasonal snows.
A collapse at this time presents financial problems as the crop may be lost if the damaged protection cannot be quickly replaced. Means are provided in at least some 20 forms of the present invention to deposit acc~ ted ice, snow or other detritus onto the ground at the sides-of the barrier when the accumulated weight exceeds a preset amount.
The barrier of this invention has been devised to provide for subst~nti~lly in~t~nt~neous 25 deployment. It is retained in a closed or contracted form Iying above and along the length of a row of trees or other crop to be protected, and may be expanded to its full size simply by pulling on one or both edge-su~?ol Lhlg cables.
Fig 1 shows in plan view 100 the overall arrangement of protective barriers of this 30 invention protecting an orchard comprising rows of trees 104. This view is at one end of five rows. The barrier 101 is fully extended; three barriers (102) are partially extended, and 103 is a substantially contracted barrier. The actual barrier fabric 114 is suppoll~d along each edge by elongated control wires or cables 106, which we call edge wires. These are preferably 12.5 gauge high tensile galvanised steel fence wire, or 35 alternatively plastic-coated cable; preferably 1/8 inch VHT (very high tensile) steel, plastic-coated to 1/8 inch depth with a UV-resistant plastic. The barrier fabric is WO 9~/25424 PCI/NZ95/00028 _ particularly ~uppolled by a central cable 109, preferably plastic-coated if cloth is to drape over it, otherwise it is a galvanised high-tensile cable preferably 7.5 mm (5/16 inch) high tensile 7 strand galvanised steel cable, held in tension from anchors at each S end. The safe working load of the preferred cable is 9,500 Ib force (45 kN). Larger constructions are also supported from side to side by cross cables as shown in later drawings.
Details of the fabric itself are provided in relation to Fig 3.
Tensioning of the central cable is provided by cables such as cable 109, comprising a loop of 7.5 mm (5/16 inch) high tensile 7 strand galvanised steel cable, anchored by pulleys to a pole and in turn to a deadm~n or anchor 111, which is one or a pair of anchors in the ground. Anchors may be driven timber posts (for example 8 inches diameter and 8 feet long), or screw anchors with for example a 7 inch plate. The post 110 is a galvanised steel pipe sloping to the left of the drawing as it rises. The preferred pipe has an outer ~ mrter of 3 1/2 inches; wall thir~nrs~ 0.22 inch and uses 60,000 psi steel. It is mounted on a 4 foot long screw anchor with a 4 inch base plate and a 6 inch ground-level plate.
The control wires 107 are preferably one or two flexible ropes, having a safe load of about 2 kN (400 Ib force). If one rope is pulled to one extreme it results in a totally contracted barrier as in 103, while if the other rope is pulled, or the rope at the other end on the first side is pulled, it provides a profile of maximum expansion as shown at 101.
Alternatives for controlling the deployment of the barrier are given in Figs 4 and 5 which show one method for controlling the configuration of a number of barriers from one end of the rows.
Post 113 is a pivot post, made of galvanised steel pipe of for example an outer diameter of 3.5 inches; wall thi(~nçss 0.11 inch and again made of 60,000 psi steel. A preferred pivot frame 112 is a length of 2 inch x 2 inch x 1/4 inch steel angle reinforced with 5/16ths inch rod bent into a wide "V" shape to create a truss in the horizontal and vertical planes.
.
35 Fig 2 illustrates the manner 200 in which the preferred woven barrier fabric can undergo profound alterations in surface area as it is taken from its maximum extension wo 95/25424 Pcr/NZss/00028 `::'J~iG3~ o- 21~6~00 state 203 through a partial extension state 202 to a collLIa~;led state 201. The arrow 206 in-lic~tes the direction in which a pull may be applied to one edge of the barrier in order to cause it to pivot on the support 204, and hence also the other support 205. Lines 207 S and 208 r~,~,se-ll intPrmPAi~te ~uppo.ls which are su~o,led by a central strain-bearing cable, which in turn is ~,uppolled on poles. The grid of lines l~;pl~senlillg the fabric in Fig 2 does not ~cpresent individual fibres of the fabric - which are seen only at a much finer scale as in Fig 3.
10 Fig 3 shows a preferred woven fabric or cloth in detail, as it would be produced by the "leno" weaving process. One suitable product is Australian (Sarlon Industries' hail cloth). (It is interesting to note that manufacture of this type of fibre has largely been discontinued in favour of knitted fibres, and we describe variants of this invention suitable for use with knitted fibres and the like later in this document). It has a warp of 13 yarn pairs per 100 mm and a weft of 31 yarn pairs per 100 mm, and is made of ultra-violet stabilised polyethylene fibres, ~ m~ter 55 to 65 tex. One p,Gfcl,~d width is 4420 mm wide, with selvedge reinforcing comprising a 50 mm wide strip at each side having approximately 60 yarn pairs per 100 mm. One, or two adjacent strips may be used on a barrier.
As previously explained it is preferable that the elements of the linear array (here comprising the weft tkreads 302, 306, 310) can swivel easily within the structure of the fabric. This is so that the barrier as a whole can undergo the transition from acontracted to an expanded state without undue stresses, as may be experienced if the ?5 weft fibres have to be bent partially into a "S" shape when the angle between the warp 301, also 305 with 307 of the fabric is other than perpendicular. Bending one fibre is easy; bending all the fibres in a long barrier requires much more force.
In 300, representing the preferred woven fabric or material at about a 1: 1 scale, the warp threads are shown as 301 and the weft threads as 302. The weft threads may be thicker as indicated in the drawing, or they may be of the same diameter as the remainder of the cloth. The strip 303 indicates an optional anchoring member which may be used to maintain the location of the warp fibres in the cloth. It has been observed that fabric of the "leno" weave tends to open out - as where for example birds have forced their way through it and left holes, or where a locally applied load has distorted the cloth. We have found that altering the barrier from its contracted to its Wo 95/25424 Pcr/NZss/00028 11 - 2 ~ 8 60~0 expanded state and back again - i.e. "working" the cloth - will restore the original - orientation of the fibres and reduce the size of holes in a short time. Hence an incidental advantage of the invention when in use is to re-seal the cloth. The swelling S 309 illustrates another optional way to maintain warp position and fabric integrity. In this part of Fig 3, the weft fibres are provided with swellings between each of the warp fibres. These swellings may be produced by techniques known in the artificial textile industry such as using a previously stretched fibre, and locally heating it using contact or radiant heat to cause it to shorten and swell, or by knotting it.
Fig 4 illustrates at 400 an installed hail barrier according to the invention, covering one row 430 of possibly many rows of trees 402 in perspective view, with a protective fabric barrier 401 supported by intermediate poles 403, 413 and slung between anchored poles 404 (the other end is not visible). An anchor 405 holds the central ~UppOl~ cable 409 in tension, and also carries a lesser tension from the intermediate cable 406. The two edge or control cables are 410 and 411, running from a winch pipe 41~ past a swivel 417 and along each side of the fabric barrier 401. (For tçrmin~tions of these control cables see Fig 5). Lateral stability is provided by a number of crossways support cables 412, 414, and optionally also cables across anchored poles 404. A~Icfel~cd cable material for the cross cables is 3/8 inch VHT galvanised 7 strand steel.
A portion of the fabric 401 has been deleted in order to show the spreaders 422 extending each side of the central support cable and which are held in position by internal spring pres~ule (see Fig 8) with ties 408 attached to the interm~ te cable 406.
The fabric of the shield may be skewed or twisted into various parallelogram shapes (as per Fig 2) by means of the winch pipe 415, supported on a bearing (not shown) at each row of trees (or other crops). This is an elongated winder that runs along the end of a number of rows. We have found that if one control rope 411 is wound clockwise onto the pipe, which is preferably a galvanised steel pipe of rli~mstçr 2 or 3 inches, and the other control cable 410 is wound on in the opposite or anticlockwise direction, then rotating the pipe in the clockwise direction has the effect of loosening one control cable while tightening the other cable, thus providing the deployment or contraction of the barrier. The reversible motor/gearbox unit 419, preferably on an elevated stand 418, provides rotation in either direction. Limit sensors may also be provided. A power source for the motor 421 may be operated remotely, perhaps by radio or telephone WO 9S/2S424 PCTnNZ95/00028 3 ! :~ 12- 2186000 wires, or may itself detect the onset of a hailstorm and cause rotation of the winch pipe 415 in the al)pro~liate direction.
S Fig S illustrates at 500 one method for allowing relative movement of the edge or control cables. Each cable 502 iS provided with a substantially constant tension by means of a weight 505 suspended over a pulley 503. held above the ground on an anchor pole 504. One alternative method 501 is to use tension springs 510, between the movable cables and a fixed support pole 513, which is held in position by the anchored cable 511 connected to an anchor 512.
Cross cables are preferred as means to provide extra support in the case of larger structures. In the case of smaller barriers, the cross cables would obstruct the passage of vehicles along the rows, and in particular m~ in.os for harvesting which straddle the crops. They may be made removable, or may be uncoupled and dropped to the ground, but in many cases a straddle harvester can also straddle the (contracted) barrier as it is used to harvest a crop.
Alternatively the support posts 403,413 may be set deeper into the ground to provide individual stability and thereby render cross-cables superfluous.
Inside posts (403) if two trees apart would preferably be of steel pipe, of for example 2.5 inch OD 60,000 psi steel, 0.09 wall, but if used adjacent to each tree would be 2 inches not 2.5 inches. This is adequate for snow loads up to 1 foot, although if over 1 foot snowfalls are expected, more substantial posts are recommended.
Fig 6 shows early versions of frames used as supporting devices for the fabric of the barrier. (Improved supports are shown in Figure 8). Poles 600,601, and 602 are intermt.f~i~te. poles made of galvanised steel pipe, for example 2.5 inch OD, 0.09 inch wall thickness, 60,000 pSi steel, if placed at every second tree, but if at every tree would be 2 inches (li~m~ter not 2.5 inches. These poles are expected to be adequate for snow loads of up to 1 foot, but if over 1 foot snowfalls are expected, more substantial posts are recommended.
The edge cables controlling the shape of the barrier are shown at 610,611, and 612.
The actual barrier is shown at 603, or 607 (several layers of barriers to provide wo 95125424 PCI~/NZ95/00028 additional ~h~ 1ing and ~h~iing flexibility. Note that these can be in any orientation to the horizontal. A preferred cross piece 608, 606 would be made of 25 mm (1 inch)bore PVC waste-pipe as this is flexible enough for arching as shown in 608 (held under tension by ties 609 to a lower central cable.).
The optional raised or lowered edges shown at 604 and 605 would be held by rods, for example fibreglass rods of approximately 1/4 inch dia and a length of 2 feet. These rods support a usually separate cloth strip. The purpose of raised edges is that birds on the inside can fly out more easily than birds on the outside flying in - they would not be able to find the gap at the apex of an edge. If the raised or lowered edgers were to be used as a bird net, preferably one would add tclllpOI~uy links bclwccn adjacent barriers.
Bats (such as fruit bats) and insects may also be controlled in this way.
A standard "Agrinova" plastic hail clip (700 in Fig 7) has been modified to provide a preferred clip to attach the barrier fabric to the edge wires 701. These clips can be attached from the side (without any threading-on step) and are folded over from the opened-out state as supplied (see 712) to a closed state (as 713) in which a pattern of protrusions 705 on one leaf 703 pass through the cloth and through correspondingape,lules 704 in the opposite leaf 702, where they lock in place owing to the provision of somewhat dilated ends. These clips have been modified with a central cutout slot 714 in which we place an insert 706 of aluminium or copper. The insert can be crimped over the edge wire (as shown in the crimped state 711 and the uncrimped state 710), and in use it engages with the plastic of the folded-over hail clip to transfer tension to the cloth. The slot running along the length of the insert neatly fits the wire and may have a granular gripping material applied to its inside such as a sand/paint mixture to aid in gripping. Our preferred insert has dilated ends 707 and section 708 to maximise contact with the hail clip, and a constricted middle 709 for crimping purposes. The insert can be made in bulk from sheet material by a sequence of a folding and a p,es~u,e deforming action.
Fig 8 shows one improved form of mounting for the barrier, which provides it with means to discard loads which may build up on the upper surface of a horizontallyorientated barrier - as during hail or snow. The left diagram shows a deployed barrier 806 in its normal ~,o~cclive position, in front of a support pole (shown as disco~ louc lines 800. The deflected barrier 801 is in the act of shedding a load to each side of the wo gs/25424 ~cr~zs5/00028 t ~ 14 - 2 1 8 6 û O O
line of crops. Details of the central hinge which is one means to provide a resilient connection between the split spreader are shown in the other two diagrams. In these mounts, the horizontal spreader 804 is split at its centre and a resilient section is S included. This is preferably a coiled wire spring 807, 810 . When deployed, each half of the spreader is separately held against spring pressure in a substantially horizontal position by a tie 805 of light rope to a lower support cable 811 (411 in Fig 4). The ties may be of any durable or easily tied material preferably having a safe load above about 100 Ib force.
As alternatives for the resilient section, one might use a single strip of fibreglass, optionally with an arcuate shape used with the concave side facing upwards as a replacement for both spreaders and the central spring, or use a leaf-spring arrangement between pipe spreaders. A ~lcrGllGd length for the fibreglass arc is 5 metres.
If sufficient snow or hail accllm--l~tes, the weight will cause the spring to give way and the barrier will slope downwards as shown at 801, thereby dropping the material to the ground but out to either side of the crop or tree under protection, and then spring back to its prolt;.;lillg snbst~nti~lly horizontal orientation 806.
Note that two separate strips of cloth, one on each side of the central support cable are used in this example; one strip is labelled 803.
The spring 807, 810 is preferably 3t8 inch spring steel formed into a I ' circle with one 25 turn or a 6 inch circle with 2 turns. The ends are preferably coupled to the plastic pipe 808 used as spreaders by bending them to fit inside a preferred 1.25 inch bore waste pipe of PVC.
A reinforcing collar 809 is placed over the outside of the pipe, over the spring ends.
30 Note that we prefer to provide the spring 807 with obliquely bent ends so that when the barrier is contracted (and here the preferred direction of movement for contraction is clockwise) the spreaders lie parallel to and beside the central support cable 810 (like 409 in Fig 4) and the wide apellule inside the spring allows it freedom to twist about the central cable. A one or two-turn spring is easy to thread over the cable at any point 35 without having ~o pass it over the cable from one free end.
" .,, '~ 15- ~ 1 ~60~0 For hail protection the barrier may be in its co~ ed state until an i ~ t hailstorm or the like requires its expansion to cover the trees, as in-iic~ted in Fig 1 and elsewhere.
The actuator causing expansion is means to apply extra tension to one of the elongated 5 support cables in relation to the other. This may preferably be a winch or pulley driven by an electric motor and a typical transition time from a conL~ ed to an exp~n~e~ state may be of the order of 30 seconds. A series of electric motors driven in parallel from a common supply line may be controlled remotely, for example in response to a weather radar report of hail forming in the vicinity, or by local observation, or on a more local 10 scale by a device including a microphone sensitive to the noise made by hailstones hitting a sounding board such as a metal sheet.
If bird or wind protection is the primary purpose of the barrier, it may be left in its extended state throughout much of the growing season; though exercising the cloth may 15 assist in sealing holes made by birds.
EXAMPLE 2 - Sun Shade The invention in this application is intended to provide a readily deployable shade over 20 plants or ~nim~lc yet be easily reduced to a minimllm size if the ambient light falls. It may be stored in a closed or contracted form Iying above and along the length of an elongated area to be protected, which may be a row of trees or other crop, or may be along water troughs in a feedlot for cattle, or may optionally be placed along a fenceline along which ~nim~lc like to congregate. The sun shade may be expanded to its full size 25 simply by pulling on one or both edge-supporting cables. Intermediate settings will provide a "dappled" shade with strips or patches of light passing between partially con~ ed strips of shade fabric.
Fig 9 illustrates one preferred embodiment of a sun shade. A fabric which blocks30 substantially all of the direct light incident on it is preferred although some light may pacs through without detracting from the effectiveness of the inct~ tion. The shade is shown in its expanded configuration at 900, a partially co~ ac;led configuration at 901, and a contracted configuration at 902. The preferred shade comprises a series of 300 mm wide strips 905 of preferably a woven fabric capable of resisting environmental 35 degradation, such as one of the horticultural plastics, black-dyed polyethylene or polypropylene. Any suitable size of strip may be used, depending on availability, but a WO 95/25424 rCT/NZ9~i/0002%
r - 16 - 2 ~ -- 8 ~ 0 0 0 plef~ d size is 4420 mm wide (colllpalible with support cables put up to accommodate the "leno" cloth width), and 2000 mm across. Each strip 905 is preferably sewn with a hem to include a rather wide, floppy loop at each end like 908 and is clipped or ~tt~c~l~d at diagonally opposite corners (906, 907) to a ~uppGIling cable (903 and 904). Means to allow replacelllen~ strips to be in~t~llecl easily include providing crimpable collectors similar to that of Fig 7 (but preferably narrower), and the use of a similar press-through fastener, or a rapidly setting glue, or simply sewing a hem on-site to form the loop (908) at each end of the strip. The wide hem allows the strip to pivot about itsattachment point without distortion and excessive forces as the shade approaches its conll~cl~d state.
As the shade contracts (as shown in 901 and 902) there is some distortion of the strips as this fabric is less easily twisted into a parallelogram shape than the hail barrier fabric of Example 1.
Advantages of the strip approach, apart from the easy deployment which is as described for example 1, include that it may be easily repaired by on-site replacement of a damaged strip; the rest of the structure need not be brought down for repair.
Optionally a ~ hlleter windbreak may be installed and may be ~tt~rhe~l to the structure.
This can also serve to keep birds, bats, and large insects out of the enclosed space.
EXAMPLE 3 - A.la~ or ~ to comply with properties of Knitte-l Shade Cloth Although we prefer woven cloth of the "leno" type, the majority of shade cloths presently available are knitted. Two distinguishing features of this type over "leno"
cloths are that the strain-bearing fibres run diagonally across the length of the fabric, and that they are locked together, albeit loosely, at each intersection. A typical barrier fabric uses 5 or 6 single fibres to form each diagonal strain-bearing strand, which are separated by about 12 mm, and fills the spaces with a mesh of single strands in order to reduce hail damage, obstruct wind, and reduce invasion by insects or birds. Fig 15 shows a portion of such a cloth, at about 3.5X original size. The width of a roll is typically about 4 m and its length may be 100 or 200m, though it can be made in any suitable size.
WO 95/25424 PCI~/r'lZ95100028 ~ I ~ f ; ~ 17 2 1 8 6 0 () O
In this invention, the protective barrier or shade cloth panel is reversibly converted into a lesser area by relatively moving opposite edges of the panel along the edges in opposite directions to distort the panel from the extended, substantially S parallelogram configuration to a much narrower substantially parallelogramconfiguration. If a strip of knitted cloth is so forced the diagonal strands will rapidly become tensed and the cloth will oppose the closing movement.
Therefore we support and use a knitted cloth according to the following preferred embodiment or method (as shown in Fig 10):
(1) The cloth panel 1004 is held to support wires 1001 along its long edges by slidable clips 1003 for example of the "Agrinet" type, so that sliding movement along thesupport cables is pe~ d over a reasonable Ai~t~nce (2) The cloth is held along its ends to fixed (rotatable) ~u~poll~ 1002.
lS (3) During closure (as in 1007), tension developed within the cloth causes tension lines 1006 to develop bcl~ n the ~tt~r~ed end portions and the free edge, and the cloth may slide along the support cables until the tension reverts to a low level. Some buckling occurs and thus s~gging is seen, as shown in the sectional view 1100, of Fig 11, which is from the line S--S of Fig 10.
Finally the cloth covers a narrow area, as shown at 1008.
(4) On re-opening the cloth slides back along the support wires 1001 until it forms a usually rectangular, fully spread-out cover as in 1000.
As a variation, (see (2) above) the cloth is held along its ends by firm ~tt~cl""~l-l to bars pivoted at the obtuse-angled joints A, C, as shown in Fig 14.
Fig 12 illustrates another improvement. This is the use of detachable catches orconnections between the end of one spacer bar 1202 and the start of another 1203, at the site in-lic~ted at 1201. An example catch is comprised of a hook 1204 and an eye 1205 (seen also in top view at 1206).
Fig 13 illustrates at 1300 a further improvement that is made possible by this combination of a knitted shade cloth and this type of support. It is the addition of slots through which accllm~ ted hail or snow may be released. The material tends to slide wo ss/2s424 PCr~;~5~ 2~
~f~ 18- ~ t86~Q
into and be dropped relatively slowly from these slots, and inflicts less damage on underlying vegetation than hail falling from a cloud. (In this Figure, 1302 is a rigid end support pivotable around the pole 1301, and there are a number of cloth attachment points 1305 along part of the end support 1302.
Fig 14 again indicates at 1400, 1407, 1409, and 1411, the behaviour of a knitted cloth during closure, and in this case the cloth is suspended at one side from ~uppoll~ 1404 and only one edge is pulled (as suggested by the arrows 1406, 1410, and 1412. We have 10 not illustrated the side clips holding the cloth to the support wires at the periphery in this illustration. The cloth 1401 is held along the full extent of its ends to swung bars like 1405 (also shown in an enlarged version) which are able to swing as shown, as the support wires are pulled as shown by the arrows. This approach has the advantage that the cloth is held along all of the end and so is less likely to tear away in a strong wind.
15 In addition, movement of the swung bars provides "give" of a sort not possible with edge sup~ol~ g wires.
When the support wire is fully stretched (as at 1412) the cloth provides a Ill;l.illll--., of coverage or protection.
This arrangement is also capable of supporting (instead of a knitted fabric) a sheet of flexible material, such as a plastics film. In use, the film buckles as described for the knitted fabric. Examples of suitable horticultural films include "Agphane 150 ~lm"
(Agpac, Christchurch, new 7P~l~nd) or "Solargro" (Sarlon, Australia).
In conclusion, it may be seen that the preferred embodiments described herein provide useful exarnples of the principles of the invention.
Finally, it will be appreciated that various alterations and modifications may be made to 30 the foregoing without departing from the scope of this invention as set out in the following claims.
Claims (15)
1. A retractable barrier to at least partially shield an area, wherein the barrier is comprised of a deformable panel supported along its length by a pair of elongateflexible elements, and wherein each elongate flexible element is attached to one or more supports at a required distance above the ground so that the barrier can be positioned above ground in a first shielding configuration with the panel assuming a first extended substantially parallelogram shape, and wherein in use the barrier can be deformed into a contracted configuration of lesser area by relatively moving opposite edges of the panel along the edges in opposite directions to distort the panel from the extended, substantially parallelogram configuration to a much narrower substantially parallelogram configuration.
2. A barrier as claimed in claim 1 wherein the panel is made up of a plurality of separate strips of flexible material.
3. A barrier as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the panel includes at least one deformable net.
4. A barrier as claimed in claim 3 wherein the deformable net is a woven net having warp threads extending substantially parallel to the length of the fabricand weft threads at substantially right angles thereto in the extended configuration, the woven net having a loose weave between the warp and weft threads so that in use the net can be deformed into parallelograms of various configurations.
5. A barrier as claimed in claim 4 wherein the woven material has a leno weave.
6. A barrier as claimed in claim 4 wherein the deformable net is a knitted net.
7. A barrier as claimed in claim 5 or claim 6 wherein the panel is substantiallyrectangular in its extended configuration having a pair of longer sides and a pair of short sides, said longer sides being supported by said elongate flexible elements, and each short side is supported by an a substantially rigid strut.
8. A barrier as claimed in claim 7 wherein the net is slidably attached to a support along its longer sides by a plurality of clips wherein each clip is crimped to one of said elongate flexible elements.
9. A barrier as claimed in claim 1 wherein a plurality of panels are aligned side by side so that the panels provide a substantially continuous barrier when each panel is in its extended position.
10. A barrier as claimed in claim 9 each panel when extended assumes a curved orangled configuration to provided a tent like structure over an area of ground.
11. A barrier as claimed in claim 10 wherein the or each panel has a downwardly extending supplementary portion which can in use function as protection against obliquely oriented damaging materials.
12. A barrier as claimed in claim 1 wherein the or each panel comprises a hail resistant cloth.
13. A barrier as claimed in claim 1, wherein the or each panel comprises shade cloth.
14. An orchard comprising rows of trees, at least one row of trees being protected by a retractable barrier as claimed in any one of the preceding claims.
15. An orchard comprising substantially parallel rows of trees, with each row oftrees being protected by a retractable barrier as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 13.
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/216,954 US5519965A (en) | 1994-03-24 | 1994-03-24 | Protective canopy |
| US08/216.954 | 1994-03-24 | ||
| NZ26023694 | 1994-03-31 | ||
| NZ260236 | 1994-03-31 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2186000A1 true CA2186000A1 (en) | 1995-09-28 |
Family
ID=26651331
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2186000 Abandoned CA2186000A1 (en) | 1994-03-24 | 1995-03-21 | Cyclic triamine chelating agents |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| AU (1) | AU2086895A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2186000A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1995025424A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR2742022B1 (en) * | 1995-12-07 | 1999-04-02 | Domaine Saint Georges Scea | SYSTEM FOR THE PROTECTION OF ORCHARDS, ESPECIALLY FRUIT TREES AGAINST WEATHER CONDITIONS AND EQUIPMENT FOR IMPLEMENTING SAID METHOD |
| FR2763212B1 (en) * | 1997-05-16 | 1999-07-02 | Mohamed Mamouri | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROTECTING PLANTATIONS SUCH AS VINES AGAINST FREEZING AND HAIL |
| FR2777737B1 (en) * | 1998-04-23 | 2000-06-16 | Mdb Texinov Sa | TISSUE-KNITTED NET SCREEN FOR PROTECTING CROPS FROM HAIL |
| ITBZ20040034A1 (en) * | 2004-07-20 | 2004-10-20 | Michael Gasser | CULTURE WEATHER PROTECTION SYSTEM. |
| FR2893638A1 (en) * | 2005-11-08 | 2007-05-25 | Paul Riedel | Windbreak comprises netting in the form of a a knitted fabric comprising a mesh of filaments supporting parallel tapes arranged perpendicular to the wind |
| IT1399191B1 (en) * | 2010-03-24 | 2013-04-11 | Valente Pali Precompressi Spa Ora Valente Spa | COVERAGE FOR IMPROVED CULTIVATIONS FOR OPENING AND CLOSING |
| NL1039513C2 (en) * | 2012-04-03 | 2013-10-07 | Johannes Franciscus Maria Pape | COVER FOR A STABLE, BARN OR OUTPUT SPACE. |
| US8826957B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2014-09-09 | General Electric Company | Methods and systems for automated ply layup for composites |
| ITUB20160131A1 (en) * | 2016-01-15 | 2017-07-15 | Magif S A S Di Angelo Cappi & C | System for transversal, centralized and limited effort handling of sheets and / or covering networks of plant protection structures and structures built with this system |
| CN107969257A (en) * | 2017-11-23 | 2018-05-01 | 梧州市雅正农业科技有限公司 | A kind of tea place greening tendril cultivation stent |
| CN110337967B (en) * | 2019-07-09 | 2021-05-14 | 康海平 | Fruit vegetables are planted and are used multi-functional rainshelter |
| RS20210633A1 (en) | 2021-05-21 | 2022-11-30 | Kokanovic Momcilo | The system with revolving guides for protecting orchard from the bed weather |
Family Cites Families (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3140563A (en) * | 1963-04-03 | 1964-07-14 | Clayton M Allen | Protective cover for plants |
| US3581436A (en) * | 1968-09-25 | 1971-06-01 | James D Basiger | Plant shield |
| FR2452870A1 (en) * | 1979-04-04 | 1980-10-31 | Lesouef Pierre | PVC-coated polyester fabric screens for agricultural purposes - for use as oblique screens supported by poles and guy-lines |
| SU1074445A1 (en) * | 1980-12-25 | 1984-02-23 | Всесоюзный Научно-Исследовательский И Конструкторско-Технологический Институт По Машинам Для Горного Земледелия И Возделывания Субтропических Культур | Arrangement for protecting grape plantings from hail |
| SU1754013A1 (en) * | 1989-11-20 | 1992-08-15 | Грузинский политехнический институт | Device for protection of vine plantations against hail |
| AU4179093A (en) * | 1992-07-03 | 1994-01-06 | John Nelson Paterson Goodall | Tensioned retractable shade cover |
-
1995
- 1995-03-21 CA CA 2186000 patent/CA2186000A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1995-03-21 AU AU20868/95A patent/AU2086895A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1995-03-21 WO PCT/NZ1995/000028 patent/WO1995025424A1/en active Application Filing
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| AU2086895A (en) | 1995-10-09 |
| WO1995025424A1 (en) | 1995-09-28 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5519965A (en) | Protective canopy | |
| US5497537A (en) | Clip for fabric structures | |
| EP1728417B1 (en) | Rain or hail protection device for crops | |
| US4068404A (en) | Shade-producing structure and method | |
| CA2186000A1 (en) | Cyclic triamine chelating agents | |
| US20070079548A1 (en) | Stowable plant protector | |
| AU2002342551B8 (en) | Weather protection device for the protection of special cultures sensitive to moisture | |
| US4296568A (en) | Agricultural crop cover | |
| US7461479B2 (en) | Plant protection system | |
| GB2251777A (en) | Cover arrangement for crops | |
| WO2017056081A1 (en) | System for covering crops provided with centralized means for fast gathering of the covering sheets | |
| US5543196A (en) | Selvedge reinforcement | |
| US5189871A (en) | Collection netting for fruit and nut trees | |
| DE60033657T2 (en) | FOIL FASTENING AND ANCHORING PART | |
| WO2022255887A1 (en) | Plant protector and the manufacture and use thereof | |
| RU2347356C1 (en) | Shelter for plant growing in open ground | |
| EP1186696A2 (en) | Washing line unit | |
| JP3963419B2 (en) | Wind net device | |
| KR20100003268U (en) | Gauze structure for protection of agricultural product | |
| JP3233778U (en) | Windbreak fence | |
| CN217958056U (en) | Cigar tobacco field shading shed | |
| AU2021205031A1 (en) | Plant protector and the manufacture and use thereof | |
| US11889802B2 (en) | Trellis structure and corresponding methods | |
| BE1025324B1 (en) | Improved device for protecting crops against the weather | |
| KR100407129B1 (en) | Structure of dividing and opening-shutting protection net |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FZDE | Dead |