CA2066009A1 - Light duty liquid detergent compositions - Google Patents
Light duty liquid detergent compositionsInfo
- Publication number
- CA2066009A1 CA2066009A1 CA002066009A CA2066009A CA2066009A1 CA 2066009 A1 CA2066009 A1 CA 2066009A1 CA 002066009 A CA002066009 A CA 002066009A CA 2066009 A CA2066009 A CA 2066009A CA 2066009 A1 CA2066009 A1 CA 2066009A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- alkyl
- composition
- sodium
- ethylene oxide
- weight
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
- C11D3/0005—Other compounding ingredients characterised by their effect
- C11D3/0094—High foaming compositions
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D1/00—Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
- C11D1/86—Mixtures of anionic, cationic, and non-ionic compounds
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
- C11D3/16—Organic compounds
- C11D3/34—Organic compounds containing sulfur
- C11D3/3418—Toluene -, xylene -, cumene -, benzene - or naphthalene sulfonates or sulfates
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D1/00—Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
- C11D1/02—Anionic compounds
- C11D1/12—Sulfonic acids or sulfuric acid esters; Salts thereof
- C11D1/123—Sulfonic acids or sulfuric acid esters; Salts thereof derived from carboxylic acids, e.g. sulfosuccinates
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D1/00—Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
- C11D1/02—Anionic compounds
- C11D1/12—Sulfonic acids or sulfuric acid esters; Salts thereof
- C11D1/22—Sulfonic acids or sulfuric acid esters; Salts thereof derived from aromatic compounds
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D1/00—Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
- C11D1/02—Anionic compounds
- C11D1/12—Sulfonic acids or sulfuric acid esters; Salts thereof
- C11D1/29—Sulfates of polyoxyalkylene ethers
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D1/00—Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
- C11D1/38—Cationic compounds
- C11D1/52—Carboxylic amides, alkylolamides or imides or their condensation products with alkylene oxides
- C11D1/523—Carboxylic alkylolamides, or dialkylolamides, or hydroxycarboxylic amides (R1-CO-NR2R3), where R1, R2 or R3 contain one hydroxy group per alkyl group
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D1/00—Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
- C11D1/66—Non-ionic compounds
- C11D1/662—Carbohydrates or derivatives
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Detergent Compositions (AREA)
- Cosmetics (AREA)
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
An aqueous liquid detergent composition for handwashing soiled dishware includes specific narrow classes and amounts of magnesium or sodium alkyl benzene sulfonate surfactant, alkyl ether sulfate surfactant, C12-C16 alkyl polyglucoside and alkanolamide foam stabilizer. A higher alkyl sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinate, optionally ethoxylated, anionic surfactant may also be present. The compositions are capable of generating a stable foam and are effective in cleaning greasy soils with acceptable mildness for the consumer and with good rinseability.
An aqueous liquid detergent composition for handwashing soiled dishware includes specific narrow classes and amounts of magnesium or sodium alkyl benzene sulfonate surfactant, alkyl ether sulfate surfactant, C12-C16 alkyl polyglucoside and alkanolamide foam stabilizer. A higher alkyl sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinate, optionally ethoxylated, anionic surfactant may also be present. The compositions are capable of generating a stable foam and are effective in cleaning greasy soils with acceptable mildness for the consumer and with good rinseability.
Description
~-4966 2 0 ~ 9 . .
LIGHT DUTY LIOUID DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS
i BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
,:
~ Field of the Inyention li, This invention relates to light duty liquid detergents ~, having particular utility in the hand washing of dishware, ~s including dighes, pot5, pans, glassware and silverware/flatware.
More particularly, it relates to a liquid dishwashing detergent composition which provides stable, persistent foaming character-istics combined with good rinseability, mildness to the skin and ;j effectiveness in removing greasy soils from dishware.
~; Discussion o~ the Art and Proble~s Solved ~$~ Foam generation by detergent compositions is associated L0 by the consumer with good deter~ive ability. However, it i~
apparent that long lasting ~oam, whether considered copiou~ or ~c medium to medium-low foam content is, by it~elf, not a su~ici-nt ~ measure o~ cleaning ability. Neverthele~, D~uch effort ha- b -n '~ extended to optimize foaming characteristics, without nece~sarily :'-~15 ~ improvlng cleaning ability.
Greasy soils are generally considered to be one o~ ~he mo3t di~ ult soil types to be removed by hand wa~hing.
Ef~octive-grea~e removal,i~ nearly always associated with requ~rinq high temperature water to help dissolve and remove the ~' 20 grease.
~, ~'';
.~
,.,~
:i,.
LIGHT DUTY LIOUID DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS
i BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
,:
~ Field of the Inyention li, This invention relates to light duty liquid detergents ~, having particular utility in the hand washing of dishware, ~s including dighes, pot5, pans, glassware and silverware/flatware.
More particularly, it relates to a liquid dishwashing detergent composition which provides stable, persistent foaming character-istics combined with good rinseability, mildness to the skin and ;j effectiveness in removing greasy soils from dishware.
~; Discussion o~ the Art and Proble~s Solved ~$~ Foam generation by detergent compositions is associated L0 by the consumer with good deter~ive ability. However, it i~
apparent that long lasting ~oam, whether considered copiou~ or ~c medium to medium-low foam content is, by it~elf, not a su~ici-nt ~ measure o~ cleaning ability. Neverthele~, D~uch effort ha- b -n '~ extended to optimize foaming characteristics, without nece~sarily :'-~15 ~ improvlng cleaning ability.
Greasy soils are generally considered to be one o~ ~he mo3t di~ ult soil types to be removed by hand wa~hing.
Ef~octive-grea~e removal,i~ nearly always associated with requ~rinq high temperature water to help dissolve and remove the ~' 20 grease.
~, ~'';
.~
,.,~
:i,.
2~66~09 Clearly, there would be a great advantage to formulate a mild, foaming, liquid hand dishwashing composition, which is capable of and effective in removing greasy soils as well as other soil types from dishware using water at ambient or warm to high temperature.
It has been known that among the anionic surfactants, those b~sed on magnesium as the counterion (i.e. cation) can improve grease cutting performance. However, grease cutting performance is generally associated with increased irritation to the skin, e.g. hands, of the consumer.
It has also been known to use generally milder types of surfactants to ameliorate the somewhat harsh effects of the magnesium based anionic surfact~nts. Alkyl polyglucoside ~APG) nonionic surfactants have been suggested for this purpose.
However, although providing some foaming characteri~tics, the APG
type surfactant has generally poorer ~oaming performance than other conventional foaming surfactants.
Another important characteristic to the consumer for hand dishwashing formulations is the ability to easily wash away the copious foam which is associated with good cleaning performance. Surfactant systems providing APG generated foa~s are not always acceptable in terms of rinseability.
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide hand dishwashing aqueous compositions which combine acceptable mildness, ~oaming and grea~e cleaning performance.
It is another object of the invention to provide ~uch compositions with good foam rinseability.
The pre~ent invention provides compositions which avoid the elevated problems-and accomplish the foregoing ob~ective~.
The compositions, although prepared from otherwise known 20660~
ingredients, but in unique combinations and proportions, is capable of achievlng a new and beneficial result.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, the liquid dishwashing detergent composition comprises, as essential ingredients:
(A) a surfactant system comprising: (1) from about 7.5 to 20% of a C10-Cl6 alkyl benzene sulfonate anionic surfactant; (2) from o to 8% of an alkali metal salt of a monoalkyl C8-C18 sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinamate anionic surfactant, wherein the alkyl group may be ethoxylated with up to about 8 moles of ethylene oxide,-(3) from about 8 to about 20% of anionic C12-C20 alkyl ether sulfate having from about 1 to less than 3 ethylene oxide groups, on average; and, (4) from about 3 to 12% of an alkyl glucoside having from 12 to 16 carbon atoms, on average, in the alkyl chain, and an average degree of poly-merization in the range of from about 1 to 3; and (B) from about 0.5 to 6% of a foam stabilization system comprising at least one lower alkanolamide of higher alkanoic acid, and the balance water. The total actives (A) + (B) will usually range from about 25 to about 54% or more of the total composition.
Optional, but often beneficial ad~uvants which can, and often are included in the composition include:
(C) a low irritant organic solvent, up to about 10%;
~25 (D) hydrotrope, up to about 8%;
(E) other adjuvants, such as, chelating or seque~tering agents, coloring agents, dyes, perfumes, bactericides, ; fungicides, preservatives, sunscreening agents, pH modifiers, pH-buffering agents, opacifiers, antioxidants, thickeners, proteins, 20~0~9 and the like, up to about 20%, in total, with a maximum of any individual component bein~ about 10%.
Unless indicated otherwise all percents and percentages given herein are on a by weight basis.
The components of the invention compositions will now be described in greater detail.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION AND PREFERRED E~BODIMENTS
The present invention is based, in part, on the quite unexpected discovery that the foam stabilizing, foam boosting combination of the alkyl polyglucoside (APG) and alkanolamide components has a significant impact on the grease removal performance of the composition ~t a constant level of total.
surfactant/foam stabilization components. More specifically, it has now been found that while some enhanced grease removal benefits may be provided with the foam stabilizing alkanolamide alone, as compared to existing top o~ the line commercial products, the improvement in grease removal performance is further dramatically improved in the system containing both foam ~tabilizing alkanolamide and APG. Furthermore, by employing the alkyl ether sulfate (AEOS) with less than 3 moles ethylene oxide, e.g. AEOS-lEO or ABOS-2EO, a more copious foam can be obtained as compared to the same composition containing AEOS-3EO (i.e. 3 moles ethylene oxide) while still retaining acceptable mildne~-.
Also, by employing low level~ o~ the foam boosting alkanolamide component (B), in conjunction with the specified surfactant system (A), good rinseability of the dishware is achieved without impairing cleaning performance. For example, the a~signee's current com~ercially available liquid light duty hand washing = ~
product, Liquid PalmoliveO (17% NaLAS, 13% AEOS-3EO, 4% LMMEA, 2~0~9 3.3% sCs+sxs~ 0.5% inorganic salts; balance perfume, color, ethanol, water), removed about 25 milligrams (mg), of grea~y soil (lard) as compared to only 5 mg for the same formula with o%
LMMEA. However, in a composition according to this invention containing APG, grease removal increases by about 80 mg over the level of LMMEA between about 1% and about 4% by weight of the composition. These observations were based on surfactant systems in which the counterion of the anionic surfactant(s) was sodium.
In systems in which magnesium salts of the anionic ABS surfactant lo are used, both the concentration of the Mg ion and the alkanolamide strongly influence grease removal. For example, when tested in the Baumgartner grease soil removal test with a surfactant system containing 10-~t % linear dodecyl benzene sulfonate (LAS)/12 wt % fatty Cl2-C16 alcohol ethoxylate (1 mole ethylene oxids (lE0~)/6wt ~ APG (C12 to Cl6 alkyl; D.P.=1.6) the grease removal performance obtained at the Mg and LMMEA levels indicated in the following Table 1 were obtained.
Table 1 Mq ion % LMME~ %Grease Removal. ma 0.1 4 37 0.1 2 8 0.4 2 61 0.25 3 60 0.4 4 80 The components of the inventions's compositions will now be described.
(A) The Surfactant Sy~tem (1) The first essential surfactant ingredient i~ the anionic salt of an alkyl benzene sulfonic acid (ABS), preferably- -a linear C10 to C16 alkyl benzene sul~onate (LAS).
2 ~
Furthermore, when the magnesium salt is used, it may be, for example, a magnesium oxide neutralized linear dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid, or alternatively, the magnesium salt may be formed by adding an electrolyte magneslum salt, such as magnesium chloride, magnesium sulfate, etc. to sodium alkyl benzene sulfonate. In the latter altexnative, an excess of the magnesium salt electrolyte could raise the cloud/clear point of the composition. This undesirable effect can, however, be compensated for by addition of hydrotrope, as described below.
lo The anionic surfactant (1) is present in an amount of from about 7.5% to about 20%, based on the total composition, or in an amount of from about 28 to 40%, based on the total surfactants (A)(1), (2), (3) an~ (4). The more preferred range of amounts of the anionic ABS salt surfactant is from about 8 to 12 or 15%, especially about 9 to 11%, e.g. about 10%, based on the total composition, or about 29 to 35%, especially about 30 to 33%, based on the sum of the surfactants (A)(1), (2), (3) and (4).
At below the 7.5% (total) level the improvement in low temperature grease removal becomes insufficient, while at amounts above 20% (total) the composition containing the magnesium salt tends to be mildly irritating to the hands.
The anionic ABS in the surfactant system may b in th-form of the alkali metal or alkaline earth metal salts, or mixtures thereof. The preferred alkali metals are sodium and potassium, preferably sodium. The preferred alkaline earth metals are calcium and magne~ium preferably magnesium. The linear alkyl group preferably contains from 10 to 13 carbon atoms, especially 11 carbon atoms, approximately, on average, e.g. sodium and/or magnesium linear dodecyl benzene sulfonate.
2~6~
The sodium salt anionic is generally considered to be a milder detergent than the magnesium salt but is less effective for greasy soil removal and i5 also less effective in generating foam, especially in the presence of soil. However, when used in combination with APG, AEOS-1 to 2 EO, and alkanolamide foam stabilizer, satisfactory foam generation, grease removal and mildness can be simultaneously exhibited.
On the other hand, enhanced grease removal performance can be achieved with the Mg salt anionic. However, since the level of Mg ion can be lowered for any particular level of grease removal performance, it is still possible to achieve levels of mildness which are acceptable to the consumer. This appears to be especially so, in terms of p~rceived mildness effects, ~
reported by small test panels of consumers, in compositions also containing the below described sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinamate anionic surfactants.
(2) In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a mono-alkyl C8-Cl8 sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinamate anionic surfactant may be incorporated in the compositions of this invention, especially when the magnesium salt of ABS i~ used as, or as part of, component (1).
It is disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,839,098 to Wisotski, et al. to incorporate in an APG (alkyl of C10 to C18, D.P.-l to 5) containing liquid diswaehing detergent compoeition from lO to 80 parts by weight of a C7 to Cg dialkyl sulfosuccinate, based on a total sur~actant content of 15 to 50% ~y weight, to enhance foaming and cleaning power. This patent suggests that such compositions should be free from petroleum-based anionic surfactants, such as alkyl benzene sulfonate~ and alkane sulfonates. However, other anionic surfactants such as alkyl 2 ~
ether sulfate or alkyl sulfate may replace a portion of the APG
or dialkyl sulfosuccinate. The di (C~-C9) alkyl sulfosuccinate are not considered to be mild surfactants and can contribute to harshness or irritation to the consumer.
In the compositions of this invention, the sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinamate is present as the monoalkylsuccinate (MAS) or monoalkylsulfosuccinamate (MASA) o Mo3S c-o~ M3~ ~ IO-N\R
C-OM C-OM
o o (MAS) (MASA) where R is an aliphatic radical~ preferably alkyl, of from 10 to 18 carbon atoms, especially from 12 to 16 carbon atoms, and preferably lauryl (C12), and M is a cation, such as an alkali metal, e.g. sodium or potassium, preferably sodium, ammonium, alkanolamine, e.g. ethanolamine, or magnesium. The alkyl radical may be ethoxylated with up to about 8 moles, preferably up to about 6 moles, on average, e.g. 2, 3 or 4 moles, of ethylene oxide, per mole of alkyl group.
Minor amounts, e.g. up to about 5% of dialkyl ~ulfosuccinates may be present with the monoalkyl sulfosucclnate or monoalkyl sulfosuccinamate. The mono-alkyl ester substantially free of dialkyl estex, and es~ecially sodlum mono-- lauryl ester which may be ethoxylated with up to 4 moles of ethylene oxide and the mono- C16 alkyl sul~osuccinamste ; 30 monoethanolamine salt are preferred.
When present, the sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinam~te, anionic surfactant is used in amounts ranging from about 2 to 20%
by weight, pre~erably from about 3 to 15 % by weight, based on ~6~
the total surfactants (A)(1)-(4). Based on the total composition, the preferred amounts of the sulfosuccinate anionic surfactant ranges from about 0.5 to 8 wt %, more preferably 0.8 to 7 wt %.
(3) The compositions of this invention also include an anionic alkyl ether sulfate (also commonly referred to as fatty alcohol ether ethyleneoxy sulfate AEOS nE0 where n represents the number of moles, on average, of ethylene oxide (E0)) containing from about 10 to 20 carbon atoms in the alkyl moiety, preferably from about 12 to 14 or 16 carbon atoms and from 1 to less than 3 moles, preferably 1 to 2 moles, especially 1 mole, ethylene oxide, on average, per mole of the alkyl sulfate. The alkyl ether sulfate, which may ~e repro6ented by the formula .
R(OC2H4)nO503M, where R is the residue of a fatty alcohol of from about 10 to 20 carbon atoms, n is a number of from 1 to less than 3, and M is a cation, is usually present as the alkali metal salt, e~pecially the sodium salt, but may also be present as the potassium salt, ammonium salt, alkanolamine salt or magnesium salt.
: 20 The amount of the alkyl ether sulfate will usually be in the range of from about 32 to about 50% by weight, preferably from about 34 to 48% by weight, ba~ed on the total weight of surfactants (A)~ (4) or from about 8 to 20%, preferably 9 to 18%, and more preferably 10 to 16~ by weight of the total compo6ition.
(4) Another essential surfactant in the invention compo~ition is (4) an alkyl glucoside, preferably an alkyl poly-glucoside, although alkyl monoglucoside may al60 be used.
The alkyl mono- and polysaccharides have received much-attention recently for their beneficial detergent, ~oaming and 2 ~ 0 ~
viscosity modifying properties. Examples of patent literature relating to light duty liquid compositions containing alkyl monosaccharides incl~de u.s. Patents 4,732,704 and 4,732,696.
The alkyl polysaccharides are used in the liquid detergent compositions disclosed, for example, in U.s. Patents 4,396,520, 4,536,318, 4,565,647, 4,599,177, 4,663,069 and 4,668,422 (including monoglucosides), as well as many of the patents and literature cited in these patents.
In the present invention, a narrow subgenus of the lo alkyl saccharides has been found to effectively enhance grease removal with acceptable mildness when used in combination with the other surfactants (A)(1)-(3) and the foam stabilizer (B).
The alkyl glycosides used in this invention are ~hose having an alkyl group of from 12 to 16 carbon atoms, on average, and a glucoside hydrophilic group containing from about 1 to about 3, preferably from about 1.2 to about 3, and most preferably from about 1.3 to 2.7, glucoside units, such as 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 2.0 or 2.6 glucoside units. Of course, the number of glucoside units in any particular surfactant molecule will be a whole number (i.e. an integer), however, for any actual physical sample of alkyl glucoside surfactants there will, in general, be a range of glucoside units, and it is the average value which characterizes a particular surfactant product. The alkyl glycosides with lower D.P. values tend to prov~de more copious foaming whereas those with higher D.P. values tend to be more soluble, for the same alkyl chain length. If the alkyl group contains less than 12 carbon atoms, satisfactory mildnes~
is difficult to achieve.
The alkyl group is preferably attached at the 1-position of the sugar molecule, but may be attached at the 1-, 2~6~9 3- or 4-positions, thus givlng a glucosyl rather than a glucoside. Furthermore, in the polyglucosides, the additional glucoside units are predominantly attached to the previous gluco~ide at the 2-position, but attachment at the 3-, 4- and 6-positions can also occur.
Optionally, and less desirably, there may be a polyalkylene oxide chain (e.g. polyethylene oxide)-joining the alkyl moiety and the glucoside units).
The preferred alkyl glucosides have the formula R2o(cmH2mo)t(z)x wherein Z is derived from glucose, R2 is an alkyl group containing from 12 to about 16 carbon atoms, m is 2 or 3, preferably 2, t is from 0 to about 6, preferably 0, and x is from 1 to 3 (on average), preferably from 1.2 to 3, most preferably from 1.3 to 2.7. To prepare these compounds a long chain alcohol (R2OH) can be reacted with glucose, in the presence of an acid catalyst to form the desired glucoside. Alternatively the alkyl polyglucosides can be prepared by a two step procedure in which a short chain alcohol (C1-C6) is reacted with glucose or a polyglucoside (x=2 to 3) to yield a short chain alkyl glucoside (x=l to 3) which can in turn be reacted with a longer chain alcohol (R2OH) to displace the short chain alcohol and obtain the desired alkyl glucoside. If this two step procedure is u~ed, tho short chain alkyl qluco~ide content of the final alkyl gluco~ide material should be less than 50%, preferably less than 10%, more preferably le~s than 5S, most preferably o% o~ the alkyl glucoside.
The amount of unreacted alcohol (the free fatty alcohol content) in the desired alkyl polygluco~lde sur~actant is --preferably less than about 2%, more preferably less than about 2 0 ~
0.5% by weight of the total of the alkyl polyglucoside plus unreacted alcohol. The amount of alkyl monoglucoside, if present, is preferably no more than about 40~, more preferably no more than about 20% by weight of the total of the alkyl polyglucoside. For some uses it is desirable to have the alkyl monoglucoside content less than about 10%, eapecially less than about 5%.
The amount of the alkyl glucoside surfactant to achieve the desired foam and detersive properties is in the range of from lo about 14 to 32%, preferably from about 16 to 30%, based on thesum of the surfactants (A)(1), (2), (3) and (4). The preferred amounts range from 3 to 12%, especially from 4 or 5 to 10%, based on the total composition.
Within these ranges the relative amounts of the alkyl benzene sulfonate (A~S) surfactant and alkyl gluccside (APG~
surfactant is not particularly critical, but will generally be within the range of ABS:APG of from about 2.5:1 to 1:2, preferably from about 2:1 to 1:1.2.
In the invention compo~itions, the total amount of active surfactant components ~A) plus (B) will be in the range of from about 25% to 54% of the total composition, preferably from : about 28 to 50%, more prePerably from about 28% to 42%, such as 30%, 32%, 34%, 35% or 40%.
(B) Foam Stabilization Sy~tem The foam stabilization system which may also it~lf contribute to tbe foaming capacity as well as foam ~tabilizing effect iB comprisQd of the lower alkanolamide of higher alkanoic acid which is the reaction product of a lower alkanol of 2 to 3- ~
carbon atoms and an alkanoic acld of 10 to 16 carbon atoms, 2~66~9 preferably with 80% or more of the lower alkanol being ethanol and a similar proportion of the alkanoic acid being of 12 to 14 carbon atoms. Other lower alkanols that are also useful are n-propanol and isopropanol. The preferred alkanoic acid is a mixture of lauric and myristic acids, generally in proportions of 1:2 to 2:1, with about 50% of each being preferable. Alter-natively, coconut oil or hydrogenated coconut oil may be used as a source of the alkanoic acids. Suitable alkanoic acid alkanol-amides include the monoethanolamides. diethanolamides and the monoisopropanolamides.
Specific examples include mixed lauric/myristic diethanolamide, lauric/myristic monoethanolamide, lauric monoethanolamide, lauric diethanolamide, coco diethanolamide, coco monoethanolamide, and the like.
The amount of the alkancic acid alkanolamide may b~ up to about 6% of the compo~ition, such as 0.5 to 6%, preferably 1 to 5%, more pre~erably 1 to 4%, such as 1.5, 2, 3 or 4%, of the composition.
The compositions of this invention which include the salt surfactants (A)(1), (A)(3), (A)(4) and, optionally, (A)(2) and foam stabilization system (B), in the specified proportions, as essential ingredients are formulated in an aqueous carrier to provide mild, stable foaming liquid compositions especially effective in cleaning, by hand washing, dishwarQ, such as dl~hes, glassQs, flatware, pots, pans, etc., at ambient wash water temperature, as well, of course, at warm or hot wash water temperatures. The invention formulations are mild to the hands and arQ clear and homogeneous. Clarity and homogeneity may often, howev~r, be improved by inclusion of, ~or example, organic-solvents and/or hydrotropes, and these and other optional 20~0a~
additives may also be included in the compositions in amounts wh~ch do not adversely influence the desirable properties.
(C) Organic Solvent Cosmetically acceptable organic solvents, usually lower alcohols, such as ethanol, propanol, isopropanol, propylene glycol, or mixtures thereof, may be included in the composition for its thinning effect, lowering of clear point, and for its solubilizing effect for any components which may not be readily soluble in the main aqueous medium. The amount of solvent, when present, will usually be limited to about 10%, preferably 8%, especially no more than about 6% of the composition, such as from 2 to 5%. Ethanol is the prefer-red organic solvent.
(D) Hydrotrope In order to assist in solubilizing various components of the composition, maintain a low clear point, and possibly modify viscosity, it i8 customary to include a hydrotropic substance in the composition. Typical hydrotropes includo primarily urea and the lower alkyl aryl sulfonate salts, such as sodium xylene eulfonate, potassium xylene 6ulfonate, sodlum cumene sulfonate, ammonium xylene sulfonate, and the like.
Mixture~ of two or more hydrotropes may also be used. Th-hydrotrope, when used, is generally present in amounts bolo~
about 8%, preferably below about 6%, such as from 1 or 2 to 6%.
(E) Other Optional Functional and Aesthetic Additives Various other materials may also be included in the present compositions for their deslrable functional or ao~thetic effects. Among these, those materials employed to increaso the 20~60~9 mildness of the detergent composition to the human hands, such as the water soluble proteins, are often very useful.
Although solvents, including water, tend to make the products clear liquids, it is sometimes desirable to opacify them or make them appear pearly. For such purpose there may be employed opacifying agents, e.g. behenic acid, or a pearlescent or pearlizing composition, such as an approximately equal mixture of high fatty acid ester of polyethoxy ethanol, coconut oil fatty acid alkanolamide and sodium lauryl ether sulfate. The higher fatty acid will usually be of 10 to 18 carbon atoms and the polyethoxy content will be of 1 to 20, preferably 1 to 10 ethoxy groups. The alkanolamide will preferably be ethanolamide, but can be mixed with isopropanolam~e, too.
Additional adjuvant components of the present compositions include perfumes; sequestrants, e.g. monohydrogen ethylene diamine tetraacetate, tetrasodium ethylene diamine tetraacetate, trisodium nitrilotriacetate; bactericides, e.g.
trichlorocarbanilide, tetrachlorosalicylanilide, hexachlorophene, chlorobromosalicylanilide; antioxidants; thickeners, e.g. sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, polyacrylamide, Irish moss; dyes; water dispersible pigments; salts, e.g. sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, as the heptahydrate or anhydrous, sodium chioride;
preservatives, su~h a3 formaldehydo or hydrogen peroxido, pH
modifiers, etc.
The total amount of the additional additives is usually no more than about 20% of the composition, preferably not exceeding 15%, while the amount o~ any individual ingredlent will not generally exceed 10%, especially 5%, and usually no more than 2 or 3%.
2~0~9 In the above description of the compositions of this invention and the various adjuvants employable therein, and in the claims, altho~gh individual constituents are mentioned for various classes or types of components it is within the invention that mixtures thereof be employed, such as mixtures of two or three anionic detergents or mixtures with the nonionic detergents, both possibly with other anionic and nonionic detergents known in the art, mixtures of skin treating materials and mixtures of solvents, among others.
For example, under certain circumstances paraffin sulfonate surfactants, such as sodium or magnesium (Cl2-Cl8~
paraffin sulfonate, can be used to replace part or all of the A~S
surfactant, achieve good foam an~ grease removal characteristic~.
Amphoteric surfactants, such as the betaines, e.g.
acylamidopropyl dimethyl ammonium betaines, can also often provide improvements in overall performance.
The viscositie~ of the detergent compositions may be further varied by the addition of thickening agents, such a3 gums and cellulose derivatives. The product viscosity and flow properties should be such as to make it pourable from a bottle and not so thin as to tend to splash or pour too readily, since usually only small quantities of the liguid detergent are to be utilized in use. Visco~ities from 20 to 1000 centipoise (Brookfield Vi~cometer spindle no. 1, 12 r.p.m.) are ~ound u-eful with those from 100 to 500 cps. beinq preferred and a viscosity of about 200 centipoise being con~idered best by most consumers, although at somewhat lower viscositie~, e.g. lO0 cp~., con~u er acceptance i8 almost the same.
In manufacturing the deocribed formulations, uoually ~t ~
is preferred to heat the detergent constituents to a somewhat 2 ~
elevated temperature, e.g. 40 to 50C and then admix them with the water and, optionally, all or a portion of the ethanol.
Thereafter, other anionic and nonionic detergents, urea, amide, protein and other adjuvants are added with the more volatile materials, such as perfumes, preferably being added last and after cooling of the composition to about room temperature.
Normally when making opaque or pearlescent detergents, the pearlizing mixture will also be added near last at about room temperature. Although the described method of making the compositions is preferred, variou~ other known techniques may also be employed, depending upon the particular detergent composition.
The pH of the formulation will generally be near.
neutral, e.g. about 5 to 8, preferably about 6.5 to 7.5.
The following representative non-limiting examples will help to further understand the pre~ent invention.
~0~0~9 Example 1 The following compositions L and L' were prepared:
Component L L' Active Active Ingredients Ingredients (wt%) (wt%) Mg linear dodecyl benzene sulfonate [Mg(LDBS)2]11.59.6 9.6 Alkyl polyglycoside1) 6.0 6.0 C12-C16 alkyl ether sulfate (lEØ) 11.8 11.8 Lauric/myristic monoethanolamide (LMMEA)I 2.02) 2.o2) Sodium Xylene Sulfonate (SXS) (5:3 Blend) Ethanol (3A) 4.1 4.1 Sodium cumene sulfonate (SCS)2.1 2.1 Disodium lauryl sulfosuccinate4.6 (Minarol LSS) Disodium laureth (3E0) sulfosuccinate 1.5 MgSO4-7H2O 1.0 1.0 Monohydrogen ethylene diamine tetraacetate, trisodium salt (HEDTA) 0.1 0.1 NaCl 2.0 2.0 Perfume 0.4 0.4 Color 0.1 0.1 Water, deionized q5 q8 1) APG 625 from Henkel Corp., hydrophobe chain length of C12/C14/C16 = 68/26/6, average of 1.6 glycoside units.
2j Based on LMMEA; SXS-1.2 wt%
2~6~0~
Example II
The following compositions WJ' and WJ" were prepared:
WJ' WJ"
Active Active Ingredient Ingredient wt. % wt. %
Na (LDBS) 10.0 10.0 APG 625 9.0 6.0 LMMEA/SXS (5:3) l.6l) 4,01) AEOS-lEO 14.0 14.0 Ethanol (3A) 0.5 1.3 SCS 0.9 o.g MgS04 . 7H20 1. 0 1. 0 NaCl l.O l.O
HEDTA 0.1 O.1 Perfume 0.3 0.3 Colorant 0.1 0.1 Water, deionized q. 5. to 100 q.~. to 100 1) Based on LMMEA
Exam~le III
Compo~ition~ A-E were prepared in the same m~nner a~
compo~ition~ WJ' and WJ" except that the amounts of APG-625 and LMMEA were changed a~ ollows:
c .12 .~S
~:25 twt %) APG-625 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 7.5 LMMEA 4.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.5 . . .
2 ~ 9 The compositions from Examples II and III were tested in the Shake-Foam Test, Shell Foam Test and Baumgartner grease (lard) removal test as described below.
(1) Baumgartner Soil Removal This test measures the ability of a diluted (1%) solution in 150 ppm hardness water to remove a greasy soil (lard) from a test surface (a cleaned glass slide 2.5 cm x 0.1 cm). The soil is applied by spreading about 0.2 to about 0.3 gram lard onto each cleaned glass slide. The soiled slides are cleaned in a 1%
product solution by dipping the soiled slide into the solution 600 times. The solution i5 maintained at ambient temperature (75F). After washing, the sli~6 are dried in a desiccator for two hours. The difference in weight of the lard before and after the cleaning process is taken as a mea~ure of grease removal, the greater the difference the more effective is the detergent composition.
(2) Shake-foam Test 100 ml of a diluted (1%) test solution in 150 ppm hardness water (113F) is filled into a 500ml graduated cylinder with a stopper. The stoppered cylinder is placed on an agitating machine which rotates the cylinder ~or 20 cycles at 30 rpm. The height of the foam in the cylinder is observed. A sugar cube having adsorbed thereon 0.01 + 0.001 grams o~ a mixed 80il ~ (potato buds, Crisco0, milk, olive oil and water) is then added to the cylinder and the test repeated. This procedure is continued until a total of 0.03 grams o~ soil have been added.
(3) Shell-Foam Test An 0.04% concentration of the test solution in 250 ml of~-water (150 ppm hardness, 45C) is filled into a water ~acketed 2~6~09 vessel with baffles and having a constant speed agitation (300 rpm mixing). Stirring is continued until the generated foam covers the entire surface of the test solution. A mixed soil (olive oil, milk, Crisco~, and potato buds) is slowly injected at a constant rate sufficient to uniformly disperse the soil below the surface of the solution. The soil interacts first with the surfactant in the solution until the surfactant is depleted and thereafter begins to deplete surfactant from the foam. The amount of soil (in grams) added until the foam quickly collapses is determined. The results (end point) are reported in Table 2 in grams.
Each of these tests were performed in triplicate and the reported results represent the 2Lverage of the three tests.
The results of the tests are shown in Table 2.
2a~600~
Table 2 Total Surfactant~ Shake Foam Volume, ml. ShQll Foam Gre~e COMP and LMMEA (wt ~) no 0.01 0.02 0.03 80il ~t, g mg ~o~lWt ratio ~PG/LMMEA 90il 90il ~oil soil to EP removed ~ 38 403 337 273 217 10.9 79 (10/4) E~ 30 418 340 290 242 6.7 3 (5/1) C 35 417 335 287 235 9.6 7 (10/1) D 33 393 317 252 193 9.9 91 (5/4) E 34 430 353 315 268 10.6 40 (7.5/2.5) WJ' 34.6 15 (9/1.6) WJ" 34 _ 98 (6l4) _ L 34.0 87 (6/2) L' 30.9 87 (6/2) Note: Formulas A-WJ" have 10 LAS and 14 AEOS-lEO; Formulas L
and L' contain 9.6 LAS and 11.8 AEOS-lEO; tests conducted in 150 ppm water. Total surfactants = (A)(1) + (A)(2) +
(A)(3) ~ (A)(4) + (B).
Both Compositions WJI and L had excellent rinsing characteristics as compareB to Liquid Palmolive and a commercial product containing a high level of magnesium for grease remova}, but which is not believed to include any alkyl polyglucoslde The above formulas A-E were statistically analyzed to identify main and interaction effects of LMMEA and APG on grea~e removal. Only LMMEA level was found to affect grease cleaning performance. All other formula factors (surfactants) did not significantly affect grease removal. Compositions A and D, having 4% LMMEA, removed a high level of grea~e versus regular Liquid Palmolive0 which would remove 25 to 30 mg of soil. For 2 ~ 9 reference, another leading commercial product containing a high level of magnesium for grease removal effectiveness would remove 120 mg of soil. However, it is significantly more irritating than Liquid Palmolive~ in a clinical handsoak test. The L and L' formulas also contain higher Mg levels and also remove more grease. These formulas are clinically milder than the commercial high Mg product. The product WJ~ containing 6% APG and 4% LMMEA, which provided comparable grease removal performance to formulas A and D was clinically tested and found to be as mild as Liquid Palmolive~.
Compositions WJ' and WJ" were both evaluated to have equal mildness to Liquid Palmolive~ and superior mildness to the high Mg-containing commercial p~oduct.
While the representative composition WJ' (NaLAS) was not as effective as Liquid Palmolive~ or the high Mg-containing commercial product in the standard Baumgartner grease (lard) removal test, it appears to be superior in terms of Crisco~-monoglyceride grease soil removal in a sample soaking test.
Similar compositions containing 17% LAS/13 AEOS-3EO with 0% APG and with 0% LMMEA or 4% LMMEA were tested in the grease removal test. The composition containing 0% LMMEA removed approximately 5 mg of soil while the co~position with 4% LMMEA
removed 25 mg of soil. This demonstrates the interaction of LMMEA with APG to produce the enhanced performance on grease.
ExamDle 4 In order to test the effect of the sulfosuccinate/
sulfo~uccinamate anionic surfactant in the composition ~ of Example 1, four different surfactants were tested at 0%, 1.5% a-nd 3% sulfo~uccinate/sulfosuccinamate levels in composition L and X~6~
were compared to Liquid Palmolive~ (POL) in the Baumgartner grease removal and Shake Foam tests described above. The surfactants which were tested were the sodium monolauryl sulfosuccinate used in L, the sodium monolauryl (3E.O.) sulfosuccinate used in L' (laureth), sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate, and mono-C16 alkyl sulfosuccinamate, monoethanolamine salt (ris). All of these surfactants were obtained from Rhone Poulenc (France).
The results are shown in Table 3.
Table 3 _ Baum~rtner --_ Sh 3ke Foam Volume, mls _ mps SD In~tial¦ SD 0.1 soil Si) 0.2 soit Sr) 0.3 soil~
POL (r~f) 37 11 385 10 330 30 260 15 195 15 0% Sulfosuccinate 122 34 387 12 317 25 252 23 184 24 1.5% dioctyl 160 8 365 0 3C5 5 240 15 195 15 3% dloctyl 118 4 395 30 315 15 270 5 210 15 1.5% laureth 126 25 390 5 315 5 255 20 185 25 3% laureth 104 48 380 10 340 10 270 15 215 15 1.5% lauryl 117 28 380 10 295 15 260 5 215 10 3% lauryl 134 16 405 5 340 20 290 25 235 20 1.5% ris 144 6 390 10 320 10 280 15 210 10 3% r,is 110 20 375 10 325 10 275 20 225 25 NOTE: SD - Standard Deviation, based on three replicates. - --2Qg~0~9 Conclusions of Sulfosuccinate Performance Comparison Grease Performance Grease cleaning results of the various sulfosuccinates tested at o%~ 1.5%, and 3% in the L formula (MgLAS) indicate all four sulfosuccinates produce a high and comparable level of baumgartner performance at all levels tested. The ~ioctyl SS
appears to give a peak in performance higher than the other materials at 1.5%.
Shake Foam Performance In general, there is a slight upward trend in foam volume at each level of soil addition as the sulfosuccinate increases from 0% to 3%. Performance is not considered to be significantly different unless a difference in foam volume greater than 50 mls is observed. The lowest to highest foam volume at each condition regardless of sulfosuccinate type or level i5 typically within 50 ml. Therefore, based on minimal impact on foam volume, any of the four materials could be used.
The more important factors are formula mildness and consumer acceptability.
The dioctyl sulfosuccinate is not believed to provide the same degree o~ mildness as the higher chain length alkyl esters.
It has been known that among the anionic surfactants, those b~sed on magnesium as the counterion (i.e. cation) can improve grease cutting performance. However, grease cutting performance is generally associated with increased irritation to the skin, e.g. hands, of the consumer.
It has also been known to use generally milder types of surfactants to ameliorate the somewhat harsh effects of the magnesium based anionic surfact~nts. Alkyl polyglucoside ~APG) nonionic surfactants have been suggested for this purpose.
However, although providing some foaming characteri~tics, the APG
type surfactant has generally poorer ~oaming performance than other conventional foaming surfactants.
Another important characteristic to the consumer for hand dishwashing formulations is the ability to easily wash away the copious foam which is associated with good cleaning performance. Surfactant systems providing APG generated foa~s are not always acceptable in terms of rinseability.
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide hand dishwashing aqueous compositions which combine acceptable mildness, ~oaming and grea~e cleaning performance.
It is another object of the invention to provide ~uch compositions with good foam rinseability.
The pre~ent invention provides compositions which avoid the elevated problems-and accomplish the foregoing ob~ective~.
The compositions, although prepared from otherwise known 20660~
ingredients, but in unique combinations and proportions, is capable of achievlng a new and beneficial result.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, the liquid dishwashing detergent composition comprises, as essential ingredients:
(A) a surfactant system comprising: (1) from about 7.5 to 20% of a C10-Cl6 alkyl benzene sulfonate anionic surfactant; (2) from o to 8% of an alkali metal salt of a monoalkyl C8-C18 sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinamate anionic surfactant, wherein the alkyl group may be ethoxylated with up to about 8 moles of ethylene oxide,-(3) from about 8 to about 20% of anionic C12-C20 alkyl ether sulfate having from about 1 to less than 3 ethylene oxide groups, on average; and, (4) from about 3 to 12% of an alkyl glucoside having from 12 to 16 carbon atoms, on average, in the alkyl chain, and an average degree of poly-merization in the range of from about 1 to 3; and (B) from about 0.5 to 6% of a foam stabilization system comprising at least one lower alkanolamide of higher alkanoic acid, and the balance water. The total actives (A) + (B) will usually range from about 25 to about 54% or more of the total composition.
Optional, but often beneficial ad~uvants which can, and often are included in the composition include:
(C) a low irritant organic solvent, up to about 10%;
~25 (D) hydrotrope, up to about 8%;
(E) other adjuvants, such as, chelating or seque~tering agents, coloring agents, dyes, perfumes, bactericides, ; fungicides, preservatives, sunscreening agents, pH modifiers, pH-buffering agents, opacifiers, antioxidants, thickeners, proteins, 20~0~9 and the like, up to about 20%, in total, with a maximum of any individual component bein~ about 10%.
Unless indicated otherwise all percents and percentages given herein are on a by weight basis.
The components of the invention compositions will now be described in greater detail.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION AND PREFERRED E~BODIMENTS
The present invention is based, in part, on the quite unexpected discovery that the foam stabilizing, foam boosting combination of the alkyl polyglucoside (APG) and alkanolamide components has a significant impact on the grease removal performance of the composition ~t a constant level of total.
surfactant/foam stabilization components. More specifically, it has now been found that while some enhanced grease removal benefits may be provided with the foam stabilizing alkanolamide alone, as compared to existing top o~ the line commercial products, the improvement in grease removal performance is further dramatically improved in the system containing both foam ~tabilizing alkanolamide and APG. Furthermore, by employing the alkyl ether sulfate (AEOS) with less than 3 moles ethylene oxide, e.g. AEOS-lEO or ABOS-2EO, a more copious foam can be obtained as compared to the same composition containing AEOS-3EO (i.e. 3 moles ethylene oxide) while still retaining acceptable mildne~-.
Also, by employing low level~ o~ the foam boosting alkanolamide component (B), in conjunction with the specified surfactant system (A), good rinseability of the dishware is achieved without impairing cleaning performance. For example, the a~signee's current com~ercially available liquid light duty hand washing = ~
product, Liquid PalmoliveO (17% NaLAS, 13% AEOS-3EO, 4% LMMEA, 2~0~9 3.3% sCs+sxs~ 0.5% inorganic salts; balance perfume, color, ethanol, water), removed about 25 milligrams (mg), of grea~y soil (lard) as compared to only 5 mg for the same formula with o%
LMMEA. However, in a composition according to this invention containing APG, grease removal increases by about 80 mg over the level of LMMEA between about 1% and about 4% by weight of the composition. These observations were based on surfactant systems in which the counterion of the anionic surfactant(s) was sodium.
In systems in which magnesium salts of the anionic ABS surfactant lo are used, both the concentration of the Mg ion and the alkanolamide strongly influence grease removal. For example, when tested in the Baumgartner grease soil removal test with a surfactant system containing 10-~t % linear dodecyl benzene sulfonate (LAS)/12 wt % fatty Cl2-C16 alcohol ethoxylate (1 mole ethylene oxids (lE0~)/6wt ~ APG (C12 to Cl6 alkyl; D.P.=1.6) the grease removal performance obtained at the Mg and LMMEA levels indicated in the following Table 1 were obtained.
Table 1 Mq ion % LMME~ %Grease Removal. ma 0.1 4 37 0.1 2 8 0.4 2 61 0.25 3 60 0.4 4 80 The components of the inventions's compositions will now be described.
(A) The Surfactant Sy~tem (1) The first essential surfactant ingredient i~ the anionic salt of an alkyl benzene sulfonic acid (ABS), preferably- -a linear C10 to C16 alkyl benzene sul~onate (LAS).
2 ~
Furthermore, when the magnesium salt is used, it may be, for example, a magnesium oxide neutralized linear dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid, or alternatively, the magnesium salt may be formed by adding an electrolyte magneslum salt, such as magnesium chloride, magnesium sulfate, etc. to sodium alkyl benzene sulfonate. In the latter altexnative, an excess of the magnesium salt electrolyte could raise the cloud/clear point of the composition. This undesirable effect can, however, be compensated for by addition of hydrotrope, as described below.
lo The anionic surfactant (1) is present in an amount of from about 7.5% to about 20%, based on the total composition, or in an amount of from about 28 to 40%, based on the total surfactants (A)(1), (2), (3) an~ (4). The more preferred range of amounts of the anionic ABS salt surfactant is from about 8 to 12 or 15%, especially about 9 to 11%, e.g. about 10%, based on the total composition, or about 29 to 35%, especially about 30 to 33%, based on the sum of the surfactants (A)(1), (2), (3) and (4).
At below the 7.5% (total) level the improvement in low temperature grease removal becomes insufficient, while at amounts above 20% (total) the composition containing the magnesium salt tends to be mildly irritating to the hands.
The anionic ABS in the surfactant system may b in th-form of the alkali metal or alkaline earth metal salts, or mixtures thereof. The preferred alkali metals are sodium and potassium, preferably sodium. The preferred alkaline earth metals are calcium and magne~ium preferably magnesium. The linear alkyl group preferably contains from 10 to 13 carbon atoms, especially 11 carbon atoms, approximately, on average, e.g. sodium and/or magnesium linear dodecyl benzene sulfonate.
2~6~
The sodium salt anionic is generally considered to be a milder detergent than the magnesium salt but is less effective for greasy soil removal and i5 also less effective in generating foam, especially in the presence of soil. However, when used in combination with APG, AEOS-1 to 2 EO, and alkanolamide foam stabilizer, satisfactory foam generation, grease removal and mildness can be simultaneously exhibited.
On the other hand, enhanced grease removal performance can be achieved with the Mg salt anionic. However, since the level of Mg ion can be lowered for any particular level of grease removal performance, it is still possible to achieve levels of mildness which are acceptable to the consumer. This appears to be especially so, in terms of p~rceived mildness effects, ~
reported by small test panels of consumers, in compositions also containing the below described sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinamate anionic surfactants.
(2) In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a mono-alkyl C8-Cl8 sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinamate anionic surfactant may be incorporated in the compositions of this invention, especially when the magnesium salt of ABS i~ used as, or as part of, component (1).
It is disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,839,098 to Wisotski, et al. to incorporate in an APG (alkyl of C10 to C18, D.P.-l to 5) containing liquid diswaehing detergent compoeition from lO to 80 parts by weight of a C7 to Cg dialkyl sulfosuccinate, based on a total sur~actant content of 15 to 50% ~y weight, to enhance foaming and cleaning power. This patent suggests that such compositions should be free from petroleum-based anionic surfactants, such as alkyl benzene sulfonate~ and alkane sulfonates. However, other anionic surfactants such as alkyl 2 ~
ether sulfate or alkyl sulfate may replace a portion of the APG
or dialkyl sulfosuccinate. The di (C~-C9) alkyl sulfosuccinate are not considered to be mild surfactants and can contribute to harshness or irritation to the consumer.
In the compositions of this invention, the sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinamate is present as the monoalkylsuccinate (MAS) or monoalkylsulfosuccinamate (MASA) o Mo3S c-o~ M3~ ~ IO-N\R
C-OM C-OM
o o (MAS) (MASA) where R is an aliphatic radical~ preferably alkyl, of from 10 to 18 carbon atoms, especially from 12 to 16 carbon atoms, and preferably lauryl (C12), and M is a cation, such as an alkali metal, e.g. sodium or potassium, preferably sodium, ammonium, alkanolamine, e.g. ethanolamine, or magnesium. The alkyl radical may be ethoxylated with up to about 8 moles, preferably up to about 6 moles, on average, e.g. 2, 3 or 4 moles, of ethylene oxide, per mole of alkyl group.
Minor amounts, e.g. up to about 5% of dialkyl ~ulfosuccinates may be present with the monoalkyl sulfosucclnate or monoalkyl sulfosuccinamate. The mono-alkyl ester substantially free of dialkyl estex, and es~ecially sodlum mono-- lauryl ester which may be ethoxylated with up to 4 moles of ethylene oxide and the mono- C16 alkyl sul~osuccinamste ; 30 monoethanolamine salt are preferred.
When present, the sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinam~te, anionic surfactant is used in amounts ranging from about 2 to 20%
by weight, pre~erably from about 3 to 15 % by weight, based on ~6~
the total surfactants (A)(1)-(4). Based on the total composition, the preferred amounts of the sulfosuccinate anionic surfactant ranges from about 0.5 to 8 wt %, more preferably 0.8 to 7 wt %.
(3) The compositions of this invention also include an anionic alkyl ether sulfate (also commonly referred to as fatty alcohol ether ethyleneoxy sulfate AEOS nE0 where n represents the number of moles, on average, of ethylene oxide (E0)) containing from about 10 to 20 carbon atoms in the alkyl moiety, preferably from about 12 to 14 or 16 carbon atoms and from 1 to less than 3 moles, preferably 1 to 2 moles, especially 1 mole, ethylene oxide, on average, per mole of the alkyl sulfate. The alkyl ether sulfate, which may ~e repro6ented by the formula .
R(OC2H4)nO503M, where R is the residue of a fatty alcohol of from about 10 to 20 carbon atoms, n is a number of from 1 to less than 3, and M is a cation, is usually present as the alkali metal salt, e~pecially the sodium salt, but may also be present as the potassium salt, ammonium salt, alkanolamine salt or magnesium salt.
: 20 The amount of the alkyl ether sulfate will usually be in the range of from about 32 to about 50% by weight, preferably from about 34 to 48% by weight, ba~ed on the total weight of surfactants (A)~ (4) or from about 8 to 20%, preferably 9 to 18%, and more preferably 10 to 16~ by weight of the total compo6ition.
(4) Another essential surfactant in the invention compo~ition is (4) an alkyl glucoside, preferably an alkyl poly-glucoside, although alkyl monoglucoside may al60 be used.
The alkyl mono- and polysaccharides have received much-attention recently for their beneficial detergent, ~oaming and 2 ~ 0 ~
viscosity modifying properties. Examples of patent literature relating to light duty liquid compositions containing alkyl monosaccharides incl~de u.s. Patents 4,732,704 and 4,732,696.
The alkyl polysaccharides are used in the liquid detergent compositions disclosed, for example, in U.s. Patents 4,396,520, 4,536,318, 4,565,647, 4,599,177, 4,663,069 and 4,668,422 (including monoglucosides), as well as many of the patents and literature cited in these patents.
In the present invention, a narrow subgenus of the lo alkyl saccharides has been found to effectively enhance grease removal with acceptable mildness when used in combination with the other surfactants (A)(1)-(3) and the foam stabilizer (B).
The alkyl glycosides used in this invention are ~hose having an alkyl group of from 12 to 16 carbon atoms, on average, and a glucoside hydrophilic group containing from about 1 to about 3, preferably from about 1.2 to about 3, and most preferably from about 1.3 to 2.7, glucoside units, such as 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 2.0 or 2.6 glucoside units. Of course, the number of glucoside units in any particular surfactant molecule will be a whole number (i.e. an integer), however, for any actual physical sample of alkyl glucoside surfactants there will, in general, be a range of glucoside units, and it is the average value which characterizes a particular surfactant product. The alkyl glycosides with lower D.P. values tend to prov~de more copious foaming whereas those with higher D.P. values tend to be more soluble, for the same alkyl chain length. If the alkyl group contains less than 12 carbon atoms, satisfactory mildnes~
is difficult to achieve.
The alkyl group is preferably attached at the 1-position of the sugar molecule, but may be attached at the 1-, 2~6~9 3- or 4-positions, thus givlng a glucosyl rather than a glucoside. Furthermore, in the polyglucosides, the additional glucoside units are predominantly attached to the previous gluco~ide at the 2-position, but attachment at the 3-, 4- and 6-positions can also occur.
Optionally, and less desirably, there may be a polyalkylene oxide chain (e.g. polyethylene oxide)-joining the alkyl moiety and the glucoside units).
The preferred alkyl glucosides have the formula R2o(cmH2mo)t(z)x wherein Z is derived from glucose, R2 is an alkyl group containing from 12 to about 16 carbon atoms, m is 2 or 3, preferably 2, t is from 0 to about 6, preferably 0, and x is from 1 to 3 (on average), preferably from 1.2 to 3, most preferably from 1.3 to 2.7. To prepare these compounds a long chain alcohol (R2OH) can be reacted with glucose, in the presence of an acid catalyst to form the desired glucoside. Alternatively the alkyl polyglucosides can be prepared by a two step procedure in which a short chain alcohol (C1-C6) is reacted with glucose or a polyglucoside (x=2 to 3) to yield a short chain alkyl glucoside (x=l to 3) which can in turn be reacted with a longer chain alcohol (R2OH) to displace the short chain alcohol and obtain the desired alkyl glucoside. If this two step procedure is u~ed, tho short chain alkyl qluco~ide content of the final alkyl gluco~ide material should be less than 50%, preferably less than 10%, more preferably le~s than 5S, most preferably o% o~ the alkyl glucoside.
The amount of unreacted alcohol (the free fatty alcohol content) in the desired alkyl polygluco~lde sur~actant is --preferably less than about 2%, more preferably less than about 2 0 ~
0.5% by weight of the total of the alkyl polyglucoside plus unreacted alcohol. The amount of alkyl monoglucoside, if present, is preferably no more than about 40~, more preferably no more than about 20% by weight of the total of the alkyl polyglucoside. For some uses it is desirable to have the alkyl monoglucoside content less than about 10%, eapecially less than about 5%.
The amount of the alkyl glucoside surfactant to achieve the desired foam and detersive properties is in the range of from lo about 14 to 32%, preferably from about 16 to 30%, based on thesum of the surfactants (A)(1), (2), (3) and (4). The preferred amounts range from 3 to 12%, especially from 4 or 5 to 10%, based on the total composition.
Within these ranges the relative amounts of the alkyl benzene sulfonate (A~S) surfactant and alkyl gluccside (APG~
surfactant is not particularly critical, but will generally be within the range of ABS:APG of from about 2.5:1 to 1:2, preferably from about 2:1 to 1:1.2.
In the invention compo~itions, the total amount of active surfactant components ~A) plus (B) will be in the range of from about 25% to 54% of the total composition, preferably from : about 28 to 50%, more prePerably from about 28% to 42%, such as 30%, 32%, 34%, 35% or 40%.
(B) Foam Stabilization Sy~tem The foam stabilization system which may also it~lf contribute to tbe foaming capacity as well as foam ~tabilizing effect iB comprisQd of the lower alkanolamide of higher alkanoic acid which is the reaction product of a lower alkanol of 2 to 3- ~
carbon atoms and an alkanoic acld of 10 to 16 carbon atoms, 2~66~9 preferably with 80% or more of the lower alkanol being ethanol and a similar proportion of the alkanoic acid being of 12 to 14 carbon atoms. Other lower alkanols that are also useful are n-propanol and isopropanol. The preferred alkanoic acid is a mixture of lauric and myristic acids, generally in proportions of 1:2 to 2:1, with about 50% of each being preferable. Alter-natively, coconut oil or hydrogenated coconut oil may be used as a source of the alkanoic acids. Suitable alkanoic acid alkanol-amides include the monoethanolamides. diethanolamides and the monoisopropanolamides.
Specific examples include mixed lauric/myristic diethanolamide, lauric/myristic monoethanolamide, lauric monoethanolamide, lauric diethanolamide, coco diethanolamide, coco monoethanolamide, and the like.
The amount of the alkancic acid alkanolamide may b~ up to about 6% of the compo~ition, such as 0.5 to 6%, preferably 1 to 5%, more pre~erably 1 to 4%, such as 1.5, 2, 3 or 4%, of the composition.
The compositions of this invention which include the salt surfactants (A)(1), (A)(3), (A)(4) and, optionally, (A)(2) and foam stabilization system (B), in the specified proportions, as essential ingredients are formulated in an aqueous carrier to provide mild, stable foaming liquid compositions especially effective in cleaning, by hand washing, dishwarQ, such as dl~hes, glassQs, flatware, pots, pans, etc., at ambient wash water temperature, as well, of course, at warm or hot wash water temperatures. The invention formulations are mild to the hands and arQ clear and homogeneous. Clarity and homogeneity may often, howev~r, be improved by inclusion of, ~or example, organic-solvents and/or hydrotropes, and these and other optional 20~0a~
additives may also be included in the compositions in amounts wh~ch do not adversely influence the desirable properties.
(C) Organic Solvent Cosmetically acceptable organic solvents, usually lower alcohols, such as ethanol, propanol, isopropanol, propylene glycol, or mixtures thereof, may be included in the composition for its thinning effect, lowering of clear point, and for its solubilizing effect for any components which may not be readily soluble in the main aqueous medium. The amount of solvent, when present, will usually be limited to about 10%, preferably 8%, especially no more than about 6% of the composition, such as from 2 to 5%. Ethanol is the prefer-red organic solvent.
(D) Hydrotrope In order to assist in solubilizing various components of the composition, maintain a low clear point, and possibly modify viscosity, it i8 customary to include a hydrotropic substance in the composition. Typical hydrotropes includo primarily urea and the lower alkyl aryl sulfonate salts, such as sodium xylene eulfonate, potassium xylene 6ulfonate, sodlum cumene sulfonate, ammonium xylene sulfonate, and the like.
Mixture~ of two or more hydrotropes may also be used. Th-hydrotrope, when used, is generally present in amounts bolo~
about 8%, preferably below about 6%, such as from 1 or 2 to 6%.
(E) Other Optional Functional and Aesthetic Additives Various other materials may also be included in the present compositions for their deslrable functional or ao~thetic effects. Among these, those materials employed to increaso the 20~60~9 mildness of the detergent composition to the human hands, such as the water soluble proteins, are often very useful.
Although solvents, including water, tend to make the products clear liquids, it is sometimes desirable to opacify them or make them appear pearly. For such purpose there may be employed opacifying agents, e.g. behenic acid, or a pearlescent or pearlizing composition, such as an approximately equal mixture of high fatty acid ester of polyethoxy ethanol, coconut oil fatty acid alkanolamide and sodium lauryl ether sulfate. The higher fatty acid will usually be of 10 to 18 carbon atoms and the polyethoxy content will be of 1 to 20, preferably 1 to 10 ethoxy groups. The alkanolamide will preferably be ethanolamide, but can be mixed with isopropanolam~e, too.
Additional adjuvant components of the present compositions include perfumes; sequestrants, e.g. monohydrogen ethylene diamine tetraacetate, tetrasodium ethylene diamine tetraacetate, trisodium nitrilotriacetate; bactericides, e.g.
trichlorocarbanilide, tetrachlorosalicylanilide, hexachlorophene, chlorobromosalicylanilide; antioxidants; thickeners, e.g. sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, polyacrylamide, Irish moss; dyes; water dispersible pigments; salts, e.g. sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, as the heptahydrate or anhydrous, sodium chioride;
preservatives, su~h a3 formaldehydo or hydrogen peroxido, pH
modifiers, etc.
The total amount of the additional additives is usually no more than about 20% of the composition, preferably not exceeding 15%, while the amount o~ any individual ingredlent will not generally exceed 10%, especially 5%, and usually no more than 2 or 3%.
2~0~9 In the above description of the compositions of this invention and the various adjuvants employable therein, and in the claims, altho~gh individual constituents are mentioned for various classes or types of components it is within the invention that mixtures thereof be employed, such as mixtures of two or three anionic detergents or mixtures with the nonionic detergents, both possibly with other anionic and nonionic detergents known in the art, mixtures of skin treating materials and mixtures of solvents, among others.
For example, under certain circumstances paraffin sulfonate surfactants, such as sodium or magnesium (Cl2-Cl8~
paraffin sulfonate, can be used to replace part or all of the A~S
surfactant, achieve good foam an~ grease removal characteristic~.
Amphoteric surfactants, such as the betaines, e.g.
acylamidopropyl dimethyl ammonium betaines, can also often provide improvements in overall performance.
The viscositie~ of the detergent compositions may be further varied by the addition of thickening agents, such a3 gums and cellulose derivatives. The product viscosity and flow properties should be such as to make it pourable from a bottle and not so thin as to tend to splash or pour too readily, since usually only small quantities of the liguid detergent are to be utilized in use. Visco~ities from 20 to 1000 centipoise (Brookfield Vi~cometer spindle no. 1, 12 r.p.m.) are ~ound u-eful with those from 100 to 500 cps. beinq preferred and a viscosity of about 200 centipoise being con~idered best by most consumers, although at somewhat lower viscositie~, e.g. lO0 cp~., con~u er acceptance i8 almost the same.
In manufacturing the deocribed formulations, uoually ~t ~
is preferred to heat the detergent constituents to a somewhat 2 ~
elevated temperature, e.g. 40 to 50C and then admix them with the water and, optionally, all or a portion of the ethanol.
Thereafter, other anionic and nonionic detergents, urea, amide, protein and other adjuvants are added with the more volatile materials, such as perfumes, preferably being added last and after cooling of the composition to about room temperature.
Normally when making opaque or pearlescent detergents, the pearlizing mixture will also be added near last at about room temperature. Although the described method of making the compositions is preferred, variou~ other known techniques may also be employed, depending upon the particular detergent composition.
The pH of the formulation will generally be near.
neutral, e.g. about 5 to 8, preferably about 6.5 to 7.5.
The following representative non-limiting examples will help to further understand the pre~ent invention.
~0~0~9 Example 1 The following compositions L and L' were prepared:
Component L L' Active Active Ingredients Ingredients (wt%) (wt%) Mg linear dodecyl benzene sulfonate [Mg(LDBS)2]11.59.6 9.6 Alkyl polyglycoside1) 6.0 6.0 C12-C16 alkyl ether sulfate (lEØ) 11.8 11.8 Lauric/myristic monoethanolamide (LMMEA)I 2.02) 2.o2) Sodium Xylene Sulfonate (SXS) (5:3 Blend) Ethanol (3A) 4.1 4.1 Sodium cumene sulfonate (SCS)2.1 2.1 Disodium lauryl sulfosuccinate4.6 (Minarol LSS) Disodium laureth (3E0) sulfosuccinate 1.5 MgSO4-7H2O 1.0 1.0 Monohydrogen ethylene diamine tetraacetate, trisodium salt (HEDTA) 0.1 0.1 NaCl 2.0 2.0 Perfume 0.4 0.4 Color 0.1 0.1 Water, deionized q5 q8 1) APG 625 from Henkel Corp., hydrophobe chain length of C12/C14/C16 = 68/26/6, average of 1.6 glycoside units.
2j Based on LMMEA; SXS-1.2 wt%
2~6~0~
Example II
The following compositions WJ' and WJ" were prepared:
WJ' WJ"
Active Active Ingredient Ingredient wt. % wt. %
Na (LDBS) 10.0 10.0 APG 625 9.0 6.0 LMMEA/SXS (5:3) l.6l) 4,01) AEOS-lEO 14.0 14.0 Ethanol (3A) 0.5 1.3 SCS 0.9 o.g MgS04 . 7H20 1. 0 1. 0 NaCl l.O l.O
HEDTA 0.1 O.1 Perfume 0.3 0.3 Colorant 0.1 0.1 Water, deionized q. 5. to 100 q.~. to 100 1) Based on LMMEA
Exam~le III
Compo~ition~ A-E were prepared in the same m~nner a~
compo~ition~ WJ' and WJ" except that the amounts of APG-625 and LMMEA were changed a~ ollows:
c .12 .~S
~:25 twt %) APG-625 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 7.5 LMMEA 4.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.5 . . .
2 ~ 9 The compositions from Examples II and III were tested in the Shake-Foam Test, Shell Foam Test and Baumgartner grease (lard) removal test as described below.
(1) Baumgartner Soil Removal This test measures the ability of a diluted (1%) solution in 150 ppm hardness water to remove a greasy soil (lard) from a test surface (a cleaned glass slide 2.5 cm x 0.1 cm). The soil is applied by spreading about 0.2 to about 0.3 gram lard onto each cleaned glass slide. The soiled slides are cleaned in a 1%
product solution by dipping the soiled slide into the solution 600 times. The solution i5 maintained at ambient temperature (75F). After washing, the sli~6 are dried in a desiccator for two hours. The difference in weight of the lard before and after the cleaning process is taken as a mea~ure of grease removal, the greater the difference the more effective is the detergent composition.
(2) Shake-foam Test 100 ml of a diluted (1%) test solution in 150 ppm hardness water (113F) is filled into a 500ml graduated cylinder with a stopper. The stoppered cylinder is placed on an agitating machine which rotates the cylinder ~or 20 cycles at 30 rpm. The height of the foam in the cylinder is observed. A sugar cube having adsorbed thereon 0.01 + 0.001 grams o~ a mixed 80il ~ (potato buds, Crisco0, milk, olive oil and water) is then added to the cylinder and the test repeated. This procedure is continued until a total of 0.03 grams o~ soil have been added.
(3) Shell-Foam Test An 0.04% concentration of the test solution in 250 ml of~-water (150 ppm hardness, 45C) is filled into a water ~acketed 2~6~09 vessel with baffles and having a constant speed agitation (300 rpm mixing). Stirring is continued until the generated foam covers the entire surface of the test solution. A mixed soil (olive oil, milk, Crisco~, and potato buds) is slowly injected at a constant rate sufficient to uniformly disperse the soil below the surface of the solution. The soil interacts first with the surfactant in the solution until the surfactant is depleted and thereafter begins to deplete surfactant from the foam. The amount of soil (in grams) added until the foam quickly collapses is determined. The results (end point) are reported in Table 2 in grams.
Each of these tests were performed in triplicate and the reported results represent the 2Lverage of the three tests.
The results of the tests are shown in Table 2.
2a~600~
Table 2 Total Surfactant~ Shake Foam Volume, ml. ShQll Foam Gre~e COMP and LMMEA (wt ~) no 0.01 0.02 0.03 80il ~t, g mg ~o~lWt ratio ~PG/LMMEA 90il 90il ~oil soil to EP removed ~ 38 403 337 273 217 10.9 79 (10/4) E~ 30 418 340 290 242 6.7 3 (5/1) C 35 417 335 287 235 9.6 7 (10/1) D 33 393 317 252 193 9.9 91 (5/4) E 34 430 353 315 268 10.6 40 (7.5/2.5) WJ' 34.6 15 (9/1.6) WJ" 34 _ 98 (6l4) _ L 34.0 87 (6/2) L' 30.9 87 (6/2) Note: Formulas A-WJ" have 10 LAS and 14 AEOS-lEO; Formulas L
and L' contain 9.6 LAS and 11.8 AEOS-lEO; tests conducted in 150 ppm water. Total surfactants = (A)(1) + (A)(2) +
(A)(3) ~ (A)(4) + (B).
Both Compositions WJI and L had excellent rinsing characteristics as compareB to Liquid Palmolive and a commercial product containing a high level of magnesium for grease remova}, but which is not believed to include any alkyl polyglucoslde The above formulas A-E were statistically analyzed to identify main and interaction effects of LMMEA and APG on grea~e removal. Only LMMEA level was found to affect grease cleaning performance. All other formula factors (surfactants) did not significantly affect grease removal. Compositions A and D, having 4% LMMEA, removed a high level of grea~e versus regular Liquid Palmolive0 which would remove 25 to 30 mg of soil. For 2 ~ 9 reference, another leading commercial product containing a high level of magnesium for grease removal effectiveness would remove 120 mg of soil. However, it is significantly more irritating than Liquid Palmolive~ in a clinical handsoak test. The L and L' formulas also contain higher Mg levels and also remove more grease. These formulas are clinically milder than the commercial high Mg product. The product WJ~ containing 6% APG and 4% LMMEA, which provided comparable grease removal performance to formulas A and D was clinically tested and found to be as mild as Liquid Palmolive~.
Compositions WJ' and WJ" were both evaluated to have equal mildness to Liquid Palmolive~ and superior mildness to the high Mg-containing commercial p~oduct.
While the representative composition WJ' (NaLAS) was not as effective as Liquid Palmolive~ or the high Mg-containing commercial product in the standard Baumgartner grease (lard) removal test, it appears to be superior in terms of Crisco~-monoglyceride grease soil removal in a sample soaking test.
Similar compositions containing 17% LAS/13 AEOS-3EO with 0% APG and with 0% LMMEA or 4% LMMEA were tested in the grease removal test. The composition containing 0% LMMEA removed approximately 5 mg of soil while the co~position with 4% LMMEA
removed 25 mg of soil. This demonstrates the interaction of LMMEA with APG to produce the enhanced performance on grease.
ExamDle 4 In order to test the effect of the sulfosuccinate/
sulfo~uccinamate anionic surfactant in the composition ~ of Example 1, four different surfactants were tested at 0%, 1.5% a-nd 3% sulfo~uccinate/sulfosuccinamate levels in composition L and X~6~
were compared to Liquid Palmolive~ (POL) in the Baumgartner grease removal and Shake Foam tests described above. The surfactants which were tested were the sodium monolauryl sulfosuccinate used in L, the sodium monolauryl (3E.O.) sulfosuccinate used in L' (laureth), sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate, and mono-C16 alkyl sulfosuccinamate, monoethanolamine salt (ris). All of these surfactants were obtained from Rhone Poulenc (France).
The results are shown in Table 3.
Table 3 _ Baum~rtner --_ Sh 3ke Foam Volume, mls _ mps SD In~tial¦ SD 0.1 soil Si) 0.2 soit Sr) 0.3 soil~
POL (r~f) 37 11 385 10 330 30 260 15 195 15 0% Sulfosuccinate 122 34 387 12 317 25 252 23 184 24 1.5% dioctyl 160 8 365 0 3C5 5 240 15 195 15 3% dloctyl 118 4 395 30 315 15 270 5 210 15 1.5% laureth 126 25 390 5 315 5 255 20 185 25 3% laureth 104 48 380 10 340 10 270 15 215 15 1.5% lauryl 117 28 380 10 295 15 260 5 215 10 3% lauryl 134 16 405 5 340 20 290 25 235 20 1.5% ris 144 6 390 10 320 10 280 15 210 10 3% r,is 110 20 375 10 325 10 275 20 225 25 NOTE: SD - Standard Deviation, based on three replicates. - --2Qg~0~9 Conclusions of Sulfosuccinate Performance Comparison Grease Performance Grease cleaning results of the various sulfosuccinates tested at o%~ 1.5%, and 3% in the L formula (MgLAS) indicate all four sulfosuccinates produce a high and comparable level of baumgartner performance at all levels tested. The ~ioctyl SS
appears to give a peak in performance higher than the other materials at 1.5%.
Shake Foam Performance In general, there is a slight upward trend in foam volume at each level of soil addition as the sulfosuccinate increases from 0% to 3%. Performance is not considered to be significantly different unless a difference in foam volume greater than 50 mls is observed. The lowest to highest foam volume at each condition regardless of sulfosuccinate type or level i5 typically within 50 ml. Therefore, based on minimal impact on foam volume, any of the four materials could be used.
The more important factors are formula mildness and consumer acceptability.
The dioctyl sulfosuccinate is not believed to provide the same degree o~ mildness as the higher chain length alkyl esters.
Claims (8)
- Claim 1. A liquid dishwashing detergent composition providing stable foaming characteristics and which is mild to the hands and is effective in removing greasy soils, said composition comprising:
(A) a surfactant system comprising (1) from about 7.5 to 20% by weight of a salt of a C10-C16 linear alkyl benzene sulfonate anionic surfactant, said salt being selected from the group consisting of alkali metal salts, alkaline earth metal salts and mixtures thereof;
(2) from 0 to about 8% of anionic C10-C18 alkyl sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinamye, wherein the alkyl group may be ethoxylated with up to 8 moles of ethylene oxide;
(3) from about 8 to 20% of anionic C10-C20 alkyl ether sulfate having from 1 to less than 3 moles ethylene oxide per mole of alkyl group; and (4) from about 3 to 12% by weight of an alkyl polyglucoside having from 12 to 16 carbon atoms, on average, in the alkyl chain, and an average degree of polymerization in the range of from about 1 to about 3;
(B) from about 0.5 to about 6% by weight of a foam stabilization system comprising at least on lower alkanolamide of higher alkanoic acid;
the total weight of components (A) and (B) ranging from about 25 to 54% by weight of the composition;
(C) up to about 10% by weight of a low irritant organic solvent;
(D) up to about 8% by weight of hydrotrope;
(E) up to about 20% by weight in total of one or more optional additives chosen from chelating or sequestering agents, coloring agents, dyes, perfumes, bactericides, fungicides, preservatives, sunscreening agents, pH modifiers, pH buffering agents, opacifiers, antioxidants, thickeners, and proteins; and, (F) balance, water. - Claim 2. The composition of claim 1 which comprises (A) from about 28 to 50%
(B) from about 1 to 5%;
(C) from about 2 to 5%;
(D) from about 1 to 6%;
(E) up to-about 10%;
(F) balance, water. - Claim 3. The composition of claim 2 wherein the surfactant system (A) comprises (1) from about 8 to 15% of a of a C10 to C14 alkyl benzene sulfonate, (2) 0 to about 8% of sodium salt of C10 to C14 mono-alkyl sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinamate, (3) 10 to 16% of sodium salt of C10 to C14 alkyl ether sulfate having from 1 to 2 moles ethylene oxide, and (4) from about 4 to 10% of an alkyl polyglucoside having from about 12 to 16 carbon atoms in the alkyl group and from about 1.2 to 3 glucoside unit-.
- Claim 4. The composition of claim 3 wherein the foam stabilization system (B) comprises at least one compound selected from the group consisting of lauric diethanolamide, lauric mono-ethanolamide, myristic diethanolamide, myristic monoethanolamide, coco diethanolamide, and coco monoethanolamide.
- Claim 5. The composition of claim 4 wherein the foam stabilization system (B) comprises from about 1 to 5% of the composition.
- Claim 6. The composition of claim 1 which comprises (A) a surfactant system comprising (1) about 8 to 12% C10-C14 linear alkyl benzene sulfonate, (2) about 0 to 6% sodium C10-C16 mono-alkyl sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinamate, (3) about 9 to about 18% C10-C16 alkyl ether sulfate having from 1 to 2 ethylene oxide groups, and (4) from about 5 to 10% of said alkyl polyglucoside.
(B) from about 1 to 5% of said foam stabilization system comprising lauric/myristic monoethanolamide;
the total amount of (A) + (B) ranging from about 28 to 42% of the composition;
(C) up to about 5% of ethanol;
(D) up to about 4% of hydrotrope;
(E) up to about 6% in total of said one or mor-additives; and, (F) water. - Claim 7. The composition of claim 1 which comprises (A) a surfactant system comprising (1) about 9 to about 11% or sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate, (2) 0 to about 2% sodium C10-C14 mono-alkyl sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinamate, the alkyl group of which may be ethoxylated with up to 6 moles of ethylene oxide, (3) about 10 to about 16% C10-C16 alkyl ether sulfate having from 1 to 2 ethylene oxide groups, and (4) about 6 to about 9% of said alkyl polyglucoside;
(B) 1 to 3% of said foam stabilization system comprising lauric/myristic monoethanolamide;
(C) 0.2 to 2% ethanol;
(D) 0.5 to 4% of sodium xylene sulfonate, sodium cumene sulfonate or mixtures thereof;
(E) 0.5 to 5% in total of one or more of magnesium sulfate, sodium chloride, color and fragrance; and, (F) water. - Claim 8. The composition of claim 1 comprising (A) a surfactant system comprising (1) about 9 to about 11% of magnesium C10-C12 alkyl benzene sulfonate, (2) about 0.8 to about 7% of C10-C16 mono-alkyl sulfosuccinate or sulfosuccinamate, wherein the alkyl group may be ethoxylated with up to 5 moles ethylene oxide, (3) about 8 to about 14% of C10-C16 alkyl ether sulfate ethoxylated with from 1 to 2 moles ethylene oxide, and (4) about 4 to about 8% of said alkyl polyglucoside;
(B) 1 to 3% of said foam stabilization system comprising lauric/myristic monoethanolamide;
(C) 0 to 2% ethanol;
(D) 0.5 to 4% of sodium xylene sulfonate, sodium cumene sulfonate or mixtures thereof;
(E) 0.5 to 5% in total of one or more of magnesium sulfate, sodium chloride, color and fragrance; and, (F) water.
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US68511891A | 1991-04-15 | 1991-04-15 | |
US07/685,118 | 1991-04-15 | ||
US07/854,048 | 1992-03-18 | ||
US07/854,048 US5565146A (en) | 1991-04-15 | 1992-03-18 | Light duty liquid detergent compositions |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2066009A1 true CA2066009A1 (en) | 1992-10-16 |
Family
ID=27103506
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002066009A Abandoned CA2066009A1 (en) | 1991-04-15 | 1992-04-14 | Light duty liquid detergent compositions |
Country Status (18)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0509608B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPH05132699A (en) |
CN (1) | CN1067068A (en) |
AT (1) | ATE140259T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU661682B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2066009A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69212045T2 (en) |
FI (1) | FI921673L (en) |
GR (1) | GR1001299B (en) |
HU (1) | HU212050B (en) |
IE (1) | IE75910B1 (en) |
MW (1) | MW2192A1 (en) |
MX (1) | MX9201702A (en) |
NO (1) | NO300333B1 (en) |
PH (1) | PH31565A (en) |
PT (1) | PT100381B (en) |
RO (1) | RO108359B1 (en) |
TR (1) | TR25951A (en) |
Families Citing this family (40)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2824192B2 (en) * | 1993-05-31 | 1998-11-11 | 花王株式会社 | Detergent composition |
AU675833B2 (en) * | 1994-03-23 | 1997-02-20 | Amway Corporation | Concentrated all-purpose light duty liquid cleaning composition and method of use |
US5531939A (en) * | 1994-03-23 | 1996-07-02 | Amway Corporation | Concentrated glass and window cleaning composition and method of use |
US5703033A (en) * | 1996-02-06 | 1997-12-30 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Low sudsing, low streaking and filming hard surface cleaners |
US5814590A (en) * | 1996-02-06 | 1998-09-29 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Low streaking and filming hard surface cleaners |
AU2535097A (en) * | 1996-03-21 | 1997-10-10 | Colgate-Palmolive Company, The | Light duty liquid cleaning compositions |
CO4771111A1 (en) * | 1996-03-25 | 1999-04-30 | Colgate Palmolive Co | LIGHTWEIGHT LIQUID CLEANING COMPOSITIONS |
AU2661597A (en) * | 1996-04-08 | 1997-10-29 | Colgate-Palmolive Company, The | Light duty liquid cleaning compositions |
US5874394A (en) * | 1996-04-08 | 1999-02-23 | Colgate Palmolive Company | Light duty liquid cleaning compositions containing a monoalkyl phosphate ester |
US5696073A (en) * | 1996-04-08 | 1997-12-09 | Colgate-Palmolive Co. | Light duty liquid cleaning composition |
US5834417A (en) * | 1996-06-13 | 1998-11-10 | Colgate Palmolive Co. | Light duty liquid cleaning compositions |
WO1998005743A1 (en) * | 1996-08-06 | 1998-02-12 | Colgate-Palmolive Company | High foaming nonionic surfactant based liquid detergent |
US5714454A (en) * | 1996-08-07 | 1998-02-03 | Colgate-Palmolive Co. | Light duty liquid cleaning compositions comprising alkyl sulroglycerides |
AU3825697A (en) * | 1996-08-08 | 1998-02-25 | Colgate-Palmolive Company, The | Light duty liquid cleaning compositions |
AU3980197A (en) * | 1996-08-14 | 1998-03-06 | Colgate-Palmolive Company, The | Light duty liquid microemulsion cleaning compositions |
GB9707718D0 (en) * | 1997-04-16 | 1997-06-04 | Unilever Plc | Light duty cleaning composition |
WO1998053041A1 (en) * | 1997-05-20 | 1998-11-26 | Colgate-Palmolive Company | Light duty liquid microemulsion cleaning compositions |
US5780417A (en) * | 1997-07-31 | 1998-07-14 | Colgate-Palmolive Company | Light duty liquid cleaning compositions |
DE19747892A1 (en) * | 1997-10-30 | 1999-05-06 | Henkel Kgaa | Use of alkyl polyglycosides in ink cleaners |
US6759382B2 (en) | 2001-06-01 | 2004-07-06 | Kay Chemical, Inc. | Detergent composition containing a primary surfactant system and a secondary surfactant system, and a method of using the same |
KR20030023394A (en) * | 2001-09-13 | 2003-03-19 | 에스케이케미칼주식회사 | Liquid detergent composition for infant |
EP1485455A1 (en) * | 2002-03-21 | 2004-12-15 | Colgate-Palmolive Company | Foamstable antimicrobial liquid dish cleaning compositions |
JP4795298B2 (en) * | 2007-04-12 | 2011-10-19 | 花王株式会社 | Liquid detergent composition |
US7902137B2 (en) * | 2008-05-30 | 2011-03-08 | American Sterilizer Company | Biodegradable scale control composition for use in highly concentrated alkaline hard surface detergents |
CN101760346B (en) * | 2009-12-17 | 2011-12-21 | 陈政 | Multi-element concentrated tableware detergent |
JP5642598B2 (en) * | 2010-04-07 | 2014-12-17 | 花王株式会社 | Dishwashing composition for hand washing |
JP5642599B2 (en) * | 2010-04-08 | 2014-12-17 | 花王株式会社 | Dishwashing composition for hand washing |
JP5654537B2 (en) * | 2011-10-12 | 2015-01-14 | 花王株式会社 | Dishwashing composition for hand washing |
JP5957198B2 (en) * | 2011-10-12 | 2016-07-27 | 花王株式会社 | Dishwashing composition for hand washing |
JP5809006B2 (en) * | 2011-10-12 | 2015-11-10 | 花王株式会社 | Dishwashing composition for hand washing |
JP5602199B2 (en) * | 2011-10-12 | 2014-10-08 | 花王株式会社 | Dishwashing composition for hand washing |
US9072919B2 (en) * | 2012-10-12 | 2015-07-07 | L'oreal S.A. | Synergistic antioxidant cosmetic compositions containing at least one of baicalin and taxifolin, at least one of caffeine and nicotinamide, at least one of vitamin C and resveratrol and ferulic acid |
CN102994254A (en) * | 2012-11-26 | 2013-03-27 | 启东市隆腾电气有限公司 | Automotive glass cleaning agent |
CN103194321B (en) * | 2013-03-24 | 2015-08-26 | 山西振东家庭健康护理用品有限公司 | antibacterial detergent for tableware and preparation method thereof |
JP2017119657A (en) * | 2015-12-28 | 2017-07-06 | ライオン株式会社 | Liquid skin cleansing composition |
CN109070150B (en) * | 2016-05-27 | 2022-01-11 | 花王株式会社 | Method for cleaning hard surfaces |
KR101959815B1 (en) * | 2017-11-14 | 2019-03-20 | 주식회사 제씨콤 | Insulating detergent composition for communication and electric equipment |
CN111304008B (en) * | 2019-11-28 | 2021-05-28 | 纳爱斯浙江科技有限公司 | Liquid detergent composition with antibacterial function in low-hardness water environment |
US20240287423A1 (en) * | 2021-07-16 | 2024-08-29 | Basf Se | A premix comprising alkyl polyglycoside for use in preparing a liquid detergent formulation |
CN118126780B (en) * | 2024-03-01 | 2024-11-05 | 江苏爱特福84股份有限公司 | A kind of kitchen disinfection detergent and preparation method thereof |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NZ206211A (en) * | 1982-11-16 | 1986-04-11 | Unilever Plc | Foaming liquid detergent compositions containing sulphosuccinic acid esters |
DE3706015A1 (en) * | 1987-02-25 | 1988-11-17 | Henkel Kgaa | LIQUID DETERGENT |
NZ230239A (en) * | 1988-08-19 | 1991-05-28 | Colgate Palmolive Co | Dishwashing detergents containing alkyl mono- or poly-glucosides |
US5015414A (en) * | 1988-09-08 | 1991-05-14 | Kao Corporation | Low-irritant detergent composition containing alkyl saccharide and sulfosuccinate surfactants |
GB8905551D0 (en) * | 1989-03-10 | 1989-04-19 | Unilever Plc | Detergent compositions |
JPH0699711B2 (en) * | 1989-07-25 | 1994-12-07 | 花王株式会社 | Liquid detergent composition |
-
1992
- 1992-04-08 AU AU14753/92A patent/AU661682B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1992-04-13 MX MX9201702A patent/MX9201702A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1992-04-13 PH PH44199A patent/PH31565A/en unknown
- 1992-04-13 GR GR920100146A patent/GR1001299B/en unknown
- 1992-04-13 PT PT100381A patent/PT100381B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1992-04-14 RO RO92-200515A patent/RO108359B1/en unknown
- 1992-04-14 MW MW21/92A patent/MW2192A1/en unknown
- 1992-04-14 HU HU9201274A patent/HU212050B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1992-04-14 CA CA002066009A patent/CA2066009A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1992-04-14 IE IE921184A patent/IE75910B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1992-04-14 JP JP4094178A patent/JPH05132699A/en active Pending
- 1992-04-14 NO NO921480A patent/NO300333B1/en unknown
- 1992-04-14 FI FI921673A patent/FI921673L/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1992-04-15 EP EP92201089A patent/EP0509608B1/en not_active Revoked
- 1992-04-15 DE DE69212045T patent/DE69212045T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1992-04-15 TR TR92/0326A patent/TR25951A/en unknown
- 1992-04-15 AT AT92201089T patent/ATE140259T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1992-04-15 CN CN92102658A patent/CN1067068A/en active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0509608B1 (en) | 1996-07-10 |
TR25951A (en) | 1993-11-01 |
IE921184A1 (en) | 1992-10-21 |
PH31565A (en) | 1998-11-03 |
ATE140259T1 (en) | 1996-07-15 |
DE69212045D1 (en) | 1996-08-14 |
NO921480L (en) | 1992-10-16 |
IE75910B1 (en) | 1997-10-08 |
MW2192A1 (en) | 1994-01-12 |
EP0509608A3 (en) | 1993-03-10 |
EP0509608A2 (en) | 1992-10-21 |
FI921673A7 (en) | 1992-10-16 |
FI921673L (en) | 1992-10-16 |
DE69212045T2 (en) | 1997-02-27 |
PT100381A (en) | 1993-06-30 |
RO108359B1 (en) | 1994-04-28 |
JPH05132699A (en) | 1993-05-28 |
CN1067068A (en) | 1992-12-16 |
PT100381B (en) | 2001-05-31 |
NO300333B1 (en) | 1997-05-12 |
MX9201702A (en) | 1992-10-01 |
GR1001299B (en) | 1993-07-30 |
AU1475392A (en) | 1992-10-22 |
HUT60761A (en) | 1992-10-28 |
HU212050B (en) | 1996-01-29 |
AU661682B2 (en) | 1995-08-03 |
NO921480D0 (en) | 1992-04-14 |
HU9201274D0 (en) | 1992-07-28 |
FI921673A0 (en) | 1992-04-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2066009A1 (en) | Light duty liquid detergent compositions | |
US5480586A (en) | Light duty liquid detergent compostion comprising a sulfosuccinamate-containing surfactant blend | |
US4595526A (en) | High foaming nonionic surfacant based liquid detergent | |
US5565146A (en) | Light duty liquid detergent compositions | |
US5476614A (en) | High foaming nonionic surfactant based liquid detergent | |
US5599476A (en) | Detergent compositions | |
US5387373A (en) | Detergent compositions | |
JP2807088B2 (en) | Light duty liquid dishwashing detergent composition | |
US4596672A (en) | Detergent compositions | |
AU654508B2 (en) | Concentrated liquid detergent composition containing alkyl benzene sulfonate and magnesium | |
US5767050A (en) | Light duty liquid cleaning compositions comprising partially esterified polyhydric alcohol solubilizing agent | |
AU634489B2 (en) | Light duty liquid detergent compositions | |
US5503779A (en) | High foaming light duty liquid detergent | |
JPH08502540A (en) | Method for producing aqueous solution of anionic surfactant having improved low temperature stability | |
JPH0333197A (en) | Detergent compound | |
US5451342A (en) | Waterwhite clear liquid detergent compositions | |
NZ242284A (en) | Aqueous dishwashing detergent comprising an alkyl benzene sulphonate | |
JPH04292695A (en) | Cleaner composition |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FZDE | Discontinued |