CA2038488A1 - Process for optimizing corrosion protection of coated substrates - Google Patents
Process for optimizing corrosion protection of coated substratesInfo
- Publication number
- CA2038488A1 CA2038488A1 CA 2038488 CA2038488A CA2038488A1 CA 2038488 A1 CA2038488 A1 CA 2038488A1 CA 2038488 CA2038488 CA 2038488 CA 2038488 A CA2038488 A CA 2038488A CA 2038488 A1 CA2038488 A1 CA 2038488A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- coating
- substrate
- parylene
- corrosion
- article
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C4/00—Coating by spraying the coating material in the molten state, e.g. by flame, plasma or electric discharge
- C23C4/18—After-treatment
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B05—SPRAYING OR ATOMISING IN GENERAL; APPLYING FLUENT MATERIALS TO SURFACES, IN GENERAL
- B05D—PROCESSES FOR APPLYING FLUENT MATERIALS TO SURFACES, IN GENERAL
- B05D1/00—Processes for applying liquids or other fluent materials
- B05D1/60—Deposition of organic layers from vapour phase
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical Treatment Of Metals (AREA)
- Preventing Corrosion Or Incrustation Of Metals (AREA)
- Application Of Or Painting With Fluid Materials (AREA)
- Paints Or Removers (AREA)
Abstract
PROCESS FOR OPTIMIZING CORROSION PROTECTION
OF COATED SUBSTRATES
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
The life of protective and/or wear resistant coatings which are applied to substrates, particularly metallic surfaces which are subject to corrosion, are extended by the deposition of poly(p-xyxylene) which penetrates and plugs microscopic pores as small as 500 angstroms in the coating. Even if the coating surface is polished or subject to wear through abrasion, the parylene has penetrated sufficiently deep into the pores forming an undisturbed protective barrier between the substrate and corrosive fluids.
OF COATED SUBSTRATES
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
The life of protective and/or wear resistant coatings which are applied to substrates, particularly metallic surfaces which are subject to corrosion, are extended by the deposition of poly(p-xyxylene) which penetrates and plugs microscopic pores as small as 500 angstroms in the coating. Even if the coating surface is polished or subject to wear through abrasion, the parylene has penetrated sufficiently deep into the pores forming an undisturbed protective barrier between the substrate and corrosive fluids.
Description
2~3~
PROCESS FOR OPTIMIZING CORROSION PROTECTION
OF COATED SUBSTRATES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
(1) FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates in general to a process for optimizing or enhancing the corrosion protection of coated substrates. In one aspect, this invention is directed to a process for protecting coated substrates, particularly metal substrates, from corrosion due to microscopic pores, volds, holes or cracks in a corrosion protective or wear resistant coating which has been applied to the substrate. In a further aspect, the invention relates to a process for enhancing the corrosion protection of a wide variety of articles, such as tool parts, engine components, sheet metal, automotive parts, rollers, decorative articles and the like.
t2) DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART
A variety of methods have been reported in ~he literature for providing protective or wear resistant coatings to substrates. In many instances, the substrate is comprised of a metal or metal alloy which easily corrodes upon exposure to the atmosphere or corrosive fluids. ~y coating the substrate with a protective coating which is inert to corrosive fluids and the atmosphere, corrosion of the underlying substrate is eliminated or at least retarded.
In many instances, the protective coating may also impart decorative or aesthetic effects to the substrate such as chrome plated articles, for example, automotive parts and the like. Likewise~ ~he : . - .
. . : . . ~: .
- : :
~3~
protective coating may be deposited on the substrate to impart a wear resistant coating as well as to protect from corrosion. In most instances, a single protective coating of a corrosion resistant material is all that is applied to the substrate to prevent or retard corrosion.
In view of economic considerations it isl of course, desirable to limit the thickness of the protective coating to that thickness just sufficient to protect the substrate. In most instances the cost of the protective coating per unit weight is much higher than the cost of the substrate material.
It is well known that substrates such as iron and steel can be protected by deposition of metal or metal alloy coatings which protect the substrate.
Additionally, other materials including metal compounds such as metal nitrides and plastics can also be protected by the deposition thereon of a protective coating. Several methods are known in the literature for depositing protective coatings and include, but are not limited to, electrodeposition from solutions, cathodic deposition, plasma deposition, sputtering, "D" gun deposition, and the like. ~
Thus, prior to the present invention, a variety of coatings both inorganic and organic have been -applied directly to substrates to provide protection.
For instance, the use of organic protective coatings such as silane coatings has been disclosed as corrosion inhibitors for iron and steel.
In U. S. Patent 3,890~269 methods are disclosed ' . . ~ : . : .: ..
~ 0 3 ~
for the prepartion of aminofunctional organopolysiloxanes which are indicated to be useful as sizing agents and as corrosion inhibitors. U. S.
Patent 3,759,751 discloses a primer comprised of an epoxy resin, an inorganic chromate and an aminosilane for use on aircraft surfaces. Trimethylsilylacetamide has also been disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,310,575 as a corrosion inhibitor for steel~ More recently, novel silane compounds have been disclosed in U. S. Patent 4,645,846 as having utility as corrosion inhibitors for metal surfaces.
While organic coating can be useful ln providing corrosion protection to substrate material, they are of course, not useful where the material will be subject to abrasion or strong corrosive conditions.
In such instances, metal or metal-containing protective coatings are employed. The patPnt literature contains numerous methods for the application of such protective coating~ many of which also serve as wear resistant coatings as well.
While the aforementioned compositions are useful for protecting metal and other surfaces from corrosion, thay are not entirely effective if the protecting surface itself is characterized by microscopic voids. Such compositions can contain small crevices, pores and other openings in the protective coating which eventually allow corrosive f1uids to penetrate to the substrate material.
Howaver, if it were possible to seal or plug such microscopic voids in the protective coating, the corrosion res~stance of the coating could be extended.
.
.. .. .
- ~ , -~ 2 ~ 3 ~
.
Accordingly, one or more of the following objects will be achieved by the practice of the present invention. It is an object of the present invention to provide a process for optimizing the corrosion protection of a variety of materials. Another obj 2Ct of the invention is to provide a process for the protection of coated substrates which are easily corroded and have been coated with a wear resist~nt and/or decorative coating. A further object of this invention is to provide a process for imparting a corrosion barrier to coated substrate materials thereby extending the useful life of such materials.
A still further object of the invention is to provide a "micro pore filler" that protects coated substxates form corrosion even though the outer surface of the "filler" may be abraded away. Another object is to provide a process for providing corrosion protection by applying to a coated substrate material a thln layer of parylene. These and other objects will readily become apparent to those skilled in the art in the light of the teachings herein set forth.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In its broad aspect, the present invention relates to a process for optimizing corrosion protection o~ a vaxiety of articles having a protective coating and to the corrosion protected -articles themselves.
- The process optimizes corrosion protectlon of substrates having a protective or wear-resistant coating wherein the coating itself exhibits microscopic pores, at least some ~f whlch provide a :
:, .
: . .
-`' 2 ~3 ~ 8 continuous path from the substrate to the outer surface of the protective coating. The process comprises applying to the protective coating a thin coating of at least one poly(p-xylylene) in an amount sufficient to at least partially fill or plug the microscopic voids and prevent exposure of the substrate material to fluids, including atmospheric elements capable of corroding the substrate.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
T. _ As indicated above, the process of the present invention provides a convenient method for retarding or preventing corrosion or degradation of metallic and other substrates which have been coated with a protective or decorative coating. During application, or deposition, such coatings may be characterized by microscopic pores, holes or cracks, etc., which eventually allow penetration of atmospheric elements or fluids to the substrate itself. alternatively, such voids may occur some time after the initial coating was applied to the substrate. In both instances, treating the coated substrate with parylene in accordance with the teachings of the present invention retards or prevents corrosion and/o~ -degradation and thereby extends the useful life of the article.
The term "corrosion" as employed throughout the specification and appended claims is meant to include not only the usual oxidation of substrate material, such as metals, by normal oxldation, but degradation of the substrate material by axposure to a wide variety of gases, llquids and the like. The term is ,., : ~ .
~, - ~ :~ ' , . .
. .
.~' -~ ~ 3 ~
also intended to include destruction of the bond which binds the protective coating to the substrate, such as protective coatings which are applied to plastic and other non-metallic surfaces.
Normally one would not see any reason to apply an organic coating over a substrate which has already been coated with a protective or wear resistant coating. If the coated article is a hand tool for example, the organic coating would quickly abrade off.
However, parylene has the unique ability to penetrate even the smallest microscopic pores, holes or cracks and hence can fill voids which are well below the surface of the protective coating and can even penetrate to the underlying substrate. Thus, while the metallic coating itself may be only a few millimeters in thickness, parylene has the ability to penetrate even the finest microscopic cracks, crevlces and holes in the metallic coatings and thereby provide portection against corrosion of the substrate due to fallure of the principal ~rotective coating. Even if the parylene closest to the surface wears~off through abraslon or the like, the parylene in the pores which extend to the subqtrate provides a barrier and ample protection against air, liquids and the like from contacting the substrate surface. Hence, although parylPne itsel is an organic polymer and can be abraded, the parylene in contact with the substrate is protected from abrasion by the stronger walls of the coating material which surround the voids or pores.
Parylene is a generic term applied to a class of :
.
~, ~3$~
.. ....
poly-p-xylylenes which are derived from a dimer of the structure:
CH~ - C~2 ~ .
C~2 -- C~2 Parylene is an inert, transparent~ conformal coating which has excellent barrier properties and can be used at relatively high temperatures. Due to its ability to provide thin films and conform to substrates of varied geometric shapes, it is ideally suited for use as a conformal coating in a wide var~ety of fields, particularly in the electronlcs industry.
The dimer itself, from which the parylene coatin~
is prepared, is made via the pyrolysis of~p-xylene or Hofmann elimination reaction of p-methylbenzyltrimethylammonium hydroxide, and is usually obtained i~ relatlvely low yields.
Accordin~ly, the overall process for the application of parylene as a conformal coating is expensive and severely restricts its application where it might otherwise be used.
The preparation of p-xylylene polymers by various routes has been reported in the patent l~terature.
For example, U.S. Pa~ent 2~,719,131 which issued in :
' :
September 27, 1955 to E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company disclosed a process for preparing poly-p-xylene wherein the vapors of p-xylene wexe pyroly~ed in the presence of chlorine gas.
Also in British patent number 650,947 which was granted March 7, 1951, polymer formation was detected on the walls of a cooling chamber after p-xylene was vaporized and pyrolyzed.
In U. S. Patent 3,149,175 which issued September 15, 1964 a process was reported for the preparation of di-para-xylylenes in yields of 10 percent and higher.
The process involved pyrolyzing a mixture of steam and p-xylene at a temperature between about 800C and 1000C to genexate a free radical and condensing the reactive diradical in a fluid medium~
More recently, U. S. Patent 4,532,369 issued on July 30, 1985 to Hartmut Hartner of the Federal Republic of Germany and discloses and claims a process for the preparation of 2,2-paracyclophane from p-methylbenzyltrimethylammonium hydroxide. It is indicated in the patent that known proce~sses which existed prior to the invention disclosed gave only low yields or the starting materials were not readily accessible. By contacting aqueous p-methylbenzyl trimethylammonium hydroxide with sodium or potasslum hydroxlde in the presence of dimethylsulfoxide (~MSO) the patentee indicated that yields as high as 7~
percent were obtained, It was also indicated at column 1, llnes 55-58, that the resulting high yields were surprising since the addition of other comparable aprotic solvents such as dimethyl~formamide~
N-methyl-pyrollidone or sulfolane had no effect~
~' - , . , . :~ . . . .
2~3~8 - Although the literature contains several references to the use of parylene as a conform~l coating and even as a direct coating on metal surfaces to prevent corrosion, there is no disclosure of using parylene as an adjunct to protective coatings contained on substrates ~o serve as "micro pore fillers" for microscopic crevices and voids in such coatings. The use of parylene applied directly to substrate surfaces, is limited due to the fact that it is an organic compound and easily abraded. Hence, it is not useful, for example, in the direct coating of hand tools or other articles subject to abrasion.
However, by utilizing parylene as a micro filler in conjunction with a less abradable or even a wear resistant protective coating, the corrosion protection of the underlying substrate material is optimized or enhanced.
Thus, while the literature such as U. S. Patent 2,785,090 may disclose and claim fabrics coated with poly-p-xylylene which are then useful as fil~ers or in the production of corrosion resistant lndustrial garments, there is no primary protective coating since the parylene is in direct contact with the fibers and the parylene itself serves as the corrosion protective layer.
In U. S. Patent 3,246,627 which issued April 19, 1966 to W. E. Loeb and is assigned to the same assignee as the present invention, The basic apparatus for the vapor deposition of films of parylene or derivatives thereof is disclosed and claimed~ It is indicated in the patent that the:apparatus is use~ul : , , 2~33J~
for coating the surfaces of containers, electrical components, wire, plastics and metallic films, sheets and the like with a uniform coating of the linear thermoplastic film.
The apparatus is comprised of a pyrolysis chamber having two temperature zones, a first zone provided with heating means sufficient to vaporize the dimer thereby prventing local overheating and degradation of the dimer which could occur with direct pyrolysis, and a second zone communicatiny with the first zone and provided with heating means sufficient to pyrolyze the vaporous dimer to reactive diradicals. A nozzled portion of tubing terminates the anterior end of the pyrolysis chamber and penetrates one face of a coating chamber, the coating chamber and a portion of the nozzled tubing being enclosed in a vacuum chamber, thus providing a continuous linear passage for the reactive dimer diradicals from the pyrolysis chamber to the coating chamber wherein condensation and polymerization occur.
While many improvements and variatio~ns have been made on the basic apparatus the essential concept remains. Accordingly, one skilled in the art to which `
this invention pertains can utilize the apparatus ~f the aforementioned patent or modifications thereof for depositing a parylene coating on protective coatings having the microscopic voids.
As indicated, the process of the present invention takes advantage of the unique physical and chemical properties of parylene. Parylene forms a continuous and conformal coating over any surface on : : . : ~ , : : : ` ~: !
`: `
: ~
.
::
~3~
which it is deposited. Sincë polymerization is effect at essentially the same time as the vaporized dimer is deposited, it is possible for the dimer to penetrate extremely small openings in the range down to about 500 angstroms, and even smaller. Accordingly, only a very small amount of parylene is needed to coat very large surface areas.
Although there are several types of parylene products commercially available, it has been found that optimum corrosion protection is aehieved by using parylene N or parylene C~ These products are known and procedures available for depositing the coating on a variety of coated substrates.
The following examples are illustrative of the present invention.
Examples 1-6 In the following examples, six 1" x 2" metal bars coated and uncoated were tested for Ealt spray in accordance with with ASTM B117-64 (100 hours) and examined for corrosion/degradation every 24 hours over the 100 hour period.
The test chamber (TL-207 Industrial Filter & Pump Type 411.3C) at a temperature of 950C ~ 3 and ~ nozzle pressure of 10 psi. 2 pounds of NaCl were used in 39 pounds of demineralized water to provide a salt solution concentration of 5.13%.
The following information was noted relative to the chamber performance:
' ,,' : : : :
, .: : . , , : ~ . - .
~3~L~g .
1. Initial salt solution pH 6.52 @ 35.5OC
2. Initial salt solution speci~ic qravity 1O034 @ 24OC
PROCESS FOR OPTIMIZING CORROSION PROTECTION
OF COATED SUBSTRATES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
(1) FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates in general to a process for optimizing or enhancing the corrosion protection of coated substrates. In one aspect, this invention is directed to a process for protecting coated substrates, particularly metal substrates, from corrosion due to microscopic pores, volds, holes or cracks in a corrosion protective or wear resistant coating which has been applied to the substrate. In a further aspect, the invention relates to a process for enhancing the corrosion protection of a wide variety of articles, such as tool parts, engine components, sheet metal, automotive parts, rollers, decorative articles and the like.
t2) DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART
A variety of methods have been reported in ~he literature for providing protective or wear resistant coatings to substrates. In many instances, the substrate is comprised of a metal or metal alloy which easily corrodes upon exposure to the atmosphere or corrosive fluids. ~y coating the substrate with a protective coating which is inert to corrosive fluids and the atmosphere, corrosion of the underlying substrate is eliminated or at least retarded.
In many instances, the protective coating may also impart decorative or aesthetic effects to the substrate such as chrome plated articles, for example, automotive parts and the like. Likewise~ ~he : . - .
. . : . . ~: .
- : :
~3~
protective coating may be deposited on the substrate to impart a wear resistant coating as well as to protect from corrosion. In most instances, a single protective coating of a corrosion resistant material is all that is applied to the substrate to prevent or retard corrosion.
In view of economic considerations it isl of course, desirable to limit the thickness of the protective coating to that thickness just sufficient to protect the substrate. In most instances the cost of the protective coating per unit weight is much higher than the cost of the substrate material.
It is well known that substrates such as iron and steel can be protected by deposition of metal or metal alloy coatings which protect the substrate.
Additionally, other materials including metal compounds such as metal nitrides and plastics can also be protected by the deposition thereon of a protective coating. Several methods are known in the literature for depositing protective coatings and include, but are not limited to, electrodeposition from solutions, cathodic deposition, plasma deposition, sputtering, "D" gun deposition, and the like. ~
Thus, prior to the present invention, a variety of coatings both inorganic and organic have been -applied directly to substrates to provide protection.
For instance, the use of organic protective coatings such as silane coatings has been disclosed as corrosion inhibitors for iron and steel.
In U. S. Patent 3,890~269 methods are disclosed ' . . ~ : . : .: ..
~ 0 3 ~
for the prepartion of aminofunctional organopolysiloxanes which are indicated to be useful as sizing agents and as corrosion inhibitors. U. S.
Patent 3,759,751 discloses a primer comprised of an epoxy resin, an inorganic chromate and an aminosilane for use on aircraft surfaces. Trimethylsilylacetamide has also been disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,310,575 as a corrosion inhibitor for steel~ More recently, novel silane compounds have been disclosed in U. S. Patent 4,645,846 as having utility as corrosion inhibitors for metal surfaces.
While organic coating can be useful ln providing corrosion protection to substrate material, they are of course, not useful where the material will be subject to abrasion or strong corrosive conditions.
In such instances, metal or metal-containing protective coatings are employed. The patPnt literature contains numerous methods for the application of such protective coating~ many of which also serve as wear resistant coatings as well.
While the aforementioned compositions are useful for protecting metal and other surfaces from corrosion, thay are not entirely effective if the protecting surface itself is characterized by microscopic voids. Such compositions can contain small crevices, pores and other openings in the protective coating which eventually allow corrosive f1uids to penetrate to the substrate material.
Howaver, if it were possible to seal or plug such microscopic voids in the protective coating, the corrosion res~stance of the coating could be extended.
.
.. .. .
- ~ , -~ 2 ~ 3 ~
.
Accordingly, one or more of the following objects will be achieved by the practice of the present invention. It is an object of the present invention to provide a process for optimizing the corrosion protection of a variety of materials. Another obj 2Ct of the invention is to provide a process for the protection of coated substrates which are easily corroded and have been coated with a wear resist~nt and/or decorative coating. A further object of this invention is to provide a process for imparting a corrosion barrier to coated substrate materials thereby extending the useful life of such materials.
A still further object of the invention is to provide a "micro pore filler" that protects coated substxates form corrosion even though the outer surface of the "filler" may be abraded away. Another object is to provide a process for providing corrosion protection by applying to a coated substrate material a thln layer of parylene. These and other objects will readily become apparent to those skilled in the art in the light of the teachings herein set forth.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In its broad aspect, the present invention relates to a process for optimizing corrosion protection o~ a vaxiety of articles having a protective coating and to the corrosion protected -articles themselves.
- The process optimizes corrosion protectlon of substrates having a protective or wear-resistant coating wherein the coating itself exhibits microscopic pores, at least some ~f whlch provide a :
:, .
: . .
-`' 2 ~3 ~ 8 continuous path from the substrate to the outer surface of the protective coating. The process comprises applying to the protective coating a thin coating of at least one poly(p-xylylene) in an amount sufficient to at least partially fill or plug the microscopic voids and prevent exposure of the substrate material to fluids, including atmospheric elements capable of corroding the substrate.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
T. _ As indicated above, the process of the present invention provides a convenient method for retarding or preventing corrosion or degradation of metallic and other substrates which have been coated with a protective or decorative coating. During application, or deposition, such coatings may be characterized by microscopic pores, holes or cracks, etc., which eventually allow penetration of atmospheric elements or fluids to the substrate itself. alternatively, such voids may occur some time after the initial coating was applied to the substrate. In both instances, treating the coated substrate with parylene in accordance with the teachings of the present invention retards or prevents corrosion and/o~ -degradation and thereby extends the useful life of the article.
The term "corrosion" as employed throughout the specification and appended claims is meant to include not only the usual oxidation of substrate material, such as metals, by normal oxldation, but degradation of the substrate material by axposure to a wide variety of gases, llquids and the like. The term is ,., : ~ .
~, - ~ :~ ' , . .
. .
.~' -~ ~ 3 ~
also intended to include destruction of the bond which binds the protective coating to the substrate, such as protective coatings which are applied to plastic and other non-metallic surfaces.
Normally one would not see any reason to apply an organic coating over a substrate which has already been coated with a protective or wear resistant coating. If the coated article is a hand tool for example, the organic coating would quickly abrade off.
However, parylene has the unique ability to penetrate even the smallest microscopic pores, holes or cracks and hence can fill voids which are well below the surface of the protective coating and can even penetrate to the underlying substrate. Thus, while the metallic coating itself may be only a few millimeters in thickness, parylene has the ability to penetrate even the finest microscopic cracks, crevlces and holes in the metallic coatings and thereby provide portection against corrosion of the substrate due to fallure of the principal ~rotective coating. Even if the parylene closest to the surface wears~off through abraslon or the like, the parylene in the pores which extend to the subqtrate provides a barrier and ample protection against air, liquids and the like from contacting the substrate surface. Hence, although parylPne itsel is an organic polymer and can be abraded, the parylene in contact with the substrate is protected from abrasion by the stronger walls of the coating material which surround the voids or pores.
Parylene is a generic term applied to a class of :
.
~, ~3$~
.. ....
poly-p-xylylenes which are derived from a dimer of the structure:
CH~ - C~2 ~ .
C~2 -- C~2 Parylene is an inert, transparent~ conformal coating which has excellent barrier properties and can be used at relatively high temperatures. Due to its ability to provide thin films and conform to substrates of varied geometric shapes, it is ideally suited for use as a conformal coating in a wide var~ety of fields, particularly in the electronlcs industry.
The dimer itself, from which the parylene coatin~
is prepared, is made via the pyrolysis of~p-xylene or Hofmann elimination reaction of p-methylbenzyltrimethylammonium hydroxide, and is usually obtained i~ relatlvely low yields.
Accordin~ly, the overall process for the application of parylene as a conformal coating is expensive and severely restricts its application where it might otherwise be used.
The preparation of p-xylylene polymers by various routes has been reported in the patent l~terature.
For example, U.S. Pa~ent 2~,719,131 which issued in :
' :
September 27, 1955 to E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company disclosed a process for preparing poly-p-xylene wherein the vapors of p-xylene wexe pyroly~ed in the presence of chlorine gas.
Also in British patent number 650,947 which was granted March 7, 1951, polymer formation was detected on the walls of a cooling chamber after p-xylene was vaporized and pyrolyzed.
In U. S. Patent 3,149,175 which issued September 15, 1964 a process was reported for the preparation of di-para-xylylenes in yields of 10 percent and higher.
The process involved pyrolyzing a mixture of steam and p-xylene at a temperature between about 800C and 1000C to genexate a free radical and condensing the reactive diradical in a fluid medium~
More recently, U. S. Patent 4,532,369 issued on July 30, 1985 to Hartmut Hartner of the Federal Republic of Germany and discloses and claims a process for the preparation of 2,2-paracyclophane from p-methylbenzyltrimethylammonium hydroxide. It is indicated in the patent that known proce~sses which existed prior to the invention disclosed gave only low yields or the starting materials were not readily accessible. By contacting aqueous p-methylbenzyl trimethylammonium hydroxide with sodium or potasslum hydroxlde in the presence of dimethylsulfoxide (~MSO) the patentee indicated that yields as high as 7~
percent were obtained, It was also indicated at column 1, llnes 55-58, that the resulting high yields were surprising since the addition of other comparable aprotic solvents such as dimethyl~formamide~
N-methyl-pyrollidone or sulfolane had no effect~
~' - , . , . :~ . . . .
2~3~8 - Although the literature contains several references to the use of parylene as a conform~l coating and even as a direct coating on metal surfaces to prevent corrosion, there is no disclosure of using parylene as an adjunct to protective coatings contained on substrates ~o serve as "micro pore fillers" for microscopic crevices and voids in such coatings. The use of parylene applied directly to substrate surfaces, is limited due to the fact that it is an organic compound and easily abraded. Hence, it is not useful, for example, in the direct coating of hand tools or other articles subject to abrasion.
However, by utilizing parylene as a micro filler in conjunction with a less abradable or even a wear resistant protective coating, the corrosion protection of the underlying substrate material is optimized or enhanced.
Thus, while the literature such as U. S. Patent 2,785,090 may disclose and claim fabrics coated with poly-p-xylylene which are then useful as fil~ers or in the production of corrosion resistant lndustrial garments, there is no primary protective coating since the parylene is in direct contact with the fibers and the parylene itself serves as the corrosion protective layer.
In U. S. Patent 3,246,627 which issued April 19, 1966 to W. E. Loeb and is assigned to the same assignee as the present invention, The basic apparatus for the vapor deposition of films of parylene or derivatives thereof is disclosed and claimed~ It is indicated in the patent that the:apparatus is use~ul : , , 2~33J~
for coating the surfaces of containers, electrical components, wire, plastics and metallic films, sheets and the like with a uniform coating of the linear thermoplastic film.
The apparatus is comprised of a pyrolysis chamber having two temperature zones, a first zone provided with heating means sufficient to vaporize the dimer thereby prventing local overheating and degradation of the dimer which could occur with direct pyrolysis, and a second zone communicatiny with the first zone and provided with heating means sufficient to pyrolyze the vaporous dimer to reactive diradicals. A nozzled portion of tubing terminates the anterior end of the pyrolysis chamber and penetrates one face of a coating chamber, the coating chamber and a portion of the nozzled tubing being enclosed in a vacuum chamber, thus providing a continuous linear passage for the reactive dimer diradicals from the pyrolysis chamber to the coating chamber wherein condensation and polymerization occur.
While many improvements and variatio~ns have been made on the basic apparatus the essential concept remains. Accordingly, one skilled in the art to which `
this invention pertains can utilize the apparatus ~f the aforementioned patent or modifications thereof for depositing a parylene coating on protective coatings having the microscopic voids.
As indicated, the process of the present invention takes advantage of the unique physical and chemical properties of parylene. Parylene forms a continuous and conformal coating over any surface on : : . : ~ , : : : ` ~: !
`: `
: ~
.
::
~3~
which it is deposited. Sincë polymerization is effect at essentially the same time as the vaporized dimer is deposited, it is possible for the dimer to penetrate extremely small openings in the range down to about 500 angstroms, and even smaller. Accordingly, only a very small amount of parylene is needed to coat very large surface areas.
Although there are several types of parylene products commercially available, it has been found that optimum corrosion protection is aehieved by using parylene N or parylene C~ These products are known and procedures available for depositing the coating on a variety of coated substrates.
The following examples are illustrative of the present invention.
Examples 1-6 In the following examples, six 1" x 2" metal bars coated and uncoated were tested for Ealt spray in accordance with with ASTM B117-64 (100 hours) and examined for corrosion/degradation every 24 hours over the 100 hour period.
The test chamber (TL-207 Industrial Filter & Pump Type 411.3C) at a temperature of 950C ~ 3 and ~ nozzle pressure of 10 psi. 2 pounds of NaCl were used in 39 pounds of demineralized water to provide a salt solution concentration of 5.13%.
The following information was noted relative to the chamber performance:
' ,,' : : : :
, .: : . , , : ~ . - .
~3~L~g .
1. Initial salt solution pH 6.52 @ 35.5OC
2. Initial salt solution speci~ic qravity 1O034 @ 24OC
3. Yolume of condensate collected in a near nozzle collection dish having 80 square cm of horizontal collecting area, during a 16 hour exposure period 30.5ml 4. Specific gravity of condensate collected in 3 above 1.038 5. Volume of condensate collect~d in a far nozzle collection dish having 80 square cm of horizontal collecting area, during a 16 hour exposure period 17.5ml 6. Specific gravity of condensate in 5 above 1.03B
7. Temperature of condensate when measurements 4 and 6 above were made 35OC
The parameters list~d in 1-7 above, comply with the requiremenutlined in ASTM B117-64.
The six metal bars employed in the test were identified as follows:
~E~ Coating 1 parylene over base steel 2 1 micron titanium nitride coating plus parylene coating 3 2 micron titanium nitride coating plus parylene coating 4 3 micron titanium nltride coating plus parylene coating 5 & 6 control .
, . .. ~.
, ~3~8 A scribe line was also made across thé surface parallel to the narrow edge and after the coatings were completed.
The sample metal bars were thereafter sub;ected to the salt spray test as indicated above and examined after 24, 48, 72 and 100 hours of exposure.
Inspection of the bars after 24 hours revealed some corrosion of the control samples 5 and 6. After 48 hours minimal corrosion was noted in samples 1-4 along the scribe lines which separted the different coatings. The control samples exhibited further corrosion.
Inspection after 72 hours revealed that for samples 1 and 2 the minimal corrosion noted after 48 hours along and around the scribe lines, began to develop in the coated areas. Samples 3 and 4 showed minimal corrosion around the scribe llnes only.
After 100 hours, corro~ion around the ~arib~
lines and coated areas of sample 1 had propogated.
Inspection of sample 2 showed additional minimal corrosion near the ed~es of the coated ar~eas. Sample 3 only exhibited minimal corrosion near the edges of the coated area. Finally, sample 4 showed corrosion around the scribe line only. Each of control samples 5 and 6 exhibited further corrosion over the entire surface.
While the pxocess of the present invention is particularly well suited for the corrosion protection of coated metal surfaces, it can also be employed on surfaces comprised of mater'ials both organ~c and inorganic, whlch are susceptible to the presence of :
:
. :
~3~ 8 .
microscopic pores, voids and crëvices in their initial surface or even after a period of use. Thus, for example, it might be desirable to treat some surfaces in accordance with the process of the present invention not only at the time the protective coating is first applied, but at a later date after the coated surface may have undergone physical or chemical changes which produce voids or cracks. For example, the process of the present invention has been successfully employed to enhance the life of rollers used in industrial operations which have a plastic coating and which over periods of use develop microscopic cracks in the coating and subseguent penetration of fluids to the underlying substrate material.
Although the invention is illustrated by the preceding examples, it is not to be construed as being limited to the materials employed therein, but rather, the invention relates to the generic area as hexein~efore disclosed. Various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit or scope thereof. ..
.
,
The parameters list~d in 1-7 above, comply with the requiremenutlined in ASTM B117-64.
The six metal bars employed in the test were identified as follows:
~E~ Coating 1 parylene over base steel 2 1 micron titanium nitride coating plus parylene coating 3 2 micron titanium nitride coating plus parylene coating 4 3 micron titanium nltride coating plus parylene coating 5 & 6 control .
, . .. ~.
, ~3~8 A scribe line was also made across thé surface parallel to the narrow edge and after the coatings were completed.
The sample metal bars were thereafter sub;ected to the salt spray test as indicated above and examined after 24, 48, 72 and 100 hours of exposure.
Inspection of the bars after 24 hours revealed some corrosion of the control samples 5 and 6. After 48 hours minimal corrosion was noted in samples 1-4 along the scribe lines which separted the different coatings. The control samples exhibited further corrosion.
Inspection after 72 hours revealed that for samples 1 and 2 the minimal corrosion noted after 48 hours along and around the scribe lines, began to develop in the coated areas. Samples 3 and 4 showed minimal corrosion around the scribe llnes only.
After 100 hours, corro~ion around the ~arib~
lines and coated areas of sample 1 had propogated.
Inspection of sample 2 showed additional minimal corrosion near the ed~es of the coated ar~eas. Sample 3 only exhibited minimal corrosion near the edges of the coated area. Finally, sample 4 showed corrosion around the scribe line only. Each of control samples 5 and 6 exhibited further corrosion over the entire surface.
While the pxocess of the present invention is particularly well suited for the corrosion protection of coated metal surfaces, it can also be employed on surfaces comprised of mater'ials both organ~c and inorganic, whlch are susceptible to the presence of :
:
. :
~3~ 8 .
microscopic pores, voids and crëvices in their initial surface or even after a period of use. Thus, for example, it might be desirable to treat some surfaces in accordance with the process of the present invention not only at the time the protective coating is first applied, but at a later date after the coated surface may have undergone physical or chemical changes which produce voids or cracks. For example, the process of the present invention has been successfully employed to enhance the life of rollers used in industrial operations which have a plastic coating and which over periods of use develop microscopic cracks in the coating and subseguent penetration of fluids to the underlying substrate material.
Although the invention is illustrated by the preceding examples, it is not to be construed as being limited to the materials employed therein, but rather, the invention relates to the generic area as hexein~efore disclosed. Various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit or scope thereof. ..
.
,
Claims (21)
1. A process for optimizing corrosion protection of substrates having a protective or wear resistant coating and wherein said coating exhibits microscopic pores, at least some of which provide a continuous conduit from said substrate to the outer surface of said coating, said process comprising depositing on said coating at least one poly(p-xylylene) in an amount sufficient to at least partially fill said microscopic pores and thereby prevent exposure of said substrate to fluids capable of corroding said substrate.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein said parylene is N
parylene.
parylene.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein said parylene is C
parylene.
parylene.
4. The process of claim 1 wherein said substrate is a metal.
5. The process of claim 1 wherein said metal is iron.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein said metal is steel.
7. The process of claim 1 wherein said substrate is a metal alloy.
8. The process of claim 1 wherein said coating is a metal.
9. The process of claim 1 wherein said coating is a metal alloy.
10. The process of claim 1 wherein said coating is a wear resistant coating.
11. The process of claim 1 wherein said substrate is non-metallic.
12. The process of claim 1 wherein said coating contains chromium.
13. The process of claim 1 wherein said coating contains titanium.
14. The process of claim 1 wherein said coating is titanium nitride.
15. An article comprised of a substrate, a protective coating on at least some of its surfaces and containing parylene within the microscopic voids of said coating in an amount sufficient to prevent corrosive fluids from penetrating said coating and reaching said substrata.
16. The article of claim 14 which is a hand tool.
17. The article of claim 14 which is an automotive part.
18. The article of claim 14 which is an engine part.
19. The article of claim 14 wherein the coating is a decorative coating.
20. The article of claim 14 wherein the coating is a wear resistant coating.
21. The article of claim 14 wherein the coating a transparent coating.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US49563990A | 1990-03-19 | 1990-03-19 | |
| US7-495,639 | 1990-03-19 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2038488A1 true CA2038488A1 (en) | 1991-09-20 |
Family
ID=23969414
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2038488 Abandoned CA2038488A1 (en) | 1990-03-19 | 1991-03-18 | Process for optimizing corrosion protection of coated substrates |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP0448016A1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JPH04224683A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2038488A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5272007A (en) * | 1992-02-21 | 1993-12-21 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Solder powder coated with parylene |
| AU669754B2 (en) * | 1992-12-18 | 1996-06-20 | Becton Dickinson & Company | Barrier coating |
| FR2700619B1 (en) * | 1993-01-21 | 1995-03-31 | Aerospatiale | Optical fiber with improved mechanical and thermal resistance. |
| US5789068A (en) * | 1995-06-29 | 1998-08-04 | Fry's Metals, Inc. | Preformed solder parts coated with parylene in a thickness effective to exhibit predetermined interference colors |
| US6174329B1 (en) * | 1996-08-22 | 2001-01-16 | Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. | Protective coating for a stent with intermediate radiopaque coating |
| US6464723B1 (en) | 1999-04-22 | 2002-10-15 | Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. | Radiopaque stents |
| US6585757B1 (en) | 1999-09-15 | 2003-07-01 | Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. | Endovascular stent with radiopaque spine |
| KR20020095805A (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2002-12-28 | 조대형 | A Method of Coating Body with Parylene |
| KR20010099356A (en) * | 2001-09-21 | 2001-11-09 | 김경현 | the Method for Coating using Parylene |
| GB2479564B (en) * | 2010-04-14 | 2012-01-04 | Weston Aerospace Ltd | Vibrating cylinder transducer with protective coating |
| JP6313161B2 (en) * | 2014-08-27 | 2018-04-18 | 信越化学工業株式会社 | Pellicle frame and pellicle |
| US11111108B2 (en) * | 2018-05-04 | 2021-09-07 | Otis Elevator Company | Coated sheave |
Family Cites Families (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR1331796A (en) * | 1961-08-22 | 1963-07-05 | Westinghouse Electric Corp | Surface coating and manufacturing process |
| US4225647B1 (en) * | 1977-12-02 | 1995-05-09 | Richard A Parent | Articles having thin, continuous, impervious coatings |
| US4178509A (en) * | 1978-06-02 | 1979-12-11 | The Bendix Corporation | Sensitivity proportional counter window |
| JPS5698495A (en) * | 1980-01-09 | 1981-08-07 | Hitachi Ltd | Surface treatment method of magnesium or its alloy |
| JPS60191627A (en) * | 1984-03-13 | 1985-09-30 | Corona Kogyo Kk | Manufacture of shape for decorative enclosing frame and enclosing frame |
| DE8518198U1 (en) * | 1985-06-22 | 1986-09-25 | Heinzel, Winfried, 7240 Horb | vessel |
| DE3926592A1 (en) * | 1989-08-11 | 1991-02-14 | Rheydt Kabelwerk Ag | OPTICAL FIBER |
-
1991
- 1991-03-18 CA CA 2038488 patent/CA2038488A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1991-03-18 JP JP7716591A patent/JPH04224683A/en active Pending
- 1991-03-18 EP EP91104159A patent/EP0448016A1/en not_active Ceased
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP0448016A1 (en) | 1991-09-25 |
| JPH04224683A (en) | 1992-08-13 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2038488A1 (en) | Process for optimizing corrosion protection of coated substrates | |
| Bertoncello et al. | TiN, TiC and Ti (C, N) film characterization and its relationship to tribological behaviour | |
| Gautier et al. | Study of the growth mechanisms of chromium nitride films deposited by vacuum ARC evaporation | |
| CA2335063C (en) | A composite material comprising a substrate with a barrier layer | |
| Carta et al. | A comparative study of Cr2O3 thin films obtained by MOCVD using three different precursors | |
| Forsich et al. | Influence of the deposition temperature on mechanical and tribological properties of aC: H: Si coatings on nitrided and postoxidized steel deposited by DC-PACVD | |
| Miśkiewicz et al. | Examination of selected thermal properties of basalt composites | |
| DE68908973D1 (en) | Process for producing a protective film on a magnesium-based substrate, application for protecting magnesium alloys, substrates obtained in the process. | |
| JP3009341B2 (en) | Boron nitride-silicate sealant | |
| Pfohl et al. | Application of wear-resistant PACVD coatings in aluminium diecasting: economical and ecological aspects | |
| Naerheim et al. | Effect of thermal spray process selection on tribological performance of wc–co and Al2O3–TiO2 coatings | |
| Kodama et al. | Machining evaluation of cemented carbide tools coated with HfN and TiC by the activated reactive evaporation process | |
| Oh et al. | Wear behaviors of ceramics TiN, TiC and TiCN with arc ion plating | |
| CA2291472A1 (en) | Multi-layer coating | |
| US3868276A (en) | Process for treating metal articles | |
| Filippov et al. | Properties of 35–40-μm-Thick Vacuum–Plasma Coatings | |
| GB2239617A (en) | Coating for preventing oxygen embrittlement | |
| Barba-Pingarrón et al. | Enhancement of Corrosion Resistance of NiCrFeBSi Coatings Obtained by Flame Thermal Spray Process Adding an Electroless Nickel Coating Ni-P | |
| GB2076432A (en) | Cu-Ni coatings on ferrous substrates | |
| JP2010235829A (en) | Rust prevention primer for aluminum member and aluminum member | |
| KR940008460B1 (en) | Two layer si-zn coated steel sheet of removing of fingerprint with an excellant corrosion resistance and adhesion and method for making the same | |
| Faderl et al. | Spangle size and aluminum pick up for hot dip zinc coatings | |
| KR960011012B1 (en) | Method for producing a zero-spangle galvanized steel plate with an excellent brightness | |
| Longo et al. | Corrosion prevention with thermal-sprayed zinc and aluminum coatings | |
| Kwiatkowski et al. | THE PROTECTIVE PROPERTIES OF ALUMINUM, ZINC AND 55% Al-Zn COATINGS EVALUATED BY ELECTROCHEMICAL METHODS(Polish) |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| FZDE | Dead |