CA2010582C - A tryptamine producing tryptophan decarboxylase gene of plant origin - Google Patents
A tryptamine producing tryptophan decarboxylase gene of plant originInfo
- Publication number
- CA2010582C CA2010582C CA 2010582 CA2010582A CA2010582C CA 2010582 C CA2010582 C CA 2010582C CA 2010582 CA2010582 CA 2010582 CA 2010582 A CA2010582 A CA 2010582A CA 2010582 C CA2010582 C CA 2010582C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- tryptophan decarboxylase
- tdc
- sequence
- coli
- enzyme
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 108090000121 Aromatic-L-amino-acid decarboxylases Proteins 0.000 title claims abstract description 31
- APJYDQYYACXCRM-UHFFFAOYSA-N tryptamine Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(CCN)=CNC2=C1 APJYDQYYACXCRM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title description 9
- 102000003823 Aromatic-L-amino-acid decarboxylases Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 240000001829 Catharanthus roseus Species 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 claims description 33
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims description 25
- 241000588724 Escherichia coli Species 0.000 claims description 16
- 239000002773 nucleotide Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 125000003729 nucleotide group Chemical group 0.000 claims description 9
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 claims description 8
- 108091028043 Nucleic acid sequence Proteins 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 claims description 6
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 claims description 6
- 102000004031 Carboxy-Lyases Human genes 0.000 claims description 5
- 108090000489 Carboxy-Lyases Proteins 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000013604 expression vector Substances 0.000 claims 5
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 claims 5
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 claims 2
- 102000053602 DNA Human genes 0.000 claims 2
- 108700005078 Synthetic Genes Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 239000013612 plasmid Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 230000010076 replication Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 239000002299 complementary DNA Substances 0.000 abstract description 23
- 238000010367 cloning Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 239000013600 plasmid vector Substances 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 101710096582 L-tyrosine decarboxylase Proteins 0.000 description 38
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 22
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 description 18
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 18
- 229940024606 amino acid Drugs 0.000 description 12
- 235000001014 amino acid Nutrition 0.000 description 12
- 108010035075 Tyrosine decarboxylase Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 description 10
- 102100038238 Aromatic-L-amino-acid decarboxylase Human genes 0.000 description 10
- NGVDGCNFYWLIFO-UHFFFAOYSA-N pyridoxal 5'-phosphate Chemical compound CC1=NC=C(COP(O)(O)=O)C(C=O)=C1O NGVDGCNFYWLIFO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- QIVBCDIJIAJPQS-VIFPVBQESA-N L-tryptophane Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(C[C@H](N)C(O)=O)=CNC2=C1 QIVBCDIJIAJPQS-VIFPVBQESA-N 0.000 description 9
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 9
- 229960004799 tryptophan Drugs 0.000 description 9
- 108091034057 RNA (poly(A)) Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 7
- XEKOWRVHYACXOJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethyl acetate Chemical compound CCOC(C)=O XEKOWRVHYACXOJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Formaldehyde Chemical compound O=C WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- OUYCCCASQSFEME-QMMMGPOBSA-N L-tyrosine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 OUYCCCASQSFEME-QMMMGPOBSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 241000863480 Vinca Species 0.000 description 6
- CJCSPKMFHVPWAR-JTQLQIEISA-N alpha-methyl-L-dopa Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@](N)(C)CC1=CC=C(O)C(O)=C1 CJCSPKMFHVPWAR-JTQLQIEISA-N 0.000 description 6
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 6
- APJYDQYYACXCRM-UHFFFAOYSA-O tryptaminium Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(CC[NH3+])=CNC2=C1 APJYDQYYACXCRM-UHFFFAOYSA-O 0.000 description 6
- 241000282324 Felis Species 0.000 description 5
- 102000008214 Glutamate decarboxylase Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108091022930 Glutamate decarboxylase Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 241001599018 Melanogaster Species 0.000 description 5
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000002255 enzymatic effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 235000007682 pyridoxal 5'-phosphate Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 239000011589 pyridoxal 5'-phosphate Substances 0.000 description 5
- 229960001327 pyridoxal phosphate Drugs 0.000 description 5
- LDCYZAJDBXYCGN-VIFPVBQESA-N 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan Chemical compound C1=C(O)C=C2C(C[C@H](N)C(O)=O)=CNC2=C1 LDCYZAJDBXYCGN-VIFPVBQESA-N 0.000 description 4
- 241000238631 Hexapoda Species 0.000 description 4
- COLNVLDHVKWLRT-QMMMGPOBSA-N L-phenylalanine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CC1=CC=CC=C1 COLNVLDHVKWLRT-QMMMGPOBSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229960004441 tyrosine Drugs 0.000 description 4
- WTDRDQBEARUVNC-LURJTMIESA-N L-DOPA Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CC1=CC=C(O)C(O)=C1 WTDRDQBEARUVNC-LURJTMIESA-N 0.000 description 3
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 3
- 101001041236 Mus musculus Ornithine decarboxylase Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 238000012300 Sequence Analysis Methods 0.000 description 3
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 3
- QIVBCDIJIAJPQS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Tryptophan Natural products C1=CC=C2C(CC(N)C(O)=O)=CNC2=C1 QIVBCDIJIAJPQS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000009396 hybridization Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229960005190 phenylalanine Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 229930001515 protoalkaloid Natural products 0.000 description 3
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 108010054576 Deoxyribonuclease EcoRI Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 206010020751 Hypersensitivity Diseases 0.000 description 2
- SIKJAQJRHWYJAI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Indole Chemical compound C1=CC=C2NC=CC2=C1 SIKJAQJRHWYJAI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 108010044467 Isoenzymes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- WTDRDQBEARUVNC-UHFFFAOYSA-N L-Dopa Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CC1=CC=C(O)C(O)=C1 WTDRDQBEARUVNC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000124008 Mammalia Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000000020 Nitrocellulose Substances 0.000 description 2
- 102000006335 Phosphate-Binding Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010058514 Phosphate-Binding Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- RADKZDMFGJYCBB-UHFFFAOYSA-N Pyridoxal Chemical compound CC1=NC=C(CO)C(C=O)=C1O RADKZDMFGJYCBB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000007513 acids Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 125000000539 amino acid group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 238000000376 autoradiography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229940083181 centrally acting adntiadrenergic agent methyldopa Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 230000001086 cytosolic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- VYFYYTLLBUKUHU-UHFFFAOYSA-N dopamine Chemical compound NCCC1=CC=C(O)C(O)=C1 VYFYYTLLBUKUHU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000002209 hydrophobic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002169 hydrotherapy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000003734 kidney Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000002858 neurotransmitter agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920001220 nitrocellulos Polymers 0.000 description 2
- LDCYZAJDBXYCGN-UHFFFAOYSA-N oxitriptan Natural products C1=C(O)C=C2C(CC(N)C(O)=O)=CNC2=C1 LDCYZAJDBXYCGN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- COLNVLDHVKWLRT-UHFFFAOYSA-N phenylalanine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CC1=CC=CC=C1 COLNVLDHVKWLRT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000011541 reaction mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 2
- QZAYGJVTTNCVMB-UHFFFAOYSA-N serotonin Chemical compound C1=C(O)C=C2C(CCN)=CNC2=C1 QZAYGJVTTNCVMB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000000741 silica gel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910002027 silica gel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004809 thin layer chromatography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 2
- OUYCCCASQSFEME-UHFFFAOYSA-N tyrosine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 OUYCCCASQSFEME-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- QIVBCDIJIAJPQS-HBGPJKQGSA-N (2S)-2-amino-3-(1H-indol-3-yl)(214C)propanoic acid Chemical compound N[14C@@H](CC1=CNC2=CC=CC=C12)C(=O)O QIVBCDIJIAJPQS-HBGPJKQGSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000040650 (ribonucleotides)n+m Human genes 0.000 description 1
- APJYDQYYACXCRM-ZQBYOMGUSA-N 2-(1H-indol-3-yl)(114C)ethanamine Chemical compound N[14CH2]CC1=CNC2=CC=CC=C12 APJYDQYYACXCRM-ZQBYOMGUSA-N 0.000 description 1
- JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethanesulfonic acid Chemical compound OCC[NH+]1CCN(CCS([O-])(=O)=O)CC1 JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101710113919 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde synthase 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229920000936 Agarose Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229930192334 Auxin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 241000219198 Brassica Species 0.000 description 1
- 108091026890 Coding region Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108020004635 Complementary DNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108091035707 Consensus sequence Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000003155 DNA primer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001712 DNA sequencing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000255581 Drosophila <fruit fly, genus> Species 0.000 description 1
- 108020005350 Initiator Codon Proteins 0.000 description 1
- FFEARJCKVFRZRR-BYPYZUCNSA-N L-methionine Chemical compound CSCC[C@H](N)C(O)=O FFEARJCKVFRZRR-BYPYZUCNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- KVOFSTUWVSQMDK-KKUMJFAQSA-N Leu-His-Lys Chemical compound NCCCC[C@@H](C(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CC(C)C)CC1=CN=CN1 KVOFSTUWVSQMDK-KKUMJFAQSA-N 0.000 description 1
- KDXKERNSBIXSRK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Lysine Natural products NCCCCC(N)C(O)=O KDXKERNSBIXSRK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004472 Lysine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108700026244 Open Reading Frames Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108700001094 Plant Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000209504 Poaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 108091036407 Polyadenylation Proteins 0.000 description 1
- BAKAHWWRCCUDAF-IHRRRGAJSA-N Pro-His-Lys Chemical compound C([C@@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H]1NCCC1)C1=CN=CN1 BAKAHWWRCCUDAF-IHRRRGAJSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108010076504 Protein Sorting Signals Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229920005654 Sephadex Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000012507 Sephadex™ Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108091081024 Start codon Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000884043 Sus scrofa Aromatic-L-amino-acid decarboxylase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241001104043 Syringa Species 0.000 description 1
- 101150067147 TDC gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000205578 Thalictrum Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000007984 Tris EDTA buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- JXLYSJRDGCGARV-WWYNWVTFSA-N Vinblastine Natural products O=C(O[C@H]1[C@](O)(C(=O)OC)[C@@H]2N(C)c3c(cc(c(OC)c3)[C@]3(C(=O)OC)c4[nH]c5c(c4CCN4C[C@](O)(CC)C[C@H](C3)C4)cccc5)[C@@]32[C@H]2[C@@]1(CC)C=CCN2CC3)C JXLYSJRDGCGARV-WWYNWVTFSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000607479 Yersinia pestis Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000011543 agarose gel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930013930 alkaloid Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 229940060532 allent Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 125000003277 amino group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000118 anti-neoplastic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000003118 aryl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 239000002363 auxin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- SRGKFVAASLQVBO-BTJKTKAUSA-N brompheniramine maleate Chemical compound OC(=O)\C=C/C(O)=O.C=1C=CC=NC=1C(CCN(C)C)C1=CC=C(Br)C=C1 SRGKFVAASLQVBO-BTJKTKAUSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010804 cDNA synthesis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003197 catalytic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004113 cell culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920002678 cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000001913 cellulose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007795 chemical reaction product Substances 0.000 description 1
- WORJEOGGNQDSOE-UHFFFAOYSA-N chloroform;methanol Chemical compound OC.ClC(Cl)Cl WORJEOGGNQDSOE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004587 chromatography analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009833 condensation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005494 condensation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000539 dimer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229960003638 dopamine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000001962 electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009088 enzymatic function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 1
- HNDVDQJCIGZPNO-UHFFFAOYSA-N histidine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CC1=CN=CN1 HNDVDQJCIGZPNO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- PZOUSPYUWWUPPK-UHFFFAOYSA-N indole Natural products CC1=CC=CC2=C1C=CN2 PZOUSPYUWWUPPK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- SEOVTRFCIGRIMH-UHFFFAOYSA-N indole-3-acetic acid Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(CC(=O)O)=CNC2=C1 SEOVTRFCIGRIMH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- RKJUIXBNRJVNHR-UHFFFAOYSA-N indolenine Natural products C1=CC=C2CC=NC2=C1 RKJUIXBNRJVNHR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- DNDNWOWHUWNBCK-NMIPTCLMSA-N indolylmethylglucosinolate Chemical class O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1S\C(=N\OS(O)(=O)=O)CC1=CNC2=CC=CC=C12 DNDNWOWHUWNBCK-NMIPTCLMSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000000411 inducer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- BPHPUYQFMNQIOC-NXRLNHOXSA-N isopropyl beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside Chemical compound CC(C)S[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O BPHPUYQFMNQIOC-NXRLNHOXSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960004502 levodopa Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 125000003588 lysine group Chemical group [H]N([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])(N([H])[H])C(*)=O 0.000 description 1
- 229930182817 methionine Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 125000000896 monocarboxylic acid group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 229930014716 monoterpenoid indole alkaloid Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 230000001717 pathogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N phenol group Chemical group C1(=CC=CC=C1)O ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000001766 physiological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008488 polyadenylation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000017854 proteolysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960003581 pyridoxal Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000008164 pyridoxal Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011674 pyridoxal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000003230 pyrimidines Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000002285 radioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002864 sequence alignment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011451 sequencing strategy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940076279 serotonin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000001082 somatic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960003048 vinblastine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- JXLYSJRDGCGARV-XQKSVPLYSA-N vincaleukoblastine Chemical compound C([C@@H](C[C@]1(C(=O)OC)C=2C(=CC3=C([C@]45[C@H]([C@@]([C@H](OC(C)=O)[C@]6(CC)C=CCN([C@H]56)CC4)(O)C(=O)OC)N3C)C=2)OC)C[C@@](C2)(O)CC)N2CCC2=C1NC1=CC=CC=C21 JXLYSJRDGCGARV-XQKSVPLYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960004528 vincristine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- OGWKCGZFUXNPDA-XQKSVPLYSA-N vincristine Chemical compound C([N@]1C[C@@H](C[C@]2(C(=O)OC)C=3C(=CC4=C([C@]56[C@H]([C@@]([C@H](OC(C)=O)[C@]7(CC)C=CCN([C@H]67)CC5)(O)C(=O)OC)N4C=O)C=3)OC)C[C@@](C1)(O)CC)CC1=C2NC2=CC=CC=C12 OGWKCGZFUXNPDA-XQKSVPLYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- OGWKCGZFUXNPDA-UHFFFAOYSA-N vincristine Natural products C1C(CC)(O)CC(CC2(C(=O)OC)C=3C(=CC4=C(C56C(C(C(OC(C)=O)C7(CC)C=CCN(C67)CC5)(O)C(=O)OC)N4C=O)C=3)OC)CN1CCC1=C2NC2=CC=CC=C12 OGWKCGZFUXNPDA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N9/00—Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
- C12N9/88—Lyases (4.)
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Enzymes And Modification Thereof (AREA)
- Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
Abstract
Isolation and cloning of cDNA sequence of the tryptophan decarboxylase gene from Catharanthus roseus and the development of the cDNA sequence in a plasmid vector capable of transforming cell lines that will produce the tryptophan decarboxylase enzyme.
Description
20~0582 TITLE OF THE INVENTION
A tryptamine producing tryptophan decarboxylase gene of plant origin.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Tryptophan decarboxylase (TDC; E.C. 4.1.1.27) catalyses the conversion of L-tryptophan to tryptamine.
This enzyme has been detected in numerous plant systems and it has been suggested that its primary role is to supply possible precursors for auxin biosynthesis (Baxter, C. & Slaytor, M. ~1972) Phytochemistry 11, 2763-2766;
Gibson, R.A., Barret, G. & Wightman F. (1972) J. Exp. Bot.
23, pages 775-786; Gross, W. & Klapchek, S. (1979) Z.
Pflanzenphysiol. 93, pages 359-363).
In the Gramineae, TDC catalyses the synthesis of precursors for the protoalkaloids which have considerable physiological activity in higher animals (Smith, T.A., (1977) Phytochemistry Vol. 16, pages 171-175). It is also known that tryptophan-derived tryptamines are also precursors of the tricyclic ~-carboline alkaloids formed by condensation with a one- or two- carbon moiety (Slaytor, M., & McFarlane, I.J., (1968) Phytochemistry 7, pages 605-610).
Furthermore, in periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus), TDC produces tryptamine for biosynthesis of the commercially important antineoplastic monoterpenoid indole alkaloids, vinblastine and vincristine (De Luca, V., &
201~
_ --2 Kurz, W.G.W. (1988), Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Constabel, F. and Vasil, I.K., eds.
Academic Press 5, pages 385-401).
The TDC from Catharanthus roseus has been purified to homogeneity. It occurs as a dimer consisting of 2 identical subunits of Mr 54,000 and it requires pyridoxal phosphate for activity (Noe, W., Mollenschott, C., & Berlin J. (1984) Plant Mol. Biol. 3, pages 281-288).
The enzyme possesses characteristics of plant aromatic decarboxylases which usually exhibit high substrate specificity. For example, TDC will decarboxylate L-tryptophan and 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan but is inactive towards L-phenylalanine and L-tyrosine, while the tyrosine decarboxylases from Syringa vulqaris (Chapple, C.C.S., (1984) Ph.D. Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada), Thalictrum ruqosum and Escholtzia californica (Marques, I.A., & Brodelius, P.
(1988) Plant Physiol. 88, pages 52-55), accept L-tyrosine and L-dopa as substrates but not L-tryptophan or 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan. The aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylases (dopa decarboxylase (DDC), ED 4.1.1.28) of D. melanogaster (Clark, W.C., Pass, P.S., Venkatararman, B., & Hodgetts, R.B. (1978~ Mol. Gen. Genet. 162, pages 287-297; Eveleth, D.D., Gietz, R.D., Spencer C.A., Nargang, F.E., Hodgetts, R.B. & Marsh, J.L. (1986) Embo.
J. 5, pages 2663-2672; Morgan B.A., Johnson, W.A. & Hirsh, ~01~5~2 _ --3 J. (1986) Embo. J. 5, pages 3335-3342) and mammals (Albert, V.R., Allent J.M., & Joh, T.H. (1987) J. Biol.
Chem. 262, pages 9404-9411) have a broader substrate specificity with L-dopa, tyrosine, phenylalanine and possibly histidine also serving as substrates.
In animals, the role of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase is to produce the major neurotransmitters dopamine and serotonin and, in D. melanogaster, the DDC
enzyme serves a second, inducible role, in the sclerotization of the insect cuticle (Christenson, J.G., Dairman, W. & Undenfriend, S. (1972) Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 69, pages 343-347; Lovenberg, W., Weissbach, W., & Undenfriend S. (1962) J. Biol. Chem. 237, pages 89-93;
Yuwiler, A., Geller, E. & Eiduson, S. (1954) Arch.
Biochem. Biophys. 80, pages 162-173; Brunet, P. (1980) Insect Biochem. 10, pages 467-500).
It would appear highly desirable to be able to clone the cDNA sequence of tryptophan decarboxylase from Catharanthus roseus, thus, providing the development of the cDNA sequence in a plasmid vector capable of transforming cell lines that will produce the tryptophan decarboxylase enzyme.
If the tryptophan decarboxylase gene could be inserted into living organisms by transformation to produce tryptamine and related protoalkaloids, it could supplement a neurotransmitter deficiency.
20:~0~
Further, the insertion of this gene in plants could be useful to alter the spectrum of tryptophan-based chemicals normally produced by the plant. For example, the insertion of constitutive expression of tryptophan decarboxylase in Brassica species could sequester the cytoplasmic tryptophan pool for the synthesis of tryptamine and related protoalkaloids and therefore repress the normal synthesis and accumulation of indole glucosinolates.
Hence, creation of plants with an altered chemical spectrum may produce novel phenotypes which have resistance to various pathogenic diseases or to insect pests.
SUHHARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, there is now provided the sequence of a cDNA clone which includes the complete coding region of tryptophan decarboxylase, preferably tryptophan decarboxylase (E.C.
4.1.1.27) from periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus). The cDNA
clone (1747 bp) was isolated by antibody screening of a cDNA expression library produced from poly At RNA found in developing seedlings of C. roseus. The clone hybridized to a 1.8 kb mRNA from developing seedlings and from young leaves of mature plants.
Also within the scope of the present invention is a method for inserting TDC gene into living organisms 2 ~ 2 by transformation. The identity of the clone was confirmed when extracts of transformed E. coli expressed a protein containing tryptophan decarboxylase enzyme activity. The tryptophan decarboxylase cDNA clone encodes a protein of 500 amino acids with a calculated molecular mass of 56,142 Da. The amino acid sequence shows a high degree of similarity with the aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (dopa-decarboxylase) and the alpha-methyldopa hypersensitive protein of Drosophila melaqonaster. The tryptophan decarboxylase sequence also showed significant similarity to feline glutamic acid decarboxylase and mouse ornithine decarboxylase suggesting a possible evolutionary link between these amino acid decarboxylases.
Furthermore, the protein encoded by the cDNA
clone of the present invention is active ln vitro.
IN THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 (lane 2) represents the TDC enzymatic activity in extracts of pTDC5-transformed E. coli, compared to those in control E. coli (lane 1) and that in C. roseus itself (lane 3).
Figure 2 represents the hybridization of the pTDC-5 clone to a 1.8 kb mRNA species isolated from periwinkle.
201~
Figure 3 shows the nucleotide sequence of the pTDC5 cDNA clone and its deduced amino acid sequence. The putative polyadenylation signal is underlined.
Figure 4 shows the amino acid sequence alignments of the protein for the D. melanoqaster alpha methyldopa hypersensitive gene (AMD), C. roseus tryptophan decarboxylase ~TDC), and Drosphila DOPA decarboxylase isoenzyme 1 (DDC1).
Figure 5 shows hydropathy profile of TDC and DDC1.
Other advantages of the present invention will be readily illustrated by referring to the following description.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OE THE INVENTION
cDNA synthesis and DNA sequencing.
Seedlings of C. roseus ~L.) G. Don cv "Little Delicata" were germinated and grown for 5 days in the dark as described previously ~De Luca, V., Alvarez-Fernandez, F., Campbell, D., & Kurz, W.G.W. (1988) Plant Physiol. 86, 447-450). Seedlings were harvested after 18 hours of light treatment and total RNA was isolated as described by Jones, J.D.G., Dunsmuir, P. & Bedrook, J. (1985) EMBO J.
4, 2411-2*18.
Poly(A)t RNA was isolated by chromatography on oligo (dT)- cellulose ~Aviv, H. & Leder, P. (1972) Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69, 1408-1412) and double-stranded , 201 0582 cDNAs were prepared according to the procedure of Gubler and Hoffman ~1983, Gene 25, 263-269). Followlng ligation with Eco RI linker, the cDNA was inserted into the Eco RI
site of the expresslon vector ZA~ (Stratagene, San Diego, Short, J.M., Fernandez, J.M., Sorge, J.A. & Huse, W.D.
(1988) Nucl. Acids Res. 16, 7S83-7600). A llbrary contalnlng 3.1 X 105 recombinant phages was obtalned and after amplificatlon, 2 X 105 plaques were screened with specific polyclonal antiserum raised against-TDC.
Plasmlds (pBluescript) containing a TDC cDNA insert were rescued using the R408 fl helper phage (Short, J.M., Fernandez, J.M., Sorge, J.A. & Huse, W.D. (1988) Nucl.
Acid~ Res. 16, 7583-7600) and the nucleotide sequence of a full-length cDNA clone (pTDC5) was determined on both strands by the dideoxy-chain-termination method (Sanger, F., NicXlen, S. & Coulson, A.R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 74, 5463-5467). The sequencing strategy lncluded subcloning of restriction fragments and the use of oligonucleotide primers. The sequence for all restriction sites used for the subcloning was determined on at least one strand. Comparisons of the pTDC5 cDNA nucleotlde sequence and of the deduced amino acid sequence with Genban~ and NBRF sequence libraries were performed using the FASTA* program pacXage (Pearson, W.R. & Lipman, D.J.
~1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 2444-2448).
*denotes trademark w RNA blot hybridization.
Poly(A)' RNA was isolated from 6 day old developlng seedlings and from young leaves of mature plants as described above. These tissues were chosen as a llkely source of TDC poly(A)' RNA based on the presence of high levels of TDC enzyme actlvity (De Luca, V., Alvarez-Fernandez, F., Campbell, D., & Kurz, W.G.W. (1988) Plant Physiol. 86, 447-450). RNA was denatured, fractioned by electrophoresis on formaldehyde/agarose gels, and then transferred to nitrocellulose fllters (Haniatls, T., Frltsch, E.F. & Sambrook, J. (1982) Ins Holecular Clonlng, A Laboratory Hanual. Cold Sprlng Harbor, New York). Blotted RNA was hybridized to [32p]_ labelled pTDC5 DNA and autoradlography was performed uslng Kodak* XAR-5 fllms.
TDC activlty in extracts of E. coli.
A culture (100 ml) of the E. coli strain ZLl-blue containlng pTDC5 or pBluescrlpt was incubated at 37~C
for 2 hours before addlng the IPTG inducer at a final concentratlon of 1 mM. Incubatlon was contlnued for an additional 2 hours. Cells were harvested, washed in TE
buffer, resuQpended and lysed in 3 ml of a buffer contalning 0.1 M Hepes, pH 7.5, 1 mH DTT. Debris was removed by centrlfugation and the supernatant was desalted by passage over a Sephadex G-25~ column. TDC enzymatlc activlty ln bacterial supernatants was determined by *denotes trademark 2 ~ 2 monitoring the conversion of L-[methylene-19C]-tryptophan to [14C]-tryptamine (De Luca, V., Alvarez-Fernandez, F., Campbell, D., & Kurz, W.G.W. (1988) Plant Physiol. 86, 447-450). Supernatants (30 ~l) were incubated in the presence of 0.1 ~Ci of [1~C]-tryptophan (sp. act. 59 mCi/mmol.) for 30 minutes and reactions were stopped with 100 ~l NaOH. Radioactive tryptamine was extracted from the reaction mixture with ethyl acetate and was analyzed by silica gel thin layer chromatography and autoradiography. Determination of TDC enzyme activity in leaves was performed as described previously (De Luca, V., Alvarez-Fernandez, F., Campbell, D., & Kurz, W.G.W. (1988) Plant Physiol. 86, 447-450).
TDC enzynatic activity in E. coli.
A tryptophan decarboxylase cDNA clone of C.
roseus was isolated by the use of antibody screening of an expression library. The antigenicity and enzymatic activity (Figure 1) of the encoded protein established the identity of the TDC cDNA.
When the original cDNA library was screened with the anti-TDC antibody, 27 clones were identified. Six clones were selected and submitted to further analysis.
Partial sequence analysis revealed no difference among these clones, except for their length. Therefore, the clone having the longest cDNA insert (pTDC5) was selected for further characterization. To confirm that this cDNA
2 ~
clone corresponded to TDC r enzymatic activity was measured in cell extracts from E coli. Figure 1 shows that ~l4C]-tryptamine was produced with extracts from cells transformed with pTDC5, and with extracts from C. roseus leaves (lane 3), but not with extracts from cells containing only the vector (lane 1).
The conversion of [l4C]-tryptophan to ~14C]-tryptamine was monitored in extracts of E. coli and C.
roseus leaves. [14C]-tryptophan (sp. act. 50 mCi/mmol) for 30 minutes. After addition of base, ~14C]-tryptamine was extracted from the reaction mixture with ethyl acetate and reaction products were analyzed by thin layer chromatography on silica gel (solvent CHCl3 MeOH: 25% NH3 (5:4:1) and autoradiography. In Figure 1, TDC enzymatic activity is shown; lane 1, E. coli is transformed by the pBluescript vector, lane 2, E. coli is transformed by pTDC5 and lane 3, C. roseus extract is shown.
This result indicated that TDC enzymatic activity was retained by the protein produced using a TDC
cDNA clone under the control of the Lac promoter of the pBluescript vector. No attempts were made to quantify the level of activity of TDC in E. coli.
Sequence analysis of a TDC cDNA clone.
DNA sequence analysis of pTDC5 revealed the presence of an open reading frame coding for a protein of 500 amino acids, which corresponded to a molecular mass of 2 0 1 0 ~ ~ 2 56,142 Da (Figure 2). The 5'-nontranslated region of pTDC5 contained 69 nucleotides and included, near its beginning, a long stretch of alternating pyrimidines.
Sequence around the methionine initiation codon (AAUAAUGGG) matched closely the consensus sequence for plant gene initiation codons (AACAAUGGC) (Lutcke, H.A., Chow, K.C., Mickel, F.S., Moss, K.A., Kerm, H.F. and Scheele, G.A. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 43-48). The 3'nontranslated region consisted of 168 nucleotides up to the poly(A) tail and contained an AAUAAA putative poly(A)f addition signal 17 nucleotides upstream from the start of the poly(A)t tail. Examination of the predicted amino acid sequence did not reveal the presence of a signal sequence (Watson, M.E.E. (1984) Nucl. Acids Res. 12, 5145-5164), which is consistent with the proposed cytoplasmic location of TDC within the cell (De Luca, V., Alvarez-Fernandez, F., Campbell, D., & Kurz, W.G.W. (1988) Plant Physiol. 86, 4474-50)-Comparison of TDC-cDNA nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences with nucleotide sequences in the Genbank DNA sequence database and with amino acid sequences in the NBRF protein sequence database revealed surprising similarity (40% amino acid identity) with the dopa-decarboxylase isoenzyme l(DDC1) from D. melanoqaster (Eveleth, D.D., Gietz, R.D., Spencer, C.A., Nargang, F.E., Hodgetts, R.B. & Marsh, J.L. (1986) EMB0 J. 5, 2663-2672;
Morgan, B.A., Johnson, W.A. & Hirsh, J. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 3335-3342), and with the protein corresponding to the D.
melanoqaster alpha-methyldopa hypersensitive gene (AMD, 35% amino acid identity) (Eveleth, D.D. & Marsh, J.L.
(1986) Genetics 114, 469-483) (Figure 3). In Figure 3, the boxes show TDC residues present in AMD and~or DDC1 sequences. Amino acids are numbered for TDC (top) and DDC1 (bottom). The areas of amino acid similarity extended throughout the protein and were not restricted to a particular portion of either structure.
Furthermore, the 39% amino acid sequence similarity could be extended to the predicted distribution of potential alpha helices and beta sheets. This indicated that the amino acid differences between the two proteins did not significantly alter their secondary structures, and may indicate the importance of such conserved domains to mediate subunit assembly, as well as catalytic function and substrate specificity.
Limited proteolysis of pig kidney dopa decarboxylase and amino acid sequencing of a tryptic fragment produced a sequence for 50 amino acid residues one third of the distance from the COOH terminus of this protein (Tancini, B., Dominici, P., Simmaco, M., Schinina, M.E., Barra, D., & Voltatormi, C.D. (1988) Arch. Biochem.
Biophys. 260, 569-576). Comparison of this 50 amino acid sequence with periwinkle TDC and D. melanoqaster DDCI gave 2~a~
and 32 identical amino acids, respectively.
Furthermore, comparison of C. roseus TDC to feline glutamic acid decarboxylase (Kobayashi, Y., Kaufman, D.L.
& Tobin, A.J. (1987) J. Neurosci. 7, 2768-2772) showed that 10~ of the amino acid residues were identical between these two proteins. This similarity could be extended to 25% on a 396 aa stretch. Mouse ornithine decarboxylase (Kahana, C. & Nathans, D. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 82, 1673-1677) showed a statistically significant (Pearson, W.R. & Lipman, D.J. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 85, 2444-2448) 12% amino acid sequence similarity to the plant TDC which also extended throughout the protein sequence. We also found that the sequence Pro-His-Lys, beginning at position 317 in TDC, was identical to the sequence at the pyridoxal phosphate binding sites of D. melanogaster DDC (Marques, I.A., & Brodelius, P.
(1988) Plant Physiol. 88, 52-55; Clark, W.C., Pass, P.S., Venkataraman, B., & Hodgetts, R.B. (1978) Mol. Gen. Genet.
162, 287-297), feline glutamic acid decarboxylase (Kobayashi, Y., Kaufman, D.L. & Tobin, A.J. (1987) J.
Neurosci. 7, 2768-2772) and pig dopa-decarboxylase (Bossa, F., Martini, F., Barra, D., Borri Voltatorni, C., Minelli, A. & Turano, C., (1977) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 78, 177-183). In contrast, the AMD protein, whose enzymatic function is unknown, contained the sequence Leu-His-Lys at the pyridoxal phosphate binding domain. The sequence 2010~32 similarity observed between TDC, feline glutamic acid decarboxylase and mouse ornithine decarboxylase also suggests an evolutionary link between these three amino acid decarboxylases.
Structural similarities between TDC and D.
melanogaster DDC1 proteins were further revealed by comparing their hydropathy profiles (Figure 4). Each value was calculated as the average hydropathic index of a sequence of 9 amino acids and plotted to the middle residue of each sequence. Positive and negative values indicate hydrophobic and hydrophillic regions of the proteins, respectively. Close examination of the alignment of hydrophobic and hydrophillic regions for the two proteins showed a striking match between them, except for the area near the N terminus and the region around TDC
residue 225.
Most decarboxylases require for their activity a pyridoxal phosphate co-factor linked to the C amino group of a lysine residue. The observed similarities around the pyridoxal binding site of pig kidney dopa-decarboxylase, D. melanogaster dopa-decarboxylase and feline glutamate decarboxylase with that of periwinkle TDC
strongly suggests that lysine 319 of TDC binds pyridoxal phosphate.
The aromatic amino acid decarboxylases of plants, insects and mammals are remarkably similar in 201~2 subunit structure, molecular mass and kinetic properties (Maneckjee, R., & Baylin, S.B. (1983) Biochemistry 22, 6058-6063). Plant aromatic amino acid decarboxylases (Noe, W., Mollenschott, C. & Berline J. (1984) Plant Mol.
Biol. 3, pages 281-288; Chapple, C.C.S., (1984) Ph.D.
Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada;
Marques, I.A., & Brodelius, P. (1988) Plant Physiol. 88, pages 52-55), in contrast to those from animals, display high substrate specificity for indole or phenolic substrates but not to both. The strong similarity observed between periwinkle TDC and DDC1 of D.
melanoqaster suggests that plant aromatic amino acid decarboxylase specific for tyrosine, phenylalanine or dihydroxyphenylalanine may be structurally similar to TDC
and may, therefore, also be evolutionarily related. The recent purification of specific L-tyrosine decarboxylases (Marques, I.A., & Brodelius, P. l1988) Plant Physiol. 88, pages 52-55) to homogeneity should allow cloning of these genes and direct testing of this hypothesis.
TDC nRNA accumulation.
Total poly(A) t RNAs (1 ~g) from six day old C.
roseus seedlings and from young leaves of mature plants were run on an agarose/formaldehyde gel and were transferred to nitrocellulose paper. Hybridization was performed with [32P]-labelled pTDC5 insert (sp. act. 1.2 X
108 cpm/yG). When total poly(A)t RNA isolated from six day 201(3S~
old seedlings was probed with a 1.6 kb cDNA fragment isolated from pTDC5, a 1.8 kb mRNA was detected (Figure 5, lane 1). Young leaves from the mature plant also contained a 1.8 kb mRNA (Figure 5, lane 2). A fainter signal corresponding to a transcript of 3.2 kb was also present in both the lanes. This signal could be a precursor form of the TDC mRNA or an unrelated transcript having some sequence similarity to TDC.
A tryptamine producing tryptophan decarboxylase gene of plant origin.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Tryptophan decarboxylase (TDC; E.C. 4.1.1.27) catalyses the conversion of L-tryptophan to tryptamine.
This enzyme has been detected in numerous plant systems and it has been suggested that its primary role is to supply possible precursors for auxin biosynthesis (Baxter, C. & Slaytor, M. ~1972) Phytochemistry 11, 2763-2766;
Gibson, R.A., Barret, G. & Wightman F. (1972) J. Exp. Bot.
23, pages 775-786; Gross, W. & Klapchek, S. (1979) Z.
Pflanzenphysiol. 93, pages 359-363).
In the Gramineae, TDC catalyses the synthesis of precursors for the protoalkaloids which have considerable physiological activity in higher animals (Smith, T.A., (1977) Phytochemistry Vol. 16, pages 171-175). It is also known that tryptophan-derived tryptamines are also precursors of the tricyclic ~-carboline alkaloids formed by condensation with a one- or two- carbon moiety (Slaytor, M., & McFarlane, I.J., (1968) Phytochemistry 7, pages 605-610).
Furthermore, in periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus), TDC produces tryptamine for biosynthesis of the commercially important antineoplastic monoterpenoid indole alkaloids, vinblastine and vincristine (De Luca, V., &
201~
_ --2 Kurz, W.G.W. (1988), Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Constabel, F. and Vasil, I.K., eds.
Academic Press 5, pages 385-401).
The TDC from Catharanthus roseus has been purified to homogeneity. It occurs as a dimer consisting of 2 identical subunits of Mr 54,000 and it requires pyridoxal phosphate for activity (Noe, W., Mollenschott, C., & Berlin J. (1984) Plant Mol. Biol. 3, pages 281-288).
The enzyme possesses characteristics of plant aromatic decarboxylases which usually exhibit high substrate specificity. For example, TDC will decarboxylate L-tryptophan and 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan but is inactive towards L-phenylalanine and L-tyrosine, while the tyrosine decarboxylases from Syringa vulqaris (Chapple, C.C.S., (1984) Ph.D. Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada), Thalictrum ruqosum and Escholtzia californica (Marques, I.A., & Brodelius, P.
(1988) Plant Physiol. 88, pages 52-55), accept L-tyrosine and L-dopa as substrates but not L-tryptophan or 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan. The aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylases (dopa decarboxylase (DDC), ED 4.1.1.28) of D. melanogaster (Clark, W.C., Pass, P.S., Venkatararman, B., & Hodgetts, R.B. (1978~ Mol. Gen. Genet. 162, pages 287-297; Eveleth, D.D., Gietz, R.D., Spencer C.A., Nargang, F.E., Hodgetts, R.B. & Marsh, J.L. (1986) Embo.
J. 5, pages 2663-2672; Morgan B.A., Johnson, W.A. & Hirsh, ~01~5~2 _ --3 J. (1986) Embo. J. 5, pages 3335-3342) and mammals (Albert, V.R., Allent J.M., & Joh, T.H. (1987) J. Biol.
Chem. 262, pages 9404-9411) have a broader substrate specificity with L-dopa, tyrosine, phenylalanine and possibly histidine also serving as substrates.
In animals, the role of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase is to produce the major neurotransmitters dopamine and serotonin and, in D. melanogaster, the DDC
enzyme serves a second, inducible role, in the sclerotization of the insect cuticle (Christenson, J.G., Dairman, W. & Undenfriend, S. (1972) Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 69, pages 343-347; Lovenberg, W., Weissbach, W., & Undenfriend S. (1962) J. Biol. Chem. 237, pages 89-93;
Yuwiler, A., Geller, E. & Eiduson, S. (1954) Arch.
Biochem. Biophys. 80, pages 162-173; Brunet, P. (1980) Insect Biochem. 10, pages 467-500).
It would appear highly desirable to be able to clone the cDNA sequence of tryptophan decarboxylase from Catharanthus roseus, thus, providing the development of the cDNA sequence in a plasmid vector capable of transforming cell lines that will produce the tryptophan decarboxylase enzyme.
If the tryptophan decarboxylase gene could be inserted into living organisms by transformation to produce tryptamine and related protoalkaloids, it could supplement a neurotransmitter deficiency.
20:~0~
Further, the insertion of this gene in plants could be useful to alter the spectrum of tryptophan-based chemicals normally produced by the plant. For example, the insertion of constitutive expression of tryptophan decarboxylase in Brassica species could sequester the cytoplasmic tryptophan pool for the synthesis of tryptamine and related protoalkaloids and therefore repress the normal synthesis and accumulation of indole glucosinolates.
Hence, creation of plants with an altered chemical spectrum may produce novel phenotypes which have resistance to various pathogenic diseases or to insect pests.
SUHHARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, there is now provided the sequence of a cDNA clone which includes the complete coding region of tryptophan decarboxylase, preferably tryptophan decarboxylase (E.C.
4.1.1.27) from periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus). The cDNA
clone (1747 bp) was isolated by antibody screening of a cDNA expression library produced from poly At RNA found in developing seedlings of C. roseus. The clone hybridized to a 1.8 kb mRNA from developing seedlings and from young leaves of mature plants.
Also within the scope of the present invention is a method for inserting TDC gene into living organisms 2 ~ 2 by transformation. The identity of the clone was confirmed when extracts of transformed E. coli expressed a protein containing tryptophan decarboxylase enzyme activity. The tryptophan decarboxylase cDNA clone encodes a protein of 500 amino acids with a calculated molecular mass of 56,142 Da. The amino acid sequence shows a high degree of similarity with the aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (dopa-decarboxylase) and the alpha-methyldopa hypersensitive protein of Drosophila melaqonaster. The tryptophan decarboxylase sequence also showed significant similarity to feline glutamic acid decarboxylase and mouse ornithine decarboxylase suggesting a possible evolutionary link between these amino acid decarboxylases.
Furthermore, the protein encoded by the cDNA
clone of the present invention is active ln vitro.
IN THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 (lane 2) represents the TDC enzymatic activity in extracts of pTDC5-transformed E. coli, compared to those in control E. coli (lane 1) and that in C. roseus itself (lane 3).
Figure 2 represents the hybridization of the pTDC-5 clone to a 1.8 kb mRNA species isolated from periwinkle.
201~
Figure 3 shows the nucleotide sequence of the pTDC5 cDNA clone and its deduced amino acid sequence. The putative polyadenylation signal is underlined.
Figure 4 shows the amino acid sequence alignments of the protein for the D. melanoqaster alpha methyldopa hypersensitive gene (AMD), C. roseus tryptophan decarboxylase ~TDC), and Drosphila DOPA decarboxylase isoenzyme 1 (DDC1).
Figure 5 shows hydropathy profile of TDC and DDC1.
Other advantages of the present invention will be readily illustrated by referring to the following description.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OE THE INVENTION
cDNA synthesis and DNA sequencing.
Seedlings of C. roseus ~L.) G. Don cv "Little Delicata" were germinated and grown for 5 days in the dark as described previously ~De Luca, V., Alvarez-Fernandez, F., Campbell, D., & Kurz, W.G.W. (1988) Plant Physiol. 86, 447-450). Seedlings were harvested after 18 hours of light treatment and total RNA was isolated as described by Jones, J.D.G., Dunsmuir, P. & Bedrook, J. (1985) EMBO J.
4, 2411-2*18.
Poly(A)t RNA was isolated by chromatography on oligo (dT)- cellulose ~Aviv, H. & Leder, P. (1972) Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69, 1408-1412) and double-stranded , 201 0582 cDNAs were prepared according to the procedure of Gubler and Hoffman ~1983, Gene 25, 263-269). Followlng ligation with Eco RI linker, the cDNA was inserted into the Eco RI
site of the expresslon vector ZA~ (Stratagene, San Diego, Short, J.M., Fernandez, J.M., Sorge, J.A. & Huse, W.D.
(1988) Nucl. Acids Res. 16, 7S83-7600). A llbrary contalnlng 3.1 X 105 recombinant phages was obtalned and after amplificatlon, 2 X 105 plaques were screened with specific polyclonal antiserum raised against-TDC.
Plasmlds (pBluescript) containing a TDC cDNA insert were rescued using the R408 fl helper phage (Short, J.M., Fernandez, J.M., Sorge, J.A. & Huse, W.D. (1988) Nucl.
Acid~ Res. 16, 7583-7600) and the nucleotide sequence of a full-length cDNA clone (pTDC5) was determined on both strands by the dideoxy-chain-termination method (Sanger, F., NicXlen, S. & Coulson, A.R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 74, 5463-5467). The sequencing strategy lncluded subcloning of restriction fragments and the use of oligonucleotide primers. The sequence for all restriction sites used for the subcloning was determined on at least one strand. Comparisons of the pTDC5 cDNA nucleotlde sequence and of the deduced amino acid sequence with Genban~ and NBRF sequence libraries were performed using the FASTA* program pacXage (Pearson, W.R. & Lipman, D.J.
~1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 2444-2448).
*denotes trademark w RNA blot hybridization.
Poly(A)' RNA was isolated from 6 day old developlng seedlings and from young leaves of mature plants as described above. These tissues were chosen as a llkely source of TDC poly(A)' RNA based on the presence of high levels of TDC enzyme actlvity (De Luca, V., Alvarez-Fernandez, F., Campbell, D., & Kurz, W.G.W. (1988) Plant Physiol. 86, 447-450). RNA was denatured, fractioned by electrophoresis on formaldehyde/agarose gels, and then transferred to nitrocellulose fllters (Haniatls, T., Frltsch, E.F. & Sambrook, J. (1982) Ins Holecular Clonlng, A Laboratory Hanual. Cold Sprlng Harbor, New York). Blotted RNA was hybridized to [32p]_ labelled pTDC5 DNA and autoradlography was performed uslng Kodak* XAR-5 fllms.
TDC activlty in extracts of E. coli.
A culture (100 ml) of the E. coli strain ZLl-blue containlng pTDC5 or pBluescrlpt was incubated at 37~C
for 2 hours before addlng the IPTG inducer at a final concentratlon of 1 mM. Incubatlon was contlnued for an additional 2 hours. Cells were harvested, washed in TE
buffer, resuQpended and lysed in 3 ml of a buffer contalning 0.1 M Hepes, pH 7.5, 1 mH DTT. Debris was removed by centrlfugation and the supernatant was desalted by passage over a Sephadex G-25~ column. TDC enzymatlc activlty ln bacterial supernatants was determined by *denotes trademark 2 ~ 2 monitoring the conversion of L-[methylene-19C]-tryptophan to [14C]-tryptamine (De Luca, V., Alvarez-Fernandez, F., Campbell, D., & Kurz, W.G.W. (1988) Plant Physiol. 86, 447-450). Supernatants (30 ~l) were incubated in the presence of 0.1 ~Ci of [1~C]-tryptophan (sp. act. 59 mCi/mmol.) for 30 minutes and reactions were stopped with 100 ~l NaOH. Radioactive tryptamine was extracted from the reaction mixture with ethyl acetate and was analyzed by silica gel thin layer chromatography and autoradiography. Determination of TDC enzyme activity in leaves was performed as described previously (De Luca, V., Alvarez-Fernandez, F., Campbell, D., & Kurz, W.G.W. (1988) Plant Physiol. 86, 447-450).
TDC enzynatic activity in E. coli.
A tryptophan decarboxylase cDNA clone of C.
roseus was isolated by the use of antibody screening of an expression library. The antigenicity and enzymatic activity (Figure 1) of the encoded protein established the identity of the TDC cDNA.
When the original cDNA library was screened with the anti-TDC antibody, 27 clones were identified. Six clones were selected and submitted to further analysis.
Partial sequence analysis revealed no difference among these clones, except for their length. Therefore, the clone having the longest cDNA insert (pTDC5) was selected for further characterization. To confirm that this cDNA
2 ~
clone corresponded to TDC r enzymatic activity was measured in cell extracts from E coli. Figure 1 shows that ~l4C]-tryptamine was produced with extracts from cells transformed with pTDC5, and with extracts from C. roseus leaves (lane 3), but not with extracts from cells containing only the vector (lane 1).
The conversion of [l4C]-tryptophan to ~14C]-tryptamine was monitored in extracts of E. coli and C.
roseus leaves. [14C]-tryptophan (sp. act. 50 mCi/mmol) for 30 minutes. After addition of base, ~14C]-tryptamine was extracted from the reaction mixture with ethyl acetate and reaction products were analyzed by thin layer chromatography on silica gel (solvent CHCl3 MeOH: 25% NH3 (5:4:1) and autoradiography. In Figure 1, TDC enzymatic activity is shown; lane 1, E. coli is transformed by the pBluescript vector, lane 2, E. coli is transformed by pTDC5 and lane 3, C. roseus extract is shown.
This result indicated that TDC enzymatic activity was retained by the protein produced using a TDC
cDNA clone under the control of the Lac promoter of the pBluescript vector. No attempts were made to quantify the level of activity of TDC in E. coli.
Sequence analysis of a TDC cDNA clone.
DNA sequence analysis of pTDC5 revealed the presence of an open reading frame coding for a protein of 500 amino acids, which corresponded to a molecular mass of 2 0 1 0 ~ ~ 2 56,142 Da (Figure 2). The 5'-nontranslated region of pTDC5 contained 69 nucleotides and included, near its beginning, a long stretch of alternating pyrimidines.
Sequence around the methionine initiation codon (AAUAAUGGG) matched closely the consensus sequence for plant gene initiation codons (AACAAUGGC) (Lutcke, H.A., Chow, K.C., Mickel, F.S., Moss, K.A., Kerm, H.F. and Scheele, G.A. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 43-48). The 3'nontranslated region consisted of 168 nucleotides up to the poly(A) tail and contained an AAUAAA putative poly(A)f addition signal 17 nucleotides upstream from the start of the poly(A)t tail. Examination of the predicted amino acid sequence did not reveal the presence of a signal sequence (Watson, M.E.E. (1984) Nucl. Acids Res. 12, 5145-5164), which is consistent with the proposed cytoplasmic location of TDC within the cell (De Luca, V., Alvarez-Fernandez, F., Campbell, D., & Kurz, W.G.W. (1988) Plant Physiol. 86, 4474-50)-Comparison of TDC-cDNA nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences with nucleotide sequences in the Genbank DNA sequence database and with amino acid sequences in the NBRF protein sequence database revealed surprising similarity (40% amino acid identity) with the dopa-decarboxylase isoenzyme l(DDC1) from D. melanoqaster (Eveleth, D.D., Gietz, R.D., Spencer, C.A., Nargang, F.E., Hodgetts, R.B. & Marsh, J.L. (1986) EMB0 J. 5, 2663-2672;
Morgan, B.A., Johnson, W.A. & Hirsh, J. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 3335-3342), and with the protein corresponding to the D.
melanoqaster alpha-methyldopa hypersensitive gene (AMD, 35% amino acid identity) (Eveleth, D.D. & Marsh, J.L.
(1986) Genetics 114, 469-483) (Figure 3). In Figure 3, the boxes show TDC residues present in AMD and~or DDC1 sequences. Amino acids are numbered for TDC (top) and DDC1 (bottom). The areas of amino acid similarity extended throughout the protein and were not restricted to a particular portion of either structure.
Furthermore, the 39% amino acid sequence similarity could be extended to the predicted distribution of potential alpha helices and beta sheets. This indicated that the amino acid differences between the two proteins did not significantly alter their secondary structures, and may indicate the importance of such conserved domains to mediate subunit assembly, as well as catalytic function and substrate specificity.
Limited proteolysis of pig kidney dopa decarboxylase and amino acid sequencing of a tryptic fragment produced a sequence for 50 amino acid residues one third of the distance from the COOH terminus of this protein (Tancini, B., Dominici, P., Simmaco, M., Schinina, M.E., Barra, D., & Voltatormi, C.D. (1988) Arch. Biochem.
Biophys. 260, 569-576). Comparison of this 50 amino acid sequence with periwinkle TDC and D. melanoqaster DDCI gave 2~a~
and 32 identical amino acids, respectively.
Furthermore, comparison of C. roseus TDC to feline glutamic acid decarboxylase (Kobayashi, Y., Kaufman, D.L.
& Tobin, A.J. (1987) J. Neurosci. 7, 2768-2772) showed that 10~ of the amino acid residues were identical between these two proteins. This similarity could be extended to 25% on a 396 aa stretch. Mouse ornithine decarboxylase (Kahana, C. & Nathans, D. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 82, 1673-1677) showed a statistically significant (Pearson, W.R. & Lipman, D.J. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 85, 2444-2448) 12% amino acid sequence similarity to the plant TDC which also extended throughout the protein sequence. We also found that the sequence Pro-His-Lys, beginning at position 317 in TDC, was identical to the sequence at the pyridoxal phosphate binding sites of D. melanogaster DDC (Marques, I.A., & Brodelius, P.
(1988) Plant Physiol. 88, 52-55; Clark, W.C., Pass, P.S., Venkataraman, B., & Hodgetts, R.B. (1978) Mol. Gen. Genet.
162, 287-297), feline glutamic acid decarboxylase (Kobayashi, Y., Kaufman, D.L. & Tobin, A.J. (1987) J.
Neurosci. 7, 2768-2772) and pig dopa-decarboxylase (Bossa, F., Martini, F., Barra, D., Borri Voltatorni, C., Minelli, A. & Turano, C., (1977) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 78, 177-183). In contrast, the AMD protein, whose enzymatic function is unknown, contained the sequence Leu-His-Lys at the pyridoxal phosphate binding domain. The sequence 2010~32 similarity observed between TDC, feline glutamic acid decarboxylase and mouse ornithine decarboxylase also suggests an evolutionary link between these three amino acid decarboxylases.
Structural similarities between TDC and D.
melanogaster DDC1 proteins were further revealed by comparing their hydropathy profiles (Figure 4). Each value was calculated as the average hydropathic index of a sequence of 9 amino acids and plotted to the middle residue of each sequence. Positive and negative values indicate hydrophobic and hydrophillic regions of the proteins, respectively. Close examination of the alignment of hydrophobic and hydrophillic regions for the two proteins showed a striking match between them, except for the area near the N terminus and the region around TDC
residue 225.
Most decarboxylases require for their activity a pyridoxal phosphate co-factor linked to the C amino group of a lysine residue. The observed similarities around the pyridoxal binding site of pig kidney dopa-decarboxylase, D. melanogaster dopa-decarboxylase and feline glutamate decarboxylase with that of periwinkle TDC
strongly suggests that lysine 319 of TDC binds pyridoxal phosphate.
The aromatic amino acid decarboxylases of plants, insects and mammals are remarkably similar in 201~2 subunit structure, molecular mass and kinetic properties (Maneckjee, R., & Baylin, S.B. (1983) Biochemistry 22, 6058-6063). Plant aromatic amino acid decarboxylases (Noe, W., Mollenschott, C. & Berline J. (1984) Plant Mol.
Biol. 3, pages 281-288; Chapple, C.C.S., (1984) Ph.D.
Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada;
Marques, I.A., & Brodelius, P. (1988) Plant Physiol. 88, pages 52-55), in contrast to those from animals, display high substrate specificity for indole or phenolic substrates but not to both. The strong similarity observed between periwinkle TDC and DDC1 of D.
melanoqaster suggests that plant aromatic amino acid decarboxylase specific for tyrosine, phenylalanine or dihydroxyphenylalanine may be structurally similar to TDC
and may, therefore, also be evolutionarily related. The recent purification of specific L-tyrosine decarboxylases (Marques, I.A., & Brodelius, P. l1988) Plant Physiol. 88, pages 52-55) to homogeneity should allow cloning of these genes and direct testing of this hypothesis.
TDC nRNA accumulation.
Total poly(A) t RNAs (1 ~g) from six day old C.
roseus seedlings and from young leaves of mature plants were run on an agarose/formaldehyde gel and were transferred to nitrocellulose paper. Hybridization was performed with [32P]-labelled pTDC5 insert (sp. act. 1.2 X
108 cpm/yG). When total poly(A)t RNA isolated from six day 201(3S~
old seedlings was probed with a 1.6 kb cDNA fragment isolated from pTDC5, a 1.8 kb mRNA was detected (Figure 5, lane 1). Young leaves from the mature plant also contained a 1.8 kb mRNA (Figure 5, lane 2). A fainter signal corresponding to a transcript of 3.2 kb was also present in both the lanes. This signal could be a precursor form of the TDC mRNA or an unrelated transcript having some sequence similarity to TDC.
Claims (15)
1. A DNA fragment comprising an isolated and purified DNA sequence encoding a plant tryptophan decarboxylase, wherein the plant decarboxylase has the DNA sequence corresponding to nucleotides 69 to 1572 of the sequence of figure 3.
2. The DNA fragment as defined in Claim 1, wherein the DNA sequence is cloned and sequenced from Catharanthus roseus.
3. A synthetic DNA molecule expressible in E. coli and coding for the expression of a plant tryptophan decarboxylase enzyme comprising the DNA
fragment as defined in Claim 1.
fragment as defined in Claim 1.
4. The synthetic DNA molecule of Claim 3, wherein the tryptophan decarboxylase enzyme is from Catharanthus roseus.
5. An expression vector coding for a plant tryptophan decarboxylase enzyme comprising the DNA fragment as claimed in Claim 1.
6. An expression vector according to Claim 5, wherein the vector is pTDC5.
7. An expression vector having a microorganism replication system and a gene coding for the expression of a plant tryptophan decarboxylase enzyme, wherein the gene comprises the DNA fragment as defined in Claim 1.
8. The expression vector of Claim 7, wherein the microorganism is E. coli and wherein the tryptophan decarboxylase enzyme is from Catharanthus roseus.
9. The expression vector of Claim 8, wherein the microorganism E. coli strain ZL-1 blue containing the pTDC5 plasmid.
.
.
10. A host cell having an extrachromosomal functional synthetic gene expressing an active plant tryptophan decarboxylase enzyme, wherein the enzyme has the DNA sequence corresponding to nucleotides 69 to 1572 of the sequence of figure 3.
11. A cell according to Claim 10, wherein said cell is a microorganism and wherein said tryptophan decarboxylase enzyme is from Catharanthus roseus.
12. A cell according to Claim 11, wherein said microorganism is a bacterium.
13. A cell according to Claim 12, wherein said bacterium is E coli.
14. An E. coli bacteria having an extrachromosomal functional synthetic gene expressing an active plant tryptophan decarboxylase enzyme, wherein the enzyme has the DNA sequence corresponding to nucleotides 69 to 1572 of the sequence of figure 3.
15. An E. coli bacteria of Claim 14, wherein the E. coli is ZL1-blue.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US31487989A | 1989-02-24 | 1989-02-24 | |
| US314,879 | 1989-02-24 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2010582A1 CA2010582A1 (en) | 1990-08-24 |
| CA2010582C true CA2010582C (en) | 1998-07-28 |
Family
ID=23221876
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2010582 Expired - Lifetime CA2010582C (en) | 1989-02-24 | 1990-02-21 | A tryptamine producing tryptophan decarboxylase gene of plant origin |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP0425597A1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP2919069B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2010582C (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1990010073A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5814520A (en) * | 1989-02-24 | 1998-09-29 | National Research Council Canada | Tryptamine producing tryptophan decarboxylase gene of plant origin |
| US7119262B1 (en) | 1997-07-31 | 2006-10-10 | Sanford Scientific, Inc. | Production of transgenic poinsettia |
| AU8682198A (en) * | 1997-07-31 | 1999-02-22 | Sanford Scientific, Inc. | Transgenic plants using the tdc gene for crop improvement |
| CN105274083B (en) * | 2015-11-20 | 2018-11-23 | 中国科学院华南植物园 | A kind of glutamate decarboxylase and its encoding gene and application |
| CN113403351B (en) * | 2021-06-28 | 2022-12-23 | 新泰市佳禾生物科技有限公司 | Method for converting L-tryptophan into tryptamine and D-tryptophan |
-
1990
- 1990-02-21 JP JP2503856A patent/JP2919069B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-02-21 CA CA 2010582 patent/CA2010582C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-02-21 WO PCT/CA1990/000057 patent/WO1990010073A1/en not_active Ceased
- 1990-02-21 EP EP19900903729 patent/EP0425597A1/en not_active Ceased
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO1990010073A1 (en) | 1990-09-07 |
| JP2919069B2 (en) | 1999-07-12 |
| EP0425597A1 (en) | 1991-05-08 |
| CA2010582A1 (en) | 1990-08-24 |
| JPH03505161A (en) | 1991-11-14 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| De Luca et al. | Molecular cloning and analysis of cDNA encoding a plant tryptophan decarboxylase: comparison with animal dopa decarboxylases. | |
| Ichinose et al. | Isolation and characterization of a cDNA clone encoding human aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase | |
| Sumi-Ichinose et al. | Molecular cloning of genomic DNA and chromosomal assignment of the gene for human aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase, the enzyme for catecholamine and serotonin biosynthesis | |
| Knappskog et al. | Recessively inherited L-DOPA-responsive dystonia caused by a point mutation (Q381K) in the tyrosine hydroxylase gene | |
| US5652131A (en) | Cyclic GMP-binding, cyclic GMP-specific phosphodiesterase materials and methods | |
| Jones et al. | Expression and structural analysis of 14-3-3 proteins | |
| Wing et al. | Molecular cloning, expression and characterization of a ubiquitin conjugation enzyme (E217kB) highly expressed in rat testis | |
| Kuo et al. | Cloning and expression of the cDNA for a Drosophila insulin-degrading enzyme | |
| AU765392B2 (en) | Highly active alkaline phosphatase | |
| CA2321224A1 (en) | Phosphodiesterase 10 | |
| US6184016B1 (en) | Polypeptides having prenylcysteine carboxyl methyltransferase activity or inhibiting activity | |
| CA2010582C (en) | A tryptamine producing tryptophan decarboxylase gene of plant origin | |
| Takenaka et al. | Complete nucleotide sequence and functional analysis of the genes for 2-aminophenol metabolism from Pseudomonas sp. AP-3 | |
| EP0793725B1 (en) | Nuclear protein serine/threonine kinases | |
| TAMURA et al. | Molecular cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding an olfactory-specific mouse phenol sulphotransferase | |
| Takata et al. | Rat guanidinoacetate methyltransferase. Effect of site-directed alteration of an aspartic acid residue that is conserved across most mammalian S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferases. | |
| JP3015878B2 (en) | Thermostable enzyme having DNA polymerase activity | |
| US5814520A (en) | Tryptamine producing tryptophan decarboxylase gene of plant origin | |
| JP2002534984A (en) | Mammalian serine racemase | |
| Schworer et al. | Calmodulin-dependent glycogen synthase kinase: Identification in liver of normal and phosphorylase kinase-deficient rats | |
| Bergstrom et al. | Hamster monomorphic arylamine N-acetyltransferase: expression in Escherichia coli and purification | |
| JP3355368B2 (en) | Plasmid vector containing cDNA encoding plant-derived epoxide hydrolase and transformant | |
| JP2000224992A (en) | Novel phosphodiesterase and its gene | |
| CA2303402A1 (en) | Hypoxia inducible promoter | |
| JPH07163364A (en) | Esterase gene |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed | ||
| MKEC | Expiry (correction) |
Effective date: 20121202 |