CA1293967C - Metal-containing spinel composition and process for using same - Google Patents

Metal-containing spinel composition and process for using same

Info

Publication number
CA1293967C
CA1293967C CA000534085A CA534085A CA1293967C CA 1293967 C CA1293967 C CA 1293967C CA 000534085 A CA000534085 A CA 000534085A CA 534085 A CA534085 A CA 534085A CA 1293967 C CA1293967 C CA 1293967C
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
metal
spinel
composition
group
metals
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
CA000534085A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Jin Sun Yoo
Cecelia Ann Radlowski
John Albert Karch
Alakananda Bhattacharyya
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Katalistiks International Inc
Original Assignee
Katalistiks International Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=25304711&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=CA1293967(C) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Katalistiks International Inc filed Critical Katalistiks International Inc
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1293967C publication Critical patent/CA1293967C/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/005Spinels
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G11/00Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils
    • C10G11/02Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils characterised by the catalyst used
    • C10G11/04Oxides
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/10Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of rare earths
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/16Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • B01J23/32Manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • B01J23/34Manganese
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/70Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
    • B01J23/74Iron group metals
    • B01J23/745Iron
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/70Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
    • B01J23/74Iron group metals
    • B01J23/75Cobalt
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S502/00Catalyst, solid sorbent, or support therefor: product or process of making
    • Y10S502/524Spinel

Abstract

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A composition of matter comprising at least one metal-containing spinel which includes a first metal and a second metal having a valence higher than the valence of the first metal, a minor amount of at least one third metal component effective to promote the oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide at sulfur dioxide oxidation conditions, and a minor amount of at least one fourth metal component effective to promote the reduction of first metal sulfate at first metal sulfate reduction conditions. These compositions are useful, e.g., in hydrocarbon conversion processes, to reduce sulfur oxide and/or nitrogen oxide atmospheric emissions.

Description

METAL-CONTAINING SPINEL COMPOSITION
AND PROCESS OF USING SAME
This invention relates to improved metal-con~aining spinel compositions, particularly for use in a manner to effect a reduction in the emission of sulfl!r oxides and~or nitrogen oxides to the atmosphere. In one specific embodiment, the invention involves compositions and processes-for the catalytic cracking of sulfur-containing hydrocarbon feedstocks to effect a reduction in the amount of sulfur oxides and/or nitrogen oxides emitted from the regeneration zone of a hydrocarbon catalytic cracking unit.
Typically, catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons takes place in a reaction zone at hydrocarbon cracking conditions to produce at least one hydrocarbon product and to cause carbonaceous material (coke) to be deposited on the catalyst.
Additionally, some sulfur, originally present in the feed hydrocarbons, may also be deposited, e.g., as a component of the coke, on the catalyst.
Sulfur-containing coke deposits tend to deactivate cracking catalyst. Cracking catalyst is advantageously continuously regenerated, by combustion with oxygen-containing gas in a regeneration zone, to low coke levels, typically below about 0.4% by weight, to perform fiatisfactorily when it is recycled to the reactor.
In the regeneration zone, at least a portion of the sulfur, along with carbon and hydrogen, which is deposited on the catalyst, ~s oxidized and leaves in the form of sulfur oxides (sulfur dioxide and ~ulfur ~3~

trioxide, hereinafter referred ~o a "SOx") along with substantial amounts of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and water. At least a portion of the nitrogen, which may be present in the coke deposits and~or in the oxygen-containing gas, is oxidized at the conditions in the regeneration zone to nitrogen oxides which also leave with the flue gas from ~he regeneration zone.
Considerable recent research effort has been directed to the reduction of sulfur oxide and nitrogen oxide atmospheric emissions, e.g., from the regeneration zones of hydrocarbon catalytic cracking units. One technique that has been suggested for reducing ~uch sulfur oxide emissions involves circulating one or more metal oxides capable of associating with oxides of sulfur with the cracking catalyst inventory in the regeneration zone. When the particles containing associated oxides of sulfur are circulated to the reducing atmosphere of the cracking zone, the associated sulfur compounds are released as gaseous sulfur-bearing material such as hydrogen sulfide, which is discharged with the products from the cracking zone and is in a form which can be readily handled in a typical facility, e.g., petroleum refinery. The metal reactant is regenerated to an active form, and is capable of further associating with the sulfur oxides when cycled to the regeneration zone.
A metallic component, either incorporated into catalyst particles or present on any of a varie~y of "inert" supports, is exposed alternately to the oxidizing atmosphere of the regeneration zone of an FCCU and the reducing atmosphere of the cracking æone to reduce sulfur oxide emissions rom regenerator gases in accordance with the teachings o U.S. Paten~s Nos. ~,153,534 and ~,153,535 to Vasalos and VasalosJ et al., respectively. In Vasalos, et al., 2 metallic oxida~ion promoter, consisting of components of ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, platinum, osmium, iridium, platinum, vanadium, uranium, zirconium, rhenium, silver and mixtures thereof is also present when carbon monoxide emissions are to be reduced. Vasalos, et al., teaches that the more preferred metallic promoter consists of components of ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, osmium, iridium, platinum and rhenium. These patents disclose nineteen different metallic components, including materials as diverse as alkaline earths, sodium, heavy metals and rare earth, as being sui~able reactants for reducing emissions of oxides of sulfur. The metallic reactants that ar~ especially preferred are sodium, magnesium, manganese and copper. The carriers for the metallic reactants, preferably have surface areas of at least 50 square meters per gram.
Examples of allegedly "inert" supports are silica, alumina and silica-alumina. The Vasalos and Vasalos, et al., patents further disclose that when certain metallic reactants (exemplified by oxides o~
iron, manganese or cerium) are employed to capture oxides of sulfur, such metallic component6 can be in the form o~ a finely divided fluidizable powder.
A vast number of sorbents have been proposed for desulfurization of non-FCCU flue gases :~Z~3~

in zones outside the unit in which SOx is generated. In some such non-FCCU applica~ions, the ~orbents are regenerated in environments appreciably richer in hydrogen than the cracking zone of an FCC
unit. Fifteen adsorbents are disclosed for flue gas desulfurization in a publication of Lowell, et al., "SELECTION OF METAL OXIDES FOR REMOVING SOx FROM
FLUE GAS," Ind. Eng. Chemical Process Design Development, Vol. 10, Nov. 3, 1971. In U.S. Patent No. 4,001,375 to Longo, cerium on an alumina support is used to absorb S02 from non-FCCU flue gas streams or automobile exhaust at temperatures of 572 to 1472 degrees F., preferably 932 to 1100 degrees F.
D. W. Deberry, et al., "RATES OF REACTION
OF S02 WITH METAL OXIDES, " Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 49, 781 (1971) reports that cerium oxide was found to form sulfates more rapidly than most of the other oxides tested. The temperatures used, however, were below 900 degrees F. and thus below those preferred for use in catalyst regenerators in FCC units.
Many commercial zeolitic FCC catalyst contain up to 4% rare earth oxide, the rare earth being used to stabilize the zeolite and provide increased activity. See, for example, U.S. Patent No. 3,930,987 to Grand. The rare earths are most often used as mixtures of La2O3, CeO2, Pr6Oll, Nd2O3 and others. Some catalyst is produced by using a lanthanum-rich mixture obtained by removing substantial cerium from the mixture of rare earth. It has been found that the mere presence of rare earth in a zeolitic cracking 3~

catalyst will not necessarily reduce SOx emissions to an appreciable extent.
In accordance with the teachings of U.S.
Patent No. 3,823,092 to Gladrow, certain zeolitic catalyst compositions capable of being regenerated at a rate appreciably faster than prior art rare earth exchanged zeolitic catalyst compositions are produced by treating a previously rare earth exchanged zeolitic catalyst composition with a dilute solution containing cerium cations ~or a mixture of rare earths rich in cerium). The final catalysts contain 0.5 to 4% cerium cations which are introduced to previously rare earth exchanged zeolitic catalyst particles prior to final filtering, rinsing and calcining. Cerium is described as an "oxidation promoter".
Thus, considerable amount of study and research effort has been directed to rsducing oxide of sulfur emissions from various gaseous streams, including those from the stacks of the regenerators of FCC units. Many metallic compounds have been proposed as materials to pick up oxides of sulfur in FCC units ~and other desulfurization applications).
Many of the proposed metallic compounds or reactants lose effectiveness when subjected to repeated cycling. Thus, when Group II metal oxides are impregnated on FCC catalysts or various supports, the activity of the Group II metals is rapidly reduced under the influence of the cyclic conditions. Discrete alumina particles, when combined with silica-containing catalyst particles and subjected to steam at elevated temperatures, lf~3$~7 e.g., those present in FCC unit regenerators, are of limited effec~iveness in reducing SOx emissions.
Incorporation of sufficient chromium on an al~nina support to improve SOx sorption results in undesirably increased coke and gas production. The presence of vanadium in the hydrocarbon feedstock to I a catalytic cracking unit is known to have a deleterious effect on the cracking operation. For i example, this vanadium, which deposits on the catalyst, tends to poison the catalyst, i.e., tends to inhibit the catalyst's ability to promote the desired cracking chemical reactions. This is one I reason for the reluctance to even consider the use I of vanadium in cracking operations.
U.S. Patents 4,469,589 and 4,472,267, ¦ relate to improved materials for reducing SOx j emissions comprising spinels, preferably alkaline i earth metal, aluminum-containing spinels, which materials may contain one or more other metal ¦ components capable of promoting the oxidation of i sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide at combustion conditions. Such metallic components include components of Group IB metals, Group IIB metals, Group IVB metals, Group VIA metals, Group VIB
metals, Group VIIA metals, Group VIII metals, the rare earth me~als, vanadium, iron, tin, antimony and mixtures thereof. In specific examples, these patents disclose ~hat magnesium, aluminum-containing spinel is impregnated with such other metal components ~e.g., cerium and platinum) using conventional techniques. In addition, these patents disclose that in situations where the spinel ~3~

normally contains aluminum ions, other trivalent metal ions, such as iron, chromium, vanadium, manganese;
gallium, boron, cobalt and mixtures thereof, may replace all or a part of the aluminum ions. U.S. Patents 4,471,070 ~,472,532; 4,476,245: 4,492,S77; 4,~92,678;
4,495,304: 4,495,305 and 4,522,937 also relate to spinel compositions useful to reduce sulfur oxide atmospheric emissions. There remains a need for still further improved spinel compositions exhibiting good SOx removal and/or nitrogen oxide reduction properties.
In one general aspect, the present invention involves a composition, hereinafter referred to as "ROS", comprising at least one metal containing spinel, preferably a major component of such spinel, which includes a first metal and a second metal having a valence higher than the valence of the first metal, a minor amount of at least one component of a third metal other than the first and second metals effective to promote the oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide at sulfur dioxide oxidation conditions, and a minor amount of at least one component of a fourth metal other than the first, second and third metals effective to promote the reduction of first metal sulfate at first metal sulfate reduction conditions; provided that in the event the third metal is rare earth metal, the fourth metal is other than vanadium. Vanadium, rare earth metal-containing spinel compositions are disclosed and claimed in commonly assigned Canadian patent application Serial No. 534,083. In another embodiment, the invention involves a catalyst system comprising, in intimate admixture, a major amount of solid particles capable of promoting hydrocarbon conversion at hydrocarbon conversion conditions, and a minor amount of discrete entities having a chemical make-up which is different from the solid particles and which comprises the ROS described above. The present ROS have been ~' 3~;i7 found to provid~ for both outstanding effectiveness in removing sulfur oxides, e.g., from the catalyst regeneration zones of hydrocarbon catalytic cracking units, and improved effectiveness in rel~asing associated sulfur oxide, e.g., in the reaction zones of hydrocarbon catalytic cracking units. The amounts of third and fourth metals present in the ROS are preferably chosen so that the third and fourth metal components have no substantial detrimental effect on the hydrocarbon conversion, e.g., cracking process.
In a further embodiment, the invention relates to a process for reducing at least one, preferably both, of tl) the sulfur oxide content of a sulfur oxide-containing gas and (2) the nitrogen oxide content of a nitrogen oxide-containing gas which comprises contacting the gas with a material at conditions to reduce at least one of (1) the sulfur oxide content of the gas and (2) the nitrogen oxide content of the gas. The material to be used is the ROS first described above.

,~, !' 39~'~
_ g _ In yet another embodiment, ~he presen~
invention relates to an improved hydrocarbon conversion, preferably cracking, process for ~onverting a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon I feedstock. The process comprises (1) contac~ing the feedstock with solid particles capable of promoting the conversion of the feedstock at hydrocarbon conversion conditions in at least one reaction zone to produce at least one hydrocarbon product and to cause deactivating sulfur-containing carbonaceous j material to be formed on the solid particles; (2) I contacting the deposit-containing particles with an oxygen-containing vaporous medium at conditions to combust at least a portion o the carbonaceous i deposit material in at least one regeneration zone to ~hereby regenerate at least a portion of ~he hydrocarbon conversion catalytic activity of the solid particles and to form a regeneration zone flue gas containing sulfur oxide (e.g., sulfur trioxide) and/or nitrogen oxide; and (3) repeating steps (1) and (2) periodically. The present improvement comprises using, in intimate admixture with the solid particles, a minor amoun~ of discrete entities having a chemical make-up which is different from the 801id particles and which comprises the ROS
first described above. Such discrete entities are present in an amoun~ effective to reduce the amount of sulfur oxides and/or nitrogen oxides in the flue gas.
In one embodiment, the di5crete ~ntities also include a minor, catalytically effective amount of at least one crystalline material effective ~o D-15~59 :~2~

promote hydrocarbon conversion, e.g., crac~ing, at hydrocarbon conversion conditions.
The preferred relative amounts o the solid par~icles and discrete entities are about 80 to about 99 parts and about 1 to about 20 parts by weight, respectively. This catalyst ~ys~em is especially effective for the catalytic cracking of a hydrocarbon feedstock to lighter, lower boiling products. The present catalyst system also has improved carbon monoxide oxidation catalytic activity and stability.
In another embodiment, the ROS has a surface area (by the conventional B.E.T. method) in the range of about 25m2/gm. to about 600m2/gm., more preferably about 40m2/gm. to about 400m2/gm., and still more preferably about 50m2/gm. to about 300m2/gm. These relatively high surface areas have been found to provide for improved reduction in sulfur oxide and/or nitrogen oxide atmospheric emissions.
This invention can be used to advantage with the catalyst (solid particles and discrete entities) being disposed in any conventional reactor-regenerator system, in ebullating catalyst bed systems, in systems which involve continuously conveying or circulating catalyst between reaction zone and regeneration zone and the like.
Circulating catalyst systems are preferred. Typical o~ the circulating catalyst bed systems are the conv0ntional moving bed and fluidized bed reactor-regenerator systems. Both of these circulating bed systems are conven~ionally used in hydrocarbon conversion, e.g., hydrocarbon cracking, operations with the fluidized catalyst bed reactor-regenerator systems being preferred.
Although ~he presently useful solid particles and discrete entities may be used as a physical admixture of separate particles, in one embodiment the discrete entities are combined as part of the solid particles. That is, the discrete entities, e.g~, comprising calcined microspheres of the ROS, are combined with the solid particles, e.g., during the manufacture of the solid particles, to form combined particles which function as both the presently useful solid particles and discrete entities. In this embodiment the discrete entities are preferably a separate and distinct phase in the combined particles. One preferred method for providing the combined particles is to calcine the discrete entities prior to incorporating the discrete entities into the combined.particles.
The ~orm, i.e., particle size, of the present particles, e.g., both solid particles and discrete entities as well as the combined particles, is not critical to the present invention and may vary depending, for example, on the type of reaction-regeneration system employed. Such particles may be formed into any desired shape such as pills, cakes, extrudates, powders, granules, spheres and the like, using conventional methods.
Where, for example, the final particles are designed ~or use as a ~ixed bed, the particles may preferably be formed in~o particles having a minimum dimension of at least about 0.01 inch and a maximum dimension 33~6~

of up to about one-half inch or one inch or more.
Spherical particles having a diameter of about 0.03 inch to about 0.25 inch, preferably abou~ 0.03 inch ~o about 0.1~ inch, are of~en useful, especially in ixed bed or moving bed operations. With regard to fluidized systems, it is preferred that the major amount by weight of the particles have a diameter in the range of about 10 microns to about 250 microns, more preferably about 20 microns to about 150 microns.
The solid particles are capable of promoting the desired hydrocarbon conversion. By "hydrocarbon conversion" is meant a chemical reaction or conversion in which one or more of the feed materials or reactants and/or one or more of the products or conversion products is substantially hydrocarbon in nature, e.g., comprises a major amount of weight of carbon and hydrogen. The solid particles are further characterized as having a r composition (i.e., chemical make-up) which is different from the discrete entities. In one preferred embodiment, the solid particles (or ~he solid particles portion of the combined particles described above) are substantially free of ROS.
The composition of the solid particles useful in the present invention is not critical, provided that 6uch particles are capable of promoting the desired hydrocarbon conversion. Solid particles having widely varying compositions are conventionally used as catalyst in such hydrocarbon conversion processes, the particular composition chosen being dependent, ~or example, on the type of ~3~

hydrocarbon chemical conversion desired. Thus, the solid particles suitable for use in the present invention include at least one of the natural or synthetic materials which are capable of promoting the desired hydrocarbon chemical conversion. For example, when the desired hydrocarbon conversion involves one or more of hydrocarbon cracking (preferably in the substantial absence of added free molecular hydrogen), disproportionation, isomerization, hydrocracking, reforming, dehydrocyclization, polymerization, alkylation and dealkylation, such suitable materials include acid-treated natural clays, such as montmorillonite, kaolin and bentonite clays; natural or synthetic amorphous materials, such as alumina, silica, silica-alumina, silica magnesia and silica zirconia composites: crystalline materials often referred to a zeolites or molecular sieves, such as aluminosilicates, SAP0, TAP0, MeAPO, LZ-210, LZ-10, and the like. Certain of these crystalline materials are discussed in U.S.
20 Patents 4,310,440; 4,440,871; 4,500,651; and 4,503,023.
In certain instances, e.g., hydrocarbon cxacking and disproportionation, the solid particles preferably include such crystalline materials to increase catalytic activity. Methods for preparing such solid particles and the combined solid particles-discrete entities particles are conventional and well known in the art. For example, arystalline aluminosilicate compositions ''I' ~93~Ç~

can be made from alkali metal silicates and alkali metal aluminates so that they initially contain significant concentrations of alkali me~als. Sodium tends to redu~e the catalyst activity of the composition for hydrocarbon conversion reactions such as hydrocarbon cracking and disproportionation.
Accordingly, most or all of.the sodium in the crystalline aluminosilicate is removed or replaced, e.g., with other metal ~ations such aluminum ions or ions of the rare earths, which are associated with the crystalline aluminosilicates. This can be accomplished by contacting the crystalline aluminosilicate with a source of hydrogen ions such as acids, or hydrogen precursors 6uch as ammonium compounds. These procedures are thoroughly described in U.S. Patents 3,140,253 and RE. 27,639.
Compositions of the solid particles which are particularly useful in the present invention are ~hose in which the crystalline material is incorporated in an amount effective to promote the desired hydrocarbon conversion, e.g., a catalytically effective amount, into a porous matrix which comprises, for example, amorphous material which may or may not be itself capable of promoting such hydrocarbon conversion. Included among such matrix materials are clays and amorphous compositions of alumina, silica, silica-alumina, magnesia, zirconia, mixtures of these and the like.
The crystalline material is preferably incorporated into the matrix material in amounts within the range of about 1% to about 75~, more preferably about 2%
to about 50%, by weight of the total solid :~Z~39~7 particles. The preparation of crystalline-a~orphous matrix catalytic materials is described in the above-mentioned patents. Catalytically active crystalline materials which are formed during and/or as part of the methods of manufacturing the solid particles, discrete entities and~or as part of the methods of manufacturing the solid particles, discrete entities and/or combined particles are wi~hin the scope of the present inYention. The solid particles are preferably substantially free of added rare earth metal, e.g., cerium, component disposed on the amorphous matrix material of the catalyst, although such rare earth metal components may be associated with the crystalline ma~erials of the solid particles.
The solid particles useful in the catalytic hydrocarbon cracking embodiment of the present invention may be any conventional catalyst capable of promoting hydrocarbon cracking at the conditions present in the reaction zone, i.e., hydrocarbon cracking conditions. Similarly, the catalytic activity of ~uch solid particles is restored at the cond~tions present in the regeneration zone.
Typical among these conventional catalysts are those which comprise amorphous silica-alumina and at least one crystalline aluminosilicate having pore diameters of abou~ 8 angstroms to about 15 angstroms and mixtures thereof. When the solid particles and/or discrete en~ities to be used in the hydrocarbon cracking embodiment of the present invention contain crystalline aluminosilicate, the crystalline aluminosilicate may include minor ~3~6~

amounts of conventional metal promoters such as therare earth metals, in particular, cerium.
As indicated above, the present ROS
comprise an effective amount, preferably a major amount, of at least one spinel containing a first metal and a second metal, preferably alkaline earth metal-containing spinel, a minor amount of at least one component of a different third metal effective to promote the oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide at sulfur dioxide oxidation conditions, and a minor amount of at least one component of a different fourth metal effective to promote the reduction of first metal sulfate at ~irst metal sulfate reduction conditions In another preferred aspect, the present ROS include amounts of third metal component and fourth metal component which are effective to promote the reduction of nitrogen oxides at nitrogen oxide reduction conditions.
The spinel structure is based on a cubic close-packed array of oxide ions. ~ypically, the crystallographic unit cell of the spinel structure contains 32 oxygen atoms; one-eighth of the ~etrahedral holes (of which there are two per anion) are occupied by divalent metal ion, and one-half of the octahedral holes (of which there are two per anion) are occupied by trivalent metal ions.
This typical spinel structure or a modification thereof is adaptable to many other mixed metal oxides o~ the type MIIM2 IIIo4 (e-g-, FeCr20~, SnA1204 and CoIICo2 III04), by some of the type MIVMI~20 ~ ~e.g., TiSn204, and SnCo204), ~3~7 and by some of the t~pe MI 2MVI04 (e.g., Na2MoO4 and Ag2MoO4). This structure is often symboli2ed a~
~Y2~04, where square brackets enclose the ions in the octahedral interstices. ~n important variant is the inverse spinel structure, YCXY]04, in which half of the Y ions are in tetrahedral interstices and the X ions are in octahedral ones along with the other half of the Y ions. The inverse spinel structure is intended to be included within the scope of the term "metal-containing spinel" as used herein. The inverse spinel structure occurs often when the X ions have a ~tronger preference for octahedral coordination than do the Y ions. All MIVM2 IIo4 are inverse, e.g., Sn(SnTi)04, and many of the M M2 4 ones are also, e.g., FeIII(CoIIFeIII)o4, NiA1204, FeIII(FeIIFeIII)o4 and Fe(NiF~)04. There are also many compounds with distorted spinel structures in which only a fraction of the X ions are in tetrahedral sites. This occurs when the preference of both X and Y ions for octahedral and tetrahedral sites do not differ markedly.
Further, details on the spinel structure are described in the following references, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference: "Modern Aspects of Inorganic Chemistry" by H. I. ~meleus and A. ~. Sharpe (1973), pp. 57-58 and 512-513;
"Structural Inorganic Chemistry", 3rd edition, (1962) by A. F. Wells, pp. 130, 487-490, 503 and 526; and "Advanced Inorganic Chemistry", 3rd edition, by F. A. Cotton and G.Wilkinson (1972), pp. 5~-55.

~æ~39~7 Metal-containing spinels include the following: MnA124~ FeA124' C~l24' 2 4 7nA1204, MgTiMgO4, FeMgFeO4, FeTiFeO~, ZnSnZnO4, ~aMgGaO4, InMgInO4, BeLi2F4, MoLi204, SnMg~04, g~l2~4' CuAl2O4~ ~LiA158)~ ZnK2(CN)4, CdK~CN)4, HgK2(CN~4, ZnTi20~, FeV2O4, MgCr204, MnCr2O4, FeCr~04, CoCr2O4, N 2 4 ZnCr2O4, CdCr2O4, MnCr2S4, ZnCr2S4, Cd 2 4 2 4~ e2o4, FeFe2O4, CoFe2O4, NiFe2O4, CuFe204, ZnFe204, CdFe204, MgCo204, T 2 4 CC~4~ Znc2~ SnC24~ CC2S4~ CUC
GeNi2O4~ NiNi2S4, ZnGa2o4~ W~g2O4, and ZnSn204 .
The presently useful metal-containing spinels include a first metal and a second metal having a valence (oxidation state) higher than the valence of the first metal. The first and second metals may be the same metal or different metals.
In other words, the same metal may exist in a given spinel in two or more different oxidation states.
As indicated above, the atomic ratio of the first metal to the second metal in any given spinel need not be consistent with the classical stoichiometric formula ~or such ~pinel. In one embodiment, the atomic ratio of the first metal to the second metal in the metal-containing spinel useful in the present invention is at least about 0.17 and preferably at least about 0.25. If the f irst metal is a ~L2~33~3C~7 mono-valPnt metal, the atomic ratio of ~he first metal to the second metal is preferably at least about 0.34, more preferably at least ahout 0.5.
The preferred metal-containing spinels for u~e in the present invention are alkaline earth metal spinels, in par~icular magnesium (first metal) and aluminum (second metal)-containing spinel.
Other alkaline earth metal ions, such as calcium, ætrontium, barium and mixtures thereo, may replace all or a part of the magnesium ions. Similarly, other metal ions, such as iron, chromium, vanadium, manganese, gallium, boron, cobalt, Group IB metals, Group IV metals, ~roup VA metals, the platinum group metals, ~he rare earth metals, Te, Nb, Ta, Sc, Zn, Y, Mo, W, Tl, Re, U, Th and mixtures thereof, may replace all or a part of the aluminum ions, preferably only a part of the aluminum ions. ~hen the spinel includes a divalent metal (e.g., magnesium) and a trivalent metal (e.g., aluminum), it is preferred that the atomic ratio of divalent to trivalen~ metals in the spinel be in the range of ahout 0.17 to about 2.5, more preferably about 0.25 to about 2.0, and still more preferably about 0.35 to about 1.5.
The metal-containing spinels useful in the present invention may be derived from conventional and well known sources. For example, these spinels may be naturally occurring or may be synthesized using technigues well known in the art. Thus, a detailed description of such techniques is not included herein. A particularly useful process for preparing the ROS is presented in U.S. patent ~2~ 6~

No. 3,728,635.
Substantially non-interfering proportions of other well known refractory material~ e.g., inorganic oxides such as silica, zirconia, thoria and the like may be included in the present ~OS~ ~y substantially "non interfering" is meant amounts of the material which do not have a substantial deleterious effect on the intended functionality of the present ROS, catalyst system, or hydrocarbon conversion process, as the case might be. The inclusion of materials such as silica, silica alumina, zirconia, thoria and the like into the present ROS may act to improve one or more of the functions of these ROS. Free magnesia and/or alumina (i.e., apart from the alkaline earth metal containing spinel) also may be included in the present ROS, e.g., using conventional techniques. For example, in one embodiment the ROS preferably includes about 0.1% to about 30% by weight of free magnesia (calculated as MgO). Such free magnesia may act to improve the effectiveness of the ROS to reduce sulfur oxide and/or nitrogen oxide atmospheric emissions.
The third metal component and the fourth metal component may be associated with the spinel using any suitable technique or combination o~ techniques: for example, impregnation, coprecipitation, ion-exchange and the like, well known in the ark. Thus, the third metal and fourth metal components may be an integral part of the . ~.

3L~93~i7 spinel or may be in a phase separate from the spinel (e.g., deposited on the spinel) or both. The~e me~al componen~s may be associated with ~he spinel together or in any sequence or by the same or different association techniques. Cost considerations favor the preferred procedure in which the metal components are associated together with the spinel. Impregnation may be carried out by contacting the spinel with a solution, preferably an aqueous solution, of third and fourth metal salts.
The third metal component is chosen from those components effective to promot the oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide at sulfur dioxide oxidation conditions. The third metal component is preferably a component of a metal selected from the group consisting of Group IB
metals, Group IIB metals, Group VIA metals, the rare earth metals, the platinum group metals and mixtures thereof. More preferably, the rare earth metals, the platinum group metals and mixtures thereof.
Particularly good results are achieved when the third metal is cerium and/or platinum, with cerium giving outstanding results.
The fourth metal component is chosen from those components effective to promote the reduction of first metal (e.g., magnesium) sulfate at first metal sulfate reduction conditions, such as those conditions prevailing in the typical reaction zone of a hydrocarbon fluid catalytic cracking unit. The fourth metal component is preferably a component of a metal selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, titanium, chromium, manganese, cobalt, germanium, tin, bismuth, molybdenum, antimony, 3~6~

-- 2~ --vanadium and mixtures thereof. More preferably, the fourth metal is sPlected from iron, nickel, cobalt, manganese, tin, vanadium and mix~ures thereof.
The specific amounts o~ khe third and fourth metal components included in the ROS may vary widely, provided that these components are effective as described herein. Preferably, the ~hird me~al component is present in an amount between about 0.001~ to about 20% by weight, calculated as elemental metal, of the ROS, and ~he fourth metal component is present in an amount between about 0.001% to about 10% by weight, calculated as elemental metal, of the ROS. It is preferred that excessive amounts of third and/or fourth metal components be avoidedr particularly in hydrocarbon conversion applications, to reduce the risk of substantially detrîmentally affecting the primary process. Preferably, the ROS include about 0.1~ to about 20%, more preferably about 0.05% to about 20~, and still more preferably about 2% to about 15%, by weight of rare earth metal, calculated as elemental metal. Of course, if the platinum group metal is employed in the ROS, very much reduced concentrations (e.g., in the parts per million (ppm) range) are employed. If vanadium i5 included as the fourth metal component, it is preferably present in an amount of about 0.05~ to about 7~, more preferably about 0.1~ ~o abou~ 5~, and still more preferably about 0.2% to about 2% by weight o~
vanadium, calculated as elemen~al metal.
It may not be necessary to wash the spinel after certain ~oluble third and fourth metal salts ~uch as nitrate or acetate) are added. Af~er impregnation with the third and fourth metal salts, the spinel can be dried and calcined to decompose the salts, forming an oxide in the case o nitrate or acetate. Alternately the ~pinel, e.g., in the form of discrete particles, can be charged ~o a hydrocarbon conversion, e.g., cracking, unit with the metals in salt form. In this case, the thlrd and fourth metal salts with thermally decomposable anions can decompose to the oxides in the unit.
The present discrete sntities may further comprise a minor amount of at least one crystalline material capable of promoting the desired hydrocarbon conversion. Typical crystalline materials have been described above. Such crystalline materials may comprise about 1% to about 30~, for example, about 1% to about 10~, by weight of the discrete entities. The presence of such crystalline materials in the present discrete entities acts to increase the overall catalytic activity of the solid particles-discrete entities mixture for promoting .he desired hydrocarbon conversion.
~ referably, the third and fourth metal components are substantially uniformly disposed in or on the ROS.
Included among the rare earth metals useful in the present invention are the Lanthanum or Lanthanide Series (of the Periodic Chart of Elements) metals and mixtures thereof. The preferred rare earth metals are selected ~rom the group consisting of cerium, praseodymium, lanthanum and mixtures thereof, with cerium being more preferred.

As no~ed above, the presently u~eful solid particles and discr~te entities can be employed in a mass of combined particles which function as both ~he solid parti~les, e.g., promo~es hydrocarbon conversion, and the discrete entities. Such combined particles may be produced in any suitable manner, certain of which methods are conventional and known in the art.
Although this invention is useful in many hydrocarbon conversions, the present catalyst, i.e., mixture comprising solid particles and discrete entities, and hydrocarbon conversion process ~ind particular applicability in systems for the catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons where oxidative regeneration of catalyst is employed. Such catalytic hydrocarbon cracking often involves converting, i.e., cracking, heavier or higher boiling components, to gasoline and other lower boiling componen~s, such as hexane, hexene, pentane, pentene, butane, butylene, propane, propylene, ethane, ethylene, methane and mixtures thereof.
Often, the substantially hydrocarbon feedstock comprises a gas oil fraction, e.g., derived from petroleum, shale oil, ~ar sand oil, coal and the like. Such feedstock may comprise a mixture of straight run, e.g., virgin, gas oil. Such gas oil fractions often boil primarily in the range of about 400 degrees F. to about 1000 degrees F. Other substantially hydrocarbon feedstocks, e.g., ~aphtha, high boiling or heavy fractions of petroleum, petroleum residuum, shale oil, tar sand oil, coal and the like, may be cracked using th2 catalyst and ~3~67 - 2s -method of the presen~ invention. Such substantially hydrocaxbon feedstock often contains minor amounts of other elements, e.g., sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen ~nd the like. ~n one aspect, the present invention involves converting a hydrocarbon feedstock containing sulfur and/or sulfur chemically combined with the molecules of hydrocarbon feeds~ock. The present invention is particularly useful when the amount of sulfur in such hydrocarbon feedstock is in the range of about 0.01% to about 5%, preferably about 0.1% to about 3~, by weight of the total feedstock.
Hydrocarbon cracking conditions are well known and often include temperatures in ~he range of about 850 degrees F. to about 1100 degrees F., preferably about 900 degrees F. to about 1050 degrees F. Other reaction condition~ usually include pressures of up to about 100 psig.; catalyst to oil ratios of about 1 to 2 to about 25 to 1, preferably about 3 ~o 1 to about 15 to 1; and weight hourly space velocities (WHSV) of about 3 to about 60. These hydrocarbon cracking conditions may be varied depending, for example, on the feedstock and solid particles or combined particles being used, the reactor-regenerator ~ys~em, e.g., fluid or moving bed catalytic cracking system, being employed and the product or products wanted.
In addition, the catalytic hydrocarbon cracking system includes a regeneration zone for restoring the catalytic ac~ivity of the solid particles or combined particles of catalyst previously used to promote hydrocarbon cracking.

1;2~33967 Carbonaceous, in particular sulfur-containing carbonaceous, deposit-containing catalyst particles from the reaction æons are contacted with free oxygen-containing gas in the regeneration zone at conditions to restore or maintain the activity of the catalyst by removing, i.e., combusting, at least a portion of the carbonaceous material from the catalyst particles. When the carbonaceous deposit material contains sulfur, at least one sulfur-containing combustion product is produced in the regeneration zone and may leave the zone with the regenerator flue gas. The conditions at which such free oxygen-containing gas contacting takes place may vary, for example, over conventional ranges. The temperatures in the catalyst regeneration zone of a hydrocarbon cracking system are often in the range of about 900 degrees F. to about 1500 degrees F., preferably about 1100 degrees F. to about 1350 degrees F. and more preferably about 1100 degrees F. to about 1300 degrees F.
Other conditions within such regeneration zone may include, for example, pressures up to about 100 psig., and average catalyst contact times within the range of about 3 minutes to about 75 minutes.
Sufficient oxygen is preferably pre~ent in ~he regeneration zone to comple~ely combust the carbon and hydrogen of the carbonaceous deposit material, for example, to carbon dioxide and water. The amount of carbonaceous material deposited on the catalyst in the reaction zone is preferably in the range of about 0.005% to about 1~%, more preferably about 0.1% to about 10%, by weight of ~he catalyst.
The amount of sulfur, if any, contained in the - ~Z~3~`,7 carbonaceous deposi~ material depends, for example, on the amount of sulfur in the hydrocarbon feedstock. This deposit material may contain about .01% to about 10% or more by weight of sulfur. At least a portion of the regenerated catalyst is often returned to the hydrocarbon cracking reaction zone.
One embodiment of the present invention involves contacting sulfur oxide and~or nitrogen oxide-containing gases, e.g~, combustion products, with the present ~OS. Reduced concentrations of sulfur oxide and/or nitrogen oxide~ e.g., reduced emissions of sulfur oxide and/or nitrogen oxide from the combustion zones, are achieved as a result of this contacting.
Typical combustion zones include, for example, fluid bed coal burning steam boilers and fluid sand bed waste combustors. In the coal fired boiler application, the present ROS may be added, either separately or with the sulfur-containing coal, to the combustion zone, e.g., boiler, where combustion takes place. The present ROS then leave the combustion zone with the coal ash and can be separated from the ash, e.g., by screening, densi~y separation, or other well known solids separation technigues. In one embodiment, the sulfur oxide-containing gaces are contacted with the present ROS at condi~ions to reduce the sul~ur oxide content of the gases in one ox more zones, e.g., separate from the combustion zone. In any event, the flue gases leaving the combustion zone/contacting zone system have reduced amounts of ~ulfur oxide and/or nitrogen oxide, e.g., relative 33~7 to processing in the absence of the present ROS.
The ROS from the combustion zone or contacting zone can be subjected to a reducing environment, e.g., contacted with hydrogen, hydrocarbon and the like reducing media, at conditions such ~hat at leask a portion of the sulfur associated with the ROS is disassociated, e.g., in the form of hydrogen sulfide and is removed for further processing, e.g., sulfur recovery. The ROS, after sulfur removal may be recycled to the combustion zone or contacting zone.
Conditions within such contacting zones may be those typically used in contact zones employing conventional sulfur oxide or nitrogen oxide removal agents. The amount of the present ROS used to contact a sulfur oxide-containing and/or a nitrogen oxide containing gas is sufficient to reduce the sulfur oxide and~or nitrogen oxide content of the gas, preferably, by at least about 50% and more preferably by at least 80%. Reducing conditions are such that at least a portion, preferably at least about 50% and more preferably at least about 80% of the sulfur associated with the ROS is removed. For example, reducing conditions may include temperatures in the range of about 900 degrees F. to about 1800 degrees F.; pressures in the range of abou~ 14 to about ~00 psig; and reducing media, e.g., hydrogen, hydrocarbon and the like, to associated sulfur mole ratio in the range of about 1 to about 10.
The following examples are provided to better illustrate the invention, wi~hout limitation, by presenting several specific embodiments of ~he composition6 processes of the invention.

3~6~7 A series of magnesium, aluminum-containing spinel compositions were prepared as ~ollows.
Magnesium, aluminum-containing spinel particles were prepared using conventional co-precipitation/calcining technigues. The resulting spinel had a surface area of more than lOOm /gm. (square meters per gram); and an atomic ratio of magnesium to aluminum of 0.77. The average particle size of the spinel particles was in the range of about 65 microns.
Fourteen portions of these spinel particles were subjected to conventional impregnation/
calcining techniques using aqueous solutions of various metal salts to prepare the following fourteen compositions :
Wt. % of Metal (as Elemental Metal) Included Composition Example with the SPinel Particles Example 1 5~ Cerium Example 2 10~ Cerium Example 3 20% Cerium Example 4 10~ Praseodymium Example 5 10% Lanthanum Example 6 10~ Iron ~xample 7 10% Manganese Example 8 10% Cobalt Example 9 5% Vanadium Example 10 2% Vanadium/10% Cerium Example 11 10% Tin Example 12 5~ Tin/5~ Cerium Example 13 1% Iron/10% Cerium:
Example 14 5% Iron/5% Tin * When two metals are included with the spinel part.icles, the spinel particles were impregnated with ~oth metals simultaneously.

~3~67 The impregnation/calcining of the various portions of the spinel particles did not sub~tantially change the surface area o~ the spinel or the size of the particles.
Examples 15-28 A quantity of solid particles of a commercially available, crystalline aluminosilicate hydrocarbon cracking ca~alyst, having the same approximate particle size distribution as the spinel-containing particles from Examples l to 14, was combined with each of the final products of Examples l to 14 so that mixtures of 1.75 parts by weight of the spinel-containing particles (discrete entities3 and 98.25 parts by weight of the solid particles resulted. The catalytic activity of the solid particles was equilibrated by use (prior to combining with ~he discrete entities) in commercial fluid bed catalytic cracking service.
Each blend was tested to determine its ability to continue to remove sulfur oxides over a period of time. This test procedure was as follows:
Step l involved an initial determination of the ability of the blend to remove sulfur oxides ~rom regenerator flue gases. Step one was carried out in a fluid bed catalytic cracking pilot plant known to provide results which are correlatable to results obtained in commercial sized systems.
The feedstock and conditions for step l were as follows:
Feedstock - mid-continent gas oil containing about 2% by weight sulfur Reactor temperature - lOOO degrees F.

~2~3~67 Regenerator temperature - 1280 degrees F.
Stripper temperature - 930 degrees F.
Pressure - 15 psia.
Approximate catalyst reyeneration time -. 30 minutes Catalyst to oil weight ratio - 6 Weight hourly space velocity - 10 Steam as inerts in reactor, 3 mole ~.

Step 2 of the test procedure involved continuous and accelerated aging in a fluidiæed-bed reactor to simulate the type of aging which occurs in commercial fluid-bed catalytic cracking service.
The feedstock and conditions utilized in step 2 were as follows:
Feedstock - mid-continent gas oil containing 2~ by weight sulfur Reactor temperature - 1150 degrees F.
Reactor pressure - 15 psig.
Reaction catalyst/oil weight ratio - 15 Weight hourly space velocity - 0.8 Regenerator temperature - ~350 degrees F.
Regenerator pressure - 15 psig.
Catalyst regenerator residence time -30 minutes Regenerator combustion air flow ratio -20 lbs. air/lb. coke Cycles per day - 11 ~ tep 3 of the test procedure involved periodically repeating step 1 to determine how much o the blend's activity to remove sulfur oxids had been lost during the aging of step 2.
The amount o total ~ulfur oxides emitted with the flue gases from the regeneration using the blend was used as the basis ~or determining the blend' 8 ability ~or activity) to remove such sulfur oxides.

~ 3~7 Resul~s of testing these blends were as ~ollows:
RELATI~E ACTIVITY
TO ~EMOVE SULFUR OXIDES
Example 1 Virgin 52 Example 1 Aged 2 days --Example 2 Virgin 83 Example 2 Aged 2 days 32 Example 3 Virgin 83 Example 3 Aged 2 days 42 Example 4 Virgin 32 Example 4 Aged 2 days --Example 5 Virgin ~0 Example 5 Aged 2 days 31 Example 6 Virgin 31 Example 6 Aged 2 days --Example 7 Virgin 36 Example 7 Aged 2 days --Example 8 Virgin 6 Example 8 Aged 2 days --Example 9 Virgin 81 Example 9 Aged 2 days 27 Example 10 Virgin 96 Example 10 Aged 2 days 78 Example 11 Virgin less than 25 Example 11 Aged 2 days --Example 12 Virgin 56 Example 12 ~ged 2 days --Example 13 Virgin 88 Example 13 Aged 2 days 38 Example 14 Virgin 47 Example 14 Aged 2 days --~3~67 These data indicate clearly that compositions according to the present invention, i.e., Compositions 12 and 13, ha~e substantial ~nitial sulfur oxide remoYal activity.
For example, the initial sulfur oxide removal activity of Composition 12 (5% tin/5~
cerium) is increased relative to ~hat of Composition 1 (5% cerium) or Composition 11 (10% tin).
Composition 13 (1% iron/10% cerium) has an increased initial sulfur oxide removal activity relative to that of Composition 2 (10~ cerium) or Composition 6 (10% iron). In addition, the sulfur oxide removal activity stability, i.e., the ability to maintain sulfur oxide removal activity over a period of time, of Composition 13 is increased relative to that of Composition 2.
ExamPles 29-30 Samples of virgin and aged Compositions 12 and 13 are taken rom a point between the reaction zone and the regeneration zone of the above-noted catalytic cracking pilot plant and are analyzed for sulfur content. It is found that the sulfur contents of these samples are significantly lower than those of other materials, such as Compositionæ
1, 2 and 3. Thus, it appears that the spinel-containing discrete entities of Compositions 12 and 13 have reduced ~ulfur contents coming out of the reaction zone. This, in turn, provides each of the Composition 12 and 13 with an increased kinetic driving force for ~ulfur oxide removal in the regeneration zone.

~3~

ExamPles 31-32 Each of the Compositions 12 and 13 is ~ested to determin0 its ability to reduce ~he nitrogen oxide (NOx) content of the ~lue gases from a cracking ~atalys~ regenera~ion zone. Thus, a sample of each of these blends is subjected to twenty two reaction/regeneration cycles using step 52) of the test procedure set ~orth above in Examples 15 to 28. After this aging, the blend i6 tested in accordance with step (1) of the above-noted test procedure and the nitrogen oxide content of ~he regeneration zone flue gases is measured. Results of these tests indicate that Compositions 12 and 13 according to the present invention do provide for reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions from combustion zone flue gases.
While this invention has been described with respect to various specific examples and embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto and that it can be variously practiced within the scope of the following claims.

Claims (80)

1. A composition of matter comprising at least one metal-containing spinel which includes a first metal and a second metal having a valence higher than the valence of said first metal, a minor amount of at least one component of a third metal other than said first and second metal effective to promote the oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide at sulfur dioxide oxidation conditions, and a minor amount of at least one component of a fourth metal other than said first, second and third metals effective to promote the reduction of first metal sulfate at first metal sulfate reduction conditions;
provided that in the event said third metal is rare earth metal, said fourth metal is other than vanadium.
2. The composition of claim 1 wherein said spinel has a surface area in the range of about 25m2/gm. to about 600m2/gm.
3. The composition of claim 2 wherein said composition comprises a major amount by weight of said spinel.
4. The composition of claim 1 wherein said third metal is selected from the group consisting of Group IB metals, Group IIB metals, Group VIA metals, the rare earth metals, the Platinum Group metals and mixtures thereof, and said fourth metal is selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, titanium, chromium, manganese, cobalt, germanium, tin, bismuth, molybdenum, antimony, vanadium and mixtures thereof.
5. The composition of claim 1 wherein at least one of said third metal component and said fourth metal component is incorporated in said composition by impregnation.
6. The composition of claim 1 wherein said spinel comprises alkaline earth metal-containing spinel and the atomic ratio of said first metal to said second metal is at least about 0.17.
7. The composition of claim 1 wherein said third metal component and said fourth metal component are present in amounts effective to promote the reduction of nitrogen oxides at nitrogen oxide reduction conditions.
8. The composition of claim 4 wherein said third metal is selected from the group consisting of the rare earth metals, the platinum group metals and and mixtures thereof.
9. The composition of claim 4 wherein said fourth metal is selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, cobalt, manganese, tin, vanadium and mixtures thereof.
10. The composition of claim 8 wherein said fourth metal is selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, cobalt, manganese, tin, vanadium and mixtures thereof.
11. The composition of claim 1 wherein third metal component is present in an amount in the range of about 0.001% to about 20% by weight, calculated as elemental third metal, and said vanadium component is present in an amount in the range of about 0.001% to about 10% by weight, calculated as elemental fourth metal.
12. The composition of claim 4 wherein said spinel comprises alkaline earth metal-containing spinel and the atomic ratio of said first metal to said second metal is at least about 0.17.
13. The composition of claim 9 wherein said spinel comprises alkaline earth metal-containing spinel and the atomic ratio of said first metal to said second metal is at least about 0.17.
14. The composition of claim 4 wherein said spinel includes magnesium as said first metal and aluminum as said second metal, and the atomic ratio of magnesium to aluminum in said spinel is at least about 0.25.
15. The composition of claim 9 wherein said spinel includes magnesium as said first metal and aluminum as said second metal, and the atomic ratio of magnesium to aluminum in said spinel is at least about 0.25.
16. The composition of claim 10 wherein said spinel includes magnesium as said first metal and aluminum as said second metal, and the atomic ratio of magnesium to aluminum in said spinel is at least about 0.25.
17. The composition of claim 4 further comprising about 0.1% to about 30% by weight of free magnesia, calculated as MgO.
18. The composition of claim 9 further comprising about 0.1% to about 30% by weight of free magnesia, calculated as MgO.
19. The composition of claim 10 further comprising about 0.1% to about 30% by weight of free magnesia, calculated as MgO.
20. The composition of claim 10 wherein said third metal is selected from the group consisting of cerium, platinum and mixtures thereof, and said fourth metal is selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, vanadium and mixtures thereof.
21. A process for reducing at least one of (1) the sulfur oxide content of a sulfur oxide-containing gas and (2) the nitrogen oxide content of a nitrogen oxide-containing gas which comprises contacting said gas with a material at conditions to reduce at least one of (1) the sulfur oxide content of said gas and (2) the nitrogen oxide content of said gas, said material comprising at least one metal-containing spinel which includes a first metal and a second metal having a valence higher than the valence of said first spinel, a minor amount of at least one component of a third metal other than said first and second metals effective to promote the oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide at sulfur dioxide oxidation conditions, and a minor amount of at least one component of a fourth metal other than said first, second and third metals effective to promote the reduction of first metal sulfate at first metal sulfate reduction conditions; provided that in the event said third metal is rare earth metal, said fourth metal is other than vanadium.
22. The process of claim 21 wherein said spinel has a surface area in the range of about 25m2/gm. to about 600m2/gm.
23. The process of claim 22 wherein said composition comprises a major amount by weight of said spinel.
24. The process of claim 21 wherein said third metal is selected from the group consisting of Group IB metals, Group IIB metals, Group VIA metals, the rare earth metals, the Platinum Group metals and mixtures thereof, and said fourth metal is selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, titanium, chromium, manganese, cobalt, germanium, tin, bismuth, molybdenum, antimony, vanadium and mixtures thereof.
25. The process of claim 21 wherein at least one of said third metal component and said fourth metal component is incorporated in said material by impregnation.
26. The process of claim 21 wherein said spinel comprises alkaline earth metal-containing spinel and the atomic ratio of said first metal to said second metal is at least about 0.17.
27. The process of claim 21 wherein said third metal component and said fourth metal component are present in amounts effective to promote the reduction of nitrogen oxides at nitrogen oxide reduction conditions.
28. The process of claim 24 wherein said third metal is selected from the group consisting of the rare earth metals, the platinum group metals and mixtures thereof.
29. The process of claim 24 wherein said fourth metal is selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, cobalt, manganese, tin, vanadium and mixtures thereof.
30. The process of claim 24 wherein said spinel comprises alkaline earth metal-containing spinel and the atomic ratio of said first metal to said second metal is at least about 0.17.
31. The process of claim 24 wherein said spinel comprises alkaline earth metal-containing spinel and the atomic ratio of said first metal to said second metal is at least about 0.17.
32. The process of claim 29 wherein said spinel comprises alkaline earth metal-containing spinel and the atomic ratio of said first metal to said second metal is at least about 0.17.
33. The process of claim 24 wherein said spinel includes magnesium as said first metal and aluminum as said second metal, and the atomic ratio of magnesium to aluminum in said spinel is at least about 0.25.
34. The process of claim 29 wherein said spinel includes magnesium as said first metal and aluminum as said second metal, and the atomic ratio of magnesium to aluminum in said spinel is at least about 0.25.
35. The process of claim 30 wherein said spinel includes magnesium as said first metals and aluminum as said second metal, and the atomic ratio of magnesium to aluminum in said spinel is at least about 0.25.
36. The process of claim 34 wherein said material further comprises about 0.1% to about 30%
by weight of free magnesia, calculated as MgO.
37. The process of claim 29 wherein said material further comprises about 0.1% to about 30%
by weight of free magnesia, calculated as MgO.
38. The process of claim 30 wherein said material further comprises about 0.1% to about 30 by weight of free magnesia, calculated as MgO.
39. The process of claim 21 wherein said third metal component is present in an amount in the range of about 0.001% to about 20% by weight, calculated as elemental third metal, and said vanadium component is present in an amount in the range of about 0.001% to about 10% by weight, calculated as elemental fourth metal.
40. The process of claim 30 wherein said third metal is selected from the group consisting of cerium, platinum and mixtures thereof, and said fourth metal is selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, vanadium and mixtures thereof.
41. A composition of matter comprising, in intimate admixture, a major amount of solid particles capable of promoting hydrocarbon conversion at hydrocarbon conversion conditions, and a minor amount of discrete entities having a chemical make-up different from said solid particles and comprising at least one metal-containing spinel which includes a first metal and a second metal having a valence higher than the valence of said first metal, a minor amount of at least one component of a third metal other than said first and second metals component effective to promote the oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide at sulfur dioxide oxidation conditions, and a minor amount of at least one component of a fourth metal other than said first, second and third metals effective to promote the reduction of first metal sulfate at first metal sulfate reduction conditions;
provided that in the event said third metal is rare earth metal, said fourth metal is other than vanadium.
42. The composition of claim 41 wherein said hydrocarbon conversion comprises hydrocarbon cracking in the substantial absence of added molecular hydrogen, at least one of said solid particles and discrete entities includes crystalline aluminosilicate effective to promote said hydrocarbon cracking and a major amount by weight of said solid particles have diameters in the range of about 10 microns to about 250 microns.
43. The composition of claim 41 wherein said discrete entities contain a major amount by weight of said spinel and said spinel has a surface area in the range of about 25m2/gm. to about 600m2/gm.
44. The composition of claim 41 wherein said third metal is selected from the group consisting of Group IB metals, Group IIB metals, Group IV A metals, the rare earth metals, the Platinum Group metals and mixtures thereof, and said fourth metal is selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, titanium, chromium, manganese, cobalt, germanium, tin, bismuth, molybdenum, antimony, vanadium and mixtures thereof.
45. The composition of claim 41 wherein at least one of said third metal component and said fourth metal component is incorporated in said discrete entities by impregnation.
46. The composition of claim 41 wherein said spinel comprises alkaline earth metal-containing spinel and the atomic ratio of said first metal to said second metal is at least about 0.17.
47. The composition of claim 41 wherein said third metal component and said fourth metal component are present in amounts effective to promote the reduction of nitrogen oxides at nitrogen oxide reduction conditions.
48. The composition of claim 44 wherein said third metal is selected from the group consisting of the rare earth metals, the platinum group metals and mixtures thereof.
49. The composition of claim 44 wherein said fourth metal is selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, cobalt, manganese, tin, vanadium and mixtures thereof.
50. The composition of claim 48 wherein said fourth metal is selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, cobalt, manganese, tin, vanadium and mixtures thereof.
51. The composition of claim 44 wherein said spinel comprises alkaline earth metal-containing spinel and the atomic ratio of said first metal to said second metal is at least about 0.17.
52. The process of claim 49 wherein said spinel comprises alkaline earth metal-containing spinel and the atomic ratio of said first metal to said second metal is at least about 0.17.
53. The composition of claim 44 wherein said spinel includes magnesium as said first metal and aluminum as said second metal, and the atomic ratio of magnesium to aluminum in said spinel is at least about 0.25.
54. The composition of claim 49 wherein said spinel includes magnesium as said first metal and aluminum as said second metal, and the atomic ratio of magnesium to aluminum in said spinel is at least about 0.25.
55. The composition of claim 50 wherein said spinel includes magnesium as said first metal and aluminum as said second metal, and the atomic ratio of magnesium to aluminum in said spinel is at least about 0.25.
56. The composition of claim 44 further comprising about 0.1% to about 30% by weight of free magnesia, calculated as MgO.
57. The composition of claim 49 further comprising about 0.1% to about 30% by weight of free magnesia, calculated as MgO.
58. The composition of claim 50 further comprising about 0.1% to about 30% by weight of free magnesia, calculated as MgO.
59. The composition of claim 41 wherein said third metal component is present in an amount in the range of about 0.001% to about 20% by weight, calculated as elemental third metal, and said vanadium component is present in an amount in the range of about 0.001% to about 10% by weight, calculated as elemental fourth metal.
60. The composition of claim 50 wherein said third metal is selected from the group consisting of cerium, platinum and mixtures thereof, and said fourth metal is selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, vanadium and mixtures thereof.
61. In a hydrocarbon conversion process for converting a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon feedstock which comprises (1) contacting said feedstock with solid particles capable of promoting the conversion of said feedstock at hydrocarbon conversion conditions in at least one reaction zone to produce at least one hydrocarbon product and to cause deactivating sulfur-containing carbonaceous material to be formed on said solid particles thereby forming a deposit-containing particles; (2) contacting said deposit-containing particles with an oxygen-containing vaporous medium at conditions to combust at least a portion of said carbonaceous deposit material in at least one regeneration zone to thereby regenerate at least a portion of the hydrocarbon conversion catalytic activity of said solid particles and to form a regeneration zone flue gas containing sulfur oxide and/or nitrogen oxide;
and (3) repeating steps (1) and (2) periodically, the improvement which comprises, using, in intimate admixture with said solid particles, a minor amount of discrete entities having a chemical make-up different from said solid particles and comprising at least one metal-containing spinel including a first metal and a second metal having a valence higher than the valence of said first metal, a minor amount of at least one component of a third metal other than said first and second metals effective to promote the oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide at sulfur dioxide oxidation conditions, and a minor amount of at least one component of a fourth metal other than said first, second and third metals effective to promote the reduction of first metal sulfate at first metal sulfate reduction conditions;
provided that in the event said third metal is rare earth metal, said fourth metal is other than vanadium, said discrete entities being present in an amount sufficient to reduce the amount of sulfur oxides and/or nitrogen oxides in said flue gas.
62. The process of claim 61 wherein said hydrocarbon conversion comprises hydrocarbon cracking in the substantial absence of added molecular hydrogen, at least one of said solid particles and discrete entities include a crystalline aluminosilicate effective to promote said hyrdocarbon cracking, a major amount, by weight of said solid particles have diameters in the range of about 10 microns to about 250 microns and said third and fourth metal components have no substantial detrimental effect on said hydrocarbon cracking.
63. The process of claim 61 wherein said discrete entities contain a major amount by weight of said spinel and said spinel has a surface area in the range of about 25m2/gm. to about 600m2/gm.
64. The process of claim 61 wherein said third metal is selected from the group consisting of Group IB metals, Group IIB metals, Group IVA metals, the rare earth metals, the Platinum Group metals and mixtures thereof, and said fourth metal is selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, titanium, chromium, manganese, cobalt, germanium, tin, bismuth, molybdenum, antimony, vanadium and mixtures thereof.
65. The process of claim 61 wherein at least one of said third metal component and said fourth metal component is incorporated in said composition by impregnation.
66. The process of claim 61 wherein said spinel comprises alkaline earth metal-containing spinel and the atomic ratio of said first metal to said second metal is at least about 0.17.
67. The process of claim 61 wherein said third metal component and said fourth metal component are present in combination in an amount effective to promote the reduction of nitrogen oxides at nitrogen oxide reduction conditions, and said discrete entities are present in an amount sufficient to reduce the amount of nitrogen oxides in said flue gas.
68. The process of claim 64 wherein said third metal selected from the group consisting of the rare earth metals, the platinum group metals and mixtures thereof.
69. The process of claim 64 wherein said fourth metal is selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, cobalt, manganese, tin, vanadium and mixtures thereof.
70. The process of claim 68 wherein said fourth metal is selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, cobalt, manganese, tin, vanadium and mixtures thereof.
71. The process of claim 64 wherein said spinel comprises alkaline earth metal-containing spinel and the atomic ratio of said first metal to said second metal is at least about 0.17.
72. The process of claim 69 wherein said spinel comprises alkaline earth metal-containing spinel and the atomic ratio of said first metal to said second metal is at least about 0.17.
73. The process of claim 64 wherein said spinel includes magnesium as said first metal and aluminum as said second metal, and the atomic ratio of magnesium to aluminum in said spinel is at least about 0.25.
74. The process of claim 69 wherein said spinel includes magnesium as said first metal and aluminum as said second metal, and the atomic ratio of magnesium to aluminum in said spinel is at least about 0.25.
75. The process of claim 70 wherein said spinel includes magnesium as said first metal and aluminum as said second metal, and the atomic ratio of magnesium to aluminum in said spinel is at least about 0.25.
76. The process of claim 64 further comprising about 0.1% to about 30% by weight of free magnesia, calculated as MgO.
77. The process of claim 69 further comprising about 0.1% to about 30% by weight of free magnesia, calculated as MgO.
78. The process of claim 70 further comprising about 0.1% to about 30% by weight of free magnesia, calculated as MgO.
79. The process of claim 61 wherein said third metal component is present in an amount in the range of about 0.001% to about 20% by weight, calculated as elemental third metal, and said vanadium component is present in an amount in the range of about 0.001% to about 10% by weight, calculated as elemental fourth metal.
80. The process of claim 70 wherein said third metal is selected from the group consisting of cerium, platinum and mixtures thereof, and said fourth metal is selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, vanadium and mixtures thereof.
CA000534085A 1986-04-07 1987-04-07 Metal-containing spinel composition and process for using same Expired - Lifetime CA1293967C (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US848,954 1986-04-07
US06/848,954 US4790982A (en) 1986-04-07 1986-04-07 Metal-containing spinel composition and process of using same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1293967C true CA1293967C (en) 1992-01-07

Family

ID=25304711

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA000534085A Expired - Lifetime CA1293967C (en) 1986-04-07 1987-04-07 Metal-containing spinel composition and process for using same

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (2) US4790982A (en)
EP (1) EP0263171B1 (en)
JP (2) JPH0729054B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE82706T1 (en)
AU (2) AU594766B2 (en)
BR (1) BR8707261A (en)
CA (1) CA1293967C (en)
DE (1) DE3782797T2 (en)
WO (1) WO1987006157A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (90)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4973791A (en) * 1989-07-20 1990-11-27 The Dow Chemical Company Process of oxidizing aliphatic hydrocarbons employing an alkali-promoted molybdate catalyst
US5116587A (en) * 1990-01-18 1992-05-26 Board Of Trustees Operating Michigan State University Layered double hydroxide sorbents for the removal of sox from flue gas resulting from coal combustion
US5057473A (en) * 1990-04-12 1991-10-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Regenerative Cu La zeolite supported desulfurizing sorbents
SG50465A1 (en) * 1992-02-05 1998-07-20 Grace W R & Co Metal passivation/sox control compositions for fcc
US5288675A (en) * 1992-02-05 1994-02-22 W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. SOx control compositions
US5458861A (en) * 1992-04-15 1995-10-17 Mobil Oil Corporation Desulfurizing a gas stream
US5514351A (en) * 1992-04-15 1996-05-07 Mobil Oil Corporation Desulfurizing tailgas from sulfur recovery unit
US5292492A (en) * 1992-05-04 1994-03-08 Mobil Oil Corporation Recovering sulfur from ammonia acid gas stream
US5547648A (en) * 1992-04-15 1996-08-20 Mobil Oil Corporation Removing SOx, NOX and CO from flue gases
US5591417A (en) * 1992-04-15 1997-01-07 Mobil Oil Corporation Removing SOx, CO and NOx from flue gases
US5728358A (en) * 1992-04-15 1998-03-17 Mobil Oil Corporation Sox sorbent regeneration
AU665836B2 (en) * 1992-10-09 1996-01-18 W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn. Metal passivation/SOx control compositions for FCC
US5376608A (en) * 1993-01-27 1994-12-27 W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. Sulfur reduction in FCC gasoline
US5364517A (en) * 1993-02-19 1994-11-15 Chevron Research And Technology Company Perovskite-spinel FCC NOx reduction additive
US5492684A (en) * 1993-07-06 1996-02-20 Mobil Oil Corporation Graded-bed system for improved separations
FR2718371B1 (en) * 1994-04-08 1996-05-03 Rhone Poulenc Chimie Reduction catalysts for nitrogen oxides based on spinels.
US5426083A (en) * 1994-06-01 1995-06-20 Amoco Corporation Absorbent and process for removing sulfur oxides from a gaseous mixture
US5843862A (en) * 1994-06-01 1998-12-01 Amoco Corporation Process for manufacturing an absorbent composition
DE4419486C2 (en) * 1994-06-03 1996-09-05 Daimler Benz Ag Catalyst, process for its preparation and use of the catalyst
US5741469A (en) * 1994-07-20 1998-04-21 Mobil Oil Corporation Process scheme for SOx removal from flue gases
US6165933A (en) 1995-05-05 2000-12-26 W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. Reduced NOx combustion promoter for use in FCC processes
AU718321B2 (en) * 1995-05-05 2000-04-13 W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn. Compositions for reduced NOx and combustion promotion in FCC processes
US6129834A (en) * 1995-05-05 2000-10-10 W. R. Grace & Co. -Conn. NOx reduction compositions for use in FCC processes
DE19546612A1 (en) * 1995-12-13 1997-06-19 Basf Ag Process for the reduction of NOx from exhaust gases
KR100453095B1 (en) * 1996-03-21 2005-05-03 인겔하드 코포레이션 Preparation and use of non-chrome catalysts for cu/cr catalyst applications
DE19623791A1 (en) * 1996-06-14 1997-12-18 Linde Ag Selective removal of nitrogen oxide(s) from carrier gas
JP5072136B2 (en) * 1998-07-24 2012-11-14 千代田化工建設株式会社 Method for producing porous spinel complex oxide
US6852214B1 (en) 1998-08-31 2005-02-08 Mobil Oil Corporation Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking
US6974787B2 (en) 1998-08-31 2005-12-13 Exxonmobil Corporation Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking
US6846403B2 (en) * 1998-12-28 2005-01-25 Mobil Oil Corporation Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking
US20020153283A1 (en) * 1998-12-28 2002-10-24 Arthur W Chester Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking
US7803267B2 (en) * 1998-12-28 2010-09-28 W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking
US6284217B1 (en) 1999-08-17 2001-09-04 Battelle Memorial Institute Method and catalyst structure for steam reforming of a hydrocarbon
US6607678B2 (en) 1999-08-17 2003-08-19 Battelle Memorial Institute Catalyst and method of steam reforming
US6635169B1 (en) 1999-09-20 2003-10-21 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for reducing gasoline sulfur in fluid catalytic cracking
US6635168B2 (en) 2001-04-13 2003-10-21 W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn Gasoline sulfur reduction catalyst for fluid catalytic cracking process
US6558533B2 (en) 2001-04-13 2003-05-06 W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn Process for sulfur removal from hydrocarbon liquids
US6839362B2 (en) * 2001-05-22 2005-01-04 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Cobalt-doped saturable absorber Q-switches and laser systems
US7153413B2 (en) * 2001-07-10 2006-12-26 W.R. Grace &Co.-Conn. Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking
US6607704B2 (en) * 2001-10-18 2003-08-19 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Sulfur tolerant lean NOx trap
US6800586B2 (en) 2001-11-23 2004-10-05 Engelhard Corporation NOx reduction composition for use in FCC processes
US6844084B2 (en) 2002-04-03 2005-01-18 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Spinel substrate and heteroepitaxial growth of III-V materials thereon
CN1688508A (en) * 2002-08-13 2005-10-26 英特凯特公司 Flue gas treatments to reduce NOx and CO emissions
US7045056B2 (en) * 2002-10-10 2006-05-16 Engelhard Corporation CO oxidation promoters for use in FCC processes
US20040074809A1 (en) * 2002-10-21 2004-04-22 George Yaluris Reduction of gas phase reduced nitrogen species in partial burn FCC processes
US7507686B2 (en) 2002-12-03 2009-03-24 W. R. Grace & Co. - Conn. Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking
ITMI20030192A1 (en) * 2003-02-05 2004-08-06 Eni Spa CATALYTIC SYSTEM AND PRODUCTION PROCESS
US20040262197A1 (en) * 2003-06-24 2004-12-30 Mcgregor Duane R. Reduction of NOx in low CO partial-burn operation using full burn regenerator additives
WO2005003034A1 (en) * 2003-07-07 2005-01-13 Instituto Mexicano Del Petróleo Method of obtaining multimetallic oxides derived from hydrotalcite-type compounds
US7326477B2 (en) 2003-09-23 2008-02-05 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Spinel boules, wafers, and methods for fabricating same
US7045223B2 (en) 2003-09-23 2006-05-16 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Spinel articles and methods for forming same
US20050061230A1 (en) * 2003-09-23 2005-03-24 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Spinel articles and methods for forming same
US20050100494A1 (en) 2003-11-06 2005-05-12 George Yaluris Ferrierite compositions for reducing NOx emissions during fluid catalytic cracking
ZA200604817B (en) * 2003-12-05 2007-12-27 Interact Inc Mixed metal oxide sorbents
US7431825B2 (en) 2003-12-05 2008-10-07 Intercat, Inc. Gasoline sulfur reduction using hydrotalcite like compounds
WO2005058488A2 (en) * 2003-12-09 2005-06-30 Albemarle Netherlands B.V. Process for the preparation of an oxidic catalyst composition comprising a divalent and a trivalent metal
GB0328649D0 (en) * 2003-12-11 2004-01-14 Johnson Matthey Plc Reforming catalyst
US8084383B2 (en) * 2004-03-16 2011-12-27 W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn. Gasoline sulfur reduction catalyst for fluid catalytic cracking process
US7304011B2 (en) 2004-04-15 2007-12-04 W.R. Grace & Co. -Conn. Compositions and processes for reducing NOx emissions during fluid catalytic cracking
US20050232839A1 (en) 2004-04-15 2005-10-20 George Yaluris Compositions and processes for reducing NOx emissions during fluid catalytic cracking
TWI342335B (en) 2004-06-02 2011-05-21 Intercat Inc Mixed metal oxide additives
US20060040823A1 (en) * 2004-08-18 2006-02-23 Stockwell David M Catalyst for NOx and/or SOx control
US7919815B1 (en) 2005-02-24 2011-04-05 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Spinel wafers and methods of preparation
TWI428180B (en) * 2005-02-25 2014-03-01 Grace W R & Co Gasoline sulfur reduction catalyst for fluid catalytic cracking process
EP1866085A2 (en) * 2005-03-24 2007-12-19 W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn. Method for controlling nox emissions in the fccu
SG169976A1 (en) * 2005-04-27 2011-04-29 Grace W R & Co Compositions and processes for reducing nox emissions during fluid catalytic cracking
WO2006131507A1 (en) * 2005-06-06 2006-12-14 Albemarle Netherlands Bv Metal-doped mixed metal oxide, its preparation and use as catalyst composition
KR101270191B1 (en) * 2005-08-15 2013-05-31 상하이 리서치 인스티튜트 오브 페트로케미칼 테크놀로지 시노펙 Method for preparation of ethylene and propylene by catalytic cracking using a fluid-bed catalyst
CA2560481A1 (en) * 2005-09-29 2007-03-29 Roger V. Simpson Portable live well/bait well for a boat
US8409428B2 (en) * 2006-06-28 2013-04-02 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Catalyst additive for reduction of sulfur in catalytically cracked gasoline
AU2007313730B2 (en) * 2006-10-31 2012-08-23 Intercat, Inc. Sulfur oxide removing additives and methods for partial oxidation conditions
US20100093526A1 (en) * 2007-02-08 2010-04-15 Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd. Catalyst composition
KR20150047643A (en) * 2007-02-21 2015-05-04 더블유.알. 그레이스 앤드 캄파니-콘. Gasoline sulfur reduction catalyst for fluid catalytic cracking process
JP4985499B2 (en) * 2008-03-21 2012-07-25 株式会社豊田中央研究所 Sulfur oxide absorber and exhaust gas purification device
US20090324468A1 (en) * 2008-06-27 2009-12-31 Golden Stephen J Zero platinum group metal catalysts
FR2937030B1 (en) * 2008-10-10 2012-04-13 Inst Francais Du Petrole OXYDO-REDUCTIVE MASSES WITH A SPINEL TYPE STRUCTURE AxA'x'ByB'y'O4 AND USE IN A CHEMICAL LOOP OXYDO-REDUCTION PROCESS
US8343885B2 (en) * 2010-12-21 2013-01-01 Basf Corporation Isomerization catalysts
BR112014008741B1 (en) 2011-11-03 2020-09-29 Indian Oil Corporation Ltd FLUIDIZED CATALYTIC CRACKING PROCESS
US9511350B2 (en) 2013-05-10 2016-12-06 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. (Cdti) ZPGM Diesel Oxidation Catalysts and methods of making and using same
US9511355B2 (en) 2013-11-26 2016-12-06 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. (Cdti) System and methods for using synergized PGM as a three-way catalyst
US20140274662A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Cdti Systems and Methods for Variations of ZPGM Oxidation Catalysts Compositions
US9314771B2 (en) * 2013-07-11 2016-04-19 Sabic Global Technologies B.V. Use of lanthanide oxides to reduce sintering of catalysts
US9545626B2 (en) 2013-07-12 2017-01-17 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Optimization of Zero-PGM washcoat and overcoat loadings on metallic substrate
US9511358B2 (en) 2013-11-26 2016-12-06 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Spinel compositions and applications thereof
US10683212B2 (en) * 2015-03-18 2020-06-16 Dic Corporation Spinel particles, method for producing same, and composition and molding including spinel particles
EP3476805B1 (en) * 2016-06-23 2021-06-16 DIC Corporation Spinel particles, method for producing same, and composition and molded article including spinel particles
US20180056280A1 (en) * 2016-08-23 2018-03-01 Quanta Technologies, Llc Efficiency of Refinery FCCU Additives
CN106512998B (en) * 2016-11-01 2019-05-14 南昌师范学院 Cobalt, magnesium oxide method for preparing composite catalyst and application
US10143966B1 (en) * 2017-05-25 2018-12-04 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. Potassium dispersed on spinel oxides as catalysts for direct NOx decomposition
RU2729422C1 (en) 2019-10-24 2020-08-06 ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОЕ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ БЮДЖЕТНОЕ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЕ НАУКИ ИНСТИТУТ ОРГАНИЧЕСКОЙ ХИМИИ им. Н.Д. ЗЕЛИНСКОГО РОССИЙСКОЙ АКАДЕМИИ НАУК (ИОХ РАН) Catalyst for removal of sulphur oxides from flue gases of power plants

Family Cites Families (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US27639A (en) * 1860-03-27 Albekttjs lakrowe
US3140253A (en) * 1964-05-01 1964-07-07 Socony Mobil Oil Co Inc Catalytic hydrocarbon conversion with a crystalline zeolite composite catalyst
JPS4931433B1 (en) * 1970-02-25 1974-08-21
US3692701A (en) * 1970-07-15 1972-09-19 Phillips Petroleum Co Group viii metals on tin-containing supports dehydrogenation catalysts
USRE27639E (en) 1971-11-16 1973-05-08 Certificate of correction
US3823092A (en) * 1972-01-24 1974-07-09 Exxon Research Engineering Co Process for preparing cracking catalysts having improved regeneration properties
US3930987A (en) * 1973-04-12 1976-01-06 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalyst and method of preparing same
US4001375A (en) * 1974-08-21 1977-01-04 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Process for the desulfurization of flue gas
US4049582A (en) * 1975-03-26 1977-09-20 Atlantic Richfield Company Method for producing a supported catalyst
US4081408A (en) * 1975-09-22 1978-03-28 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalyst composition
US4153534A (en) * 1975-12-19 1979-05-08 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Catalytic cracking with reduced emission of noxious gases
US4153535A (en) * 1975-12-19 1979-05-08 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Catalytic cracking with reduced emission of noxious gases
US4503023A (en) * 1979-08-14 1985-03-05 Union Carbide Corporation Silicon substituted zeolite compositions and process for preparing same
US4263020A (en) * 1980-01-02 1981-04-21 Exxon Research & Engineering Co. Removal of sulfur from process streams
US4372842A (en) * 1980-05-01 1983-02-08 Phillips Petroleum Company Catalytic hydrocracking, hydrodesulfurization, and/or hydrodenitrogenation of organic compounds employing promoted zinc titanate and a zeolite as the catalytic agent
US4310440A (en) * 1980-07-07 1982-01-12 Union Carbide Corporation Crystalline metallophosphate compositions
US4472267A (en) * 1980-07-29 1984-09-18 Atlantic Richfield Company Catalyst and process for conversion of hydrocarbons
US4495305A (en) * 1980-07-29 1985-01-22 Atlantic Richfield Company Catalyst for conversion of hydrocarbons
JPS5761085A (en) * 1980-07-29 1982-04-13 Atlantic Richfield Co Conversion of hydrocarbon
US4495304A (en) * 1980-07-29 1985-01-22 Atlantic Richfield Company Catalyst for conversion of hydrocarbons
US4642178A (en) * 1980-07-29 1987-02-10 Katalistiks, Inc. Process for conversion of hydrocarbons
JPS5847087A (en) * 1981-09-14 1983-03-18 アトランテイツク・リツチフイ−ルド・カンパニ− Hydrocarbon conversion
JPS58176539A (en) * 1982-04-09 1983-10-17 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Electrode for measuring concentration of gaseous oxygen in blood
US4440871A (en) * 1982-07-26 1984-04-03 Union Carbide Corporation Crystalline silicoaluminophosphates
US4472532A (en) * 1982-11-29 1984-09-18 Atlantic Richfield Company Preparative process for alkaline earth metal, aluminum-containing spinels
CA1201699A (en) * 1982-11-29 1986-03-11 Jin S. Yoo Preparative process for alkaline earth metal, aluminum-containing spinels
US4471070A (en) * 1982-11-29 1984-09-11 Atlantic Richfield Company Preparative process for alkaline earth metal, aluminum-containing spinels
US4522937A (en) * 1982-11-29 1985-06-11 Atlantic Richfield Company Preparative process for alkaline earth metal, aluminum-containing spinels
US4476245A (en) * 1982-11-29 1984-10-09 Atlantic Richfield Company Preparative process for alkaline earth metal, aluminum-containing spinels
US4500651A (en) * 1983-03-31 1985-02-19 Union Carbide Corporation Titanium-containing molecular sieves
US4613428A (en) * 1983-07-13 1986-09-23 Katalistiks, Inc. Hydrocarbon cracking process
US4492677A (en) * 1984-05-17 1985-01-08 Atlantic Richfield Company Preparative process for alkaline earth metal, aluminum-containing spinels and their use for reducing the sulfur oxide content of gases
US4735705A (en) * 1984-05-30 1988-04-05 Katalistiks International Inc. Composition of matter and process useful for conversion of hydrocarbons
GB8513868D0 (en) * 1985-06-01 1985-07-03 British Petroleum Co Plc Removing mineral matter from solid carbonaceous fuels

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU7281587A (en) 1987-11-09
ATE82706T1 (en) 1992-12-15
JPH06210177A (en) 1994-08-02
AU620178B2 (en) 1992-02-13
EP0263171A1 (en) 1988-04-13
DE3782797T2 (en) 1993-04-29
BR8707261A (en) 1988-04-19
AU594766B2 (en) 1990-03-15
AU4583689A (en) 1990-04-05
JPH0729054B2 (en) 1995-04-05
EP0263171B1 (en) 1992-11-25
DE3782797D1 (en) 1993-01-07
JP2767539B2 (en) 1998-06-18
WO1987006157A1 (en) 1987-10-22
US4790982A (en) 1988-12-13
US4963520A (en) 1990-10-16
JPH01500250A (en) 1989-02-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1293967C (en) Metal-containing spinel composition and process for using same
US4472267A (en) Catalyst and process for conversion of hydrocarbons
US4758418A (en) Process for combusting solid sulfur-containing material
US4469589A (en) Catalyst and process for conversion of hydrocarbons
US4957892A (en) Process for combusting solid sulfur containing material
US4495304A (en) Catalyst for conversion of hydrocarbons
US4495305A (en) Catalyst for conversion of hydrocarbons
US4137151A (en) Hydrocarbon conversion with cracking catalyst having co-combustion promoters lanthanum and iron
US4497902A (en) Composition for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
US4381991A (en) Process for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
US4369108A (en) Process for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
US4423019A (en) Process for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
US4369130A (en) Composition for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
US4836993A (en) Process for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
US4642178A (en) Process for conversion of hydrocarbons
EP0158858B1 (en) A process for combusting sulfur-containing material, a hydrocarbon conversion process including such a combustion process in a catalyst regeneration step and a composition suitable for use as a catalyst in the hydrocarbon conversion process
EP0318808A2 (en) Process for reducing emissions of sulfur oxides
US4405443A (en) Process for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
US4613428A (en) Hydrocarbon cracking process
US4542116A (en) Catalyst for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
WO1987006156A1 (en) Vanadium, rare earth metal-containing spinel composition and process of using same
US4883783A (en) Composition of matter for conversion of hydrocarbons
US4839026A (en) Catalytic cracking with reduced emissions of sulfur oxides
CA1154735A (en) Catalytic cracking with reduced emissions of sulfur oxides
US4187199A (en) Hydrocarbon conversion catalyst

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKEX Expiry