CA1264512A

CA1264512A - Interdental toothbrush

Info

Publication number: CA1264512A
Application number: CA000502281A
Authority: CA
Inventors: Emanuel B. Tarrson; Dane Maric; Thomas P. Kelly
Original assignee: John O Butler Co Inc
Current assignee: Sunstar Americas Inc
Priority date: 1985-02-21
Filing date: 1986-02-20
Publication date: 1990-01-23
Anticipated expiration: 2007-01-23
Also published as: IT8619496A0; ES9100013A1; KR930005085B1; GB2171296B; FR2577398B1; JPS61240907A; IL77906A; EP0193101A2; CH668537A5; EP0193101B1; IT1188501B; JPH0633853Y2; FR2577398A1; ATE51746T1; KR860006235A; EP0193101A3; GB2171296A; JP2510593Y2; IE860484L; JPH0337920U

Abstract

ABSTRACT OF DISCLOSURE

An interdental toothbrush has a handle made from a mixture of a thermoplastic elastomer and a general purpose polypropylene. A twisted wire brush projects from the handle in axial alignment therewith. The toothbrush can be held within a loosely clasped fist, with one end of the brush held between a thumb and an index finger. By manipulating the thumb and index finger, the angle at which the brush projects may be changed at will. In this way, the insertion of the brush in more difficult to reach spaces in or around teeth is more easily performed.

Description

i451~

The handle and brush of the prior art devices are generally a rigid unit; therefore, use of the unit is similar to holding a pencil of a comparable length and projecting it into the back of the mouth, while trying to fit the point into a gap under a 05 bridge or between adjacent teeth. This kind of rigidity may require an extension of the cheek or the use of two hands.
Once the gap is found, the brushing must occur without a loss of gap orientation unless one is willing to go through the process of finding the gap again. Also, if one brushes too vigorously and loses the gap while doing so, he may jab himself in the gum or tooth and also bend the wire stem brush. Thus, interdental cleaning may be difficult to perform, especially where visual contact is not easy to achieve.
Accordinglyl an ob~ect of the invention is to pr~vide new and novel interdental brushes and, more particularly, to provide small and portable units which may be carried in pocket or purse.
~ nother object oE the invention is to provide an interdental brush which may be guided into a brushing position responsive to the user's sense of touch. Yet another object is to provide such a brush which may be guided into position by a slight change in the attitude of the tip of a finger. Here, an object is to provide a brush with a handle which may be flexed at the tip end, especially so that it may be used more easily in the back of the mouth and other hard to reach places in the mouth. In this connection, an object is to provide a brush which is bendable to a proper angle during use and which can be s~raightened when not in use.

~'?

A further object is to provide a brush where very small movements at the tip of the finger may be used to brush in the interdental spaces, thereby reducing the possibility of jabbing the gum responsive to a loss of brush-to-tooth contact.
05 ~n keeping with an aspect of the invention, these and other objects are accomplished by providing an interdental brush having a handle with a selected amount of flexibility in a neck region at a junction between the handle and brush, while being substantially rigid in the handle. The dimensions of the brush and handle are such that a small amount of finger pressure upon the neck region causes the tip of the brush to deflect, bend or flex to a convenient brushing angle. After use, the neck may be straightened from the deflected position. The brush may be repeatedly bent and straightened for repeated use.
Furthermore, it may be bent at different angles to afford access to different areas of the mouth. Thus, during brushing, one side of the iltterdental space may be brushed by slightly increasing the deflection responsive to an added finger pressure and the other side of the space may be brushed responsive to decreasing the deflection by reduced finger pressure. If need be, the brush may be rolled between the fingers to enable the finger tip to help straighten or to change the angle of the tip. Thus, the brushing itself may be accomplished by slight movements of the finger tip and thumb.
A preferred embodiment of the invention is shown in the attached drawing in which:

45~

Fig. 1 is a side elevation of the inventive brush and cap, as it might be viewed by the user;
Fig. 2 is a side elevation, partly in cross section, showing the inventive brush and cap;
05 Figs. 3 - 6 are end views taken along lines 3~3 to 6-6, respectively, of Fig. 2;
Fig. 7 is an assembled showing of the cap and brush, as they appear while the brush is being carried in packet or purse, for example:
E'ig. 8 shows the brush in operation, illustrating how the brush is deflected responsive to finger pressure;
Fig. 9 shows an alternative embodiment of the invention shown in Figs. 1-7;
Fig. 10 is a side elevation of an embodiment of the invention, with the top partially broken away to show internal grooves within the cap, with the cap closed over the handle;
Fig. 11 is a side elevation also showing the embodiment of figure 10 wlth the cap on the bottom of the handle extending the length thereof; and Fig. 12 is a cross sectional view of the cap of figure 1 also showing an enlar~ed portion showing internal longitudinal ribs.
The brush of Figs. 1 and 8 include a handle 20 and a cap 22. The cap 22 is a cylindrical member, having one end 23 closed. The other end 24 is open and slips over the brush handle 20 with friction fit (as best seen in Fig. 7).
Optionally, one or more vents 21 may be provided in the cap to facilitate drying of the brush after use. A reduction in 5~

internal diameter, such as annular stop 25, limits the distance which the cap 22 may be slipped over the end oE handle 20 and, therefore, protects the brush 26 from the cap being jammed downwardly internal ribs 29 (Fig. 12~ run longitudinally within 05 the cap 22 to provide added friction for holding the cap in place on the handle 20. The added holding forces occur because it is impossible to mold plastic with a completely circular interior to close enough tolerances to always fit snuggly.
With the longitudinal ribs, the cover will stretch slightly between the ribs on undersized tolerances and yet the unstret~hed cap still holds on oversized tolerances. This holding force is especially important if it is necessary to cover the brush after use and while it is still wet, when there could be a tendency for the cap to slip off the handle.

In the embodiment of Fig. 2 the internal diameter o the cap is uniform throughout the distance from the step 24 to the closed end 23 to give a smooth internal wall. It is desirable for the outside of the handle 20 and cap 22 to be serrated with longitudinal ribs so that they may be better manipulated by a person with wet hands. These ribs add friction, in the mold between the cap 22 and walls of the cavity in which it was formed.
Therefore, when the male member of the mold parts is opened, it often slipped out of the cap 22 with the smooth internal wall, thus leaving the cap ~2 trapped inside the female member of the mold. This required a knock-out pin which would leave unslightly marks on the cap. To avoid this problem the male mold part is given a plurality of circumferential ,. ..

~45~

grooves to ~orm a number of ribs 25a, inside the cap 22. When the male part of the mold is open, these rlbs and grooves are engaged to provide enough holding forces to overcome the friction between the cap 22 and the female mold part.
05 Thereafter the cap 22 may be knocked off the male part since the depth of the grooves (or the height of the ribs 25a) is very shallow. To help with the knock-off without causing a blemish on the cap~ a smooth surfaced ~lange 24a is provided for on the bottom of the cap. This flange also provides a controlled amount of resistance to a flaring of the open end (i.e. it acts somewhat as a rubberband would act to hold the cap 22 in place).
Handle 20 has a twisted wire brush 26 of any suitable design projecting longitudinally therefrom. The opposite end 27 of handle 20 is solid. When the cap 22 is in place on the handle 20, the brush 26 is kept clean and sanitary. When the cap 22 is placed on the opposite end of the handle 20, the handle is made longer. The internal ribs 29 help secure the cap 22 on the opposite end of the handle 20 so that, together, they provide a more secured tool which may be gripped with greater ease within the hand and braced against the palm at the fleshy fold 34 between the thumb and the index finger~ The stop 25 limits the distance that the end of the handle 20 extends into the cap 22.

The handle 20 is a solid member which is approximately a quarter-inch in diameter, for a distance A, which may be about one-inch. Beginning at shoulder 28, the diameter of a tip end 30 gradually reduces over a distance, which may be about ;4~5~

one-quarter inch, to an outer tip 31, which is also approximately one-quarter inch in length and an eighth-inch in diameter. The wire stem 32 is exposed over a distance between the top of tip end 31 and the bottom of brush 26 which is about 05 one-sixteenth of one-inch.
The wire stem 32 of brush 26 extends through and is embedded in the tip end and handle of the molded part. This wire stem continues for a substantial distance into the full diameter section of handle 20, as shown, for example in Fig.

2. Preferably, the brush stem 32 is molded into the plastic of the handle at the time when the handle is made. To aid in preventing the brush from being pulled out of the handle, the end of the wire may be bent or crimped, as shown at 36 in Fig. 9.

Longitudinal ribs 38 are provided in the handle 20 and the cap 22. These ribs enhance the esthetic appearance of the product and give the handle and cap a better feel to the user.
The ribs also aid in removal of the cap from the handle, particularly after the brush has been used.

In order to achieve a desired flexing characteristic, the handle 20 is preferably made from a mixture of a thermoplastic elastomer, polymer material and a polypropylene of a general purpose homopolymer grade. More particularly, in one embodiment which was constructed and found satisfactory, the handle was made of approximately 80 ~'C-Flex" and 20%
"Polypropylene #5820".
rrhe "C-Flex~' material is manufactured by Concept Polymer Technologies, Inc. of 12707 U.S. 19 South~ Clearwater, Florida , . . .

5~;~

33546. In its technical data sheets, the manufacturer reports that "C-Flex" has the following properties:

MECHANICAL ASTM C-FLEX C-FLEX C-FLEX
PROPERTIES METHOD 42-3500 42-35i0 42-3515 05 Durometer Hardness D-2240 50A 65A 70A
Tensile Str. Break PSI @23~C D-412 1650 1780 1900 Tensile Modulus PSI at 100~ D-412 175 330 340 PSI at 300% D-412 310 540 650 Tensile - Set % (5) after Break D-412 55 100 43 Elongatlon %
at Break @23~C D-412 850 800 790 Compression Set at 70C D-395 72 66 70 Tear Strength -Method-Die C lbs/in D-624 130 183 220 Specific Gravity + .02 D-792 .90 .90 .90 Water Absorption (5) at 1 week at 50% RH D~570 .14 .27 .30 1 week at 100% RH D-570 .42 .26 .17 THERMAL
P ERTIES
Brittle Temperature D-746 -100F -100F -100F
Melt Index-Cond. E D-1238 .25 1.9 1.8 ELECTRICAL
PROPERTIES
Dielectric Strength (Volts/Mil) 450 740 800 Volume Resistivity (1016 ohm-cmj 1.2 3.0 0.8 Surface Resistivity (1015 ohm) 3.6 3.6 2.6 Dielectric Constant (lo2Hz~ 2.33 2~27 2.27 (103Hz) 2.33 2~27 2.27 (106HZ) 2.31 2.27 2.15 Dissi~ation Factor (103Hz) 0.0004 0.0002 0.0002 (10 Hz) 0.0006 0.0002 0.0002 (106Hz) 0.0022 0.0008 0.0008 45~.~

g Polypropylene #5820 (]2 melt) is manufactured by the Shell Chemical Company, having an address at 1415 West 22 Street, Oak Brook, Illinis 60521. The manufacturer of this product describes its physical properties as follows:

PROPERTY UNITS UNITS TEST

Melt Flow 12g/10 min 12g/10 min D 1238 Density at 23~C 0 903 g/cc 0.903 g/cc D 1505 Tensile yield s~rength, at 2.0 in/min 5100 psi 35 MPa D 6382 Yield elongation at 2.0 in/min 10% 10% D 6382 1~ Secant modulus~
at 0.2 in/min 200,000 psi 1375 MPa D 6382 Flexural modulus, at 0.05 in/min, 2 in span 220,000 psi 1500 MPa D 790A2 Notched Izod impact strength, at 73F/23C 0.5 ft-lb/in 27 J/~ D 2562 at 0F/-18C 0.4 ft-lb/in 20 J/m D 2562 Hardness, Rockwell R95 R95 D 785 Heat deflection temp at 66 psi/
455 kPa 220F 104C D 648 Vicat softening temp 305F 152C D 1525 1 Condition L, 230C, 2160g 2 ASTM Type 1 specimen, 1/8" thick (injection molded) Shell further describes this product as being a high flow, general purpose material suitable for injection molding of intricate parts where long flow paths are involved. An antistat component reduces electrical charges during processing and subsequent storage, thereby reducing dust pickup. The - ]~o -manufacturer claims that the product has an excellent flex life, good chemical and solvent resistance, high strength-to-weight ratio, and exceptional stress cracking resistance.
05 8Oth of these materials meet exacting Federal standards for bio-medical use and for making direct contact with food.
To further control the amount of flexing which may occur in the neck region 30, 31, the diameter of wire stem 32 may be either increased or decreased somewhat and the diameter and length of the neck region 30, 31 may be modified. It is thought that those who manufacture the inventive brush will determine the best diameters and lengths for themselves and for their own particular needs. In general, the wire stem of a conventional interdental brush may be increased in diameter in the approximate range of 10-50%.
The method of using the inventive brush is shown in Fig. 8. The length of handle 20 is such that, when the tip end 30 is held between the thumb and index finger, the opposite end of the handle is captured and stabilized along the length of the finger. Or, if the cap is in place on the end of the brush, its end might be captured in or near the palm of the hand, as in the fleshy fold 34, which is between the thumb and index finger. By pressing the index finger against the tip end 30 while holding the handle 20 by the thumb, it is possible to deflect~ bend, or flex, the brush to point, more or less, in i4~

llne with the finger tip. If the user wishes to point the brush in another direction, the handle may be rolled between the thumb and index finger or a small amount of thumb pressure may be applied to the brush to straighten it or bend it to the 05 other position. Thus, the flexed angle of the brush may be varied, at the will of the user.
It is relatively easy to point one's finger at an object since the sense of touch tends to assist the pointer. This ma~es the invention easy to use. On the other hand, it is more difficult to point an instrument with a relatively long handle since the instrument may be held at almost any angle and since the user cannot always take advantage of the sense of touch to tell the user where the tip end of the long handled brush is located. Moreover, none of the existing long-handled or other interdental brushes have f~exible tip ends similar to the inventive brush so their tip ends cannot be deflected as in the inventive brush. While the tip end is held and deflected, as seen in Fig. 8, use of the instrument is much more like pointing a finger since the method of bending inherently tends to align the brush with the finger. This is an important advantage over the prior interdental brushes.
Another factor is that, when the brush is held in the hand as seen in Fig. 8, it is much easier to place the brush in the space between the teeth in the back of the mouth as compared to attempting to position it when the brush is straight, as seen in Fig. l, because the natural curvature of the hand in this position is most appropriate to reaching into that back of the mouth space. An advantage is that the portion of the wire brush encased in plastic is more resistant to breaking from 05 repeated or excessive bending than would be the case if the wire were exposed.
The claims are to be construed to cover all equivalent structures which fall within the scope and of the invention.

Claims

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. An interdental toothbrush comprising a handle having a first portion and second portion, the first portion having a reduced cross-section in comparison to the second portion, the first portion being flexible, brushing means having a brush with a twisted wire stem embedded in at least said first portion of the handle and projecting from said first portion in axial alignment with the handle, said flexibility being such that manipulation of the first portion with finger pressure flexes the first portion and the brush at an angle to the axis of the handle.

2. The toothbrush of claim 1 wherein said first portion is such that when the handle is held by a person's hand between the thumb and a finger, a small amount of thumb and finger pressure flexes the first portion at the angle to the axis.

3. The toothbrush of claim 2 wherein the length is such that said second portion of said toothbrush handle is captured along the length of the finger when said first portion is held by the thumb and index finger.

4. The toothbrush of claim 2 wherein the length is such that said second portion of said toothbrush handle is captured in approximately the palm of the hand when said first portion is held by the thumb and index finger.

5. The toothbrush of claim 3 wherein said first portion is approximately one-half inch long and tapers for approximately one-quarter inch diameter from said second portion to about one-eighth inch diameter, and then maintains the one-eighth inch diameter for approximately one-quarter inch.

6. The toothbrush of claim 5 wherein said twisted wire brush has a diameter which is selected to provide said controlled flexibility.

7. The toothbrush of claim 6 and cap means for covering said first portion and said twisted wire brush.

8. The toothbrush of claim 8 wherein the cap means includes at least one internal longitudinal rib for adding friction to secure the cap when in place over the handle.

9. The toothbrush of claim 7 or 8 wherein the cap has at least one internal circumferential rib.

10. The toothbrush of claim 7 wherein said cap means are adapted to receive the second portion of the handle when the cap is removed from the first portion to provide a handle extension and means are provided in said cap means for limiting movement of the second portion when it is inserted in the cap.

11. The toothbrush of claim 8 wherein the second portion of the handle and the cap are provided with external longitudinal ribs extending along a major portion of their lengths.

12. The toothbrush of claim 1 or 5 wherein said handle is made from a composition of approximately 80% of a thermoplastic elastomer polymer and approximately 20% of a general purpose polypropylene.

13. The toothbrush of claim 12 wherein said handle is made from a composition of approximately 80% of a thermoplastic elastomer polymer and approximately 20% of a general purpose polypropylene.

14. The toothbrush of claims 1 or 5 wherein said handle is made from a composition of approximately 80% of a thermoplastic elastomer polymer and approximately 20% of a general purpose polypropylene.

15. The toothbrush of claim 12 wherein said handle is made from a composition of approximately 80% of a thermoplastic elastomer polymer and approximately 20% of a general purpose polypropylene.

16. The toothbrush of claim 13 wherein said handle is made from a composition of approximately 80% of a thermoplastic elastomer polymer and approximately 20% of a general purpose polypropylene.