CA1257900A

CA1257900A - Control of the charging of pressurized gas-metal electrical storage cells

Info

Publication number: CA1257900A
Application number: CA000520666A
Authority: CA
Inventors: Steven J. Stadnick; Howard H. Rogers
Original assignee: Hughes Aircraft Co
Current assignee: Raytheon Co
Priority date: 1985-10-17
Filing date: 1986-10-16
Publication date: 1989-07-25
Also published as: WO1987002515A3; JPH0787103B2; JPS63502310A; JPS63501111A; JPH0793152B2; US4689544A; EP0241552B1; CA1284355C; DE3673821D1; EP0254730B1; DE3687655T2; EP0254730A1; US4683178A; DE3687655D1; WO1987004863A1; WO1987002515A2; EP0241552A1

Abstract

CONTROL OF THE CHARGING OF PRESSURIZED
GAS-METAL ELECTRICAL STORAGE CELLS

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE

A process and apparatus for controlling the charging of pressurized gas-metal cells such as nickel-hydrogen cells, to prevent detrimental overcharging, wherein the time rate of change of a battery gas pressure index is monitored as a control parameter. When the time rate of change of the index falls below a preselected value, charging is discontinued. The cell gas pressure index can be gas pressure itself, or a quantity which is responsive to, and depends upon gas pressure, such as the deformation of a cell component.

Description

O~) CONTROL OF THE CHARGING OF PRESSURIZED
~;~S-METAL ELECTRICAL STORAGE CELLS

BACXGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Thi~ invention relates generally to pressurized ga~-~etal ~torag~ cells 6uch 'as sealed nickel-hydrogen cells and, ~ore particularly, to contro~ 1 ing the charging of ~uch cell~.
Rechargeable ~torage cells are electrochemical devices for ~toring an electric,al s:harge and later deliv-ering that charge a~ a u~eful currentO A ~amiliar exam-ple o~ the rechaxgeable ~torage cell i~ the lead-acid battery us~d ~n automobiles. Another typ~ of cell having a grea~er electrical storage capac$~y per unit weight is the pressurized gas-metal storage cell, an i~portant exam-ple of which is the nickel-hydrogen cell used ln space-craft applications. A nickel-hydrogen cell u~ed in a 6a-tellite is typically periodically charged by electrical current produced by solar panels on the 6pacecraft, and then later discharged to æupply electrical power, when the spacecraft i8 in shadow or th~ ~olar panels are otherwise unable to furnieh electrical pow~r.
The primary requirements of torage cells ~o be used in ~pacecraft ar~ high energy c~pacity per unit weight of cell, reliability, and the abili~y to be re-cyclad through many cycleE o~ charging and dlscharging.
Reliabili~y and multiple cycle capability are ~nfluenced in part by the degree of charging of the cell. That is, .~t has been ~ound that nickel-hydrogen cell~ tend to have a ~horter life and greater incidence of ~ilures if the 3 o cells are ~everely ov~rcharged during l:he aharqing cycle.
~t i~ therefore important to control the charg-ing of pre~urized gas~matal ~t~rage cell~ during ~d~

-2~ 3C)~) charging, ts:~ optimiz~ their long~ Q performance. It ha3 been pr~viou~ly obsexved that th~ hydrogen partial pre~sure in~ide ~ ~ealed preR~urized gas-~etal storage cell ~t ~irst increase~ llnearly r,luring charging, but 5 that later some of the hydrogQn combines w~:th oxygen generated at the po6i~1ve electrod~ as the cell near~ its full charge. This ob~ervation ha~ been used in con-trolling the charging of Ruch c:ells by monitoring the value of pre~sure within tha sealed cell. Unfortunately, 10 the pressure corr~sponding wi~h a partiular degree o~
call charging varies with age o~ the c~ll, temperature, and charging rate, a~ wç~ll a~ with th~ amount o~ elec-trical energy utored ln the cell. Slnce ~pacecraft may be in orbit ~or a nu~b~r of years with the storage cells constantly undergoing charge-discharg2 cycles, the value of ga~ pressure within tha c~ll doe~ not provide a îully reliable maa~ura that c n be u~ed to c::ontrol l:he charging of the cell.
TherQ therefore exl6t8 a need for an improved 20 approach to controlling the charging o~ pressurizQd ~as-metal ~torage cell~, which does nvt depend upon the value of the pres~ure of the ga~ within th~ ~ealed cell contain-er. Such an approach ~hould be dependable and reliable through many thousand~ o~ charge-d~scharge cycles. It 25 should b~ compatible with exis'cing cell designs, s~nce ~he cellti; mu~t be optimiz~d ~or their el~ctrical perfor-mance and weight, rather than control procedures, and should not add ~xcessive weight or complexity to ~he storage cell. D~Rirably, the control procedure would 30 allow the ceLla to be charged and discharged autono-D~ously, without any out~idle contac:t such as intervention by a ground controller. ~he pr~sent: ~vention ~ulfills thiB need, and further provide~ related advantages.

~L~S7~0~

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The pre~ent lnvention re~ides in ~ ~ethod and apparatus for controlling the charging of pressurized gas-metal cells, to prevent the detrimental overcharging 5 0~ 6U ch cells. ~he approach ~llows the reproducible limitation of cell charging, without regard to the age, temperature, charging rate, or other parameters, within the normal operating limi~s of typical spacecraft operations. No sign~ficant modifications to the cell itself are required, ~nd the decisional and control functions can be accomplished using either ~ small hard-ware controller or a digital computer to ~onitor the instrumentation of the cell. Control may be accomplished ent~rely wlthout outaide intervention, so that charqing requires no contact with a ground computer or controller.
In accordance with the invention, a storage cell charging controller for use with a pressurized gas-metal storage cell comprises means for determining the rate of change of a cell gas pressure index with time, and means for discontinuing the charging of the cell when the rate of change ~alls and remains below a preselected value.
The gas pressure index can be any quantity which res-ponsively and functionally varies with the gas pressure within the storage cell, including the gas pressure itsel~ or a responsive guantity ~uch a6 the deformation of one o~ the cell components.
The rate o~ change of the cell pressure indcx can vary widely within ~ short p~riod o~ time, e~en durlng 310w ch~rglng o~ th~ cell. It is there~ore 3a important to filter out or otherwi~e avoid the adverse effects o~ the variation, to obtain a true measure of the rate of change of the ga~ pre~sure index with time.
The controller there~ore desirably includes means for calculating an averaged value of the rate of change of the cell pressure index. The averaging may be 7~tO~

accomplished in any appropr.iate manner, ~uch a~ l~y aver-aging ~veral EIUCC2~ V~ value~ of the rate o~ change, or by obt~ining two averaged value~ oî the ga~ pr~ure in-dex and thQn dividing by the average t~me b~tween obtain-5 ing the values. Whatever approach i~ used, whsn the rateo~ change Iallg below the pr~selec:ted valu~, then it i6 concluded that ths cell is approachiny a ~ull charge, and charging i8 di~continued, oxcept for a possible triclcle charge to maintain the charged ~tate.
In a mo3t preferred approach, the cell gas pres-sure index i~ taken to ba the~ defor~atlon of the wall OI
th~ aell pre~ure Y~Rsel, a3 mea~ured by a straln gauge of transducer mounted on the extlQrnal wall o~ the pressure ve~38el. A5 the pres~urs within the va~el rlse~, the 15 wall deforms, and the strain gauge measure~ thls defor-mation a~ produced by the internal pre~sure. Becau~e of random variation o~ the index, th~ measured value of the rate of change OI the cell ga~ pres~ure index varies widely about a true value. It i8 therefore pref`erred to 20 measure a plurali~y of values of the rate of change, as on the order of about 33 value~ in a two minute period, and then to average thase values to deriv~ a tru~, reliable ~alue o~ the rat~ of change o~ the gas pre6sure index. If thi~ ~verag~ value ~all~ below the preselacted value, then lt ie conclud~d that the cell is ~ully charg~d within ~he operational error limits of this procedure, and the ch~rging iB di continued. To in ure consistQncy, tho preferr~d controller requires that two or more consecutive ~lue~ o~ th~ ~veraged value of th~
rate o~ chang~ o~ the ga~ pre3sure index ~ust be below the pre~lected level, to be certain that r~ndom vari-ation haa not cau~d an incorrect determination of full charging.
The calcul~tions can be made ei~h~r by ~ully dedicated hardwar~, by a digital computer, or by a combined d~ice ~uch a3 a microprocessor worklng ~rom a 7~30~
read-only ~emory. All of the necessary hardware and 8Up-port ~unctions can be placed ad~acent the oell 50 that control o~ charging does not require the intervention of a ground-ba~ed controller.
In ~nother a~pect o~ the $nv~ntion, a process for preventing the detrimental overcharging o~ a pr~ured ga~-metal cell being charged ~rom a voltage source compri~e6 d~termining the time rate o~ change oP a cell ga~ pressure index, co~paring th~ time rak~ o~
o change with a preselected value, and discontinuing the charging o~ the cell when the time ratQ o~ change ~alls and r~mains below the pr~sel~cted value. The various modification~ and optimlzation~ discu~sed previou~ly in regard to the controller can also b~ applied to the process for pr~venting overcharging.
It will now be appreciated that the present in-v~ntion repr~sent~ an advance in the art o~ pre~surized gas-metal ~torage cells, and partic~llarly in the long-lifetime operation of ~uch cell~. u~ing the ~pproach of 2 0 the present invention, cell charg~ng can be limi~ed to optimal levela, without rellanc:e upon a~sumption~ about internal g~8 pre6~ure, charg~ng rate, or oth~r features.
When the cell approache~ it~ optimum full charge, tha rate of change of the cell ga~ pr~s~ure index is reduced, and this reduced rate of change triggers the termination of the charging operation. Charging may therefore be commenced ~rom any level of discharge, without knowing the value o~E that di~charge level. This capability is important, inasmuch ae the charg~/discharge cycles can vary significantly depending upon th~ orbi~al po~ition, the ~un anyle, and ~ther ~light paramet2r~. Variations ~n temperature of the cell, charge rate, and aga have no direct effect on thl~ approach ba~ed upon the t$me rate of change oiE the index, and therefore do not haml?er the attaining oï an accurate level of Iull chaxging. Other feature~ and~ advant~ges of the present invention wil 1 become apparent from the following 3nore detailed des-- 6- '1 2g rj7~

cription, t2ken ln conjunction with the ~ccompanying dr~wing~, which illuetrate, by way Oï Qxample, tha principl~ o~ the invention.

IIRIEF DESCRXPTION oY THE DRAWINGS

FIG~E 1 ~ ~ac~ional ~levat~onal vlew o~ a fl~ght-type nickel-hydrogen cel:L;

FIGU~E 2 i~ a detail og FIGURE 1, taken generally on lin~ 2-~, lllustrat:lng the plate ~et~;

FIGURE 3 i~ a gr~ph o~ internal cell gas pres-0 BUr8 ~!18 a îunction o~ time during charging oî c~ll;

FI~i;Ul~E 4 i~ a graph o~ time rate o~ oh~nge of the gas pressure index, specifically ~train gage volt-age, a~ a ~unction o~ tim~, ~or the charging depicted ~n FIGUXE 2; and FIGU~E 5 i8 a proaes~ ~low chart ~or calculating an averaged ti~a rate o~ ohange o~ the cell pressure index.

DETAII.ED DESCP~IPTION OF T~IE_PREFFERED EMBODIMENT

Th~ present invention i8 desirably us~d in con-junction w~h a nicksl-hydrogen ~orage cell 10, as ~llus-trated in FIGURES 1 and 2, oi~ the pressurized gas-metal cell type. Such a cell 10 typically co~prises a plurality o~ individual plate 8et8 12. Each plate 6et 12 in turn compri~e an anod~ or po~itiv~ e1QCtrOde 14, a cathode or negati~e electrods 16, and an eleckrolyte-containing separator 1~, which phy6ically ~eparates the ~lectrodes 14 and 16, and also ~u~aplies the electrolyte 1.~5~3~

~nedium through which ionic and electron transfer occur.
Charging and dlscharg~ng o~ the plate aet 12 are accom-plished through electrical leads 20.
Variou~ con~truction~ o~ nickel-hydrogen cells and compon~nts ~re disclosed ln the ~ollowing U.S. patents:
4,369,212; 4,283,844: 4,262,061; 4,250,235; 4,000,350; and

3, 669,744.
The po~ltlve ~lectrode 14 i~ ~ormed by impreg-nating nicXel hydroxide into porou~ s~ntered nicXel that i5 ~upport~d on ~n etched nickel. electrode ~ub~trate. The negative el~ctrode 16 i8 coated on on~ si~e by a ~intered mixture o platinum black and polytetrafluoro~khylene and on the other ~ide with a porous layer o~ polytetrafluoro-ethylene 19. The~e layer~ are applied to a nickel sub strate in th~ ~orm o~ etched ~heet or a woven mesh, to ~orm the negative electrode 16. Many different types o~ sepa-rator~ 18 have been u~ed, including, for example, asbestos, nylon, and a cloth o~ zirconium oxide-yttrium oxide con-taining polysulfoneO The electrolyt~, preferrably potas-sium hydroxide, is impregnated into the ~eparator 18.
The individual plat~ 8et8 12 are assembled onto a central core 22 to ~ox~ a ~tacked array 24. In form mg the ~tacked ~rray 24, a monofilam~nt polypropylene ~creen 25 is placed between e~ch plate ~et 12, 80 that oxygen liberated during overcharging ~t each posi~iv~ electrode 14 can diffuse ~way ~rom the elec:trode 14 and to the negative electrode lfi to comblne with hydrogen. The stacked array 24 i~ placed under a longitudinal pres~ure of, for example, about lO pound~ per aquare inch, by tightening compression plates 28 against each end of the stacked array 24. The tightenir~g o~ the compressis:~n plate~ 28 is prPferably accomplished by compre sing the array 24 a~d then tighten-ing a nut 30 on threads on the core 22, thereby compressing a Belleville washer set 32 against the compresslon plate 2a to hold the stacked array 24 in place.
The stacked array 24 i8 sealed withln a pressure 8 ~,5t79~f~
'['M
vessel 34, manufactur~d o~ a material ~uch a~ Inconel 718 nickel-based alloy which can withstand internal pressures on the order of 1,000 p~1, without damage by hydrogen em-brittlement or corrosion by the electrolyte. A gas fill tube 35 allOW8 ga~ content and E~reseure within the pressure vessel 34 ~o be controlled. The pressur~ ve~sel 34 is typically constructed in the form o~ ~ cylindrical tube having domed ends. ~y way o~ illu~tration, the cell lo having the pressure ve~el 34 o~ external dimension~ 3-1/2 inchea diameter and 13 lnches long can contain about 40 individual plat~ ~et~ 12, wlth a resulting electrical storage capacity o~ the cell of about 50 ampere-hours. The cell 10 may be ch~rged and di~charged through thousands of cycles without apparent damago, 1~ the charging and discharging are acco~pll~hed properly. A number of cells 10 can be combined ln ~eri~e or parallel to produce a battery.
Charging is ~ccompl~ shed by impr~ing a voltage through tha leads 20 ~cro~s each plate ~et 12 80 tha~
eleGtrons flow from the electrode 16 to the electrode 14.
2Q Electrical eneryy 1~ thereby stored in each plate set in the form of chemical reactant~, for subsequent discharging to produce a u~able current. A nickel-hydrogen cell of the type described prsviously may ~e fully charged by a solar cell array to ~ capac~ty o~, for example, about 50 ampere hour~, u~ing a current of about 5 amperes at 1.5 volts, through a charging period of about 14 hours from a dis-charg~d etate. Th2 voltage and charging time vary, depend-lng upon the power ~vailable ~rom the 601ar cell and the cycle dictated by the orbit of the ~pacecra~
A6 the nickel-hydrogen cell is charged, hydrogen is evolved, and the pressure withln the sealed pressure vessel 34 lncr2ases. The ri~e in pressure may be measured directly by a pre~sure transdu~er 3 6, which measures the pressure within the pressure ve sel 34. Alternatively, the rise in pressure may also be deduced by measuring ~ ~uantity which responde to presBursa~ ~pecifically the de~ormation in the wall 33 of the pressure vessel 34. That i5, as the pressure 9~ ~L~57`~3~3(J

within thQ pre~Z3ure ves~el 34 increa~eE~, the pres3ure vessel tenda to ~xpand ~nd bulgQ ~lightly. A ~train gauge 4 0 fast~ned to the wall 38 of the pre~sure vess~l 34 measures 'che bulging o~ the wall, which 1~ ~ ~unction OI, ~nd preferably proportional to, the ~nternal ga~ pre~ure within the ve~sel 34. The pre~ure it;self or ~ respon~ve quantity ~uch as de~ormation o~ a c:ell compon~nt can be u~ed as the gas preesure index.
FIGURE 3 i~ a graph of' the pres6ure in psig ~pounds per ~quar~ inch, sause) actually ~easured within the prQssure va3~el 34 a~ a ~unction o~ time during ch~rging, ~or one set o~ chaxging conditions. Charging wa~ acco~plished with a current of approximat~ly 4.8 a~pere~, at voltage~ up to 1.5 volts. A~ may be ~een in FIGURE 3, the pre6sure varies approxi~ately lin~rly with time until the pre~ure reaches approximataly 520 p~i. Thereafter, the pre~ur~ continu~s to ris2 but at a lesser rate, toward a value which reaches approximately 600 p6i after 450 minutss.
FIGURE 4 ~lustrate~ the time rate o~ change of the 2Q voltage output of the Rtrain gauge 40 during the 6ame test illustrat~d in FIGURE 3, which voltag~ output is a measure of deformation o~ the waLl 38 o~ the pressure vessel 34, which defor~ation i in turn a ~ea6ur~ of t:he pressure within the pres~ure v~el 34. Tha voltage output of tha strain gauge 40 i8 'chere~ore a ga~ pre~ure index for the cell 10. I~ the charsJing condi~ion~ were varied, the curves in FIGURES 3 and 4 would change. The test oP FIGU~ES 3 and

4 wa conducted at a laboratory a~bien~ temperature oP about 20 ~, but typical variatlons in temparature on board a spacecraft could result in change~ in tha curves of FIGURES
3 and 4. So~e temperature effect~ can be compensated, but other~ are ~ore di~icult to correct~ These effecks ~ak~
control o~ cell charginq, through pressure alone, diPficult without intervention of the ground controller.
Regardle6s of these other cause6 o~ variation6 in the internal pre6~ure o~ the pressure vessel 34 during chargin~ of th~ ~ell 10, it ha~ now been determined that in all known lnetanc~ the time rate of change (or 610pe) o~
the g~ pressure index ~uch a~ illustrat~d ln FIGURE 4 dQcrea~es to a low level a~ the optimu~ d~sired charge level ~s approached. Thu~, th~ pra~ent i~v~ntion provides that, when the time rate o~ change o~ the cell ga~ pressure index falls below ~ preselect~d value during the charging of the cell, charging i~ discontinued. Tha preselected value is determined by ob~erving the optimum performance o~ the pres~urized ga~-~etal cell for variou~ charging levels or by other factors. For the nickel-hydrogen cell and test ~lustrated ln FIGURES 1-4, a E~referred preselected value i6 slightly less than about one-half the steady ~tate rate o~
change during aharging. Th~t i~, typically when the time rato o~ change o~ voltag~ fall~ below about 1.5 ~v par minute, charging i~ di~continued. For the conditions of FIGURES 3 and 4, chaxging would be discontinued after approximately 460 ~ninute Althou~h a graph ~uch as FIGURE 4 may be readily used after the fact to determine the time for discontinuing 20 the charging, ~uch a determlnation is more dlfficult when conducted in real tim~. In ~ctual practice, the time rate of change a~ a function of time varie~ widely, due to ran-dom variation. It i~ therefore nece~sary eit:hPr to filter out the noise or, preferably, to average a number of values 25 to determine ~n apparent true value of the curve at a parti-cular time.
In the prssently preferred approac:h, the true value of ths rate of change o~ the cell pressure index i8 calcu-lated a~ the average of ~averal values. FIGTJRE 5 depicts 30 the approach us~d. A value of voltage ~ 8 read from the strain gauge 40, and th~ time of the reading i5 also recorded. Then th~ tim~ rate o:E change fro~n th~ last read-ing of voltage and t~ m~ i~ deter~ d. ThiE~ calculation is performed by calculating the di~ference between the current 35 voltage raading and the la~t prior voltage readmg, and dividing thi~ difference by ~he time interval between taking th~ two readings. This tim~ rate of chang~ can vary widely, (~

and in the preferred approach 33 such values, each deter-mined about i.6 seconds apart, are averaged to obtain the average apparent true value.
~he average apparent true value is compared with the preselected value, or, preferably, a set of two or more average values are each compared w~th the preselected value. The reason for comparing several average apparent true values with the preselected value i6 apparent from FIGURE 4, which is the graph of the average apparent true values as a function of time. The enlarged inset FIGURE 4A
shows the actual data points for each 2-minute average over 33 data points. Even after averaging, the data st11l varies somewhat. The averaged values vary from a smooth curve through the points, and it is possible that a single averaged value might lie below the preselected value before the optimal charging i~ reached. Experience has shown that, where each of the last three average apparent true values is below the preselected value, there is virtually no chance that the cell will be undercharged when charging is dis-continued according to this criterion. Since the averagedapparent true values are determined approximately every two minutes in thi~ preferred approach, three values are accu-mulated in 8iX ~inutes.
~he calculations previously described have been performed ueing a digital computer in the presently pre-ferred approach. For hardware to be flown in space, the calcul~tions would pre~erably be per$ormed by a micro-proces60r operating from an in6truction 6et in a permanent read-only memory. The calculation~ may also ~e per$ormed by dedicated hardwar~ element~ where the analog prec~ure ~ig-nai~ are converted to digltnl in~ormation and processed according to a procedure such as illustrated in FIGUR~ 5.
The controller and procedure di~closed herein have been operatQd in an autonomous fashion to demonstrate that no external intervention is re~uired. A nickel-hydrogen cell has been repeatedly charged to an optimal level using the preferxed approach, and then discharged. Such an ~12- ~rj7~

approach allow~ the cell charging and discharging to be correctly p~rfor~d even in the ab~0nae o~ telemetry, radio cont~ct, and a hu~an controller for ~xt~nded periods, a requirement ~or cextain type~ o~ ~atellite.
~he present ~pproach may be di~tingui6hed from khe prior npproach, wherein ~h~ mt~gnitude o~ the ga~ pressure wa~ co~pared with a pr~d~termined value. In the present approach, the time rate o~ ehange o~ th~ gas pres~ure index is co~pared wi~h a pre~elected value.
It will now b~ appreei.ated that, through the use oP
thi~ invention, the charging of a pr~urized gas-metal eell, ~uch as a nickal-hydrogen cell, ean be eontrolled to avoid the possibility o~ ~igni~icantly ovareharging the cell. ~he approach i~ rlally compatible with existing types of such cells. Using the invention, detrimental over-eharging o~ the call in varylng charging condition~ can be avoided. Although a particular embodiment o~ the invention has b~en described in de~a~l for purpose~ o~ illu6tration, various modi~ication~ may b~ ~ade without departing from the splrit and ~cope o~ th~ invention. Accordingly, the invention i~ not to be limi~ed except a~ by ths appended claim~.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:

1. A storage cell charging controller for use with a pressurized gas-metal storage cell, comprising:
means for determining the rate of change of a cell gas pressure index with time; and means for discontinuing the charging of the cell when the rate of change falls and remains below a preselected value.

2 . The controller of claim 1, wherein said cell is a nickel-hydrogen cell.

3. The controller of claim 1, wherein said means for determining includes:
means for measuring the deformation of a compo-nent of the cell, and the deformation is the gas pressure index.

4. The controller of claim 1, wherein said means for determining includes a strain gauge fastened to an external wall of the cell, and the voltage output of the strain gauge is the gas pressure index.

5. The controller of claim 1, wherein said means for determining includes:
means for measuring the gas pressure within the cell, and the gas pressure is the gas pressure index.

6. The controller of claim 1, wherein said means for discontinuing includes:
means for calculating an averaged value of the rate of change of the cell gas pressure index.

7. The controller of claim 6, wherein said means for calculating averages at least two unaveraged values of the rate of change of the cell gas pressure index.

8. The controller of claim 6, wherein said means for calculating comprises a digital computer.

9. A process for preventing the detrimental over-charging of a pressurized gas-metal cell being charged from a current source, comprising:
determining the time rate of change of a cell gas pressure index;
comparing the time rate of change with a pre-selected value; and discontinuing the charging of the cell when the time rate of change falls and remains below the preselected value.

10. The process of claim 9, wherein said cell is a nickel-hydrogen cell.

11. The process of claim 9, wherein the cell pressure index is gas pressure within the cell.

12. The process of claim 9, wherein the cell pressure index is deformation under pressure of a component of the cell.

13. The process of claim 9, wherein the cell pressure index is the voltage output of a strain gauge fastened to an extenral wall of the cell.