CA1211674A - Oven cleaner - Google Patents
Oven cleanerInfo
- Publication number
- CA1211674A CA1211674A CA000436444A CA436444A CA1211674A CA 1211674 A CA1211674 A CA 1211674A CA 000436444 A CA000436444 A CA 000436444A CA 436444 A CA436444 A CA 436444A CA 1211674 A CA1211674 A CA 1211674A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- oven cleaner
- cleaner
- oven
- alkali metal
- polyhydric alcohol
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Abstract
ABSTRACT
An oven cleaner containing as the active ingredients a non-caustic alkali metal carbonate, sesquicarbonate or bicarbonate and a polyhydric alcohol, preferably glycerol, which is liquid and substantially non-volatile at the desired cleaning temperature and in which the alkali metal salt is soluble at that temperature..
A method for cleaning ovens and cookware comprises applying the oven cleaner according to the invention to the surface to be cleaned and heating the surface to a temperature of at least 125°C for a period of at least five minutes and wiping and/or washing the saponified oils and fats from the surfaces.
Effective oven cleaning compositions having a pH of 9 or below may be produced using the present invention.
An oven cleaner containing as the active ingredients a non-caustic alkali metal carbonate, sesquicarbonate or bicarbonate and a polyhydric alcohol, preferably glycerol, which is liquid and substantially non-volatile at the desired cleaning temperature and in which the alkali metal salt is soluble at that temperature..
A method for cleaning ovens and cookware comprises applying the oven cleaner according to the invention to the surface to be cleaned and heating the surface to a temperature of at least 125°C for a period of at least five minutes and wiping and/or washing the saponified oils and fats from the surfaces.
Effective oven cleaning compositions having a pH of 9 or below may be produced using the present invention.
Description
~ 2 ~ lZ11674 The present invention relates to an improved oven cleaner and to a method for removing baked on fats and greases from cooking surfaces.
Oven cleaners are compositions of matter used to remove baked on fats and greases from cooking surfaces. Such compositions are commonly used for cleaning ovens as the name implies but may also be used to clean other cooking surfaces on which there has been a build up of baked on fats and greases. Such surfaces include fry pans, kitchenware, barbecue equipment, cooking utensils and the like. These surfaces may be of bare metal, metal coated as with baked enamel, glazed stoneware, porcelain, glass or the like.
Conventional oven cleaners are based on caustic soda.
It has generally been considered necessary to use a caustic alkali in order to efectively saponify the fats in the baked on material in order to enable its removal. A ~ew oven cleaners have been based on solvents, acetate salts, amines or ammonia. The known caustic based systems suffer from the disadvantage o~ being quite hazardous and/or require the consumer to wear gloves during usage. These known caustic-based systems are required to carry poisons schedule labelling and warning statements. The systems based on acetate salts have the disadvantage that they require temperatures of 250C or above to activate them.
It has been proposed in the past to individually add organic solvents and inorganic builder salts to oven cleaning compositions based on alkali or nitrogen containing active cleaning ingredients. Such additions are for instance disclosed in U.S. Patent Specifications 3,829,387; 3,813,343;
and 3,658,711. It has also been known to use aqueous solutions of alkali metal salts to form non-stick coatings on ovens; see U.K. Patent Specifications 2,019,876 and 1,523,491 and Australian Patent Specification 453,537. It has not previously been proposed, however, to use the two abovementioned types of ingredients together. It has also .. _ .. . ..
~Z11674 not been previously recognised that these two types of ingredients, which each has only a mild cleaning action on its own, can be combined together to provide a highly e~fective oven cleaner while avoiding many of the disadvantages of the known oven cleaners.
The present invention consists in an oven cleaner containing as acti.ve ingredients an effective amount of an alkali metal bicarbonate, sesquicarbonate or carbonate or a mixture thereof and a polyhydric alcohol which is liquid and substantially non-volatile at the desired cleaning temperature and in which the alkali metal salt is soluble at that temperature.
The present invention further consists in applying the oven cleaner according to this invention to a cooking surface carrying baked on fats or g;reases, heating the cooking surface to at least 125C, and preferably from 125 to 250C, for a period of at least five minutes and washing andJor wiping the saponified fats or greases from the cooking surface.
The oven cleaner according tG the present invention may have a pH as low as 9 or less which allows its use without rubber gloves and like protective clothing. These oven cleaners also have the advantage that surfaces of stainless steel, aluminium, and some other metals will be left with a shiny surface after cleaning rather than being left with a dull, oxidised, surface as is the case with many of the prior art oven cleaning compositions.
The non-caustic alkali metal salt is most preferably sodium or potassium bicarbonate. Other alkali metal salts which can be advantageously used include sodium or potassium sesquicarbonate, and sodium or potassium carbonate. The alkaline salt preferably comprise from 0.5 to 20% by weight of the product and most preferably 2 to 20% by weight.
The pH of the product is preferably below 11 and more preferably below 10 and most preferably 9 or below.
~ 4 - lZ116 ~4 The po]yhydric alcohol used in the present invention preferably have the general formula:
CH20H (CHO~) n CH2O~ where n = 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4.
The liq~id is most preferably glycerol or includes glycerol.
Other compounds in this group which may be used include mannitol, ethylene glycol and sorbitol. When the salt is a potassium salt the polyhydric alcohol ma~ with equal effectiveness be an alcohol falling outside the above general formula. This is blelieved to be due to the higher solubility of the potassium salts in the polyols as compared with the corresponding sodium salt. Plolyhydric alcohols which work efficiently ~ith the potassium salts include various grades of propylene glycol, diethylene glycol, polyeth~lene glycol, dipropylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, triethylene glycol, and 1,2,6 hexanetriol. The p~olyhydric alcohol preferably comprises from 1 to 50% by weight of the product.
The oven cleaner according to this invention preferably includes water. The water is preferably present in an amount of at least 35% by weight.
The oven cleaner is preferably water based and preferably contains a thickener to prevent it running off vertical surfaces. Other ingredients may include a surfactant or soap, a fragrance, a pigment marker and a propellant.
The oven cleaner according to this invention may be applied in any suitable manner. These include an aerosol, a trigger or pump spray, a brush or pad.
In carrying out the method according to this invention the oven cleaner is preferably applied to a surface to be cleaned and heated to a temperature of from 125C to 250C for a time of from 5 minutes to 2 hours.
It is believed that oven cleaners according to this invention are effective, despite their limited alkalinity and the evaporation of the water from the cleaner, due to the continued action of the alkaline salt dissolved in the _ 5 _ ~ 21 1 6'~4 non-volatile polyhydric alcohol. The alkaline salt is maintained in a condition in which it is available for reaction with the baked on fats and greases at the required elevated temperature by being dissolved in the polyhydric alcohol. For this reason the polyhydric alcohol is required to be substantially non-volatile at the cleaning temperature.
Hereinafter given by way of example are preferred embod~ments of t;he present invention.
Test surfaces were prepared by baking smeared dripping onto white vitreous enamel metal plates for 1 1/2 hours at 250 C. The baked-on dripping could not be removed at all by washing or wiping without a scourer.
Cleaners consisting of the formulations given below were applied to the test surfaces to be cleaned from a trigger pack after shaking well.
The test plates were then heated in an oven for 30 minute~ to a final temperature of 150C~
The test plates were then either rinsed under a fast running tap or wiped with a damp sponge and the percentage removal of baked-on dripping recorded.
Example 1 ~ w/w Sodium Bicarbonate 6.3 Glycerol 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 25 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0~5 Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 30 ~ Removal of soil 100 Example 2 ~ w/w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 Glycerol 20.0 35 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 6 - ~1211~i'74 Veegum T~D I . 5 Xanthan G~m O . 05 Titanium Diox ide O . 5 Water to lO0 5 Product pH 8.4 ~ Removal of soil lO0 Example 3 % w/w Soda Ash (Sodium rarbonate) 4.0 Glycerol 20O0 lO Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate l.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum o.i~5 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to lO0 15 Product pH 11.25 ~ Removal of soil 100 Example 4 ~ w/w Sodium Sesquicarbonate 5.65 Glycerol 20.0 20 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate l.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan ~um o~o5 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 25 Product pH 10.1 % Removal of soil lO0 Example 5 % w/w , Sodium Bicarbonate 3.15 j Potassium Bicarbonate 3.75 ~' ~ ~.
~X11S~'7~
Glycerol 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 5 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 % Removal of soil 100 Note: Use of the bicarbonate mixture gave no improvement in performance at lower temperatures or shorter heating time intervals.
Example 6 % w/w Sodium Bicarbonate 6.3 Sorbitol (70%) 20.0 15 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 20 Product pH ~.4 ~ Removal of soil 95 Example 7 % w/w Sodium Bicarbonate 6.3 Ethylene Glycol 20.0 25 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide `0.5 Water to 100 30 Product pH 8.4 ~ ~
~IZ~ ;'7~
Removal of soil 80 Example 8 ~ w/w Sodium Bicarbonate 6.3 Mannitol 20.0 5 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0 5 Titanium Dioxide o. 5 Water to 100 10 Product pH 8.4 % Removal of soil 92 Example 9 % w/w Sodium Bicarbonate 6.3 Ethylene Glycol 8.3 15 Sorbitol (70%~ 11.7 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1~5 Xanthan Gum o.
Titanium Dioxide 0.5 20 Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 % Removal of soil 93 Note: Mixture of ethylene glycol and sorbitol matches glycerol with respect to average chain length.
Example 10 A cleaner consisting of the following formulation was applied to a test surface to be cleaned, prepared as for Examples 1-9, from an aerosol pack after shaking well. The test was then carried out in the same manner as for Examples 1-9.
.
~2116~4 g ~ W/W
Sodium 8icarbonate 5.~7 Glycerol 18.0 Gafteric MD 0 . 036 5 Veegum T~ 1. 35 Xanthan Gum 0.045 Titanium Dioxide 0.45 Deionised Water 64.45 Propellant P12/114:60/40 10.0 10 Product pH 8.4 ~ Removal of soil 99 Example 11 A cleaner consisting of the following formulation was brushed onto a test surface to be cleaned, prepared as for Examples 1-9. The test was then carried out in the same m~nner as for Examples 1-9.
% w/w Sodium Bicarbonate 24.0 Glycerol 76.0 20 % Removal of soil 100 Example 12 % w/w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 Diethylene GLycol 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 25 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 ; Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 30 % Removal of soil 100 `A
Zl~
Example 13 ~ w~w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 Triethylene Glycol 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 5 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 10 % Removal of soil 100 Example 14 % w/w -Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 Propylene Glycol 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 15 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 20 ~ Removal of soil 100 Example 15 % w/w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 1,2,6 Hexanetriol 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 25 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxid~ 0.5 Water to 100 Product pH 8~4 ~ ?~, ~
L?~
% Removal of soil 100 Example 16 % w/w Potassium ~icarbonate 7.5 Dipropylene Glycol 20.0 5 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 10 Product pH 8.4 ~ Removal of soil 95 Example 17 ~ w/w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 Polypropylene Glycol 15020.0 15 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 20 Product pH 8.4 % Removal of soil 95 Example 18 % w/w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 Polyethylene Glycol 200 20.0 25 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 1 2 ~2~ 74 Product pH 8.4 96 Removal of soil 95 Example 19 ~ w/w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 Polyethylene Glycol 300 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum O.o5 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 10 Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 % Removal of soil 90 Example 20 % w/w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 15 Polyethylene Glycol 600 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 20 Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 Removal of soil 90 The performance of the composition according to Examples, ~or instance, 1 to 5 was equal to that of a molar equivalent active level of caustic soda in the same formulation base.
Caustic soda based products on the market when tested under identical conditions removed only 80-95% of the baked-on dripping.
A synergistic effect between the polyhydric alcohol(s) A
lZ1~6'74 and the non-caustic alkali metal salt(s) has been demonstrated by testing glycerol and sodium bicarbonate separately alongside a mixture of both on the same prepared test plate.
.5 Sodium bicarbonate on its own removed onIy 50% of the baked-on dripping and glyce.rol on its own removed only 30% of the baked-on dripping where,as the mixture of sodium bicarbonate and glycerol removed 100% of the baked-on dripping.
Oven cleaners are compositions of matter used to remove baked on fats and greases from cooking surfaces. Such compositions are commonly used for cleaning ovens as the name implies but may also be used to clean other cooking surfaces on which there has been a build up of baked on fats and greases. Such surfaces include fry pans, kitchenware, barbecue equipment, cooking utensils and the like. These surfaces may be of bare metal, metal coated as with baked enamel, glazed stoneware, porcelain, glass or the like.
Conventional oven cleaners are based on caustic soda.
It has generally been considered necessary to use a caustic alkali in order to efectively saponify the fats in the baked on material in order to enable its removal. A ~ew oven cleaners have been based on solvents, acetate salts, amines or ammonia. The known caustic based systems suffer from the disadvantage o~ being quite hazardous and/or require the consumer to wear gloves during usage. These known caustic-based systems are required to carry poisons schedule labelling and warning statements. The systems based on acetate salts have the disadvantage that they require temperatures of 250C or above to activate them.
It has been proposed in the past to individually add organic solvents and inorganic builder salts to oven cleaning compositions based on alkali or nitrogen containing active cleaning ingredients. Such additions are for instance disclosed in U.S. Patent Specifications 3,829,387; 3,813,343;
and 3,658,711. It has also been known to use aqueous solutions of alkali metal salts to form non-stick coatings on ovens; see U.K. Patent Specifications 2,019,876 and 1,523,491 and Australian Patent Specification 453,537. It has not previously been proposed, however, to use the two abovementioned types of ingredients together. It has also .. _ .. . ..
~Z11674 not been previously recognised that these two types of ingredients, which each has only a mild cleaning action on its own, can be combined together to provide a highly e~fective oven cleaner while avoiding many of the disadvantages of the known oven cleaners.
The present invention consists in an oven cleaner containing as acti.ve ingredients an effective amount of an alkali metal bicarbonate, sesquicarbonate or carbonate or a mixture thereof and a polyhydric alcohol which is liquid and substantially non-volatile at the desired cleaning temperature and in which the alkali metal salt is soluble at that temperature.
The present invention further consists in applying the oven cleaner according to this invention to a cooking surface carrying baked on fats or g;reases, heating the cooking surface to at least 125C, and preferably from 125 to 250C, for a period of at least five minutes and washing andJor wiping the saponified fats or greases from the cooking surface.
The oven cleaner according tG the present invention may have a pH as low as 9 or less which allows its use without rubber gloves and like protective clothing. These oven cleaners also have the advantage that surfaces of stainless steel, aluminium, and some other metals will be left with a shiny surface after cleaning rather than being left with a dull, oxidised, surface as is the case with many of the prior art oven cleaning compositions.
The non-caustic alkali metal salt is most preferably sodium or potassium bicarbonate. Other alkali metal salts which can be advantageously used include sodium or potassium sesquicarbonate, and sodium or potassium carbonate. The alkaline salt preferably comprise from 0.5 to 20% by weight of the product and most preferably 2 to 20% by weight.
The pH of the product is preferably below 11 and more preferably below 10 and most preferably 9 or below.
~ 4 - lZ116 ~4 The po]yhydric alcohol used in the present invention preferably have the general formula:
CH20H (CHO~) n CH2O~ where n = 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4.
The liq~id is most preferably glycerol or includes glycerol.
Other compounds in this group which may be used include mannitol, ethylene glycol and sorbitol. When the salt is a potassium salt the polyhydric alcohol ma~ with equal effectiveness be an alcohol falling outside the above general formula. This is blelieved to be due to the higher solubility of the potassium salts in the polyols as compared with the corresponding sodium salt. Plolyhydric alcohols which work efficiently ~ith the potassium salts include various grades of propylene glycol, diethylene glycol, polyeth~lene glycol, dipropylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, triethylene glycol, and 1,2,6 hexanetriol. The p~olyhydric alcohol preferably comprises from 1 to 50% by weight of the product.
The oven cleaner according to this invention preferably includes water. The water is preferably present in an amount of at least 35% by weight.
The oven cleaner is preferably water based and preferably contains a thickener to prevent it running off vertical surfaces. Other ingredients may include a surfactant or soap, a fragrance, a pigment marker and a propellant.
The oven cleaner according to this invention may be applied in any suitable manner. These include an aerosol, a trigger or pump spray, a brush or pad.
In carrying out the method according to this invention the oven cleaner is preferably applied to a surface to be cleaned and heated to a temperature of from 125C to 250C for a time of from 5 minutes to 2 hours.
It is believed that oven cleaners according to this invention are effective, despite their limited alkalinity and the evaporation of the water from the cleaner, due to the continued action of the alkaline salt dissolved in the _ 5 _ ~ 21 1 6'~4 non-volatile polyhydric alcohol. The alkaline salt is maintained in a condition in which it is available for reaction with the baked on fats and greases at the required elevated temperature by being dissolved in the polyhydric alcohol. For this reason the polyhydric alcohol is required to be substantially non-volatile at the cleaning temperature.
Hereinafter given by way of example are preferred embod~ments of t;he present invention.
Test surfaces were prepared by baking smeared dripping onto white vitreous enamel metal plates for 1 1/2 hours at 250 C. The baked-on dripping could not be removed at all by washing or wiping without a scourer.
Cleaners consisting of the formulations given below were applied to the test surfaces to be cleaned from a trigger pack after shaking well.
The test plates were then heated in an oven for 30 minute~ to a final temperature of 150C~
The test plates were then either rinsed under a fast running tap or wiped with a damp sponge and the percentage removal of baked-on dripping recorded.
Example 1 ~ w/w Sodium Bicarbonate 6.3 Glycerol 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 25 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0~5 Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 30 ~ Removal of soil 100 Example 2 ~ w/w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 Glycerol 20.0 35 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 6 - ~1211~i'74 Veegum T~D I . 5 Xanthan G~m O . 05 Titanium Diox ide O . 5 Water to lO0 5 Product pH 8.4 ~ Removal of soil lO0 Example 3 % w/w Soda Ash (Sodium rarbonate) 4.0 Glycerol 20O0 lO Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate l.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum o.i~5 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to lO0 15 Product pH 11.25 ~ Removal of soil 100 Example 4 ~ w/w Sodium Sesquicarbonate 5.65 Glycerol 20.0 20 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate l.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan ~um o~o5 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 25 Product pH 10.1 % Removal of soil lO0 Example 5 % w/w , Sodium Bicarbonate 3.15 j Potassium Bicarbonate 3.75 ~' ~ ~.
~X11S~'7~
Glycerol 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 5 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 % Removal of soil 100 Note: Use of the bicarbonate mixture gave no improvement in performance at lower temperatures or shorter heating time intervals.
Example 6 % w/w Sodium Bicarbonate 6.3 Sorbitol (70%) 20.0 15 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 20 Product pH ~.4 ~ Removal of soil 95 Example 7 % w/w Sodium Bicarbonate 6.3 Ethylene Glycol 20.0 25 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide `0.5 Water to 100 30 Product pH 8.4 ~ ~
~IZ~ ;'7~
Removal of soil 80 Example 8 ~ w/w Sodium Bicarbonate 6.3 Mannitol 20.0 5 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0 5 Titanium Dioxide o. 5 Water to 100 10 Product pH 8.4 % Removal of soil 92 Example 9 % w/w Sodium Bicarbonate 6.3 Ethylene Glycol 8.3 15 Sorbitol (70%~ 11.7 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1~5 Xanthan Gum o.
Titanium Dioxide 0.5 20 Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 % Removal of soil 93 Note: Mixture of ethylene glycol and sorbitol matches glycerol with respect to average chain length.
Example 10 A cleaner consisting of the following formulation was applied to a test surface to be cleaned, prepared as for Examples 1-9, from an aerosol pack after shaking well. The test was then carried out in the same manner as for Examples 1-9.
.
~2116~4 g ~ W/W
Sodium 8icarbonate 5.~7 Glycerol 18.0 Gafteric MD 0 . 036 5 Veegum T~ 1. 35 Xanthan Gum 0.045 Titanium Dioxide 0.45 Deionised Water 64.45 Propellant P12/114:60/40 10.0 10 Product pH 8.4 ~ Removal of soil 99 Example 11 A cleaner consisting of the following formulation was brushed onto a test surface to be cleaned, prepared as for Examples 1-9. The test was then carried out in the same m~nner as for Examples 1-9.
% w/w Sodium Bicarbonate 24.0 Glycerol 76.0 20 % Removal of soil 100 Example 12 % w/w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 Diethylene GLycol 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 25 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 ; Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 30 % Removal of soil 100 `A
Zl~
Example 13 ~ w~w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 Triethylene Glycol 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 5 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 10 % Removal of soil 100 Example 14 % w/w -Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 Propylene Glycol 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 15 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 20 ~ Removal of soil 100 Example 15 % w/w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 1,2,6 Hexanetriol 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 25 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxid~ 0.5 Water to 100 Product pH 8~4 ~ ?~, ~
L?~
% Removal of soil 100 Example 16 % w/w Potassium ~icarbonate 7.5 Dipropylene Glycol 20.0 5 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 10 Product pH 8.4 ~ Removal of soil 95 Example 17 ~ w/w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 Polypropylene Glycol 15020.0 15 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 20 Product pH 8.4 % Removal of soil 95 Example 18 % w/w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 Polyethylene Glycol 200 20.0 25 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 Water to 100 1 2 ~2~ 74 Product pH 8.4 96 Removal of soil 95 Example 19 ~ w/w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 Polyethylene Glycol 300 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum O.o5 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 10 Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 % Removal of soil 90 Example 20 % w/w Potassium Bicarbonate 7.5 15 Polyethylene Glycol 600 20.0 Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonate 1.0 Veegum T~ 1.5 Xanthan Gum 0.05 Titanium Dioxide 0.5 20 Water to 100 Product pH 8.4 Removal of soil 90 The performance of the composition according to Examples, ~or instance, 1 to 5 was equal to that of a molar equivalent active level of caustic soda in the same formulation base.
Caustic soda based products on the market when tested under identical conditions removed only 80-95% of the baked-on dripping.
A synergistic effect between the polyhydric alcohol(s) A
lZ1~6'74 and the non-caustic alkali metal salt(s) has been demonstrated by testing glycerol and sodium bicarbonate separately alongside a mixture of both on the same prepared test plate.
.5 Sodium bicarbonate on its own removed onIy 50% of the baked-on dripping and glyce.rol on its own removed only 30% of the baked-on dripping where,as the mixture of sodium bicarbonate and glycerol removed 100% of the baked-on dripping.
Claims (17)
1. An oven cleaner comprising an effective amount of a polyhydric alcohol which is a liquid and substantially non-volatile at a desired cleaning temperature of at least 125°C and an alkali metal salt soluble therein at said temperature, characterised in that the alkali metal salt is the essential active ingredient in the cleaner, and is non caustic and selected from an alkali metal carbonate or bicarbonate or sesquicarbonate, or mixture thereof, in an amount of at least 2% by weight of the cleaner.
2. An oven cleaner as claimed in claim 1 in which the polyhydric alcohol has the general formula:-CH2OH(CHOH)nCH2OH
wherein n = 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4.
wherein n = 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4.
3. An oven cleaner as claimed in claim 1 in which the alkali metal salt is a potassium salt and in which the polyhydric alcohol is selected from the group comprising propylene glycol, diethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, triethylene glycol and 1, 2, 6 hexanetriol.
4. An oven cleaner as claimed in claim 1 in which the oven cleaner contains at least 35% by weight of water.
5. An oven cleaner as claimed in claim 1 in which the desired cleaning temperature is between 125 and 250°C.
6. An oven cleaner as claimed in claim 1 in which the alkali metal salt is present in an amount of from 2% to 20% by weight of the oven cleaner.
7. An oven cleaner as claimed in claim 1 in which the alkali metal salt is a sodium or potassium salt.
8. An oven cleaner as claimed in claim 1 in which the polyhydric alcohol is present in an amount of from 1 to 50% by weight of the oven cleaner.
9. An oven cleaner as claimed in claim 1 in which the polyhydric alcohol is glycerol.
10. An oven cleaner as claimed in claim 1 in which the oven cleaner has a pH of less than 11.
11. An oven cleaner as claimed in claim 10 in which the oven cleaner has a pH of less than 10.
12. An oven cleaner as claimed in claim 11 in which the oven cleaner has a pH of 9 or less.
13. An oven cleaner as claimed in claim 1 in which the oven cleaner additionally contains a surfactant, a fragrance, a pigment marker, a propellant, a thickener, or a mixture of two or more of these ingredients.
14. A method for cleaning a cooking surface carrying baked on fats or greases, comprising applying an oven cleaner as claimed in claim 1 to the cooking surface, heating the cooking surface to at least 125°C for a period of at least 5 minutes and removing the saponified fats or greases from the cooking surfaces.
15. A method as claimed in claim 14, in which the removing of the saponified fats or greases includes washing the same.
16. A method as claimed in claim 14, in which the removing of the saponified fats or greases includes wiping the same.
17. A method as claimed in claim 14, in which the removing of the saponified fats or greases includes washing and wiping the same.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000436444A CA1211674A (en) | 1983-09-12 | 1983-09-12 | Oven cleaner |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000436444A CA1211674A (en) | 1983-09-12 | 1983-09-12 | Oven cleaner |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1211674A true CA1211674A (en) | 1986-09-23 |
Family
ID=4126050
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000436444A Expired CA1211674A (en) | 1983-09-12 | 1983-09-12 | Oven cleaner |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA1211674A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5364551A (en) * | 1993-09-17 | 1994-11-15 | Ecolab Inc. | Reduced misting oven cleaner |
-
1983
- 1983-09-12 CA CA000436444A patent/CA1211674A/en not_active Expired
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5364551A (en) * | 1993-09-17 | 1994-11-15 | Ecolab Inc. | Reduced misting oven cleaner |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA1231878A (en) | Acidic liquid detergent composition for cleaning ceramic tiles without eroding grout | |
| US3829387A (en) | Caustic cleaner composition | |
| AU633814B2 (en) | Heavy duty hard surface liquid detergent | |
| US5102573A (en) | Detergent composition | |
| US3650831A (en) | Method of cleaning surfaces | |
| KR101350353B1 (en) | Low odor ester-based microemulsions for cleaning hard surfaces | |
| US4214915A (en) | Method and composition for cleaning ovens | |
| EP0708820B1 (en) | Low temperature non-caustic oven cleaning composition | |
| EP0692013A1 (en) | Oven pretreatment and cleaning composition containing silicone | |
| EP0379093A1 (en) | Hard surface cleaning composition | |
| US4372788A (en) | Grill and oven cleaner | |
| CA1306921C (en) | Detergent composition | |
| US4116848A (en) | Novel cleaning method and compositions | |
| US4193886A (en) | Novel low temperature cleaner | |
| US4135947A (en) | Method of cleaning surfaces with CO2 -neutralized amine compositions | |
| EP0103466B1 (en) | Oven cleaner | |
| US4236935A (en) | Method for removing organic acid soil from surfaces | |
| CA1211674A (en) | Oven cleaner | |
| US3511707A (en) | Method of cleaning a stone surface and composition therefor | |
| US20050059565A1 (en) | Cleaning composition | |
| WO2017174959A1 (en) | Sprayable thickened aqueous acidic compositions | |
| CA3168855A1 (en) | Oven cleaning compositions and methods of making and using same | |
| JP3207432B2 (en) | CLEANING COMPOSITION COMPRISING A Saturated Dialkylcationic Surfactant | |
| US3785986A (en) | Denture cleaner | |
| JP2008024831A (en) | Detergent composition |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |