AU5938499A - A process for the automatic monitoring by a computer of the attainment of training targets - Google Patents
A process for the automatic monitoring by a computer of the attainment of training targets Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU5938499A AU5938499A AU59384/99A AU5938499A AU5938499A AU 5938499 A AU5938499 A AU 5938499A AU 59384/99 A AU59384/99 A AU 59384/99A AU 5938499 A AU5938499 A AU 5938499A AU 5938499 A AU5938499 A AU 5938499A
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- computer
- trainee
- questions
- control test
- values
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B5/00—Electrically-operated educational appliances
- G09B5/08—Electrically-operated educational appliances providing for individual presentation of information to a plurality of student stations
- G09B5/14—Electrically-operated educational appliances providing for individual presentation of information to a plurality of student stations with provision for individual teacher-student communication
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B5/00—Electrically-operated educational appliances
- G09B5/06—Electrically-operated educational appliances with both visual and audible presentation of the material to be studied
- G09B5/065—Combinations of audio and video presentations, e.g. videotapes, videodiscs, television systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
- G09B7/04—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student characterised by modifying the teaching programme in response to a wrong answer, e.g. repeating the question, supplying a further explanation
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Description
P/00/01Il Regulation 3.2
AUSTRALIA
Patents Act 1990 C
ORIGINAL
COMPLETE SPECIFICATION STANDARD PATENT Invention Title: 'A process for the automatic monitoring by a computer of the attainment of training targets' The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to us: FW'.RYrXN.AT~12ffiYYI finI5 fi CE\99316005.4 2 A Process for the Automatic Monitoring by a Computer of the Attainment of Training Targets Field of the invention The present invention relates to a process for the automatic monitoring by a computer of the attainment of training targets by a trainee in the framework of a training course comprising at least one training unit.
The present invention further relates to a computer for automatically monitoring the attainment of training targets by a trainee in the framework of a training course comprising at least one training unit.
S. 10 Background of the invention The computer in which such a process is implemented is generally a microcomputer, in particular a personal computer A process of the above mentioned type is also referred to as computer-assisted learning or computer-based training (CBT). CBT is the generic term for interactively imparting knowledge by means of a computer. From the prior art a CBT process is 15 known which operates off-line and which, from a local storage medium, for example a CD- ROM, makes the training units of the training course available to the trainee on a display unit of ooi the computer for study purposes. However, CBT processes are also known which utilize the facilities of modem computer networks, for example an in-house intranet or the world-wide internet, to present the training units of the training course. In the CBT processes which operate 20 using computer networks, a specific computer in the computer network, the so-called server, is accessed by the trainee via his computer by means of the computer network. The training units of the training courses, the training environment, and functions for the management of the training courses are stored in the server.
In the known CBT processes, to monitor the attainment of training targets, a control test is generally made available to the trainee by the computer following the completion of a training unit. It is normally left to the trainee as to when he then takes this control test. For convenience, the trainee will take the control test immediately following the completion of the corresponding training unit while the study material is still present in his short-term memory.
The result of such a control test is not very authoritative in terms of the training success actually achieved. In other words, actual training success only occurs if the trainee has understood the CE\99316005.4 3 content of the training course and retains it for a relatively long period of time. This requires the content of the training course to be stored in his long-term memory.
The known CBT processes are shifting the learning process increasingly into the area of responsibility of the trainee. A very high degree of self-initiative, self-discipline and learning ability is demanded of the trainee. It rests with the trainee to ensure that the control test result is authoritative by leaving a sufficient time interval between completing a training unit and taking the control test. However, compared to taking the control test immediately following a training unit, this requires a considerable additional effort on the part of the trainee as he must have actually understood the content of the corresponding training unit and also remember it after a relatively long period of time.
If the result of the control test indicates that the trainee has not understood, or has Smisunderstood, parts of the training unit, the CBT processes known from the prior art can react in various possible ways. The first possibility consists in ignoring the deficiency and continuing the training course. The trainee can however be advised to re-study the corresponding training 15 unit. This is the worst conceivable option as the training success is extremely poor and the training targets are unlikely to be achieved. Another option consists in presenting the trainee with an additional training unit which repeats the topic of the corresponding training unit which ooo.oi has not been understood or has been misunderstood. These are generally ready-prepared o:o oi training units which repeat the topic of the corresponding training unit in summarised form.
S. 20 The efficiency of such additional training units is extremely poor as they are not adapted to the •individual level of knowledge of the trainee. The additional training units are either based on too great a lack of knowledge on the part of the trainee, in which case they are experienced by the trainee as boring, or are based on too high a level of knowledge, in which case the trainee is overtaxed. In both cases the trainee is likely to discontinue the additional training unit after a short length of time. The efficiency of a CBT process which utilizes the second option is thus extremely poor.
Summary of the invention According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a process for the automatic monitoring by a computer of the attainment of training targets by a trainee in the framework of a training course comprising at least one training unit, comprising the steps of: CE\99316005.4 4 selection of questions from a group of questions by the computer, where the selected questions relate to an area of learning which the trainee is working on in the framework of the training course, creation of a control test by assembly of the selected questions by the computer, the making available of the control test to the trainee by the computer, recording of the trainee's answers to the control test questions by the computer, comparison of the answers with given required values by the computer, creation by the computer of an additional training unit, taking into account the results 10 of the comparison, if the required values demanded in the framework of the control test have not been attained and the making available of the additional training unit to the trainee by the computer.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, it has been recognised that the S efficiency of a training course can be improved in that a control test comprising questions is made available to the trainee by the computer and in that the trainee's answers to these questions are used for the automatic creation by the computer of an additional training unit individually adapted to the level of knowledge of the trainee, which additional training unit is made available to the trainee. During the training course the attainment of training targets by the trainee is monitored by means of the computer.
In particular, the following steps are performed in the framework of the process according to an embodiment of the invention. Firstly the computer automatically creates a control test from a group of questions. For this purpose, preferably using a random generator, the computer selects a plurality of questions from the group of questions and assembles the selected questions to form the control test. The group of questions can be stored in a database.
The selected questions will obviously relate to an area of learning which the trainee is working on in the framework of the training course.
The created control test is made available to the trainee for study purposes. This can take place for example in that the control test is printed out and made available to the trainee in paper form. However, it is also conceivable for the control test to be made available directly to the trainee by electronic means, for example on a display unit of the computer.
CE\99316005.4 Then the trainee's answers to the control test questions are recorded by the computer.
This can take place for example in that the answers are given on paper and then input into the computer. However, it is also conceivable for the trainee to input the answers directly into the computer by electronic means, for example via an input unit of the computer.
Then the answers to the control test questions are compared with given required values by the computer. In the evaluation of the answers, different features of the answers (time, score, correct/incorrect) can be taken into account.
Finally, an additional training unit is created and made available to the trainee by the computer if the required values demanded in the framework of the control test have not been 10 attained. The results of the comparison of the answers to the control test questions with the required values are taken into account in the creation of the additional training unit. On the basis of the comparison results, the areas in which the trainee is still deficient in knowledge can be determined. An additional training unit created in this way can be adapted to the individual requirements of each individual trainee. This type of additional training unit neither overtaxes 15 nor undertaxes the trainee. Consequently the likelihood that the trainee will complete the study of the additional training unit is considerably increased. The efficiency of a training course can thus be decisively improved by the process according to the invention.
0e°o°* It is conceivable that the process according to the invention will be called up again some time after the completion of the additional training unit to check whether the trainee has 20 understood and retained the content of the additional training unit. The process according to the S invention can be called up for such time until the trainee has actually understood and retained the entire content of a training unit.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment the present invention, it is proposed that the accuracy of the answers to the control test questions are recorded by the computer as first values, and the length of time required by the trainee to answer the questions is stored by the computer as second values, and that the first values and second values are compared with given required values by the computer. These are the decisive values for evaluating the trainee's answers to the control test questions. An adequately precise and authoritative evaluation of the answers can be performed on the basis of these values.
A preferred embodiment of the process proposes that a message is sent from the computer to the trainee telling him to take the control test. This message can appear at any time during the study of the training course. Moreover, the process according to the invention can be CE\99316005.4 6 called up by the computer at any time during the study of the training course. It is conceivable, for example, to call up the control test for a specific training unit only some training units later in order to test the trainee's long-term memory in this way. It is also conceivable to combine the questions on several training courses to form one single control test. It is thus possible to test the capability of the trainee also to use the contents of the already studied training units in new contexts and to apply what he has learned.
Advantageously, the message is sent to the trainee in dependence upon given conditions.
The given conditions are for example didactic or pedagogic conditions. Such a condition can consist, for example, of sending the message to the trainee at the earliest two days after the completion of a specific training unit to which the control test relates.
In accordance with an advantageous further development of the invention, the process is performed automatically at specified time intervals in the framework of the training course. It is also conceivable to perform the process automatically at specified didactic intervals, i.e. when a specified number of training units have been studied. It can thus be ensured that the content of 15 the training course has also actually been understood and retained by the trainee.
-Advantageously, the control test questions are sent to the trainee by electronic mail (email) via a computer network. The trainee's answers to the control test questions are likewise preferably sent to the computer running the process by electronic mail (e-mail) via a computer network.
S 20 Alternatively or additionally, it is proposed that the control test questions are made available on a web page of a computer network to which the trainee has access. The trainee's answers to the control test questions are preferably input on a web page and sent from the web page via a computer network to the computer running the process.
In order to motivate the trainee, the results of the comparison of the first values and the second values with the given required values are made available on a web page. All the subscribers to a training course have access to the web page. In this way an important motivation factor of classroom teaching, namely a sense of competition between several subscribers to a training course, is for the first time transferred to a CBT process. The efficiency of a training course can be further improved in this way.
The implementation of the process according to the invention in the form of a control element for a computer is of particular significance. Here the control element stores a program CE\99316005.4 7 which can run on the computer and is suitable to execute the process according to the invention.
In this case the invention is therefore implemented by a program stored on the control element so that this control element, provided with the program, constitutes the invention in the same way as the process which the program is suitable to execute. An electric storage medium, for example a compact disc floppy disc or the like, can be used in particular as control element.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer for automatically monitoring the attainment of training targets by a trainee in the framework of a training course comprising at least one training unit, wherein the computer comprises: 10 means for selecting questions from a group of questions, where the questions relate to an area of learning which the trainee is working on in the framework of the training course, means for creating a control test by assembling the selected questions, means for making the control test available to the trainee, means for recording the trainee's answers to the control test questions, o: 15 means for comparing the answers with given required values, means for creating an additional training unit on the basis of the results of the S comparison if the required values demanded in the framework of the control test have not been attained and means for making the additional training unit available to the trainee.
The means for selecting the questions from the group of questions preferably comprise a random generator.
In accordance with an preferred embodiment of the invention, it is proposed that the computer comprises: means for recording the accuracy of the answers to the control test questions as first values, and the length of time required by the trainee to answer the questions as second values and means for comparing the first values and the second values with given required values.
CE99316005.4 8 Advantageously, the computer comprises means for sending the trainee a message telling him to take the control test. Preferably, these means consist of means for sending the message in dependence upon predetermined conditions.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment, it is proposed that the computer comprises a database in which the group of questions is stored.
The computer is advantageously linked to a computer network. The computer network preferably has the form of an in-house intranet. Alternatively it is proposed that the computer network has the form of a global computer network, in particular the internet.
Brief description of the drawings A preferred embodiment of the present invention will be explained in detail in the I following making reference to the drawing in which: Figure 1 is a flow diagram of the process according to the invention.
Detailed description of the embodiments n Figure 1 the process according to the invention has been provided with the overall reference symbol 1. The process 1 serves for the automatic monitoring by a computer of the attainment of training targets by a trainee 3 in the framework of a training course. The training course comprises a plurality of training units. At the start of the process 1, in a step 2 questions are selected from a group of questions by means of a random generator of the computer. The group of questions is stored in a database 4. The selected questions relate to an area of learning S 20 which the trainee 3 is working on in the framework of the training course.
In a following step 5 a control test is created. For this purpose the selected questions are assembled by the computer.
In a further step 6 the trainee 3 is sent a message telling him to take the control test. The broken-line arrow between step 6 and the trainee 3 indicates that a communication takes place between the computer and the trainee 3 at this point.
In a following step 7 the control test is made available to the trainee 3. The control test questions are represented for example on the display unit of the computer. The trainee 3 answers the control test questions in a further step 8 of the process 1. The broken-line arrows between steps 7 and 8 and the trainee 3 again indicate a communication between the computer and the trainee 3 in the directions shown.
CE\9931 6 005.4 9 In a following step 9 the answers of the trainee 3 to the control test questions are compared with given required values. Here preferably the accuracy of the answers to the questions is recorded by the computer as first values and the length of time required by the trainee to answer the questions is recorded by the computer as second values. These first and second values are than compared with the given required values for these values in the step 9.
In a subsequent enquiry 10 it is checked whether the requirements demanded in the framework of the control test have been met, i.e. whether the control test has been passed. If this is the case (yes), the process 1 according to the invention can end at this point.
If however the control test has not been passed in accordance with the present invention an additional training unit is created by the computer in a further step 11. Here the results of the comparison of step 9 are taken into account. The deficiencies in the knowledge of the trainee 3 can be deduced from the results of the comparison. The additional training unit generated in step 11 can thus be individually adapted to the level of knowledge of the trainee 3.
In a following step 12 this additional training unit is made available to the trainee 3 for 15 study purposes. The additional training unit can be made available to the trainee for example on Sthe display unit of the computer. The broken-line double arrow between step 12 and the trainee 3 here indicates an interaction between the trainee and the computer.
"Thereafter, the process 1 according to the invention can be re-run at any time to check whether the trainee 3 has understood and retained the content of the additional training unit and S 20 whether he now has understood and retained the whole of the main training unit of the training course. The process 1 according to the invention can be run for such time until the trainee 3 has passed the control test.
The message to take the control test (step 6) can be sent via electronic mail (e-mail).
The control test and the additional training unit can be made available to the trainee 3 via a web page to which the trainee 3 has access.
It will be understood that the invention disclosed and defined herein extends to all alternative combinations of two or more of the individual features mentioned or evident from the text or drawings. All of these different combinations constitute various alternative aspects of the invention.
CE\99316005.4 The foregoing describes embodiments of the present invention and modifications, obvious to those skilled in the art can be made thereto, without departing from the scope of the present invention.
It should be noted that where in the specification or claims the term "comprising" is used that term should be interpreted inclusively rather than exclusively.
*o o *5 S S
Claims (12)
1. A process for the automatic monitoring by a computer of the attainment of training targets by a trainee in the framework of a training course comprising at least one training unit, comprising the steps of: selection of questions from a group of questions by the computer where the selected questions relate to an area of learning which the trainee is working on in the framework of the training course, creation of a control test by assembly of the selected questions by the computer the making available of the control test to the trainee by the computer recording of the answers of the trainee to the control test questions by the computer comparison of the answers with given required values by the computer creation of an additional training unit by the computer taking into account the results of the comparison if the required values demanded in the framework of the control test have S°not been attained and the making available of the additional training unit to the trainee by the computer
9.9.. S2. A process according to Claim 1, wherein the questions are selected from the group of :oo i questions by a random generator of the computer 3. A process according to Claim 1 or 2, wherein the accuracy of the answers to the o.9oo. S. control test questions are recorded by the computer as first values and the length of time required by the trainee to answer the questions is recorded by the computer as second values, and that the first values and second values are compared with given required values by the computer. 4. A process according to one of Claims 1 to 3, wherein a message is sent from the computer to the trainee telling him to take the control test 5. A process according to Claim 4, wherein the message is sent to the trainee in dependence upon given conditions. 6. A process according to any one of Claims 1 to 5, wherein the process is performed automatically at specified time intervals in the framework of the training course. CE\99316005.4 12 7. A process according to any one of Claims 1 to 6, wherein the control test questions are sent to the trainee by electronic mail (e-mail) via a computer network. 8. A process according to any one of Claims 1 to 7, wherein the answers of the trainee to the control test questions are sent to the computer running the process by electronic mail (e- mail) via a computer network. 9. A process according to any one of Claims 1 to 8, wherein the control test questions are made available on a web page of a computer network to which the trainee has access. A process according to any one of Claims 1 to 9, wherein the answers of the trainee to the control test questions are input on a web page, and that the answers are sent from the web 10 page via a computer network to the computer running the process
11. A process according to any one of Claims I to 10, wherein the results of the comparison of the first values and second values with the given required values are made available on a web page. A control element, in particular a compact disc floppy disc or the like, for a S 15 computer on which a program is stored which can run on the computer and is suitable to execute a process according to any one of Claims 1 to 11.
13. A computer for automatically monitoring the attainment of training targets by a trainee in the framework of a training course comprising at least one training unit, wherein the e. computer comprises: S 20 means for selecting questions from a group of questions, where the questions relate to an area of learning which the trainee is working on in the framework of the training course, means for creating a control test by assembling the selected questions, means for making the control test available to the trainee means for recording the answers of the trainee to the questions of the control test, means for comparing the answers with given required values and means for creating an additional training unit on the basis of the results of the comparison, if the required values demanded in the framework of the control test have not been attained and means for making the additional training unit available to the trainee CE\99316005.4 13
14. A computer according to Claim 13, wherein the means for selecting the questions from the group of questions comprise a random generator. A computer according to Claim 13 or 14, wherein the computer comprises: means for recording the accuracy of the answers to the control test questions as first values, and the length of time required by the trainee to answer the questions as second values and means for comparing the first values and second values with given required values.
16. A computer according to any one of Claims 13 to 15, wherein the computer comprises means for sending the trainee a message telling him to take the control test.
17. A computer according to Claim 16, wherein the computer comprises means for sending the message in dependence upon predetermined conditions.
18. A computer according to any one of Claims 13 to 17, wherein the computer comprises a database in which the group of questions is stored.
19. A computer according to any one of Claims 13 to 18, wherein the computer is linked 15 to a computer network. A computer according to Claim 19, wherein the computer network has the form of an in-house intranet.
21. A computer according to Claim 19, wherein the computer network has the form of a global computer network, in particular the internet.
22. A process for the automatic monitoring of the attainment of training targets by a trainee substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawing.
23. A computer substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings. Dated this 12th day of November 1999 ALCATEL by its attorneys Freehills Patent Attorneys
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE1998152937 DE19852937A1 (en) | 1998-11-17 | 1998-11-17 | Process for the automatic monitoring of the achievement of learning goals by a computer |
| DE19852937 | 1998-11-17 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| AU5938499A true AU5938499A (en) | 2000-05-18 |
Family
ID=7888042
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU59384/99A Abandoned AU5938499A (en) | 1998-11-17 | 1999-11-12 | A process for the automatic monitoring by a computer of the attainment of training targets |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP1003142A1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP2000162955A (en) |
| AU (1) | AU5938499A (en) |
| DE (1) | DE19852937A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2001031610A1 (en) * | 1999-10-27 | 2001-05-03 | Arc Research & Development Pty Limited | A data collection method |
Families Citing this family (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AU2001239212A1 (en) * | 2000-03-10 | 2001-09-17 | Ims Learning A/S | A method for interactively monitoring and changing the behavior, attitude or educational state of an individual, in particular an individual related to an organization |
| DE10059054A1 (en) * | 2000-04-11 | 2001-11-15 | Billhardt Jutta | Learning system and method for controlling a learning system |
| CN1291335C (en) * | 2001-02-28 | 2006-12-20 | 思科学习机构 | System for distributed learning |
| DE102007008364A1 (en) * | 2006-10-19 | 2008-04-24 | Imawere GmbH c/o Treuhand- und Revisions AG | Learning device for querying and presentation of e.g. question, has assigning units for assigning querying time and knowledge levels, and priority assigning unit assigning priority and sorting learning units of defined querying time |
| DE102013009057A1 (en) * | 2013-05-28 | 2014-12-04 | Eckart Schütz | Device and method for controlling the learning progress in autonomous learners |
Family Cites Families (14)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE3640405A1 (en) * | 1986-11-26 | 1988-06-09 | Thomson Brandt Gmbh | Recording and reproduction appliance with a memory |
| US5597312A (en) * | 1994-05-04 | 1997-01-28 | U S West Technologies, Inc. | Intelligent tutoring method and system |
| US5618182A (en) * | 1994-09-30 | 1997-04-08 | Thomas; C. Douglass | Method and apparatus for improving performance on multiple-choice exams |
| US5749736A (en) * | 1995-03-22 | 1998-05-12 | Taras Development | Method and system for computerized learning, response, and evaluation |
| US5779486A (en) * | 1996-03-19 | 1998-07-14 | Ho; Chi Fai | Methods and apparatus to assess and enhance a student's understanding in a subject |
| US5813863A (en) * | 1996-05-01 | 1998-09-29 | Sloane; Sharon R. | Interactive behavior modification system |
| US5947747A (en) * | 1996-05-09 | 1999-09-07 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and apparatus for computer-based educational testing |
| GB9619165D0 (en) * | 1996-09-13 | 1996-10-23 | British Telecomm | Training apparatus and method |
| NZ334584A (en) * | 1996-09-25 | 2001-02-23 | Sylvan Learning Systems Inc | Automated testing and electronic instructional delivery and student management system |
| KR100191329B1 (en) * | 1996-10-23 | 1999-06-15 | 윤종용 | Internet education method and device |
| US6039575A (en) * | 1996-10-24 | 2000-03-21 | National Education Corporation | Interactive learning system with pretest |
| US5954516A (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 1999-09-21 | Relational Technologies, Llc | Method of using question writing to test mastery of a body of knowledge |
| US5957699A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 1999-09-28 | Scientific Learning Corporation | Remote computer-assisted professionally supervised teaching system |
| DE29801655U1 (en) * | 1998-01-31 | 1998-06-04 | Grosse, Burkhard, 14772 Brandenburg | Audiovisual learning, testing, quiz and intelligence test device |
-
1998
- 1998-11-17 DE DE1998152937 patent/DE19852937A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
1999
- 1999-11-10 JP JP31914899A patent/JP2000162955A/en active Pending
- 1999-11-12 AU AU59384/99A patent/AU5938499A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1999-11-16 EP EP99440315A patent/EP1003142A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2001031610A1 (en) * | 1999-10-27 | 2001-05-03 | Arc Research & Development Pty Limited | A data collection method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2000162955A (en) | 2000-06-16 |
| EP1003142A1 (en) | 2000-05-24 |
| DE19852937A1 (en) | 2000-05-18 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6347943B1 (en) | Method and system for creating an individualized course of instruction for each user | |
| US5618182A (en) | Method and apparatus for improving performance on multiple-choice exams | |
| JP3986252B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for adaptively determining teaching material presentation patterns according to learners | |
| US6039575A (en) | Interactive learning system with pretest | |
| US6149438A (en) | System and method for the delivery, authoring, and management of courseware over a computer network | |
| Kellenberger | Preservice teachers’ perceived computer self-efficacy based on achievement and value beliefs within a motivational framework | |
| US20040014017A1 (en) | Effective and efficient learning (EEL) system | |
| US6195528B1 (en) | Teaching method and system | |
| WO2008030990A2 (en) | Adaptive and individual learning with feedback for online courses | |
| Birch | Is any identification procedure necessary? | |
| US20050158697A1 (en) | System and method for providing customized, effective, risk based ethics and compliance training and information using a network | |
| US8545232B1 (en) | Computer-based student testing with dynamic problem assignment | |
| JPH1115361A (en) | Repeated learning method by computer | |
| AU754173B2 (en) | A process for the automatic creation and monitoring of a progress plan for a training course by a computer | |
| Maki et al. | Mastery quizzes on the Web: Results from a Web-based introductory psychology course | |
| AU5938499A (en) | A process for the automatic monitoring by a computer of the attainment of training targets | |
| Kendall et al. | Strategic management education incorporating written or simulation cases: An empirical test | |
| Weibelzahl et al. | Adapting to prior knowledge of learners | |
| US20030180701A1 (en) | Learning support method and learning support program | |
| Gouli et al. | How COMPASS supports multifeedback forms & components adapted to learner’s characteristics | |
| JP2000147989A (en) | Method of automatically selecting and editing training course by computer | |
| Stern | Web-based intelligent tutors derived from lecture-based courses | |
| Tian | Supporting progress-based e-learning with Learning Advancement Management System (LAMS) | |
| JP3053863U (en) | Computer iterative learning device | |
| Shoener et al. | Web‐Accessible Learning Resources: Learner‐Controlled versus Instructor‐Controlled |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MK1 | Application lapsed section 142(2)(a) - no request for examination in relevant period |