AU2013248217B2 - Propyzamide Formulations - Google Patents

Propyzamide Formulations Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2013248217B2
AU2013248217B2 AU2013248217A AU2013248217A AU2013248217B2 AU 2013248217 B2 AU2013248217 B2 AU 2013248217B2 AU 2013248217 A AU2013248217 A AU 2013248217A AU 2013248217 A AU2013248217 A AU 2013248217A AU 2013248217 B2 AU2013248217 B2 AU 2013248217B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
water
active agent
propyzamide
surface active
dispersible granular
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
AU2013248217A
Other versions
AU2013248217A1 (en
AU2013248217C1 (en
Inventor
Ross Rainbird
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Imtrade Australia Pty Ltd
Original Assignee
Imtrade Australia Pty Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2012904916A external-priority patent/AU2012904916A0/en
Priority to AU2013248217A priority Critical patent/AU2013248217C1/en
Priority to AU2013101459A priority patent/AU2013101459B4/en
Application filed by Imtrade Australia Pty Ltd filed Critical Imtrade Australia Pty Ltd
Publication of AU2013248217A1 publication Critical patent/AU2013248217A1/en
Priority to AU2016102384A priority patent/AU2016102384A4/en
Priority to AU2016210595A priority patent/AU2016210595A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2013248217B2 publication Critical patent/AU2013248217B2/en
Priority to AU2018203399A priority patent/AU2018203399B2/en
Publication of AU2013248217C1 publication Critical patent/AU2013248217C1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Abstract

A water-dispersible granular formulation containing propyzamide, wherein the propyzamide is loaded to at least 600 g/kg based upon the total formulation, and wherein the formulation further includes a first surface active agent being a dispersant, a second surface active agent being a wetting agent, and, optionally, an inert filler.

Description

ι 2013248217 24 Oct 2013
PROPYZAMIDE FORMULATIONS FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to granular formulations of the herbicide propyzamide. In particular, this invention relates to water-dispersible granular formulations of propyzamide that contain a high level of propyzamide as active agent and to methods of preparing said formulations.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The herbicide propyzamide, belongs to the benzamide category of herbicides. Propyzamide has the nomenclature 3, 5-dichloro-N-(l, l-dimethylprop-2-ynyl) benzamide, and has also been referred to as “pronamide”. Propyzamide is a group D herbicide, with a mode of action based on inhibition of microtubule assembly. The water solubility of propyzamide in 15 mg/L at 25°C, and the melting point is 155°C.
[0003] Propyzamide is the active agent in Kerb herbicide, sold by Dow AgroSciences and has also been sold under the trade name Clanex. In Australia, water-dispersible granular formulations of propyzamide containing 500 g/kg propyzamide have been sold by 4Farmers under the trade name 4Farmers Propyzamide 500 WG, and by Imtrade under the trade name Edge 500 WG herbicide. Water-dispersible granular formulations of 500 g/kg propyzamide have also been sold by Titan Ag Pty Ltd under the trade name Titan Propyzamide 500 WG.
Granulation [0004] Patent literature such as Kurita and Misumi (EP 1382244), entitled “Granular Compositions and Process for Producing Same”, published in Japanese on 7 November 2002 as WO 2002/087324 and in English on 21 April 2004 as EP 1382244, teaches methods of use and compositions for a pesticide-containing wettable granule or granular wettable powder. Such wettable granules are said to diminish problems associated with dosing, dusting and bulkiness of a non-granulated wettable powder, and to diminish 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,! 2 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 problems associated with high viscosity in a flowable (suspension concentrate) formulation of a finely divided active agent. Water-dispersible granular formulations are designed to disintegrate in water and to form a fine dispersion in the water for subsequent application to areas to be treated by spraying through nozzles.
[0005] In particular Kurita and Misumi teaches that the granule may be prepared by mixing a pesticidal active ingredient, a binder, and, if necessary other ingredients such as surfactants, followed by granulation of these ingredients into granules.
[0006] Kurita and Misumi also teaches that the granulation method may involve extrusion granulation, spray drying granulation, fluidised bed granulation, tumbling granulation (e.g., pan granulation), compression granulation, or coating granulation. Kneading granulation is said to be useful for making a granular wettable powder. This involves kneading of fine powder components into a dough (for example, with the addition of water to the powder prior to, or during, kneading). Surfactant, carrier and binder can be added during kneading. After dough formation, an extrusion process can be used to form the granules, which are subsequently dried. Granulation by kneading and extrusion is said to have the merit that installation and operating costs are relatively low. However, a disadvantage is that that the nature of the kneaded product is substantially influenced by the content and character of the pesticidal active ingredient. The higher the pesticidal active ingredient content, the more difficult it is to form the granules. This factor is considered to be a significant problem in the art by Kurita and Misumi.
[0007] Kurita and Misumi teaches that highly pure quartz powder may be added to such a kneaded material prior to extrusion granulation. Preferably the highly pure quartz powder is added in an amount from 15-95 wt%.
Surfactants [0008] Kurita and Misumi teaches further that a surfactant or combination of surfactants may be included in a kneaded material prior to extrusion granulation. The content of such a surfactant or surfactants is preferably from 0.1 - 15% by weight of the granules. Suitable non-ionic surfactants are said to include polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers, 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,2 3 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 polyoxyethylene alkyl phenyl ethers, polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene ethers, polyoxyethylene alkyl esters, polyoxyethylene sorbitan alkyl esters, polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene block copolymers, sorbitan alkyl esters or higher fatty acid alkanolamides. Such nonionic surfactants may be used alone or in combination as a mixture of two or more of them. Suitable cationic surfactants are said to include alkylamine salts or quaternary ammonium salts. Such cationic surfactants may be used alone or in combination as a mixture of two or more of them. Further, suitable anionic surfactants may include naphthalenesulfonic acid polycondensate, alkenylsulfonate, naphthalenesulfonate, formalin condensate of a naphthalenesulfonate, formalin condensate of an alkylnaphthalenesulfonate, lignin sulfonate, alkylallylsulfonate, alkylallyl sulfonate sulfate, polystyrene sulfonate, polycarboxylate, polyoxyethylenealkyl ether sulfate, polyoxyethylenealkylallyl ether sulfate, alkylsulfosuccinate, alkyl sulfate, alkyl ether sulfonate, or a higher fatty acid alkali salt. Such anionic surfactants may be used alone or in combination as a mixture of two or more of them.
Binders [0009] Kurita and Misumi also teaches that binders may be included in a kneaded material prior to extrusion. The binders may include carboxymethylcellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, dextrin, starch or α-modified starch, a physical propertyimproving agent such as sodium tripolyphosphate, an arginate or a polyacrylate and, if necessary, other adjuvants such as a water soluble polymer, a solvent, an absorptive fine powder, a binder, a pulverization assistant, a decomposition-preventing agent, a colorant, a defoaming agent, an effect-improving agent, a perfume or a builder.
Carriers [0010] Kurita and Misumi also teaches that carriers (other than highly pure quartz powder) may be included in a kneaded material prior to extrusion. The carrier may be a mineral carrier, a water-soluble carrier or a vegetable carrier. A suitable mineral carrier may, for example, be diatomaceous earth, talc, clay, calcium carbonate, acid clay, attapulgite, zeolite, sericite, sepiolite or calcium silicate. A suitable water-soluble carrier may, for example, be ammonium sulfate, urea, dextrin, lactose, fructose, sucrose glucose, 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,3 4 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 sodium chloride, Glaubers salt, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, maleic acid, citric acid, fumaric acid, malic acid or polyethylene glycol having an average molecular weight of from 6000 to 20000. A suitable vegetable carrier may, for example, be wheat flour, wood powder, starch, bran, soy flour or a pulverized product of fiber plant. The content of such a carrier in the composition of the present invention usually may be from 0.1 to 90 wt%, preferably from 0.5 to 75 wt%.
[0011] One typical method for making water-dispersible granular formulations involves combining pesticidal active ingredient, a binder, a physical property-improving agent, and a component-stabilizer, etc., and if necessary, pulverizing by e.g. an impact pulverizer, whereupon a mineral powder is mixed, water is added, and the mixture is kneaded and then granulated usually by an extrusion granulator employing a screen for a particle size of from 0.1 to 5 mm, preferably from 0.2 to 2 mm, and the granulated product is dried and sieved by a suitable screen for a predetermined grain size, to obtain the composition of Kurita and Misumi.
[0012] Further, Kurita and Misumi teaches that it is also possible that a proper amount of water, a pesticidal active ingredient, a surfactant and if necessary, other components such as a carrier, are added in necessary amounts, followed by pulverization by means of a wet type pulverizer such as a ball mill, a Dyno-mill or a sand grinder. To the resultant aqueous suspension, other components such as a surfactant, a carrier, etc., may be mixed in a suitable amount, as the case requires, obtaining a kneaded product which can be granulated by an extrusion granulator.
[0013] Based upon the teaching of Kurita and Misumi it can be seen that, in attempting to meet the need to include carriers, binders, surfactants, disintegrants and so forth in a granular wettable powder, this frequently results in the commercially viable product being made with a diminished weight of active pesticidal agent.
[0014] Propyzamide active agent has been commercially available in water-dispersible granular formulation form for a considerable period of time in Australia. For all this time the loading of active agent in the product granules has been 50% by weight of the 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,4 5 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 water-dispersible granular formulation or less. The composition of commercially available propyzamide water-dispersible granules is typically as follows: [0015] Propyzamide 500 g/kg formulation: CAS Identification Component %w/w CAS# 23950-58-5 Propyzamide tech 52.0000 CAS# 107-21-1 Polyethylene glycol 2.0000 CAS# 1332-58-7 Kaolin 42.0000 CAS# 8061-51-6 Sodium lignosulphonate (e.g., Polyfon H) 2.0000 CAS# 9036-19-5 Octylphenol polyethoxy ethanol 2.0000 Total 100.0000 [0016] Commercially available water-dispersible granules typically are in the size range from about 30 microns up to 5,000 microns. In such typical prior art formulations, kaolin acts as an inert filler, and the sodium lignosulphonate and octylphenol polyethoxy ethanol are surface-active agents. Sodium lignosulphonate is a dispersant which may have some function as a granule binder. Octylphenol polyethoxy ethanol (sometimes sold under the trade name Triton X 100TM) is a nonionic surfactant which is an effective wetting agent. The surface active agents facilitate disintegration of the water-dispersible granules to a fine and relatively stable aqueous dispersion when the granules are added to the water in a spray tank prior to spray application. The kaolin has no herbicidal properties, and no surface-active effects.
[0017] It is desirable to provide a water-dispersible granular formulation of propyzamide with a loading of propyzamide at greater than 500 g/kg. The benefits of a more highly loaded water-dispersible granular formulation would include: 1. A reduced amount of packaging material would be necessary to carry a given amount of active ingredient to a cultivation zone. 2. The costs of disposing of used packaging material would be less. 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,5 6 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 3. A reduced weight of goods would need to be carried by a farm worker in applying a given amount of propyzamide to a cultivation zone. 4. The cost of freight (volume and weight basis) in transporting the propyzamide formulation from factory to field would be reduced. 5. A higher loading propyzamide formulation would enable a manufacturer to demonstrate superior formulation expertise to farmers.
[0018] In this specification and in the claims, the term “highly loaded” is to be taken to refer to the concentration level of active agent of propyzamide herbicide in a water-dispersible granular formulation on a weight by weight basis (g/kg) in the amount from at least 600 g/kg.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0019] Accordingly, according to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a water-dispersible granular formulation containing propyzamide, wherein the propyzamide is loaded to at least 600 g/kg based upon the total formulation weight.
[0020] Accordingly, in another aspect of the present invention there is provided a water-dispersible granular formulation containing propyzamide, wherein the propyzamide is highly loaded based upon the total formulation weight.
[0021] According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a water-dispersible granular formulation containing at least 600 g/kg of propyzamide, at least 30 g/kg of one or more surface active agents with the remainder, if any, of the water-dispersible granular formulation being a finely divided inert filler.
[0022] Most preferably there is a minimal amount of, or no, finely divided inert filler in the water-dispersible granular formulation. 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,6 7 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 [0023] According to a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of manufacturing a water-dispersible granular propyzamide formulation including the steps of: (a) blending fine propyzamide particles in the presence of (i) a first surface active agent wherein the first surface active agent is a dispersant, (ii) a second surface active agent, wherein the second surface active agent is a wetting agent, and (iii) optionally, an inert filler, to homogeneity; (b) extruding the homogenous propyzamide blend to form moist granules; and (c) passing the extruded moist granules through a collecting sieve; and (d) drying the collected moist granules to a temperature up to about 80°C.
[0024] Preferably said first surface active agent and said second surface active agent have a combined concentration in the final form of the water-dispersible granular formulation of at least 30 g/kg.
[0025] Preferably the first surface active agent is a lignosulphonate salt or sodium lignosulphonate.
[0026] It is preferred that the aforesaid step of blending is effected in the presence of a water spray.
[0027] According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of manufacturing a water-dispersible granular propyzamide formulation including the steps of: (a) blending fine propyzamide particles in the presence of (i) a first surface active agent wherein the first surface active agent is a 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,7 8 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 dispersant, and (ii) a second surface active agent, wherein the second surface active agent is a wetting agent, to homogeneity; (b) extruding the homogenous propyzamide blend to form moist granules; and (c) passing the extruded moist granules through a collecting sieve; and (d) drying the collected moist granules to a temperature up to about 80°C.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0028] Preferably, the propyzamide in the water-dispersible granular formulation is loaded to at least 600 g/kg based upon the total formulation.
[0029] Even though the water-dispersible granular formulation active herbicide agent is loaded to at least 600 g/kg, the water-dispersible granular formulation according to the present invention can be highly loaded with propyzamide up to 900 g/kg.
[0030] The propyzamide to be used in the preparation of water-dispersible granular formulation is in the form of finely divided particles.
[0031] The water-dispersible granular formulation, optionally, includes an inert filler which has no herbicidal properties. The inert filler is in the form of a finely divided material and constitutes no greater than 300 g/kg based upon the total water-dispersible granular formulation. Preferably, the inert filler constitutes no greater than 200 g/kg based upon the total water-dispersible granular formulation. More preferably, that amount is less than 100 g/kg, and even more preferably, that amount is less than 50 g/kg based on the total water-dispersible granular formulation.
[0032] The water-dispersible granular formulation includes at least one, or at least two, or at least three surface active agents. The at least one surface active agent is a 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,8 9 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 dispersant. It may have the ancillary function as a granular binder. One such example of a dispersant is a lignosulphonate salt such as sodium lignosulphonate.
[0033] The second surface active agent, if present, is a wetting agent and may be an anionic surfactant.
[0034] The dispersant, being the lignosulphonate salt or sodium lignosulphonate, and the wetting agent have a combined amount in the water-dispersible granular formulation of at least 30 g/kg based upon the total weight of the formulation. The amount of lignosulphonate salt or sodium lignosulphonate may also range between 25 g/kg to 50 g/kg based upon the total weight of the formulation.
[0035] Useful wetting agents are naphthalene sulphonate condensate salt or its sodium salt. The amount of naphthalene sulphonate condensate salt or its sodium salt in the water-dispersible granular formulation can range between 8 g/kg to 30 g/kg based upon the weight of the total formulation, although the amount ranging between 12 g/kg to 18 g/kg is the more preferred range.
[0036] The water-dispersible granular formula also may include a third surface active agent which is also an anionic surfactant. This second anionic surfactant may be an alkyl naphthalene sulphonate blend or its sodium salt.
[0037] The amount of alkyl naphthalene sulphonate blends or its sodium salt in the water-dispersible granular formulation range between 10 g/kg to 30 g/kg, although the preferred range lies between 15 g/kg to 25 g/kg based upon the total weight of the formulation.
[0038] The inert filler, in the form of finely divided material, when present, is present in an amount desirably of no greater than 250 g/kg, based upon the total weight of the formulation.
[0039] In order to manufacture the wettable granular propyzamide formulation, a preferred method involves the following steps. 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,9 ίο 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 [0040] First, a defined quantity of finely divided propyzamide particles are loaded into a normal industrial sized commercial blender and then blended to homogeneity in the presence of a water spray or something similar, in combination with all of the other components being: (i) a lignosulphonate salt or sodium lignosulphonate; (ii) a naphthalene sulphonate condensate salt or its sodium salt; (iii) an alkyl naphthalene sulphonate blend or its sodium salt; and, optionally, (iv) the finely divided inert filler.
[0041] Then the resultant homogenous propyzamide blend is then transferred to an extruder, which is a usual industrial type extruder, and the ensuring extrusion process forms moist granules of the propyzamide blend.
[0042] The third step of the method of manufacture is to pass the extruded moist wet granules through a sieve, which is, preferably, a 1 mm to 5 mm industrial type sieve. Once the moist granules pass through the sieve they are then dried to make the desired water-dispersible granular formulation. Temperatures in the order of up to about 80°C, even though lesser temperatures may be used, are used to dry the moist granules.
[0043] After the completion of the above described process, the water-dispersible granular formulation will be in the form of dried granules and will have a moisture content of less than about 1% by weight, based upon the total weight of the formulation.
[0044] The dried granules are designed to disintegrate in water in a spray tank, and to form a fine dispersion in the water, for subsequent application by spraying through nozzles.
[0045] According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of controlling weeds including the addition of wettable granular propyzamide formulation, wherein the propyzamide is highly loaded based on the total formulation, to spray water in a spray tank and spraying the resultant spray liquor on to a site containing weeds.
[0046] The advantages of highly loaded wettable granular propyzamide formulations include: reduced packaging requirements, reduced freight costs, reduced amounts of non-herbicidally active ingredients relative to the propyzamide in the 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,10 11 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 formulations leading to reduced weight and volumes to be transported, and, where inert filler is not incorporated in the highly loaded formulations, the minimising or elimination of problems arising from the presence of inert filler particles.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS AND EXAMPLES OF THE INVENTION
[0047] In order that the present invention may be more readily comprehended, one or more preferred embodiments are described hereinafter.
Example 1 [0048] A water-dispersible granular formulation according to the present invention was made by incorporating the following components.
Components Parts by Weight 1. Propyzamide 98% 918.4kg 2. Sodium salt of naphthalene sulphonate condensate (e.g., Morwet D 425, or Galoryl DT 505) 15.1kg 3. S odium ligno sulphonate (e.g., Polyfon H). 38.4kg 4. Sodium alkyl naphthalene sulphonate blend (e.g., Morwet EFW) 19.4kg [0049] In Example 1, the formulation procedure for a 1000 kg batch, inclusive of quality control measures, was as follows, with the steps being numerically as 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and so on.
[0050] 1.1 Ensure the blender, which is provided with water sprayers, is empty and clean.
[0051] 1.2 Charge the blender with the components via a hopper. 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,l 1 12 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 [0052] 1.3 Seal the blender and switch on.
[0053] 1.4 Activate the sprayers to distribute water throughout the dry mix.
Set the water flow-rate to lit per minute, and spray until sufficient water is present to allow a consistent mix to develop. Operate the blender for a minimum of one further hour to ensure the mix is homogeneous.
[0054] 1.5 Transfer the mix to the extruder and switch the drying receiver on. Extrude the mixture in the form of granules into the receiver and air dry at a temperature of no greater than 80°C to a moisture content of approximately 1% weight based on the weight of the formulation. Where the moisture content significantly exceeds 1% weight to weight of the formulation, recycle the granules through the drying receiver (at the end of the run) until the moisture content target is achieved.
[0055] 1.6 Sample approximately 1kg of product, ensuring it is representative.
[0056] 1.7 Sub-sample approximately 250g from the original 1kg sample and subject it to the following testing regime. 1.7.1 Active constituent (Propyzamide) content (using validated method). 1.7.2 pH of a 1% aqueous solution (CIPAC MT75.3). 1.7.3 Wet sieve test (CIPAC MT185). 1.7.4 Wettability (CIPAC MT53.3). 1.7.5 Persistent foaming (CIPAC MT 47.2).
[0057] 1.8 If active constituent level is satisfactory, record results and proceed to step 1.10 described below. 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,12 13 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 [0058] 1.9 If active constituent level is outside the bounds of the acceptable range listed in the specification, adjust the level accordingly by recycling granules through the blending process (Returning to step 1.4 described above) along with additional excipients, being sodium alkyl naphthalene sulphonate, sodium lignosulphonate and naphthalene sulphonate blend in the weight to weight ratio 15:38:19 (to adjust for a high active content) or along with additional propyzamide (to adjust for a low active content).
[0059] 1.10 If the sample fail to meet a specification for any of the other parameters, quarantine the batch for further investigation and possible rework. Otherwise proceed to step 1.11 described below.
[0060] 1.11 Catalogue and store a retention sample of approximately 200g.
[0061] 1.12 Generate a certificate of analysis noting results of testing.
Tests to Confirm the Suitability of the Formulation of Example 1 [0062] For the test methods identified by the prefix CIPAC, refer to International
Pesticides Analytical Council (CIPAC) published methodology.
Test Parameter Test Method Required Outcome Observed Outcome (Advised preferred formulation) Required, Preferably Required, More Preferably Appearance Visual White to beige, homogeneous, fine granule White to beige, homogeneous, fine granule Assay Validated chromatographic method (Accuracy: 98102%) (Linearity: R > 0.99) 875 to 925 g/kg propyzamide 909 g/kg propyzamide - - 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,13 14 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 (Precision: s/average < 2%) pH (1%) CIPAC MT 75.3 7 to 10 8.5 - - Wet sieve test CIPAC MT185 <2%w/w over 75pm 0.05% <l%w/w over 75pm 0%w/w over 75pm Spontaneity of dispersion CIPAC MT174 Between 60 and 105% 93.5% - - Suspensibility CIPAC MT184 Between 60 and 105% 96.4% - - Wettability CIPAC MT53 <1 minute (without swirling) Pass - - Persistent foam CIPAC MT47 <60mL after 1 min 12mL <30mL (1 minute) <15mL (1 minute) Dust content CIPAC MT171 <1%, otherwise inhalation toxicity data required 0.001% - - Flowability CIPAC MT172 Sample flows through aperture after <5 liftings Pass - - Attrition resistance CIPAC MT178.2 >98% 99.9% - - Long Term Performance Various as per above Test parameter maintained within required range after accelerated aging to approximate 2 years. Complies - - 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,14 15 2013248217 24 Oct 2013
Bioefficacy Studies [0063] A number of trials were carried out to assess the weed control efficacy of a highly loaded propyzamide water-dispersible granular formulation with that of a conventionally loaded propyzamide water-dispersible granular formulation when applied to sites containing grass weeds at the same active ingredient rate. The Reports of those tests are set out below. It was found that there was no significant difference in the level of weed control between the formulations.
DRAWINGS
[0064] The drawings comprise bar graphs showing the effects of application of the aforesaid formulations.
[0065] Figure 1 is a bar graph showing the effect on annual ryegrass plants at 74 days after application of formulations; [0066] Figure 2 is a bar graph showing the effect on annual ryegrass panicles at 153 days after application of formulations; and [0067] Figure 3 is a bar graph showing the effect on annual ryegrass panicles at 137 days after application of formulations.
Example BE 1 [0068] The reference formulation of propyzamide was Imtrade Edge 500WG. This commercially available formulation contained 500 g ai/kg Propyzamide. The current registration profile for this commercially available formulation includes use in various legume pastures including clover, medic and Lucerne as well as Lettuce crops, turf and lawns. It controls a range of annual grass weed species including annual ryegrass (L.rigidum). The trial work in this example was undertaken to examine absolute control and bioequivalence of Imtrade Edge 500 WG Herbicide and the new formulation of propyzamide (900 g/kg active agent) which is designated Imtrade Edge 900 WG (see 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,15 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 16 example 1 for formulation details). The example relates to the use of Imtrade Edge 900 WG in canola for the control of annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum).
Aims [0069] To prove that Imtrade Edge 500 WG Herbicide and the new formulation of Imtrade Edge 900 WG Herbicide provide control of annual ryegrass at use rates of 500 and lOOOg ai per hectare.
[0070] To prove that both formulations provide equivalent level of control of annual ryegrass when applied at equivalent rates (g ai/ha).
Main Conclusions [0071] Both formulations of Edge provided a high level of annual ryegrass control (>85%) which was significantly different from the untreated control. There was no significant difference in the weed control between the two formulations of the Propyzamide when applied at the same rate (g ai) per hectare.
Treatments [0072] Both products were applied at 2 rates; 500 and 1000 g ai per hectare.
[0073] Table 1 sets out the treatment types and application rate mL product per hectare and g ai per hectare.
Table 1
Treatment
Nil
Edge 500WG 1 kg (500g ai)
Edge 900WG 0.555 kg(500g ai) 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,16 17 2013248217 24 Oct 2013
Edge 500WG 2 kg/ha (lOOOg ai) Edge 900WG l.llkg(1000g ai)
Experimental Details [0074] The trial was a randomized block design comprising 4 replicates. The Edge treatments were applied prior to sowing and the canola was seeded using farmer scale seeding equipment. The trial was seeded using knife points and press wheels with no disturbance other than the seeding operation. Full application details are set out in Tables 2 and 3.
Table 2 - Trial Design
Trial Location: Walebing State: WA Study Design: Randomised Block Reps: 4 Plot Width: 2.5 Plot Length: 10m Plot number: 20 Variety: Thunder Canola Seeding date: 11 May 2011 Tillage system: Knife Points press wheels Seed depth: 2.5 cm Seeding rate: 5 kg/ha Row spacing: 25 cm Seedbed moisture: Dry at seeding, rainfall 5 DAS Seed Bed condition: Friable 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,17 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 18 Stubble load: Low - Medium Soil type: Sandy Loam soil Previous Crop: Wheat
Table 3 - Application Details Application: Date and time 12.45-1.15 4/05/11 Temperature 24 °C Relative humidity (%) 29% Cloud cover (%) Nil Wind (speed,direct,consist) 4.6 km/h NW Constant Soil moisture status Dry top 10cm Proximity of rain Nil Inversion Risk Nil Application Equipment: Nozzle type / Size AI001 Nozzle Spacing 50cm Spray Height 50cm Spray Pressure 2 bar Speed (km/hr) 6.7 Km/hr Spray Vol (L/ha) 70L/ha 2 [0075] Plant counts were taken using a l/10m quadrat and annual ryegrass was counted 74 days after treatment. Annual ryegrass panicle counts were taken 153 days after 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,18 19 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 treatment. Results were analysed using Analysis of Variance and treatment means were separated at the 95% probability level (P 0.05) using Fishers least significant difference.
Results [0076] There was no visual effect of any treatment on the canola crop. The application of Propyzamide significantly reduced annual ryegrass numbers in the crop. There was a significant reduction in annual ryegrass in all treatments irrespective of application rate or the formulation type of Edge applied. When applied at equivalent g ai/ha, both formulations controlled weeds to an equivalent level. As well as significant reduction in annual ryegrass number, surviving plants appeared stunted and less competitive than those in the untreated plot based on visual observation. When carried through to seed head formation, annual ryegrass panicle counts reflected the trends of the plant counts undertaken earlier in the season. There was a significant reduction in panicle counts in all treatments compared to the untreated control. There was no significant difference between rates applied on a g ai/ ha basis. There was no significant difference between panicle counts when comparing the different formulations when applied at the same g ai/ ha.
[0077] Figure 1 shows the effect on annual ryegrass numbers per square metre in response to the application of Imtrade Edge 500 WG Herbicide and Imtrade Edge 900 WG Herbicide, 74 days after application.
[0078] Table 4 sets out the average annual ryegrass plants per square metre per treatment per replicate 74 DAA.
Table 4 2 Annual ryegrass plant counts/m Treatment Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 rep 4 Average Nil 42 124 98 96 90 a Edge 500WG 1kg (500gai) 4 12 8 30 13.5 b 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx.,19 20
Edge 900WG 0.555kg (500gai) 0 10 18 8 9b Edge 500WG 2kg (lOOOgai) 4 8 6 18 9b Edge 900WG 1.11kg (lOOOgai) 2 2 0 10 3.5 b
Treatment means in the same columns followed by the same numbers are not statistically different. 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 [0079] Figure 2 shows the effect on annual ryegrass panicles per square metre in response to the application of hntrade Edge 500 WG Herbicide and Imtrade Edge 900 WG Herbicide, 153 days after application.
[0080] Table 5 sets out the annual ryegrass panicles per square metre per treatment per replicate 153 DAA.
Table 5
Annual ryegrass panicle counts/m2 Treatment Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 rep 4 Average Nil 330 144 302 512 322 a Edge 500WG 1kg (500gai) 34 8 68 64 43.5 b Edge 900WG 0.555kg (500gai) 12 22 32 58 31 b Edge 500WG 2kg (lOOOgai) 4 30 32 40 26.5 b Edge 900WG 1.11kg (lOOOgai) 10 12 4 22 12 b
Treatment means in the same columns followed by the same numbers are not statistically different. 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,20 21 2013248217 24 Oct 2013
Discussion [0081] The use rates (g ai/ha) reflects the range of current registered rates of hntrade Edge 500WG herbicide for control of grass weeds in other use patterns including legume pastures and Lucerne. There was a significant reduction in annual ryegrass numbers and annual ryegrass panicle counts at all rates and with both the 500g and 900 g ai formulations. There was no significant difference in herbicide efficacy between the products at comparable g ai / ha application and this highlights the bioequivalence of the two formulations.
Example BE 2 [0082] The reference formulation of propyzamide was Imtrade Edge 500WG. This commercially available formulation contained 500 g ai/kg Propyzamide. The current registration profile for this commercially available formulation includes use in various legume pastures including clover, medic and Lucerne as well as Lettuce crops, turf and lawns. It controls a range of annual grass weed species including annual ryegrass (L.rigidum). The trial work in this example was undertaken to examine absolute control and bioequivalence of Imtrade Edge 500 WG Herbicide and the new formulation of propyzamide (900 g/kg active agent) which is designated Imtrade Edge 900 WG (see example 1 for formulation details). The example relates to the use of Imtrade Edge 900 WG in legume-based pasture control of annual ryegrass {Lolium rigidum).
Aims [0083] To prove that Imtrade Edge 500 WG Herbicide and the new formulation of Imtrade Edge 900 WG Herbicide provide control of annual ryegrass in pasture at use rates of 500 and 1000 g ai per hectare.
[0084] To prove that both formulations provide equivalent level of control of grass weeds, in particular annual ryegrass, when applied at equivalent rates (g ai/ha). 24/10/13,jb20372 complete speciflcation.docx,21 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 22
Main Conclusions [0085] Both formulations of Edge provided a level of grass weed control, which was significantly different to the untreated control. This was assessed by reduction of panicle counts of the annual ryegrass. There was no significant difference in the weed control between the two formulations of the Propyzamide when applied at the same rate (g ai) per hectare based on annual ryegrass panicle counts.
Treatments [0086] Both products were applied at 2 rates; 500 and 1000 g ai per hectare.
[0087] Table 6 sets out the treatment types and application rate mL product per hectare and g ai per hectare.
Table 6
Treatment
Nil
Edge 500 WG 1kg (500g ai) Edge 900 WG 0.555kg (500g ai) Edge 500 WG 2kg/ha (lOOOg ai) Edge 900 WG 1.11kg (lOOOg ai)
Experimental Details [0088] The trial was a non-replicated large plot trial consisting of 50m x 25m plots for each treatment. The Edge treatments were applied across seeded pasture plots using a hand boom. The annual ryegrass (L.rigidum) was not seeded and had established from the residual seed bank from previous seasons across the seeded legume species. The annual ryegrass weeds were varying sizes ranging from 2 leaf to well tillered stage, with approximately 50% of the plants having multiple tillers. The legume pastures was well 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,22 23 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 established at spraying. The site was seeded approximately 5 weeks prior to spraying the trial. Full application details are set out in Tables 7 and 8.
Table 7 - Trial Design
Trial Location: Kojonup State: WA Study Design: Large single block non replicated Plot Width: 2.5 Plot Length: 50m Plot number: 5 Variety: Seeded legume species Seedbed moisture: Moist at spraying Stubble load: Low Soil type: Sandy Loam with gravel soil Previous Crop: Imidazolinone Tolerant Canola
Table 8 - Application Details
Application: Date and time 21/6/2011 12.30 pm Temperature 14.5 Relative humidity (%) 57% Cloud cover (%) 95% Wind (speed,direct,consist) 3.7km/hr W Soil moisture status moist 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,23 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 24 Delta T 4 Proximity of rain Nil Inversion Risk Nil Application Equipment: Nozzle type / Size AI001 Nozzle Spacing 50cm Spray Height 50cm Spray Pressure 2 bar Speed (km/hr) 6.7 Km/hr Spray Vol (L/ha) 70L/ha [0089] Annual ryegrass panicle counts were taken 110 days after treatment. All data from this trial was analysed using a confidence interval of 95% unless otherwise specified. Means were compared using paired t-test and single factor Analysis of Variance. All mention of significant differences contained within this report refer to statistically significant differences.
Results [0090] There was no visual effect of any treatment on the legume pasture species. Annual Ryegrass Biomass Reduction [0091] The application of Propyzamide resulted in a visual reduction the biomass of the annual ryegrass in the sward. Annual ryegrass plants were discoloured and stunted when compared with the untreated, which grew well throughout the season. The treated areas exhibited symptoms of root pruning as would be expected from this herbicide mode of action. 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,24 25 2013248217 24 Oct 2013
Annual Ryegrass Panicle Counts [0092] When carried through to seed head formation, annual ryegrass panicle counts reflected the trends observed in biomass observations of earlier in the season.
There was a significant reduction in panicle number in all treatments compared to the untreated control. There was a significant difference between rates applied on a g ai/ ha basis with higher rates resulting in greater reduction in the panicle numbers. There was no significant difference between panicle counts when comparing the different formulations when applied at the same g ai1 ha. At each rate of application, Edge 900 WG provided the same level control of annual ryegrass as Edge 500 WG as measured by panicle counts.
[0093] Figure 3 shows the effect on annual ryegrass panicles per square metre in response to the application of hntrade Edge 500 WG Herbicide and Tmtrade Edge 900 WG Herbicide 137 days after application.
[0094] Table 9 sets out the average annual ryegrass panicles per square metre per treatment.
Table 9
Treatment Average Ryegrass panicle /m2 Nil 546.8 a Edge 500 1kg (500g ai) 87.6 b Edge 900 0.555kg ( 500g ai) 83.6 b Edge 500 2kg (lOOOg ai) 21.6 c Edge 900 1.11kg ( lOOOg ai) 16.4 c
Treatment means in the same columns followed by the same numbers are not statistically different. 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,25 26 2013248217 24 Oct 2013
Discussion [0095] The use rates (g ai/ha) reflects the range of current registered rates of Imtrade Edge 500 WG Herbicide for control of grass weeds in legume pastures and Lucerne. The application timing of the herbicide fell outside the ideal timing, with many of the ryegrass plants tillered, resulting in more established plants which are more difficult to control with a root absorbed herbicide. This is reflected in the significant difference in rate response across the trial of the recommended range for this use pattern. The Imtrade Edge 500 WG Herbicide label also states “Rain or irrigation is necessary to thoroughly wet the top 3-4cm of soil. This is similar to 25mm rain”. At this site, at the time of application the soil was moist and a soaking rain of approximately 28mm occurred within 4 days of application. This may or may not have washed the herbicide into the top 3-4cm and the next significant rainfall event was approximately 22mm some 4 days later. Despite the size of the annual ryegrass at spraying, where approximately 50% of plants were tillering, there was an extremely visual biomass reduction for all treatments. There was a significant reduction in annual ryegrass panicles at all rates with both the 500g and 900 g ai formulations. There was no significant difference in annual ryegrass panicle numbers between the Imtrade Edge 500 WG and Imtrade Edge 900 WG product when applied at comparable rates of grams active ingredient per hectare. As a result of the plant biomass observations and subsequent annual ryegrass panicle counts, Imtrade Edge 900 WG Herbicide should be considered at least equivalent in efficacy when compared to Imtrade Edge 500 WG Herbicide.
[0096] The complete disclosures of any patents, patent documents and publications cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety as if each were individually incorporated. Various modifications and alterations to this invention will become apparent to those persons skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of this invention. It should be understood that this invention is not intended to be unduly limited by the illustrative embodiments and examples set forth herein and that such examples and embodiments are presented by way of example only with the scope of the invention intended to be limited only by the claims set forth herein as follows. 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,26 27 2013248217 24 Oct 2013 [0097] Throughout this specification and the claims which follow, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise” and variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or step or group of integers or steps but not the exclusion of any other integer or step or group of integers or steps.
[0098] The reference in this specification to any prior publication (or information derived from it) or to any matter which is known, is not, and should not be taken as an acknowledgment or admission or any form of suggestion that the prior publication (or information derived from it) or known matter forms part of the common general knowledge in the field of endeavour to which this specification relates. 24/10/13,jb20372 complete specification.docx,27

Claims (21)

1. A water-dispersible granular formulation containing propyzamide, wherein the propyzamide is loaded to at least 825 g/kg based upon the total formulation.
2. The water-dispersible granular formulation according to claim 1, which further includes: (a) a first surface active agent wherein the first surface active agent is a dispersant; (b) a second surface active agent, wherein the second surface active agent is a wetting agent; and, optionally, (c) an inert filler.
3. The water-dispersible granular formulation according to claim 2, wherein the first surface active agent and a second surface active agent have a combined amount of at least 30 g/kg.
4. The water-dispersible granular formulation according to claim 2 or claim 3 wherein, the first surface active agent includes lignosulphonate salt or sodium lignosulfonate.
5. The water-dispersible granular formulation according to any one of claim 2 to claim 4, wherein the first surface active agent is in the amount ranging between 25 g/kg to 50 g/kg.
6. The water-dispersible granular formulation according to any one of claim 2 to claim 5, wherein the second surface active agent is an anionic surfactant.
7. The water-dispersible granular formulation according to any one of claim 2 to claim 6, wherein the second surface active agent includes naphthalene sulphonate condensate salt or its sodium salt.
8. The water-dispersible granular formulation according to claim 7, wherein the naphthalene sulphonate condensate salt or its sodium salt is in the amount ranging between 8 g/kg to 30 g/kg.
9. The water-dispersible granular formulation according to claim 7 or claim 8, wherein the naphthalene sulphonate condensate salt or its sodium salt is in the amount ranging between 12 g/kg to 18 g/kg.
10. The water-dispersible granular formulation according to any one of claim 2 to claim 9, which further includes a third surface active agent, wherein the third surface active agent is an anionic surfactant.
11. The water-dispersible granular formulation according to claim 10, wherein the third surface active agent includes alkyl naphthalene sulphonate blend or its sodium salt.
12. The water-dispersible granular formulation according to claim 11, wherein the alkyl naphthalene sulphonate blend or its sodium salt is in the amount ranging between 10 g/kg to 30 g/kg.
13. The water-dispersible granular formulation according to claim 11 or claim 12, wherein the alkyl naphthalene sulphonate blend or its sodium salt is in the amount ranging between 15 g/kg to 25 g/kg.
14. The water-dispersible granular formulation according to any one of claim 2 to claim 13, wherein the inert filler, when present, is no greater than 300 g/kg.
15. The water-dispersible granular formulation according to any one of claim 2 to claim 14, wherein the inert filler, when present, is in the form of finely divided material.
16. The water-dispersible granular formulation according to any one of claim 1 to claim 15, wherein the granular formulation has moisture content of less than about 1% by weight.
17. A method of manufacturing a water-dispersible granular propyzamide formulation, wherein the propyzamide is loaded to at least 825 g/kg based upon the total formulation, comprising the steps of: (a) blending fine propyzamide particles and at least one surface active agent being a dispersant, and at least one other surface active agent, being a wetting agent, to form a propyzamide blend; (b) extruding the homogenous propyzamide blend to form moist granules; (c) passing the extruded moist granules through a collecting sieve; and (d) drying the collected moist granules to a temperature up to about 80°C.
18. The method according to claim 17, wherein the step of blending propyzamide particles is carried out in the presence of any one or more of the following additional components: finely divided inert filler; and a third surface active agent.
19. The method according to claim 17 or claim 18, wherein the step of blending is carried out in the presence of a water spray.
20. The method according to any one of claim 17 to claim 19, wherein the collecting sieve is 1 mm to 5 mm.
21. A method of controlling weeds, including the addition of a water-dispersible granular propyzamide formulation of any one of claims 1 to 16 to spray water in a spray tank and spraying the resultant spray liquor on to a site containing weeds.
AU2013248217A 2012-11-08 2013-10-24 Propyzamide Formulations Active AU2013248217C1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2013248217A AU2013248217C1 (en) 2012-11-08 2013-10-24 Propyzamide Formulations
AU2013101459A AU2013101459B4 (en) 2012-11-08 2013-10-24 Propyzamide Formulations
AU2016102384A AU2016102384A4 (en) 2012-11-08 2016-08-01 Propyzamide formulations
AU2016210595A AU2016210595A1 (en) 2012-11-08 2016-08-01 Propyzamide formulations
AU2018203399A AU2018203399B2 (en) 2012-11-08 2018-05-15 Propyzamide formulations

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2012904916A AU2012904916A0 (en) 2012-11-08 Propyzamide Formulations
AU2012904916 2012-11-08
AU2013248217A AU2013248217C1 (en) 2012-11-08 2013-10-24 Propyzamide Formulations

Related Child Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2013101459A Division AU2013101459B4 (en) 2012-11-08 2013-10-24 Propyzamide Formulations
AU2016102384A Division AU2016102384A4 (en) 2012-11-08 2016-08-01 Propyzamide formulations
AU2016210595A Division AU2016210595A1 (en) 2012-11-08 2016-08-01 Propyzamide formulations

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2013248217A1 AU2013248217A1 (en) 2014-05-22
AU2013248217B2 true AU2013248217B2 (en) 2017-06-08
AU2013248217C1 AU2013248217C1 (en) 2019-08-15

Family

ID=50775275

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2013248217A Active AU2013248217C1 (en) 2012-11-08 2013-10-24 Propyzamide Formulations
AU2016102384A Expired AU2016102384A4 (en) 2012-11-08 2016-08-01 Propyzamide formulations

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2016102384A Expired AU2016102384A4 (en) 2012-11-08 2016-08-01 Propyzamide formulations

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (2) AU2013248217C1 (en)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001013721A1 (en) * 1999-08-26 2001-03-01 Agform Ltd. Water-dispersible agrochemical compositions
WO2013029005A1 (en) * 2011-08-25 2013-02-28 Dow Agrosciences Llc Pesticidal compositions with enhanced active ingredient retention in pest control zones

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001013721A1 (en) * 1999-08-26 2001-03-01 Agform Ltd. Water-dispersible agrochemical compositions
WO2013029005A1 (en) * 2011-08-25 2013-02-28 Dow Agrosciences Llc Pesticidal compositions with enhanced active ingredient retention in pest control zones

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Environmental Information Sheet on Menace 80EDF (Dow Agrosciences LLC) dated 25 June 2012 from The Voluntary Initiative *
Menace 80EDF Label, last updated 14 July 2011, available from website http://dev.applinskinner.com/dowuk/labels/ and retrieved on 11 July 2016 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2013248217A1 (en) 2014-05-22
AU2016102384A4 (en) 2019-05-16
AU2013248217C1 (en) 2019-08-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2667719B1 (en) Pesticide composition comprising sulphur, an insecticide and an agrochemical excipient.
UA127565C2 (en) Novel agricultural composition
UA127505C2 (en) Novel crop nutrition and fortification composition
CN103749480A (en) Paddy field herbicide composition and application
CN101773142A (en) Herbicide composition containing glufosinate and oxadiazon and application thereof
CN108271782A (en) A kind of technical method improving inner-adsorption conduction-type herbicide efficiency
CN103828816B (en) Mixed herbicide containing fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, clodinafop-propargyl and fluroxypyr
CN102239843A (en) Composition of fluroxypyr or ester of fluroxypyr and fluoroglycofen-ethyl and preparation method thereof
CN106614717A (en) Composite herbicide
AU2018203399B2 (en) Propyzamide formulations
AU2016102384A4 (en) Propyzamide formulations
KR101208335B1 (en) Synergistic herbicidal compositions comprising Metamifop
CN108967431A (en) A kind of Herbicidal combinations containing metamitron and haloxyfop-r-methyl
CN108029699A (en) The Herbicidal combinations of a kind of Glufosinate-ammoniumpesticideng and bispyribac-sodium and its application
JP5128087B2 (en) Mixed granular pesticide composition
CN107079917A (en) Complex herbicidal composition
CN115707382A (en) Weeding composition containing penoxsulam, pretilachlor and fluroxypyr-meptyl
AU2014101026A4 (en) Phenylurea Formulation
WO2008001783A1 (en) Bryophyte-controlling agent and use thereof
CN104621173B (en) A kind of composition pesticide containing methylsulfonyl bacterium azoles and preparation
CN104068037A (en) Weeding composition for paddy fields
CN112106778B (en) Herbicide, water dispersible granule for weeding and preparation method thereof
AU2015100742A4 (en) Concentrated Triglyceride-Synthesis-Inhibiting Fungicide
CN107006494A (en) Rice field Herbicidal combinations
CN116267936A (en) Weeding composition and application thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)
DA2 Applications for amendment section 104

Free format text: THE NATURE OF THE AMENDMENT IS AS SHOWN IN THE STATEMENT(S) FILED 18 JAN 2018

DA3 Amendments made section 104

Free format text: THE NATURE OF THE AMENDMENT IS AS SHOWN IN THE STATEMENT FILED 18 JAN 2018