AU2002216632A1 - Fire retardant compositions with reduced aluminum corrosivity - Google Patents

Fire retardant compositions with reduced aluminum corrosivity

Info

Publication number
AU2002216632A1
AU2002216632A1 AU2002216632A AU2002216632A AU2002216632A1 AU 2002216632 A1 AU2002216632 A1 AU 2002216632A1 AU 2002216632 A AU2002216632 A AU 2002216632A AU 2002216632 A AU2002216632 A AU 2002216632A AU 2002216632 A1 AU2002216632 A1 AU 2002216632A1
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
ferric
corrosion
ferrous
composition
biopolymer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
AU2002216632A
Other versions
AU2002216632B2 (en
Inventor
Gary H. Kegeler
Howard L. Vandersall
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Perimeter Solutions LP
Original Assignee
Perimeter Solutions LP
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US09/723,567 external-priority patent/US6802994B1/en
Application filed by Perimeter Solutions LP filed Critical Perimeter Solutions LP
Priority claimed from US09/978,602 external-priority patent/US6905639B2/en
Publication of AU2002216632A1 publication Critical patent/AU2002216632A1/en
Assigned to ASTARIS LLC reassignment ASTARIS LLC Amend patent request/document other than specification (104) Assignors: ASTARIS LLC, GARY H. KEGELER
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2002216632B2 publication Critical patent/AU2002216632B2/en
Assigned to ICL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LP reassignment ICL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LP Request for Assignment Assignors: ASTARIS LLC
Assigned to PERIMETER SOLUTIONS LP reassignment PERIMETER SOLUTIONS LP Request to Amend Deed and Register Assignors: ICL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LP
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

FIRE RETARDANT COMPOSITIONS WITH REDUCED ALUMINUM
CORROSlNITY
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent Application Serial Number
09/723,567, filed November 28, 2000, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR
DEVELOPMENT Not applicable.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to corrosion-inhibited fire retardant compositions. More specifically, the invention is directed to ammonium polyphosphate concentrates and other solutions containing suspended and/or soluble iron compounds and at least one biopolymer.
BACKGROUND Aerial application of fire-retardant compositions to combat the spread of wildland fires is common. The composition of fire retardants concentrates designed for managing and controlling wildland fires are of two generally types, those which, when mixed or diluted with water to end-use concentration, result in either a gum thickened solution, and those which do not contain a gum thickener and, consequently, result in water-like solutions, which are not rheologicaliy modified. These water-like retardant solutions exhibit inferior drop characteristics. The former may be supplied as dry powders or as suspensions or slurries generally referred to as fluids. Those concentrates that result in waterlike solutions when diluted with water may contain suspended components, as well, but are generally referred to as liquid concentrates. Fire retardant 41482/29066 concentrates that are supplied as fluids or liquids are preferred by some because they can be simply and easily diluted to end-use strength with little rnixing hardware and manpower.
Ammonium polyphosphate liquids have been used as aerially applied fire- retardants. These liquids have certain advantages in comparison to other fire- suppressing compositions since they can be transported and stored prior to use in the liquid form rather than being mixed from dry ingredients. However, concentrated liquid fire retardants and solutions prepared therefrom are extremely corrosive to aluminum and brass and mildly corrosive to other materials of construction used in handling, storage and application equipment. As used herein, all metals include alloys thereof. Accordingly, aluminum includes aluminum 2024T3, 6061 and 7074, steel includes 1010 and 4130 steel and brass includes yellow and naval brass. Since wildland fire retardants are most frequently transported to the fire and applied aerially, it is imperative that corrosive damage to the materials of construction of fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters be minimized.
Accordingly, the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") Forest Service has established, in "Specification 5100-304b (January 2000) Superseding Specification 5100-00304a (February 1986)/' entitled "Specification for Long Term Retardant, Wildland Fire, Aircraft or Ground Application"
(hereinafter, "Forest Service Specifications"), hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, maximum allowable corrosion rates for 2024T3 aluminum, 4130 steel, yellow brass and Az-31-B magnesium. For example, the corrosivity of forest fire retardants, in concentrate, to aluminum, steel and yellow brass must not exceed 5.0 milli-inches ("mils") per year as determined by the "Uniform 41482/29066
Corrosion" test set forth in Section 4.3.5.1 of the aforementioned USDA, Forest Service Specifications. If the product is applied from fixed-tank equipped helicopters, the corrosivity of the fire retardants to magnesium must not exceed 5.0 mils per year. The Forest Service Specifications identify the maximum amount of corrosion acceptable when both the retardant concentrate and its diluted solutions are exposed to each metal indicated above at temperatures of 70° Fahrenheit ("F") and 120°F in both totally and partially immersed configurations. The maximum allowable corrosivity of aerially applied fire retardant diluted solutions to aluminum is 2.0 mils per year ("mpy"), and the maximum corrosivity to brass and steel is 5.0 mpy when partially immersed, and 2.0 mpy when tested in the partially immersed condition. In the partially immersed configuration, one-half of the coupon is within the solution and one- half is exposed to the vapors in the air space over the solution.
In an effort to address the corrosivity problems encountered with the use of fertilizer grade ammonium polyphosphates, sodium ferrocyanide was incorporated into the corrosive compositions. Sodium ferrocyanide has proven to be an effective corrosion inhibitor in fire retardant compositions containing ammonium polyphosphate fertilizer solutions. However, while sodium ferrocyanide is effective as a corrosion inhibitor, several disadvantages of its use make its incorporation in wildland fire retardant compositions undesirable.
Specifically, the environmental and toxicological safety of ferro(i)cyanides is, at best, questionable. When exposed to acidic conditions and/or ultraviolet radiation from natural sunlight, the ferro(i)cyanide radical readily degrades releasing free iron and cyanide and/or hydrogen cyanide, which are toxic to humans, animals and aquatic life. Further, free iron emanating either from 41482/29066 decomposition of a portion of the ferro(i) cyanide radical, or introduced from other components or impurities within the composition, will subsequently react with remaining non-decomposed feπo(i)cyanide to form ferrous ferricyanide ("Turnbull's Blue") or ferric ferrocyanide ("Prussian Blue"), which emit a persistent blue-black or indigo-blue coloration, staining all that they contact. Consequently, neither ferricyanide nor ferrocyanide can be used in fire-retardants that are expected to fade and become non-visible over time, for example, in fugitive retardant compositions.
The magnitude of the above concerns is increased since wildland fire retardants are generally applied aerially in a less than completely controlled manner. Due to the presence of variables such as vegetative cover, smoke, or wind drift that impact the trajectory of the free-falling solution, aerially applied wildland fire retardant solutions may land on or near people, animals and in bodies of water, or on soil where it could enter the water supply. In addition, the rheological properties of wildland fire retardant solutions during periods of extreme and relaxed shear, and its elasticity are recognized as important properties. The rheological properties of forest and brush land fire retardant solutions are important because they significantly affect the performance of the retardant during and following aerial discharge and subsequent distribution within the fuel ladder. The degree of dispersion, integrity of the retardant cloud, magnitude of wind-induced drift, as well as the continuity of coverage, retention on and penetration of the fuel complex are among those performance-related characteristics impacted. Fire retardant solutions, which exhibit increased viscosity and elastic properties, are more desired because they 41482/29066 are less affected by the extreme forces encountered in aerial application, e.g. wind effects, gravity, and shear force due to forward momentum.
Historically, wildland fire retardant solutions, as prepared for application, have been of three general rheological types: (1) unthickened liquid fertilizer solutions with little effective viscosity and elasticity,- (2) clay thickened aqueous ammonium sulfate solutions with high apparent viscosity, but little effective viscosity and no elasticity; and (3) high viscosity, pseudoplastic and elastic, gum thickened ammonium phosphate and/or sulfate solutions, which maintain an increased viscosity level and elastic character even when subjected to great amounts of shear.
Guar gums, natural polysaccharides that are extracted from the guar bean, have been used in aerially applied fire retardant to enhance the rheological properties of the retardant solutions. Guar gum thickeners function in an acceptable manner when the ammonium polyphosphate based fire retardant composition is diluted relatively soon after preparation. The rate of degradation of the guar gum thickener varies with the composition of the fertilizer grade ammonium polyphosphate and can be as short as a few hours to one week. However, when the concentrated retardant is stored for more than about one week, the rate of viscosity decreases to an unacceptable level. For example, experiments have shown that a fire retardant concentrate stored for one month prior to dilution shows little tendency to increase in viscosity for several hours and does not reach its expected viscosity level for perhaps a week. Since wildland fires occur on a non-predictable basis and a rapid response is required to treat them, this type of behavior is unacceptable. 41482/29066
Conventional xanthan biopolymers thickeners having particle sizes in excess of about 100 microns have also been used to alter the rheological characteristics of aerially applied fire retardants. Conventional commercially available xanthan biopolymers include but are not limited to Kelzan® and Kelzan S® from CP Kelco, Wilmington, DE, and Xanthan AC® from
Jungbunzlauer International AG, Basel, Switzerland. However, like guar gums, conventional xanthan biopolymer thickeners perform unacceptably in liquid arnmoniun polyphosphate compositions. Even when prepared freshly, ammonium polyphosphate fire retardant concentrates containing these conventional xanthan biopolymers have a decreased ability to increase the viscosity of the solution in a timely manner, upon subsequent dilution with water. As such, the use of conventional xanthan biopolymer thickeners to improve the rheological characteristics of ammonium polyphosphate based fire retardant compositions for aerially application is less desired. Accordingly, there is a need to provide safe and acceptable wildland fire retardants for the suppression or management of wildland fires that are not corrosive to the equipment associated with the transportation, handling and application of the retardant, have favorable rheological and aerial application characteristics and are environmentally and toxicologically friendly, thereby avoiding the above disadvantages.
SUMMARY OF THE INvΕNTION In overcoming the above disadvantages, it is an object of the invention to produce a wildland fire retardant composition that has a reduced-tendency to corrode various metals, favorable rheological and aerial application characteristics, and is not negatively affected by exposure to sunlight or acidic 41482/29066 conditions, resulting in the release of toxic by-products that could be both environmentally and toxicologically hazardous.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a fire retardant composition that is compatible with the concept of a fugitive or fading color system, able to become invisible over time with exposure to natural sunHght. The above and other objects are met by the present invention, which provides a corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition including at least one fire retardant composition that includes at least one ammonium polyphosphate, at least one biopolymer having a particle diameter less than about 100 microns, and a corrosion inhibiting system that includes at least one corrosion inhibiting compound selected from a group of compounds consisting of azoles, insoluble ferric pyrophosphate, soluble ferric pyrophosphate (mixture or blend of sodium citrate and insoluble ferric pyrophosphate), ferrous oxalate, ferric citrate, ferrous sulfate, ferric ammonium citrate, insoluble ferric orthophosphate, soluble ferric orthophosphate, ferric ammonium oxalate, ferric ammonium sulfate, ferric bromide, ferric sodium oxalate, ferric stearate, ferric sulfate, ferrous acetate, ferrous ammonium sulfate, ferrous bromide, ferrous gluconate, ferrous iodide, ferric acetate, ferric fluoroborate, ferric hydroxide, ferric oleate, ferrous fumarate, ferrous oxide, ferric lactate, ferric resinate, and any combination thereof; wherein the corrosion inhibiting system is present in a minor effective amount to substantially reduce the corrosiveness of the fire retardant composition.
In a second aspect, the present invention provides a method of preparing the above-described corrosion-inhibited fire retardant compositions of the invention that includes the steps of forming an intermediate concentrate composition suitable for transportation and storage that includes the above- 41482/29066 described corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition of the invention; wherein the corrosion inhibiting system is present in a minor amount effective to substantially reduce the corrosivity of the fire retardant composition of the invention and diluting the intermediate concentrate with water to form the corrosion-inhibited fire retardant compositions of the invention.
In yet a third aspect, the present invention provides a method of suppressing wildland fires that includes aerially applying to wildland vegetation, ahead of wildland fire, a fire suppressing composition that is comprised of water and the above-described corrosion-inhibited fire-retardant compositions of the invention.
In a fourth aspect, the present invention provides a method of inhibiting corrosion that includes providing a corrodible material and contacting it with an effective amount of the above-described corrosion inhibiting system of the invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Not applicable.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the present invention, it has been discovered that a fire-retardant composition can be prepared that has a reduced tendency to corrode various metals, including aluminum, that is superior to known fire retardants in rheological aerial application characteristics and is toxicologically and environmentally safe. The corrosion-inhibited fire retardants of the invention include at least one fire retardant composition comprised of at least one ammonium polyphosphate and a corrosion inhibiting system comprised of at least one corrosion inhibiting compound selected from a group of corrosion 41482/29066 inhibiting compounds consisting of azoles, insoluble ferric pyrophosphate, soluble ferric pyrophosphate, ferrous oxalate, ferric citrate, ferrous sulfate, ferric ammonium citrate, insoluble ferric orthophosphate, soluble ferric orthophosphate, ferric ammonium oxalate, ferric ammonium sulfate, ferric bromide, ferric sodium oxalate, ferric stearate, ferric sulfate, ferrous acetate, ferrous ammonium sulfate, ferrous bromide, ferrous gluconate, ferrous iodide, ferric acetate, ferric fluoroborate, ferric hydroxide, insoluble ferric oleate, ferrous fumarate, ferrous oxide, ferric lactate, ferric resinate, and any combination thereof. Generally, the corrosion inhibiting system is present in a minor amount effective to substantially reduce the corrosiveness of the fire retardant composition.
In one embodiment of the invention, a small amount of at least one biopolymer is added to the fire retardant compositions of the invention. When small amounts of biopolymers are added to the fire retardant compositions of the invention, further reduction in aluminum corrosivity is experienced. As shown in Tables 7a and 7b below, the corrosion-inhibited fire retardant compositions of the invention containing biopolymers pass the corrosion requirements in both concentrate and diluted solutions. Generally, the fire retardant compositions of the invention, in concentrate, comprise in the range of about .01% to about 5.0% biopolymer. However, as one skilled in the art will appreciate, compositions comprising biopolymer concentrations outside of this range are also effective. Further, biopolymers having particle diameters outside of the above range may be incorporated into the compositions of the invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, fire retardant compositions containing biopolymers having particle sizes greater than about 100 microns in 41482/29066 combination with biopolymers having particle sizes less than about 100 microns would be obvious to one skilled in the art.
In one specific embodiment of the invention, the concentrated fire retardant composition comprises about 1.0% biopolymer. In another specific embodiment of the invention, the concentrated fire retardant composition comprises about 3.0% biopolymer.
The biopolymer may be any biopolymer having a particle size less than about 100 microns. Biopolymers suitable for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to rhamsan, xanthan and welan biopolymers having an average particle diameter less than about 100 microns. Conventional xanthan thickeners having average particle diameters in excess of about 100 microns perform unacceptably in contact with liquid ammonium polyphosphate compositions. However, the inventors have found that reducing the particle diameter of biopolymers improves the ability of the biopolymers to rapidly increase the viscosity of the fire retardant composition upon subsequent dilution with water and exhibit increased corrosion inhibition, generally.
For example, a xanthan gum, with a weight average particle diameter in the range of about 100 to about 180 microns performs unacceptably in the fire retardant composition of the present invention, while a chemically identical xanthan gum with an average particle diameter in the range of about 20 to about 70 microns performs acceptably.
In one embodiment, the corrosion-inhibited fire retardant compositions of the invention include at least one xanthan biopolymer having an average particle diameter less than about 100 microns. Unlike prior art fire retardant compositions comprising guar gum thickeners and conventional xanthan 41482/29066 biopolymers having average particle diameters greater than about 100 microns, the rate of viscosity of the fire retardant compositions of the invention that include xanthan biopolymer show viscosity development that is unaffected by the length of time that the biopolymer is in contact with the ammonium polyphosphate fire retardant solution. Some xanthan biopolymers suitable for use in the present invention are found in Xanthan Gum-natural biopolymer for scientific water control, Fifth Edition, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The corrosion- inhibited fire retardant compositions of the invention, specially adapted for aerial application to wildland fires, are prepared by forming an intermediate concentrate composition comprising the above-described fire retardant composition containing the above-described corrosion inhibiting system. The intermediate concentrate is then diluted with water to form the corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition of the invention. Generally, the corrosion inhibiting system is present in the corrosion-inhibited fire retardant of the invention in a minor amount effective to substantially reduce the corrosiveness of the fire retardant composition.
In accordance with the present invention, the corrosion-inhibited fire retardants of the invention include a fire retardant comprised of at least one ammonium polyphosphate. Ammonium polyphosphate is also referred to as polyammonium phosphate and may include both ortho- and polyphosphate, other ammonium phosphates such as pyro- and metaphosphates, the alkali metal equivalents thereof, as well as a blend of phosphate polymers.
The ammonium polyphosphate solutions that are used as agricultural fertilizer and wildland (vegetative) fire retardants are manufactured by 41482/29066 neutralizing aqueous solutions of wet-process phosphoric acid, generally containing about 68% to about 74% phosphorus pentoxide with anhydrous ammonia in such a manner that both high temperature and pressure are experienced. When prepared in this manner, a portion of the impure orthophosphoric acid polymerizes or condenses, resulting in the formation of pyrophosphate, short chain polyphosphates and, in most instances, small amounts of cyclic or metaphosphates. That portion of the acid that does not polymerize, of course, remains as orthophosphoric acid. Ammoniation of this mixture of phosphate species occurs within the reactor, as well, resulting in an aqueous solution containing ammonium ortho, pyro, tripoly, tetrapoly and some higher chain and cyclic phosphate species. These condensed phosphates generally exhibit increased water solubility as compared to orthophosphates and, consequently, more highly concentrated solutions can be prepared when they are present. The relative concentrations of the various species depends primarily on the temperature and pressure achieved within the reactor. Commercial solutions generally contain from about 34% to about 37% phosphorus pentoxide. Phosphorus pentoxide concentrations above about 37% approach water solubility limits resulting in solutions that are not stable, from which solids may precipitate during ambient temperature storage. Solutions of this type are generally referred to as either 10-34-0 or 11-37-0 liquid concentrates; the numerical designation refers to the percentage of their plant nutrient composition, i.e., ammoniacal nitrogen, phosphorus pentoxide and potassium oxide.
It should be noted that the condensed phosphates that are present in liquid concentrate solutions are subject to hydrolyses, which results in de- polymerization. The rate of hydrolytic degradation increases with time, 41482/29066 temperature, and the relative acidity of the solution. Therefore, ammonium polyphosphate concentrates and their solutions may vary in species composition as received, and as time progresses during their subsequent storage.
These liquid concentrates may additionally contain small amounts of diammonium sulfate and a host of metal and alkali-metal impurities. The quantity and quality of these impurities vary with the composition of the phosphate ore, the utilized process and the extent of purification that is conducted during manufacture of the wet-process phosphoric acid. Since these solutions are manufactured primarily as nutrients, the quality control parameters of greatest interest are the percentages of their contained nutrients - nitrogen and phosphorus - and the clarity, stability and color of the solution rather than purity per se.
The corrosion inhibiting system of the invention is comprised of at least one corrosion inhibiting compound selected from a group of corrosion inhibiting compounds consisting of azoles, insoluble ferric pyrophosphate, soluble ferric pyrophosphate, ferrous oxalate, ferric citrate, ferrous sulfate, ferric ammonium citrate, insoluble ferric orthophosphate, soluble ferric orthophosphate, ferric ammonium oxalate, ferric ammonium sulfate, ferric bromide, ferric sodium oxalate, ferric stearate, ferric sulfate, ferrous acetate, ferrous ammonium sulfate, ferrous bromide, ferrous gluconate, ferrous iodide, ferric acetate, ferric fluoroborate, ferric hydroxide, ferric oleate, ferrous fumarate, ferrous oxalate, ferrous oxide, ferric lactate, ferric resinate, and any combination thereof. In one preferred embodiment, the corrosion inhibiting system is comprised of at least one soluble corrosion inhibiting compound and at least one insoluble corrosion inhibiting compound. The combination of such soluble and insoluble corrosion 41482/29066 inhibiting iron containing compounds appears to provide the optimum combination of corrosion inhibition.
A minor amount of the corrosion inhibiting system of the invention effective to substantially reduce the corrosiveness of the fire retardant composition is included in the corrosion-inhibited fire retardant compositions of the invention. A minor effective amount of the corrosion inhibiting system is that amount, which substantially reduces the corrosivity of the fire retardant. As is understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, what constitutes a substantial reduction in corrosivity is largely dependent on the specific fire retardant used in the fire retardant composition of the invention, as well as the specific composition of the corrosion inhibiting system, and can be readily determined by one of skill in the art without undue experimentation.
In one embodiment, the corrosion inhibiting system of the invention is present in a minor amount effective in the corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition, in concentrate, to obtain a retardant having at least one of a maximum corrosivity to aluminum of 5.0 mpy, yellow brass of 5.0 mpy, and steel of 5.0 mpy, as determined by the "Uniform Corrosion Test" set forth in Section 4.5.6.1.2 of "Specification 5100-304b (January 2000) Superseding Specification 5100-304a (February 1986)," entitled "Specification For Long Term Retardant, Wildland Fire, Aircraft or Ground Application," issued by the USDA.
In a specific embodiment, the corrosion inhibiting system of the invention comprises in the range of about .01% to about 10.0% of the total corrosion- inhibited fire retardant. In another specific embodiment, the corrosion inhibiting system of the invention comprises in the range of about 0.3% to about 6.0% of the total corrosion-inhibited fire retardant. In yet another specific embodiment, 41482/29066 the corrosion inhibiting system of the invention comprises in the range of about
0.6% to about 5.0% of the total corrosion-inhibited fire retardant.
Prior to use, and in one embodiment of the invention, the corrosion- inhibited compositions of the invention are blended with water to form dilute solutions containing the amount of phosphorus pentoxide required to achieve the maximum amount of vegetation coverage at an application rate sufficient to reduce the flammability of the vegetative fuels to the desired level. The water used in the composition of the invention may be tap water, or water from other convenient water sources. Generally, the compositions are diluted one part concentrate to in the range of about three to seven parts water. In a specific embodiment, the compositions of the invention are diluted one part concentrate to in the range of about four to six parts water. However, it should be noted that the compositions of the invention may be diluted outside of the above ranges, for example where improved retardant penetration is desired. In a specific embodiment, the fire retardant compositions of the invention comprise less than about 1.18% biopolymer in dilute solution.
In a specific embodiment, the compositions of the invention are blended with water to form dilute solutions containing the amount of phosphorus pentoxide required to meet USDA, Forest Service Specification fire-retardant effectiveness requirements. This concentration, which is determined via combustion-retarding effectiveness testing described in USDA, Forest Service Specification 5100-304b, "4.5.2. Combustion Retarding Effectiveness Test," will generally depend on the percentage of phosphorus pentoxide present in the concentrated composition, and the extent of its availability for retarding reactions. The corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition of the invention is 41482/29066 typically diluted to an amount effective to achieve maximum coverage of vegetation at an application rate sufficient to reduce the flammable fuels to a desired level. The minimum USDA, Forest Service Specifications, for combustion retarding effectiveness, as specified in Specification 5100-304b, is generally obtained when the corrosion-inhibited fire retardant concentrate of the invention is diluted with about 1 to about 8 volumes of water.
To suppress wildland fires, the corrosion-inhibited fire retardant compositions of the invention are diluted with water and applied on threatened vegetation, ahead of approaching wildland fire. Ammonia from both the ammonium phosphate and the ammonium sulfate are liberated at temperatures below the ignition temperature of the fuel. The phosphoric and sulfuric acids are both initially effective fire retarding acids. The phosphoric acid will remain present and effective with the vegetative fuel until temperatures exceed 600°C. However, the boiling point of sulfuric acid is much lower, and the amount present will decrease as the fuel temperature increases. Thus, at least a portion of the sulfuric acid is lost prior to the ignition temperature of the fuel. The resultant mineral acids subsequently react with the cellulosic components of vegetative fuels on which they are applied. Their thermal decomposition is thereby altered in such a manner that they will no longer serve as fuel. These reactions are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,839,065 to Vandersall, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The fire retardant compositions of the invention may also contain suspending agents. Suspending agents effectively reduce the rate of separation and settling during long term storage. Thus, as one skilled in the art would appreciate, the amount of suspending agent depends upon its relative 41482/29066 effectiveness per unit applied, the desired length of storage and the additional additives incorporated into the compositions of the invention. As used herein, suspending agents useful in the compositions of the invention include colloidal clays, for example, attapulgus, fuller's earth, sepiolite, montmorillonite, and kaolin clays. As used herein, attapulgus clay includes, but is not limited to attapulgite and polygorskite. As used herein, kaolin clay includes, but is not limited to Kaolinite, [Al2Si2O7-2(H2O)] and [AlαO3-2SiO1-2(HαO)].
As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, the corrosion-inhibited fire retardant of the invention may contain or be mixed with other functional components or additives such as suspending agents, coloring agents, surfactants, stabilizers, opacifying agents, other corrosion inhibitors, any combination thereof, or with other functional components.
For example, and in one embodiment of the invention, the corrosion- inhibited fire retardant composition of the invention includes at least one highly colored pigment. The colored pigment is incorporated to assist in the visual identification of treated and untreated vegetation. Suitable highly colored pigments include iron oxide, which produces many colors like brown and red, titanium dioxide pigments, which produce a white color, or an ultra-violet sensitive dye dispersed in biodegradable plastic. However, for certain uses, like along roadsides or in parks, it may be desirable to exclude any colorant from the mixture. Accordingly, as one skilled in the art would appreciate, the amount of colorant or pigment incorporated into the compositions of the invention depends on the degree of the dilution and visibility contemplated by the user. Visibility is usually obtained with red iron oxide when it is present in the diluted solution in the range of about 0J 5% to about 0.4%, depending on the colorant characteristics 41482/29066 and on the vegetative and topographical characteristics of that on which it will be applied. The amount incorporated in the concentrate will, of course, vary with the dilution rate required to provide adequate fire retarding effectiveness.
In another embodiment, the present invention includes at least one of red iron oxide or brown iron oxide, or a combination thereof. In yet another embodiment, the present invention includes a fugitive coloring agent, whose color fades upon exposure to the elements. In a further embodiment, the present invention includes opacifying pigments, which are generally not highly colored, but have the ability to cover and hide that on which it is deposited so that the highly colored pigment becomes more visible.
Surfactants may also be added to increase -visibility, through the generation of a foam, and to improve penetration of the retardant solution into porous fuels. Accordingly, as one skilled in the art would appreciate, the amount and type of surfactant incorporated into the compositions of the invention depends on the degree of the dilution and visibility contemplated by the user. Thickeners, for example, hydroxypropyl guar, may also optionally be added to the compositions of the invention. The existence of such gums in the compositions of the invention is not necessary for anti-corrosive or improved rheological characteristics to be realized. If employed, the quantity of other gums in the compositions of the invention will vary depending in part on the nature and concentration of the fire-retardant salts present, the presence of impurities, and the presence of other components. Accordingly, and in one embodiment of the invention, the compositions of the invention contain thickeners, for example, hydroxypropyl guar, or other non-ether derivative guar thickeners. In other 41482/29066 embodiments of the invention, the compositions do not contain thickeners, for example, hydroxypropyl guar.
It has been discovered that azoles are effective corrosion inhibitors for brass. In one embodiment of the invention, the compositions of the invention comprise at least one azole. As used herein, an azole is any of a group of chemical compounds with a five-membered ring containing one or more nitrogen atoms. Azoles suitable for use in the corrosion-inhibited fire retardants of the invention include, but are not limited to tolytriazole, benzotriazole, mercaptobenzothiazole, dimercaptothiadiazole, l,2 benzisothiazoline-3-l, 2- benzimidazolone, 4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzotriazole, tolylimidazole, 2-(5-ethyl-2- pyridyl) benzimidazole, phthalimide, any alkali metal salts thereof and combinations thereof. The amount of azole or other corrosion inhibitor is dependent upon the corrodible metal for which corrosion resistance is desired, the level of resistance desired, and the specific concentration of the fire retardant composition employed, including corrosion inhibiting compounds contained therein.
However, in one embodiment of the invention, the corrosion-inhibited fire retardant concentrates include at least one azole, present in a minor amount effective to obtain a corrosivity of yellow brass to a maximum of 5.0 mpy, as determined by the "Uniform Corrosion Test" set forth in Section 4.5.6.1 of "Specification 5100-304b (January 2000) Superseding Specification 5100-304a (February 1986)," entitled "Specification For Long Term Retardant, Wildland Fire, Aircraft or Ground Application," issued by the USDA. In a specific embodiment of the invention, the fire retardant concentrates of the invention comprise in the range of about .01% to about 1.0% tolytriazole. In yet another 41482/29066 specific embodiment, the compositions of the invention include in the range of about 0.2% to about 0.6% tolytriazole. In yet another specific embodiment, the compositions of the invention include in the range of about 0.3% to about 0.5% tolytriazole. A method of inhibiting corrosion using the above-described corrosion inhibiting system of the invention is also provided. According to the method of the invention, a corrodible material is provided and contacted with an effective amount of the corrosion inhibiting system of the invention to substantially reduce the corrosiveness of the fire retardant. In one embodiment of the invention the corrodible material is also contacted with at least one above-described suspending agents. In another embodiment, the method of inhibiting corrosion further includes the step of contacting the corrodible material with at least one above-described biopolymer having a particle size less than about 100 microns. Accordingly, the method includes providing a corrodible material and contacting the corrodible material and at least one above-described biopolymer having a particle size less than about 100 microns and an effective amount of the corrosion inhibited system of the invention.
Any corrodible material may be used according to the method of inhibiting corrosion of the invention. In one embodiment, the corrodible material is selected from a group of corrodible materials consisting of steel, brass, aluminum, and any alloy thereof.
Prior to use, and in one embodiment of the invention, the conosion inhibiting system and biopolymer, if present, are blended with water prior to or 41482/29066 during contact with the corrodible material. The water used in the composition of the invention may be tap water or water from other convenient water sources.
In one embodiment, the corrosion inhibiting system of the invention includes at least one additive selected from a group of additives including suspending agents, coloring agents, surfactants, opacifying pigments, stabilizers, corrosion inhibitors and any combination thereof.
While the corrosion-inhibited fire retardant compositions of the invention reduce aluminum corrosivity in the absence of biopolymers, biopolymers are not significantly effective for reducing corrosion to aluminum in the absence of the corrosion inhibiting system of the invention. However, it has been discovered that the corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition of the invention containing biopolymers shows improved rheological characteristics in the absence of the corrosion-inhibiting system of the invention. Specifically, increased viscosity is shown in dilute solutions comprising the above-described corrosion- inhibited fire retardant composition, in the absence of the corrosion inhibiting system of the invention. Accordingly, in one embodiment, fire retardant composition of the invention comprises at least one above-described fire retardant composition comprised of at least one ammonium polyphosphate and at least one above-described biopolymer having a particle diameter of less than about 100 microns. This embodiment, which does not include the above-described corrosion inhibiting system of the invention, will hereinafter be referred to as the viscosity-increased fire retardant compositions of the invention.
While suspending agents may be utilized in all of the fire retardant compositions of the invention, the use of suspending agents is not necessary for improved rheological characteristics to be realized in both the concentrated and 41482/29066 dilute fire retardant compositions, or for the corrosion inhibiting characteristics of the corrosion-inhibited fire retardant compositions of the invention to be realized.
The viscosity-increased fire retardant compositions of the invention generally comprise in the range of about .01% to about 5.0% biopolymer, in concentrate composition. However, as one skilled in the art will appreciate, compositions comprising biopolymer concentrations outside of this range are also effective in increasing the viscosity of fire retardant compositions. In one specific embodiment of the invention, the viscosity-increased fire retardant composition of the invention, in concentrate, comprises about 1.0% biopolymer. In another specific embodiment of the invention, the fire retardant composition, in concentrate, comprises about 3.0% biopolymer.
In one specific embodiment, the viscosity-increased fire retardant compositions of the invention include at least one above-described xanthan biopolymer. In a specific embodiment, the fire retardant compositions of the invention include at least one fire retardant composition comprised of at least one ammonium polyphosphate, in the range of about .01% to about 5.0% at least one xanthan biopolymer having a particle size less than about 100 microns, and at least one above-described additive or functional component. The viscosity-increased fire retardant compositions of the invention are prepared in the same manner as the above-described corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition of the invention. Accordingly, and in one embodiment of the invention, the viscosity-increased fire retardant compositions of the invention are prepared by forming an intermediate concentrate composition comprising the above-described fire retardant composition containing at least one ammonium 41482/29066 polyphosphate and at least one above-described biopolymer having a particle size less than about 100 microns, and diluting the intermediate concentrate with water to form the viscosity-increased fire retardant composition of the invention. In one embodiment the compositions comprise less than about 1.18% biopolymer.
In a specific embodiment, the fire retardant compositions of the invention are prepared by forming an intermediate concentrate composition comprised of at least one above-described fire retardant and at least one xanthan biopolymer having an average particle diameter less than about 100 microns, wherein the fire retardant compositions comprise in the range of about .01% to about 5.0% xanthan biopolymer, and diluting the intermediate concentrate with water to form the increased-viscosity fire retardant composition of the invention.
A method of suppressing wildland fires using the viscosity-increased fire retardant compositions of the invention is also provided. The method includes the steps of aerially applying to wildland vegetation a fire suppressing composition comprising water and the above-described viscosity-increased fire retardant composition. In a specific embodiment, the method includes aerially applying to wildland vegetation a fire suppressing composition comprising water, at least one ammonium polyphosphate composition, less than about 1.18% of at least one xanthan biopolymer having a particle size less than about 100 microns and at least one above-described additive.
All references and patents cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties for their relevant teachings. Accordingly, any reference cited herein and not specifically incorporated by reference is, 41482/29066 nevertheless, incorporated by reference in its entirety as if part of the present specification.
The following examples illustrate specific embodiments of the invention without limiting the scope of the invention in any way. In each example, samples of ammonium polyphosphate fire retardant concentrates were mechanically admixed with iron containing compounds, biopolymer, additives, and in some cases, with an azole, as indicated in each table. Any mechanical mixing technique that is well known in the art may be used in the present invention. The concentrated fire retardant solutions are diluted with water, as indicated. The "Requirements" row illustrates the level of aluminum 2024-T3 corrosion allowed by the USDA, Forest Service Specifications 5100-304b, i.e., the maximum allowable corrosivity for product acceptance for use in wildland fire retardant compositions. The resulting samples were tested for corrosivity in accordance with USDA, Forest Service Specifications 5100-304b. EXAMPLE 1 -THE ALUMINUM CORROSIVITY OF NEAT AMMONIUM
POLYPHOSPHATE SOLUTION Table 1 illustrates the corrosion characteristics of neat, unadulterated fertilizer grade 10-34-0 and 11-37-0 ammonium polyphosphate liquid concentrates obtained from three different sources. All of the samples are either 10-34-0 or 11-37-0, as received, with no additions. The corrosivity of the samples were expressed in mils of metal loss on exposed metal surface extrapolated from 90 to 365 days (mpy) and ascertained using the aforementioned USDA, Forest Service Specifications for determining corrosivity. Both the concentrated retardant and its diluted solutions were tested at each temperature and condition indicated. 41482/29066
The diluted solutions were prepared by admixing four to five volumes of water with one volume of the concentrated solution. Thus, the diluted solutions were in the range of between about 15% to about 20% by volume of the concentrate. In accordance with the Forest Service Specifications for corrosion testing of fire retardants, a one-inch wide, four-inches long, one-eighth inch thick coupon of the aluminum was obtained from a standard source. The coupon is cleaned, dried and weighed according to standard USDA, Forest Service Specifications and suspended in a one quart, straight sided jar filled either 50% (partially) or 100% (totally) full using a piece of nylon string. When suspended in a partially full jar, the coupon was 50% (two inches) immersed in the test solution with the other 50% extending up from the solution into the air space above it. When the jar was full with approximately 800 ml of the solution, the metal coupon was totally immersed in the solution. The jars were then closed with a screw cap and two or three identical corrosion jars (cells) of each partially and totally immersed coupons were stored at 70°F and 120°F for ninety days. At the end of the ninety day storage period, the jars were opened and the coupons were removed and cleaned according to the USDA, Forest Service Specifications. The coupon was then re-weighed after it dried and its weight loss was determined by comparing its initial and final weights. The calculated weight loss and density of the metal coupon were used to extrapolate to mils (0.001 inches) of aluminum that would be lost during a one-year period at the test condition, assuming that the weight loss was experienced uniformly across the coupon surface. The corrosion rate of both the partially and totally immersed coupons were calculated using the total 41482/29066 surface area of the coupon. The samples at each condition were then averaged and reported as the corrosion rate. The results are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 00 t t o
41482/29066
The corrosivity of the ammonium polyphosphate solutions to aluminum
2024T-3 was relatively low when the temperature was maintained at about 70°F.
However, none of the samples of the neat ammonium polyphosphate solutions met the Forest Service Specifications for corrosivity of fire retardants. In addition, the results showed that increasing the solution temperature to 120°F dramatically increased the corrosion of the aluminum coupon by the neat ammonium polyphosphate samples, i.e., in excess of an order of magnitude.
EXAMPLE 2-THE ALUMINUM CORROSIVITY OF AMMONIUM POLYPHOSPHATE SOLUTION CONTAINING 1.2% IRON OXIDE (Fe2O3) & 1.4% ATTAPULGUS CLAY
The corrosion characteristics of neat fertilizer grade ammonium polyphosphate solutions containing additional amounts (<3%) of a mixture of an iron oxide colorant and attapulgus clay is illustrated in Table 2. Each sample was prepared by admixing neat concentrated ammonium polyphosphate obtained from several sources with 1.4% attapulgus clay, and either 1.2% red iron oxide or 1.2% brown iron oxide, as indicated. In addition, 0.3% tolytriazole was also admixed into Samples 11, 15, 16, 18 and 19 and 0.5% tolytriazole was admixed into sample 20. Aliquots from these concentrate samples were then diluted by admixing 1.0 volume of concentrate with 4.25 volumes of tap water. The concentrates and their solutions were then tested for corrosivity and diluted in accordance with Forest Service Specifications. The results are shown in Table 2.
Table 2
41482/29066
The results indicated that the addition of small amounts of iron oxide and clay reduced the corrosion of totally immersed aluminum in a 70°F solution by
50% to 65%. In addition, the impact of the mixture on high temperature corrosion was even more dramatic than at low temperature. When the corrosion cell was stored at 120°F, the rate of aluminum corrosion decreased by about 75% to 90%. At both temperatures the corrosion rate on partially immersed coupons was greater than 50% of the totally immersed values, which indicated that significant interface or vapor/air phase corrosion occurs when the mixture is present in the solution. This differs from the corrosivity of the neat ammonium polyphosphate solutions of Table 1. However, the addition of 1.2% insoluble iron oxide and a suspending clay to the ammonium polyphosphate samples did not reduce the aluminum 2024-T3 corrosion rate of the concentrates or its solutions to within the limits required by the USDA, Forest Service Specifications.
EXAMPLE 3-THE ALUMINUM CORROSIVITY OF AMMONIUM POLYPHOSPHATE SOLUTIONS CONTAINING A MIXTURE OF SOLUBLE
AND INSOLUBLE IRON COMPOUNDS The data in Tables 3a and 3b illustrate the relative effectiveness of a number of corrosion inhibitor systems containing water soluble and water insoluble sources of iron, and mixtures thereof, in several sources and types of ammonium polyphosphate concentrates and their diluted solutions. The samples were prepared by admixing either 10-34-0 or 11-37-0 type ammonium polyphosphate solutions from various sources with varying concentrations of insoluble red iron oxide or brown iron oxide additives and attapulgus clay additives and varying the concentrations of other iron containing additives, as indicated. The solutions were subjected to high shear mixing in order to activate or hydrate the clay. 41482/29066
Each concentrate and its diluted solution was tested for aluminum corrosivity in accordance with the Forest Service Specification protocols. The results are shown in Tables 3a and 3b.
Table 3a
*These composiuons contain 0 3 0 5% tolytnazole for brass corrosion inhibition
Table 3b
4^ OO JO to o
ON σs
00 cw
1 These compositions contain 0 3 0 5% tolytπazole for brass corrosion inhibmon
(2) 11 37 0 type Ammonium Polyphosphate Sample
41482/29066
For comparative purposes, line 1 illustrates the average corrosion characteristics of neat concentrate and dilute solutions from Sample 1, taken from Table 1, and line 2 illustrates the corrosion of the concentrate and diluted solutions when 1.2% iron oxide and 1.4% attapulgus clay, with the exception of the formulations on line 9 which contained 0.7% attapulgus clay and the formulation on line 11, which contained 2.8% attapulgus clay, was mixed with the neat concentrate solution, see Table 2. Samples 1-4 were 10-34-0 type ammonium polyphosphate samples obtained from various sources. Samples 5-7 were 11-37-0 type ammonium polyphosphate samples obtained from various sources.
The data in Tables 1 and 2 illustrate that corrosive attack of aluminum was most severe when exposed to the fire retardant concentrate and its solutions at elevated (120°F/49°C) temperature in the totally immersed configuration. Consequently, the evaluation of corrosion inhibiting systems stressed testing under these conditions. Periodic testing at other conditions was conducted.
Lines 3 through 6 illustrate the corrosion inhibiting effectiveness of combinations of insoluble brown iron oxide and soluble ferric pyrophosphate. The results indicated that the USDA, Forest Service Specifications for corrosivity of fire retardants were met when 1.2% of the brown iron oxide was used in conjunction with 3.0% of the soluble ferric pyrophosphate. In addition, the results indicated that lower amounts of the insoluble iron oxide resulted in unacceptable corrosion in the concentrated retardant solution.
Lines 7 through 12 illustrate the effectiveness of corrosion inhibiting systems similar to those described in the preceding paragraph, except red iron oxide is substituted for brown iron oxide. The results indicate that the red iron 41482/29066 oxide is effective in reducing the aluminum corrosion of the concentrated and diluted ammonium polyphosphate although perhaps not quite as effective as the brown iron oxide.
Lines 13-22 illustrate the corrosion inhibiting effectiveness of mixtures of insoluble iron oxide and soluble ferric citrate. The results indicated that ferric citrate was an equally effective substitute for soluble ferric pyrophosphate. In addition, the results indicate that a mixture of brown iron oxide and 3.0% soluble ferric citrate was capable of reducing the corrosivity of the ammonium polyphosphate samples to within acceptable levels for compliance with Forest Service Specifications for corrosivity of fire retardants.
Lines 23 and 24 illustrate the use of ferric ammonium citrate as a substitute for ferric citrate. The results indicated that the soluble ferric compounds were as effective as ammonium citrate in reducing corrosion of aluminum by ammonium polyphosphate solutions. Lines 27 through 38 illustrate the effectiveness of systems in which only uncolored, soluble and insoluble iron containing compounds are used rather than the relatively highly colored persistent iron oxides. This is important where true fugitive retardants are desired, whereby the color gradually fades when exposed to natural sunlight and disappears so as not to permanently stain that on which it is applied.
Lines 26 through 38 illustrate the effectiveness of mixtures of soluble and insoluble ferric pyrophosphate. Acceptable aluminum corrosion properties were obtained when 3.0% of the former and 1.2% of the latter were used as the corrosion inhibiting system in an ammonium polyphosphate solution. The 41482/29066 results also indicate that an increased level of insoluble ferric pyrophosphate did not further reduce the corrosivity of the concentrate.
Lines 27 though 38 illustrate the aluminum corrosion inhibiting effectiveness of mixtures of the various soluble and insoluble iron compounds. Lines 37 and 38 revealed that, although effective, the tested ferrous salts were less effective at equivalent iron addition rates as compared to the ferric compounds.
Lines 39 through 44 illustrate the aluminum corrosion inhibiting effectiveness of various soluble and insoluble iron compounds when used in conjunction with 10-34-0 ammonium polyphosphate concentrates obtained from alternative sources. These data indicate that the amount and ratio of corrosion inhibitor necessary to reduce corrosivity to an acceptable level will need to be optimized dependent on the source and characteristics thereof.
Lines 45 through 54 illustrate the aluminum corrosion inhibiting effectiveness of the subject compounds when used in various sources of 11-37-0 type ammonium polyphosphate concentrate and their diluted solutions.
EXAMPLE 4-CORROSION CHARACTERISTICS OF AMMONIUM POLYPHOSPHATE SOLUTIONS CONTAINING WATER SOLUBLE IRON
COMPOUNDS Example 4 illustrates the effectiveness of water-soluble ferric pyrophosphate, ferric citrate and ferrous sulfate as aluminum corrosion inhibitors in ammonium polyphosphate solutions. In each sample, the indicated soluble iron compounds and 1.4% attapulgus clay were admixed with neat ammonium polyphosphate. Aliquots were subsequently drawn from the concentrate and diluted with the prescribed amount of water. The aluminum corrosivity of both the concentrated fire retardants and their diluted solutions was determined in 41482/29066 accordance with the aforementioned Forest Service Specifications. The results of this testing is shown in Table 4.
Table 4
4^ l o
MD O
(1) Aluminum 2024T3 coupons tested in the manner described in USDA, Forest Service specification 5100-304b. Values obtained when the corrosion cell was maintained at 120°F (50°C) for 90 days with the coupon totally immersed therein. The data is expressed in milli-inches per year.
41482/29066
The results indicate that both soluble ferric and ferrous iron containing salts show utility as aluminum corrosion inhibitors in ammonium polyphosphate solutions. Relatively small concentrations (0.35%) of soluble iron derived from a soluble ferric pyrophosphate decreased the corrosion rate of totally immersed aluminum exposed to 120°F solutions of the diluted fire retardant to within the
USDA Forest Service Specification requirements. The data illustrate that soluble iron containing compounds are most effective in controlling the corrosivity of diluted solutions. Since the corrosivity of both the concentrate and its diluted solutions is of importance, mixtures of water soluble and water insoluble iron compounds generally provide superior performance.
EXAMPLE 5-CORROSION CHARACTERISTICS OF AMMONIUM POLYPHOSPHATE SOLUTIONS CONTAINING OTHER WATER
INSOLUBLE IRON COMPOUNDS Table 5 illustrates the effectiveness of water insoluble ferric orthophosphate, insoluble ferric pyrophosphate and ferrous oxalate as aluminum corrosion inhibitors in ammonium polyphosphate concentrates and their diluted solutions. 1.4% attapulgus clay was mixed with the concentrated ammonium polyphosphate, with the exception of Samples 6 and 7 which contained 0.7% and 2.8% attapulgus clay, respectively. Samples 13, 18 and 24 contained, also, an insoluble iron oxide as a solution colorant. The resultant fire retardant concentrates and their diluted solutions were evaluated in terms of aluminum corrosivity in accordance with the USDA Forest Service Specification requirements. The results of the testing are shown in Table 5. Table 5
(1) Average values from Table 1
(2) See Table 2
41482/29066
The corrosion inhibiting effectiveness of insoluble ferric pyrophosphate was shown by a comparison of the compositions containing only this component, lines 2-13, with line 1. The effectiveness was also shown by comparison with 1.2% red iron oxide, line 14. These comparisons illustrate the effectiveness of insoluble ferric pyrophosphate as an aluminum corrosion inhibitor for concentrated ammonium polyphosphate and its solutions. It was shown to be superior to red iron oxide when compared on an equal ferric iron level. Accordingly, the insoluble ferric pyrophosphate would be preferred in many applications since it is not highly colored like the conventional iron oxides, which result in highly visible and persistent discoloration of that on which it is applied. Consequently, inhibitor systems containing these components would be suitable for use in fugitive colored fire retardant formulations.
Lines 15-19 illustrate the further reduction in aluminum corrosion, which was obtained by combining iron oxide and ferric pyrophosphate in the same corrosion inhibiting system. The results indicated that several of these formulations met the USDA, Forest Service Specifications for corrosivity of aluminum in both the concentrate and dilute forms.
The data contained in lines 20 and 23 illustrate the effectiveness of insoluble ferric orthophosphate in inhibiting the corrosion of aluminum exposed to ammonium polyphosphate solutions. The results indicated that the pyrophosphate moiety may be somewhat superior to orthophosphate for inhibiting the corrosion of aluminum.
The data contained in line 24 indicates that increasing the ferric iron content of the corrosion inhibiting system by using mixtures of ferric 41482/29066 orthophosphate and iron oxide was also an effective way of meeting the USDA,
Forest Service Specifications for corrosivity of aluminum.
The data contained in line 25 illustrates the aluminum corrosion inhibiting effectiveness of small amounts of ferrous (Fell) iron when incorporated in ammonium polyphosphate concentrates and their diluted solutions.
EXAMPLE 6-EFFECTΓVΕNESS OF AZOLES AS CORROSION INHIBITORS IN AMMONIUM POLYPHOSPHATE FIRE RETARDANT COMPOSITIONS Example 6 illustrates the effectiveness of azoles as yellow brass corrosion inhibitors in concentrated ammonium polyphosphate based fire retardant formulations and in their diluted solutions. Each sample was prepared by mixing
1.4% attapulgus clay, 1.2% red iron oxide and the indicated azole corrosion inhibitor with the neat, concentrated ammonium polyphosphate. Subsequently, the concentrates were diluted with water in the manner described herein. The samples were then tested in accordance with USDA Forest Service Specification requirements.
Table 6
THE IMPACT OF AZOLES ON THE CORROSION OF YELLOW BRASS EXPOSED TO CONCENTRATED AMMONIUM 4^ POLYPHOSPHATE AND ITS DILUTED SOLUTIONS.* I t
M3 O O CA
4^ OJ
10-34-0 containing 1.4% attapulgus clay and 1.2% red iron oxide in addition to the described inhibitor additive.
70 and 120 refer to the solution storage temperature in °F, T and P refer to total of partial immersion of the metal coupon in the retardant solution during storage. from a 50% aqueous solution of sodium tolytriazole.
+ from an 85% aqueous solution of sodium tolytriazole. + + from 100% sodium triazole.
41482/29066
The results indicated that azoles, including both tolytriazoles and salts thereof, are effective corrosion inhibitors for yellow brass in ammonium polyphosphate concentrates and solutions. These data and others included in previous Examples illustrate the advantages of using azoles in conjunction with the iron containing inhibitors of this invention to reduce both aluminum and brass corrosivity of the fire retardant compositions to within desirable limits.
EXAMPLE 7-THE IMPACT OF XANTHAN BIOPOLYMER ON 11-37-0 BASED
LIQUID CONCENTRATE RETARDANT FORMULATIONS Table 7 illustrates the impact of xanthan (Keltrol BT®) on the viscosity and aluminum corrosion of ammonium polyphosphate fire retardant concentrates and their dilute solutions containing water soluble and water insoluble sources of iron, xanthan biopolymer having a particle size less than about 100 microns, additives and mixtures thereof, as indicated. The samples were prepared by admixing 11-37-0 type ammonium polyphosphate solutions with various concentrations of attapulgus clay, tolytriazole, iron oxide, xanthan gum, insoluble ferric pyrophosphate and soluble ferric pyrophosphate or sodium citrate, as indicated. The solutions were subjected to high shear mixing in order to activate or hydrate the clay, where necessary. Dilution was accomplished by admixing five volumes of water with one volume of the concentrated 11-37-0 or compositions based thereon. All references to xanthan in Tables 7a and 7b refer to a commercial grade of xanthan, Keltrol BT®, which has an average particle diameter less than about 100 microns.
Each concentrate and diluted solution was tested for aluminum corrosivity in accordance with the Forest Service Specification protocols and the viscosity of 41482/29066 each concentrate and diluted solution was tested by methods of testing viscosity that are well-known in the art. The results are shown in Tables 7a and 7b.
Table 7a
* Samples stored at 90°F with steel coupon suspended therein Sample homogenized pπor to measuring viscosity
4^ oo to
O ON
4^
Samples stored at 90°F with steel coupon suspended therein Sample homogenized pπor to measuπng viscosity
41482/29066
The results indicate that in the absence of an iron containing corrosion inhibitor, the addition of 1.0% xanthan biopolymer has no significant effect on the corrosivity of either concentrated neat ammonium polyphosphate or its diluted solution. With reference to samples A and C, the results indicate that the addition of attapulgus clay, tolytriazole, and pigment grade iron oxide results in a dramatic reduction in the aluminum corrosivity of concentrated 11-37-0 and its diluted solutions.
With reference to samples C and D, the addition of 1.0% xanthan to 11-37-0 compositions containing attapulgus clay, tolytriazole and iron oxide further reduces the aluminum corrosivity of both the concentrated and diluted solutions. As indicated, the aluminum corrosivity of the concentrated solution is reduced to within the corrosion requirements of the specifications, but its diluted solutions, while reduced somewhat, are still marginally unacceptable.
With reference to samples E, G and I, the addition of 3.0% insoluble ferric pyrophosphate, 3.0% each of soluble and insoluble ferric pyrophosphate or a mixture of 4.3% insoluble ferric pyrophosphate, and 1.7% sodium citrate reduce the alxrminum corrosivity of both the concentrated and diluted 11-37-0 solutions containing attapulgus clay and iron oxide to about the same degree as 1.0% xanthan. With reference to samples F, H and J, the addition of 1.0% xanthan to the compositions of samples E, G and I, reduces the aluminum corrosivity of the resultant concentrate and diluted solutions to within the Forest Service Specifications in all testing conditions and situations.
The results also indicate that neat 11-37-0 ammonium polyphosphate concentrate, sample A, exhibits a viscosity of about 65 cps, while its diluted 41482/29066 solution has a viscosity of 5-10 cps. The addition of 1.0% xanthan biopolymer to the concentrated 11-37-0 ammonium polyphosphate solution had no significant effect on viscosity. However, upon dilution the viscosity of the resultant solution was increased initially. The viscosity of the solution gradually decreased so that it was insignificantly different than the neat solution after a relatively short period of time.
Samples M through S illustrate the impact of increasing the concentration of xanthan biopolymer from 1.0% to 3.0% in the liquid fire retardant concentrate. The data indicate that the addition of 1.0% biopolymer to an iron containing ammonium polyphosphate composition results in a further reduction in aluminum corrosivity. However, increased concentrations of xanthan biopolymer do not appear to be more effective. Additional xanthan biopolymer does appear, however, to increase the viscosity of the dilute solution to within Forest Service Specifications. With reference to sample M, the results indicate that 3.0% xanthan biopolymer may have a slight impact on both the viscosity and aluminum corrosivity of concentrated 11-37-0 ammonium polyphosphate compositions. The diluted concentrate exhibits a stable viscosity in the range of 1000 cps, however, its aluminum corrosivity is only slightly reduced. Samples K and R further indicate that the biopolymer has no significant impact on the viscosity of the concentrated product, but does reduce the aluminum corrosivity thereof by 50% when tested at elevated temperatures. With reference to samples L and S, the results indicate that Forest Service aluminum corrosion requirements can be met in formulations that do not include a suspending agent, such as attapulgus clay. 41482/29066
With reference to samples H and P, the addition of soluble ferric pyrophosphate to formulations containing insoluble ferric polyphosphate and xanthan biopolymers does not further improve aluminum corrosivity.
41482/29066
EXAMPLE 8-THE IMPACT OF XANTHAN BIOPOLYMERS WITH
VARYING PARTICLE SIZING ON THE VISCOSITY OF LIQUID
CONCENTRATE FIRE RETARDANTS Table 8 illustrates the impact of xanthan biopolymers having various particle sizes on the rheological properties of ammonium polyphosphate fire retardant concentrates. The samples were prepared by admixing 3.0% of the xanthan biopolymers of various weight average particle size diameters, as indicated in Table 8, with concentrated ammonium polyphosphate type fire retardants. Dilution was accomplished by admixing five volumes of water with one volume of the concentrated fire retardant.
The viscosity of each dilute solution was tested by methods of testing viscosity that are well-known in the art. The rapid viscosity increase upon dilution (Diluted Viscosity - 10 minutes) was tested. The stable viscosity upon dilution (Diluted Viscosity - 30 days) was tested. The rapid viscosity increase of the solution after one-year (After 1 Year ((cps)) was tested. The stable viscosity of the solution after one-year (After 1 Year ((cps)) was tested. The results are shown below in Table 8.
TABLE 8 - PROPERTIES OF LIQUID CONCENTRATE FIRE RETARDANTS THICKENED WITH XANTHAN BIOPOLYMER WITH VARYING PARTICLE
SIZING
10 minute viscosity as a % of maximum viscosity achieved. 41482/29066
The results indicate that liquid concentrate fire retardant compositions comprising biopolymers having weight average particle diameters in the range of about 31 to about 70 microns exhibit ideal rheological properties. However, fire retardant concentrates comprised of biopolymers having particle diameters larger than about 100 microns do not exhibit desirable rheological properties.
EXAMPLE 9-THE IMPACT OF PARTICLE SIZING OF THE VISCOSITY OF BIOPOLYMERS IN LIQUID CONCENTRATE FIRE RETARDANTS
Table 9 illustrates the particle sizing and performance of several xanthan- type biopolymers in comparison with standard hydroxypropyl guar gum in liquid fire retardant concentrates. The samples were prepared by admixing 3.0% xanthan type biopolymers or guar gum, as indicated below in Table 9, with concentrated ammonium polyphosphate type fire retardants. Dilution was accomplished by admixing about five volumes of water with one volume of each dilute fire retardant composition.
The viscosity of each sample ammonium polyphosphate solution was tested by the methods described in Example 8. The results are shown in Table 9 below.
TABLE 9 - IMPACT OF PARTICLE SIZING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF XANTHAN BIOPOLYMERS
IN LIQUID CONCENTRATE SOLUTIONS ^ 00 to o
en oo
diluted 30 days after preparation of the concentrate
41482/29066
The results indicate that fire retardant concentrates comprising xanthan- type biopolymers in the range of about 31 to 70 microns exhibit ideal rheological properties. However, fire retardant concentrates comprised of biopolymers having particle diameters larger than about 100 microns do not exhibit desirable rheological properties. Fire retardant concentrates comprising guar gum having a particle size diameter greater than about 100 microns also fail to exhibit desirable rheological properties. Specifically, ammonium polyphosphate based fire retardant concentrates containing guar gum appear to have highly unstable rheological characteristics, which make the use of guar gum undesirable in some embodiments of the invention. Accordingly, in one embodiment of the invention the compositions of the invention do not include guar gum.
EXAMPLE 10-THE IMPACT OF PARTICLE SIZING AND BIOPOLYMER TYPE ON THE VISCOSITY OF BIOPOLYMERS IN AMMONIUM
POLYPHOSPHATE SOLUTIONS Table 10 illustrates the particle sizing and performance of xanthan- type biopolymers with welan and rhamsan biopolymers in ammonium polyphosphate type liquid fire retardants. The samples were prepared by admixing about 91.1% concentrated liquid ammonium polyphosphate solution, 1.2% attapulgus clay,
0.3% tolytriazole, 3.0% insoluble ferric pyrophosphate and 3.0% of the biopolymer indicated in Tables 10a and 10b. The biopolymers used included
Kelzan®, Kelzan S®, Keltrol BT®, Kelcorete®, and a rhamsan biopolymer, all of which are commercially available from CP Kelco, Wilmington, DE. Kelzan® is an uncoated, conventional xanthan biopolymer, while Kelzan S® is a conventional xanthan biopolymer with an applied surface coating. Keltrol BT® is a xanthan biopolymer having a particle size diameter less than about 100 microns.
Kelcocrete is a welan type biopolymer. 41482/29066
The viscosity of each concentrate were measured by methods described in Example 8. Then, each sample was diluted with water at a mix ratio of 5 volumes of water per volume of concentrate. The 10-minute and 18-hour viscosity of the diluted sample was measured and the samples were stored in a laboratory at a temperature of about 70°F-74°F for varying periods of time, re- diluted and viscosity measured. The viscosity of each sample was measured at 10 minutes, 1 hour, 24 hours, 7 days, 15 days, 21 days and 28 days after dilution. The results are shown in Tables 10a and 10b below.
4^
Table 10a l to
IMPACT OF PARTICLE SIZING AND BIOPOLYMER TYPE ON THE O OS VISCOSITY OF AMMONIUM POLYPHOSPHATE TYPE FIRE RETARDANTS σs
c-n CA
Table 10b
IMPACT OF PARTICLE SIZING AND BIOPOLYMER TYPE ON THE VISCOSITY OF AMMONIUM POLYPHOSPHATE TYPE FIRE RETARDANTS
41482/29066
The results indicate that welan and rhamsan type biopolymers thicken more slowly than xanthan type biopolymers but are effective at increasing the viscosity of ammonium polyphosphate type fire retardant solutions. Xanthan type biopolymers having a particle size diameter of less than about 100 microns, however, rapidly increase the viscosity of ammonium polyphosphate type fire retardants upon dilution. Conventional biopolymers, e.g. xanthan type biopolymers having particle size diameters greater than about 100 microns, fail to develop the viscosity of the fire retardants in a timely manner. Accordingly, both coated and uncoated conventional biopolymers are unsuitable for use in thickening ammonium polyphosphate type fire retardants. In addition, the long- term data, i.e. measured viscosity 7, 15, 21 and 28 days after preparation of the concentrated sample, indicate that there is no particular change in the performance of the various biopolymers during storage in ammonium polyphosphate based fire retardants.
EXAMPLE 11- IMPACT OF USE LEVELS OF BIOPOLYMERS AND IRON ADDITIVES ON THE VISCOSITY OF AMMONIUM POLYPHOSPHATE
SOLUTIONS The optimal use levels of mixtures of biopolymer and insoluble ferric pyrophosphate when used to reduce the aluminum corrosion level of liquid ammonium polyphosphate type fire retardants and their dilute solutions was analyzed. Formulations were prepared by using ammonium polyphosphate type fire retardants with attapulgus clay, tolytriazole, and in some cases, iron oxide.
Biopolymers having average particle size diameters of less than 100 microns and insoluble ferric pyrophosphate were also added, where indicated. Each formulation was prepared by adding the dry components separately to the fire retardants and mixing them using a high shear mixer at approximately 1000 m 41482/29066 over about a 2 hour period. The high shear was used to hydrate the clay and disperse the insoluble components. Dilute solutions were prepared by admixing 1 part concentrate with 5 parts tap water. The concentrate formulations and their dilute solutions were tested in accordance with all four of the test conditions prescribed by the U.S. Forest Service Specifications, described herein. The results are shown below in Tables 1 la, 1 lb and lie.
Table 11a
4^ oo to to o
CA CA
Samples stored at 90°F with steel coupon suspended therein. Samples homogenized prior to measuring viscosity.
Table lib
'Samples stored at 90°F with steel coupon suspended therein. Samples homogenized prior to measuring viscosity.
Table l ie
4^ oo to t ^O O
OS CA
'Samples stored at 90°F with steel coupon suspended therein. Samples homogenized prior to measuring viscosity.
41482/29066
The results indicate that the incorporation of some iron oxide within fire retardant concentrates and solutions of the present inventions is necessary to meet U.S. Forest Service Specification requirements. Fire retardant concentrates that include 1.2% iron oxide, 3% ferric pyrophosphate and 1% biopolymer, and their diluted solutions meet the U.S. Forest Service Specification requirements. The viscosity of the fire retardant concentrates containing 1% biopolymer gradually increased from about 150 to 200 cps immediately after manufacture to 1000 to 2000 cps. After three months of storage at 90°F, and upon dilution, the solution viscosity was in the range of 100 to 200 cps. In view of the above, it is seen that the various objects and features of the invention are achieved and other advantages and results are obtained. Variations and modification may be made to the various steps and compositions of the invention without departing from the scope of the invention.

Claims (79)

  1. 41482/29066
    CLAIMS We claim: 1. A corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition comprising: at least one fire retardant comprised of at least one ammonium polyphosphate- at least one biopolymer having a particle size diameter less than about 100 microns; and a corrosion inhibiting system comprised of at least one corrosion inhibiting compound selected from a group of corrosion inhibiting compounds consisting of azoles, insoluble ferric pyrophosphate, soluble ferric pyrophosphate, ferrous oxalate, ferric citrate, ferrous sulfate, ferric arnmonium citrate, soluble ferric orthophosphate, insoluble ferric orthophosphate, ferric arnmonium oxalate, ferric ammonium sulfate, ferric bromide, ferric sodium oxalate, ferric stearate, ferric sulfate, ferrous acetate, ferrous ammonium sulfate, ferrous bromide, ferrous gluconate, ferrous iodide, ferric acetate, ferric fluoroborate, ferric hydroxide, ferric oleate, ferrous fumarate, ferrous oxide, ferric lactate, ferric resinate, and any combination thereof; wherein said corrosion inhibiting system is present in a minor amount effective to substantially reduce corrosiveness of said fire retardant composition. 2. The composition of claim 1 wherein said azole is at least one azole selected from a group of azoles including tolytriazole, benzotriazole, mercaptobenzothiazole, dimercaptothiadiazole, l,2 benzisothiazoline-3-l, 2- benzimidazolone, 4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzotriazole, tolylimidazole,
  2. 2-(5-ethyl-2- pyridyl) benzimidazole, phthalimide, any alkali metal salts thereof and combinations thereof. 41482/29066
  3. 3. The composition of claim 1 further comprising at least one additive selected from a group of additives consisting of suspending agents, fugitive coloring agents, non-fugitive coloring agents, surfactants, stabilizers, corrosion inhibitors, opacifying pigments and any combination thereof.
  4. 4. The composition of claim 1 wherein said corrosion inhibitor is at least one azole and said azole is present in said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition, in concentrate, in a minor amount effective to obtain a maximum corrosivity of yellow brass to a maximum of 5.0 mils per year, as determined by the "Uniform Corrosion" test set forth in Section 4.5.6J of "Specification 5100- 304b (January 2000) Superseding Specification 5100-00304a (February 1986)," entitled "Specification for Long Term Retardant, Wildland Fire, Aircraft or Ground Application," issued by the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
  5. 5. The composition of claim 1 wherein said coloring agent is at least one coloring agent selected from a group of coloring agents consisting of fugitive coloring agents, opacifying pigments, and highly colored coloring agents.
  6. 6. The composition of claim 3 wherein said suspending agent is at least one suspending agent selected from a group of suspending agents consisting of attapulgus, sepiolite, fuller's earth, montmorillonite, and kaolin clay.
  7. 7. The composition of claim 1 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system is comprised of at least one soluble corrosion inhibiting compound and at least one insoluble corrosion inhibiting compound.
  8. 8. The composition of claim 1 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system is present in a minor amount effective in said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition, in concentrate, to obtain at least one of a maximum corrosivity to 41482/29066 aluminum of 5.0 mils per year per year, yellow brass of 5.0 mils per year, and steel of 5.0 mils per year, as determined by the "Uniform Corrosion" test set forth in Section 4.5.6J of "Specification 5100-304b (January 2000) Superseding Specification 5100-00304a (February 1986)," entitled "Specification for Long Term Retardant, Wildland Fire, Aircraft or Ground Application," issued by the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
  9. 9. The composition of claim 1 further comprising water.
  10. 10. The composition of claim 1 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system comprises in the range of about .01% to about 10% of said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition.
  11. 11. The composition of claim 1 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system comprises in the range of about .30% to about 6.0% of said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition.
  12. 12. The composition of claim 1 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system comprises in the range of about 0.6% to about 5.0% of said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition.
  13. 13. The composition of claim 1 comprising in the range of about .01% to about 5.0% said biopolymer.
  14. 14. The composition of claim 1 comprising in the range of about 1.0% said biopolymer.
  15. 15. The composition of claim 1 further comprising at least one guar biopolymer.
  16. 16. The composition of claim 1 wherein said biopolymer is at least one biopolymer selected from a group of biopolymers consisting of rhamsan, xanthan and welan biopolymers. 41482/29066
  17. 17. The composition of claim 16 wherein said biopolymer is at least one xanthan biopolymer.
  18. 18. The composition of claim 17 wherein said xanthan biopolymer comprises about 1% of said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition.
  19. 19. The composition of claim 1 comprising in the range of about 2% to about 3% ferric pyrophosphate.
  20. 20. The composition of claim 1 comprising in the range of about 2% to about 3% ferric pyrophosphate and about 1% xanthan biopolymer.
  21. 21. The composition of claim 1 comprising in the range of about 1% to about 2% iron oxide, about 2% to about 3% ferric pyrophosphate, about 1% xanthan biopolymer, about 1% to about 2% attapulgus clay, and about .01% to about 1% tolytriazole.
  22. 22. A corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition comprising: at least one fire retardant comprised of at least one ammonium polyphosphate; attapulgus clay; at least one xanthan biopolymer having a particle size less than about 100 microns; at least one additive selected from a group of additives consisting of suspending agents, coloring agents, surfactants, stabilizers, corrosion inhibitors, opacifying pigments and any combination thereof; and a corrosion inhibiting system comprised of at least one corrosion inhibiting compound selected from a group of corrosion inhibiting compounds consisting of azoles, insoluble ferric pyrophosphate, soluble ferric pyrophosphate, ferrous oxalate, ferric citrate, ferrous sulfate, ferric ammonium citrate, soluble 41482/29066 ferric orthophosphate, insoluble ferric orthophosphate, ferric ammonium oxalate, ferric ammonium sulfate, ferric bromide, ferric sodium oxalate, ferric stearate, ferric sulfate, ferrous acetate, ferrous arnmonium sulfate, ferrous bromide, ferrous gluconate, ferrous iodide, ferric acetate, ferric fluoroborate, ferric oleate, ferrous fumarate, ferrous oxide, ferric lactate, ferric resinate, and any combination thereof; wherein said corrosion inhibiting system is present in a minor amount effective to reduce corrosiveness of said ammonium polyphosphate to a maximum corrosivity to aluminum of 5.0 mils per year, as determined by the "Uniform Corrosion" test set forth in Section 4.5.6J of "Specification 5100-304b (January 2000) Superseding Specification 5100-00304a (February 1986)," entitled "Specification for Long Term Retardant, Wildland Fire, Aircraft or Ground Application," issued by the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,- and wherein said biopolymer comprises in the range of about 0.01% to about 5.0% of said fire retardant composition.
  23. 23. A method of preparing a corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition, adapted for aerial application to wildland fires, the method comprising the steps of: (a) forming an intermediate concentrate composition comprising:
    (i) a fire retardant composition comprised of at least one ammonium polyphosphate;
    (ii) a corrosion inhibiting system comprised of at least one corrosion inhibiting compound selected from a group of corrosion inhibiting compounds consisting of azoles, insoluble ferric pyrophosphate, soluble ferric 41482/29066 pyrophosphate, ferrous oxalate, ferric citrate, ferrous sulfate, ferric ammonium citrate, soluble ferric orthophosphate, insoluble ferric orthophosphate, ferric ammonium oxalate, ferric ammonium sulfate, ferric bromide, ferric sodium oxalate, ferric stearate, ferric sulfate, ferrous acetate, ferrous ammonium sulfate, ferrous bromide, ferrous gluconate, ferrous iodide, ferric fluoroborate, fenic hydroxide, ferric hydroxide, ferric oleate, ferrous fumarate, ferrous oxide, ferric lactate, ferric resinate, and any combination thereof; and at least one biopolymer having a particle size less than about 100 microns; wherein said corrosion inhibiting system is present in a minor amount effective to substantially reduce corrosiveness of said fire retardant composition; and
    (b) diluting said intermediate concentrate with water to form said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition.
  24. 24. The method of claim 23 wherein said azole is at least one azole selected from a group of azoles including tolytriazole, benzotriazole, mercaptobenzothiazole, dimercaptomthiadiazole, l,2 benzisothiazoline-3-l, 2-benzimidazolone, 4,5,6,7- tetrahydrobenzotriazole, tolylimidazole, 2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridyl) benzimidazole, phthalimide, any alkali metal salts thereof and combinations thereof.
  25. 25. The method of claim 23 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system is comprised of at least one soluble corrosion inhibiting compound and at least one insoluble corrosion inhibiting compound.
  26. 26. The method of claim 23 wherein said intermediate concentrate composition further comprises at least one additive selected from a group of additives consisting of suspending agents, coloring agents, surfactants, stabilizers, corrosion inhibitors, opacifying pigments and any combination thereof. 41482/29066
  27. 27. The method of claim 23 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system comprises at least one azole and said azole is present in said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition, in concentrate, in a minor amount effective to obtain a maximum corrosivity to yellow brass of 5.0 mils per year, as determined by the "Uniform Corrosion" test set forth in Section 4.5.6.1 of "Specification 5100-304b (January 2000) Superseding Specification 5100-00304a (February 1986)," entitled "Specification for Long Term Retardant, Wildland Fire, Aircraft or Ground Application," issued by the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
  28. 28. The method of claim 23 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system is present in a minor amount effective to reduce the corrosiveness of said fire retardant composition, in concentrate, to at least one of a maximum corrosivity to aluminum of 5.0 mils per year, brass of 5.0 mils per year and steel of 5.0 mils per year, as determined by the "Uniform Corrosion" test set forth in Section 4.5.6.1 of "Specification 5100-304b (January 2000) Superseding Specification 5100- 00304a (February 1986)," entitled "Specification for Long Term Retardant, Wildland Fire, Aircraft or Ground Application," issued by the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
  29. 29. The method of claim 23 wherein said intermediate concentrate composition is diluted such that a maximum corrosivity of aluminum is 2.0 mils per year and the maximum corrosivity of brass and steel is 2.0 mils per year when tested in the totally immersed condition and 5.0 mils per year when tested in the partially immersed condition, as specified and determined by the "Uniform Corrosion" test set forth in Section 4.5.6.1 of "Specification 5100-304b (January 2000) Superseding Specification 5100-00304a (February 1986)," entitled "Specification 41482/29066 for Long Term Retardant, Wildland Fire, Aircraft or Ground Application," issued by the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
  30. 30. The method of claim 23 wherein said coloring agent is at least one coloring agent selected from a group of coloring agents consisting of fugitive coloring agents, opacifying pigments, and highly colored coloring agents.
  31. 31. The method of claim 26 wherein said suspending agent is at least one suspending agent selected from a group of suspending agents consisting of attapulgus clay, sepiolite, fuller's earth, montmorillonite, and kaolin clay.
  32. 32. The method of claim 23 wherein said fire retardant composition comprises in the range of about .01% to about 5.0% said biopolymer.
  33. 33. The method of claim 23 wherein said fire retardant composition comprises in the range of about 1.0% said biopolymer.
  34. 34. The method of claim 23 wherein said fire retardant composition further comprises at least one guar biopolymer.
  35. 35. The method of claim 23 wherein said biopolymer is at least one biopolymer selected from a group consisting of a xanthan rhamsan and welan biopolymers.
  36. 36. The method of claim 35 wherein said biopolymer is a xanthan biopolymer.
  37. 37. The method of claim 36 wherein said xanthan biopolymer comprises about 1% of said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition.
  38. 38. The method of claim 23 wherein said step of forming an intermediate concentrate comprises forming a concentrate comprising in the range of about 2% to about 3% ferric pyrophosphate.
  39. 39. The method of claim 23 wherein said step of forming an intermediate concentrate comprises forming a concentrate comprising in the range of about 2% to about 3% ferric pyrophosphate and about 1% xanthan biopolymer. 41482/29066
  40. 40. The method of claim 23 wherein said step of forming an intermediate concentrate comprises forming a concentrate comprising in the range of about 1% to about 2% iron oxide, about 2% to about 3% ferric pyrophosphate, about 1% xanthan biopolymer, about 2% attapulgus clay, and about .01% to about 1% tolytriazole.
  41. 41. A method of preparing a corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition, adapted for aerial application to wildland fires, the method comprising the steps of:
    (a) forming an intermediate concentrate composition comprising: (i) at least one fire retardant comprised of at least one ammonium polyphosphate;
    (ii) attapulgus clay-
    (iii) a corrosion inhibiting system comprised of at least one corrosion inhibiting compound selected from a group of corrosion inhibiting compounds consisting of azole, insoluble ferric pyrophosphate, soluble ferric pyrophosphate, insoluble ferrous oxalate, soluble ferric citrate, soluble ferrous sulfate, insoluble ferric ammonium citrate, insoluble ferric orthophosphate, soluble fenic orthophosphate, ferric ammonium oxalate, ferric ammonium sulfate, ferric bromide, ferric sodium oxalate, ferric stearate, ferric sulfate, ferrous acetate, ferrous ammonium sulfate, ferrous bromide, ferrous gluconate, ferrous iodide, ferric fluoroborate, ferric hydroxide, ferric oleate, ferrous fumarate, ferrous oxide, ferric lactate, ferric resinate, and any combination thereof; and at least one xanthan biopolymer having a particle size of less than about 100 microns; 41482/29066 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system is present in a minor amount effective to reduce the corrosiveness of said fire retardant composition, in concentrate, to aluminum of 5.0 mils per year, as determined by the "Uniform Corrosion" test set forth in Section 4.5.6.1 of "Specification 5100-304b (January 2000) Superseding Specification 5100-00304a (February 1986)," entitled "Specification for Long Term Retardant, Wildland Fire, Aircraft or Ground Application," issued by the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,- and wherein said fire retardant composition comprises in the range of about .01% to about 5.0% said xanthan biopolymer prior to dilution,- and (b) diluting said intermediate concentrate with water to form said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition such that a maximum corrosivity of aluminum is 2.0 mils per year, as determined by the "Uniform Corrosion" test set forth in Section 4.5.6.1 of "Specification 5100-304b (January 2000) Superseding Specification 5100-00304a (February 1986)," entitled "Specification for Long Term Retardant, Wildland Fire, Aircraft or Ground Application," issued by the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
  42. 42. A method of suppressing wildland fires comprising aerially applying to wildland vegetation a fire suppressing composition comprising: water; and a corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition comprising: at least one fire retardant composition comprised of at least one ammonium polyphosphate; at least one biopolymer having a particle size of less than about 100 microns; and 41482/29066 a corrosion inhibiting system comprising at least one corrosion inhibiting compound selected from a group of corrosion inhibiting compounds consisting of azoles, insoluble ferric pyrophosphate, soluble ferric pyrophosphate, ferrous oxalate, ferric citrate, ferrous sulfate, ferric ammonium citrate, soluble ferric orthophosphate, insoluble ferric orthophosphate, ferric ammonium oxalate, ferric ammonium sulfate, ferric bromide, ferric sodium oxalate, ferric stearate, ferric sulfate, ferrous acetate, ferrous ammonium sulfate, ferrous bromide, ferrous gluconate, ferrous iodide, ferric acetate, ferric fluoroborate, ferric hydroxide, ferric oleate, ferrous fumarate, ferrous oxide, ferric lactate, ferric resinate, and any combination thereof; wherein said corrosion inhibiting system is present in a minor amount effective to substantially reduce the corrosiveness of said fire retardant composition.
  43. 43. The method of claim 42 wherein said azole is at least one azole selected from a group of azoles including tolytriazole, benzotriazole, mercaptobenzothiazole, dimercaptomthiadiazole, l,2 benzisothiazoline-3-l, 2-benzimidazolone, 4,5,6,7- tetrahydrobenzotriazole, tolylimidazole, 2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridyl) benzimidazole, phthalimide, any alkali metal salts thereof and combinations thereof.
  44. 44. The method of claim 42 further comprising at least one additive selected from a group of additives consisting of suspending agents, coloring agents, surfactants, stabilizers, corrosion inhibitors, opacifying pigments, and any combination thereof.
  45. 45. The method of claim 42 wherein said corrosion inhibitor is at least one azole and said azole is present in said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition, in concentrate, in a minor amount effective to obtain a corrosivity to yellow brass of a maximum of 5.0 mils per year, as determined by the "Uniform Corrosion" test 41482/29066 set forth in Section 4.5.6J of "Specification 5100-304b (January 2000) Superseding Specification 5100-00304a (Febmary 1986)," entitled "Specification for Long Term Retardant, Wildland Fire, Aircraft or Ground Application," issued by the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
  46. 46. The method of claim 42 wherein said coloring agent is at least one coloring agent selected from a group of coloring agents consisting of fugitive coloring agents, opacifying pigments and highly colored colorants.
  47. 47. The method of claim 44 wherein said suspending agent is at least one selected from a group of suspending agents consisting of attapulgus clay, sepiolite, fuller's earth, montmorillonite, and kaolin clay.
  48. 48. The method of claim 42 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system is comprised of at least one soluble corrosion inhibiting compound and at least one insoluble corrosion inhibiting compound.
  49. 49. The method of claim 42 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system is present in a minor amount effective to reduce the corrosiveness of said fire retardant composition, in concentrate, to at least one of a maximum corrosivity to aluminum of 5.0 mils per year, brass of 5.0 mils per year, and steel of 5.0 mils per year, as determined by the "Uniform Corrosion" test set forth in Section 4.5.6.1 of "Specification 5100-304b (January 2000) Superseding Specification 5100-00304a (February 1986)," entitled "Specification for Long Term Retardant, Wildland Fire, Aircraft or Ground Application," issued by the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
  50. 50. The method of claim 42 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system comprises in the range of about .01% to about 10.0% of said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition. 41482/29066
  51. 51. The method of claim 42 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system comprises in the range of about .30% to about 6.0% of said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition.
  52. 52. The method of claim 42 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system comprises in the range of about .60% to about 5.0% of said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition.
  53. 53. The method of claim 42 wherein said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition comprises in the range of about .01% to about 5.0% said biopolymer.
  54. 54. The method of claim 53 wherein said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition comprises in the range of about 1.0% said biopolymer.
  55. 55. The method of claim 42 wherein said biopolymer is at least one biopolymer selected from a group consisting of xanthan, rhamsan and welan biopolymers.
  56. 56. The method of claim 42 wherein said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition further comprises at least one guar biopolymer.
  57. 57. The method of claim 55 wherein said biopolymer is a xanthan biopolymer.
  58. 58. The method of claim 57 wherein said xanthan biopolymer comprises about 1% said corrosion-inhibited fire retardant composition.
  59. 59. The method of claim 42 wherein said step of aerially applying a fire suppressing composition comprises aerially applying a fire suppressing composition comprising in the range of about 2% to about 3% ferric pyrophosphate.
  60. 60. The method of claim 42 wherein said step of aerially applying a fire suppressing composition comprises applying a fire suppressing composition comprising in the range of about 2% to about 3% ferric pyrophosphate and about 1% biopolymer. 41482/29066
  61. 61. The method of claim 42 wherein said step of aerially applying a fire suppressing composition comprises applying a fire suppressing composition comprises applying a fire suppressing composition comprising in the range of about 1% to about 2% iron oxide, about 2% to about 3% ferric pyrophosphate, about 1% xanthan biopolymer, about 2% attapulgus clay, and about .01% to about 1% tolytriazole.
  62. 62. A method of suppressing wildland fires comprising aerially applying to wildland vegetation a fire suppressing composition comprising: water; and a corrosion-inhibited polyphosphate composition comprising: at least one ammonium polyphosphate; attapulgus clay; in the range of about .01% to about 5.0% at least one xanthan gum having a particle size less than 100 microns; at least one additive selected from a group of additives consisting of coloring agents, surfactants, stabilizers, corrosion inhibitors, and any combination thereof; and a corrosion inhibiting system comprised of at least one corrosion inhibiting compound selected from a group of corrosion inhibiting compounds consisting of insoluble ferric pyrophosphate, soluble ferric pyrophosphate, ferrous oxalate, ferric citrate, ferrous sulfate, ferric ammonium citrate, soluble ferric orthophosphate, insoluble ferric orthophosphate, ferric ammonium oxalate, ferric ammonium sulfate, ferric bromide, ferric sodium oxalate, ferric stearate, ferric sulfate, ferrous acetate, ferrous ammonium sulfate, ferrous bromide, ferrous gluconate, ferrous iodide, ferric acetate, ferric fluoroborate, ferric hydroxide, ferric 41482/29066 oleate, ferrous fumarate, ferrous oxide, ferric lactate, ferric resinate and any combination thereof; wherein said corrosion inhibiting system is present in a minor amount effective to reduce corrosiveness to said ammonium polyphosphate, in concentrate, to a maximum corrosivity to aluminum of 5.0 mils per year, as determined by the "Uniform Corrosion" test set forth in Section 4.5.6J of "Specification 5100-304b (January 2000) Superseding Specification 5100-00304a (February 1986)," entitled "Specification for Long Term Retardant, Wildland Fire, Aircraft or Ground Application," issued by the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
  63. 63. A method of inhibiting corrosion comprising: providing a corrodible material; and contacting said corrodible material with a composition for inhibiting corrosion comprising at least one biopolymer having a particle size less than about 100 microns and an effective amount of a corrosion inhibiting system comprised of at least one corrosion inhibiting compound selected from a group of corrosion inhibiting compounds consisting of azoles, insoluble ferric pyrophosphate, soluble ferric pyrophosphate, ferrous oxalate, ferric citrate, ferrous sul ate, ferric ammonium citrate, soluble ferric orthophosphate, insoluble ferric orthophosphate, ferric ammonium oxalate, ferric ammonium sulfate, ferric bromide, ferric sodium oxalate, ferric stearate, ferric sulfate, ferrous acetate, ferrous ammonium sulfate, ferrous bromide, ferrous gluconate, ferrous iodide, ferric acetate, ferric fluoroborate, ferric hydroxide, ferric oleate, ferrous fumarate, ferrous oxide, ferric lactate, ferric resinate and any combination thereof. 41482/29066
  64. 64. The method of claim 63 wherein said azole is at least one azole selected from a group of azoles including tolytriazole, benzotriazole, mercaptobenzothiazole, dimercaptomthiadiazole, l,2 benzisothiazoline-3-l, 2-benzimidazolone, 4,5,6,7- tetrahydrobenzotriazole, tolylimidazole, 2-(5-ethyl-2-pyridyl) benzimidazole, phthalimide, any alkali metal salts thereof and combinations thereof.
  65. 65. The method of claim 63 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system is comprised of at least one soluble corrosion inhibiting compound and at least one insoluble corrosion inhibiting compound.
  66. 66. The method of claim 63 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system further comprises at least one additive selected from a group of additives consisting of suspending agents, coloring agents, opacifying pigments, surfactants, stabilizers, corrosion inhibitors, and any combination thereof.
  67. 67. The method of claim 63 wherein said corrodible material is at least one material selected a group of corrodible materials consisting of steel, brass and aluminum.
  68. 68. The method of claim 63 wherein said corrosion inhibiting system further comprises water.
  69. 69. The method of claim 66 wherein said suspending agent is at least one selected from a group of suspending agents consisting of attapulgus clay, Fuller's earth, montmorillonite, sepiolite and kaolin clay.
  70. 70. The method of claim 63 wherein said step of contacting said corrodible material with at one biopolymer comprises contacting in the range of about .01% to about 5.0% of said biopolymer is contacted with said corrodible material.
  71. 71. The method of claim 70 wherein about 1.0% of said biopolymer is contacted with said corrodible material. 41482/29066
  72. 72. The method of claim 63 wherein said biopolymer is at least one biopolymer selected from a group including xanthan, rhamsan and welan biopolymers.
  73. 73. The method of claim 63 whereby no guar gum is contacted with said corrodible material.
  74. 74. The method of claim 72 wherein said biopolymer is a xanthan biopolymer.
  75. 75. The method of claim 74 wherein said step of contacting said corrodible material with said composition comprises contacting said material with said composition, wherein said xanthan biopolymer comprises about 1% of said composition.
  76. 76. The method of claim 63 wherein said step of contacting said corrodible material with said composition comprises contacting said material with said composition, wherein said composition comprises in the range of about 2% to about 3% ferric pyrophosphate.
  77. 77. The method of claim 63 wherein said step of contacting said corrodible material with said composition comprises contacting said material with said composition, wherein said composition comprises in the range of about 2% to about 3% ferric pyrophosphate and about 1% xanthan biopolymer.
  78. 78. The method of claim 63 wherein said step of contacting said corrodible material with said composition comprises contacting said material with said composition, wherein said composition comprises about 1% to about 2% iron oxide, about 2% to about 3% ferric pyrophosphate, about 1% xanthan biopolymer, about 1% to about 2% attapulgus clay, and about .01% to about 1% tolytriazole.
  79. 79. A method of inhibiting corrosion comprising: providing a corrodible material, and contacting said corrodible material with a composition for inhibiting corrosion comprising in the range of about .01% to about 5.0% at least one 41482/29066 xanthan gum having a particle size less than 100 microns and an effective amount of a corrosion inhibiting system comprised of ferric pyrophosphate.
AU2002216632A 2000-11-28 2001-10-16 Fire retardant compositions with reduced aluminum corrosivity Expired AU2002216632B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/723,567 2000-11-28
US09/723,567 US6802994B1 (en) 2000-11-28 2000-11-28 Fire retardant compositions containing ammonium polyphosphate and iron additives for corrosion inhibition
US09/978,602 2001-10-16
US09/978,602 US6905639B2 (en) 2000-11-28 2001-10-16 Fire retardant compositions with reduced aluminum corrosivity
PCT/US2001/032283 WO2002044305A2 (en) 2000-11-28 2001-10-16 Fire retardant compositions with reduced aluminum corrosivity

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2002216632A1 true AU2002216632A1 (en) 2002-08-15
AU2002216632B2 AU2002216632B2 (en) 2006-01-12

Family

ID=27110821

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2002216632A Expired AU2002216632B2 (en) 2000-11-28 2001-10-16 Fire retardant compositions with reduced aluminum corrosivity
AU1663202A Pending AU1663202A (en) 2000-11-28 2001-10-16 Fire retardant compositions with reduced aluminum corrosivity

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU1663202A Pending AU1663202A (en) 2000-11-28 2001-10-16 Fire retardant compositions with reduced aluminum corrosivity

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US6905639B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1343855B1 (en)
AU (2) AU2002216632B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2430420C (en)
ES (2) ES2415835T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2002044305A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6802994B1 (en) 2000-11-28 2004-10-12 Astaris Llc Fire retardant compositions containing ammonium polyphosphate and iron additives for corrosion inhibition
US6846437B2 (en) * 2000-11-28 2005-01-25 Astaris, Llc Ammonium polyphosphate solutions containing multi-functional phosphonate corrosion inhibitors
AU2002216632B2 (en) 2000-11-28 2006-01-12 Perimeter Solutions Lp Fire retardant compositions with reduced aluminum corrosivity
US6780991B2 (en) 2000-11-28 2004-08-24 Astaris Llc Biopolymer thickened fire retardant compositions
CA2479653C (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-10-24 Robert S. Taylor Methods and compositions for extinguishing fires using aqueous gelled fluids
US20080024998A1 (en) * 2005-07-20 2008-01-31 Shih-Ping Hsu Substrate structure integrated with passive components
US8202449B2 (en) 2006-10-31 2012-06-19 Icl Performance Products, Lp Corrosion-inhibited ammonium polyphosphate fire retardant compositions
US20090069496A1 (en) * 2007-09-06 2009-03-12 Sortwell Edwin T Coherent gel coating for preventing and/or extinguishing fires
CZ303547B6 (en) * 2009-03-10 2012-11-28 Wetter@Antonín Formulation for removing corrosion products from metallic surfaces
BR112014029845B1 (en) * 2012-06-06 2021-04-20 Universidade Federal De Pelotas xanthan-based compositions for obtaining biocompatible and biodegradable bioplastics and biocompatible and biodegradable bioplastics obtained
US9597538B2 (en) 2013-01-22 2017-03-21 Miraculum, Inc. Flame retardant and fire extinguishing product for fires in liquids
US9586070B2 (en) 2013-01-22 2017-03-07 Miraculum, Inc. Flame retardant and fire extinguishing product for fires in solid materials
US9265978B2 (en) 2013-01-22 2016-02-23 Miraculum Applications, Inc. Flame retardant and fire extinguishing product for fires in liquids
CA2939033C (en) * 2013-02-06 2021-12-14 X'aan Innovations Inc. Ammonium polyphosphate based fire-retardant compositions
WO2017005546A1 (en) * 2015-07-09 2017-01-12 Danmarks Tekniske Universitet Fire retardant formulations
CA3033245A1 (en) 2016-08-08 2018-02-15 Perimeter Solutions Lp Fire-retardant compositions and their uses
US10695597B2 (en) 2017-12-02 2020-06-30 M-Fire Holdings Llc Method of and apparatus for applying fire and smoke inhibiting compositions on ground surfaces before the incidence of wild-fires, and also thereafter, upon smoldering ambers and ashes to reduce smoke and suppress fire re-ignition
US10332222B1 (en) 2017-12-02 2019-06-25 M-Fire Supression, Inc. Just-in-time factory methods, system and network for prefabricating class-A fire-protected wood-framed buildings and components used to construct the same
US10430757B2 (en) 2017-12-02 2019-10-01 N-Fire Suppression, Inc. Mass timber building factory system for producing prefabricated class-A fire-protected mass timber building components for use in constructing prefabricated class-A fire-protected mass timber buildings
US10311444B1 (en) 2017-12-02 2019-06-04 M-Fire Suppression, Inc. Method of providing class-A fire-protection to wood-framed buildings using on-site spraying of clean fire inhibiting chemical liquid on exposed interior wood surfaces of the wood-framed buildings, and mobile computing systems for uploading fire-protection certifications and status information to a central database and remote access thereof by firefighters on job site locations during fire outbreaks on construction sites
US10260232B1 (en) 2017-12-02 2019-04-16 M-Fire Supression, Inc. Methods of designing and constructing Class-A fire-protected multi-story wood-framed buildings
US10653904B2 (en) 2017-12-02 2020-05-19 M-Fire Holdings, Llc Methods of suppressing wild fires raging across regions of land in the direction of prevailing winds by forming anti-fire (AF) chemical fire-breaking systems using environmentally clean anti-fire (AF) liquid spray applied using GPS-tracking techniques
US11395931B2 (en) 2017-12-02 2022-07-26 Mighty Fire Breaker Llc Method of and system network for managing the application of fire and smoke inhibiting compositions on ground surfaces before the incidence of wild-fires, and also thereafter, upon smoldering ambers and ashes to reduce smoke and suppress fire re-ignition
US11836807B2 (en) 2017-12-02 2023-12-05 Mighty Fire Breaker Llc System, network and methods for estimating and recording quantities of carbon securely stored in class-A fire-protected wood-framed and mass-timber buildings on construction job-sites, and class-A fire-protected wood-framed and mass timber components in factory environments
US10290004B1 (en) 2017-12-02 2019-05-14 M-Fire Suppression, Inc. Supply chain management system for supplying clean fire inhibiting chemical (CFIC) totes to a network of wood-treating lumber and prefabrication panel factories and wood-framed building construction job sites
US10814150B2 (en) 2017-12-02 2020-10-27 M-Fire Holdings Llc Methods of and system networks for wireless management of GPS-tracked spraying systems deployed to spray property and ground surfaces with environmentally-clean wildfire inhibitor to protect and defend against wildfires
US11865394B2 (en) 2017-12-03 2024-01-09 Mighty Fire Breaker Llc Environmentally-clean biodegradable water-based concentrates for producing fire inhibiting and fire extinguishing liquids for fighting class A and class B fires
US11865390B2 (en) 2017-12-03 2024-01-09 Mighty Fire Breaker Llc Environmentally-clean water-based fire inhibiting biochemical compositions, and methods of and apparatus for applying the same to protect property against wildfire
US11826592B2 (en) 2018-01-09 2023-11-28 Mighty Fire Breaker Llc Process of forming strategic chemical-type wildfire breaks on ground surfaces to proactively prevent fire ignition and flame spread, and reduce the production of smoke in the presence of a wild fire
WO2020247775A2 (en) 2019-06-07 2020-12-10 Frs Group, Llc Long-term fire retardant with corrosion inhibitors and methods for making and using same
AU2021400293A1 (en) 2020-12-15 2023-08-03 Frs Group, Llc Long-term fire retardant with magnesium sulfate and corrosion inhibitors and methods for making and using same
ES2812305B2 (en) * 2020-12-31 2021-05-26 Barricade Brs S L FLAME RETARDANT COMPOSITION
US11911643B2 (en) 2021-02-04 2024-02-27 Mighty Fire Breaker Llc Environmentally-clean fire inhibiting and extinguishing compositions and products for sorbing flammable liquids while inhibiting ignition and extinguishing fire
US20230310917A1 (en) * 2022-03-31 2023-10-05 Frs Group, Llc Long-term fire retardant with corrosion inhibitors and methods for making and using same

Family Cites Families (77)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US371066A (en) * 1887-10-04 Adam s
US3007879A (en) 1958-02-14 1961-11-07 Gen Mills Inc Stabilized gums and methods of making them
US3214372A (en) 1961-12-26 1965-10-26 Stop Fire Inc Dry chemical fire extinguisher composition
US3245904A (en) 1962-07-03 1966-04-12 Union Oil Co Fire retardant
US3223649A (en) 1962-11-06 1965-12-14 Monsanto Co Corrosion-inhibited phosphate solutions and compositions useful for manufacturing them
US3293189A (en) 1962-11-06 1966-12-20 Monsanto Co Corrosion-inhibited phosphate solutions and compositions useful for manufacturing them
US3196108A (en) 1962-12-06 1965-07-20 Arizona Agrochemical Corp Fire suppressing composition for aerial application
US3305305A (en) * 1962-12-26 1967-02-21 Hooker Chemical Corp Purification of phosphate solutions
US3309324A (en) 1963-12-23 1967-03-14 Monsanto Co Corrosion inhibited ammonium sulfate solutions and compositions useful for manufacturing them
US3338829A (en) 1964-05-06 1967-08-29 Monsanto Co Corrosion-inhibited ammonium orthophosphate solutions and compositions useful for manufacturing them
US3364149A (en) 1964-05-13 1968-01-16 Monsanto Co Corrosion-inhibited phosphate solutions and compositions useful for manufacturing them
US3350305A (en) 1964-05-19 1967-10-31 Monsanto Co Corrosion-inhibited phosphate firefighting solutions and compositions useful for manufacturing them
US3342749A (en) 1964-06-02 1967-09-19 Monsanto Co Corrosion inhibited phosphate solutions
US3354084A (en) 1964-06-24 1967-11-21 Dow Chemical Co Aqueous gel of water-swellable acrylic polymer and non-ionic filler
US3257316A (en) 1965-02-23 1966-06-21 Monsanto Co Corrosion-inhibited phosphate solutions and compositions useful for manufacturing them
US3275566A (en) 1965-09-16 1966-09-27 Monsanto Co Corrosion-inhibited phosphate solutions
US3409550A (en) 1965-12-30 1968-11-05 Shell Oil Co Fire retardant compositions
US3634234A (en) 1969-12-15 1972-01-11 Monsanto Co Stabilized ammonium phosphate solutions comprising a galactomannan gum and a metal salt
US3625716A (en) 1970-04-13 1971-12-07 Monsanto Co Methods of inhibiting corrosion with epoxy ethane polyphosphonate compositions
US3714066A (en) 1970-04-13 1973-01-30 Monsanto Co Methods of inhibiting corrosion with ethane diphosphonate compositions
US3730890A (en) 1971-12-03 1973-05-01 Early California Ind Fire retardant composition and method of production
US3955987A (en) 1974-04-19 1976-05-11 Monsanto Research Corporation Intumescent compositions and substrates coated therewith
US3960735A (en) 1974-08-15 1976-06-01 Early California Industries, Inc. Corrosion-inhibited polyphosphate compositions
US4168239A (en) 1974-09-23 1979-09-18 Petrolite Corporation Fire suppressing concentrates
US4101485A (en) 1976-05-28 1978-07-18 Monsanto Company Durable fire retardant for forest and rangelands
DE2728076A1 (en) 1977-06-22 1979-01-11 Harald Dipl Chem Dr Gottschall DRY EXTINGUISHING POWDER BASED ON GLUCONIC ACID SALT
US4145295A (en) * 1977-08-15 1979-03-20 Canadian Patents And Development Limited Cellulose ester ultra-filtration membranes and their manufacture
US4145296A (en) 1977-12-29 1979-03-20 Monsanto Company Weather-durable aqueous fire retardant stabilized against gelation
GB2013168B (en) 1978-01-28 1982-06-03 Fospur Ltd Corrosion inhibition
DE2807697A1 (en) 1978-02-23 1979-09-06 Basf Ag FIRE PROTECTION MATERIAL
JPS54138060A (en) 1978-04-19 1979-10-26 Nippon Koudoshi Kogyo Kk Manufacturing of flame retardant low-density cellulosic fiber board
US4272414A (en) 1978-05-26 1981-06-09 Monsanto Company Chemical retardants for forest fires
US4247435A (en) 1978-10-02 1981-01-27 Monsanto Company Intumescent fire retardant coating compositions
US4447336A (en) 1981-12-18 1984-05-08 Monsanto Company Stabilized galactomannan gum compositions
US4447337A (en) 1982-02-24 1984-05-08 Monsanto Company Stabiized galactomannan gum compositions
DE3225705A1 (en) * 1982-07-09 1984-01-12 A. Nattermann & Cie GmbH, 5000 Köln METHOD FOR APPLYING PLANT PROTECTION AGENT SPLASHES BY SPRAYING AND PACKING UNIT FOR CONCENTRATES
US4448841A (en) 1982-09-30 1984-05-15 The Sargom Company Limited Flame retardant compositions for textiles and treated textiles
US4459213A (en) 1982-12-30 1984-07-10 Secom Co., Ltd. Fire-extinguisher composition
US4652383A (en) 1985-02-14 1987-03-24 Energy & Minerals Research Co. Vinyl polymer gelling agent for powder dissemination composition
US4588510A (en) 1984-03-07 1986-05-13 University Of Dayton Intumescent fire extinguishing solutions
DE3716304A1 (en) 1987-05-15 1988-11-24 Bluecher Hubert EXTINGUISHING WATER ADDITION
US4978460A (en) 1985-05-03 1990-12-18 Bluecher Hubert Aqueous swollen macromolecule-containing system as water for firefighting
US4606831A (en) 1985-06-17 1986-08-19 Monsanto Company Stabilized galactomannan gum compositions
DE3780058T2 (en) 1986-04-07 1993-02-25 Kalk Chemische Fabrik Gmbh REACTIVE, FIRE-RETARDANT COMPOSITION FOR FLAME-RETARDING POLYURETHANE FOAM MATERIALS AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF.
US4770794A (en) 1986-07-07 1988-09-13 Wormald Canada Inc. Foam fire extinguishing compositions for aerial fire extinguishing
CA1303300C (en) 1986-10-25 1992-06-16 Derek A. Thacker Fire retardant composition
US4971728A (en) 1987-01-30 1990-11-20 Monsanto Company Method for the preparation of aqueous fire retarding concentrates
US4839065A (en) 1987-01-30 1989-06-13 Monsanto Company Fire retardant concentrates and methods for preparation thereof
US4983326A (en) 1987-01-30 1991-01-08 Monsanto Company Fire retardant concentrates and methods for preparation thereof
US4822524A (en) 1988-04-01 1989-04-18 Chemonics Industries, Inc. Xanthan gum enhanced fire-retardant compositions
ATE76167T1 (en) 1988-11-28 1992-05-15 Exibelco Gmbh CONNECTING ELEMENT.
JPH0720530B2 (en) 1989-07-27 1995-03-08 京葉プラントエンジニアリング株式会社 Corrosion control method for steel in carbon dioxide absorption process
US5294664A (en) 1991-01-24 1994-03-15 Day-Glo Color Corp. Aqueous dispersions of fluorescent pigments
DE69114259T2 (en) 1991-01-24 1996-06-20 Day Glo Color Corp Aqueous emulsions of synthetic resins that contain fluorescent dyes.
US5091097A (en) 1991-06-05 1992-02-25 Old Firehand Corporation Fire extinguishing and inhibiting material
FR2690627A1 (en) 1992-04-30 1993-11-05 Lafarge Nouveaux Materiaux Compositions useful for the prevention and / or fight against fire.
DE4343728C2 (en) 1993-12-21 1997-04-24 Gernot Dr Loehnert Process for the production of thickened water and its use
WO1996003477A1 (en) 1994-07-21 1996-02-08 Chemonics Industries, Inc. Fugitive color fire retardant composition for aerial application
US6162375A (en) 1994-07-21 2000-12-19 Fire-Trol Holdings, L.L.C. Fugitive color fire retardant composition for aerial application
US5801116A (en) 1995-04-07 1998-09-01 Rhodia Inc. Process for producing polysaccharides and their use as absorbent materials
GB2301122A (en) 1995-05-24 1996-11-27 Cyril Glass Flame retardant compositions
US6124394A (en) 1996-08-13 2000-09-26 Tosoh Corporation Fire-retardant tablet, and fire-retarding method, fire-retardant polymer composition and molded article employing the same
US5958117A (en) 1996-08-19 1999-09-28 Fire-Trol Holdings, L.L.C. Stabilized, corrosion-inhibited fire retardant compositions and methods
US5854309A (en) 1996-09-30 1998-12-29 Blount; David H. Flame retardant compositions utilizing amino condensation compounds
US5882541A (en) * 1996-11-04 1999-03-16 Hans Achtmann Biodegradable foam compositions for extinguishing fires
US5969011A (en) 1997-02-05 1999-10-19 Akzo Nobel Nv Sizing of paper
US6019176A (en) 1997-06-03 2000-02-01 Fire-Trol Holdings, L.L.C. Fire suppressants and methods of manufacture and use thereof
CA2321904C (en) 1998-02-27 2005-07-26 Solutia Inc. Fire retardant concentrates and methods for preparation thereof and the like
US6054515A (en) 1998-03-02 2000-04-25 Blount; David H. Flame retardant compounds and compositions
DE19832094A1 (en) 1998-07-16 2000-01-27 Consortium Elektrochem Ind Use of a water-dispersible silicon compound(s) and a water-soluble or dispersible phosphorous compound(s) in an aqueous polymer dispersion for e.g. adhesives and treating fibrous material
US6676858B2 (en) 1999-03-03 2004-01-13 Astaris Llc Colorant liquid, method of use, and wildland fire retardant liquids containing same
US6447697B1 (en) 1999-03-03 2002-09-10 Astaris, Llc Colorant liquid, method of use, and wildland fire retardant liquids containing same
US6323263B1 (en) 1999-11-11 2001-11-27 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Semiconductor sealing liquid epoxy resin compositions
US6611832B1 (en) 2000-10-30 2003-08-26 International Business Machines Corp. Data structure for longest-matching prefix searching and updating method for search table data structures
AU2002216632B2 (en) 2000-11-28 2006-01-12 Perimeter Solutions Lp Fire retardant compositions with reduced aluminum corrosivity
US6780991B2 (en) 2000-11-28 2004-08-24 Astaris Llc Biopolymer thickened fire retardant compositions
US6620348B1 (en) 2002-04-23 2003-09-16 Astaris, Llc Fire retardant compositions containing metal ferrites for reduced corrosivity

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6905639B2 (en) Fire retardant compositions with reduced aluminum corrosivity
US6852853B2 (en) Methods for preparation of biopolymer thickened fire retardant compositions
EP2280055B1 (en) Fire retardant compositions with reduced aluminum corrosivity
AU2002216632A1 (en) Fire retardant compositions with reduced aluminum corrosivity
AU2002211757A1 (en) Biopolymer thickened fire retardant compositions
US6846437B2 (en) Ammonium polyphosphate solutions containing multi-functional phosphonate corrosion inhibitors
AU2002235123A1 (en) Fire retardant compositions containing ammonium polyphosphate and iron additives for corrosion inhibition
CA2268941C (en) Fire retardants and methods of manufacture and use thereof
CA2423752C (en) Fire retardant compositions containing metal ferrites for reduced corrosivity