WO2019155669A1

WO2019155669A1 - Information processing device, control method, and program

Info

Publication number: WO2019155669A1
Application number: PCT/JP2018/033153
Authority: WO
Inventors: 芳直北野; 忠則園田
Original assignee: 日本電気株式会社
Priority date: 2018-02-07
Filing date: 2018-09-07
Publication date: 2019-08-15
Also published as: CN111699447B; CN111699447A; JP7040541B2; JPWO2019155669A1

Abstract

An information processing device (2000) generates a first display screen (10) that includes a first graph (12), and outputs the generated first display screen (10). The first graph (12) shows the times relating to a plurality of kinds of losses and net operation time for each of a number of facilities. The information processing device (2000) receives an input for selecting one of the facilities in the first graph (12). The information processing device (2000) that has received the input operation generates a second display screen (20) that includes a second graph (22) for the facility selected by the input operation, and outputs the generated second display screen (20). The second graph (22) for the selected facility time-sequentially shows the occurrence time length of each of the losses in the facility.

Description

Information processing apparatus, control method, and program

The present invention relates to a loss in operation of equipment.

A system has been developed to handle losses that occur during work in factories. For example, Patent Document 1 discloses NC data for operating a production facility when a time required for mounting one board circuit (mounting tact) is longer than a standard in a production operation of the production facility, that is, when a tact loss occurs. Is disclosed to correct the content to reduce the tact loss.

JP 2002-111298 A

The present inventor has discovered a new technique for facilitating the grasp of information on loss. The present invention has been made in view of the above-described problems, and one of its purposes is to provide a new technique for facilitating grasping of information relating to loss.

The information processing apparatus according to the present invention 1) generates a first display screen including a first graph representing a time of each of a plurality of types of losses and a net operating time for each of the plurality of facilities in operation of the facility, and the generated first display A first generation unit that outputs a screen, 2) an input reception unit that receives an input operation for selecting any of the facilities in the first graph, and 3) a long occurrence time of each loss for the facility selected by the input operation A second generation unit that generates and outputs a second display screen including a second graph that represents the time in time series.

The control method of the present invention is a control method executed by a computer. The control method 1) generates a first display screen including a first graph representing the time of each of a plurality of types of losses and the net operating time for each of the plurality of facilities in operation of the facility, and outputs the generated first display screen A first generation step, 2) an input reception step for accepting an input operation for selecting any of the facilities in the first graph, and 3) the length of the time of occurrence of each loss for the facility selected by the input operation. A second generation step of generating and outputting a second display screen including a second graph represented by a series.

The program of the present invention causes a computer to execute each step of the control method of the present invention.

According to the present invention, a new technology that makes it easy to grasp information related to loss is provided.

The above-described object and other objects, features, and advantages will be further clarified by a preferred embodiment described below and the following drawings attached thereto.

It is a figure which shows notionally the process which the information processing apparatus (information processing apparatus shown in FIG. 2) of this embodiment performs. 2 is a diagram illustrating a functional configuration of the information processing apparatus according to the first embodiment. FIG. It is a figure which illustrates the computer for implement | achieving information processing apparatus. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a flow of processing executed by the information processing apparatus according to the first embodiment. It is a figure which illustrates loss information in a table format. It is a figure which illustrates the variation of the output method of a 1st display screen. It is a figure which illustrates the position of the 1st graph in the 1st display screen and the 2nd display screen. It is a figure which illustrates the 1st display screen of a usage example. It is a figure which illustrates the 2nd display screen.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In all the drawings, the same reference numerals are given to the same components, and the description will be omitted as appropriate. Also, unless otherwise specified, in each block diagram, each block represents a functional unit configuration, not a hardware unit configuration.

[Embodiment 1]
<Overview>
FIG. 1 is a diagram conceptually showing processing performed by the information processing apparatus (information processing apparatus 2000 shown in FIG. 2) of the present embodiment. The information processing apparatus 2000 is an apparatus that generates a display including a graph regarding a loss time in operation of equipment in a factory or the like. The equipment is, for example, a line or a device. Loss is a factor that hinders the full use of the capabilities of equipment.

First, the information processing apparatus 2000 generates the first display screen 10 including the first graph 12 and outputs the generated first display screen 10. The first graph 12 is a graph representing the time and net operating time of each of a plurality of types of losses for each facility. For example, in FIG. 1, the first graph 12 is a band graph representing the ratio of each time and net operating time of three types of loss (loss 1, loss 2, and loss 3) for each device.

“The time of loss” is the time from the time when the loss occurs until the time when the loss ends. The net operating time is the time during which no loss has occurred in the time during which the equipment is operating. For example, if a facility is operated for 12 hours on a certain day and at least one loss occurs in 4 hours, the net operation time is 8 hours.

The information processing apparatus 2000 receives an input for selecting any of the facilities in the first graph 12. For example, the input operation is an operation of touching the touch panel on which the first display screen 10 is displayed. Note that the first display screen 10 is not necessarily displayed on the touch panel. Variations in the input operation will be described later.

The information processing apparatus 2000 that has received the input operation generates the second display screen 20 including the second graph 22 for the facility selected by the input operation, and outputs the generated second display screen 20. The 2nd graph 22 about the selected installation shows the length of generation time of each loss in the installation in time series.

For example, in FIG. 1, an input operation for selecting the facility 1 is performed for the first graph 12. Therefore, the information processing apparatus 2000 generates the second display screen 20 including the second graph 22 for the facility 1. The second graph 22 in FIG. 1 is a line graph representing the length of occurrence time of loss 1, loss 2, and loss 3 in the facility 1 in time series for each time zone (for example, every hour).

<Effect>
According to the information processing apparatus 2000 of the present embodiment, the first display screen 10 including the first graph 12 representing the time of each of a plurality of types of loss and the net operation time for each facility is output. As a result, it is possible to easily grasp information such as how long each loss has occurred in each facility, how long the net operating time is, and what is the ratio between each loss and net operating time. .

Further, the facility is selected for the first display screen 10, and the second display screen 20 including the second graph 22 that represents the length of the occurrence time of each loss in the selected facility in time series is output.
Thereby, the detailed data of the loss in the facility which a user pays attention to can be confirmed easily.

Hereinafter, the information processing apparatus 2000 of the present embodiment will be described in more detail.

<Example of Functional Configuration of Information Processing Device 2000>
FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a functional configuration of the information processing apparatus 2000 according to the first embodiment. The information processing apparatus 2000 includes a first generation unit 2020, an input reception unit 2040, and a second generation unit 2060. The first generation unit 2020 generates the first display screen 10 including the first graph 12 and outputs the generated first display screen 10. The first graph 12 represents the time and net operating time of each of a plurality of types of losses in the operation of the facility for each facility. The input receiving unit 2040 receives an input operation for selecting any facility in the first graph 12. The second generation unit 2060 generates the second display screen 20 including the second graph 22 for the facility selected by the input operation, and outputs the generated second display screen 20. The second graph 22 represents the length of loss occurrence time in a time series for the selected equipment.

<Hardware Configuration of Information Processing Device 2000>
Each functional component of the information processing apparatus 2000 may be realized by hardware (eg, a hard-wired electronic circuit) that implements each functional component, or a combination of hardware and software (eg: It may be realized by a combination of an electronic circuit and a program for controlling it). Hereinafter, the case where each functional component of the information processing apparatus 2000 is realized by a combination of hardware and software will be further described.

FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a computer 1000 for realizing the information processing apparatus 2000. The computer 1000 is an arbitrary computer. For example, the computer 1000 is a personal computer (PC) or a server machine. The computer 1000 may be a dedicated computer designed for realizing the information processing apparatus 2000 or a general-purpose computer.

The computer 1000 includes a bus 1020, a processor 1040, a memory 1060, a storage device 1080, an input / output interface 1100, and a network interface 1120. The bus 1020 is a data transmission path through which the processor 1040, the memory 1060, the storage device 1080, the input / output interface 1100, and the network interface 1120 transmit / receive data to / from each other. However, the method of connecting the processors 1040 and the like is not limited to bus connection.

The processor 1040 is various processors such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit), and an FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array). The memory 1060 is a main storage device realized using a RAM (Random Access Memory) or the like. The storage device 1080 is an auxiliary storage device realized by using a hard disk, an SSD (Solid State Drive), a memory card, or a ROM (Read Only Memory).

The input / output interface 1100 is an interface for connecting the computer 1000 and an input / output device. For example, the input / output interface 1100 is connected to an input device such as a keyboard and an output device such as a display device. The network interface 1120 is an interface for connecting the computer 1000 to a communication network. This communication network is, for example, “LAN (Local Area Network)” or “WAN (Wide Area Network)”. A method of connecting the network interface 1120 to the communication network may be a wireless connection or a wired connection.

The storage device 1080 stores a program module that implements each functional component of the information processing apparatus 2000. The processor 1040 implements a function corresponding to each program module by reading each program module into the memory 1060 and executing the program module.

<Process flow>
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating the flow of processing executed by the information processing apparatus 2000 according to the first embodiment. The first generation unit 2020 generates the first display screen 10 including the first graph 12 (S102). The first generation unit 2020 outputs the first display screen 10 (S104). The input receiving unit 2040 receives an input operation for selecting any facility in the first graph 12 (S106). The 2nd production | generation part 2060 produces | generates the 2nd display screen 20 containing the 2nd graph 22 about the installation selected by input operation (S108). The second generation unit 2060 outputs the second display screen 20 (S110).

<About Ross>
The information processing apparatus 2000 handles information on a plurality of types of loss in work. For example, as this loss, it is possible to employ each loss included in the seven major losses used for evaluating the operation efficiency of equipment in a factory or the like. The seven major losses include, for example, setup loss, cutting tool loss, production preparation loss, failure stop loss, defect loss, interference loss, and speed loss.

The setup loss is a loss associated with the setup work. The setup work is a preparation work for changing an object created by the apparatus. For example, this preparation includes an operation of changing a mold set in the apparatus. The blade loss is a loss associated with replacement of the blade. More specifically, the cutting tool loss is a loss such as a periodic loss of a cutting tool, a time loss associated with replacement due to cutting, a defective product produced before and after the replacement, and a time required for repairing the defective product. . The production preparation loss is a loss associated with production preparation. The preparation for production is, for example, operation of the apparatus. The failure stop loss is a loss due to a stop due to equipment failure. The defect loss is a loss due to a defect occurring in the generated product. The interference loss is a waiting loss that occurs when facilities interfere with each other between facilities and facilities or between facilities and workers. As a more specific example, interference loss refers to the case where equipment is stopped due to temporary equipment failure or when work is linked between the idle equipment and other equipment. This is a loss associated with the exchange of objects between devices. Or when the other apparatus which cooperates needs to wait for completion of the operation | work by the said failure installation, an interference loss is a loss accompanying the stagnation (waiting) of the operation | work in the said other apparatus. In another example, for example, it is assumed that the device B uses a component generated by the device A. In this case, it takes time to deliver the part generated by the device A to the device B. This time becomes an interference loss in the apparatus B. A speed loss is a loss caused by the speed at which the apparatus manufactures an object being slower than a reference speed.

Here, the setup loss, the cutting tool loss, and the production preparation loss are all losses caused by work performed by a person. Therefore, these three losses may be combined and handled as one loss. The combined loss of these three losses is called a human work time loss.

<Generation of First Display Screen 10: S102>
The first generation unit 2020 generates the first display screen 10 (S102). For this purpose, the first generation unit 2020 generates the first graph 12 included in the first display screen 10. As described above, the first graph 12 represents the time and net operating time of each of the plurality of types of losses for each facility.

In order to generate the first graph 12, the first generation unit 2020 acquires loss information. Loss information is information which shows the time of each of multiple types of loss, and net operation time for every installation. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating loss information in a table format. The table shown in FIG. The table 200 includes an equipment identifier 202, a data type 204, a time 206, a start time 208, and an end time 210. The equipment identifier 202 indicates an equipment identifier.

In the case of data relating to loss, the data type 204 indicates the type of loss (such as setup loss or cutting tool loss). Time 206 represents the length of the loss. Furthermore, the start time 208 indicates the time when the loss starts, and the end time 210 indicates the time when the loss ends. In other words, the start time 208 indicates the time when the loss occurs, and the end time 210 indicates the time when the cause of the loss is resolved.

On the other hand, if the data is related to the net operating time, the data type 204 indicates that the data is related to the net operating time. The time 206 indicates the length of the net operation time. Furthermore, the start time 208 indicates the time when the operation of the facility is started, and the end time 210 indicates the time when the operation of the facility is completed.

The time 206 is a value obtained by subtracting the start time 208 from the end time 210. Therefore, the table 200 may not include the time 206. In this case, the first generation unit 2020 calculates the length of the loss and the length of the net operation time by subtracting the start time 208 from the end time 210.

When the same loss occurs several times in a certain facility, the total time of the loss in the facility can be calculated by integrating the time of the loss indicated by the loss information.

The first generation unit 2020 generates a first graph using the loss information, and generates a first display screen including the generated first graph. Here, various types of graphs can be adopted as the first graph. However, it is preferable that the 1st graph 12 is a graph which can compare each loss and the length of net operation time. An example of such a graph is a stacked bar graph. This stacked bar graph may be one in which the lengths of loss and net operating time are stacked in the vertical direction, or may be stacked in the horizontal direction.

The first graph 12 may indicate the loss or net operating time as an absolute value or a relative value. In the latter case, for example, the first graph 12 shows the length of each loss and net operating time with respect to the total operation time as a percentage.

The 1st graph 12 shows the length of the loss and net operation time in a predetermined operation period. For example, the predetermined operation period is one day, one week, or one month. The predetermined operation period may be determined in advance or may be set by the user of the information processing apparatus 2000. Further, the predetermined operation period may be the most recent period (for example, the most recent day or the most recent one week), or may be a period determined by the user's selection.

It is preferable that the first graph 12 includes all of the seven major losses described above. However, some of the seven major losses may be collectively handled as one loss. For example, as described above, it is possible to employ a method in which a setup loss, a cutting tool loss, and a production preparation loss are handled as one loss called a human work time loss. Further, the first graph 12 does not necessarily include all of the seven major losses. Which loss is included in the first graph 12 may be determined in advance or may be set by the user of the information processing apparatus 2000.

The first graph 12 may include only the graph for the line, may include only the graph for the device, or may include the graph for both the line and the device. When the graph for both the line and the device is included in the first graph 12, it is preferable that each device included in the first graph 12 is a device included in one of the lines included in the first graph 12. .

When the graph for both the line and the device is included in the first graph 12, the format of the first graph 12 for the line and the format of the first graph 12 for the device may be the same, May be different. For example, in the specific example described later, the first graph 12 for the line is a vertical stacked bar graph, and the first graph 12 for the device is a horizontal stacked bar graph. The format of the first graph 12 may be determined in advance or may be set by the user of the information processing apparatus 2000.

Note that the settings related to the first graph 12 (such as the predetermined operation period, the type of loss, or the format of the graph described above) may be changed by the user after the first display screen 10 is output.

Here, the first display screen 10 generated by the first generation unit 2020 may be an image representing the first display screen 10, or an image representing the first display screen 10 is generated by performing predetermined processing. Data that can be used. An example of the latter is an “HTML” file. When the first display screen 10 is generated as an “HTML” file, an image representing the first display screen 10 is generated by processing the HTML file with an application such as a browser.

<Output of first display screen: S104>
The first generation unit 2020 outputs the first display screen 10. There are various output methods for the first display screen 10. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a variation of the output method of the first display screen.

6, the first generation unit 2020 displays the first display screen 10 on the display device 30 connected to the information processing device 2000. On the other hand, in the lower case of FIG. 6, the first generation unit 2020 transmits the first display screen 10 to the external terminal 40 that is communicably connected to the information processing apparatus 2000. Then, the external terminal 40 displays the first display screen 10 on the display device 50 connected to the external terminal 40. In the lower case of FIG. 6, for example, the information processing apparatus 2000 functions as a server apparatus, and the external terminal 40 functions as a client apparatus.

<Input to Information Processing Device 2000: S106>
The input receiving unit 2040 receives an input operation for selecting any facility in the first graph 12 (S106). Here, when a graph for a plurality of objects (equipment in the first graph 12) is displayed, an existing technique may be used as a technique for receiving an input for selecting any one of the objects. it can.

<Generation of first display screen: S108>
The second generation unit 2060 generates the second display screen 20 (S108). The second display screen 20 includes a second graph 22 for the facility selected by the input operation. The second graph 22 represents the length of occurrence time of each loss in time series.

Here, in order to display the length of the loss occurrence time in time series, the length of the loss occurrence time is expressed for each predetermined time zone. An arbitrary length such as one hour or one day can be adopted as the length of this time zone (that is, the granularity of the second graph 22 in the time direction). The length of the time zone may be set in advance, or may be set by the user of the information processing apparatus 2000. The length of the time zone may be changed by an input operation after the second display screen 20 is displayed.

Here, the second graph 22 is preferably generated for each type of loss. For example, when the second display screen 20 includes the second graph 22 for seven large losses, the seven second graphs 22 are included in the second display screen 20.

However, there are cases where several losses are combined into one, such as the case where the above-mentioned human work time loss is adopted. In this case, it is preferable to generate one second graph 22 collectively for a plurality of losses combined into one. The second graph 22 in which information about a plurality of losses is collected may indicate the data of each loss separately, or may indicate one data obtained by adding the times of the plurality of losses.

The format of the second graph 22 can be any format that can represent time-series data. For example, a line graph, a bar graph, or a scatter diagram can be used.

Here, the second display screen 20 may include not only the second graph 22 but also the first graph 12. At this time, it is not always necessary to include the first graph 12 for all facilities in the second graph 22. However, it is preferable that at least the first graph 12 about the equipment selected by the input operation received by the input receiving unit 2040 is included in the second display screen 20. By doing so, the first graph 12 and the second graph 22 for the selected equipment can be viewed at the same time, so that the user can easily grasp the information about the selected equipment (that is, the equipment noted by the user). .

Also, when the first graph 12 other than the selected equipment is also included in the second display screen 20, it is preferable that the selected equipment can be distinguished from other equipment on the second display screen 20. For example, in the first graph 12 included in the second display screen 20, information about the selected equipment is highlighted (highlighted, surrounded by a frame, etc.).

The position of the first graph 12 on the second display screen 20 may be the same as or different from the position of the first graph 12 on the first display screen 10. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating the position of the first graph 12 on the first display screen 10 and the second display screen 20. In the upper example of FIG. 7, the first graph 12 is included on the left side of the first display screen 10, and the right side is blank. On the second display screen 20, the second graph 22 is displayed in a portion that is blank on the first display screen 10. However, this portion does not necessarily need to be blank in the first display screen 10. For example, the coordinate axis of the second graph 22 or the like may be included in this portion in advance (refer to a usage example described later).

7, the position of the first graph 12 on the first display screen 10 and the position of the first graph 12 on the second display screen 20 are different from each other. Specifically, on the first display screen 10, a first graph 12 is displayed near the center. On the other hand, on the second display screen 20, the first graph 12 is displayed on the left side and the second graph 22 is displayed on the right side, as in the upper example of FIG.

7, the first graph 12 on the first display screen 10 may be made larger than the first graph 12 on the second display screen 20. For example, on the first display screen 10, the size of the first graph 12 is made substantially the same as the entire screen, and on the second display screen 20, the first graph 12 is reduced to about the left half of the second display screen 20. To the size of

<Output of second display screen 20: S110>
The second generation unit 2060 outputs the generated second display screen 20 (S110). Here, as the output method of the second display screen 20, the same output method as that of the first display screen 10 can be adopted.

<Input Operation for Second Display Screen 20>
Here, when the first graph 12 is also included in the second display screen 20, the information processing apparatus 2000 may treat the second display screen 20 as the first display screen 10. In this case, the input receiving unit 2040 receives an input for selecting equipment for the first graph 12 included in the second display screen 20. As a result, the second generation unit 2060 generates and outputs the second display screen 20 including the second graph 22 for the selected facility.

[Usage example]
Here, a specific usage example of the information processing apparatus 2000 will be described. The usage example shown here is an example of a situation in which the information processing apparatus 2000 is used to facilitate understanding of the information processing apparatus 2000, and limits the situation in which the information processing apparatus 2000 is used. is not.

FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating the first display screen 10 of the usage example. On the left side of the first display screen 10, a first graph 12 is shown. On the right side, the coordinate axes of the second graph 22 are shown.

In the first graph 12, the data for each line is shown on the upper side. On the other hand, data for each device is shown on the lower side.

The loss handled in this usage example includes the seven major losses described above. However, in the first graph 12, the setup loss, the cutting tool loss, and the production preparation loss are treated as one loss called a human work time loss. Losses other than the seven major losses are summarized as “Other”.

When any facility included in the first graph 12 is selected, a second display screen 20 including the second graph 22 for the facility is generated. FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating the second display screen 20. In FIG. 9, the K device is selected. Therefore, a second graph 22 showing the time of occurrence of each loss in the K device in time series is displayed. Here, in the 2nd display screen 20, in the 1st graph 12 about the selected installation, the name of an installation and the data regarding the installation are each enclosed with the thick frame.

The second graph 22-1 is a graph of the loss of man work time in the K device. Here, the second graph 22-1 displays data indicating the lengths of the setup loss, the cutting tool loss, and the production preparation loss.

The second graph 22-2 is a graph about the failure stop loss in the K device.

The second graph 22-3 is a graph regarding the defect loss in the K device. This graph includes data indicating the defect rate in addition to data indicating the length of the defect loss. The defective rate is the ratio of defective products to the total number of products produced.

The second graph 22-4 is a graph regarding speed loss and interference loss in the K device. This graph includes data indicating cycle time and data indicating machine time. Here, the cycle time means the time required for one work process, and the machine time means the time during which the machine is working among the time required for one work process. That is, the difference between the cycle time and the machine time is the transfer time between processes, and becomes longer when the work object cannot be transferred from the previous process for some reason or the work object cannot be transferred to the subsequent process. Of the transfer time between processes, the time exceeding the transfer reference time is an interference loss.

In the second graph 22-4, the interference loss can be grasped by comparing the cycle time with the machine time. In addition, the data indicating the difference between the cycle time and the machine time, the data indicating the transport reference time, the data directly indicating the interference loss (data obtained by further subtracting the transport reference time from the difference between the cycle time and the machine time), etc. 2 may be included in the graph 22-4.

The speed loss time is the difference between the actual time required for the device to produce an object and the reference time determined based on the reference speed. That is, the speed loss time is the difference between the actual machine time (measured machine time in FIG. 9) and the ideal machine time. Therefore, for example, the speed loss can be grasped from the measured machine time data shown in the second graph 22-4. Note that data representing the ideal machine time and data representing the speed loss directly (data representing the difference between the measured machine time and the ideal machine time) may be included in the second graph 22-4.

As described above, the embodiments of the present invention have been described with reference to the drawings. However, these are exemplifications of the present invention, and various configurations other than the above can be adopted.

A part or all of the above-described embodiment can be described as in the following supplementary notes, but is not limited thereto.
1. A first generation unit that generates a first display screen including a first graph representing each of a plurality of types of loss and a net operating time for each of the plurality of facilities in the operation of the facility, and outputs the generated first display screen; ,
An input receiving unit for receiving an input operation for selecting any of the facilities in the first graph;
An information processing apparatus comprising: a second generation unit configured to generate and output a second display screen including a second graph representing the length of occurrence time of each loss in time series for the facility selected by the input operation.
2. The second generation unit includes at least the first graph for the selected equipment in the second display screen. The information processing apparatus described in 1.
3. The plurality of facilities includes at least one of both a line and an apparatus,
The first display screen includes the first graph for one or more lines and the first graph for each device included in each of the one or more lines. Or 2. The information processing apparatus described in 1.
4). The types of loss include loss associated with setup work (setup loss), loss associated with blade replacement (blade loss), loss associated with production preparation (production preparation loss), and loss due to equipment failure (failure stop). Loss), loss associated with the exchange of components between devices (interference loss), loss due to the occurrence of defects in the generated components (defect loss), loss associated with the processing speed of the device being lower than expected (speed loss) Any one or more of 1. To 3. The information processing apparatus according to any one of the above.

5). A control method executed by a computer,
A first generation step of generating a first display screen including a first graph representing a time of each of a plurality of types of losses and a net operating time for each of the plurality of facilities in operation of the facility, and outputting the generated first display screen; ,
An input receiving step of receiving an input operation for selecting any equipment in the first graph;
A control method comprising: a second generation step of generating and outputting a second display screen including a second graph representing the length of occurrence time of each loss in time series for the equipment selected by the input operation.
6). 4. In the second generation step, at least the first graph for the selected equipment is included in the second display screen. The control method described in 1.
7). The plurality of facilities includes at least one of both a line and an apparatus,
4. The first display screen includes the first graph for one or more lines and the first graph for each device included in each of the one or more lines. Or 6. The control method described in 1.
8). The types of loss include loss associated with setup work (setup loss), loss associated with blade replacement (blade loss), loss associated with production preparation (production preparation loss), loss due to equipment failure (failure stop) Loss), loss associated with the exchange of components between devices (interference loss), loss due to the occurrence of defects in the generated components (defect loss), loss associated with the processing speed of the device being lower than expected (speed loss) 4. a plurality of any of the above. To 7. The control method as described in any one.

9. 5. To 8. A program for causing a computer to execute each step of the control method according to any one of the above.

This application claims priority based on Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-019929 filed on Feb. 7, 2018, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein.

Claims

A first generation unit that generates a first display screen including a first graph representing each of a plurality of types of loss and a net operating time for each of the plurality of facilities in the operation of the facility, and outputs the generated first display screen; ,
An input receiving unit for receiving an input operation for selecting any of the facilities in the first graph;
An information processing apparatus comprising: a second generation unit configured to generate and output a second display screen including a second graph representing the length of occurrence time of each loss in time series for the facility selected by the input operation.
The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the second generation unit includes at least the first graph for the selected facility in the second display screen.
The plurality of facilities includes at least one of both a line and an apparatus,
The first display screen includes the first graph for each of one or more lines, and the first graph for each device included in each of the one or more lines. Information processing device.
The types of loss include loss associated with setup work (setup loss), loss associated with blade replacement (blade loss), loss associated with production preparation (production preparation loss), and loss due to equipment failure (failure stop). Loss), loss associated with the exchange of components between devices (interference loss), loss due to the occurrence of defects in the generated components (defect loss), loss associated with the processing speed of the device being lower than expected (speed loss) The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the information processing apparatus is any one of the plurality.
A control method executed by a computer,
A first generation step of generating a first display screen including a first graph representing a time of each of a plurality of types of losses and a net operating time for each of the plurality of facilities in operation of the facility, and outputting the generated first display screen; ,
An input receiving step of receiving an input operation for selecting any equipment in the first graph;
A control method comprising: a second generation step of generating and outputting a second display screen including a second graph representing the length of occurrence time of each loss in time series for the equipment selected by the input operation.
The control method according to claim 5, wherein, in the second generation step, at least the first graph for the selected equipment is included in the second display screen.
The plurality of facilities includes at least one of both a line and an apparatus,
The first display screen includes the first graph for each of one or more lines and the first graph for each device included in each of the one or more lines. Control method.
The types of loss include loss associated with setup work (setup loss), loss associated with blade replacement (blade loss), loss associated with production preparation (production preparation loss), and loss due to equipment failure (failure stop). Loss), loss associated with the exchange of components between devices (interference loss), loss due to the occurrence of defects in the generated components (defect loss), loss associated with the processing speed of the device being lower than expected (speed loss) The control method according to claim 5, wherein the control method is any one of the plurality.
A program for causing a computer to execute each step of the control method according to any one of claims 5 to 8.