EP2117420A1

EP2117420A1 - Method for measuring information of technical and biological systems

Info

Publication number: EP2117420A1
Application number: EP08706362A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Ralf Otte
Original assignee: tecData AG
Current assignee: tecData AG
Priority date: 2007-02-15
Filing date: 2008-02-14
Publication date: 2009-11-18
Also published as: US20100102207A1; WO2008098400A1; DE102007008021A1; US20100030059A1; EP2120685A1; US20100036615A1; EP2122869A1; WO2008098401A1; WO2008098402A1

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for measuring potential information of a biological or technical system. The aim of the invention is to receive signals using less energy. To achieve this, random generators are used as receivers of low-energy quanta, since the random generators can be regarded and implemented as antennae and receivers of signals of this type. The extensive natural transmission range of low-energy quanta can also be used to receive potential information from systems.

Description

METHOD FOR MEASURING INFORMATION OF TECHNICAL AND

BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS

The invention relates to a method for measuring information from technical and biological systems.

The method is suitable for measuring the future potential entropy and information state of a technical installation or a biological system.

It is well known to detect information by measurement by means of suitable procedures to send, transmit, receive and evaluate. ¹

A disadvantage of the conventional methods is that a relatively large amount of energy must be applied to convey information. Even the most modern mobile phones have some watts or milliwatts of transmission power to transmit the information of a language.

To transmit the information (messages) by means of electromagnetic waves, the messages are modulated onto a carrier wave of suitable frequency and power (e.g., amplitude or frequency modulation) and transmitted, and this modulated carrier wave can then be received, decoded, and processed by a receiver. Suitable receivers for electromagnetic waves are antennas of suitable length (λ / 2 or λ / 4 dipoles) or other resonators with suitable wave or radiation resistance. It is state of the art to receive or transmit waves having a frequency of, for example, 30 kHz to 30 THz, which corresponds to wavelengths of 10 km to 10 μm. Waves of higher frequencies, e.g. Infrared or optical frequencies are also technically processed, further, in some specialized physical disciplines (e.g., nuclear physics) one employs electromagnetic waves of extremely high frequency and energy, e.g. with gamma rays.

¹ Fritsche, Witzschel: Information Transfer, VEB Verlag Technik, Berlin, 1989 Problematic or partially impossible, however, is the reception, processing and transmission of electromagnetic long-wave waves, ie waves whose frequency is in the extremely low range, eg in the heart area, which thus have wavelengths of several hundred or thousand kilometers. This is therefore technically difficult, since for the reception resonators (oscillating circuits) with extremely low resonance frequency and yet suitable characteristic impedance are necessary, which requires antenna systems of very large spatial extent. There are technical approaches to use the earth's ionosphere itself as an antenna and thus to generate or manipulate waves of very large wavelength, which however requires a very large amount of equipment and thus remains reserved for a few institutions. But even these approaches fail if you want to receive electromagnetic waves with several 10,000 km wavelength.

Furthermore, it is known that the waves have both particle and wave characteristics and that the associated properties can be determined with different measurement methods. It is state of the art that electromagnetic waves consist of quanta that obey the laws of quantum physics. An example is the well-known double-slit experiment, which shows the wave character of such photons or quanta, while other experiments, such as measuring the radiation pressure, illustrate the particle character of such quanta ² .

Since there is a clear mathematical relationship between frequency and energy, it is not possible in the current state of the art to detect quanta, e.g. electromagnetic quanta, with extremely low energy (frequency) to receive or send targeted.

The invention has for its object to provide a method and a device with which quanta, so-called. Low energy or Niedrigstenergiequanten - so quantum with energies below 10 ^'32 Joule - can be measured, received and evaluated in order to realize novel applications ,

^: DI Blochiπzew: Fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics, Publisher Harri Deutsch, Frankfurt, 1988 This object is achieved by a method specified in claim 1 for measuring potential information of technical or biological systems in which the low-energy signals are received and evaluated by suitable receivers, so-called random number generators, wherein the physical relationship between frequency and energy according to E = h * f is used (with E being the energy of a quantum, f its frequency and h = 6.626 * ^10'34 Js, the so-called Planck's constant ³ ) to determine the energy of the signal to be received and the random number generators as receiver or Transmitters designed such low energy signals.

Advantageous embodiments are disclosed in the subclaims.

The new approach to the measurement of lowest energies and thus lowest frequencies creates previously unknown technical applications.

In support of the understanding of the invention, in parallel with the law of conservation of energy, an information conservation theorem of nature is postulated, stating that information can not be lost. Information can only be converted - as well as energy - from one form (e.g., random information = entropy) to another form (structure information), i.

Overall information I = structure information S + random information H + residual information U

I = S + H + U (1.1)

U stands for a possibly yet to be introduced unknown type of information. The moment random information H turns into structure information S through semantic knowledge, equation (1.1) has not changed the overall information I of an object.

From the o.g. Parallels between conservation of energy and preservation of information show that an entropy exchange (information exchange) must occur between two objects with different entropy density (information density).

¹ Brandt, Dahmen: Quantum mechanics on the personal computer, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993 Just as there is an energy exchange between two objects of different energy until the energy difference is balanced.

If there is an entropy difference ΔH = Hi - H ₂ between two objects 1 and 2 and a possible possibility of compensation, then the following applies to the entropy flux HF:

H _F ~ ΔH (1.2)

The entropy flux HF is proportional to the entropy gradient of the two objects and is directed so that the entropy from the object higher entropy (eg Hi) to the object of low entropy (eg H ₂ ) flows off until an entropy balance has taken place.

By the relationship (1.1) between entropy H and information I, the entropy transmission can be set equal to an information transmission, i. Information transfer and entropy transfer are treated as equivalent in the description because they are mathematically interconvertible. For example, a bit string of 20 bits has a total information of 20 bits. How many bits of it are structure information and how much random information always depends on the context, but both are interconvertible. In the following, however, simplified talk is made of entropy transmission.

It is known that the exchange of information between two objects by so-called. Quantum (eg quanta of the electromagnetic field, ie photons) of a given energy or frequency. It is customary in this case to receive quanta of a specific energy, which are emitted as an electromagnetic wave with the wavelength λ, by means of special devices and methods. The usual oscillating circuits are those used in every radio receiver. The resonant circuit must be tuned to the frequency f of the wave (with f = λ / c with c is the speed of light) and for receiving one needs an antenna. It is known that the antenna ought to obey, inter alia, the λ / 4 law, ie the length of the antenna dipole should be λ, λ / 2 or λ / 4 ⁴ .

⁴ Liebscher: Broadcasting, television, sound storage technology, VEB Verlag Technik, Berlin, 1981 It is also known that these methods and devices can only receive waves up to a certain wavelength, for example, longitudinal waves. Waves with even greater wavelength (eg 10000 km and more) and thus extremely low frequency and low energy are not receivable according to the current state of the art.

For example, conventional television waves have a frequency> 30 MHz, i. Wavelengths of <10 meters. Conventional LW radio waves have a frequency of> 30 kHz, i. Wavelengths <10 kilometers. In this area usually vary the electromagnetic radio waves and frequencies of common technical applications. However, there are many technical applications with much higher frequencies, e.g. Microwaves (λ = 1 mm to 1 m, f = 300 MHz to 300 GHz), spectroscopy (λ = 30 microns to 3 mm, f = 0.1 THz to 10 THz) or infrared remote operations (λ = 780 nm to 1 mm, f > 300 GHz). Longitudinal waves, such as have been received and / or sent by special systems, for example, have a frequency of 3 kHz and thus a wavelength <100 km. The reception of waves (quanta) with a wavelength of several hundred or a thousand kilometers is currently not technically possible or only with extremely great effort.

It is the object of the invention to develop methods for measuring information, which makes it possible to receive waves of extremely large wavelengths (up to several thousand kilometers and more) and thus extremely low energy.

According to the generally known equations λ = c / f and E = h * f with h «6.63 * 10 ^'34 Js, for example, 8 Hz corresponds to the following wavelength and thus the following energy of the 8 Hz quanta: λ« 37,500 km and E = 5.3 * 10 ^"33 years

From the Heisenberg blur theorem ⁵

Δp * Δx> h (2.1.)

⁵ W. Heisenberg: "On the Illustrative Content of Quantum Theory Kinematics and Mechanics" 1927, in "Documents of Natural Science", Physics, Battenberg Verlag, Stuttgart, 1963 where Δp is the accuracy of the momentum, Δx is the accuracy of the location, and h Planck's quantum of effect is that these 8 Hz quanta above the location of 37,500 km are indeterminate.

For the further description the following terms are introduced (the classification is simplified and serves only the term clarification, the physically exact limits are to be taken from the literature):

The invention makes it possible to receive LEQ quanta or LSTEQ quanta, while other quanta (e.g., radio quanta) can also be received. Today, there are technical solutions (radio, television, mobile phone receivers) for the reception of radio quanta, but not yet for the reception of low-energy quanta, which is why the description concentrates on the latter. The technical design for receiving both low energy quanta (4,5) is the same, only the application possibilities differ. For example, LEQ quanta are suitable for remote monitoring or diagnostics. LSTEQ quanta are predestined for forecasting tasks. In the following, however, the terms low energy quanta and lowest energy quanta are used synonymously whenever a distinction is not necessary.

There are several possibilities for the execution of the invention, two of which are to be mentioned by way of example, whereby the variant 2.1.b) is deepened: 2.1.a) Reception of the signals by receivers whose paths have been structurally designed and manufactured accordingly. For example, the track lengths on integrated circuits were as early as 1985 about 40 km long. Assuming that these tracks correspond to technical antennas, frequencies of 7.494 KHz were receivable. According to the invention, to receive signals of the lowest energy, corresponding receivers are designed which have a specific strip conductor configuration. Although this design is technically demanding, it is physically and conceptually trivial.

An interesting side effect is that even today all technical devices with such conductor tracks, e.g. Computer processors, intentionally or unintentionally, record and also emit such low-energy signals that can not be shielded without the clearing system (see below). Thus, it comes intentionally or unintentionally permanently to communication between, for example, processors and other processors or biological systems.

2.1.b) Receiving the signals by measuring the influence of microsystems, such as atoms, electrons, etc. From a certain minimum energy, the complexity of the engineering design and construction of antennas is no longer possible or too expensive, so you have to use a fundamentally different process , According to the invention, for example, systems are used which have a certain arrangement of microparticles whose change can be registered. For example, interfaces of semiconductors, radioactive decay processes, constructions in which photons are reflected with a certain probability and much more are suitable for this purpose.

On on 2.1. b) based new measurement method for measuring low-energy quanta represents the use of noise generators, as they are commonly used to generate random numbers.

According to the invention, therefore, a random process is used for the reception of signals (quanta). For the reception of low-energy signals (LEQ, LSTEQ quanta), the random process must be suitably designed. Suitable random processes can be implemented by mathematical random number generators (pseudo-random number generators, time random number generators, π-random number generators) or physical random number generators (physical noise generators). The noise signals of physical noise generators can be generated by various physical processes, such as thermal noise, radioactive noise, magnetic noise, otoacoustic noise, biological noise, photon noise, etc. In these processes, the movement of microparticles (eg, electrons in thermal noise at semiconductor interfaces) or photon quantum in photon noise (quantization devices ⁶ ) converted into an electrically measurable signal, which is then interpreted as a noise signal (random signal).

According to the invention, signals from random processes are often not real random signals, but indicate the reception of lowest energy waves whose energy is just sufficient to affect, for example, the microparticles (electrons) of a noise generator.

A technically well-known example for the reception of broadband signals is provided by the so-called fractal antennas, which are present in numerous applications (eg mobile phones, cars), since they are capable of miniaturizing extremely small antennas that nevertheless receive the desired wavelengths (Fractal Antennas: A Novel Antenna Miniaturization Technique and Applications, J. Gianvittorio and Y. Rahmat-Samii in IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine Vol. 44, No.1, Feb. 2002).

Such antennas are also formed at the boundary layers of the pn junctions of semiconductors. The doping process produces molecular structures that are similar to the technically generated fractal antennas, albeit on a different scale. The naturally formed fractal antennas of semiconductor devices are suitable for receiving broadband signals. As their structures, although folded, are spatially large, they are suitable for receiving low frequency signals. That Even simple diodes can be used to receive LEQ and LSTEQ quanta.

'www.idquantique.ch Particularly suitable for the reception of biological signals are avalanche diodes, for the reception of technical signals z-diodes. But also the tracks of complex digital switching networks, such as processors, are technically suitable for receiving above-mentioned LEQ and LSTEQ quanta.

The microparticles or their natural or technical connection to resonant circuits are thus according to the invention antennas of LEQ and LSTEQ quanta. Their spatial arrangement on an interface determines the possibility of receiving signals of a certain wavelength, since the antennas and the wavelength of the signal must be in a certain resonance condition. The length of such an antenna at semiconductor interfaces may be several meters to thousands of kilometers, allowing the reception of signals of the appropriate wavelength.

It is well known that the semiconductor effect is a quantum mechanical effect, because through entanglement of the electrons (holes) whole columns of electrons (holes) can act like a single electron (hole) and migrate through the semiconductor. Thus, the reception by means of semiconductor noise generators is ultimately based on a quantum mechanical process (Robert B. Laughlin, Abschied der Weltformel, Piper Verlag, Munich, 2007). This is advantageous in that it allows quantum-mechanical effects to be used selectively.

Each semiconductor is thus an information receiving device based on a quantum mechanical process that obeys the laws of emergence. Specific emergence patterns arise from spatial and / or temporal proximity.

The physical effects of quantum self-interference described in this invention are made technically utilizable by the use according to the invention, in particular of semiconductors as antennas for longitudinal waves, ie low-energy quanta (LEQ, LSTEQ). Semiconductor-based noise generators are thus information receiving devices that enable physically induced quantum effects of the low-energy range in technically exploitable applications. Thus, from a technical point of view, it does not matter whether the quanta are received by fractal antennas at the interfaces of the semiconductors (and thus satisfy the known λ / 4 conditions, Page 5) or whether their reception is made possible by a temporal self-entanglement of the quanta and thus arises directly by the temporal sampling of the random signal.

Random or noise generators are information or entropy receiving devices. They permanently receive the energy and entropy (information) of the objects surrounding them.

Fig1. shows a device DEVICE for receiving quanta. The quantum LEQ of the environment ENV with a distance s to the device DEVICE are received by a random number generator RNG, whereupon its noise behavior changes. The resulting random number sequences ⁷ are passed on to a processing unit PRZ, where they are evaluated and compared.

The resonance condition between object, which emits quantum and a receiver is as usual in the telecommunication exactly given if the receiver can record the frequency (wavelength). In contrast to conventional communications technology, however, it always involves the exchange of low-energy quanta, that is, quanta having a very small frequency or a very large wavelength. Other forms of resonance condition are disclosed on page 13. In particular, when exchanging information, a semantic resonance condition must be created, since otherwise the receiver does not recognize the information from the transmitter as such, but interprets it as a random signal.

An example of random generators capable of receiving low energy quanta (even LEQ quanta) is well known to those skilled in the art. Thus, in the design of random number generators (e.g., thermal noise generators), special efforts are made to shield these generators from the AC inputs. The alternating current in Europe has a frequency of 50 Hz, which after E = h * f

⁷ Although the random number sequences of a noise generator according to the invention resulting from the receipt of quantum, that are causal, they are to be referred to hereinafter as yet random sequences because these sequences are all statistical tests of randomness. This is because the tests perform a statistical analysis of the sequence rather than a semantic analysis. A semantic evaluation was also not necessary so far, because the consequences of noise generators actually and not only seemingly as random assumed. Although there is a causal influence on random number generators, their consequences will always be random because the generators represent an additive and / or multiplicative superposition of very many and complex states of received quanta. corresponds to an energy of its quantum of 3.31 * 10 ^"32 J and a wavelength of about 5995 km, so that random number generators can now receive quanta with an energy of 3.31 * 10 ^{" 32} J. If the generator is not very well shielded or constructed by appropriate measures such as the construction of balanced circuits for mutually canceling the alternating current components in the noise, then you can see the influence of the alternating current in the trend image of a noise sequence display system even with the naked eye. Random generators influenced in this way therefore do not pass random tests for chance. Therefore, the (involuntary) reception of quanta of low energy (eg 50 Hz quanta) in random generators is extremely annoying these days although it has not been recognized as such until now.

An essential part of such information exchange of low-energy quanta is that it can hardly be shielded with currently known methods, since 1) the energy of the quanta is so small that the quantum with the surrounding materials (electrons, atoms, nuclei) often interact only very slightly and thus can penetrate through these materials and 2), especially with low-energy quanta effects of the electromagnetic near field, in particular the radial proportion effect (longitudinal portion) can be used. As a result, our environment is constantly flooded with myriads of quanta. Every biological and technical system can filter and process the quanta that are useful for it from this "quantum mixture" by means of suitable filtering, addressing and calibration routines.

This makes it possible to measure the information state of a human being, an animal, a plant or any other technical or biological object and system over a large spatial distance. During such a measurement, it always comes to the exchange of low-energy quanta. Thus, according to the invention, information about desired objects can be recorded. The objects can be at a spatial distance that can be several thousand kilometers and much more. The objects may be humans, animals, technical equipment, devices of any kind, cars, power plants, airplanes, computers, etc.

If signals of the lowest frequency are received with the detectors, special features result. It is known from communications engineering that the electromag- There are two fundamentally different areas of net waves: the near field and the far field (Zinke, Brunswig, Hochfrequenztechnik 1, Springer Verlag, 6th edition, Berlin, 2000). In the technically conventional case, the properties of the far field are used, which are based essentially on the transverse properties of the Hertzian waves. This is because only a range of one to two times the wavelength of a near field, and moreover always a far field. The frequencies commonly used today therefore have a near field, which is small, at most only a few inches to meters. That does not apply to the LEQ frequencies. The waves used here have a wavelength of up to 300,000 km (1 Hz) but mostly 30,000 km (10 Hz).

For example, near f = 50 Hz at a distance of 1000 km there is still near field (ibid., P. 386).

Therefore, whenever using LEQ frequencies on Earth, you must always consider the characteristics of the near field. From the telecommunications industry is now also known that in particular in the near field each electromagnetic signal also has longitudinal (radial) shares; it is this longitudinal portion that contributes to the detachment of the Hertzian wave (ibid., p. 388). In the near field, magnetic and electrical components of the field are phase shifted by 90 degrees, not in the far field. Since the longitudinal parts fall with 1 / r ³ (r is the distance to the transmitter), but the transversal shares only with 1 / r ² , one only has the transversal properties of the wave from a certain distance from the transmitter, which is used by today's technical applications becomes.

In the near field, however, there are other phenomena. The longitudinal fraction is difficult to shield with conventional methods. However, this means that signal sources, e.g. in the 10 Hz range, a difficult to shield near field of 10,000 - 30,000 km swing around it.

Low energy quanta have a large spatial penetration, they can be received almost anywhere on the earth's surface. With suitable receivers, therefore, states of technical and biological objects can be received anywhere on earth. This reduces the signal transmission to the reception and in particular the filtering of the desired signals from the composite signal at the receiver, because each random process, in particular each semiconductor device receives the signals from millions of transmitters, all of which are superimposed. From this, the superposition generates the random signal recognizable to the person skilled in the art, which actually satisfies almost all criteria of a random signal (autocorrelation, etc.).

It is furthermore known from information technology that a periodic time signal can be converted into an image area by a Fourier analysis, an aperiodic signal by laplace transformation. The properties of the above-mentioned transformations show the person skilled in the art that, for example, a so-called Dirac pulse in the time domain can only be represented by a very broad frequency spectrum ⁸ . Since frequencies and energies are interconvertible, a Dirac pulse thus requires a very broad energy spectrum. This results in an orthogonality between the great time and energy, which is confirmed in particular by the uncertainty theorem of Heisenberg.

(System) time is proportional to changing information within the system

t ~ Δl (2.2.)

However, since energy and time by E * t - t * e = h / 2τri are orthogonal to each other ^9, also energy and information must be orthogonal to each other. Such orthogonality is known, for example, in sine and cosine. Small values of the sine mean large values of the cosine and vice versa. Exactly the effect exists between energy and information, which is used according to the invention.

A quantum is described by its state of energy and information. The energy value results after E = h * f directly from its frequency. But also the information

⁸ Woschni: Information Technology, VEB Verlag Technik, Berlin, 1988

⁹ According to W. Heisenberg: "On the Illustrative Content of Quantum-Theoretical Kinematics and Mechanics" 1927, in "Dokumente der Naturwissenschaft", Physics, Battenberg Verlag, Stuttgart, 1963, p. 14: E * t - t * E = h / 2πi. The variable i = V (-1) expresses this orthogonality mathematically. The value of a quantum can be derived. Unlike sine and cosine, neither the energy nor the information of a quantum can become zero, since this prohibits Heisenberg's uncertainty theorem. It is the case that at extremely high energies of a quantum very little information occur (or can be measured), at extremely low energies but very high information. Especially in the lowest energy range described here, therefore, relatively high amounts of information will be effective (or measurable) ¹⁰ .

That Due to the orthogonality of energy and information, quanta in the lowest energy range are much more strongly characterized by their encoded information than high-energy quanta. The so-called Ur-Theory (quantum theory of the original alternatives of CF Weizsäcker) goes one step further and explains the information as the actual, fundamental building block of the world and not the energy (Holger Lyre, Information Theory, UTB Verlag für Wissenschaft, Munich, 2002). Especially in the area of the lowest energy quanta this seems plausible.

As already explained, it is known from quantum mechanics that the product of the accuracy of momentum Δp and location Δx must always be greater than or equal to Plank's quantum h (equation (2.1)) and not as a consequence of inadequate measurement systems, but as a natural inherent phenomenon Quantum mechanics explains the location Δx by a probability function 4. According to this theory, the "nearly point-sized" microparticle would be found somewhere within the location Δx, but only where it is not known then as "collapse of the wave function" ¹ H denotes ¹¹ and more recent date, see Tipler2006 ^12. However, the determination of the location x1 causes the exact momentum p1 and vice versa to blur again.

In contrast to the classical explanation, a working model is assumed here that the quantum is a physically existing physical entity of the extent Δx (and with Δy and Δz as further spatial dimensions). The quantum is after this

¹⁰ One indicator of the correctness of this thesis is provided by the so-called homeopathy, which has success especially with very high potencies, ie extremely large dilutions. In homeopathic preparations of potency 1000, almost no material components of the Sunstanz (energies) can be detected, but with these high potencies a detectable effect on the patient can be achieved. 1 ¹ W. Heisenberg: "On the Illustrative Content of Quantum Theory Kinematics and Mechanics" 1927, in "Documents of Science", Physics, Battenberg Verlag, Stuttgart, 1963 Not as small as predicted by quantum mechanics, it may instead have spatial dimensions of the order of its wavelength. This explains, for example, the well-known double-slit experiment, in which it can be shown that a quantum interferes with itself. Because even if the intensity of the radiation source is so small that the quanta separate in time hit each other on a double slit, then occur behind the double slit interference pattern that can not be satisfactorily explained to date ¹³ . It is assumed in the description that the quantum is spatially extended so that, when passing through a slit, it also receives the information of the other slit and interferes with itself based on both pieces of information. Due to this self-interference, there is information about both types of columns behind the gap. The distance and the width of the two columns have a suitable relation to the wavelength of the quantum in these experiments.

By quant is meant in the description that portion of the wave packet in which most (e.g., 90%) of its energy is located. In theory, quanta can have an infinite extent, but they are usually considered Gaussian wave packet. It is assumed here that a quantum has no inherent form, but the actually occurring energy distribution (form) always arises from the interaction of the quantum with the (spatial and temporal) environment. A quantum in a potential well has a different energy distribution (shape) than a free quantum or quantum in a rectangular slit.

• In quantum mechanics, the wave packets of the quanta, which can be developed according to the Schrödinger equation, are interpreted as probability waves. This view is not connected here, because the wave packets - as shown above - can be interpreted as physically real. Quantum has a spatial extent that depends on its wavelength. The "mathematical problems of the flow of the wave packets as a function of time" associated with this view of the actually existing spatially distributed wave packets can theoretically be solved.

¹² Tipler, Mosca: Physics, Spectrum Akademischer Verlag, Munich, 2nd edition, 2006, p. 1126

¹³ Feynman: Lectures on Physics, Volume III Quantum Mechanics, Oldenbourg Verlag, Munich, Vienna,

1992 For the technical applications of the invention, however, the spatial view postulated here and the known classical views are equivalent, since the quantum always interacts where it comes in contact with other quanta. Whether this leads to a collapse of the probability wave function (classical view of quantum mechanics) or the quantum simply interacts exactly at this point at which it is contacted does not play a decisive role for the invention and its technical application.

The spatial view is therefore only a working model with which real measurable effects can be explained. In the end, it does not matter if the expansion actually exists in reality or if the quanta get information from remote locations in other ways, as is the case with the double-slit experiment. It is crucial that quanta, when passing through a slit (Spalfl), interact with themselves and process information from spatially distant locations (slit2) during this interference. Only then do the well-known interference patterns at the double slit arise. Quantum therefore has at least information from all places of its blurring range.

A further indication that quanta have a real physical extent, results not only from the above-mentioned double-slit experiment, but also from the uncertainty theorem itself. The energy of a quantum with 8 Hz is E = h * f approx. E (8Hz) = 5.3 * ^10'33 J.

Therefore, the accuracy of an energy measurement (or impulse measurement) must be at least more accurate than 5.3 * 10 ^"33 J. Low-energy quanta require an extremely high accuracy of measuring their impulse or their energy (or frequency), since the measurement inaccuracy finally In general, the measurement accuracy should be an order of magnitude more accurate than the values to be measured, so that low-energy quanta inevitably have an extremely high fuzziness with respect to the location, which is consistent with the assumption that low-energy quanta exceed a very large place are "smeared", so at the same time at the place Δx (and Δy and Δz) stay.

Thus, both quantum mechanics and double-gap experiments support the postulated model assumption that quantum is a spatial expansion in size. but at least have information about their entire spatial uncertainty range.

According to the invention, this model assumption is now also extended to the time domain. Just as a quantum is "out of focus" over the location Δx (and Δy and Δz), so it is always "smeared" over time Δt. And the amount of time comes from the simple conversion

Δt = 1 / Δf = h / ΔE (2.3.)

The well-known blurring of location and momentum also applies to the product of energy and time, which, through the equivalence of time as a change of information, leads to the energy and information of a quantum never being zero.

ΔE * Δt ≥ h (2.4.)

Equation (2.4.) Is well known from quantum mechanics ¹⁴ . For low-energy sources, however, (2.4.) Has serious consequences. For just as a lowest-energy quantum is distributed over the place (ie it is everywhere in the place Δx, so it is also "smeared" over the time Δt.) Thus, in principle, low-energy quanta have a time uncertainty, because one must assume that then in particular, if E becomes very small (E - $ ^► 0) ΔE must become very small (ΔE -> 0) Therefore, according to equation (2.4.), the time uncertainty Δt must become very large for low-energy quanta, resulting in novel time effects.

According to the invention, this time blur is used to set a certain time interval, e.g. Δt / 2, to look into the future. There are also other time intervals possible, but for the sake of simplicity should be left in this example.

For a quantum of the brain of 8 Hz, for example, a time uncertainty of Δt = 125 ms results and thus for symmetry reasons at the time of measurement tθ a "view into the future" of Δt / 2 = 60.25 ms

¹⁴ W. Heisenberg: "On the Illustrative Content of Quantum Theory Kinematics and Mechanics" 1927, in "Documents of Science", Physics, Battenberg Verlag, Stuttgart, 1963 Able to foresee events of 60.25 ms or to anticipate the results of these events. Effects that could confirm this are well known in psychology and can be explained physically using the model assumptions made here. To what extent the human brain today can record quanta of frequencies below 1 Hz (LSTEQ quanta), eg 10 ^'10 Hz is not known. However, it can be assumed that the brain is able to receive very low-frequency quanta, for example by certain trance states in which 1) the track length of the interconnected neuron tracks is extremely increased and / or 2) the noise level of other nerve activities is reduced so that the received lowest energy quanta can penetrate to consciousness. Thus, many phenomena of the future vision of so-called "medial gifted persons" are physically explainable.These persons manage to receive and process low-energy quanta through certain training, so that they can receive information from geographically distant areas and future events It may be easier to receive information that is more distant than the reception of future information, because even if you can evaluate the information of 8 Hz quanta in the brain (eg in the hypothalamus), then information from up to However, only future events of 60.25 ms are receivable at 37,500 km, so receiving future events several hours or years in advance will require extremely low-frequency quanta. Whether the brain is capable of receiving these LSTEQ quanta is not In terms of apparatus, ie metrologically, such freq However, it is not yet possible to determine the meanings or low-energy quanta today.

In particular, with semiconductor-based random number generators as the receivers of low-energy quanta such devices are developable, which will foresee in future areas other than, for example, only the above 60.25 ms. With noise generators of a suitable design, for example, quanta can be detected with so little energy that future events become physically measurable. If, for example, a quantum of energy 1, 84 * 10 ^" ³⁷ J, is detected by a random generator, this corresponds to a fuzziness of Δt = 1 h, allowing a view of the order of magnitude of about 30 minutes into the future. Thus, events at an instant t0 can be predicted to an object, which quantum at the time tθ sent to the receiving noise generator, which affects the object but only at the time tO + .DELTA.t / 2.

In accordance with the invention, methods and devices are thus developed which permit the physical measurement and evaluation of future events at the current time tθ on the basis of the measurement of lowest energy quanta.

The invention is thus diametrically opposed to the current research, which attempts to "bend space and time" with ever higher energies in order to achieve novel phenomena of timekeeping.These scientific considerations are used in physics with the popular scientific term of the so-called "wormhole described ¹⁵ . According to the invention, however, novel time phenomena are achieved, especially with lowest energy quanta.

A concrete description of the temporal self-interference of quanta is shown again in FIGS. 2 and 3:

The basis is again the well-known double-slit experiment: A quantum (LEQ) which falls in the direction of DIR on a double slit interferes therewith itself if the double slit is of the order of magnitude of the wavelength, i. the quantum, passing a gap (e.g., x1), has the information of the other (not passed) gap (x2).

If λ is very large, λ = 37,500 km for 8 Hz quanta, the quantum at point x1 has information about point x2, ie from a point that is 37,500 km away. Therefore, LEQ quanta have information from a location x2, even if evaluated at a distant location x1.

Interference patterns also occur when the gap distance is less than λ / 4, e.g. λ / 8, λ / 16 or λ / 32, but the patterns are getting weaker, at a certain point, no more interference can be detected. If the gap distance is greater than λ, e.g. 10 * λ, there is no interference pattern on the screen SC. The quanta behave like normal particles again.

¹⁵ F. Tipler: The Physics of Immortality, Publisher Doubleday, New York, Munich, 1994, p. 520 ff. These physical relationships of the double slit can be transferred to the time domain by analogy (FIG. 3). The exchange of place and time dimension according to the invention results in new effects:

A quantum LEQ is sampled at a particular location at two consecutive times t1 and t2. The two sampling times assume the previous function of the double slit x1 and x2. The entire temporal sampling grid represents the spatial grid in a simplified way. By choosing the sampling distances, one can vary the interference pattern. The column width of the grating is generated in the temporal case by sampling not only a single value from the signal at a sampling time t1 but, for example, with a 1000 times higher sampling rate 10 to 100 values, from which one then selects the mean value, for example. In the thus generated sample at time t1, information from time t2 is present at the same time. There is a temporal effect between t1 and t2 that can not be prevented. A sample always links a quantum to itself in time, i. the concrete sample of a signal at a time t1 always also contains information about the sampling of the future sampling time t2 of the signal (and also of the past signal).

If t is chosen to be sufficiently large, with 0.01 Hz quanta, t = 100 s, the quantum at time t1 has information from a time t2, which is still 100 seconds away. LSTEQ quanta can therefore transmit information of an object from a time t2 to a time t1 (t2> t1). Information about the future sample of the signal is always included in the current sample. Just as with the double slit, the location of the impact of the next quantum can not be predicted, so the future sample can not be deduced therefrom, it still remains random. Only in the overall distribution (e.g., amplitude density) can one determine interference properties.

Interference patterns in which the temporal link results are stored also occur when the time interval is less than 1 / 4f, eg 1 / 8f, 1 / 16f or 1 / 32f, but the patterns become weaker and weaker at a certain point prove no interference and thus no information from time t2. t2 is then in time just too close to point t1 to leave any measurable evidence of t2. If the time interval is greater than 1 / f, eg 10 * 1 / f, there is also no interference pattern in the distributions. The quanta behave like normal particles, t2 is then too far in time to leave measurable evidence at point t1.

An optimal sampling of the 0.01 Hz quanta (t = 100s) would thus be every 1 / 0.04Hz = 25s (or 50s). The two samples t1 and t2 = t1 + 25s are temporally linked, i. the measured interference pattern are the values of the noise generator itself.

For this reason, no classical interference pattern is obtained in the amplitude density distributions of sampled random signals, since the random signal consists of a broadband frequency mixture. Therefore, the interference pattern of the amplitude density blurs as well as it would be blurred at the double slit, if one would apply to the gap not with coherent waves but with a frequency mixture. On the other hand, if one were to sample a signal with a pure frequency (sinusoidal signal), one would obtain an amplitude density that is increased to the left and to the right. A sampled signal which consists of a frequency with a small fluctuation range (ie is almost coherent) generates an amplitude density which is reminiscent of a classical interference pattern with suitable adjustment. Quantum temporally interfere with itself.

According to the invention, the fact of the temporal self-interest of quanta is used to obtain potential information about the future behavior of objects.

The easiest way to do this is to compare two successive random values (difference or quotient). Since information of the time t2 is already contained in the random value at the time t1, it can be determined by a comparison with the later sample value at the time t2 whether, for example, a device will fail. How the ratio of two consecutive random numbers must ultimately be in order to arrive at this semantic statement is determined beforehand by a calibration procedure. Important tasks in the measurement of potential information is therefore the solution a) the addressing of the object of which one wants a statement, ie the selection of the desired information from the permanent information mixture and b) the interpretation of the rash of the random number generator.

Solutions for both tasks a, b, are described below.

a) addressing or selection

The addressing takes place by transfer of addresses of the sender to the receiver. Addresses are, for example, surrogates of the transmitter. Each transmitter transmits its information permanently to the environment along an entropy slope. The task of the receiver is to filter out this information. Since the low energy quanta can be transmitted over a very large distance, the receiver has overlays of all possible quanta, i. Also available from very far away stations. From these overlays, the receiver must filter out the quanta of the transmitter.

There are several methods for selection. On the one hand, the method of calibration between transmitter and receiver, see the following paragraph b), on the other hand, the detection of the transmitter due to its individual transmitter characteristics. Since the selection of the transmitter is not based on the determination of signal amplitudes, the distance between transmitter and receiver also plays a minor role.

Every material production process entails a cross between original (A) and duplicate (A1), in the sense that the original and the duplicate are in constant communication and the information exchange can be filtered out from the other environmental influences. The original and the duplicate are, so to speak, in a potential resonance relationship.

For the physically realized entanglement, two alternative views are possible, but both have the same technical applications.

i) The entanglement must not be understood quantum mechanically, because it is not the case that what happens to object A also happens instantaneously to object A1, in the sense of the well-known remote effect of entangled quantum states. The Entanglement means only a fine tuning of the frequency so that original and duplicate information can be exchanged. ii) The entanglement must be understood quantum-mechanically, ie that what happens to the quanta of the object A also instantaneously passes the quantum at the object A1 in the sense of the known remote effect of entangled quantum states. However, since there is no absolute identical duplicate, the effects of the changes in A are currently receivable at A1, but since A1 also has other quanta than A, the state of A1 does not change identically to the state of A. Only the entangled Quanta of A and A1 change their states identically.

Both i) and ii) can technically be used in the same way so that a receiver tunes to the frequency of a transmitter.

There are three ways of addressing:

1.) The addressing of a transmitter A at the receiver B can be done via any type of surrogate A1, ie parts of the object of A itself, digital fingerprints, identical components (eg identical diodes at sender and receiver), unique serial numbers, etc. The surrogates For example, via a special device (Plattenkondenstoren, windings, measuring cup) inductively or capacitively coupled into the resonant circuit of the semiconductor device used.

2.) Another way of addressing is the alignment of the receiver to the desired object with appropriate probes, antenna systems or collimators.

3.) Another simple way of addressing is given by the choice of sampling frequency. Transmitter objects and receivers roar on a very broad spectrum. By choosing its sampling rate, the receiver decides which quantum with which energy it would like to receive. If, for example, quanta of energy E = 5.3 * 10 ^"33 J, ie 8 Hz quanta, are to be received, because natural frequencies of a human are to be evaluated, then a sampling rate of the noise generator of 16 Hz is suitable. essentially generated by other quanta. At the generator, all this information is superimposed on the typical, known noise signal of the noise generators. The evaluation algorithm used determines whether the "pure" 8 Hz values are used or whether the noise generator is still sampled higher, but only 8 Hz averages are included in the further processing.

b) Interpretation or calibration b1) Motivation for calibration

Today, there are various projects around the world to identify patterns from global or local noise data and interpret them to make predictions or correlations. Known is the so-called Global Consciousness Project of Princeton University ¹⁶ , in which for 20 years worldwide noise generators were set up and since then attempts to correlate the results of the noise measurements with global events such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, terrorist attacks.

An important goal is to investigate whether the statistical properties of the noise signals change before or after global events. The goal is to build an indicator or forecast certain global events.

These projects are more or less successful. That's because the statistical metrics happen randomly to global events. The main reason is that it is looking for the wrong characteristics. If one considers the low-energy quanta as part of an alphabet of a-still unknown-communication language of technical and biological systems, it becomes clear that the analysis of the occurrence of averages, median values, scatters, etc., can not show a real connection to any of the events. Ultimately, all above-mentioned projects fail, which want to make predictions about events from statistical patterns in the time sequences of noise data, if the predictions are to include a certain complexity and nontriviality.

¹⁶ www.noosphere.princeton.edu In particular, it is problematic in the analysis of noise data that due to the influence of the investigated noise processes by quanta of other (even more distant) objects and processes, in principle everything could be filtered out of the noise data. It is only important to set the correct filters, then you can find complex patterns or even simple repetitions in noise data. Note, however, that the patterns found are sometimes only artifacts of the process itself, ie patterns that are generated by the analysis process. Thus, each examination must be limited in time, but this means a multiplication of the noise signal with a time window or the mathematical convolution of the investigated random function with a rectangular function in the image area of their Fourierransfomierten, which in turn generates process-related periodicities. In particular, if the investigations analyze trivial correlations, ie correlation, histogram similarities, subordinate frequencies, fractal structures, mean deviations, drift, etc., it can happen that one finds in the noise data exactly what one has been looking for.

But even if you exclude these procedural errors, the desired information with the o.g. statistical evaluations mostly do not find, as it the sought correlations, e.g. between noise values of random number generators and global events only in the trivial case. Nevertheless, global events can and will be foreshadowed in the noise sequences of random number generators, but they can not be found with today's methods of statistical and stochastic analysis of random processes.

Only by looking at the noise data as an alphabet of noise values generated by quanta can significant results be obtained. However, according to the invention, this means the transition from purely statistical and stochastic analysis of random processes to a semantic analysis of these consequences. Because random sequences form letters, words and phrases of an information exchange, which is physically realized by quantum. But even if one does not know the above-postulated alphabet of quantum information (especially in natural systems they are not known), complex information can be transmitted by both transmitter and receiver of the information can use an unknown, but nevertheless arranged encoding and decoding method ie by both sides defining a semantics.

The possibility of a complex (and therefore semantic) exchange of information between a sender and a receiver occurs through the process of calibration. The calibration is thus particularly advantageous if signals from nature are to be received and interpreted, since the quantum radiation of the transmitter can not be deliberately intervened. In a technical communication, in which transmitter and receiver are, for example, noise generators, one can generate the transmission quanta specifically and thereby perform the calibration procedure at least only in a simplified manner.

b2) calibration

To significantly improve the results of receiving with random number generators, the generators must be calibrated in their context if they are to receive more complex information. The calibration determines the semantic level between sender and receiver.

A simple calibration, ie coordination between sender and receiver on the information content of the messages to be exchanged, in the example a "calibration of the amount of entropy" at the sender object can be technically integrated into the process as follows, for example (FIG. 4):

Addressing of transmitter A at the receiver B by connection of an identifier ID, e.g. Use of a surrogate A1 of the transmitter

• Defined increase of the entropy of the transmitter (eg by heating) and emission of entropy quanta (LEQ or LSTEQ) • Reception of the entropy quanta at the receive noise generator RNGB, whose behavior is influenced by the quanta, but which is still random or statistically so

• Processing of the amplitude values of the noise generator by a specific algorithm PRZB and generation of a number or sequence of numbers

• Interpretation of the sequence of numbers as high or low entropy at the transmitter and checking whether this corresponds to the facts at the transmitter

• calibration:

- If the RNGB receiver noise generator statement is correct for the user (high entropy measured when high entropy was present), the calibration will continue with other transmitter entropy values.

If, however, the user's statement of the noise generator RNGB is incorrect, then the parameters of the noise generator and the evaluation algorithm must be systematically adapted with the same setting of the transmitter (eg change in the noise generator, sampling rate of the noise generator, coefficients of the algorithm, normalization ) until the receiver's (and known) information has been correctly received by the receiver.

- Then continue with other settings.

After calibration, the receiver has tuned to the low energy quanta of the transmitter and can correctly interpret subsequent quanta, i. if the transmitter sends information that it has high entropy, then the calibrated receiver correctly receives this entropy by "randomly" selecting a sequence of numbers which is recognized as having high entropy in the subsequent algorithm. The semantics is defined.

This means, however, that different receivers, which have been calibrated differently for various reasons, can react differently to the same information of a transmitter. But this is well known from automata theory. That is, since a complex receiver of quantum usually has an internal state and a specific algorithm for processing the quantum information, a identical message at the receiver (an identical quantum or a sequence of quanta) lead to different "rashes" or interpretation, therefore, the calibration of a receiver is necessary.

By implementing the addressing and calibration, the sender and receiver can communicate with each other in accordance with the method.

After a receiver has received (selected) and can interpret the information of an object to be examined, the effect of self-interference of quanta will be used to obtain potential information from the examined object. Each sample at time t1 contains potential information of future value t2. By comparing both values, a statement about the future development of the object can then be given.

In the literature one reads from time to time of the white noise as a carrier of a new, yet to be discovered communication channel. However, the white noise is not the carrier of a modulated information, but the white noise is the information itself. Because low energy quanta have the physical property of expanding and propagating spatially and temporally very far, which is why a novel communication technology does not have to modulate information onto a carrier wave , The information of a sender object is transmitted through existing natural transmission mechanisms, a large spatial and temporal extension of quanta and their large penetration to the receiver.

The novel data communication described here simply reads the information permanently transmitted from each object out of the noise. According to the invention, the nature of the actual data transmission so to speak by itself. Therefore, the essential content of the invention is, based on novel receivers, random number generators to receive the information-containing low-energy quantum and then selectively filter out. This requires a special addressing and calibration.

For example, there are completely new possibilities for remote diagnosis of patients, remote monitoring of technical equipment, treatment options, communication with the severely disabled and prognosis possibilities. In the following, four technical applications of the invention are described by way of example:

1.) By means of the method according to the invention, it is possible to purposefully read out information states of a biological system by constructing information sinks which resonate with certain desired information at the transmitter. Just as one can thereby purposefully diagnose mental states of persons, since the states correspond to certain entropy conditions that can be received by suitable receivers, it is also possible to measure other brain states of a person or a biological system. Unlike conventional methods of EEG signal evaluation, which is erroneously performed in the high energy range (from the point of view of the invention), by receiving quanta by means of noise generators, one can receive and evaluate low energy quanta representing particular brain states of a person.

Applications include diagnostic systems, lie detectors, communication systems for the severely disabled, therapy devices.

2.) By means of the method according to the invention, it is possible to purposefully read out information states of a technical system by constructing information sinks which resonate with certain information at the transmitter. As a result, it is possible to diagnose faulty states of devices or systems in a targeted manner, since the states correspond to certain entropy ratios that can be received by suitable receivers. In contrast to conventional diagnostic methods via signal evaluation, which is erroneously carried out in the high energy range (from the point of view of the invention), by receiving quanta by means of noise generators low energy quanta can be received and evaluated that represent certain equipment and device states.

Applications include technical diagnostic systems for power plants, aircraft, cars and all technical devices. The device and the receiver do not have to be electrically connected. Furthermore, there may be a spatial separation between device and diagnostic system, which implies numerous applications, such as remote diagnostics of cars and more.

3.) LSTEQ quanta are used for the prognosis. Due to the principle of time uncertainty in the reception of low-energy quanta, certain process states and thus also events can be predicted. Depending on the quality of the noise generator, events that are still a few milliseconds to a few hours (or more) in the future can be measured in detail. The vote on the concrete energy of the object to be measured (technical or biological system) is carried out as explained in the previous descriptions of addressing and calibration.

Applications include technical forecast systems for the private sector or other facilities for users who need short-term information about upcoming events. However, these applications are limited by the extremely low level of the energy to be measured (up to 10 ^"38 J and less) and the extremely high quality of the noise generators required for this purpose Take 1 hour, one needs receivers that can receive low energy quanta (LSTEQ quanta) with an energy of 9.20 * ^10'38 J and less.

Although all random number generators are in principle suitable for these applications, in addition to semiconductor-based noise generators for some studies with a short time window i.a. also noise generators on a radioactive basis, e.g. Measurement of noise generation during alpha decay of plutonium. One reason is that alpha decay generators are difficult to influence by environmental factors (room temperature, room humidity, electrosmog, etc.), so that their decay rate variations are caused by the desired low energy quanta of the desired field type. However, one should pay attention to the alpha decay that an exact alignment of the collimators takes place in the room.

A vision of the application could, for example, also be interesting for astrophysics, since with the above-mentioned generators corresponding cosmic objects could be targeted (for example by collimators) and analyzed, which are far away and even from these distant objects, one can get information about how these objects behave in the current present.

4.) It is known that there are certain groups of people who can be used with different instruments, such as pendulums or rods, e.g. Water or resources and other activities. These activities are not considered serious today because they are often unverifiable or at least reproducible. With the receivers of low-energy quanta described here, all these so-called radionic activities can be reproducibly constructed and realized by technical devices, which should be explained using the example of the one-hand rod.

It is known that the wearer of a rod must calibrate this in advance, since it is not known which unconscious muscle rashes lead to the respective reactions of the rod in which questions. After calibration, the tail can answer the relevant questions correctly for the user, since the muscle movements are generated unconsciously and the rod only gives such an answer, which wanted to give the Unterwustsein the person, but because of various nervous activity in the brain does not penetrate to consciousness could.

This work of specially trained people can be technically realized by so-called "electronic pendulum" (ELPs).

For example, an ELP operates as follows: As a noise source, use is made of a thermal noise generator, e.g. an z-diode, as the concrete receiver of low-energy quanta. This analog noise source is then sent e.g. sampled and digitized at a frequency of 15 Hz. In the PC, then for a given time interval of e.g. 5 seconds, the generated binary random number sequence evaluated.

After the technical realization of an ELP you have to calibrate it. From a set of about 100 questions (whose correct answers you all know) is a first question selected, which then pretends the ELP. Then you start the query of the ELP and expect the answer. During the query, the number of zeros and ones - which the noise source has generated - is counted and evaluated over a time interval. For example, if there were more ones than zeros, this could be "Yes" be interpreted and vice versa. If one agrees with the answer one goes over to the next question and repeats the calibration procedure. If the answer is incorrect, the algorithm will be adjusted (for example, change range, change processing algorithm for noise data). The calibration of the ELP takes place until the ELP has answered about 85% of the questions as the user expected. Then the ELP can be operated in user mode and answers newly asked questions more or less correctly. After verification, the user may also ask the ELP system questions about potentially future conditions. Since, according to the invention, the current samples of the noise source always contain partial information of future samples, this provides first information about future properties of the examined object.

The correctness of the answers is therefore above the statistical expectation value, because the system "operator & ELP" learned to give correct answers during the calibration.The learning takes place in such a way, that the low energy quanta radiated by the human being the random number generator of the ELP, in the example the thermal one Noise generator, so influence that just exactly the random value that represents the correct answer.The calibration is necessary because 1) each person sends quanta of a slightly different energy (and) information and 2) the system "operator & ELP" itself also on the concrete implemented algorithm for the evaluation of the numbers must adjust.

All random number generators of suitable design can be used as a noise source for ELPs. In practice, however, offers as a noise source, for example, the body noise of the operator himself. It is possible to use so-called otoacoustic noise signals (ie noise generators which can measure and process the noise of the inner ear) or systems for measuring the fluctuations of the skin conductivity as a noise source. Thus, the ELP can also be worn as a kind of watch with a metal base directly on the skin on the arm and used mobile. Other mobile options would be realizations in the mobile phone, in the organizer, etc. Thus, the ELP - insofar as he was previously calibrated correctly - give, so to speak, the answers that would have given the Unterwustsein the person to the question. ELP systems can also be used for other purposes, such as knowledge generators, truth-level detectors, or medical therapy, to remember things that have been pushed out of consciousness.

image Description

Fiq.1

ENV environment environment

LEQ Low Energy Quants Low Energy Quantum

RNG Random Number Generator Random Number Generator

PRZ processor processor

DEVICE device device

S Distance distance

LEQ Low Energy Quants Low Energy Quantum

Dir direction

SC screen screen

Fig. 3

LEQ Low Energy Quants Low Energy Quantum

TIME Time Time

SC screen screen

Fig. 4

PRZA processor A processor A

BITS bits bits

RNGA Random Number Generator A Random Number Generator A

LEQ Low Energy Quants Low-Energy Quantum

S Distance distance

PRZB processor B processor B

BITS bits bits

RNGB Random Number Generator B Random Number Generator B

ADR DO Address Tuning Address Tuning

ID identification identification

Claims

claims

1. A method for measuring information of technical and biological systems, in which signals or quanta by suitable receivers, noise generators, received and evaluated, the physical relationship between frequency and energy is used to determine the energy of the signal to be received and to use the noise generators as receivers or transmitters of quanta.

2. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the quanta received by noise generators are low energy quanta LEQ or lowest quantum number LSTEQ.

3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the received quantum originate from humans.

4. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the received quanta of natural systems such as animals, plants, minerals or other materials.

5. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that the based on noise generators recipients of low energy quanta for the diagnosis of diseases, for the diagnosis of mental states are used.

6. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that the based on noise generators receiver of low energy quanta are used for communication with critically ill.

7. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that the based on noise generators recipients of low-energy quanta for the healing of the truth content of human statements are used.

8. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that the received quanta of technical systems such as cars, power plants, aircraft, railways originate.

9. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, characterized in that the received quantum originate from spatially distant systems, so that remote diagnostics of biological systems or remote monitoring of technical systems and equipment can be performed.

10. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, characterized in that the reception or the emission of quanta can be selectively shielded by the use of suitable Entropiesenken.

11. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 10, characterized in that the based on noise generators receiver of low energy quanta are used for exploration of natural resources.

12. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 11, characterized in that the based on noise generators receiver of low energy quanta are used for the determination of materials and they can be targeted with it by a calibration of the receiver is carried out on the corresponding materials that makes it possible , the quanta, which send out the materials permanently from the abundance of signals to select.

13. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 12, characterized in that the based on noise generators receiver of low energy quanta are used for data communication by an addressing and calibration takes place between transmitter and receiver of quanta, so that the receiver from the transmitter sent quantum from filter out the information mixture of its noise generator and thus a bit sequence can be transmitted from the transmitter to the receiver.

14. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 13, characterized in that its implementation in the steps:

> Addressing of transmitter A at the receiver B by interconnection of an identifier ID, surrogates of the transmitter

> Defined increase in the entropy of the transmitter and emission of entropy quanta

> Reception of the entropy quanta at the receive noise generator RNGB whose behavior is influenced by the quanta, but which is still random or statistically so

> Processing of the amplitude values of the noise generator by a specific algorithm PRZB and generation of a number or sequence of numbers

> Interpretation of the sequence of numbers as high or low entropy at the transmitter and checking whether this corresponds to the facts at the transmitter

> Calibration

he follows.

15. The method according to claim 14, characterized in that the calibration comprises the following steps:

> if the statement of the receive noise generator RNGB is correct for the user, the calibration is continued with other transmitter entropy values (A)

> however, if the user's statement of the noise generator RNGB is incorrect, the parameters of the noise generator and of the evaluation algorithm are systematically adapted with the same setting of the transmitter until the information transmitted by the transmitter and known information is received correctly at the receiver (B),

> then continue with other station settings.

16. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 15, characterized in that the based on noise generators receiver of low energy quanta are used for prognosis by the known uncertainty theorem of quantum tenmechanik is used to the effect that in the measurement of low-energy quanta in principle results in a time uncertainty, which can thus make statements about states of an object or system with appropriate parameterization of the receiver, which will adjust in the future.

17. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 16, characterized in that the noise generators based receiver of low energy quanta for the construction and application of computer-assisted rod systems (ELPs) are used by an ELP and its user are matched by a suitable calibration process whereby the ELP will respond statistically correct in a later survey.