CN110297884B - Project member authentication method and device - Google Patents

Project member authentication method and device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN110297884B
CN110297884B CN201910406802.5A CN201910406802A CN110297884B CN 110297884 B CN110297884 B CN 110297884B CN 201910406802 A CN201910406802 A CN 201910406802A CN 110297884 B CN110297884 B CN 110297884B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
project
questionnaire
type
questions
authentication
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201910406802.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN110297884A (en
Inventor
王明亮
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Advanced New Technologies Co Ltd
Advantageous New Technologies Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Advanced New Technologies Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Advanced New Technologies Co Ltd filed Critical Advanced New Technologies Co Ltd
Priority to CN201910406802.5A priority Critical patent/CN110297884B/en
Publication of CN110297884A publication Critical patent/CN110297884A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN110297884B publication Critical patent/CN110297884B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/33Querying
    • G06F16/3331Query processing
    • G06F16/334Query execution
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/103Workflow collaboration or project management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/08Insurance
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Abstract

The specification provides a project member authentication method and device, wherein the project member authentication method comprises the following steps: receiving an authentication request of a project member in a project for applying to join in a project audit group, wherein the authentication request carries identification information of the project member and a project type of the project member joining in the project; randomly selecting a first type of title from a database, and searching a second type of title corresponding to the item type from the database; generating a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, sending the questionnaire to the project members, and receiving questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the questionnaire; and evaluating the questionnaire answers, generating corresponding project audit group member authentication results, and transmitting the project audit group member authentication results to the project members.

Description

Project member authentication method and device
Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to the field of internet technologies, and in particular, to a method for authenticating a member of an item. The present specification also relates to an item member authentication apparatus, a computing device, and a computer-readable storage medium.
Background
In the internet insurance business, the determination of whether an adventure should be paid out is always a big problem, so that many online insurance platforms propose a manner of voting by members of a project audit group to determine whether to pay out an adventure. The project auditing group refers to an organization for project auditing, which is participated by the mutual insurance members with the election rights of a certain number of people, and the members of the organization are the members of the project auditing group. But project audit group membership authentication still presents difficulties.
Some simple methods in the prior art are that users purchasing insurance have project audit voting rights without screening, namely users purchasing insurance directly have project audit voting rights, but the method lacks authority and fairness, so that the specialty of project audit group member voting in the project audit process cannot be ensured, and the credibility of voting results cannot be ensured.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of this, embodiments of the present disclosure provide a project member authentication method. The present disclosure also relates to an item member authentication apparatus, a computing device, and a computer-readable storage medium, which solve the technical drawbacks in the prior art.
According to a first aspect of embodiments of the present specification, there is provided an item member authentication method, including:
receiving an authentication request of a project member in a project for applying to join in a project audit group, wherein the authentication request carries identification information of the project member and a project type of the project member joining in the project;
randomly selecting a first type of title from a database, and searching a second type of title corresponding to the item type from the database;
generating a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, sending the questionnaire to the project members, and receiving questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the questionnaire;
and evaluating the questionnaire answers, generating corresponding project audit group member authentication results, and transmitting the project audit group member authentication results to the project members.
Optionally, generating a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, sending the questionnaire to the project member, and receiving a questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated in response to the questionnaire, and before executing the step of generating a questionnaire answer to the questionnaire, further comprising:
Issuing learning materials related to the questionnaire to the project members;
and executing the steps of generating a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, sending the questionnaire to the project members and receiving questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the questionnaire under the condition that the learning result confirmation notification of the learning materials of the project members is received.
Optionally, generating a questionnaire based on the first type of topic and the second type of topic, sending the questionnaire to the project member, and receiving a questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated for the questionnaire comprises:
acquiring the difficulty coefficient grade of the questions contained in the first type of questions and the second type of questions;
classifying the questions contained in the first type questions and the second type questions into 1-m levels according to the difficulty coefficient levels, wherein the question difficulty coefficient levels corresponding to the 1-m levels are sequentially increased, and m is an integer larger than 1;
sending an ith grade question in the questionnaire to the project member, wherein i epsilon [1, m ], i is a positive integer which starts to be valued from 1;
Receiving an ith-level questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to an ith-level question in the questionnaire, evaluating the ith-level questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding ith evaluation score;
judging whether the ith evaluation score is larger than a preset score threshold value or not;
if yes, i is increased by 1, and whether i is smaller than or equal to m is judged;
and if i is less than or equal to m, returning to the substep of sending the ith grade title in the questionnaire to the project member.
Optionally, if the judging result of the judging whether i is less than or equal to m substeps is no, executing the following operations:
acquiring 1 st to m th-level questionnaires answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the 1 st to m th-level questions;
combining the 1 st to m th-level questionnaire answers to generate the questionnaire answers;
and if the judgment result of judging whether the ith evaluation score is larger than a preset score threshold is NO, executing the following operations:
and sending prompt information of failure in authentication of the project audit group members to the project members, and subtracting 1 from the authentication times of the project audit group members of the project members.
Optionally, evaluating the questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding item auditing group member authentication result, and sending the item auditing group member authentication result to the item member, including:
Acquiring 1 st to m th evaluation scores corresponding to 1 st to m th class questions in the questionnaire;
evaluating the answers of the questionnaire according to the weight coefficient and the 1 st to the m evaluation scores of each level of questions in the preset 1-m levels of questions and generating a corresponding first total evaluation score;
judging whether the first total evaluation score is greater than a highest score threshold;
if yes, a prompt message of successful authentication is sent to the project member.
Optionally, generating a questionnaire based on the first type of topic and the second type of topic, sending the questionnaire to the project member, and receiving a questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated for the questionnaire, including:
taking the first type of questions as a first component of the questionnaire and the second type of questions as a second component of the questionnaire;
sending a first component of the questionnaire to the project member;
receiving a first sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to the questions in the first component part, evaluating the first sub-questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding first evaluation score;
Judging whether the first evaluation score is larger than a preset score threshold value or not;
if yes, sending a second component in the questionnaire to the project member;
receiving a second sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to the questions in the second component part;
and combining the first sub-questionnaire answer and the second sub-questionnaire answer to generate the questionnaire answer.
Optionally, if the result of the step of determining whether the first evaluation score is greater than the preset score threshold is no, the following operations are executed:
judging whether the first evaluation score is greater than a lowest score threshold;
if yes, randomly selecting a first type of title from the database as the first component, and returning to execute the step of sending the first component in the questionnaire to the project member;
if not, sending prompt information of failure in authentication of the project audit group members to the project members, and subtracting 1 from the authentication times of the project audit group members of the project members;
judging whether the remaining authentication times after the authentication times are reduced by 1 are greater than 0;
if yes, randomly selecting a first type of title from the database as the first component, and returning to execute the step of sending the first component in the questionnaire to the project member.
Optionally, if the result of the step of determining whether the first evaluation score is greater than the preset score threshold is no, the following operations are executed:
judging whether the first evaluation score is greater than a lowest score threshold;
if yes, randomly selecting a first type of title from the database for the j th time, wherein j epsilon [2, n ], j takes a value from 2, and j and n are integers greater than or equal to 2;
sending a first component of the questionnaire to the project member;
receiving a j-th sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to the questions in the first component part, evaluating the j-th sub-questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding j-th evaluation score;
judging whether the j-th evaluation score is larger than a j-1-th evaluation score generated by previous evaluation;
if yes, j is increased by 1, and whether j is larger than n is judged;
if not, returning to execute the step of randomly selecting the first type of title from the database for the j th time as the first component sub-step;
if greater than n, a second component of the questionnaire is sent to the project member.
Optionally, if the judging result of the j-1 th evaluation score substep of judging whether the j-1 th evaluation score is greater than the j-1 th evaluation score generated by the previous evaluation is no, the following operations are executed:
and sending prompt information of failure in authentication of the project audit group members to the project members, and subtracting 1 from the authentication times of the project audit group members of the project members.
Optionally, evaluating the questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding item auditing group member authentication result, and sending the item auditing group member authentication result to the item member, including:
evaluating the questionnaire answers and generating corresponding second total evaluation scores;
judging whether the second total estimated score is greater than a highest score threshold;
and if the second total evaluation score is larger than the highest score threshold, sending prompt information of successful authentication to the project member.
Optionally, after the step of receiving the authentication request that the project member applies to join the project audit group in the project is executed, the step of randomly selecting the first type of title in the database, and searching the second type of title corresponding to the project type in the database is executed, further includes:
Determining a project audit group member authentication state of the project member;
if the authentication state of the project audit group member of the project member is not authenticated, determining the authentication times of the rest project audit group members of the project member;
if the remaining authentication times are 0, a prompt message of failure of authentication of the project audit group member is returned to the project member;
and if the remaining authentication times are greater than 0, issuing the questionnaire to the project member.
Optionally, after the step of receiving the authentication request that the project member applies to join the project audit group in the project is executed, the step of randomly selecting the first type of title in the database, and searching the second type of title corresponding to the project type in the database is executed, further includes:
acquiring identity information carried by the project member in the project audit group member authentication request;
verifying the identity of the project member according to the identity identification information of the project member;
executing the step of randomly selecting a first type of questions in a local database under the condition that the identity verification of the project member is passed;
and sending prompt information of failed authentication of the project audit group members to the project members under the condition that the authentication of the project members fails.
According to another aspect of the embodiments of the present specification, there is provided an item member authentication apparatus including:
the receiving module is configured to receive an authentication request of a project member in a project for applying to join a project audit group, wherein the authentication request carries identification information of the project member and a project type of the project member joining the project;
the title retrieval module is configured to randomly select a first type title in a database and retrieve a second type title corresponding to the item type in the database;
a questionnaire processing module configured to generate a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, send the questionnaire to the project members, and receive questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated for the questionnaire;
and the authentication result processing module is configured to evaluate the questionnaire answers, generate corresponding item auditing group member authentication results and send the item auditing group member authentication results to the item members.
Optionally, the project member authentication apparatus further includes:
a data issuing module configured to issue learning data related to the questionnaire to the project member;
The questionnaire processing module is further configured to generate a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, send the questionnaire to the project members, and receive questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the questionnaire when receiving a learning result confirmation notification of the learning materials by the project members.
Optionally, the questionnaire processing module comprises:
the first acquisition submodule is configured to acquire the difficulty coefficient grade of the questions contained in the first type of questions and the second type of questions;
the classification sub-module is configured to classify the topics contained in the first type of topics and the second type of topics into 1-m levels according to the difficulty coefficient levels, wherein the topic difficulty coefficient levels corresponding to the 1-m levels are sequentially increased, and m is an integer larger than 1;
the question sending submodule is configured to send the ith class of questions in the questionnaire to the project member, wherein i epsilon [1, m ] and i are positive integers with values from 1;
the first evaluation sub-module is configured to receive an ith-level questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to an ith-level question in the questionnaire, evaluate the ith-level questionnaire answer and generate a corresponding ith evaluation score;
A first evaluation score determination sub-module configured to determine whether the i-th evaluation score is greater than a preset score threshold;
the first numerical comparison submodule is configured to automatically increase i by 1 if the i-th evaluation score is obtained, and judge whether i is smaller than or equal to m;
and the circulation sub-module is configured to return to execute the transmission of the ith grade title in the questionnaire to the project member if i is less than or equal to m.
Optionally, the authentication result processing module includes:
a second obtaining sub-module configured to obtain 1 st to m th evaluation scores corresponding to 1 st to m th level topics in the questionnaire;
the second evaluation sub-module is configured to evaluate the questionnaire answers according to the weight coefficient and the 1 st to m th evaluation scores of each level of questions in the preset 1-m level of questions and generate corresponding first total evaluation scores;
a second evaluation score determination sub-module configured to determine whether the first total evaluation score is greater than a highest score threshold;
and the information sending sub-module is configured to send prompt information of successful authentication to the project member if the first total evaluation score is greater than a highest score threshold.
According to another aspect of the embodiments of the present specification, there is provided a computing device comprising a memory, a processor and computer instructions stored on the memory and executable on the processor, the processor implementing the steps of the item member authentication method when executing the instructions.
According to another aspect of the embodiments of the present description, there is provided a computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions which, when executed by a processor, implement the steps of the project member authentication method.
In the embodiment of the specification, an authentication request for applying for joining in a project audit group by a project member in the project is received, wherein the authentication request carries identification information of the project member and a project type of the project member joining in the project; randomly selecting a first type of title from a database, and searching a second type of title corresponding to the item type from the database; generating a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, sending the questionnaire to the project members, and receiving questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the questionnaire; and evaluating the questionnaire answers, generating corresponding project audit group member authentication results, and transmitting the project audit group member authentication results to the project members.
In the embodiment of the specification, the first type of questions are selected randomly in the database, the second type of questions corresponding to the item types of the item members added into the item are searched in the database, and the questionnaire is generated based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a computing device provided by an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a project membership authentication method provided by an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a process for generating a questionnaire answer in the project member authentication method according to the embodiment of the present application;
fig. 4 is a flowchart of another process for generating a questionnaire answer in the project member authentication method provided in the embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a questionnaire processing procedure in the project membership authentication method provided in the embodiment of the present application;
fig. 6 is a schematic structural diagram of an item member authentication apparatus provided in an embodiment of the present application.
Detailed Description
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present application. This application is, however, susceptible of embodiment in many other ways than those herein described and similar generalizations can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the application and the application is therefore not limited to the specific embodiments disclosed below.
The terminology used in the one or more embodiments of the specification is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the one or more embodiments of the specification. As used in this specification, one or more embodiments and the appended claims, the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It should also be understood that the term "and/or" as used in one or more embodiments of the present specification refers to and encompasses any or all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
It should be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. may be used in one or more embodiments of this specification to describe various information, these information should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one type of information from another. For example, a first may also be referred to as a second, and similarly, a second may also be referred to as a first, without departing from the scope of one or more embodiments of the present description. The word "if" as used herein may be interpreted as "at … …" or "at … …" or "responsive to a determination", depending on the context.
First, terms related to one or more embodiments of the present invention will be explained.
Claims audit group: an "censoring group" is a platform mediation mechanism by which a user may participate in the decision making of an insurance claim case. Is a business innovation of the insurance industry. Refers to a system that a certain number of mutual insurance members with election rights participate in deciding whether to pay a claim case or not. Similar to the clan in the national judicial system of the english-american system.
The claimant: the claimant is a participant in the claimant and has the right to vote for participation in the claimant's case. In general, to be an inspector, the inspector needs to go through a series of authentication tests, and only pass the authentication to have the voting rights of the related insurance claim cases.
In the present application, a project member authentication method is provided. The present specification relates to an item member authentication apparatus, a computing device, and a computer-readable storage medium, and is described in detail in the following embodiments.
Fig. 1 shows a block diagram of a computing device 100 according to an embodiment of the present description. The components of the computing device 100 include, but are not limited to, a memory 110 and a processor 120. Processor 120 is coupled to memory 110 via bus 130 and database 150 is used to store data.
Computing device 100 also includes access device 140, access device 140 enabling computing device 100 to communicate via one or more networks 160. Examples of such networks include the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN), a Local Area Network (LAN), a Wide Area Network (WAN), a Personal Area Network (PAN), or a combination of communication networks such as the internet. The access device 140 may include one or more of any type of network interface, wired or wireless (e.g., a Network Interface Card (NIC)), such as an IEEE802.11 Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) wireless interface, a worldwide interoperability for microwave access (Wi-MAX) interface, an ethernet interface, a Universal Serial Bus (USB) interface, a cellular network interface, a bluetooth interface, a Near Field Communication (NFC) interface, and so forth.
In one embodiment of the present description, the above-described components of computing device 100, as well as other components not shown in FIG. 1, may also be connected to each other, such as by a bus. It should be understood that the block diagram of the computing device shown in FIG. 1 is for exemplary purposes only and is not intended to limit the scope of the present description. Those skilled in the art may add or replace other components as desired.
Computing device 100 may be any type of stationary or mobile computing device including a mobile computer or mobile computing device (e.g., tablet, personal digital assistant, laptop, notebook, netbook, etc.), mobile phone (e.g., smart phone), wearable computing device (e.g., smart watch, smart glasses, etc.), or other type of mobile device, or a stationary computing device such as a desktop computer or PC. Computing device 100 may also be a mobile or stationary server.
Wherein the processor 120 may perform the steps of the project membership authentication method shown in fig. 2. Fig. 2 shows a flow chart of a method of item membership authentication, including steps 202 to 208, according to an embodiment of the present description.
Step 202: and receiving an authentication request of the project member in the project for applying to join in the project audit group, wherein the authentication request carries the identity information of the project member and the project type of the project member joining in the project.
Specifically, the item can be an insurance item, a mutual assistance item or a public benefit item, and the item member is the member joining the item. Taking an insurance item as an example, a user makes an insurance to become an item member of the insurance item, and the item member joining the item can apply for joining the item audit group.
In one embodiment provided by the specification, an authentication request of a project member for joining a project audit group carries identification information of the project member, after receiving the authentication request of the project member for joining the project audit group, a first type of title is selected randomly in a database, and before retrieving a second type of title corresponding to the project type in the database, a project audit group member authentication state of the project member is required to be determined; if the authentication state of the project audit group member of the project member is not authenticated, determining the authentication times of the rest project audit group members of the project member; if the remaining authentication times are 0, a prompt message of failure of authentication of the project audit group member is returned to the project member; and if the remaining authentication times are greater than 0, issuing the questionnaire to the project member.
Specifically, taking an insurance item as an example, after receiving an authentication request of a project member for joining in a claim audit group, determining an authentication state of the project member, if the authentication state of the project member is not authenticated, determining the remaining authentication times of the project member, and if the remaining authentication times are 2 times, issuing a questionnaire to the project member; if the remaining authentication times of the project members are 0 times, returning prompt information of authentication failure to the project members; in addition, if the authentication state of the project member is authentication, a prompt message of authentication is returned to the project member; if the authentication state of the project member is authentication success, a prompt message of authentication success is returned to the project member, and the project member becomes a claimant after authentication success.
In addition, after receiving an authentication request that an item member in an item applies for joining an item auditing group, randomly selecting a first type of title in a database, and before retrieving a second type of title corresponding to the item type in the database, verifying the identity of the item member through identity identification information of the item member carried in the authentication request; executing the step of randomly selecting a first type of questions in a local database under the condition that the identity verification of the project member is passed; and sending prompt information of failed authentication of the project audit group members to the project members under the condition that the authentication of the project members fails.
In one embodiment provided in the present disclosure, the execution sequence of the authentication process for the project member and the authentication number process for obtaining the project member may be determined according to actual needs, which is not limited herein.
Step 204: and randomly selecting a first type of title from a database, and searching a second type of title corresponding to the item type from the database.
In one embodiment provided by the specification, under the condition that the identity verification of the project member passes and the residual authentication times of the project member is not equal to 0, randomly selecting a first type of title in a database, searching a second type of title corresponding to the project type in the database, and issuing learning materials related to the questionnaire to the project member; in the case where a learning result confirmation notification of the learning material is received for the item member, step 206 is performed.
In one embodiment provided in the present disclosure, the first type of questions are basic questions related to the item, the second type of questions are necessary questions, and related to the item added by the item member, and the accuracy of the necessary questions must be higher than a preset highest score threshold in the answer process of the item member. Taking insurance items as an example, assuming that the insurance seed applied by a user is an accident insurance, the first type of questions are basic questions related to the insurance, the question scope is larger, the question difficulty is relatively lower, the second type of questions are questions related to the accident insurance, the question scope is smaller, the difficulty is relatively larger, the accuracy of the answer result of the first type of questions by the user is required to be higher than a preset accuracy threshold value of 80%, and the accuracy in the second type of questions is required to be 100%; if the total score of the first type of questions and the second type of questions is 100 points, the score of the first type of questions needs to be higher than 80 points, and the score of the second type of questions needs to be 100 points.
Step 206: generating a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, sending the questionnaire to the project members, and receiving questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the questionnaire.
In a first embodiment provided in the present specification, step 206 may be implemented by the steps shown in fig. 3, and fig. 3 shows a flowchart of a process for generating a questionnaire answer in the project member authentication method, which specifically includes the following sub-steps 302 to 318.
302: and obtaining the difficulty coefficient grade of the questions contained in the first type of questions and the second type of questions.
304: and classifying the topics contained in the first type of topics and the second type of topics into 1-m levels according to the difficulty coefficient levels, wherein the topic difficulty coefficient levels corresponding to the 1-m levels of topics are sequentially increased, and m is an integer greater than 1.
Specifically, taking m equal to 5 as an example, namely the difficulty coefficient grade of the questions is 1-5, classifying the first-type questions and the second-type questions into 1-5 according to the difficulty coefficient grade, wherein the 1-grade questions are all questions with the difficulty coefficient grade of 1 in the first-type questions and the second-type questions, the 2-grade questions are all questions with the difficulty coefficient grade of 2 in the first-type questions and the second-type questions, and the questions corresponding to the 1-5-grade questions are sequentially increased by the classification.
306: and sending an ith grade title in the questionnaire to the project member, wherein i epsilon [1, m ], i is a positive integer which starts to be valued from 1.
Specifically, i starts to take a value from 1, i.e. the item member is sent a level 1 title first.
308: and receiving an ith-level questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to an ith-level question in the questionnaire, evaluating the ith-level questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding ith evaluation score.
Taking i equal to 1 as an example, receiving a level 1 questionnaire submitted by a project member and generated for a level 1 question, evaluating the level 1 questionnaire and generating a corresponding level 1 evaluation score.
310: judging whether the ith evaluation score is larger than a preset score threshold value or not; if yes, go to sub-step 312; if not, sub-step 314 is performed.
Specifically, taking the preset score threshold value as 80 minutes as an example, judging whether the 1 st evaluation score generated in the step 308 is greater than 80 minutes, if yes, executing a step 312; if not, go to step 316.
312: i is increased by 1, and whether i is smaller than or equal to m is judged; if yes, execute sub-step 306; if not, sub-step 316 is performed.
In the substep 308, i is equal to 1, i is equal to 2 after i is increased by 1, and if it is judged that 2 is less than or equal to 5, then the level 2 questions in the questionnaire are sent to the project members.
314: and sending prompt information of failure in authentication of the project audit group members to the project members, and subtracting 1 from the authentication times of the project audit group members of the project members.
Specifically, if the 1 st evaluation score is not greater than the preset score threshold value of 80 scores, a prompt message of failure in authentication of the project audit group member is sent to the project member, and the authentication times of the project audit group member of the project member are reduced by 1. Assuming that the initial authentication number of the item member is 3 times, the remaining authentication number becomes 2 times after the authentication number is reduced by 1.
316: and acquiring the 1 st to m th questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by answering the 1 st to m th questions.
Specifically, if m is equal to 5, assuming that i is equal to 6 after 1 is increased, if i is greater than 5, obtaining 1 st to 5 th questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by answering the 1 st to 5 th questionnaires.
318: and combining the 1 st-m th-level questionnaire answers to generate the questionnaire answers.
Specifically, the 1 st to 5 th level questionnaire answers are combined to generate a final questionnaire answer.
In one embodiment provided by the specification, questions contained in the first type questions and the second type questions are classified according to the difficulty coefficient grades, questions are sent to the project members in the order from low to high according to the difficulty coefficient grades, the answers of the questions, which are generated by the project members in response to the questions, are evaluated, when the evaluation score is larger than a preset score threshold value, questions with higher difficulty coefficient grades are sent to the project members until all the questions are sent to completion, and when the evaluation score of the questions at any grade is smaller than or equal to the preset score threshold value, prompt information of authentication failure is returned to the project members, so that authority and effectiveness of the project audit group member authentication process are ensured.
In a second embodiment provided in the present specification, step 206 may also be implemented by the steps shown in fig. 4, where fig. 4 shows a flowchart of another questionnaire answer generation process in the project member authentication method, including sub-steps 402 to 414.
402: the first type of questions are used as a first component of the questionnaire, and the second type of questions are used as a second component of the questionnaire.
404: a first component of the questionnaire is sent to the project member.
406: and receiving a first sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to the questions in the first component part, evaluating the first sub-questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding first evaluation score.
408: judging whether the first evaluation score is larger than a preset score threshold value or not; if yes, go to sub-step 410; if not, judging whether the first evaluation score is larger than a lowest score threshold value.
Specifically, assuming that the preset score threshold is 80 score and the lowest score threshold is 60 score, if the first evaluation score is greater than 80 score, step 410 is executed; and if the first evaluation score is not more than 80 points, judging whether the first evaluation score is more than 60 points.
In one embodiment provided in the present specification, if the first evaluation score is greater than the lowest score threshold, the substeps shown in fig. 5 are performed, and fig. 5 shows a flow chart of a questionnaire processing procedure in the project membership authentication method, specifically including substeps 502 to 512.
502: and randomly selecting a first type of title for the j th time in the database as the first component, wherein j epsilon [2, n ], j takes a value from 2, and both j and n are integers which are more than or equal to 2.
In one embodiment provided by the specification, after generating a questionnaire according to a first type of topic and a second type of topic, the system issues related learning materials to the project members according to the content of the questionnaire, and n is the maximum value of the times of issuing the learning materials to the project members after the project members send authentication requests. If the first evaluation score is greater than the lowest score threshold and smaller than or equal to the preset score threshold, the first type of questions are selected randomly from the database again, so that j is valued from 2.
504: a first component of the questionnaire is sent to the project member.
506: and receiving a j-th sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to the questions in the first component part, evaluating the j-th sub-questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding j-th evaluation score.
508: judging whether the j-th evaluation score is larger than a j-1-th evaluation score generated by previous evaluation; if yes, execute sub-step 510; if not, sub-step 512 is performed.
Taking j as 3 as an example, receiving a 3 rd sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to the questions in the first component part, evaluating the 3 rd sub-questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding 3 rd evaluation score, judging whether the 3 rd evaluation score is greater than a 2 nd evaluation score, if yes, executing a substep 510; if not, sub-step 512 is performed.
510: j is incremented by 1 and it is determined if j is greater than n, if so, substep 410 is performed; if not, sub-step 502 is performed.
Specifically, taking n equal to 3 and j equal to 3 as an example, j is equal to 4 after j increases by 1, if j is determined to be greater than n, the sub-step 512 is executed, and if the value of j after j increases by 1 is not greater than n, the sub-step of randomly selecting the first type of title in the database may be executed.
512: and sending prompt information of failure in authentication of the project audit group members to the project members, and subtracting 1 from the authentication times of the project audit group members of the project members.
In one embodiment provided in the present specification, after subtracting 1 from the number of authentication times of the item auditing group member of the item member, the following operations may be further performed:
Judging whether the remaining authentication times after the authentication times are reduced by 1 are greater than 0;
if yes, randomly selecting a first type of title from the database as the first component, and returning to execute the step of sending the first component in the questionnaire to the project member;
if not, the processing is not needed.
In one embodiment provided in the present disclosure, the first type of questions are basic questions related to the project, and if the first answer score of the first type of questions is lower than the preset score threshold but higher than the lowest preset threshold, the user can obtain opportunities for re-learning and re-answering, so that the quality of the project audit team members can be effectively ensured, and thus, the project audit team members with higher quality can be screened.
410: a second component of the questionnaire is sent to the project member.
412: and receiving a second sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by answering the questions in the second component.
414: and combining the first sub-questionnaire answer and the second sub-questionnaire answer to generate the questionnaire answer.
In one embodiment provided by the specification, the first type of questions and the second type of questions are respectively used as two components of the questionnaire, the first component is issued to the user, and when the score obtained by the user for answering the first component is higher than a preset score threshold value, the second component is issued to the user, so that the screening efficiency of the project audit group members is ensured, and meanwhile, the quality of the project audit group members is ensured.
Step 208: and evaluating the questionnaire answers, generating corresponding project audit group member authentication results, and transmitting the project audit group member authentication results to the project members.
In one embodiment provided in the present disclosure, the evaluating the questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding item auditing group member authentication result, and sending the item auditing group member authentication result to the item member may be implemented by:
evaluating the questionnaire answers and generating corresponding second total evaluation scores;
judging whether the second total estimated score is greater than a highest score threshold;
and if the second total evaluation score is larger than the highest score threshold, sending prompt information of successful authentication to the project member.
Specifically, according to the implementation method described in fig. 3, the evaluation of the questionnaire answer and the generation of the corresponding authentication result of the project audit group member, and the transmission of the authentication result of the project audit group member to the project member may be implemented by the following steps:
acquiring 1 st to m th evaluation scores corresponding to 1 st to m th class questions in the questionnaire;
evaluating the answers of the questionnaire according to the weight coefficient and the 1 st to the m evaluation scores of each level of questions in the preset 1-m levels of questions and generating a corresponding first total evaluation score;
Judging whether the first total evaluation score is greater than a highest score threshold;
if yes, a prompt message of successful authentication is sent to the project member.
Taking m equal to 5 as an example, assuming that the 1 st to 5 th evaluation scores corresponding to the 1 st to 5 th level questions in the questionnaire are 85, 90, 95, 90 and 85, respectively, and the weight coefficients of each level of questions in the 1 st to 5 th level questions are 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30%, respectively, evaluating the answers of the questionnaire according to the weight coefficients of each level of questions in the 1 st to 5 th level questions and the 1 st to 5 th evaluation scores, and generating the corresponding first total evaluation scores as follows: 80 x 10% +90 x 15% +95 x 20% +90 x 25% +85 x 30% = 88.5, assuming that the highest score threshold is 85 scores, if the first total evaluation score 88.5 is greater than the highest score threshold 85, a prompt message of successful authentication is sent to the project member.
In one embodiment provided by the specification, the problem of cheating authentication of the project audit group members can be solved to a certain extent by randomly selecting the first type of questions in the database, searching the second type of questions corresponding to the project types of the project added by the user in the database and generating the questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, and fairness and authority of the project audit group member authentication process and authentication results are improved.
Corresponding to the above method embodiments, the present disclosure further provides an embodiment of the project member authentication apparatus, and fig. 6 shows a schematic structural diagram of the project member authentication apparatus according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. As shown in fig. 6, the apparatus includes:
the receiving module 602 is configured to receive an authentication request that an item member in an item applies for joining an item audit group, where the authentication request carries identification information of the item member and an item type of the item member joining the item;
a topic retrieval module 604 configured to randomly select a first type of topic in a database and retrieve a second type of topic corresponding to the item type in the database;
a questionnaire processing module 606 configured to generate a questionnaire based on the first type of topic and the second type of topic, send the questionnaire to the project members, and receive questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated for the questionnaire;
and the authentication result processing module 608 is configured to evaluate the questionnaire answer, generate a corresponding item auditing group member authentication result, and send the item auditing group member authentication result to the item member.
In one embodiment provided in the present specification, the item member authentication device further includes:
a data issuing module configured to issue learning data related to the questionnaire to the project member;
the questionnaire processing module is further configured to generate a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, send the questionnaire to the project members, and receive questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the questionnaire when receiving a learning result confirmation notification of the learning materials by the project members.
In one embodiment provided in the present specification, the questionnaire processing module includes:
the first acquisition submodule is configured to acquire the difficulty coefficient grade of the questions contained in the first type of questions and the second type of questions;
the classification sub-module is configured to classify the topics contained in the first type of topics and the second type of topics into 1-m levels according to the difficulty coefficient levels, wherein the topic difficulty coefficient levels corresponding to the 1-m levels are sequentially increased, and m is an integer larger than 1;
a first sending submodule configured to send an i-th grade title in the questionnaire to the project member, wherein i epsilon [1, m ], i is a positive integer which starts to be valued from 1;
The first evaluation sub-module is configured to receive an ith-level questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to an ith-level question in the questionnaire, evaluate the ith-level questionnaire answer and generate a corresponding ith evaluation score;
a first evaluation score determination sub-module configured to determine whether the i-th evaluation score is greater than a preset score threshold;
the first numerical comparison submodule is configured to automatically increase i by 1 if the i-th evaluation score is obtained, and judge whether i is smaller than or equal to m;
and the circulation sub-module is configured to return to execute the transmission of the ith grade title in the questionnaire to the project member if i is less than or equal to m.
Optionally, the questionnaire processing module further comprises:
the questionnaire answer obtaining sub-module is configured to obtain 1 st to m th questionnaires which are submitted by the project members and are generated by responding to the 1 st to m th questions if the i is not less than m;
a first questionnaire combining sub-module configured to combine the 1 st to m th-level questionnaire answers to generate the questionnaire answers;
and the processing sub-module is configured to send prompt information of failed authentication of the project audit group member to the project member and reduce the authentication times of the project audit group member of the project member by 1 if the i-th evaluation score is judged not to be larger than a preset score threshold value.
In one embodiment provided in the present specification, the authentication result processing module includes:
a second obtaining sub-module configured to obtain 1 st to m th evaluation scores corresponding to 1 st to m th level topics in the questionnaire;
the second evaluation sub-module is configured to evaluate the questionnaire answers according to the weight coefficient and the 1 st to m th evaluation scores of each level of questions in the preset 1-m level of questions and generate corresponding first total evaluation scores;
a second evaluation score determination sub-module configured to determine whether the first total evaluation score is greater than a highest score threshold;
and the information sending sub-module is configured to send prompt information of successful authentication to the project member if the first total evaluation score is greater than a highest score threshold.
In one embodiment provided in the present specification, the questionnaire processing module further comprises:
a questionnaire composition sub-module configured to take the first type of topic as a first component of the questionnaire and the second type of topic as a second component of the questionnaire;
a second transmission sub-module configured to transmit a first component of the questionnaire to the project member;
A third evaluation sub-module configured to receive a first sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the item member and generated by responding to the questions in the first component, evaluate the first sub-questionnaire answer, and generate a corresponding first evaluation score;
a third evaluation score determination sub-module configured to determine whether the first evaluation score is greater than a preset score threshold;
a third sending sub-module configured to send a second component of the questionnaire to the project member if the first evaluation score is greater than a preset score threshold;
a receiving sub-module configured to receive a second sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the item member generated for the questions in the second component;
and a second questionnaire combining sub-module configured to combine the first sub-questionnaire answer and the second sub-questionnaire answer to generate the questionnaire answer.
A fourth evaluation score determination sub-module configured to determine whether the first evaluation score is greater than a minimum score threshold if it is determined that the first evaluation score is not greater than a preset score threshold;
a first loop execution sub-module configured to randomly select a first type of topic in the database as the first component if the first evaluation score is greater than a minimum score threshold, and to return execution of sending the first component in the questionnaire to the item member;
A fourth sending sub-module configured to send prompt information of failed authentication of the project audit group member to the project member if the first evaluation score is not greater than a minimum score threshold value, and reduce the authentication times of the project audit group member of the project member by 1;
a second numerical comparison sub-module configured to determine whether the number of authentications remaining after subtracting 1 from the number of authentications is greater than 0;
and the second loop execution sub-module is configured to randomly select a first type of title in the database as the first component part if the remaining authentication number after the authentication number is reduced by 1 is greater than 0, and return to execute the sending of the first component part in the questionnaire to the project member.
A fifth evaluation score determination sub-module configured to determine whether the first evaluation score is greater than a minimum score threshold if the determination that the first evaluation score is not greater than a preset score threshold;
the title selecting sub-module is configured to randomly select a first type title for a j-th time in the database as the first component part if the first evaluation score is greater than a lowest score threshold, wherein j is 2 and n, j is a value from 2, and both j and n are integers greater than or equal to 2;
A fifth transmitting sub-module configured to transmit a first component of the questionnaire to the project member;
a fourth evaluation sub-module configured to receive a j-th sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the item member and generated by responding to the questions in the first component, evaluate the j-th sub-questionnaire answer, and generate a corresponding j-th evaluation score;
a sixth evaluation score judgment sub-module configured to judge whether the j-th evaluation score is larger than a j-1-th evaluation score generated by previous evaluation;
the third numerical comparison sub-module is configured to automatically increase j by 1 and judge whether j is larger than n if the j-th evaluation score is larger than the j-1 evaluation score generated by previous evaluation;
a third loop execution sub-module configured to return to execute the j-th randomly selecting a first type of title in the database as the first component if j is not greater than n;
a sixth transmitting sub-module configured to transmit a second component of the questionnaire to the project member if j is greater than n.
Optionally, the questionnaire processing module further comprises:
and the processing sub-module is configured to send prompt information of failed authentication of the project audit group member to the project member and reduce the authentication times of the project audit group member of the project member by 1 if the j-th evaluation score is not greater than the j-1-th evaluation score generated by previous evaluation.
Optionally, the authentication result processing module is further configured to:
evaluating the questionnaire answers and generating corresponding second total evaluation scores;
judging whether the second total estimated score is greater than a highest score threshold;
and if the second total evaluation score is larger than the highest score threshold, sending prompt information of successful authentication to the project member.
Optionally, the project member authentication apparatus further includes:
an authentication state determination module configured to determine an item audit group member authentication state of the item member;
the authentication number determining module is configured to determine the authentication number of the remaining item auditing group members of the item member if the authentication state of the item auditing group member of the item member is not authenticated;
the first information sending module is configured to return prompt information of failed authentication of the project audit group members to the project members if the residual authentication times are 0;
and the sending module is configured to issue the questionnaire to the project member if the remaining authentication times are greater than 0.
Optionally, the project member authentication apparatus further includes:
the identity information acquisition module is configured to acquire identity information of the project member carried in the project audit group member authentication request;
The identity verification module is configured to verify the identity of the project member according to the identity identification information of the project member;
an execution module configured to execute the step of randomly selecting a first type of question in a local database if the identity verification of the item member is passed;
and the second information sending module is configured to send prompt information of failed authentication of the project audit group member to the project member under the condition that the authentication of the project member is not passed.
A computing device in an embodiment of the present description includes a memory 110, a processor 120, and computer instructions stored on the memory 110 and executable on the processor, the processor 120 implementing the following steps when executing the instructions:
receiving an authentication request of a project member in a project for applying to join in a project audit group, wherein the authentication request carries identification information of the project member and a project type of the project member joining in the project;
randomly selecting a first type of title from a database, and searching a second type of title corresponding to the item type from the database;
generating a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, sending the questionnaire to the project members, and receiving questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the questionnaire;
And evaluating the questionnaire answers, generating corresponding project audit group member authentication results, and transmitting the project audit group member authentication results to the project members.
Optionally, generating a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, sending the questionnaire to the project member, and receiving a questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated in response to the questionnaire, and before executing the step of generating a questionnaire answer to the questionnaire, further comprising:
issuing learning materials related to the questionnaire to the project members;
and executing the steps of generating a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, sending the questionnaire to the project members and receiving questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the questionnaire under the condition that the learning result confirmation notification of the learning materials of the project members is received.
Optionally, generating a questionnaire based on the first type of topic and the second type of topic, sending the questionnaire to the project member, and receiving a questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated for the questionnaire comprises:
Acquiring the difficulty coefficient grade of the questions contained in the first type of questions and the second type of questions;
classifying the questions contained in the first type questions and the second type questions into 1-m levels according to the difficulty coefficient levels, wherein the question difficulty coefficient levels corresponding to the 1-m levels are sequentially increased, and m is an integer larger than 1;
sending an ith grade question in the questionnaire to the project member, wherein i epsilon [1, m ], i is a positive integer which starts to be valued from 1;
receiving an ith-level questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to an ith-level question in the questionnaire, evaluating the ith-level questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding ith evaluation score;
judging whether the ith evaluation score is larger than a preset score threshold value or not;
if yes, i is increased by 1, and whether i is smaller than or equal to m is judged;
and if i is less than or equal to m, returning to the substep of sending the ith grade title in the questionnaire to the project member.
Optionally, if the judging result of the judging whether i is less than or equal to m substeps is no, executing the following operations:
acquiring 1 st to m th-level questionnaires answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the 1 st to m th-level questions;
Combining the 1 st to m th-level questionnaire answers to generate the questionnaire answers;
and if the judgment result of judging whether the ith evaluation score is larger than a preset score threshold is NO, executing the following operations:
and sending prompt information of failure in authentication of the project audit group members to the project members, and subtracting 1 from the authentication times of the project audit group members of the project members.
Optionally, evaluating the questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding item auditing group member authentication result, and sending the item auditing group member authentication result to the item member, including:
acquiring 1 st to m th evaluation scores corresponding to 1 st to m th class questions in the questionnaire;
evaluating the answers of the questionnaire according to the weight coefficient and the 1 st to the m evaluation scores of each level of questions in the preset 1-m levels of questions and generating a corresponding first total evaluation score;
judging whether the first total evaluation score is greater than a highest score threshold;
if yes, a prompt message of successful authentication is sent to the project member.
Optionally, generating a questionnaire based on the first type of topic and the second type of topic, sending the questionnaire to the project member, and receiving a questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated for the questionnaire, including:
Taking the first type of questions as a first component of the questionnaire and the second type of questions as a second component of the questionnaire;
sending a first component of the questionnaire to the project member;
receiving a first sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to the questions in the first component part, evaluating the first sub-questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding first evaluation score;
judging whether the first evaluation score is larger than a preset score threshold value or not;
if yes, sending a second component in the questionnaire to the project member;
receiving a second sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to the questions in the second component part;
and combining the first sub-questionnaire answer and the second sub-questionnaire answer to generate the questionnaire answer.
Optionally, if the result of the step of determining whether the first evaluation score is greater than the preset score threshold is no, the following operations are executed:
judging whether the first evaluation score is greater than a lowest score threshold;
if yes, randomly selecting a first type of title from the database as the first component, and returning to execute the step of sending the first component in the questionnaire to the project member;
If not, sending prompt information of failure in authentication of the project audit group members to the project members, and subtracting 1 from the authentication times of the project audit group members of the project members;
judging whether the remaining authentication times after the authentication times are reduced by 1 are greater than 0;
if yes, randomly selecting a first type of title from the database as the first component, and returning to execute the step of sending the first component in the questionnaire to the project member.
Optionally, if the result of the step of determining whether the first evaluation score is greater than the preset score threshold is no, the following operations are executed:
judging whether the first evaluation score is greater than a lowest score threshold;
if yes, randomly selecting a first type of title from the database for the j th time, wherein j epsilon [2, n ], j takes a value from 2, and j and n are integers greater than or equal to 2;
sending a first component of the questionnaire to the project member;
receiving a j-th sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to the questions in the first component part, evaluating the j-th sub-questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding j-th evaluation score;
Judging whether the j-th evaluation score is larger than a j-1-th evaluation score generated by previous evaluation;
if yes, j is increased by 1, and whether j is larger than n is judged;
if not, returning to execute the step of randomly selecting the first type of title from the database for the j th time as the first component sub-step;
if greater than n, a second component of the questionnaire is sent to the project member.
Optionally, if the judging result of the j-1 th evaluation score substep of judging whether the j-1 th evaluation score is greater than the j-1 th evaluation score generated by the previous evaluation is no, the following operations are executed:
and sending prompt information of failure in authentication of the project audit group members to the project members, and subtracting 1 from the authentication times of the project audit group members of the project members.
Optionally, evaluating the questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding item auditing group member authentication result, and sending the item auditing group member authentication result to the item member, including:
evaluating the questionnaire answers and generating corresponding second total evaluation scores;
judging whether the second total estimated score is greater than a highest score threshold;
and if the second total evaluation score is larger than the highest score threshold, sending prompt information of successful authentication to the project member.
Optionally, after the step of receiving the authentication request that the project member applies to join the project audit group in the project is executed, the step of randomly selecting the first type of title in the database, and searching the second type of title corresponding to the project type in the database is executed, further includes:
determining a project audit group member authentication state of the project member;
if the authentication state of the project audit group member of the project member is not authenticated, determining the authentication times of the rest project audit group members of the project member;
if the remaining authentication times are 0, a prompt message of failure of authentication of the project audit group member is returned to the project member;
and if the remaining authentication times are greater than 0, issuing the questionnaire to the project member.
Optionally, after the step of receiving the authentication request that the project member applies to join the project audit group in the project is executed, the step of randomly selecting the first type of title in the database, and searching the second type of title corresponding to the project type in the database is executed, further includes:
acquiring identity information carried by the project member in the project audit group member authentication request;
Verifying the identity of the project member according to the identity identification information of the project member;
executing the step of randomly selecting a first type of questions in a local database under the condition that the identity verification of the project member is passed;
and sending prompt information of failed authentication of the project audit group members to the project members under the condition that the authentication of the project members fails.
An embodiment of the present application also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions that when executed by a processor perform the steps of:
receiving an authentication request of a project member in a project for applying to join in a project audit group, wherein the authentication request carries identification information of the project member and a project type of the project member joining in the project;
randomly selecting a first type of title from a database, and searching a second type of title corresponding to the item type from the database;
generating a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, sending the questionnaire to the project members, and receiving questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the questionnaire;
And evaluating the questionnaire answers, generating corresponding project audit group member authentication results, and transmitting the project audit group member authentication results to the project members.
Optionally, generating a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, sending the questionnaire to the project member, and receiving a questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated in response to the questionnaire, and before executing the step of generating a questionnaire answer to the questionnaire, further comprising:
issuing learning materials related to the questionnaire to the project members;
and executing the steps of generating a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, sending the questionnaire to the project members and receiving questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the questionnaire under the condition that the learning result confirmation notification of the learning materials of the project members is received.
Optionally, generating a questionnaire based on the first type of topic and the second type of topic, sending the questionnaire to the project member, and receiving a questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated for the questionnaire comprises:
Acquiring the difficulty coefficient grade of the questions contained in the first type of questions and the second type of questions;
classifying the questions contained in the first type questions and the second type questions into 1-m levels according to the difficulty coefficient levels, wherein the question difficulty coefficient levels corresponding to the 1-m levels are sequentially increased, and m is an integer larger than 1;
sending an ith grade question in the questionnaire to the project member, wherein i epsilon [1, m ], i is a positive integer which starts to be valued from 1;
receiving an ith-level questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to an ith-level question in the questionnaire, evaluating the ith-level questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding ith evaluation score;
judging whether the ith evaluation score is larger than a preset score threshold value or not;
if yes, i is increased by 1, and whether i is smaller than or equal to m is judged;
and if i is less than or equal to m, returning to the substep of sending the ith grade title in the questionnaire to the project member.
Optionally, if the judging result of the judging whether i is less than or equal to m substeps is no, executing the following operations:
acquiring 1 st to m th-level questionnaires answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the 1 st to m th-level questions;
Combining the 1 st to m th-level questionnaire answers to generate the questionnaire answers;
and if the judgment result of judging whether the ith evaluation score is larger than a preset score threshold is NO, executing the following operations:
and sending prompt information of failure in authentication of the project audit group members to the project members, and subtracting 1 from the authentication times of the project audit group members of the project members.
Optionally, evaluating the questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding item auditing group member authentication result, and sending the item auditing group member authentication result to the item member, including:
acquiring 1 st to m th evaluation scores corresponding to 1 st to m th class questions in the questionnaire;
evaluating the answers of the questionnaire according to the weight coefficient and the 1 st to the m evaluation scores of each level of questions in the preset 1-m levels of questions and generating a corresponding first total evaluation score;
judging whether the first total evaluation score is greater than a highest score threshold;
if yes, a prompt message of successful authentication is sent to the project member.
Optionally, generating a questionnaire based on the first type of topic and the second type of topic, sending the questionnaire to the project member, and receiving a questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated for the questionnaire, including:
Taking the first type of questions as a first component of the questionnaire and the second type of questions as a second component of the questionnaire;
sending a first component of the questionnaire to the project member;
receiving a first sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to the questions in the first component part, evaluating the first sub-questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding first evaluation score;
judging whether the first evaluation score is larger than a preset score threshold value or not;
if yes, sending a second component in the questionnaire to the project member;
receiving a second sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to the questions in the second component part;
and combining the first sub-questionnaire answer and the second sub-questionnaire answer to generate the questionnaire answer.
Optionally, if the result of the step of determining whether the first evaluation score is greater than the preset score threshold is no, the following operations are executed:
judging whether the first evaluation score is greater than a lowest score threshold;
if yes, randomly selecting a first type of title from the database as the first component, and returning to execute the step of sending the first component in the questionnaire to the project member;
If not, sending prompt information of failure in authentication of the project audit group members to the project members, and subtracting 1 from the authentication times of the project audit group members of the project members;
judging whether the remaining authentication times after the authentication times are reduced by 1 are greater than 0;
if yes, randomly selecting a first type of title from the database as the first component, and returning to execute the step of sending the first component in the questionnaire to the project member.
Optionally, if the result of the step of determining whether the first evaluation score is greater than the preset score threshold is no, the following operations are executed:
judging whether the first evaluation score is greater than a lowest score threshold;
if yes, randomly selecting a first type of title from the database for the j th time, wherein j epsilon [2, n ], j takes a value from 2, and j and n are integers greater than or equal to 2;
sending a first component of the questionnaire to the project member;
receiving a j-th sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to the questions in the first component part, evaluating the j-th sub-questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding j-th evaluation score;
Judging whether the j-th evaluation score is larger than a j-1-th evaluation score generated by previous evaluation;
if yes, j is increased by 1, and whether j is larger than n is judged;
if not, returning to execute the step of randomly selecting the first type of title from the database for the j th time as the first component sub-step;
if greater than n, a second component of the questionnaire is sent to the project member.
Optionally, if the judging result of the j-1 th evaluation score substep of judging whether the j-1 th evaluation score is greater than the j-1 th evaluation score generated by the previous evaluation is no, the following operations are executed:
and sending prompt information of failure in authentication of the project audit group members to the project members, and subtracting 1 from the authentication times of the project audit group members of the project members.
Optionally, evaluating the questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding item auditing group member authentication result, and sending the item auditing group member authentication result to the item member, including:
evaluating the questionnaire answers and generating corresponding second total evaluation scores;
judging whether the second total estimated score is greater than a highest score threshold;
and if the second total evaluation score is larger than the highest score threshold, sending prompt information of successful authentication to the project member.
Optionally, after the step of receiving the authentication request that the project member applies to join the project audit group in the project is executed, the step of randomly selecting the first type of title in the database, and searching the second type of title corresponding to the project type in the database is executed, further includes:
determining a project audit group member authentication state of the project member;
if the authentication state of the project audit group member of the project member is not authenticated, determining the authentication times of the rest project audit group members of the project member;
if the remaining authentication times are 0, a prompt message of failure of authentication of the project audit group member is returned to the project member;
and if the remaining authentication times are greater than 0, issuing the questionnaire to the project member.
Optionally, after the step of receiving the authentication request that the project member applies to join the project audit group in the project is executed, the step of randomly selecting the first type of title in the database, and searching the second type of title corresponding to the project type in the database is executed, further includes:
acquiring identity information carried by the project member in the project audit group member authentication request;
Verifying the identity of the project member according to the identity identification information of the project member;
executing the step of randomly selecting a first type of questions in a local database under the condition that the identity verification of the project member is passed;
and sending prompt information of failed authentication of the project audit group members to the project members under the condition that the authentication of the project members fails.
The above is an exemplary version of a computer-readable storage medium of the present embodiment. It should be noted that, the technical solution of the storage medium and the technical solution of the project member authentication method belong to the same concept, and details of the technical solution of the storage medium which are not described in detail can be referred to the description of the technical solution of the project member authentication method.
The foregoing describes specific embodiments of the present disclosure. Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims. In some cases, the actions or steps recited in the claims can be performed in a different order than in the embodiments and still achieve desirable results. In addition, the processes depicted in the accompanying figures do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In some embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are also possible or may be advantageous.
The computer instructions include computer program code that may be in source code form, object code form, executable file or some intermediate form, etc. The computer readable medium may include: any entity or device capable of carrying the computer program code, a recording medium, a U disk, a removable hard disk, a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a computer Memory, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a random access Memory (RAM, random Access Memory), an electrical carrier signal, a telecommunications signal, a software distribution medium, and so forth. It should be noted that the computer readable medium contains content that can be appropriately scaled according to the requirements of jurisdictions in which such content is subject to legislation and patent practice, such as in certain jurisdictions in which such content is subject to legislation and patent practice, the computer readable medium does not include electrical carrier signals and telecommunication signals.
It should be noted that, for the sake of simplicity of description, the foregoing method embodiments are all expressed as a series of combinations of actions, but it should be understood by those skilled in the art that the present application is not limited by the order of actions described, as some steps may be performed in other order or simultaneously in accordance with the present application. Further, those skilled in the art will also appreciate that the embodiments described in the specification are all preferred embodiments, and that the acts and modules referred to are not necessarily all necessary for the present application.
In the foregoing embodiments, the descriptions of the embodiments are emphasized, and for parts of one embodiment that are not described in detail, reference may be made to the related descriptions of other embodiments.
The above-disclosed preferred embodiments of the present application are provided only as an aid to the elucidation of the present application. Alternative embodiments are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Obviously, many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the application and the practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best understand and utilize the application. This application is to be limited only by the claims and the full scope and equivalents thereof.

Claims (18)

1. A method of item member authentication, comprising:
receiving an authentication request of a project member in a project for applying to join in a project audit group, wherein the authentication request carries identification information of the project member and a project type of the project member joining in the project;
randomly selecting a first type of title from a database, and searching a second type of title corresponding to the item type from the database;
Generating a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, sending the questionnaire to the project members, and receiving questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the questionnaire;
and evaluating the questionnaire answers, generating corresponding project audit group member authentication results, and transmitting the project audit group member authentication results to the project members.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of generating a questionnaire based on the first type of topic and the second type of topic, sending the questionnaire to the item member, and receiving a questionnaire answer submitted by the item member for answer generation to the questionnaire, further comprises:
issuing learning materials related to the questionnaire to the project members;
and executing the steps of generating a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, sending the questionnaire to the project members and receiving questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the questionnaire under the condition that the learning result confirmation notification of the learning materials of the project members is received.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the generating a questionnaire based on the first type of topic and the second type of topic, sending the questionnaire to the item member, and receiving a questionnaire answer submitted by the item member that was generated for the questionnaire comprises:
acquiring the difficulty coefficient grade of the questions contained in the first type of questions and the second type of questions;
classifying the questions contained in the first type questions and the second type questions into 1-m levels according to the difficulty coefficient levels, wherein the question difficulty coefficient levels corresponding to the 1-m levels are sequentially increased, and m is an integer larger than 1;
sending an ith grade question in the questionnaire to the project member, wherein i epsilon [1, m ], i is a positive integer which starts to be valued from 1;
receiving an ith-level questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to an ith-level question in the questionnaire, evaluating the ith-level questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding ith evaluation score;
judging whether the ith evaluation score is larger than a preset score threshold value or not;
if yes, i is increased by 1, and whether i is smaller than or equal to m is judged;
and if i is less than or equal to m, returning to the substep of sending the ith grade title in the questionnaire to the project member.
4. A method according to claim 3, wherein if the determination result of the determining whether i is less than or equal to m substeps is no, the following operations are performed:
acquiring 1 st to m th-level questionnaires answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the 1 st to m th-level questions;
combining the 1 st to m th-level questionnaire answers to generate the questionnaire answers;
and if the judgment result of judging whether the ith evaluation score is larger than a preset score threshold is NO, executing the following operations:
and sending prompt information of failure in authentication of the project audit group members to the project members, and subtracting 1 from the authentication times of the project audit group members of the project members.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein evaluating the questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding item audit group member authentication result, transmitting the item audit group member authentication result to the item member, comprises:
acquiring 1 st to m th evaluation scores corresponding to 1 st to m th class questions in the questionnaire;
evaluating the answers of the questionnaire according to the weight coefficient and the 1 st to the m evaluation scores of each level of questions in the preset 1-m levels of questions and generating a corresponding first total evaluation score;
Judging whether the first total evaluation score is greater than a highest score threshold;
if yes, a prompt message of successful authentication is sent to the project member.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the generating a questionnaire based on the first type of topic and the second type of topic, sending the questionnaire to the item member, and receiving a questionnaire answer submitted by the item member that was generated in response to the questionnaire, comprises:
taking the first type of questions as a first component of the questionnaire and the second type of questions as a second component of the questionnaire;
sending a first component of the questionnaire to the project member;
receiving a first sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to the questions in the first component part, evaluating the first sub-questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding first evaluation score;
judging whether the first evaluation score is larger than a preset score threshold value or not;
if yes, sending a second component in the questionnaire to the project member;
receiving a second sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to the questions in the second component part;
And combining the first sub-questionnaire answer and the second sub-questionnaire answer to generate the questionnaire answer.
7. The method according to claim 6, wherein if the determination result of the sub-step of determining whether the first evaluation score is greater than a preset score threshold is negative, performing the following operations:
judging whether the first evaluation score is greater than a lowest score threshold;
if yes, randomly selecting a first type of title from the database as the first component, and returning to execute the step of sending the first component in the questionnaire to the project member;
if not, sending prompt information of failure in authentication of the project audit group members to the project members, and subtracting 1 from the authentication times of the project audit group members of the project members;
judging whether the remaining authentication times after the authentication times are reduced by 1 are greater than 0;
if yes, randomly selecting a first type of title from the database as the first component, and returning to execute the step of sending the first component in the questionnaire to the project member.
8. The method according to claim 6, wherein if the determination result of the sub-step of determining whether the first evaluation score is greater than a preset score threshold is negative, performing the following operations:
Judging whether the first evaluation score is greater than a lowest score threshold;
if yes, randomly selecting a first type of title from the database for the j th time, wherein j epsilon [2, n ], j takes a value from 2, and j and n are integers greater than or equal to 2;
sending a first component of the questionnaire to the project member;
receiving a j-th sub-questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to the questions in the first component part, evaluating the j-th sub-questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding j-th evaluation score;
judging whether the j-th evaluation score is larger than a j-1-th evaluation score generated by previous evaluation;
if yes, j is increased by 1, and whether j is larger than n is judged;
if not, returning to execute the step of randomly selecting the first type of title from the database for the j th time as the first component sub-step;
if greater than n, a second component of the questionnaire is sent to the project member.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein if the determination result of the j-1 evaluation score sub-step of determining whether the j-1 evaluation score is greater than the j-1 evaluation score generated by the previous evaluation is no, performing the following operations:
And sending prompt information of failure in authentication of the project audit group members to the project members, and subtracting 1 from the authentication times of the project audit group members of the project members.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein evaluating the questionnaire answer and generating a corresponding item audit group member authentication result, transmitting the item audit group member authentication result to the item member, comprises:
evaluating the questionnaire answers and generating corresponding second total evaluation scores;
judging whether the second total estimated score is greater than a highest score threshold;
and if the second total evaluation score is larger than the highest score threshold, sending prompt information of successful authentication to the project member.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein after the step of receiving the authentication request for the item member to join the item review group, the step of randomly selecting the first type of title in the database and retrieving the second type of title corresponding to the item type in the database further comprises:
determining a project audit group member authentication state of the project member;
If the authentication state of the project audit group member of the project member is not authenticated, determining the authentication times of the rest project audit group members of the project member;
if the remaining authentication times are 0, a prompt message of failure of authentication of the project audit group member is returned to the project member;
and if the remaining authentication times are greater than 0, issuing the questionnaire to the project member.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein after the step of receiving the authentication request for the item member to join the item review group, the step of randomly selecting the first type of title in the database and retrieving the second type of title corresponding to the item type in the database further comprises:
acquiring identity information carried by the project member in the project audit group member authentication request;
verifying the identity of the project member according to the identity identification information of the project member;
executing the step of randomly selecting a first type of questions in a local database under the condition that the identity verification of the project member is passed;
and sending prompt information of failed authentication of the project audit group members to the project members under the condition that the authentication of the project members fails.
13. An item member authentication apparatus, comprising:
the receiving module is configured to receive an authentication request of a project member in a project for applying to join a project audit group, wherein the authentication request carries identification information of the project member and a project type of the project member joining the project;
the title retrieval module is configured to randomly select a first type title in a database and retrieve a second type title corresponding to the item type in the database;
a questionnaire processing module configured to generate a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, send the questionnaire to the project members, and receive questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated for the questionnaire;
and the authentication result processing module is configured to evaluate the questionnaire answers, generate corresponding item auditing group member authentication results and send the item auditing group member authentication results to the item members.
14. The apparatus as recited in claim 13, further comprising:
a data issuing module configured to issue learning data related to the questionnaire to the project member;
The questionnaire processing module is further configured to generate a questionnaire based on the first type of questions and the second type of questions, send the questionnaire to the project members, and receive questionnaire answers submitted by the project members and generated by responding to the questionnaire when receiving a learning result confirmation notification of the learning materials by the project members.
15. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the questionnaire processing module comprises:
the first acquisition submodule is configured to acquire the difficulty coefficient grade of the questions contained in the first type of questions and the second type of questions;
the classification sub-module is configured to classify the topics contained in the first type of topics and the second type of topics into 1-m levels according to the difficulty coefficient levels, wherein the topic difficulty coefficient levels corresponding to the 1-m levels are sequentially increased, and m is an integer larger than 1;
the question sending submodule is configured to send the ith class of questions in the questionnaire to the project member, wherein i epsilon [1, m ] and i are positive integers with values from 1;
the first evaluation sub-module is configured to receive an ith-level questionnaire answer submitted by the project member and generated by responding to an ith-level question in the questionnaire, evaluate the ith-level questionnaire answer and generate a corresponding ith evaluation score;
A first evaluation score determination sub-module configured to determine whether the i-th evaluation score is greater than a preset score threshold;
the first numerical comparison submodule is configured to automatically increase i by 1 if the i-th evaluation score is obtained, and judge whether i is smaller than or equal to m;
and the circulation sub-module is configured to return to execute the transmission of the ith grade title in the questionnaire to the project member if i is less than or equal to m.
16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the authentication result processing module comprises:
a second obtaining sub-module configured to obtain 1 st to m th evaluation scores corresponding to 1 st to m th level topics in the questionnaire;
the second evaluation sub-module is configured to evaluate the questionnaire answers according to the weight coefficient and the 1 st to m th evaluation scores of each level of questions in the preset 1-m level of questions and generate corresponding first total evaluation scores;
a second evaluation score determination sub-module configured to determine whether the first total evaluation score is greater than a highest score threshold;
and the information sending sub-module is configured to send prompt information of successful authentication to the project member if the first total evaluation score is greater than a highest score threshold.
17. A computing device comprising a memory, a processor, and computer instructions stored on the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor, when executing the instructions, implements the steps of the method of any of claims 1-12.
18. A computer readable storage medium storing computer instructions which, when executed by a processor, implement the steps of the method of any one of claims 1 to 12.
CN201910406802.5A 2019-05-16 2019-05-16 Project member authentication method and device Active CN110297884B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910406802.5A CN110297884B (en) 2019-05-16 2019-05-16 Project member authentication method and device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910406802.5A CN110297884B (en) 2019-05-16 2019-05-16 Project member authentication method and device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN110297884A CN110297884A (en) 2019-10-01
CN110297884B true CN110297884B (en) 2023-04-28

Family

ID=68026860

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910406802.5A Active CN110297884B (en) 2019-05-16 2019-05-16 Project member authentication method and device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN110297884B (en)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106657164A (en) * 2017-03-06 2017-05-10 泰华智慧产业集团股份有限公司 Composite identity recognition algorithm for real name authentication, and identity recognition system for real name authentication
CN107392829A (en) * 2017-08-21 2017-11-24 中国电建集团北京勘测设计研究院有限公司 Water power Emigration in Water Conservancy Project evaluation information system
CN109285076A (en) * 2018-02-07 2019-01-29 中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司 Intelligent core protects processing method, server and storage medium
CN109672694A (en) * 2019-02-26 2019-04-23 深圳市信锐网科技术有限公司 A kind of method, apparatus and associated component of information collection
CN109727055A (en) * 2018-06-01 2019-05-07 平安普惠企业管理有限公司 Network Questionnaire Survey method, apparatus, equipment and computer readable storage medium

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004102341A2 (en) * 2003-05-07 2004-11-25 Ncqa Automated accreditation system
US10327139B2 (en) * 2016-10-06 2019-06-18 Bank Of America Corporation Multi-level authentication using phone application level data

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106657164A (en) * 2017-03-06 2017-05-10 泰华智慧产业集团股份有限公司 Composite identity recognition algorithm for real name authentication, and identity recognition system for real name authentication
CN107392829A (en) * 2017-08-21 2017-11-24 中国电建集团北京勘测设计研究院有限公司 Water power Emigration in Water Conservancy Project evaluation information system
CN109285076A (en) * 2018-02-07 2019-01-29 中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司 Intelligent core protects processing method, server and storage medium
CN109727055A (en) * 2018-06-01 2019-05-07 平安普惠企业管理有限公司 Network Questionnaire Survey method, apparatus, equipment and computer readable storage medium
CN109672694A (en) * 2019-02-26 2019-04-23 深圳市信锐网科技术有限公司 A kind of method, apparatus and associated component of information collection

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Delphi法确立临床护理专家的资格认证方法;杨小平等;《现代护理》;20050630(第06期);全文 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN110297884A (en) 2019-10-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20080133552A1 (en) Information Processor Arrangement
CN108021934B (en) Method and device for recognizing multiple elements
CN110163005B (en) Block chain-based service processing method, system, computing device and storage medium
Coan et al. It's not easy being green: Minor party labels as heuristic aids
US20200210693A1 (en) Internet-based crowd peer review methods and systems
CN107835247B (en) Credit authentication and guarantee system and method
CN111428217A (en) Method and device for identifying cheat group, electronic equipment and computer readable storage medium
CN107517180A (en) Login method and device
CN114548118A (en) Service conversation detection method and system
CN110297884B (en) Project member authentication method and device
CN110188977B (en) Project audit member scheduling method and device
CN111047146B (en) Risk identification method, device and equipment for enterprise users
CN110059457B (en) Body-building method and device
CN110189092B (en) Method and device for evaluating audit group members
Hendricks et al. Can a mobile credit-scoring model provide better accessibility to South African citizens requiring micro-lending?
CN112766824B (en) Data processing method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium
WO2020108131A1 (en) Data processing method, device, computing apparatus, and storage medium
CN114970670A (en) Model fairness assessment method and device
Stobb et al. Mixed messages & bounded rationality: The perverse consequences of real ID for immigration policy
CN110213210A (en) A kind of network operation requesting method, server and storage medium
CN112185355B (en) Information processing method, device, equipment and readable storage medium
CN116401685A (en) Data full-flow risk internal examination method, device and platform
CN117592859A (en) LSTM-based customer financial risk assessment method, device and equipment
Vestad et al. Adoption of Cybersecurity Innovations—A Systematic Literature Review
Pintea et al. AUTOMATIC EVALUATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL QUIZ TESTS.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
TA01 Transfer of patent application right

Effective date of registration: 20200930

Address after: Cayman Enterprise Centre, 27 Hospital Road, George Town, Grand Cayman Islands

Applicant after: Advanced innovation technology Co.,Ltd.

Address before: A four-storey 847 mailbox in Grand Cayman Capital Building, British Cayman Islands

Applicant before: Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.

Effective date of registration: 20200930

Address after: Cayman Enterprise Centre, 27 Hospital Road, George Town, Grand Cayman Islands

Applicant after: Innovative advanced technology Co.,Ltd.

Address before: Cayman Enterprise Centre, 27 Hospital Road, George Town, Grand Cayman Islands

Applicant before: Advanced innovation technology Co.,Ltd.

TA01 Transfer of patent application right
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant