WO2024162214A1

WO2024162214A1 - Resin molded body

Info

Publication number: WO2024162214A1
Application number: PCT/JP2024/002451
Authority: WO
Inventors: 竜弥和田; 敦遊佐; 聡生谷口; 智史山本
Original assignee: マクセル株式会社
Priority date: 2023-01-31
Filing date: 2024-01-26
Publication date: 2024-08-08
Also published as: JP2024108991A; JP7482278B1

Abstract

Provided is a resin molded body having excellent mechanical strength even if said body is a resin molded body containing a thin-walled portion, being of uneven thickness, and being formed by shaping a foamed resin. A resin molded body 1 is formed by shaping a foamed resin sheet 10 including: a core layer 11; a skin layer 12 laminated on one major surface of the core layer 11; and a skin layer 13 laminated on another major surface. The thinnest-walled portion has a thickness of at least 0.5 mm. The thickest-walled portion has a thickness of at most 5.0 mm. The resin molded body 1 includes a thinnest-walled portion 2 having a minimum thickness and a thickest-walled portion 3 having a maximum thickness. A first ratio (M1/M2) of an elastic modulus M1 of the thinnest-walled portion 2 and an elastic modulus M2 of the thickest-walled portion 3 is at least 0.7.

Description

Resin Molding

This disclosure relates to a resin molded body formed from a foamed resin sheet.

In recent years, foamed resins have been attracting attention as they can increase convenience by reducing the weight of resin molded bodies and reduce carbon dioxide emissions. There are two methods for molding foamed resins: physical foam molding and chemical foam molding. Chemical foam molding uses a chemical foaming agent as the foaming agent. Chemical foaming agents have a high environmental impact and are not preferred from the perspective of protecting the global environment. On the other hand, physical foam molding uses a physical foaming agent such as nitrogen or carbon dioxide as the foaming agent. Physical foaming agents have a small environmental impact and are preferred from the perspective of protecting the global environment. Physical foam molding includes a method for foaming highly heat-resistant engineering plastics and super engineering plastics, in which molten resin of engineering plastics and super engineering plastics is shear-kneaded and dissolved with high-pressure supercritical fluid.

Patent Publication No. 6139038 (Patent Document 1) discloses a method for producing a foamed molded body using a physical foaming agent such as nitrogen or carbon dioxide at a relatively low pressure, rather than a high-pressure supercritical fluid. This method makes it possible to form fine foam cells in a resin molded body through a relatively simple process using a low-pressure physical foaming agent without using a special high-pressure device. Patent Document 1 also discloses methods for forming a foamed molded body using injection molding and extrusion molding.

Injection molding can produce foamed molded products with complex shapes. However, the surface layer of the molten resin flows inside the mold while cooling and solidifying. At that time, a relatively thin non-foamed skin layer is formed on the surface of the foamed molded product. On the other hand, extrusion molding has fewer restrictions on mold size and load than injection molding, and is suitable for continuously producing foamed molded products of a single shape and thickness. In addition, sheet-like foamed molded products obtained by extrusion molding can be shaped into relatively complex shapes or relatively large sizes by vacuum molding, etc. However, with extrusion molding, it is difficult for a skin layer to form on the surface of the foamed molded product when the molten resin is discharged from the die outlet and cooled and solidified.

As a method for forming a skin layer with sufficient thickness, Japanese Patent No. 3654697 (Patent Document 2) discloses a method for manufacturing a thermoplastic resin foam sheet. According to this method for manufacturing a thermoplastic resin foam sheet, a skin layer can be easily formed on the surface of a thermoplastic resin foam sheet by extrusion molding. In addition, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2000-52370 (Patent Document 3) discloses a method for manufacturing a multi-layer laminate molded body. In the multi-layer laminate molded body, a core layer and a skin layer made of foamed resin are formed by co-extrusion molding. The manufacturing methods of Patent Document 2 and Patent Document 3 use general-purpose plastics such as polypropylene or polystyrene, which have relatively low heat resistance and mechanical strength, as the main resin material, and do not form a skin layer for the purpose of heat resistance and mechanical strength.

Japanese Patent No. 7100216 (Patent Document 4) discloses a coextruded sheet that can suppress surface swelling and cracking of the coextruded sheet that occurs during thermal shaping such as vacuum forming, and can obtain excellent lightness and mechanical strength. The coextruded sheet contains polycarbonate resin, which is an engineering plastic with excellent heat resistance and strength. The coextruded sheet includes a core layer made of a foamed resin, and a skin layer laminated on each of one and the other main surfaces of the core layer. The coextruded sheet aims to improve mechanical strength and surface smoothness by controlling the density and the ratio of the thickness of the core layer and the skin layer, or by controlling the melt volume rate (MVR), etc.

Patent No. 6139038 Patent No. 3654697 JP 2000-52370 A Patent No. 7100216

However, although the co-extruded sheet of Patent Document 4 can achieve excellent mechanical strength and surface smoothness, it is necessary to ensure excellent mechanical strength in the shape of the resin molded product after vacuum forming, for example, in thin-walled parts that are relatively thin and difficult to obtain mechanical strength in. In other words, there is still ample room for further study in order to obtain better mechanical strength in resin molded products obtained by vacuum forming, etc., of co-extruded sheets.

The objective of this disclosure is to provide a resin molded body that has excellent mechanical strength, even if it is a resin molded body with uneven thickness that includes thin-walled portions and is formed by shaping a foamed resin.

In order to solve the above problems, the present disclosure provides the following solution. That is, the resin molded body according to the present disclosure is formed by shaping a foamed resin sheet including a foamed layer, a first non-foamed layer laminated on one main surface of the foamed layer, and a second non-foamed layer laminated on the other main surface of the foamed layer. The resin molded body may include a thinnest part having the smallest thickness, and a thickest part having the largest thickness. The thinnest part may have a thickness of 0.5 mm or more. The thickest part may have a thickness of 5.0 mm or less. A first ratio (M1/M2) between the flexural modulus M1 of the thinnest part and the flexural modulus M2 of the thickest part may be 0.7 or more.

The resin molded body according to the present disclosure can have excellent mechanical strength even if it is a resin molded body with uneven thickness that includes thin-walled parts and is made by shaping a foamed resin.

FIG. 1 is a perspective view showing a foamed resin sheet. FIG. 2 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of the foamed resin sheet shown in FIG. FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view showing a molding process of the resin molded body of this embodiment. FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view showing a molding process of the resin molded body of this embodiment. FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view showing a molding process of the resin molded body of this embodiment. 6A to 6C are cross-sectional views showing a molding process for the resin molded body of this embodiment. FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view showing the resin molded body of this embodiment. FIG. 8 is an enlarged cross-sectional view showing the resin molded body of the present embodiment. FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view showing the resin molded body of this embodiment. FIG. 10 is a perspective view showing a mold. FIG. 11 is a cross-sectional view showing a molding process of a test specimen of the example. FIG. 12 is a cross-sectional view showing a conventional molding process for a resin molded product. FIG. 13 is a cross-sectional view showing a conventional molding process for a resin molded product. FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional view showing a conventional molding process for a resin molded product. FIG. 15 is a cross-sectional view showing a conventional molding process for a resin molded product. FIG. 16 is a cross-sectional view showing a conventional molding process for a resin molded product.

As described above, when a foamed resin sheet 10 (see Figs. 1 and 2; details will be described later) in which a core layer made of a foamed resin and skin layers made of a non-foamed resin are laminated on one and the other main surfaces of the core layer are heat-formed by vacuum forming or the like to form a resin molded product 1000, it is difficult to ensure mechanical strength in the thin-walled portion, which has a relatively small thickness. The inventors have considered the mechanism as follows. As shown in Fig. 12, in the conventional vacuum forming of a foamed resin sheet 10, first, the end of the foamed resin sheet 10 is fixed with a jig 1001, and both sides of the foamed resin sheet 10 are heated by a heater 1002 to a temperature equal to or higher than the glass transition temperature of the resin material. At this time, as shown in Fig. 13, the foamed resin sheet 10 becomes in a molten state and deforms so as to sag down without being able to withstand its own weight. That is, the area of the foamed resin sheet 10 increases, and as a result, the plate thickness of the foamed resin sheet 10 decreases. Furthermore, the air bubbles 111 contained in the foamed resin sheet 10 in a molten state are united or expanded by heating, as shown in Fig. 14. Thereafter, the foamed resin sheet 10, which has been deformed so as to sag as described above, is vacuum-formed using a mold 1003 as shown in FIG. 15, and cooled and solidified. As a result, as shown in FIG. 16, in the conventional resin molded product 1000, the air bubbles 111 are unevenly enlarged, causing a decrease in density, and the bending modulus of the thin-walled portion is lower than that of the foamed resin sheet 10 before vacuum forming. This presumably makes it difficult to ensure mechanical strength in the thin-walled portion. Note that a solid sheet made only of non-foamed resin deforms under its own weight when heated. However, the density of the thin-walled portion of the solid sheet does not change, and the bending modulus of the thin-walled portion, which is derived from the basic physical properties of the resin itself, does not change.

After extensive research, the inventors discovered that in a resin molded product obtained by shaping a foamed resin sheet 10 by vacuum forming or the like, if the ratio of the flexural modulus of the thinnest part to the flexural modulus of the thickest part exceeds a predetermined value, excellent mechanical strength can be ensured in the thinnest part even in a resin molded product with uneven thickness. This led to the completion of the present invention, as described below.

(Configuration 1)
The resin molded body according to the embodiment of the present disclosure is formed by shaping a foamed resin sheet including a foamed layer, a first non-foamed layer laminated on one main surface of the foamed layer, and a second non-foamed layer laminated on the other main surface of the foamed layer. The resin molded body may include a thinnest part having the smallest thickness and a thickest part having the largest thickness. The thinnest part may have a thickness of 0.5 mm or more. The thickest part may have a thickness of 5.0 mm or less. A first ratio (M1/M2) between the bending modulus M1 of the thinnest part and the bending modulus M2 of the thickest part may be 0.7 or more.

This makes it possible to suppress the change in density of the resin molded body 1, which has an uneven thickness including the thinnest part, relative to the foamed resin sheet before molding, thereby improving the mechanical strength of the resin molded body 1.

(Configuration 2)
In the resin molded body of configuration 1, the first ratio (M1/M2) may be 2.0 or less.

(Configuration 3)
In the resin molded body of

configuration

1 or 2, a second ratio (t1/t2) between the thickness t1 of the thinnest part and the thickness t2 of the thickest part may be 0.4 or more and 0.9 or less. This prevents unevenness in the thickness of the resin molded body 1, suppresses damage during molding, or damage or holes after molding, and improves vacuum moldability.

(Configuration 4)
In the resin molded body of any one of configurations 1 to 3, the resin molded body may be made of a thermoplastic resin. The density of the resin molded body may be 1.0 g/ ^cm3 or less. The bending modulus of each of the thinnest wall part and the thickest wall part may be 1000 MPa or more. This makes it possible to suppress a decrease in the bending modulus of the resin molded body 1 molded by thermal shaping such as vacuum molding, and to achieve weight reduction.

(Configuration 5)
In the resin molded body of any one of configurations 1 to 4, the resin molded body may contain a polycarbonate resin. This makes it possible to easily perform thermal shaping such as vacuum molding, and to obtain the resin molded body 1 that is excellent in appearance design and mechanical strength.

(Configuration 6)
In the resin molded article according to any one of configurations 1 to 4, the resin molded article may contain at least one selected from the group consisting of polycarbonate resin, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polystyrene.

(Configuration 7)
In the resin molded article according to any one of configurations 1 to 6, the ratio between the first ratio and the second ratio (first ratio/second ratio) may be 4.0 or less.

(Configuration 8)
In the resin molded product of any one of configurations 1 to 7, the ratio between the first ratio and the second ratio (first ratio/second ratio) may be greater than 1.0, thereby making it possible to reduce the change in strength due to the thickness of the thinnest part and the thickest part, and to ensure excellent mechanical strength.

Below, an embodiment of the resin molded body 1 of the present disclosure will be specifically described with reference to Figures 1 to 9. Note that the same or corresponding components in the figures are given the same reference numerals, and the same description will not be repeated. Note that, to make the description easier to understand, the drawings referenced below show simplified or schematic configurations, and some components are omitted.

First, we will explain the material of the resin molded body 1, that is, the foamed resin sheet 10 before it is shaped by vacuum molding or the like.

The foamed resin sheet 10 is made of a resin material that can be shaped by vacuum forming or the like. The foamed resin sheet 10 only needs to have an area and thickness that allows it to be shaped by vacuum forming or the like. However, it is preferable that the foamed resin sheet 10 has a thickness of 1 to 5 mm. This makes it easy to perform thermal shaping such as vacuum forming. The resin material of the foamed resin sheet 10 is not particularly limited, but is, for example, a thermoplastic resin. Thermoplastic resins are, for example, general-purpose plastics such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene, or polystyrene, engineering plastics that have a heat resistance of 100°C or more, or super engineering plastics that have a heat resistance of 150°C or more. However, it is preferable that the resin material has a deflection temperature under load of 90°C or more. This improves moldability during thermal shaping such as vacuum forming, making it easier to perform thermal shaping. The resin material may include at least one selected from the group consisting of general-purpose plastics, engineering plastics, and super engineering plastics. An alloy of polycarbonate resin and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer resin (ABS resin) may also be used, and it is preferable that the resin material mainly contains polycarbonate resin, for example, at 50% by weight or more. Polycarbonate resin has excellent heat processability. This makes it possible to easily perform heat shaping such as vacuum molding, particularly heat shaping for deep drawing as described below, and to obtain a resin molded body 1 with excellent appearance design and mechanical strength. In this disclosure, the deflection temperature under load is determined based on ISO 75-2B (load of 1.81 MPa).

As shown in Figures 1 and 2, the foamed resin sheet 10 has a foamed layer (hereinafter referred to as the core layer) 11, a non-foamed layer (hereinafter referred to as the skin layer) 12 laminated on one main surface of the core layer 11, and a skin layer 13 laminated on the other main surface of the core layer 11.

The core layer 11 is made of a foamed resin. The core layer 11 can be formed by physical foaming of a molten resin material. The physical foaming agent is, for example, an inert gas such as nitrogen, carbon dioxide, air, or argon. The core layer 11 of the present disclosure is preferably foamed using a physical foaming agent such as nitrogen or carbon dioxide with a relatively low pressure, and nitrogen is more preferable. This allows the pressure of the physical foaming agent to be set to a relatively low value of 1 to 6 MPa, and a large number of fine bubbles can be formed. This makes it possible to more reliably suppress expansion and the like when heated at high temperatures during vacuum molding. The average bubble diameter of the bubbles is preferably 0.1 mm or more, 1.0 mm or less, and preferably 0.3 mm or less. As shown in FIG. 2, the core layer 11 has a large number of bubbles 111. The large number of bubbles have an approximately elliptical shape elongated in the extrusion direction in a cross-sectional view cut in the thickness direction in the direction along the extrusion direction during extrusion molding. Of the many bubbles contained in the core layer 11, the bubbles contained near the center of the core layer 11 in the thickness direction have a larger bubble diameter than the bubbles 111 contained near the ends of the core layer 11 in the thickness direction. The bubble diameter of the many bubbles 111 gradually decreases from the center of the core layer 11 in the thickness direction toward the ends of the core layer 11 in the thickness direction.

As shown in FIG. 2, the skin layer 12 is made of a non-foamed resin. That is, the skin layer 12 is not foamed. The skin layer 12 may be extruded from a die outlet in a non-foamed state by a co-extrusion molding method and laminated integrally with the core layer 11. Alternatively, after the core layer 11 is formed, the skin layer 12 may be fixed to one main surface of the core layer 11 by adhesion, welding, or the like. In this disclosure, non-foamed means that the porosity is less than 5%. Moreover, foamed means that the porosity is 5% or more. More specifically, the porosity is calculated as follows. First, a portion of the foamed resin sheet 10 is cut out to produce a sheet piece that is a square of 20 mm x 20 mm in plan view. A high-power micro X-ray CT system (Shimadzu Corporation, model number "inspexio SMX-225CTS") is used to CT scan the sheet piece, and a CT cross-sectional image is obtained by cutting the sheet piece in the thickness direction along a line passing through the center point of the sheet piece and the midpoint of a predetermined side in a plan view. The detailed measurement conditions are: applied voltage 160 kV, pixel size 0.105 mm/voxel, pixel number 512 x 512 x 512, view number 1200, field of view in the XY direction 53.5 mm, and field of view in the Z direction 48.9 mm. When the interface between the skin layer 12 and the core layer 11 is clear in a cross-sectional view of the foamed resin sheet 10, the layer with the fewest bubbles among the clear interface is the skin layer 12, and the layer with the most bubbles is the core layer 11. In addition, in the case of the interface between the skin layer 12 and the core layer 11, among the many bubbles present, 15 bubbles close to the surface of the resin sheet 1 on each imaginary boundary line when the cross section of the foamed resin sheet 10 is divided into 16 equal parts in the width direction are selected, and among them, the bubble closest to the surface of the foamed resin sheet 10 is confirmed. A virtual line is drawn that passes through the upper end of this closest bubble and is perpendicular to the thickness direction. The inner side of the imaginary line in the thickness direction is the core layer 11, and the outer side in the thickness direction is the skin layer 12. Next, in a CT cross-sectional image obtained by photographing the cross sections of the core layer 11 and the skin layer 12, square sections (the length of one side of each section depends on the thickness of the foamed resin sheet 10) are defined so as to divide the core layer 11 into 20 equal parts in the thickness direction and to divide the skin layer 12 into 5 equal parts in the thickness direction in the same straight line (therefore, the length of one side of each section depends on the thickness of the foamed resin sheet 10). Five rows are extracted in which 20 sections are arranged along the thickness direction of the core layer 11 and 5 sections are arranged along the thickness direction of the skin layer 12. Next, the bubbles and bubble walls are binarized using the image processing software "Image J (manufactured by the National Institutes of Health)". At this time, the threshold value for the binarization process is obtained from the density histogram obtained by the Otsu method. Then, the white parts of the obtained binarized image are regarded as bubble walls and the black parts as bubbles, and the cross-sectional area of the independent bubbles contained in each section of each row is calculated. In this way, the cross-sectional area of the independent bubbles contained in each section is calculated, and the porosity of each section contained in each row is calculated by dividing the cross-sectional area of each section. In addition, the five extracted rows are positioned and extracted at the center in the width direction, one end in the width direction, the other end in the width direction, the center between the center in the width direction and one end in the width direction, and the center between the center in the width direction and the other end in the width direction in the cross-sectional image of the core layer 11 and the skin layer 12.

The skin layer 12 may be made of a thermoplastic resin that can adhere well to the core layer 11. More specifically, the resin material of the skin layer 12 is preferably the same as that of the core layer 11, but may be different from that of the core layer 11 as long as it is highly compatible with the resin material of the core layer 11. In order to strengthen the skin layer 12, the skin layer 12 may be made of a reinforced resin that contains an inorganic filler to an extent that does not impair the effects of the present disclosure, or a resin that contains additives such as a flame retardant or a foam nucleating agent. This configuration of the skin layer 12 makes it possible to efficiently improve the strength while reducing the weight and improving the strength. Examples of inorganic fillers include glass fiber, carbon fiber, aramid fiber, talc, and mica.

The skin layer 12 may be colored by applying paint or pigment, etc., to an extent that does not impair the effects of the present disclosure. A decorative film may be provided by adhesion or lamination on the outer surface of the skin layer 12, i.e., the surface opposite to the surface facing one of the main surfaces of the core layer 11. This makes it possible to improve the external design of the resin molded body 1 after the foamed resin sheet 10 is thermally shaped by vacuum forming or the like. In this way, in addition to the three-layer structure consisting of the skin layer 12, the core layer 11, and the skin layer 13, a layer having another function may be provided on the outer surface of the skin layer 12 or the skin layer 13. This makes it possible to form the foamed resin sheet 10 and the resin molded body 1 with multiple functions.

Skin layer 13 is the same as skin layer 12, except that it is laminated on the other main surface of core layer 11. Therefore, a detailed description of skin layer 13 is omitted.

The resin molded body 1 of the present disclosure can be obtained by subjecting the foamed resin sheet 10 described above to thermal shaping, such as vacuum forming. A method for molding the resin molded body 1 will be specifically described below with reference to Figures 3 to 7. Note that although a molding method using vacuum forming will be described here, the molding method for the resin molded body 1 is not particularly limited.

First, as shown in FIG. 3, the foamed resin sheet 10 is fixed by a jig 101. As shown in FIG. 4, heating plates 102 made of graphite are arranged above and below the foamed resin sheet 10. The heating plates 102 are heated in advance to a temperature higher than the glass transition temperature by a high-frequency induction heating device. Graphite has a thermal conductivity two to three times higher than that of copper and is lightweight. In addition, graphite has excellent water repellency, so it is difficult to adhere to molten resin. As a result, the heating plate 102 made of graphite is suitable for heating the foamed resin sheet 10 while uniformly regulating the thickness of the foamed resin sheet 10. That is, in the molding process of the resin molded body 1 of the present disclosure, it is preferable that the foamed resin sheet 10 is heated so that its thickness is uniform over the entire surface. The gap between the heating plate 102 located above and the heating plate 102 located below has a width W of 104% of the thickness of the foamed resin sheet 10. This makes it easier to heat the foamed resin sheet 10 so that the thickness is uniform. From the viewpoint of heating the foamed resin sheet 10 so that the thickness of the foamed resin sheet 10 is uniform, it is preferable that the gap width W be within 104% of the thickness of the foamed resin sheet 10. Although not shown in the figure, the gap width W may be adjusted by a spacer disposed between the upper heating plate 102 and the lower heating plate 102.

It is presumed that the foamed resin sheet 10 heated while being regulated to have a uniform thickness in this way has the same bubble structure as the foamed resin sheet 10 before heating shown in FIG. 2. In other words, the foamed resin sheet 10 after heating has a structure that makes it easy to suppress the occurrence of bulges on the surface of the foamed resin sheet 10 without the bubbles coalescing. When the foamed resin sheet 10 heated in this way reaches a temperature higher than the glass transition temperature, it is moved directly above the mold 103. The temperature of the foamed resin sheet 10 is measured by a temperature sensor at the end of the foamed resin sheet 10. Thereafter, as shown in FIG. 5, the upper heating plate 102 and the lower heating plate 102 are removed from the foamed resin sheet 10, and the molten foamed resin sheet 10 is brought into close contact with the upper surface of the mold 103, and the space containing the foamed resin sheet 10 is sealed so that it is airtight. Immediately after that, as shown in FIG. 6, suction is applied through the suction hole 104 provided in the mold 103, and the foamed resin sheet 10 is vacuum molded. Thereafter, the molded foamed resin sheet 10 is cooled and solidified, and then released from the mold. By trimming off excess parts of the foamed resin sheet 10 thus formed, a resin molded body 1 as shown in FIG. 7 can be obtained.

As shown in FIG. 8, the bubbles 111 contained in the resin molded body 1 obtained by such a manufacturing method are crushed in the thickness direction as the resin molded body 1 becomes thinner during molding, and stretch in the direction perpendicular to the thickness, becoming an elliptical disk. The resin molded body 1 containing the stretched bubbles becomes denser and changes to a structure similar to a non-foamed structure. This makes it possible to suppress the decrease in bending modulus in the thin-walled part of the resin molded body 1, improve mechanical strength, and improve moldability. The resin molded body 1 may be thermally shaped by pressure molding or press molding, not limited to vacuum molding, and the method is not limited as long as the foamed resin sheet 10 can be shaped. Pressure molding uses a positive pressure with a higher differential pressure with atmospheric pressure than the negative pressure of a vacuum. Therefore, it is easy to suppress the decrease in strength due to the effect of crushing the bubbles enlarged by heating. Alternatively, press molding can be used as a method of controlling the thickness and strength with a mold while suppressing the enlargement of the bubbles. In terms of the mold configuration and molding process, vacuum molding, pressure molding, and vacuum pressure molding can be performed with a mold for one side, making them suitable for producing large parts at low cost. In addition, the mold 103 may be of any shape that is used in known shaping methods, and may be made of any material, such as metal or wood.

The resin molded body 1 produced by the above-mentioned manufacturing method will thin during molding even if it has a curvature, is bent, or is relatively small, and the air bubbles will be crushed and partially stretched, changing into a structure similar to a non-foamed structure, resulting in an increased density. In other words, the resin molded body 1 produced by the above-mentioned manufacturing method can suppress the decrease in bending modulus in the thin-walled parts, improve mechanical strength, and also improve moldability.

The resin molded body 1 thus formed will be described in detail with reference to FIG. 9.

The resin molded body 1 has the thinnest wall portion 2, which has the smallest thickness, and the thickest wall portion 3, which has the largest thickness. The thinnest wall portion 2 has a thickness of 0.5 mm or more, and the thickest wall portion 3 has a thickness of 5.0 mm or less. If the thickness of the thinnest wall portion 2 is too small, the rigidity of the resin molded body 1 may decrease. In addition, defects such as tears may occur in the foamed resin sheet 10 during vacuum molding. If the thickness of the thickest wall portion 3 is too large, the moldability decreases and the weight of the resin molded body 1 increases. In other words, from the viewpoint of ensuring the rigidity and moldability of the resin molded body 1 and achieving weight reduction, the thickness of the thinnest wall portion 2 is preferably 1 mm or more, more preferably 1.5 mm or more, and the thickness of the thickest wall portion 3 is preferably 4.5 mm or less, more preferably 4.0 mm or less. The thickness of the thinnest part 2 is preferably 1 mm or more and 4.5 mm or less, more preferably 1.5 mm or more and 4.5 mm or less, and even more preferably 1.5 mm or more and 4.0 mm or less.

The thickness distribution of the resin molded body 1 can be measured using a magnetic thickness gauge, an ultrasonic thickness gauge, or a 3D scanner. This allows the thickness distribution of the resin molded body 1 to be measured without destroying the resin molded body 1. In this disclosure, the thickness distribution of the resin molded body 1 can be measured using, for example, a 3D scanner-type three-dimensional measuring machine (manufactured by Keyence Corporation, model number "VL-500"). Of the thickness distribution measured in this manner, the point with the smallest thickness can be defined as the thinnest part 2, and the point with the greatest thickness can be defined as the thickest part 3.

The ratio M1/M2 (hereinafter sometimes referred to as ratio Y) of the flexural modulus M1 of the thinnest part 2 to the flexural modulus M2 of the thickest part 3 is preferably 0.7 or more. This prevents the decrease in mechanical strength of the thinned resin molding 1 due to the change in density from the foamed resin sheet 10 before molding, and improves the mechanical strength of the resin molding 1. It is preferable that the ratio Y is 1.0 or more. This further improves the mechanical strength of the resin molding 1. The upper limit of the ratio Y is not particularly limited, but is, for example, 2.0 or less. The ratio Y is preferably 0.7 or more and 2.0 or less, and more preferably 1.0 or more and 2.0 or less.

The bending moduli M1 and M2 are values evaluated in a three-point bending test. The three-point bending test is specifically performed as follows. First, a planar thinnest piece including the thinnest part 2 and a planar thickest piece including the thickest part 3 are cut out from the resin molded body 1 using a punching machine. The thinnest piece and the thickest piece each have a rectangular shape in plan view with a width of 10 mm and a length of 80 mm. In each of the thinnest piece and the thickest piece, the thinnest part 2 and the thickest part 3 are positioned at the intersection of the diagonals of the rectangular shape in plan view. A three-point bending test is performed on each of the thinnest piece and the thickest piece by applying a load to the thinnest part 2 and the thickest part 3 with each point 16 mm from the center in the length direction toward both ends as a fulcrum. In the present disclosure, the three-point bending test can be performed using, for example, a precision universal testing machine (manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation, model number "AGS-J"). In addition, there are cases where the thinnest part 2 or the thickest part 3 is located at the end or step of the resin molded body 1, making it impossible to perform a three-point bending test. In such cases, the thinnest part 2 and the thickest part 3 can be defined as the locations where a three-point bending test is possible, i.e., the locations where the above-mentioned thinnest and thickest rectangular pieces in plan view can be cut out, and where the thickness is smallest and the thickness is largest, respectively.

In addition, when the periphery of the thinnest part 2 or the thickest part 3 has a shape with a curvature, the thinnest and thickest pieces are cut out in an arc shape having a width of 10 mm and an arc length of 80 mm. For example, when the curvature of the arc-shaped thinnest and thickest pieces is 30 m ^-1 or less, a three-point bending test can be performed in the same manner as the planar thinnest and thickest pieces. However, when the thinnest and thickest pieces are displaced during the three-point bending test and accurate measurement cannot be performed, the thinnest and

thickest parts

2 and 3 can be defined as the parts where the thinnest and thickest pieces with a curvature of 30 m ^-1 or less can be cut out and the parts with the smallest and largest thicknesses, respectively.

The density of the thinnest and thickest pieces can be calculated as follows. First, the width of each of the thinnest and thickest pieces is measured using a micrometer, and the length is measured using a vernier caliper. The volume is calculated from these widths, lengths, and the average thickness mentioned above. The average thickness of each of the thinnest and thickest pieces can be calculated by measuring the thickness of each of the thinnest and thickest pieces at 10 equally spaced points along the length, and taking the arithmetic mean value of these 10 thicknesses. In addition, the weight of each of the thinnest and thickest pieces is measured using an electronic balance. The density of the thinnest and thickest pieces can be calculated by dividing each weight by the volume.

The ratio t1/t2 (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the ratio X) of the thickness t1 of the thinnest part 2 to the thickness t2 of the thickest part 3 is preferably 0.4 or more. This prevents unevenness in the thickness of the resin molded body 1. In other words, when a part of the resin molded body 1 is extremely thin, damage due to heating during molding, or damage or holes after molding can be suppressed. In addition, the ratio X is preferably 0.7 or more. This makes it easier to make the ratio Y 1.0 or more, and improves the strength of the thinnest part 2. The ratio X should be at least smaller than 1, but may be, for example, 0.9 or less. This improves moldability during thermal shaping such as vacuum molding. The ratio X is preferably 0.7 or more and less than 1, and more preferably 0.7 or more and 0.9 or less.

The thinnest wall portion 2 and the thickest wall portion 3 may each have a flexural modulus of 1000 MPa or more. This makes it possible to suppress a decrease in the flexural modulus of the resin constituting the resin molded body 1. From the viewpoint of ease of molding in thermal shaping such as vacuum molding, the flexural modulus of each of the thinnest wall portion 2 and the thickest wall portion 3 is preferably 2800 MPa or less, or 3500 MPa or less even when inorganic filler is contained in the skin layers 12 and 13 of the foamed resin sheet 10 as described above.

The resin molded body 1 may have a density of 1.0 g/cm3 or ^less . This allows the resin molded body 1 to be lightweight.

The ratio Y/X (hereinafter sometimes referred to as ratio Z) between the above-mentioned ratio Y (M1/M2) and ratio X (t1/t2) is preferably greater than 1.0. If the ratio Z is 1.0 or less, that is, if the ratio X is greater than the ratio Y, the change in strength due to the thickness of the thinnest part 2 and the thickest part 3 becomes large, and the strength of the thinnest part 2 may decrease. In other words, by considering the balance between the ratio Y and the ratio X, it is possible to ensure excellent mechanical strength of the resin molded body 1. There is no particular limit to the upper limit of the ratio Z, but it is preferably 4.0 or less. By making the ratio Z greater than 1.0 and 4.0 or less, it is possible to ensure ease of molding in thermal shaping such as vacuum molding.

The resin molded body 1 is molded into various shapes depending on the application by thermal shaping such as vacuum forming. The resin molded body 1 may be formed into any shape as long as it can be molded by thermal shaping such as vacuum forming. The resin molded body 1 is molded into, for example, a box shape, a triangular prism shape, a cylinder shape, etc.

The resin molded body 1 utilized as a predetermined product and part can reduce the amount of resin used. As a result, the resin molded body 1 according to the present embodiment can contribute to improving resource utilization efficiency, reducing transportation burden, reducing energy consumption, and reducing _CO2 emissions. By providing the resin molded body 1 to society, it is possible to contribute to the achievement of Goal 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), Goal 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure), and Goal 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) out of the 17 goals of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) established by the United Nations. In addition, since the resin molded body 1 according to the present embodiment can be melted and reused, it can contribute to the achievement of Goal 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production).

Although the embodiments have been described above, the present disclosure is not limited to the above embodiments, and various modifications are possible without departing from the spirit of the present disclosure.

[Example]
In Examples 1 to 5 and Comparative Examples 1 and 2, a resin molded body was prepared by molding a foamed resin sheet, and the above-mentioned three-point bending test was performed on the thinnest and thickest parts of each body to measure the bending elastic modulus. In Table 1 below, the average thickness of the foamed resin sheet was calculated as follows. The thickness of a cross section of the foamed resin sheet cut in the thickness direction along the width direction was measured at 10 points equidistantly in the width direction, and the arithmetic mean value of the thicknesses at these 10 points was determined as the average thickness of the foamed resin sheet.

Example 1
In Example 1, a foamed resin sheet having a width of 200 mm and a length of 400 mm was produced by co-extrusion molding using polycarbonate resin (PC) as the resin material. Therefore, the resin materials of the core layer and the skin layer are the same. The core layer was foamed using the above-mentioned low-pressure physical foaming agent (nitrogen). The polycarbonate resin was Teijin Panlite L-1225Y (density: 1.2 g/cm ³ , deflection temperature under load: 143° C., flexural modulus: 2400 MPa), and a small amount of foaming nucleating agent was added in order to improve the melt tension and make the bubbles finer. More specifically, first, the molten resin forming the core layer was pressurized with nitrogen inside the short-axis screw cylinder (not shown). Next, the molten resin was discharged from the short-axis screw cylinder with nitrogen, and then the resin was extruded while suppressing foaming by pressurizing it with a gear pump. Then, the molten resin for the skin layer, which was adjusted to the same pressure as the resin for the core layer, was merged in a manner sandwiching the core layer. After forming a laminar flow through a coat hanger die from the manifold, the mixture was extruded from the tip of the die into a foamed resin sheet and solidified by a cooling roll. As a result, a foamed resin sheet having an average thickness of 2.5 mm, a density of 0.60 g/cm ³ , and a flexural modulus of 1330 MPa was obtained.

Then, the foamed resin sheet thus produced was heated to 190°C and vacuum molded by the method described above to obtain a test specimen (resin molded body) of Example 1. The width of the gap between the upper and lower heating plates was adjusted to be 104% of the thickness of the foamed resin sheet, and when the temperature of the end surface of the foamed resin sheet reached 170°C, the foamed resin sheet was moved directly above the mold. A box-shaped mold 103 with a width L1 of 100 mm, a length L2 of 200 mm, and a depth L3 of 40 mm as shown in Figure 10 was used.

The thinnest and thickest parts of the specimen thus obtained were determined by the method described above, and the thicknesses of the thinnest and thickest parts were measured. As described above, the density was measured, and the bending modulus of the thinnest and thickest parts was measured by the three-point bending test described above. The three-point bending test was performed using a tabletop precision universal testing machine (manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation, model number "AGS-J") at a test speed of 10 mm/min and a support distance of 32 mm. As a result, the bending modulus M1 of the thinnest part was 1400 MPa, and the bending modulus M2 of the thickest part was 1800 MPa, which was improved compared to the bending modulus of the foamed resin sheet before vacuum molding. This is presumably because the air bubbles were crushed without being united, resulting in an increase in density. The ratio Y was 0.78. In this way, the resin molded body vacuum molded by the above method was able to improve its mechanical strength. In Table 1, the densities of the thinnest and thickest parts refer to the densities of the thinnest and thickest pieces described above.

Example 2
The specimen of Example 2 was produced by the same method as Example 1, except that the mold depth during vacuum forming was set to 60 mm and deep drawing was performed. The change in thickness was large due to deep drawing, and the increase in density was suppressed. The bending modulus M1 of the thinnest part was 1250 MPa, and the bending modulus M2 of the thickest part was 1300 MPa, which was equivalent to the bending modulus of the foamed resin sheet. In addition, the ratio Y was 0.96, and the strength reduction in the thinnest part was small, and the ratio Z was 1.66, which was sufficiently larger than 1.0, and it was confirmed that the thickness change and the reduction in mechanical strength were suppressed even in deep drawing.

Example 3
The specimen of Example 3 was molded in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the foamed resin sheet having an average thickness of 2.5 mm was molded to be thicker at 3.0 mm when heated. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 11, the width W of the gap between the upper heating plate 102 and the lower heating plate 102 was adjusted to 3.0 mm, so that the foamed resin sheet 10 having an average thickness of 2.5 mm was expanded by heating to 3.0 mm, that is, the thickness was uniformly increased by 0.5 mm. The upper heating plate 102, the lower heating plate 102, and the foamed resin sheet 10 whose thickness had expanded were moved directly above the mold 103. At this time, it is presumed that the thickness of the foamed resin sheet 10 has increased as the bubbles expand, as compared with the foamed resin sheet 10 shown in FIG. 2. Thereafter, the upper heating plate 102 and the lower heated plate 104 were removed, and vacuum molding was performed. In the specimen of Example 3 obtained in this manner, the bubbles were enlarged, and the thickness was suppressed from being thinned as shown in Table 1.

In the specimen of Example 3, there were some areas where the thinning after vacuum molding was suppressed and the density was reduced. The bending modulus M1 of the thinnest part was 1200 MPa, and the bending modulus M2 of the thickest part was 1100 MPa. The ratio Y was 1.09. That is, the bending modulus M1 of the thinnest part was greater than the bending modulus M2 of the thickest part. Although the bending moduli M1 and M2 were lower than the bending modulus of the foamed resin sheet, the overall reduction in thickness was suppressed, and it is considered that the rigidity was superior to that of the specimen of Example 1. The ratio Z was 1.39, which was greater than 1.0. In Example 3, it was found that the change in thickness and density of the specimen was suppressed by the molding method in which the thickness of the foamed resin sheet was expanded when heated, and as a result, the mechanical strength was improved.

Example 4
The specimen of Example 4 was molded by deep drawing in the same manner as in Example 2, except that the average thickness of the foamed resin sheet was 3.0 mm. By making the thickness of the foamed resin sheet of Example 4 larger than that of the foamed resin sheet of Example 2, the change in thickness after vacuum molding could be suppressed. In addition, the bending modulus M1 of the thinnest part was 1600 MPa, and the bending modulus M2 of the thickest part was 1100 MPa. That is, the ratio Y was 1.45, which is greater than 1.0. The ratio Z was 1.73, approaching 2.0. That is, the value was close to that of a vacuum molded product of a non-foamed resin, suggesting that the mechanical strength was improved.

Example 5
The specimen of Example 5 was vacuum-formed in the same manner as the specimen of Example 1, except that the depth of the box-shaped mold was 80 mm. Although the thickness changed due to the deep drawing, the density of the specimen of Example 5 was similar to that of the specimen of Example 1. In addition, the bending modulus M1 of the thinnest part was 1630 MPa, and the bending modulus M2 of the thickest part was 1470 MPa. That is, the ratio Y was 1.11, and the bending modulus of the thinnest part was greater than the bending modulus of the thickest part. The ratio Z was 2.71, which was significantly greater than 2.0. A detailed observation of the specimen of Example 5 suggested that the thinnest part was closer to the structure of a resin molded product made of a non-foamed resin, and that the mechanical strength was improved.

Next, the resin material of the test specimen was changed from the polycarbonate resin of Examples 1 to 5 to general-purpose plastics such as polypropylene, polystyrene, or polyethylene terephthalate, or to an alloy resin of polycarbonate resin and ABS resin, an engineering plastic, and the tests of Examples 6 to 9 were carried out.

Example 6
The specimen of Example 6 was produced in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the resin material was an alloy resin of polycarbonate resin/ABS resin. Therefore, in the specimen of Example 6, the resin materials of the core layer and the skin layer were the same. The alloy resin of polycarbonate/ABS was Multilon T-2754 (density: 1.11 g/cm ³ , deflection temperature under load: 118° C., flexural modulus: 2200 MPa) manufactured by Teijin Limited, and a small amount of foaming nucleating agent was added for the purpose of improving the melt tension and making the bubbles finer. The polycarbonate/ABS foamed resin sheet before vacuum molding had an average thickness of 2.5 mm, a density of 0.56 g/cm ³ , and a flexural modulus of 1220 MPa. After vacuum molding, the specimen had a flexural modulus M1 of 1280 MPa at the thinnest part and a flexural modulus of 1650 MPa at the thickest part, which were improved compared to the foamed resin sheet before vacuum molding. Furthermore, it was confirmed that the ratio Y was 0.78, and even when the resin material was changed to an alloy resin of polycarbonate/ABS, the change in thickness and the decrease in mechanical strength were suppressed.

(Example 7)
The specimen of Example 7 was produced in the same manner as in Example 1, except that polypropylene (PP) was used as the resin material. Therefore, in the specimen of Example 7, the resin materials of the core layer and the skin layer are the same. The polypropylene is Calp 4700G (density: 1.05 g/cm ³ , deflection temperature under load: 118° C., flexural modulus: 3200 MPa) manufactured by Idemitsu Fine Composites Co., Ltd., and talc is added to improve the strength of the resin. The polypropylene foamed resin sheet before vacuum molding has an average thickness of 2.5 mm, density: 0.52 g/cm ³ , and flexural modulus: 1840 MPa. In the specimen after vacuum molding, the flexural modulus M1 of the thinnest part was 1940 MPa, and the flexural modulus of the thickest part was 2490 MPa, which was improved compared to the foamed resin sheet before vacuum molding. In addition, the ratio Y was 0.78, and it was confirmed that the thickness change and the decrease in mechanical strength were suppressed even when the resin material was changed to polypropylene.

(Example 8)
The specimen of Example 8 was produced in the same manner as in Example 1, except that polyethylene terephthalate (PET) was used as the resin material. Therefore, in the specimen of Example 8, the resin materials of the core layer and the skin layer are the same. The polyethylene terephthalate is polyethylene terephthalate resin SA-1206 (density: 1.41 g/cm ³ , flexural modulus: 2300 MPa) manufactured by Unitika Ltd. The polyethylene terephthalate foamed resin sheet before vacuum molding has an average thickness of 2.5 mm, density: 0.7 g/cm ³ , and flexural modulus: 1280 MPa. In the specimen after vacuum molding, the flexural modulus M1 of the thinnest part was 1350 MPa, and the flexural modulus M2 of the thickest part was 1740 MPa, which was improved compared to the foamed resin sheet before vacuum molding. In addition, the ratio Y was 0.78, and it was confirmed that the thickness change and the decrease in mechanical strength were suppressed even when the resin material was changed to polyethylene terephthalate.

Example 9
In Example 9, the resin material was polystyrene (PS), and the resin material was the same as in Example 1. Therefore, the resin material of the core layer and the skin layer was the same. The polystyrene was XC-515 (DicStyrene (registered trademark) manufactured by DIC Corporation, density: 1.04 g/cm ³ , flexural modulus: 3300 MPa). The polystyrene foam resin sheet before vacuum molding had an average thickness of 2.5 mm, density: 0.53 g/cm ³ , and flexural modulus: 1830 MPa. In the test specimen after vacuum molding, the flexural modulus M1 of the thinnest part was 1930 MPa, and the flexural modulus M2 of the thickest part was 2480 MPa, which was improved compared to the foam resin sheet before vacuum molding. In addition, the ratio Y was 0.78, and it was confirmed that the thickness change and the decrease in mechanical strength were suppressed even when the resin material was changed to polystyrene.

(Comparative Example 1)
The specimen of Comparative Example 1 was molded by the conventional manufacturing method described above. That is, as shown in FIG. 13, the foamed resin sheet 10 sagged under its own weight during heating, and the bubbles were united after vacuum molding, resulting in a decrease in density. The specimen of Comparative Example 1 had a large change in thickness and a large decrease in density. In addition, the bending modulus M1 of the thinnest part was 450 MPa, and the bending modulus M2 of the thickest part was 860 MPa. That is, the bending modulus M1 and M2 were significantly lower than the bending modulus of the foamed resin sheet. In addition, the ratio Y was small at 0.52, and the strength decrease in the thinnest part was large. Furthermore, the ratio Z was 1.00, suggesting that the strength decrease due to the thickness change after vacuum molding was large.

(Comparative Example 2)
The specimen of Comparative Example 2 was vacuum molded in the same manner as Comparative Example 1, except that a deep-drawing mold was used in the same manner as in Example 2, and the thickness of the foamed resin sheet was 3.0 mm. It is presumed that the density and mechanical strength of the thinnest part of the specimen of Comparative Example 2 were further reduced due to the thicker foamed resin sheet and the use of a deep-drawing mold. In addition, the bending modulus M1 of the thinnest part was 350 MPa, and the bending modulus M2 of the thickest part was 860 MPa. That is, the ratio Y was 0.41, which was smaller than that of Comparative Example 1. The ratio Z was 0.74, and the rigidity of the specimen was also reduced. Thus, it was suggested that the balance between mechanical strength and thickness of the specimen of Comparative Example 2 was deteriorated.

(Comparative Example 3)
The specimen of Comparative Example 3 was produced by the same method as Comparative Example 1, except that the resin material was an alloy resin of polycarbonate resin/ABS resin as in Example 5. The specimen of Comparative Example 3 had a large change in thickness and a decrease in density as in Comparative Example 1. In addition, the flexural modulus M1 of the thinnest part was 410 MPa, and the flexural modulus M2 of the thickest part was 790 MPa. The ratio Y was 0.52, and the strength decrease in the thinnest part was large. The ratio Z was 0.99, and it was confirmed that even if the resin material was changed to polycarbonate/ABS resin, the strength decrease due to the thickness change after vacuum molding was large in the conventional molding method.

(Comparative Example 4)
The specimen of Comparative Example 4 was produced by the same method as Comparative Example 1, except that polypropylene resin was used as the resin material as in Example 6. The specimen of Comparative Example 4 had a large change in thickness and a decrease in density as in Comparative Example 1. In addition, the flexural modulus M1 of the thinnest part was 620 MPa, and the flexural modulus M2 of the thickest part was 1190 MPa. The ratio Y was 0.52, and the strength decrease in the thinnest part was large. The ratio Z was 0.99, and it was confirmed that even if the resin material was changed to polypropylene and talc was added to improve strength, the strength decrease due to the thickness change after vacuum molding was large in the conventional molding method.

(Comparative Example 5)
The specimen of Comparative Example 5 was produced by the same method as Comparative Example 1, except that the resin material was polyethylene terephthalate resin as in Example 7. The specimen of Comparative Example 5 had a large change in thickness and a decrease in density as in Comparative Example 1. In addition, the flexural modulus M1 of the thinnest part was 430 MPa, and the flexural modulus M2 of the thickest part was 830 MPa. The ratio Y was 0.52, and the strength decrease in the thinnest part was large. The ratio Z was 0.99, and it was confirmed that even if the resin material was changed to polyethylene terephthalate, the strength decrease due to the thickness change after vacuum molding was large in the conventional molding method.

(Comparative Example 6)
The specimen of Comparative Example 6 was produced in the same manner as Comparative Example 1, except that polystyrene resin was used as the resin material as in Example 8. The specimen of Comparative Example 5 had a large change in thickness and a decrease in density as in Comparative Example 1. In addition, the bending modulus M1 of the thinnest part was 620 MPa, and the bending modulus M2 of the thickest part was 1180 MPa. The ratio Y was 0.53, and the strength decrease in the thinnest part was large. The ratio Z was 1.00, and it was confirmed that even if the resin material was changed to polystyrene resin, the strength decrease due to the thickness change after vacuum molding was large in the conventional molding method.

Furthermore, as shown in the test results of Examples 6 to 9 and Comparative Examples 3 to 5 above, similar results were obtained not only when polycarbonate resin was used as the resin material, but also when alloy resins of polycarbonate resin and ABS resin, an engineering plastic, or general-purpose plastics such as polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polystyrene were used. Similar results were also obtained when other resins were used, such as super engineering plastics such as PAR and PPS, and alloys of polycarbonate resin and PAR or PPS.

The deformation state of the specimen of Example 1 and the specimen of Comparative Example 1 when a weight of 10 kg was placed on them was confirmed. In the specimen of Comparative Example 1, the vertical wall side part of the box-shaped part, which is the thinnest part, was bent and the entire specimen was destroyed. On the other hand, the specimen of Example 1 maintained its original shape. From this result, it was confirmed that if the ratio Y is 0.7 or more, the resin molded body has high impact strength. In other words, it is believed that similar results would be obtained even if the specimens of Examples 2 to 5 were used.

REFERENCE SIGNS LIST 1 resin molded body, 2 thinnest part, 3 thickest part, 10 foamed resin sheet, 11 core layer (foamed layer), 12 skin layer (non-foamed layer), 13 skin layer (non-foamed layer), 111 air bubble, t1 thickness of thinnest part, t2 thickness of thickest part, M1 bending modulus of thinnest part, M2 bending modulus of thickest part, X ratio, Y ratio, Z ratio, W width

Claims

A resin molded product obtained by shaping a foamed resin sheet including a foamed layer, a first non-foamed layer laminated on one main surface of the foamed layer, and a second non-foamed layer laminated on the other main surface of the foamed layer,
The resin molded body includes a thinnest part having a smallest thickness and a thickest part having a large thickness,
The thinnest part has a thickness of 0.5 mm or more,
The thickest portion has a thickness of 5.0 mm or less,
A resin molded body, wherein a first ratio (M1/M2) between a flexural modulus M1 of the thinnest portion and a flexural modulus M2 of the thickest portion is 0.7 or more.
The resin molded article according to claim 1,
The resin molded body, wherein the first ratio (M1/M2) is 2.0 or less.
The resin molded article according to claim 1,
a second ratio (t1/t2) of the thickness t1 of the thinnest portion to the thickness t2 of the thickest portion is 0.4 or greater and 0.9 or less.
The resin molded article according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
The resin molded body is made of a thermoplastic resin,
The density of the resin molded body is 1.0 g/ cm3 or less,
The resin molded body, wherein the thinnest portion and the thickest portion each have a flexural modulus of elasticity of 1000 MPa or more.
The resin molded article according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
The resin molded body includes a polycarbonate resin.
The resin molded article according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
The resin molded article includes at least one selected from the group consisting of polycarbonate resin, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polystyrene.
The resin molded body according to claim 4,
The resin molded body includes a polycarbonate resin.
The resin molded body according to claim 4,
The resin molded article includes at least one selected from the group consisting of polycarbonate resin, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polystyrene.
The resin molded body according to claim 4,
A resin molded body, wherein a ratio between the first ratio and the second ratio (first ratio/second ratio) is 4.0 or less.
The resin molded body according to claim 9,
A resin molded article, wherein a ratio between the first ratio and the second ratio (first ratio/second ratio) is greater than 1.0.