WO2024052259A1 - Sensor for detecting scour - Google Patents
Sensor for detecting scour Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2024052259A1 WO2024052259A1 PCT/EP2023/074138 EP2023074138W WO2024052259A1 WO 2024052259 A1 WO2024052259 A1 WO 2024052259A1 EP 2023074138 W EP2023074138 W EP 2023074138W WO 2024052259 A1 WO2024052259 A1 WO 2024052259A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- scour
- sensor
- fin
- movement
- movement sensors
- Prior art date
Links
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000009991 scouring Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003628 erosive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000013505 freshwater Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000009412 basement excavation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009530 blood pressure measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009529 body temperature measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000873 masking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000691 measurement method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012806 monitoring device Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013049 sediment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D33/00—Testing foundations or foundation structures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
- G06V20/00—Scenes; Scene-specific elements
- G06V20/05—Underwater scenes
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D1/00—Investigation of foundation soil in situ
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2218/00—Aspects of pattern recognition specially adapted for signal processing
Definitions
- This invention relates to a sensor for detecting scour adjacent submerged structures.
- Scour is defined as the excavation and removal of material from the bed and banks of streams, rivers and marine environments as a result of the erosive action of flowing water.
- the erosion of sediment by scour at the base of bridge piers, abutments and other underwater structures is a major problem in civil engineering.
- Scour of bridge foundations in particular is a major cause of bridge instability and collapse.
- the high profile failure of the Malahide railway viaduct in Dublin was caused by foundation scour. While scour can occur slowly over time, flood events can cause rapid scouring, to the point of structure failure.
- Existing techniques for determining/monitoring scour include using a buried float coupled to a switch to that detects when the buried float become uncovered by scour, optical/sonar devices to measure depth in the expected location of scour adjacent a submerged structure, and the measurement of strain on buried rods, whereby bending of the rods once uncovered and exposed to the flow of water is detected by strain gauges.
- Other methods include the attachment of sensors to the bridge structure above water to detect global damage which may be an indicator of scour.
- One known method of scour monitoring is to use a single use device including a float, possibly tethered to a switch, buried in a region of the bed or bank likely to experience scour, said float rising towards the surface when the action of scour causes the device to become uncovered and the float released.
- a single use device including a float, possibly tethered to a switch, buried in a region of the bed or bank likely to experience scour, said float rising towards the surface when the action of scour causes the device to become uncovered and the float released.
- a sensor for detecting scour comprises a body adapted to be partially buried adjacent a submerged structure in a region of a riverbed expected to suffer from scour, a plurality of vertically spaced flexible fins extending from a downstream side of the body, said fins incorporating one or more sensors to detect movement, such as fibre Bragg gratings, strain gauges, crack gauges or similar, wherein, once a respective fin is uncovered due to the action of scour, movement of the respective fin due to vortices created by water flowing around the body to which the fin is attached is detected by the respective sensors, thereby provided an indication of the progression of the scour.
- said body comprises a vertically arranged post adapted to be at buried in the riverbed.
- Said body may comprise a metal box section post.
- Said body may made from stainless steel.
- Electronic components of the sensor may be housed within the post.
- Said body may include a flat face on an upstream side thereof to encourage the formation of oscillating vortices on a downstream side of the body.
- Each fin is preferably made from an elastomeric polymer having fibre Bragg gratings or other electrical based movement sensors embedded therein.
- Figure 1 is a perspective view of a scour sensor in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- Figures 2 to 4 illustrate the scour sensor of Figure 1 in use.
- a scour sensor 1 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention comprises a substantially rigid body 2 in the form of a post adapted to be partially buried adjacent a submerged structure, such as a bridge support 10, in a region of a riverbed expected to suffer from scour, a plurality of vertically spaced flexible polymeric fins 4,6,8 extending from a downstream side of the body 2, said fins incorporating fibre Bragg gratings or electrical based movement sensors embedded therein or applied thereto, wherein, once a respective fin is uncovered due to the action of scour “S”, movement of the respective fin 4,6,8 due to vortices created by water flowing around the body 2 to which the fin 4,6,8 is attached is detected by the movement sensors embedded in the fin, thereby provided an indication of the progression of the scour.
- an upstream side of the body 2 is defined by a substantially flat surface 3 arranged to extend transverse to the expected direction of water flow
- the sensor 1 can measure the progression of scouring in real time of riverbed material using the principal of vortex shedding of flowing water around a bluff body (i.e. around the post 2).
- Scouring is the leading cause of bridge failure worldwide and bridges over water represent over 50% of the total bridge stock in Northern Ireland.
- scouring is recorded if found during a routine scheduled bridge inspection or as a special inspection should a specific concern be raised about a bridge site.
- There are limited options for measuring scouring during the scour event as by its nature they tend to be high flow situations when operatives are unable to safely assess/ measure the scour extents.
- suspended material tends to in-fill the scouring thus potentially masking the true extents and severity. Often this means that the maximum scour experienced at a structure is not known or its likely response to future scouring events. This has been seen in some recent high profile bridge failures across the UK and Ireland.
- a scour sensor in accordance with the present invention can reliably measure the presence of scouring near a bridge support in a river environment and provide early warning of scouring events in order to allow proactive response by the asset owner. This can help inform the asset owner on the structural stability of the bridge during high flow events and whether corrective action could be considered or closing the structure in the interests of public safety.
- the bluff body/post 2 and rubber fins 4,6,8 may be geometrically optimised to force movement in the fin even at water low flow rate.
- the sensor exploits the generation of vortices downstream of the body 2 by using said rubber fins 4,6,8 embedded with movement sensors, such as Fibre Bragg Grating sensors (FBG), whereby the fins move with these vortices and such movement is detected by the movement sensors.
- the signals from the movement sensors may be received by electronics within the body adapted to translate the sensed movement of the or each fin into a signal output, for example on a digital display.
- the signals may be recorded over time to provide a record of the progression of scour.
- Wireless transmission means may be provided for transmitting data from the movement sensors to a remote location, such as to a mobile telephone.
- the sensor 1 may be installed at areas known to be at risk of scour and to a depth at which trigger alerts can be linked in order to inform the asset owner if the scouring is posing a risk to the foundations of the structure.
- the flow rate for a pre-determined movement of the or each fin may be established by testing to establish a correlation between the magnitude of change in flow rate and the initial occurrence of the scour event, thereby determining a link between flow rate and scour.
- a scour senor in accordance with the present invention does not try to identify scour through changing structural performance of the bridge. Rather the scour sensor is installed in the river bed to identify the scour event before it causes damage to the bridge.
- the scour sensor may provide a real time record of scouring and infill events which is a limitation to many of the other more established methods employed to date.
- the scour sensor may track the progression of scour and provide advanced warnings of early scour events, thus allowing bridge asset owner to arrange for proactive measures to be deployed to prevent catastrophic damage to structures or enact emergency response plans (such as temporary road closures) in the interests of public safety.
- a scour sensor in accordance with the present invention is relatively simple in its approach to output. If a fin is exposed to flow it will oscillate and provide a signal to indicate it is exposed. Once it is infilled and the fin stops moving, the signal stops. This does not require careful calibration of the soil conditions around it or ongoing calibration. Operatives carrying out scheduled bridge inspections with minimal training could verify if a sensor fin 4,6,8 of the scour sensor 1 is exposed or buried and compare that to a simple digital output showing ‘flow’ or ‘no flow’.
- the scour sensor does not rely on the dielectric properties of the surroundings it is unaffected by metal objects present or salt water environments meaning it can be deployed in any water environment.
- the body 2 of the scour sensor may comprise a stainless steel box section post providing a robust defence against waterborne debris damage, such as floating trees during a flood event.
- the exposed rubber fins 4,6,8 attached to and extending from the post 2 are flexible enough to take impact damage and deflect back to shape without permanent damage.
- the movement sensors embedded in the fins 4,6,8 may be electrically connected to circuitry safely housed within the steel box section post 2 to minimise potential for damage.
- the scour sensor 1 can be provide real time output on the development and infilling of scour and can allow for set trigger levels alert to inform asset owners that action may need to be taken at vulnerable structures.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Paleontology (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Soil Sciences (AREA)
- Revetment (AREA)
- Bridges Or Land Bridges (AREA)
Abstract
A sensor for detecting scour comprises a body adapted to be partially buried adjacent a submerged structure in a region of a riverbed expected to suffer from scour, a plurality of vertically spaced flexible fins extending from a downstream side of the body, said fins incorporating fibre Bragg gratings or other electrical based movement sensors, wherein, once a respective fin is uncovered due to the action of scour, movement of the respective fin due to vortices created by water flowing around the body to which the fin is attached is detected by the movement sensors embedded in the fin, thereby provided an indicated of the progression of the scour.
Description
Sensor for Detecting Scour
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a sensor for detecting scour adjacent submerged structures.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Scour is defined as the excavation and removal of material from the bed and banks of streams, rivers and marine environments as a result of the erosive action of flowing water. The erosion of sediment by scour at the base of bridge piers, abutments and other underwater structures is a major problem in civil engineering. Scour of bridge foundations in particular is a major cause of bridge instability and collapse. The high profile failure of the Malahide railway viaduct in Dublin was caused by foundation scour. While scour can occur slowly over time, flood events can cause rapid scouring, to the point of structure failure.
It is therefore desirable to provide a real time monitoring system to monitor scour adjacent submerged structures, and in particular bridge foundations.
Existing techniques for determining/monitoring scour include using a buried float coupled to a switch to that detects when the buried float become uncovered by scour, optical/sonar devices to measure depth in the expected location of scour adjacent a submerged structure, and the measurement of strain on buried rods, whereby bending of the rods once uncovered and exposed to the flow of water is detected by strain gauges. Other methods include the attachment of sensors to the bridge structure above water to detect global damage which may be an indicator of scour.
One known method of scour monitoring is to use a single use device including a float, possibly tethered to a switch, buried in a region of the bed or bank likely to experience scour, said float rising towards the surface when the action of scour causes the device to become uncovered and the float released. However, such
single use devices cannot provide continuous monitoring of the progression of scour and typically require expensive installation and they give no indication of the maximum scour depth reached.
Other measuring systems use reflected optical, acoustic or electromagnetic signals to measure depth or obtain a geophysical profile of the river bed. However, such systems are expensive, cannot provide continuous monitoring and are difficult to use in harsh weather conditions and flooding. The initial calibration of such systems can also be problematic. In order to determine the properties of the surrounding material, a calibration of the sensors are required, so that the complex data output can be interpreted correctly. This typically involves expensive set up and ongoing costly testing of riverbed soil samples in a lab. When in operation, it is difficult to verify if the sensors are working correctly or if they are giving false readings of their surroundings. The effect of metal objects, which are often found under bridges, such as discarded bicycles, shopping trolleys and other debris, may also have an impact on the sensitivity of such sensors. Furthermore, such sensors may not work in salt water or brackish environments, limiting them to freshwater locations only.
It is also known to provide embedded sensors, for example elongate rods, incorporating strain gauges to detect induced bending of the sensor as it becomes partially exposed due to scour. Such devices have the benefit of being cheap and easy to fabricate and can perform well in monitoring the development of scour over time. However, they can be sensitive to vibrations due to flowing water or traffic excitation of the adjacent structure (e.g. a bridge) and may give false readings.
The ability to withstand debris damage in a natural river setting is also a major hurdle for real-time scour monitoring devices is the greatest hurdle. The effects of debris giving false readings or affecting the performance of the devices such as float based devices are well known. Many of these devices have an inability to provide real time data on the scour progression during a high flow event nor provide text alerts to asset owners.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the present invention there is provided a sensor for detecting scour comprises a body adapted to be partially buried adjacent a submerged structure in a region of a riverbed expected to suffer from scour, a plurality of vertically spaced flexible fins extending from a downstream side of the body, said fins incorporating one or more sensors to detect movement, such as fibre Bragg gratings, strain gauges, crack gauges or similar, wherein, once a respective fin is uncovered due to the action of scour, movement of the respective fin due to vortices created by water flowing around the body to which the fin is attached is detected by the respective sensors, thereby provided an indication of the progression of the scour.
Preferably said body comprises a vertically arranged post adapted to be at buried in the riverbed. Said body may comprise a metal box section post. Said body may made from stainless steel. Electronic components of the sensor may be housed within the post. Said body may include a flat face on an upstream side thereof to encourage the formation of oscillating vortices on a downstream side of the body.
Each fin is preferably made from an elastomeric polymer having fibre Bragg gratings or other electrical based movement sensors embedded therein.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
A scour sensor in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a perspective view of a scour sensor in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and
Figures 2 to 4 illustrate the scour sensor of Figure 1 in use.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
As illustrated in the drawings, a scour sensor 1 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention comprises a substantially rigid body 2 in the form of a post adapted to be partially buried adjacent a submerged structure, such as a bridge support 10, in a region of a riverbed expected to suffer from scour, a plurality of vertically spaced flexible polymeric fins 4,6,8 extending from a downstream side of the body 2, said fins incorporating fibre Bragg gratings or electrical based movement sensors embedded therein or applied thereto, wherein, once a respective fin is uncovered due to the action of scour “S”, movement of the respective fin 4,6,8 due to vortices created by water flowing around the body 2 to which the fin 4,6,8 is attached is detected by the movement sensors embedded in the fin, thereby provided an indication of the progression of the scour. Preferably an upstream side of the body 2 is defined by a substantially flat surface 3 arranged to extend transverse to the expected direction of water flow.
The sensor 1 can measure the progression of scouring in real time of riverbed material using the principal of vortex shedding of flowing water around a bluff body (i.e. around the post 2).
Scouring is the leading cause of bridge failure worldwide and bridges over water represent over 50% of the total bridge stock in Northern Ireland. Currently scouring is recorded if found during a routine scheduled bridge inspection or as a special inspection should a specific concern be raised about a bridge site. There are limited options for measuring scouring during the scour event, as by its nature they tend to be high flow situations when operatives are unable to safely assess/ measure the scour extents. As the high flow subsides, suspended material tends to in-fill the scouring thus potentially masking the true extents and severity. Often this means that the maximum scour experienced at a structure is not known or its likely response to future scouring events. This has been seen in some recent high profile bridge failures across the UK and Ireland.
A scour sensor in accordance with the present invention can reliably measure the presence of scouring near a bridge support in a river environment and provide early warning of scouring events in order to allow proactive response by the asset owner. This can help inform the asset owner on the structural stability of the bridge during
high flow events and whether corrective action could be considered or closing the structure in the interests of public safety.
During the development of the sensor, a number of measurement methods were evaluated to attempt to identify the initial development scour within the sensor, including strain, bending, temperature and pressure measurements. In each case the methods were discounted due to unsuitability for harsh environmental conditions or vulnerability to false readings due to debris in the river.
The action of inserting a non-stream lined obstruction in flowing water results in oscillating vortices on the downstream side of the object. This novel approach of artificially producing such oscillating vortices on a downstream side of a post by means of flexible fins extending from said downstream side of the post to identify water flow in a scour hole provides a straightforward means of alerting asset owners to a scour event.
The bluff body/post 2 and rubber fins 4,6,8 may be geometrically optimised to force movement in the fin even at water low flow rate. The sensor exploits the generation of vortices downstream of the body 2 by using said rubber fins 4,6,8 embedded with movement sensors, such as Fibre Bragg Grating sensors (FBG), whereby the fins move with these vortices and such movement is detected by the movement sensors. The signals from the movement sensors may be received by electronics within the body adapted to translate the sensed movement of the or each fin into a signal output, for example on a digital display. The signals may be recorded over time to provide a record of the progression of scour. Wireless transmission means may be provided for transmitting data from the movement sensors to a remote location, such as to a mobile telephone.
When the fins 4,6,8 are buried, there is no movement registered in the fins. Should one or more of the fins 4,6,8 become exposed through the action of scouring, the flow of water around the body 2 and over the respective fin causes the exposed fin or fins to move and said movement is registered by the sensor.
Should material in-fill the scour hole and burry the exposed fin or fins again, such fin will no longer move with the flow of water and will cease to register a response. This allows for a determination of the real time scour depth at the sensor location which is not dependant on any initial calibration of soil conditions.
The sensor 1 may be installed at areas known to be at risk of scour and to a depth at which trigger alerts can be linked in order to inform the asset owner if the scouring is posing a risk to the foundations of the structure.
The flow rate for a pre-determined movement of the or each fin may be established by testing to establish a correlation between the magnitude of change in flow rate and the initial occurrence of the scour event, thereby determining a link between flow rate and scour.
A scour senor in accordance with the present invention does not try to identify scour through changing structural performance of the bridge. Rather the scour sensor is installed in the river bed to identify the scour event before it causes damage to the bridge. The scour sensor may provide a real time record of scouring and infill events which is a limitation to many of the other more established methods employed to date.
Once installed, the scour sensor may track the progression of scour and provide advanced warnings of early scour events, thus allowing bridge asset owner to arrange for proactive measures to be deployed to prevent catastrophic damage to structures or enact emergency response plans (such as temporary road closures) in the interests of public safety.
A scour sensor in accordance with the present invention is relatively simple in its approach to output. If a fin is exposed to flow it will oscillate and provide a signal to indicate it is exposed. Once it is infilled and the fin stops moving, the signal stops. This does not require careful calibration of the soil conditions around it or ongoing calibration.
Operatives carrying out scheduled bridge inspections with minimal training could verify if a sensor fin 4,6,8 of the scour sensor 1 is exposed or buried and compare that to a simple digital output showing ‘flow’ or ‘no flow’.
As the scour sensor does not rely on the dielectric properties of the surroundings it is unaffected by metal objects present or salt water environments meaning it can be deployed in any water environment.
The body 2 of the scour sensor may comprise a stainless steel box section post providing a robust defence against waterborne debris damage, such as floating trees during a flood event. The exposed rubber fins 4,6,8 attached to and extending from the post 2 are flexible enough to take impact damage and deflect back to shape without permanent damage. The movement sensors embedded in the fins 4,6,8 may be electrically connected to circuitry safely housed within the steel box section post 2 to minimise potential for damage.
The scour sensor 1 can be provide real time output on the development and infilling of scour and can allow for set trigger levels alert to inform asset owners that action may need to be taken at vulnerable structures. This sensor setup is not limited to fresh water environments as it is unaffected by salty marine water or metal debris which could be potentially found at these sites. There is less calibration required for setting up the sensors on site as they work on the principal of ‘Flow = exposed’ or ‘ No Flow = buried’ and as such are easier to interpret and check by bridge asset owners.
The invention is not limited to the embodiment described herein but can be amended or modified without departing from the scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
Claims
1. A sensor for detecting scour comprises a body adapted to be partially buried adjacent a submerged structure in a region of a riverbed expected to suffer from scour, a plurality of vertically spaced flexible fins extending from a downstream side of the body, said fins incorporating movement sensors, wherein, once a respective fin is uncovered due to the action of scour, movement of the respective fin due to vortices created by water flowing around the body to which the fin is attached is detected by said movement sensors, thereby provided an indicated of the progression of the scour.
2. A sensor as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said movement sensors comprise fibre Bragg gratings or other electrical based movement sensors embedded within said fins.
3. A sensor as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said movement sensors comprise one or more strain gauges, crack gauges or other sensors capable of detecting movement of the respective fin.
4. A sensor as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein each fin is made from an elastomeric polymer having said movement sensors embedded therein.
5. A sensor as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein said body comprises a vertically arranged post adapted to be at buried in the riverbed.
6. A sensor as claimed in claim 5, wherein said body comprises a metal box section post.
7. A sensor as claimed in claim 6, wherein said body is made from stainless steel.
8. A sensor as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein electronic components of the sensor are housed within the post.
9. A sensor as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the body includes a flat face on an upstream side thereof.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB2212899.5 | 2022-09-05 | ||
GB2212899.5A GB2622100A (en) | 2022-09-05 | 2022-09-05 | Sensor for detecting scour |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2024052259A1 true WO2024052259A1 (en) | 2024-03-14 |
Family
ID=83933214
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2023/074138 WO2024052259A1 (en) | 2022-09-05 | 2023-09-04 | Sensor for detecting scour |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
GB (1) | GB2622100A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2024052259A1 (en) |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4411160A (en) * | 1981-07-27 | 1983-10-25 | Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Vane modulus soil tester |
CN114705338A (en) * | 2022-03-28 | 2022-07-05 | 中国长江三峡集团有限公司 | Real-time monitoring device and monitoring method for scouring of offshore wind power pile foundation |
-
2022
- 2022-09-05 GB GB2212899.5A patent/GB2622100A/en active Pending
-
2023
- 2023-09-04 WO PCT/EP2023/074138 patent/WO2024052259A1/en unknown
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
KHAN ET AL: "REAL TIME MEASUREMENT OF SCOUR DEPTHS AROUND BRIDGE PIERS AND ABUTMENTS", 2 January 2015 (2015-01-02), South Carolina, XP093089016, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31090> [retrieved on 20231005] * |
WORMLEY DAVID N ET AL: "Instrumentation for measuring scour at bridge piers and abutments.", 2 January 1997 (1997-01-02), XP093089039, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_396.pdf> [retrieved on 20231005] * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB2622100A (en) | 2024-03-06 |
GB202212899D0 (en) | 2022-10-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Prendergast et al. | A review of bridge scour monitoring techniques | |
Lin et al. | Real-time monitoring of local scour by using fiber Bragg grating sensors | |
US20120303276A1 (en) | Scour monitoring system | |
Lagasse | Instrumentation for measuring scour at bridge piers and abutments | |
CN107460898B (en) | Real-time monitoring system and monitoring method for submerged bridge pile foundation scouring | |
US20130233079A1 (en) | Sensor system for detecting flow | |
Azhari et al. | Laboratory validation of buried piezoelectric scour sensing rods | |
Wang et al. | A piezoelectric film type scour monitoring system for bridge pier | |
US7832274B1 (en) | System and method for pneumatic scour detection | |
US5784338A (en) | Time domain reflectometry system for real-time bridge scour detection and monitoring | |
Crotti et al. | Scour at river bridge piers: real-time vulnerability assessment through the continuous monitoring of a bridge over the river Po, Italy | |
Lin et al. | Applications of optical fiber sensor on local scour monitoring | |
JP5348728B2 (en) | Optical fiber scour detector and system | |
WO2024052259A1 (en) | Sensor for detecting scour | |
Prendergast et al. | Sensitivity studies on scour detection using vibration-based systems | |
Farooq et al. | Bridge scour monitoring: challenges and opportunities | |
Maroni | A SHM-based decision support system for risk management of bridge scour | |
Tubaldi et al. | Evaluating the benefit of structural health monitoring for improving bridge resilience against scour. Deliverable D1–Report on critical review of alternative techniques for bridge scour monitoring | |
TW574458B (en) | A cantilever monitor device and method using it | |
Cai et al. | Monitoring bridge scour using fiber optic sensors. | |
Zabilansky et al. | Increased bed erosion due to ice | |
US20240093990A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for riverbed monitoring using a fiber optic cable sensor | |
CROTTI | Decision Support System for hydraulic risk management of a river bridge | |
Al-jubouri et al. | Methods to detect and measure scour around bridge foundations | |
Lin et al. | Bridge pier and embankment foundation real time scour monitoring system development |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 23764918 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |