WO2024048274A1 - Information processing device, information processing method, and program - Google Patents

Information processing device, information processing method, and program Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2024048274A1
WO2024048274A1 PCT/JP2023/029550 JP2023029550W WO2024048274A1 WO 2024048274 A1 WO2024048274 A1 WO 2024048274A1 JP 2023029550 W JP2023029550 W JP 2023029550W WO 2024048274 A1 WO2024048274 A1 WO 2024048274A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
value
user
information
information processing
processing device
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2023/029550
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
直輝 齋藤
智子 渡辺
孝平 松森
昌也 安藤
Original Assignee
株式会社 資生堂
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 株式会社 資生堂 filed Critical 株式会社 資生堂
Publication of WO2024048274A1 publication Critical patent/WO2024048274A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0201Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
    • G06Q30/0204Market segmentation

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to an information processing device, an information processing method, and a program.
  • Information technology is progressing in a wide range of technical fields, and users who are the consumers of services are now able to easily access the various information they desire. The same is true on the supplier side, and it is possible to acquire the user's knowledge and awareness in advance or at the time of sale through a questionnaire or the like, and provide advice based on the results of the questionnaire or the like in a timely manner.
  • the present disclosure provides an information processing device that outputs appropriate information based on questionnaire results.
  • processor memory, Equipped with The processor includes: Based on the results of the questionnaire, a first value indicating skin care information sensitivity and a second value indicating self-awareness of skin condition assessment ability are obtained for each user, classifying users into a plurality of categories based on the first value and the second value; Outputting information based on the classification of the user to each user belonging to the classification; Information processing device.
  • the processor includes: comparing the first value with a first threshold; comparing the second value with a second threshold; Class 1, where the first value is above the first threshold and the second value is above the second threshold; the first value is above the first threshold; a second category in which the second value is less than or equal to the second threshold; a third category in which the first value is less than or equal to the first threshold and the second value is above the second threshold; Classifying the user into one of the fourth categories, where the first value is less than or equal to the first threshold and the second value is less than or equal to the second threshold;
  • the information processing device according to [1].
  • the processor includes: at least outputting at least one of information on skin care products, skin care methods, or information on lifestyle habits related to skin care based on the classification; The information processing device according to [2].
  • the processor includes: outputting a beauty counseling method based on the classification; The information processing device according to [3].
  • Perform a skin diagnosis of the user The processor includes: Obtaining the results of the skin diagnosis, outputting at least one of the skin care product information, the skin care method, or the skin care-related lifestyle information, or changing the output expression thereof, based on the skin diagnosis result and the classification; The information processing device according to [3] or [4].
  • the processor includes: obtaining the first value based on a weighted sum of the points selected by the user for each item of the questionnaire regarding the first value by a coefficient set for each item; obtaining the second value based on a weighted sum of the points selected by the user for each item of the questionnaire regarding the second value by a coefficient set for each item;
  • the information processing device according to any one of [3] to [5].
  • the coefficient is a value obtained based on the factor loading amount when factor-analyzing the questionnaire results of the user's skin care awareness survey obtained in advance.
  • the information processing device according to [6].
  • the first threshold value and the second threshold value are determined using statistics about the first value and the second value for each user weighted by coefficients of questionnaire results obtained in advance.
  • the information processing device according to [6] or [7]. [9] further comprising a user interface that presents information to the user and receives input from the user; The information processing device according to any one of [1] to [8]. [10]
  • the user interface includes: a display section that presents a questionnaire to the user; an input section that accepts questionnaire responses from users; The information processing device according to [9], comprising: [11]
  • the user interface includes: an output section that presents information based on the classified results to the user;
  • the information processing device according to [9] or [10].
  • the processor includes: acquiring the first value and the second value for the same user at different timings; outputting information based on time-series changes in the acquired first value and second value; The information processing device according to any one of [1] to [8].
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of user classification according to an embodiment. A diagram showing an example of a questionnaire regarding one embodiment.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a KA card according to an embodiment.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of a value group map according to an embodiment.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of the relationship between items and factors according to an embodiment.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of the relationship between items and factors according to an embodiment.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of the relationship between items and factors according to an embodiment.
  • FIG. 3 is a path diagram illustrating an example of the relationship between factors according to one embodiment.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of a comprehensive effect according to an embodiment.
  • an information processing device includes, for example, a storage circuit such as a memory, and a processing circuit such as a processor.
  • a storage circuit such as a memory
  • a processing circuit such as a processor.
  • memory we mean not only so-called memory, but also devices and modules that can appropriately store data, such as storage areas such as various types of RAM, primary storage areas such as cache, and storage.
  • the information processing device may be a device in which a processor specifically implements information processing by software using hardware resources.
  • the memory may store programs, executable files, etc. for the processor to perform information processing, and the processor may perform information processing by referring to these files stored in the memory. .
  • the information processing device is not limited to these, and may include a dedicated circuit for executing information processing.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of user classification according to an embodiment.
  • the information processing device classifies users into categories based on skin care-related indicators, and provides skin care services for each user directly through a terminal or indirectly through a beauty staff member. Provide information regarding.
  • indicators related to skin care include, by way of non-limiting example, a first indicator indicating the user's sensitivity to information regarding skin care, and a second indicator indicating the self-awareness of the user's ability to assess skin conditions.
  • a first indicator indicating the user's sensitivity to information regarding skin care
  • a second indicator indicating the self-awareness of the user's ability to assess skin conditions.
  • explanation will be given mainly using these two indicators, but other indicators may be used as long as the indicators allow the user to appropriately classify skin care.
  • the user answers a questionnaire including questions regarding the first index and the second index.
  • This questionnaire may include questions that directly indicate matters related to the first and second indicators, or may include questions that do not directly indicate (indirectly indicate) matters.
  • a question that directly indicates matters related to the first indicator is a question such as "Do you actively obtain information about skin care?"
  • Questions that do not directly indicate matters related to the first index are not questions that directly include matters that directly represent the first index, such as the questions above, but are questions in which the user's answer has some correlation with the first index. .
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a questionnaire according to an embodiment. As shown in this figure, the questionnaire includes various questions.
  • direct questions regarding skin care information sensitivity include: "I'm always gathering information to see if there are better skin care methods or products.” “I want to try new skin care products as soon as they come out.” Examples include:
  • direct questions regarding self-awareness include: "You can tell right away whether your skin is in good condition” "You can judge for yourself whether your skin is moisturized or not.” Examples include:
  • the questionnaire may be one in which the user responds to each question using radio button format.
  • the information processing device converts each answer input by the user into points. For example, in response to the above question, the information processing device sets 1 point for not at all, 6 points for strongly agree, and sets the user's sensory value between 2 and 5 points.
  • the questionnaire may be of such a type that the user is asked to respond using radio buttons to choose the answer that most closely matches his or her feelings.
  • the information processing device may convert the user's answers into points, calculate the statistics of the points regarding the first index from the points, and use the calculated statistics as the first value. Similarly, the information processing device may calculate a point statistic related to the second index from the input points and use the calculated value as the second value.
  • the questionnaire may be of a format in which points are displayed to the user in advance, ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree, and the user selects how many points to give.
  • the information processing device calculates, as the first value, the product of the coefficient set for each question related to the first index and the point value of the user's answer, and calculates the sum, average, etc. (i.e., (calculating the weighted sum or weighted average, etc.). Similarly, the information processing device may obtain the second value by calculating the sum or weighted average of weights based on coefficients for each question from the questions related to the second index.
  • the coefficient will be explained in detail later, but it may be set to a larger positive value for a question where the correlation between the height of the first index and the points is higher, and a smaller value for a question where the correlation is lower. Furthermore, the coefficient is not limited to being positive, and may be set to a negative value if there is an inverse correlation between the height of the first index and the points. The same applies to the second indicator.
  • the information processing device sets a coefficient to multiply the points selected by the user for each item of the questionnaire shown in FIG. By calculating a weighted sum of points, etc., a first value regarding the first index and a second value regarding the second index are obtained.
  • a coefficient is set for either the first index or the second index, but the coefficient is not limited to this.
  • a certain question may have a correlation or an inverse correlation with both the first index and the second index.
  • a coefficient for the first index and a coefficient for the second index are respectively set for the same question.
  • a coefficient may be set for each.
  • the answers to the questionnaire may be input by the user into the information processing device.
  • the user may enter the questionnaire responses through the input interface of the information processing device, or may enter the questionnaire responses on a terminal device other than the information processing device, such as a smartphone or tablet terminal, and input the questionnaire responses by wired or wireless.
  • the information may be transmitted to the information processing device via the network.
  • questionnaires are not input via electronic devices such as information processing devices or terminal devices, but users' paper or verbal responses to the questionnaire are input directly or indirectly into the information processing device by another person. It may be something that does.
  • a user can go to a store or the like and receive counseling or the like based on the answers provided at the store or the like.
  • a user can respond to a questionnaire using a terminal device, on paper, or verbally at a store or the like, and receive counseling based on the answers at the store or the like.
  • the information processing device calculates a first value that quantifies the user's information sensitivity toward skin care based on the user's response to the first index, and a self-awareness level of the user's ability to assess skin condition based on the response to the second index. Obtain the digitized second value.
  • the information processing device classifies users into four categories, as a non-limiting example, based on these first and second values. Through this process, the information processing device classifies users into a plurality of categories based on each user's information sensitivity to skin care and self-awareness of ability to assess skin condition.
  • the information processing device compares the first value and the first threshold value and classifies the users into a group with high information sensitivity to skin care and a group with low information sensitivity.
  • the information processing device compares the second value with the second threshold and classifies the users into a group with a high self-awareness level of skin condition judgment ability and a group with a low self-awareness level.
  • the user is a skin care sensitive user who is a type 1 skin care sensitive user whose first value is higher than the first threshold and whose second value is higher than the second threshold;
  • the user is classified as a minimum user, which is the fourth category, for which the second value is less than or equal to the second threshold. Note that the names of the categories are given as examples and are not limited to these.
  • Type 1 is a group with high sensitivity to information about skin care and high self-awareness in assessing skin.
  • users classified as category 1 may be users who are highly interested in skin care, are active in collecting information and participating in trials, and are determined to be able to assess their skin condition by themselves.
  • Type 2 is a group with high sensitivity to information about skin care, but low self-awareness in assessing skin.
  • users classified as category 2 may be users who are highly interested in skin care and actively collect information and participate in trials, but who do not think they can assess their skin condition by themselves.
  • Type 3 is a group with low sensitivity to information about skin care, but high self-awareness in assessing skin.
  • users classified as category 3 may be users who think they can assess their skin condition by themselves, but who have little interest in skin care and do not collect much information.
  • Type 4 is a group with low sensitivity to information about skin care and low self-awareness in assessing skin.
  • users classified as category 4 may be users who are not so interested in skin care, who are not active in collecting information or trying trials, and who do not think they can assess their skin condition by themselves.
  • the information processing device After classifying the users, the information processing device outputs information based on the user classification.
  • the information processing device may output information to a user or may output information to a service provider such as a beauty salon staff. That is, the user may directly refer to information regarding skin care outputted from the information processing device, or a beauty staff member or the like may transmit information regarding skin care to the user based on the information outputted from the information processing device, or Alternatively, actions may be taken based on this information.
  • the information processing device outputs information related to skin care based on the classification.
  • This skin care information may include, by way of non-limiting example, at least one of information on skin care products, information on skin care methods, and information on lifestyle habits related to skin care.
  • the information processing device may output the results of beauty counseling such as skin care or the counseling method based on the classification.
  • the information processing device has an output interface that presents information to the user or a beauty staff member, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the user, etc.), an interface that presents a questionnaire to the user, and an interface that receives input from the user, etc.
  • the input interface may include an interface through which the user answers a questionnaire. Then, the information processing device can output information corresponding to the results of classifying the users based on the answers to the questionnaire to the users etc. from the output interface.
  • the information processing device determines that a user classified as category 1 has a high interest in beauty in general, and after outputting information about skin diagnosis to such a user, actively obtains the information. Recommends products for users with detailed beauty information. Furthermore, users classified as category 1 are considered to have a higher level of awareness regarding beauty than users in other categories, so they mention the massage method to experience the product as well as how it feels the next morning after applying the product. You may also introduce tips such as aromas and pressure points.
  • the information processing device can refer to skin diagnosis results actually performed at stores etc. as objective data, and It is possible to provide additional information related to determining the skin condition, such as the structure of the skin.
  • the information processing device may recommend products for users who actively search for information to users classified as category 2, omitting detailed information.
  • users classified as category 2 it may be possible to refer to the massage method for experiencing the product as well as the sensation immediately after applying the product.
  • the information processing device outputs information about skin diagnosis that is sufficient for users classified in this category. It is possible to output information about skin care that is not available in an easy-to-understand manner. For example, the information processing device can output basic information about skin care that is easy to understand or information about skin care based on self-recognized skin diagnosis to users in this category. Furthermore, for users classified as category 3, products that match their concerns may be recommended along with information that allows them to feel the difference in their skin condition.
  • the information processing device determines that a user classified as Category 4 is a user who has skin-related concerns but has difficulty actively acquiring information, and provides an easy-to-understand method for determining skin information and an easy-to-understand product explanation. You may also output information related to skin care, including the following. Users classified as Category 4 may not be good at acquiring information on their own, so even if the information processing device outputs easy-to-understand explanations and narrows down the information to basic care methods, etc. good.
  • the information processing device can output, for example, basic skin care products and easy-to-use products along with basic instructions on how to use them to users classified as category 4.
  • the information processing device provides a user experience based on classification using two axes: the user's information sensitivity regarding skin care and the user's self-awareness of skin condition assessment ability. can do.
  • the service provider may actually perform a skin diagnosis of the user at a store or the like.
  • the service provider uses the user's self-awareness level of skin condition assessment ability acquired by the information processing device and the skin diagnosis results to determine the user's information sensitivity for skin care and self-awareness level of skin condition assessment ability, Furthermore, it becomes possible to provide better counseling based on the skin condition. Further, based on the results output by the information processing device, it is possible to provide feedback regarding the difference between the user's subjective recognition of his/her own skin condition and the actual skin diagnosis result.
  • the service provider can also perform a skin diagnosis by changing the skin diagnosis to be performed or the level of the skin diagnosis, etc., based on the user's self-awareness of the user's ability to assess skin conditions. That is, the information processing device obtains the skin diagnosis results, and based on the skin diagnosis results and the classified categories, selects information on skin care products, skin care methods, or lifestyle habits related to skin care. At least one of these pieces of information can be outputted, or the output representation of these pieces of information can be changed and outputted.
  • the information processing device can output information regarding these factors.
  • the information processing device can also change the content or expression of the information to be output based on these factors.
  • the skin diagnosis to be performed may be selected based not only on the self-perceived level of skin condition assessment ability but also on the groups classified by the information processing device.
  • the service provider defines the first index and the second index in advance, and provides coefficients for calculating the first value and the second value, and the first value and the second value.
  • a first threshold value and a second threshold value are set for each.
  • the index, this coefficient, and the threshold value may be determined based on the results of, for example, conducting a questionnaire (user awareness survey) including the same question items in advance. This questionnaire may be performed, for example, on a large number of randomly sampled users who regularly use lotion.
  • This depth interview may be conducted as a preliminary work, for example, by having the user take a video of their skin care routine in the morning and evening using a terminal device on the user's side. Specifically, while taking privacy into consideration, we ask participants to take photos of their skin care routine from start to finish in their usual location, as much as possible.
  • In-depth interviews may be conducted by interviewers with extensive knowledge of cosmetics, such as beauty staff or counselors.
  • the interview content is recorded and analysis can be performed by transcribing the spoken data.
  • the KA method is a qualitative analysis method, and is mainly used to understand and analyze the usage status of UX design.
  • the KA method can extract the value of a user's actions by interpreting the reasons, motives, etc. behind them.
  • the KA method is characterized by the belief that user actions, no matter how small, have meaning and value, and converts them into codes of ⁇ the value of...''.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a card (KA card) used for analysis in the KA method.
  • KA card a card used for analysis in the KA method.
  • analysis is performed using this KA card.
  • data related to the user's actions are extracted from the utterance data obtained in the interview and written.
  • the identifier of the relevant KA card is written.
  • a value map is derived from the group arrangement of values using the KA method described above.
  • a value map is a map in which similar value groups are arranged close to each other and the relationships between the value groups are structured.
  • the derived value map can show the cause-and-effect relationship of value across all skin care behaviors, such as selecting a skin care product, purchasing it, continuing to use it to feel its effects, and taking actions to adjust as necessary. . Any area can also be extracted from the generated value map. For example, it is also possible to extract from the value map the main elements that correspond to the perceived skin care effect.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of a value map in which main elements are extracted for the portion corresponding to the feeling of skin care effect according to one embodiment. Based on this diagram, an example of a hypothetical conceptual structure for realizing skin care effects is derived. Arrows between each group indicate relationships between the groups.
  • Skin care behavior> is ⁇ maintaining the current status while monitoring the skin condition and making adjustments as necessary.'' This adjustment differs depending on the individual, but the factors that make this difference are influenced by ⁇ C.
  • Daily skin care styles are influenced by the ⁇ basic attitude toward skin care,'' which is formed by ⁇ information and knowledge obtained through actions,'' including past experiences.
  • ⁇ Basic attitudes toward skin care'' are related to mental models such as images of the effects of skin care cosmetics and their mechanisms of action, and recognition of skin conditions associated with aging.
  • ⁇ D. Realizing skin care effects> is felt in daily life as ⁇ the effects of skin care that can be felt when touching or looking at the skin.'' Typically, this is felt when adjustments or changes are made, such as when changing skin care cosmetic items. This experience of skin care effects is also influenced by ⁇ self-awareness of assessing skin condition.''
  • the conceptual structure formed is consistent with the context of the obtained utterance data and can be said to have a certain validity.
  • Quantitative research is realized, for example, by conducting a questionnaire to a research panel.
  • Sampling of users is performed by, for example, grouping users into five-year age groups and extracting a predetermined number of users from each group.
  • the above-mentioned coefficient and threshold value are calculated based on the responses of the sampled users to the questionnaire, and are determined together with the determination of the first index and the second index.
  • the survey items may be formulated based on the detailed items of the value groups of the KA method that make up the conceptual structure diagram shown in Figure 4, and may be in a form that allows you to grasp the three major elements A to C.
  • items for understanding skin care behavior may also be set. for example, ⁇ Multiple questions are set for each item regarding skin care attitude, skin care behavior, skin care practical ability, and perceived skin care effect.
  • a factor analysis will be performed for each of the three elements of the questions created.
  • a scale candidate is created by creating 26 items, performing item analysis using the maximum likelihood method and promax rotation, determining two factors from the scree plot, and reducing the number of items while determining the discriminative power.
  • Item 1 which has a high loading on the first factor, is ⁇ I am always gathering information to see if there are better skin care methods or products,'' and it is particularly related to the behavior of gathering new information and being proactive about trials.
  • ⁇ Skin Care Information Sensitivity'' because it consists of items.
  • the second factor has a high loading on item 5, ⁇ I can tell right away whether my skin is in good condition,'' and it is composed of items that express self-awareness regarding assessing skin condition. It was named ⁇ self-awareness''.
  • the third factor has a high loading on item 8, ⁇ Due to family and work commitments, I don't have enough time to spend on skin care and makeup.'' This item is mainly related to situational constraints on skin care. ” was named.
  • the first factor has a high loading on item 1, ⁇ I feel that my current skin care routine is working well,'' and item 3 has a high loading, ⁇ The products and methods I currently use for skin care are providing me with skin care results that are as expected.'' It consists of items that refer to actual skin care effects, such as "I feel like I am getting the desired results," but since the main purpose is that the results are as expected, I chose "Feeling the effects (as expected)."
  • the second factor has a high loading on item 5, ⁇ I feel dissatisfied and would like to improve if possible,'' and is composed of items that indicate dissatisfaction and compromise. ” was named.
  • the third factor has a high loading on item 8, ⁇ I'm not particularly satisfied, but it doesn't mean I'm dissatisfied,'' and both items are neither dissatisfied nor satisfied. ” was named.
  • the items of the questionnaire for performing quantitative analysis include the same items as those of the questionnaire actually analyzed by the information processing device, as well as many more items.
  • the coefficients and threshold values used by the information processing device according to the present disclosure can be determined based on factor analysis.
  • the indicators are not limited to the above two, but may be three or more.
  • an index such as inquisitiveness toward skin care can be set based on the results of factor analysis.
  • the information processing device can classify users along three axes: information sensitivity to skin care, self-awareness of ability to assess skin condition, and skin care inquisitiveness.
  • the information processing device can, for example, classify users into eight categories, and for each of these eight categories, Information related to skin care can also be output.
  • the threshold used for classification is, for example, calculated by calculating the first and second values of each user using the results of an awareness survey of a large number of users, and using some kind of statistical value of the many first and second values obtained. It may be calculated by
  • the threshold may be set based on the average value, median, mode, etc. of the first value and second value of all users who gave significant answers.
  • the average value of the first values may be used as the first threshold value
  • the average value of the second values may be used as the second threshold value.
  • Separate statistics may be set as thresholds for each axis, for example, an average value may be used as the first threshold, a mode may be used as the second threshold, etc.
  • threshold values may be set for each age group, region, or store visited.
  • the information processing device can appropriately classify users along different axes and output information regarding appropriate skin care based on the classification.
  • the information processing device can also analyze items divided by age to obtain overall awareness and current trends for each age group, and add age-related information to the output results. .

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

[Problem] To output appropriate information based on questionnaire results. [Solution] This information processing device comprises a processor and a memory. The processor acquires, for each user, a first value indicating information sensitivity for skin care and a second value indicating self-awareness of skin condition discernment ability, on the basis of the results of the questionnaire, classifies users into a plurality of categories on the basis of the first value and the second value, and outputs information based on the user's category to users belonging to each of the categories.

Description

情報処理装置、情報処理方法及びプログラムInformation processing device, information processing method and program
 本開示は、情報処理装置、情報処理方法及びプログラムに関する。 The present disclosure relates to an information processing device, an information processing method, and a program.
 広い技術分野において情報化が進んでおり、サービスを受ける需要者であるユーザ自らが欲している種々の情報に簡単にアクセスできるようになってきている。供給者側でも同様であり、ユーザの知識や意識を事前に、又は、販売時においてアンケート等で取得して適時にアンケート等の結果に基づいたアドバイス等をすることが可能となっている。 Information technology is progressing in a wide range of technical fields, and users who are the consumers of services are now able to easily access the various information they desire. The same is true on the supplier side, and it is possible to acquire the user's knowledge and awareness in advance or at the time of sale through a questionnaire or the like, and provide advice based on the results of the questionnaire or the like in a timely manner.
 化粧品に関連する処理についても同様であり、従来は美容部員が販売店舗においてユーザの嗜好を聞いたり、肌状態を判断したりすることで適切なカウンセリングをすることが可能であったが、この手法では、実際にユーザからのヒアリングをする時間的コストや、また、カウンセリング内容が美容部員の熟練度に依存するといった課題が残る。 The same applies to processing related to cosmetics. Previously, beauty staff could provide appropriate counseling by asking users about their preferences and determining their skin condition at retail stores, but this method However, problems remain, such as the time cost of actually interviewing users and the dependence of the content of the counseling on the skill level of the beauty staff.
 そこで、本開示では、アンケート結果に基づいた適切な情報を出力する情報処理装置を提供する。 Therefore, the present disclosure provides an information processing device that outputs appropriate information based on questionnaire results.
 一実施形態によれば、以下の発明が提供される。
[1]
 プロセッサと、メモリと、
 を備え、
 前記プロセッサは、
  アンケートの結果に基づいて、ユーザごとに、スキンケアに対する情報感度を示す第1値及び肌状態見極め能力の自己認知度を示す第2値を取得し、
  前記第1値及び前記第2値に基づいて、ユーザを複数の区分に分類し、
  それぞれの前記区分に属するユーザに、当該ユーザの区分に基づいた情報を出力する、
 情報処理装置。
[2]
 前記プロセッサは、
  前記第1値を第1閾値と比較し、
  前記第2値を第2閾値と比較し、
  前記第1値が前記第1閾値より上の値であり前記第2値が前記第2閾値より上の値である第1類、前記第1値が前記第1閾値より上の値であり前記第2値が前記第2閾値以下である第2類、前記第1値が前記第1閾値以下であり前記第2値が前記第2閾値より上の値である第3類、及び、前記第1値が前記第1閾値以下であり前記第2値が前記第2閾値以下である第4類、のいずれかの区分にユーザを分類する、
 [1]に記載の情報処理装置。
[3]
 前記プロセッサは、
  少なくとも、前記区分に基づいてスキンケア用品の情報、スキンケア方法又はスキンケアに関連する生活習慣の情報のうち少なくとも1つを出力する、
 [2]に記載の情報処理装置。
[4]
 前記プロセッサは、
  前記区分に基づいて美容に関するカウンセリング方法を出力する、
 [3]に記載の情報処理装置。
[5]
 ユーザの肌診断を実行し、
 前記プロセッサは、
  前記肌診断の結果を取得し、
  前記肌診断の結果及び前記区分に基づいて、前記スキンケア用品の情報、前記スキンケア方法若しくは前記スキンケアに関連する生活習慣の情報のうち少なくとも1つを出力し、又は、これらの出力表現を変更する、
 [3]又は[4]に記載の情報処理装置。
[6]
 前記プロセッサは、
  前記第1値に関する前記アンケートの項目ごとにユーザが選択した点数を、当該項目ごとに設定されている係数によって重み付け和に基づいて前記第1値を取得し、
  前記第2値に関する前記アンケートの項目ごとにユーザが選択した点数を、当該項目ごとに設定されている係数によって重み付け和に基づいて前記第2値を取得する、
 [3]から[5]のいずれかに記載の情報処理装置。
[7]
 前記係数は、予め取得しているユーザのスキンケアに関する意識調査のアンケート結果を因子分析した際の因子負荷量に基づいて取得された値である、
 [6]に記載の情報処理装置。
[8]
 前記第1閾値及び前記第2閾値は、予め取得されているアンケート結果の係数による重み付けしたユーザごとの前記第1値及び前記第2値についての統計量を用いて決定される、
 [6]又は[7]に記載の情報処理装置。
[9]
 ユーザに情報を提示し、ユーザからの入力を受け付けるユーザインタフェースをさらに備える、
 [1]~[8]のいずれかに記載の情報処理装置。
[10]
 前記ユーザインタフェースは、
  ユーザにアンケートを提示する表示部と、
  ユーザからアンケートの回答を受け付ける入力部と、
 を備える[9]に記載の情報処理装置。
[11]
 前記ユーザインタフェースは、
  ユーザに分類した結果に基づいた情報を提示する出力部、
 を備える[9]又は[10]に記載の情報処理装置。
[12]
 前記プロセッサは、
  同一のユーザに対して、異なるタイミングにおいて前記第1値及び前記第2値を取得し、
  取得した前記第1値及び前記第2値の時系列変化に基づいた情報を出力する、
 [1]~[8]のいずれかに記載の情報処理装置。
According to one embodiment, the following invention is provided.
[1]
processor, memory,
Equipped with
The processor includes:
Based on the results of the questionnaire, a first value indicating skin care information sensitivity and a second value indicating self-awareness of skin condition assessment ability are obtained for each user,
classifying users into a plurality of categories based on the first value and the second value;
Outputting information based on the classification of the user to each user belonging to the classification;
Information processing device.
[2]
The processor includes:
comparing the first value with a first threshold;
comparing the second value with a second threshold;
Class 1, where the first value is above the first threshold and the second value is above the second threshold; the first value is above the first threshold; a second category in which the second value is less than or equal to the second threshold; a third category in which the first value is less than or equal to the first threshold and the second value is above the second threshold; Classifying the user into one of the fourth categories, where the first value is less than or equal to the first threshold and the second value is less than or equal to the second threshold;
The information processing device according to [1].
[3]
The processor includes:
at least outputting at least one of information on skin care products, skin care methods, or information on lifestyle habits related to skin care based on the classification;
The information processing device according to [2].
[4]
The processor includes:
outputting a beauty counseling method based on the classification;
The information processing device according to [3].
[5]
Perform a skin diagnosis of the user,
The processor includes:
Obtaining the results of the skin diagnosis,
outputting at least one of the skin care product information, the skin care method, or the skin care-related lifestyle information, or changing the output expression thereof, based on the skin diagnosis result and the classification;
The information processing device according to [3] or [4].
[6]
The processor includes:
obtaining the first value based on a weighted sum of the points selected by the user for each item of the questionnaire regarding the first value by a coefficient set for each item;
obtaining the second value based on a weighted sum of the points selected by the user for each item of the questionnaire regarding the second value by a coefficient set for each item;
The information processing device according to any one of [3] to [5].
[7]
The coefficient is a value obtained based on the factor loading amount when factor-analyzing the questionnaire results of the user's skin care awareness survey obtained in advance.
The information processing device according to [6].
[8]
The first threshold value and the second threshold value are determined using statistics about the first value and the second value for each user weighted by coefficients of questionnaire results obtained in advance.
The information processing device according to [6] or [7].
[9]
further comprising a user interface that presents information to the user and receives input from the user;
The information processing device according to any one of [1] to [8].
[10]
The user interface includes:
a display section that presents a questionnaire to the user;
an input section that accepts questionnaire responses from users;
The information processing device according to [9], comprising:
[11]
The user interface includes:
an output section that presents information based on the classified results to the user;
The information processing device according to [9] or [10].
[12]
The processor includes:
acquiring the first value and the second value for the same user at different timings;
outputting information based on time-series changes in the acquired first value and second value;
The information processing device according to any one of [1] to [8].
一実施形態に関するユーザ区分の一例を示す図。FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of user classification according to an embodiment. 一実施形態に関するアンケートの一例を示す図。A diagram showing an example of a questionnaire regarding one embodiment. 一実施形態に係る KA カードの一例を示す図。FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a KA card according to an embodiment. 一実施形態に係る価値グループマップの一例を示す図。FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of a value group map according to an embodiment. 一実施形態に係る項目と因子との関係の一例を示す図。FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of the relationship between items and factors according to an embodiment. 一実施形態に係る項目と因子との関係の一例を示す図。FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of the relationship between items and factors according to an embodiment. 一実施形態に係る項目と因子との関係の一例を示す図。FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of the relationship between items and factors according to an embodiment. 一実施形態に係る因子間の関連性の一例を示すパス図。FIG. 3 is a path diagram illustrating an example of the relationship between factors according to one embodiment. 一実施形態に係る総合効果の一例を示す図。FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of a comprehensive effect according to an embodiment.
 以下、図面を参照して本開示における実施形態の説明をする。本開示においては、数値の比較として、「以上」「未満」の文言を使用することがあるが、これらは、矛盾しない範囲においてそれぞれ適宜「より多い (高い、大きい) 」「以下」と読み替えることが可能であり、逆もまた可能である。 Hereinafter, embodiments of the present disclosure will be described with reference to the drawings. In this disclosure, the terms "more than" and "less than" may be used to compare numerical values, but these may be read as "more than" (higher, larger) and "less than" as appropriate to the extent that they do not contradict each other. is possible and vice versa.
 本開示において、情報処理装置は、例えば、メモリをはじめとする記憶回路と、プロセッサをはじめとする処理回路と、を備える。メモリと記載した場合、所謂メモリだけではなく、各種 RAM といった記憶領域、キャッシュといった一次記憶領域やストレージのように適切にデータを格納できるデバイス、モジュールを意味する。 In the present disclosure, an information processing device includes, for example, a storage circuit such as a memory, and a processing circuit such as a processor. When we say "memory," we mean not only so-called memory, but also devices and modules that can appropriately store data, such as storage areas such as various types of RAM, primary storage areas such as cache, and storage.
 情報処理装置は、プロセッサにより、ソフトウェアによる情報処理がハードウェア資源を用いて具体的に実現される装置であってもよい。この場合、メモリは、プロセッサが情報処理を行うためのプログラム、実行ファイル等を格納してもよく、プロセッサは、メモリに格納されたこれらのファイルを参照することで情報処理を実行してもよい。 The information processing device may be a device in which a processor specifically implements information processing by software using hardware resources. In this case, the memory may store programs, executable files, etc. for the processor to perform information processing, and the processor may perform information processing by referring to these files stored in the memory. .
 これらに限定されず、情報処理装置は、情報処理を実行するための専用の回路を備えていてもよい。 The information processing device is not limited to these, and may include a dedicated circuit for executing information processing.
 図1は、一実施形態に係るユーザの区分の一例を示す図である。本開示においては、情報処理装置は、ユーザをスキンケアに関する指標により区分に分けた範囲ごとに分類し、このユーザごとに端末を介して直接的に、又は、美容部員を介して間接的に、スキンケアに関する情報を提供する。 FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of user classification according to an embodiment. In the present disclosure, the information processing device classifies users into categories based on skin care-related indicators, and provides skin care services for each user directly through a terminal or indirectly through a beauty staff member. Provide information regarding.
 スキンケアに関する指標は、限定されない一例として、ユーザのスキンケアに対する情報感度を示す第1指標、及び、ユーザの肌状態見極め能力の自己認知度を示す第2指標である。本開示においては、主にこれらの2つの指標を用いて説明するが、用いる指標は、スキンケアに関してユーザが適切に区分できる指標であれば別の指標であってもよい。 Examples of indicators related to skin care include, by way of non-limiting example, a first indicator indicating the user's sensitivity to information regarding skin care, and a second indicator indicating the self-awareness of the user's ability to assess skin conditions. In the present disclosure, explanation will be given mainly using these two indicators, but other indicators may be used as long as the indicators allow the user to appropriately classify skin care.
 ユーザは、第1指標及び第2指標に関する質問項目を含むアンケートに答える。このアンケートは、第1指標及び第2指標に関する事項を直接的に示す質問が含まれていてもよいし、直接的に示されない (間接的に示す) 質問が含まれていてもよい。 The user answers a questionnaire including questions regarding the first index and the second index. This questionnaire may include questions that directly indicate matters related to the first and second indicators, or may include questions that do not directly indicate (indirectly indicate) matters.
 例えば、第1指標に関する事項を直接的に示す質問は、「スキンケアに関する情報を自ら積極的に取得しますか?」といった質問である。第1指標に関する事項を直接的に示さない質問は、上記の質問のように直接的に第1指標を表す事項を含む質問ではなく、ユーザの回答が第1指標と何らかの相関を有する質問である。 For example, a question that directly indicates matters related to the first indicator is a question such as "Do you actively obtain information about skin care?" Questions that do not directly indicate matters related to the first index are not questions that directly include matters that directly represent the first index, such as the questions above, but are questions in which the user's answer has some correlation with the first index. .
 図2は、一実施形態に係るアンケートの一例を示す図である。この図に示されるようにアンケートにはいろいろな質問が示されている。 FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a questionnaire according to an embodiment. As shown in this figure, the questionnaire includes various questions.
 限定されない例として、スキンケアに対する情報感度に関する直接的な質問としては、
 「よりよいスキンケアの方法や商品がないか、いつも情報収集している」
 「新しいスキンケア化粧品が出たら早く試したい」
といったものが挙げられる。
As a non-limiting example, direct questions regarding skin care information sensitivity include:
"I'm always gathering information to see if there are better skin care methods or products."
“I want to try new skin care products as soon as they come out.”
Examples include:
 限定されない例として、自己認知度に関する直接的な質問としては、
 「肌状態がいいかどうかはすぐにわかる」
 「肌が潤っているかどうかは、自分なりに判断できる」
といったものが挙げられる。
As a non-limiting example, direct questions regarding self-awareness include:
"You can tell right away whether your skin is in good condition"
"You can judge for yourself whether your skin is moisturized or not."
Examples include:
 アンケートは、図2に示すように、各質問に対するユーザの度合いをラジオボタン形式で回答するものであってもよい。情報処理装置は、ユーザが入力した回答をそれぞれポイントに変換する。情報処理装置は、例えば、上記の質問に対して、全く思わないを 1 ポイントとし、とてもそう思うを 6 ポイントとし、その間のユーザの感覚値を 2 ~ 5 ポイントとして設定する。アンケートは、このようにユーザが最も自らの感覚と合っているものをラジオボタン形式で回答させる方式であってもよい。 As shown in FIG. 2, the questionnaire may be one in which the user responds to each question using radio button format. The information processing device converts each answer input by the user into points. For example, in response to the above question, the information processing device sets 1 point for not at all, 6 points for strongly agree, and sets the user's sensory value between 2 and 5 points. The questionnaire may be of such a type that the user is asked to respond using radio buttons to choose the answer that most closely matches his or her feelings.
 情報処理装置は、ユーザの回答をポイントに変換し、このポイントから第1指標に関するポイントの統計量を算出し、第1値としてもよい。同様に、情報処理装置は、入力されたポイントから第2指標に関するポイントの統計量を算出し、第2値としてもよい。 The information processing device may convert the user's answers into points, calculate the statistics of the points regarding the first index from the points, and use the calculated statistics as the first value. Similarly, the information processing device may calculate a point statistic related to the second index from the input points and use the calculated value as the second value.
 別の例として、アンケートは、全くそう思わない~とてもそう思うかをあらかじめポイントとしてユーザに表示し、何点であるかをユーザが選択する形式であってもよい。 As another example, the questionnaire may be of a format in which points are displayed to the user in advance, ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree, and the user selects how many points to give.
 情報処理装置は、第1値として、第1指標に関連する質問ごとに設定された係数と、ユーザの回答のポイント値との積を算出し、和、又は、平均等を算出する (すなわち、重み付けの和又は重み付け平均等を算出する) ことにより取得してもよい。同様に、情報処理装置は、第2指標に関連する質問から、それぞれの質問に対する係数に基づいた重み付けの和又は重み付け平均等を算出することで、第2値を取得してもよい。 The information processing device calculates, as the first value, the product of the coefficient set for each question related to the first index and the point value of the user's answer, and calculates the sum, average, etc. (i.e., (calculating the weighted sum or weighted average, etc.). Similarly, the information processing device may obtain the second value by calculating the sum or weighted average of weights based on coefficients for each question from the questions related to the second index.
 係数については後述にて詳しく説明するが、第1指標の高低とポイントの相関が高くなる質問ほど、正の大きい値とし、相関が低くなる質問ほど、小さい値としてもよい。また、係数は、正であることには限定されず、第1指標の高低とポイントとが逆相関の関係にある場合には、負値が設定されていてもよい。第2指標についても同様である。 The coefficient will be explained in detail later, but it may be set to a larger positive value for a question where the correlation between the height of the first index and the points is higher, and a smaller value for a question where the correlation is lower. Furthermore, the coefficient is not limited to being positive, and may be set to a negative value if there is an inverse correlation between the height of the first index and the points. The same applies to the second indicator.
 情報処理装置は、例えば、図2に示すアンケートの項目ごとに、ユーザが選択したポイントに掛ける係数が設定され、第1指標及び第2指標に関連する質問項目ごとに、設定された係数に基づいてポイントの重み付け和等を算出することで、第1指標に関する第1値及び第2指標に関する第2値を取得する。 For example, the information processing device sets a coefficient to multiply the points selected by the user for each item of the questionnaire shown in FIG. By calculating a weighted sum of points, etc., a first value regarding the first index and a second value regarding the second index are obtained.
 なお、上記のような質問例においては、第1指標又は第2指標のいずれかに対する係数が設定されることを想定しているが、これに限定されるものではない。例えば、ある質問が、第1指標及び第2指標の双方に相関又は逆相関を有していてもよい。すなわち、同じ質問に対して、第1指標に対する係数と第2指標に対する係数とがそれぞれ設定されることを排除するものではない。例えば、「自分の肌状態にあった情報の検索ができる」といったスキンケアに対する情報感度及び自己認知度の双方に関連する可能性がある質問に対しては、スキンケアに対する情報感度及び自己認知度の双方に対してそれぞれ係数が設定されていてもよい。 Note that in the example questions above, it is assumed that a coefficient is set for either the first index or the second index, but the coefficient is not limited to this. For example, a certain question may have a correlation or an inverse correlation with both the first index and the second index. In other words, it is not excluded that a coefficient for the first index and a coefficient for the second index are respectively set for the same question. For example, in response to a question that may be related to both information sensitivity and self-awareness regarding skin care, such as "I can search for information that suits my skin condition," A coefficient may be set for each.
 アンケートの回答は、ユーザが情報処理装置に入力してもよい。ユーザは、情報処理装置の入力インタフェースを介してアンケートの回答を入力してもよいし、情報処理装置とは別の端末装置、例えば、スマートフォンやタブレット端末においてアンケートの回答を入力し、有線又は無線のネットワークを介して情報処理装置に送信してもよい。 The answers to the questionnaire may be input by the user into the information processing device. The user may enter the questionnaire responses through the input interface of the information processing device, or may enter the questionnaire responses on a terminal device other than the information processing device, such as a smartphone or tablet terminal, and input the questionnaire responses by wired or wireless. The information may be transmitted to the information processing device via the network.
 また、アンケートは、情報処理装置、端末装置といった電子機器を介して入力するものではなく、紙面又は口頭でのユーザのアンケートの回答を、別の人間が情報処理装置に直接的又は間接的に入力するものであってもよい。 In addition, questionnaires are not input via electronic devices such as information processing devices or terminal devices, but users' paper or verbal responses to the questionnaire are input directly or indirectly into the information processing device by another person. It may be something that does.
 例えば、ユーザは、自らが有する端末装置においてアンケートに回答した後に、販売店等に行くことで販売店等において回答に沿ったカウンセリング等を受けることもできる。例えば、ユーザは、販売店等において端末装置、紙面又は口頭によりアンケートに回答し、当該販売店等において、そのまま回答に沿ったカウンセリング等を受けることもできる。 For example, after a user answers a questionnaire using a terminal device that he or she owns, the user can go to a store or the like and receive counseling or the like based on the answers provided at the store or the like. For example, a user can respond to a questionnaire using a terminal device, on paper, or verbally at a store or the like, and receive counseling based on the answers at the store or the like.
 図1に戻り、情報処理装置は、ユーザの第1指標に対する回答からユーザのスキンケアに対する情報感度を数値化した第1値と、第2指標に対する回答からユーザの肌状態見極め能力の自己認知度を数値化した第2値と、を取得する。情報処理装置は、これら第1値及び第2値に基づいて、限定されない一例として、ユーザを4つの類に区分する。この処理により、情報処理装置は、ユーザごとにスキンケアに対する情報感度と、肌状態見極め能力の自己認知度に基づいて、ユーザを複数の区分に分類する。 Returning to Figure 1, the information processing device calculates a first value that quantifies the user's information sensitivity toward skin care based on the user's response to the first index, and a self-awareness level of the user's ability to assess skin condition based on the response to the second index. Obtain the digitized second value. The information processing device classifies users into four categories, as a non-limiting example, based on these first and second values. Through this process, the information processing device classifies users into a plurality of categories based on each user's information sensitivity to skin care and self-awareness of ability to assess skin condition.
 情報処理装置は、例えば、第1値と第1閾値とを比較してユーザをスキンケアに対する情報感度が高いグループと低いグループとに区分する。同様に、情報処理装置は、例えば、第2値と第2閾値とを比較してユーザを肌状態見極め能力の自己認知度が高いグループと低いグループとに区分する。 The information processing device, for example, compares the first value and the first threshold value and classifies the users into a group with high information sensitivity to skin care and a group with low information sensitivity. Similarly, the information processing device, for example, compares the second value with the second threshold and classifies the users into a group with a high self-awareness level of skin condition judgment ability and a group with a low self-awareness level.
 一例として、ユーザは、第1値が第1閾値より高く第2値が第2閾値より高い第1類であるスキンケア高感度ユーザ、第1値が第1閾値より高く第2値が第2閾値以下である第2類である知識先行ユーザ、第1値が第1閾値以下であり第2値が第2閾値より高い第3類である現実重視ユーザ、第1値が第1閾値以下であり第2値が第2閾値以下である第4類であるミニマムユーザ、のいずれかに区分される。なお、区分の名称は、例としてあげたものであり、これらに限定されるものではない。 As an example, the user is a skin care sensitive user who is a type 1 skin care sensitive user whose first value is higher than the first threshold and whose second value is higher than the second threshold; A knowledge-oriented user who is in the second category who is below, a reality-oriented user who is in the third category whose first value is less than or equal to the first threshold and whose second value is higher than the second threshold, and a reality-oriented user whose first value is less than or equal to the first threshold. The user is classified as a minimum user, which is the fourth category, for which the second value is less than or equal to the second threshold. Note that the names of the categories are given as examples and are not limited to these.
 第1類は、スキンケアに対する情報感度も肌見極めの自己認知も高いグループである。例えば、第1類に区分されたユーザは、スキンケアに関心が高く情報収集やトライアルに積極的であり、自分で肌状態を見極められると判断しているユーザであるとしてもよい。 Type 1 is a group with high sensitivity to information about skin care and high self-awareness in assessing skin. For example, users classified as category 1 may be users who are highly interested in skin care, are active in collecting information and participating in trials, and are determined to be able to assess their skin condition by themselves.
 第2類は、スキンケアに対する情報感度が高いが肌見極めの自己認知が低いグループである。例えば、第2類に区分されたユーザは、スキンケアに関心が高く情報収集やトライアルも積極的であるが、自分では肌状態を見極められないと思っているユーザであるとしてもよい。 Type 2 is a group with high sensitivity to information about skin care, but low self-awareness in assessing skin. For example, users classified as category 2 may be users who are highly interested in skin care and actively collect information and participate in trials, but who do not think they can assess their skin condition by themselves.
 第3類は、スキンケアに対する情報感度が低い一方で肌見極めの自己認知が高いグループである。例えば、第3類に区分されたユーザは、自分で肌状態は見極められると思っているが、スキンケアに関心がやや乏しく情報収集はあまりやっていないユーザであるとしてもよい。 Type 3 is a group with low sensitivity to information about skin care, but high self-awareness in assessing skin. For example, users classified as category 3 may be users who think they can assess their skin condition by themselves, but who have little interest in skin care and do not collect much information.
 第4類は、スキンケアに対する情報感度も肌見極めの自己認知も低いグループである。例えば、第4類に区分されるユーザは、スキンケアにそれほど関心がなく情報収集やトライアルも積極的ではなく、かつ、自分で肌状態を見極められるとも思っていないユーザであるとしてもよい。 Type 4 is a group with low sensitivity to information about skin care and low self-awareness in assessing skin. For example, users classified as category 4 may be users who are not so interested in skin care, who are not active in collecting information or trying trials, and who do not think they can assess their skin condition by themselves.
 このような区分にユーザを分類することで、ユーザごとにユーザが普段取得する情報と、ユーザ自身の肌状態の見極め力と、に基づいた情報を提供することができる。 By classifying users into such categories, it is possible to provide each user with information based on the information that the user usually obtains and the user's ability to discern their own skin condition.
 ユーザを区分した後に、情報処理装置は、ユーザの区分に基づいた情報を出力する。情報処理装置は、ユーザに情報を出力してもよいし、美容部員といったサービス提供側に情報を出力してもよい。すなわち、ユーザが情報処理装置から出力されたスキンケアに関する情報を直接的に参照してもよいし、美容部員等が情報処理装置から出力された情報に基づいてユーザにスキンケアに関する情報を伝達したり、又は、この情報に基づいた処置をしたりしてもよい。 After classifying the users, the information processing device outputs information based on the user classification. The information processing device may output information to a user or may output information to a service provider such as a beauty salon staff. That is, the user may directly refer to information regarding skin care outputted from the information processing device, or a beauty staff member or the like may transmit information regarding skin care to the user based on the information outputted from the information processing device, or Alternatively, actions may be taken based on this information.
 情報処理装置は、区分に基づいて、スキンケアに関する情報を出力する。このスキンケアに関する情報は、限定されない例として、スキンケア用品に関する情報、スキンケア方法に関する情報、又は、スキンケアに関連する生活習慣の情報のうち、少なくとも1つを含んでいてもよい。 The information processing device outputs information related to skin care based on the classification. This skin care information may include, by way of non-limiting example, at least one of information on skin care products, information on skin care methods, and information on lifestyle habits related to skin care.
 また、情報処理装置は、区分に基づいて、スキンケアをはじめとする美容に関するカウンセリングをした結果、又は、カウンセリング方法を出力してもよい。 Furthermore, the information processing device may output the results of beauty counseling such as skin care or the counseling method based on the classification.
 すなわち、限定されない例として、情報処理装置は、ユーザ又は美容部員等 (以下、ユーザ等と記載する) に情報を提示する出力インタフェースとしてユーザにアンケートを提示するインタフェースと、ユーザ等からの入力を受け付ける入力インタフェースとしてユーザがアンケートに回答するインタフェースを備えてもよい。そして、情報処理装置は、アンケートの回答に基づいて、ユーザを分類した結果に応じた情報を出力インタフェースからユーザ等に出力することができる。 In other words, as a non-limiting example, the information processing device has an output interface that presents information to the user or a beauty staff member, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the user, etc.), an interface that presents a questionnaire to the user, and an interface that receives input from the user, etc. The input interface may include an interface through which the user answers a questionnaire. Then, the information processing device can output information corresponding to the results of classifying the users based on the answers to the questionnaire to the users etc. from the output interface.
 情報処理装置は、例えば、第1類に区分されたユーザが美容全般に高い関心があると判定し、このようなユーザには、肌診断についての情報を出力した後に、積極的に情報を入手しているユーザ向けの商品を美容に関する詳細な情報とともにレコメンドする。さらに、第1類に区分されるユーザは、美容に関しての意識も他の区分のユーザよりも高いと考えられるため、商品を体験するマッサージ法とともに、商品を塗布した翌朝の感触に言及し、また、アロマやツボ押し等の Tips を紹介してもよい。 For example, the information processing device determines that a user classified as category 1 has a high interest in beauty in general, and after outputting information about skin diagnosis to such a user, actively obtains the information. Recommends products for users with detailed beauty information. Furthermore, users classified as category 1 are considered to have a higher level of awareness regarding beauty than users in other categories, so they mention the massage method to experience the product as well as how it feels the next morning after applying the product. You may also introduce tips such as aromas and pressure points.
 情報処理装置は、例えば、第2類に区分されたユーザがスキンケアの知識を豊富に有していることから、実際に店舗等で行った肌診断結果を客観的なデータとして参照するとともに、肌の構造等の肌状態見極めに関する付随的な情報を提供することができる。情報処理装置は、第2類に区分されたユーザには、情報を積極的に探索するユーザ向けの商品を詳細な情報を省略してレコメンドしてもよい。さらに、第2類に区分されるユーザには、商品を体験するマッサージ法とともに、商品を塗布した直後の感触に言及してもよい。 For example, since users classified as category 2 have a wealth of knowledge about skin care, the information processing device can refer to skin diagnosis results actually performed at stores etc. as objective data, and It is possible to provide additional information related to determining the skin condition, such as the structure of the skin. The information processing device may recommend products for users who actively search for information to users classified as category 2, omitting detailed information. Furthermore, for users classified as category 2, it may be possible to refer to the massage method for experiencing the product as well as the sensation immediately after applying the product.
 情報処理装置は、例えば、第3類に区分されたユーザが肌状態の見極め能力の自己認知度が高いことから、肌診断についての情報を出力した後に、この類に区分されているユーザに足りないスキンケアに関する情報を、わかりやすく出力することができる。例えば、情報処理装置は、この区分のユーザには、わかりやすいスキンケアに関する基本的な情報や自己認知した肌診断に基づいたスキンケアに関する情報を出力することができる。さらに、第3類に区分されるユーザには、肌状態の違いを感じられるような情報とともに悩みに即した商品をレコメンドしてもよい。 For example, since users classified as category 3 have a high level of self-awareness in their ability to assess skin conditions, the information processing device outputs information about skin diagnosis that is sufficient for users classified in this category. It is possible to output information about skin care that is not available in an easy-to-understand manner. For example, the information processing device can output basic information about skin care that is easy to understand or information about skin care based on self-recognized skin diagnosis to users in this category. Furthermore, for users classified as category 3, products that match their concerns may be recommended along with information that allows them to feel the difference in their skin condition.
 情報処理装置は、例えば、第4類に区分されたユーザが肌に関する悩みを持ちつつも積極的な情報の取得が困難であるユーザと判断し、わかりやすい肌情報の判断方法と、わかりやすい商品の説明等を含む、スキンケアに関する情報を出力してもよい。この第4類に区分されるユーザは、自ら情報を取得することが苦手である可能性があるため、情報処理装置がわかりやすい説明とともに、基本的なケア方法等に情報を絞って出力してもよい。情報処理装置は、第4類に区分されるユーザには、例えば、基本的なスキンケア商品や手軽に使える商品をその基本的な使い方とともに出力することができる。 For example, the information processing device determines that a user classified as Category 4 is a user who has skin-related concerns but has difficulty actively acquiring information, and provides an easy-to-understand method for determining skin information and an easy-to-understand product explanation. You may also output information related to skin care, including the following. Users classified as Category 4 may not be good at acquiring information on their own, so even if the information processing device outputs easy-to-understand explanations and narrows down the information to basic care methods, etc. good. The information processing device can output, for example, basic skin care products and easy-to-use products along with basic instructions on how to use them to users classified as category 4.
 このように、本実施形態に係る情報処理装置によれば、ユーザのスキンケアに対する情報感度と、肌状態見極め能力の自己認知度との2軸を用いて分けられた区分に基づいたユーザ体験を提供することができる。 In this way, the information processing device according to the present embodiment provides a user experience based on classification using two axes: the user's information sensitivity regarding skin care and the user's self-awareness of skin condition assessment ability. can do.
 さらに、サービスの提供者は、店舗等においてユーザの肌診断を実際に行ってもよい。サービスの提供者は、情報処理装置が取得したユーザの肌状態見極め能力の自己認知度と、肌診断との結果を用いることで、ユーザのスキンケアに対する情報感度及び肌状態見極め能力の自己認知度、さらに、肌状態に基づいたよりよいカウンセリングをすることも可能となる。また、情報処理装置が出力する結果により、ユーザの主観的な自己の肌状態の認識と実際の肌診断の結果との違いに関してフィードバックをすることもできる。 Furthermore, the service provider may actually perform a skin diagnosis of the user at a store or the like. The service provider uses the user's self-awareness level of skin condition assessment ability acquired by the information processing device and the skin diagnosis results to determine the user's information sensitivity for skin care and self-awareness level of skin condition assessment ability, Furthermore, it becomes possible to provide better counseling based on the skin condition. Further, based on the results output by the information processing device, it is possible to provide feedback regarding the difference between the user's subjective recognition of his/her own skin condition and the actual skin diagnosis result.
 サービスの提供者はまた、ユーザの肌状態見極め能力の自己認知度に基づいて、実行する肌診断、又は、肌診断のレベル等を変更して肌診断を実行することもできる。すなわち、情報処理装置は、肌診断の結果を取得して、この肌診断の結果と、分類された区分とに基づいて、スキンケア用品の情報、スキンケア方法若しくはスキンケアに関連する生活習慣の情報のうち少なくとも1つを出力することもできるし、又は、出力するこれらの情報の出力表現を変更して出力することができる。 The service provider can also perform a skin diagnosis by changing the skin diagnosis to be performed or the level of the skin diagnosis, etc., based on the user's self-awareness of the user's ability to assess skin conditions. That is, the information processing device obtains the skin diagnosis results, and based on the skin diagnosis results and the classified categories, selects information on skin care products, skin care methods, or lifestyle habits related to skin care. At least one of these pieces of information can be outputted, or the output representation of these pieces of information can be changed and outputted.
 情報処理装置は、例えば、肌診断の結果である要因に悩みがある (例えば、シワ、シミ等) と判断されたユーザに対しては、これらの要因に対する出力をすることができる。また別の例として、情報処理装置は、これらの要因に基づいて、出力する情報の内容又は表現を変更することもできる。 For example, for a user who is determined to have concerns about certain factors (for example, wrinkles, age spots, etc.) as a result of a skin diagnosis, the information processing device can output information regarding these factors. As another example, the information processing device can also change the content or expression of the information to be output based on these factors.
 この場合、肌状態見極め能力の自己認知度だけではなく、情報処理装置が区分したグループに基づいて、実施する肌診断を選択する態様であってもよい。 In this case, the skin diagnosis to be performed may be selected based not only on the self-perceived level of skin condition assessment ability but also on the groups classified by the information processing device.
 次に、上記の第1指標及び第2指標の選択についてと、各質問の回答に掛けるそれぞれの指標に対応する係数と、区分に関する閾値等の統計的な手法について説明する。なお、以下の説明は、本開示における限定されない一例を示すものであり、本開示の技術的範囲は、以下の説明以外の形態を排除するものではない。 Next, the selection of the first and second indicators described above, the coefficients corresponding to each indicator multiplied by the answers to each question, and statistical methods such as thresholds for classification will be explained. Note that the following description shows a non-limiting example of the present disclosure, and the technical scope of the present disclosure does not exclude forms other than those described below.
 サービスの提供者は、ユーザを適切に区分するために、予め第1指標及び第2指標を定義し、第1値及び第2値を算出するための係数、及び、第1値及び第2値それぞれに対する第1閾値及び第2閾値を設定する。指標と、この係数及び閾値とは、例えば、同じ質問項目を含むアンケート (ユーザの意識調査のアンケート) を予め実施し、この実施した結果に基づいて決定されてもよい。このアンケートは、例えば、普段から化粧水を使用しているユーザからランダムにサンプリングされた多数のユーザに対して実行されてもよい。 In order to appropriately classify users, the service provider defines the first index and the second index in advance, and provides coefficients for calculating the first value and the second value, and the first value and the second value. A first threshold value and a second threshold value are set for each. The index, this coefficient, and the threshold value may be determined based on the results of, for example, conducting a questionnaire (user awareness survey) including the same question items in advance. This questionnaire may be performed, for example, on a large number of randomly sampled users who regularly use lotion.
 まず、第1指標及び第2指標の決定方法について説明する。ユーザのスキンケア体験の実態を把握するために、ユーザに対するデプスインタビューを行い定性的な分析を行うとともに、個人差に関する検討をアンケートによる定量的な分析によって行うことができる。 First, the method for determining the first index and second index will be explained. In order to understand the actual state of users' skin care experiences, in-depth interviews with users can be conducted for qualitative analysis, and individual differences can be examined through quantitative analysis using questionnaires.
 デプスインタビューは、スキンケアの普段の行動及びスキンケアに対する考え、期待又は価値観等を把握するとともに、普段の生活においてスキンケアの効果を感じるような状況について具体的に把握するために実施される。 In-depth interviews are conducted to understand the person's daily skin care behavior and thoughts, expectations, or values regarding skin care, as well as to specifically understand the situations in which they feel the effects of skin care in their daily lives.
 このデプスインタビューは、事前作業として、例えば、朝、晩のスキンケアの様子をユーザ側の端末装置を用いて動画を撮影してもらうことにより実施されてもよい。具体的には、プライバシーに配慮した上で、できるだけ普段の場所で普段通りのやり方のスキンケア動作の始めから終わりまでの間を撮影してもらう。 This depth interview may be conducted as a preliminary work, for example, by having the user take a video of their skin care routine in the morning and evening using a terminal device on the user's side. Specifically, while taking privacy into consideration, we ask participants to take photos of their skin care routine from start to finish in their usual location, as much as possible.
 デプスインタビューでは、例えば、
・普段のスキンケア行動のパターンの把握、
・現在のスキンケア行動の自己評価、
・自分の肌状態を気にするタイミング、
・肌状態の良い/悪いとは、及び、その基準の把握、
・スキンケア、メイク関連の情報収集の仕方、
・自分に合いそうだと感じる化粧品の判断方法、
・スキンケアで一番大事にしていること (理想) の把握、
といった項目について、ユーザの回答を取得する。
In depth interviews, for example,
・Understanding the pattern of daily skin care behavior,
・Self-evaluation of current skin care behavior,
・When to be concerned about your skin condition,
・Understanding what constitutes good/bad skin condition and its standards;
・How to collect information related to skin care and makeup,
・How to judge which cosmetics you feel are suitable for you,
・Understanding what is most important (ideal) in skin care,
Obtain user answers for items such as:
 普段のスキンケア行動のパターンについては、例えば、
-撮影してきた映像を見て確認する、
-特徴的な行動の理由、過去からの経緯、
-状況が異なる場合での行動の違い、
に基づいて把握することができる。
Regarding the pattern of daily skin care behavior, for example,
- Check the video you have taken,
- Reasons for characteristic behavior, history from the past,
- Differences in behavior in different situations,
can be determined based on
 自分の肌状態を気にするタイミングについては、例えば、
-潤っている時とそうでない時を見極められるか、
-肌を確認してわかること、
-わかったこと、考えた後に取る行動、
に基づいて把握することができる。
Regarding when to be concerned about your skin condition, for example,
-Can you tell when it's moist and when it's not?
- What you can find out by checking your skin,
- What you understand, what you do after thinking about it,
can be determined based on
 デプスインタビューは、美容部員、カウンセラーといった化粧品の知識が豊富なインタビュアが実行してもよい。インタビュー内容は記録され、発話データを書き起こすことにより、分析を実行することができる。 In-depth interviews may be conducted by interviewers with extensive knowledge of cosmetics, such as beauty staff or counselors. The interview content is recorded and analysis can be performed by transcribing the spoken data.
 上記の発話データの書き起こしに基づいて、 KA 法によりスキンケア効果実感の構造を分析する。 KA 法とは、質的分析法の1つであり、主に UX デザインの利用状況を把握、分析する際に用いられる。 KA 法は、ユーザの行為の背後にある理由、動機等を解釈することにより、行為の価値を抽出することができる。ユーザの行為は、どのような小さなものであってもの、そこに意味、価値が存在すると考え、「~する価値」というコードに変換することが KA 法の特徴である。 Based on the transcription of the above speech data, the structure of skin care effect perception will be analyzed using the KA method. The KA method is a qualitative analysis method, and is mainly used to understand and analyze the usage status of UX design. The KA method can extract the value of a user's actions by interpreting the reasons, motives, etc. behind them. The KA method is characterized by the belief that user actions, no matter how small, have meaning and value, and converts them into codes of ``the value of...''.
 図3は、 KA 法で分析に用いるカード (KA カード) の一例を示す図である。 KA 法では、この KA カードを用いて分析が実行される。カードの上部には、インタビューで得られた発話データの中からユーザの行為に関するデータを抜き出して記述する。左の欄には、当該 KA カードの識別子が記述される。 Figure 3 is a diagram showing an example of a card (KA card) used for analysis in the KA method. In the KA method, analysis is performed using this KA card. At the top of the card, data related to the user's actions are extracted from the utterance data obtained in the interview and written. In the left column, the identifier of the relevant KA card is written.
 このデータを解釈し、ユーザ視点において一言で言い換えたコードを左下の「ユーザの心の声」欄に記述する。データの文脈を理解した上で言い換えたコードを下にこのデータの行為に含まれる価値を「~する価値」「~できる価値」「~しなくてよい価値」等のように動詞+価値と表現するコーディングを行い、 KA カードの右下欄に記述する。 Interpret this data and write the code paraphrased in one word from the user's perspective in the "User's inner voice" column at the bottom left. The value included in the act of this data is expressed as verb + value, such as "value to do," "value to be able to do," "value to not have to do," etc. using the code that has been paraphrased after understanding the context of the data. Perform the coding and write it in the bottom right column of the KA card.
 1つ1つの KA カードで抽出された右下欄の価値を手がかりに、グルーピングを行うとともに、より抽象度が高い概念構造を検討することができる。本開示においては、スキンケア行動による効果実感を対象とすることから、行為の価値を導出できるこの KA 法を用いることができる。 Using the values extracted in the lower right column of each KA card as clues, it is possible to perform grouping and consider conceptual structures with a higher level of abstraction. In the present disclosure, since the subject is the perceived effect of skin care actions, this KA method that can derive the value of actions can be used.
 上記の KA 法による価値に対するグループの整理から、価値マップを導出する。価値マップは、類似する価値グループ同士を近くに配置し、価値グループ間における関係性を構造化したマップである。 A value map is derived from the group arrangement of values using the KA method described above. A value map is a map in which similar value groups are arranged close to each other and the relationships between the value groups are structured.
 導出された価値マップは、スキンケア製品を選択し、購入し、使い続けてその効果を感じ、必要に応じて調整する行動を取る、といったスキンケア行動の全般に亘る価値の因果関係を示すことができる。生成された価値マップから、任意の領域を取り出すこともできる。例えば、価値マップから、スキンケア効果実感に該当する部分について主要な要素を抽出することもできる。 The derived value map can show the cause-and-effect relationship of value across all skin care behaviors, such as selecting a skin care product, purchasing it, continuing to use it to feel its effects, and taking actions to adjust as necessary. . Any area can also be extracted from the generated value map. For example, it is also possible to extract from the value map the main elements that correspond to the perceived skin care effect.
 図4は、一実施形態に係るスキンケア効果実感に該当する部分について主要な要素を抽出した価値マップの一例を示す図である。この図に基づいて、スキンケア効果実感の仮説的な概念構造の一例を導き出す。それぞれのグループ間の矢印は、グループ間の関連性を示す。 FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of a value map in which main elements are extracted for the portion corresponding to the feeling of skin care effect according to one embodiment. Based on this diagram, an example of a hypothetical conceptual structure for realizing skin care effects is derived. Arrows between each group indicate relationships between the groups.
 まず、日常的な<E.スキンケア行動>は、「肌状態を見ながら現状を維持しつつ必要に応じて変える調整」を行っている。この調整は個人によって異なっているが、その違いの要因は<C.肌状態見極め能力>及び<A.スキンケアに関する情報行動>、<B.スキンケア態度 (価値観や期待)>によって影響を受けている。肌状態を見極められるかどうかは、一種の能力であるが、インタビューでは「肌状態を見極められる自己認知」として表われる。 First of all, daily <E. Skin care behavior> is ``maintaining the current status while monitoring the skin condition and making adjustments as necessary.'' This adjustment differs depending on the individual, but the factors that make this difference are influenced by <C. Ability to assess skin condition>, <A. Information behavior regarding skin care>, and <B. Skin care attitude (values and expectations)>. There is. Being able to discern skin conditions is a kind of ability, but in interviews it is expressed as ``self-awareness to be able to discern skin conditions.''
 日常のスキンケアのスタイルは、これまでの経験を含む「行動によって得られた情報、知識」によって形成された「スキンケアへの基本態度」の影響を受けている。「スキンケアへの基本態度」には、スキンケア化粧品に対する効果のイメージ若しくはその作用機序などのメンタルモデル又は加齢に伴う肌状態の認識などが関連している。 Daily skin care styles are influenced by the ``basic attitude toward skin care,'' which is formed by ``information and knowledge obtained through actions,'' including past experiences. ``Basic attitudes toward skin care'' are related to mental models such as images of the effects of skin care cosmetics and their mechanisms of action, and recognition of skin conditions associated with aging.
 肌状態を見ながら、基本は現状を維持しつつ必要に応じて行う調整には、スキンケア化粧品のアイテムの変更や塗布方法の変更、中止等がある。これらは、情報、基本態度の影響を受けつつ行われる。 While keeping an eye on the skin condition, adjustments can be made as needed while basically maintaining the current state, such as changing the skin care cosmetic item, changing the application method, or discontinuing it. These decisions are made while being influenced by information and basic attitudes.
 スキンケア行動には個人差があるが、これにはスキンケアを実践する能力があると想定される。その能力は、先にも述べた<C.肌状態見極め能力>であるが、加えて<A.スキンケアに関する情報行動>も、化粧品の化学的な説明などを読み理解する能力等、個人差を生む能力の一つと位置付けられる。 Although there are individual differences in skin care behavior, it is assumed that this is due to the ability to practice skin care. This ability is the above-mentioned <C. Ability to assess skin condition>, but in addition, <A. Information behavior related to skin care> is also required to understand individual differences, such as the ability to read and understand chemical explanations of cosmetics. It is positioned as one of the abilities to produce.
 <D.スキンケア効果実感>は、日常生活において「肌を触る・見るタイミングで感じるスキンケアの効果」として感じられる。スキンケア化粧品のアイテムを変更した時など、調整や変化に伴って感じることが典型である。このスキンケア効果実感も、「肌状態を見極める自己認知」によって影響を受けている。 <D. Realizing skin care effects> is felt in daily life as ``the effects of skin care that can be felt when touching or looking at the skin.'' Typically, this is felt when adjustments or changes are made, such as when changing skin care cosmetic items. This experience of skin care effects is also influenced by ``self-awareness of assessing skin condition.''
 先にも述べたように普段のスキンケア行動は、肌状態を見ながら現状を維持しつつ必要に応じて調整することであるため、特に現状維持で良いと判断される場合は、「現在のケアの肯定感 (継続)」という一種の満足感を感じられる。この満足感もスキンケア効果実感の一つの側面といえる。現状維持では良くないと気づいた場合は、新たに情報収集などの行動を起こすといったことが行われる。 As mentioned earlier, daily skin care behavior is about maintaining the current skin condition while adjusting it as necessary, so if it is judged that it is okay to maintain the current condition, please refer to the "Current care". You can feel a kind of satisfaction, a sense of affirmation (continuation). This feeling of satisfaction can also be said to be one aspect of realizing skin care effects. If they realize that maintaining the status quo is not a good idea, they will take new actions such as gathering information.
 上記のように、形成される概念構造は、得られた発話データの文脈と矛盾はなく一定の妥当性があると言える。 As mentioned above, the conceptual structure formed is consistent with the context of the obtained utterance data and can be said to have a certain validity.
 定性的な判定により、スキンケア効果実感の仮説的な概念構造を形成した。これらについて定量的に検証するとともに、個人特性として把握可能にする尺度を構成することで、よりスキンケア効果実感を形作る指標を取得することができる。 Through qualitative judgment, we formed a hypothetical conceptual structure for the actual skin care effect. By quantitatively verifying these and constructing a scale that allows them to be understood as individual characteristics, it is possible to obtain indicators that better shape the perception of skin care effects.
 定量的な調査は、例えば、調査パネルに対するアンケートを実施することにより実現される。ユーザのサンプリングは、例えば、5歳ごとの年齢にユーザをグループ分けし、それぞれのグループから所定人数を抽出することで実行される。サンプリングされたユーザのアンケートの回答に基づいて、上記の係数及び閾値が算出され、第1指標及び第2指標の決定とともに、決定される。 Quantitative research is realized, for example, by conducting a questionnaire to a research panel. Sampling of users is performed by, for example, grouping users into five-year age groups and extracting a predetermined number of users from each group. The above-mentioned coefficient and threshold value are calculated based on the responses of the sampled users to the questionnaire, and are determined together with the determination of the first index and the second index.
 調査項目は、図4で示した概念構造図を構成する KA 法の価値グループの詳細項目に基づいて作問し、 A ~ C の大きく3つの要素を把握できる形態としてもよい。以下の項目以外にもスキンケア行動を把握する項目を合わせて設定してもよい。例えば、
・スキンケア態度・スキンケア行動に関する項目
・スキンケア実践能力に関する項目
・スキンケア効果実感に関する項目
について、それぞれ複数の質問項目を設定する。
The survey items may be formulated based on the detailed items of the value groups of the KA method that make up the conceptual structure diagram shown in Figure 4, and may be in a form that allows you to grasp the three major elements A to C. In addition to the following items, items for understanding skin care behavior may also be set. for example,
・Multiple questions are set for each item regarding skin care attitude, skin care behavior, skin care practical ability, and perceived skin care effect.
 以下においては、実際に調査した結果を用いた分析を本開示の限定されない一例としてあげて説明する。 In the following, an analysis using the results of an actual investigation will be described as a non-limiting example of the present disclosure.
 作問した項目において、3つの要素ごとに因子分析を行う。まず、スキンケア態度、スキンケア行動に関する項目について分析する。尺度候補は、例えば、26項目を作問し、最尤法、プロマックス回転で項目分析を行い、スクリープロットから2因子と定めた上で弁別力を判断しながら項目を減らしていき、最終的に11項目による結果を得た。因子負荷量を図5に示す (全分散の寄与率 58.7% 、 χ2 = 530.1 、 df = 34 、 p < .001 、 α = 0.87) 。なおサンプル数が多いため、 χ2 値は有意となっている。 A factor analysis will be performed for each of the three elements of the questions created. First, we will analyze items related to skin care attitudes and skin care behaviors. For example, a scale candidate is created by creating 26 items, performing item analysis using the maximum likelihood method and promax rotation, determining two factors from the scree plot, and reducing the number of items while determining the discriminative power. We obtained results based on 11 items. The factor loadings are shown in Figure 5 (contribution of total variance 58.7%, χ 2 = 530.1, df = 34, p < .001, α = 0.87). Note that due to the large number of samples, the χ 2 value is significant.
 第一因子で負荷量の高い項目1と項目2は、それぞれ「同年代の人と比べて、スキンケアには詳しいと思う」、「毎日の肌状態に合わせて、その時のケアの方法を変えている」であったため、「スキンケア積極行動」と命名した。第二因子で負荷量の高い項目9は「スキンケアをすることは、肌の若さを保つために欠かせないと思う」であり、スキンケアによって年齢を重ねても肌が良い状態に保たれるといった基本的な考えを示しており、「スキンケア基本態度」と命名した。第一因子は図4で示した<E.スキンケア行動>の内容を含んでいた。 Items 1 and 2 with high loadings on the first factor are ``I think I know more about skin care than people my age,'' and ``I change my skin care methods every day depending on my skin condition.'' ”, so we named it ``Skin Care Proactive Behavior.'' Item 9, which has a high loading on the second factor, is ``I think that taking care of your skin is essential to keeping your skin young,'' indicating that skin care can keep your skin in good condition even as you get older. This is why we named it the ``Basic Attitude towards Skin Care.'' The first factor included the contents of <E. Skin care behavior> shown in Figure 4.
 スキンケア実践能力に関する項目について分析する。尺度候補は、例えば、14項目を作問し、同様に最尤法、プロマックス回転により因子分析を行った。最終的に9項目で構成された。因子負荷量を図6に示す (全分散の寄与率 64.8% 、 χ2 = 209.9 、 df = 12、 p < .001, α = 0.73) 。 Analyze items related to skin care practical ability. For example, 14 items were created as candidate scales, and factor analysis was similarly performed using the maximum likelihood method and promax rotation. In the end, it consisted of 9 items. The factor loadings are shown in Figure 6 (contribution rate of total variance 64.8%, χ 2 = 209.9, df = 12, p < .001, α = 0.73).
 第一因子で負荷量の高い項目1は、「よりよいスキンケアの方法や商品がないか、いつも情報収集している」であり、特に新しい情報を収集する行動やトライアルに積極的であることに関する項目で構成されていることから「スキンケア情報感度」と命名した。第二因子は、項目5「肌の状態がいいかどうかは、すぐにわかる」の負荷量が高く、肌状態の見極めに関する自己認知を表す項目で構成されていることから「肌状態見極め能力の自己認知」と命名した。第三因子は、項目8「家庭や仕事の都合で、スキンケアやメイクにかける時間が十分でない」といった項目の負荷量が高く、主にスキンケアに対する状況的な制約に関する項目であることから「状況制約」と命名した。 Item 1, which has a high loading on the first factor, is ``I am always gathering information to see if there are better skin care methods or products,'' and it is particularly related to the behavior of gathering new information and being proactive about trials. We named it ``Skin Care Information Sensitivity'' because it consists of items. The second factor has a high loading on item 5, ``I can tell right away whether my skin is in good condition,'' and it is composed of items that express self-awareness regarding assessing skin condition. It was named ``self-awareness''. The third factor has a high loading on item 8, ``Due to family and work commitments, I don't have enough time to spend on skin care and makeup.'' This item is mainly related to situational constraints on skin care. ” was named.
 最後に、スキンケア効果実感に関する項目について分析する。尺度候補は、例えば、14項目を作問し、同様に最尤法、プロマックス回転により因子分析を行った。最終的に10項目となった。因子負荷量を図7に示す (全分散の寄与率 63.5% 、 χ2 = 278.9 、 df = 18 、 p < .001 、 α = 0.46) 。 Finally, we will analyze items related to actual skin care effects. For example, 14 items were constructed as candidate scales, and factor analysis was similarly performed using the maximum likelihood method and promax rotation. In the end, there were 10 items. The factor loadings are shown in Figure 7 (contribution of total variance 63.5%, χ 2 = 278.9, df = 18, p < .001, α = 0.46).
 第一因子は、項目1「今のスキンケアのやり方は、うまくできていると実感できる」の負荷量が高く、項目3では「今のスキンケアに使っている商品や方法で、期待通りのスキンケア効果を得られていると感じる」など、スキンケア効果実感そのものを指す項目で構成されているが、主に期待通りという趣旨であることから、「効果実感 (期待通り) 」とした。 The first factor has a high loading on item 1, ``I feel that my current skin care routine is working well,'' and item 3 has a high loading, ``The products and methods I currently use for skin care are providing me with skin care results that are as expected.'' It consists of items that refer to actual skin care effects, such as "I feel like I am getting the desired results," but since the main purpose is that the results are as expected, I chose "Feeling the effects (as expected)."
 第二因子は、項目5「不満を感じているので、できれば改善したいと思っている」の負荷量が高く、不満感や妥協していることを示す項目で構成されていることから「改善欲求」と命名した。第三因子は、項目8「特に満足しているわけではないが、かと言って不満があるわけではない」の負荷量が高く、いずれも不満でも満足でもないという項目であることから「未満足」と命名した。 The second factor has a high loading on item 5, ``I feel dissatisfied and would like to improve if possible,'' and is composed of items that indicate dissatisfaction and compromise. ” was named. The third factor has a high loading on item 8, ``I'm not particularly satisfied, but it doesn't mean I'm dissatisfied,'' and both items are neither dissatisfied nor satisfied. ” was named.
 続いて、上記の探索的因子分析で導き出された3尺度で合計8個の因子得点を用いて、共分散構造分析を用いて、図4に示す概念構造を検証する。 Next, we will verify the conceptual structure shown in Figure 4 using covariance structure analysis using a total of eight factor scores on the three scales derived from the above exploratory factor analysis.
 図4の構造に基づいて、それぞれの因子間にパスを設定した。その上で当てはまりを示すインデクス及び修正指数を参考にしながらパスの改善を行ったところ、非常に当てはまりの良い結果を得られた (χ2 = 8.19 、 df = 3 、 p = .042 、 GFI = 1.00 、 AGFI = .997 、 RMSEA = .014) 。なお、ここでは上記の探索的因子分析の因子得点を用いて分析した。このため、パス図ではいずれも観測変数として表現されている。結果としてのパス図を図8に示す。なお、図を簡略化するため、誤差変数は省略している。 Based on the structure in Figure 4, paths were set between each factor. Then, when we improved the path by referring to the index and modification index that indicates the fit, we obtained results with very good fit (χ 2 = 8.19, df = 3, p = .042, GFI = 1.00 , AGFI = .997, RMSEA = .014). In this case, the factor scores of the above exploratory factor analysis were used for analysis. For this reason, both are expressed as observed variables in the path diagram. The resulting path diagram is shown in Figure 8. Note that error variables are omitted to simplify the diagram.
 得られたパス図に基づいて、それぞれの変数間の影響度を分析するため、間接的な効果を考慮した総合効果を算出した。この総合効果を図9に示す。 Based on the obtained path diagram, in order to analyze the degree of influence between each variable, we calculated the total effect taking into account indirect effects. Figure 9 shows this overall effect.
 「情報感度」が「積極行動」に影響し (0.76) 、それが「効果実感」に影響する (0.66) のが基本構造であることがわかる。「肌見極め能力の自己認知」も、「積極態度」 (0.32) や「基本態度」 (0.35) 及び「効果実感」 (0.35) と、影響している。図4では、肌見極め能力の自己認知は基本態度に影響を想定していなかったが、より広い範囲に影響していたことが示された。 It can be seen that the basic structure is that "information sensitivity" influences "proactive behavior" (0.76), which in turn influences "feeling of effectiveness" (0.66). ``Self-perception of ability to judge skin'' also has an influence on ``positive attitude'' (0.32), ``basic attitude'' (0.35), and ``perception of effectiveness'' (0.35). Figure 4 shows that self-perception of skin discernment ability was not expected to have an effect on basic attitudes, but it was shown to have an effect on a broader range.
 これらのことから、定性的研究によって導出された仮説的な概念構造は、概ね定量的にも検証できたといえる。特に、「情報感度」および「肌見極め能力の自己認知」は、ユーザのスキンケア行動や「基本態度」に影響する心理的要因であることが示された。このことから、結果的に、本開示においては、第1指標としてスキンケアに対する情報感度を用い、第2指標として肌見極め能力の自己認知度を用いる。 From the above, it can be said that the hypothetical conceptual structure derived through qualitative research was generally verified quantitatively. In particular, ``information sensitivity'' and ``self-perception of skin discernment ability'' were shown to be psychological factors that influence users' skin care behavior and ``basic attitude.'' Consequently, in the present disclosure, information sensitivity regarding skin care is used as the first index, and self-awareness of skin discernment ability is used as the second index.
 まとめると、上記のように、定量的分析を実行するアンケートの項目は、実際に情報処理装置が分析するアンケートと同じ項目とともに、さらに多くの項目を含むことが望ましい。この係数及び閾値を算出するためのアンケート項目から、因子分析に基づいて、本開示における情報処理装置が用いる係数及び閾値を決定することができる。 In summary, as described above, it is desirable that the items of the questionnaire for performing quantitative analysis include the same items as those of the questionnaire actually analyzed by the information processing device, as well as many more items. Based on the questionnaire items for calculating the coefficients and threshold values, the coefficients and threshold values used by the information processing device according to the present disclosure can be determined based on factor analysis.
 また、指標は、上記の2つに限定されるものではなく3以上としてもよい。例えば、スキンケアに対する探究心といった指標を、因子分析の結果から設定することもできる。この場合、情報処理装置は、ユーザをスキンケアに対する情報感度、肌状態見極め能力の自己認知、及び、スキンケア探究心の3軸に沿って分類することができる。また、情報処理装置は、この3軸に対して閾値を設定しユーザを分類することで、例えば、8個の区分にユーザを分類することもでき、この8個の区分のそれぞれに対して、スキンケアに関する情報を出力することもできる。 Furthermore, the indicators are not limited to the above two, but may be three or more. For example, an index such as inquisitiveness toward skin care can be set based on the results of factor analysis. In this case, the information processing device can classify users along three axes: information sensitivity to skin care, self-awareness of ability to assess skin condition, and skin care inquisitiveness. Furthermore, by setting thresholds for these three axes and classifying users, the information processing device can, for example, classify users into eight categories, and for each of these eight categories, Information related to skin care can also be output.
 区分に用いる閾値は、例えば、多数のユーザの意識調査の結果を用いてそれぞれのユーザの第1値及び第2値を算出し、取得された多数の第1値及び第2値の何らかの統計量により、算出されてもよい。 The threshold used for classification is, for example, calculated by calculating the first and second values of each user using the results of an awareness survey of a large number of users, and using some kind of statistical value of the many first and second values obtained. It may be calculated by
 例えば、有意な回答をした全てのユーザの第1値及び第2値の平均値、メディアン、又は、モード等に基づいて閾値が設定されてもよい。一例として、第1値の平均値を第1閾値とし、第2値の平均値を第2閾値としてもよい。それぞれの軸に関する閾値として別々の統計量、例えば、第1閾値としては平均値、第2閾値としてはモードを用いる等、を設定してもよい。 For example, the threshold may be set based on the average value, median, mode, etc. of the first value and second value of all users who gave significant answers. As an example, the average value of the first values may be used as the first threshold value, and the average value of the second values may be used as the second threshold value. Separate statistics may be set as thresholds for each axis, for example, an average value may be used as the first threshold, a mode may be used as the second threshold, etc.
 上記では、全てのユーザに対して同一の閾値用いることとしたが、これに限定されるものではない。例えば、年代別、地域別、訪れる店舗別等の閾値を設定してもよい。 In the above, the same threshold value is used for all users, but the invention is not limited to this. For example, threshold values may be set for each age group, region, or store visited.
 このように設定された係数、閾値を用いることで、情報処理装置は、適切にユーザを異なる軸に対して区分し、区分に基づいて、適切なスキンケアに関する情報を出力することができる。 By using the coefficients and threshold values set in this way, the information processing device can appropriately classify users along different axes and output information regarding appropriate skin care based on the classification.
 情報処理装置はさらに、年齢に分割して項目の分析をすることで、年代ごとの全体的な意識及び現状の傾向を取得し、出力結果に対して年齢に関連する情報を付加することもできる。 The information processing device can also analyze items divided by age to obtain overall awareness and current trends for each age group, and add age-related information to the output results. .
 本開示の態様は、前述した実施形態に限定されるものではなく、想到しうる種々の変形も含むものであり、本開示の効果も前述の内容に限定されるものではない。各実施形態における構成要素は、適切に組み合わされて適用されてもよい。すなわち、特許請求の範囲に規定された内容及びその均等物から導き出される本開示の概念的な思想と趣旨を逸脱しない範囲で種々の追加、変更及び部分的削除が可能である。 The aspects of the present disclosure are not limited to the above-described embodiments, and include various conceivable modifications, and the effects of the present disclosure are not limited to the above-described contents. The components in each embodiment may be applied in appropriate combinations. That is, various additions, changes, and partial deletions are possible without departing from the conceptual idea and spirit of the present disclosure derived from the content defined in the claims and equivalents thereof.

Claims (15)

  1.  プロセッサと、メモリと、
     を備え、
     前記プロセッサは、
      アンケートの結果に基づいて、ユーザごとに、スキンケアに対する情報感度を示す第1値及び肌状態見極め能力の自己認知度を示す第2値を取得し、
      前記第1値及び前記第2値に基づいて、ユーザを複数の区分に分類し、
      それぞれの前記区分に属するユーザに、当該ユーザの区分に基づいた情報を出力する、
     情報処理装置。
    processor, memory,
    Equipped with
    The processor includes:
    Based on the results of the questionnaire, a first value indicating skin care information sensitivity and a second value indicating self-awareness of skin condition assessment ability are obtained for each user,
    classifying users into a plurality of categories based on the first value and the second value;
    Outputting information based on the classification of the user to each user belonging to the classification;
    Information processing device.
  2.  前記プロセッサは、
      前記第1値を第1閾値と比較し、
      前記第2値を第2閾値と比較し、
      前記第1値が前記第1閾値より上の値であり前記第2値が前記第2閾値より上の値である第1類、前記第1値が前記第1閾値より上の値であり前記第2値が前記第2閾値以下である第2類、前記第1値が前記第1閾値以下であり前記第2値が前記第2閾値より上の値である第3類、及び、前記第1値が前記第1閾値以下であり前記第2値が前記第2閾値以下である第4類、のいずれかの区分にユーザを分類する、
     請求項1に記載の情報処理装置。
    The processor includes:
    comparing the first value with a first threshold;
    comparing the second value with a second threshold;
    Class 1, where the first value is above the first threshold and the second value is above the second threshold; the first value is above the first threshold; a second category in which the second value is less than or equal to the second threshold; a third category in which the first value is less than or equal to the first threshold and the second value is above the second threshold; classifying the user into one of the fourth categories in which the first value is less than or equal to the first threshold and the second value is less than or equal to the second threshold;
    The information processing device according to claim 1.
  3.  前記プロセッサは、
      少なくとも、前記区分に基づいてスキンケア用品の情報、スキンケア方法又はスキンケアに関連する生活習慣の情報のうち少なくとも1つを出力する、
     請求項2に記載の情報処理装置。
    The processor includes:
    at least outputting at least one of information on skin care products, skin care methods, or information on lifestyle habits related to skin care based on the classification;
    The information processing device according to claim 2.
  4.  前記プロセッサは、
      前記区分に基づいて美容に関するカウンセリング方法を出力する、
     請求項3に記載の情報処理装置。
    The processor includes:
    outputting a beauty counseling method based on the classification;
    The information processing device according to claim 3.
  5.  ユーザの肌診断を実行し、
     前記プロセッサは、
      前記肌診断の結果を取得し、
      前記肌診断の結果及び前記区分に基づいて、前記スキンケア用品の情報、前記スキンケア方法若しくは前記スキンケアに関連する生活習慣の情報のうち少なくとも1つを出力し、又は、これらの出力表現を変更する、
     請求項3に記載の情報処理装置。
    Perform a skin diagnosis of the user,
    The processor includes:
    Obtaining the results of the skin diagnosis,
    outputting at least one of the skin care product information, the skin care method, or the skin care-related lifestyle information, or changing the output expression thereof, based on the skin diagnosis result and the classification;
    The information processing device according to claim 3.
  6.  前記プロセッサは、
      前記第1値に関する前記アンケートの項目ごとにユーザが選択した点数を、当該項目ごとに設定されている係数によって重み付け和に基づいて前記第1値を取得し、
      前記第2値に関する前記アンケートの項目ごとにユーザが選択した点数を、当該項目ごとに設定されている計数によって重み付け和に基づいて前記第2値を取得する、
     請求項3に記載の情報処理装置。
    The processor includes:
    obtaining the first value based on a weighted sum of the points selected by the user for each item of the questionnaire regarding the first value by a coefficient set for each item;
    obtaining the second value based on a weighted sum of points selected by the user for each item of the questionnaire regarding the second value using a count set for each item;
    The information processing device according to claim 3.
  7.  前記係数は、予め取得しているユーザのスキンケアに関する意識調査のアンケート結果を因子分析した際の因子負荷量に基づいて取得された値である、
     請求項6に記載の情報処理装置。
    The coefficient is a value obtained based on the factor loading amount when factor-analyzing the questionnaire results of the user's skin care awareness survey obtained in advance.
    7. The information processing device according to claim 6.
  8.  前記第1閾値及び前記第2閾値は、予め取得されているアンケート結果に基づいて前記係数を用いて決定される、
     請求項6に記載の情報処理装置。
    The first threshold value and the second threshold value are determined using the coefficients based on survey results obtained in advance.
    7. The information processing device according to claim 6.
  9.  前記第1閾値及び前記第2閾値は、前記予め取得されているアンケート結果の係数による重み付けしたユーザごとの前記第1値及び前記第2値についての統計量を用いて決定される、
     請求項8に記載の情報処理装置。
    The first threshold value and the second threshold value are determined using statistics about the first value and the second value for each user weighted by a coefficient of the survey result obtained in advance.
    The information processing device according to claim 8.
  10.  ユーザに情報を提示し、ユーザからの入力を受け付けるユーザインタフェースをさらに備える、
     請求項1から請求項9のいずれかに記載の情報処理装置。
    further comprising a user interface that presents information to the user and receives input from the user;
    10. The information processing device according to claim 1.
  11.  前記ユーザインタフェースは、
      ユーザにアンケートを提示する表示部と、
      ユーザからアンケートの回答を受け付ける入力部と、
     を備える請求項10に記載の情報処理装置。
    The user interface includes:
    a display section that presents a questionnaire to the user;
    an input section that accepts questionnaire responses from users;
    The information processing device according to claim 10, comprising:
  12.  前記ユーザインタフェースは、
      ユーザに分類した結果に基づいた情報を提示する出力部、
     を備える請求項10に記載の情報処理装置。
    The user interface includes:
    an output section that presents information based on the classified results to the user;
    The information processing device according to claim 10, comprising:
  13.  前記プロセッサは、
      同一のユーザに対して、異なるタイミングにおいて前記第1値及び前記第2値を取得し、
      取得した前記第1値及び前記第2値の時系列変化に基づいた情報を出力する、
     請求項1から請求項9のいずれかに記載の情報処理装置。
    The processor includes:
    acquiring the first value and the second value for the same user at different timings;
    outputting information based on time-series changes in the acquired first value and second value;
    10. The information processing device according to claim 1.
  14.  プロセッサが、
      アンケートの結果に基づいて、ユーザごとに、スキンケアに対する情報感度を示す第1値及び肌状態見極め能力の自己認知度を示す第2値を取得し、
      前記第1値及び前記第2値に基づいて、ユーザを複数の区分に分類し、
      それぞれの前記区分に属するユーザに、当該ユーザの区分に基づいた情報を出力する、
     情報処理方法。
    The processor
    Based on the results of the questionnaire, a first value indicating skin care information sensitivity and a second value indicating self-awareness of skin condition assessment ability are obtained for each user,
    classifying users into a plurality of categories based on the first value and the second value;
    Outputting information based on the classification of the user to each user belonging to the classification;
    Information processing method.
  15.  プロセッサに、
      アンケートの結果に基づいて、ユーザごとに、スキンケアに対する情報感度を示す第1値及び肌状態見極め能力の自己認知度を示す第2値を取得し、
      前記第1値及び前記第2値に基づいて、ユーザを複数の区分に分類し、
      それぞれの前記区分に属するユーザに、当該ユーザの区分に基づいた情報を出力する、
     情報処理方法を実行させるプログラム。
    to the processor,
    Based on the results of the questionnaire, a first value indicating skin care information sensitivity and a second value indicating self-awareness of skin condition assessment ability are obtained for each user,
    classifying users into a plurality of categories based on the first value and the second value;
    Outputting information based on the classification of the user to each user belonging to the classification;
    A program that executes an information processing method.
PCT/JP2023/029550 2022-08-29 2023-08-16 Information processing device, information processing method, and program WO2024048274A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2022-136203 2022-08-29
JP2022136203 2022-08-29

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2024048274A1 true WO2024048274A1 (en) 2024-03-07

Family

ID=90099387

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2023/029550 WO2024048274A1 (en) 2022-08-29 2023-08-16 Information processing device, information processing method, and program

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2024048274A1 (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2011128922A (en) * 2009-12-18 2011-06-30 Kao Corp Beauty support system and beauty support method
WO2018008138A1 (en) * 2016-07-08 2018-01-11 株式会社オプティム Cosmetic information provision system, cosmetic information provision device, cosmetic information provision method, and program
JP2020201528A (en) * 2019-06-05 2020-12-17 株式会社アイピーコーポレーション Beauty determination method, organoleptic evaluation method, and system

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2011128922A (en) * 2009-12-18 2011-06-30 Kao Corp Beauty support system and beauty support method
WO2018008138A1 (en) * 2016-07-08 2018-01-11 株式会社オプティム Cosmetic information provision system, cosmetic information provision device, cosmetic information provision method, and program
JP2020201528A (en) * 2019-06-05 2020-12-17 株式会社アイピーコーポレーション Beauty determination method, organoleptic evaluation method, and system

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Kesavayuth et al. Locus of control, health and healthcare utilization
Brazier et al. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation
Boden et al. Are emotional clarity and emotion differentiation related?
Schomerus et al. Attitudes that determine willingness to seek psychiatric help for depression: a representative population survey applying the Theory of Planned Behaviour
Stafford Effects of group influences on consumer brand preferences
Elosua Subjective values of quality of life dimensions in elderly people. A SEM preference model approach
Santos et al. Functional, psychological and emotional barriers and the resistance to the use of digital banking services
San Miguel et al. Are preferences stable? The case of health care
Yan et al. Response burden: What is it and what predicts it?
KR101829606B1 (en) Apparatus and method for diagnostic of internet overflow
KR101731561B1 (en) Personality test apparatus and method thereof
Carr Reassessing the assessment: Exploring the factors that contribute to comprehensive financial risk evaluation
De Gucht et al. The different faces of (high) sensitivity, toward a more comprehensive measurement instrument. Development and validation of the sensory processing sensitivity questionnaire (SPSQ)
Toepoel et al. Design of web questionnaires: An information-processing perspective for the effect of response categories
Dohmen et al. Accounting for Individual-Specific Reliability of Self-Assessed Measures of Economic Preferences and Personality Traits
Ballard et al. A systematic investigation into the reliability of inter-temporal choice model parameters
Crivelli et al. Happiness and health
Mulhern et al. Is dimension order important when valuing health states using discrete choice experiments including duration?
JP7349125B2 (en) Beauty evaluation method, sensory evaluation method, and system
Liu et al. Assessing the effect of flight information presentation styles on the usability of airline web booking interface
WO2024048274A1 (en) Information processing device, information processing method, and program
Ferreira et al. Unveiling usability and UX relationships for different gender, users habits and contexts of use
JP7355308B1 (en) Information provision device, method and program
JP2021060761A (en) Health advice generation device, and health advice generation program
JP7072306B1 (en) Indexing system, indexing method, and indexing program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 23860039

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1