WO2023195117A1 - グループ生成装置、グループ生成方法、及び非一時的なコンピュータ可読媒体 - Google Patents

グループ生成装置、グループ生成方法、及び非一時的なコンピュータ可読媒体 Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2023195117A1
WO2023195117A1 PCT/JP2022/017235 JP2022017235W WO2023195117A1 WO 2023195117 A1 WO2023195117 A1 WO 2023195117A1 JP 2022017235 W JP2022017235 W JP 2022017235W WO 2023195117 A1 WO2023195117 A1 WO 2023195117A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
group
person
psychological state
state index
candidate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/JP2022/017235
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
勝 青木
隆司 前野
亮太郎 井上
淳一 中野
春華 茂刈
麻代 武田
智彩 岩科
大裕 古木
杏 大堀
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NEC Corp
Keio University
Original Assignee
NEC Corp
Keio University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by NEC Corp, Keio University filed Critical NEC Corp
Priority to PCT/JP2022/017235 priority Critical patent/WO2023195117A1/ja
Priority to JP2024513634A priority patent/JP7769923B2/ja
Publication of WO2023195117A1 publication Critical patent/WO2023195117A1/ja
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to a group generation device, a group generation method, and a non-transitory computer-readable medium.
  • Patent Document 1 discloses a system that automatically determines project group members to meet required specifications.
  • Patent Document 1 The required specifications disclosed in Patent Document 1 are programming ability, past experience, and time available for the project. Therefore, Patent Document 1 does not disclose a method of determining the assignment of people to groups using indicators other than these. The present disclosure has been made in view of such problems, and one of its purposes is to provide a new technique for assigning people to groups.
  • the group generation device of the present disclosure includes an acquisition unit that acquires person information regarding a plurality of candidate persons, a psychological state index value regarding the psychological state of each of the candidate persons, and a group composition rule based on the psychological state index value. and determining means for determining assignment of the candidate person to each of one or more groups.
  • the group generation method of the present disclosure is executed by a computer.
  • the method includes a step of acquiring person information regarding a plurality of candidate persons, a psychological state index value regarding the psychological state of each of the candidate persons, and a group composition rule based on the psychological state index value. and a determining step of determining assignment of the candidate person to each of the above groups.
  • the non-transitory computer-readable medium of the present disclosure stores a program that causes a computer to execute the information providing method of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an overview of the operation of the group generation device according to the embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a functional configuration of a group generation device.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating the hardware configuration of a computer that implements a group generation device.
  • 3 is a flowchart illustrating the flow of processing executed by the group generation device. 12 is a flowchart showing a procedure for assigning candidate persons according to example 5 of generation rules.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an operation screen provided by the group generation device.
  • predetermined values such as predetermined values and threshold values are stored in advance in a storage device or the like that can be accessed by a device that uses the values.
  • the storage unit is configured by one or more arbitrary number of storage devices.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an overview of a group generation device 2000 according to an embodiment.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram for easy understanding of the outline of the group generation device 2000, and the operation of the group generation device 2000 is not limited to that shown in FIG. 1.
  • the group generation device 2000 determines persons to be assigned to each of a plurality of groups.
  • a candidate for a person to be assigned to a group will be referred to as a "candidate person.”
  • the group generation device 2000 can be used to divide multiple people belonging to one organization into multiple groups. For example, it is conceivable to use the group generation device 2000 for personnel allocation such as "assigning each of 200 employees to one of five departments.” In this case, each employee belonging to this company becomes a candidate person.
  • the group generation device 2000 can be used to extract a predetermined number of people from a plurality of people belonging to one organization and create one or more new groups.
  • the group generation device 2000 for team formation such as ⁇ selecting 10 employees from among 50 candidate employees to form a new project team.''
  • each of the 50 candidates is a candidate.
  • the group generation device 2000 generates a project team by selecting 10 appropriate candidates from 50 candidates.
  • the number of groups that are generated is not limited to one. For example, suppose that two teams are to be formed: project team A consisting of 10 people and project team B consisting of 15 people. It is also assumed that the employees assigned to these project teams are selected from the 50 employees listed as candidates. In this case, the group generation device 2000 appropriately selects 10 employees to be assigned to project team A and 15 employees to be assigned to project team B from among the 50 candidates. Generate a team.
  • the candidate persons may include persons who cannot be assigned to any group. For example, in the above-mentioned example of ⁇ forming a project team'', 40 out of 50 candidates will not be assigned to a group.
  • the group generation device 2000 obtains person information 10.
  • Person information 10 indicates information regarding each candidate person.
  • the person information 10 shows identification information (employee number, name, etc.) of each candidate person.
  • the group generation device 2000 uses the person information 10 to determine candidate persons to be assigned to each of one or more groups.
  • the psychological state index value of each candidate person is used to assign the candidate person to the group.
  • the psychological state index value is an index value regarding a person's psychological state.
  • the psychological state index value represents the degree of good psychological state of a person.
  • generation rules are used to assign candidate persons to each group.
  • the generation rule represents a criterion for group composition based on the psychological state index value.
  • Group generation device 2000 determines candidate persons to be assigned to each group based on the psychological state index value and generation rule of each candidate person.
  • the allocation of candidate persons to groups is determined using the psychological state index value of each candidate person and the generation rule representing the criteria for group composition based on the psychological state index value. Ru. Therefore, it is possible to allocate people to groups, taking into account the psychological state of each person.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating the functional configuration of the group generation device 2000 according to the embodiment.
  • the group generation device 2000 includes an acquisition section 2020 and a determination section 2040.
  • the acquisition unit 2020 acquires person information 10.
  • the determining unit 2040 uses the psychological state index value of each candidate person shown in the person information 10 and the generation rule to determine the assignment of the candidate person to one or more groups.
  • Each functional component of the group generation device 2000 may be realized by hardware that implements each functional component (e.g., a hardwired electronic circuit), or by a combination of hardware and software (e.g., (e.g., a combination of an electronic circuit and a program that controls it).
  • a combination of hardware and software e.g., (e.g., a combination of an electronic circuit and a program that controls it).
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating the hardware configuration of the computer 1000 that implements the group generation device 2000.
  • Computer 1000 is any computer.
  • the computer 1000 is a stationary computer such as a PC (Personal Computer) or a server machine.
  • the computer 1000 is a portable computer such as a smartphone or a tablet terminal.
  • Computer 1000 may be a dedicated computer designed to implement group generation device 2000, or may be a general-purpose computer.
  • each function of the group generation device 2000 is realized on the computer 1000 by installing a predetermined application on the computer 1000.
  • the above-mentioned application is composed of programs for realizing each functional component of the group generation device 2000.
  • the method for acquiring the above program is arbitrary.
  • the program can be obtained from a storage medium (DVD disc, USB memory, etc.) in which the program is stored.
  • the program can be obtained by downloading the program from a server device that manages a storage device in which the program is stored.
  • the computer 1000 has a bus 1020, a processor 1040, a memory 1060, a storage device 1080, an input/output interface 1100, and a network interface 1120.
  • the bus 1020 is a data transmission path through which the processor 1040, memory 1060, storage device 1080, input/output interface 1100, and network interface 1120 exchange data with each other.
  • the method for connecting the processors 1040 and the like to each other is not limited to bus connection.
  • the processor 1040 is a variety of processors such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit), or an FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array).
  • the memory 1060 is a main storage device implemented using RAM (Random Access Memory) or the like.
  • the storage device 1080 is an auxiliary storage device implemented using a hard disk, an SSD (Solid State Drive), a memory card, a ROM (Read Only Memory), or the like.
  • the input/output interface 1100 is an interface for connecting the computer 1000 and an input/output device.
  • an input device such as a keyboard
  • an output device such as a display device are connected to the input/output interface 1100.
  • the network interface 1120 is an interface for connecting the computer 1000 to a network.
  • This network may be a LAN (Local Area Network) or a WAN (Wide Area Network).
  • the storage device 1080 stores programs that implement each functional component of the group generation device 2000 (programs that implement the aforementioned applications).
  • the processor 1040 implements each functional component of the group generation device 2000 by reading this program into the memory 1060 and executing it.
  • the group generation device 2000 may be realized by one computer 1000 or by multiple computers 1000. In the latter case, the configurations of each computer 1000 do not need to be the same and can be different.
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating the flow of processing executed by the group generation device 2000 of the embodiment.
  • the acquisition unit 2020 acquires person information 10 (S102).
  • the determining unit 2040 determines candidate persons to be assigned to each of one or more groups based on the psychological state index value of each candidate person and the generation rule (S104).
  • the acquisition unit 2020 acquires person information 10 (S102).
  • Person information 10 indicates information regarding each candidate person.
  • the person information 10 indicates identification information of each candidate person.
  • the person information 10 may further indicate information regarding the attributes of each candidate person.
  • the attributes of the candidate person are used, for example, when predicting a psychological state index value based on the attributes, as described later. Details regarding the attributes of the candidate person will be described later.
  • the acquisition unit 2020 acquires the personal information 10.
  • the personal information 10 is stored in advance in a storage section that is accessible from the group generation device 2000.
  • the acquisition unit 2020 acquires the personal information 10 by reading the personal information 10 from this storage unit.
  • the acquisition unit 2020 may acquire the personal information 10 by receiving the personal information 10 transmitted from another device.
  • the method of generating the personal information 10 is arbitrary. For example, assume that all people who belong to a specific organization such as a company are treated as candidate people. In this case, the person information 10 can be generated by acquiring information about all the people belonging to the organization using any method. Information about people who belong to a specific organization can be obtained from a system used to manage people who belong to an organization, such as an employee database.
  • the person information 10 may be generated to indicate only people who meet specific conditions as candidate people.
  • the personal information 10 can be generated by, for example, searching for a person who meets specific conditions from the aforementioned employee database or the like.
  • Various conditions can be used as conditions, such as age, gender, current or past affiliation, position, qualifications, career history, or work experience.
  • the person information 10 may be generated to indicate a person selected by the user of the group generation device 2000 as a candidate person.
  • the user selects an arbitrary person using the aforementioned employee database or the like. Information indicating each selected person is then used as person information 10.
  • the assignment of candidate persons to each group is realized by exchanging members among a plurality of groups.
  • the candidate persons are existing members of each group. Therefore, information indicating existing members of each group may be used as the person information 10.
  • existing members may be treated as candidates. For example, suppose that a group includes members who can be moved to other groups and members who cannot be moved to other groups. In this case, among the existing members of the group, members who can be moved to another group are treated as candidate persons. For example, the person information 10 indicates only those members who can be moved to another group among the existing members of the group.
  • the psychological state index value is an index value regarding a person's psychological state.
  • the psychological state index value may be expressed as a single index value regarding a person's psychological state, or as a combination of multiple index values regarding a person's psychological state (for example, a vector listing index values). may be done. In the latter case, each index value included in the psychological state index value represents a person's psychological state from a different perspective.
  • the psychological state index value represents the goodness of a person's psychological state.
  • happiness can be used as a value representing the good psychological state.
  • a person's happiness level is determined using, for example, the person's answers to questions regarding the four factors of happiness disclosed in Non-Patent Document 1.
  • Non-Patent Document 1 discloses 16 questions for measuring a person's level of happiness.
  • the psychological state index value is a combination of the answer values for each of these 16 questions (i.e., the combination of the 16 index values). combination).
  • the answers to all 16 questions instead of using the answers to all 16 questions, only the answers to some of the questions may be used.
  • the psychological state index value may be expressed as a combination of scores for each of the four factors of happiness, calculated using answers to questions regarding the four factors of happiness.
  • the 16 questions disclosed in Non-Patent Document 1 include four questions for each of the first to fourth factors of happiness.
  • psychological state index values statistical values of answers to four questions regarding the first factor of happiness, statistical values of answers to four questions regarding the second factor of happiness, and answers to four questions regarding the third factor of happiness are used.
  • a combination of four scores can be used: the statistical value of , and the statistical value of the answers to the four questions regarding the fourth factor of happiness.
  • various types of statistical values such as a total sum and an average value can be used as the statistical value.
  • ⁇ About the group> Various groups can be handled as the groups to which candidate persons are assigned.
  • the meaning of each group is not particularly limited, and only the total number of groups may be specified.
  • the assignment of candidate persons to each group corresponds to the process of "dividing the plurality of candidate persons shown in the personal information 10 into a specified number of groups.”
  • each group to which the candidate person is to be assigned may be specified. For example, assume that assignment of candidate persons to two departments, Department A and Department B, is determined. In this case, groups called department A and department B are specified.
  • the acquisition unit 2020 acquires group information that is information regarding a group to which a candidate person is assigned.
  • group information indicates the total number of groups.
  • the group information indicates group identification information.
  • the group information indicates identification information of the existing members of the group.
  • the group information may indicate constraint conditions regarding the group.
  • the constraint condition is a condition regarding the minimum number of people to be included in the group, the maximum number of people, or both.
  • the constraint condition is a condition regarding the attributes of a person to be included in a group.
  • the attribute is a level that is set according to a person's ability or experience.
  • a level that allows the user to work as a manager hereinafter referred to as manager level
  • a level that allows the user to work as a group leader hereinafter referred to as group leader level
  • the constraint conditions for a group are conditions regarding the minimum and maximum number of people of each level to be assigned to the group. For example, it is conceivable to set a constraint such as "one or more people are at the manager level and three or more people are at the group leader level.”
  • the constraint conditions may be common to the multiple groups or may be different for each group. Moreover, both a constraint condition common to a plurality of groups and a constraint condition different for each group may be set.
  • the determining unit 2040 determines the assignment of candidate persons to each group based on the psychological state index value of each candidate person and the generation rule.
  • the generation rule is a standard for determining candidate persons to be assigned to each group based on the psychological state index value. For example, if the process of determining candidate persons to be assigned to each group is considered as the process of solving a combinatorial optimization problem, the generation rule can be expressed as an objective function to be maximized or minimized in the combinatorial optimization problem. . Therefore, candidate persons to be assigned to each group are determined by combinatorial optimization in which candidate persons are assigned to each group so as to maximize or minimize the objective function.
  • the determining unit 2040 uses various algorithms for solving a combinatorial optimization problem to maximize or minimize the objective function. Next, the assignment of candidate persons to each group is determined. However, the allocation of candidate persons to each group that maximizes or minimizes the objective function, which is determined by the determining unit 2040, does not have to be an exact solution. For example, the determining unit 2040 may determine the assignment of candidate persons to each group so as to maximize or minimize the objective function using various algorithms for finding approximate optimal solutions to the combinatorial optimization problem.
  • the generation rule does not necessarily need to be expressed as an objective function.
  • the generation rule is a rule that "both candidate persons with large psychological state index values and persons with small psychological state index values are assigned to a group.”
  • this generation rule can be expressed as a rule that maximizes the objective function U1(G) below.
  • G represents the set of groups
  • i represents the group identifier
  • N represents the total number of groups.
  • G[i] represents a set of identifiers of people included in the i-th group.
  • group identifier used in equation (1) and each mathematical equation described below is a natural number uniquely assigned to each group in order from 1.
  • the identifier of the person included in G[i] is a natural number that is uniquely assigned to each person included in G[i] in order from 1.
  • S[i][j] represents a set obtained by extracting only the value of the j-th element from the psychological state index values of each person included in group i.
  • k is an identifier of a person included in group i.
  • v[k] represents the psychological state index value of person k.
  • v[k][j] represents the value of the j-th element of vector v[k] representing psychological state index values.
  • D1(i) of equation (1) the difference between the maximum and minimum psychological state index values in group i is calculated for each element j. Then, the sum of the differences between the maximum and minimum values calculated for each element j is calculated as D1(i). Then, the sum of D1(i) calculated for each group i is calculated as U1(G).
  • the determining unit 2040 determines the set G that maximizes the objective function U1(G). To this end, for example, the determining unit 2040 calculates the value of the objective function U1(G) while varying the assignment of candidate persons to each group i (in other words, the identification information of the persons included in G[i]), By comparing the calculated values, determine the set G that maximizes the objective function U1(G).
  • various existing algorithms can be used as a specific algorithm for determining the allocation of elements (in this case, candidate persons) to a plurality of groups so that the objective function is maximized. Note that if there are existing members in group i and those members cannot be moved to another group, the identifiers of those existing members are always included in G[i].
  • each team can be generated so that members in a good psychological state can support members in a poor psychological state.
  • U1(G) may be determined by the average of D(i) instead of the sum of D(i).
  • D(i) may be determined by the average of the differences between the maximum and minimum values calculated for each element, instead of the sum of the differences between the maximum and minimum values calculated for each element.
  • the generation rule is a rule that says, "The difference between the psychological state index value for a group and the psychological state index value for the whole group should be made small.”
  • this generation rule can be expressed as a rule to minimize the following objective function U2(G).
  • A[j] represents a set obtained by extracting only the value of the j-th element from the psychological state index values of each person included in an arbitrary group.
  • Other symbols are the same as in formula (1).
  • D2(i) of Equation (2) the absolute value of the difference between the average value of the psychological state index values in all groups and the average value of the psychological state index values in group i is calculated for each element j. Then, the sum of the absolute values of the differences calculated for each element j is calculated as D2(i). Then, the sum of D2(i) calculated for each group i is calculated as U2(G).
  • the determining unit 2040 determines the set G that minimizes the objective function U2(G).
  • various existing algorithms can be used as a specific algorithm for determining the assignment of elements (in this case, candidate persons) to a plurality of groups so that the objective function is minimized. Note that if there are existing members in group i and those members cannot be moved to another group, the identifiers of those existing members are always included in G[i].
  • each group is generated such that the difference between the average psychological state index value within the group and the average psychological state index value among all groups becomes small. Therefore, candidate persons are assigned to each group so that the psychological state index values are balanced among the groups.
  • part of the objective function U2(G) can be changed without departing from its purpose.
  • an average or the like may be used instead of the sum.
  • a square or the like may be used instead of the absolute value.
  • the generation rule is a rule that "make the difference between the psychological state index value in a group and the psychological state index value for the whole group large.”
  • a generation rule can be expressed as a rule that maximizes the objective function U3(G) below.
  • D3(i) is obtained by removing the absolute value symbol from D2(i) in equation (2).
  • the determining unit 2040 determines the set G that maximizes the objective function U3(G).
  • various existing algorithms can be used as specific algorithms for determining the allocation of elements to a plurality of groups so that the objective function is minimized. Note that if there are existing members in group i and those members cannot be moved to another group, the identifiers of those existing members are always included in G[i].
  • a group is generated that has the characteristic that "the average of the psychological state index values within the group is larger than the average of the psychological state index values of the entire group.”
  • part of the objective function U3(G) can be changed without departing from its purpose.
  • an average or the like may be used instead of the sum.
  • the generated rule is a rule that says, "The variation in psychological state index values within a group should be made to be close to the variation in psychological state index values for the whole group.”
  • This generation rule can be expressed, for example, as a rule to minimize the objective function U4(G) below.
  • var(X) represents the variance of the elements of set X.
  • var(Y) represents the variance of the elements of set X.
  • Element x[k] of set X represents the average value of all elements of vector v[k] representing psychological state index values for person k included in group i.
  • the element y[k] of the set Y represents the average value of all elements of the vector v[k] representing the psychological state index value for the person k included in any group.
  • the determining unit 2040 determines the set G that minimizes the objective function U4(G).
  • various existing algorithms can be used as specific algorithms for determining the allocation of elements to multiple groups so that the objective function is minimized. Additionally, if group i has existing members and those members cannot be moved to another group, the identifiers of those existing members are always included in G[i].
  • the variation in psychological state index values can be made to be the same in each group. Therefore, it is possible to prevent the generation of a group in which the dispersion in psychological states among members is extremely large.
  • part of the objective function U4(G) can be changed without departing from its purpose.
  • an average or the like may be used instead of the sum.
  • D4(i) a square or the like may be used instead of the absolute value.
  • the generation rule is a rule that "persons with large psychological state index values and persons with small psychological state index values are equally assigned to each group.”
  • the assignment of candidate persons according to this generation rule can be expressed, for example, by the procedure shown in FIG.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the procedure for assigning candidate persons according to Example 5 of the generation rule.
  • the determining unit 2040 generates a permutation P in which candidate persons are sorted in descending or ascending order of psychological state index value (S202).
  • the determining unit 2040 initializes the identifier i of the group to be processed to 1 (S204).
  • S206 to S214 are loop processing L1 executed for each group.
  • the determining unit 2040 extracts the first person a and the last person b from the permutation P, and assigns them to group i.
  • a and b may be the same value or different values.
  • the determining unit 2040 determines whether there are any candidate persons remaining in permutation P (S210). If no candidate person remains in the permutation P (S210: NO), the process of FIG. 5 ends.
  • ⁇ Method to identify psychological state index value> In order to determine the assignment of candidate persons to groups using the method described above, it is necessary to specify the psychological state index value v[k] for each candidate person k.
  • the psychological state index value is predetermined for each candidate person.
  • the determining unit 2040 uses a predetermined psychological state index value for each candidate person.
  • the person information 10 indicates, for each candidate person, the identification information of the candidate person and the psychological state index value in association with each other.
  • the method of predetermining the psychological state index value is arbitrary. For example, assume that the psychological state index value is determined using the answers to the questions regarding the four factors of happiness described above. In this case, for example, each candidate (e.g., each employee) is sent a questionnaire asking questions regarding the four factors of happiness, and responses to the questionnaire are collected from each candidate to determine the psychological state of each candidate. Index values can be calculated.
  • the psychological state index value of each candidate person may be calculated from the results of a single questionnaire (for example, the results of the most recent questionnaire), or may be calculated from the results of multiple questionnaires. In the latter case, for example, the above-mentioned questionnaire is periodically sent to each person. Thereby, the psychological state index value can be calculated for each person from each of the plurality of questionnaires. Therefore, for example, statistical values of a plurality of psychological state index values obtained using a plurality of questionnaires are used as the psychological state index value of each person. For example, if a questionnaire is conducted once a week, a method may be considered in which the psychological state index value of each person is calculated using the results of the last four questionnaires.
  • the psychological state of each candidate may change depending on the group to which they are assigned. For example, a person's psychological state is likely to be significantly different depending on whether he or she is assigned to a group with a boss with whom he or she is bad, or whether he or she is assigned to a group with a boss he or she gets along well with. Additionally, a person's psychological state is thought to be significantly different between a case where the person is assigned to a department related to the job they desire and a case where the person is assigned to a department related to the job they do not desire. .
  • the determining unit 2040 calculates the psychological state index value of each candidate person in each trial based on the composition of the group in that trial. Good too.
  • an estimation model for estimating the psychological state index value of each candidate person is determined in advance.
  • the estimation model can be realized by any machine learning model such as a neural network.
  • An estimation model that estimates a psychological state index value of a certain person is configured to output a psychological state index value of a certain person in response to input of information representing the environment in which the person is placed, for example.
  • a person's environment is represented by, for example, an attribute of the person, an attribute of a group to which the person belongs, or an attribute of each person belonging to the same group as the person.
  • attributes of a person that represent the person's environment attributes that change depending on the group to which the person belongs, such as job or occupation, are used.
  • information representing the characteristics of the group can be used, such as the location of the group's office or the like, or the frequency of overtime work or work on holidays in the group.
  • various attributes such as personality, age, gender, current or past department, position, qualifications, career, or work experience can be used.
  • the history of past psychological state index values is matched with information representing the environment in which that person was placed when the psychological state index value was calculated. and record it.
  • the determining unit 2040 considers the constraint indicated in the group information in addition to the generation rule to determine assignment of the candidate person to the group.
  • various existing algorithms are used as specific algorithms for determining elements (candidate persons in this disclosure) to be assigned to each group so as to maximize or minimize the objective function while taking into account constraints. can be used.
  • candidate persons can be assigned in consideration of constraint conditions using various methods.
  • the constraint condition is a condition regarding a person's attributes.
  • the determining unit 2040 preferentially extracts persons satisfying the constraint conditions.
  • a constraint condition is set such that each group includes at least one manager level person.
  • the determining unit 2040 determines, for each group, that ⁇ the manager-level candidate person who is closest to the beginning of the permutation P is extracted from the permutation P and added to the group.'' Execute processing in order.
  • Group generation device 2000 outputs output information representing processing results.
  • the output information indicates, for each of one or more groups, the identification information of the group and the identification information of each candidate person assigned to the group.
  • the output information may include the estimated psychological state index value for each candidate person assigned to the group.
  • An index value may also be indicated.
  • the output information may indicate, for each group, statistical information regarding the psychological state index value in that group.
  • the statistical information regarding the psychological state index value indicates, for example, the maximum value, minimum value, average, or variance of the psychological state index value in the group.
  • the output mode of the output information is arbitrary.
  • the output information is stored in any storage unit.
  • the output information may also be displayed on any display device.
  • the output information may also be transmitted to any device.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an operation screen provided by the group generation device 2000.
  • the operation screen 100 in FIG. 6 includes a display area 110, a display area 120, a display area 130, and a display area 140.
  • the group generation device 2000 is used to allocate personnel to each group under the division named Division A.
  • a user of the group generation device 2000 selects a business whose personnel allocation is desired to be changed from among a plurality of business divisions owned by the company.
  • the group generation device 2000 acquires person information 10 indicating all the people belonging to the selected business division as candidate persons.
  • the group generation device 2000 also acquires group information indicating information on each group under the selected business division. Then, the group generation device 2000 assigns each person belonging to the selected business division to one of the groups under the selected business division.
  • the target is Division A. Therefore, the group generation device 2000 assigns each person belonging to the A division to any one of the G1 group, G2 group, and G3 group under the A division. As a result of the assignment, the group generation device 2000 outputs the operation screen 100 shown in FIG. 6.
  • the display area 110 shows the average value of the psychological state index values of all the people calculated for the entire A division (that is, all groups under the A division).
  • a value estimated using the above-mentioned estimation model is used as the psychological state index value of each person.
  • the psychological state index value is expressed as the sum of scores calculated for each of the four happiness factors disclosed in Non-Patent Document 1.
  • graphs representing the magnitude of the psychological state index value are obtained by accumulating the scores of each factor.
  • the "original plan” indicates the average value of the psychological state index values of all the people in the case where personnel allocation is performed as determined by the group generation device 2000.
  • the “comparison plan” indicates the average value of the psychological state index values of all the people in the case where the assignment of the people is changed by the user's input operation. The input operation by the user will be described later.
  • “Current” indicates the average value of all psychological state index values for the current actual group composition.
  • “Last time” indicates the average value of all psychological state index values for the past actual group composition.
  • the display area 120 shows the configuration of the A division. By selecting two groups displayed in the display area, the user can exchange members between the two selected groups.
  • the above-mentioned "comparative plan" shows information about a case where the personnel allocation is changed by this replacement operation.
  • the display area 130 shows, for each of the two selected groups, the average value of the psychological state index values of all the people belonging to that group.
  • the user After viewing the configuration of the group automatically generated by the group generation device 2000, the user can attempt to change the personnel allocation by performing the above-described replacement operation. Then, by comparing the psychological state index value before the trial (original draft) and the psychological state index value after the trial (comparison draft), the staffing arrangement automatically generated by the group generation device 2000 can be modified. It is possible to judge whether or not it is appropriate.
  • the program includes a set of instructions (or software code) for causing the computer to perform one or more of the functions described in the embodiments when loaded into the computer.
  • the program may be stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium or a tangible storage medium.
  • computer readable or tangible storage media may include random-access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, solid-state drive (SSD) or other memory technology, CD - Including ROM, digital versatile disc (DVD), Blu-ray disc or other optical disc storage, magnetic cassette, magnetic tape, magnetic disc storage or other magnetic storage device.
  • the program may be transmitted on a transitory computer-readable medium or a communication medium.
  • transitory computer-readable or communication media includes electrical, optical, acoustic, or other forms of propagating signals.
  • Additional note 1 an acquisition means for acquiring personal information regarding a plurality of candidate persons; determining means for determining the assignment of the candidate person to each of one or more groups based on a psychological state index value regarding the psychological state of each candidate person and a group composition rule based on the psychological state index value; Group generation device with.
  • Optional note 2 The group generation device according to supplementary note 1, wherein the person information indicates the psychological state index value of each candidate person.
  • An estimation model is defined for estimating the psychological state index value of the candidate person according to the environment of the group to which the candidate person belongs, The group generation device according to supplementary note 1, wherein the determining means calculates the psychological state index value of each candidate person using the estimation model.
  • the person information includes information regarding attributes of each candidate person, The group generation device according to any one of Supplementary Notes 1 to 3, wherein the determining means determines the assignment of the candidate person to each group so as to satisfy a constraint regarding an attribute of the candidate person to be included in each group. .
  • a screen output that outputs an operation screen showing statistical values of the psychological state index values of the people included in the group and information on each person included in the group. have the means, The screen output means, in response to an operation of exchanging a person included in the first group and a person included in the second group, displays information in the first group after the exchange operation.
  • the group generation device according to any one of the items. (Appendix 7) an acquisition step of acquiring person information regarding a plurality of candidate persons; a determining step of determining the assignment of the candidate person to each of one or more groups based on a psychological state index value regarding the psychological state of each candidate person and a group composition rule based on the psychological state index value;
  • a computer-implemented group generation method comprising: (Appendix 8) The group generation method according to appendix 7, wherein the person information indicates the psychological state index value of each candidate person.
  • An estimation model is defined for estimating the psychological state index value of the candidate person according to the environment of the group to which the candidate person belongs, The group generation method according to appendix 7, wherein in the determining step, the psychological state index value of each candidate person is calculated using the estimation model.
  • the person information includes information regarding attributes of each candidate person, The group generation method according to any one of Supplementary Notes 7 to 9, wherein in the determining step, the assignment of the candidate person to each group is determined so that constraint conditions regarding the attributes of the candidate person to be included in each group are satisfied. .
  • a screen output that outputs an operation screen showing statistical values of the psychological state index values of the people included in the group and information on each person included in the group. has a step, In the screen output step, in response to an operation of exchanging a person included in the first group and a person included in the second group, the information is displayed in the first group after the exchange operation.
  • Appendix 14 The computer-readable medium according to appendix 13, wherein the person information indicates the psychological state index value of each candidate person.
  • An estimation model is defined for estimating the psychological state index value of the candidate person according to the environment of the group to which the candidate person belongs, 14.
  • Appendix 16 The computer-readable medium according to any one of appendices 13 to 15, wherein the rule is a rule for maximizing or minimizing an objective function calculated from the psychological state index value of each person included in each of the groups. .
  • the person information includes information regarding attributes of each candidate person, The computer-readable medium according to any one of Supplementary Notes 13 to 15, wherein in the determining step, the assignment of the candidate person to each group is determined so as to satisfy the constraint regarding the attributes of the candidate person to be included in each group. .
  • a screen output that outputs an operation screen showing statistical values of the psychological state index values of the people included in the group and information on each person included in the group. has a step, In the screen output step, in response to an operation of exchanging a person included in the first group and a person included in the second group, the information is displayed in the first group after the exchange operation.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
PCT/JP2022/017235 2022-04-07 2022-04-07 グループ生成装置、グループ生成方法、及び非一時的なコンピュータ可読媒体 Ceased WO2023195117A1 (ja)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2022/017235 WO2023195117A1 (ja) 2022-04-07 2022-04-07 グループ生成装置、グループ生成方法、及び非一時的なコンピュータ可読媒体
JP2024513634A JP7769923B2 (ja) 2022-04-07 2022-04-07 グループ生成装置、グループ生成方法、及びプログラム

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2022/017235 WO2023195117A1 (ja) 2022-04-07 2022-04-07 グループ生成装置、グループ生成方法、及び非一時的なコンピュータ可読媒体

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2023195117A1 true WO2023195117A1 (ja) 2023-10-12

Family

ID=88242764

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2022/017235 Ceased WO2023195117A1 (ja) 2022-04-07 2022-04-07 グループ生成装置、グループ生成方法、及び非一時的なコンピュータ可読媒体

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7769923B2 (https=)
WO (1) WO2023195117A1 (https=)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009271601A (ja) * 2008-04-30 2009-11-19 Toshiba Corp 人材配置支援装置及びプログラム
US20160055236A1 (en) * 2014-08-21 2016-02-25 Affectomatics Ltd. Personalized experience scores based on measurements of affective response
US20180082258A1 (en) * 2014-08-25 2018-03-22 Unitive, Inc. Computer Mediated Tool for Teams
JP2019114218A (ja) * 2017-12-25 2019-07-11 株式会社Ｉｒｙ 組合せ作成支援システム
JP2019215808A (ja) * 2018-06-14 2019-12-19 Ｚホールディングス株式会社 評価装置、評価方法および評価プログラム
JP2020038599A (ja) * 2018-08-31 2020-03-12 カシオ計算機株式会社 情報処理装置及びプログラム

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005044150A (ja) 2003-07-23 2005-02-17 Sony Corp データ収集装置
JP2016152020A (ja) 2015-02-19 2016-08-22 ソニー株式会社 情報処理装置、制御方法、およびプログラム
US20200134541A1 (en) 2018-10-31 2020-04-30 Sap Portals Israel Ltd. Team matching system
US11000218B2 (en) 2019-08-22 2021-05-11 Raghavendra Misra Systems and methods for dynamically providing and developing behavioral insights for individuals and groups
US11986301B2 (en) 2020-06-18 2024-05-21 Nec Corporation Information processing device, control method, and storage medium

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009271601A (ja) * 2008-04-30 2009-11-19 Toshiba Corp 人材配置支援装置及びプログラム
US20160055236A1 (en) * 2014-08-21 2016-02-25 Affectomatics Ltd. Personalized experience scores based on measurements of affective response
US20180082258A1 (en) * 2014-08-25 2018-03-22 Unitive, Inc. Computer Mediated Tool for Teams
JP2019114218A (ja) * 2017-12-25 2019-07-11 株式会社Ｉｒｙ 組合せ作成支援システム
JP2019215808A (ja) * 2018-06-14 2019-12-19 Ｚホールディングス株式会社 評価装置、評価方法および評価プログラム
JP2020038599A (ja) * 2018-08-31 2020-03-12 カシオ計算機株式会社 情報処理装置及びプログラム

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
MITSUCARI: "Human resources data analysis at Mitsukari ① ~ High performer analysis ~", MITSUCARI BLOG, 15 October 2021 (2021-10-15), XP009550281, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://web.archive.org/web/20211015092839/https://mitsucari.com/blog/top_performer_analysis/> *
MITSUCARI: "Human resources data analysis at Mitsukari ② ~ Visualization of company culture ~", MITSUCARI BLOG, 20 June 2021 (2021-06-20), JP, XP009550282, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://web.archive.org/web/20210620032616/https://mitsucari.com/blog/culture_visualization> *
MITSUCARI: "Human resources data analysis at Mitsukari ③ ~ Determining the place of assignment ~", MITSUCARI BLOG, 20 June 2021 (2021-06-20), JP, XP009550279, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://web.archive.org/web/20210620030843/https://mitsucari.com/blog/assignment/> *
O'REILLY CHARLES A., CHATMAN JENNIFER, CALDWELL DAVID F.: "People and Organizational Culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person-Organization Fit", ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, vol. 34, no. 3, 1 September 1991 (1991-09-01), US , pages 487 - 516, XP093097958, ISSN: 0001-4273, DOI: 10.5465/256404 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPWO2023195117A1 (https=) 2023-10-12
JP7769923B2 (ja) 2025-11-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11734566B2 (en) Systems and processes for bias removal in a predictive performance model
Huang Mean-parametrized Conway–Maxwell–Poisson regression models for dispersed counts
Banasik et al. Sample selection bias in credit scoring models
Thadewald et al. Jarque–Bera test and its competitors for testing normality–a power comparison
JP6369053B2 (ja) マッチング装置、マッチング方法及びプログラム
CN107040397B (zh) 一种业务参数获取方法及装置
US20120271612A1 (en) Predictive modeling
Hadi-Vencheh et al. An inverse optimization model for imprecise data envelopment analysis
US12192408B1 (en) Systems and methods for electronic request routing and distribution
CN111598360B (zh) 服务策略确定方法、装置及电子设备
CN111179055A (zh) 授信额度调整方法、装置和电子设备
Wastvedt et al. An intersectional framework for counterfactual fairness in risk prediction
Maziarz et al. Response to Henschen: causal pluralism in macroeconomics
US20190050373A1 (en) Apparatus, method, and program for calculating explanatory variable values
CN114925275A (zh) 产品推荐方法、装置、计算机设备及存储介质
JP2019160089A (ja) 情報処理装置、情報処理方法及び情報処理プログラム
JP2022190881A (ja) 施策提示装置、施策提示方法、および施策提示プログラム
JP7769923B2 (ja) グループ生成装置、グループ生成方法、及びプログラム
CN119648031A (zh) 基于业务数据的员工评级方法、装置、设备及存储介质
CN117390256A (zh) 网络净推荐值的预测方法及存储介质
US20230394227A1 (en) Apparatus for generating draft document and method therefor
Kuznietsova et al. Business intelligence techniques for missing data imputation
Almomani et al. Selecting a good stochastic system for the large number of alternatives
CN113807749B (zh) 一种对象评分方法和装置
Crato et al. α-stable laws for noncoding regions in DNA sequences

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 22936516

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2024513634

Country of ref document: JP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 22936516

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1