WO2023094342A1 - Système et procédé de test d'une porte - Google Patents

Système et procédé de test d'une porte Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2023094342A1
WO2023094342A1 PCT/EP2022/082704 EP2022082704W WO2023094342A1 WO 2023094342 A1 WO2023094342 A1 WO 2023094342A1 EP 2022082704 W EP2022082704 W EP 2022082704W WO 2023094342 A1 WO2023094342 A1 WO 2023094342A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
door
test
function
measurement data
data associated
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2022/082704
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Rebeca HOMSSI
Original Assignee
Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Ab
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Ab filed Critical Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Ab
Publication of WO2023094342A1 publication Critical patent/WO2023094342A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0218—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to a system, a method and a computer program product for testing a function of a door.
  • a non-functioning door can e.g. cause an obstacle in accessing a building or a warehouse, which in turn can cause a delay or hinder in e.g. logistics of goods and have a negative impact on a business, energy consumption, in-house climate or just cause irritation.
  • the door customer calls the door company to report that the door is malfunctioning and/or indicates a need for service.
  • a service technician is often sent to go visit the location of the door to test the door where it is installed in order to understand what is not working with the door.
  • the service technician can determine when visiting and testing the door that nothing is wrong with the door and that the door is working as it should.
  • Testing and verifying a function of the door however needs to be done at the door by a service technician, which requires that the service technician visit the location of the door. This can be both costly, take time. It sometimes also unfortunately turns out that the visit to the location of the door was not necessary because the door was not malfunctioning. There is also a desire to avoid unnecessary travel from a sustainability perspective.
  • a system for remote testing of a door comprising a door operator module configured to control operation of the door, a communication module arranged at the door configured to communicate with a remote device via a communication network, a processing circuitry operatively connected to the door operator module and the communication module.
  • the processing circuitry is configured to cause the system to receive, at the communication module, a door operation test message indicative of instructions to the door operator module to test a function of the door, perform the test of the function of the door by the door operator module according to instructions of the door operation test message, and send, via the communication module, a door operation test response message indicative of test result data associated with the test of the function of the door.
  • An advantage with this first aspect is that the door can be tested from a remote location in order to understand what function of the door that may be malfunctioning. This minimizes the need to be present at the door to test the door.
  • the door operation test message is further indicative of instruction to obtain measurement data associated with test of the function of the door and the processing circuitry is further configured to obtain measurement data associated with the test of the function of the door and generate test result data based on the obtained measurement data.
  • the processing circuitry is further configured to cause the system to determine if the door is in a user safe operation mode for a safe testing of the function of the door.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that it minimizes the risk of obtaining wrong measurement data due to a user that is affecting the measurements, and it also minimizes the risk of injuring a user during testing of the function of the door.
  • the instructions to the door operator module comprises at least any of opening a door, closing a door and holding a door.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that the door operator module can cause the door to open, close or hold the door in order to obtain different measurement data dependent on what function of the door that is going to be tested.
  • the measurement data comprises at least any of measurement of an opening time, and an opening speed, a closing time, a closing speed, an opening width, a closing width, a power consumption, an opening friction, a closing friction, an opening force, a closing force, a temperature and a sound.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that different parameters can be obtained when testing the door in order to determine the function of the door.
  • the determination if the door is in a user safe operation mode the system comprises determining if the door is in a standby operation mode or in an active operation mode, and in a determination that the door is in an active operation mode ignore testing the function of the door while the door is in an active operation mode, and in a determination that the door is in a standby operation mode, determining that the door is in a user safe operation mode to perform safe testing of the door.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that it by determining the operation mode of the door, the risk of obtaining wrong measurement data can be minimized, and it also minimizes the risk of injuring a user when testing of the function of the door e.g. when opening, closing or holding a door.
  • a standby operation mode the door is not in use and/or is not likely to be used within a predetermined time period
  • an active operation mode the door is in use and/or is likely to be used within a predetermined time period.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that it can be determined that if the door is used, or going to be used within a predetermined time period, by a user, and ignore testing the function of the door while the door is in the active operation mode for a more reliable and user safe testing.
  • the system further comprises a sensor operatively connected to the processing circuitry configured to obtain the measurement data associated with test of the function of the door and/or measurement data associated with the status of the door before and/or after the test of the function of the door.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that depending on the sensor, different kind of measurement data can be obtained by the sensor for a more precise test of the function of the door.
  • the senor is further configured to obtain sensor data indicative of if the door is in use and/or is likely to be used within a predetermined time period.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that it can be determined if a user is present at the door.
  • the processing circuitry is further configured to, cause the system to obtain measurement data associated with the status of the door before the test of the function of the door, and obtain measurement data associated with the status of the door after the test of the function of the door.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that it can be determined if the status of the door change over time.
  • a method for remote testing of a door comprising the step of receiving, at a communication module arranged at the door, a door operation test message indicative of instructions to a door operator module to test a function of the door, the step of performing the test of the function of the door by the door operator module according to instructions of the door operation test message, and the step of sending, via the communication module, a door operation test response message indicative of test result data associated with the test of the function of the door.
  • An advantage with this second aspect is that the door can be tested from a remote location in order to understand what function of the door that may be malfunctioning. This minimizes the need to be present at the door to test the door.
  • the method further comprises the step of obtaining measurement data associated with the test of the function of the door, and the step of generating test result data based on the obtained measurement data.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that measurement data can be obtained and used to determine the function of the door by analyzing the test result data.
  • the method further comprises the step of determining if the door is in a user safe operation mode for a safe testing of the function of the door.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that it minimizes the risk of obtaining wrong measurement data due to a user that is affecting the measurements, and it also minimizes the risk of injuring a user during testing of the function of the door.
  • the method further the method comprises the step of obtaining measurement data associated with the status of the door before the test of the function of the door, and the step of obtaining measurement data associated with the status of the door after the test of the function of the door.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that it can be determined if the status of the door change over time.
  • a computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium, having thereon a computer program comprising program instructions, the computer program being loadable into a processing circuitry and configured to cause execution of the method when the computer program is run by the at least one processing circuitry.
  • Figure la illustrates a system for remote testing of a door, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • Figure lb illustrates example sensors of the system for remote testing of the door, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • Figures 2a-2d illustrates example door movements and door positions when obtaining measurement data, according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • Figures 3a and 3b illustrates example determinations if the door is in a user safe operation mode.
  • Figure 4 illustrates a flow chart of the method steps according to the second aspect of the disclosure.
  • Figure 5 illustrates a computer program product according to the third aspect of the disclosure.
  • Figure la illustrates a system for remote testing of a door, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • the first aspect of this disclosure shows a system 100 for remote testing of a door 1.
  • the door 1 is a pedestrian door, e.g. an entrance door at a building such as a hotel, an office or a home. It is understood that the system 100 for remote testing of a door 1 can be configured for remote testing of any type of door. According to some embodiments the door 1 is any of a revolving door, a slider door, a hangar door, a sliding door, a swing door, an overhead sectional door, a folding door, a vertical-lifting door, a high speed door, a garage door and a mega door.
  • the system 100 comprising a door operator module 20 configured to control operation of the door 1.
  • the door operator module 20 is configured to steer and/or control operation of movement of the door 1.
  • the door operator module 20 is configured to operate a door operator device 21 of the door 1 wherein in the door operator device 21 is configured to cause a movement of the door 1.
  • Figure la illustrates an example door operator device 21 at a pedestrian door configured to open, close and hold the door 1.
  • the door operator device 21 is any of an electrical motor, a compressor, a pneumatic device or a hydraulic device. According to some embodiments the door operator module 20 is configured to obtain measurement data associated with the movement of the door 1. According to some embodiments the measurement data associated with the movement of the door 1 is time data.
  • the system 100 comprising a communication module 40 arranged at the door 1 configured to communicate with a remote device 400,800 via a communication network 50.
  • the remote device is a portable electronic device 400. According to some embodiments the remote device is a stationary electronic device 800. Example remote devices 400,800 are illustrated in Figure la.
  • the communication network 50 is a wireless communication network.
  • the wireless communication network is a standardized wireless local area network such as a Wireless Local Area Network, WLAN, BluetoothTM, ZigBee, Ultra-Wideband, UWB, Radio Frequency Identification, RFID, or similar network.
  • the wireless communication network is a standardized wireless wide area network such as a Global System for Mobile Communications, GSM, Extended GSM, General Packet Radio Service, GPRS, Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution, EDGE, Wideband Code Division Multiple Access, WCDMA, Long Term Evolution, LTE, Narrowband-loT, 5G, Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access, WiMAX or Ultra Mobile Broadband, UMB or similar network.
  • GSM Global System for Mobile Communications
  • Extended GSM Extended GSM
  • General Packet Radio Service GPRS
  • Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution EDGE
  • Wideband Code Division Multiple Access WCDMA
  • LTE Long Term Evolution
  • Narrowband-loT 5G
  • Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access WiMAX or Ultra Mobile Broadband, UMB or similar network.
  • the wireless communication network can also be a combination of both a wireless local area network and a wireless wide area network.
  • communication network 50 can be a combination a wired communication network and a wireless communication network.
  • the communication network 50 is defined by common Internet Protocols.
  • the system 100 comprising a processing circuitry 102a, 102b, 102c.
  • the processing circuitry 102a is arranged at the door operator module 20 at the door 1.
  • the processing circuitry 102b is comprised in a remote device that is a stationary electronic device 800 operatively connected to the door operator module 20 via the communication network 50.
  • the processing circuitry 102c is comprised in a remote device stationary electronic device 800 operatively connected to the door operator module 20 via the communication network 50.
  • the system 100 comprising a memory 101a, 101b, 101c.
  • the memory 101a is arranged at the door operator module 20 at the door 1.
  • the memory 101b is comprised in a remote device that is a stationary electronic device 800 operatively connected to the door operator module 20 via the communication network 50.
  • the memory 101c is comprised in a remote device that is a portable electronic device 400 operatively connected to the door operator module 20 via the communication network 50.
  • the processing circuitry 102a, 102b, 102c is operatively connected to the door operator module 20 and the communication module 40, configured to cause the system 100 to receive, at the communication module 40, a door operation test message indicative of instructions to the door operator module 20 to test a function of the door 1, and perform the test of the function of the door 1 by the door operator module 20 according to instructions of the door operation test message, and send, via the communication module 40, a door operation test response message indicative of test result data associated with the test of the function of the door 1.
  • An advantage with this first aspect is that the door can be tested from a remote location in order to understand what function of the door that may be malfunctioning. This minimizes the need to be present at the door to test the door.
  • the door operation test message indicative of instructions to the door operator module 20 comprises instructions to open the door 1, close the door 1 or hold the door 1.
  • the door operation test message is received from the remote device 400,800.
  • the remote device 400,800 is configured to receive input, via a user interface of the remote device 400,800, from a user that is operating the remote device 400,800.
  • the remote device 400,800 is a server that sends the door operation test message.
  • an automated remote door control system is configured to automatically initiate remote testing of a door 1.
  • the remote testing of a door 1 is carried out at predetermined times according to a predetermined time schedule.
  • a service technician can at a remote location input commands via the remote device 400,800 for remote testing of a door 1.
  • the door operation test response message indicative of test result data associated with the test of the function of the door 1 is configured to be received at the remote device 400, 800.
  • the test result data associated with the test of the function is processed at the remote device 400, 800.
  • the test result data associated with the test of the function is processed and displayed via a user interface to a user of the remote device 400, 800.
  • the door operation test message is further indicative of instruction to obtain measurement data associated with test of the function of the door 1 and the processing circuitry 102a, 102b, 102c is further configured to obtain measurement data associated with the test of the function of the door 1, and generate test result data based on the obtained measurement data.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that measurement data can be obtained and used to determine the function of the door by analyzing the test result data.
  • obtaining of measurement data associated with the test of the function of the door 1 is obtained by the door operator module 20 by obtaining door operation data from a component of the door 1.
  • the door operator module 20 is configured to obtain measurement data associated with at least any of a torque, a current consumption, an energy consumption, an operating state, an acceleration, a rotation frequency, an opening time, a closing time, a door component temperature, a resistance, a force, a sound and a vibration.
  • a potentiometer is used for determining a change in the resistance when a door is moving. The potentiometer can for example be used to determine the opening angle of the door 1.
  • a clock of the door operator module 20 is counting the time when the door 1 is opening, closing or standing still.
  • the door operator device 21 is an electrical motor
  • the torque of the electrical motor is determined by measuring the electrical power input, the voltage and the current in the power line driving the electrical motor, and the torque is determined by the that the torque is directly proportional to the current and the torque is derived by knowing a shaft speed and the motor efficiency.
  • processing circuitry 102a, 102b, 102c is further configured to obtain measurement data associated with the test of the function of the door when the door 1 is moving.
  • the movement of the door 1 is caused by a user that is using the door 1.
  • the movement of the door 1 is caused by the door operator module 20 configured to control operation of the door 1. According to some embodiments the movement of the door 1 is caused by the door operator device 21.
  • the processing circuitry 102a, 102b, 102c is further configured to only obtain measurement data associated with the test of the function of the door when the door 1 is moving and when the movement is caused by a user.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that the system 100 for remote testing of a door 1 is can test the function of the door 1 while the door is in use. In an example, during rush hour in at an office the door is constantly used by a user and a test of the function of the door 1 is impossible unless the test can be performed while a user is at the door.
  • the processing circuitry 102a, 102b, 102c is further configured to only obtain measurement data associated with the test of the function of the door 1 when the door 1 is moving and when the movement is caused by instructions to the door operator module 20 to move the door 1.
  • processing circuitry 102a, 102b, 102c is further configured to cause the system 100 to determine if the door 1 is in a user safe operation mode for a safe testing of the function of the door 1.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that it minimizes the risk of obtaining wrong measurement data due to a user that is affecting the measurements, and it also minimizes the risk of injuring a user during testing of the function of the door.
  • the door 1 is in a user safe operation mode when the testing of the function of the door only requires a movement of the door 1 that is caused by a user.
  • the instructions to the door operator module 20 comprises at least any of opening a door, closing a door and holding a door.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that the door operator module can cause the door to open, close or hold the door in order to obtain different measurement data dependent on what function of the door that is going to be tested.
  • the instructions to the door operator module 20 comprises testing of the function of the door 1 when the door 1 is moving and when the movement of the door 1 is caused by a user.
  • the measurement data comprises at least any of measurement of an opening time, and an opening speed, a closing time, a closing speed, an opening width, a closing width, a power consumption, an opening friction, a closing friction, an opening force, a closing force, a temperature and a sound.
  • the measurement data comprises at least any of measurement of an opening acceleration or a closing acceleration.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that different parameters can be obtained when testing the door in order to determine the function of the door.
  • the measurement data comprises a combination of at least two of measurement of an opening time, and an opening speed, a closing time, a closing speed, an opening width, a closing width, a power consumption, an opening friction, a closing friction, an opening force, a closing force, a temperature and a sound.
  • the determination if the door 1 is in a user safe operation mode the system comprises determining if the door 1 is in a standby operation mode or in an active operation mode, and in a determination that the door 1 is in an active operation mode ignore testing the function of the door 1 while the door 1 is in an active operation mode, and in a determination that the door 1 is in a standby operation mode, determining that the door 1 is in a user safe operation mode to perform safe testing of the door 1.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that it by determining the operation mode of the door, the risk of obtaining wrong measurement data can be minimized, and it also minimizes the risk of injuring a user when testing of the function of the door e.g. when opening, closing or holding a door.
  • the door 1 in a standby operation mode the door 1 is not in use and/or is not likely to be used within a predetermined time period, and in an active operation mode the door 1 is in use and/or is likely to be used within a predetermined time period.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that it can be determined that if the door is used, or going to be used within a predetermined time period, by a user, and ignore testing the function of the door while the door is in the active operation mode for a more reliable and user safe testing.
  • the system 100 further comprises a sensor 10a, 10b, 10c, lOd operatively connected to the processing circuitry 102a, 102b, 102c configured to obtain the measurement data associated with test of the function of the door 1 and/or measurement data associated with the status of the door 1 before and/or after the test of the function of the door 1.
  • the senor 10a, 10b, 10c, lOd is at least any of a gyroscope or an accelerometer configured to detect movement and/or relative movement, acceleration and position, a pressure sensor configured to measure a force, a camera configured to capture images and video, a microphone configured to obtain sound, a temperature sensor configured to measure temperature, a barometer configured to measure air pressure, a hygrometer configured to measure humidity, a light sensor configured to measure light conditions, an infrared sensor configured to measure distance to an object, a light detection and ranging, LIDAR, sensor configured to measure distance to an object, a radio detection and ranging, RADAR, sensor configured to measure distance to an object, a voltage meter sensor configured to measure voltage, and a current meter sensor configured to measure current.
  • a gyroscope or an accelerometer configured to detect movement and/or relative movement, acceleration and position
  • a pressure sensor configured to measure a force
  • a camera configured to capture images and video
  • a microphone configured
  • the senor 10a, 10b, 10c, lOd is configured to determine if a user is within a predetermined distance from the door 1.
  • the senor 10a, 10b, 10c, lOd is configured to determine if a user is approaching the door 1 or moving away from the door 1.
  • the senor 10a, 10b, 10c, lOd is configured to determine if a user is standing still at the door 1.
  • Figure lb illustrates example sensors of the system for remote testing of a door, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • a door 1 is illustrated from above.
  • four sensors 10a, 10b, 10c, lOd are arranged at the door 1.
  • sensor 10a is arranged at the wall adjacent to the door 1 on a first side
  • sensors 10b is arranged at the wall adjacent to the door 1 on second first side.
  • sensors 10c and lOd are arranged on the door 1.
  • the sensors 10c and lOd are accelerometers for detecting movements and/or relative movement, acceleration and position of the door 1.
  • instructions to the door operator module 20 to test a function of the door 1 comprises instructions to open the door 1, hold the door 1, close the door 1 and the door operation test message is further indicative of instruction to obtain measurement data wherein the measurement data comprises measurement of an opening speed V-op, an opening width A-ow, a closing speed V-cl and a closing width A-cIl, A-cl2.
  • a service technician has received an error message from the door 1.
  • the service technician input commands via a remote device 400, e.g. a smartphone, for remote testing of a door 1.
  • a door operation test message indicative of instructions is received at the door operator module 20 to test a function of the door.
  • Measurement data associated with the status of the door 1 before the test of the function of the door 1 is obtained and in the example the opening width of the door 1 has an angle A before the test of the function of the door, as illustrated in Figure 2a.
  • the test of the function of the door 1 is performed according to instructions of the door operation test message and the door 1 opens.
  • the door operation test message is further indicative of instruction to obtain measurement data wherein the measurement data comprises measurement of an opening speed V-op by the sensors 10c and 10 d that are accelerometers detecting the movements of the door.
  • An opening width A-ow is also determined. After holding the door 1, the door 1 is closed.
  • the door 1 stops since there is a stone S hindering the door 1 from closing.
  • Measurement data associated with the status of the door 1 after the test of the function of the door 1 is obtained and in the example the closing width of the door 1 has an angle A-cIl after the test of the function of the door, as illustrated in Figure 2c.
  • angle A before the test of the function of the door was offset from a predetermined angle for a normal functioning door. In this example this value is indicated as a possible malfunction of the door 1. Further in the example use case it was determined that the opening speed V-op, the opening width A-ow and the closing speed V-cl were normal. However, the indication that the closing width of the door 1 has an angle A-cIl after the test of the function of the door, was determined as offset from a predetermined angle for a normal functioning door. In the example this value is indicated as a possible malfunction of the door 1.
  • a door operation test response message indicative of test result data associated with the test of the function of the door 1 is sent sending via the communication module 40.
  • the door operation test response message is received at the remote device 400 of the service technician.
  • the service technician can conclude that the angle A before the test of the function of the door and that the angle A-cIl after the test of the function of the door stands out and the service technician can draw conclusions out from the data.
  • the service technician concludes that the door 1 seems to be functioning as it should but that something seems to be hindering the door from closing.
  • the service technician could potentially see what is hindering the door from closing, e.g. the stone or if there is snow or dust that is hindering the door 1 from closing.
  • the service technician does not visit the door 1 but instead the service technician performs a further test at a later point of time. This time the door 1 has an angle A before the test of the function of the door comparable to an angle of a normal functioning door, and, as illustrated in the Figure 2d, the angle A-cl2 after the test of the function of the door is comparable to an angle of a normal functioning door.
  • the service technician concludes that the door 1 seems to be functioning as it should.
  • the sensor 10a, 10b, 10c, lOd is further configured to obtain sensor data indicative of if the door 1 is in use and/or is likely to be used within a predetermined time period.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that it can be determined if a user is present at the door.
  • the sensors 10a and 10b are cameras for capturing images and video of users that are configured to determine if a user approaching the door 1, moving away from the door 1 or standing still at the door 1.
  • the sensor 10a is a camera that captures images of the user.
  • the sensor is a camera configured to obtain images and the determination that the door 1 is in use and/or is likely to be used within a predetermined time period is determined by image processing of the obtained images.
  • the sensor is an infrared sensor configured to measure distance to an object, and the determination that the door 1 is in use and/or is likely to be used within a predetermined time period is determined by measure the distance and to the user.
  • a user is approaching the door 1, and it is determined that the door 1 is in use and/or is likely to be used within a predetermined time period.
  • processing circuitry 102a, 102b, 102c is further configured to, cause the system 100 to obtain measurement data associated with the status of the door 1 before the test of the function of the door 1, and obtain measurement data associated with the status of the door 1 after the test of the function of the door 1.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that it can be determined if the status of the door change over time.
  • the second aspect of this disclosure shows a method for remote testing of a door 1.
  • Figure 5 illustrates a computer program product according to the third aspect of the disclosure. The method comprising the step of SI receiving, at a communication module 40 arranged at the door 1, a door operation test message indicative of instructions to a door operator module 20 to test a function of the door 1, the step of S4 performing the test of the function of the door 1 by the door operator module 20 according to instructions of the door operation test message, and the step of S8 sending, via the communication module 40, a door operation test response message indicative of test result data associated with the test of the function of the door 1.
  • An advantage with this second aspect is that the door can be tested from a remote location in order to understand what function of the door that may be malfunctioning. This minimizes the need to be present at the door to test the door.
  • the method further comprises the step of S5 obtaining measurement data associated with the test of the function of the door 1, and the step of S7 generating test result data based on the obtained measurement data.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that measurement data can be obtained and used to determine the function of the door by analyzing the test result data.
  • the method further comprises the step of S3 determining if the door 1 is in a user safe operation mode for a safe testing of the function of the door 1.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that it minimizes the risk of obtaining wrong measurement data due to a user that is affecting the measurements, and it also minimizes the risk of injuring a user during testing of the function of the door.
  • the method further comprises the step of S2 obtaining measurement data associated with the status of the door 1 before the test of the function of the door 1, and the step of S6 obtaining measurement data associated with the status of the door 1 after the test of the function of the door 1.
  • An advantage with this embodiment is that it can be determined if the status of the door change over time.
  • the third aspect of this disclosure shows a computer program product the second aspect.
  • Figure 5 illustrates a computer program product according to the third aspect of the disclosure.
  • the computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium, having thereon a computer program comprising program instructions, the computer program being loadable into a processing circuitry 102a, 102b, 102c and configured to cause execution of the method according to any of the second aspect when the computer program is run by the at least one processing circuitry 102a, 102b, 102c.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)

Abstract

Les systèmes d'entrée ASSA ABLOY AB ont développé un système (100) pour tester à distance une porte (1), le système (100) comprenant : un module d'opérateur de porte (20) configuré pour commander le fonctionnement de la porte (1) ; un module de communication (40) placé au niveau de la porte (1), configuré pour communiquer avec un dispositif distant (400, 800) par l'intermédiaire d'un réseau de communication (50) ; un circuit de traitement (102a, 102b, 102c) connecté fonctionnellement au module d'opérateur de porte (20) et au module de communication (40), configuré pour amener le système (100) à recevoir, au niveau du module de communication (40), un message de test de fonctionnement de porte indiquant des instructions au module d'opérateur de porte (20) pour tester une fonction de la porte (1), effectuer le test de la fonction de la porte (1) par le module d'opérateur de porte (20) conformément à des instructions du message de test de fonctionnement de porte, et envoyer, par l'intermédiaire du module de communication (40), un message de réponse de test de fonctionnement de porte indiquant des données de résultat de test associées au test de la fonction de la porte (1). La divulgation se rapporte en outre à un procédé pour tester à distance une porte (1) ainsi qu'à un produit-programme informatique (500).
PCT/EP2022/082704 2021-11-23 2022-11-22 Système et procédé de test d'une porte WO2023094342A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE2130328 2021-11-23
SE2130328-4 2021-11-23

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2023094342A1 true WO2023094342A1 (fr) 2023-06-01

Family

ID=84439734

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2022/082704 WO2023094342A1 (fr) 2021-11-23 2022-11-22 Système et procédé de test d'une porte

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2023094342A1 (fr)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3282434A1 (fr) * 2016-03-11 2018-02-14 Michel Gelin Maintenance à distance de porte de garage motorisée
WO2020254141A1 (fr) * 2019-06-17 2020-12-24 Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Ab Système de gestion d'actionnement de porte
WO2021198313A1 (fr) * 2020-04-03 2021-10-07 The Convex Lens Limited Système d'essai permettant de surveiller et contrôler à distance la fonctionnalité de systèmes d'urgence dans des bâtiments

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3282434A1 (fr) * 2016-03-11 2018-02-14 Michel Gelin Maintenance à distance de porte de garage motorisée
WO2020254141A1 (fr) * 2019-06-17 2020-12-24 Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Ab Système de gestion d'actionnement de porte
WO2021198313A1 (fr) * 2020-04-03 2021-10-07 The Convex Lens Limited Système d'essai permettant de surveiller et contrôler à distance la fonctionnalité de systèmes d'urgence dans des bâtiments

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN111954635B (zh) 使用智能移动设备监控电梯门的门运动过程的特征的方法
US20210123768A1 (en) Automated mapping of sensors at a location
US10956876B2 (en) Connected entrance system
WO2018136510A1 (fr) Navigation dynamique de drone
US11531082B2 (en) Device location network
CN109563840B (zh) 泵组件和方法
US11098519B2 (en) Door operator
CN108226777A (zh) 状态监测装置以及用于监测电机的方法
US20210074143A1 (en) Recording activity detection
CN107852569B (zh) 用于测量终端的位置的终端及其方法
CN105339765A (zh) 用于确定房门或房窗的关闭状态的装置和方法
US11199038B2 (en) Door operator
US20230177287A1 (en) Monitoring a Door Position to Determine a Status of a Radio Frequency Identification Tag
WO2023094342A1 (fr) Système et procédé de test d'une porte
GB2586099A (en) An apparatus and method for person detection, tracking and identification utilizing wireless signals and images
US10180319B2 (en) Device and method to determine height of a panel using elevation determination
KR20170005411A (ko) 거리 율 기반 정지 검출
US11255558B1 (en) Systems and methods for estimating an input power supplied to a fan motor of a climate control system
EP3567564B1 (fr) Appareil et procédé de détection de fraude d'un dispositif monté
Tang et al. Study of IMU installation position for posture estimation of excavators
US20220307317A1 (en) A door operation management system
CN107975908A (zh) 空调器的开合结构控制方法、空调器和可读存储介质
JP6370333B2 (ja) 気圧センサを用いた位置検出システム及び位置検出方法
CN211594668U (zh) 一种用于电梯乘运质量测量的在线数据采集控制装置
Choudhry et al. RSSI-based indoor robot localization system using LabVIEW

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 22818808

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1