WO2023007082A1

WO2023007082A1 - Agricultural vehicle tyre with lightweight crown

Info

Publication number: WO2023007082A1
Application number: PCT/FR2022/051487
Authority: WO
Inventors: Philippe Johnson; Nizar DIDANE
Original assignee: Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin
Priority date: 2021-07-29
Filing date: 2022-07-25
Publication date: 2023-02-02
Also published as: FR3125746A1; FR3125746B1

Abstract

The present invention relates to a radial tyre (1) for an agricultural vehicle, the load index of which is at most equal to 156, the tread pattern of which comprises lugs with a radial height at least equal to 25 mm and with a thickness at least equal to 20 mm, comprising a crown reinforcement (3), comprising 3 working layers (31, 32, 33), each comprising high-tenacity PET reinforcing elements having a tensile breaking strength at least equal to 17.5 daN for a linear density at most equal to 125 g to the km. The angles ANT1 and ANT3 of the reinforcing elements of the radially inner and outer layers (31, 33) with the circumferential direction are of the same orientation and less than 22°. The angle ANT2 of the reinforcing elements of the median layer (32) with the circumferential direction is of opposite orientation to ANT1. The absolute value of the difference of the oriented angles ANT1 and ANT2 is at least equal to 50°.

Description

Title: Light Top Agricultural Vehicle Tire

The present invention relates to a radial tire for an agricultural vehicle and relates more particularly to its crown reinforcement.

[0002] The dimensional specifications and the conditions of use (load, speed, pressure) of a tire for an agricultural vehicle, or agricultural tire, are defined by use. The tires are medium to large in size depending on the type of crop. The diameter of the rims for mounting agricultural tires is at least equal to 16 inches and at most equal to 46 inches. For agricultural tyres, the recommended minimum inflation pressure corresponding to the load capacity indicated, is most often at most equal to 300 kPa, but can go down to 240 kPa for an IF tire ("Improved Flexion", improved flex ), or even 160 kPa for a VF (“Very improved Flexion”) tire. IF tires differ from standard tires known as NF ("Normal Flexion", standard flexion), i.e. not falling within the IF or VF classification according to the ETRTO 2020 standard, of the same size by a load capacity increased by 20% at constant pressure or 20% lower pressure with equal load and respectively 40% with VF (“Very improved flexion”) tyres. The maximum speed of these tires is 65 km/h corresponding to speed index D. The load index of these tires is at least equal to 107 (975 kg) and at most equal to 189 (10,300 kg).

[0003] A tire for an agricultural vehicle comprises a tread, intended to come into contact with the ground via a running surface, the two axial ends of which are connected, via two sidewalls, to two beads ensuring the mechanical connection between the tire and the rim on which it is intended to be mounted.

[0004] In what follows, the circumferential, axial and radial directions respectively designate a direction tangent to the rolling surface and oriented according to the direction of rotation of the tire, a direction parallel to the axis of rotation of the tire and a direction perpendicular to Tire rotation fax.

[0005] A radial tire for an agricultural vehicle comprises a reinforcement reinforcement, consisting of a crown reinforcement, radially interior to the tread, and of a carcass reinforcement, radially interior to the crown reinforcement.

[0006] The tread of a tire for an agricultural vehicle generally comprises a plurality of elements in relief, called sculpture elements or blocks, extending radially outwards from a bearing surface or tread bottom to the running surface, and usually separated from each other by hollows or grooves. These sculpture elements are most often strips generally having an elongated overall parallelepiped shape, comprising at least one rectilinear or curvilinear portion. The dimension of the bars, namely their radial height and their circumferential thickness, is essential to ensure an adequate tractive effort for use on soft ground.

[0007] The carcass reinforcement of a radial tire for an agricultural vehicle comprises at least one carcass layer connecting the two beads together. A carcass layer comprises reinforcements, or reinforcing elements, coated with a polymeric material comprising an elastomer, obtained by blending, or elastomeric blending. The carcass layer reinforcements are most often made up of textile polymeric materials, such as a polyester, for example. The reinforcements of a carcass layer are substantially parallel to each other and form, with the circumferential direction, an angle of between 85° and 95°.

[0008] The crown reinforcement of a radial tire for an agricultural vehicle comprises a superposition of crown layers extending circumferentially, radially outside the carcass reinforcement. Each crown layer consists of reinforcements coated with an elastomeric mixture and parallel to each other. When the reinforcements of a crown layer form, with the circumferential direction, an angle at most equal to 10°, they are said to be circumferential, or substantially circumferential, and perform a shrinking function limiting the radial deformations of the tire. When the reinforcements of a crown layer form, with the circumferential direction, an angle at least equal to 10° and most often less than 40° but which can go up to 50°, they are called angled reinforcements and have an function of taking up circumferential and transverse forces, parallel to the axial direction, applied to the tire. The top layers are then called working layers. The reinforcements of the crown layers can be constituted by textile polymeric materials, such as a polyester, for example, or by metallic materials, such as steel.

[0009] A tire for an agricultural vehicle is intended to run on various types of ground such as the more or less compact earth of fields, unpaved access paths to fields and the tarred surfaces of roads, sometimes including objects behaving such as indenters, stones, branches, metal fence bars, etc. Given the diversity of use, in the field and on the road, a tire for an agricultural vehicle must present a performance compromise between, in a non-exhaustive way, the traction in the field on soft ground, resistance to tearing, resistance to wear on the road, resistance to progress, vibration comfort on the road, endurance to fatigue due to the number of cycles, mass, impact resistance on various obstacles.

[0010] One of the essential research avenues in a world with limited resources is to reduce the mass of the products used for the manufacture of the tire. Nevertheless, the tires produced must meet the various performance criteria expected by buyers for their uses.

[0011] Given the complexity of agricultural use and the different expected performances, certain innovations in materials are not simply applicable. For example, the use of high tenacity polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is complicated by the difficulty of maintaining the properties obtained by manufacturers of reinforcements in tires after curing and over time and according to the mode of stress (US 2005 /0196610 Al). A high tenacity PET is a PET whose breaking strength relative to its linear mass is greater than 70 cN/tex.

[0012] The inventors have set themselves the objective, for an agricultural tire, of maintaining the endurance of a crown reinforcement to fatigue and resistance to perforation, with a possible drop in this performance of less than 10%, up to at a level at least equivalent to that of a crown reinforcement with at least 4 working layers of textile reinforcement elements, while reducing the number of working layers to reduce the mass of the tire.

[0013] This object has been achieved by a radial tire for a vehicle of the agricultural type, intended to be mounted on a rim with a diameter at least equal to 16 inches and at most equal to 38 inches, and whose load index is at plus equal to 156, comprising:

- A tread intended to come into contact with the ground with an axial width LT and comprising a central part with an axial width LT/2 and two axially outer parts each with an axial width LT/4,

- The two axially outer parts comprising tread blocks with a radial height at least equal to 25 mm, these blocks covering at least 80% of the axial width LT/4 of the axially outer parts of the tread and a thickness circumferential thickness at least equal to 20 mm,

- a crown reinforcement radially inside the tread, composed of 3 working layers, each working layer comprising textile reinforcement elements, parallel to each other coated with a rubbery material and forming angles with the circumferential direction at least equal to 10° and at most equal to 50°,

- the reinforcement elements of the working layers having a tensile strength at least equal to 17.5 daN measured according to the D885/D885M - 10A standard of 2014 comprising at least two high tenacity PET strands with a linear mass at most equal to 125 g per km.

- the angles formed by reinforcement elements of the radially innermost working layer ANT1 and of the radially outermost working layer ANT3 and the circumferential direction having the same orientation and have absolute values at least equal to 10° and at most equal to 22°,

- the angle ANT2 formed by reinforcing elements of the median working layer and the circumferential direction being of opposite sign to the angles ANT1 and ANT3 formed by reinforcing elements respectively of the radially innermost working layer and of the innermost layer radially outermost working surface with the circumferential direction,

- the absolute value of the difference of the oriented angles ANT1, formed by reinforcement elements respectively of the radially innermost working layer and ANT2, formed by reinforcement elements of the median working layer and the circumferential direction, being at least equal to 50°.

The field of application is that of tires for agricultural vehicles intended to be mounted on a rim with a diameter of between 16 and 38 inches. The inflation pressure is less than or equal to 2.4 bars and the maximum authorized load is less than or equal to 4000 kg. For mounting rim diameters or diameter of the bead base greater than 38 inches, the reinforcements used in the state of the art cannot be replaced by those used in the invention.

[0015] The solution works particularly well for agricultural tires with blocks or strips, which are long tread blocks whose axial width is close to the axial half width of the tread. Designing a more compact tread pattern with grooves and blocks of smaller dimension in radial height in particular, would certainly make it possible to find a lighter solution thanks to better heat exchange between the working layers and the outside of the tire and by reducing the flex of the crown at the level of the lugs. Such a pattern would make it possible to reduce the mechanical and thermal stresses for the use of metal cables, for example, but would be less efficient in terms of grip on soft ground.

[0016] The tread blocks of the axially outer parts of the tread of the tires considered by the invention have an axial width at least equal to 80% of the axial width of the axially outer parts of the tread, namely LT/4, LT being the axial width of the tread. By this is meant that the axial distance from the axially outer end of the tread block to its axially inner end is at least equal to 80% of the quarter axial width of the tread. The axial width will be measured, the tire being new and to avoid details of the sidewall, the measurement points will be taken belonging to the block and on its rolling surface.

[0017] For efficient operation on soft ground, the tread height or radial height of the bars or tread block of agricultural tires is at least equal to 25 mm.

[0018] For adequate resistance to tearing of the tread pattern elements and good transmission of engine torque on soft ground, the circumferential thickness of the tread blocks or bars, measured halfway between the tread bottom and the running surface and in the circumferential plane passing through the center of the axially outer parts of the tread, is at least equal to 20 mm. Furthermore, a preferred solution for limiting thermal stresses while maintaining resistance to tearing of the tread elements is for the circumferential thickness of the tread to be at most equal to 80mm. This geometric characteristic of sculpture blocks or barrettes is the most relevant with respect to cracking under thermal stresses of the mixtures located near the axial ends of the working layers. This circumferential distance is the distance over which the tread block or bar influences the operation of the working layers, by the deformations of the working layers that it involves when driving on a ground that is not very deformable and by the thermal insulation vis-à-vis -vis the outside air that it generates especially since, for agricultural use, the tread height is particularly high.

[0019]Under these conditions, for the use in question, for a crown reinforcement comprising less than 4 working layers to have an endurance equivalent to the crown reinforcements with 4 working layers sold on the market, it is essential that the elements of reinforcement of the said working layers have a breaking force, measured according to the designated standard D885/D885M - 10A (2014), which allows, with a weight reduction, to take up an equivalent effort while preserving the endurance of the elastomeric compounds between the reinforcing elements. Furthermore, experience has shown that the reinforcement elements must be composed of at least two strands of PET whose behavior in compression will protect the crown from ruptures.

[0020] High-tenacity PETs are interesting materials for carrying out this type of optimization. For an agricultural application, a reinforcement element with a particularly interesting high tenacity PET in terms of its diameter, is a PET whose tensile strength is at least equal to 17.5 daN, measured according to standard D885/D885M - 10A of 2014, and comprising at least two strands of PET with a linear mass at most equal to 125 g per km.

[0021] On the other hand, the tests, particularly in penetration, have strangely shown that the simple replacement of the reinforcement elements of the state of the art with 4 working layers by reinforcement elements in high tenacity PET for a crown reinforcement presenting an equivalent breaking force, was not sufficient. Probably due to the difficulty in maintaining the properties obtained by the manufacturers of reinforcements in the tires and over time and according to the stresses, if certain performances were in line with the expected, the drop in performance in perforation was between -20% -40% according to the criteria compared to the estimates and tests applied by the tire designers.

[0022] The innovative solution was to balance the angles of the working layers differently so that the middle working layer in particular is stressed differently.

[0023] In a configuration with 3 working layers, it is essential to balance the angles of the reinforcement elements of the three layers in a very particular way. Usually on a 4 working layer top, the working layers are balanced in pairs, one radially inner pair and one radially outer pair. In each pair of working layers, the reinforcing elements of the two layers are crossed with respect to each other with respect to the median circumferential plane, the absolute values of the angles formed with the circumferential direction being of the same value at plus or minus 3° near.

[0024] Certain tires for passenger vehicles or heavy goods vehicles have configurations with 3 crown layers, in particular a configuration with two adjacent working layers, the respective reinforcement elements of which form, with the circumferential direction, opposite angles and close absolute values. , associated with a layer so-called hooping crown whose reinforcing elements form with the circumferential direction an angle at most equal to 10°. This configuration is totally unsuitable for the agricultural tires covered by the invention. The low pressure work accepted for agricultural vehicles, for sculptures of great height, at least equal to 25mm, generates for layers of hooping of the traction-compression cycles too important, so that this solution is effective.

[0025] Another configuration with 3 crown layers known in essentially truck tires, but with metallic reinforcing elements, associates two adjacent working layers whose respective reinforcing elements form, with the circumferential direction, opposite angles and of close absolute values, to a radially innermost so-called triangulation crown layer, the reinforcing elements of which form with the circumferential direction an angle whose absolute value is at least equal to 50°. However, this solution is not suitable for the tires considered by the invention, this triangulation layer working far too much in compression for textile reinforcement elements more suitable for agricultural use, a metal version with 3 crown layers not only make the tire heavier, thus going against the objective of the invention.

[0026] A solution with 3 layers of textile work with high tenacity PET reinforcement elements, arranged as according to the rules of the state of the art, would be offset in durability performance compared to current solutions.

[0027] It is therefore necessary to find an arrangement of the working layers comprising high tenacity PET reinforcing elements, and therefore angles making it possible to solve the technical problem particular to this context. The solution developed is such that the angles ANT1, ANT3 formed by reinforcing elements respectively of the most radially inner working layer and of the most radially outer working layer with the circumferential direction, are at most equal to 22 ° and of the same orientation. It is also necessary that the angle ANT2, formed by reinforcement elements of the middle working layer and the circumferential direction, be of opposite sign to the angles ANT1 and ANT3, and that the absolute value of the difference of the oriented angles ANT1 and ANT2 is at least equal to 50°. This balance of the angles ANT1, ANT2 and ANT3 allows a very good balance of the tensile and compressive stresses in all the reinforcement elements of all the working layers not only in rolling endurance but also in the event of crown perforation. None of the working layers is over-stressed in tension as with a hooping layer or over-stressed in compression as with a triangulation layer. Positioning the central layer crossed with the other two allows a double coupling conducive to the endurance of the summit. The two working layers, the most radially inner and the most radially outer, jointly take up the forces in extension. The orientation chosen for the median working layer allows a balanced absorption of the transverse forces and the compression forces, in particular for road use or work in the fields. It limits bending stresses during crown shocks. The angles which the reinforcing elements of the working layers make with the circumferential direction are measured at the level of the median circumferential plane.

[0028] A preferred solution is for the reinforcing elements of the working layers to consist of two strands of PET, because this material and this architecture make it possible to obtain reinforcing elements that are not very sensitive to compression and of a diameter small enough to gain in thickness of the working layers and therefore in mass.

[0029] For good resistance to compressive forces, it is preferred that each PET strand of the reinforcing elements of the working layers has a linear density at least equal to 100 g per km.

[0030] The preferred solution is a tire in which the reinforcing elements of the 3 working layers are cords consisting of two strands of PET with a linear density of between 100 and 125 g per km, and laid at a pitch of between 0.6mm and 1mm. The laying pitch is the distance measured, perpendicular to two adjacent reinforcement elements of a working layer, between the two centers of these two reinforcement elements.

It is advantageous for the angles formed by the reinforcing elements of the radially innermost working layer ANT1 and of the radially outermost working layer ANT3 and the circumferential direction to be equal to plus or minus 2 degrees for a homogeneous distribution of the forces in these two working layers and to allow standardization of the manufacture of these working layers.

[0032] An advantageous solution is that the reinforcing elements of the working layers are cables consisting of two strands of PET with a linear density of between 105 and 120 g per km, each strand having a breaking strength at least equal to 9 daN and the reinforcement elements being placed according to a pitch of between 0.7 mm and 0.8 mm. The absolute value of G angle ANT1 of the reinforcement elements of the radially innermost working layer with the circumferential direction and the absolute value of the angle ANT3 of the reinforcement elements of the radially outermost working layer with the circumferential direction ANT3 is between 13 and 17°. The angles ANT1 and ANT3 have the same sign and the absolute value of the angle ANT2 of the reinforcing elements of the second radially innermost working layer with the circumferential direction is between 40° and 50°, ANT2 being of opposite sign to ANT1 and ANT3, preferably the absolute value of the angles ANT1 and ANT3 being between 14.5° and 15.5° and the absolute value of the angle ANT2 being between 42.5° and 47.5°. Indeed, this arrangement after numerical simulations and tests has proven to be the best.

The characteristics of the invention are illustrated by the schematic figures let 2 and not shown to scale:

- Figure 1: diagram of a meridian half section of the tire according to the invention

- Figure 2: portion of the tread pattern of the tire according to the invention

[0034] FIG. 1 represents a portion of the crown of the tire according to the invention in a meridian plane YZ passing through the axis of rotation YY' of the tire. The tire 1 for an agricultural vehicle comprises a crown reinforcement 3 radially inside a tread 2 and radially outside a carcass reinforcement 4. The crown reinforcement 3 comprises 3 working layers (31, 32, 33), each comprising textile reinforcement elements composed of two high tenacity PET strands, coated in an elastomeric material, parallel to each other and forming, with a circumferential direction (XX'), an angle A at least equal to 15° (not shown ) and at most equal to 50°. The carcass reinforcement 4 comprises one or more carcass layers comprising textile reinforcement elements coated in an elastomeric material, parallel to each other and forming, with the circumferential direction (XX'), an angle at least equal to 85° and plus equal to 95°. The tread 2 comprises tread blocks 21, here continuous blocks usually called barrettes with a radial height h at least equal to 25mm. The tread has an axial width LT and comprises a central part 23 with an axial width LT/2 and two axially outer parts 24 each with an axial width LT/4. The barrettes or tread blocks have an axial width Lba greater than 0.8* LT/4.

[0035] Figure 2 shows a portion of the tread 2 of a tire for an agricultural vehicle. The tread 2, of an axial width LT, comprises tread blocks 21, in this case bars and hollows 22 allowing good grip on soft ground. The tread blocks 21 on the axially outer parts of the tire have an axial width Lba greater than 80% of LT/4. When driving, the thickness of the bars increasing the thermal stresses, this type of tread generates compression/extension cycles of the reinforcements of the working layers, for which it is advisable to balance the angles particularly well in order to be able to lighten the reinforcement. from top to just 3 layers of work. To resist tearing, the strips have a circumferential thickness ep measured at tread mid-height in the circumferential plane passing through the center of each axially outer part of the tread, at least equal to 20 mm. This thickness also impacts the thermal stresses on this area. The invention has been more particularly implemented for an agricultural tire of size 540/65R28. The tire according to the state of the art comprises 4 working layers, the reinforcement elements of which consist of two PET strands with a linear mass of 144 g per km, a breaking force of 9.7 daN and a tenacity equal to 67.4 cN/tex, the reinforcing elements being arranged at a pitch of 0.95 mm. The angles of the reinforcing elements of the working layers at the level of the median circumferential plane with the circumferential direction, are from the most radially inner layer to the most radially outer -18, 18, -18, 18°. The tread pattern is made up of strips 50 mm in radial height, with a circumferential thickness ep measured in the middle of each axially outer part equal to 50 mm and with an axial width representing 51% of the total width of the tread.

[0037] A first tire was tested using high tenacity PET reinforcement elements with three working layers. Their reinforcement elements are cables made up of two high tenacity PET strands with a linear mass equal to 110 g per km, the reinforcement elements of the working layers being arranged in the working layers according to a pitch equal to 0.75 mm . The PET strand has a breaking force equal to 10 daN, and the reinforcing elements have a breaking force equal to 18 daN. The tenacity of PET is therefore equal to 90 cN/tex. The angles of the reinforcing elements of the working layers at the level of the median circumferential plane with the circumferential direction, are from the most radially interior to the most radially exterior equal to -18, 18, -18.

[0038] This tire enables a gain of 2.4 kg, or 30% on the mass of the working layers and has been tested in endurance. The inventors tested this first tire by comparing the lifespan, from the point of view of the endurance of the crown reinforcement, with that of 1 state of the art. Rolling on a steel flywheel with a diameter of 1.7 m, and at a speed V equal to 15 km/h was carried out for each tire, inflated to a pressure P equal to 260 kPa, namely the nominal pressure increased by 1 bar and subjected to load levels equal to 2600 daN for 24 hours, then 3120 daN for 24 hours then 4160 daN for 24 hours and finally 5200 daN for 328 hours. The tire using the high tenacity PET with a lower mass, achieved an equivalent number of kilometers than the tire according to the state of the art without demonstrating any failure of the reinforcing elements of the working layers.

[0039] On the other hand, the performance of this first tire was tested in terms of impact resistance performance by a test called "breaking energy" (breaking energy) which consists of driving in a steel indenter 38.1 mm in diameter ( 1.5 inches) having a hemispherical end of the same diameter at a speed of 50 mm per minute, the tire being inflated to its nominal pressure of 1.6 bar. The test is stopped when the tire is punctured. The force exerted by the indenter on the tire is measured and a calculation of the deformation energy is made. For the tire tested, the performance is down by -22% with regard to the breaking force of the tire and by -37% with regard to the breaking energy. This variation in performance is much greater than expected perhaps due to the less stable behavior of high performance PET depending on the type of stress.

[0040] A tire according to the invention was then produced by determining a new balance of the stresses on the working layers. The tire is similar to the first tire described containing high tenacity PET but the angles of the working layers ANT1, ANT2 and ANT3 are respectively 15/-45/15. The absolute value of the difference of the oriented angles ANT1 and ANT2 being equal to 60.

[0041] On the rolling endurance test, this tire according to the invention used under the same conditions, achieved an equivalent number of kilometers as the tire according to the state of the art without demonstrating any failure of the reinforcing elements. working layers. Its performance in impact endurance is equivalent on the effort and in very slight reduction of less than -10% on the breaking energy compared to the tire according to the state of the art. This constitutes a performance that is perfectly acceptable for this dimension while allowing a particularly interesting gain in mass.

Claims

1- Radial tire (1) for an agricultural-type vehicle, intended to be mounted on a rim with a diameter at least equal to 16 inches and at most equal to 38 inches, and whose load index is at most equal to 156, including:

- A tread (2) intended to come into contact with the ground with an axial width LT and comprising a central part (23) with an axial width LT/2 and two axially outer parts (24) each of axial width LT/4,

- The two axially outer parts (24) comprising tread blocks with a radial height at least equal to 25 mm, these blocks covering at least 80% of the axial width LT/4 of the axially outer parts (24) of the strip bearing and a circumferential thickness ep at least equal to 20 mm,

- a crown reinforcement (3) radially inside the tread, composed of 3 working layers (31,32,33), each working layer (31, 32, 33) comprising textile reinforcement elements, parallel between them coated with a rubbery material and forming angles with the circumferential direction (XX') at least equal to 10° and at most equal to 50°,

- characterized in that the reinforcing elements of the working layers (31,32,33) have a tensile strength at least equal to 17.5 daN measured according to standard D885 / D885M - 10A of 2014 comprising at least two strands of PET of high tenacity of linear mass at most equal to 125 g per km.

- in that the angles formed by reinforcing elements of the radially innermost working layer (33) ANT1 and of the radially outermost working layer (31) ANT3 and the circumferential direction (XX') have the same orientation and have absolute values at least equal to 10° and at most equal to 22°,

- in that the angle ANT2 formed by reinforcing elements of the median working layer (32) and the circumferential direction has the opposite sign to the angles ANT1 and ANT3 formed by reinforcing elements respectively of the working layer (33 ) the radially innermost and the radially outermost working layer (31) with the circumferential direction (XX'),

- and in that the absolute value of the difference of the oriented angles ANT1, formed by reinforcement elements respectively of the working layer (33) most radially inner and ANT2, formed by reinforcement elements of the middle working layer (32) and the circumferential direction, is at least equal to 50°.

2. A tire according to claim 1 wherein the reinforcing elements of the working layers (31,32,33) consist of two strands of PET.

3. A tire according to claim 2, in which each PET strand of the working layer reinforcement elements (31,32,33) has a linear density at least equal to 100 g per km.

4- A tire according to any one of claims 1 to 3, the crown reinforcement of which is composed of 3 working layers (31,32,33), the reinforcing elements of which are cables consisting of two strands of PET with a linear mass between 100 and 125 g per km, and laid with a pitch between 0.6 mm and 1 mm.

5- A tire according to any one of claims 1 to 4, the angles formed by reinforcement elements of the radially innermost working layer (33) ANT1 and of the radially outermost working layer (31) ANT3 and the circumferential direction (XX') are equal to plus or minus 2 degrees.

6- A tire according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the reinforcing elements of the working layers (31,32,33) are cables consisting of two strands of PET with a linear mass of between 105 and 120 g per km, each strand having a breaking force at least equal to 9 daN and the reinforcement elements being laid according to a pitch of between 0.7 mm and 0.8 mm, the absolute value of the angle ANT1 of the reinforcement elements of the working layer (33) the most radially inner with the circumferential direction (XX') and the absolute value of the angle ANT3 of the reinforcing elements of the working layer (33) the most radially outer with the circumferential direction ANT3 is between 13 and 17°, the angles ANT1 and ANT3 having the same sign and ANT2 being of opposite sign to ANT1 and ANT3, preferably the absolute value of the angles ANT1 and ANT3 being between 14.5° and 15.5° and the absolute value of the angle ANT2 being between 42.5° and 47.5°.