WO2022202171A1 - Driver evaluation device and driver evaluation system - Google Patents

Driver evaluation device and driver evaluation system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2022202171A1
WO2022202171A1 PCT/JP2022/009004 JP2022009004W WO2022202171A1 WO 2022202171 A1 WO2022202171 A1 WO 2022202171A1 JP 2022009004 W JP2022009004 W JP 2022009004W WO 2022202171 A1 WO2022202171 A1 WO 2022202171A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
evaluation
driver
warning
unit
item
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2022/009004
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
宏亮 向後
Original Assignee
矢崎総業株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 矢崎総業株式会社 filed Critical 矢崎総業株式会社
Publication of WO2022202171A1 publication Critical patent/WO2022202171A1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a driver evaluation device and a driver evaluation system.
  • Patent Document 1 a device that counts the number of accelerations and performs economic driving evaluation based on the number of accelerations within a unit travel distance
  • the present invention has been made in view of the circumstances described above, and an object of the present invention is to provide a driver evaluation device and a driver evaluation system capable of giving appropriate driving guidance to the driver during operation.
  • a driver evaluation device is characterized by the following [1] to [5].
  • the evaluation item is at least one of deviation distance from the delivery route, operating time, break time, number of breaks, and arrival time. Must be a driver evaluation device.
  • the evaluation unit calculates the evaluation value of the driver according to the evaluation of the shipper or the recipient.
  • the evaluation unit calculates an item evaluation value for each of the plurality of evaluation items, weights the calculated item evaluation values, and calculates the evaluation value of the driver based on the weighted item evaluation values. calculate, A setting unit that sets the weight, Must be a driver evaluation device.
  • a driver evaluation system comprising an onboard device mounted on a vehicle driven by a driver and a server capable of wireless communication with the onboard device,
  • the vehicle-mounted device includes a driving behavior acquisition unit that acquires the driving behavior of the driver, a first determination unit that determines whether the evaluation item of the driver is within a warning range based on the driving behavior, and the evaluation item. is determined to be within the warning range, and a first warning generation unit that generates a warning, and a second determination unit that determines whether the state in which the evaluation item of the driver is within the warning range continues or intermittently.
  • a second warning generating unit that issues a warning that the evaluation value of the driver is lowered when it is determined that the state in which the evaluation item of the driver falls within the warning range continues or intermittently; a transmitting unit that transmits to the server;
  • the server has an evaluation unit that evaluates the driver based on the driving behavior, and a warning information acquisition unit that acquires warning information indicating whether or not a warning has been issued by the second warning generation unit, The evaluation unit lowers the evaluation of the driver when the second warning generation unit issues a warning.
  • the driver evaluation device and the driver evaluation system having the configurations of [1] and [5] above, a warning is issued when the evaluation item falls within the warning range while the driver is driving, and if the state within the warning range continues or intermittently. A further warning is generated, the evaluation is lowered, and the evaluation is lowered. As a result, it is possible to give appropriate driving guidance to the driver during operation.
  • the evaluation items are at least one of the deviation distance from the delivery route, operating time, break time, number of breaks, and arrival time. As a result, drivers can be instructed to return to the delivery route during operation, instructed to stop driving for long hours, instructed to stop taking long breaks, and instructed to arrive on time.
  • the driver evaluation device having the above configuration [3] it is possible to appropriately evaluate the driver based on the evaluation of the shipper or recipient.
  • the driver evaluation device having the configuration [4] above it is possible to appropriately evaluate the driver based on whether or not the vehicle is operating as scheduled.
  • the present invention it is possible to provide a driver evaluation device and a driver evaluation system that can give appropriate driving guidance to the driver during operation.
  • FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram showing an example of a driver evaluation system as a driver evaluation device of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a configuration diagram showing an example of the device shown in FIG.
  • FIG. 3 is a configuration diagram showing an example of the server shown in FIG.
  • FIG. 4 is a flow chart of the vehicle-mounted device and the server that constitute the driver evaluation system shown in FIG.
  • FIG. 5 is a table showing an example of evaluation items requested by the server shown in FIG.
  • FIG. 6 is a table showing an example of evaluation for the evaluation items shown in FIG.
  • FIG. 7 is a radar chart showing an example of evaluation performed by the server shown in FIG.
  • the driver evaluation system 1 of this embodiment is a system that evaluates a driver who drives a truck 10 (delivery vehicle) that delivers packages.
  • the driver evaluation system 1 includes a device (vehicle-mounted device) 2 mounted on a truck 10 which is an example of a delivery vehicle, a server 3 capable of communicating with the device 2 via an Internet communication network 11, A server 3 and terminals 4 to 6 capable of communicating via an Internet communication network 11 are provided.
  • the device 2 includes an Internet communication section 21, a GPS communication section 22, an external connection terminal 23, a CAN interface (I/F) 24, and a control section 25, as shown in FIG.
  • the Internet communication unit 21 is composed of a circuit, an antenna, and the like for connecting to the Internet communication network 11 .
  • the GPS communication unit 22 receives radio waves oscillated from a plurality of GPS (Global Positioning System) satellites, obtains the current position, and outputs the current position to the control unit 25, which will be described later.
  • External devices such as the display unit 30 and the speaker 40 are connected to the external connection terminal 23 .
  • the display unit 30 displays a warning or the like to the driver.
  • a speaker 40 outputs a warning sound or the like to the driver.
  • a CAN interface (I/F) 24 is provided for connection to a CAN (Controller Area Network) bus in the vehicle.
  • the device 2 can acquire the speed, G value (acceleration), and engine speed of the truck 10 from CAN by performing CAN communication.
  • the device 2 utilizes the GPS information (current position and time) acquired from the GPS communication unit 22, the control unit 25 of the device 2 converts the GPS information, and acquires the speed and G value (acceleration) of the truck 10. You may make it Further, the G value may be obtained by incorporating a G sensor in the device 2 and acquiring the G value from the incorporated G sensor.
  • the control unit 25 includes memories such as RAM (Random Access Memory) and ROM (Read Only Memory), for example, and is composed of a CPU (Central Processing Unit) that operates according to a program, and controls the vehicle-mounted device 2 as a whole.
  • the control unit 25 periodically obtains the current position from the GPS communication unit 22 and transmits it to the server 3 . Further, the control unit 25 periodically acquires the speed, G value, and engine speed from the CANI/F 24 and transmits them to the server 3 .
  • the server 3 has an Internet communication unit 31, a database (DB) 32, and a control unit 33, as shown in FIG.
  • the Internet communication unit 31 is composed of a circuit and the like for connecting to the Internet communication network 11.
  • the DB 32 records position information, speed, G value, history of engine rotation speed, etc. periodically transmitted from the vehicle-mounted device 2 .
  • the control unit 33 includes a memory such as a RAM and a ROM, and is composed of a CPU that operates according to a program, and controls the server 3 as a whole.
  • the terminals 4 to 6 are composed of, for example, PCs, smartphones, etc., and communicate with the server 3 via the Internet communication network 11.
  • Terminal 4 is a terminal owned by a consignor.
  • the terminal 5 is owned by the recipient of the parcel.
  • Terminal 6 is a terminal owned by a delivery company.
  • the control unit 25 of the device 2 functions as a driving behavior acquisition unit, and periodically detects the current position, speed, G value, and engine rotation from the GPS communication unit 22 and CANI/F 24. number (driving behavior) is acquired (S1).
  • the device 2 functions as a first determination unit and determines whether each evaluation item is within the warning range based on these driving behaviors (S2).
  • the device 2 determines that the route deviation is within the warning range when the deviation distance between the predetermined delivery route and the current position of the truck 10 is greater than or equal to the deviation warning distance. Specifically, the device 2 sets a geofence within a deviation warning distance from a predetermined delivery route, and determines whether or not the current position of the truck is within the geofence.
  • the device 2 determines whether the driver is driving based on the history of the current position. 00-6:00). The device 2 determines that the operating time is within the warning range unless it is within the travelable time. The device 2 determines whether or not the driver is stopped based on the history of the current position, the on/off state of the ignition switch, speed, engine speed, etc. The time from when it is determined that the vehicle is not stopped is counted as the stop time. The device 2 determines that the break is within the warning range when the stop time exceeds the stop warning time.
  • the arrival time is within the warning range. I judge.
  • the device 2 obtains deceleration and acceleration based on the speed history, and if the obtained deceleration and acceleration exceed the warning value, it determines that the sudden deceleration and sudden acceleration are within the warning range. .
  • the device 2 determines that sharp turns and impacts are within the warning range when the G value in the rotational direction and the G value in the vertical direction of the truck 10 exceed the warning values.
  • the device 2 determines that the speed is in the warning range when the speed exceeds the warning value.
  • the device 2 determines that the evaluation item is not within the warning range (N in S2), it proceeds to S5. On the other hand, when the device 2 determines that the evaluation item is within the warning range (Y in S2), it determines whether or not the first warning has occurred (S3). If the first warning has not been generated (N in S3), the device 2 functions as a first warning generator and generates the first warning using the display section 30 and the speaker 40 (S4). In case of warning of route deviation, the device 2 generates a warning to guide the delivery route back. When generating an alert about working hours, the device 2 generates an alert instructing you to take a rest.
  • the device 2 When issuing a warning about a break, the device 2 issues a warning instructing the driver to stop taking a break and start driving the truck 10 . In the case of generating a warning about the arrival time, the device 2 generates a warning instructing the user to quickly go to the receiving place or the destination because the arrival time has passed.
  • the device 2 When warning about sudden deceleration, sudden acceleration, sharp turning, impact, or overspeeding, the device 2 warns the user to avoid sudden acceleration, sudden deceleration, sharp turning, overspeeding, and to avoid applying impact. generate. After generating the first warning (S4), the device 2 proceeds to S5.
  • the device 2 determines whether the state in which the evaluation item is within the warning range continues or intermittently. More specifically, the device 2 detects whether the route deviation, operating time, rest, and speeding are within the warning range for a predetermined time or longer, and the arrival warning distance from the receiving place or destination even after the arrival time. Whether the state of being separated from the vehicle continues for the second arrival warning time, which is longer than the first arrival warning time. determine whether or not
  • the device 2 proceeds to S5.
  • the device 2 functions as a second warning generation unit and uses the display unit 30 and the speaker 40 to perform evaluation. After generating a second warning to lower the value (S7), the process proceeds to S5.
  • the device 2 determines whether or not the truck 10 has arrived at a predetermined destination such as a receiving place or a transit point for the cargo, and has completed one operation. If the service has not ended (N in S5), the device 2 returns to S1. If the operation has ended (Y in S5), the device 2 functions as a transmission unit and transmits the collected data of the current position, speed, G value, and number of revolutions collected during one operation to the server 3 (S8 ).
  • the server 3 receives collected data from the device 2 (S11). Also, the server 3 functions as a receiving unit, communicates with the terminals 4 and 5, and receives the evaluations of the consignor and the consignee (S12). After that, the server 3 evaluates the driver in one trip with respect to the evaluation items shown in FIG. 5 based on the collected data (S13). There are four types of evaluation: fixed hours, quality, safety, and economy. The fixed time system is a comprehensive evaluation value calculated based on four evaluation items: route deviation, operating time, rest, and arrival time. An example of part-time evaluation will be described. In this embodiment, the server 3 performs evaluation by a point deduction method, and does not deduct points when the first warning is generated.
  • the server 3 calculates a total evaluation score by adding a value obtained by multiplying the score obtained by subtracting the score from the full score by the method described above by a predetermined weight for each evaluation item. That is, the server 3 calculates the total evaluation score of the part-time system by the following formula (1). (full points - deduction for route deviation) x weight for route deviation + (full points - deduction for working hours) x weight for working hours + (full points - deduction for breaks) x weight for breaks + (full points - receiving) Points deduction for time of arrival at location) x Weight of time of arrival at receiving location + (Full score - Deduction of points for time of arrival at destination) x Weight of time of arrival at destination ... (1)
  • the server 3 functions as a setting unit, and can freely set the weight according to the wishes of the shipping company. A large weight can be set for evaluation items that the transportation company considers important.
  • Quality is a comprehensive evaluation value calculated based on two evaluation items: cargo damage and quantity.
  • Cargo damage is a comprehensive evaluation value calculated based on six evaluation items: sudden deceleration, sudden acceleration, sudden turning, impact, shipper evaluation, and consignee evaluation.
  • the shipper evaluation is an evaluation of the loading state of the cargo mounted on the truck 10 by the shipper.
  • the shipper evaluation for example, the shipper can select and evaluate from three ranks of dangerous, normal, and polite.
  • the consignee rating is the consignee's assessment of the condition of the received package.
  • the consignee evaluation for example, the consignee can select and evaluate from three ranks of serious, normal, and beautiful.
  • a quantity consignee rating is a consignee's rating of the quantity of a package.
  • the consignee can select and evaluate from two ranks, i.e., according to the order and below the order.
  • the server 3 adds the value obtained by multiplying the score of each evaluation item by a weight as in the case of the part-time system, and calculates the overall quality evaluation score.
  • Safety is a comprehensive evaluation value calculated based on five evaluation items: sudden deceleration, sudden acceleration, sudden turns, drinking, and speeding.
  • Economy is a comprehensive evaluation calculated based on two evaluation items, fuel efficiency and vehicle body damage. Fuel efficiency is determined from engine speed and speed, and the better the fuel efficiency, the higher the evaluation.
  • the vehicle body damage is a comprehensive evaluation of three evaluation items: sudden deceleration, sudden acceleration, and impact.
  • the server 3 When the server 3 evaluates one trip, it sends the evaluation result to the delivery company's terminal 6 in association with the driver's ID. Upon receiving the evaluation result, the terminal 6 displays the evaluation result. At this time, as shown in FIG. 7, a radar chart for each item of fixed hours, quality, safety, and economy may be displayed so that the driver's evaluation can be easily understood.
  • the device 2 issues a warning when the evaluation item falls within the warning range while the driver is driving, and further issues a warning when the state within the warning range continues or intermittently, and returns the evaluation value. Issue a warning to lower and lower the evaluation value. As a result, it is possible to give appropriate driving guidance to the driver during operation.
  • the evaluation items include deviation distance from the delivery route, operating time, break time, number of breaks, and arrival time.
  • drivers can be instructed to return to the delivery route during operation, instructed to stop driving for long hours, instructed to stop taking long breaks, and instructed to arrive on time.
  • the server 3 calculates the evaluation value of the driver according to the evaluation received from the shipper and recipient. Accordingly, the driver can be properly evaluated based on the shipper's or recipient's evaluation.
  • the server 3 calculates the driver's evaluation based on the distance to the receiving place or destination at the estimated arrival time. Accordingly, it is possible to appropriately evaluate the driver based on whether or not the vehicle operates as scheduled.
  • the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and can be modified, improved, etc. as appropriate.
  • the material, shape, size, number, location, etc. of each component in the above-described embodiment are arbitrary and not limited as long as the present invention can be achieved.
  • the device 2 collectively transmits collected data on driving behavior to the server 3 each time one operation is completed, but the present invention is not limited to this.
  • the device 2 may transmit to the server 3 collected driving behavior data collected during each predetermined period of time while the vehicle is in operation.
  • the device 2 determines whether the evaluation item is within the warning range from the driving behavior, but it is not limited to this.
  • the driving behavior may be transmitted from the device 2 to the server 3, and the server 3 may determine from these driving behaviors whether the evaluation item is within the warning range.
  • a first warning generator (26) that generates a warning when the driver's evaluation item falls within the warning range
  • a second warning generation unit (26) that issues a warning to the effect that the evaluation value of the driver calculated based on the evaluation item will be lowered if the state in which the evaluation item falls within the warning range continues or intermittently
  • An evaluation unit (33) that reduces the evaluation value of the driver when the second warning generation unit (26) issues a warning, Driver evaluation device (1).
  • the evaluation item is at least one of deviation distance from the delivery route, operating time, break time, number of breaks, and arrival time.
  • Driver evaluation device (1) [3] In the driver evaluation device (1) according to [1] or [2], A receiving unit (33) for receiving the evaluation of the shipper or recipient, The evaluation unit (33) calculates the evaluation value of the driver according to the evaluation of the shipper or the recipient.
  • Driver evaluation device (1) [4] In the driver evaluation device (1) according to any one of [1] to [3], The evaluation unit (33) calculates an item evaluation value for each of the plurality of evaluation items, weights the calculated item evaluation values, and performs the evaluation of the driver based on the weighted item evaluation values.
  • a driver evaluation system (1) comprising an onboard device (2) mounted on a vehicle driven by a driver and a server (3) capable of wireless communication with the onboard device (2),
  • the vehicle-mounted device (2) includes a driving behavior acquisition unit (26) that acquires the driving behavior of the driver, and a first determination that determines whether the evaluation item of the driver is within a warning range based on the driving behavior.
  • a first warning generation unit (26) for generating a warning when the evaluation item is determined to be within the warning range; and a state in which the evaluation item of the driver is within the warning range continues or intermittently.
  • a second determination unit (26) for determining whether or not the driver's evaluation item is in the warning range, and when it is determined that the state in which the driver's evaluation item falls within the warning range continues or intermittently, the driver's evaluation value is lowered.
  • a transmission unit (26) for transmitting the driving behavior to the server,
  • the server (3) has an evaluation unit (33) that evaluates the driver based on the driving behavior, and a warning that acquires warning information indicating whether or not a warning has been issued by the second warning generating unit (26). an information acquisition unit (33), The evaluation unit (33) lowers the evaluation of the driver when the second warning generation unit (26) warns.
  • Driver Evaluation System (1) The evaluation unit (33) that evaluates the driver based on the driving behavior, and a warning that acquires warning information indicating whether or not a warning has been issued by the second warning generating unit (26).
  • the present invention it is possible to provide a driver evaluation device and a driver evaluation system that can give appropriate driving guidance to the driver during operation.
  • INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The present invention is useful for driver evaluation devices and driver evaluation systems.
  • Driver evaluation system (driver evaluation device) 2 Device (in-vehicle device) 3 server 25 control unit (first warning generation unit, second warning generation unit, driving behavior detection unit, first determination unit, second determination unit) 33 control unit (evaluation unit, reception unit, warning information acquisition unit)

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

A device (2) detects the driving behavior of a driver, and issues a warning upon determining, on the basis of the detected driving behavior, that an evaluated criterion for the driver falls into a warning range. In addition, the device (2) issues a warning which lowers the evaluation of the driver upon determining that a state in which an evaluated criterion is in the warning range continues or occurs intermittently. A server (3) receives the driving behavior from the device (2), and lowers the evaluation of the driver upon determining that a second warning has been issued on the basis of the received driving behavior.

Description

ドライバ評価装置及びドライバ評価システムDriver evaluation device and driver evaluation system
　本発明は、ドライバ評価装置及びドライバ評価システム、に関する。 The present invention relates to a driver evaluation device and a driver evaluation system.
　上述したドライバ評価装置として、加速回数を計数し、単位走行距離内における加速回数により経済運転評価を行うものが提案されている（特許文献１）。 As the driver evaluation device described above, there has been proposed a device that counts the number of accelerations and performs economic driving evaluation based on the number of accelerations within a unit travel distance (Patent Document 1).
日本国特開２００２－３６４４００号公報Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2002-364400
　従来のドライバ評価装置は、運行が終了した後、評価を行ってドライバに対して運転指導を行うものである。このため、運行中にドライバの運転指導を適切に行うことができない、という問題があった。 　Conventional driver evaluation devices evaluate and give driving guidance to the driver after the operation is completed. Therefore, there is a problem that it is not possible to appropriately give driving guidance to the driver during operation.
　本発明は、上述した事情に鑑みてなされたものであり、その目的は、運行中にドライバに対して適切な運転指導を行うことができるドライバ評価装置及びドライバ評価システムを提供することにある。 The present invention has been made in view of the circumstances described above, and an object of the present invention is to provide a driver evaluation device and a driver evaluation system capable of giving appropriate driving guidance to the driver during operation.
　前述した目的を達成するために、本発明に係るドライバ評価装置は、下記［１］～［５］を特徴としている。
［１］
　ドライバの評価項目が警告範囲になると、警告を発生する第１警告発生部と、
　前記評価項目が前記警告範囲となる状態が継続又は断続すると、前記評価項目に基づいて算出する前記ドライバの評価値を下げる旨の警告を行う第２警告発生部と、
　前記第２警告発生部が警告を行った場合、前記ドライバの評価値を下げる評価部と、を備えた、
　ドライバ評価装置であること。
［２］
　［１］に記載のドライバ評価装置において、
　前記評価項目は、配送ルートからの逸脱距離、稼働時刻、休憩時間、休憩回数、到着時間の少なくとも１つである、
　ドライバ評価装置であること。
［３］
　［１］又は［２］に記載のドライバ評価装置において、
　荷主又は受取人の評価を受信する受信部を備え、
　前記評価部は、前記荷主又は前記受取人の評価に応じて前記ドライバの評価値を算出する、
　ドライバ評価装置であること。
［４］
　［１］～［３］の何れか１項に記載のドライバ評価装置において、
　前記評価部は、複数の前記評価項目毎に項目評価値を算出し、算出した前記項目評価値に重みづけを行い、重みづけを行った前記項目評価値に基づいて前記ドライバの前記評価値を算出し、
　前記重みを設定する設定部を備えた、
　ドライバ評価装置であること。
［５］
　ドライバが運転する車両に搭載された車載器と、前記車載器と無線通信可能なサーバと、を備えたドライバ評価システムであって、
　前記車載器は、前記ドライバの運転挙動を取得する運転挙動取得部と、前記運転挙動に基づいて前記ドライバの評価項目が警告範囲であるか否かを判定する第１判定部と、前記評価項目が警告範囲であると判定されたとき、警告を発生する第１警告発生部と、前記ドライバの評価項目が前記警告範囲となる状態が継続又は断続しているか否かを判定する第２判定部と、前記ドライバの評価項目が前記警告範囲となる状態が継続又は断続していると判定されたとき、前記ドライバの評価値を下げる旨の警告を行う第２警告発生部と、前記運転挙動を前記サーバに送信する送信部と、を有し、
　前記サーバが、前記運転挙動に基づいて前記ドライバの評価を行う評価部と、前記第２警告発生部による警告が行われた否かの警告情報を取得する警告情報取得部と、を有し、
　前記評価部は、前記第２警告発生部が警告を行った場合、前記ドライバの評価を下げる、
　ドライバ評価システムであること。 In order to achieve the above object, a driver evaluation device according to the present invention is characterized by the following [1] to [5].
[1]
a first warning generator that generates a warning when the driver evaluation item falls within the warning range;
a second warning generation unit that issues a warning to the effect that, if the evaluation item continues or intermittently falls within the warning range, the evaluation value of the driver calculated based on the evaluation item is lowered;
an evaluation unit that reduces the evaluation value of the driver when the second warning generation unit issues a warning,
Must be a driver evaluation device.
[2]
In the driver evaluation device according to [1],
The evaluation item is at least one of deviation distance from the delivery route, operating time, break time, number of breaks, and arrival time.
Must be a driver evaluation device.
[3]
In the driver evaluation device according to [1] or [2],
comprising a receiving unit for receiving the shipper's or recipient's evaluation,
The evaluation unit calculates the evaluation value of the driver according to the evaluation of the shipper or the recipient.
Must be a driver evaluation device.
[4]
In the driver evaluation device according to any one of [1] to [3],
The evaluation unit calculates an item evaluation value for each of the plurality of evaluation items, weights the calculated item evaluation values, and calculates the evaluation value of the driver based on the weighted item evaluation values. calculate,
A setting unit that sets the weight,
Must be a driver evaluation device.
[5]
A driver evaluation system comprising an onboard device mounted on a vehicle driven by a driver and a server capable of wireless communication with the onboard device,
The vehicle-mounted device includes a driving behavior acquisition unit that acquires the driving behavior of the driver, a first determination unit that determines whether the evaluation item of the driver is within a warning range based on the driving behavior, and the evaluation item. is determined to be within the warning range, and a first warning generation unit that generates a warning, and a second determination unit that determines whether the state in which the evaluation item of the driver is within the warning range continues or intermittently. a second warning generating unit that issues a warning that the evaluation value of the driver is lowered when it is determined that the state in which the evaluation item of the driver falls within the warning range continues or intermittently; a transmitting unit that transmits to the server;
The server has an evaluation unit that evaluates the driver based on the driving behavior, and a warning information acquisition unit that acquires warning information indicating whether or not a warning has been issued by the second warning generation unit,
The evaluation unit lowers the evaluation of the driver when the second warning generation unit issues a warning.
Be a driver evaluation system.
　上記［１］及び［５］の構成のドライバ評価装置及びドライバ評価システムによれば、ドライバの運行中、評価項目が警告範囲になると警告を発生し、さらに警告範囲になる状態が継続又は断続するとさらに警告を発生して、評価を下げる警告を行い、評価を下げる。これにより、運行中にドライバに対して適切な運転指導を行うことができる。
　上記［２］の構成のドライバ評価装置によれば、評価項目は、配送ルートからの逸脱距離、稼働時刻、休憩時間、休憩回数、到着時間の少なくとも１つである。これにより、運行中にドライバに対して配送ルートに戻るよう指導したり、長時間運転をやめるよう指導したり、長時間休息を取るのをやめるよう指導したり、到着時間を守るように指導したり、することができる。
　上記［３］の構成のドライバ評価装置によれば、荷主又は受取人の評価に基づいてドライバを適切に評価することができる。
　上記［４］の構成のドライバ評価装置によれば、運行予定通りの運行をしているか否かによりドライバを適切に評価することができる。 According to the driver evaluation device and the driver evaluation system having the configurations of [1] and [5] above, a warning is issued when the evaluation item falls within the warning range while the driver is driving, and if the state within the warning range continues or intermittently. A further warning is generated, the evaluation is lowered, and the evaluation is lowered. As a result, it is possible to give appropriate driving guidance to the driver during operation.
According to the driver evaluation device having the above configuration [2], the evaluation items are at least one of the deviation distance from the delivery route, operating time, break time, number of breaks, and arrival time. As a result, drivers can be instructed to return to the delivery route during operation, instructed to stop driving for long hours, instructed to stop taking long breaks, and instructed to arrive on time. can be
According to the driver evaluation device having the above configuration [3], it is possible to appropriately evaluate the driver based on the evaluation of the shipper or recipient.
According to the driver evaluation device having the configuration [4] above, it is possible to appropriately evaluate the driver based on whether or not the vehicle is operating as scheduled.
　本発明によれば、運行中にドライバに対して適切な運転指導を行うことができるドライバ評価装置及びドライバ評価システムを提供することができる。 According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a driver evaluation device and a driver evaluation system that can give appropriate driving guidance to the driver during operation.
　以上、本発明について簡潔に説明した。更に、以下に説明される発明を実施するための形態（以下、「実施形態」という。）を添付の図面を参照して通読することにより、本発明の詳細は更に明確化されるであろう。 The above is a brief description of the present invention. Furthermore, the details of the present invention will be further clarified by reading the following detailed description of the invention (hereinafter referred to as "embodiment") with reference to the accompanying drawings. .
図１は、本発明のドライバ評価装置としてのドライバ評価システムの一例を示す構成図である。FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram showing an example of a driver evaluation system as a driver evaluation device of the present invention. 図２は、図１に示すデバイスの一例を示す構成図である。FIG. 2 is a configuration diagram showing an example of the device shown in FIG. 図３は、図１に示すサーバの一例を示す構成図である。FIG. 3 is a configuration diagram showing an example of the server shown in FIG. 図４は、図１に示すドライバ評価システムを構成する車載器及びサーバのフローチャートである。FIG. 4 is a flow chart of the vehicle-mounted device and the server that constitute the driver evaluation system shown in FIG. 図５は、図１に示すサーバが求める評価項目の一例を示す表である。FIG. 5 is a table showing an example of evaluation items requested by the server shown in FIG. 図６は、図５に示す評価項目についての評価の一例を示す表である。FIG. 6 is a table showing an example of evaluation for the evaluation items shown in FIG. 図７は、図１に示すサーバが行った評価の一例を示すレーダーチャートである。FIG. 7 is a radar chart showing an example of evaluation performed by the server shown in FIG.
　本発明に関する具体的な実施形態について、各図を参照しながら以下に説明する。 A specific embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to each drawing.
　本実施形態のドライバ評価システム１は、荷物の配送を行うトラック１０（配送車）を運転するドライバを評価するシステムである。同図に示すように、ドライバ評価システム１は、配送車の一例であるトラック１０に搭載されたデバイス（車載器）２と、デバイス２とインターネット通信網１１を介して通信可能なサーバ３と、サーバ３とインターネット通信網１１を介して通信可能な端末４～６と、を備えている。 The driver evaluation system 1 of this embodiment is a system that evaluates a driver who drives a truck 10 (delivery vehicle) that delivers packages. As shown in the figure, the driver evaluation system 1 includes a device (vehicle-mounted device) 2 mounted on a truck 10 which is an example of a delivery vehicle, a server 3 capable of communicating with the device 2 via an Internet communication network 11, A server 3 and terminals 4 to 6 capable of communicating via an Internet communication network 11 are provided.
　デバイス２は、図２に示すように、インターネット通信部２１と、ＧＰＳ通信部２２と、外部接続端子２３と、ＣＡＮインタフェース（Ｉ／Ｆ）２４と、制御部２５と、を備えている。インターネット通信部２１は、インターネット通信網１１に接続するための回路やアンテナなどで構成されている。ＧＰＳ通信部２２は、周知のように複数のＧＰＳ(Global Positioning System)衛星から発振される電波を受信して、現在位置を求めて後述する制御部２５に出力する。外部接続端子２３には、表示部３０やスピーカ４０などの外部機器が接続されている。表示部３０には、ドライバに対する警告などを表示する。スピーカ４０は、ドライバに対する警告音などを出力する。 The device 2 includes an Internet communication section 21, a GPS communication section 22, an external connection terminal 23, a CAN interface (I/F) 24, and a control section 25, as shown in FIG. The Internet communication unit 21 is composed of a circuit, an antenna, and the like for connecting to the Internet communication network 11 . As is well known, the GPS communication unit 22 receives radio waves oscillated from a plurality of GPS (Global Positioning System) satellites, obtains the current position, and outputs the current position to the control unit 25, which will be described later. External devices such as the display unit 30 and the speaker 40 are connected to the external connection terminal 23 . The display unit 30 displays a warning or the like to the driver. A speaker 40 outputs a warning sound or the like to the driver.
　ＣＡＮインタフェース（Ｉ／Ｆ）２４は、車内のＣＡＮ（Controller Area Network）バスに接続するために設けられている。デバイス２は、ＣＡＮ通信を行うことにより、ＣＡＮからトラック１０の速度、Ｇ値（加速度）、エンジン回転数を取得できる。なお、本実施形態では、ＣＡＮ通信により、デバイス２が、トラック１０の速度、Ｇ値（加速度）、を取得する例について説明するが、これに限ったものではない。デバイス２は、ＧＰＳ通信部２２から取得されるＧＰＳ情報（現在位置、時間）を活用し、デバイス２の制御部２５がＧＰＳ情報を変換して、トラック１０の速度、Ｇ値（加速度）を取得するようにしてもよい。また、Ｇ値については、デバイス２内にＧセンサを内蔵し、内蔵したＧセンサから取得するようにしてもよい。 A CAN interface (I/F) 24 is provided for connection to a CAN (Controller Area Network) bus in the vehicle. The device 2 can acquire the speed, G value (acceleration), and engine speed of the truck 10 from CAN by performing CAN communication. In this embodiment, an example in which the device 2 acquires the speed and G value (acceleration) of the truck 10 through CAN communication will be described, but the present invention is not limited to this. The device 2 utilizes the GPS information (current position and time) acquired from the GPS communication unit 22, the control unit 25 of the device 2 converts the GPS information, and acquires the speed and G value (acceleration) of the truck 10. You may make it Further, the G value may be obtained by incorporating a G sensor in the device 2 and acquiring the G value from the incorporated G sensor.
　制御部２５は、例えばＲＡＭ(Random Access Memory)やＲＯＭ(Read Only Memory)などのメモリを備え、プログラムに従って動作するＣＰＵ(Central Processing Unit)で構成され、車載器２全体の制御を司る。制御部２５は、定期的にＧＰＳ通信部２２から現在位置を求めてサーバ３に送信する。また、制御部２５は、ＣＡＮＩ／Ｆ２４から定期的に速度、Ｇ値、エンジン回転数を取得してサーバ３に送信する。 The control unit 25 includes memories such as RAM (Random Access Memory) and ROM (Read Only Memory), for example, and is composed of a CPU (Central Processing Unit) that operates according to a program, and controls the vehicle-mounted device 2 as a whole. The control unit 25 periodically obtains the current position from the GPS communication unit 22 and transmits it to the server 3 . Further, the control unit 25 periodically acquires the speed, G value, and engine speed from the CANI/F 24 and transmits them to the server 3 .
　サーバ３は、図３に示すように、インターネット通信部３１と、データベース（ＤＢ）３２と、制御部３３と、を有している。 The server 3 has an Internet communication unit 31, a database (DB) 32, and a control unit 33, as shown in FIG.
　インターネット通信部３１は、インターネット通信網１１に接続するための回路などで構成されている。ＤＢ３２は、車載器２から定期的に送信される位置情報、速度、Ｇ値、エンジン回転数の履歴などが記録される。制御部３３は、例えばＲＡＭやＲＯＭなどのメモリを備え、プログラムに従って動作するＣＰＵで構成され、サーバ３全体の制御を司る。 The Internet communication unit 31 is composed of a circuit and the like for connecting to the Internet communication network 11. The DB 32 records position information, speed, G value, history of engine rotation speed, etc. periodically transmitted from the vehicle-mounted device 2 . The control unit 33 includes a memory such as a RAM and a ROM, and is composed of a CPU that operates according to a program, and controls the server 3 as a whole.
　端末４～６は、例えばＰＣやスマートフォンなどから構成され、インターネット通信網１１を介してサーバ３と通信する。端末４は、荷主が所有する端末である。端末５は、荷物の受取人が所有する端末である。端末６は、配送業者が所有する端末である。 The terminals 4 to 6 are composed of, for example, PCs, smartphones, etc., and communicate with the server 3 via the Internet communication network 11. Terminal 4 is a terminal owned by a consignor. The terminal 5 is owned by the recipient of the parcel. Terminal 6 is a terminal owned by a delivery company.
　次に、上述した構成のドライバ評価システム１の動作について図４を参照して説明する。まず、デバイス２の制御部２５（以下、「デバイス２」と略記）は、運転挙動取得部として機能し、定期的にＧＰＳ通信部２２やＣＡＮＩ／Ｆ２４から現在位置、速度、Ｇ値、エンジン回転数（運転挙動）を取得する（Ｓ１）。デバイス２は、第１判定部として機能し、これら運転挙動に基づいて各評価項目が警告範囲内であるか否かを判定する（Ｓ２）。 Next, the operation of the driver evaluation system 1 configured as described above will be described with reference to FIG. First, the control unit 25 of the device 2 (hereinafter abbreviated as “device 2”) functions as a driving behavior acquisition unit, and periodically detects the current position, speed, G value, and engine rotation from the GPS communication unit 22 and CANI/F 24. number (driving behavior) is acquired (S1). The device 2 functions as a first determination unit and determines whether each evaluation item is within the warning range based on these driving behaviors (S2).
　評価項目としては、例えば、図５に示すものが考えられる。デバイス２が、ドライバの運行中に警告範囲内になったか否かを判定する評価項目としては、ルート逸脱、稼働時刻、休憩、到着時間、急減速（＝急ブレーキ）、急加速、急旋回、衝撃、速度超過がある。 For example, the items shown in Fig. 5 can be considered as evaluation items. Evaluation items for determining whether or not the device 2 is within the warning range while the driver is driving include route deviation, operating time, break, arrival time, sudden deceleration (= sudden braking), sudden acceleration, sudden turning, There is an impact and excessive speed.
　ルート逸脱についてデバイス２は、予め定められた配送ルートとトラック１０の現在位置との逸脱距離が逸脱警告距離以上離れていると、ルート逸脱が警告範囲にあると判定する。具体的には、デバイス２は、予め定めた配送ルートからの距離が逸脱警告距離以内となるジオフェンスを設定し、ジオフェンス内にトラックの現在位置があるか否かによって判定する。 Regarding route deviation, the device 2 determines that the route deviation is within the warning range when the deviation distance between the predetermined delivery route and the current position of the truck 10 is greater than or equal to the deviation warning distance. Specifically, the device 2 sets a geofence within a deviation warning distance from a predetermined delivery route, and determines whether or not the current position of the truck is within the geofence.
　稼働時刻についてデバイス２は、現在位置の履歴に基づいてドライバが運転中であるか否かを判定し、運転中であると判定した場合、現在時刻が予め定めた走行可能時刻内（例えば15：00-6：00）であるか否か判定する。デバイス２は、走行可能時刻内でなければ、稼働時刻が警告範囲にあると判定する。休憩についてデバイス２は、現在位置の履歴や、イグニッションスイッチのオンオフ状態、速度、エンジン回転数などに基づいてドライバが停車中であるか否かを判定し、停車中の状態が所定時間以上継続してから停車中でないと判定されるまでの時間を停車時間としてカウントする。デバイス２は、停車時間が停車警告時間を超えると休憩が警告範囲にあると判定する。 Regarding the operation time, the device 2 determines whether the driver is driving based on the history of the current position. 00-6:00). The device 2 determines that the operating time is within the warning range unless it is within the travelable time. The device 2 determines whether or not the driver is stopped based on the history of the current position, the on/off state of the ignition switch, speed, engine speed, etc. The time from when it is determined that the vehicle is not stopped is counted as the stop time. The device 2 determines that the break is within the warning range when the stop time exceeds the stop warning time.
　到着時間についてデバイス２は、予め定められた到着時間を過ぎても荷受場所や目的地から到着警告距離以上離れた状態が、第１到着警告時間継続している場合、到着時間が警告範囲にあると判定する。 About the arrival time When the device 2 continues to be at the arrival warning distance or more from the receiving place or the destination even after the predetermined arrival time has passed for the first arrival warning time, the arrival time is within the warning range. I judge.
　急減速、急加速についてデバイス２は、速度の履歴に基づいて減速度、加速度を求めて、求めた減速度、加速度が警告値を超えると、急減速、急加速が警告範囲にあると判定する。急旋回、衝撃についてデバイス２は、トラック１０の回転方向のＧ値、上下方向のＧ値が警告値を超えると、急旋回、衝撃が警告範囲にあると判定する。速度超過についてデバイス２は、速度が警告値を超えると、速度が警告範囲にあると判定する。 Sudden Deceleration and Sudden Acceleration The device 2 obtains deceleration and acceleration based on the speed history, and if the obtained deceleration and acceleration exceed the warning value, it determines that the sudden deceleration and sudden acceleration are within the warning range. . Regarding sharp turns and impacts, the device 2 determines that sharp turns and impacts are within the warning range when the G value in the rotational direction and the G value in the vertical direction of the truck 10 exceed the warning values. For overspeeding, the device 2 determines that the speed is in the warning range when the speed exceeds the warning value.
　デバイス２は、評価項目が警告範囲でないと判定すると（Ｓ２でＮ）、Ｓ５に進む。一方、デバイス２は、評価項目が警告範囲であると判定すると（Ｓ２でＹ）、第１警告発生済みか否かを判定する（Ｓ３）。第１警告が発生済みでなければ（Ｓ３でＮ）、デバイス２は、第１警告発生部として機能し、表示部３０やスピーカ４０を用いて第１警告を発生させる（Ｓ４）。ルート逸脱を警告する場合、デバイス２は、配送ルートに戻るように指導する警告を発生させる。稼働時刻について警告を発生する場合、デバイス２は、休息を取るように指導する警告を発生させる。休憩について警告を発生する場合、デバイス２は、休憩をやめてトラック１０の運転を始めるように指導する警告を発生させる。到着時刻について警告を発生する場合、デバイス２は、到着時間を過ぎているので迅速に荷受場所や目的地に向かうように指導する警告を発生させる。 When the device 2 determines that the evaluation item is not within the warning range (N in S2), it proceeds to S5. On the other hand, when the device 2 determines that the evaluation item is within the warning range (Y in S2), it determines whether or not the first warning has occurred (S3). If the first warning has not been generated (N in S3), the device 2 functions as a first warning generator and generates the first warning using the display section 30 and the speaker 40 (S4). In case of warning of route deviation, the device 2 generates a warning to guide the delivery route back. When generating an alert about working hours, the device 2 generates an alert instructing you to take a rest. When issuing a warning about a break, the device 2 issues a warning instructing the driver to stop taking a break and start driving the truck 10 . In the case of generating a warning about the arrival time, the device 2 generates a warning instructing the user to quickly go to the receiving place or the destination because the arrival time has passed.
　急減速、急加速、急旋回、衝撃、速度超過について警告する場合、デバイス２は、急加速、急減速、急旋回、速度超過しないように、また、衝撃が加えられないように指導する警告を発生させる。デバイス２は、第１警告を発生した後（Ｓ４）、Ｓ５に進む。 When warning about sudden deceleration, sudden acceleration, sharp turning, impact, or overspeeding, the device 2 warns the user to avoid sudden acceleration, sudden deceleration, sharp turning, overspeeding, and to avoid applying impact. generate. After generating the first warning (S4), the device 2 proceeds to S5.
　一方、デバイス２は、第１警告が発生済みであれば（Ｓ３でＹ）、Ｓ６に進む。Ｓ６において、デバイス２は、第２判定部として機能し、評価項目が警告範囲である状態が継続又は断続しているか否かを判定する。詳しく説明すると、デバイス２は、ルート逸脱、稼働時刻、休息、速度超過が警告範囲である状態が所定時間以上継続しているか否か、到着時間を過ぎても荷受場所や目的地から到着警告距離以上離れている状態が第１到着警告時間よりも長い第２到着警告時間以上継続しているか否か、急減速、急加速、急旋回、衝撃が警告値を超えている状態が断続しているか否かを判定する。 On the other hand, if the device 2 has issued the first warning (Y in S3), it proceeds to S6. In S6, the device 2 functions as a second determination unit and determines whether the state in which the evaluation item is within the warning range continues or intermittently. More specifically, the device 2 detects whether the route deviation, operating time, rest, and speeding are within the warning range for a predetermined time or longer, and the arrival warning distance from the receiving place or destination even after the arrival time. Whether the state of being separated from the vehicle continues for the second arrival warning time, which is longer than the first arrival warning time. determine whether or not
　評価項目が警告範囲である状態が継続又は断続していなければ（Ｓ６でＮ）、デバイス２は、Ｓ５に進む。一方、評価項目が警告範囲である状態が継続又は断続していると判定すると（Ｓ６でＹ）、デバイス２は、第２警告発生部として機能し、表示部３０やスピーカ４０を用いて、評価値を下げる旨の第２警告を発生させた後（Ｓ７）、Ｓ５に進む。 If the state in which the evaluation item is within the warning range does not continue or intermittently (N in S6), the device 2 proceeds to S5. On the other hand, when it is determined that the state in which the evaluation item is within the warning range continues or intermittently (Y in S6), the device 2 functions as a second warning generation unit and uses the display unit 30 and the speaker 40 to perform evaluation. After generating a second warning to lower the value (S7), the process proceeds to S5.
　Ｓ５においてデバイス２は、トラック１０が予め定めた荷受場所や荷物の中継地などの目的地に到着して、一運行が終了したか否かを判定する。運行が終了していなければ（Ｓ５でＮ）、デバイス２は、Ｓ１に戻る。運行が終了していれば（Ｓ５でＹ）、デバイス２は、送信部として機能し、一運行中に収集した現在位置、速度、Ｇ値、回転数の収集データをサーバ３に送信する（Ｓ８）。 In S5, the device 2 determines whether or not the truck 10 has arrived at a predetermined destination such as a receiving place or a transit point for the cargo, and has completed one operation. If the service has not ended (N in S5), the device 2 returns to S1. If the operation has ended (Y in S5), the device 2 functions as a transmission unit and transmits the collected data of the current position, speed, G value, and number of revolutions collected during one operation to the server 3 (S8 ).
　サーバ３は、デバイス２から収集データを受信する（Ｓ１１）。また、サーバ３は、受信部として機能し、端末４、５と通信を行って荷主、荷受人の評価を受信する（Ｓ１２）。その後、サーバ３は、収集データに基づいて、図５に示す評価項目について一運行におけるドライバの評価を行う（Ｓ１３）。評価としては、定時制、品質、安全性、経済性の４種類がある。定時制は、ルート逸脱、稼働時刻、休息、到着時間の４つの評価項目に基づいて算出する総合評価値である。定時制評価の一例について説明する。本実施形態では、サーバ３は、減点方式で評価を行い、第１警告を発生した状態では減点しない。サーバ３は、警告情報取得部として機能し、デバイス２から受信した運転挙動の収集データに基づいて第２警告が発生したか否かの警告情報を取得し、第２警告を発生した状態となっていれば減点する。例えば、サーバ３は、ルート逸脱、稼働時刻、休憩が警告範囲にある状態が所定時間以上継続すると１点限定し、さらに一定時間以上継続する毎に１点ずつ減点する。また、サーバ３は、到着時間を過ぎても到着警告距離以上離れた状態が第２警告時間以上継続すると１点限定し、さらに一定時間以上継続する毎に１点ずつ減点する。例えば、第２警告時間を２０分、一定時間を１０分とすると、到着時間を過ぎても到着警告距離以上離れた状態が４０分継続した場合、サーバ３は、（４０－２０）／１０＝２点減点する。 The server 3 receives collected data from the device 2 (S11). Also, the server 3 functions as a receiving unit, communicates with the terminals 4 and 5, and receives the evaluations of the consignor and the consignee (S12). After that, the server 3 evaluates the driver in one trip with respect to the evaluation items shown in FIG. 5 based on the collected data (S13). There are four types of evaluation: fixed hours, quality, safety, and economy. The fixed time system is a comprehensive evaluation value calculated based on four evaluation items: route deviation, operating time, rest, and arrival time. An example of part-time evaluation will be described. In this embodiment, the server 3 performs evaluation by a point deduction method, and does not deduct points when the first warning is generated. The server 3 functions as a warning information acquisition unit, acquires warning information as to whether or not the second warning has occurred based on the collected driving behavior data received from the device 2, and enters a state in which the second warning has occurred. If so, points will be deducted. For example, the server 3 assigns 1 point if the state in which the deviation from the route, the operating time, and the break are within the warning range continues for a predetermined time or longer, and further deducts 1 point each time the state continues for a predetermined time or longer. Further, the server 3 limits 1 point when the state of being separated by the arrival warning distance or longer continues for the second warning time or longer even after the arrival time, and deducts 1 point each time the state continues for a predetermined time or longer. For example, if the second warning time is 20 minutes and the fixed time is 10 minutes, if the state of being away from the arrival warning distance or more continues for 40 minutes even after the arrival time, the server 3 calculates (40-20)/10= 2 points will be deducted.
　サーバ３は、各評価項目について満点から上述した方法により減点を行った点数に予め定めた重みづけを乗算した値を加算して、総合評価点として算出する。即ち、サーバ３は、下記の式（１）により定時制の総合評価点を算出する。
　（満点－ルート逸脱での減点数）×ルート逸脱の重み＋（満点－稼働時刻での減点数）×稼働時刻の重み＋（満点－休憩での減点数）×休憩の重み＋（満点－荷受場所への到着時間での減点数）×荷受場所への到着時間の重み＋（満点－目的地への到着時間での減点数）×目的地への到着時間の重み　…（１） The server 3 calculates a total evaluation score by adding a value obtained by multiplying the score obtained by subtracting the score from the full score by the method described above by a predetermined weight for each evaluation item. That is, the server 3 calculates the total evaluation score of the part-time system by the following formula (1).
(full points - deduction for route deviation) x weight for route deviation + (full points - deduction for working hours) x weight for working hours + (full points - deduction for breaks) x weight for breaks + (full points - receiving) Points deduction for time of arrival at location) x Weight of time of arrival at receiving location + (Full score - Deduction of points for time of arrival at destination) x Weight of time of arrival at destination … (1)
　なお、サーバ３は、設定部として機能し、運送会社の希望により重みを自由に設定することができる。運送会社が重要と考える評価項目についての重みを大きく設定することができる。 The server 3 functions as a setting unit, and can freely set the weight according to the wishes of the shipping company. A large weight can be set for evaluation items that the transportation company considers important.
　品質は、貨物破損、数量の２つの評価項目に基づいて算出する総合評価値である。貨物破損は、急減速、急加速、急旋回、衝撃、荷主評価、荷受人評価の６つの評価項目に基づいて算出する総合評価値である。急減速、急加速、急旋回、衝撃については、サーバ３は、定時制と同様に、減点方式で評価を行い、第１警告を発生した状態では減点せず、第２警告を発生した状態となって減点する。荷主評価は、荷主によるトラック１０に搭載された荷物の荷積み状態の評価である。荷主評価は、例えば、危険・普通・丁寧の３ランクから荷主が選んで評価できるようになっている。荷受人評価は、荷受人による受取荷物の状態の評価である。荷受人評価は、例えば、酷い・普通・綺麗の３ランクから荷受人が選んで評価できるようになっている。 Quality is a comprehensive evaluation value calculated based on two evaluation items: cargo damage and quantity. Cargo damage is a comprehensive evaluation value calculated based on six evaluation items: sudden deceleration, sudden acceleration, sudden turning, impact, shipper evaluation, and consignee evaluation. For sudden deceleration, sudden acceleration, sudden turning, and impact, the server 3 evaluates in the same way as the fixed-time system, using the point deduction method. points will be deducted. The shipper evaluation is an evaluation of the loading state of the cargo mounted on the truck 10 by the shipper. For the shipper evaluation, for example, the shipper can select and evaluate from three ranks of dangerous, normal, and polite. The consignee rating is the consignee's assessment of the condition of the received package. For the consignee evaluation, for example, the consignee can select and evaluate from three ranks of terrible, normal, and beautiful.
　数量は、荷受人評価によって評価される。数量の荷受人評価は、荷受人による荷物の数量の評価である。数量の荷受人評価は、例えば、注文通り・注文以下の２ランクから荷受人が選んで評価できるようになっている。サーバ３は、定時制と同様に各評価項目の点数に重みを乗じた値を加算して品質の総合評価点として算出する。 　The quantity is evaluated by the consignee evaluation. A quantity consignee rating is a consignee's rating of the quantity of a package. For the consignee evaluation of the quantity, for example, the consignee can select and evaluate from two ranks, i.e., according to the order and below the order. The server 3 adds the value obtained by multiplying the score of each evaluation item by a weight as in the case of the part-time system, and calculates the overall quality evaluation score.
　安全性は、急減速、急加速、急旋回、飲酒、速度超過の５つの評価項目に基づいて算出される総合評価値である。経済性は、燃費、車体ダメージの２つの評価項目に基づいて算出される総合評価である。燃費は、エンジン回転数や速度から求められ、燃費が良いほど評価が高くなる。車体ダメージは、急減速、急加速、衝撃の３つの評価項目の総合評価である。 　Safety is a comprehensive evaluation value calculated based on five evaluation items: sudden deceleration, sudden acceleration, sudden turns, drinking, and speeding. Economy is a comprehensive evaluation calculated based on two evaluation items, fuel efficiency and vehicle body damage. Fuel efficiency is determined from engine speed and speed, and the better the fuel efficiency, the higher the evaluation. The vehicle body damage is a comprehensive evaluation of three evaluation items: sudden deceleration, sudden acceleration, and impact.
　サーバ３は、一運行の評価を行うと、ドライバのＩＤに紐づけて評価結果を配送業者の端末６に送信する。端末６は、評価結果を受信すると、評価結果を表示する。このとき、図７に示すように、ドライバの評価が分かりやすいように、定時制、品質、安全性、経済性の各項目のレーダーチャートを表示するようにしてもよい。 When the server 3 evaluates one trip, it sends the evaluation result to the delivery company's terminal 6 in association with the driver's ID. Upon receiving the evaluation result, the terminal 6 displays the evaluation result. At this time, as shown in FIG. 7, a radar chart for each item of fixed hours, quality, safety, and economy may be displayed so that the driver's evaluation can be easily understood.
　上述した実施形態によれば、デバイス２は、ドライバが運行中、評価項目が警告範囲になると警告を発生し、さらに警告範囲になる状態が継続又は断続するとさらに警告を発生して、評価値を下げる警告を行い、評価値を下げる。これにより、運行中にドライバに対して適切な運転指導を行うことができる。 According to the above-described embodiment, the device 2 issues a warning when the evaluation item falls within the warning range while the driver is driving, and further issues a warning when the state within the warning range continues or intermittently, and returns the evaluation value. Issue a warning to lower and lower the evaluation value. As a result, it is possible to give appropriate driving guidance to the driver during operation.
　上述した実施形態によれば、評価項目は、配送ルートからの逸脱距離、稼働時刻、休憩時間、休憩回数、到着時間を含む。これにより、運行中にドライバに対して配送ルートに戻るよう指導したり、長時間運転をやめるよう指導したり、長時間休息を取るのをやめるよう指導したり、到着時間を守るように指導したり、することができる。 According to the above-described embodiment, the evaluation items include deviation distance from the delivery route, operating time, break time, number of breaks, and arrival time. As a result, drivers can be instructed to return to the delivery route during operation, instructed to stop driving for long hours, instructed to stop taking long breaks, and instructed to arrive on time. can be
　上述した実施形態によれば、サーバ３は、荷主、受取人から受信した評価に応じてドライバの評価値を算出している。これにより、荷主又は受取人の評価に基づいてドライバを適切に評価することができる。 According to the embodiment described above, the server 3 calculates the evaluation value of the driver according to the evaluation received from the shipper and recipient. Accordingly, the driver can be properly evaluated based on the shipper's or recipient's evaluation.
　上述した実施形態によれば、サーバ３は、到着予定時間における荷受場所又は目的地までの距離に基づいてドライバの評価を算出している。これにより、運行予定通りの運行をしているか否かによりドライバを適切に評価することができる。 According to the above-described embodiment, the server 3 calculates the driver's evaluation based on the distance to the receiving place or destination at the estimated arrival time. Accordingly, it is possible to appropriately evaluate the driver based on whether or not the vehicle operates as scheduled.
　なお、本発明は、上述した実施形態に限定されるものではなく、適宜、変形、改良、等が可能である。その他、上述した実施形態における各構成要素の材質、形状、寸法、数、配置箇所、等は本発明を達成できるものであれば任意であり、限定されない。 It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and can be modified, improved, etc. as appropriate. In addition, the material, shape, size, number, location, etc. of each component in the above-described embodiment are arbitrary and not limited as long as the present invention can be achieved.
　上述した実施形態によれば、デバイス２は、一運行終了する毎に運転挙動の収集データをサーバ３にまとめて送信していたが、これに限ったものではない。例えば、デバイス２は、運行中、所定時間毎にその時間の間に収集した運転挙動の収集データをサーバ３に送信するようにしてもよい。 According to the above-described embodiment, the device 2 collectively transmits collected data on driving behavior to the server 3 each time one operation is completed, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the device 2 may transmit to the server 3 collected driving behavior data collected during each predetermined period of time while the vehicle is in operation.
　上述した実施形態によれば、デバイス２が、運転挙動から評価項目が警告範囲であるか否かを判定していたが、これに限ったものではない。運転挙動をデバイス２からサーバ３に送信し、サーバ３がこれら運転挙動から評価項目が警告範囲であるか否かを判定してもよい。 According to the above-described embodiment, the device 2 determines whether the evaluation item is within the warning range from the driving behavior, but it is not limited to this. The driving behavior may be transmitted from the device 2 to the server 3, and the server 3 may determine from these driving behaviors whether the evaluation item is within the warning range.
　ここで、上述した本発明に係るドライバ評価装置及びドライバ評価システムの実施形態の特徴をそれぞれ以下［１］～［５］に簡潔に纏めて列記する。
［１］
　ドライバの評価項目が警告範囲になると、警告を発生する第１警告発生部（２６）と、
　前記評価項目が前記警告範囲となる状態が継続又は断続すると、前記評価項目に基づいて算出する前記ドライバの評価値を下げる旨の警告を行う第２警告発生部（２６）と、
　前記第２警告発生部（２６）が警告を行った場合、前記ドライバの評価値を下げる評価部（３３）と、を備えた、
　ドライバ評価装置（１）。
［２］
　［１］に記載のドライバ評価装置（１）において、
　前記評価項目は、配送ルートからの逸脱距離、稼働時刻、休憩時間、休憩回数、到着時間の少なくとも１つである、
　ドライバ評価装置（１）。
［３］
　［１］又は［２］に記載のドライバ評価装置（１）において、
　荷主又は受取人の評価を受信する受信部（３３）を備え、
　前記評価部（３３）は、前記荷主又は前記受取人の評価に応じて前記ドライバの評価値を算出する、
　ドライバ評価装置（１）。
［４］
　［１］～［３］の何れか１項に記載のドライバ評価装置（１）において、
　前記評価部（３３）は、複数の前記評価項目毎に項目評価値を算出し、算出した前記項目評価値に重みづけを行い、重みづけを行った前記項目評価値に基づいて前記ドライバの前記評価値を算出し、
　前記重みを設定する設定部（３３）を備えた、
　ドライバ評価装置（１）。
［５］
　ドライバが運転する車両に搭載された車載器（２）と、前記車載器（２）と無線通信可能なサーバ（３）と、を備えたドライバ評価システム（１）であって、
　前記車載器（２）は、前記ドライバの運転挙動を取得する運転挙動取得部（２６）と、前記運転挙動に基づいて前記ドライバの評価項目が警告範囲であるか否かを判定する第１判定部（２６）と、前記評価項目が警告範囲であると判定されたとき、警告を発生する第１警告発生部（２６）と、前記ドライバの評価項目が前記警告範囲となる状態が継続又は断続しているか否かを判定する第２判定部（２６）と、前記ドライバの評価項目が前記警告範囲となる状態が継続又は断続していると判定されたとき、前記ドライバの評価値を下げる旨の警告を行う第２警告発生部（２６）と、前記運転挙動を前記サーバに送信する送信部（２６）と、を有し、
　前記サーバ（３）が、前記運転挙動に基づいて前記ドライバの評価を行う評価部（３３）と、前記第２警告発生部（２６）による警告が行われた否かの警告情報を取得する警告情報取得部（３３）と、を有し、
　前記評価部（３３）は、前記第２警告発生部（２６）が警告を行った場合、前記ドライバの評価を下げる、
　ドライバ評価システム（１）。 Here, the features of the embodiments of the driver evaluation device and the driver evaluation system according to the present invention described above are briefly listed in [1] to [5] below.
[1]
a first warning generator (26) that generates a warning when the driver's evaluation item falls within the warning range;
a second warning generation unit (26) that issues a warning to the effect that the evaluation value of the driver calculated based on the evaluation item will be lowered if the state in which the evaluation item falls within the warning range continues or intermittently;
An evaluation unit (33) that reduces the evaluation value of the driver when the second warning generation unit (26) issues a warning,
Driver evaluation device (1).
[2]
In the driver evaluation device (1) according to [1],
The evaluation item is at least one of deviation distance from the delivery route, operating time, break time, number of breaks, and arrival time.
Driver evaluation device (1).
[3]
In the driver evaluation device (1) according to [1] or [2],
A receiving unit (33) for receiving the evaluation of the shipper or recipient,
The evaluation unit (33) calculates the evaluation value of the driver according to the evaluation of the shipper or the recipient.
Driver evaluation device (1).
[4]
In the driver evaluation device (1) according to any one of [1] to [3],
The evaluation unit (33) calculates an item evaluation value for each of the plurality of evaluation items, weights the calculated item evaluation values, and performs the evaluation of the driver based on the weighted item evaluation values. Calculate the evaluation value,
A setting unit (33) for setting the weight,
Driver evaluation device (1).
[5]
A driver evaluation system (1) comprising an onboard device (2) mounted on a vehicle driven by a driver and a server (3) capable of wireless communication with the onboard device (2),
The vehicle-mounted device (2) includes a driving behavior acquisition unit (26) that acquires the driving behavior of the driver, and a first determination that determines whether the evaluation item of the driver is within a warning range based on the driving behavior. a first warning generation unit (26) for generating a warning when the evaluation item is determined to be within the warning range; and a state in which the evaluation item of the driver is within the warning range continues or intermittently. a second determination unit (26) for determining whether or not the driver's evaluation item is in the warning range, and when it is determined that the state in which the driver's evaluation item falls within the warning range continues or intermittently, the driver's evaluation value is lowered. and a transmission unit (26) for transmitting the driving behavior to the server,
The server (3) has an evaluation unit (33) that evaluates the driver based on the driving behavior, and a warning that acquires warning information indicating whether or not a warning has been issued by the second warning generating unit (26). an information acquisition unit (33),
The evaluation unit (33) lowers the evaluation of the driver when the second warning generation unit (26) warns.
Driver Evaluation System (1).
　本発明を詳細にまた特定の実施態様を参照して説明したが、本発明の精神と範囲を逸脱することなく様々な変更や修正を加えることができることは当業者にとって明らかである。 Although the present invention has been described in detail and with reference to specific embodiments, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
　本出願は、2021年3月26日出願の日本特許出願（特願2021-053709）に基づくものであり、その内容はここに参照として取り込まれる。 This application is based on a Japanese patent application (Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-053709) filed on March 26, 2021, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
　本発明によれば、運行中にドライバに対して適切な運転指導を行うことができるドライバ評価装置及びドライバ評価システムを提供することができる。この奏する本発明は、ドライバ評価装置及びドライバ評価システムに関して有用である。 According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a driver evaluation device and a driver evaluation system that can give appropriate driving guidance to the driver during operation. INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The present invention is useful for driver evaluation devices and driver evaluation systems.
　１　ドライバ評価システム（ドライバ評価装置）
　２　デバイス（車載器）
　３　サーバ
　２５　制御部（第１警告発生部、第２警告発生部、運転挙動検出部、第１判定部、第２判定部）
　３３　制御部（評価部、受信部、警告情報取得部） 1 Driver evaluation system (driver evaluation device)
2 Device (in-vehicle device)
3 server 25 control unit (first warning generation unit, second warning generation unit, driving behavior detection unit, first determination unit, second determination unit)
33 control unit (evaluation unit, reception unit, warning information acquisition unit)

Claims (5)

  1. 　ドライバの評価項目が警告範囲になると、警告を発生する第１警告発生部と、
    　前記評価項目が前記警告範囲となる状態が継続又は断続すると、前記評価項目に基づいて算出する前記ドライバの評価値を下げる旨の警告を行う第２警告発生部と、
    　前記第２警告発生部が警告を行った場合、前記ドライバの評価値を下げる評価部と、を備えた、
    　ドライバ評価装置。     a first warning generator that generates a warning when the driver evaluation item falls within the warning range;
    a second warning generation unit that issues a warning to the effect that, if the evaluation item continues or intermittently falls within the warning range, the evaluation value of the driver calculated based on the evaluation item is lowered;
    an evaluation unit that reduces the evaluation value of the driver when the second warning generation unit issues a warning,
    Driver evaluation device.
  2. 　請求項１に記載のドライバ評価装置において、
    　前記評価項目は、配送ルートからの逸脱距離、稼働時刻、休憩時間、休憩回数、到着時間の少なくとも１つである、
    　ドライバ評価装置。     In the driver evaluation device according to claim 1,
    The evaluation item is at least one of deviation distance from the delivery route, operating time, break time, number of breaks, and arrival time.
    Driver evaluation device.
  3. 　請求項１又は２に記載のドライバ評価装置において、
    　荷主又は受取人の評価を受信する受信部を備え、
    　前記評価部は、前記荷主又は前記受取人の評価に応じて前記ドライバの評価値を算出する、
    　ドライバ評価装置。     The driver evaluation device according to claim 1 or 2,
    comprising a receiving unit for receiving the shipper's or recipient's evaluation,
    The evaluation unit calculates the evaluation value of the driver according to the evaluation of the shipper or the recipient.
    Driver evaluation device.
  4. 　請求項１～３の何れか１項に記載のドライバ評価装置において、
    　前記評価部は、複数の前記評価項目毎に項目評価値を算出し、算出した前記項目評価値に重みづけを行い、重みづけを行った前記項目評価値に基づいて前記ドライバの前記評価値を算出し、
    　前記重みを設定する設定部を備えた、
    　ドライバ評価装置。     In the driver evaluation device according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
    The evaluation unit calculates an item evaluation value for each of the plurality of evaluation items, weights the calculated item evaluation values, and calculates the evaluation value of the driver based on the weighted item evaluation values. calculate,
    A setting unit that sets the weight,
    Driver evaluation device.
  5. 　ドライバが運転する車両に搭載された車載器と、前記車載器と無線通信可能なサーバと、を備えたドライバ評価システムであって、
    　前記車載器は、前記ドライバの運転挙動を取得する運転挙動取得部と、前記運転挙動に基づいて前記ドライバの評価項目が警告範囲であるか否かを判定する第１判定部と、前記評価項目が警告範囲であると判定されたとき、警告を発生する第１警告発生部と、前記ドライバの評価項目が前記警告範囲となる状態が継続又は断続しているか否かを判定する第２判定部と、前記ドライバの評価項目が前記警告範囲となる状態が継続又は断続していると判定されたとき、前記ドライバの評価値を下げる旨の警告を行う第２警告発生部と、前記運転挙動を前記サーバに送信する送信部と、を有し、
    　前記サーバが、前記運転挙動に基づいて前記ドライバの評価を行う評価部と、前記第２警告発生部による警告が行われた否かの警告情報を取得する警告情報取得部と、を有し、
    　前記評価部は、前記第２警告発生部が警告を行った場合、前記ドライバの評価を下げる、
    　ドライバ評価システム。     A driver evaluation system comprising an onboard device mounted on a vehicle driven by a driver and a server capable of wireless communication with the onboard device,
    The vehicle-mounted device includes a driving behavior acquisition unit that acquires the driving behavior of the driver, a first determination unit that determines whether the evaluation item of the driver is within a warning range based on the driving behavior, and the evaluation item. is determined to be within the warning range, and a first warning generation unit that generates a warning, and a second determination unit that determines whether the state in which the evaluation item of the driver is within the warning range continues or intermittently. a second warning generating unit that issues a warning that the evaluation value of the driver is lowered when it is determined that the state in which the evaluation item of the driver falls within the warning range continues or intermittently; a transmitting unit that transmits to the server;
    The server has an evaluation unit that evaluates the driver based on the driving behavior, and a warning information acquisition unit that acquires warning information indicating whether or not a warning has been issued by the second warning generation unit,
    The evaluation unit lowers the evaluation of the driver when the second warning generation unit issues a warning.
    Driver rating system.
PCT/JP2022/009004 2021-03-26 2022-03-02 Driver evaluation device and driver evaluation system WO2022202171A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2021-053709 2021-03-26
JP2021053709A JP7389078B2 (en) 2021-03-26 2021-03-26 Driver evaluation device and driver evaluation system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2022202171A1 true WO2022202171A1 (en) 2022-09-29

Family

ID=83396903

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2022/009004 WO2022202171A1 (en) 2021-03-26 2022-03-02 Driver evaluation device and driver evaluation system

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7389078B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2022202171A1 (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2018109896A (en) * 2017-01-05 2018-07-12 日本メジフィジックス株式会社 Delivery arrangement system and delivery arrangement method
WO2020031827A1 (en) * 2018-08-09 2020-02-13 本田技研工業株式会社 Driving evaluation device
JP6689470B1 (en) * 2019-06-18 2020-04-28 三菱電機株式会社 Information processing apparatus, program, and information processing method
JP2021012626A (en) * 2019-07-09 2021-02-04 三菱電機株式会社 Driving support control device, driving support system, driving support method, and program

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4116896B2 (en) 2003-02-07 2008-07-09 株式会社堀場製作所 Vehicle operation management system
JP6708844B2 (en) 2017-02-27 2020-06-10 丸市倉庫株式会社 Information processing equipment

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2018109896A (en) * 2017-01-05 2018-07-12 日本メジフィジックス株式会社 Delivery arrangement system and delivery arrangement method
WO2020031827A1 (en) * 2018-08-09 2020-02-13 本田技研工業株式会社 Driving evaluation device
JP6689470B1 (en) * 2019-06-18 2020-04-28 三菱電機株式会社 Information processing apparatus, program, and information processing method
JP2021012626A (en) * 2019-07-09 2021-02-04 三菱電機株式会社 Driving support control device, driving support system, driving support method, and program

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP7389078B2 (en) 2023-11-29
JP2022150905A (en) 2022-10-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20210366041A1 (en) Information management apparatus, information processing apparatus, system, and method of managing information
CN100504955C (en) Method in a communication network for distributing vehicle driving information and system implementing the method
US9601017B2 (en) Reckless-vehicle reporting apparatus, reckless-vehicle reporting program product, and reckless-vehicle reporting method
JP5665232B2 (en) Vehicle position transmitter
WO2011111750A1 (en) Safe vehicle driving facilitating system
US20170270291A1 (en) Information processing system
JP5942754B2 (en) Driving diagnosis management system
WO2007097689A1 (en) A vehicle safety syystem
US20190278271A1 (en) Monitoring and tracking mode of operation of vehicles to determine services
CN110395205A (en) Car accident alarm method, device, electronic equipment, storage medium
KR20130143185A (en) The appratus and method for car accident preventing
WO2022202171A1 (en) Driver evaluation device and driver evaluation system
US11823506B2 (en) Driving evaluation apparatus
CN106548308A (en) A kind of method and information transmitting apparatus for sending arrival information
CN112193196A (en) Vehicle with a steering wheel
WO2024018791A1 (en) Driver evaluation device and driver evaluation system
US10362552B2 (en) Terminal device, non-transitory computer readable storage medium, and insurance condition determination device
CN207909354U (en) Collision rear defence knocks into the back control system
JP5215764B2 (en) Eco driving support device and eco driving support method
Konstantinidis et al. Development of a collaborative vehicle collision avoidance system
US20210311209A1 (en) Driving evaluation apparatus
KR101994214B1 (en) A driving and power limiting apparatus for in-use vehicles of exceeding axial load and gross weight
JP6415125B2 (en) Operation management system, vehicle-mounted device and operation management device
US11941924B2 (en) Control device, vehicle, non-transitory storage medium, and operation method of control device
EP4206041A1 (en) Vehicle impact detection system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 22774967

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 22774967

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1