WO2021106600A1

WO2021106600A1 - Computer device, control method, and program

Info

Publication number: WO2021106600A1
Application number: PCT/JP2020/042268
Authority: WO
Inventors: 直次郎竹田
Original assignee: 直次郎竹田
Priority date: 2019-11-29
Filing date: 2020-11-12
Publication date: 2021-06-03
Also published as: JP2021083958A

Abstract

Provided are a computer device, a control method, and a program for establishing "interchange between different events", which is an evolved form of digital game.　Having defined three elements of a digital game as "story", "input device", and "confrontation", each element is established independently as a game (event), defined as a "facilitator event", a "motivator event", and an "initiator event", and the three types of event are linked in embodiments described as "amusement" and "hard work". Further, a "starting point" is provided in said linkage, to enable the linkage to be performed on the basis of the starting point.

Description

Computer equipment, control methods and programs

The present invention relates to a computer device, a control method, and a program for establishing interspecific exchange.

As a method of calculating scores, grades, etc. from competition results of different events, there is a "bowling score calculation device, bowling score calculation method, and computer program" of Patent Document 1 by the inventor himself. In addition, a "game performance evaluation method" (Patent Document 2) in which a secondary game is performed using the parameter values of the battle results of the primary game has also been proposed.

Patent No. 5232928 Patent No. 3887001

It is possible to output evaluations based on different events and create new ways of enjoying by games using devices and methods as disclosed in

Patent Documents

1 and 2, but from the scores of certain games. It only outputs a new score of the same type.

On the other hand, the "interspecies exchange" considered by the inventor of the present application is a new competition method following the analog type and the digital type, and is not a competition method that is established by itself as in the analog type and the digital type, but is established by itself. Prepare multiple events in the form that the event organizer (hereinafter referred to as "organizer") thinks, and make the prepared single event belong to any of the roles of "progress", "motivation", and "device". Each player is made to decide the event to be the facilitator, and the event to be the facilitator cannot be established independently. For example, if the facilitating event is soccer, it will not be possible to win with soccer ability alone, and the organizer will compete with the combined ability.
This is a "competitive treat," and if you compare it to the way you eat, traditional competition eats whole ingredients such as cows and fish, but interspecific exchanges collect only the good ingredients and eat them as a treat. The skill of the cook (organizer) will be tested, and you will be able to eat (competition), which is the only way in the world.

The need to treat the competition is one is to diversify the competition, two is to raise the appeal of single-shot games, three is to make effective use of time to make efforts, and four are to say "same event / same level". By removing the walls, five will be to tackle the problems of modern society.
First, in addition to the conventional method, a new genre called inter-eye exchange will be created, and the number of competitions will increase by the number of chefs.
Second, for example, fleeting games such as VR, AR, and quoits are not played so much even if they are interested. However, if they are spun into one big game, it will have to be played inevitably, the demand will naturally increase, the understanding will deepen by touching it, and a virtuous cycle will be created. In addition, VR means "Virtual Reality", and AR means "Augmented Reality".
Third, human beings are creatures that make an effort, but the period of effort is lonely and costly. However, if inter-species exchange becomes possible, the period can be effectively used, and it can be transformed into a place for exchange and earning.
Fourth, humans are suffocating when they are lonely. However, if you join some group, you will be enslaved. It is a hierarchical relationship based on meritocracy, and it is the conventional competition to support it. This is because conventional competition must be conducted in the same event and at the same level, and the village society was naturally nurtured. However, if it becomes possible to compete in "different types and different levels", the talented people will be dispersed, it will be important to utilize the right person in the right place, the sense of solidarity will increase, and each person will be valued.
Fifth, when a sense of solidarity and reverence are fostered, a spirit of mutual support grows, reaching out to the vulnerable, and more actively tackling various problems in modern society. For example, the problem of loneliness, the problem of non-bonuses and hopelessness of retired groups and losers, the problem of regional decline, etc., that is, cross-species exchange has a role to complement a biased competitive society. In other words, it is not a "competition for competition" but a "competition for social creation".

As mentioned above, if cross-species exchange becomes possible, it may bring about many social changes. However, in order to exchange between different species, it is necessary to divide the so-called events and games into three types of roles, "progress", "motivation", and "device", and link them under the roles. It cannot be done without a computer device. The present invention corresponds to a portion of the device.

Note that the "event" according to the present invention is a "rule-based valuation act", and if it can be valued, it can be regarded as an "event". Therefore, if baseball and soccer are also one event, rock-paper-scissors and what kind of actions pets and babies will take are also one event, and VR and AR can also be used as events if superiority or inferiority can be given. In addition, one scene such as baseball can be treated as one event, for example, one offense and defense, and a confrontation between a pitcher and a batter.

In addition, the event that plays a facilitator is described as a "facilitator event", the event that acts as a motive or creates a motive is described as a "work-in-process event", and the event that acts as a work-in-process is described as a "work-in-process event".

Also, if you write about the acronym,
ID stands for "Identification"
OS stands for "Operating System"
AI stands for "Artificial Intelligence".
The CPU stands for "Central Processing Unit".
GPU stands for "Graphics Processing Unit".
XML stands for "eXtensible Markup Language".
RPG stands for "Role Playing Game"
RGB means "Red Green Blue".
RGBA stands for "Red Green Blue Alpha".
CMYK stands for "Cyan Magenta Yellow Key Plate".

The main solution to the problem is a new way of competing called "inter-species exchange". Therefore, it is necessary to write a little more about interspecific exchange.

Inter-eye exchange is a new way of competing following the analog and digital types, but as mentioned above, the essence is different from the analog type and digital type, so to speak, it is a method of utilizing the analog type and digital type. However, instead of simply gathering together as in the conventional compound event, we cut out only the good points or necessary points from various competitions such as studying, playing, and practicing, and divide them into three types of roles. Make it a co-dependency. Co-dependency means that each cannot be independent, and it is divided into dependent events and dependent events, and the dependent events are not judged one by one but depended on in important situations without independent judgment. Leave it to the event on the side. And, the event of the dependent side can be carried out only for such entrustment, and it may be carried out based on the content to be entrusted, or it may be randomly selected, but in any case, the event of the dependent side As a result of, the dependent event takes action.

Therefore, the present invention acts as a bridge between the dependent event and the dependent event, and conveys the content of the consignment from the dependent event to the dependent event and implements it. Will be returned to the dependent event. For such an intermediary function, it is the first to increase the number of dependent items to two types, change the way of passing values, make it possible to store values for a while, and make various adjustments. It will be after 2 inventions.

In addition, the inter-eye exchange is a development of the digital type in consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of the analog type and the digital type. When I write about each

The analog type sets rules in the real world created by God, and makes the person and the enemy fight under the rules. The enemies at this time include exam questions and personality judgments. Therefore, the three analog elements can be said to be "rules," "principal," and "enemy." And, since the analog type is performed directly by humans in the natural world, and because humans can be replaced as many times as possible, infinity that cannot be patterned can be obtained, but on the other hand, the difference in ability becomes remarkable because the physical ability is directly tested. As a result, it is necessary to prepare the battle conditions, and the rules are indispensable, but by setting the rules, on the contrary, anything can be done within the rules, and the technique of the foul limit can be developed. , Evolving tools, spending huge amounts of money on training, and so on. In other words, the analog type is not as pure and fixed as the digital type, but it is a crystal of an impure battle to seek loopholes within the rules.

The digital type is more regular than the analog type and cannot take unexpected actions. However, in addition to being able to change scenes, if the input device is changed to a motion sensor, it can be adapted to everyone, and in reality it can be simulated. However, since the author needs to create a virtual world and can only do what is expected, it is difficult to develop, and it is easy to become a rut for the time and cost. In addition, since it is at the author's discretion, opacity that cannot be wiped out in the specifications and work-in-process remains, and if it is released, it will be cleared immediately, which is a serious obstacle to the development of e-sports. Also, above all, the input device gets in the way, and the player's ability is tested in the handling of the input device, and after all, the digital type has universal adaptability, but the analog type. Similarly, we are in a situation where we have to do it in the same event and level.
In addition, in the virtual world created by the author, the three digital elements are the enemy who does not know whether it is the work of the author or the enemy by using a common input device (motive) under the story (progress) of the author. Confrontation (work in process). Therefore, it can be said that it is a story, an input device, and a confrontation. It is expressed as "progress,""motivation," and "work in process."

Inter-species exchange is an all-independent game, so-called event, utilizing the three digital elements as they are. As a result, one can secure at least a digital level of gameplay, two can obtain infinity by replacing the events, and three can be developed easily by developing only the role of each event. In four, the opacity of the specifications disappeared due to the disappearance of the input device, in five it became clear because it could be done if the in-process event was activated, and in six it was called the input device. By changing from hardware to software called an event, there is no need to fix it, and it will be possible to remake it to the optimum one for each player, each event, each scene, and it will be possible to revive universal adaptability. it can. In the 7th, the scene change that the digital type is good at is actually moved to other events, so the scale and accuracy are significantly improved, and in the 8th, all the competitions of the digital type and the analog type can be utilized as the event. By changing the content and combination of the three types of events, the player's various abilities can be tested at the same time, and tests and aptitude tests can be performed in an unprecedented manner. Comprehensive skills such as intelligence, technology, and analysis will be tested, and you will be able to engage in muddy battles in the same way as the analog type. As a result of the above, all the problems of the digital type can be solved, and the advantages of the digital type and the analog type can be utilized to break down the wall of "same item / same level" which was the biggest concern.

In other words, heterogeneous interaction has traditionally handled the story that establishes the game, the input device that creates the motive, and the confrontation that the author and the player set up, but each of them has been changed to software that can be transformed into an event. As a result, it solved the problems of the digital type and was able to interweave the impure battle as well as the analog type. In addition, analog-type impure battles are often conducted through the practice stage, but for example, eating more expensive meals than opponents, using expensive training equipment, etc. To proceed at the same time. For example, if you try to steal a baseball in baseball, in the case of a digital type, the scene changes to a stolen base scene, and the input device competes for which of the running motion and the motion to prevent it is superior, but one point is that it is an input device. If you compete for things, there is no big difference in the results no matter how many times you try. However, if it is not a scene change but an event change, the first time is a boxing fight, the second time is a 5-digit mental arithmetic, etc., and each time they compete in an event that replaces the input device, can they steal with a wide variety of abilities? It can be decided whether or not. However, although the baseball game is impure by that amount, if the player actually steals the baseball, an analog event can be incorporated into the digital game of baseball.

However, in order to make it possible, one needs to be able to exchange value between different events, and the other needs to be able to carry out the most suitable event for the player. However, although the second is unnecessary if the play element is enhanced, it is indispensable because the purpose of the interspecific exchange is to effectively utilize self-discipline. Then, what makes them possible is the value exchange by the "question-and-answer formula" devised by the inventor of the present application.

The question-and-answer formula is based on the exchange of value with money. To realize the exchange of value with money, one requires a strong motive of supply and demand, and the other is a reliable one with money. Is necessary, and the value must be exchanged in a consistent manner for the three. In other words, there are various methods such as cash buying and accounts payable, but both must be convinced. The exchange of value by money is referred to as "money type".
Following the above three points, the inter-eye exchange is
One is to use the three digital elements as a strong motivation.
The second is to quantify it by replacing the money described as "conceptual base".
The third is to exchange value by asking and answering questions.

Although it is the first strong motive, value exchange by money cannot be established without a strong motive of supply and demand. Similarly, in cross-species exchange, since each event is independent, there is no need to dare to exchange value with other events. Nevertheless, value exchange requires a certain amount of motivation, so the three elements of the game must be set as events, and other events must be carried out inevitably in order to establish the game.

Although it is an alternative to the second currency, money represents the relative value of itself. Therefore, it may become extremely large, but the event is a "value-adding act consisting of a unique value system" and is not subject to other interference. Therefore, the intra-item value becomes an absolute value and is stored in a finite field such as 0 to 100. As a result, the event itself can be abstracted in a finite field. However, it has no relative value. This is an alternative to money and a great base for the present invention, so we have named this finite field a "conceptual base".

A conceptual base means a finite field of an abstract concept that represents an internal value, and can be any finite field that can be ordered, such as an integer of 0 to 10 or 0 to 100, or 0 to 1 or 0 to 100. Any number that is easy to use, such as a numerical value including a decimal number, a character or symbol representing a group such as A to Z, or a color value area, may be used. In the present invention, a value including a decimal number from 0 to 100 is used. The reason is that the value has infinity and flexibility, which leads to the fifth invention.

In addition, the expression "assign the value of the conceptual base so as to satisfy the conceptual base" will be used in the future, but if the conceptual base is 0 to 100, any value of 0 to 100 is specified. In the sense of getting closer to that option, it should not be biased toward a specific part or a specific direction (50 or more directions) such as 80 to 90 or 50 to 100. Therefore, in an extreme case, if A is 30 and B is 80, it is a collection of choices with only two choices, A and B. It will meet. " The strictness does not matter. This is because the value within the event is unique and does not receive interference from the outside, but even so, if the balance is lost, the consistency becomes inconsistent and the player cannot be convinced.

In the third question-and-answer form, just as buying and selling is done in the relationship between the seller and the buyer, the question-and-answer formula is also done in the relationship between the dependent side and the dependent side. The questioning side is the questioning side, the dependent side is the responding side, and the responding side returns the answer to the question on the questioning side. We will simplify it further and provide options to ask and answer each other. As a result, impurities are not mixed in the questions and answers, and the value can be exchanged correctly. For example, in the case of the stolen base, if the success or failure of the stolen base is selected between victory and defeat, the value can be exchanged in the form of success if the other event is won and failure if the defeat. Also, if it is less than 30 points, it will be double play, if it is 30 points or more and less than 60 points, it will be out, if it is 60 points or more and less than 90 points, it will be successful, and if it is 90 points or more, it will be a wild pitch and the runners will be wiped out. If you return the score, the trend will be entrusted to other events without any problem. In this way, if we make a co-dependent relationship, ask and answer each other, and then make choices, we can exchange between different eyes without a meaningless concept such as a conceptual base. .. This is the first point above, and it is a device that allows value exchange between different events.
Therefore, the first invention is such a device.
1) Make the two who exchange values co-dependent and make them co-dependent
2) The dependent side prepares the dependent content and makes it an option.
3) Arrange the dependent side in some way,
4) Determine the options prepared by the dependent side based on the implementation results of the dependent side.
It becomes something like.

In addition, there are "pre-determined type", "post-determined type", and "non-arranged type" as the method of arranging the options, which are as follows.

The pre-emptive type decides the options before deciding the event on the responding side. For that reason,
For one, challenges are imposed on the respondent's event,
Secondly, the result of the reply side can be returned depending on whether or not it is cleared.
For example, if a value of 80 is assigned to the arranged options, one will get the option if the task of difficulty 80 is performed and cleared in the responding event, and two will be random. If you perform the task selected in 1 and get 80 or more results, you have cleared it and you can get the option. As described above, the pre-determined type has the advantage that a task is imposed on the event on the responding side and the advantage that the result can be returned with an easy value, but on the other hand, there is a weakness that the question side must be activated. In many cases, the question side is undecided in the inter-eye exchange, and in such a case, it cannot be carried out by the pre-determined type.

In the post-determination type, options are decided based on the result of the event on the responding side. For that reason,
For one thing, the results can be stored while the question side is undecided.
Two need to return a higher value than the pre-determined type.
In the opposite of the pre-determined type, you cannot receive the task from the question side, but if you return the result of the implementation in points, for example, in the above example, you will be able to select the option equivalent to the point when the question side's option is decided. .. For example, if the value of 60 is returned from the responding event, one can select one option with a value of 60 or less, and two can select multiple options until the total reaches 60. In addition, to return an advanced value, if it is a pre-determined type, it is sufficient to return whether or not it has been cleared, but if it is a post-determined type, it is necessary to return the score as described above in which the options are negotiated. That's what it means.

The non-arranged type is also known as the "element value transmission type", and "type matching" is performed between the two who ask and answer questions.
One is to send the implementation conditions directly from the question side to the responder side with multiple element values.
Second, the implementation result is directly returned from the responder to the question side with multiple element values.
Therefore, the items on the question side and the event on the response side are integrated. However, if it is a simple battle element collection, it is easier to do it with a pre-determined type or a post-determined type, and no error occurs. The reason is that all you have to do is to make the content of the options a battle element, and that way you can standardize without the need for type matching. In other words, the non-contract type is basically unnecessary. However, in spite of this, the non-arrangement type is necessary in order to improve the question-and-answer formula and to save the trouble of providing options. If the area of color NO is set to the finite area of the conceptual base, the element value can be specified and the conceptual base value can be specified only by specifying a specific color with a color circle or the like. It can be done by operation. Moreover, there is no need to provide options. However, using that technique requires considerable familiarity and standardization, which is premature at this point.

For example, in a soccer game
1) Passing from Honda to Nagatomo,
2) If the player plans the three steps of running Nagatomo to the XX point 3) having Honda return it again and shoot, there are an infinite number of options that can occur in 1) to 3), and that is the option. There is not much need to do. Therefore, the wishes of the three steps are divided into RGB, passed to the responding side item, and returned in RGB again to create the changes 1) to 3). For example, if the pass is stolen at the stage of 1) and the worst of 2) and 3) are, the counter goal may be targeted. There is not much need to make such changes an option, and internal processing can be performed with calculated values and can be changed subtly. It is not necessary to use a color circle in such a shape, but it is very useful in card games and the like. The non-arranged type is used as described above, but it cannot be used immediately because it is necessary to adjust the question side and the answer side, such as what kind of element RGB is used for.

As described above, if options are provided and questions and answers are provided, cross-species exchange can be performed without establishing a conceptual base. But that's the case for play, not for self-discipline or other-style games. This is because self-discipline prioritizes one's own growth over victory or defeat, and other-style games need to be played fairly and fairly with ability competition that transcends disciplines. Incorporate a conceptual basis for the relationships that are asked and answered.

As mentioned above, the conceptual base is the containment of internal value and can be treated uniformly in appearance. Therefore, not only the event but also all valuation acts including people and traps can be treated as a conceptual base. On the contrary, if the conceptual base is satisfied, whatever the contents are, it can be regarded as a "new event". The above-mentioned problem can be solved by abstracting the inter-eye exchange with such a illusionary concept. For example, if self-discipline is prioritized, the conventional method of competing "practice + match" is replaced with "practice event + match event" to create a relationship of asking and answering questions. Then, if you are a student of the University of Tokyo, you will collect only the best exercises for the University of Tokyo exam and make a practice event, and if you are a professional gamer, you will collect only the best practice scenes for a professional gamer and make a practice event, and then, for a certain period of time To be able to repeat the practice event. Then, each player can concentrate on his / her own practice event, and if he / she is lazy, he / she will lose a lot in the game event, so he / she will naturally work hard at studying and practicing. Also, the same is true for other-style games, where practice events are changed to preparatory events, and multiple preparatory events are created according to the tournament level. Players can select the events they are good at and prepare for each match, and when the preparations for the match are completed, they will collide at once, so the spectators can enjoy the changes in preparation and collision.

In short, the conceptual base strengthens the relationship of asking and answering questions, and although it is possible to replace the event without the conceptual base, the conventional way of competing is "practice + match" or "preparation + match". I couldn't do the practice and preparation dynamically. However, by establishing a conceptual base, events can be created dynamically, and by optimizing the response events, self-discipline and other-style games become possible. In other words, in the conventional way of competing, although practice and preparation were important factors for winning and losing the game, it was fixed separately from the game, so it was necessary to do it in the "same event / same level". By doing this at the same time, you will be able to compete even in "different eyes and different levels".

The conceptual base has no external value. Therefore, it is not as reliable as money. Nevertheless, it needs to be reliable, and the following measures are required.
One is the opposite of the monetary method of value exchange.
Second, the questioner prepares what he wants and fills the conceptual base.
The third is to subdivide the responding side so that it can be freely remade.
In the fourth, a subject is set up, the responding side is optimized for the subject, and the subject asks the question side.

The first is that the method of value exchange is the exact opposite of the monetary formula. In the case of the monetary formula, the relationship between "for sale and consideration" is that the sale is on the other side and the consideration is at hand. , The question-and-answer formula is the exact opposite, so that the item for sale is at hand but the consideration is on the other side. As a result, for one thing, value exchange does not fail. For the second, you only have to exchange the price with the other party. In other words, buying and selling can be standardized. Such an effect can be obtained. In short, when exchanging value with another event, the value of the other event cannot be received as a sale (commodity). However, if only the values that abstract the internal values are exchanged, and if only the values of the so-called conceptual bases and the values that judge pass / fail are exchanged, it can be done uniformly regardless of the event. Moreover, since the questioner prepares what he / she wants, he / she does not have to push unnecessary things. As a result, the questioner only needs to prepare what he wants, so-called trends and competition elements as needed.

Second, the questioner prepares what he / she wants and fills the conceptual base, which is a device to make the conceptual base reliable for the questioner. As mentioned above, the questioner only prepares what he / she wants. Then you don't need a conceptual base, much less meet it. However, the options here are not only to decide the behavior of the questioner, but also to catch the ball with the respondent's event, and if the responder's event is satisfied, that is, to return a wide range of results from failure to success. If it comes, don't miss it. In short, it needs to be placed on an equal footing. For the questioner, the choice is a product, and the conceptual base is a price tag, so there may be multiple same price tags, multiple products may be selected and one selling price may be used, and the product may consist of multiple products. You may. In such a form, a price tag is attached so as to satisfy the conceptual base by providing a plurality of options as one option by combining one or a plurality of values that determine the trend and values that are the elements of the battle. As a result, the conceptual base, which is the price tag, becomes reliable for the questioning event.

The third, to subdivide the responding side so that it can be freely recreated, is to change the event of the responding side from the conventional one that is carried out from beginning to end to the one that is partially carried out, and to make each part a "problem". ", And set the event on the responding side to" a collection of tasks ". After that, the required number of alignment items and extraction items are set for each task so that they can be freely sorted and extracted, and each task is set to satisfy the conceptual basis for the set of extracted tasks. Reassign the value of the conceptual base. Then, the set of new tasks becomes a full-fledged responder's event, and can be freely recreated for each player, each event, and each scene. The set of new tasks created in this way becomes a new responding event, and the responding event can be optimized. It is a so-called optimization of the motive role item, but the identity of the optimized motive role item is an "index" consisting of a "conceptual base value" and a "problem ID", etc. Be done. As a result, even if there is only one motive role event, by creating a large number of indexes under various conditions, a substantially large number of events exist, and inter-species exchange is established. The index created in this way is referred to as a "pseudo-motive role event". In addition, since the value of the conceptual base is reassigned by the responding event, the value of the conceptual base is reliable for the responding event.

Fourth, when a subject is set up, the responding side is optimized for the subject, and the subject asks the question side, both the questioning side and the responding side provide their own options and optimize the task, and on top of that. Each is credible to the conceptual base, as it is reassigned to meet the conceptual base. However, the conceptual base is not objective and the values of both cannot be matched. Therefore, a "subject" is set up in the relationship of asking and answering questions, a so-called protagonist is set up, the subject is optimized from the same viewpoint as the conceptual base of the questioning side, and the subject is made to make an arrangement of options. Then, the subject acts as a bridge between the two, equalizing the values and making the conceptual base reliable. As a result, value can be exchanged without discomfort. For example, if both conceptual bases are difficulty levels, the difficulty level that the subject feels as an option and the difficulty level of the task that must be actually performed will match within the subject, and will be able to be performed as expected, and will be consistent. You will be able to take sex. It should be noted that the conceptual base is not limited to the difficulty level, and may be from any viewpoint as long as it can be ranked, such as the popularity level and the question rate. In addition, the subject may be a player, an event holding level, a participant, or the organizer himself. Depending on the difference, the embodiments named "study promotion type", "other style game type", "contact type", and "self-expression type" will be different. I will write about them again.

As described above, by establishing a conceptual base for interspecific exchange, the relationship of asking and answering is strengthened, and the practice and preparation that match "practice + match" and "preparation + match" can be dynamically performed during the match. You will be able to train yourself and play other games.

Here, to summarize the heterogeneous exchange, the question-and-answer formula, which is the fundamental mechanism of the heterogeneous exchange, can be implemented without a conceptual basis. Therefore, it is difficult to understand, but regardless of whether or not to use a conceptual base, there is a basic flow in the question-and-answer formula, which is as follows.
One is that the questioner prepares the answer (choice) by himself and
The two are to decide the event of the responding side in some way,
The third is to decide the first option with the second result, so it is necessary to give the following two explanations.
One is how to arrange the response side event.
The second is how to return the result of the responding event.

There are many ways to arrange the first response side item, and one is based on the content of the question side. For example, negotiate based on the values assigned to the options. The two play a game and negotiate. Three are randomly arranged. The four are arbitrarily arranged by the player. The organizer will arrange the five in advance. Six are arranged using an external arrangement device or an external program. After all, any method may be used. In addition, when using the sixth external arrangement device or external program as self-discipline, or when repeating the first round, the second round, the third round and the qualifying, it goes without saying that the player or the external performance management system is used. You should manage your grades. However, even if the results and the like are managed externally, the system may be an instruction from the player or an instruction from the external system, and there is no problem as long as the instruction is performed as instructed.

The second method is to return the result of the implementation, but in reality, any value can be used. This is because it is basically good if you know success or failure, or how successful or unsuccessful you are, and you may add ranking or add value to it. In short, the question-and-answer formula may be any value as long as the options can be specified. Under such circumstances, the present invention recommends success or failure.

The success / failure degree is a value representing the success degree and the failure degree as a single value. For example, if the conceptual base is a finite field of 0 to 100, the degree of success is indicated by 50, if it is 50 or more, the degree of failure is expressed. Represent and thereby change the situation. For example, when you want to pass Honda in a soccer game, if you pass 50 or more, you will pass, but if you approach 100, you will pass in a way that leads to a score, and if you approach 0, you will not pass and you will get a counter attack. .. Further, even in the case of using RGB described in the previous case, if each of RGB is returned by the success or failure degree, and if R, G, and B are evaluated as a big failure, it may be changed to a serious situation. In that sense, success or failure is easy to use.

Finally, the reason why cross-species exchange is not limited to digital or analog type, study, play, etc. is that the item and the present invention are different, and the item itself is performed in each implementation environment. Therefore, the present invention only needs to pass information to each implementation environment and collect the results, and if it is an event that can be automatically linked with this system, for example, in the case of an online game, the opponent information and the computer information to be used are sent to the server of the online game. Etc., the online side creates an implementation environment and lets the corresponding player implement it. Then, the result is returned to this system. Further, if the computer device cannot be automatically linked, for example, in the case of an arcade game machine in an arcade, any computer device serves as a representative device and exchanges necessary information with a QR code (registered trademark) or the like. Then, it can be done like automatic linkage. Also, in the case of an analog event, the implementation requirements are displayed on someone's computer device, the implementation is performed as it is, and the result is manually input to the computer device and returned. For example, in the case of analog quoits, the implementation requirement is displayed on someone's computer device, such as throwing 5 times within 1 minute at a distance of 10 m and clearing if the total score is 10 points or more. Is returned by manually entering the total score or success or failure. At that time, if it is done by multiple people, it will be returned in the ranking or the total score. In other words, the motive role events that participate in the inter-species exchange require a lot of information to set the implementation scene, but since there is no further exchange and the result can be returned as a simple value, it is easy to be heterogeneous. You can participate in the inter-eye exchange. However, it is difficult to participate in the entire event that takes a long time, and only a part of the event will be participated.

As a result of the above, interspecific exchange becomes possible.

Therefore, considering patentability, cross-species exchange itself is a new way of competing following the analog and digital types, but it requires a medium and cannot be done artificially. Therefore, a computer device for establishing interspecific exchange is indispensable, and it is considered to be patentable in that respect. Because
1) There are no fixed rules that govern interspecific exchanges, and it is not an artificial arrangement.
2) Computer devices that can be used in a variety of new ways of competing and can be used industrially.
3) The present invention is a person-event agency business and an aggregation business, and is a mechanical process.
Because.

In addition, supplementing the events that play three types of roles,

The facilitator event literally acts as a facilitator of interspecies exchanges. Therefore, there is only continuity, creating the mood of the battlefield and calculating the results of each player. However, that does not mean that the overall result will be calculated, and how to decide the victory or defeat on the battlefield will be the exclusive matter of the organizer, even if it gets tired. In other words, the organizer has absolute authority instead of the rules. In that respect, it is no different from the digital author, but the digital author is the creator of the virtual world, while the organizer of the interspecific exchange is the coordinator, collecting useful events for the participants. Make it the best. Therefore, if there is an opaque part or a defective part, it can be immediately eliminated, and it can be adjusted easily and boldly.
The biggest feature of the facilitator event is the only continuity, so you can multiplex the battles as many times as you like. Multiplexing can be done simply like Sugoroku, but it can be complicated in multiple stages. For example, if you want to decide on offensive power, defensive power, and physical strength, you can use each as a motive. It is also possible to make arrangements by event and then make a decisive battle. Such linkage is performed by combining three types of events, but it can be endlessly complicated by performing the part of the work-in-process event by the facilitator event itself within the facilitator event. For example, in RPGs, etc., the work of building up camps and troops was conventionally performed in battles prepared by the RPG itself, but it is done based on the results of the motive role event, and then the final decisive battle is performed in the facilitator event. By doing so, even if there is no work-in-process event, it can be complicated as much as possible. For this reason, the first invention is an inter-species exchange performed in two types of events.
As a result of the above, the facilitator event may be a competitive event or a non-competitive event, and if it is a non-competitive event or score such as a bowling score, it is necessary to decide the superiority or inferiority in the battlefield. It is also possible to score points and items obtained from the work-in-process event and add them to the results of the facilitator event. The organizer makes such an arrangement.

The motive role event is the only event that creates motives. However, creating motives does not create all the motives that move the virtual world like digital input devices, but as mentioned above, at key points, important arrangements that cannot be created in the dependent event. Leave it to the motive event. In the case of digital, these important arrangements are, for example, character arrangements, item arrangements, etc., which are agreed between players before the match or by the players themselves during the match. Rather than making important arrangements voluntarily, it is the inter-eye interaction that allows the player to make arrangements based on his or her own ability. It will be possible to negotiate in the best and most suitable way for the player or the event, including the events.
If the dialectic is used, as described above, the response value will be extremely simple, and it is sufficient to return whether or not the item has been cleared, or the order in which the superiority or inferiority is determined. Therefore, analog-type events can be used without being caught in digital-type events, and virtually every value-adding act is used as a motivating event. For example, which way a pet or baby is heading, whether it can run 100m in 15 seconds, whether it can beat the opponent in judo, etc. You can use it, one for making results and two for preparing for the match. The difference between the two is the same as the motive role event, but the difference is how the dependent event uses the motive role event, and if it is used for making a result, the trend is decided by the result of the motive role event. On the contrary, if it is used as a battle preparation, the decisive battle will be held based on the result of the motive role event. Therefore, when using it for making results, there is no problem even if you perform a battle-type motive role event, but if you use it as a battle preparation, if you perform a battle-type motive role event, it will be a two-time confrontation and the value of one confrontation will be diluted. Will be done. However, there is no problem if another person conducts the second confrontation.
The biggest feature of the motive role event is that it can be optimized, and if it is optimized as described above, it is possible to equalize everyone or all events.

The work-in-process event will be a one-time battle type event. Therefore, since the result of victory or defeat is known for each match, the award winner can be decided and the award can be given to the award winner. There are various benefits, such as licenses for facilitator events, medals and items that are valid on the battlefield, and changes in the flow of facilitator events. As with the facilitator event, the work-in-process event is the event that depends on the co-dependency, and is the same as the facilitator event from a standpoint. Therefore, if it is only once, it will act as a substitute for the facilitator event. As a result, the work-in-process event can be used in two ways, one can be used by inserting a horizontal spear into the relationship between the facilitator event and the motive role event, and the second can be used in place of the facilitator event. It is possible to perform a work-in-process event based on the result of the event, and to perform the facilitator event as a privilege of the work-in-process event. In each embodiment, the former is a parallel type, the latter is a series type, the parallel type is shown in FIG. 4, and the series type is shown in FIG. It should be noted that these differences increase claims and diversify interspecific exchanges. As a result, large-scale battles are possible.
For example, the facilitator event is sugoroku, the work-in-process event is playing card poker, the motive role event is an event that each player is good at, and each player can play the motive role event freely or as many times as necessary for a predetermined time. By collecting cards in this way, freely arranging the collected cards and registering them in the center (central device), even if there are tens of thousands of participants, players can be grouped or played against each other. If the period is set to one week or two weeks, all participants will be able to collect battle elements under the same conditions, and poker can be played with the contents registered in the center, so it can be done automatically even if there is no player. Sugoroku. Then, if only the award winners are allowed to roll the dice to advance the sugoroku, the award winners can press the buttons at any time within the predetermined time and determine the winner after the predetermined time. If such qualifying is repeated as many times as necessary and narrowed down to about 10 to 20 groups, and the final match is played at a local meeting place etc. where teammates such as ball rolling and two-legged race can support each other, a great war that anyone can participate in is possible. It becomes a place for people to interact and earn bounty hunters, and dreams grow.
It should be noted that this is the reason why we can tackle the problems of modern society, and if we make the best use of our daily efforts and compete happily with everyone across generations and positions, a sense of solidarity will naturally be fostered and various problems in the region will be addressed. You will be able to work as one. In other words, if competition can be conducted from the same event / same level to different events / different levels, various things can be done with unprecedented ideas.
The biggest feature of the work-in-process event is that it greatly changes the form of inter-species exchange.

Based on the above, the present invention that enables interspecific exchange is as follows.
In the first invention, inter-species exchange is performed in two types of events.
In the second invention, inter-species exchange is performed in three types of events.
The third invention is different from the second invention in the method of using the work-in-process item.
The fourth invention enables an embodiment described as a round system.
The fifth invention provides a value adjusting means on the battlefield.
The sixth invention provides a data structure as a base point on the battlefield.
The seventh invention enriches the benefits of the work-in-process event.

If the embodiment is supplemented, it can be implemented in the following four embodiments. However, not all of them are in separate forms, but they are roughly divided into two types, one is the first invention type and the other is the fourth invention type. The first invention type was named "play" because it was performed for the purpose of play, and the fourth invention type was named "kiri" because it was performed for the purpose of self-discipline.
One is the contact type (play)
Two are self-phenotype (play)
Three are study promotion type (cutting)
The four are other-style game types (cutting swords)

Yugi was developed with the theme of play and is the first invention type. Therefore, the basics are two types, the facilitator event and the motive role event, and the work-in-process event has a horizontal spear in response to the situation. However, as mentioned in the previous explanation, there is continuity in the facilitator event, and it can be complicated as much as possible depending on the development. Further, if the facilitator event is a battle type, the battlefield is actually performed by one facilitator event even if a plurality of facilitator events can be theoretically implemented. In that case, the battlefield will be hijacked by the facilitator event, and if it is hijacked, it may be possible to have a plurality of hijacked facilitator events. The reason for not being able to pluralize is simply to confuse the player, and if the player is not confused, there is no problem in pluralizing. On the other hand, since the events are conducted in each implementation environment, even if one event consists of multiple events, this system acts as an exchange based on the signals transmitted from the events managed by this system. There is no processing problem just by performing. In addition, since the player also performs a plurality of facilitator events while advancing one facilitator event, it can be carried out without discomfort. Therefore, it is possible to have multiple facilitator events. It should be noted that only the facilitator event can be performed in this way, and the motive role event and the work-in-process event cannot be performed because there is no continuity.
To describe the pluralization of facilitator events a little more concretely, if the facilitator event is RPG, there is no point in enabling facilitator events other than RPG, but RPG is a game with the theme of the Warring States period. Then, many "Battle of Nagashino" and "Battle of Sekigahara" will be held. At that time, the individual battles between the warlords are crushed by the motive role event, but when it comes to the battle with multiple people, it is done by the work-in-process event. When it comes to a bigger battle, it is necessary to separate the RPG into a battle, and it is conceivable that the battle of Nagashino itself will be a new facilitator event. In that sense, in such a form, the player will not be confused as a timed facilitator event played through the game of the Warring States period. Also, in terms of the system, there is no particular change only by activating the facilitator event that corresponds to the child by the facilitator event itself.
In addition, although the game becomes the first invention type, it is possible up to the third invention, and the specialized type of the third invention type becomes a sword. So to speak, the game can be carried out just before the start of the game. Therefore, unlike Kiritsugi, Yugi can freely interact between different types of eyes, and it is worth adjusting the organizer. However, the development of this system becomes difficult accordingly.

Kiriwa was developed with the theme of discipline, and will be the fourth invention type. However, the content is a specialized type of the third invention, in the third invention, the three events are arranged in a straight line, the work-in-process event is performed based on the result of the motive role event, and the facilitator event is performed by the privilege of the work-in-process event. Do. Therefore, the motive role item, the work-in-process item, and the facilitator item are lined up in a series. On the other hand, in the second invention, two events, a facilitator event and a work-in-process event, are changed in one driving role event, and the second invention is a parallel type. However, the difference between a game and a game is not only whether it is a series type or a parallel type, but if it becomes a series type round system, it becomes a game, and other than that, it becomes a game. That is, the cut-and-sew is a fairly limited embodiment. However, it is versatile and the development of this system is easier than in games. From such a thing, the possibility that a simplified version of the cut fox will be made cannot be wiped out.
In addition, the round system allows you to concentrate on collecting battle elements for a certain period of time or a certain number of times, as in the case described in the explanation of the work-in-process event, so that it does not interfere with studying and practicing. In the past, you would challenge the game with the cards dealt (competition elements), but you will be able to eliminate such contingencies and collect cards through your abilities in the events that you are good at.

The contact type and the self-expression type belong to the game and are basically the same. However, the self-phenotype allows you to create your own playground on the Internet like a homepage, and needs to be completed on the Internet. Therefore, the events that can be used are limited to games that can be played on the Internet. On the other hand, the contact type makes it possible to carry out various events with analog events, and makes it possible to meet many people by making school festivals, sightseeing, and contact with the community into games.

The study promotion type and the other-style game type belong to the sword, and basically there is no change. However, the study promotion type literally aims to promote study, and rather than competing, it makes it fun to work hard. Therefore, except for the motive role event, the play also serves as a break, and a relatively simple game (event) is played. The motive role item is optimized for the player. On the other hand, the purpose of the other-style game type is to literally play another-style game, and instead of deciding the victory or defeat in one event as in the past, by combining three types of events, for example, oneself decides the motive role event. Perform in the event you are good at, face off the in-process event directly in the action game, and play the brain game in the facilitator event. As a result, instead of simply adding up the results as in the conventional composite type, the total power is fused and tested. The event will be optimized by the organizer based on the purpose of the event.

The inter-eye exchange devised by the inventor of the present application is a new way of competing following the analog type and the digital type, and is a format named "study promotion type", "other style game type", "contact type", and "self-expression type". Can be carried out at. If it becomes feasible by the present invention, the way of competing will be diversified, and the barrier of "same event / same level" that hindered people's interaction will be removed, and study and play, event and level, analog type It can be used for studying and playing, competition and practice, examination and inspection, etc. resulting in,
For one thing, it has the potential to radically change the way we study at home, in cram schools and at school.
Second, it may be possible to publish your playground on the Internet.
Third, there is the potential for a bonus war that everyone in the region can participate in.
Fourth, there is a possibility that the problems of e-sports can be solved and developed.

It is a block diagram which shows the relay system which concerns on this invention. It is a block diagram which shows the function of a central device. It is a block diagram which shows the function of a terminal device. It is a simple flow chart of the 1st invention. It is an image diagram of the second invention. It is an image diagram of the third invention. It is a simple flow chart of the round system. It is explanatory drawing of claim 7. It is explanatory drawing of claim 8.

First, the present invention is a computer device, a control method, and a program for realizing a new way of competing for interspecies alternating current, and the computers used here are a calculation unit, a storage unit, an input / output unit, and the like. It consists of a communication department.

The arithmetic unit uses a processor such as a CPU or GPU and a memory, and performs arithmetic processing based on a program stored in the storage unit. The storage unit uses a hard disk, flash memory, or the like to store various programs. The input / output unit is an interface for physical buttons, a touch panel, a microphone, a speaker, a motion sensor, and the like. The communication unit is a communication module that realizes a communication connection to a public communication network such as the Internet, and uses a network card, a wireless communication device, or a carrier communication module. The communication department is also responsible for linking via the intranet.
Further, although the computer device requires an input / output unit, due to the characteristics of the computer device connected by a digital signal, the input / output unit can be separated without being integrally formed with the calculation unit and the storage unit. For example, in a home-use game machine or a home-use learning machine, a calculation unit, a storage unit, and an input / output unit are integrally formed, whereas a computer device connected by a network such as the Internet or an intranet performs central processing. The computer device does not necessarily need an input / output unit.
Therefore, the present invention is a computer device that is tentatively separated by broadly interpreting it as "a thing that is established by using a computer device" regardless of whether or not the input / output parts of the computer device are integrally formed. Even if it does not touch on the method of forming or linking the computer device, the arithmetic unit, storage unit, and communication unit that perform central processing are described as "central device", the input / output unit is described as "terminal device", and the central device. It is a computer device that establishes interspecific exchanges due to the relationship between terminal devices. Therefore, in addition to the integrally formed input / output unit, a smartphone, a home-use game machine, a personal computer, a newly developed computer device, or the like is used as the terminal device. Also, as for the method of linking the central device and the terminal device, there is a method of directly communicating using a digital signal, and there is a method of communicating using a general-purpose communication technology (protocol), and an intermediary program such as an OS can be used. There is also a method of converting to the prepared event message and exchanging it, and any method may be used.

Next, cross-species exchange is performed in units of "battlefields" in which one or more players participate. Therefore, it is necessary to enable each player to exchange between different types of eyes, and a terminal device for each player (hereinafter referred to as "AC terminal device") is required. However, one AC terminal device may be used in turn. It is possible to do this differently from the events performed for heterogeneous exchange and heterogeneous exchange, and the AC terminal device for promoting heterogeneous exchange can be shared. For example, in a game center or a facility that conducts various inspections, the events that are actually used are the various playsets and equipment in the facility, whereas the central device gives the inquiries from the events in order or in order of priority. It is not necessary to proceed at the same time as in a competitive event, just by providing, accepting, processing appropriately, and giving instructions to the event and the player. Therefore, even if there are a plurality of AC terminal devices, the processing itself is sequentially accepted. Therefore, even if there is only one AC terminal device, the usability is slightly reduced, but the AC terminal devices can be used sequentially. That is, since the present invention is an agency and aggregation business, it is not necessary to process them in parallel.

Note that the terminal device used for agency work is referred to as an AC terminal device as described above, whereas the terminal device used for performing an event is referred to as an "event terminal device".

Next, the events that play the three roles used to establish the interspecific exchange used in the present invention are as described in "Means for Solving Problems".

Also, the exchange between different species itself is as described in "Means for Solving the Problem", and the content described there is also effective in the "Mode for Implementing the Invention".

It should be noted that the relationship between the present invention and the item is different as described above, and since the present invention is an agency business, it is sufficient if the basic implementation conditions and the results can be exchanged. However, only the facilitator event has continuity and needs to be integrated compared to other events. Therefore, various methods can be considered. For example, the space of this system is rented out, the game content is drawn there, and the input operation performed in the area is transmitted to the event side, or the event side. The software has a menu to return the focus to the system so that the focus can be freely moved between the system and the event, and the menus added to the event side can be increased so that the processing of the system can be directly instructed. , Either may be used.

In addition, although it is the management and linkage method of the event in this system, the linkage method with the event differs depending on the event to be implemented. For example, in the case of an online game that can be automatically linked, when the player, the terminal device to be used, the place to be played, the situation, etc. are sent to the server of the online game, the server downloads the software to each player's exchange terminal device. Then, the implementation can be performed in the online system, and the implementation result is returned from the online system to the present system. Further, in the case of an analog event, the computer device of either the venue or the player is used as a relay terminal device, the implementation requirements are drawn on the relay terminal device, and the result is manually input. In addition, dedicated devices such as arcade game machines and sports attractions are linked with the central device like a server for online games if there is a central device that bundles the dedicated devices, and if there is no central device, one item in this system. Treat as a terminal device for cooperation. In addition, such a dedicated device needs to manage more information such as usage order, usage time, usage fee, etc., and it is troublesome to manage all of them directly by this system.

Therefore, a "relay program" that specializes in linking the event and this system is provided for the event that participates in the inter-species exchange, and this system stores the relay program and when actually using it, The relay program is started on a secure server, and the system links to the relay program. And after that, leave it to the relay program. Then, the event linkage in this system becomes the linkage up to the relay program, and the linkage with any of the above-mentioned events can be performed uniformly. That is, the processing can be unified.
The method of using a relay program is recommended, and the system may directly link with the event as described above. In addition, the relay program is jointly developed by this system and the event provider, and this system is developed up to the part linked with the relay program.

Also, in addition to the relay program, the event side will be provided with a "setting program". Then, you will be able to optimize the event and set the implementation content as you like.

In addition, as for the facilitator event, the player usually decides one facilitator event. However, even if one person performs a plurality of facilitator events, there is no problem as long as the player is not confused. This is because the situation of the battlefield does not change even if there are multiple, and even if it is limited to one, as described above, there are one or more facilitator events in the battlefield, and any one of them. The exchange starts when a signal for the motive is issued from the facilitator event. Therefore, there is no difference in the situation between one person performing multiple facilitator events and multiple people performing one facilitator event, and if one person can answer questions normally, one person will perform multiple facilitator events. There is no problem even if you perform a role event.

Also, there are cases where multiple people form a team. As described above, the inter-species exchange itself is carried out on a battlefield basis, and one battlefield has one or more facilitator events, one or more motive role events, and zero or multiple work-in-process events. On the other hand, one or more players play individual battles or team battles. Although it corresponds to the team battle, there are many ways of team battle, one is when multiple people play the same facilitator event, and the other is when each player plays a different facilitator event. Even if the same facilitator event is performed for the three, the AC terminal device may be performed separately, and if the first AC terminal device is performed without division, it is the same as performing by one person, so a group It is not a battle, but an individual battle for everyone. When each of the second teammates performs a different facilitator event, the teammate's performance may be calculated by the means for totaling the player's performance, and the battlefield itself does not change. However, it is necessary not to play against each other, and teammates are excluded from the target when conducting a battle-type event. The third problem is that the inter-species AC is divided into an AC terminal device and an event terminal device as described above, and the event terminal device is changed for each event. Therefore, if you only need to switch the terminal device for the event, it is the same as the first one, but if you need to have multiple AC terminal devices, for example, if you want to form a team with a remote person, proceed within the team. It is necessary to synchronize the roles, one is to enable only the reader's AC terminal device and synchronize, and the other is to enable only the terminal device that gave the instruction earlier in the team and the process is completed. Disable and synchronize other devices until. However, in any case, after all, since the processing is performed only for the effective AC terminal device, the processing for synchronization increases, but the composition of the battlefield itself does not change.

In addition, there are two meanings of inter-species exchange, one is "inter-species exchange as a name" which refers to a new way of competing following the analog type and digital type, and two are questions and answers with other events. Since there is a risk of confusion in the matching "inter-species exchange as an act", the latter is referred to as "exchange act" or simply "exchange".

The core of the present invention is "support for exchange acts", not interspecific exchange itself. Therefore, it is necessary to grasp and set the trigger that triggers the exchange act, and there are five triggers.
One is the ongoing exchange.
The second is motive interaction.
Three are in-process exchanges.
The fourth is intermediary exchange.
Five are structural exchanges.

Progressive interaction is an exchange act that begins with the facilitator event, and there is continuity in the facilitator event, and each player advances the facilitator event while performing other events in order to obtain a motive in an important phase. Do. Therefore, it is an exchange that clearly shows the basic operation of the exchange between different types of eyes. The basic operation of the dialectic is as described in "Means for Solving Problems".
One is that the questioner prepares the answer (choice) by himself and
The two are to decide the event of the responding side in some way,
The third is to decide the first option with the second result.
If the above basic movements are performed in an orderly manner, it is possible to artificially perform it without using a machine, but if the motive role item is decided in another game, or if it is a battle-type motive role event, an opponent is recruited. The situation becomes complicated, such as letting the fighters perform basic movements, etc., and it is impossible to do it artificially. In that sense as well, interspecific exchange cannot be established without the present invention.

There are two types of motive-initiated exchange, which start with 2 of the basic movement of the question-and-answer type. One is the case where the first of the basic movements is omitted, and the two are the invitations for the battle of the battle-type motive role event. There are two more cases, one is for equal fighting and the other is for non-equal fighting. That is, there are the following four cases.
One is the case of throwing the facilitator event in a circle.
The second is the case where the motive role item is simply decided first.
The third is the case of fighting on an equal footing.
The four are non-equal battle cases.
The first, throwing the facilitator event in a circle is a case where the license of the facilitator event is bet, or the event equivalent to the license is bet and the motive role event is performed. For example, the facilitator event is Othello or If it is a camp game, you can bet the license without having to choose the next move. In addition, if a competitive action game is played in a facilitator event, characters and items can be automatically arranged based on the result of the motive role event. However, this is as close as possible to the post-decision type of choices, but if the player can choose arbitrarily, it will be the post-decision type of choices, but if it is automatically decided, it will be the round throw type.
The second, to decide the motive role item first, usually starts from the questioning event on the battlefield before arranging the motive role item, but the motive factor is not followed. It decides the role item, which is similar to the round throw in the previous section, but the difference from the round throw is that each person who performs the motive role item decides the options in the facilitator item. Therefore, this item is the same as the equal battle of the next item.
The third, equal response, is when someone decides on a fighting-type motive role event in a progressive exchange, the respondent also takes an option in the facilitator event that he or she is doing in response to the invitation to the match. In the case of deciding, it will be the case of fighting on an equal footing with the provocateur. Therefore, a person who conducts an event in an equal relationship between a provocateur and a respondent in this way is referred to as an "equal opponent".
The fourth, non-equal response, is the case where the respondent responds in the facilitator event without arranging the options in the third case, so to speak, he / she only fights against the opponent. Therefore, no record of non-equal fighters remains and the results are not utilized. In short, it only interferes with the opponent, and the person who is in such a position to interfere is described as "non-equal opponent".

Work-in-process exchange is an exchange act that occurs when the requirements for establishing a work-in-process event are activated, and the work-in-process event is a one-shot battle-type event that is performed based on the results of the motive role event. Therefore, it cannot be implemented unless the requirements for establishment are met. However, if it becomes active without being established, the establishment requirement management means starts work to meet the requirements. For example, in order to carry out a work-in-process event, information on the work-in-process event, information on the opponent, information on benefits, etc. are required, and if the work-in-process event is undecided, it is specified, and if the opponent is undecided, it is specified. , If the privilege is undecided, let it be specified before or after the match. Under such circumstances, if the motive role event is undecided even though the opponent has been decided, or the result of the motive role event is not recorded, the motive role event is decided, and the player is made to decide the motive role event. To be carried out. The act of carrying out the motive role event is a work-in-process exchange. In addition, in the exchange act at this time, the work-in-process item is not the questioner of the question-and-answer type, but the establishment requirement is the questioner. Therefore, the options cannot be arranged in the pre-determined type, but it can be implemented in the post-determined type and the non-arranged type. This is because the result can be recorded in the establishment requirement, and when the work-in-process event is activated, the content can be passed to change the battle situation.

The intermediary-originated exchange is an exchange act performed by the intermediary role function according to the fourth invention, and the intermediary role function mediates between the motive role event and the work-in-process role event, and is performed for a certain period, a certain number of times, or both. The battle elements are intensively collected, and the work-in-progress event is repeated a certain number of times based on the collected battle elements. Therefore, if the motive role item is optimized for each player, it is possible to concentrate on studying and practicing for a certain period of time. Also, if it is optimized for each event, you can prepare for the match in the event that you are good at for a certain period of time. This is a function that extends the requirements for establishing the work-in-process event, and it does not perform the motive role event and the work-in-process event only once as in the establishment requirement, but it is performed collectively, but the difference from the establishment requirement is Since many requirements for establishment are created in the battlefield, the option arrangement type can only be implemented by the post-decision type or the non-arrangement type, but the intermediary function superficially manages the inside of the battlefield. Therefore, if the intermediary function obtains information from the work-in-process event, it will be possible to directly collect the battle elements, and the option arrangement type can be the pre-determined type. That is, the establishment requirement cannot be specialized in a specific work-in-process item, but the intermediary function is specialized in a specific work-in-process item.

Structure-based exchange is an exchange act that begins with the three types of data structures that are the sixth invention, and unlike other exchange acts, there are multiple patterns. However, since it is a substitute for motive-initiated exchange and in-process-initiated exchange, it is collectively referred to as structure-initiated exchange. In other words, the past exchanges have been conducted directly between events, but with that, various devices cannot be created. Therefore, the mechanism of inter-species exchange is made into a double structure so that the events are not directly linked to each other, and the exchange action after the arrangement of options can be expressed by three types of data structures, and the events are described as those. Make it an accessory. As a result, various combinations and work-in-process can be performed without activating the event, and moreover, the linkage between the events becomes one pattern, which facilitates system development. It will be an exchange act performed in such a situation.

Based on the above, the invention will be described.

The first invention is a cross-species exchange performed in two types of events, a facilitator event and a motive role event, and is the basis of inter-species exchange. However, there is continuity in the facilitator event, and as described in "Means for Solving Problems", if the results of the motivator event are stored in the facilitator event, it can be complicated as much as possible. Therefore, the first invention is the origin of interspecific exchange and has infinite possibilities. In addition, the exchange act that can be carried out in the first invention is an exchange of progress and motive.

To make this possible
1) Means to manage the battlefield,
2) Means for managing the events that can be carried out on the battlefield,
3) Means for managing players who interact between different types of eyes,
4) Means for managing terminal devices (including those for events) used in the battlefield, and
5) Means for processing the interaction between progressive and motive factors,
6) Means for deciding the motive role event,
7) Preparation of the event, follow-up, means of collecting the results,
8) The means to return the result in the facilitator event is
You will need it. To supplement the above,

1) The means for managing the battlefield is, so to speak, 2) to 8) itself, but cross-species exchange is performed on a battlefield basis. As a means of managing it, one battlefield is in an environment where one or more facilitator events and one or more motive role events can be performed, and one or more players enter and the events. The terminal device for AC and the terminal device for AC are separated. In addition, cross-species exchange is a "organizer-adjusted" competition method, in which the organizer decides on the basic contents of the battlefield. The basic contents are, in addition to the events that can be carried out as described above, the so-called development such as the contents of each event, the combination and order of the events, and the method of calculating the results of the values (coins, items, etc.) that are valid in the battlefield. Various settings can be made. Therefore, it is necessary to make use of such settings. However, the setting itself by the organizer is outside the present invention, and the present invention is the battlefield management after such setting is reflected.
There are many means of managing the battlefield, but basically, the main management of the event, player, and terminal device is performed outside the battlefield, and in the battlefield, only the information necessary for the battle is extracted and the central device is used. Create tables such as "item table", "player table", and "combination table", and record the identifiers of the information managed by the main book in the table so that the main information can be extracted. Therefore, the event table, player table, and combination table managed by the central device manage only the minimum necessary information, but serve as the main body table for establishing inter-species exchange. Information on the AC terminal device and the event terminal device is included in such information, and the AC terminal device becomes the input / output device of the central device, and the program that directs the battlefield to each input / output device and the minimum required main unit table. The duplicated data of the above is downloaded, and the battlefield is produced in the best possible form for each input / output device and each so-called AC terminal device, and the central device is linked through the production. That is, although the main body processing itself is performed based on the main body table, it is necessary to make the main body processing easy to understand for each player, and the battlefield is produced in the best form for the player who uses the terminal device in the AC terminal device. In cooperation with the central device above, if the environment of the battlefield changes, the changed contents are transmitted to the related AC terminal device and synchronized. The above is an outline of the means for managing the battlefield.

2) The means of managing the events that can be implemented depends on the adjustment by the organizer, but not only the motive role events but also the continuous facilitator events are dynamically arranged. It is a means to manage the events that can be carried out on the battlefield including such things, and as described in the previous section, an event table that manages the facilitator events and motive role events that can be carried out on the battlefield is provided in the central device and is to be implemented. Information such as "item table ID", "item type", "item name", "summary", and "icon" is transmitted to the player's exchange terminal device so that the player can select the terminal device. Then, if the player selects one of the events, the event table ID, the player ID, and other information if necessary are transmitted to the central device so that the central device can perform the event in the event table ID. .. In addition, in order to carry out the event, it is necessary to meet the implementation requirements, and such work is carried out by the means for preparing, following up and collecting the results of the event described in 7). In addition, if a fee is incurred if the event is carried out, the fee information is managed. In addition, the item table ID is an identifier for specifying the item and may be described as "item ID".

3) The means for managing the player is a means for managing the player in the battlefield, and the player's name and ID, the results, information on the exchange terminal device used by the player, and the current situation such as waiting or in the battle are displayed. In addition to the information to be represented, information such as the number of coins and items obtained if valid coins and items are provided on the battlefield, information on the team if a team battle is held, and other information such as the implementation record of the event and accompanying Add information about charges and so on. In addition, if a battle-type event is selected on the battlefield, it is necessary to search for an opponent, and it is necessary to clarify the event that can be performed for each player. Manage any other necessary information.

4) The means for managing the terminal device including the event terminal device includes the AC terminal device and the event terminal device, and the AC terminal device is managed in association with the means for managing the player. In addition to the individual ID of the terminal device, the management content includes the model and the current status indicating whether or not it is in use, and if there is an authentication code issued for communication, the code is managed and an event message is sent. Each time it is sent to the central device, the player is identified based on the authentication code, or the player is identified by referring to the player table, and appropriate processing is performed. Therefore, a "report card" is provided so that communication can be verified promptly, and the above-mentioned authentication code is issued.
Further, the event terminal device is managed by the relay program if the event that participates in the inter-species exchange provides a "relay program", but is managed by this system if it is not used. Therefore, regardless of whether the relay program is used or not, it is necessary for this system to manage either the relay program or the event terminal device, and the event terminal device is always used when carrying out the event. Find out if it is possible.

5) As for the means for processing the interaction between the progressive and the motive, the difference between the progressive and the motive is as described above. Depending on whether it is performed from the facilitator event or the motive role event, both processes will be performed later, but they will be basically the same. However, as an exception, there is a form in which the facilitator event throws its own movements, and the strongest in the round throw is the license of the facilitator event. However, there is a problem of whether or not giving the license to the player is in the category of the dialectic, and one is that the co-dependency relationship is established even if it is a round throw. Secondly, the inventor of the present application includes the round throw in the dialectic because it is not possible to judge whether or not the process is a round throw because the processing in the event is no touch in the present invention. However, this does not mean that the processing of the exchange act will change, and it will be an intermediary business that only decides the motive role item in some way and returns the result to the question side in response to the question on the question side.

6) The means for determining the motive role item is the second of the basic movements of the question-and-answer type, and the present invention is the only one involved in the question-and-answer type. However, even if the involvement in the question-and-answer formula is small, the results of the battlefield are not calculated only by the results of the facilitator events, and the present invention must be comprehensively considered. However, the question-and-answer type of partner search can be carried out in various ways, as described in "Means for Solving Problems", in the so-called motive role item arrangement method. One of the reasons is that the use of interspecific exchange is wide from study to play, and the other is that if the motive role item is optimized, basically any task can be tolerated. Because. However, that does not mean that the issues of the event should be decided in the dark clouds, but it should be decided in the most suitable way according to the purpose of the event.
So, to supplement the various arrangements for the motive role event,
One is to decide on the content of the question. This is a conceptual base when the questioner's event wants a motive, and when an event message is issued in search of a so-called motive, the message contains information that limits or identifies the event or task. The value of is typical. However, if the sixth invention is used, it does not necessarily have to be the value of the conceptual base because it is a value that specifies the data structure or a virtual charge is set for the driving role item. The virtual charge is the specified number of payments when a specified number of coins must be paid as coins, which is a valid value on the battlefield, for each of the motive roles.
The two are negotiated in computer games. In the case of inter-eye exchange with enhanced play elements, it is advantageous to hit a convenient motive role event. Therefore, various games can be played for the events that can be performed. Therefore, if the event selection game can be replaced in the same way as the event, it seems that there is interaction between different types of events in 4 types of circles, but even if the event selection game is included, there are 4 types of events. It does not become a valid inter-eye exchange. This is because, for one thing, the event selection game is not co-dependent, and for two, it is not an indispensable element. In other words, inter-species exchange is possible even if there is no event selection game.
In addition, when entrusting the selection of an item to the outside, first, the motive role items that can be performed by the player are narrowed down in the present invention, and the narrowed down "item table ID", "item item", "icon", etc. are arranged and sent to the outsourcer. If it is decided in a computer game, the terminal device information and the player information to be used are also passed, and then the agreement is made in the implementation environment of the contractor, and the arranged item, task ID, player ID, etc. are returned to the central device.
The three are randomly arranged by the computer. Items that can be implemented in the central device or the player's AC terminal device are extracted and arranged, random numbers are generated within the number of lines to identify the line number, and the ID and player ID of the item or task in the line number and the player ID. To the central device.
The four are arbitrarily arranged by the player. Similarly to the third, the events that can be performed by the player are extracted by the central device or the AC terminal device of the player, displayed on the AC terminal device of the player, and selected by the player, and the selected events and tasks are selected. Ask the central device to return the ID and player ID.
The organizer will arrange the five in advance. As mentioned above, the result of the agreement is recorded in the agreement table, etc., and when deciding the motive role event, the agreement table is first inspected, and if it is in the agreement table, the ID of the event or issue in the corresponding record And the player ID etc. are returned to the central device. If the event in the agreement table is a battle type, inform the opponent of the situation and take the necessary steps for the battle. The procedure required for the battle corresponds to 7) "Means for preparing, following up, and collecting the results of the event", but if a battle-type motive role event is selected, first decide on the opponent. Next, it is necessary to decide the terminal device for the event to be used, and when it becomes possible to implement it, it is necessary to pass the information to the implementation destination, and it starts with the judgment of whether or not the event can be implemented by the player, and among the opponents. It is necessary to confirm whether you can agree or not.
Six are left to external means of arrangement. In the same way as entrusting to the above-mentioned computer game, the information required by the external arrangement means is passed, and based on the information, the external arrangement means makes an arrangement. If player information is to be managed comprehensively and permanently externally, the player ID should be made permanent, and at the same time, the genre, content, level, etc. of the event should be coded so that it can be managed comprehensively and permanently. , The exchange between different kinds of eyes is carried out based on the code, or it is carried out so as to be associated with the code. That is, when the motive role item is optimized, the code can be added or linked to the index that becomes the pseudo motive role item so that it can be calculated. Then, the player's performance for each event over a long period of time can be managed, and trends and countermeasures can be taken.
Seven can be arranged in various other ways.

7) In the present invention, a wide variety of events are dynamically implemented as means for preparing, following up, and collecting results. Therefore, unlike conventional computer games, it is necessary to prepare, follow up, and collect the results for each event, and the "implementation event management means" is responsible for all of this.
There are many methods for managing the items to be implemented, but in the present invention, it is necessary to inform each player of the current status of other players, and such a method is also performed based on the information from the means. Therefore, the functions required for the implementation item management means are
One is a function to clarify the events that can be performed by the player.
The second is the function of managing the requirements for establishing the event to be implemented.
The third is the function to prepare based on the establishment requirements.
The fourth is the function of passing necessary information to the implementation destination.
The fifth is a function to monitor the implementation status.
Six are the functions to collect the implementation results and calculate the results.
Seven are the functions to perform final processing based on grades,
And so on. When I write about each
The first function to clarify the events that can be performed by the player is that there are many methods, but serial numbers are assigned to the events that can be performed on the battlefield, an array of serial numbers is created for each player, and a flag is set. Make it possible for the player to know whether or not it can be performed. On top of that, if there is a call for a match on the battlefield, only the players with the flag are extracted to create a table, and the player's name and current status are added to the table and displayed.
The second function of managing the requirements for establishment is, as described at the beginning, in the present invention, a wide variety of events are dynamically performed. Therefore, it is necessary to verify whether or not it can be implemented each time, and it is a requirement to establish the verification item. The requirements for establishment differ depending on the event, but if the information on the event to be implemented is complete, the implementers are complete, the implementation conditions are complete, the implementation environment is in place, and if the benefits are granted, the benefits are eligible. In addition to that, the time limit and information about the event on the questioning side are also managed, and the implementation of the event is outsourced to the fullest extent.
The third function, which is prepared based on the requirements for establishment, needs to be satisfied in sequence if the requirements for establishment are not met. First, if the implementation item is unknown, the implementation item is specified, if the implementer is unknown, the implementer is specified, and if the implementer needs to arrange the question-and-answer type options, the implementation item is arranged. If the result of the motive role event is required, each practitioner checks whether the result of the motive role event is recorded, and if it is not recorded, the motive role event is executed. At that time, if the motive role item is undecided, the motive role item is decided. Then, when it is ready for implementation, check whether the environment of the implementation destination is in place, if it is not in place, for example, if the terminal device for the event is unknown, clarify it, and if using an arcade game machine etc., check whether it can be implemented. After all the necessary conditions for carrying out the event are met, the implementation starts.
The fourth function of passing necessary information to the implementation destination is that if the requirements for establishment are met, the implementation of the event is basically outsourced. In other words, the implementation of the event is carried out in the implementation environment of each event. Therefore, all the information necessary for entrustment, such as player information, terminal information for events used by the player, battle elements acquired by the player, and information on the content of the implementation, is passed. It becomes such a function. In addition, instead of passing all the information at once, it is possible to pass the information step by step rather than the prepared one. Then, the other side is ready, and the event can be carried out quickly, for example, in a digital scene change.
The fifth function of monitoring the implementation status is that even if the implementation of the event is outsourced to the implementation destination, it is necessary to monitor whether the implementation is correctly implemented at the implementation destination. For example, it is such a monitoring function whether it is not stopped or the time is exceeded.
The sixth function of collecting the implementation results and calculating the results is that if it is a competitive event, the results will be calculated in the event. Therefore, it is not necessary to calculate the results, but if other conditions are added, for example, a handicap is added, or if a special value that is effective on the battlefield is obtained, the result calculated by the event should be overturned. Therefore, the grades will be calculated again based on the requirements for establishment.
The seventh function of returning results based on grades to a predetermined place is the means of managing the event, up to the point of "what is the purpose of this event" and "what kind of result do you want?" Is recorded in. Therefore, as a matter of course, information about the event on the question side is also recorded, so if it is the event on the response side, the result is returned to the place where it should be returned. Further, if a plurality of facilitator events are activated and the second and subsequent events are activated, the results of the second and subsequent events are returned to the parent facilitator event. However, as for the parent-child relationship of the facilitator event, that is, when another facilitator event is activated in one facilitator event and the result is collected, it is basically performed within the facilitator event. There is no touch on the coordination of the parent-child relationship, and in the present invention, if an event message requesting a motive is issued for either parent or child, it is simply returned to the original.

8) As described above, the means for returning the results of the facilitator item is the implementation item management means. However, if the base point of the sixth invention is set or the coins and items that are valid on the battlefield are separated from the implementation of the event, it cannot be done by returning the coins and items that are valid in the battlefield directly from the event management means to the facilitator event. Therefore, even if it is returned directly, it is necessary to increase or decrease the effective value on the battlefield, or to calculate the value such as price matching based on the effective value, and such a case. It is an item to emphasize that there is, both the implementation item management means and the means to manage the effective value in the battlefield are arithmetic processing by the central device, and again the facilitator item in the item. There is basically no need to provide a means of returning results. However, if it is returned directly from the implementation item management means, there is a risk that the value-added processing based on the value valid on the battlefield may be overlooked, and this item is for avoiding it. In other words, it is an item to emphasize that it is possible to fight differently from the facilitator event in the case of inter-species exchange in the results of a wide variety of events.

The second invention adds a work-in-process item to the first invention, and when the work-in-process item is carried out in the first invention, the result is also sent to the management means of the work-in-process item, and one motive role item. The result of the above is to be utilized in two types of events, the facilitator item and the work-in-process item, and it is possible because both the facilitator item and the work-in-process item are the items on the question side in the question-and-answer formula. However, as described in the work-in-process exchange, if the player does not make an arrangement of options in the facilitator event, that is, in the case of non-equal response, the result of the so-called non-equal opponent's motive role event is ignored. Therefore, it is not sent to the work-in-process item management means.
If the necessity of the work-in-process event is performed by only two types, the facilitator event and the motive role event as in the first invention, the power relationship of the facilitator event is too strong in the battlefield, and the motive role event is the facilitator. It becomes an accessory of the event, or the motive role event is intentionally omitted. However, even if a deliberate omission is made, the result will be reflected in the work-in-process event, so there is a possibility that it will be a pit for tat, and it will not be possible to make a detour. In other words, by adding work-in-process events to the battlefield, the power balance of the three events is equalized and the tension increases.
In addition, as described above, the feature of the work-in-process event is a one-time, so-called non-continuity, one-shot type fighting event. Therefore, the winner is always known, and strictly speaking, the privilege winner is identified, and the privilege is given to the privilege winner. The contents of the privilege are arranged when setting up a work-in-process event, and you can improve your own battle environment, worsen the opponent's battle environment, and get effective coins on the battlefield.
In addition, setting a work-in-process event is a one-shot battle type event that borrows the result of the motive role event, so it is said that "the result of the XXth time and the result of the △△ time are played against each other". Players and organizers are set up in advance, and when the requirements for establishment are met, the work-in-process event is activated like a time bomb, and the battle for benefits begins. In other words, the work-in-process event is performed as if a trap is set.
However, there are two ways to activate the work-in-process event, one is the passive type that collects the results of the motive role event and waits for the establishment requirement to be satisfied, and the other is the active type that has not been established. It is an active type that can forcibly satisfy the requirements for establishment, and the role of the work in process differs depending on whether it is a passive type or an active type. In other words. If it is a passive type, other results will be diverted, but if it is an active type, it will be done for the work-in-process event, and the relationship between the events will be significantly different. Therefore, the active type is the third invention, and the second invention is only the passive type.

To make this possible
1) Add work-in-process items,
2) A function to add requirements for establishment and
3) Functions that meet the requirements for establishment and
4) The function to carry out the work-in-process event and
5) The function to decide the award winners and
6) Provide a function to give benefits.
To supplement the above,

1) Adding a work-in-process event means that the work-in-process event becomes a one-shot type battle-type event as described above. Therefore, it can be used as a substitute for a competitive motive event. Regardless of whether or not to substitute, it is necessary to prepare one or more battle-type events called work-in-process events on the battlefield, and at that time, whether or not to include analog events, but theoretically it is included. Is also good. However, it is difficult to complicate the start condition with the analog type, and it is used only for recreation. For example, in the case of quoits and ball throwing, the number and distance of balls and rings can be made relatively easily.
In addition, the work-in-process event is performed based on the result of the motive role event. Therefore, as mentioned above, the victory or defeat may be known without the need for a match, and in such a case, the race will be completed and the match pattern will only be produced. It can be said that this is a work-in-process event, but in the present invention, even software that produces such a production determines the outcome, so it is a work-in-process event.
In addition, whether or not a battle-type event that does not require the result of a motive role event is recognized as a work-in-process event is not a work-in-process event but a battle-type motive role event. Then, a privilege is added to the battle-type motive role event, and such privilege processing becomes the seventh "function of performing final processing based on the result" of "0085" described in the first invention.
Based on the above, one or a plurality of work-in-process events used in the battlefield are prepared in the same manner as the motive role event.
2) The function to add the establishment requirement cannot be implemented independently because the work-in-process item is the item on the question side of the question-and-answer type. Therefore, a 3-piece set of information about the work-in-process event, information about the opponent, and information about the privilege is required, and even if the same work-in-process event is used, if the opponent is changed or the privilege content is changed, it can be repeated as many times as necessary. Can be implemented. In addition, the greatest attraction of the work-in-process event is the privilege, and the player sets up the work-in-process event in order to acquire the privilege. It is a function that makes it possible, and a "work in process item addition" menu is provided in the player's AC terminal device to dynamically add it and manage it in the central device. In addition, in order to be able to see the requirements for establishment on the AC terminal device, the necessary information should be downloaded to the AC terminal device and viewed in the same way as the items can be viewed. In addition, the requirements for establishment may be incomplete, and the organizer may arrange in advance and let the central device manage it.
3) The functions that meet the requirements for establishment are as follows: First, the requirements for establishment are a set of 3 points as described in the previous section, 1 is information on the work-in-process event, 2 is information on the opponent, and 3 is information on benefits. Become.
The first information about the work-in-process event is the ID of the event table that manages the work-in-process event, the number of opponents, the information about the terminal device for the event, the information to be passed to the work-in-process event such as the battle stage, and so on. Become. The information passed to the work-in-process item also includes the player information described in the next section.
The second information about the opponent is the player information for the number of opponents, and above all, the result of the motive role item for each player is required. If the result of the motive role item is unknown, the motive role item for each player To be carried out. Therefore, information on the motive role event is also required, but in the case of the second invention, information on the implemented motive role event is required, such as "what number of events performed" and "event with a value of XX". Collect the results of the motive role event based on the implementation NO such as "event with event ID of △△", the sign recorded at the time of implementation, and the event ID. It will be the information for that.
The third information about the benefits is how to arrange the benefits and the contents of the benefits, and the method of arranging the benefits varies depending on the top few people, winners, lucky seven people, etc., and the contents of the benefits are also in advance such as 10 coins. In some cases, the privilege winners may be presented with the benefits that can be implemented so that they can freely choose. However, there are cases where coins that are valid on the battlefield are multiplied, and in such cases, information on the coins that have been multiplied, information on refunds, and the ability to refund are required. In addition, since the function related to refund etc. is usually included in the function to process coins valid in the battlefield, the information related to refund handled in the information related to benefits is only the information for linking with the function to process coins. Become.
Returning to the story, the function that meets the establishment requirements is the function that tries to satisfy the shortage for such establishment requirements, and if the motive role event is implemented on the battlefield, the establishment requirements managed by the central device are investigated. Then, it is investigated whether there is a requirement for establishment that requires the result of the event, and if there is, it is recorded in the requirement for establishment.
4) The function to execute the work-in-process event is that if the requirements for establishment are met, and if it is in a state where it can be implemented strictly, the necessary information is passed to the implementation event management means to execute the event and the result is established. Return to requirements management method.
5) What is the function of deciding the award winner? The establishment requirement management means that has received the implementation result of the work-in-process event has such a function of deciding the award winner based on the result.
6) The function of granting benefits depends on the content of the benefits, but it is possible to increase or decrease the number of coins that are valid on the battlefield, or send privilege information to the facilitator event to grant the benefits within the facilitator event. In this case, it is not necessary to make the player perform a special action in the present invention, but if the player can change the battle environment of himself / herself or the opponent, or allow the player to select the privilege to be entrusted to the facilitator event, the privilege It is necessary to make the acquirer perform some actions. The method is to display the privilege that can be implemented on the exchange terminal device of the privilege acquirer, have the user select the privilege within the time limit, and return the selected ID and the privilege processing ID to the central device. Then, the central device appropriately processes the privilege based on the information.

The third invention is another form of the second invention, and the second invention is a work-in-process item in which a work-in-process item is inserted in the first invention. The motive role event is performed in, and the facilitator event is changed by the privilege of the work-in-process event. The necessity was that the power balance of the three types of events on the battlefield was fairly equalized by the second invention, but the facilitator event was still strong. However, by focusing on the work-in-process event, the motive role event is the preparation for the work-in-process event, and the facilitator event is the privilege for the work-in-process event, the preparation, the main battle, and the decisive battle (privilege) become almost equal. Even if you are good at preparation, main battle, or decisive battle, if you are inferior in overall strength, you will not be able to win, and you will be able to reverse by that amount, and you will be able to compete in a unique way of cross-species exchange.
As mentioned in "Issues to be solved by the invention", the unique way of competing between different kinds of eyes is not to eat a wide variety of ingredients directly, but to eat them as a treat. Rather than conducting competitions individually, they will be fused so that players and spectators can conduct the competition in the most suitable way. However, in the first and second inventions, there was no distinction between preparation, main battle, and decisive battle, and they were chaotic. However, the third invention clarifies them, making it easier for players and spectators to understand the overall strength and aim, but the technology. There is nothing new in terms of the subject, and the third invention only changes the linking procedure between the events.
Further, in the third invention, when the establishment requirement of the work-in-process event is activated without following the procedure of the second invention, the establishment requirement implements the motive role item in order to satisfy itself. Such a composition is the same as that of the motive-motive exchange, and the motive-motive exchange decides the motive role item without following the procedure of arranging the options. In other words, all of them go backwards beyond the order, and the degree of retrograde is more in-process than in-in-process, and if it is in-process, it goes back only one, but if it is in-process, it must go back two. The difference is, depending on how the battle-type event is performed, if it is a motive factor, it will be done in a direct confrontation, but if it is a work-in-process event, it will be done after the motive role event is performed and the battle is prepared. Therefore, even if the opponent has a difference in ability and cannot win at all, by adding preparations for the battle, for example, letting children and the elderly throw quoits and throw balls, and change the character and battle elements as a result. Then, even if there is a difference in ability, you will not be able to win. You will be able to fight in that way, and your tactics will be enriched.
However, this slight change not only enriches the tactics, but also enables the embodiment described as "Kiri", which is a step to greatly change the inter-eye exchange. In addition, although I will describe the cut-and-sew again, it will be carried out in a round system, which is the fourth invention, after only the in-process exchanges are performed.
Further, at the stage of the third invention, even if the motive factor exchange and the work-in-process exchange are mixed, that is, whether the motive role item is directly selected or the work-in-process item (strictly speaking, the requirement for establishing the work-in-process item) is directly selected. The third invention is based on the first invention, even if it is chosen or made possible. Therefore, in order to perform the motive role event, the options must be arranged in the facilitator event, and the "granting of the license of the facilitator event", which is the greatest benefit of the work-in-process event, cannot be implemented. However, even in such a case, various benefits can be given, such as making the arrangement of options as advantageous as possible, obtaining coins that are valid on the battlefield, and so on.

In order to make the above possible, 1) a function to specify any of the requirements for establishment and
2) Provide a function to perform work that meets the implementation requirements.
To supplement the above,

1) The function of designating the establishment requirements is not special, and in the second invention, the organizer prepares the establishment requirements of the work-in-process item in advance or the player creates it during the battle. All or part of the requirements for establishment can be displayed on the AC terminal device of each player so that they can be selected, or one of the requirements for establishment is specified based on the event message sent from the facilitator event.
In order to allow the former player to select, the central device manages all the establishment requirements on the battlefield, but the management items are provided with items that limit the establishment requirements that can be specified depending on the target player, implementation status, and scene. , After limiting, add the ID of the establishment requirement that can be specified by the player, the information indicating the content of each establishment requirement, the pattern, etc. to the AC terminal device of each player, and download the motive of the first invention. In the scene where the interaction is possible, that is, in the scene where the motive role item is selected, the downloaded establishment requirements are mixed and displayed, or only the establishment requirements are displayed so that the player can select. It should be noted that the method of selecting the displayed establishment requirements can be carried out by various methods in the same manner as the method of arranging the motive role item. For example, it can be played in a computer game, the player can make an arbitrary arrangement, or the organizer can make an arrangement in advance. Then, the player will be able to decide whether to select the motive role item or the establishment requirement, and if the motive role item is selected, the motive cause exchange will be possible, and if the establishment requirement is selected, the work-in-process exchange will be possible. ..
In order to be able to select from the information from the latter facilitator event, a trap like a land mine is set in the facilitator event, and if the trap is activated, the requirements for establishment are specified in the central device, and the method is running. Since it is difficult to pass the information of the in-process event created in the facilitator event one by one, an event message that can be activated like a land mine is provided in the facilitator event, and information that limits the requirements for establishment is added to the message, for example. , Add information that limits the difficulty level and the type of event, narrow down the requirements that the central device can implement based on the player ID as in the previous section, and let the player make the final decision as in the previous section. Display and select the requirements that can be selected on the AC terminal device, and if the central device makes an automatic arrangement, make an arrangement. At that time, if the automatic arrangement is required, install a program to produce on the player's AC terminal device. To entertain the player.

2) The function of performing the work satisfying the implementation requirements may be incomplete as described in the "function satisfying the establishment requirements" of the second invention. However, if it is incomplete, it is necessary to complete it until the work-in-process item in the requirement can be implemented, and it becomes a function to perform such work. For example, if the work-in-process item is undecided, the person who activates the establishment requirement is made to decide the work-in-process item, if the opponent is undecided, the opponent is decided, and if the motive role item of each opponent is undecided, each is asked. The work-in-progress event is decided, and if the result of the work-in-progress event is uncollected, the uncollected player is made to carry out the work-in-progress event and the result is collected. In addition, if the privilege is undecided, the privilege method and the target person are decided, that is, whether the privilege is decided before the battle or the privilege winner is decided after the battle, and then the privilege target is the winner. Let them decide whether to make it, how many people are in the top, and what number they should be. Also, if the terminal device for the event is unknown, such an arrangement will be made. As described above, it is a function to dynamically arrange the shortages one by one. Then, when the implementation requirements are satisfied, as described in the second invention, the work-in-process event is activated, the result is received, and the privilege is given.
In short, the difference from the establishment requirement in the second invention is that the second invention has the establishment requirement such as "what number of events were carried out", "event with a value of XX", "event with event ID of △△", etc. Whereas the location of the motive role item is recorded in, the motive role item itself is recorded in the requirements for establishment of the third invention, and the motive role item is implemented for the work-in-process event. Therefore, if both the result and the location of the motive role event can be recorded in the establishment requirements, if the result is not collected, the motive role event at the location can be automatically performed, and both types are mixed. Be done. For example, the player A may record the result of the work-in-process event specified in advance, and the player B may be forced to perform the specified work-in-process event. It will be one of the benefits of the work-in-process event.
In other words, the third invention forcibly implements the requirements for establishment, which is just that, but the meaning of the linkage between the events changes greatly, and the three types of events are connected linearly or in parallel. However, as described above, since the first invention is used as a base, when both the motive-initiated exchange and the work-in-process exchange are mixed, the privilege content of the work-in-process item is limited. This is because the work-in-process event must be arranged in the facilitator event in order to implement the motive role event, and the facilitator event can be changed only within the option arrangement process. Therefore, the license of the facilitator event, which is the greatest privilege, cannot be granted, but coins, etc. that are valid on the battlefield can be granted, and the most advantageous arrangement can be made in the process of deciding the options. It is also possible to set a difficult motive role item in the requirements for establishing the in-process part item.
However, the addition of the serial type to the three types of linking methods has great significance and diversifies the exchange between different types of items.

The fourth invention enables an embodiment described as a "round system", and makes use of the characteristic that the driving force event can collect battle elements, and changes it from a single-shot type to a continuous type, that is, for a certain period of time. Alternatively, it is possible to repeat the motive role event a certain number of times to solve the one-shot problem and enable a more advanced way of fighting. As a result, the embodiment described as "study promotion type" and "other-style game type" can be described as so-called "cutting".
It should be noted that the one-shot type problem is that the question-and-answer formula up to the third invention is to carry out the question-side item and the answer-side item one by one. Therefore, it is necessary to perform the question-side event every time the motive role event is performed, and the concentration is interrupted to promote study and practice, and other games cannot be played while concentrating. It was. Also, even in other-style games, the audience was irritated and could not be seen, regardless of the players.
However, if implemented in a round system, the round system divides one battle into multiple times, and in each round, separates "competition element collection" and "competition" so that each can be concentrated. By doing it multiple times, the tactics can be rebuilt. Therefore, in other-style games, the player's basic techniques and tactics can be seen individually, and the confrontation is based on that, so the audience can enjoy the sense of speed and excitement. Also, when studying or practicing, you can concentrate on your strengths and weaknesses for a certain period of time, and if you neglect, you will not be able to get a competitive element and you will lose a lot, so you will naturally be motivated. And, during the break time, you can play with nothing else based on it, it will be a distraction, you can understand the progress and hard work of the other party, and you can work hard regardless of genre or level. Also, if the opponent is too strong, the implementation level of the opponent can be changed at the turn of the round, so the ability can be improved harmoniously.
The round system is not a novel technology, as it bundles the requirements for establishing work-in-process events multiple times. Therefore, as long as the work-in-process item is made up of question-and-answer formulas, the round system is also made up of question-and-answer formulas. However, the difference between the requirements for establishing work-in-process and the round system is that the requirements for establishment are for individual work-in-process events, while the round system is for the entire battlefield or for groups. Therefore, since all the players are in step with each other, it is possible to collect battle elements and to arrange so-called options regardless of whether they are a pre-determined type, a post-determined type, or a non-arranged type.
Strictly speaking, the pre-determined type can be implemented even with the requirements for establishment. This is because the establishment requirement holds information about the work-in-process event, but unlike other arrangements, the pre-emptive type needs to present options, and in order to present options, the actual battle element to be used is used. You need to figure it out, and it's impossible for the main system to do that, so you'll be able to get the competitive elements in bulk by genre or category. For example, in the case of playing card games, even though there are various events such as poker and blackjack, playing cards are used together. Then, a nifty tag cannot be presented, and only an irrelevant tag or a combination of tags can be presented, which is not interesting. In other words, despite the fact that the processing is a big deal, there are few things that can be obtained, and it is not worth doing, so the pre-determined type cannot be implemented.
However, it is possible with the round system, and before that, with the round system, it is necessary to have all the players who perform the round collect the battle elements under the same conditions, and the battle elements are then Since it must be effective for the work-in-process event to be performed, it is rational and high that the round system prepares for the work-in-process event and provides a scene for collecting battle elements in the work-in-process event. It becomes performance.
Therefore, the provider of the work-in-process event is provided with a program capable of collecting the battle elements of the work-in-process event separately from the work-in-process event, and the battle elements can be collected under the program. Then, the battle element collection and the battle can be separated, and it becomes a round system.
Moreover, if it is done in such a way, that is, if the program for collecting the battle elements is described as a "round program" and the round program is provided as a set with the work-in-process event, how much the battle elements can be collected. However, it can be complicated, and it is possible to obtain subtle values, that is, values that cannot be obtained by so-called options. For example, you can launch a special game with the acquired value such as tulips and probability fluctuations seen in pachinko, or you can introduce options such as time sale that can obtain a special value at a special time zone. And if it is possible to carry out such a special phenomenon with ability, it will become more difficult and complicated. You will be able to do such things freely.
When providing a round program, the competition elements are collected in the implementation environment of the work-in-process event. In other words, it is outsourced like the event.
The round system can also be applied to facilitator events. In other words, the round system can be used not only in the work-in-process event but also in the competitive facilitator event. This is because the round system separates the battle element collection from the battle, and the battle element collection is, so to speak, how to use the motive role event, and if the motive role event is used as the battle preparation, it can be a round system. Therefore, even in the first invention, if the motive role event is used as a battle preparation, a round system can be adopted. If the facilitator event is used, a round program will be provided for the facilitator event.
In addition, the main body of the round system is managed by the central device. Therefore, there is no problem even if multiple round programs are started. This is because the round system is usually performed in multiple rounds. Therefore, the central device provides "round management means", and the means manages a plurality of rounds by dividing the data into a plurality of data. Moreover, a round is, so to speak, a battle-type question-side event, in short, a work-in-process event or a battle-type facilitator event that is performed multiple times, and during that period, the player who performs the event is restrained and controlled. It becomes a function to do. Therefore, the mechanism does not change whether the rounds are executed multiple times or multiple rounds are started, and there is no problem as long as they can be grouped correctly.

To enable the above, claim
1) Provide a round management means in the central device.
2) Provide the player with a screen that can be performed under the same conditions.
3) The implementation of events and benefits is left to the main system.
4) Overall flow.

In addition, since the value of the round system is not well understood as it is, it may not be necessary for the sword that shows the value of the round system most, but I will add it.

Kiritsugi is a specialized type of the third invention, and is a completed form in which three types of events are arranged in a straight line. In other words, the facilitator event is placed under the privilege of the work-in-process event, the motive role event is prepared for the work-in-process event, the preparation, the main battle and the privilege (decisive battle) are set, and the so-called motive role event, the work-in-process event and the facilitator event are set. By connecting in a straight line, the direct relationship between the facilitator event and the motive role event will be cut off, and the round system will be implemented.
The characteristic of Kiritsumi is
One is to equalize the power relationships of the three types of roles on the battlefield.
The second is that you can concentrate on preparing for the match.
Three can increase the number of opponents indefinitely.
Fourth, it will be easier to open a battlefield.
Each of them has already been described, but the first is as described in the third invention, and if the second is performed in a round system, the player repeats the motive role event for a certain period or a certain number of times to collect battle elements. it can. Thirdly, if the implementation method is devised as in the case described in the explanation of the work-in-process event, it will be possible to play against an almost unlimited number of people. The fourth difference between the embodiment described as "game" and "kiri" is that the kimono is easy to prepare, and basically the facilitator event, the work-in-process event, and the motive role event and round performed by each player. It can be implemented simply by deciding the number of systems and time allocation.
In short, the sword is made to be as easy to understand and implement as possible by eliminating unnecessary diversity while compensating for the weaknesses and weaknesses of the game. Therefore, the relationship between the events that play three different roles is also one pattern, which consists of the relationship between preparation, main battle, and decisive battle, and each can be carried out in the same event. If you want to change the event, change it for each round. However, even within the round, if it is a work-in-process event, the battle stage and character will change for each match, and the task of implementing the motive role event will be different each time. Furthermore, if you want to change the motive role event itself, you can change it. However, the selling of swords is that you can collect battle elements in the event you are good at, and there is not much need to change the motive role event itself within the round.
In addition, one of the weaknesses of the game is that all players are in step with each other, and two are performed with a time lag. This is because game is a real-time competition that mainly involves free action, and of course it is not possible to play against people who are not on the scene, and it is not possible to play with a time lag. Moreover, in such a situation, if a large number of people try to keep pace, the organizer and the player will not be able to handle it. Therefore, even if it is entrusted to a computer, it is extremely difficult to manage it in line with each other, and it can be said that it is almost impossible when the number of people reaches tens of thousands. However, if the dedicated specifications are used, system development is easier than playing games, and the above two weaknesses can be compensated for.
The issue is how to make it a dedicated specification, one is to utilize the game system as it is, and the other is to develop a system dedicated to the sword, but tentatively develop a system dedicated to the sword. Even if it does, it is necessary to link the events in a question-and-answer format, and in many respects the same processing as in the game must be performed. Above all, the difference between the third invention and the cutting edge is small, and it is irrational to develop a new system because of this small difference. However, this is not the case if the game is not played, but regardless of whether or not to develop a dedicated system, the cut-off will perform the following processing, and even if a dedicated system is developed, the next processing procedure Does not change at all.
First, the organizer decides how to implement the round system.
The second is to have each player decide on a facilitator event.
For the three, the organizer decides the work-in-process event.
The fourth is to have each player decide on a motive role event.
The fifth is to have all players collect battle elements under the same conditions.
Six will save and redeploy the acquired battle elements.
Seven are to carry out the work-in-process event a specified number of times.
Eight decide the award winners for each work-in-process event.
Nine give benefits to the award winners.
10 repeats 4 to 9 if there is a next round.
11 calculates the overall grade.
To briefly describe each,
The first is that cross-species exchange is "organizer-coordinated", and basically one organizer opens a battlefield and takes responsibility. Therefore, the organizer will make an arrangement regarding the sword.
Second, under the agreement of the organizer, each player participating in the battlefield decides on a facilitator event. However, if all the members perform the same facilitator event, the organizer's agreement will be followed and the work will not be necessary.
Thirdly, all the players perform the same event as the work-in-process event. However, if it is a team competition, only the representative of the team will play it. In addition, since the work-in-process item is executed a set number of times during one round, the implementation content changes each time. Such a setting is also made in the first step.
Fourth, before the start of the round, each player optimizes the events to be performed during the round during the interval immediately before the start of the round. In other words, recreate the pseudo-motive role event. At that time, it is possible to change the event, and if it is a different-style match type, the event prepared by the organizer will be reselected as a so-called pseudo-motive role event.
Fifth, whether it is a team battle or an individual battle, the battle elements are collected by repeating the motive role event for a predetermined time or a predetermined number of times. However, even if the number of times is less than the predetermined number, it may be forcibly terminated due to time over.
Sixth, the acquired battle elements are saved in preparation for the battle in the work-in-process event. At that time, it is easy to select the desired element by redeploying in the order of use or redeploying by element. Space is needed for such redeployment. In order to make it easier to select a desired element, a battle element is determined for each work-in-process event.
The seventh is to challenge the work-in-process event based on the acquired battle elements. Depending on the work-in-process event, it may not be necessary to face each other directly. In such a case, the battle pattern will be produced and the results will be announced together. Other than that, the player is made to carry out the work-in-process event.
Eighth, the award winners are decided based on the contents decided in the first. Therefore, it usually returns the ranking, but it may get a special value during the work-in-process event, for example, if you get the title of complete clear when you finish with a perfect score, it is a special value Whether or not you have obtained it is also received from the work-in-process event.
Ninth, the award winner is decided based on the results returned from the work-in-process event, and the award is given to the award winner. In addition, the privilege of Kiritsugi is the license of the facilitator event. Therefore, if the value returned to the facilitator event does not have the proof of the privilege winner, the facilitator event cannot be implemented. In some cases, the value returned for each facilitator event should be given a difference within the facilitator event by adding the ranking, etc. in addition to whether or not the privilege has been acquired.
If there is a next round, 10 returns to the 4th round and repeats up to the 9th round.
11 will calculate the overall result and decide the winner if there is no next round.
Based on the above, when the cut-offs are arranged, the cut-offs are provided with a function of entrusting the inter-event linkage in the battlefield for a temporary period or the entire period in the third invention, and the inter-event linkage is performed under the function. It should be noted that this function links the events in units described as "rounds", and one or more work-in-process events are carried out in each round. All the players involved in preparing for the implementation of the work-in-process event collect the battle elements under the screen with the same contents. That is, the battle elements are collected for a predetermined time or a predetermined number of times under the same conditions. In addition, in the collection of battle elements, the function becomes the question side of the question-and-answer type, and the choices are decided by the pre-determined type, the post-determined type, or the non-arranged type, and the motive role item is entrusted to the main system based on the choices. , Get the result back and get the battle element according to the way of arranging the options and save it. Then, if the battle element is redeployed, it is redeployed and the redeployed content is used to challenge the work-in-process event, but the role of the function is up to that point, and the rest is left to the main system of the third invention. In other words, Kiriki holds information about the work-in-process event to be performed after collecting the battle elements, collects the battle elements based on the information, and dynamically sets the requirements for establishing the work-in-process event based on the collected battle elements. Since the information is only passed to the main system so that it can be created, and the implementation of the motive role event is also entrusted to the main system, this function collects temporary battle elements in place of the requirements for establishing the work-in-process event for in-process exchange. Only. Then, this temporary substitute is divided into rounds, and the round is repeated one or more times, or the substitute function is recreated for each round.

Therefore, returning to the above story, that is, which method of utilizing the game system or developing a dedicated system is better, the third invention only provides the substitute function, and the game It is easier and more rational to utilize the system as it is.
In addition, although it is a substitute function, the indispensable element for the substitute function is limited to one point in which it is necessary to collect battle elements according to the work-in-process event. Therefore, it is possible to separate it from the central device, so to speak, the agency function itself can be outsourced like other events, and if it is outsourced to the provider of the work in process event, it will be a match in the category of the work in process event. You can collect elements, and you can collect the most advanced battle elements. For this reason, we will ask the in-process event provider to provide a program "round program" for collecting battle elements.

The above is the outline of the sword, and it can be implemented by providing the third invention with a function to perform a round system. However, if only the round system is used, the first invention can also be implemented if it is not in the form of a so-called cut-and-sew.

From now on, the technology that enables the round system, which was listed before the cut-off, will be supplemented.

1) Providing a round management means in the central device means that, as described above, a round is a collection of battle elements by repeating the motive role event for a certain period or a certain number of times on the premise that the motive role event is used as a battle preparation. The question-side event is repeated a certain number of times or for a certain period of time with the battle elements collected, and the question-side event must be a basic battle-type event. Then, the person who performs the fighting type event performs the round.
In addition, in the first invention, it is not considered as a non-competitive event because it is difficult to understand whether the facilitator event is a one-person game or a competitive game, such as bowling score or sugoroku, that it must be a basic competitive event. It is an expression for.
Therefore, the round management means requires information on the question side event, information on the player performing the question side event, and information on the round, and if the question side event is a work-in-progress event, information on benefits is required. In addition, each player needs to repeat the motive role event to collect the battle elements, and the player information requires the information of the motive role event and the computer terminal device for collecting the battle elements, and is usually an exchange terminal. Use the device. However, when a round is performed on an arcade game machine or the like, the battle elements are collected on the arcade game machine, so it is not always necessary to use an AC terminal device. Therefore, information about the round terminal device is required.
In other words, for each round, there are "round information", "question side event information", "player information", "motivation role event information for each player", "terminal information for each player's round", and "privilege information". As for where to manage the pseudo-motive role item, the pseudo-motive role item consists of the "problem ID" and the "conceptual base value" created by optimizing the pseudo-motive role item as described above. It is an index, and if the number of cases is too large, it will be thinned out, so it may be stored in either the central device or the round terminal device, but usually it is stored in the central device.

2) Providing a player with a screen that can be performed under the same conditions means a "round program" installed in each player's round terminal device, and each player collects battle elements through the round program. In addition, the battle elements collected here are used in the event on the question side. Originally, in the embodiment described as "game", the motive role event is for the event message requesting the motive emitted from the event on the question side. The competition element is prepared by the questioning event itself, but the program prepares it instead, so the best thing is to have the program provided to the questioning event. However, no matter where the provider is, that is, even if it is provided by the main system, the round program needs a function to appropriately display the battle elements used by the questioner, and the questioner's event. It is necessary to have a function to create an option instead of the above, and an event message is sent to the central device according to the method of arranging the options, the central device is made to carry out the motive role item as described in the first invention, and the result is received. It is necessary to have a function of determining whether or not an option can be obtained, and a function of accumulating the obtained battle elements, and it is necessary to have all the players who perform the round perform the above operations under the same conditions. However, all players must be able to collect battle elements under the same conditions, but the contents are not always the same. This is because the questioning event may be a group battle, in which case a role can be played within the group, and battle elements are collected based on the role. Therefore, the display contents and the like change depending on the role of the player, but even in such a case, the same conditions must be met throughout the group.

3) Entrusting the implementation of events and benefits to the main system, in short, the round management means and the program for rounds perform question-and-answer formulas on behalf of the event on the questioning side, and all the events and benefits actually given are given. It is left to the main body system as described in the first to third inventions. However, since the motive role item and the work-in-process role item are repeated a certain number of times, it is advisable to simplify the procedure.
The round management means basically manages the battlefield, and when the battlefield is provided with the round management means, the round processing is prioritized. Therefore, the round registrant can only carry out the round-related matters during the round.

4) The overall flow is the overall flow of the person performing the round, as described in the sword, but to briefly restate it, when a round is formed in the battlefield, it is related to the round. For example, a player with is displayed in the player table to the effect that a round is in progress, and cannot participate in other play. Then, the AC terminal device of the player performing the round displays the implementation guideline of the round and the time until the start, which is the interval immediately before the start of the round. If it is formed, the role can be changed.
It should be noted that the remodeling of the pseudo motive role item is the optimization of the motive factor role item, and when the motive force role item to be executed by the player is selected, the "setting program" prepared by the motive factor role item can be started. Then, when the program is started, there are various words and numerical values that extract the tasks of the motive role event, and when the extraction conditions such as "past questions of XX university" are entered, only the tasks are extracted and the index is displayed. It's done. Since the index is a pseudo-motive role event, the value of the conceptual base of the index is reassigned as described above. Whether the index is managed by the central device or the round terminal device of each player is different, but in the case of a game, it is managed by the central device, so that it is usually managed by the central device.
After the optimization of the motive role event is completed, the round starts, and the screen for deciding the choice and the place to store the battle elements is displayed on the round terminal device of the player participating in the round, and the screen for deciding the choice. When an option is decided in, an event message is issued based on the method of deciding the option, and if the round terminal device manages the pseudo-motive role event, one problem is identified by the device and the central device manages it. If so, identify one task with the central device, have the player perform the identified task as described in the first invention, have the result returned to the round program, and based on how to arrange options in the program. It is determined whether or not the battle element in the option can be obtained, and if it is obtained, the battle element is stored in the means for storing. After repeating the above as many times as necessary and collecting the battle elements, the screen for deciding the options is invalidated, and the storage method can be changed on the screen for storing the battle elements.
How to store the battle elements is free and depends on the event on the question side, but if you want to automatically perform the event on the question side, arrange them in the order of submission, and if the player can freely select, classify them so that they are easy to use. Put them side by side. In addition, since the automatic operation is performed regardless of the player, the central device stores the battle elements so that they can be automatically taken out in sequence.
Then, when it is time to carry out the event on the question side, the battle elements are sequentially sent to the central device, and if the event on the question side is a facilitator event, the battle element is returned together with the player information to the event on the question side. If is a work-in-process item, the central device dynamically creates a requirement for establishing the work-in-process item, and performs the work-in-process item as described in the second and third inventions. In addition, information that is insufficient when creating the requirements for establishment will be supplemented by round management means. For example, information about benefits.
In addition, the granting of benefits is also entrusted to the main system. In addition, the privilege of the round system is the license of the event on the basic question side, but as mentioned above, even if the license is given to everyone and there is a disparity, or the license is not obtained, the question side It is necessary to tell that fact in the event, and basically the result is returned in the event on the question side of all players.
The above is repeated as many times as necessary, and when the round is completed, each player performs necessary processing such as recreating the pseudo-motive role event if there is a next round.

In the fifth invention, the question-and-answer formula that establishes the interspecific exchange is established based on the conceptual base. Therefore, regardless of whether or not to use the conceptual base, the value of the conceptual base is exchanged, so it is called "interspecies exchange". In other words, how to compete to exchange the value of the conceptual base between different types. However, the conceptual base is not a special value, but a "value in a specific range" to represent the entire internal value of the things participating in the interspecies exchange, and is 0 to 1 or 0 to 0. Any so-called finite range value such as a value including a fraction of 100, an integer of 0 to 100, a character or a symbol representing a group such as AZ, etc. may be used. However, in the present invention, a value including a decimal number from 0 to 100 is recommended. That is because it can be diverted to a ratio, which will become clear later.
What can be said there is that the values of the conceptual bases are exchanged, so if the value contains a decimal number from 0 to 100, even if it is changed a little within the finite region, it can be consistent, that is, If everyone is satisfied, there is no problem. Taking advantage of its characteristics
For one thing, it makes up for the weaknesses of the dialectic.
Two have new added value
Third, you can adjust the value of the entire battlefield,
Fourth, it allows the internal value to be substantially changed.
The fifth invention makes the above four points possible, so to speak, it is a series of inventions, but since it can be carried out without going through the steps, the claims are separated even though it is the fifth invention. To supplement each,

First, regarding the question-and-answer formula, the value system of each is put into a finite field described as a conceptual base, and the so-called internal value is put into a finite field and asked and answered. In other words, both parties exchanging value are divided into a question side and a responder side, the question side asks the responder side, and the responder side answers the question, and the trend of the question side is decided based on the result of the implementation. This is, so to speak, a replacement of the part, in which the questioner chooses what he or she should do and stops it, shakes that part to another event, and restarts the place where it was stopped by the result of another event. , There is no close relationship between other disciplines and options in resuming what was stopped. In other words, since the options cover from success to failure, anything can be used as long as the options can be identified. However, if there is a discrepancy between the guideline given to the options, that is, the difficulty level if the difficulty level is given, and the difficulty level of the actual event, the player will be disappointed. Therefore, it is necessary to match the guideline with the event to be implemented, and in order to match, the event on the responding side is set to "aggregate of tasks", the value of the conceptual base is assigned to each task, and then the "subject" The set of tasks is optimized and recreated. Then, for the subject, it becomes possible to do what the subject imagined as an option in other events. In addition, the subject is each player in the case of self-discipline type, the tournament level in the case of other style game type, and the organizer in the case of play.
In other words, the question-and-answer formula originally requires that the options can be specified, and has no causal relationship with the respondent. However, it is necessary not to offend the player who implements it, and for that purpose, a guideline that the player can vaguely imagine is necessary, and it is a conceptual base that plays that role, meaning a vague base. However, it is about that much, and even if the value changes a little, if the background of the change is clear, it will not be regarded as a problem. That is the basis of the fifth invention.

The first, to make up for the weaknesses of the dialectic, is as described above, and the conceptual basis is not absolutely important. However, that doesn't mean it can't be handled roughly, and it's used everywhere. At that time, for example, assuming that the value 70 of the conceptual base was assigned to the options, the tasks to be implemented were searched based on 70, but the values assigned to each task were 68, 71, 73 ... If so, 71 is the target of implementation, and 73 is rarely selected. The reason is that the values assigned to the options are relatively rough, and the search is based on that value. Therefore, if the implementation target has a range with 70 as the boundary, and if a so-called threshold value is set, the range will be uniform. Not only can it not be finely adjusted, but it is also difficult for the player to understand, which is a factor that makes him feel uncomfortable.
Therefore, the organizer is also given a conceptual base, and the conceptual base is freely divided and grouped at the discretion of the organizer. Then, when identifying the task of the motive role item, the value of the conceptual base issued by the question side is not directly passed to the motive role item, but is grouped via the conceptual base of the organizer, and the group is formed. Pass the start and end points of the motive role event. Then, the tasks in the same group will be selected equally. For example, if the group is 70 to less than 80, 73 will be selected equally, and by clearly indicating the group division, it will be obvious to the player, and the organizer will be able to make subtle division adjustments.
In other words, the organizer will be able to control the accuracy of the battlefield, which is a big improvement in itself. In short, although the inter-species exchange is an organizer-adjusted type, it was not possible to make sufficient adjustments in the first to fourth inventions, and it was left to the event, but the organizer's own adjustment became possible, and the fifth The invention is dug down.

To add new value to the second, the first grouping may be used as it is, or it may be grouped again, but the question-and-answer formula is used both when asking a question and when answering. It can be expressed by the value of the conceptual base. However, it is up to the developer of this system to use it or not, but for example, if the motive role item and the task to be implemented are negotiated in the game, a conceptual base is not necessary. However, if only the motive role item is negotiated in the game and the task is negotiated by the value assigned to the option, the value of the conceptual base is required. Also, when replying, if only the success or failure of clearing is returned, the conceptual base is not necessary, but if the return is based on the success, failure, or success or failure, the value of the conceptual base can be used. Therefore, as described above, in the present invention, it is recommended to express by the degree of success or failure, that is, the upper value indicates the degree of success at the boundary of 50 from 0 to 100, and the lower value indicates the degree of failure. It shows the degree, but depending on how detailed the degree is, the group division at the time of answer and the group division at the time of question will not match and you will have to change the group division naturally, but whether to separate both Anyway, by grouping the organizer's conceptual bases and placing them with valid values on the battlefield for all or some of the groups at the time of reply, for example, coins valid on the battlefield. By placing items that affect the facilitator event, characters and symbols that unravel the puzzle, etc., and by passing through the organizer's conceptual base when returning the result of the motive role event, etc. Can be obtained. That is to add a second value, which creates new fun on the battlefield.
In addition, a part or all of the group division at the time of reply may be changed, or the value given to each group may be changed.

The third major feature of inter-species interaction is that the value of the entire battlefield can be adjusted. The unique value system of the event, the player, and the trap that changes the value of the conceptual base. All things made up of can be treated as conceptual bases, and since the values of conceptual bases are exchanged, value adjustment and mischief can be performed by changing the values.
However, there are two embodiments of interspecific exchange, one is a game and the other is a game. The difference between the two has already been described, but the tactics can be performed in the self-discipline type and the other-style game type, and in both cases, the motive role item is optimized mainly by the player. Strictly speaking, the tournament level is the main player in the other-style game type, but the tournament level is the player's level, and the player is the main player. Therefore, the above changes do not require so-called mischief or value adjustment, and it is the game that needs them, and the purpose of the game is to play, interact, and support each other. Is highly desirable.
Therefore, one-dimensional coordinates or two-dimensional coordinates with the conceptual base held by the organizer as the base effective area are created, and the conceptual base held by the event, the player, or the trap is arranged in a rod-shaped figure at the coordinates. Then, for the conceptual bases such as events and players that do not have external value depending on the length and placement position of the rod-shaped figure, the conceptual bases held by the organizer become absolute values (base values) and have external value. Therefore, depending on the size and placement position of the figure placed in the coordinates, the value can be adjusted by the relationship between the figure and the base axis value.
At that time, it is important that the internal value held by the event, the player, or the trap is expressed as a ratio to the length of each rod-shaped figure, and even if the figure size changes by expressing it as a ratio. Internal value is not impaired. In that sense, that is, in the sense that the internal value is expressed as a ratio, converted to a coordinate value, converted to the ratio of the internal value again, and the value is passed, the conceptual base can be converted to a ratio of 0 to 100. A value that includes a decimal number of is desirable. That is the reason why the conceptual base is recommended to 0 to 100. If the conceptual base is a symbol representing a group such as AZ, it can be used without any problem unless it is graphicized, but it is graphicized. When converting the value as described above, it is necessary to express the internal value as a ratio, and the position indicated by each symbol must be quantified and calculated. Therefore, in the end, 0 to 100 is required. That is, the conceptual base may be anything as long as it is not graphicized, but if it is graphicized, a value including a decimal number from 0 to 100 can be used most efficiently.
Also, if you take the form of graphicizing into one-dimensional coordinates and converting the value, that is, if you take the diagram of converting the internal value to the basic value and converting the basic value to the internal value again, as described above, the questioner side, the sponsor Not only the relationship between the person and the responder, but also the player and the trap can be added to such a relationship, and the value can be adjusted through each figure such as the question side, the player, the trap, the organizer, and the responder. .. To give a specific example, assuming that the questioning side is a facilitator event, if the conceptual base of the facilitator event is graphicized on the Y-axis 10 to 90 and the option value 80 is emitted from the facilitator event, 10 80% of ~ 90 will be 64, followed by 64% of 70 ~ 140 will be 125 if the conceptual base of the player who performed the facilitator event was graphicized at 70 ~ 140 on the Y axis. , 125 is rounded to 100 because it exceeds the effective range, and if the conceptual base of the trap is graphicized on 15-70 of the Y-axis, 100% of 15-70 becomes 70, and 70 is the organizer. It is passed to, grouped under the organizer as in the previous claim, the start point and end point of the group to which it belongs are passed to the responder, and the start point and end point are 60 and 80, which is a conceptual motive role event. If the base is graphicized from 20 to 70, the meaning pointed to by the graphic is reversed after the organizer, that is, after it is handed over to the organizer, and the range that can be released up to the organizer is the graphic. While it is made into a figure, the range that can be received after the organizer is made into a figure. Therefore, while the range of the group is 60 to 80, only the range of 60 to 70 can be received. Therefore, the task of the motive role item is searched for the task to be carried out within the range of 60 to 70 where both intersect, and 60. Since ~ 70 is 83% to 100%, 83 to 100 tasks are extracted and one task is randomly selected. As a result of the above, in this case, the values of the options changed significantly to 80, 64, 100, 70, 60 to 70, and 83 to 100, but the value can be adjusted in this way.
In other words, the content pointed to by the bar-shaped figure differs between when it is handed over to the organizer and after it is handed over to the organizer, and until it is handed over to the organizer, the range that can be converted to the basic value is shown by the figure. Then, after being handed over to the organizer, the range that can be received from the base value is shown in a figure, and the content pointed to by the figure is reversed. For that reason, it will be easier to understand if the coordinates are set to two-dimensional coordinates and the figures that are passed to the organizer are placed in the minus direction of the X-axis and the figures that are passed to the organizer are placed in the plus direction of the X-axis. Therefore, in that sense, it is defined as one-dimensional coordinates or two-dimensional coordinates.
In addition, the result of the motive role event is usually used as it is without being changed. This is because the situation becomes complicated, and reaching difficult or easy tasks is the result of overcoming the challenges.
In addition, the insertion position of the player or the trap, that is, the arrangement position is only until it is passed to the organizer, and it is not inserted after it is passed. This is because the organizer's coordination, for example, does not know how the grouping will be improved in the future, and it is safer if the same thing can be done in the same part.
In addition, the value outside the basic effective range is converted to the value of the effective range as 125 is converted to 100 as described above. Such work may be performed one by one, but only once when handing it to the organizer. You may do it.

The fourth reason is that the internal value can be changed substantially, which can be said in the driving role event. As mentioned above, the figure size and the arrangement position are changed by arranging them in one-dimensional or two-dimensional coordinates. Even so, the internal value could not be changed. For example, even if the figure size of the driving role item is set to 30 to 60 in the basic effective range, all values of 30 or less and 60 or more will be 30 or 60 because they are donated to the nearest figure value, and eventually 30 to 60. The task of the motive role event could be carried out only within the range of. Moreover, the probability of becoming a problem of 30 or 60 becomes extremely high, and the balance becomes unbalanced. Therefore, that part is selected with a high probability, but other tasks also need to be selected with a low probability, and it is necessary to be able to do it without losing balance, and it is possible to do so. Will be.
The method is extremely simple, making the bar-shaped figure wide and providing the required number of division points. Then, if one of the dividing points of the dividing line that divides both sides is set to, for example, the Y axis as the effective range, the bar-shaped figure becomes vertically long, and if the dividing line is inserted in the form of dividing the vertically long figure, the rod-shaped figure becomes vertically long. A contact point with the dividing line is made on the left side and the right side, and if one of the contact points is made movable and moved so as not to exceed the upper and lower sides of the adjacent dividing line or rod-shaped figure, the divided interval changes. The so-called frontage becomes wider or narrower, which changes the probability of being selected. For example, if the figure size is set to 0 to 100, the dividing lines are set to 30 and 60, and one dividing point is moved to 10 and 90, which is usually on the left side, the dividing point is 30 to 60. The range will be selected in the range of 10 to 90, and the 10 parts before and after will be selected with tasks less than 30 and tasks more than 60, and all the above problems will be solved.
The required number of division points as described above can be provided. However, although the rod-shaped figure is rectangularized in this example, it may be difficult to see even if the old and new dividing points are provided in the rod shape instead of being rectangular so that only the new dividing point can be moved.

To divide the above inventions into four and make each possible, it is as follows, but since many things have already been described, only the necessary items will be supplemented.

The first means for rounding the value of the conceptual base according to claim 5 is to provide the conceptual base management means in the central device, and in the management means, the conceptual base is freely divided and the division points are held. If the questioner sends an event message to the central unit asking for a motive to interact, check if the value of the conceptual base is attached regardless of how the options are arranged, and if it is attached. It checks which group is freely divided and sends the start value and end value of the group to which it belongs to the motive role event side.
Regardless of how the options are arranged, there are pre-determined type, post-determined type, and non-arranged type as the method of arranging the options. The value is basically unnecessary. However, the value of the conceptual base is a value required when deciding the task of the motive role event, and the value of the conceptual base may be added to the event message seeking the motive by a trap or a mechanism by the organizer. Strictly speaking, if the event message for the motive contains the value of the conceptual base, in the sense that it may happen.
Further, a threshold value may be provided for the value of the conceptual base. For example, if the value includes a decimal number from 0 to 100, the decimal point is rounded or the integer part is also provided with a width. In such a case, the threshold value may be one step or two steps and three steps to expand the threshold in a gradation style, and if it is set stepwise, the threshold "step". When the "start value" and "end value" are arranged and sent to the central device, the central device groups the start value and end value of each stage as described above, and sets the "start value" in group units. When the "end value" is arranged by providing a "step" and sent to the motive role item, the motive role item takes out the start value and the end value in the order of the steps, searches for the task, and if the task is not found, the target. Expand the area step by step. For example, if the first is 5 to 6, then the search target area is expanded step by step like 4 to 7, 3 to 8, and if a task to be implemented is found, the work is stopped at that point and the corresponding task is implemented. .. As described above, the conceptual bases are grouped in the central device, and the task of the motive role item is searched for in each group.
The point to note when grouping is that if the organizer divides the conceptual base with higher accuracy than the options, there will be a problem that will not be implemented again. For example, if the organizer divides the choices into 10 even though the choices provided by the questioner are 30 and 70, the tasks of 80 or 90 are not selected because 30 and 70 are the starting points for searching for the task. In order to prevent this from happening, the method of arranging options should be post-determined, or the group should be divided into two at the boundary of 50. If the values given are 30, 40, 60, 35 and 50 will be the boundary, and if 40 options are selected, 40 may be sent instead of 40, and two values of 35 and 50 may be sent. Although such a form is also a kind of threshold value, it has an advantage that the range is not constant and dead space cannot be formed, which is the reason for expressing "the value of the conceptual base is one or more" described in the claim. However, even in such a case, grouping is performed by binary as described above. The boundary point is calculated by arranging the values assigned to the options in ascending order and extracting them, and calculating an intermediate value with respect to the values before and after the corresponding value.

As a means for obtaining a value valid in the battlefield as the result of the motive role event, which is the second claim 6, the first group can be used as it is or regrouped. All groups or some groups are given one or more valid values on the battlefield, and when the result of the motive role event is returned to the central device, the group is specified based on the result, and the specified group If there is a valid value on the battlefield in possession, all or part of the value is given to the player unconditionally or conditionally.
If you can do the above, the method does not matter, but the group is the "group symbol" or "identification value", the "start value" and "end value" of the group, the "valid value" that is valid on the battlefield, and if you add conditions, " Manage "acquisition conditions", etc., and then have the "player ID", "conceptual base value", "rank", etc. returned as the result of the motive role item from the motive role item, and compare them with the previous management contents in sequence. If there is a group that corresponds to the value of the conceptual base and the acquisition conditions are met, the acquired value can be added to the means for managing the effective value on the battlefield for each player, for example, in the player table. Send and add along with the player ID. Then, if it is necessary to show it to the player, a means for displaying an effective value is provided in the AC terminal device of the player, and dummy data is sent to the means to show synchronization.
The boundary and size of the group from which a valid value can be obtained may be variable, or the valid value itself may be changed. In such a case, a means for changing the group allocation is provided, and the group allocation is changed for each time or for each set condition. In addition, when changing a valid value, the value to be changed is prepared in advance and placed in an array, and the value is replaced when a predetermined time or situation is reached, that is, when the condition to be changed is satisfied. The changing pattern may be performed by a calculation formula, or may be arranged and the current may be sequentially moved.
Further, although it is an example of the above "acquisition condition", it may be made into a game. Making a game is to decide whether or not to give it in spite of being able to acquire it, for example, by making it a quiz or like a pachinko game heaver, a special value beyond the value provided in the group The result of downloading, installing, and starting a computer game such as roulette on the target person's exchange terminal device was received and matched with the acquisition conditions. To get it. Therefore, if the ID of the game to be implemented is used as the acquisition condition, the event to be implemented can be changed. In addition, if the game to be played is decided to be a shooting game, for example, the number of bullets may be changed for each group, and the value obtained as a result of the game may be changed in the battlefield.

The means for changing the value of the conceptual base based on the drawing information arranged at the coordinates according to the third claim 7 is the above-mentioned conceptual base management means, and all or a part of the objects participating in the battlefield. Have information to visualize our conceptual base in one-dimensional or two-dimensional coordinates, decide the order of processing for it, for example, questioner (facilitator or in-process event), player, trap, group If an event message asking for the motive is sent after deciding the order of processing, such as conversion and motive role, first check whether it is the facilitator or the in-process event, and there is no graphic information of the found event. If there is, the value of the conceptual base sent from one or more is used as a percentage, and within the range indicated by the graphic information, the ratio is calculated according to the case described above, and the basic value is calculated and the conceptual base is calculated. Change the value of. Subsequently, such work is performed again if there is graphic information of the player, and further, if there is graphic information of the trap, the value of the conceptual base changed through the questioner, the player, and the trap is claimed before the previous time. As described in, group all values, make an array of start value and end value of the group to which you belong, check if there is graphic information of the driving role item, and if there is, within the range in the graphic information, the above As shown, the value of the conceptual base is changed within the range indicated by each group and the intersection indicated by the graphic information, and the problem is searched for as described in the previous claim based on the changed value.
As described above, it is not necessary to display the graphic if only the value of the conceptual base is changed by the graphic information in the central device, but it is necessary for each player if the coordinate contents are visualized according to the implementation status of each player. The information and coordinate content display program is downloaded to the AC terminal device, and the program is installed so that the coordinate content can be displayed and changed. In addition, the information required as graphic information is the "classification code" and "investigation order" of each graphic, the "ID" and "start point" and "end point" of the graphic, or the "graphic length" instead of the end point. Based on these, the internal value is expressed by the ratio of the figure length, and the external value is expressed by the base value of the coordinates.

The fourth method of adjusting the internal value of the conceptual base according to claim 8 is to provide a division point on each figure representing the conceptual base, manage the division point by dividing it into old and new, and manage the new division point. It is made movable, and as described above, it is made movable so as not to exceed the adjacent dividing points and the upper and lower ends of the figure. Then, the frontage pointed to by the old division point is widened or narrowed. As a result, if the frontage is widened, a large amount of the basic axis value can be accepted, and the ratio to the frontage is accepted, so that the acceptance balance does not change. On the contrary, if it is narrowed, the acceptance range of the basic axis value is narrowed by that amount, but the balance is not lost as described above. For example, if the division points are at 60, 70, and 80 and the division points are moved to 10, 30, and 90, the actual base value to be implemented will change significantly, and the tasks of 60 or less will be solved. If the basic axis value is 10 or less, it cannot be carried out, and the tasks of 70 to 80 will be carried out at 30 to 90. In this way, the relationship between the internal value and the basic value can be greatly changed.
Note that even if a plurality of division points are provided, the values up to the division points are used as they are because they are compressed or decompressed at equal ratios. For example, if the division points are set in 30 and 90 and the division point of 90 is moved to 40, the basic axis value 60 becomes 60 from 40 to 100, which is 33%, so 33% of 90 to 100 becomes 93. Will be converted. That is, the original division point 90 is used as it is, and the value of the ratio moved on it is added.
In addition to the above-mentioned conceptual base management means, the above-mentioned division point and division point movement information are created and changed to the AC terminal device used by the authorized person for the authorized person who can create and move the divided point. The information necessary for this is downloaded so that it can be created and modified, and the changed contents are recorded in the conceptual base management means in the central device. As for the recorded contents, only "old and new dividing points" are added to the graphic information in the previous section.

In the sixth invention, a base point composed of a data structure is provided on the battlefield, and an exchange action is performed with the base point as a starting point. In other words, until now, there were only events that could be carried out in the battlefield, but a "base point" was given to each player, and after identifying one base point, the exchange action was started. Let me. resulting in,
For one thing, inter-event linkage can be done with data structures.
Secondly, various work-in-process can be performed at the base point.
Third, you will be able to fight both sides.
For the fourth, you will be able to play a game like a battle for the base point.
However, depending on the embodiment, the base point is not required, and there are embodiments described as "game" and "kiri" for inter-species exchange, which are almost unnecessary for the game and may not be necessary for the game. In other words, the starting point is needed when you want to set traps or complicate battles. For example, in the case of games, the purpose is play, contact, and support, and rather than playing a competitive game, there are various traps. It is more interesting to set up and cause a happening. However, there is a disadvantage because it increases the time and effort to specify the base point, but setting the base point does not mean that you can not do it so far, so if it is unused, the base point is automatically set under the surface of the water. By creating, automatically identifying, and allowing the base point to be decided within the facilitator event, that is, by integrating the facilitator event and the base point arrangement, such trouble can be saved and unnecessary. Since it can be easily switched, there is no problem in setting a base point.
To supplement each,

The first is that inter-event linkage can be performed with a data structure. In the conventional question-and-answer formula, the question side sends an "event message seeking a motive", and the motive role event is carried out using that as the source. , The result was returned to the source and the options were decided. In addition, when a source is required in advance, such as a work-in-process event, the motive role item can be specified, such as "what number of the motive role item to be implemented" or "the motive role item having a value of XX". I did it with something. However, in that case, it was not possible to do anything more than that, so-called work in process, just by identifying the motive role item.
Therefore, in order to perform an exchange act, strictly speaking, one data structure must be decided in order to perform a motive role event. Then, as mentioned above, in order to perform the exchange act, the work of having to decide the base point increases, but there are more things that can be obtained, and the biggest advantage is that the inter-item linkage of this item is the data structure. As a result, it becomes possible to create various inter-event linkages and flows while the player and the event are undecided. This is because the base point is the realization of the event message that seeks the motive, and it becomes possible to do in advance what could not have been done until the event message was sent, and it is related to the motive role item to be implemented at each base point. If you have information, for example, if you have various information such as genre, difficulty level, number of opponents, popularity, etc., you will be able to carry out such motive role events, and motives If you have the information to be passed to the role type, you will have to carry out with that content. Furthermore, if the results of the motive role events are recorded, even if the contents are undecided based on the base point, it becomes possible to perform various value matching and the like, and it is possible to diversify the exchange between different species. And above all, interspecific exchange can be standardized.
The fact that cross-species exchange can be standardized means that cross-species exchange is a link between a wide variety of events, and if the number of opponents in the event to be implemented changes, the inter-event link will become complicated. Under such circumstances, it was difficult to set up a wide variety of events, but by providing a base point, a wide variety of linkages can be organized based on the base point and made into a single pattern. In other words, the three types of inter-event linkage can be expressed by the linkage of the "base point", the "motive role event", and the "in-process role event", each of which is a data structure, and the base point is an "exchange body". , If the motive role item is "dynamic body" and the in-process role item is "in-process body", the motive body needs an AC body, the in-process body needs an AC body or a motive body, and the in-process body needs an AC body. The results of the motive role events in the motive body are recorded, and the values of the motive role events in the motive body can be matched with each other. As such, interspecific exchanges can be explained and assembled by combining three types of data structures.
To describe this point a little more, the AC body is the base point, the motive body has the information of the motive role item, and the work-in-process has the information of the work-in-process item and the establishment requirement. Under such circumstances, in order to establish the question-and-answer formula, a source is required for the motive role event, and an exchange body that is the source is required for the motive body. In addition, since the result of the motive role event is required for the work-in-process event, the result of the motive role event is recorded in the AC body. In addition, the in-process body also needs an AC body, and if the result of the motive role event is not recorded in the in-process body, the in-process body is necessary. If selected, the interaction body of each player who performs the in-process combination event in the in-process body is examined, and if the result of the motive role event is not recorded in each interaction body, the motive force in the player's motive body is not recorded. It will be better if the role item is carried out. In addition, if the AC bodies are bundled for each player, changes such as value matching can occur depending on the result of the player's motive role event. In other words, the exchange body becomes the base point of important actions for the exchange action such as "motive role event", "work in process event", and "aggregation of effective values in the battlefield", and if you set a trap at such a base point, one The motive body can be limited to, 2 can change the implementation conditions of the motive role event, 3 can change the implementation conditions of the work-in-process event, and 4 can be set by the values valid on the battlefield. You will be able to interfere and assist.

The second point is that various gimmicks can be performed at the base point, as described in 1 to 4 at the end of the previous section. Needless to say, the exchange body is the motive role event, the gimmick role event, and the battlefield. It becomes the starting point for the aggregation of valid values in, and affects them.

The third thing that the front and back battles can be performed is that the exchange body and the motive body are a set, and the result of the motive role event is recorded in the exchange body. At that time, if a value effective on the battlefield can be obtained as a result of the motive role event, the values can be matched between the exchange bodies owned by each player. For example, the values can be simply aligned in vertical, horizontal, and diagonal columns, the crossword can be completed, and the values can be aligned in a three-dimensional array if a hand is applied. Therefore, the AC body owned by each player is referred to as a "unit", and the unit is a data structure that bundles the AC bodies of each player, and is different from the facilitator item based on the so-called unit based on the structure. It is called "front and back battle" because it is possible to fight, and it is possible to fight two battles, one by the facilitator and the other by the unit. However, the battles on the front and back are not necessarily separated, and the number of exchanges given to each player is at most 100, and it is possible to pass the arrangement information to that extent in advance to the facilitator event. Then, the selection of the exchange body can be incorporated into the facilitator event. As a result, the front and back battles may be separated, united, or invalidated. How to handle it is up to the organizer. It is not preferable to separate the front and back battles and invalidate the front and back battles.

As mentioned above, the fact that the fourth game, such as a battle for the base point, can be played will greatly change the subsequent development depending on the interaction body. Therefore, if an AC mold is provided and a sample having the same contents as the mold is provided, a battle for such a mold can be carried out. This is because the template of the AC body is different from the selection of the motive role item and the selection of the motive body, because it holds the implementation conditions including them. For example, even if the same quoits is performed, it may be performed at 2 m or 10 m depending on the AC body. To do. Therefore, it becomes possible to have a conditional struggle for selecting an exchange body, which is more than selecting an event. It will be possible to engage in various forms of competition, such as whether such an exchange body can be arbitrarily specified by each player, or whether it can be obtained through a computer game, and so on.

To enable the above, on the battlefield,
1) Set up an exchange body on the battlefield.
2) Bundle the AC body for each player.
3) If necessary, provide a motive body.
4) If necessary, install a work-in-process.
5) Procedures for processing front and back battles.
6) Processing procedure for each exchange act.

1) Providing an AC body means that the AC body is a data structure that serves as a base point for four actions in an AC action, as described above. One is the implementation of the motive role event, the third is the implementation of the in-process role event, and the four is the aggregation of effective values in the battlefield based on the exchange body, so-called value matching processing. Therefore, it is possible to have the information related to them in the AC body. Specifically, "exchange body information", "player information", "information limiting the motive role event", "information passed to the motive role event", "information passed to the in-process role event", and "results of the motive role event" are stored in the central device. Provide the required number of data structures consisting of "variables to be recorded" and the like.
In addition to the AC body ID, the AC body information is such a value if a classification value is provided for the AC body. The classification value is a value representing a feature, and if the AC body is selected, a special process may be performed. For example, if a motive body or the like is set as a preset by the organizer, the identifier of the preset table, that is, the ID of the so-called "organizer setting table" is recorded, and processing is performed based on the recorded contents. However, overbooking may occur in interspecific AC, and processing is performed based on the priority order. Further, the player information is a player ID or the like, whereby various information about the player can be obtained. In addition, the information that limits the motive role item is the information that limits the motive body when the motive body is used, and the content is slightly different. This is because the information that limits the motive role item is information that represents the characteristics of the motive role item, such as the number of opponents, the target, and the level, but the information that limits the motive element is a value that is irrelevant to the item and both sides. Can be associated. For example, if the motive body is given a classification value such as an implementation NO or a color, it is possible to limit the events to be performed at the time of Lucky Seven, or to limit the events to have a red value. As a result, it is possible to carry out the motive role events in order or to carry out under various conditions. In addition, the information passed to the motive role item is literally a value passed when the motive role item is implemented. The information to be passed to the motive role item recorded in the AC body is a value that mainly changes the player's implementation environment, and is basically a value for each player. However, if the person is the first person to decide on the motive role event, the implementation content of the motive role event itself can be changed based on the exchange body if the motive role event is implemented based on the contents of the exchange body. Will be. That depends on the specifications. Further, the information passed to the work-in-process item is the same as the information passed to the motive role item, and is different between the motive role item and the work-in-process item. Further, the variable for recording the result of the motive role event is a variable for recording the result of the motive role event as it is or recording a value valid in the battlefield.
If a mold for an alternator is provided on the battlefield, that is, if a part of the contents can be copied, a required number of alternators for the mold to be a copy source are provided. After that, if you want to display an icon or table that allows you to select an AC body on each player's AC terminal device, download the "template ID or AC body ID" and "information indicating the characteristics of the AC body or mold" to the minimum necessary. To be embodied in the device so that it can be viewed and selected. Then, for the specified AC body, the "template ID or AC body ID" and the "player ID" are transmitted to the central device. The AC body may be created dynamically, but when it is created dynamically, one is created by selecting a template, and the other is automatically created. In such a case, only the mold needs to be displayed on the AC terminal device, and if it is automatically created, the mold does not need to be displayed and only the mold is created on the central device.
Also, when referring to the template, the AC body may be created dynamically, but if it is the case, the organizer cannot set in advance. Therefore, give each player the required number of alternators, and record the template ID if the contents in the mold are referred to in the alternators, and if the contents in the mold are to be taken in, set a variable to take in those contents. Prepare and place and overwrite. In other words, the template is additional information, and does not rewrite the entire contents of the AC body, but captures only the contents to be referred to. Then, the organizer and the player can set in advance.

2) Bundled AC bodies for each player means the above-mentioned "unit", and bundles statically and dynamically created AC bodies for each player. Therefore, in one unit, the exchange body for the exchange action performed by the player or the exchange body assigned in advance is stored. The unit managed by the central device is usually a one-dimensional array AC body, and in that state, it is not possible to perform value matching processing based on the result of the driving role event. Therefore, when such processing is performed, only the necessary values are extracted from the AC body of the one-dimensional array and made into a two-dimensional array or a three-dimensional array to establish a value alignment or the like, and the points are added or subtracted. Therefore, each unit should have an aggregation function or a variable to record the aggregation result. Further, if secondary processing is performed to rearrange the unit contents in multiple dimensions, software for secondary processing is required. Such software may be processed by providing it in the central device or outsourced like the event, but it may be incorporated into this system like a dynamic library, and it may be outsourced like the event. You may. In any case, there is no difference in the point of outsourcing, pass the minimum necessary information for processing, process it, have the result returned and record it in the unit, or set a unit item in the player table Score and record.

3) Providing a motive body if necessary means that the battlefield is originally provided with a table for managing motive role events. Therefore, it may be used as it is, but the difference between the motive body and the table is that the table proactively handles information on the motive role event. On the other hand, the motive body is a little lighter, and the motive role event itself can be retrofitted. In other words, it does not matter if it is in an unknown state. Actually, as described above, the motive role item used in the inter-species exchange is an index described as "pseudo motive role item", and is dynamically created at the time of implementation. Therefore, until just before the implementation, the motive role item and the implementation content are uncertain and may be changed due to work in process or the like. For this reason, it is expressed as "one or more motive role events" even though it is a heterogeneous exchange performed in a wide variety of events. This is because a large number of motives are created from one motive role event, and as many "pseudo motive role events" are created as there are motives.
When the motive body is provided on the battlefield, "motive motive information", "motive motive role event information", and "information to be passed to the motive role event" can be recorded. It also contains information that represents the characteristics of the body. For example, it also includes information such as a motive body having a red value, the number of opponents, an implementation target for children, a genre, and a degree of popularity. In addition to the motive role item ID, the motive role item information also includes information related to index creation (pseudo motive role item creation) as described above. In addition to the task ID, the information to be passed to the motive role item is the value of the conceptual base such as the difficulty level and the information related to the initial setting.
Also, depending on whether or not the motive body needs the AC body information, the motive body and the AC body are a set, and the result of the event in the motive body is recorded in the AC body. However, it is not necessary for the motive body to have the AC body information for recording, and the main body system that connects the two can be linked to the AC body for recording, and it is not necessary to dare to provide the AC body for the motive body. .. That is, a table such as the "organizer setting table" may be provided to record the contents arranged by the organizer, and when an event message requesting the motive is issued, the table may be inspected first.

4) Providing a work-in-process if necessary means that the work-in-process becomes information on the work-in-process item and information on the establishment requirements, which is almost the information managed by the work-in-process management means. It will be made into a data structure again so that it can be displayed on the player's AC terminal device or dynamically created if necessary. Therefore, the recorded contents are the same as the contents managed by the work-in-process item management means, and become "work-in-process information", "work-in-process item information", "information to be passed to the work-in-process item", "player information", and "privilege information". The information includes a work-in-process ID and information that identifies the work-in-process. In addition, unlike the dynamic body, the implementation content of the work-in-process is almost fixed. Therefore, unlike the motive body, they do not compete with each other, and as described in the motive body, the work-in-process is not guided to carry out a specific work-in-process by giving the work-in-process color information or NO information representing the work-in-process. However, when the work-in-process event is carried out by something like a land mine set in the facilitator event, it is difficult to give the work-in-process event the establishment requirement ID and the work-in-process ID of the work-in-process event. , One of the requirements or work-in-process must be specified. It may have information to identify any of them. For example, it is information when the work-in-process item to be executed is changed depending on the destructive power of the land mine. Further, the work-in-process item information is a work-in-process item ID or the like. Further, the information to be passed to the work-in-process item is information for designating the implementation stage of the work-in-process item and changing the implementation condition according to the result of the motive role item for each opponent. In addition to the player ID to be executed, the player information is the interaction body information and the motive body information of each player, and the interaction body information is the information for referring to the result of the motive force role event and becomes the interaction body ID. Instead of the exchange body ID, the result of the driving role event may be recorded. Further, the motive element information is information for performing the motive role event when the information of the motive role event is not recorded in the AC body, and if the motive element ID or the like is undecided, the operation of selecting the motive element is performed. In addition, the privilege information may be decided after the privilege target and the privilege content are identified and the privilege winner is known. In such a case, the privilege winner is asked to present and select the privilege content that can be selected.

5) As described above, the front and back battle processing procedure is that the front battle is a battle based on the facilitator event, and the back battle is a battle based on the unit given to each player. The battle between the front and back is separated into one, combined into two, and invalidated in three. However, in any case, the AC body itself is managed by the central device, the number of AC bodies is not infinite, and the player creates the AC body and the requirements for establishing the work-in-progress event. It is easy to pass the AC body information to the facilitator item because it is not the case, and in addition to the AC body ID, if the AC body has characteristics, the classification values may be passed as an array. The opposite may be true, and when the facilitator event is decided, the method of creating the exchange body may be decided when the game is started on the so-called battlefield. In other words, it may change depending on the facilitator event. Under such circumstances, if the event message for the motive includes the AC body ID, the facilitator event, strictly speaking, the question side and the AC body are integrated, and if it is not included, the center if it is automatically created. The device automatically adds an AC body to the player's unit, or moves the current if an AC body is assigned in advance. If it is not automatically created, the player is asked to display the unit of the player or to display and select a specifiable interaction body. At that time, if an AC body selection game is to be played, the player is asked to play the AC body information that can be specified in the same manner as the motive role item selection game, and the player is asked to return the result with the AC body ID. In this way, when the source information and the exchange ID are prepared, the next process is performed.
It should be noted that, at what stage the value matching process in the unit is performed, if the value matching in the unit is made like a bowling score, if a so-called spare or strike is provided to change the value, the final Aggregation is done at the end, but it is necessary to aggregate one by one to entertain the progress, and in such a case, a new item to display the results is provided and displayed with strike and spare symbols to entertain the player. In addition, when special processing by matching prices is performed like the fever seen in pachinko, such processing is performed at the end of the game or the like.
As described above, the back battle can be carried out in various ways, and the selection of the exchange body is also made by each player. The computer automatically arranges for the two. The organizer will negotiate three. Four are arranged by computer games. If there is a method such as, and the organizer makes an arrangement, record the contents of the arrangement in the above-mentioned "organizer setting table" and refer to it.

6) What is the processing procedure of each exchange act? As described above, the exchange act according to the present invention includes progressive exchange, motive type exchange, in-process exchange, mediation type exchange, and structure type exchange.
In the case of progressive exchange, as described above, the exchange body information is added to the event message for which the motive is requested, and the processing content is changed based on the information.
In the case of motive-initiated exchange, if a battle-type motive role event is selected, the process of deciding the option must be performed only during the equal battle. So-called equal opponents also have to negotiate one exchange body, but at that time, a recursive phenomenon occurs because the exchange body contains information that limits the motive body. Therefore, in order to prevent the recursive phenomenon from occurring in the event message for which the motive is sought, a value is set so that it can be understood that the event message is an exchange body arrangement by equal response. Then, if the value is included, the handling of the AC body is restricted, and the motive agent is not selected based on the AC body.
In the case of work-in-process exchange, the exchange body information is added to the means for managing the establishment requirements of the work-in-process event. On top of that, if the exchange body is not registered even though the opponent is confirmed, the player is made to specify the exchange body. At that time, if the result of the motive role event is not recorded in the AC body, it is necessary to let the player who has not recorded the motive role event play the motive role event. Have the player decide on a motive role event or a motive body, execute it, and record the result in the exchange body.
In the case of intermediary exchange, the round system of the fourth invention is adopted. Therefore, the AC body is basically unnecessary, but if it is used, the AC body is specified when the motive role event is carried out. Then, apart from collecting the battle elements based on the question-and-answer formula, that is, apart from the battle elements collected by repeating the motive role event, the unit is made so that a valid value can be obtained on the battlefield through the motive role event. In, if there is a matching price as described above, a special value can be obtained so as to challenge the work-in-process event. At that time, it is necessary to present a screen with the same conditions to the player who carries out the round so that a special value set can be seen, and the "round program" provides such a screen. Therefore, it is necessary to pass the AC body information to the program and integrate the program and the AC body.
In the case of structure-initiated exchange, the above exchange actions can be performed from the motive element or work-in-process, and the content is the same as the above-mentioned motive-initiated exchange or work-in-process exchange. In-process exchange activates the requirements for establishing a direct motive role event or a work-in-process event, whereas it activates a motive element or a work-in-process body that manages a motive role event or a work-in-process event. Therefore, in the case of a motive agent, the equal opponent who performs the motive role event in the motive element is made to arrange an exchange body for recording the result for each of the equal opponents, and the result of the motive role event is determined in the facilitator event. If it is necessary to prepare to receive it, prepare it, then carry out the motive role event in the motive body, record only the result of the equal opponent in the exchange body arranged for each, and change it by returning to the facilitator event. Let me. In addition, if the work-in-process originates from the work-in-process, the work-in-process itself is basically the same as the requirements for establishing the work-in-process event, but as described above, the work-in-process includes an AC body in which the result of each player's driving role event is recorded. Since the motive body in which the motive role event performed by each player is recorded is recorded, if the result of the motive role event is not recorded in the interaction body of each player, the motive role event in the motive body is performed on the player. Let them record the result. Therefore, all those who perform the work-in-process event become equal opponents, and if necessary, prepare each player to receive the result of the driving role event in the facilitating role event. However, this is not necessary when the facilitator event is thrown round, that is, when the facilitator event is changed by the privilege of the work-in-process event. Then, when the results of the motive role events of each player are collected, the work-in-process event is performed according to the contents in the work-in-process, and the privilege acquirer is given a privilege to carry out the operation.

In the sixth invention, a "base point" composed of a data structure is provided on the battlefield, but it is not always necessary to provide a highly functional data structure as described above. That is, it may be a simpler data structure. For example, it does not form a unit, it does not record the result of the work-in-progress event, etc. However, even if it is such a simple base point, it is significant to set a base point on the battlefield, and even if it is a base point on the battlefield. Without, there will be three types of linkage: facilitator event, motive role event, and work in process event, and adjustments by the organizer and punishment by the player will be extremely limited. However, even if it is a simple base point, by providing a base point that is a data structure, a fourth element is added to the battlefield and it becomes "3 types of events + base points", and the base points are 3 types of events. Depending on the starting point, it is possible to make the exchange act a motive or a work-in-progress, limit the events that can be carried out, and pass the implementation conditions to the events to be carried out. In other words, work in process can be done based on the base point.
However, such a base point has a different role from the base point referred to as the "exchange body" described above, and in the case of the base point described as the exchange body, the unit becomes a player and the exchange body plays a motive role event as an equal opponent. Represents the operation. Therefore, even if the player is undecided, the flow of inter-eye interaction can be created by the relationship between the unit and the alternating current. On the other hand, the simplified base point is rather the "starting point", which shapes one exchange act. Therefore, it does not take the place of the player, but acts as an intermediary for the motive role item and the work-in-process item, and determines the requirements for establishing the motive role item and the work-in-process item via the starting point. However, even so, it is possible to record information that limits or specifies the motive role event as the starting point, information that limits the requirements for establishing the work-in-process event, and information to be passed to those events, and select a starting point that has such information. Will affect the subsequent motive and in-process events.
These changes are trivial, but for example, if there are 10 or 20 motive roles that can be implemented, it is extremely difficult to set up each one, but 5 starting points are prepared and each starting point. If the work in process for punishment and punishment is performed, the work in process for punishment and punishment will be limited, and the work in process can be performed accurately.
For this reason, the starting point that functions as an intermediary and the exchange body that represents the player's actions as an equal opponent have different meanings of the base point, so the claims are separated.
In addition, the base point representing the player's actions as an equal opponent and the heterogeneous interaction are abstracted by four types of data structures, "unit", "interchange body", "moving element", and "device", and the heterogeneous interaction. Since the meaning is different from structuring, the claims are separated in that respect as well.
As a result, the claim for establishing a base point on the battlefield is
One is characterized by the provision of an intermediary function that marks the starting point for exchange activities.
The second is characterized by the establishment of a base point for equal opponents.
The third is characterized in that the battlefield is structured with four types of data structures.
A brief supplement to each

First, the provision of an intermediary function that describes the starting point in the exchange act means that, as mentioned above, the requirements for establishing the motive role item and the work-in-process role item are not directly selected, but are selected via the starting point. Therefore, at the starting point, it is possible to record information that limits the requirements for establishing the motive role event and the work-in-process role event, and information to be passed to such event. Further, the starting point itself may be extracted according to the situation, and in such a case, the information for classifying the starting point is possessed. It should be noted that the starting point here is to act as an intermediary, to limit the requirements for establishing the motive role event and the work-in-process event, and the actual event will be carried out in the same manner as described above.

The second point of setting the base point of the equal opponent is to provide the unit and the exchange body on the battlefield as described above, and when the player is the unit and the motive role event is carried out as the equal opponent, it must be done. One interaction must be arranged. In doing so, the details are as described above. Also, as mentioned above, this is made independent, and the battlefield is normally structured with four types of data structures, but even if you do not make a leap to that point, you can play the unit and the AC body as a player. This is because it is meaningful enough to provide each one.

Structuring the battlefield with the third and four types of data structures means that, as described above, the process is standardized by abstracting and structuring the interspecific exchange with the four types of data structures. , Efficiency is improved, and it becomes easy for the organizer and the player to set up.

The seventh invention enriches the work-in-process, and even if the sixth invention makes it possible to carry out work-in-process while the items and the like are undecided, in reality, not so many work-in-process can be done. This is because, for example, if the event is shogi, you must know the rules of shogi, and that person does not necessarily play the shogi that you set up. It's kind of like a survival game, and while you don't know what's going to happen the next moment, the only gimmicks you can do are change the value of the conceptual base or steal a valid value on the battlefield. Then, the value of the work-in-process event is halved. This is because the work-in-process event is a battle for benefits, and the poorer the content of the benefits, the lower the value of the work-in-process event.
Therefore, "award and punishment terms" are provided. Bonuses and punishments are bonuses and punishments. Bonuses are used to improve one's own implementation environment, and punishment is used to mean worsening the other party's implementation environment. In addition, the award and punishment terms are simple and consist of the implementation target value and simple words. For example, for "team battles", "lowering the main force by two levels" and "increasing the defense power by one level". On the other hand, in each event, after clarifying whether or not the punishment term can be used, if it is not available, the punishment is ignored, and if it can be used, for example, if the event is soccer, "in the implementation scene". Add specific content for the event, such as "lowering the ability of the main force of the game by two levels." As a result, the award and punishment terms consist of "award and punishment ID", "work in process", "ambiguous title", "ambiguous explanation", "concrete explanation", "change value", etc., and "award and punishment ID (award and punishment code)" and "change value". Is added to the "first-in, first-out" arrangement in the "information to be passed to the motive role item and the work-in-process item" in the "exchange body", "dynamic body", and "work-in-process" described in the sixth invention. Then, if the event is activated and an implementation task is prepared, for example, when the task is in soccer and the attacking posture with Keisuke Honda as the main force is ready, Keisuke Honda's physical strength is reduced by two steps or two steps down. Can be replaced by a player. Therefore, even if you try to "raise the main force by two levels" to recover the work in process, it will return to the original if Keisuke Honda's physical strength decreases because it is based on the changed state, but if the player has changed It cannot be restored. However, the awards and punishments are carried out almost as expected. It is the same even if it is a shogi that does not know the rules, and if the main force of the starting scene is a rook, it will be lowered by two steps and it will be money. At that time, the number of gold may exceed the fixed number of four, but the game is a play and is tolerated.
The difference between the award / punishment ID and the award / punishment code is basically the same, but the award / punishment code is described with the meaning of "a unique identification value that can be classified". Therefore, the classification value is a set of the characteristics of work in process and punishment.
In addition, the punishment has immediate effect and slow effect, and the punishment for the facilitator event and the punishment for changing the effective value on the battlefield are reflected at the time of setting, but the event is activated like the above soccer and shogi. Awards and punishments that cannot be activated otherwise will be delayed and will be stored in a "first in, first out" array until they are activated. Then, when it becomes possible to activate it, it is sequentially changed based on the changed state.
In addition, although it is a scene where work in process is performed, the work in process itself is carried out as a privilege of the work in process event. However, as mentioned above, if it is a mechanism to change the current situation, it can be implemented in various situations. For example, instead of the exchange body selection game, you can make a prize / penalty value selection game, use the prize / penalty value as a shooting game bullet and shoot it into the opponent's exchange body, or use the prize / penalty value as a pachinko ball and make a tulip into an exchange body. It can be carried out in various ways, such as collecting. It is also possible to change the effective value on the battlefield obtained as a result of the motive role event into a punishment value. In other words, the punishment is divided into slow-acting and immediate-acting, and if it is immediate-acting, it changes immediately, but if it is slow-acting, it is stored in the array, and if an unsupported punishment is set, it can be ignored and consistency. If you can get it, you can carry out the work in process anytime and anywhere.
In addition, a change value may be set for the award and punishment terms. The change value is to separate the title and the value to be actually changed, and if the previous device is to "lower the main force by two steps", separate the "main force lower" and the "two steps" to reduce the title of the work in process. As a result, it becomes easier to choose the award and punishment. Furthermore, it will be possible to carry out awards and punishments based on "how to win and how to lose".
The award and punishment based on how to win and lose is that if the award and punishment are carried out regardless of how to win or lose, you will lose your temper when the loss is confirmed. However, if the punishment changes depending on how you win or lose, you can fight without giving up until the very end. Therefore, in the case of a work-in-process event, the award winners are usually decided by ranking, but the success or failure is added to it. As mentioned above, the success / failure degree expresses the success degree and the failure degree with a value of 0 to 100, but in simple terms, it is a “performance of each player” calculated independently by the work-in-process event, and it is a hot battle. If you develop a low-level battle, the success or failure rate will return 50 or more even if the ranking is low, and conversely, if you engage in a low-level battle, even if you are in the 1st place, a value of 50 or less will be returned. Using the success or failure degree, if there is a difference of 40 points or more between players, so-called opponents, it is a large difference, if it is 20 points or more and 50 points or less, it is a medium difference, and if it is 1 point or more and 20 points or less, it is a small difference. Change the punishment you can choose. Then, you will be able to fight without giving up until the very end, but if you have arranged the benefits before the match, you cannot change the benefits depending on the success or failure. However, if the perks and perks were separated, that is, if the titles and changes were separated, then that would be possible.
In addition, there are pre-determined type and post-determined type as the privilege of the work-in-process event, and if it is the pre-determined type, the privilege content is decided before the battle. Therefore, we challenge the work-in-process event with the privilege content. This is done when the organizer decides on the privilege content and the player challenges the event. However, it is necessary to decide the content of the privilege while the winner of the privilege is undecided, and it is necessary to be able to do it without knowing who is the winner or the loser, which requires a lot of work. The value used when taking the time and effort is the "pre-privilege value".

The value immediately before the privilege is literally the value immediately before the privilege is decided, and when the privilege acquirer is found, the privilege is implemented based on the immediately preceding value. Until then, record it in the work in process. The procedure for arranging benefits is the same for both the pre-determined type and the post-determined type, and is as follows.
1. Arrange for those who are eligible for the benefits. (Conditions and number of people)
2. Arrangements for award winners. (Winner)
3. Arrangement of bonus or punishment. (type)
4. Arrangement of work in process. (Work in process)
5. Arrangement of punishment terms. (the term)
6. Arrangement of changed values. (Change value)
In the above procedure, in the case of the pre-determined type, an agreement other than the third is agreed, and in the case of the post-determined type, only the first is agreed. The value obtained by recording the contents of 1 to 6 in such a form becomes the "value immediately before the privilege", and is recorded in the requirements for establishing the work-in-process event. Then, when the award winner is identified, in the case of the pre-determined type, the work in process is determined based on the award winner and a data structure consisting of a "prize and punishment code" and a "change value" is transmitted to the work in process. In the case of the post-decision type, the screen for deciding the privilege is presented to the exchange terminal device of the privilege winner, and the third and subsequent ones are arranged according to the above procedure, and it consists of the agreed "prize and punishment code" and "change value". Send the data structure to the work in process.
Then, if the work-in-process that received the prize / penalty value has immediate effect, for example, if the situation of the facilitator event is changed or the effective value is changed in the battlefield recorded in the exchange body, it is changed immediately and the effect is delayed. In the case of sex, as described above, it is additionally recorded in the "first in, first out" arrangement and stored, and when it is time to activate it, it is activated all at once.
As described above, ambiguous expressions and punishment terms that forcibly change the implementation environment in a way that was unthinkable in the past, in which the person who handles the punishment interprets the ambiguous expression independently and executes the punishment. Is provided on the battlefield to enrich the mechanism for inter-species exchange.

To make this possible
1) Establish award and punishment terms.
2) Work in process in a timely manner.
3) Perform immediate and slow-acting treatments.
In addition, since I have already written a lot about the above, I will briefly supplement it.

1) What is the term for punishment and punishment? The term for punishment and punishment is not a strict agreement, but an ambiguous title that makes you imagine an event. It is a collection of titles for the four types of data structures described, players and traps to independently interpret the ambiguous titles that have been set up and forcibly change their implementation environments, so-called situations. Therefore, what is actually needed is a "prize / punishment code" and an "argument (change value)", but an explanation about an ambiguous title, a specific explanation that is uniquely interpreted, and a value for classifying the award / punishment. Is required, and as mentioned at the beginning, it becomes a data structure consisting of "prize and punishment code", "work in process", "ambiguous title", "changed value", "ambiguous commentary", "concrete commentary", and the like. However, specific explanations are added to those that process the award and punishment code, so-called events, etc., and do not exist in the award and punishment terminology table. In addition, the work-in-process is a classification code, and the award / punishment code is not necessary if the classification code and the ID are a set.
As described in the fifth invention, the fact that players and traps are also subject to work-in-process means that the conceptual bases owned by the players and traps are graphically arranged in coordinates based on the conceptual bases owned by the organizer. If so, that state can be forcibly changed.
Also, an ambiguous title is like a heading in a classification table. Therefore, the punishment term is a technique that changes the situation independently based on the classification code and heading, but it is unknown whether such a technique exists, but there is a road guide sign that is very similar. .. Road signs are vague guides, but human imagination interprets them and somehow arrives at the destination. While taking advantage of such vagueness, it adds supplements to the award and punishment terms so that confusion does not occur if necessary, and if it is not necessary or adds specific implementation contents to knowledge as in other style games. If you want to use it as a competitive material, hide the supplementary part.

2) To carry out work-in-process in a timely manner, as described above, work-in-process is basically performed as a privilege of the work-in-process event. However, it only sends a data structure consisting of a "prize and punishment code" and a "changed value" to the work in process, and if it cannot be implemented immediately, it can be stored in a "first in, first out" array, and if it cannot be implemented, the work in process is ignored. As mentioned above, the work-in-process itself is set everywhere. Under such circumstances, there are two types of work-in-process, one is to directly handle the award and punishment value, and the other is to decide the award and punishment right holder and let them choose arbitrarily. The award and punishment value will be sent. On the other hand, the form of deciding the second award and punishment right holder is a form of deciding the privilege of the work in process event afterwards, and the work in process arrangement screen is displayed on the exchange terminal device of the award and punishment right holder. Follow steps 3 to 6 above.
So, for reference, if you supplement the above procedure,
The first, deciding who is eligible for the award is the condition of the award winner and the number of target people. Based on the result of the work-in-process event, the award is acquired under various conditions such as the top 〇 and the bottom 〇. If there is no such person, the work-in-process event ends in vain. In addition, if the number exceeds the specified number, a lottery will be held for the relevant person. It is an agreement on such conditions and the number of people.
The second, award winner arrangement, is to decide the award winner within the conditions as described above.
The third, bonus or punishment arrangement, is an arrangement of the type of privilege, in which the bonus benefits one's own implementation environment and the punishment harms the other party's implementation environment. Therefore, there is a limit to the awards and punishments that can be carried out. For example, in the case of a bonus, there is no problem even if multiple people receive the privilege, but in the case of punishment, the privilege cannot be given to multiple people. This is because there is a possibility that a specific player will be punished by multiple people, and if that is not the case, the privilege can be given to multiple people even if it is a punishment.
The fourth, in-process arrangement, is that the awards and punishments that can be implemented by the in-process are limited. Therefore, if the work-in-process is set as "information to be passed to the motive role item", the corresponding prize or punishment can be extracted and selected from the "work-in-process" of the data structure forming the prize or punishment. If the work-in-process decides the bonus or punishment, the bonus or punishment can be automatically determined from the work-in-process in many cases.
The fifth, award and punishment term arrangement, is to arrange one award and punishment from a group of awards and punishments extracted according to the type of work in process and the type of award and punishment.
The sixth, to decide the change value, is that if the award and punishment term decided in the fifth takes an argument, if a so-called change value is required, the change value that can be selected is usually displayed, and among them, the change value that can be selected is displayed. Choose one. Then, the above information is sent to the main body system of the central device, the main body system identifies a specific person to be punished, and the "punishment ID" and the "change value" are transmitted to the work-in-process of the person. Then, the processing is changed at the work-in-process depending on whether the award or punishment is immediate effect or delayed effect.
In the case of the privilege pre-determined type, the first and second are undecided, the third and subsequent ones are decided, the value immediately before the privilege is set and recorded in the requirements for establishing the work-in-process event, and the privilege winner is decided. At that point, as described above, the privilege information is transmitted to the main system.

3) Immediate-acting or slow-acting processing is as described above. If immediate-acting is immediate, the punishment will be reflected immediately, if slow-acting, it will be stored in the "first-in, first-out" arrangement, and if the punishment can be implemented. , The next recorded award and punishment is performed based on the state in which the award and punishment in the array are sequentially changed.

1 Centralized traffic control 10 Calculation unit 11 Storage unit 12 Input / output unit 13 Communication unit 1P Aggregation program (computer program)
2 Terminal device 20 Calculation unit 21 Storage unit 22 Input / output unit 23 Communication unit

Claims

A computer device that enables heterogeneous exchange
A means of managing two types of valuation activities, which are defined as facilitator events and motive role events,
A means of co-dependently linking both events at key points,
A means for calculating grades based on the facilitator event while setting restrictions on the facilitator event for advancing both events,
A means for associating the identification information of one or more players, the identification information of one or more facilitator events, and the identification information of one or more motive role events with the information defined as the battlefield.
A means for acquiring information on facilitator events and motive role events performed through the battlefield by communication, and
Means to decide one from the above-mentioned motive role items,
A means of initializing the data of the agreed motive role event,
A means for calculating the result corresponding to the player's identification information, and
When a team system is set for the agreed event, a means for calculating the team product for each team of the player and a means for calculating the team product.
A means for associating the player with a value related to the results on the battlefield or item identification information.
A means for causing the player to continue executing the one or more facilitator events, and
When a signal (event message) for motive is sent with respect to the facilitator event to be executed in association with the information on the battlefield, a means for determining one motive role event by any means and a means for determining one motive role event.
If the motive role event is a fighting type, the identification information of the player who will be the opponent is decided, and it is divided into "equal opponent" or "non-equal opponent", and the equal opponent is given each facilitator event. A means of preparing to receive the result of the motive role event and making the player who has issued the signal for the motive also an equal opponent.
Means for arranging the second motive role event by any means,
Means for deciding the player who performs the second motive role event,
A means for receiving the result of the motive role event in each facilitator event in association with the identification information of the equal opponent for the player.
A means for acquiring data on the motive role event of another player who performs the motive role event including a non-equal opponent to the player.
A means for outputting information necessary for the other player to perform the motive role event, and a means for outputting the information of the motive role event.
Means for receiving the implementation results on the motive role event side,
A means to output the results of equal opponents to the facilitator event,
Means for changing the facilitator event in each facilitator event,
A means of executing the process a set number of times and
A means for calculating the results of each player on the battlefield based on the results of the facilitator event,
If a valid value is provided on the battlefield, a means for adding the value of the value to the results of each player, and
A computer device comprising means for calculating the results of each team based on the results of each player when the battlefield is set so that the players play in a team system.
While managing the two types of valuation acts described as "facilitator event" and "motive role event", both events are linked in a co-dependent relationship at key points so that the facilitator event cannot be established independently. It is a computer device that enables the competition method described as "interspecies exchange" that calculates the results based on the facilitator event.
A means for managing one or more players, one or more facilitator events, and one or more motive role events on the battlefield, respectively.
Means for communicating with facilitators and motives that can be performed through the battlefield,
Means to decide one of the motive role events,
Means to prepare for the implementation of the agreed motive role event,
Provide a means to calculate the results of each player
In addition, if the players are in a team system, a means for managing the team and a means for calculating the results for each team are provided.
Also, if a valid value is provided on the battlefield, for example, if a medal or item is provided, a means for managing the value and processing the transfer of ownership is provided.
Each player decides one or more facilitator events and continuously performs them.
For one thing, if a signal (event message) for a motive is sent from any of the facilitators managed on the battlefield, one motive role item is decided in some way and the motive is determined. If the role type is a fighting type, decide the responder and divide it into "equal opponent" or "non-equal opponent", and prepare the equal opponent to receive the result of the motive role event in each facilitator event. , The player who issued the signal for the above-mentioned motive is also an equal opponent.
Second, one motive role event is arranged in some way, the player performing the motive role event is decided, and the equal opponents are prepared to receive the result of the motive role event in each facilitator event. hand,
Then, the player who performs the motive role event including the non-equal opponent is prepared to perform the motive role event, and the information necessary for performing the motive role event is passed to the motive role event. It is carried out on the motive role event side, the result of the motive role event is received, and only the performance of the equal opponent is returned to the facilitator event in which each equal opponent is prepared to receive the result, and the result is returned in each facilitator event. Change the facilitator event,
If a series of such processes is performed at key points as many times as necessary, the results for each player on the battlefield are calculated based on the results of the facilitator event, and a valid value is provided on the battlefield, the value is set to the value. If the value is added to the results of each player and the competition is a team system, the results of each team are calculated based on the results of each player to determine the outcome. A computer device that enables interaction.
The above-mentioned claim in which a battle-type valuation act described as "work-in-process event" is added to the battlefield, a privilege acquirer is determined based on the result of the work-in-process event, and a means for granting the privilege to the privilege acquirer is provided. It is a computer device that enables inter-eye exchange in
On the battlefield mentioned above
A means of managing one or more work-in-process events,
A means of communicating with work-in-process events that can be performed through the battlefield,
A means for creating and managing work-in-process item information, player information for performing the work-in-process item, and requirements for establishing a work-in-process item consisting of privilege information for the work-in-process item.
Means to prepare for the work-in-process event and
Provide a means for the award winners to implement the award
If the motive role event is implemented in the battlefield, the result of the equal opponent is sent to the establishment requirement management means of the work-in-process event, and it is investigated whether there is a establishment requirement that requires the result of the motive role event in the means. If there is a required establishment requirement, record it in the player's information and record it.
If the work-in-process event that meets the requirements for establishment can be implemented by recording the result, prepare for the implementation of the work-in-process event, pass the necessary information to the work-in-process event, and then perform the work-in-process event. On the work-in-process event side, let the player who meets the establishment requirements execute the result, receive the result of the work-in-process event, decide the privilege acquirer according to the contents of the establishment requirement, and let the privilege acquirer implement the privilege. Characterized by computer equipment.
In claim 1, it is different from claim 2, in which the requirements for establishing the work-in-process item are activated without being completed, the motive role item is performed mainly in the work-in-process item, and the facilitating role item is changed by the privilege of the work-in-process item. A computer device that enables interspecies alternating current according to claim 2, wherein the procedure is added to the claim.
On the battlefield mentioned above
A means of identifying and activating one requirement, or dynamically creating and activating it,
Provide means to prepare for the implementation of active requirements
If one establishment requirement is activated by some method during the battle, if the establishment requirement is not in a state where the establishment requirement can be implemented, in the above-mentioned preparatory means, if the in-process combination item is undecided, an agreement is made by some method and the in-process combination item is performed. If the player is undecided, make an arrangement in some way, if the result of each player's motive role item is unrecorded and the motive role item performed by the player is undecided, make an arrangement in some way, and if the target person of the privilege and the privilege content are undecided, in some way If the result of the motive role item of the player in the establishment requirement is unrecorded, the unrecorded player is made to perform the motive role item in the establishment requirement as described above, the result is recorded, and the in-process combination in the establishment requirement is recorded. When the event is ready to be executed, the player prepares to execute the in-process event, passes the necessary information to the in-process event, and causes the player who meets the establishment requirements to execute the in-process event. The computer device is characterized in that a procedure of receiving the result of the in-process combination item, deciding the privilege acquirer according to the content of the establishment requirement, and causing the privilege acquirer to carry out the privilege is added to the claim.
The different types of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that a means is provided to enable an embodiment described as a "round system" that separates the battle preparation and the battle so that each can be performed intensively. It is a computer device that enables inter-communication.
In this system
Round management means to prepare and manage one or more rounds,
Provide a means to link with the round program,
In the round management means, the implementation guideline of each round, the player information to perform each round, the computer device information used by each player, the motive role item information performed by each player, and the facilitator item to be the battle event to be performed in each round. Manages information on work-in-process events and program information for rounds used in each round,
Each round program has a means to collect battle elements, a means to store the acquired battle elements, and a means to inform the status of the round, and if necessary, perform computer game processing to acquire the battle elements. There are means to change or obtain a battle element that is different from the battle element that you have acquired.
If any round is started
The program for the round is installed and started on the player's computer device recorded in the round, and the program is started.
If any player performs an operation to perform a motive role event in the means for collecting the battle elements, the player information and the operation content are sent to the system provided with the round management means, and the motive role event is sent in the system. Is possible, the result is returned to the player's round program, and the battle element that can be acquired is determined based on the result. At that time, if the battle element that can be acquired by performing the computer game processing is changed, it is changed. If there is a battle element obtained, store it in the above-mentioned battle element storage means.
The player repeats the above collection of battle elements until the predetermined conditions are reached.
When the predetermined conditions are reached, the battle elements have been collected and the saved battle elements are transmitted to the round management means all at once, or each time the battle event is carried out.
The competition event to be held in the round is
In the case of a facilitator event, the battle elements sent to the round management means are sent to the facilitator event.
In the case of a work-in-process event, the system dynamically creates the requirements for establishing the work-in-process event, executes the work-in-process event as described in the above claim, decides the award winner based on the result, and decides the award winner. To complete the round by repeating the competition event until the prescribed conditions are reached, either by having the player implement the benefits one by one or by recording the privilege acquisition information and then executing them all at once.
The computer device according to any one of claims 2 to 4, wherein if there is a next round, the next round is performed in the same manner.
The unique valuation act related to the battle is described as "conceptual base", for example, abstracted to a finite field value including a decimal number from 0 to 100, and all the valuation acts on the battlefield are used as the conceptual base. Treat them uniformly, and then exchange the values of the conceptual bases to exchange values.
In this system
Establish a conceptual base management means,
The conceptual bases are freely divided into the required number and grouped, and the grouping is changed if necessary.
If the value of the conceptual base is sent to the system to be passed to the motive role event, the group to which the value belongs is specified by the conceptual base management means as much as necessary, and the conceptual base consists of one value. The second to fifth claims are provided with a means for rounding the value of the conceptual base, which is characterized in that the value of the base is set to two values of the start point and the end point of the specified group and passed to the motive role event. A computer device that enables inter-eye interaction.
To the above-mentioned conceptual base management means,
By using the above groups or establishing a new group, all or some of the groups are given a required number of values that are valid or to obtain a valid value on the battlefield, and they are used. Provide a means to process
If the result of the motive role event sent to this system contains the value of the conceptual base, identify the group by the value, and if the specified group has the above value,
If the value is valid on the battlefield, then all or part of the value is obtained by the player.
If the value is a value for obtaining a valid value, for example, if the value indicates a condition, the value to be obtained is determined by judging whether or not the condition is satisfied, and if the value specifies a computer game, the designation is specified. If the player is to start the computer game based on the above, the player is allowed to execute the game, and if it is not necessary to execute the game, the player is watched over, and the value obtained from the result is decided.
It enables inter-species exchange according to claims 2 to 6, characterized in that a valid value can be obtained on the battlefield based on the value of the conceptual base returned from the motive role event. Computer device.
To the above-mentioned conceptual base management means,
Coordinates and drawing means,
Established drawing information management means
With the basic axis finite area of the coordinates as the conceptual base possessed by this system, the conceptual bases of the events, players, traps, and scenes related to the inter-species exchange are arranged and arranged in a rod-shaped figure at the coordinates. The bar length of each figure becomes each conceptual base, and the value used internally by each is expressed as a ratio to each bar length, and the value of the conceptual base handled by this system is the base value of the coordinates. As,
If a conceptual coordinate value is sent to the system to be passed to the motive role event, the source of the value is said to be before the value is grouped in the system as described in claim 5. If it exists, the rod-shaped length in the drawing information is set to 100, the value of the conceptual base is multiplied as a ratio, and the multiplied value is multiplied by the drawing start point of the drawing information. To calculate the basic axis value of the coordinates and use the basic axis value as the value of the conceptual base, then check whether the player exists in the drawing information management means, and if so, perform the operation at the source. The same processing is performed by the player, the base value of the coordinates is calculated and used as the value of the conceptual base, and then it is examined whether the trap and the scene exist in the drawing information management means, and if so, the source. The same processing performed in the above is performed in the trap and the scene, and the basic axis value of the coordinates is calculated to be the value of the conceptual base. The processing order other than the source is not the same, and the basic axis value calculated from the drawing information. If is out of the effective range of the coordinates, it must be converted to the nearest effective range value, but the process may be performed when it is out of the effective range or after all the above processes are completed. ,
After completing the above processing, if the values of the conceptual bases are grouped and rounded as described in claim 5, the values are rounded to make one value into two values, the start point and the end point of the group.
For the 1 value or 2 values, it is checked whether or not the drawing information of the motive role item to which the value is passed exists in the drawing information management means, and if it exists, the above 1 value expressed by the basic axis value of the coordinates. Alternatively, the position where the binary value corresponds to the rod-shaped length of the drawing information is specified, and if the position is outside the rod-shaped length, the position is converted to the nearest rod-shaped length position, and the ratio of the position to the rod-shaped length is calculated. Then, the value of the conceptual base to be passed to the motive role item based on the drawing information arranged in the coordinates, which is characterized by passing the calculated ratio as the value of the conceptual base and passing one value or two values to the motive role item. A computer device that enables interspecies exchange according to claims 2 to 7 provided with means for changing.
The rod-shaped length of the rod-shaped figure in the preceding claim,
Means that can be freely divided,
The freely divided division points are divided into old and new, and only the new division points are adjacent to each other, and a means for recording the movement destination by moving the division points so as not to exceed the lower limit point and the upper limit point of the figure is provided.
Set the required number of division points, freely move the new division points and record them.
Based on the new division point, the position pointed to by the basic axis value of the coordinates is specified, the group to which the specified position belongs at the new division point is specified, and the position within the specified group is calculated as a ratio to the area of the group. Calculated, the ratio is multiplied by the region based on the old division point of the group to calculate the value within the old division point, and the value is added to the start point of the group to obtain the conceptual value. Between claims 2 to 7 provided with means for adjusting the internal value of the conceptual base, characterized in passing to the event represented by the base or to the conceptual base owned by the player or trap or scene. A computer device that enables interaction.
On the battlefield
A means of creating and managing a data structure marked as the "starting point",
Provide a means to determine the starting point,
At each starting point, record the information that limits the requirements for establishing the event or event, and the information that is passed to the event.
If one starting point is decided by some method, the event is limited by the content at the starting point, and the information to be passed to the event at the starting point is passed to the event specified by some method, based on the starting point. A computer device that enables inter-species exchange according to claims 2 to 9, wherein the event to be carried out is decided.
On the battlefield
The data structure described as "AC body" and
A means of creating and managing a data structure described as a "unit" that bundles alternating currents for each player,
Provide a means to decide the unit and the AC body,
When a player carries out a motive role event as an equal opponent, it is necessary to arrange one interaction body in the unit owned by the player in some way, and if necessary, decide the motive role event based on the contents of the interaction body. If there is, the contents in the AC body are passed to the motive role event, the execution result of the motive role event is recorded in the AC body, and if necessary, the effective value obtained in the battlefield in the motive role event is obtained. Data for cross-species AC, which is characterized by recording in the AC body, calculating the value of the unit in some way if necessary, and passing the contents in the AC body to the in-process event if necessary. A computer device that enables inter-species alternating current according to claims 2 to 10 provided with a base point of a structure.
The computer device according to the above claim.
Add the data structure described as "motive body" and the data structure described as "work in process".
The exchange body includes the exchange body information, the motive body information, the information to be passed to the motive role event, the result of the motive role event, the value obtained by the result, the effective value in the battlefield, the information to be passed to the work-in-process event, etc. Can be recorded,
In the motive body, the motive body information, the motive role item information, the information to be passed to the motive role item, etc. can be recorded.
The in-process body includes the in-process body information, the in-process combination item information, the player information, the information to be passed to the in-process combination item, the privilege information, and the player information includes the interaction information of each player and the motive body of each player. Information can be recorded,
The motive body needs an alternator for the player,
The AC body needs the result of the motive role event,
There are four types of inter-item exchanges, which are characterized in that the inter-events can be linked according to claims 2 to 11, with a relationship that requires an exchange body and a motive element for each player in the in-process body. A computer device that enables inter-species alternating current according to claims 2 to 11, which is structured by the data structure of the above.
On the battlefield
Arrange the required number of unique codes consisting of ambiguous titles, ambiguous explanations and classification values, which are described as "prize and punishment terms", and provide means for managing the terms and means for processing the terms.
Record the code with its arguments, if necessary, where it can be recorded on the battlefield.
When the code can be processed, the means for processing the code independently interprets and processes the code, and forcibly changes the target to which the code is set from the outside. A computer device that enables inter-species exchange according to claims 2 to 12 provided with means.
On the battlefield
Decide on a code consisting of an ambiguous title, an ambiguous description, and a unique identifier that can be classified, which is described as "award and punishment term", and provide a means for managing the term and a means for processing the term.
Where the code can be recorded on the battlefield, if necessary, it is recorded together with the arguments, and if the code can be processed, the means for processing the code will perform its own processing based on an ambiguous title. A computer device that enables inter-species exchange according to claims 2 to 12, which is provided with punishment and punishment means, characterized in that the implementation content of the event to be given is forcibly changed from the outside.
While managing the two types of valuation acts described as "facilitator event" and "motive role event", both events are linked in a co-dependent relationship at key points so that the facilitator event cannot be established independently. It is a computer control method that enables the competition method described as "interspecies exchange" that calculates the results based on the facilitator event.
A step of managing one or more players, one or more facilitator events, and one or more motive role events on the battlefield, respectively.
The steps to communicate with the facilitator and motivator events that can be performed through the battlefield,
Steps to determine one of the motive roles and
Steps to prepare for the agreed motive role event,
A step to calculate the results of each player is provided.
Also, if the players are in a team system, there is a step to manage the team and a step to calculate the results for each team.
Also, if a valid value is provided on the battlefield, for example, if a medal or item is provided, the value has a step of managing the value and processing the transfer of ownership.
Each player decides one or more facilitator events and continuously performs them.
For one thing, if a signal (event message) for a motive is sent from any of the facilitators managed on the battlefield, one motive role item is decided in some way and the motive is determined. If the role type is a fighting type, decide the responder and divide it into "equal opponent" or "non-equal opponent", and prepare the equal opponent to receive the result of the motive role event in each facilitator event. , The player who issued the signal for the above-mentioned motive is also an equal opponent.
Second, one motive role event is arranged in some way, the player performing the motive role event is decided, and the equal opponents are prepared to receive the result of the motive role event in each facilitator event. hand,
Then, the player who performs the motive role event including the non-equal opponent is prepared to perform the motive role event, and the information necessary for performing the motive role event is passed to the motive role event. It is carried out on the motive role event side, the result of the motive role event is received, and only the performance of the equal opponent is returned to the facilitator event in which each equal opponent is prepared to receive the result, and the result is returned in each facilitator event. Change the facilitator event,
If a series of such processes is performed at key points as many times as necessary, the results for each player on the battlefield are calculated based on the results of the facilitator event, and a valid value is provided on the battlefield, the value is set to the value. A control method in which the value is added to the results of each player, and if the competition is a team system, the results of each team are calculated based on the results of each player to determine the outcome.
While managing the two types of valuation acts described as "facilitator event" and "motive role event", both events are linked in a co-dependent relationship at key points so that the facilitator event cannot be established independently. It is a computer program that enables the competition method described as "interspecies exchange" that calculates the results based on the facilitator event.
A step of managing one or more players, one or more facilitator events, and one or more motive role events on the battlefield, respectively.
The steps to communicate with the facilitator and motivator events that can be performed through the battlefield,
Steps to determine one of the motive roles and
Steps to prepare for the agreed motive role event,
A step to calculate the results of each player is provided.
Also, if the players are in a team system, there is a step to manage the team and a step to calculate the results for each team.
Also, if a valid value is provided on the battlefield, for example, if a medal or item is provided, the value has a step of managing the value and processing the transfer of ownership.
Each player decides one or more facilitator events and continuously performs them.
For one thing, if a signal (event message) for a motive is sent from any of the facilitators managed on the battlefield, one motive role item is decided in some way and the motive is determined. If the role type is a fighting type, decide the responder and divide it into "equal opponent" or "non-equal opponent", and prepare the equal opponent to receive the result of the motive role event in each facilitator event. , The player who issued the signal for the above-mentioned motive is also an equal opponent.
Second, one motive role event is arranged in some way, the player performing the motive role event is decided, and the equal opponents are prepared to receive the result of the motive role event in each facilitator event. hand,
Then, the player who performs the motive role event including the non-equal opponent is prepared to perform the motive role event, and the information necessary for performing the motive role event is passed to the motive role event. It is carried out on the motive role event side, the result of the motive role event is received, and only the performance of the equal opponent is returned to the facilitator event in which each equal opponent is prepared to receive the result, and the result is returned in each facilitator event. Change the facilitator event,
If a series of such processes is performed at key points the required number of times, the results of each player on the battlefield are calculated based on the results of the facilitator event, and a valid value is provided on the battlefield, the value is set to the value. If the value is added to the results of each player, and if the competition is a team system, the results of each team are calculated based on the results of each player, and the computer is made to execute the process of determining the victory or defeat.
Control methods and computer programs that enable heterogeneous interaction.