WO2021087842A1 - 一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法 - Google Patents
一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法 Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2021087842A1 WO2021087842A1 PCT/CN2019/116175 CN2019116175W WO2021087842A1 WO 2021087842 A1 WO2021087842 A1 WO 2021087842A1 CN 2019116175 W CN2019116175 W CN 2019116175W WO 2021087842 A1 WO2021087842 A1 WO 2021087842A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- file
- click
- import
- model
- dimensional roughness
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B11/00—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques
- G01B11/30—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques for measuring roughness or irregularity of surfaces
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16C—COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; CHEMOINFORMATICS; COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
- G16C60/00—Computational materials science, i.e. ICT specially adapted for investigating the physical or chemical properties of materials or phenomena associated with their design, synthesis, processing, characterisation or utilisation
Definitions
- the invention belongs to the technical field of concrete surfaces, in particular to a method for measuring the three-dimensional roughness of the concrete surface.
- Concrete bonding interfaces are widely present in concrete structures, such as construction joints, settlement joints and expansion joints during concrete pouring, splicing joints during wet installation of precast components, and joints between new and old concrete in structural repair and reinforcement Wait.
- the concrete bonding interface is composed of different concrete matrices, interface layers and interface steel bars.
- the material properties and hydration levels of different concrete matrices near the interface layer are different.
- the interface layer has deformation coordination problems. Under the action of load and shrinkage, weak links are easy to form; on the other hand, these weak interface layers provide convenient transmission of harmful substances.
- the method accelerates the corrosion of the interface steel bars, and the volume expansion of the corrosion products will aggravate the damage of the bonding interface, resulting in the durability of the structure near the bonding interface and even failure. Failure cases caused by insufficient durability of the concrete bonding interface are not uncommon, which seriously affects the applicability of the structure and threatens the safe service of the structure.
- the roughness of the concrete bonding interface is a key factor affecting the weak interface layer, which in turn affects the durability of the structure.
- most methods for evaluating the roughness of concrete surface are sand laying method and probe method.
- the sand paving method is susceptible to human subjective factors, and the detection accuracy is low; while the roughness value detected by the probe method is only a two-dimensional representation of the concrete surface, but the actual roughness should be a three-dimensional index. Therefore, it is necessary to propose a method for measuring the three-dimensional roughness of concrete surface.
- the present invention provides a method for measuring the three-dimensional roughness of the concrete surface, which solves the problems of difficulty in detecting the roughness of concrete on the construction site, low accuracy, and limited dimensions.
- the technical scheme adopted by the present invention is as follows: a method for measuring three-dimensional roughness of concrete surface, including the following steps:
- the reference surface is a 99% reference surface.
- the method for determining the 99% datum plane is as follows:
- the sand paving method test is specifically as follows:
- the CSP standard model uses the CSP standard model mentioned in the'Guideline No. 310.2R-2013' by the International Concrete Repair Institute (ICRI). As the number increases, the roughness of the model changes. Big.
- ICRI International Concrete Repair Institute
- Roland LPX 3D laser scanner is used for 3D scanning.
- the 3D scanning test is specifically as follows:
- the step (4) is specifically as follows:
- the step (5) is specifically as follows:
- the root mean square height (Sq), skewness (Ssk), kurtosis (Sku), maximum peak height (Sp), and maximum peak height (Sp) are also calculated.
- a high-precision instrument 3D scans to reconstruct the rough surface, uses a quadratic integral formula to calculate the roughness index, measures the concrete surface roughness index from a three-dimensional angle, and describes the rough surface roughness more comprehensively and accurately.
- the three-dimensional roughness of the concrete surface can be measured, so that the construction of the concrete bonding interface on site can be standardized, and the durability of the concrete building can be improved.
- Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the CSP standard model.
- Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of the placement of the CSP standard model.
- Figure 3 shows the Sa values of different datum planes of the CSP standard model.
- Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of sand-laying materials.
- Figure 5 shows the MTD value of CSP standard model sand paving method.
- Figure 6 shows the error of MTD value and Sa value of different CSP standard models with different reference planes.
- Figure 7 shows the error variance between the MTD value and the Sa value of the CSP standard model with different reference levels.
- This embodiment provides a method for measuring the three-dimensional roughness of a concrete surface, which includes the following steps:
- the 3D scanning test is as follows: start the Dr.PICZA3 software on the desktop, click the SCAN green button, select the surround scan, set the scanning surface to 4, set the height and width to 100mm and 150mm according to the CSP standard model size, and set the scanning accuracy to 0.2 mm, to ensure the accuracy of the 3D scanning test; to ensure that the object to be tested is completely scanned, click Preview to preview, and adjust the parameter settings through a small window; after the parameters are set, click Scan to scan.
- Roland LPX 3D laser scanner is used for 3D scanning in this embodiment, of course, it is not limited to this.
- 1Sq is the same as Sa, which can be used to describe the peak, valley and surface feature distribution of the object to be measured; 2Ssk>0 indicates the main distribution peak of the object to be measured; Ssk ⁇ 0 indicates the main distribution valley.
- a larger value of Ssk indicates the deterioration of the object to be measured, and the number of peaks with steep slopes and sharp peaks increases; a negative value of Ssk indicates that the object to be measured is composed of a plateau with deep valleys; a positive value of Ssk indicates a plane with many peaks; 3Sku Indicates the probability of occurrence of defects and their distribution on the object to be tested.
- Sku ⁇ 3 means that the defects appear less and are evenly distributed; Sku>3 means that the defects occur frequently and are unevenly distributed; 4Sp, Sv and Sz are the absolute highest and lowest points on the object to be tested, and their relative height difference .
- the three-dimensional roughness index Sa value of the 3D scanning method is checked according to the MTD value of the sand paving method, the error variance under different reference surfaces is calculated, and the final reference surface is determined (the reference surface is the point whose Z coordinate is greater than zero on the rough surface accounts for all the data points. Percentage), the method of determining the datum plane is as follows:
- the sand-laying method test was performed on ten CSP standard models with different roughness surfaces to obtain the MTD value; the sand-laying method test is as follows (A1)-(A8), and the materials required for the sand-laying method test are shown in Figure 4.
- A1-(A8) the materials required for the sand-laying method test are shown in Figure 4.
- 1 Ottawa standard sand (0.15-0.3mm); 2—sample container (quantitatively measure the volume of Ottawa standard sand, 0.1ml); 3—with a graduated ruler (spread out the sand into a circle and measure Diameter, 0.1mm); 4-brush.
- the 3D scanning test Sa value has the same physical meaning as the sand paving test MTD, so compare the difference between the Sa value and the MTD value of the different reference levels of different CSP standard models, as shown in Figure 6, calculate all CSPs under different reference levels
- the error variance between the standard model Sa value and the MTD value is shown in Figure 7. It is found that the error variance under the 99% reference level is the smallest, so the 99% reference level is selected as the final reference level.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
- Length Measuring Devices By Optical Means (AREA)
- Length Measuring Devices With Unspecified Measuring Means (AREA)
Abstract
一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法,对待测对象进行3D扫描试验,运用软件进行旋转移动、修补优化和编辑计算处理,获得三维粗糙度指标值。通过CSP标准模型铺砂法MTD值与3D扫描Sa值的误差方差,确立最终基准面。该方法可以测得混凝土表面的三维粗糙度,规范现场对混凝土结合界面的施工,提升混凝土建筑的耐久性能。
Description
本发明属于混凝土表面技术领域,具体地说是一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法。
混凝土结合界面广泛存在于混凝土结构中,如混凝土浇筑过程中的施工缝、沉降缝和伸缩缝等结构缝,预制构件湿法安装过程中的拼接缝,以及结构修复加固中新旧混凝土的接缝等。
混凝土结合界面由不同混凝土基体、界面层以及界面钢筋共同构成。界面层附近不同混凝土基体的材料性能和水化程度不同,界面层存在变形协调问题,在荷载和收缩作用下,容易形成薄弱环节;另一方面,这些薄弱界面层为有害物质提供了便捷的传输途径,加速了界面钢筋的腐蚀,腐蚀产物的体积膨胀将加剧结合界面损伤,导致结构在结合界面附近耐久性降低甚至失效。由混凝土结合界面耐久性不足引起的失效案例屡见不鲜,严重地影响了结构的适用性能,并威胁结构的安全服役。
混凝土结合界面的粗糙度是影响薄弱界面层的关键因素,进而影响结构的耐久性。目前对混凝土表面的粗糙度评定方法多为铺砂法、探针法。铺砂法易受到人为主观因素影响,且检测精度较低;而探针法检测的粗糙度值仅仅为混凝土表面的二维表征,但实际粗糙度应是一个三维指标。故有必要提出一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法。
发明内容
针对上述不足,本发明提供一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法,解决了施工现场混凝土粗糙度检测困难、精度较低、维度局限等问题。
本发明所采用的技术方案如下:一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法,包括如下步骤:
(1)对待测对象进行3D扫描试验,扫描结束后,将文件数据导出为源.stl和源.dxf格式;
(2)将源.dxf文件导入Auto CAD,模型粗糙面与Z坐标轴垂直,导出为旋转.dxf文件;
(3)将文件导入Geomagic Studio软件,删除粗糙面以外的三个无关面,修补粗糙面,导出为粗糙面1.stl和粗糙面1.dxf文件;
(4)将粗糙面1.stl文件,导入COMSOL Multiphysics软件中,导出坐标1.txt文件;
(5)将坐标1.txt文件导入到Excel文件中;
(6)删除坐标以外的数据,将数据点按Z值降序进行排序,找到基准面偏离XOY空间面的值A;
(7)将粗糙面1.dxf文件导入Auto CAD软件中,将粗糙面沿Z轴方向移动距离A,导 出为移动.dxf文件;
(8)将移动.dxf文件导入到Geomagic Studio软件中,导出为粗糙面2.stl和粗糙面2.dxf文件;
(9)将粗糙面2.stl导入COMSOL Multiphysics软件中,导出坐标2.txt文件;
(10)将坐标2.txt文件导入Excel文件中,计算的算数平均高度(Sa),即为三维粗糙度指标值。
作为优选,所述基准面采用99%基准面。
作为优选,99%基准面的确定方法如下:
将十种不同粗糙度面的CSP标准模型重复步骤(1)-步骤(10),得到每个模型在85%、90%、95%、98%、99%、100%六种不同基准面下的三维粗糙度指标值;
对十种不同粗糙度面的CSP标准模型进行铺砂法试验,得到MTD值;
用MTD值校核3D扫描三维粗糙度指标值,得到最终基准面。
作为优选,所述铺砂法试验具体如下:
(A1)将CSP标准模型水平放置于无风环境的实验室操作台上;
(A2)用刷子清理CSP标准模型粗糙面;
(A3)用样本容器量取适量体积V(ml)的渥太华标准砂;
(A4)将量取的渥太华标准砂倾倒在CSP标准模型上;
(A5)用直尺将渥太华标准砂成圆形展开,最高面与砂子覆盖区域最高点平齐;
(A6)用直尺多次测量圆形砂面直径,并计算平均值D;
(A7)根据公式计算该覆盖区域粗糙面的MTD值;
(A8)多次测量模型不同区域的MTD值,并计算平均值即为该模型最终的MTD结果。
作为优选,所述CSP标准模型选用国际混凝土修复协会(International Concrete Repair Institute/ICRI)在‘Guideline No.310.2R-2013’中提到的CSP标准模型,随着编号的增大,模型粗糙度变大。
作为优选,3D扫描采用Roland LPX 3D激光扫描仪。
作为优选,所述步骤(1)中,3D扫描试验具体如下:
启动桌面的Dr.PICZA3软件,点击SCAN绿色按钮,选择环绕扫描,扫描面设置为4,高度和宽度根据CSP标准模型尺寸分别设置为100mm和150mm,扫描精度设置为0.2mm;点击Preview进行预览,通过小窗口调整参数设置;参数设置完毕后,点击Scan进行扫描。
作为优选,所述步骤(4)具体如下:
打开COMSOL Multiphysics软件,创建三维空模型;模型开发器窗口中,右击全局定义选择几何零件,右击几何零件选择三维零件,右击三维零件选择导入;设置导入,文件名选择前一步导出的粗糙面1.stl文件,点击导入;模型开发器右击结果数据集选择网格;设置网格选择网格零件;模型开发器右击结果导出,选择数据;设置输出栏点击浏览,选择保存文本的位置;点击导出,保存结果为坐标1.txt文件。
作为优选,所述步骤(5)具体如下:
新建Excel文件并打开,选择数据自文本,找到导出的坐标1.txt文件,点击导入;选择分隔符号“Tab键”和“空格”,点击下一步;选择常规,点击完成;放置于现有工作表中,点击确定。
作为优选,在步骤(10)将坐标2.txt文件导入Excel文件中后,还计算均方根高度(Sq)、偏度(Ssk)、峰度(Sku)、最大峰高(Sp)、最大谷低(Sv)和最大表面高度差(Sz)。
本发明的有益效果如下:高精度仪器3D扫描重构粗糙面,利用二次积分公式计算粗糙度指标,从三维角度测量得到混凝土表面粗糙度指标,对粗糙面的粗糙度描述更为全面精确。通过本发明提出的方法,可以测得混凝土表面的三维粗糙度,从而可以规范现场对混凝土结合界面的施工,提升混凝土建筑的耐久性能。
图1为CSP标准模型示意图。
图2为CSP标准模型放置示意图。
图3为CSP标准模型不同基准面Sa值。
图4为铺砂法材料示意图。
图5为CSP标准模型铺砂法MTD值。
图6为不同基准面不同CSP标准模型MTD值与Sa值误差。
图7为不同基准面CSP标准模型MTD值与Sa值误差方差。
下面结合说明书附图和具体实施方式对本发明作进一步说明。
本实施例提供一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法,包括如下步骤:
(1)对待测对象进行3D扫描试验,扫描结束后,将文件数据导出为源.stl和源.dxf格式;
其中3D扫描试验具体如下:启动桌面的Dr.PICZA3软件,点击SCAN绿色按钮,选择环绕扫描,扫描面设置为4,高度和宽度根据CSP标准模型尺寸分别设置为100mm和150mm,扫描精度设置为0.2mm,保证3D扫描试验的精度;为保证待测对象被完整扫描,点击Preview进行预览,通过小窗口调整参数设置;参数设置完毕后,点击Scan进行扫描。本实施例中3D扫描采用Roland LPX 3D激光扫描仪,当然不限于此。
(2)将源.dxf文件导入CAD,模型粗糙面与Z坐标轴垂直,确保Z坐标值的大小能准确表述混凝土表面的起伏特征,导出为旋转.dxf文件;
(3)将文件导入Geomagic Studio软件,删除粗糙面以外的三个无关面,修补粗糙面,得到一完整的粗糙面,导出为粗糙面1.stl和粗糙面1.dxf文件;
(4)打开COMSOL Multiphysics软件,创建三维空模型;模型开发器窗口中,右击全局定义选择几何零件,右击几何零件选择三维零件,右击三维零件选择导入;设置导入,文件名选择前一步导出的粗糙面1.stl文件,点击导入;模型开发器右击结果数据集选择网格;设置网格选择网格零件;模型开发器右击结果导出,选择数据;设置输出栏点击浏览,选择保存文本的位置;点击导出,保存结果为坐标1.txt文件。
(5)新建Excel文件并打开,选择数据自文本,找到导出的坐标1.txt文件,点击导入;选择分隔符号“Tab键”和“空格”,点击下一步;选择常规,点击完成;放置于现有工作表中,点击确定。
(6)删除坐标以外的数据,将数据点按Z值降序进行排序,找到基准面偏离XOY空间面的值A;
(7)将粗糙面1.dxf文件导入Auto CAD软件中,将粗糙面沿Z轴方向移动距离A,使得基准面与XOY空间面重合,导出为移动.dxf文件;
(8)将移动.dxf文件导入到Geomagic Studio软件中,导出为粗糙面2.stl和粗糙面2.dxf文件;
(9)将粗糙面2.stl导入COMSOL Multiphysics软件中,导出坐标2.txt文件;
(10)将坐标2.txt文件导入Excel文件中,计算的算数平均高度(Sa),即为三维粗糙度指标值。
在本申请实施例中,在步骤(10)将坐标2.txt文件导入Excel文件中后,还计算均方根高度(Sq)、偏度(Ssk)、峰度(Sku)、最大峰高(Sp)、最大谷低(Sv)和最大表面高度差(Sz)。①Sq同Sa一样可适用于描述待测对象的峰、谷和表面特征分布;②Ssk>0表示待测对象主要分布峰;Ssk<0表示主要分布谷。Ssk值变大表示待测对象的劣化,具有陡峭坡度和尖峰的峰数目增多;Ssk是负值表示待测对象由一个具有深谷的高原组成;Ssk是正值表示一个有许多峰的平面;③Sku表示缺陷出现的可能性及在待测对象上的分布。Sku<3表示缺陷出现较少,且均匀分布;Sku>3表示缺陷高频出现且分布不均匀;④Sp,Sv和Sz是待测对象上绝对最高值和最低值点,及他们的相对高差。
S
p=sup{Z(x
i,y
j)} (5)
S
v=|inf{Z(x
i,y
j)}| (6)
S
z=S
p-S
v (7)
在本申请实施例中,随着基准面的变化,计算得到的三维粗糙度指标也会随之发生改变。因此根据铺砂法MTD值校核3D扫描法三维粗糙度指标Sa值,计算不同基准面下的误差方差,确定最终基准面(基准面即粗糙面上Z坐标大于零的点占所有数据点的百分数),基准面的确定方法如下:
将十种不同粗糙度面的CSP标准模型重复步骤(1)-步骤(10),得到每个模型在85%、90%、95%、98%、99%、100%六种不同基准面下的三维粗糙度指标值;本实施例中所述CSP标准模型选用国际混凝土修复协会(International Concrete Repair Institute/ICRI)在‘Guideline No.310.2R-2013’中提到的CSP标准模型,随着编号的增大,模型粗糙度变大,如图1。
测试时,将具有十种不同粗糙度面的CSP标准模型依次垂直放置于Roland LPX 3D激光扫描仪的置物台中央处,如图2。
对十种不同粗糙度面的CSP标准模型进行铺砂法试验,得到MTD值;所述铺砂法试验具体如下(A1)-(A8),铺砂法试验所需材料如图4所示,图中1——渥太华标准砂(0.15-0.3mm);2——样本容器(可定量测量渥太华标准砂的体积,0.1ml);3——有刻度直尺(将砂子铺开成圆,测量直径,0.1mm);4——刷子。
(A1)将CSP标准模型水平放置于无风环境的实验室操作台上;
(A2)用刷子清理CSP标准模型粗糙面;
(A3)用样本容器量取适量体积V(ml)的渥太华标准砂;
(A4)将量取的渥太华标准砂倾倒在CSP标准模型上;
(A5)用直尺将渥太华标准砂成圆形展开,最高面与砂子覆盖区域最高点平齐;
(A6)用直尺多次测量圆形砂面直径,并计算平均值D;
(A7)根据公式计算该覆盖区域粗糙面的MTD值;
(A8)多次测量模型不同区域的MTD值,并计算平均值即为该模型最终的MTD结果,见图5,发现CSP1-CSP3模型由于粗糙度过小而无法测得MTD值。
用MTD值校核3D扫描三维粗糙度指标值,得到最终基准面,见图3。
需要说明的是:3D扫描试验Sa值与铺砂法试验MTD具有相同的物理意义,故比较不同CSP标准模型不同基准面Sa值与MTD值的误差,见图6,计算不同基准面下所有CSP标准模型Sa值与MTD值的误差方差,见图7,发现99%基准面下的误差方差最小,故选择99%基准面为最终基准面。
以上所述仅为本发明的优选实施例,并非因此限制本发明的专利范围,凡是利用本发明说明书及附图内容所作的等效流程变换,或直接或间接运用在其他相关的技术领域,均同理包括在本发明的专利保护范围内。
Claims (10)
- 一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法,其特征在于,包括如下步骤:(1)对待测对象进行3D扫描试验,扫描结束后,将文件数据导出为源.stl和源.dxf格式;(2)将源.dxf文件导入Auto CAD,模型粗糙面与Z坐标轴垂直,导出为旋转.dxf文件;(3)将文件导入Geomagic Studio软件,删除粗糙面以外的三个无关面,修补粗糙面,导出为粗糙面1.stl和粗糙面1.dxf文件;(4)将粗糙面1.stl文件,导入COMSOL Multiphysics软件中,导出坐标1.txt文件;(5)将坐标1.txt文件导入到Excel文件中;(6)删除坐标以外的数据,将数据点按Z值降序进行排序,找到基准面偏离XOY空间面的值A;(7)将粗糙面1.dxf文件导入Auto CAD软件中,将粗糙面沿Z轴方向移动距离A,导出为移动.dxf文件;(8)将移动.dxf文件导入到Geomagic Studio软件中,导出为粗糙面2.stl和粗糙面2.dxf文件;(9)将粗糙面2.stl导入COMSOL Multiphysics软件中,导出坐标2.txt文件;(10)将坐标2.txt文件导入Excel文件中,计算的算数平均高度(Sa),即为三维粗糙度指标值。
- 根据权利要求1所述的一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法,其特征在于,所述基准面采用99%基准面。
- 根据权利要求2所述的一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法,其特征在于,99%基准面的确定方法如下:将十种不同粗糙度面的CSP标准模型重复步骤(1)-步骤(10),得到每个模型在85%、90%、95%、98%、99%、100%六种不同基准面下的三维粗糙度指标值;对十种不同粗糙度面的CSP标准模型进行铺砂法试验,得到MTD值;用MTD值校核3D扫描三维粗糙度指标值,得到最终基准面。
- 根据权利要求3所述的一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法,其特征在于,所述CSP标准模型选用国际混凝土修复协会(International Concrete Repair Institute/ICRI)在‘Guideline No.310.2R-2013’中提到的CSP标准模型,随着编号的增大,模型粗糙度变大。
- 根据权利要求1所述的一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法,其特征在于,3D扫描采用Roland LPX 3D激光扫描仪。
- 根据权利要求1所述的一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法,其特征在于,所述步骤(1)中,3D扫描试验具体如下:启动桌面的Dr.PICZA3软件,点击SCAN绿色按钮,选择环绕扫描,扫描面设置为4,高度和宽度根据CSP标准模型尺寸分别设置为100mm和150mm,扫描精度设置为0.2mm;点击Preview进行预览,通过小窗口调整参数设置;参数设置完毕后,点击Scan进行扫描。
- 根据权利要求1所述的一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法,其特征在于,所述步骤(4)具体如下:打开COMSOL Multiphysics软件,创建三维空模型;模型开发器窗口中,右击全局定义选择几何零件,右击几何零件选择三维零件,右击三维零件选择导入;设置导入,文件名选择前一步导出的粗糙面1.stl文件,点击导入;模型开发器右击结果数据集选择网格;设置网格选择网格零件;模型开发器右击结果导出,选择数据;设置输出栏点击浏览,选择保存文本的位置;点击导出,保存结果为坐标1.txt文件。
- 根据权利要求1所述的一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法,其特征在于,所述步骤(5)具体如下:新建Excel文件并打开,选择数据自文本,找到导出的坐标1.txt文件,点击导入;选择分隔符号“Tab键”和“空格”,点击下一步;选择常规,点击完成;放置于现有工作表中,点击确定。
- 根据权利要求1所述的一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法,其特征在于,在步骤(10)将坐标2.txt文件导入Excel文件中后,还计算均方根高度(Sq)、偏度(Ssk)、峰度(Sku)、最大峰高(Sp)、最大谷低(Sv)和最大表面高度差(Sz)。
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911065755.9 | 2019-11-04 | ||
CN201911065755.9A CN110940299B (zh) | 2019-11-04 | 2019-11-04 | 一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2021087842A1 true WO2021087842A1 (zh) | 2021-05-14 |
Family
ID=69906337
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2019/116175 WO2021087842A1 (zh) | 2019-11-04 | 2019-11-07 | 一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法 |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN110940299B (zh) |
WO (1) | WO2021087842A1 (zh) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111561884B (zh) * | 2020-04-28 | 2021-01-19 | 昆山市建设工程质量检测中心 | 一种用于预制混凝土叠合板表面粗糙度检测的方法 |
CN111964635B (zh) * | 2020-08-28 | 2023-10-24 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | 一种混凝土基体修复表面粗糙度的测试方法 |
CN113758459A (zh) * | 2021-09-07 | 2021-12-07 | 郑州大学 | 定量表征高聚物注浆材料与混凝土接触面形貌特征的方法 |
CN114858071B (zh) * | 2022-05-07 | 2024-01-30 | 浙江翰达工程检测有限公司 | 一种预制混凝土构件叠合面粗糙度的测量装置及方法 |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105783851A (zh) * | 2016-04-14 | 2016-07-20 | 常州奥凡威尔智能技术有限公司 | 一种粗糙度检测系统及检测方法 |
CN109029304A (zh) * | 2018-07-11 | 2018-12-18 | 天津城建大学 | 一种混凝土的表面粗糙度测量方法 |
CN110084880A (zh) * | 2018-01-25 | 2019-08-02 | 广达电脑股份有限公司 | 三维图像处理的装置及方法 |
JP2019174207A (ja) * | 2018-03-27 | 2019-10-10 | 太平洋セメント株式会社 | 評価方法および評価システム |
CN110360963A (zh) * | 2019-07-22 | 2019-10-22 | 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 | 一种钻孔摄像技术的岩体结构面三维粗糙度描述方法 |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1697695A1 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2006-09-06 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Device and method for measuring the profile of a surface |
KR100925724B1 (ko) * | 2007-02-22 | 2009-11-10 | 한국철도기술연구원 | 레이저 스캐닝 데이터를 이용한 시설물 검측 장치 및 그방법과 그를 이용한 터널 관리 시스템 및 그 방법 |
CN101158573A (zh) * | 2007-10-26 | 2008-04-09 | 北京航空航天大学 | 三维表面粗糙度评定中建立轮廓基准面的新方法 |
CZ2009133A3 (cs) * | 2009-03-03 | 2009-07-08 | Witrins S.R.O. | Zarízení, zpusob merení vnejších rozmeru testovaného výrobku a použití tohoto zarízení |
CN105372168B (zh) * | 2015-12-08 | 2018-03-23 | 清华大学 | 一种混凝土孔隙三维结构的构建方法 |
CN106289117A (zh) * | 2016-07-20 | 2017-01-04 | 重庆交通大学 | 路面粗糙度的测量方法及装置 |
CN109577148B (zh) * | 2019-01-15 | 2024-05-03 | 台州市泰辉市政工程有限公司 | 水泥混凝土同步三维振动整平装置 |
-
2019
- 2019-11-04 CN CN201911065755.9A patent/CN110940299B/zh active Active
- 2019-11-07 WO PCT/CN2019/116175 patent/WO2021087842A1/zh active Application Filing
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105783851A (zh) * | 2016-04-14 | 2016-07-20 | 常州奥凡威尔智能技术有限公司 | 一种粗糙度检测系统及检测方法 |
CN110084880A (zh) * | 2018-01-25 | 2019-08-02 | 广达电脑股份有限公司 | 三维图像处理的装置及方法 |
JP2019174207A (ja) * | 2018-03-27 | 2019-10-10 | 太平洋セメント株式会社 | 評価方法および評価システム |
CN109029304A (zh) * | 2018-07-11 | 2018-12-18 | 天津城建大学 | 一种混凝土的表面粗糙度测量方法 |
CN110360963A (zh) * | 2019-07-22 | 2019-10-22 | 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 | 一种钻孔摄像技术的岩体结构面三维粗糙度描述方法 |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
JIANG HAO: "Research on Transmission Property of Interlaminar Structure by Composite Specimens for Twin-Block Ballastless Track", CHINESE MASTER’S THESES FULL-TEXT DATABASE, 1 June 2015 (2015-06-01), XP055811592 * |
TAN YEWEN, WANG SHUGUANG, XU FENG, LIU WEIQING, CHEN XUANDONG, LIANG YU: "Application of COMSOL Multiphysics in Research of Concrete Durability-A Short Review", JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, vol. 45, no. 5, 1 May 2017 (2017-05-01), pages 697 - 707, XP055811597, DOI: 10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.2017.05.16 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN110940299B (zh) | 2020-11-13 |
CN110940299A (zh) | 2020-03-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2021087842A1 (zh) | 一种混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测量方法 | |
WO2021218114A1 (zh) | 一种用于预制混凝土叠合板表面粗糙度检测的方法 | |
Zhao et al. | Shear-related roughness classification and strength model of natural rock joint based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation | |
Jiang et al. | New method for characterizing the shear damage of natural rock joint based on 3D engraving and 3D scanning | |
Tonietto et al. | New method for evaluating surface roughness parameters acquired by laser scanning | |
Santos et al. | A state-of-the-art review on roughness quantification methods for concrete surfaces | |
Tatone et al. | A method to evaluate the three-dimensional roughness of fracture surfaces in brittle geomaterials | |
Zhang et al. | Probability distribution model for cross-sectional area of corroded reinforcing steel bars | |
Wang et al. | Determination of residual cross-sectional areas of corroded bars in reinforced concrete structures using easy-to-measure variables | |
CN110702536B (zh) | 一种岩体结构面剪切破坏表面形态演化规律研究方法及系统 | |
Siewczyńska | Method for determining the parameters of surface roughness by usage of a 3D scanner | |
Paixão et al. | Abrasion evolution of steel furnace slag aggregate for railway ballast: 3D morphology analysis of scanned particles by close-range photogrammetry | |
Ban et al. | A new criterion for peak shear strength of rock joints with a 3D roughness parameter | |
CN112325835B (zh) | 预制混凝土构件点状凹坑结合面粗糙度检测方法 | |
Soroushian et al. | Morphological operations, planar mathematical formulations, and stereological interpretations for automated image analysis of concrete microstructure | |
Gui et al. | Modelling shear behaviour of joint based on joint surface degradation during shearing | |
Macek | Fracture surface formation of notched 2017A-T4 aluminium alloy under bending fatigue | |
Ozkul et al. | Design and optimization of an instrument for measuring bughole rating of concrete surfaces | |
Wang et al. | Measuring aggregate morphologies based on three‐dimensional curvature analysis | |
Grigoriadis | Use of laser interferometry for measuring concrete substrate roughness in patch repairs | |
Song et al. | A 3D petrographic analysis for concrete freeze-thaw protection | |
Ban et al. | A modified roughness index based on the root mean square of the first derivative and its relationship with peak shear strength of rock joints | |
Buczkowski et al. | Experimental validation of numerical static calculations for a monolithic rectangular tank with walls of trapezoidal cross-section | |
Miao et al. | Feasibility of one side 3-D scanning for characterizing aggregate shape | |
CN110864610B (zh) | 基于3d扫描重构混凝土表面三维粗糙度的测试方法 |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 19951637 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 19951637 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |