WO2020181320A1 - Procédé et système permettant de localiser une défaillance de pim dans une antenne en réseau phasé - Google Patents

Procédé et système permettant de localiser une défaillance de pim dans une antenne en réseau phasé Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2020181320A1
WO2020181320A1 PCT/AU2020/050161 AU2020050161W WO2020181320A1 WO 2020181320 A1 WO2020181320 A1 WO 2020181320A1 AU 2020050161 W AU2020050161 W AU 2020050161W WO 2020181320 A1 WO2020181320 A1 WO 2020181320A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
pim
aut
fault
signals
probes
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/AU2020/050161
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Brendan Horsfield
Michael John VERITY
Mostafa Mohamed Taher Abushaaban
Original Assignee
Kaelus Pty Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2019900794A external-priority patent/AU2019900794A0/en
Application filed by Kaelus Pty Ltd filed Critical Kaelus Pty Ltd
Priority to CN202080029777.4A priority Critical patent/CN113711061A/zh
Publication of WO2020181320A1 publication Critical patent/WO2020181320A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/28—Testing of electronic circuits, e.g. by signal tracer
    • G01R31/2832—Specific tests of electronic circuits not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/2836—Fault-finding or characterising
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R29/00—Arrangements for measuring or indicating electric quantities not covered by groups G01R19/00 - G01R27/00
    • G01R29/08—Measuring electromagnetic field characteristics
    • G01R29/10—Radiation diagrams of antennas
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R23/00—Arrangements for measuring frequencies; Arrangements for analysing frequency spectra
    • G01R23/16—Spectrum analysis; Fourier analysis
    • G01R23/20—Measurement of non-linear distortion
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R29/00—Arrangements for measuring or indicating electric quantities not covered by groups G01R19/00 - G01R27/00
    • G01R29/08—Measuring electromagnetic field characteristics
    • G01R29/10—Radiation diagrams of antennas
    • G01R29/105—Radiation diagrams of antennas using anechoic chambers; Chambers or open field sites used therefor

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the identification of a passive intermodulation (PIM) fault in a phased array antenna.
  • PIM passive intermodulation
  • the invention relates to the determination of the location of a PIM fault in a phased array antenna under test.
  • Phased array antennas are important building blocks in many radio communications systems. By coherently receiving or transmitting signals from multiple radiating elements at the same time, this type of antenna can achieve a much more directional radiation pattern than would be possible with one radiating element alone.
  • phased array antennas can be very complex, especially when the antenna contains a large number of radiating elements. Modern antennas can contain literally hundreds of interconnects, cables and components. For these reasons, phased array antennas can be challenging to manufacture, and even more difficult to troubleshoot when faults occur.
  • PIM passive intermodulation distortion
  • RF radiofrequency
  • PIM faults may not necessarily manifest in a consistent manner.
  • some PIM faults may manifest only under certain conditions, e.g. when moved or when force is applied to a part of the antenna.
  • the present invention is directed to methods and systems for locating PIM faults in a phased array antenna, which may at least partially overcome at least one of the abovementioned disadvantages or provide the consumer with a useful or commercial choice.
  • the present invention in one form, resides broadly in a system for locating a passive intermodulation (PIM) fault in an antenna under test (AUT), the AUT comprising an input port and a plurality of branches, each branch ending in at least one radiating element, the system comprising: a fixed array of over-the-air probes, each over-the- air probe configured to receive PIM signals emitted from at least one of the plurality of radiating elements; a PIM analyser, connected to the AUT and the fixed array of over-the-air probes, for: applying a plurality of RF stimulus signals to the input port of the AUT; and measuring one or more characteristics of the Forward PIM signals received by the fixed array of over-the-air probes to locate the PIM fault in the AUT.
  • PIM passive intermodulation
  • a method of locating a passive intermodulation (PIM) fault in an antenna under test (AUT), the AUT comprising an input port and a plurality of branches, each branch ending in at least one radiating element comprising: applying a plurality of RF stimulus signals to the input port of the AUT; receiving, by a fixed array of over-the-air probes, the Forward PIM signals emitted from at least one of the plurality of radiating elements; measuring, by a PIM analyser, one or more characteristics of the Forward PIM signals received by the fixed array of over-the-air probes; and analysing the one or more characteristics of the Forward PIM signals to locate the PIM fault in the AUT.
  • the system and method enable PIM faults to be easily located in an AUT, which is particularly useful when manufacturing phased array antennas.
  • the antenna under test may be a phased array antenna, an omni-band antenna or a small cell antenna.
  • the antenna under test may be situated in an anechoic chamber.
  • the antenna under test may include a power divider, which splits an input signal into multiple branches. Each branch may terminate in at least one radiating element.
  • Locating a PIM fault may comprise determining which individual branch or set of branches of the antenna under test contains the PIM fault.
  • Each over-the-air probes may be configured to receive signals from two or more of the radiating elements.
  • Beam forming may be used to isolate signals from each of the radiating elements of the AUT received at the over-the-air probes.
  • the OTA probes may be positioned at least 1 m from (e.g. above) the radiating elements.
  • the OTA probes may be at least about 50cm from the radiating elements.
  • Two or more of the OTA probes may be at least about 50cm from the radiating elements.
  • the OTA probes may be arranged in a curved arrangement.
  • the OTA probes may be arranged in a curved arrangement in a direction perpendicular to the AUT (e.g. in the vertical direction when tested from above).
  • the OTA probes may be arranged such that they are furthest from the radiating elements at a centre of the antenna, and closest to the radiating elements at edges of the antenna.
  • the OTA probes may form a dome-shape above the antenna.
  • the OTA probes may be positioned to lay on an elliptical curve in the vertical direction.
  • the OTA probes may be equidistantly placed on the elliptical curve.
  • the elliptical curve may be defined according to the following parameterisation:
  • f is from 0 to TT
  • W is the width of the curve
  • h is the height of the upper most point of the curve above the AUT
  • b is the height of the curve from vertically, from its upper most point to its lowermost point.
  • the OTA probes may be linearly arranged.
  • the OTA probes may be linearly arranged.
  • the OTA probes may be linearly arranged.
  • the OTA probes may comprise less than 30 probes.
  • the OTA probes may comprise about 16 probes. The skilled addressee will, however, readily appreciate that as many probes as are needed to separate the radiating elements.
  • the OTA probes may be configured such that amplitude response functions of the elements of the antenna have at least about 10dB target isolation.
  • each over-the-air probes may be configured to receive signals from a single radiating element only.
  • the probes may be configured to achieve a strong coupling with the radiating elements of the AUT.
  • Each of the radiating elements of the antenna under test may be coupled to one of the plurality of over-the-air (OTA) probes.
  • OTA over-the-air
  • the angular orientation of the of the probe may be adjusted to achieve a strong coupling.
  • Each of the OTA probes may be centred over its counterpart radiating element in the AUT.
  • the probes may be positioned within about 30mm of the radiating elements of the AUT.
  • the OTA probes may be mounted on a gantry which is height-adjustable to allow the vertical separation between the OTA probes and the radiating elements to be configurable.
  • the vertical separation between each OTA probe and its corresponding radiating element may be less than 100mm.
  • the vertical separation may be in the range 10-100mm.
  • the system may include a controller, connected to the PIM analyser, for analysing the one or more characteristics of the Forward PIM signals to locate the PIM fault in the AUT.
  • the at least one of the RF stimulus signals may be swept over a range of frequencies.
  • the PIM analyser may be configured to measure the one or more characteristics of the Forward PIM signals to identify static PIM faults and dynamic PIM faults.
  • the AUT may be selectively vibrated to identify dynamic PIM faults.
  • the system may include a vibration table, for vibrating the AUT to identify dynamic
  • a controller may be configured to activate vibration of the vibration table during first measurement of the Forward PIM signals, and not activate vibration of the vibration table during second measurement of the Forward PIM signals.
  • the vibration table may be provided within the anechoic chamber.
  • One or more actuators may be configured to provide vibration to the vibration table.
  • the actuators may be provided in the anechoic chamber.
  • the actuators may be screened for PIM.
  • the actuators may be screened to limit conducted and radiated emissions.
  • the radiated screening may be performed by enclosing the actuator in an aluminium housing.
  • the conducted screening may be performed by one or more low pass filters in line with power cables of the actuators.
  • each actuator may include a low pass filter on each of its positive and negative power cables.
  • the vibration table may include a support surface, for supporting the AUT.
  • the actuators may be configured to vibrate the support surface directly.
  • the actuators may be configured to vibrate the table at a resonance frequency of the table and an AUT.
  • the actuators may be configured to magnify the force applied to the AUT at a discrete set of resonance frequencies.
  • the vibration table may include one or more sensors to measure a vibration of the table. Such sensors may be used to provide closed loop control of the vibration of the vibration table and AUT together with the actuators.
  • the apparatus may comprise an RF switchbox.
  • the RF switchbox may be a solid- state device built from electronic switches.
  • the RF switchbox may be constructed from a network of electromechanical relays.
  • the apparatus may comprise a bandpass filter configured between a common port of the RF switchbox and a port of a PIM analyser.
  • the bandpass filter may pass frequencies in the receive band of the PIM analyser and reject frequencies in the transmit band.
  • the PIM analyser may be a single-receiver PIM analyser capable of measuring both Forward and Reverse PIM across a range of frequencies.
  • the PIM analyser may be a multi-receiver PIM analyser capable of measuring both Forward and Reverse PIM across a range of frequencies.
  • the multi-receiver PIM analyser may be capable of measuring the Forward PIM emitted from all over-the-air probes simultaneously.
  • the multi- receiver PIM analyser may include an internal diplexer bank containing a plurality of receive diplexers, one for each of the plurality of over-the-air probes.
  • the PIM analyser may contain a transmit module. The transmit module may adjust the frequency and amplitude of the carrier signals to perform a swept frequency PIM measurement.
  • Forward PIM may be measured across a range of frequencies within the passband of the AUT.
  • a Range-to-Fault (RTF) module may be used to determine the distance to the PIM fault on a branch of the AUT.
  • the Range-to-Fault module may measure Reverse PIM. Reverse PIM may be measured across a range of frequencies within the passband of the AUT.
  • the PIM analyser may be configured to measure the phase characteristics of Forward PIM signals received by the fixed array of over-the-air probes.
  • the PIM analyser may include a coherent receiver bank to measure the phase characteristics of Forward PIM signals received by the fixed array of over-the-air probes.
  • the system may be configured to locate the PIM fault in the AUT using rank ordering to classify received forward PIM signals into fault classes, each class corresponding to at least one potential failure point. Detection of a fault condition comprises finding which class the data corresponds to, which leads to the position (location) of the fault.
  • Training data may be used to locate the PIM fault in the AUT, the training data comprising data corresponding to a PIM source in each of a plurality of possible fault positions and a corresponding signal received of the array of over-the-air probes.
  • the training data may be used in a method similar to Massive MIMO, wherein spatial separation of PIM sources is provided in a similar manner to separation of mobile phone users in Massive MIMO, wherein the training data provides analogous information to the uplink pilots in Massive MIMO.
  • Locating the PIM fault may include machine learning to map received PIM signals.
  • a mapping is built from collected data to map data from the many sources to classes of possible failure.
  • the method may include analysing the characteristics of the PIM signals to determine the branch of one or more PIM faults.
  • the characteristics of the PIM signals may include amplitude, or phase or amplitude and phase.
  • the method may include measuring the group delay response of the PIM signals emitted by the radiating elements of the AUT.
  • the group delay is defined as the gradient of the measured PIM phase response with respect to frequency.
  • the method may further comprise the prior step of identifying PIM faults on the input port of the AUT by performing a distance to PIM (DTP) test.
  • the method may further comprise repairing a PIM fault on the input port of the AUT before measuring the Forward PIM response of the AUT.
  • DTP distance to PIM
  • the method may further comprise repeating the steps of receiving and measuring the characteristics of the PIM signals a plurality of times, adding a low-PIM mismatch to a different branch of the AUT at each iteration.
  • the at least one of the RF stimulus signals may be swept over a range of frequencies.
  • the method may further comprise setting the AUT’s down-tilt to a preconfigured value.
  • the method may further comprise introducing an impedance mismatch into one or more branches of the AUT and observing the change in PIM response.
  • the method may further comprise measuring the scalar Forward PIM response of each branch and using heuristic techniques to infer the location of the PIM fault.
  • a PIM sweep may be performed comprising a stepped-frequency sweep, in which PIM is measured at a set of discrete frequency points within the receive band of the PIM analyser.
  • the PIM sweep may be performed repetitively at multiple down-tilt settings.
  • Measuring the characteristics of the PIM signals received by the fixed array of over-the air probes may comprise measuring PIM phase as well as amplitude. Analysing the characteristics of the PIM signals may comprise calculating the PIM group delay. Analysing the characteristics of the PIM signals may comprise fitting a parametric model to the
  • a system for testing an antenna under test comprising: an input for receiving a plurality of RF stimulus signals and providing the plurality of RF stimulus signals to the input port of the AUT; a fixed array of over-the-air probes, for receiving Forward PIM signals emitted from at least one of the plurality of radiating elements; and an output for providing the Forward PIM signals emitted from at least one of the plurality of radiating elements.
  • the at least one of the plurality of RF stimulus signals may be swept over a range of frequencies.
  • a vibration table for inducing dynamic passive intermodulation (PIM) faults in an antenna under test (AUT), the vibration table including one or more actuators, coupled to a support surface of the vibration table, and configured to selectively vibrate support surface, and thereby an AUT thereon to induce dynamic passive intermodulation (PIM) faults in the AUT, wherein the actuators are RF screened.
  • PIM dynamic passive intermodulation
  • the screening includes radiated screening.
  • the screening includes conducted screening.
  • the radiating screening may comprise one or more housings, for housing the one or more actuators.
  • the conducted screening may comprise a low pass filter.
  • the actuators may be configured to vibrate the support surface and AUT at one or more resonance frequencies.
  • actuators may be simpler and less expensive than pneumatic actuators.
  • the vibration table may include one or more sensors to measure a vibration of the table. Such sensors may be used to provide closed loop control of the vibration of the vibration table and AUT together with the actuators.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a phased array antenna with one power divider, in accordance with the prior art
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a phased array antenna with 3 power dividers, in accordance with the prior art
  • Figure 3 is a block diagram of an embodiment of an aspect of the invention, which includes an electronic RF switchbox, diplexer bank and Rx bandpass filter;
  • Figure 4 is a block diagram of an embodiment of an aspect of the invention, which includes a relay-based RF switchbox;
  • Figure 5 is a block diagram of an embodiment of an aspect of the invention, which includes a PIM analyser with one transmitter and multiple receivers;
  • Figure 6 is a flowchart depicting the key steps in fault-finding Method 1 ;
  • Figure 7 is a graph depicting the simulation of PIM emitted by radiating elements in a 7-branch phased array antenna during a Forward PIM measurement sweep using Method 1 ;
  • Figure 8 is a graph depicting example simulated results from Method 1 , in which the PIM fault is located 20mm from a splitter port;
  • Figure 9 is a graph depicting example simulated results from Method 1 , in which the PIM fault is located 71 mm from a splitter port;
  • Figure 10 is a flowchart depicting the key steps in fault-finding Method 2;
  • Figure 1 1 is a graph depicting simulated results obtained using Method 2;
  • Figure 12 is a flowchart depicting the key steps in fault-finding Method 3;
  • Figure 13 is a graph depicting simulated results obtained using Method 4.
  • Figure 14 is a set of graphs depicting simulated sweep data from Method 5;
  • Figure 15 is a graph depicting simulated results of PIM fault-finding analysis on a branch antenna using Method 5;
  • Figure 16 is a block diagram of a phased array antenna with two radiating elements per branch, in accordance with the prior art
  • Figure 17 is a block diagram of a system of an embodiment of an aspect of the invention, which includes a near field focusing gantry.
  • Figure 18 illustrates an exemplary plot of an amplitude response function of near field focusing for a single element
  • Figure 19a illustrates a flat OTA probe arrangement of a system of an embodiment of an aspect of the invention, which includes a near field focusing gantry;
  • Figure 19b illustrates amplitude response functions of near field focusing for each of the elements of the arrangement of Figure 19a.
  • Figure 20a illustrates a curved OTA probe arrangement of a system of an embodiment of an aspect of the invention, which includes a near field focusing gantry;
  • Figure 20b illustrates amplitude response functions of near field focusing for each of the elements of the arrangement of Figure 20a.
  • Figure 21 a illustrates a curved OTA probe arrangement of a system of an embodiment of an aspect of the invention, which includes a near field focusing gantry;
  • Figure 21 b illustrates amplitude response functions of near field focusing for each of the elements of the arrangement of Figure 21 a.
  • Figure 22a illustrates a further curved OTA probe arrangement of a system of an embodiment of an aspect of the invention, which includes a near field focusing gantry;
  • Figure 22b illustrates amplitude response functions of near field focusing for each of the elements of the arrangement of Figure 22a.
  • Figure 23a illustrates yet a further curved OTA probe arrangement of a system of an embodiment of an aspect of the invention, which includes a near field focusing gantry;
  • Figure 23b illustrates amplitude response functions of near field focusing for each of the elements of the arrangement of Figure 23a.
  • Figure 24 illustrates an example system including a single PIM source
  • Figure 25 illustrates a plot of a simulation of the example of Figure 24 in a first configuration
  • Figure 26 illustrates a plot of a simulation of the example of Figure 24 in a second configuration.
  • a phased array antenna is one in which two or more radiating elements are connected together in such a way as to produce an antenna with a more directional radiation pattern than would be possible with one of the radiating elements alone.
  • Phased arrays may be configured according to a variety of designs, from low-cost assemblies made entirely of passive RF components, to advanced systems in which each radiating element is driven by a dedicated digital transceiver.
  • Radiating elements can be arranged in a single row, forming a so-called linear array, or into a two-dimensional grid known as a planar array.
  • the radiation pattern can be steered in different directions by adjusting the relative phasing of the signals travelling to/from each radiating element.
  • phased array antenna that is of relevance to aspects of the current invention is depicted in the schematic diagram in Figure 1 .
  • the antenna s RF input port 102 is connected to a power divider (also known as a “splitter”) 104, which splits the signal into multiple branches comprising carefully chosen lengths of coaxial cable or waveguide.
  • a power divider also known as a “splitter”
  • Each branch terminates in its own radiating element 106a-n.
  • Adjustable phase shifters 108a-n are usually included in each branch in order to steer the radiation pattern in the desired direction.
  • the power divider may comprise a number of separate stages, as shown in Figure 2. This is often done for reasons of mechanical convenience. Functionally, however, the antenna in Figure 2 is substantially similar to that of Figure 1 .
  • the antenna may contain multiple radiating elements per branch.
  • each branch is terminated by a small splitter module (for example, 1602), wherein the splitter module’s common port (for example, 1604) is connected to the end of the branch, and the splitter module’s output ports (for example, 1606a and 1606b) are connected to the radiating elements (for example, 1608a and 1608b).
  • a possible antenna configuration may use two radiating elements per branch, although more than two elements per branch may be used. Despite the additional complexity of this configuration compared to the antenna configurations depicted in Figures 1 and 2, the antenna 1600 depicted in Figure 16 is functionally similar to the antennas depicted in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
  • the power divider 104 may be designed to deliver less power to radiating elements at the ends of the array than to the elements in the middle of the array, a strategy referred to as“tapering” or“windowing”. By an appropriate choice of tapering function, it may be possible to trade off the antenna’s beamwidth against its peak sidelobe level.
  • phased array antennas shown in Figure 1 , Figure 2 and Figure 16 may also incorporate one or more RF filters into their assemblies in order to reject noise and unwanted interference from other radio transmitters.
  • phased arrays each having a different operating frequency range and/or polarization to the others, may be installed into the same enclosure, often with their radiating elements interleaved with each other to minimize the overall size of the unit.
  • phased array antenna topology in Figure 1 may be used in the cellular mobile telecommunications industry.
  • An application for phased array antenna topologies, as shown in Figure 1 , Figure 2 and Figure 16, is in sector antennas, whose purpose is to restrict the radio coverage of a base station to a small number (typically three) of limited geographical areas known as“sectors”. This type of antenna design may provide the following advantages in this application.
  • this phased array antenna topology may lend itself to a cheap and lightweight construction, which may utilise mechanically simple components. Secondly, it may be capable of operation at high RF power levels without damage. Finally, if assembled carefully using good quality materials, it may generate very low levels of PIM.
  • phased array antennas of the type used in cellular telecommunications networks; however, it shall be understood that embodiments of the invention may be used with phased array antennas that share the following architectural features in common with Figure 1 , Figure 2 and Figure 16: a single RF port; a power divider network that splits the feed network from the RF port into two or more branches; an array of radiating elements; and a set of transmission lines connecting the output ports of the power divider to the radiating elements.
  • these architectural features may also apply to pseudo- omnidirectional antennas, which are not strictly phased array antennas, but which nevertheless share a similar architecture to the classical phased array antenna topology depicted in Figure 1 .
  • antennas are reciprocal devices, meaning that their radiation patterns are the same regardless of whether they are transmitting or receiving.
  • antenna reciprocity allows the same antenna to be used for both transmitting and receiving, resulting in a simpler, cheaper hardware configuration than one which employs dedicated transmit and receive antennas; however, one disadvantage of this approach is that it may result in downlink and uplink signals sharing a common RF path.
  • the high-power downlink signals may generate a PIM signal that falls in the uplink band of the system, which then propagates unattenuated back into the base station’s receiver.
  • the two PIM signals can interfere destructively at the input to the radiating element.
  • a faulty branch it is entirely possible for a faulty branch to emit less PIM than its neighbours, despite the fact that the neighbouring branches are simply emitting PIM that has leaked across from the faulty branch.
  • phase shifters which in a cellular antenna are collectively referred to as the“down-tilt” setting of the antenna. It is not unusual for an antenna to meet the manufacturer’s PIM specification at one down-tilt setting, but fail it at another; however, this does not necessarily mean that the phase shifters are faulty. It can also be the result of signals from multiple PIM faults, or even the forwardtravelling and backward-travelling components of a single PIM fault, following different pathways through the antenna assembly before coming together at a common output port, like the antenna’s RF port or one of its radiating elements. In such cases, changing the settings of the phase shifters can alter the phase relationship between the PIM signals, resulting in constructive interference at some down-tilt settings and destructive interference at others.
  • a related phenomenon can arise in which the antenna’s interbranch isolation varies with down-tilt. This can produce similar effects to the one just described, in which the relative amplitudes of two or more PIM signals vary with down-tilt, resulting in different amounts of coherent interference from one down-tilt setting to the next.
  • phased array antennas can have very complex and counterintuitive PIM responses. This is due to their mechanical complexity, poor interbranch isolation, low power divider output return loss and sensitivity to down-tilt. These factors have historically hindered the development of effective PIM troubleshooting tools and techniques forthis category of antennas.
  • Cellular sector antennas may be manufactured in a high-volume, low-cost environment, often by production staff with little or no technical training. Cycle time is a key parameter, which means that it is important for defects to be detected and remedied as quickly and as early in the manufacturing process as possible. This is especially important in multi-port, multi-band antennas, wherein several independent phased arrays may be installed in the same housing, usually in a tightly integrated mechanical assembly. With this type of antenna, late detection of a faulty component can require extensive disassembly of several of the arrays inside the antenna in order to access the site of the fault.
  • PIM testing may be performed progressively during the assembly process.
  • One approach is to PIM test each array as soon as it is installed into the antenna housing. This approach entails moving the partially-constructed antenna unit from the production line to an anechoic chamber, and measuring the Reverse PIM response of the array in accordance with the IEC 62037 standard.
  • the array may be returned to the production line, where it moves onto the next stage in the assembly process. In the event that the array fails PIM testing, it may be taken to a repair station where a technician begins the troubleshooting process.
  • a first step in the troubleshooting process is to search for obvious defects, such as loose connectors, broken solder joints and cables protruding into areas with high levels of RF radiation. If no obvious assembly defects are found, the next step may be to rework every interconnect in every branch of the array. This includes reflowing all solder joints and performing back-torque checks on all coaxial connectors and mechanical fasteners.
  • the antenna may be taken back to the anechoic chamber for a second round of PIM testing. If the array fails the test a second time, it is returned to the repair station, where the troubleshooting process may be repeated. This cycle of testing and rework continues until the array meets the target PIM specification.
  • aspects of the invention may not be exclusively applicable to cellular antennas only. As will be apparent to a person skilled in the art, aspects of the invention may be adapted to suit a variety of phased array antenna designs in any frequency band.
  • DTP Distance-to-PIM
  • the location of PIM faults inside a phased array antenna may be located by applying a plurality of RF stimulus signals, for example two high-power carriers at frequencies F1 and F2, to the input port of the antenna under test (AUT), while measuring the Forward PIM signals emitted from each of the antenna’s radiating elements using a fixed array of over-the-air (OTA) probes.
  • the high-power carriers F1 and F2 are typically unmodulated sinusoidal continuous wave (CW) signals, with frequencies chosen such that the PIM product of interest lands within the receive bands of both the PIM analyser and the AUT.
  • one or both of carriers F1 and F2 may be modulated using any one of a variety of schemes, including direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS), orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) or frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW), to name just a few.
  • DSSS direct sequence spread spectrum
  • OFDM orthogonal frequency division multiplexing
  • FMCW frequency-modulated continuous wave
  • the RF stimulus signals, carriers F1 and F2 may be replaced by a single ultra-wideband modulated signal.
  • any of the above variants of F1 and F2 may be used in practice, provided that the resulting PIM product lies within the receive bands of the PIM analyser and the AUT, and that the PIM product’s amplitude is within the dynamic range of the PIM analyser’s receiver.
  • the amplitude and/or phase characteristics of the radiated Forward PIM signals it may be possible to identify which branch or set of branches of the antenna the PIM fault resides in.
  • embodiments of aspects of the invention may be capable of detecting a PIM fault in one branch, or may be capable of detecting multiple PIM faults in multiple branches.
  • the accuracy, precision and robustness of the results produced by an embodiment may be improved by measuring the Forward PIM across a range of frequencies within the passband of the antenna. Further improvements in the quality of the results can be achieved by measuring the Forward PIM at multiple down-tilt settings, and/or by deliberately introducing large impedance mismatches into one or more branches of the antenna in order to perturb the antenna’s PIM response in a controlled fashion.
  • the embodiments of aspects of the current invention may use a fixed array of probes to measure the Forward PIM signal emitted by each antenna element. This ensures that all antenna elements are presented with a near-constant impedance during the PIM measurement process, thereby minimising return loss-induced measurement uncertainty.
  • embodiments of the invention may be reconfigured for different antenna models, because there is no need to specify the exact X-Y-Z coordinates of the individual radiating elements in every antenna model, something that may be required in systems based on a single probe mounted on a moveable gantry.
  • test apparatus configured in accordance with aspects of the invention may be implemented in a variety of hardware configurations, each offering different strengths and limitations.
  • FIG. 3 An example system 300 which embodies an aspect of the invention is depicted in Figure 3.
  • the antenna under test (AUT) 302 is placed on a testbench (not shown) inside an anechoic chamber 304, with its radiating elements 320a to 320n facing towards the ceiling. It is preferred that the testbench and the anechoic chamber 304 both be constructed from low-PIM materials, so that they do not generate spurious PIM when illuminated by the transmit carriers F1 and F2 that radiate from the AUT 302 during testing.
  • a two-port PIM analyser 306 is installed outside the anechoic chamber 304. Any make and model of PIM analyser may be used, including those that are capable of making both Forward and Reverse PIM measurements according to or exceeding the IEC 62037 standard.
  • the PIM analyser 306 be capable of performing swept-frequency PIM measurements within the passband of the AUT 302.
  • the PIM analyser 306 may also be advantageous for the PIM analyser 306 to be capable of measuring the phase of the Forward and/or Reverse PIM signals as well as their amplitude.
  • This capability is denoted by the RTF Module 308 in Figure 3.
  • the RTF Module 308 may comprise a companion product for PIM analysers manufactured by Kaelus Pty Ltd of Brisbane, Australia that confers on the analyser the ability to measure the phase of a PIM signal.
  • PIM analysers from other manufacturers usually have the necessary phase detection circuitry integrated into their transceivers, and therefore do not require an RTF module in order to measure PIM phase.
  • Port 1 of the PIM analyser 306 is connected to the RF port of the AUT 302 by a length of low-PIM coaxial cable, illustrated by line 310. It may be preferred that the insertion loss of the coaxial cable be as low as possible, in order to maximise the amount of RF power that is delivered to the AUT 302.
  • Port 2 of the PIM analyser 306 is connected to the output port of a filter bank 312 by a length of coaxial cable, illustrated by line 314. It may not be necessary that the coaxial cable 314 have superior PIM performance, but it is desirable for the coaxial cable 314 to have low insertion loss in order to maximise the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the PIM measurement.
  • SNR signal-to-noise ratio
  • the PIM analyser 306 contains an AISG modem 316, so that the down-tilt of the AUT 302 can be adjusted automatically during the PIM fault finding process. If the PIM analyser’s AISG interface takes the form of a dedicated RS-485 connector, this port should be connected to the Remote Electrical Tilt (RET) port of the AUT 302 (if available) by a length of shielded digital communications cable, illustrated by line 322.
  • RET Remote Electrical Tilt
  • the Forward PIM signals emitted by the radiating elements 320a to 320n in the AUT 302 are detected by an array of over-the-air (OTA) probes 318a to 318n suspended above the AUT 302.
  • OTA over-the-air
  • Each OTA probe 318a to 318n in the array is coupled to one radiating element 320a to 320n in the AUT 302.
  • the vertical separation between the OTA probe and the corresponding radiating element is typically in the range 10-100 mm.
  • Each OTA probe 318a to 318n is centred over its counterpart radiating element 320a to 320n in the AUT 302, and the angular orientation of the probe adjusted to achieve strongest coupling.
  • the OTA probes 318a to 318n are mounted on a gantry 322 constructed from low- PIM materials that are preferably transparent to RF radiation, such as timber, Delrin or PTFE.
  • the gantry is height-adjustable to allow the optimal vertical separation between the probe array 318a to 318n and the AUT 302 to be attained, and to facilitate the easy placement and removal of the AUT 302 on the testbench (not shown).
  • the individual OTA probes 318a to 318n should have the following performance characteristics.
  • Tight coupling to AUT 302 Each probe 318a to 318n should couple as strongly as possible to the radiating element 320a to 320n to which it has been assigned, in order to maximise the SNR of the PIM measurements.
  • a coupling loss of approximately 5-10 dB is recommended for cellular antenna testing, although weaker coupling levels may be acceptable in other applications, depending on the range of PIM levels to be measured and the noise floor of the PIM analyser’s receiver.
  • Each probe 318a to 318n should respond predominantly to the PIM signal emitted by the radiating element 320a to 320n to which it has been assigned, while ignoring PIM signals from neighbouring elements in the AUT 302.
  • the radiating elements 320a to 320n in the AUT 302 will also emit the two high-power carriers F1 and F2. These two carriers will couple into each OTA probe 318a to 318n at power levels that may exceed 8 watts rms. It is therefore important for the OTA probes 318a to 318n to be capable of passing this amount of RF power without suffering damage due to RF heating or dielectric breakdown.
  • Low PIM Due to the substantial amount of carrier power that can couple into the OTA probes 318a to 318n, it is important for the probes to have a low-PIM construction, so that the residual PIM is well below the minimum PIM signal of interest from the AUT 302. This requirement also applies to the RF cables that connect the probe output ports to the input ports of the filter bank 312.
  • No disruption to input return loss of radiating elements 320a to 320n in AUT 302 When an OTA probe couples to one of the elements in the AUT 302, there is a risk that the input return loss of the element will degrade due to the load impedance presented by the OTA probe. A poor load match can dramatically perturb the amplitude of the PIM generated inside an RF device, thereby increasing the uncertainty in the PIM measurement. In order to avoid this, it is preferred that the OTA probes be designed in such a way that they do not degrade the input return loss of the radiating elements 320a to 320n in the AUT 302.
  • Bandwidth It is desirable that the OTA probes 318a to 318n satisfy the above criteria at all frequencies in the transmit and receive bands of the PIM analyser. Furthermore, it is desirable for the OTA probes 318a to 318n to satisfy the above criteria across multiple cellular frequency bands, so that PIM troubleshooting can be performed in different frequency bands if desired, without requiring a different OTA probe array to be used in each band.
  • Circular polarization It is desirable for the OTA probes 318a to 318n to be relatively insensitive to the angular orientation of each probe relative to its counterpart in the AUT.
  • One way of achieving this is to base the OTA probe design on a circularly polarized antenna. This has the advantage of minimizing the sensitivity of the test apparatus to small differences in probe orientation from one element to the next. It also allows the OTA probes 318a to 318n to measure the PIM from both arrays in a cross-polar antenna array without requiring the probes’ angular orientations to be changed from one array to the next, thereby allowing the same equipment setup to be used regardless of which half of the cross-polar array is being tested.
  • the output ports of the OTA probe array 318a to 318n are connected to the common ports of a bank of diplexers 324a to 324n, which separate the measured PIM signals from the leaked F1 and F2 carriers from the AUT.
  • One diplexer is provided for every OTA probe.
  • the PIM signal from each OTA probe passes through the corresponding diplexer’s receive (Rx) filter, and continues on to an RF switchbox 328.
  • the F1 and F2 carriers from the OTA probe pass through the diplexer’s transmit (Tx) filter and into a high-power matched load 326a to 326n.
  • the diplexer bank 324a to 324n is necessary due to the relatively large amount of RF power in the F1 and F2 carriers that couple from the AUT 302 to the OTA probes 318a to 318n. As mentioned previously, this power can exceed 8 watts rms per probe in extreme cases.
  • the risks posed by the F1 and F2 carriers are two-fold, and both are related to the RF switchbox 328. Firstly, the RF switchbox 328 may be damaged by the power in F1 and F2 carriers, and secondly the F1 and F2 carriers may generate spurious intermodulation products in the active electronic circuitry inside the RF switchbox 328. In order to avoid these risks and maximise the accuracy of the test apparatus, it may be preferred that each diplexer in the diplexer bank 324a to 324n satisfies the following criteria.
  • Rx filter attenuation in Tx band The diplexer’s Rx filter should provide sufficient attenuation in the transmit band of the PIM analyser 306 to protect the RF switchbox 328 from damage by the leaked F1 and F2 carriers, and to ensure that any spurious intermodulation products generated in the RF switchbox 328 by F1 and F2 are well below the minimum PIM level of interest from the AUT 302.
  • Tx filter attenuation in Rx band The diplexer’s Tx filter should provide sufficient attenuation in the receive band of the PIM analyser 306 to ensure that any spurious PIM products that are generated in the high-power load resistor 326a to 326n at the output of the Tx filter are well below the minimum PIM level of interest from the AUT 302 by the time they reach the common port of the diplexer.
  • Common port return loss The input return loss of the diplexer at its common port should be as high as possible in both the transmit and receive bands of the PIM analyser 306, in order to minimize the PIM measurement uncertainty of the test apparatus due to impedance mismatches at the F1 , F2 and PIM frequencies.
  • the diplexer bank 324a to 324n is followed by an RF switchbox 328, whose purpose is to multiplex the filtered PIM signals from the diplexer bank 324a to 324n onto a single output port.
  • Each input port on the switchbox 328 is connected to a corresponding Rx output port in the diplexer bank 324a to 324n.
  • the active input port on the RF switchbox 328 is set by sending a software command from the System Controller 330 via a USB communications link.
  • the RF switchbox 328 is preferably a solid- state device built from electronic switches. Solid-state RF switches may offer benefits, including low cost, low power consumption, small size and high speed compared to other RF switches.
  • the options are to: increase the power in the F1 and F2 carriers; insert a low-noise amplifier (LNA) before each of the input ports on the RF switchbox 328 to limit the degradation in SNR; use a lower-loss switch technology such as electromechanical relays; or reduce the noise floor in the PIM analyser’s receiver.
  • LNA low-noise amplifier
  • the RF switchbox 328 meets the following RF performance criteria.
  • Return loss The return loss on all ports of the switchbox should be sufficiently high to ensure that the PIM measurement uncertainty of the test apparatus due to impedance mismatches at the F1 , F2 and PIM frequencies is as low as possible.
  • Insertion loss The insertion loss of the RF pathway between the active input port and the common port of the switchbox should be as low as possible, in order to preserve the SNR of the measured PIM signal. If this is not possible, the insertion loss mitigation strategies described above may be considered.
  • Isolation The isolation between the common port of the switchbox and its inactive input ports should be as high as possible, to ensure that the test apparatus only measures the PIM signal from one OTA probe at a time.
  • the 1 dB compression point of the switchbox should be sufficiently high to allow accurate measurement of the maximum PIM level of interest from the AUT 302.
  • the embodiment depicted in Figure 3 includes a bandpass filter 332 between the common port of the RF switchbox 328 and Port 2 of the PIM analyser 306.
  • the bandpass filter 332 passes frequencies in the receive band of the PIM analyser 306, while rejecting frequencies in the transmit band.
  • the purpose of the bandpass filter 332 is to protect the RF switchbox 328 from damage in the event that the two high-power carriers F1 and F2 are accidentally transmitted from Port 2 of the PIM analyser 306 instead of Port 1 as intended. This could occur as the result of an error in the instrument’s software settings, or if the test port cables on Ports 1 and 2 of the PIM analyser 306 were to be interchanged by mistake when the test apparatus is being assembled. In either case, the RF switchbox 328 may suffer irreparable damage. With the bandpass filter 332 in place, the F1 and F2 carriers are reflected back into the PIM analyser 306, where they are absorbed by the high-power isolators in the instrument’s transmit module (not shown). There is no risk of damage to the PIM analyser 306 in this scenario, as the isolators (not shown) are designed to dissipate this amount of power if necessary.
  • the Rx bandpass filter 332 meet the following performance requirements:
  • the bandpass filter 332 should provide sufficient attenuation in the transmit band of the PIM analyser 306 to protect the RF switchbox 328 from damage in the event that the F1 and F2 carriers are inadvertently transmitted from Port 2 of the PIM analyser 306.
  • the bandpass filter 332 should be capable of withstanding the F1 and F2 carriers being applied to its output port at full power, without incurring any damage or significant changes in its frequency response due to RF heating effects or voltage breakdown.
  • the system controller 330 is a programmable device, for example a personal computer or microcontroller, that runs the control software for the test apparatus. It also provides a user interface to enable the operator to configure and initiate a measurement sweep and view the results upon completion of the PIM fault-finding process.
  • the system controller 330 included in the embodiment depicted in Figure 3, includes the following core functions.
  • the system controller 330 provides a user interface for configuring the instrument’s sweep settings and entering the details of the AUT 302, such as model, serial number and number of radiating elements.
  • the system controller 330 automates the operation of the PIM analyser 306, RTF module 308 and RF switchbox 328 during a PIM measurement sweep.
  • the system controller 330 adjusts the down-tilt of the AUT 302 by sending AISG commands to the AUT’s RET controller (not shown) via the AISG modem 316 in the PIM analyser 306.
  • the system controller 330 post-processes the raw sweep data from each OTA probe 318a to 318n at the end of a PIM measurement sweep, and estimates the location(s) of any PIM fault(s) inside the AUT 302.
  • the system controller 330 reports the estimated PIM fault location(s) to the user.
  • the system controller 330 saves the results to a non-volatile storage medium (not shown) for future reference and statistical analysis.
  • FIG. 4 Another embodiment of an aspect of the invention is depicted in Figure 4.
  • a hardware configuration substantially similar to the embodiment depicted in Figure 3 is used, except that the diplexer bank 324a to 324n and Rx bandpass filter 332 are eliminated, and the solid-state RF switchbox 328 is replaced by an RF switchbox 402 constructed from a network of electromechanical relays.
  • the coaxial cable 408 that connects the RF switchbox 402 to Port 2 of the PIM analyser 404 must now be a low-PIM cable.
  • relays can handle much higher RF power levels than electronic switches, and generate much lower levels of spurious intermodulation distortion (also known as “residual PIM”).
  • the relay-based RF switchbox 402 does not require protection from the power in the F1 and F2 carriers (either from the OTA probes 406a to 406n or from Port 2 of the PIM analyser 404), and it does not require the leaked F1 and F2 carriers from the OTA probes 406a to 406n to be attenuated in order to avoid generating spurious PIM in the relay network inside the switchbox 402.
  • a relay-based RF switchbox 402 may offer advantages; namely, the test apparatus is simplified greatly by the removal of the diplexers, bandpass filter and associated cabling. Furthermore, RF relays have much lower insertion loss than solid-state switches, which increases the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the measured PIM signal significantly compared to the embodiment depicted in Figure 3. Additionally, RF relays may operate over a relatively wide frequency range. With the removal of the diplexers 324a to 324n and Rx bandpass filter 332, this means that the embodiment depicted in Figure 4 is capable of wideband operation, being limited only by the bandwidth of the OTA probes 406a to 406n and the PIM analyser 404.
  • SNR signal to noise ratio
  • relay-based RF switches include their large size and slow speed relative to solid-state switches. Furthermore, while relay- based RF switches with good residual PIM performance are commercially available, they tend to be prohibitively expensive, and their residual PIM performance can degrade significantly after a certain number of switching operations.
  • the two-port PIM analysers 306, 404 depicted in Figure 3 and Figure 4 respectively, are replaced by a PIM analyser 502 which includes as many receivers 510a to 51 On as there are OTA probes 506a to 506n, plus an additional receiver 509 that is used to measure the Reverse PIM response of the AUT 512.
  • This multi-receiver PIM analyser 502 can measure the PIM signals from all OTA probes 504a to 504n simultaneously, greatly speeding up the data acquisition phase of the PIM fault finding process. It also allows the RF switchboxes 328, 402 depicted in Figure 3 and Figure 4 respectively, to be eliminated completely, while the diplexer bank 324a to 324n and Rx bandpass filter 332 depicted in Figure 3 are replaced by an internal diplexer bank 506a to 506n.
  • the OTA probe array 504a to 504n may be substantially identical to the OTA probe arrays included in the configurations depicted in Figure 3 and Figure 4.
  • the coaxial cables that connect the OTA probes 504a to 504n to PIM analyser’s internal diplexer bank 506a to 506n should all be low-PIM cables.
  • multi-receiver PIM analyser 502 may be better adapted to detecting unstable or transient PIM sources, which may be referred to as“dynamic” PIM sources.
  • This type of PIM source can exhibit sudden and dramatic changes in PIM level from moment to moment, usually as the result of vibration, percussive stimulus or thermal expansion and contraction of the AUT.
  • the Forward PIM signals emitted from all OTA probes may track the change in the level of the dynamic PIM source within a few nanoseconds of each other.
  • this near-simultaneous change in PIM amplitude across all elements may be recorded, thereby enabling the relative PIM levels emitted by each element to be accurately measured, even as the absolute PIM level varies from instant to instant.
  • the implementation of a multi-receiver PIM analyser as depicted in Figure 5 is designed to measure the Forward PIM in one direction only, from Port 1 to any of the other N ports, while the Reverse PIM can be measured at Port 1 only.
  • FIG. 5 The configuration as depicted in Figure 5 is one possible implementation of a multireceiver PIM analyser.
  • a person skilled in the art would understand that in principle, more elaborate implementations of a multi-receiver PIM analyser are possible that would allow the Forward and Reverse PIM to be measured in any direction through any combination of ports.
  • Some of the implementations of a multi-receiver PIM analyser could offer significant benefits, such as the ability to perform Distance-to-PIM testing into each radiating element individually.
  • Such an instrument would be capable of unambiguously identifying PIM-affected branches, as it could pinpoint the exact location of PIM faults located between the radiating element and the splitter output port in that branch; however, this capability may come at the expense of significantly increased hardware complexity.
  • the multi-receiver PIM analyser 502 contains a transmit module 508 that generates two high-power carriers F1 and F2, similar to a conventional one-port or two-port PIM analyser.
  • the transmit module 508 allows the frequency and amplitude of carriers F1 and F2 to be adjusted if desired, for example to perform a swept-frequency PIM measurement.
  • the multi-receiver PIM-analyser 502 contains an internal diplexer bank 505, 506a to 506n in its RF front end.
  • One of these diplexers 505 is a Tx/Rx diplexer that connects the transmit module 508 and Receiver 1 509 in the receiver bank 509, 510a to 51 On to Port 1 of the PIM analyser 502.
  • the Tx/Rx diplexer 505 is essential to the PIM analyser’s Reverse PIM measurement capability. This enables the operator to perform a standard factory PIM test before and after reworking the AUT 512, in order to determine whether the repair process has been successful.
  • the internal diplexer bank 505, 506a to 506n in the multi-receiver PIM analyser 502 also contains a set of receive diplexers 506a to 506n, one for every probe in the OTA probe array 504a to 504n.
  • the OTA probe outputs are connected to the common ports of the receive diplexers, labelled Ports 2 to N+1 in Figure 5.
  • the receive diplexers 506a to 506n serve a substantially identical function to the external diplexer bank 324a to 324n as depicted in Figure 3, namely to protect the electronic circuitry inside the instrument from damage by the leaked F1 and F2 carriers from the AUT 512, as well as attenuating the F1 and F2 carriers sufficiently to avoid generating spurious intermodulation products inside the instrument that could interfere with the PIM measurement process.
  • the input return loss at the common port of each receive diplexer 506a to 506n in the internal diplexer bank should be as high as possible in both the transmit and receive bands of the PIM analyser 502, in order to minimize the PIM measurement uncertainty of the test apparatus due to impedance mismatches at the F1 , F2 and PIM frequencies.
  • the PIM signals from the OTA probes 504a to 504n pass through the receive filters in the diplexer bank 506a to 506n and into a bank of tuned radio receivers 510a to 51 On.
  • One receiver is provided for each diplexer in the diplexer bank 505, 506a to 506n, including the Tx/Rx diplexer 505, which as mentioned previously is required for making Reverse PIM measurements.
  • the incoming PIM signals from the OTA probes 504a to 504n are down converted in the receiver bank 510a to 51 On, before being digitized and transmitted to the system controller 516 for post-processing.
  • This operation can be performed simultaneously by all receivers in the receiver bank, enabling Forward PIM sweeps to be carried out more rapidly in the configuration as depicted in Figure 5, compared to the configurations depicted in Figures 3 and 4.
  • the receivers in the receiver bank 509, 510a to 51 On can be designed to measure PIM phase as well as amplitude.
  • each receiver in the receiver bank meet the following criteria:
  • Sensitivity The receiver should be capable of detecting the minimum Forward PIM signal of interest from the AUT 512, taking into account the coupling loss of the OTA probes 504a to 504n and the insertion loss of the cables and receive diplexers 506a to 506n.
  • Noise figure The noise figure should be sufficiently low that the SNR of the measured PIM signal is not unduly affected by noise generated within the receiver itself
  • Input return loss The input return loss should be as good as possible in order to minimize PIM measurement uncertainty due to poor load match at frequency of PIM signal
  • Compression point The receiver should be capable of detecting the maximum PIM signal of interest from the AUT 512 without exceeding the receiver’s 1 dB compression point
  • Over-power protection In the event that the PIM signal from the AUT 512 exceeds the 1 dB compression point of the receiver, it is prudent to provide an RF-limiting device at the input to the receiver as a protective measure.
  • the multi-receiver PIM analyser 502 implemented in the configuration as depicted in Figure 5 could be adapted to support an RTF module of Kaelus Pty Ltd. This would offer an alternative way of measuring the phase of PIM signals from the AUT 512.
  • a preferable approach to measuring PIM phase may be to integrate the phase detection circuitry into the receiver bank. This circuitry could leverage some of the design principles used in an RTF module, although other approaches are also possible as described above.
  • a multiport version of an RTF module could be developed based on the inline PIM and scattering parametertest set described in International (PCT) Patent Publication WO/2019/000034 entitled“System and Apparatus for Identifying Faults in a Radio Frequency Device or System”.
  • the PIM analyser 502 may be desirable for the PIM analyser 502 to contain an AISG modem 514, so that the down-tilt of the AUT 512 can be adjusted during the PIM fault finding process. If the PIM analyser 502 is equipped with an AISG modem 514 that is connected to a dedicated RS-485 front panel connector, this port should be connected to the Remote Electrical Tilt (RET) port of the AUT 512 by a length of shielded digital communications cable 518.
  • RET Remote Electrical Tilt
  • the system controller 516 may be functionally the same as the system controllers 330, 410 of Figures 3 and 4, respectively, except that it now collects PIM readings from multiple receivers 509, 510a to 510n, rather than from one receiver and an RF switchbox 328, 402.
  • a test instrument embodying aspects of the invention, can identify PIM fault locations in a phased array antenna.
  • available methods to identify PIM fault locations in a phased array antenna include both scalar and vector techniques, using Forward PIM only or a combination of Forward and Reverse PIM measurements. Some methods may involve making PIM measurements at multiple antenna down-tilt settings, while others may entail deliberately introducing an impedance mismatch into one or more branches of the AUT and observing the change in PIM response. Methods are available that treat the AUT as a“black box”, in which the fault location is inferred from the measured PIM data using a set of empirical rules.
  • phased array antenna configurations with relevance to aspects of the invention, are depicted in Figures 1 , 2 and 16. These phased array antenna configurations all contain a common RF path between the RF port of the AUT and the input to the power divider network, as also shown in Figure 1 , Figure 2 and Figure 16.
  • a convenient and reliable way of detecting PIM faults in the input section of the AUT may be by performing a Distance-to-PIM (DTP) sweep into the AUT’s RF port.
  • DTP Distance-to-PIM
  • the RTF module of Kaelus Pty Ltd when used in conjunction with a compatible PIM analyser, is an example an instrument which is capable of performing a DTP sweep.
  • the RTF module is supported by the configurations as depicted in Figures 3 and 4.
  • the configuration as depicted in Figure 5 could be designed to support the RTF module, but as mentioned previously it may be preferable to integrate the phase detection functionality upon which DTP analysis depends into the transceiver of the multi-receiver PIM analyser.
  • the PIM fault be repaired immediately.
  • the AUT may be PIM tested according to the normal factory test procedure. If the AUT’s Reverse PIM meets the factory test limit, it can be returned to the main production line. Further PIM troubleshooting may be required.
  • the faulty branch in an AUT may be identified by measuring the scalar Forward PIM response of each branch, and using heuristic techniques, such as pattern recognition based on empirical knowledge of the AUT, to infer which branch is the faulty one.
  • the term“scalar” in this context is intended to mean that the test apparatus only measures the power (or amplitude) of the Forward PIM signal, not its phase.
  • Method 1 Scalar PIM Measurements at a Fixed Down-tilt Setting
  • a scalar fault finding method (hereafter referred to as “Method 1”) involves performing a swept Forward PIM measurement across the widest possible frequency range, subject to the frequency limits of the PIM analyser and the bandwidth of the AUT, and measuring the power of the PIM signals emerging from the radiating elements.
  • Figure 6 shows an exemplary set of steps to perform Method 1 in accordance with an aspect of the invention.
  • a scalar fault-finding method may be performed through a set of steps which may differ from the steps shown in Figure 6, whilst still falling within the scope of the present invention.
  • the first step 604 in Method 1 600 is to place the AUT in an anechoic chamber and connect the AUT to the test apparatus.
  • the second step 606 is to configure the PIM analyser’s frequency sweep settings.
  • the lowest-order PIM product in the receive band of the PIM analyser is preferred, due to the fact that low-order PIM products like IM3 usually have larger amplitudes than higher order PIM products like IM5 and IM7, and are therefore more likely to be responsible for the AUT failing its factory PIM test.
  • the third step 608 is to set the AUT down-tilt to a known value. This may be done by sending a command to the AUT’s RET controller via the PIM analyser’s AISG port.
  • the down-tilt value should preferably be the same as it was when the AUT failed the original factory PIM test. Once the down-tilt of the AUT has been set, it will remain unchanged for the remainder of the fault-finding process.
  • the fourth step 610 is to perform a DTP sweep into the RF port of the AUT and look for PIM faults as step 612 in the input section of the AUT, between the RF port and the input to the power divider network.
  • any PIM faults found in this part of the AUT should be repaired immediately, preferably through re-working the input branch in step 614.
  • a standard factory PIM test may be performed as step 616. If the AUT passes this test, as determined by step 618, it can be returned to the main production line to continue to the next stage in the assembly process, thus ending the process shown in Figure 6. Otherwise, the PIM troubleshooting procedure moves on to step 620.
  • the next steps 620 to 632 in Method 1 involve performing a Forward PIM sweep into the RF port of the AUT, and measuring the PIM levels emitted by its radiating elements.
  • the preferred sweep type is a stepped-frequency sweep, in which the PIM is measured at a set of discrete frequency points within the receive band of the PIM analyser.
  • the either the F1 or F2 carriers may be swept, usually with little difference in the results.
  • the F1 and F2 carriers could be swept simultaneously. This latter approach may provide more reliable results when the AUT contains impedance mismatches in one or more of its branches.
  • Method 1 could not be performed at a fixed frequency, without sweeping carriers F1 and F2 at all.
  • FIG. 7 shows a simulation of PIM emitted by radiating elements in a 7-branch phased array antenna during a Forward PIM measurement sweep using Method 1 .
  • the results were taken from a Microwave OfficeTM (registered mark of AWR Corporation) simulation of an 1800 MHz phased array antenna having a topology similar to that of Figure 1 .
  • the AUT has 7 branches, with a single PIM fault in Branch 2 at a distance of 20 mm from the splitter output port in that branch.
  • the raw PIM data from each radiating element is post-processed, in step 630, by the system controller, which then estimates which branch is the faulty one and reports the result to the user.
  • a variety of postprocessing algorithms are possible to identify the faulty branch.
  • One approach is to simply calculate the average power emitted by each radiating element across the measured frequency range, and plot the results as a bar graph. The highest bar on the bar graph will correspond to the faulty branch.
  • Figure 8 depicts the simulated results of Method 1 , showing average PIM emitted by radiating elements in a 7-branch phased array antenna.
  • the true location of the PIM fault is Branch 2 of AUT, at a distance of 20mm from the splitter output port. Using Method 1 , the faulty branch is correctly identified in the case depicted in Figure 8.
  • Method 1 may be modified slightly for antennas having a configuration similar to the configuration shown in Figure 16, due to the fact that each branch, of the antenna 1600 shown in Figure 16, is connected to multiple radiating elements (for example, 1608a and 1608b). Accordingly, for antenna configurations in which one or more branches is connected to a plurality of radiating elements, it may be advantageous to treat elements that share a common branch as a single logical element for the purpose of applying Method 1 . This may be achieved by summing together the measured PIM levels emitted by such elements, thereby obtaining a list of the total Forward PIM power emitted by each branch of the AUT. From this point onwards, the algorithm to identify the faulty branch proceeds exactly as it would for antennas with architectures similar to those shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
  • the above described algorithm to identify the faulty branch may identify an alternative branch as the faulty branch. This is because it is possible in some cases for a faulty branch to emit a lower PIM level than a neighbouring branch which contains no faults at all, thereby causing the neighbouring branch to be misidentified as the source of the PIM fault. This results from a fundamental property of the AUT itself, caused by the high output return loss and poor interbranch isolation of the splitter module.
  • FIG. 9 An example of Method 1 identifying an alternative branch than the faulty branch is shown in Figure 9, which depicts average PIM emitted by radiating elements in a 7-branch phased array antenna. These results were taken from a simulation identical to the previous example depicted in Figure 8, except that the PIM fault is now located 71 mm from the splitter output port rather than 20 mm. It is clear that the largest bar in the bar graph now corresponds erroneously to Branch 1 , even though the true fault location is in Branch 2.
  • the next step in Method 1 is to carry out a standard factory PIM test on the AUT again 616, to confirm that the repairs have been successful. If the AUT passes this test, it can be returned to the main production line to continue to the next stage in the assembly process. Otherwise, it may be necessary to return to step 620 to repeat the faulty branch identification and rework process until all PIM faults have been eliminated.
  • Method 2 It may be possible to improve upon Method 1 by repeating the Forward PIM measurement process at multiple down-tilt settings, and analysing the change in the PIM response of the AUT from one down-tilt setting to the next.
  • Method 2 A flowchart summarizing the steps involved in this alternative approach (hereafter referred to as“Method 2”) is presented in Figure 10.
  • Method 2 The first four steps in Method 2 are substantially identical to Method 1 , namely: place the AUT in an anechoic chamber and connect the AUT to the test apparatus 1002; configure the PIM analyser’s sweep settings 1004; initialize the AUT’s down-tilt to a known value 1006; and use DTP testing to ensure that the input section of the AUT is free of PIM faults 1008, 1010, 1012.
  • step 1014 a standard factory PIM test may be performed as step 1014. If the AUT passes this test, as determined by step 1016, it can be returned to the main production line to continue to the next stage in the assembly process, thus ending the process shown in Figure 10. Otherwise, the PIM troubleshooting procedure moves on to step 1018.
  • the Forward PIM sweep through the AUT may also be substantially identical to Method 1 except that the measurement process is repeated at multiple down-tilt settings across the AUT’s full down-tilt range.
  • the raw PIM data from each radiating element is post-processed by the system controller 1034, which then estimates which branch is the faulty one and reports the result to the user.
  • the system controller 1034 when analysing an AUT with an architecture like that of Figure 16, it may be advantageous to treat elements that share a common branch (for example, 1608a and 1608b) as a single logical element. This may be achieved by summing together the measured PIM levels emitted by such elements, thereby obtaining a list of the total Forward PIM power emitted by each branch of the AUT. From this point onwards, the algorithm to identify the faulty branch proceeds exactly as it would for antennas with architectures similar to those shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
  • the raw PIM data that is collected using Method 2 can be analysed in several different ways. The final choice of which analysis algorithm to use will often be based on practical experience with a given model of AUT, or derived from a detailed computer simulation of the AUT. Some algorithms may return more reliable results for a given AUT model than others, depending on the specific differences in antenna architecture from one model to the next.
  • One analysis strategy is to measure the maximum change in the average PIM emitted by each radiating element across the AUT’s full range of down-tilt settings.
  • the branch that experiences the largest variation in PIM with down-tilt is most likely to be the faulty one.
  • An example of this is shown in Figure 1 1 , which was generated from the same Microwave OfficeTM (registered mark of AWR Corporation) simulation that was used for the example of Method 1 .
  • the bar graph in Figure 1 1 displays the average PIM emitted by each radiating branch in a 7- branch phased array antenna with a single PIM fault in Branch 2, at down-tilt settings ranging from 0° to 10°.
  • Method 2 Another analysis strategy that can be used with Method 2 is to record the maximum value of the average PIM emitted by each radiating element across all downtilt settings.
  • the next step 1014 in Method 2 is to carry out a standard factory PIM test on the AUT to confirm that the repairs have been successful. If the AUT passes this test, it can be returned to the main production line to continue to the next stage in the assembly process. Otherwise, the AUT may be returned to step 1018 to repeat the faulty branch identification and rework process until all PIM faults have been eliminated.
  • Method 1 Another way of improving Method 1 may be to deliberately introduce a large impedance mismatch into one or more branches of the AUT.
  • This strategy (hereafter referred to as“Method 3”) exploits the sensitivity of PIM to load match, a well-known phenomenon that has been documented by previous workers in the field [1 ]
  • An impedance mismatch at the end of an antenna branch can dramatically affect the amplitude of the PIM generated in that branch. This effect is further amplified if the source end of the branch is also mismatched, a common feature of many phased array antennas in the cellular industry.
  • Steps 1202 to 1216 in Method 3 may be substantially identical to Methods 1 and 2, namely: place the AUT in an anechoic chamber and connect the AUT to the test apparatus 1202; configure the PIM analyser’s sweep settings 1204; initialize the AUT’s downtilt to a known value 1206; and use DTP testing to determine whether the input section of the AUT is free of PIM faults 1208, 1210, 1212.
  • Step 1218 the Forward PIM sweep through the AUT, may be substantially identical to Method 1 except that the measurement process is repeated multiple times, with a low-PIM mismatch added to a different branch in the AUT each time.
  • the low-PIM mismatch could simply be a highly reflective object, like a metal plate or block of high-dielectric constant material, that is placed onto a radiating element in order to reflect the radiated signals from that element back into the AUT.
  • the low PIM mismatch should be made of a non-PIM-generating material, so that it does not pollute the PIM response of the AUT. If a metal plate is used for this purpose, care should be taken to prevent it from coming into contact with any metallic components in the AUT, as this can be a strong source of PIM even if the individual materials are low-PIM.
  • the raw PIM data from each radiating element is post-processed by the system controller, in step 1232, which then estimates which branch is the faulty one and reports the result to the user.
  • the system controller estimates which branch is the faulty one and reports the result to the user.
  • Method 3 the interpretation of the PIM responses obtained with Method 3 will often have an empirical aspect to it, usually involving heuristics derived from test data from previous antenna units, or from a detailed computer simulation of the AUT.
  • an adaptive software algorithm could be developed to identify the faulty branch based on the measured PIM responses.
  • Method 3 further insight into the likely location of the PIM fault may be gained by repeating all of the steps in Method 3 at several different down-tilt settings. This may provide additional data from which more effective heuristics - or a more effective adaptive algorithm - could be derived, thereby improving the success rate of this method.
  • step 1234 the final step in Method 3, step 1214, is to carry out a standard factory PIM test on the AUT to confirm that the repairs have been successful. If the AUT passes this test, it can be returned to the main production line to continue to the next stage in the assembly process. Otherwise, it may be necessary to return to step 1218, to repeat the faulty branch identification and rework process until all PIM faults have been eliminated.
  • test apparatus is capable of performing vector PIM measurements (i.e. measurement of Forward PIM phase as well as amplitude)
  • vector PIM measurements i.e. measurement of Forward PIM phase as well as amplitude
  • postprocessing algorithms may offer superior precision over scalar techniques, and may be configurable to detect multiple PIM faults simultaneously.
  • One type of vector PIM troubleshooting method involves measuring the group delays of the PIM signals emitted by the radiating elements of the AUT.
  • PIM group delay is defined as the gradient of the measured PIM phase response with respect to frequency, hence the need for a vector PIM measurement apparatus. By comparing the PIM group delays across all branches, the faulty branch can be identified.
  • Method 4 The flowchart for Method 4 is essentially the same as the one for Method 1 (see Figure 6), with differences being that the Forward PIM sweep of Method 4 entails the measurement of PIM phase as well as amplitude, and the post-processing algorithm of Method 4 entails the calculation of PIM group delay rather than its average amplitude over frequency.
  • Method 4 may be best suited to cases where the AUT contains only one dominant PIM fault, and the AUT is comprised solely of components with little or no dispersion (which may be a reasonable assumption for many broadband antennas used in the cellular industry). Under these conditions, the PIM group delay will have the following properties.
  • the group delay of the PIM signal emitted by the radiating element (or elements, in the case of antennas with architectures similar to the architecture shown in Figure 16) in the faulty branch will exhibit a distinct variation over frequency compared to the other elements, due to the coherent interference between the forward- and backward-travelling components of the PIM signal.
  • branches that do not contain a PIM fault the group delay of the PIM signals emitted from the radiating elements in those branches will be nearly frequency-invariant.
  • the Microwave OfficeTM (registered mark of AWR Corporation) simulation described in Method 1 may be used to compute the group delays of the PIM signals emitted by a 7-branch phased array antenna with a PIM fault in Branch 2.
  • the output return loss of the splitter in this example is known to be poor on all ports.
  • the faulty branch is distinguished by its relatively high group delay variation over frequency, and its low average group delay compared to the other branches.
  • the group delay of the PIM signal from Element 2 exhibits approximately 5 ns of variation over the measured frequency range, while the group delays corresponding to the other elements exhibit almost no variation at all.
  • some AUTs may contain branches whose cables have been lengthened by an integer multiple of a wavelength in order to physically span the distance between the splitter output port and the radiating element. This may increase the group delay through those branches, potentially creating confusing and misleading results if the PIM fault occurs in one of those branches. To compensate for this, it may be desirable to normalize the measured PIM phase in each branch to the known insertion phase of that branch prior to computing the PIM group delay.
  • These insertion phases may need to be characterised in advance using one of the following three methods: 1 . obtain from original engineering design drawings, calculations or simulations of AUT; 2. perform a characterization sweep using a“golden” (i.e. PIM-free) antenna of the same model as the AUT, with a strong, stable PIM source connected to its RF port; or 3. measure insertion phase directly with a vector network analyser.
  • a parametric model of the AUT is fitted to the measured PIM data. Once the model has been fitted, the locations and amplitudes of the PIM faults in the AUT can be obtained from the coefficients of the model. In principle this approach works equally well with AUTs containing one PIM fault or many, although in practice the finite SNR and sweep bandwidth of the measured PIM data will limit the number of PIM faults that can be reliably detected.
  • Method 5 involves the use of a mathematical optimisation technique called“L1 -norm minimization” to fit a parametric model to a set of PIM measurements from the test apparatus.
  • an advantage of L1 -norm minimization in this application may be that it tends to favour solutions which are“sparse”, meaning that the algorithm attempts to find the minimum number of PIM sources that explains all of the measured PIM signals from the AUT [2]
  • a sparse solution is strongly preferred over a non-sparse one, as it may be far more common for antennas to fail because of one or two PIM faults rather than hundreds.
  • the first step in applying Method 5 is to develop a detailed linear circuit model of the AUT, including all cables, filters, splitters, phase shifters and radiating elements. This information can be gleaned from computer simulations created during the engineering design process, or from vector network analyser measurements on a sample antenna of the same model as the AUT.
  • the second step is to compile a catalogue of locations within the AUT where PIM faults are likely to arise, such as solder joints and RF connectors. The precise position of each of these potential PIM faults may then be measured relative to a known datum, such as the nearest splitter port.
  • the third step is to generate a set of mathematical functions describing the PIM signals that are generated when the PIM sources in Step 2 are energized. Without being limited by theory, these functions should capture the amplitude and phase characteristics of each PIM signal, referenced to the radiating element in each branch, taking into account the transmission and reflection characteristics of all of the devices in the PIM signal’s transmission path.
  • the mathematical functions preferably also take into account the amplitude and phase changes experienced by the transmit carriers F1 and F2 as they travel from the RF port of the AUT to each PIM source location. Additionally, each function preferably includes both a forward- and backward-travelling component, in order to properly model the observed behaviour of real-world PIM signals.
  • each function preferably models the amplitude of the corresponding PIM source as a real, frequency-invariant multiplicative constant, so that the final system of equations can be expressed in a form that lends itself to solution by L1 -norm minimization.
  • the fourth step is to sum up the mathematical functions for the PIM signals as they appear at each radiating element, in order to obtain an expression for the total PIM signal emerging from each element.
  • Each of these complex expressions will typically contain a contribution from every PIM source in every branch in the AUT, with their amplitudes and phases adjusted to reflect the different transmission paths followed by each signal.
  • [00288] complex vector of PIM signals emitted by radiating elements in AUT at a given frequency, as measured by test apparatus
  • [00289] matrix of complex coefficients derived from linear circuit model of AUT at a given frequency, taking into account transmission and reflection characteristics of all components in AUT, as well as pre-selected list of likely PIM fault locations
  • Equation 1 describes the complex PIM response of the AUT as a function of the linear transmission and reflection characteristics of the components in the AUT assembly, and the amplitudes of the PIM faults at the pre-selected list of locations in the AUT. However, it should be emphasized that Equation 1 only applies to a single frequency point. While in some cases this may be sufficient information to allow Equation 1 to be solved for the PIM amplitudes
  • Equation 1 it is preferable to use PIM measurements from multiple frequency points when fitting a parametric model, as it improves the noise immunity and overall robustness of the solution.
  • Equation 1 it is preferable to use PIM measurements from multiple frequency points when fitting a parametric model, as it improves the noise immunity and overall robustness of the solution.
  • i: complex vector of PIM signals emitted by radiating elements in AUT at I th point in frequency sweep, as measured by test apparatus
  • [00295] matrix of complex coefficients derived from linear circuit model of AUT at ⁇ point in frequency sweep, taking into account transmission and reflection characteristics of all components in AUT, as well as pre-selected list of likely PIM fault locations
  • 3 ⁇ 4 real vector of PIM fault amplitudes, assumed to be frequency-invariant
  • the quality of the parametric model can be further improved by constructing additional versions of Equation 2, in which a low-PIM mismatch is introduced into one or more of the AUT’s branches, and then stacking each version of Equation 2 together into a block system of equations that can be solved for the vector of PIM amplitudes 3 ⁇ 4 .
  • Equation 2 is modified to include the Reverse PIM response of the AUT, as measured at the RF port of the antenna. This would increase the lengths of the observation vectors by one element each, and add one row to each of the coefficient matrices The vector of PIM amplitudes ⁇ would be unchanged.
  • Equation 2 the penultimate step before solving Equation 2 for the PIM amplitude vector 3 ⁇ 4 is to separate Equation 2 into its real and imaginary parts, thereby creating two systems of purely real equations, and then stacking the two systems of real equations together in block form as shown:
  • Equation 3 can now be solved for the vector of PIM amplitudes using L1 -norm minimisation.
  • L1 -norm minimization algorithms have been published in the literature, many of which are available as Open Source software libraries.
  • a non-limiting example of such an algorithm is Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares (IRLS) (with reference to [3]).
  • IRLS Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares
  • Other L1 -norm minimization algorithms such as Orthogonal Matching Pursuit, may also be used.
  • Equation 3 may prove to be overdetermined, meaning that it has more equations than unknowns.
  • L1 -norm minimization problems reported in the literature, which usually involve underdetermined systems of equations constructed from a relatively small number of random samples of the signal of interest. Such applications are so common that they have been given special names in the literature, such as“compressed sensing” or“compressive sampling”.
  • L1 -norm minimization appears to work equally well with overdetermined systems of equations based on deterministic (as opposed to random) sampling.
  • the total number of samples used in Method 5 is a function of the number of radiating elements, frequency points, down-tilt settings and low PIM mismatch locations at which the PIM is measured. These parameters can be optimized for a given antenna design.
  • Method 5 To demonstrate the use of Method 5, consider a simulated 1800 MHz phased array antenna with 7 branches and a topology similar to Figure 1. For this example, it is assumed that all branches are 2 metres in length from splitter to radiating element. Each branch has 3 interconnects that are known to be prone to developing PIM faults: one at the splitter output, one at the radiating element input, and one at the mid-point of the branch. This gives a total of 21 potential PIM fault locations inside the antenna assembly.
  • the antenna will fail its factory PIM test.
  • the PIM faults may be in the following locations: in Branch 2, at the splitter output; in Branch 5, at the input to the radiating element; and in Branch 7, at the midpoint of the branch.
  • TOIP third-order intercept point
  • the noise floor of the PIM analyser’s receiver is assumed to be -130 dBm, while the residual PIM of the test apparatus is assumed to be negligible.
  • the simulated Forward PIM response of the antenna across the frequency range 1730-1785 MHz, obtained by sweeping the F1 carrier, is shown in Figure 14.
  • Equation 3 Based on the PIM response in Figure 14 and knowledge of the internal construction of the antenna, a system of equations can be constructed according to Equation 3. Solving for the PIM amplitude vector ⁇ using the IRLS algorithm, the results in Figure 15 may be obtained, showing the estimated PIM faults as a set of black circles overlaid onto a schematic of the AUT. The diameter of each circle is proportional to the severity of the PIM fault at that location. Referring back to the original simulation, the estimated PIM fault locations align with their true locations in the antenna assembly, while the estimated amplitudes are within ⁇ 1 dB of the true values, even in the presence of noise.
  • Method 5 it may be necessary to characterize the vector transmission characteristics of the test apparatus in advance, in order to exclude their contributions from the parametric model.
  • One way to exclude their contributions from the parametric model may be to create a calibration fixture with known RF characteristics, which generates a PIM signal that couples to every OTA probe in the test apparatus.
  • the calibration fixture will typically comprise a purpose-built phased array antenna with an architecture similar to that depicted in Figure 1 , with a strong, stable PIM source connected to its input port.
  • the vector transmission coefficient of each RF pathway through the test apparatus can be computed.
  • Another way to exclude their contributions from the parametric model may be to measure the vector transmission coefficients of the relevant RF pathways through the test apparatus using a vector network analyser.
  • the troubleshooting process could start with a scalar PIM sweep using Method 1 , so chosen for its speed and simplicity. If the results produced by Method 1 do not clearly and unambiguously identify the faulty branch, then additional measurement sweeps could be performed at different down-tilt settings according to Method 2, until the faulty branch can be discerned with greater confidence.
  • a vector PIM sweep could be performed at a fixed down- tilt setting, wherein both the amplitude and phase of the PIM signals are measured. The sweep data could then be analysed according to Methods 1 and 4, and the results compared in order to identify the faulty branch. In this way, a single vector PIM sweep allows two independent fault-finding strategies to be brought to bear on the problem.
  • Figure 17 is a block diagram of a system 1700 according to an embodiment of an aspect of the invention, which includes a near field focusing gantry.
  • the gantries depicted in Figure 3, 4 and 5 are replaced by a gantry 1702 comprising a plurality of OTA probes 1704 arranged in a curved arrangement above an AUT 1706.
  • the gantry 1702 and OTA probes 1704 do not need to be near the AUT 1706, or specifically aligned with the AUT 1706 as the system 1706 utilises beam forming to separate the signals from each of the radiating elements of the AUT.
  • the gantry 1702 and OTA probes 1704 are at least 1 m from the AUT 1706. This has the advantage that is enables a quick setup and adjustment to any antenna design.
  • the gantries of Figures 3, 4 and 5 have to be strongly coupled to the AUT, which is generally achieved by placing the gantry OTA probes within about 30mm of a respective antenna element of the AUT.
  • Such configuration takes time to setup as the probe elements must be aligned with the elements of the AUT and appropriately spaced.
  • the gantry 1702 does not require any such alignment, and the AUT 1706 may simply be locked in place in the chamber.
  • the inventors estimate that such configuration may reduce setup time from several minutes to around 10 seconds.
  • the probes need to interact strongly with the elements of the AUT. This may change the return loss of the AUT and disturb the measurement so much to change the PIM response. As a result, the gantry is generally lifted, to avoid disturbing the antenna, the PIM response is then measured, after which the gantry probes are dropped to generate the strong coupling to detect the fault.
  • the change of return loss may change the PIM levels so much as to hide the PIM source due to cancellation.
  • magnification of PIM is induced on other branches, reducing the PIM on the faulty branch to the point where it confuses the detection methods.
  • the gantry 1702 may completely avoid such problems, as it removes the strong coupling between the probes and the AUT elements by increasing physical separation of the probe elements 1704 to the AUT 1706 and alleviating the need to match each probe to antenna element.
  • anechoic chambers are about 2m high.
  • the size of a sector array is typically up to about 1 .6m at 1800Mhz with 12 to 16 elements.
  • the Rayleigh distance which identifies the far field from the near field which is around 2D 2 , is 120m.
  • the same limit for each element as the source is 0.48m.
  • near field focusing methods can be used to separate the sources of the signals.
  • Figure 18 illustrates an exemplary plot 1800 of an amplitude response function of near field focusing for a single element, where the y axis is the gain in dB and the x axis is the distance along the array under test.
  • the plot includes a beam centre 1802, a side lobe level 1804 and a grating lobe level 1806.
  • the beam centre at point 1802 represents the gain from the point of interest, and thus maximum sensitivity is provided at that point.
  • the side lobe level 1804 represents the gain from sources adjacent to the point of interest. Ideally, minimum gain is desirable at the side lobe level 1804, however this is limited by the aperture width of the probe array and how far it is from the surface of AUT.
  • the grating lobe level 1806 is due to aliasing, due to under sampling in space. For the same aperture, if more elements are added with smaller spacing, the grating lobe 1806 moves away from the area of interest up to l/2 separation where it would disappear. Using values larger than l/2 allows optimization of the system to use minimum number of components.
  • Figures 19-22 illustrate various OTA probe arrangements and their associated amplitude responses, in accordance with embodiments of aspects of the present invention.
  • Figure 19a illustrates a flat OTA probe arrangement where a plurality of OTA probes 1902 are arranged approximately 1200mm from corresponding elements 1904 of an AUT in a linear arrangement. 16 OTA probes 1902 are spread out over a length of 2000mm, directly above the AUT. The AUT comprises 16 elements 1904 spread out over a length of 1500mm.
  • Figure 19b illustrates amplitude response functions of near field focusing for each of the 16 elements 1904 using the OTA probe arrangement of Figure 19a. As can be seen from Figure 19b, there is significant overlap of the amplitude response functions and less than 8dB target isolation is achieved.
  • Figure 20a illustrates a curved OTA probe arrangement where a plurality of OTA probes 2002 are arranged approximately 1200mm from corresponding elements 2004 of an AUT at a central portion, and about 630mm at outer edges. 16 OTA probes 2002 are spread out over 2000mm, directly above the AUT, and are spaced equally in the X-direction (i.e. along a length of the AUT). In other words the OTA probe arrangement of Figure 20a is the same as that of Figure 19a, but with the probes 2002 offset in the y-direction.
  • the AUT comprises 16 elements 2004 spread out over 1500mm.
  • Figure 20b illustrates amplitude response functions of near field focusing for each of the 16 elements 2004 using the OTA probe arrangement of Figure 20a. As can be seen from Figure 20b, target isolation is improved, but grating lobes and beam centres are close to each other, resulting in less than 8dB target isolation being achieved.
  • Figure 21 a illustrates a curved OTA probe arrangement where a plurality of OTA probes 2102 are arranged on an elliptical curve, approximately 1200mm from corresponding elements 2104 of an AUT at a central portion, and about 600mm at outer edges.
  • 16 OTA probes 2102 are spread out equally spaced along the elliptical curve (rather than being equally spaced in the x-direction), and directly above the AUT.
  • the OTA probes are spread out over about 1600mm in the X-direction (i.e. along a length of the AUT).
  • the AUT comprises 16 elements 2104 spread out over 1500mm.
  • Figure 21 b illustrates amplitude response functions of near field focusing for each of the 16 elements 2104 using the OTA probe arrangement of Figure 21 a. As can be seen from Figure 21 b, about 10dB target isolation can be achieved with a minimum number of (16) elements.
  • f is from 0 to TT
  • W is the width of the curve
  • h is the height of the upper most point of the curve above the AUT
  • b is the height of the curve from vertically, from its upper most point to its lowermost point.
  • anechoic chamber e.g. 3m+ high
  • a larger number of probes may be used in an elliptical arrangement to provide even better target isolation. This is possible as a larger ellipse according to the above parameterisation can physically fit in the chamber.
  • Figure 22a illustrates a curved OTA probe arrangement where a plurality of OTA probes 2202 are arranged on an elliptical curve, similar to the arrangement of Figure 22a, but with 30 OTA probes 2202.
  • the probes 2202 are spread over the same shaped elliptical curve as the arrangement of Figure 21 a (i.e. according to the parameterisation above), but at a greater size (3000mm in the X-direction).
  • Figure 22b illustrates amplitude response functions of near field focusing for each of the 16 elements 2204 using the OTA probe arrangement of Figure 22a. As can be seen from Figure 22b, more than 16dB target isolation can be achieved in such arrangement.
  • Calibration is also used to correct the phase and amplitude variation of each the receiver channels. Calibration is initially performed using a probe element of the counter clockwise polarization, to couple to the clockwise polarised probes. In addition, this reduces the effect of first reflection multipath in the calibration process. This arrangement is set up in five different positions and a response of the system is measured. A calibration coefficient is found for each element at each frequency point, which is later used to adjust measurements.
  • the AUT 1706 is fixed to a vibration bench 1708, which enables vibration of the AUT 1706 during testing, avoid the need to excite dynamic PIM faults manually by a technician.
  • Dynamic PIM faults in an AUT often manifest only in the presence of mechanical force or vibration, and otherwise test without fault.
  • mechanical excitation i.e. mechanical force applied to the AUT
  • This may be otherwise performed by a technician that is located inside the anechoic chamber while power is applied. This is, however, highly unsafe for the technician, as the technician may be subjected to up to 40W of RF power.
  • the vibration bench 1708 thus alleviates the need for a technician to be inside the chamber during testing, as it enables mechanical excitation of the AUT during testing.
  • the vibration bench 1708 also simplifies separation of static and dynamic PIM, as testing may be automatically performed both with and without vibration. This may in turn give further clues on debugging any antenna faults.
  • a motor may be provided on the bench close to the antenna.
  • a standard DC motor contains ferrite cores in the rotor or the linear moving part in linear case. RF incident on such material generates intermodulation products due to the non-linear hysteresis response of the ferrite cores. This generates large signals and renders the system incapable of detecting PIM by masking any signal generated in the antenna.
  • pneumatic actuators may be used to eliminate such interfering signals.
  • an electric motor of a pneumatic pump may be placed outside of the anechoic chamber and mechanical excitation may be provided using pressurised gas and actuators near the antenna.
  • motors may be provided inside the anechoic chamber, but screened to prevent RF power from reaching the core of the motor.
  • the screening may consist of two parts: conducted and radiated screening.
  • the radiated screening may be performed by enclosing the motor in an aluminium casing to completely shield the inside ferrite core from the RF power.
  • the motor inside the shield moves a ferrite core with weight attached to it, to transfer force to the table (and thus antenna). This arrangement is most advantageous as the motor is completely enclosed by rigid structure and the casing exert the force.
  • the pi low pass filter includes a coil with two capacitors on either side, and without ferrite feedthroughs as they will produce PIM as much like the electric motor itself.
  • the structure does need ground to be connected to make sure no PIM is generated by dissimilar metals.
  • the grounding is provided by capacitively coupling input and output cylinders isolated with a dielectric sheet.
  • Resonant frequency excitation is further used, to enable the use of a smaller motor, which in turn reduces costs and simplifies screening.
  • the motors excite the antenna in certain vibration resonant modes that provides acceleration magnification to generate enough g-force to test the antenna.
  • This configuration including screened motors may be more cost-effective than pneumatic actuators, as large motors are needed to power the pneumatic actuators to overcome power loss in the pressure power transferred to the actuators.
  • the bench surface may be designed to be a weak structure with low damping loss.
  • Such weak structure may have many resonant modes that may be exploited to magnify the applied force by the motors.
  • the antenna will perturb the modes as the mass of the antenna is comparable to the bench top mass.
  • An accelerometer sensor may be provided to enable closed loop excitation.
  • a controller may operate the motors to achieve resonance, and confirm using the accelerometer that resonance is achieved.
  • Figure 23 illustrates a schematic of the vibration bench 2300 with two motor actuators 2305 and an accelerometer sensor 2310, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the bench 2300 may be similar or identical to a bench used in the system 1700.
  • the bench 2300 comprises an upper support surface 2315, to which an AUT (not shown) is fastened.
  • the upper support surface 2315 is substantially planar, and is support by substantially vertical legs 2320.
  • the legs 2320 are coupled to the upper support surface 2315 by flexible joints 2325 to prevent the legs 2320 from restricting vibration of the upper support surface 2315.
  • the motor actuators 2305 are coupled directly to a bottom of the upper support surface 2315, and thereby enable the actuators to vibrate the upper support surface 2315 directly.
  • the accelerometer sensor 2310 comprises a piezoelectric sensor, also coupled directly to the bottom of the upper support surface 2315, to measure the frequency of the vibration for the resonant modes.
  • a vibration bench driver 1710 is coupled to the table 1708 (and thus any sensors 2310 and actuators 2305), and is configured to drive the table at one or more resonance frequencies.
  • the driver 1710 may be configured to pick the lowest frequency mode to minimize the applied excitation.
  • the OTA probes 1704 are coupled to a coherent receiver/ADC bank 1712 by a plurality of Rx band pass filters 1714.
  • a system controller 1716 is coupled to the coherent receiver/ADC bank 1712 and a PIM analyser 1718, which in turn is coupled to the coherent receiver/ADC bank 1712 by an RTF module 1720.
  • the system 1700 enables static and dynamic PIM to be measured. As a result, different methods of identifying faults may be beneficial, as alternatives or to complement the methods discussed above.
  • Dynamic PIM is a time varying phenomenon, and therefore absolute value-based fault detection methods, such as those described above, are not particularly suited to dynamic PIM faults. Fault identification based on rank ordering may be used in such cases, as a statistical test to identify the dominant fault. Although it has the limitation of providing little information, it generally provides robust results.
  • the order of strength is used to classify the response into fault classes.
  • the classes in this case are single fault at each possible failure point, in addition to the multiple fault as they can be classified a new type of dual source faults.
  • rank ordering is scalar technique for detecting PIM fault locations.
  • the method is based on classification techniques based on statistical analysis.
  • Each fault condition is a class to be identified, i.e. a failure at a point or multiple of points is a separate case, and as such, detection of a fault condition comprises finding which class the data corresponds to, which leads to the position (location) of the fault.
  • the absolute level of PIM is not constant in time and cannot be used to compare between elements, however the rank order based on power level is scalar information that can be robustly used with application of a suitable weight function on the rank to produce estimator of faulty branch.
  • the rank ordering method is a generalisation of Methods 1 and 2 discussed above with different weighting functions.
  • Method 1 described above is equivalent to the rank ordering method with the following weighting function: o is max
  • Such configuration basically finds the port of the highest PIM power emitted.
  • V (o) Var(o ⁇ tilt)
  • Such configuration basically finds the port of the highest variation in PIM power emitted as a function of tilt.
  • Voronoi areas can be used to identify the probability for the current measurement likelihood to be in each class. This can be used to identify new fault positions and increate the class set to identify.
  • the antenna in phased array beam forming, has multiple elements with enough spatial separation to provide separate independent channels to provide the aperture.
  • the signals from the different channels are combined with the proper phasing coefficients to maximise signal strength in certain direction or area in space.
  • Such configuration works well in direct line of sight with little alternative reflectors (or“clutter” as it is referred to in the radar industry).
  • Multi path propagation was a problem in such systems, however, developments in the 5G and Massive MIMO has allowed the use of this diversity of reflectors and environment surrounding the transmitter to improve the signal integrity rather than reduce it. This is possible as in such situations the angle of arrival is not important and avoiding channel fading effects and increasing data throughput is most desirable.
  • the massive MIMO antenna In use, the massive MIMO antenna generates a separate channel to each of the devices (e.g. phones) to which it is communicating. It performs this using uplink pilots and the phasing of the received signal sets up a bespoke beam coefficient for each device to maximize SNR to the phase and nulls in the positions of all other devices, using pseudo inverse of the received coefficients.
  • the condition for this procedure to function reasonably is that the number of antennas in the massive MIMO system is larger than the number of phones simultaneously connected. In addition, there is enough diversity in the system to have enough independent channels.
  • a Massive MIMO-like approach is adopted, where the pilot signal is replaced by a training procedure where a PIM source is placed in each possible fault position and the signal stored, and zero-forcing (nulling) is used for other PIM sources.
  • the maximum simultaneous sources it can detect is N.
  • a hybrid algorithm based on a scalar method and rank ordering is used to narrow the possible sources and then detect the levels of each source independently.
  • Embodiments of aspects of the present invention may provide similar spatial separation to PIM sources as Massive MIMO offers for separating devices (e.g. mobile phones).
  • Massive MIMO offers for separating devices (e.g. mobile phones).
  • a simple training method of placing a PIM source and testing the phase of the received signal replaces the pilot signal.
  • the method uses all the vector information measured by the system and provides a much more accurate and reliable result.
  • the output of this method is the strength of the PIM source at all identified possible sources. Such output may be easier to interpret than amplitude with distance and branch, as provided by other methods.
  • the method is ideal when the number of PIM sources is equal to or less than the number of probes. This means it can have nulls for all other sources. For more sources than probes as typically the case in antenna testing, the method is approximate in the sense that it no longer has enough degrees of freedom to create nulls for all other source points when estimating the signal, a certain source point.
  • Embodiments of the present invention include further establishing a set of possible sources using other methods, such as the methods described above, to 16 or less possible sources, after which this technique to resolve the fault from the 15 possibilities.
  • the method may in effect be equivalent to phase array focusing with nulls set to all other sources.
  • Calibration may be the same as the near field focusing method, outlined above, the main goal being to optimize the isolation between the probes to maximize the numerical stability of the pseudo inverse step.
  • calibration may involve the following steps.
  • Data from the calibration may then be applied to actual test data.
  • the first term in each equation represent the first path 2410a and the second term in each equation is the second path 2410b. With a perfect return loss G the second term disappears.
  • w g 2 w 1 — w 2 .
  • the PIM generated and measured back at the source point is [00398] where the first term is the return to the source point, the Tx power as based on the order and (*) is the conjugate, giving
  • This method is an alternative to Method 5, discussed above.
  • Method 5 the user needs to provide a complete module simulation response for each of the antenna building block, whereas this method is a black box method in the sense that it obtains this information for the antenna from the training sequence, meaning that the user is not required to know all the antenna details.
  • the calibration and training method are the same as for the MIMO method, described above, however requires the user to measure with different sweep arrangements.
  • the calibration includes the following steps:
  • the systems and methods described herein enable PIM to be easily located in an AUT, which is particularly useful when manufacturing phased array antennas.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Nonlinear Science (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Variable-Direction Aerials And Aerial Arrays (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention porte sur un système permettant de tester une antenne en cours de test (AUT pour Antenna Under Test), et sur un système et sur un procédé de localisation d'une défaillance d'intermodulation passive (PIM) dans une antenne AUT. L'antenne AUT comprend un port d'entrée et une pluralité de branches, chaque branche se terminant par au moins un élément rayonnant. Le procédé consiste : à appliquer une pluralité de signaux de stimulus RF au port d'entrée de l'antenne AUT ; à recevoir, au moyen d'un réseau fixe de sondes de liaison radio, des signaux d'intermodulation PIM vers l'avant émis à partir d'au moins un élément rayonnant de la pluralité d'éléments rayonnants ; à mesurer, au moyen d'un analyseur d'intermodulation PIM, une ou plusieurs caractéristiques des signaux d'intermodulation PIM vers l'avant reçus par le réseau fixe de sondes de liaison radio ; et à analyser la ou les caractéristiques des signaux d'intermodulation PIM vers l'avant pour localiser la défaillance d'intermodulation PIM dans l'antenne AUT.
PCT/AU2020/050161 2019-03-11 2020-02-24 Procédé et système permettant de localiser une défaillance de pim dans une antenne en réseau phasé WO2020181320A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202080029777.4A CN113711061A (zh) 2019-03-11 2020-02-24 用于定位相控阵天线中的pim故障的方法和系统

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2019900794A AU2019900794A0 (en) 2019-03-11 Method and system for locating a PIM fault in a phased array antenna
AU2019900794 2019-03-11

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2020181320A1 true WO2020181320A1 (fr) 2020-09-17

Family

ID=72426502

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/AU2020/050161 WO2020181320A1 (fr) 2019-03-11 2020-02-24 Procédé et système permettant de localiser une défaillance de pim dans une antenne en réseau phasé

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CN (1) CN113711061A (fr)
WO (1) WO2020181320A1 (fr)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113702722A (zh) * 2021-10-28 2021-11-26 成都雷电微力科技股份有限公司 一种tr组件多级链路故障检测结构和方法
CN113708853A (zh) * 2021-08-09 2021-11-26 中国计量科学研究院 一种针对天线群时延测量的阻抗失配修正方法及装置
CN114509757A (zh) * 2022-01-11 2022-05-17 电子科技大学 一种腔体内二次诱发无源互调源的甄别与筛选方法
KR20230049862A (ko) * 2021-10-07 2023-04-14 주식회사 이너트론 슬롯 확장형 pim 측정 장치 및 이를 이용한 pim 자동 측정 방법
WO2024041722A1 (fr) * 2022-08-22 2024-02-29 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Dispositif de test, configuration de test ainsi que procédé
WO2024062272A1 (fr) * 2022-09-21 2024-03-28 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Procédé d'analyse de spectrogramme à réseau de neurones (nn)/réseau de neurones à convolution (cnn) d'une anomalie spectrale et détection d'intermodulation passive (pim) dans un réseau radio 5g, 6g

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114325227B (zh) * 2021-12-21 2024-01-23 南京长峰航天电子科技有限公司 一种射频阵列馈电系统故障定位方法及系统
CN114780621B (zh) * 2022-06-23 2022-10-04 中铁电气化勘测设计研究院有限公司 一种轨道交通接触网缺陷检索方法

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0639035B1 (fr) * 1993-08-12 2002-10-23 Nortel Networks Limited Dispositif d'antenne pour station de base
US6806845B2 (en) * 2003-01-14 2004-10-19 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, Llc Time-delayed directional beam phased array antenna
US8558533B2 (en) * 2006-09-06 2013-10-15 Yokohama National University Passive intermodulation distortion measuring method and system
US9515753B2 (en) * 2014-05-07 2016-12-06 GM Global Technology Operations LLC AM/FM antenna performance in the presence of wide-band noise using tunable high-Q structures
US20170122990A1 (en) * 2015-11-03 2017-05-04 CommScope Italy S.r.I. Apparatus and methods for dynamic passive intermodulation distortion testing

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0639035B1 (fr) * 1993-08-12 2002-10-23 Nortel Networks Limited Dispositif d'antenne pour station de base
US6806845B2 (en) * 2003-01-14 2004-10-19 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, Llc Time-delayed directional beam phased array antenna
US8558533B2 (en) * 2006-09-06 2013-10-15 Yokohama National University Passive intermodulation distortion measuring method and system
US9515753B2 (en) * 2014-05-07 2016-12-06 GM Global Technology Operations LLC AM/FM antenna performance in the presence of wide-band noise using tunable high-Q structures
US20170122990A1 (en) * 2015-11-03 2017-05-04 CommScope Italy S.r.I. Apparatus and methods for dynamic passive intermodulation distortion testing

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113708853A (zh) * 2021-08-09 2021-11-26 中国计量科学研究院 一种针对天线群时延测量的阻抗失配修正方法及装置
CN113708853B (zh) * 2021-08-09 2024-03-26 中国计量科学研究院 一种针对天线群时延测量的阻抗失配修正方法及装置
KR20230049862A (ko) * 2021-10-07 2023-04-14 주식회사 이너트론 슬롯 확장형 pim 측정 장치 및 이를 이용한 pim 자동 측정 방법
KR102664542B1 (ko) 2021-10-07 2024-05-09 주식회사 이너트론 슬롯 확장형 pim 측정 장치 및 이를 이용한 pim 자동 측정 방법
CN113702722A (zh) * 2021-10-28 2021-11-26 成都雷电微力科技股份有限公司 一种tr组件多级链路故障检测结构和方法
CN113702722B (zh) * 2021-10-28 2022-01-25 成都雷电微力科技股份有限公司 一种tr组件多级链路故障检测结构和方法
CN114509757A (zh) * 2022-01-11 2022-05-17 电子科技大学 一种腔体内二次诱发无源互调源的甄别与筛选方法
CN114509757B (zh) * 2022-01-11 2023-07-18 电子科技大学 一种腔体内二次诱发无源互调源的甄别与筛选方法
WO2024041722A1 (fr) * 2022-08-22 2024-02-29 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Dispositif de test, configuration de test ainsi que procédé
WO2024062272A1 (fr) * 2022-09-21 2024-03-28 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Procédé d'analyse de spectrogramme à réseau de neurones (nn)/réseau de neurones à convolution (cnn) d'une anomalie spectrale et détection d'intermodulation passive (pim) dans un réseau radio 5g, 6g

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN113711061A (zh) 2021-11-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2020181320A1 (fr) Procédé et système permettant de localiser une défaillance de pim dans une antenne en réseau phasé
CN108966264B (zh) 对大规模多入多出无线系统执行空中测试的系统和方法
CN107800495B (zh) 用于多入多出无线链路的无线电信道仿真的系统和方法
US9692530B2 (en) Active antenna system and methods of testing
Remley et al. Measurement challenges for 5G and beyond: An update from the National Institute of Standards and Technology
EP3447940B1 (fr) Agencement et procédé d'essai
US20180164407A1 (en) On-site calibration of array antenna systems
US8502546B2 (en) Multichannel absorberless near field measurement system
JP6464151B2 (ja) 無線試験信号を用いて無線周波数無線信号送受信機を試験するためのシステム及び方法
JP2019097207A (ja) 無線検査信号を用いる無線周波数無線信号送受信機の検査システム及び方法
CN106788791B (zh) 暗室多波面控制器测试系统、方法及装置
KR101520563B1 (ko) OTA(over-the air) 시험용 에뮬레이팅 시스템 및, 그 장치와 방법
US10935583B2 (en) Measurement system and method for performing test measurements
WO2009046516A1 (fr) Système de mesure en champ proche sans absorbeur à multiples canaux
US11131701B1 (en) Multi-probe anechoic chamber for beam performance testing of an active electronically steered array antenna
Rumney et al. Practical active antenna evaluation using the two-stage MIMO OTA measurement method
RU2744320C1 (ru) Способ и система для испытания антенны, содержащей множество излучающих элементов
Chen et al. Examination of EMC chamber qualification methodology for applications above 1 GHz using frequency domain mode filtering
Kawamura et al. Near-field measurement system for 5G massive MIMO base stations
CN113189407A (zh) 一种干扰机极化分集性能测试系统及方法
El Arja et al. Joint TOA/DOA measurements for UWB indoor propagation channel using MUSIC algorithm
Vouras et al. Wideband synthetic-aperture millimeter-wave spatial-channel reference system with traceable uncertainty framework
CN106850095B (zh) X波段月球探测器通信接收与发射兼容性测试和分析方法
Costanzo et al. An integrated probe for phaseless plane‐polar near‐field measurements
Nicolas Measurements of phased array antenna fields in situ: A few key aspects

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 20771124

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

32PN Ep: public notification in the ep bulletin as address of the adressee cannot be established

Free format text: NOTING OF LOSS OF RIGHTS PURSUANT TO RULE 112(1) EPC (EPO FORM 1205A DATED 17/01/2022)

32PN Ep: public notification in the ep bulletin as address of the adressee cannot be established

Free format text: NOTING OF LOSS OF RIGHTS PURSUANT TO RULE 112(1) EPC (EPO FORM 1205A DATED 17.01.2022)

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 20771124

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1