WO2020108580A1

WO2020108580A1 - Automatic test system and method for security check instrument, and device having storage function

Info

Publication number: WO2020108580A1
Application number: PCT/CN2019/121734
Authority: WO
Inventors: 钟书文; 祁春超; 王荣
Original assignee: 深圳市华讯方舟太赫兹科技有限公司; 华讯方舟科技有限公司
Priority date: 2018-11-29
Filing date: 2019-11-28
Publication date: 2020-06-04
Also published as: CN109507752A; CN109507752B

Abstract

An automatic test system (10) and method for a security check instrument, and a device having a storage function. The system comprises: a touch tool (101) and a controller (102) connected to each other, the controller (102) being connected to the security check instrument (20); the controller (102) is configured to control the touch tool (101) to touch an input device (201) of the security check instrument (20) so as to input a control instruction to the security check instrument (20), and to obtain operation result data of the security check instrument (20) to test whether the security check instrument (20) operates normally. In this way, the test of the security check instrument (20) can be automatically completed. Compared with software simulation touch, use of the touch tool (101) for actual touch has higher accuracy.

Description

Automatic test system, method and device with storage function of security inspection instrument

Technical field

This application relates to the technical field of security inspection instruments, in particular to an automatic test system and method for security inspection instruments and a device with a storage function.

Background technique

Existing security tester testing methods are usually to manually click on the control screen or use software to give touch commands to test whether the security tester's operation results are normal. However, the artificial click method requires human participation and consumes manpower. However, the method of simulating the touch screen by software is still different from the actual touch, the accuracy of the test results is not high, and the reference value is not high.

Technical solution

This application mainly provides a security tester automatic test system, method and device with a storage function, which can automatically complete the security tester test, using touch tools to actually touch, compared with software simulation touch, the accuracy is higher.

In order to solve the above technical problems, a technical solution adopted in this application is to provide an automatic test system for a security tester, which is applied to a security tester and includes: a touch tool and a controller connected to each other, the controller connected to the security tester; The control touch tool touches the input device of the security inspection instrument to input control instructions to the security inspection instrument, and obtains the operation result data of the security inspection instrument to test whether the security inspection instrument operates normally.

In order to solve the above technical problems, another technical solution adopted by the present application is to provide an automatic test method for a security instrument, which includes: a controller sends a touch command to a touch tool; the touch tool touches the security instrument according to the touch command Input device to input control instructions to the security inspection instrument; the controller obtains the operation result data of the security inspection instrument and judges whether the operation result data is consistent with the expected operation result data corresponding to the touch instruction; if it is inconsistent, the controller judges that the security inspection instrument Normal, otherwise it is determined that the security checker is operating normally.

In order to solve the above technical problems, another technical solution adopted by the present application is to provide an automatic test method of a security instrument, which includes: a controller sends a touch command to a touch tool to control the input device of the touch tool to touch the security instrument , In order to input control instructions to the security inspection instrument; the controller obtains the operation result data of the security inspection instrument and judges whether the operation result data is consistent with the expected operation result data corresponding to the touch instruction; Determine that the security checker is operating normally.

In order to solve the above technical problems, another technical solution adopted by the present application is to provide a device with a storage function that stores instructions, and when the instructions are executed, the automatic test method of the security instrument described above is implemented.

The beneficial effects of the present application are: different from the situation in the prior art, in the embodiment of the present application, the controller sends a touch command to the touch tool; the touch tool touches the input device of the security instrument according to the touch command, to Input the control instruction to the security inspection instrument; the controller obtains the operation result data of the security inspection instrument, and judges whether the operation result data is consistent with the expected operation result data corresponding to the touch instruction; if they are not consistent, the controller judges that the security inspection instrument is not operating normally, otherwise, the security inspection The instrument is operating normally. In the above method, the controller does not need to manually perform the touch operation. The controller directly controls the touch tool to automatically complete the touch and the entire security instrument test process, saving manpower costs, and uses the touch tool to actually touch, compared to the software simulation of touch , Higher accuracy and more reference value.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is a schematic structural diagram of an embodiment of an automatic test system of a security inspection instrument of the present application;

2 is a schematic diagram of an application scenario of an automatic test system of a security instrument of this application;

3 is a schematic diagram of an application scenario of a controller using an electromagnetic point contact to touch an input device;

4 is a schematic flowchart of a first embodiment of an automatic test method of a security instrument of this application;

FIG. 5 is a schematic flowchart of specific steps in FIG. 4;

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of the interaction process of each device in the method shown in FIG. 5;

7 is a schematic flowchart of a second embodiment of an automatic test method of a security instrument of this application;

8 is a schematic structural diagram of an embodiment of a device with a storage function according to the present application.

Embodiments of the invention

The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be described clearly and completely below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present application, but not all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by a person of ordinary skill in the art without creative work fall within the protection scope of the present application.

As shown in FIG. 1, in an embodiment of an automatic test system for a security instrument of the present application, the automatic test system 10 for a security instrument includes: a touch tool 101 and a controller 102 that are connected to each other.

The automatic test system 10 of the security instrument is applied to a security instrument, such as the cylindrical human security instrument shown in FIG. 2.

The controller 102 is connected to the security inspection instrument 20. The controller 102 is used to control the touch tool 101 to touch the input device 201 of the security inspection instrument 20 to input control instructions to the security inspection instrument 20 and obtain the operation result data of the security inspection instrument 20 to Test whether the security device 20 is operating normally.

The controller 102 may be a field programmable gate array (Field Programmable Gate Array, FPGA), or a complex programmable logic device (Complex Programmable Logic Device, CPLD), or the like.

The touch tool 101 may be a manipulator, and the controller 102 may control the touch tool 101 by inputting coordinates of a target position. The touch tool 101 may also be an electromagnetic point contact as shown in FIG. 3. For example, the controller 102 may input current to a tool such as an electromagnet in the electromagnetic point contact to generate a corresponding magnetic field to control the touch tool 101.

In an application example, as shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, the security inspection instrument 20 includes a lower computer 202 for controlling the security inspection instrument 20 to scan. For example, the lower computer 202 can control the scanning antenna of the security inspection instrument 20 shown in FIG. 2 (Not shown) Send a scan signal (such as a terahertz wave) to scan the target to be measured. Wherein, the lower computer 202 may be a programmable logic controller (Programmable Logic Controller, PLC), and a storage device (not shown) of the lower computer 202, such as a status register, stores the operating state data of the security inspection instrument 20, including Operation result data.

The operation result data is the result data after the security instrument 20 performs scanning, and may include data such as the frequency of the signal emitted by the scanning antenna, the number of scanning times, the scanning time, the scanning angle, and whether a failure occurred during the scanning process.

The controller 102 is connected to the lower computer 202 and can obtain the operation result data of the security inspection instrument 20 from the storage device of the lower computer 202. Then, the controller 102 can compare the operation result data with the expected operation result data, and if the two match, it can be determined that the security inspection instrument 20 is operating normally, otherwise it is judged that the security inspection instrument 20 is operating abnormally.

For example, when the controller 102 obtains the operation result data, the frequency of the signal emitted by the scanning antenna is 1 THz, and when the frequency of the signal emitted by the scanning antenna in the expected operation result data is also 1 THz, the two are consistent, and it can be determined that the security instrument 20 is operating normal. Or, the gap between the two is within the allowable error range, for example, the scan angle in the obtained operation result data is 118 degrees, and the scan angle in the expected operation result data is 120 degrees. At this time, the gap between the two is 2 degrees. Within the error range (such as 5 degrees), at this time, the two are still considered to match, and it is determined that the security inspection instrument 20 is operating normally.

Among them, the expected operation result is that when the controller 102 controls the touch tool 101 to touch the input device 201 of the security inspection instrument 20, the controller 102 estimates the touch with the touch after calculating according to the touch command to control the touch tool 101 The operation result of the security tester 20 corresponding to the instruction. For example, according to the corresponding control instruction at the position touched by the touch tool 101, the operation result after the safety inspection instrument 20 is operated according to the control instruction is estimated.

Of course, in other embodiments, the controller 102 can also obtain the probability of normal operation of the security checker 20 according to the comparison result of multiple operation result data, when the probability of normal operation is higher than a preset value (such as 90% ), it is judged that the security inspection instrument is operating normally, otherwise it is judged that the security inspection instrument is not operating normally and needs to be repaired.

Optionally, when the touch tool 101 is a manipulator, the controller 102 can also determine the input device according to the touch instruction sent to the touch tool 101 and the input position coordinates recognized by the input device 201 obtained from the security inspection instrument 20 201 Whether the identification is accurate.

Specifically, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, in an application example, the touch tool 101 may be a robot, and the end of the robot may be used to touch the input device 201. When the controller 102 sends a touch command to the touch tool 101, the touch command includes the coordinates of the target end position of the manipulator, and after receiving the touch command, the manipulator determines the target end position according to the current position coordinates of the end and the target end Position coordinates, plan the movement trajectory of its end, and control its end to move from the current position coordinates to the target end position coordinates according to the movement trajectory, and touch the input device 201 at the target end position coordinates. At this time, the input device 201 will recognize the control command triggered after the robot touches, and then the security inspection device 20 will operate according to the control command, so that after the operation, the lower computer 202 of the security inspection device 20 will obtain the operation result data. The input device 201 may be a key or a touch screen.

When the touch tool 101 is an electromagnetic point contact, as shown in FIG. 3, the electromagnetic point contact is detachably mounted on the surface of the input device 201 (such as a touch screen). The head of the electromagnetic point contact is wrapped with electric cloth, which can touch the touch screen and can prevent the point from being damaged or scratching the screen.

Specifically, as shown in FIG. 3, the touch tool 101 may include a plurality of electromagnetic point contacts, each electromagnetic point contact is correspondingly disposed at each control icon displayed on the touch screen, and four electromagnetic points are set as shown in FIG. Touch the head, corresponding to the four control icons for men's scan, women's scan, result confirmation and correction. When the controller 102 inputs current to the corresponding electromagnetic point contact, the electromagnetic point contact generates a magnetic field, drives the head of the electromagnetic point contact to touch the control icon of the corresponding position on the touch screen, and the touch screen recognizes the touch position (i.e. the After the position of the touched control icon), the control instruction corresponding to the control icon can be input to the security inspection instrument 20.

As shown in FIG. 1, the security instrument 20 further includes a host 203 connected to the touch screen, where the host 203 may be a personal computer PC or a server. When the input device 201 is a touch screen, the touch screen can recognize the position touched by the robot, that is, the input position coordinates of the touch tool 101, and then transmit the recognized input position coordinates to the host 203 for storage. The host 203 can also recognize the control command corresponding to the input position coordinates, and send the control command or the control command of the lower computer 202 parsed according to the control command to the lower computer 202 to control the lower computer 202 to scan.

As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the controller 102 is connected to the host 203. After the touch tool 101 touches the touch screen, the controller 102 can obtain the input position of the touch tool 101 recognized by the touch screen from the host 203. coordinate. Then, the controller 102 may compare the input position coordinates with the touch position coordinates of the touch tool 101 to determine whether the touch screen is recognized accurately.

For example, when the touch tool 101 is a robot, the touch position of the touch tool 101 is the coordinate of the target end position of the robot. After the controller 102 obtains the input position coordinates, since the input position coordinates are the position information recognized by the touch screen, which is usually the relative position coordinates in the touch screen, at this time, the controller 102 may obtain the reference position of the touch screen, such as obtaining in advance The coordinates of the center point of the touch screen in the world coordinate system, a simple coordinate system conversion of the input position coordinates, and convert it to the same reference coordinate system as the target end position coordinates. Finally, the controller 102 can compare the converted input position coordinates with the target end position coordinates. If the difference between the two is within the allowable error range (such as the distance between the two is less than 1cm), the two match, the touch screen The identification is accurate, otherwise the touch screen identification is judged to be inaccurate. Of course, the coordinates of the target end position can also be converted to the same coordinate system as the input position coordinates for comparison, or both can be converted to another same coordinate system for comparison.

For another example, when the touch tool 101 is an electromagnetic point contact, the controller 102 has pre-stored the control icon corresponding to each electromagnetic point contact, the position coordinates of the control icon in the touch screen, or the control instruction corresponding to the control icon At least one of them, when the controller 102 controls the input of current to the corresponding electromagnetic point contact, the touch position of the electromagnetic point contact can be obtained, so as to obtain the corresponding control icon, the position coordinates of the control icon in the touch screen, or the control At least one piece of information in the control instruction corresponding to the icon is then compared with the information corresponding to the position coordinates recognized by the touch screen. If the two are consistent or within the allowable error range, the two match, otherwise they do not match.

Of course, in other embodiments, the controller 102 may also obtain the probability of whether the touch screen is correctly recognized or not according to the comparison result of multiple touch screen recognition results. When the probability of correct recognition is higher than a preset value (such as 95%), It is determined that the touch screen recognition is accurate, otherwise it is determined that the touch screen recognition is inaccurate, and maintenance or replacement is required.

In addition, the automatic test system 10 of the security instrument may also include other devices such as a memory (not shown), a display (not shown), an input and output device (not shown), etc. according to actual needs.

In the automatic test system of the security instrument of this embodiment, the controller can send the touch instruction to the touch tool, so that the control touch tool can touch the input device of the security instrument according to the touch instruction to input the control instruction to the security instrument, and After obtaining the operating result data of the security inspection instrument, determine whether the operating result data is consistent with the expected operating result data corresponding to the touch command. If they are not consistent, the controller determines that the security inspection instrument is not operating normally, otherwise it is determined that the security inspection instrument is operating normally, and the entire process does not need Man-made touch operation, the controller directly controls the touch tool to automatically complete the touch and the entire security instrument test process, saving labor costs, and the actual touch using the touch tool, compared with the software simulation of touch, the accuracy is higher, It has more reference value.

As shown in FIG. 4, the first embodiment of the automatic test method of the security instrument of the present application includes:

S11: The controller sends a touch command to the touch tool.

S12: According to the touch instruction, the touch tool touches the input device of the safety inspection instrument to input the control instruction to the safety inspection instrument.

Optionally, when the touch tool is a robot, and the touch instruction includes coordinates of the target end position of the robot, as shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, step S12 includes:

S121: The manipulator plans the end movement trajectory according to its current position coordinates and target end position coordinates to move from the current position coordinates to the target end position coordinates, and touches the input device; or, receives the current signal input by the controller The electromagnetic point contact generates a magnetic field and drives its head to point touch the input device to input control instructions to the security inspection instrument.

Optionally, when the input device is a touch screen, as shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, after step S121, it includes:

S161: The controller obtains the input position coordinates recognized by the touch screen, and determines whether the input position coordinates and the position coordinates of the touch of the touch tool match.

Wherein, the security inspection apparatus may further include a host connected to the touch screen, the touch screen transmits the recognized input position coordinates to the host, and the controller may obtain the input position coordinates recognized by the touch screen from the host.

If there is a match, the following step S162 is executed, otherwise step S163 is executed.

S162: Determine that the touch screen recognition is accurate.

S163: Determine that the touch screen recognition is not accurate.

S13: The controller obtains the operation result data of the security inspection instrument, and judges whether the operation result data is consistent with the expected operation result data corresponding to the touch command.

Optionally, when the security inspection apparatus includes a lower computer that controls the security inspection apparatus to perform scanning, as shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, step S13 includes:

S131: The controller obtains the operation result data of the security inspection instrument from the lower computer register of the security inspection instrument, and judges whether the operation result data is consistent with the expected operation result data corresponding to the touch command.

If the judgment result of step S13 is NO, that is, they are inconsistent, the following step S14 is executed, otherwise step S15 is executed.

S14: The controller determines that the security checker is not operating normally.

S15: The controller determines that the security inspection instrument is operating normally.

The automatic test method of the security tester of this embodiment is applied to the automatic test system of the security tester of this application. The specific execution process of each step can refer to the description of the execution process of each device in an embodiment of the automatic test system of the security tester of this application, and will not be repeated here. .

In this embodiment, the controller can send the touch instruction to the touch tool, so that the control tool can touch the input device of the security inspection instrument according to the touch instruction to input the control instruction to the security inspection instrument and obtain the operation of the security inspection instrument After the result data, determine whether the operation result data is consistent with the expected operation result data corresponding to the touch command. If they are not consistent, the controller determines that the security inspection instrument is not operating normally, otherwise it is determined that the security inspection instrument is operating normally, and the entire process does not require manual touch operation The controller directly controls the touch tool to automatically complete the touch and the entire security testing process, saving labor costs. The actual touch using the touch tool is more accurate than the software simulation of touch, and has more reference value.

As shown in FIG. 7, the second embodiment of the automatic test method of the security instrument of the present application includes:

S21: The controller sends a touch command to the touch tool to control the input device of the security tool by the touch tool to input the control command to the security device.

Optionally, when the input device is a touch screen, after step S21, it includes:

S25: The controller obtains the input position coordinates recognized by the touch screen, and determines whether the input position coordinates and the target end position coordinates match.

If they match, the following step S26 is executed, otherwise step S27 is executed.

S26: Determine that the touch screen recognition is accurate.

S27: Determine that the touch screen recognition is not accurate.

S22: The controller obtains the operation result data of the security inspection instrument, and judges whether the operation result data is consistent with the expected operation result data corresponding to the touch command.

Optionally, when the security inspection instrument includes a lower computer that controls the security inspection instrument to scan, the controller may obtain the operation result data of the security inspection instrument from the lower computer register of the security inspection instrument.

If the judgment result of step S22 is no, that is, they are inconsistent, the following step S23 is executed, otherwise step S24 is executed.

S23: The controller determines that the security checker is not operating normally.

S24: It is determined that the security inspection instrument is operating normally.

The execution subject of the security tester automatic test method of this embodiment is the controller in the security tester automatic test system of the present application. For the specific execution process of each step, please refer to the controller execution process description in an embodiment of the security tester automatic test system of the present application , Not repeated here.

As shown in FIG. 8, in an embodiment of a device with a storage function in the present application, the device 70 with a storage function stores an instruction 701, which can be implemented as the first or The method provided by the second embodiment.

Among them, the device 70 with a storage function may be a portable storage medium such as a U disk, an optical disk, or may be a terminal, a server, or an integrated independent component, such as a processing chip.

In this embodiment, when an instruction stored in the device with a storage function is executed, by sending a touch instruction to the touch tool, the touch tool can be controlled to touch the input device of the security instrument according to the touch instruction to The security instrument enters the control command, and after obtaining the operating result data of the security instrument, it is determined whether the operating result data is consistent with the expected operating result data corresponding to the touch command. If they are not consistent, the controller determines that the security instrument is not operating normally, otherwise the security The instrument runs normally, and the whole process does not need to be touched manually. The controller directly controls the touch tool to automatically complete the touch and the entire test process of the security tester, saving manpower costs, and uses the touch tool to actually touch, relative to the software simulation Touch, the accuracy is higher, and it has more reference value.

The above are only the embodiments of the present application, and therefore do not limit the patent scope of the present application. Any equivalent structure or equivalent process transformation made by the description and drawings of this application, or directly or indirectly used in other related technologies In the field, the same reason is included in the scope of patent protection of this application.

Claims

An automatic test system for a security inspection instrument is applied to a security inspection instrument, which is characterized by comprising: a touch tool and a controller connected to each other, the controller is connected to the security inspection instrument;

The controller is used to control the input device of the safety inspection instrument by the touch tool to input control instructions to the safety inspection instrument, and obtain the operation result data of the safety inspection instrument to test whether the safety inspection instrument operates normally.
The system according to claim 1, wherein the security instrument includes a lower computer for controlling the security instrument to scan, and the controller is connected to the lower computer to obtain the security instrument from the lower computer The operation result data.
The system according to claim 1, wherein the touch tool is a manipulator, and the controller is used to send target end position coordinates to the manipulator to control the end of the manipulator to run to the target end position coordinates To touch the input device of the security instrument with a tap; or,

The touch tool is an electromagnetic point contact detachably mounted on the input device, and the controller can input current to the electromagnetic point contact to control the electromagnetic point contact to touch the input device .
The system according to claim 3, wherein the input device is a touch screen, and the controller is further configured to obtain input position coordinates recognized by the touch screen, and compare the input position coordinates with the touch tool The position coordinates of the touch are compared to determine whether the touch screen is recognized accurately.
The system according to claim 4, wherein the security instrument includes a host connected to the touch screen, the touch screen transmits the recognized input position coordinates to the host, and the controller is connected to the A host computer to obtain the input position coordinates from the host computer.
An automatic test method of a security instrument is characterized by comprising:

The controller sends touch commands to the touch tool;

According to the touch instruction, the touch tool touches an input device of a security inspection instrument to input a control instruction to the security inspection instrument;

The controller obtains the operation result data of the security inspection instrument and judges whether the operation result data is consistent with the expected operation result data corresponding to the touch command;

If they are not consistent, the controller determines that the security checker is not operating normally, otherwise it determines that the security checker is operating normally.
The method according to claim 6, wherein the controller acquiring the operation result data of the security inspection instrument comprises:

The controller obtains the operation result data of the security inspection instrument from the lower computer register of the security inspection instrument.
The method according to claim 6, wherein the touch tool is a robot, and the touch command includes coordinates of a target end position of the robot;

According to the touch instruction, the touch tool touches the input device of the security inspection instrument to input the control instruction to the security inspection instrument including:

The manipulator plans an end movement trajectory according to its current position coordinates and the target end position coordinates to move from the current position coordinates to the target end position coordinates, and taps the input device; or,

The touch tool is an electromagnetic touch contact detachably connected to the input device, and the touch instruction is a current signal input to the electromagnetic touch contact;

According to the touch instruction, the touch tool touches the input device of the security inspection instrument to input the control instruction to the security inspection instrument including:

The electromagnetic point contact receiving the current signal input by the controller generates a magnetic field, driving its head to point touch the input device, so as to input control instructions to the security inspection instrument.
The method according to claim 8, characterized in that the input device is a touch screen; the touch tool touches the input device of the security instrument according to the touch instruction to input the control instruction to the security instrument ,include:

The controller obtains the input position coordinates recognized by the touch screen, and determines whether the input position coordinates and the position coordinates of the point-to-point tool touch match;

If they match, it is determined that the touch screen recognition is accurate.
The method according to claim 9, wherein the security instrument includes a host connected to the touch screen, the touch screen transmits the recognized input position coordinates to the host; the controller acquires the The input position coordinates recognized by the touch screen include:

The controller obtains the input position coordinates recognized by the touch screen from the host.
An automatic test method of a security instrument is characterized by comprising:

The controller sends a touch command to the touch tool to control the input device of the touch tool to touch the security inspection instrument to input the control command to the security inspection instrument;

The controller obtains the operation result data of the security inspection instrument and judges whether the operation result data is consistent with the expected operation result data corresponding to the touch command;

If they are not consistent, the controller determines that the security checker is not operating normally, otherwise it determines that the security checker is operating normally.
A device with a storage function that stores instructions, characterized in that, when the instructions are executed, an automatic test method for a security inspection instrument according to any one of claims 6-11 is realized.