WO2020082585A1

WO2020082585A1 - Method and device for interface testing

Info

Publication number: WO2020082585A1
Application number: PCT/CN2018/123986
Authority: WO
Inventors: 程学峰
Original assignee: 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司
Priority date: 2018-10-25
Filing date: 2018-12-26
Publication date: 2020-04-30
Also published as: CN109491894B; CN109491894A

Abstract

A method and device for interface testing. The method comprises: acquiring interface information of a test object (S101); importing each rated operating parameter into a pressure test parameter conversion model respectively, calculating a pressure test parameter of each interface to be tested, and generating a pressure test script of the test object on the basis of the pressure test parameter (S102); sending the pressure test script to the test object, and controlling the test object to run the pressure test script, and collecting test data output based on the pressure test script by each interface to be tested (S103); and importing the test data into a data analysis template associated with the test object, and generating a pressure test report on the test object (S104). It is not necessary for a user to configure a pressure test parameter for each interface, and therefore, the efficiency of pressure testing is improved.

Description

Interface testing method and equipment

This application declares that it enjoys the priority of the Chinese patent application with the application number 201811252453.8 and the name "a method and equipment for interface testing" filed on October 25, 2018. The entire content of the Chinese patent application is incorporated by reference in this document Applying.

Technical field

The present application belongs to the field of information processing technology, and in particular relates to an interface testing method and equipment.

Background technique

With the continuous development of terminal technology, in order to meet the various needs of users during use, the number of terminal devices and the update speed are also continuously increasing. Therefore, how to effectively test the terminal device directly affects the update speed of the device. The terminal device contains many interfaces. In order to detect the data processing capability of the interface in actual applications, it is often necessary to perform stress tests on each interface.

However, due to the differences in the operating parameters of each interface in the device, the existing interface testing method requires the user to manually configure the pressure parameters for each operating parameter. When the number of interfaces is large, it takes a lot of manpower to perform Configuration reduces the efficiency of stress testing.

technical problem

In view of this, the embodiments of the present application provide an interface testing method and equipment to solve the existing interface testing technology, which requires the user to manually configure the pressure parameters for each operating parameter. When there are many interfaces, then It takes more manpower to configure, which reduces the problem of the efficiency of stress testing.

Technical solution

The first aspect of the embodiments of the present application provides an interface testing method, including:

Obtain the interface information of the test object; the interface information records the rated operating parameters of each interface to be tested in the test object;

Importing each of the rated operating parameters into a pressure test parameter conversion model, calculating pressure test parameters of each interface to be tested, and generating a pressure test script of the test object based on the pressure test parameters;

Sending the stress test script to the test object, and controlling the test object to run the stress test script, and collecting test data output by each of the interfaces to be tested based on the stress test script;

Import the test data into the data analysis template associated with the test object to generate a stress test report on the test object.

Beneficial effect

In the embodiment of the present application, by acquiring the interface information of the test object, and configuring corresponding pressure test parameters for each interface that needs to be subjected to the pressure test according to the interface information, a pressure test script is generated, and then the control test is run corresponding to the pressure test script to obtain each The test data output from the interface to be tested and generate a pressure test report without the need for users to configure pressure test parameters for each interface, which improves the efficiency of the pressure test, and the terminal equipment will also analyze the test data and import the corresponding data analysis template, Generate highly readable test reports, without requiring users to determine whether the interface is abnormal through experience and test data, which improves the readability of the test results. Even non-technical personnel can clearly understand the test status of each interface.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is an implementation flowchart of an interface testing method provided by the first embodiment of the present application;

2 is a specific implementation flowchart of an interface testing method S102 provided in a second embodiment of the present application;

3 is a flowchart of a specific implementation of an interface testing method S104 provided in a third embodiment of the present application;

4 is a specific implementation flowchart of an interface testing method provided by a fourth embodiment of the present application;

5 is a flowchart of a specific implementation of an interface testing method S104 provided in a fifth embodiment of the present application;

6 is a structural block diagram of a terminal device according to an embodiment of the present application;

7 is a schematic diagram of a terminal device according to another embodiment of the present application.

Implementation of this application

In the embodiment of the present application, the execution subject of the process is a terminal device. The terminal equipment includes but is not limited to: computers, smart phones, and tablet computers that can perform interface testing. FIG. 1 shows an implementation flowchart of the interface testing method provided in the first embodiment of the present application, which is described in detail as follows:

In S101, the interface information of the test object is obtained; the interface information records the rated operating parameters of each interface to be tested in the test object.

In this embodiment, the terminal device may perform a stress test on the interface within the test object to determine the robustness of each interface. Since the test object is not in the rated working state at all times during the actual operation, it may be in an overload state. Therefore, whether the test object can run stably under the overload state will directly affect the stability of the test object as a whole. Based on this Before the test object leaves the factory or is released, it is necessary to perform a pressure test on each interface to determine the operating parameters of each interface of the test object under overload and determine whether it meets the factory or release standards. The terminal device can identify all the interfaces included in the test object as the interface to be tested. In this case, the terminal device will traverse each interface of the analysis test object, obtain the rated operating parameters of each interface, and based on the corresponding ratings of all interfaces Run parameters generate interface information. The terminal device can also select a part of the interface from the test object as the interface to be tested. Specifically, the terminal device can select an interface of a certain type or types of interfaces as the interface to be tested for this stress test according to the interface type of each interface, and can also receive a list of interfaces to be tested preset by the user based on the test to be tested The interface list obtains the rated operating parameters of each interface to be tested from the test object and generates interface information.

In this embodiment, the rated operating parameter specifically refers to: the data processing capability of the interface to be tested under the rated operating environment. The rated operating parameter can be a range of parameter values. Since the operating parameters of each interface may float during operation, in order to more accurately determine the data processing capability of the interface under test in the rated operating environment, you can pass The parameter value range represents the rated operating parameter, that is, under the rated operating environment, when the actual operating parameter of the interface to be tested is within this parameter value range, it indicates that the interface to be tested is in a normal state. Rated operating parameters can be used to define the operating parameters of the input signal and / or the output signal of the interface to be tested, for example, the operating parameters of the input signal can include: the transmission rate of the input signal, the number of concurrent threads, and the rated data of a single file The operating parameters of the output signal can include: data processing rate, bit error rate, etc.

In this embodiment, the test object may be a physical device. In this case, the terminal device may establish a communication connection with the physical device, and send an interface information reporting request to the physical device, so that the physical device can test each interface to be tested. The rated operating parameters are summarized, interface information is generated and returned to the terminal device. Optionally, the terminal device may also obtain product design information of the device model according to the device model of the physical device, and obtain rated operating parameters of each interface to be tested based on the product design information, and generate interface information. The test object can also be an application program. The terminal device can parse the program file of the application program, determine the virtual interface contained in the program file, and obtain the corresponding rated operating parameters according to the interface identifier corresponding to each virtual interface to generate the interface information. It should be noted that if the test object is an application, the application can be installed on the terminal device or any other device, which is not limited herein.

In S102, the rated operating parameters are respectively imported into a pressure test parameter conversion model, the pressure test parameters of each interface to be tested are calculated, and a pressure test script of the test object is generated based on the pressure test parameters.

In this embodiment, since the terminal device needs to perform a pressure test on each interface to be tested, it is necessary to place each interface to be tested in an overloaded operating environment, so as to collect the operation status of each interface to be tested under an overloaded environment, to Generate stress test report. Based on this, the terminal device will configure a pressure test parameter matching the rated operating parameter for each interface to be tested according to the rated operating parameter of each interface to be tested. As the parameter value of the rated operating parameter is larger, it means that the data processing capability of the interface to be tested is higher, and the corresponding pressure test parameter should also be increased accordingly; and the smaller the parameter value of the rated operating parameter, it means that the interface of the test is to be tested. The data processing capability is low, and the corresponding pressure test parameters should be reduced accordingly. It can be seen that the pressure test parameters of each interface to be tested are related to its rated operating parameters, and the terminal device will generate a pressure test parameter conversion model based on the conversion relationship between the two. After the terminal device receives the rated operating parameters of the interface to be tested , Then each rated operating parameter can be separately imported into the pressure test parameter conversion model to calculate the pressure test parameter corresponding to each rated operating parameter.

Optionally, the pressure test parameter conversion model is configured with a pressure measurement ratio, and the parameter value of the rated operating parameter is adjusted based on the pressure measurement ratio to obtain a corresponding pressure test parameter conversion model. For example, if the preset pressure measurement ratio is 50%, and a certain rated operating parameter is the transmission rate, the parameter value is 100M / s, then the pressure test parameter is: (1 + 50%) * 100M / s = 150M / s For other rated test parameters, the parameters can be calculated in the above manner. The pressure measurement ratio in the pressure test parameter calculation model may be fixed, that is, the pressure measurement ratio is the same for each interface to be tested, and of course, the pressure measurement ratio may also be changed. Preferably, the terminal device may determine the pressure measurement ratio with the interface type according to the interface type of the interface to be tested, and adjust the pressure test parameter conversion model based on the pressure measurement ratio, and import the rated operating parameters of the interface to be tested into the adjustment After the pressure test parameter conversion model, the pressure measurement ratio of the pressure test parameter conversion model can be dynamically adjusted in the above manner, thereby improving the accuracy of the pressure test parameter.

In this embodiment, after determining the pressure test parameter of the interface to be tested, the terminal device may adjust each interface test instance based on the pressure test parameter, and generate a pressure test script about the test object based on each interface test instance.

In S103, the stress test script is sent to the test object, and the test object is controlled to run the stress test script to collect test data output by each interface to be tested based on the stress test script.

In this embodiment, after the stress test script is generated, the terminal device may send the stress test script to the test object, and send a stress test start instruction to the test object, so that the test object starts the stress test process. Specifically, if the test object is a physical device, the terminal device may establish a communication link with each test interface in the physical device through the communication interface, and configure a corresponding excitation signal for each test interface, and then the physical device According to the excitation signal and the stress test script, each interface to be tested can be stress-tested; if the test object is an application, the terminal device can configure the corresponding based on the input data type of each interface to be tested and the corresponding pressure test parameters Training samples, import each training sample to each interface to be tested, and realize the stress test of each interface to be tested.

In this embodiment, the terminal device collects the actual operating parameters during the pressure test process of each interface to be tested and the output results of each interface to be tested, and generates test data according to the actual operating parameters and the output results. The actual operating parameters include, but are not limited to: the resource occupancy rate, data processing rate, and response time of the test object. The terminal device can determine whether the test object can be carried out within the preset operating range under the overload state based on the actual operation parameters Data processing, and based on the training samples of each excitation signal, determine whether the output results match the training samples to determine whether the proportion of abnormal responses.

It should be noted that, because the functional modules to which different interfaces to be tested belong may be the same, in order to avoid the mutual influence of the test scripts of the different interfaces to be tested during the stress test, the terminal device may separately perform stress tests on each interface to be tested , That is, test each interface to be tested in turn according to the stress test script. Preferably, the terminal device can recognize the correlation between the interfaces to be tested, select multiple interfaces to be tested with a low correlation as concurrent test interfaces, and perform concurrent tests on the concurrent test interfaces, thereby improving test efficiency.

In S104, the test data is imported into a data analysis template associated with the test object, and a stress test report on the test object is generated.

In this embodiment, the terminal device may obtain the data analysis template corresponding to the object identifier from the data analysis database according to the object identifier of the test object, as the data analysis template associated with the test object. The data analysis template records the verification algorithm of each interface to be tested. The terminal device will parse the test data of each interface to be tested from the test data and import it into the corresponding verification algorithm in the data analysis template to determine each Test the test results of the interface and generate a stress test report based on each test result.

Optionally, if the test results of each to-be-tested interface in the stress test report are all tested successfully, the test object is identified as a qualified object, and subsequent follow-up factory or release links can be carried out; otherwise, if any of the test reports If the test result of the test interface is that the test fails, abnormal test information is generated, and the abnormal test interface is recorded in the test abnormal information, so that the developer can adjust the abnormal test interface to be tested.

Optionally, in this embodiment, the test data may be a jtl format file, that is, when the stress test script is executed, the test data of each interface to be tested is obtained through the jmeter program, and the corresponding jtl file is generated Because of the low readability of the jtl file, the terminal device can parse the jtl file and import the test results of the interfaces to be tested in the jtl file into the data analysis template in HTML format to generate HTML about the test object The HTML page is used to display the test results, which can be easily read by each user, thereby improving the readability of the test report.

It can be seen from the above that an interface test method provided by an embodiment of the present application obtains interface information of a test object and configures a corresponding pressure test parameter for each interface that needs to be subjected to a pressure test according to the interface information to generate a pressure test script. Then the control test is run corresponding to the stress test script to obtain the test data output by each interface to be tested and generate a stress test report, without requiring the user to configure stress test parameters for each interface, which improves the efficiency of the stress test, and the terminal equipment will also Analyze the test data, import the corresponding data analysis template, and generate a more readable test report, without the user's experience and test data to determine whether the interface is abnormal, improve the readability of the test results, even non-technical personnel can Clearly understand the test situation of each interface.

FIG. 2 shows a specific implementation flowchart of an interface testing method S102 provided by the second embodiment of the present application. Referring to FIG. 2, relative to the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the method for interface testing provided in this embodiment separately imports each of the rated operating parameters into a pressure test parameter conversion model to calculate the pressure of each of the interfaces to be tested Test parameters, including: S1021 ～ S1025, detailed as follows:

In S1021, the memory capacity and cache capacity of the test object are obtained, and the average text capacity and the number of rated threads are extracted from the rated operating parameters.

In this embodiment, after receiving data, each test object will first store the data in the cache area, and based on the data type of the data and the operation to be performed, it will be transferred from the cache area to the corresponding memory area Perform arithmetic processing. Therefore, the data processing capability of a test object is not only related to the data processing capability of the interface, but also related to the memory capacity and cache capacity of the test object. Based on this, the terminal device needs to determine the pressure test parameters before determining The storage capacity of the test object, so the memory capacity and cache capacity of the test object will be obtained.

In this embodiment, the terminal device extracts the average text capacity and the number of rated threads from the rated operating parameters, where the average text capacity specifically refers to the average value of the file data volume when the interface under test receives file data ; The number of rated threads is specifically the number of threads that the interface can maintain simultaneously under the rated operating environment during the operation of the interface to be tested, for example, an interface can establish communication connections with multiple user terminals at the same time, and each communication Each link requires an independent concurrent thread for maintenance, so the number of connected user terminals is the number of threads corresponding to the interface.

In S1022, the average text volume is imported into a first pressure parameter conversion model to calculate the first pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; the first pressure parameter conversion conversion model is specifically:

Wherein, DocVol is the first pressure parameter; Scale is the pressure measurement ratio; DocVol ₀ is the average text volume.

In this embodiment, the pressure test parameters include three types of pressure parameters, which are a first pressure parameter related to the text volume, a second pressure parameter related to the maximum concurrent thread, and a third pressure test parameter related to the pressure test running time. Through the above three types of pressure parameters, you can determine the data processing situation of the interface to be tested in the overload state. If the maximum text capacity is larger, it means that the interface to be tested can quickly process a single file with a large amount of data. That is, the larger the range of processing files, and the more the maximum number of concurrent threads, the higher the parallel data processing capability of the interface to be tested. Under overload, it can quickly process accumulated service requests; and the more time the stress test runs Long means that the interface to be tested is more robust and can be operated in an overloaded environment for a long time. Therefore, different pressure parameters can be used to characterize the overload handling capabilities of the interface to be tested in multiple dimensions.

In this embodiment, the average text volume is imported into the first pressure parameter conversion model to determine the first pressure test parameter corresponding to the average text volume, so as to calculate the amount of text data for each training sample during the stress test. The greater the amount of text data, the greater the computational pressure on the interface to be tested. The terminal device will calculate the first pressure parameter based on the preset pressure measurement ratio and the average text volume.

In S1023, the number of rated threads is imported into a second pressure parameter conversion model to calculate the second pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; the second pressure parameter conversion conversion model is specifically:

Wherein, ThreadNum is the second pressure parameter; ThreadNum ₀ is the number of rated threads.

In this embodiment, the terminal device imports the number of rated threads into the second pressure parameter conversion model to determine the second pressure test parameter corresponding to the number of rated threads, thereby determining the concurrency required to be called during the pressure test The number of threads. As the number of concurrent threads increases, the test object needs to process multiple data at the same time, so the corresponding arithmetic processing capability is greater. The terminal device will calculate the second pressure parameter based on the preset pressure measurement ratio and the number of rated threads.

In S1024, the first pressure parameter, the second pressure parameter, the memory capacity, and the cache capacity are imported into a third pressure parameter conversion model to calculate the third pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; The third pressure parameter conversion model is specifically:

Wherein, RunTime is the third pressure parameter; RAM is the memory capacity; Cache is the cache capacity.

In this embodiment, since each concurrent thread sends training samples to the test object in parallel, the file size of each training sample is the first stress test parameter, and the amount of instantaneous data received by the test object at a certain time is specific It is: ThreadNum * DocVol, and the test object can store the training samples in the cache area and the content area, so the running time of the stress test, that is, the third stress parameter can be based on the ratio between (RAM + Cache) and (ThreadNum * DocVol) Make sure. Specifically, since the test terminal can perform arithmetic processing on the data when it receives the data and eliminates the processed data, the value of the pressure measurement ratio may be greater than 1.

In S1025, a pressure test parameter of the interface to be tested is generated based on the first pressure parameter, the second pressure parameter, and the third pressure parameter.

In this embodiment, the terminal device packages and integrates the first pressure parameter, the second pressure parameter, and the third pressure parameter to obtain the pressure test parameter of the interface to be tested. Specifically, the terminal device can package and integrate the three pressure parameters in the form of an array.

In the embodiment of the present application, the pressure test parameters of the interface to be tested are generated by calculating the three types of pressure parameters of the interface to be tested respectively, and the data processing capability of the interface is characterized by multiple dimensions, so that the pressure test script can be improved. The matching degree of the interface, so as to accurately test the interface.

FIG. 3 shows a specific implementation flowchart of an interface testing method S104 provided in the second embodiment of the present application. Referring to FIG. 3, relative to the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the method for interface testing provided in this embodiment imports the test data into a data analysis template associated with the test object to generate information about the test object. Stress test report, including: S1041 ～ S1044, detailed as follows:

In S1041, a pressure measurement trajectory curve about the interface to be tested is generated according to the test data.

In this embodiment, the terminal device will acquire the interface parameters of each interface to be tested within a preset collection time period, so the test data corresponding to each interface to be tested contains the operating parameter values corresponding to multiple collection points. Based on the collection time of each collection point, each collection point is marked on a preset coordinate axis, thereby generating a pressure measurement trajectory curve about the interface to be tested.

Preferably, the terminal device can determine whether the divergence point is included in the pressure measurement trajectory curve through a divergence point recognition algorithm, for example, the derivative value corresponding to a certain collection point is less than the first threshold, and the derivative value of the collection point adjacent to the collection point If the values are opposite to each other, and the value is greater than the second threshold, it can be determined that the collection point is a divergence point, and the collection point is smoothed out.

In S1042, a standard trajectory curve of the interface to be tested and the pressure trajectory curve are drawn on a preset coordinate axis, and the distance between each coordinate point on the standard trajectory curve and the pressure trajectory curve is obtained value.

In this embodiment, after generating the pressure measurement trajectory curve, the terminal device may display the standard trajectory curve of the interface to be tested on the same coordinate axis as the pressure measurement trajectory curve, thereby comparing the pressure measurement trajectory curve and the standard trajectory The curve can identify the degree of deviation of the interface to be tested from the ideal situation during the actual operation. Therefore, the terminal device may use the distance between each coordinate point on the standard trajectory curve and the corresponding coordinate point on the pressure trajectory curve as the deviation value between the two curves.

In S1043, an average distance between the standard trajectory curve and the pressure measurement trajectory curve is calculated based on the distance value of each coordinate point, and the average distance is used as the pressure measurement response level of the interface to be tested.

In this embodiment, the terminal device can calculate the average distance between the two curves according to the distance value of each coordinate point. Of course, the terminal device can weight the different distance values according to the collection time corresponding to each coordinate point , And then averaged after the weighted operation, thereby determining the average distance between the two trajectory curves. Specifically, the coordinate point corresponding to the later collection time has a larger weighting weight, and conversely, the coordinate point corresponding to the earlier collection time has a smaller weighting weight. The coordinate points with a later acquisition time indicate that the longer the interface to be tested runs in an overloaded environment, the more robust the interface can be characterized, so the corresponding weight should also be greater.

In this embodiment, as the average distance between the two curves is larger, it means that the pressure response capability of the interface is poorer, and the data processing rate is slower in the case of overload; and the smaller the average distance is, it means The closer the interface is to the preset ideal operating state, the higher data capacity can be maintained under overload conditions. Therefore, the terminal device can use the average distance as the pressure test response level of the interface to be tested.

In S1044, the pressure test report is generated according to the pressure test response level of each interface to be tested.

In this embodiment, the terminal device may generate a correspondence table about the interface to be tested and the response level of the pressure test, and the user may quickly determine the data processing capability of the overload state of each interface to be tested through the correspondence table. Optionally, the terminal device can also encapsulate the rated operating parameters, pressure test parameters, the corresponding relationship, standard trajectory curve and / or pressure trajectory curve table of each interface to be tested to generate the pressure test report, so that the user can easily determine each The operating parameters of the interface to be tested.

In the embodiment of the present application, by generating a pressure test trajectory curve, it is possible to intuitively determine the degree of deviation of the interface to be tested from the standard trajectory curve during actual operation, determine the pressure response level, and intuitively determine the overload operation of each interface to be tested .

FIG. 4 shows a specific implementation flowchart of an interface testing method provided by a fourth embodiment of the present application. Referring to FIG. 4, relative to the embodiments described in FIGS. 1-3, in an interface testing method provided in this embodiment, the test object is controlled to run the stress test script to collect each of the interfaces to be tested After the test data output based on the stress test script, it also includes: S401 to S403, which are described in detail as follows:

Further, after the controlling the test object to run the stress test script and collecting test data output by each of the interfaces to be tested based on the stress test script, the method further includes:

In S401, if the test data sent by the interface to be tested is not received within a preset waiting time threshold, the interface to be tested is determined according to the current time and the startup time corresponding to running the test script Pressure test running time.

In this embodiment, the test object will feed back test data to the terminal device at a preset time interval during the stress test. The terminal device will set a data reception timer. When receiving test data sent by the test object, the test Set the count value of the reception timer. If the count value of the counter is greater than the waiting time threshold, it means that the test object has not sent test data to the terminal device according to the preset data feedback process. At this time, it can be identified that the interface to be tested is in an abnormal state, for example, in a down state , Or the interface data is blocked. The reason for the above situation may be that the pressure test parameter is too high, which exceeds the processing range of the interface to be tested, so the pressure test parameter needs to be adjusted.

In this embodiment, the terminal device will obtain the time value of the current time, and the time value of the corresponding startup time when running the test script, and based on the difference between the two time values, it may be determined that the interface to be tested is running The stress test running time of the stress test script.

In S402, the pressure test parameter of the interface to be tested is adjusted based on the pressure test running time.

In this embodiment, the terminal device may reduce the pressure test parameters according to the pressure test running time, thereby preventing the pressure test script from exceeding the executable range of the interface to be tested. Specifically, the terminal device can calculate the ratio between the pressure test running time and the preset pressure test time, reduce each pressure test parameter of the interface to be tested in proportion, and identify the reduced pressure test parameter as the adjusted pressure test parameter .

In S403, add the adjusted stress test parameters to the stress test script, return to execute the sending of the stress test script to the test object, and control the test object to run the stress test script To collect test data output by each of the interfaces to be tested based on the stress test script.

In this embodiment, the terminal device re-imports the adjusted stress test parameters into the stress test script, and re-tests the test object according to the adjusted stress test script, and collects each interface to be tested under the stress test script The output test data.

In the embodiment of the present application, the pressure test parameters are automatically adjusted by collecting the pressure test time, so that the pressure test parameters and the test object can be adjusted adaptively, thereby improving the intelligence and test efficiency of the pressure test.

FIG. 5 shows a specific implementation flowchart of an interface testing method S104 provided in the fifth embodiment of the present application. Referring to FIG. 5, relative to the embodiments described in FIGS. 1 to 3, in a method for interface testing provided in this embodiment, S104 includes: S1045 to S1046, and details are as follows:

In S1045, the test data is compared with the standard parameter range of each interface to be tested in the data analysis template.

In this embodiment, the standard parameter range of each interface to be tested is recorded in the data analysis template, and the terminal device determines the actual operating parameters of each interface to be tested through the test data, and compares the actual operating parameters with the standard parameters of the interface to be tested The range is compared, if the actual operating parameter is within the standard parameter range, the interface to be tested is identified as a normal interface; conversely, if the actual operating parameter of an interface to be tested is outside the standard parameter range, the relevant operation of S1046 is performed .

It should be noted that the test data can be converted into the pressure response level by the method provided in the third embodiment, and whether the pressure response level is within the preset standard response level range is determined, and the corresponding is performed based on the comparison result Operation.

In S1046, if the test data exceeds the standard parameter range of any one of the interfaces to be tested, the interface to be tested is identified as an abnormal interface, and interface abnormal information about the abnormal interface is output.

In this embodiment, when the terminal device recognizes that a certain interface to be tested is an abnormal interface, it may generate interface abnormal information about the abnormal interface. Preferably, the terminal device may use the actual operating parameters and pressure test parameters of the abnormal interface And / or rated operating parameters are added to the interface abnormal information, so that the user can easily repair the abnormal interface according to the multiple parameter values recorded in the interface abnormal information.

In the embodiment of the present application, by comparing with the standard parameter range, an abnormal interface is identified, and the efficiency of abnormal response is improved.

It should be understood that the size of the sequence numbers of the steps in the above embodiments does not mean the order of execution, and the execution order of each process should be determined by its function and internal logic, and should not constitute any limitation on the implementation process of the embodiments of the present application.

FIG. 6 shows a structural block diagram of a terminal device provided by an embodiment of the present application. Each unit included in the terminal device is used to execute each step in the embodiment corresponding to FIG. 1. For details, please refer to the related descriptions in the embodiments corresponding to FIG. 1 and FIG. 1. For ease of explanation, only the parts related to this embodiment are shown.

Referring to FIG. 6, the terminal device includes:

The interface information obtaining unit 61 is used to obtain the interface information of the test object; the interface information records the rated operating parameters of each interface to be tested in the test object;

The pressure test script generating unit 62 is configured to respectively import each of the rated operating parameters into a pressure test parameter conversion model, calculate the pressure test parameters of each of the interfaces to be tested, and generate the pressure of the test object based on the pressure test parameters Test script

The stress test execution unit 63 is configured to send the stress test script to the test object, and control the test object to run the stress test script to collect tests output by each of the interfaces to be tested based on the stress test script data;

The stress test report generating unit 64 is configured to import the test data into a data analysis template associated with the test object, and generate a stress test report on the test object.

Optionally, the stress test script generating unit 62 includes:

A test object parameter acquisition unit, used to acquire the memory capacity and cache capacity of the test object, and extract the average text capacity and the number of rated threads from the rated operating parameters;

The first pressure parameter calculation unit is used to import the average text volume into the first pressure parameter conversion model to calculate the first pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; the first pressure parameter conversion conversion model is specifically:

DocVol is the first pressure parameter; Scale is the pressure measurement ratio; DocVol ₀ is the average text capacity;

The second pressure parameter calculation unit is used to introduce the number of rated threads into a second pressure parameter conversion model to calculate the second pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; the second pressure parameter conversion conversion model is specifically:

Where ThreadNum is the second pressure parameter; ThreadNum ₀ is the number of rated threads;

The third pressure parameter calculation unit is configured to import the first pressure parameter, the second pressure parameter, the memory capacity, and the buffer capacity into a third pressure parameter conversion model, and calculate the third pressure parameter of the interface to be tested Pressure parameter; the third pressure parameter conversion model is specifically:

Wherein, RunTime is the third pressure parameter; RAM is the memory capacity; Cache is the cache capacity;

The pressure test parameter generating unit is configured to generate a pressure test parameter of the interface to be tested based on the first pressure parameter, the second pressure parameter, and the third pressure parameter.

Optionally, the stress test report generating unit 64 includes:

A pressure measurement trajectory curve generating unit, configured to generate a pressure measurement trajectory curve about the interface to be tested according to the test data;

A pressure measurement trajectory curve comparison unit, used to draw a standard trajectory curve of the interface to be tested and the pressure trajectory curve on a preset coordinate axis, to obtain each coordinate point on the standard trajectory curve Distance value between trajectory curves;

The pressure measurement response level determination unit is used to calculate the average distance between the standard trajectory curve and the pressure measurement trajectory curve based on the distance value of each coordinate point, and use the average distance as the interface to be tested Pressure response level;

The pressure measurement response level summary unit is used to generate the pressure test report according to the pressure measurement response level of each interface to be tested.

Optionally, the terminal device further includes:

The pressure test running time determining unit is used to determine if the test data sent by the interface to be tested is not received within a preset waiting time threshold, based on the current time and the start time corresponding to running the test script Describe the running time of the pressure test interface to be tested;

A pressure test parameter adjusting unit, configured to adjust the pressure test parameter of the interface to be tested based on the pressure test running time;

A stress test script adjusting unit, configured to add the adjusted stress test parameters to the stress test script, return to execute the sending of the stress test script to the test object, and control the test object to run The stress test script collects test data output by each of the interfaces to be tested based on the stress test script.

Optionally, the stress test report generating unit 64 includes:

A standard parameter range comparison unit, used to compare the test data with the standard parameter range of each of the interfaces to be tested in the data analysis template;

The abnormal interface identification unit is configured to identify the interface to be tested as an abnormal interface if the test data exceeds the standard parameter range of any of the interfaces to be tested, and output interface abnormal information about the abnormal interface.

Therefore, the terminal device provided by the embodiment of the present application can also obtain the interface information of the test object and configure corresponding pressure test parameters for each interface that needs to be subjected to the pressure test according to the interface information, generate a pressure test script, and then correspond to the control test Run the stress test script to obtain the test data output from each interface to be tested and generate a stress test report, without the need for users to configure stress test parameters for each interface, which improves the efficiency of stress testing, and the terminal equipment will also analyze the test data , Import the corresponding data analysis template to generate a more readable test report, without the need for users to determine whether the interface is abnormal through experience and test data, and improve the readability of the test results, even non-technical personnel can clearly understand the interface Test the situation.

7 is a schematic diagram of a terminal device according to another embodiment of the present application. As shown in FIG. 7, the terminal device 7 of this embodiment includes: a processor 70, a memory 71, and computer-readable instructions 72 stored in the memory 71 and executable on the processor 70, for example, interface tested program. When the processor 70 executes the computer-readable instructions 72, the steps in the method embodiment of each interface test described above are implemented, for example, S101 to S104 shown in FIG. 1. Alternatively, when the processor 70 executes the computer-readable instructions 72, the functions of each unit in the foregoing device embodiments are realized, for example, the functions of the modules 61 to 64 shown in FIG. 6.

Exemplarily, the computer-readable instructions 72 may be divided into one or more units, and the one or more units are stored in the memory 71 and executed by the processor 70 to complete the application . The one or more units may be a series of computer-readable instruction instruction segments capable of performing specific functions, and the instruction segments are used to describe the execution process of the computer-readable instructions 72 in the terminal device 7. For example, the computer-readable instructions 72 may be divided into an interface information acquisition unit, a stress test script generation unit, a stress test execution unit, and a stress test report generation unit, and the specific functions of each unit are as described above.

Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for convenience and conciseness of description, only the above-mentioned division of each functional unit and module is used as an example for illustration. In practical applications, the above-mentioned functions can be allocated by different functional units, Module completion means that the internal structure of the device is divided into different functional units or modules to complete all or part of the functions described above. The functional units and modules in the embodiment may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit. The above integrated unit may use hardware It can also be implemented in the form of software functional units. In addition, the specific names of each functional unit and module are only for the purpose of distinguishing each other, and are not used to limit the protection scope of the present application. For the specific working processes of the units and modules in the above system, reference may be made to the corresponding processes in the foregoing method embodiments, which will not be repeated here.

In the above embodiments, the description of each embodiment has its own emphasis. For a part that is not detailed or recorded in an embodiment, you can refer to the related descriptions of other embodiments.

The above-mentioned embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present application, not to limit them; although the present application has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art should understand that they can still implement the foregoing The technical solutions described in the examples are modified, or some of the technical features are equivalently replaced; and these modifications or replacements do not deviate from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application. Within the scope of protection of this application.

Claims

An interface testing method, which is characterized by:

Obtain the interface information of the test object; the interface information records the rated operating parameters of each interface to be tested in the test object;

Importing each of the rated operating parameters into a pressure test parameter conversion model, calculating pressure test parameters of each interface to be tested, and generating a pressure test script of the test object based on the pressure test parameters;

Sending the stress test script to the test object, and controlling the test object to run the stress test script, and collecting test data output by each of the interfaces to be tested based on the stress test script;

Import the test data into the data analysis template associated with the test object to generate a stress test report on the test object.
The method according to claim 1, wherein the separately importing each of the rated operating parameters into a pressure test parameter conversion model to calculate the pressure test parameters of each of the interfaces to be tested includes:

Obtain the memory capacity and cache capacity of the test object, and extract the average text capacity and the number of rated threads from the rated operating parameters;

Import the average text volume into a first pressure parameter conversion model to calculate the first pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; the first pressure parameter conversion conversion model is specifically:

DocVol is the first pressure parameter; Scale is the pressure measurement ratio; DocVol 0 is the average text capacity;

Import the number of rated threads into a second pressure parameter conversion model to calculate the second pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; the second pressure parameter conversion conversion model is specifically:

Where ThreadNum is the second pressure parameter; ThreadNum 0 is the number of rated threads;

Import the first pressure parameter, the second pressure parameter, the memory capacity and the buffer capacity into a third pressure parameter conversion model, and calculate the third pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; the third pressure parameter The conversion model is:

Wherein, RunTime is the third pressure parameter; RAM is the memory capacity; Cache is the cache capacity;

A pressure test parameter of the interface to be tested is generated based on the first pressure parameter, the second pressure parameter, and the third pressure parameter.
The method according to claim 1, wherein the importing the test data into a data analysis template associated with the test object to generate a stress test report on the test object includes:

Generating a pressure test trajectory curve about the interface to be tested according to the test data;

Drawing a standard trajectory curve of the interface to be tested and the pressure measurement trajectory curve on a preset coordinate axis to obtain the distance value between each coordinate point on the standard trajectory curve and the pressure measurement trajectory curve;

Calculating the average distance between the standard trajectory curve and the pressure test trajectory curve based on the distance values of the respective coordinate points, and using the average distance as the pressure test response level of the interface to be tested;

The pressure test report is generated according to the pressure test response level of each interface to be tested.
The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the control object is controlled to run the stress test script to collect test data output by each of the interfaces to be tested based on the stress test script After that, it also includes:

If the test data sent by the interface to be tested is not received within a preset waiting time threshold, the pressure test running time of the interface to be tested is determined according to the current time and the start time corresponding to running the test script ;

Adjusting the pressure test parameters of the interface to be tested based on the pressure test running time;

Add the adjusted stress test parameters to the stress test script, return to execute the sending the stress test script to the test object, and control the test object to run the stress test script to collect all The test interface is based on test data output by the stress test script.
The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the importing the test data into a data analysis template associated with the test object to generate a stress test report on the test object includes:

Comparing the test data with the standard parameter range of each of the interfaces to be tested in the data analysis template;

If the test data exceeds the standard parameter range of any of the interfaces to be tested, the interface to be tested is identified as an abnormal interface, and interface abnormal information about the abnormal interface is output.
An interface testing device, which is characterized by:

An interface information obtaining unit, used to obtain interface information of a test object; the interface information records the rated operating parameters of each interface to be tested in the test object;

A stress test script generation unit, which is used to import each of the rated operating parameters into a stress test parameter conversion model, calculate the stress test parameters of each of the interfaces to be tested, and generate a stress test of the test object based on the stress test parameters script;

A stress test execution unit, configured to send the stress test script to the test object, and control the test object to run the stress test script to collect test data output by each of the interfaces to be tested based on the stress test script ;

The stress test report generating unit is configured to import the test data into a data analysis template associated with the test object, and generate a stress test report on the test object.
The device for interface testing according to claim 6, wherein the stress test script generating unit includes:

A test object parameter acquisition unit, used to acquire the memory capacity and cache capacity of the test object, and extract the average text capacity and the number of rated threads from the rated operating parameters;

The first pressure parameter calculation unit is used to import the average text volume into the first pressure parameter conversion model to calculate the first pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; the first pressure parameter conversion conversion model is specifically:

DocVol is the first pressure parameter; Scale is the pressure measurement ratio; DocVol 0 is the average text capacity;

The second pressure parameter calculation unit is used to introduce the number of rated threads into a second pressure parameter conversion model to calculate the second pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; the second pressure parameter conversion conversion model is specifically:

Where ThreadNum is the second pressure parameter; ThreadNum 0 is the number of rated threads;

The third pressure parameter calculation unit is configured to import the first pressure parameter, the second pressure parameter, the memory capacity, and the buffer capacity into a third pressure parameter conversion model, and calculate the third pressure parameter of the interface to be tested Pressure parameter; the third pressure parameter conversion model is specifically:

Wherein, RunTime is the third pressure parameter; RAM is the memory capacity; Cache is the cache capacity;

The pressure test parameter generating unit is configured to generate a pressure test parameter of the interface to be tested based on the first pressure parameter, the second pressure parameter, and the third pressure parameter.
The interface testing device according to claim 6, wherein the stress test report generating unit includes:

A pressure measurement trajectory curve generating unit, configured to generate a pressure measurement trajectory curve about the interface to be tested according to the test data;

A pressure measurement trajectory curve comparison unit, used to draw a standard trajectory curve of the interface to be tested and the pressure trajectory curve on a preset coordinate axis, to obtain each coordinate point on the standard trajectory curve Distance value between trajectory curves;

The pressure measurement response level determination unit is used to calculate the average distance between the standard trajectory curve and the pressure measurement trajectory curve based on the distance value of each coordinate point, and use the average distance as the interface to be tested Pressure response level;

The pressure measurement response level summary unit is used to generate the pressure test report according to the pressure measurement response level of each interface to be tested.
The device for interface testing according to any one of claims 6-8, wherein the device for interface testing further comprises:

The pressure test running time determining unit is used to determine if the test data sent by the interface to be tested is not received within a preset waiting time threshold, based on the current time and the start time corresponding to running the test script Describe the running time of the pressure test interface to be tested;

A pressure test parameter adjusting unit, configured to adjust the pressure test parameter of the interface to be tested based on the pressure test running time;

A stress test script adjusting unit, configured to add the adjusted stress test parameters to the stress test script, return to execute the sending of the stress test script to the test object, and control the test object to run The stress test script collects test data output by each of the interfaces to be tested based on the stress test script.
The interface testing device according to any one of claims 6-8, wherein the pressure test report generating unit includes:

A standard parameter range comparison unit, used to compare the test data with the standard parameter range of each of the interfaces to be tested in the data analysis template;

The abnormal interface identification unit is configured to identify the interface to be tested as an abnormal interface if the test data exceeds the standard parameter range of any of the interfaces to be tested, and output interface abnormal information about the abnormal interface.
A terminal device is characterized by comprising a memory, a processor, and computer-readable instructions stored in the memory and executable on the processor, and the processor implements the computer-readable instructions as follows step:

Obtain the interface information of the test object; the interface information records the rated operating parameters of each interface to be tested in the test object;

Importing each of the rated operating parameters into a pressure test parameter conversion model, calculating pressure test parameters of each interface to be tested, and generating a pressure test script of the test object based on the pressure test parameters;

Sending the stress test script to the test object, and controlling the test object to run the stress test script, and collecting test data output by each of the interfaces to be tested based on the stress test script;

Import the test data into the data analysis template associated with the test object to generate a stress test report on the test object.
The terminal device according to claim 11, wherein the importing each of the rated operating parameters into a pressure test parameter conversion model to calculate the pressure test parameters of each interface to be tested includes:

Obtain the memory capacity and cache capacity of the test object, and extract the average text capacity and the number of rated threads from the rated operating parameters;

Import the average text volume into a first pressure parameter conversion model to calculate the first pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; the first pressure parameter conversion conversion model is specifically:

DocVol is the first pressure parameter; Scale is the pressure measurement ratio; DocVol 0 is the average text capacity;

Import the number of rated threads into a second pressure parameter conversion model to calculate the second pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; the second pressure parameter conversion conversion model is specifically:

Where ThreadNum is the second pressure parameter; ThreadNum 0 is the number of rated threads;

Import the first pressure parameter, the second pressure parameter, the memory capacity and the buffer capacity into a third pressure parameter conversion model, and calculate the third pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; the third pressure parameter The conversion model is:

Wherein, RunTime is the third pressure parameter; RAM is the memory capacity; Cache is the cache capacity;

A pressure test parameter of the interface to be tested is generated based on the first pressure parameter, the second pressure parameter, and the third pressure parameter.
The terminal device according to claim 11, wherein the importing of the test data into a data analysis template associated with the test object to generate a stress test report on the test object includes:

Generating a pressure test trajectory curve about the interface to be tested according to the test data;

Drawing a standard trajectory curve of the interface to be tested and the pressure measurement trajectory curve on a preset coordinate axis to obtain the distance value between each coordinate point on the standard trajectory curve and the pressure measurement trajectory curve;

Calculating the average distance between the standard trajectory curve and the pressure test trajectory curve based on the distance values of the respective coordinate points, and using the average distance as the pressure test response level of the interface to be tested;

The pressure test report is generated according to the pressure test response level of each interface to be tested.
The terminal device according to any one of claims 11 to 13, wherein the control object is controlled to run the stress test script to collect tests output by each of the interfaces to be tested based on the stress test script After the data, the processor also implements the following steps when executing the computer-readable instructions:

If the test data sent by the interface to be tested is not received within a preset waiting time threshold, the pressure test running time of the interface to be tested is determined according to the current time and the start time corresponding to running the test script ;

Adjusting the pressure test parameters of the interface to be tested based on the pressure test running time;

Add the adjusted stress test parameters to the stress test script, return to execute the sending the stress test script to the test object, and control the test object to run the stress test script to collect all The test interface is based on test data output by the stress test script.
The terminal device according to any one of claims 11 to 13, wherein the importing the test data into a data analysis template associated with the test object to generate a stress test report on the test object includes:

Comparing the test data with the standard parameter range of each of the interfaces to be tested in the data analysis template;

If the test data exceeds the standard parameter range of any of the interfaces to be tested, the interface to be tested is identified as an abnormal interface, and interface abnormal information about the abnormal interface is output.
A computer non-volatile readable storage medium, the computer non-volatile readable storage medium stores computer readable instructions, characterized in that, when the computer readable instructions are executed by a processor, the following steps are implemented:

Obtain the interface information of the test object; the interface information records the rated operating parameters of each interface to be tested in the test object;

Importing each of the rated operating parameters into a pressure test parameter conversion model, calculating pressure test parameters of each interface to be tested, and generating a pressure test script of the test object based on the pressure test parameters;

Sending the stress test script to the test object, and controlling the test object to run the stress test script, and collecting test data output by each of the interfaces to be tested based on the stress test script;

Import the test data into the data analysis template associated with the test object to generate a stress test report on the test object.
The computer non-volatile readable storage medium according to claim 16, wherein each of the rated operating parameters is introduced into a pressure test parameter conversion model to calculate the pressure test parameters of each interface to be tested, include:

Obtain the memory capacity and cache capacity of the test object, and extract the average text capacity and the number of rated threads from the rated operating parameters;

Import the average text volume into a first pressure parameter conversion model to calculate the first pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; the first pressure parameter conversion conversion model is specifically:

DocVol is the first pressure parameter; Scale is the pressure measurement ratio; DocVol 0 is the average text capacity;

Import the number of rated threads into a second pressure parameter conversion model to calculate the second pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; the second pressure parameter conversion conversion model is specifically:

Where ThreadNum is the second pressure parameter; ThreadNum 0 is the number of rated threads;

Import the first pressure parameter, the second pressure parameter, the memory capacity and the buffer capacity into a third pressure parameter conversion model, and calculate the third pressure parameter of the interface to be tested; the third pressure parameter The conversion model is:

Wherein, RunTime is the third pressure parameter; RAM is the memory capacity; Cache is the cache capacity;

A pressure test parameter of the interface to be tested is generated based on the first pressure parameter, the second pressure parameter, and the third pressure parameter.
The computer non-volatile readable storage medium according to claim 16, wherein the importing the test data into a data analysis template associated with the test object generates a stress test report on the test object, include:

Generating a pressure test trajectory curve about the interface to be tested according to the test data;

Drawing a standard trajectory curve of the interface to be tested and the pressure measurement trajectory curve on a preset coordinate axis to obtain the distance value between each coordinate point on the standard trajectory curve and the pressure measurement trajectory curve;

Calculating the average distance between the standard trajectory curve and the pressure test trajectory curve based on the distance values of the respective coordinate points, and using the average distance as the pressure test response level of the interface to be tested;

The pressure test report is generated according to the pressure test response level of each interface to be tested.
The computer non-volatile readable storage medium according to any one of claims 16 to 18, characterized in that, when the control object is controlled to run the stress test script, each of the interfaces to be tested is collected based on After the test data output by the stress test script, the processor also implements the following steps when executing the computer-readable instructions:

If the test data sent by the interface to be tested is not received within a preset waiting time threshold, the pressure test running time of the interface to be tested is determined according to the current time and the start time corresponding to running the test script ;

Adjusting the pressure test parameters of the interface to be tested based on the pressure test running time;

Add the adjusted stress test parameters to the stress test script, return to execute the sending the stress test script to the test object, and control the test object to run the stress test script to collect all The test interface is based on test data output by the stress test script.
The computer non-volatile storage medium according to any one of claims 16 to 18, wherein the importing the test data into a data analysis template associated with the test object generates information about the test object The stress test report includes:

Comparing the test data with the standard parameter range of each of the interfaces to be tested in the data analysis template;

If the test data exceeds the standard parameter range of any of the interfaces to be tested, the interface to be tested is identified as an abnormal interface, and interface abnormal information about the abnormal interface is output.