WO2020075195A1 - Système et procédé de production d'une poutre composite en béton précontraint faisant appel à une barre en polymère renforcé par des fibres - Google Patents

Système et procédé de production d'une poutre composite en béton précontraint faisant appel à une barre en polymère renforcé par des fibres Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2020075195A1
WO2020075195A1 PCT/IN2019/050753 IN2019050753W WO2020075195A1 WO 2020075195 A1 WO2020075195 A1 WO 2020075195A1 IN 2019050753 W IN2019050753 W IN 2019050753W WO 2020075195 A1 WO2020075195 A1 WO 2020075195A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
concrete
bfrp
steel
bar
spandrel
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IN2019/050753
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Arghadeep LASKAR
Prashant MOTWANI
Nissar KHAN
Original Assignee
Indian Institute Of Technology Bombay
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Indian Institute Of Technology Bombay filed Critical Indian Institute Of Technology Bombay
Publication of WO2020075195A1 publication Critical patent/WO2020075195A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04C—STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS; BUILDING MATERIALS
    • E04C5/00—Reinforcing elements, e.g. for concrete; Auxiliary elements therefor
    • E04C5/07—Reinforcing elements of material other than metal, e.g. of glass, of plastics, or not exclusively made of metal
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B28—WORKING CEMENT, CLAY, OR STONE
    • B28B—SHAPING CLAY OR OTHER CERAMIC COMPOSITIONS; SHAPING SLAG; SHAPING MIXTURES CONTAINING CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL, e.g. PLASTER
    • B28B23/00—Arrangements specially adapted for the production of shaped articles with elements wholly or partly embedded in the moulding material; Production of reinforced objects
    • B28B23/02—Arrangements specially adapted for the production of shaped articles with elements wholly or partly embedded in the moulding material; Production of reinforced objects wherein the elements are reinforcing members
    • B28B23/04—Arrangements specially adapted for the production of shaped articles with elements wholly or partly embedded in the moulding material; Production of reinforced objects wherein the elements are reinforcing members the elements being stressed
    • B28B23/043—Wire anchoring or tensioning means for the reinforcements
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B28—WORKING CEMENT, CLAY, OR STONE
    • B28B—SHAPING CLAY OR OTHER CERAMIC COMPOSITIONS; SHAPING SLAG; SHAPING MIXTURES CONTAINING CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL, e.g. PLASTER
    • B28B23/00—Arrangements specially adapted for the production of shaped articles with elements wholly or partly embedded in the moulding material; Production of reinforced objects
    • B28B23/02—Arrangements specially adapted for the production of shaped articles with elements wholly or partly embedded in the moulding material; Production of reinforced objects wherein the elements are reinforcing members
    • B28B23/04—Arrangements specially adapted for the production of shaped articles with elements wholly or partly embedded in the moulding material; Production of reinforced objects wherein the elements are reinforcing members the elements being stressed
    • B28B23/06—Arrangements specially adapted for the production of shaped articles with elements wholly or partly embedded in the moulding material; Production of reinforced objects wherein the elements are reinforcing members the elements being stressed for the production of elongated articles
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04C—STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS; BUILDING MATERIALS
    • E04C3/00—Structural elongated elements designed for load-supporting
    • E04C3/02—Joists; Girders, trusses, or trusslike structures, e.g. prefabricated; Lintels; Transoms; Braces
    • E04C3/20—Joists; Girders, trusses, or trusslike structures, e.g. prefabricated; Lintels; Transoms; Braces of concrete or other stone-like material, e.g. with reinforcements or tensioning members
    • E04C3/26—Joists; Girders, trusses, or trusslike structures, e.g. prefabricated; Lintels; Transoms; Braces of concrete or other stone-like material, e.g. with reinforcements or tensioning members prestressed
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04C—STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS; BUILDING MATERIALS
    • E04C5/00—Reinforcing elements, e.g. for concrete; Auxiliary elements therefor
    • E04C5/08—Members specially adapted to be used in prestressed constructions
    • E04C5/085—Tensile members made of fiber reinforced plastics

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a novel beam construction for structural works, and particularly to a system for constructing prestressed concrete beams using Basalt Fibre Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) bar.
  • BFRP Basalt Fibre Reinforced Polymer
  • Prestressed concrete is increasingly used for the construction of large scale infrastructure projects required for the development of the society.
  • PSC can be classified as pre-tensioned or post-tensioned based on the methodology adopted to prestress the concrete members.
  • post-tensioning the strands are stretched after concrete has gained sufficient strength with the usage of portable hydraulic jacks.
  • the strands are stretched before the casting of the concrete and released after the concrete has gained enough strength.
  • Pre-tensioning eliminates the usage of additional transfer equipment’s and pre-tensioning is more efficient and economical than post-tensioning.
  • the pre-tensioning process consists of tensioning the high-tensile steel tendons (either single wire or seven-wire strands) in the prestressing bed before the casting of concrete elements.
  • the tensile forces in the strands are transferred as equivalent compression to the concrete elements, upon release of strands after hardening of concrete.
  • This known prior art of transferring prestress using end abutments is known as Long-Line method or Hoyer’s method.
  • a PSC beam is widely used in civil engineering applications.
  • a bridge of short and medium spans is commonly constructed with a PSC beam
  • long-span bridges which are constructed with steel-reinforced concrete can be constructed with the PSC beam
  • PSC is typically used in beams and slabs.
  • the Long-Line or the Hoyer’s method is typically used to cast, and pre-tension PSC beams have several limitations. Firstly, a large span is required to caste several beams at the same time. Such large span requirement leads to the Hoyer’s method feasible only for mass production and makes it uneconomical for small scale projects. Secondly, due to the requirement of the end blocks (also known as bulkheads or abutments), the Hoyer’s method is difficult to be replicated at the site. Furthermore, the conventional PSC beam with prestressing steel element has certain limitations, particularly the durability of the PSC beam due to the corrosion of the steel prestressing strand.
  • the conventional construction method of the PSC beam has disadvantages of development of tensile cracks in concrete beam due to the loss in prestressing force caused by corrosion in the steel strand.
  • the concern for durability and prolonged service life of PSC structures is rapidly gaining its importance with the American Concrete Institute (ACI) releasing guidelines in the year 2004 to replace steel strands with composite bars in PSC members.
  • ACI American Concrete Institute
  • Fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composite bars are manufactured from artificial polymer materials such as basalt, glass, aramid and carbon and can be adopted for prestressing of concrete members. Due to their non-metallic and non-corrosive nature, the artificial polymer materials are potential alternatives to reduce the corrosion of prestressing elements in PSC members. However, due to the complex nature of FRP material, its behaviour is categorically different from steel prestressing strands and involves more complicated modes of response.
  • FRP bars have different surface and mechanical characteristics than steel strands, and therefore, the same system utilised for stressing steel strands cannot be utilised for stressing FRP bars.
  • FRP bars have different surface and mechanical characteristics than steel strands, and therefore, the same system utilised for stressing steel strands cannot be utilised for stressing FRP bars.
  • there exists a disparity and incompleteness of a generic methodology to fabricate PSC beams with FRP bars that stem from the lack of one unifying system for casting and prestressing PSC beams with FRP as the prestressing element. Therefore, even after the successful demonstration of FRP in a few field applications, the knowledge of FRP bars as a prestressing element is very primitive and its application in PSC members remains in a developmental stage.
  • BFRP bar is a newly developed composite bar manufactured using organic basalt continuous fibre roving’s and has high resistance to UV exposure, low thermal and electrical conductivity and high resistance to chemical attack.
  • BFRP has a great potential as a composite material in areas having an abundant supply of basalt rocks.
  • ACI report proposes guidelines for prestressing concrete structures using composite bars.
  • the present invention aims to fabricate prestressed concrete (PSC) members pre-tensioned using BFRP bars.
  • the primary object of the present disclosure is to provide a system for constructing pre-tensioned prestressed concrete beams using BFRP bars as a prestressing element in concrete.
  • Another object of the present disclosure is to provide a method or procedure for constructing and pre-tensioning concrete beams with BFRP bars, using the system disclosed.
  • One aspect of the present disclosure is a system for manufacturing composite pre-tensioned concrete (PSC) beams using a Basalt Fibre Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) bar.
  • PSC composite pre-tensioned concrete
  • BFRP Basalt Fibre Reinforced Polymer
  • the system comprises a T-Frame having two Indian standards medium weight beams (ISMB) of overall depth 450 mm (5 and 12), a spandrel beam (13) with a built-up section comprising of two rolled steel sections of ISMB with overall depth of 150 mm and top and bottom plates of 8 mm thickness, two steel formworks (6) placed beside the T-frame to cast concrete beams, two BFRP bars of length 5 metres each (1) placed inside each of the two steel formworks (6) and locked at both ends using wedge anchors (2 and 9), and a hydraulic jack (3) to stretch and release BFRP bars and transfer prestress force to the concrete beams.
  • ISMB Indian standards medium weight beams
  • two steel formworks (6) placed beside the T-frame to cast concrete beams
  • two BFRP bars of length 5 metres each (1) placed inside each of the two steel formworks
  • Another aspect of the present disclosure is a method for constructing two small scale composite prestressed concrete members each with a single concentric BFRP bar.
  • the method comprises the steps of providing a T-frame having a back supporting beam (12) and a mid- supporting beam (5) connected to each other, providing a spandrel beam (13) with a built-up section comprising of two rolled steel sections of ISMB- 150 and two steel plates, providing two steel formworks (6) placed beside the T-frame to cast the concrete beams.
  • the method further comprises the steps of positioning at least one BFRP bar placed inside each of the two steel formworks followed by simultaneous pre-tensioning of the BFRP bars, pouring of concrete in the formworks to cast the concrete beams and curing the concrete in the two steel formworks and releasing the prestress in the BFRP bar of each concrete beam to transfer the prestress to concrete beams.
  • Figure 1 illustrates a principle mechanism utilised to design the system.
  • Figures 2a - 2d show the top-view, side-elevation, front-elevation and back-elevation of the system fabricated in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • Figures 3a and 3b show the assembly and meshing of the finite element model for the finite element analysis, respectively.
  • Figure 4a shows the locations of the displacement applied on the finite element model of the frame.
  • Figure 4b shows the boundary conditions applied on the plane of symmetry of the finite element model.
  • Figure 5 shows the deformation contours of the back supporting beam and spandrel beam of the system based on the finite element analysis.
  • Figure 6a shows the schematic layout of the instrumentation for the pilot study.
  • Figures 6b and 6c shows the location and nomenclature for the strain gauges installed on the BFRP bars for the pilot study.
  • Figure 7 shows a Table 1 reporting the load, strain and slip history from the test data recorded during the manufacture of two PSC beams fabricated using the system disclosed.
  • a system and a method for constructing prestressed concrete (PSC) beams using Basalt Fibre Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) bars as a prestressing element in concrete are disclosed.
  • the system is capable of constructing and prestressing the PSC beam with a single concentric BFRP bar without the need of end blocks.
  • the present system aims to enhance the potential use of the newly developed BFRP bars as a prestressing element to exploit its excellent longitudinal tensile strength for prestressing applications.
  • the system disclosed is designed as a self-equilibrating steel frame, and the forces acting on each part of the framework is balanced by formulating a box-shaped configuration. Referring to Figure 1, illustrated is a principle mechanism utilised to design the system.
  • a force equilibrium is ensured by balancing the forces Fl applied by the hydraulic jack and the resisting force F2 offered by the wedge anchors.
  • the second condition necessary to achieve equilibrium is that the net external torque on the system must be equal to zero.
  • the second condition is achieved by maintaining the same height of the centre of gravity for each part of the system and thereby ensuring that the torque is balanced between the forces Fl and F2.
  • Figures 2a - 2d shows the top-view, side- elevation, front-elevation and back-elevation of the system, respectively.
  • the prestress is transferred after the concrete has gained strength more than 70% of the peak characteristic compressive strength.
  • the release of prestressing force in the bars is facilitated by releasing the locking arrangement in the spandrel beam followed by the unlocking of the locknut on the ram of the hydraulic jack.
  • the system comprises a back supporting beam (12), and a mid supporting beam (5) fabricated using ISMB-450 rolled sections and connected in a T-shape and forming a T-frame ( Figure 2a), a spandrel beam (13) comprising a built-up section is fabricated using ISMB-150 rolled sections and 8 mm thick rectangular steel plates.
  • Two adjustable mechanisms are provided in the system.
  • the spandrel beam (13) is supported on the first adjustable mechanism having four adjustable bolts (15).
  • the first adjustable mechanism comprises two bolts in the front of the spandrel beam (13) and two bolts at the back of the spandrel beam (13).
  • the first adjustable mechanism is installed to adjust the height of the spandrel beam with respect to the back supporting beam (12) ( Figure 2b).
  • a plurality of rubber rollers with a locking arrangement (16) are provided at the bottom of the adjustable bolts of the spandrel beam (13) ( Figure 2b) to reduce the contact friction and to allow the free movement of the spandrel beam during the pre-tensioning operation.
  • the system further comprises two steel formworks (6) fabricated and placed beside the T-frame to cast the concrete beams.
  • Both the formworks are attached with a second adjustable mechanism (7) to align/adjust the height of the formwork with reference to the back supporting beam (12) and the spandrel beam (13).
  • the second adjustable mechanism (7) comprises four adjustable bolts, two bolts in the front end of each formwork and two bolts at the back end of each formwork.
  • the system further comprises at least one Basalt Fibre Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) bar (1) placed inside each of the two steel formworks (6) and a hydraulic jack (3) placed between the spandrel beam (13) and mid supporting beam (5).
  • the hydraulic jack (3) has a piston which is operated using a manually operated hydraulic pump.
  • a plurality of vertical stiffener angles (or angle sections) (4 and 8) are added to the mid- supporting beam (5), and a plurality of additional stiffener plates (10 and 14) are added to the back supporting beam (12) and spandrel beam (13) to avoid any damage to the system during the tensioning operation.
  • BFRP bars (1) are placed inside each of the two steel formworks (6).
  • the bars are passed through a plurality of holes of diameter 15 mm, drilled in the back supporting beam (12), and the spandrel beam (13) and the BFRP bars (1) are locked at the two ends using mechanical wedge anchors (2 and 9), as shown in Figure 2a and Figure 2b.
  • the anchors grip the BFRP bars and prevent their slippage during the tensioning operation.
  • the BFRP bars in each of the two steel formworks (6) are pre tensioned simultaneously using the hydraulic jack (3) by displacing the spandrel beam (13) by a pre-determined magnitude of 29.65 mm.
  • the linear potentiometers (LP3 and LP4) are monitored to ensure that the system has maintained equilibrium and both BFRP bars are stretched equally.
  • the rubber rollers (16) facilitate the frictionless movement in the displacement of the spandrel beam during pre-tensioning.
  • the allowable maximum initial prestress limit for carbon and aramid FRP bars reported in Section 3.7 of ACI 440.4R report, is 65% and 50% of the peak rupture strength of the FRP bar, respectively. Since no such guidelines are reported for BFRP bars, the maximum initial prestress is selected to be same as AFRP (50% of the peak rupture strength). This is because the Young’s modulus and the peak rupture strain for BFRP bars are similar to AFRP bars.
  • the hydraulic jack is released after the concrete has gained strength approximately greater than 70% of its peak characteristic compressive strength. Since the stretched BFRP bars are in its elastic state, the bars tend to regain its original cross-section which is prevented by the effective bond between the bars and concrete resulting in the transfer of prestress from the BFRP bars to concrete beams.
  • FIG. 3 shows the three-dimensional finite element model and the mesh assembly for the system.
  • the geometry and boundary conditions defined to simulate the half- scale FE model of the fabricated system is shown in Figure 4 (4a - 4b).
  • Figure 5 shows the deformation contours of the back supporting beam (12) and the spandrel beam (13) of the system obtained through the FE analysis.
  • the dimensions of the two concrete beams manufactured and prestressed were 3-meter-long, 0.1 -metre-wide and 0.2-meter-deep.
  • the required initial prestress is achieved by the application of 30 kN force on the spandrel beam using a hydraulic jack.
  • the 30 kN force generates an average displacement of 29.64 mm of the spandrel beam as measured by linear potentiometers (LP3 and LP4).
  • Figure 6a-6c The loads, strain levels and anchor slippage of the two prestressing bars was accurately measured at the locations as shown in Figures 6a-6c.
  • Figure 6a shows the schematic layout of the instrumentation for the pilot study, more precisely, the location of the linear potentiometers and load cells.
  • Figures 6b and 6c show the location and nomenclature for the strain gauges installed on the BFRP bar for the pilot study. All dimensions in Figure 6b and Figure 6c are in mm. The data was acquired continuously during the entire procedure at an acquisition rate of 1 Hz with the help of HBM data logger MGCplus.
  • Equation 1 The slippage of the prestressing elements at the anchorages is considered, and the axial load on the BFRP bar is modified using Equation 1, where, F is the modified load, F pu is the load including slips, A is the cross- sectional area of the BFRP bar; D is the slippage of the bar from the anchors at the dead-end location, L is the original distance between the two anchors and E pu is the Young’s modulus of the BFRP bar. Equation 1
  • Figures 7a - 7f show the load-history, slip-history, strain-history and the respective bar charts from the test data recorded during the manufacture of two PSC beams fabricated using the system.
  • Figure 7a shows the load-history obtained from the load cells LC1, LC2 and LC3.
  • Figure 8 shows a Table 1 reporting the load, strain and slip history from the test data recorded during the manufacture of two PSC beams fabricated using the system. The variation shows that there is a steep reduction in the magnitude of load between 100 hours and 200 hours. This variation is anticipated due to the increase in the slippage of the BFRP bar, as shown by LP2 (see Table 1 and Figure 7b), which starts at approximately 100 hours.
  • the system is capable of constructing two identical concrete beams simultaneously prestressed using a single concentric BFRP bar each, without the need of end blocks or buttresses. No specialised equipment’s are required for the application of the controlled tensioning and de-tensioning process other than the normal equipment’s typically utilised by the manufacturing plants.
  • the system is a self-restraining-rig and the system is fabricated using rudimentary materials and equipment that are easily available, and the framework can be replicated in laboratories and factories. The framework can be used multiple times for repeated prestressing operations of concrete members.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing Of Tubular Articles Or Embedded Moulded Articles (AREA)
  • Rod-Shaped Construction Members (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un système et un procédé de fabrication de poutres en béton précontraint (PSC) composites faisant appel à des barres en polymère renforcé par des fibres de basalte (BFRP) en tant qu'élément de précontrainte dans du béton. Le procédé comprend les étapes consistant à : utiliser un cadre en T comportant une poutre de support arrière (12) et une poutre de support intermédiaire (5) reliées l'une à l'autre, utiliser une poutre de tympan (13) avec une section intégrée comprenant deux sections en acier laminé à chaud de ISMB-150 et deux plaques en acier, utiliser deux coffrages en acier (6) placés à côté du cadre en T pour couler les poutres en béton ; positionner au moins une barre BFRP (1) placée à l'intérieur de chacun des deux coffrages en acier (6), effectuer une précontrainte simultanée des barres BFRP (1), verser du béton dans les deux coffrages en acier (6) pour couler des poutres en béton et durcir le béton dans les deux coffrages en acier et libérer la précontrainte dans les barres BFRP pour transférer la précontrainte aux poutres en béton.
PCT/IN2019/050753 2018-10-10 2019-10-10 Système et procédé de production d'une poutre composite en béton précontraint faisant appel à une barre en polymère renforcé par des fibres WO2020075195A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IN201821038501 2018-10-10
IN201821038501 2018-10-10

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2020075195A1 true WO2020075195A1 (fr) 2020-04-16

Family

ID=70164237

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IN2019/050753 WO2020075195A1 (fr) 2018-10-10 2019-10-10 Système et procédé de production d'une poutre composite en béton précontraint faisant appel à une barre en polymère renforcé par des fibres

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2020075195A1 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112832512A (zh) * 2021-01-07 2021-05-25 中铁三局集团建筑安装工程有限公司 大跨度缓粘结预应力钢筋混凝土梁及施工方法
CN113459274A (zh) * 2021-07-16 2021-10-01 湖南大学 一种纤维编织网增强混凝土复合板材的制作方法
CN115012581A (zh) * 2022-06-08 2022-09-06 商丘师范学院 一种纤维增强复合材料筋混凝土梁构件及其制备方法

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3233027A (en) * 1961-12-20 1966-02-01 Wennstrom Elof Method of making prestressed concrete beams
US5342568A (en) * 1992-05-21 1994-08-30 Oriental Construction Company Method for prestressing concrete
US6773650B1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2004-08-10 Power Poles, Inc. Prestressed concrete casting apparatus and method
US20110194897A1 (en) * 2010-02-09 2011-08-11 Clark James R Apparatus And Method For On Site Pouring Of Pre-Stressed Concrete Structures
US20130239503A1 (en) * 2010-10-21 2013-09-19 Reforcetech Ltd. Reinforcement bar and method for manufacturing same

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3233027A (en) * 1961-12-20 1966-02-01 Wennstrom Elof Method of making prestressed concrete beams
US5342568A (en) * 1992-05-21 1994-08-30 Oriental Construction Company Method for prestressing concrete
US6773650B1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2004-08-10 Power Poles, Inc. Prestressed concrete casting apparatus and method
US20110194897A1 (en) * 2010-02-09 2011-08-11 Clark James R Apparatus And Method For On Site Pouring Of Pre-Stressed Concrete Structures
US20130239503A1 (en) * 2010-10-21 2013-09-19 Reforcetech Ltd. Reinforcement bar and method for manufacturing same

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112832512A (zh) * 2021-01-07 2021-05-25 中铁三局集团建筑安装工程有限公司 大跨度缓粘结预应力钢筋混凝土梁及施工方法
CN112832512B (zh) * 2021-01-07 2022-05-27 中铁三局集团建筑安装工程有限公司 大跨度缓粘结预应力钢筋混凝土梁及施工方法
CN113459274A (zh) * 2021-07-16 2021-10-01 湖南大学 一种纤维编织网增强混凝土复合板材的制作方法
CN113459274B (zh) * 2021-07-16 2022-10-11 湖南大学 一种纤维编织网增强混凝土复合板材的制作方法
CN115012581A (zh) * 2022-06-08 2022-09-06 商丘师范学院 一种纤维增强复合材料筋混凝土梁构件及其制备方法

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Dan et al. Theoretical and experimental study on composite steel–concrete shear walls with vertical steel encased profiles
Lee et al. Flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams with pre-stressed near surface mounted CFRP systems
Ismail et al. Quasi-static in-plane testing of FRCM strengthened non-ductile reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills
He et al. Experimental investigation of movable hybrid GFRP and concrete bridge deck
Dan et al. Nonlinear behavior of composite shear walls with vertical steel encased profiles
Zhang et al. Behaviour of one-way concrete slabs reinforced with CFRP grid reinforcements
Abbas et al. Experimental studies on corrugated steel-concrete composite slab
WO2020075195A1 (fr) Système et procédé de production d'une poutre composite en béton précontraint faisant appel à une barre en polymère renforcé par des fibres
Li et al. Experimental and numerical study of hollow core slabs strengthened with mounted steel bars and prestressed steel wire ropes
Gai et al. Experimental investigation into a ductile FRP stay-in-place formwork system for concrete slabs
El-Gendy et al. Effect of flexural reinforcement type and ratio on the punching behavior of RC slab-column edge connections subjected to reversed-cyclic lateral loads
Liu et al. Flexural behavior of prestressed concrete composite slab with precast inverted T-shaped ribbed panels
Yao et al. Mechanical behavior of an innovative steel–concrete joint for long-span railway hybrid box girder cable-stayed bridges
Colajanni et al. Stress transfer and failure mechanisms in steel-concrete trussed beams: Experimental investigation on slab-thick and full-thick beams
Ngo et al. Proposed new dry and hybrid concrete joints with GFRP bolts and GFRP reinforcement under cyclic loading: Testing and analysis
Jawdhari Behavior of RC beams strengthened in flexure with spliced CFRP rod panels
Branco et al. Cyclic behavior of composite timber-masonry wall in quasi-dynamic conditions reinforced with superelastic damper
Lan et al. Seismic performance of steel-concrete composite structural walls with prestressed internal bracing
Ellobody et al. Behaviour of unbonded post-tensioned one-way concrete slabs
Vázquez-Herrero et al. Comparative study of the flexural behavior of lightweight and normal weight prestressed concrete beams
Roschke et al. Overload and ultimate load behavior of posttensioned slab bridge
Li et al. A comparative study of self-centering precast concrete walls with replaceable buckling-restrained yielding plates or friction dissipation components
Li et al. Rate-dependent bond performance of plain bars in concrete under biaxial transverse tensions
Motwani et al. Finite Element Analysis and Design of Test Setup for Determination of Transfer Length in BFRP Prestressed Concrete Beams
Vaghani et al. Performance of RC beam column connections subjected to cyclic loading

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 19870723

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 19870723

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1