WO2020056853A1 - 一种具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法 - Google Patents
一种具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法 Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2020056853A1 WO2020056853A1 PCT/CN2018/112949 CN2018112949W WO2020056853A1 WO 2020056853 A1 WO2020056853 A1 WO 2020056853A1 CN 2018112949 W CN2018112949 W CN 2018112949W WO 2020056853 A1 WO2020056853 A1 WO 2020056853A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- persons
- crime
- age
- imprisoned
- prison
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/903—Querying
- G06F16/9035—Filtering based on additional data, e.g. user or group profiles
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/903—Querying
- G06F16/90335—Query processing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/903—Querying
- G06F16/9038—Presentation of query results
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W4/00—Services specially adapted for wireless communication networks; Facilities therefor
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W4/00—Services specially adapted for wireless communication networks; Facilities therefor
- H04W4/02—Services making use of location information
Definitions
- the present application relates to the technical field of monitoring and control methods, and in particular, to a prison monitoring intelligent control method with a comparative analysis function.
- this application proposes an intelligent monitoring and control method for prison monitoring with a comparative analysis function.
- the intelligent monitoring and control method for prison monitoring with comparative analysis function proposed in this application includes the following steps:
- a preset duration is stored in step S2;
- step S2 counting the total meeting time accumulated by any two detained persons in the prison within a preset time period includes:
- the meeting duration of the effective meeting is marked as a calculation item of the total meeting time of the two detained persons.
- the first total duration C 1 , the second total duration C 2 , and the third total duration C 3 are stored in step S2;
- step S2 determining the abnormality levels of the two imprisoned persons based on the total duration of the meeting specifically includes:
- step S3 specifically includes:
- a preset age difference is stored in step S4;
- Step S4 specifically includes:
- Formulate a third warning strategy when the actual age difference between the two imprisoned persons is greater than a preset age difference and the first crime type is different from the second crime type;
- the first warning strategy is to mark the information that the two imprisoned persons have met for a long time and have a large age gap;
- the second warning strategy is to mark the information that the two imprisoned persons have met for a long time and have different types of crimes;
- the third early warning strategy is to mark the information that the two imprisoned persons have met for a long time, have a large age gap, and have different types of crime.
- step S4 further includes:
- the intelligent control module formulates the first warning strategy, the first warning means is selected;
- the intelligent control module formulates the second warning strategy, the second warning means is selected;
- the third warning means is selected
- the first early warning means is: the frequency of feedback information to the supervisory authority remains P 1 ;
- the second early warning means is: the frequency of feedback information to the supervisory authority remains at P 2 ;
- the third early warning means is: the frequency of feedback information to the supervisory authority remains at P 3 ;
- P 1 , P 2 , and P 3 are all preset values, P 1 ⁇ P 3 , and P 2 ⁇ P 3 .
- step S1 in the identifier-age-type model, one of a prisoner identifier, an age, and a crime type corresponds to each other.
- step S1 when an imprisoned person has at least two types of crimes, the most recent type of crime is selected as the type of crime corresponding to the incarceration identifier of the imprisoned person.
- the intelligent monitoring and control method for prison monitoring with comparative analysis function proposed in this application first establishes the correspondence between the age, crime type and identity of each prisoner in the prison to facilitate the analysis of the age of each prisoner in the subsequent process And whether the type of crime has affected its own abnormal situation, providing a direct and effective reference basis for the analysis process; and then determining the total length of the meeting by analysing the total length of meetings between any two prisoners in a preset period of time.
- the anomaly levels of the two imprisoned persons are described, and a qualitative analysis can be performed on the potential dangers of the two imprisoned persons in a hierarchical manner, which is conducive to improving the precision of the analysis.
- the supervision department enables the supervision department to know the actual situation of the two detainees in real time, which helps the supervision department to analyze the potential danger between the two, on the other hand, it provides a direct and effective way for the supervision department to supervise the detainees in the prison. Analyze the data, improve the management efficiency of the supervision department, and optimize the environment in the prison.
- This application pre-judges the behavior of the two detainees by analyzing the relationship between the total meeting time, age, and type of crime of any two detainees in the prison, which effectively prevents the detainees from The occurrence of anomalous situations, such as mutual communication, comprehensively and effectively guarantees security in prisons.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic flowchart of an intelligent monitoring and control method for prison monitoring with a comparative analysis function.
- FIG. 1 is an intelligent monitoring and control method for prison monitoring with a comparative analysis function proposed by the present application.
- the intelligent monitoring and control method for prison monitoring provided by the present application with a comparative analysis function includes the following steps:
- one of a prisoner's mark, an age, and a crime type corresponds to each other.
- the most recent type of crime is selected as the type of crime corresponding to the incarceration mark of the imprisoned person.
- a preset duration is stored in step S2;
- step S2 counting the total meeting time accumulated by any two detained persons in the prison within a preset time period includes:
- the meeting duration of the effective meeting is marked as a calculation item of the total meeting time of the two detained persons.
- Step S2 stores a first total duration C 1 , a second total duration C 2 , and a third total duration C 3 ;
- step S2 determining the abnormality levels of the two imprisoned persons based on the total duration of the meeting specifically includes:
- step S3 specifically includes:
- a preset age difference is stored in step S4;
- Step S4 specifically includes:
- the first warning strategy is to mark the information that the two detained persons have met for a long time and have a large age gap;
- the second warning strategy is to mark the information that the two imprisoned persons have met for a long time and have different types of crimes;
- the third warning strategy is : Mark the information that the two imprisoned persons have met for a long time, have a large age gap, and have different types of crimes; it is convenient for the supervision department to know the abnormal situation existing between the two imprisoned persons in time, and take measures based on their actual status. Measures to prevent the further spread or deterioration of abnormal conditions and ensure the security of the environment in the prison.
- step S4 further includes:
- the intelligent control module formulates the first warning strategy, the first warning means is selected;
- the intelligent control module formulates the second warning strategy, the second warning means is selected;
- the third warning means is selected
- the first early warning means is: the frequency of feedback information to the supervisory authority remains P 1 ;
- the second early warning means is: the frequency of feedback information to the supervisory authority remains at P 2 ;
- the third early warning means is: the frequency of feedback information to the supervisory authority remains at P 3 ;
- P 1 , P 2 , and P 3 are preset values, P 1 ⁇ P 3 , and P 2 ⁇ P 3 .
- Selecting different information feedback frequencies is conducive to reflecting the urgency of the abnormal situation through the frequency, thereby facilitating the supervision department to take timely targeted treatment measures and plans according to the actual situation and actual needs, and comprehensively guarantee the security in the prison.
- the intelligent monitoring and control method for prison monitoring with comparative analysis function proposed in this embodiment first establishes the correspondence between the age, crime type and identity of each incarcerated person in the prison to facilitate the analysis of each incarcerated person in the subsequent process. Whether age and type of crime have affected their own abnormal situation, provide a direct and effective reference basis for the analysis process; then determine by analyzing the total length of meetings of any two detained persons in the prison within a preset period of time
- the abnormality levels of the two imprisoned persons can be qualitatively analyzed by the method of whether the two imprisoned persons are potentially dangerous, and it is conducive to improving the precision of the analysis; and then based on the different levels of the abnormality Analyze the age and / or crime type of the two imprisoned persons, and select targeted analysis objects to further improve the effectiveness of the analysis process; finally, based on the analysis of the age and / or crime type of the two imprisoned persons As a result, different early warning strategies were developed.
- the supervision department enables the supervision department to know the actual situation of the two detainees in real time, which helps the supervision department to analyze the potential danger between the two, on the other hand, it provides a direct and effective way for the supervision department to supervise the detainees in the prison. Analyze the data, improve the management efficiency of the supervision department, and optimize the environment in the prison.
- This embodiment analyzes the relationship between the total meeting time, age, and type of crime of any two detainees in the prison to prejudge the behavior of the two detainees, which effectively prevents The occurrence of anomalous situations such as interpersonal communication, comprehensively and effectively guarantee the security in prisons.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Alarm Systems (AREA)
Abstract
一种具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法:基于被监禁人员的监禁标识年龄、犯罪类型之间的对应关系建立标识-年龄-类型模型(S1);基于任意两个被监禁人员在预设时间段内累计的会面总时长确定两个被监禁人员的异常等级(S2);基于异常等级在标识-年龄-类型模型内查询两个被监禁人员对应的年龄和/或犯罪类型(S3);基于对两个被监禁人员的年龄和/或犯罪类型的分析结果制定预警策略并反馈(S4)。通过分析监狱内任意两个监禁人员的见面总时长、年龄、犯罪类型之间的关系,来对两个被监禁人员的行为动态进行预判断,有效地防止了被监禁人员之间相互私通等异常情况的发生,全面且有效地保障监狱内的安全。
Description
本申请要求于2018年09月21日提交中国专利局、申请号为201811109325.8、申请名称为一种具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法的中国专利申请的优先权,其全部内容通过引用结合在本申请中。
本申请涉及监控调控方法技术领域,尤其涉及一种具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法。
在监狱中关押着一些高危犯人,他们出现出逃、自残或结党闹事的几率更大,因此,需要对高危犯人进行更严格的管理和全面的监控,了解他们的行为,防止暴力事件的发生,保障监管人员和监狱犯人的人身安全。通常是通过摄像头等监控设备对高危犯人进行监控,但是由于摄像头等监控设备比较有限,不可能监控到每一个犯人或每一个区域,给狱政监管工作带来了一定的难度。且单纯的监控系统只能对被监管人员的活动位置进行检测,而不能对被监管人员的行为动态进行预判断,当存在被监禁人员相互私通等异常情况时,现有的监控系统难以保证监狱内的安全。
发明内容
基于背景技术存在的技术问题,本申请提出了一种具有对比分析功能 的监狱监控智能化调控方法。
本申请提出的具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法,包括以下步骤:
S1、为监狱内每一个被监禁人员分配一个监禁标识,且基于每一个监禁标识与其对应的被监禁人员的年龄、犯罪类型之间的对应关系建立标识-年龄-类型模型并存储;
S2、统计监狱内任意两个被监禁人员在预设时间段内累计的会面总时长,并基于上述会面总时长确定所述两个被监禁人员的异常等级;
S3、基于上述异常等级在标识-年龄-类型模型内查询所述两个被监禁人员对应的年龄和/或犯罪类型;
S4、基于对所述两个被监禁人员的年龄和/或犯罪类型的分析结果制定预警策略,并将上述预警策略及所述两个被监禁人员的监禁标识反馈至监管部门。
优选地,步骤S2内存储有预设持续时间;
步骤S2中,统计监狱内任意两个被监禁人员在预设时间段内累计的会面总时长具体包括:
获取监狱内任意两个被监禁人员的单次见面持续时间;
将所述单次见面持续时间与预设持续时间进行比较,当所述单次见面持续时间大于预设持续时间时,标记此次会面为有效会面;
将上述有效会面的见面持续时间标记为所述两个被监禁人员的会面总时长的计算项。
优选地,步骤S2内存储有第一总时长C
1、第二总时长C
2、第三总时 长C
3;
步骤S2中,基于会面总时长确定所述两个被监禁人员的异常等级具体包括:
获取监狱内任意两个被监禁人员在预设时间段内累计的会面总时长,记为C;
将会面总时长C分别与第一总时长C
1、第二总时长C
2、第三总时长C
3进行比较:
当C>C
1时,确定所述两个被监禁人员为第一异常等级;
当C>C
2时,确定所述两个被监禁人员为第二异常等级;
当C>C
3时,确定所述两个被监禁人员为第三异常等级;
其中,C
1<C
2<C
3。
优选地,步骤S3具体包括:
获取所述两个被监禁人员的异常等级;
当所述两个被监禁人员为第一异常等级时,获取所述两个被监禁人员的年龄;
当所述两个被监禁人员为第二异常等级时,获取所述两个被监禁人员的犯罪类型;
当所述两个被监禁人员为第三异常等级时,获取所述两个被监禁人员年龄、犯罪类型。
优选地,步骤S4内存储有预设年龄差;
步骤S4具体包括:
获取所述两个被监禁人员的年龄和/或犯罪类型;
计算所述两个被监禁人员的实际年龄差,并将所述两个被监禁人员的犯罪类型标记为第一犯罪类型和第二犯罪类型;
分别将所述两个被监禁人员的实际年龄差与预设年龄差、第一犯罪类型与第二犯罪类型进行比较:
当所述两个被监禁人员的实际年龄差大于预设年龄差时,制定第一预警策略;
当第一犯罪类型与第二犯罪类型不同时,制定第二预警策略;
当所述两个被监禁人员的实际年龄差大于预设年龄差、第一犯罪类型与第二犯罪类型不同时,制定第三预警策略;
其中,第一预警策略为:标记所述两个被监禁人员会面累计时间长、年龄差距大的信息;
第二预警策略为:标记所述两个被监禁人员会面累计时间长、犯罪类型不同的信息;
第三预警策略为:标记所述两个被监禁人员会面累计时间长、年龄差距大、犯罪类型不同的信息。
优选地,步骤S4还包括:
基于不同的预警策略选择不同的预警手段;
当智能调控模块制定第一预警策略时,选择第一预警手段;
当智能调控模块制定第二预警策略时,选择第二预警手段;
当智能调控模块制定第三预警策略时,选择第三预警手段;
其中,所述第一预警手段为:向监管部门反馈信息的频率保持为P
1;
所述第二预警手段为:向监管部门反馈信息的频率保持为P
2;
所述第三预警手段为:向监管部门反馈信息的频率保持为P
3;
其中,P
1、P
2、P
3均为预设值,P
1<P
3,P
2<P
3。
优选地,步骤S1中,所述标识-年龄-类型模型中,一个监禁标识、一个年龄、一种犯罪类型三者一一对应。
优选地,步骤S1中,当一个被监禁人员具有至少两种犯罪类型时,选择最近一次的犯罪类型作为与该被监禁人员的监禁标识对应的犯罪类型。
本申请提出的具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法,首先建立监狱内每一个被监禁人员的年龄、犯罪类型与其身份之间的对应关系,方便后续过程中分析每一个被监禁人员的年龄和犯罪类型是否对其自身存在的异常情况造成了影响,为分析过程提供直接有效的参考基础;然后通过分析监狱内任意两个被监禁人员在预设时间段内累计的会面总时长来确定所述两个被监禁人员的异常等级,通过分等级的方式能够对所述两个被监禁人员是否存在潜在危险进行定性分析,且有利于提高分析的精细性;再根据上述异常等级的不同选择对所述两个被监禁人员的年龄和/或犯罪类型进行分析,针对性挑选分析对象有利于进一步提高分析过程的有效性;最后根据对两个被监禁人员的年龄和/或犯罪类型的分析结果制定不同的预警策略。
一方面使监管部门实时了解上述两个被监禁人员的实际状况,有利于帮助监管部门分析两者之间的潜在危险性,另一方面为监管部门对监狱内被监禁人员的监管提供直接且有效的分析数据,提高监管部门的管理效率,优化监狱内的环境。
本申请通过分析监狱内任意两个监禁人员的见面总时长、年龄、犯罪 类型之间的关系,来对所述两个被监禁人员的行为动态进行预判断,有效地防止了被监禁人员之间相互私通等异常情况的发生,全面且有效地保障监狱内的安全。
图1为一种具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法的流程示意图。
如图1所示,图1为本申请提出的一种具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法。
参照图1,本申请提出的具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法,包括以下步骤:
S1、为监狱内每一个被监禁人员分配一个监禁标识,且基于每一个监禁标识与其对应的被监禁人员的年龄、犯罪类型之间的对应关系建立标识-年龄-类型模型并存储;
本实施方式中,所述标识-年龄-类型模型中,一个监禁标识、一个年龄、一种犯罪类型三者一一对应。
进一步的,当一个被监禁人员具有至少两种犯罪类型时,选择最近一次的犯罪类型作为与该被监禁人员的监禁标识对应的犯罪类型。
S2、统计监狱内任意两个被监禁人员在预设时间段内累计的会面总时长,并基于上述会面总时长确定所述两个被监禁人员的异常等级;
本实施方式中,步骤S2内存储有预设持续时间;
步骤S2中,统计监狱内任意两个被监禁人员在预设时间段内累计的会面总时长具体包括:
获取监狱内任意两个被监禁人员的单次见面持续时间;
将所述单次见面持续时间与预设持续时间进行比较,当所述单次见面持续时间大于预设持续时间时,标记此次会面为有效会面;
将上述有效会面的见面持续时间标记为所述两个被监禁人员的会面总时长的计算项。
步骤S2内存储有第一总时长C
1、第二总时长C
2、第三总时长C
3;
步骤S2中,基于会面总时长确定所述两个被监禁人员的异常等级具体包括:
获取监狱内任意两个被监禁人员在预设时间段内累计的会面总时长,记为C;
将会面总时长C分别与第一总时长C
1、第二总时长C
2、第三总时长C
3进行比较:
当C>C
1时,表明所述两个被监禁人员在预设时间段内累计的会面总时长达到了第一等级,此时确定所述两个被监禁人员为第一异常等级;
当C>C
2时,表明所述两个被监禁人员在预设时间段内累计的会面总时长达到了第二等级,此时确定所述两个被监禁人员为第二异常等级;
当C>C
3时,表明所述两个被监禁人员在预设时间段内累计的会面总时长达到了第三等级,此时确定所述两个被监禁人员为第三异常等级;
其中,C
1<C
2<C
3。
S3、基于上述异常等级在标识-年龄-类型模型内查询所述两个被监禁人员对应的年龄和/或犯罪类型;
本实施方式中,步骤S3具体包括:
获取所述两个被监禁人员的异常等级;
当所述两个被监禁人员为第一异常等级时,获取所述两个被监禁人员的年龄;
当所述两个被监禁人员为第二异常等级时,获取所述两个被监禁人员的犯罪类型;
当所述两个被监禁人员为第三异常等级时,获取所述两个被监禁人员年龄、犯罪类型;
根据所述两个被监禁人员的不同异常等级来选择不同的参数作为分析对象,一方面有利于提高分析过程的针对性,两一方面能够保证分析结果的有效性和精度。
S4、基于对所述两个被监禁人员的年龄和/或犯罪类型的分析结果制定预警策略,并将上述预警策略及所述两个被监禁人员的监禁标识反馈至监管部门。
本实施方式中,步骤S4内存储有预设年龄差;
步骤S4具体包括:
获取所述两个被监禁人员的年龄和/或犯罪类型;
计算所述两个被监禁人员的实际年龄差,并将所述两个被监禁人员的犯罪类型标记为第一犯罪类型和第二犯罪类型;
分别将所述两个被监禁人员的实际年龄差与预设年龄差、第一犯罪类 型与第二犯罪类型进行比较:
当所述两个被监禁人员的实际年龄差大于预设年龄差时,表明所述两个被监禁人员的实际年龄相差较大,在此种情况下,两个被监禁人员之间长时间见面相处不正常,为使监管部门及时了解到上述异常情况,则制定第一预警策略;第一预警策略为:标记所述两个被监禁人员会面累计时间长、年龄差距大的信息;
当第一犯罪类型与第二犯罪类型不同时,表明所述两个被监禁人员的犯罪类型不同,在此种情况下,两个被监禁人员之间长时间见面相处不正常,为使监管部门及时了解到上述异常情况,则制定第二预警策略;第二预警策略为:标记所述两个被监禁人员会面累计时间长、犯罪类型不同的信息;
当所述两个被监禁人员的实际年龄差大于预设年龄差、第一犯罪类型与第二犯罪类型不同时,表明所述两个被监禁人员的实际年龄相差较大、所述两个被监禁人员的犯罪类型不同,在此种情况下,两个被监禁人员之间长时间见面相处不正常,为使监管部门及时了解到上述异常情况,则制定第三预警策略;第三预警策略为:标记所述两个被监禁人员会面累计时间长、年龄差距大、犯罪类型不同的信息;方便监管部门及时知晓所述两个被监禁人员之间存在的异常情况,并根据其实际状态采取针对性的应对措施,防止异常情况的进一步扩散或恶化,保证监狱内的环境安全。
在进一步的实施例中,步骤S4还包括:
基于不同的预警策略选择不同的预警手段;
当智能调控模块制定第一预警策略时,选择第一预警手段;
当智能调控模块制定第二预警策略时,选择第二预警手段;
当智能调控模块制定第三预警策略时,选择第三预警手段;
其中,所述第一预警手段为:向监管部门反馈信息的频率保持为P
1;
所述第二预警手段为:向监管部门反馈信息的频率保持为P
2;
所述第三预警手段为:向监管部门反馈信息的频率保持为P
3;
其中,P
1、P
2、P
3均为预设值,P
1<P
3,P
2<P
3。
选择不同的信息反馈频率,有利于通过所述频率反映出异常情况的紧急程度,从而方便监管部门根据实际情况和实际需要及时采取针对性的处理措施和方案,全面保证监狱内的安全性。
本实施方式提出的具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法,首先建立监狱内每一个被监禁人员的年龄、犯罪类型与其身份之间的对应关系,方便后续过程中分析每一个被监禁人员的年龄和犯罪类型是否对其自身存在的异常情况造成了影响,为分析过程提供直接有效的参考基础;然后通过分析监狱内任意两个被监禁人员在预设时间段内累计的会面总时长来确定所述两个被监禁人员的异常等级,通过分等级的方式能够对所述两个被监禁人员是否存在潜在危险进行定性分析,且有利于提高分析的精细性;再根据上述异常等级的不同选择对所述两个被监禁人员的年龄和/或犯罪类型进行分析,针对性挑选分析对象有利于进一步提高分析过程的有效性;最后根据对两个被监禁人员的年龄和/或犯罪类型的分析结果制定不同的预警策略。
一方面使监管部门实时了解上述两个被监禁人员的实际状况,有利于帮助监管部门分析两者之间的潜在危险性,另一方面为监管部门对监狱内 被监禁人员的监管提供直接且有效的分析数据,提高监管部门的管理效率,优化监狱内的环境。
本实施方式通过分析监狱内任意两个监禁人员的见面总时长、年龄、犯罪类型之间的关系,来对所述两个被监禁人员的行为动态进行预判断,有效地防止了被监禁人员之间相互私通等异常情况的发生,全面且有效地保障监狱内的安全。
以上所述,仅为本申请较佳的具体实施方式,但本申请的保护范围并不局限于此,任何熟悉本技术领域的技术人员在本申请揭露的技术范围内,根据本申请的技术方案及其申请构思加以等同替换或改变,都应涵盖在本申请的保护范围之内。
Claims (8)
- 一种具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法,其特征在于,包括以下步骤:S1、为监狱内每一个被监禁人员分配一个监禁标识,且基于每一个监禁标识与其对应的被监禁人员的年龄、犯罪类型之间的对应关系建立标识-年龄-类型模型并存储;S2、统计监狱内任意两个被监禁人员在预设时间段内累计的会面总时长,并基于上述会面总时长确定所述两个被监禁人员的异常等级;S3、基于上述异常等级在标识-年龄-类型模型内查询所述两个被监禁人员对应的年龄和/或犯罪类型;S4、基于对所述两个被监禁人员的年龄和/或犯罪类型的分析结果制定预警策略,并将上述预警策略及所述两个被监禁人员的监禁标识反馈至监管部门。
- 根据权利要求1所述的具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法,其特征在于,步骤S2内存储有预设持续时间;步骤S2中,统计监狱内任意两个被监禁人员在预设时间段内累计的会面总时长具体包括:获取监狱内任意两个被监禁人员的单次见面持续时间;将所述单次见面持续时间与预设持续时间进行比较,当所述单次见面持续时间大于预设持续时间时,标记此次会面为有效会面;将上述有效会面的见面持续时间标记为所述两个被监禁人员的会面总 时长的计算项。
- 根据权利要求1所述的具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法,其特征在于,步骤S2内存储有第一总时长C 1、第二总时长C 2、第三总时长C 3;步骤S2中,基于会面总时长确定所述两个被监禁人员的异常等级具体包括:获取监狱内任意两个被监禁人员在预设时间段内累计的会面总时长,记为C;将会面总时长C分别与第一总时长C 1、第二总时长C 2、第三总时长C 3进行比较:当C>C 1时,确定所述两个被监禁人员为第一异常等级;当C>C 2时,确定所述两个被监禁人员为第二异常等级;当C>C 3时,确定所述两个被监禁人员为第三异常等级;其中,C 1<C 2<C 3。
- 根据权利要求3所述的具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法,其特征在于,步骤S3具体包括:获取所述两个被监禁人员的异常等级;当所述两个被监禁人员为第一异常等级时,获取所述两个被监禁人员的年龄;当所述两个被监禁人员为第二异常等级时,获取所述两个被监禁人员的犯罪类型;当所述两个被监禁人员为第三异常等级时,获取所述两个被监禁人员 年龄、犯罪类型。
- 根据权利要求4所述的具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法,其特征在于,步骤S4内存储有预设年龄差;步骤S4具体包括:获取所述两个被监禁人员的年龄和/或犯罪类型;计算所述两个被监禁人员的实际年龄差,并将所述两个被监禁人员的犯罪类型标记为第一犯罪类型和第二犯罪类型;分别将所述两个被监禁人员的实际年龄差与预设年龄差、第一犯罪类型与第二犯罪类型进行比较:当所述两个被监禁人员的实际年龄差大于预设年龄差时,制定第一预警策略;当第一犯罪类型与第二犯罪类型不同时,制定第二预警策略;当所述两个被监禁人员的实际年龄差大于预设年龄差、第一犯罪类型与第二犯罪类型不同时,制定第三预警策略;其中,第一预警策略为:标记所述两个被监禁人员会面累计时间长、年龄差距大的信息;第二预警策略为:标记所述两个被监禁人员会面累计时间长、犯罪类型不同的信息;第三预警策略为:标记所述两个被监禁人员会面累计时间长、年龄差距大、犯罪类型不同的信息。
- 根据权利要求5所述的具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法,其特征在于,步骤S4还包括:基于不同的预警策略选择不同的预警手段;当智能调控模块制定第一预警策略时,选择第一预警手段;当智能调控模块制定第二预警策略时,选择第二预警手段;当智能调控模块制定第三预警策略时,选择第三预警手段;其中,所述第一预警手段为:向监管部门反馈信息的频率保持为P 1;所述第二预警手段为:向监管部门反馈信息的频率保持为P 2;所述第三预警手段为:向监管部门反馈信息的频率保持为P 3;其中,P 1、P 2、P 3均为预设值,P 1<P 3,P 2<P 3。
- 根据权利要求1所述的具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法,其特征在于,步骤S1中,所述标识-年龄-类型模型中,一个监禁标识、一个年龄、一种犯罪类型三者一一对应。
- 根据权利要求1-7任一项所述的具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法,其特征在于,步骤S1中,当一个被监禁人员具有至少两种犯罪类型时,选择最近一次的犯罪类型作为与该被监禁人员的监禁标识对应的犯罪类型。
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US16/307,484 US20210200808A1 (en) | 2018-09-21 | 2018-10-31 | Prison monitoring intelligent control method with comparative analysis function |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201811109325.8 | 2018-09-21 | ||
CN201811109325 | 2018-09-21 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2020056853A1 true WO2020056853A1 (zh) | 2020-03-26 |
Family
ID=69888174
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2018/112949 WO2020056853A1 (zh) | 2018-09-21 | 2018-10-31 | 一种具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法 |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20210200808A1 (zh) |
WO (1) | WO2020056853A1 (zh) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN113298486A (zh) * | 2021-04-21 | 2021-08-24 | 易事软件(厦门)股份有限公司 | 一种基于大数据的政务监察督查方法及系统 |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11507909B2 (en) * | 2020-05-21 | 2022-11-22 | Talitrix Holdings, LLC | Offender electronic monitoring program compliance assessment and program revision |
WO2023164782A1 (en) * | 2022-03-04 | 2023-09-07 | Spectronix Inc. | Harm prevention monitoring system and method |
CN115188466B (zh) * | 2022-07-08 | 2023-12-12 | 江苏优盾通信实业有限公司 | 一种基于特征分析的受询辅助方法及系统 |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20150262466A1 (en) * | 2014-03-12 | 2015-09-17 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Apparatus and method for supporting safe living |
CN105025260A (zh) * | 2015-07-07 | 2015-11-04 | 合肥指南针电子科技有限责任公司 | 一种监控系统智能追溯方法 |
CN105049795A (zh) * | 2015-07-07 | 2015-11-11 | 合肥指南针电子科技有限责任公司 | 一种基于数据关联存储的监控系统 |
CN106128021A (zh) * | 2016-08-29 | 2016-11-16 | 无锡卓信信息科技股份有限公司 | 一种监狱人员监控系统及方法 |
CN106162526A (zh) * | 2016-06-27 | 2016-11-23 | 合肥指南针电子科技有限责任公司 | 一种监狱用智能跟踪监控方法 |
-
2018
- 2018-10-31 US US16/307,484 patent/US20210200808A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2018-10-31 WO PCT/CN2018/112949 patent/WO2020056853A1/zh active Application Filing
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20150262466A1 (en) * | 2014-03-12 | 2015-09-17 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Apparatus and method for supporting safe living |
CN105025260A (zh) * | 2015-07-07 | 2015-11-04 | 合肥指南针电子科技有限责任公司 | 一种监控系统智能追溯方法 |
CN105049795A (zh) * | 2015-07-07 | 2015-11-11 | 合肥指南针电子科技有限责任公司 | 一种基于数据关联存储的监控系统 |
CN106162526A (zh) * | 2016-06-27 | 2016-11-23 | 合肥指南针电子科技有限责任公司 | 一种监狱用智能跟踪监控方法 |
CN106128021A (zh) * | 2016-08-29 | 2016-11-16 | 无锡卓信信息科技股份有限公司 | 一种监狱人员监控系统及方法 |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN113298486A (zh) * | 2021-04-21 | 2021-08-24 | 易事软件(厦门)股份有限公司 | 一种基于大数据的政务监察督查方法及系统 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20210200808A1 (en) | 2021-07-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2020056853A1 (zh) | 一种具有对比分析功能的监狱监控智能化调控方法 | |
US10380521B2 (en) | Predicting service for intrusion and alarm systems based on signal activity patterns | |
US10187411B2 (en) | Method for intrusion detection in industrial automation and control system | |
EP3139359A1 (en) | System and method providing early prediction and forecasting of false alarms by applying statistical inference models | |
US20170076576A1 (en) | Activity monitoring method and system | |
CA2630308C (en) | Video alarm verification | |
US20210157311A1 (en) | Maintenance plan forecast using automation control devices' usage pattern through big data analytics | |
CN104050787B (zh) | 具有分类属性的异常检测的系统和方法 | |
CN112349015B (zh) | 基于物联网的方舱管控系统及方法 | |
US11875657B2 (en) | Proactive loss prevention system | |
CN114973567B (zh) | 一种基于人脸识别的自动告警方法及终端 | |
CN108769922B (zh) | 一种监所内重点区域的智能化分析调控系统 | |
CN109472966A (zh) | 一种利用互联网信息的安防警报方法及安防系统 | |
CN107609330B (zh) | 基于门禁日志挖掘的内部威胁异常行为分析方法 | |
EP2656322B1 (en) | Intrusion detection | |
KR102335156B1 (ko) | 지능형 안전사고 예방 시스템 및 그 방법 | |
US20070174099A1 (en) | Personnel performance monitoring system and method | |
Vladimirovich et al. | Model of optimization of arrangement of video surveillance means with regard to ensuring their own security | |
US20200168074A1 (en) | Wearable personal or public safety device | |
US9449497B2 (en) | Method and system for detecting alarm system tampering | |
CN106612412A (zh) | 复合式警务督察系统 | |
KR20220083046A (ko) | Erp 시스템의 로그추출에 의한 효과적인 머신러닝 시스템 | |
Yan et al. | Detection of suspicious patterns in secure physical environments | |
US20230047013A1 (en) | System and method for artificial intelligence (ai)-based protocol compliance tracking for workplace applications | |
WO2020056854A1 (zh) | 一种基于监狱人员信息分析的智能化监控调控系统 |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 18933793 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 18933793 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |