WO2020009108A1 - Inspection method, inspection system and program - Google Patents

Inspection method, inspection system and program Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2020009108A1
WO2020009108A1 PCT/JP2019/026288 JP2019026288W WO2020009108A1 WO 2020009108 A1 WO2020009108 A1 WO 2020009108A1 JP 2019026288 W JP2019026288 W JP 2019026288W WO 2020009108 A1 WO2020009108 A1 WO 2020009108A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
inspection
information
part number
data group
level
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2019/026288
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
隆一郎 紺田
Original Assignee
オムロン株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by オムロン株式会社 filed Critical オムロン株式会社
Priority to DE112019003395.6T priority Critical patent/DE112019003395T5/en
Priority to CN201980039712.5A priority patent/CN112272968B/en
Publication of WO2020009108A1 publication Critical patent/WO2020009108A1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H05ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05KPRINTED CIRCUITS; CASINGS OR CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS OF ELECTRIC APPARATUS; MANUFACTURE OF ASSEMBLAGES OF ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS
    • H05K13/00Apparatus or processes specially adapted for manufacturing or adjusting assemblages of electric components
    • H05K13/08Monitoring manufacture of assemblages
    • H05K13/083Quality monitoring using results from monitoring devices, e.g. feedback loops
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H05ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05KPRINTED CIRCUITS; CASINGS OR CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS OF ELECTRIC APPARATUS; MANUFACTURE OF ASSEMBLAGES OF ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS
    • H05K13/00Apparatus or processes specially adapted for manufacturing or adjusting assemblages of electric components
    • H05K13/08Monitoring manufacture of assemblages
    • H05K13/081Integration of optical monitoring devices in assembly lines; Processes using optical monitoring devices specially adapted for controlling devices or machines in assembly lines
    • H05K13/0815Controlling of component placement on the substrate during or after manufacturing

Definitions

  • the present invention belongs to the technical field related to inspection of articles on which components are mounted.
  • Automatic visual inspection equipment is widely used as an equipment for inspecting the mounting state of components on a board.
  • the appearance information of the board on which the component is mounted (including the board before soldering) is acquired by the sensor, and the measurement of items corresponding to the component is performed for each component. Then, by comparing the obtained result with a predetermined inspection standard, a non-defective product / defective product is determined.
  • inspection items and inspection standards are adjusted using verification images of boards and components, and after these adjustments are completed, the aforementioned inspection items and inspection standards are applied to actual production lines. You. However, conventionally, after adjusting the inspection items and inspection standards for all the part numbers arranged on one board, it is developed in a mass production program so that it can be executed in mass production inspection. Therefore, the quality is not constant depending on the part number. Things could also be present, and "too much” or "missing" could occur.
  • JP 2014-183216 A Patent No. 6219579
  • JP 2008-45952 A JP 2006-250610 A JP 2001-24321 A
  • the present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and an object of the present invention is to make it possible to manage the quality of inspection items and / or inspection standards for each component, thereby enabling inspection items and inspections in board inspection and the like.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a technology that enables a standard to be optimized for each part.
  • the present invention employs the following configuration.
  • the inspection method is an inspection method for inspecting the article by an inspection program that determines the quality of the article on which the component is mounted, A setting step in which inspection information including an inspection item and / or inspection standard of the component in the inspection is set for each component; A determination step in which the quality of the article is determined by the inspection program, The inspection information further includes inspection quality level information that is an index of the reliability of the inspection information, In the setting step, the inspection information is set based on a part number data group provided for each part number of the component and updated each time the inspection information is changed,
  • the inspection method is characterized in that, in the determining step, quality is determined for each component based on the inspection information acquired with reference to the part number data group.
  • the inspection item and the inspection standard can be optimized for each part, and the inspection quality can be managed for each part. Further, the inspection information set for each component can be managed based on the quality level set as the inspection quality level information.
  • the inspection quality level information includes a first level indicating a high quality level and a second level indicating a low quality level
  • the inspection quality level information may be set to the second level
  • the inspection quality level information is set to the second level. Quality level can be easily checked.
  • the inspection quality level information may be set to “OK” for the first level, “NG” for the second level, and the like. Then, the user can intuitively recognize the inspection item and the quality level of the inspection standard.
  • the inspection information in the quality data group can be set by a plurality of users, In the setting step, when the inspection quality level information is set to a level other than the first level by a predetermined user, a change of the inspection quality level information to the first level by a user other than the predetermined user is performed. You may make it restricted.
  • the inspection information is settable by a plurality of users and the inspection quality is set to a level other than the first level (for example, “NG”) by a predetermined user, the situation is not known.
  • the inspection quality can be prevented from being changed by another user. By doing so, it is possible to prevent the inspection items and inspection standards with low quality levels from being used for inspection unintentionally.
  • the inspection information may further include reference presence / absence information indicating whether the inspection program refers to the part number data group. Then, based on the reference presence / absence information, the inspection program can determine whether or not to perform inspection by referring to inspection items and inspection standards in the part number data group. Further, by changing the reference presence / absence information, the user can easily manage whether or not to apply the inspection items and inspection criteria in the part number data group to the actual inspection.
  • the reference presence / absence information includes ON information indicating that there is a reference to the part number data group by the inspection program, and OFF information indicating that there is no reference to the part number data group by the inspection program. Including In the setting step, when the inspection information is changed and the part number data group is updated, the reference presence / absence information may be set to the OFF information.
  • the reference presence / absence information is automatically set to OFF information, and the unchecked inspection item or inspection standard is inadvertently set to the inspection. Application can be suppressed.
  • the inspection information in the quality data group can be set by a plurality of users,
  • the setting step when the reference presence / absence information is set to the OFF information by a predetermined user, a change of the reference presence / absence information to the ON information by a user other than the predetermined user is restricted. You may.
  • the inspection information is settable by a plurality of users, and when the reference presence / absence information is set to “OFF” by a predetermined user, the reference presence / absence is set by another user who does not know the circumstances. For example, it is possible to prevent information from being changed to “ON”. Then, it is possible to prevent the inspection item or the inspection standard having the low quality level from being unintentionally referred to by the inspection program, and to suppress the inspection item or the inspection standard having the low quality level from being used for the actual inspection. .
  • the inspection quality level information is obtained by referring to the part number data group in a specific inspection program in addition to the first level and the second level, so that the inspection information in the part number data group can be inspected. Further including a third level indicating that the quality level is being verified, In the setting step, when the inspection quality level information in the part number data group is changed from the third level to the first level, the reference presence / absence information may be changed to the ON information.
  • the inspection quality level information at that time may be set to “TRY”, which is the third level.
  • the inspection item or inspection standard is changed from a state being checked (for example, a state set to “TRY”) to a state showing high quality (for example, a state set to “OK”)
  • the reference presence / absence information is automatically changed to “ON”, and a high-quality inspection item or inspection standard can be automatically applied to the inspection program.
  • the inspection quality level information can be set to a first level indicating a high quality level and a second level indicating a low quality level
  • the inspection information further includes reference presence / absence information indicating presence / absence of reference to the part number data group by the inspection program
  • the reference presence / absence information can be set to ON information indicating that there is a reference to the part number data group by the inspection program, and OFF information indicating that there is no reference to the part number data group by the inspection program.
  • the inspection quality level information in the part number data group is set to the second level and the reference presence / absence information is set to the ON information
  • the inspection of the component related to the part number data group may be performed without using the inspection program.
  • the inspection item or inspection standard is set to the second level (for example, “NG”) indicating low quality and the reference presence / absence information is set to “ON”, the inspection item or inspection standard is not set. Inspection of a part to which the inspection standard is applied can be performed not by an automatic inspection by an inspection program but by a manual inspection. As a result, it is possible to suppress the occurrence of “overlooking” or “overlooking” due to automatic inspection performed based on low-quality inspection items and inspection standards, and to perform manual inspection to reduce the quality of the inspection items and inspection standards. It is possible to confirm with.
  • the second level for example, “NG” indicating low quality and the reference presence / absence information is set to “ON”
  • the present invention is an inspection system for inspecting the article by an inspection program that determines the quality of the article on which the component is mounted,
  • a storage unit for storing a part number data group in which inspection information including inspection items and / or inspection standards of the component in the inspection is incorporated;
  • a processing unit that causes the inspection program to determine the quality of the article,
  • the inspection information further includes inspection quality level information that is an index of the reliability of the inspection information,
  • the part number data group is provided for each part number of the component and updated each time the inspection information is changed,
  • the inspection program may be an inspection system that determines quality for each component based on the inspection information acquired with reference to the part number data group.
  • the inspection information may further include reference presence / absence information indicating whether or not the inspection program refers to the part number data group.
  • the inspection quality level information includes a first level indicating a high quality level and a second level indicating a low quality level
  • a data management unit that sets the inspection quality level information to the second level may be further provided.
  • the reference presence / absence information includes ON information indicating that there is a reference to the part number data group by the inspection program, and OFF information indicating that there is no reference to the part number data group by the inspection program.
  • the data management unit may set the reference presence / absence information in the OFF information when the inspection information is changed and the part number data group is updated.
  • the above inspection system further comprising an information setting unit that receives a setting of the inspection information in the quality data group by a plurality of users, When the inspection quality level information is set to a level other than the first level by a predetermined user, the information setting unit changes the inspection quality level information to the first level by a user other than the predetermined user. May be limited.
  • the above inspection system further comprising an information setting unit that receives a setting of the inspection information in the quality data group by a plurality of users, The information setting unit, when the reference presence / absence information is set to the OFF information by a predetermined user, restricts a user other than the predetermined user from changing the reference presence / absence information to the ON information. You may.
  • the inspection quality level information includes the first level and the second level, as well as the part number data group in a specific inspection program to refer to the inspection information in the part number data group. Further including a third level indicating that the inspection quality level is being verified;
  • the data management unit may change the reference presence information to the ON information when the inspection quality level information in the part number data group is changed from the third level to the first level.
  • the inspection information further includes reference presence / absence information indicating presence / absence of reference to the part number data group by the inspection program
  • the inspection quality level information includes a first level indicating a high quality level and a second level indicating a low quality level
  • the reference presence / absence information includes ON information indicating that there is a reference to the part number data group by the inspection program, and OFF information indicating that there is no reference to the part number data group by the inspection program
  • Further comprising an information setting unit for receiving the setting of the inspection information in the quality data group The information setting unit may be such that the inspection quality level information in the part number data group is set to the second level, and the reference presence / absence information can be set to the ON information.
  • the present invention may also be a program for causing a computer to execute the setting step and / or the determining step. Note that the means for solving the above problems can be used in combination as much as possible.
  • substrate inspection etc. can be optimized for every component by making the quality of the inspection item and / or inspection standard manageable for every component, and mounting the said component The reliability of the inspection of the manufactured article can be improved.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a hardware configuration of a board inspection system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating functions of the board inspection system according to the embodiment of the present invention. It is a figure showing the example of the quality data table in the example of the present invention. It is a figure showing an example of a quality reference data table of an inspection program in an example of the present invention.
  • 6 is a flowchart illustrating processing of a test information management routine according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of an aspect of updating a quality reference data table of an inspection program in the first embodiment of the present invention.
  • 9 is a flowchart illustrating processing of a test information management routine 2 according to the second embodiment of the present invention.
  • 8 is a flowchart illustrating a process of an inspection system control routine according to a second embodiment of the present invention. It is a figure showing the example of a mode of updating of the quality reference data table of the inspection program
  • FIG. 1 shows an example of a hardware configuration of an inspection system 9 according to this application example.
  • the inspection system 9 of this embodiment is configured by connecting a control terminal 1, a data management server 2, and a board inspection device 3 to each other via a communication line.
  • the control terminal 1 is a stationary terminal including an output unit 101 such as a display monitor and a printer, an input unit 102 such as a keyboard and a mouse, a memory 103 such as an HDD and a RAM, and a processing unit 104 such as a CPU. Or a tablet-type terminal, or may be configured integrally with the board inspection device 3.
  • the control terminal 1 is a terminal for performing operations such as creation (including modification) of an inspection program to be executed in the board inspection apparatus 3 and setting / registration of a part number data group referred to in each inspection program.
  • the part number data group includes inspection items to be inspected for components, inspection standards for each inspection item, component information such as dimensions and component types of the components, information on product numbers attached to the components, and the like. In addition, it also includes inspection information such as an inspection item and an inspection standard for each component described later.
  • the data management server 2 stores a plurality of types of data, stores the above-described inspection program and part number data group, and manages various information necessary for processing in the control terminal 1.
  • the board inspection apparatus 3 captures an image of a component mounting board that has undergone a component mounting step or a reflow step, and processes the generated image using an inspection program registered in advance. Thereby, the quality of the mounted state of the components on the board is determined as good or bad.
  • the hardware configuration for that includes an image sensor, a lighting device, a substrate holding unit, a RAM, a CPU, and the like. Further, the inspection device 3 may be provided with an output unit such as a monitor and an input unit such as a mouse and a keyboard.
  • FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram showing functions of the control terminal 1, the data management server 2, and the inspection device 3 related to the creation of the inspection content data.
  • the data management server 2 includes a board information storage unit 21, a component information storage unit 22, an inspection program storage unit 23, an inspection information storage unit 24, an inspection history storage unit 25, and the like.
  • the board information storage unit 21 stores board information including information such as board colors, mounted components, and component positions, and board images including non-defective product model images and defective product performance images.
  • the part information storage unit 22 includes part information including information such as part number, part type, color, shape, electrode information, and board used, non-defective model images for each part number, and part image information including defective result images. Has been saved.
  • the inspection program storage unit 23 stores an inspection program for each board, inspection program history information for accumulating a change history of the inspection program for each revision, and the like.
  • the inspection information storage unit 24 stores characteristic amounts (also referred to as inspection items) and inspection standards, quality level information of the inspection items and inspection standards (described later), inspection information such as inspection items and inspection standards set for each part number of the component. (Hereinafter described), inspection history information for accumulating a setting history for each part number of such information and a comment corresponding thereto for each revision, and the like.
  • the inspection history storage unit 25 stores inspection results, inspection images, and the like performed by the inspection device 3. These various pieces of information function as a so-called relational database that can be referred to and linked with each other.
  • the inspection program corresponding to the substrate to be inspected is read from the inspection program storage unit 23, and the inspection information corresponding to the substrate to be inspected is read from the inspection information storage unit 24, and the inspection is executed.
  • the results of a series of inspections, images generated at the time of inspection, and the like are transmitted from the inspection device 3 to the data management server 2 and stored in the inspection history storage unit 25.
  • UI user interface
  • reading processing unit 12 a part number data processing unit 13
  • registration processing unit 14 a registration processing unit 14
  • inspection program processing unit 15 functions such as a user interface (hereinafter, UI) control unit 11, a reading processing unit 12, a part number data processing unit 13, a registration processing unit 14, and an inspection program processing unit 15 are set.
  • the UI control unit 11 displays a work screen, accepts a user operation, and executes a process according to the operation in cooperation with the other processing units 12 to 14.
  • the read processing unit 12 reads information necessary for processing by the UI control unit 11 and the inspection program processing unit 15 from the board information storage unit 21 and the component information storage unit 22 and provides the information to the UI control unit 11 and the inspection program processing unit 15. I do.
  • the part number data processing unit 13 includes inspection item and inspection standard, quality level information of the inspection item and inspection standard (described later), information on whether the inspection information such as the inspection item and inspection standard can be developed into an inspection program (described later), and inspection information history. Information and the like are read from the test information storage unit 24. In addition, component information and the like are read from the component information storage unit 22. Then, a part number data group (described later) is created from these pieces of information and provided to the UI control unit 11. Further, it receives information from the registration processing unit 14 and changes information relating to the part number data group.
  • the registration processing unit 14 receives the setting information from the UI control unit 11, passes the setting information to the part number data processing unit 13 and the inspection program processing unit 15, and changes each information stored in the inspection information storage unit.
  • the inspection program processing unit 15 receives necessary information from the reading processing unit 12 and setting information from the registration processing unit 14, creates an inspection program for the board based on these, and stores the information in the inspection program storage unit 23. register. Note that the inspection program in the present embodiment is to judge whether the board is good or bad based on the inspection logic linked with the part number data group.
  • the invention according to this application example is applied to the inspection system 9 described above.
  • the inspection item and the inspection standard which are set for each product number of the component mounted on the board
  • the inspection item and the inspection quality level information of the inspection standard, the inspection item, and the inspection standard are included. Revision management is performed for each change as information on whether or not the inspection information can be developed into an inspection program as a part number data group.
  • This quality level information is “NG” when inspection information such as inspection items and inspection standards is created and reliability is not confirmed, and “TRY” when applied only to a specific inspection program and is being confirmed. "OK” if the reliability has been confirmed and it is applicable to mass production.
  • the deployment availability information is “OFF” when the inspection information including the inspection item and the inspection standard is not applied to the inspection program that refers to the part number data group, and is “ON” when it is applied. is there. Then, when inspecting a part, each inspection program refers to the part number data group of the latest revision while the development availability information is “ON”, and performs inspection using the information.
  • the inspection items and the inspection standards can be optimized for each part, and the inspection quality can be managed for each part. Can be. Therefore, in the board inspection on which a plurality of components are mounted, it is possible to perform an inspection for all the components based on the optimal inspection information. In addition, it is possible to easily manage the inspection information set for each component based on the quality level information.
  • the component information storage unit 22 and the inspection information storage unit 24 correspond to storage units.
  • the memory 103 may be used as a storage unit.
  • the processing unit 104 in this application example or the CPU in the inspection device 3 corresponds to a processing unit.
  • the control terminal 1 in this application example constitutes a data management unit and an information setting unit.
  • FIG. 3 shows an example of the product number data table 30 in the present embodiment.
  • the part number data table 30 is created in the part number data processing unit 13 based on the information stored in the part information storage unit 22 and the inspection information storage unit 24 of the data management server 2 and output to the output unit as described above. Displayed by 101.
  • the part number data table 30 is a table in which a part number ID corresponding to each component mounted on the board to be inspected and a part number data group corresponding to each part number ID are recorded.
  • part number data group for a part 1608RS which is a chip resistor with a part number ID001
  • a part QFP4848 which is a QFP (QuadFlat Package) with a part number ID002.
  • the combination of the part number data groups of the parts related to the plurality of part number IDs is the part number data table in the present embodiment.
  • the part number data group of the part related to the part number ID001 will be described in detail.
  • a shape, a component type, an inspection item, an inspection standard, and the like are recorded for the component associated with the part number ID001.
  • the inspection criterion is a threshold or a judgment index for judging the quality of the mounted component in the inspection.
  • the revision of the part number data group is updated and described at the top of the column corresponding to each part number ID.
  • the inspection item and the inspection standard are changed 11 times, and it can be seen that the latest revision is the revision 12.
  • the part number data group corresponding to each component includes data of the quality level and the availability of development for each revision.
  • This quality level is an index indicating whether the quality or reliability of the inspection item or inspection standard of the product number data group in each revision is at a level that can be used for inspection by the inspection device 3. For example, a case where the quality level is NG indicates that the part number data group is being created and cannot be used for actual inspection.
  • the quality level is TRY, it is a part number data group in which the inspection information of inspection items and inspection standards is developed in a specific inspection program and the reliability is confirmed, and the level at which mass production can be applied soon Indicates that Further, when the quality level is OK, it is a part number data group in which inspection information of inspection items and inspection standards is developed in a specific inspection program and the reliability has been confirmed, and it is a level that can be applied to mass production. Show.
  • the deployment availability data is an index indicating whether or not the part number data group of each revision is applied to all inspection programs. When the development availability data is OFF, the part number data group of the revision is not applied to all inspection programs. If the development availability data is ON, the part number data group of the revision is developed in all inspection programs.
  • the development availability data can be set by the user independently of the quality level data. In FIG. 3, the quality level data corresponds to inspection quality level information.
  • the expandability data corresponds to reference presence / absence information.
  • FIG. 4 shows an example of a part number reference data table for the inspection program according to the present embodiment.
  • a plurality of components are inspected on the board by using a plurality of inspection programs as described above.
  • FIG. 4 shows part number reference data tables 35a and 35b for inspection programs 1 and 2 among many inspection programs.
  • the circuit IDs assigned to the plurality of circuits on the board the part numbers of the parts mounted on the circuits assigned with the circuit IDs, and the mounting positions of the parts assigned with the part number IDs
  • a reference revision which is a revision to be referenced in the part number data group related to each part number ID, a quality level in the reference revision part number data group, expandability, a latest revision of the part number data group related to each part number ID, a part number data group of the latest revision ,
  • the status of the part number development which is the state of the part number data group, is displayed.
  • the parts corresponding to the part number ID001 are used in the circuits corresponding to the circuit IDs 1 to 4, and the mounting position of the part on the board is determined. It can be seen that they are Left and Top, and that the latest revision of the part number data group for the part is revision 12. Further, the part number data group of the revision 12 is currently NG as the quality level, but the ON / OFF is set as to whether or not the development is possible, and it can be seen that the update is necessary.
  • the inspection program 1 refers to the part number data group of the revision 9 instead of the part number data group of the latest revision. The part number data group of the revision 9 is currently OK as the quality level, and the deployment possibility is ON. You can see that there is.
  • the inspection items and the inspection criteria for each component on the board are managed by a part number data group.
  • the part number data group is managed for each revision, along with the inspection items and inspection standards, the quality level of the part number data group itself, and whether or not it can be developed.
  • a part number data group referred to in each inspection program is managed by a part number reference data table.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart of the inspection information management routine.
  • step S101 a part number is created for a new inspection target component.
  • step S102 a product number is created, a product number data group corresponding to the product number is generated.
  • the part number level is set to NG, and the availability is set to OFF.
  • step S102 a window screen corresponding to the created part number data group is automatically created and displayed on the output unit 101 of the control terminal 1. Further, in addition to the good part model image and the defective part result image of the part corresponding to the part number data group created in step S103, the part information, the part shape, the part type, the inspection item and the inspection reference temporarily set at the present time, and the like are stored. 22. As a result, the product name, shape, component type, inspection item, inspection standard, and the like in the product number data table 30 of FIG. 3 are displayed.
  • step S104 a verification image is registered. More specifically, a sample image for pre-verification as to whether “overlooking” or “overlooking” occurs according to the inspection item and inspection standard registered in the process of step S103 is registered.
  • step S105 a product number adjustment is performed. That is, the inspection item and the inspection standard that are considered appropriate are adjusted with respect to the verification image registered in step S104.
  • step S106 the process proceeds to step S106.
  • step S106 it is determined whether or not “overlooked” or “missed” has not occurred on the verification screen registered in step S104.
  • “overlooking” or “overlooking” it is determined that the inspection item or inspection standard in the part number data group is not appropriate, so that the process returns to the process of step S105, and further adjustment of these items is performed. Is performed.
  • step S106 the processing of steps S105 and S106 is repeated until neither "overlooking" nor "missing” occurs on the verification screen.
  • step S107 the quality level is changed to TRY by the user.
  • step S108 the part number data group is applied to a specific inspection program. More specifically, a specific inspection program to which the part number data group is applied may be specified in another window displayed on the output unit 101. As a result, in the part number reference data table of the specific inspection program, whether or not development is possible is set to ON corresponding to the part number data group.
  • the specific inspection program may be one or two or more.
  • step S109 a board inspection is performed in the inspection apparatus 3 using the inspection program subjected to the processing applied in step S108. Then, in step S110, it is determined whether or not “too much” or “missing” has occurred in the inspection performed in step S109. If it is determined that “overlook” or “overlook” has occurred, the process returns to step S109, and the inspection items and inspection standards are adjusted again. On the other hand, when it is determined that “too much” or “missing” does not occur, the process proceeds to step S111.
  • step S111 the part number data is applied to a larger number of inspection programs, and the inspection device 3 performs a plurality of inspections.
  • step S111 it is determined whether "overlooking” or "missing” has occurred in the plurality of inspections in step S111. If “too much” or “missing” has occurred in step S112, the process returns to step S111, and the inspection items and inspection standards are adjusted again. On the other hand, if it is determined that “too much” or “missing” does not occur, the process proceeds to step S113.
  • step S113 the quality level in the part number data group is set to OK, and whether or not development is set to ON. As a result, the part number data group is applied to all inspection programs to which the part number data group should be referred.
  • the present routine ends once.
  • Steps S101, S107, and S113 of the inspection information management routine according to the present embodiment correspond to setting steps.
  • Steps S106, S110, and S112 correspond to a determination step.
  • the right side of the flowchart shown in FIG. 5 shows the setting of the quality level and the possibility of development in the part number data group at the stage when each step is executed.
  • the quality level is set to NG, and the availability is set to OFF.
  • the quality level is set to TRY and the development possibility is set to OFF. Is set.
  • the quality level is set to “OK” and the development possibility is set to “ON”.
  • FIG. 6 shows changes in the part number reference data table when the examination of the inspection items and inspection standards of the part number data group is advanced and the quality level of the part number reaches OK, as described in the above flow.
  • FIG. 6 shows a part number reference data table for the inspection programs 1 and 2.
  • the inspection program 1 refers to the revision 5 and the inspection program 2 refers to the revision 6 for the part associated with the part number ID001.
  • the quality level of the part number data group is set to TRY
  • revision 6 the quality level of the part number data group is set to OK.
  • the deployment availability is set to ON.
  • the part number data group of the part having the part number ID 001 the latest revision is the revision 7, the quality level of the revision 7 has already been set to OK, and the availability of the development has already been set to ON. That is, it can be seen that the revision 7 is a completed product number data group.
  • the latest revision is applied to all the inspection programs for the item number data group of item number ID001. More specifically, another window may be displayed on the output unit 101, and an instruction to apply the latest reference revision for the inspection program 1 may be executed in the another window. Then, as shown in FIG. 6B, in the inspection program 1 and the inspection program 2, the part number data group of the latest revision 7 is referred to, and the quality level is changed to OK. . As described above, in the present embodiment, the completed part number data group can be collectively applied to all inspection programs, and the optimum inspection items and inspection standards can be efficiently applied. ing.
  • the quality level of the part number data group when the inspection system 9 is enabled by a plurality of users, when the quality level of the part number data group is set to NG or TRY by a specific user, the quality is set by another user.
  • the change of the level to OK may be restricted. More specifically, the quality level may be prohibited from being changed to OK by a user other than the specific user at all, or may be changed only by a specific other user, for example, the manager of the specific user. May be permitted.
  • the inspection system 9 when the inspection system 9 is available for use by a plurality of users, if the development permission / prohibition of the part number data group is set to OFF by a specific user, the development permission / prohibition is changed to ON by another user. May be restricted. More specifically, it is possible to completely prohibit the deployment permission / prohibition from being changed to ON by a user other than the specific user, or to be changed only by a specific other user, for example, the manager of the specific user. May be permitted.
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a process of the inspection information management routine 2 executed when “missing” occurs during inspection in a state where the item number level in the item number data group is set to “OK” and the development possibility is set to “ON”. It is.
  • This flow may be stored in the memory 103 of the control terminal 1, or may be automatically executed when the “missing” detection data is transmitted from the inspection device 3.
  • the inspection program may be in a state of waiting for a result input from an operator.
  • step S201 it is detected that "missing" at the time of inspection has occurred. In this case, there is a risk that the defective product will pass through without being found in the process, so urgent action is required. Therefore, in step S202, the quality level of the product number data group is set to NG. When the process in step S202 ends, the process proceeds to step S203.
  • step S203 the part number data group is applied to all inspection programs.
  • a part number data group having a quality level of NG is applied.
  • the inspection system 9 stops the automatic inspection by the inspection program and performs the manual inspection for the inspection referring to the part number data group in which “missing” has occurred.
  • the quality of the product number may be simply displayed as NG in the window related to the product number data group displayed on the output unit 101 in the inspection system 9 or some other alert display may be performed. Good.
  • step S206 there was no "overlooking” or “missing” for the verification screen registered in step S104. Is determined by a manual inspection. Further, in step S210, it is determined whether or not “too much” or “missing” has occurred in the inspection performed in step S109 by a manual inspection. In step S212, it is determined whether or not “overlooking” or “overlooking” has occurred in the plurality of inspections in step S111 by a manual inspection.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates an inspection system control routine for performing a manual inspection when “overseeing” occurs in the manufacturing process as described above.
  • This flow may be stored in the inspection program storage unit 23, or may be executed when the inspection is performed by the inspection device 3.
  • this routine is executed, first, in step S301, an inspection program is read. When step S301 ends, the process proceeds to step S302. In step S302, a part number data group referred to in the inspection program read in step S301 is read. When the process in step S302 ends, the process proceeds to step S303. In step S303, an inspection image is obtained. Then, an inspection is performed in step S304.
  • step S305 it is determined whether the quality level in the product number data group is set to OK.
  • the process proceeds to step S309, and an automatic inspection is performed.
  • step S306 it is determined whether or not the quality level of the product number data group is set to TRY.
  • step S309 it is determined whether or not the quality level of the product number data group is set to TRY.
  • step S307 it is determined whether or not the quality level of the product number data group is set to NG.
  • the process proceeds to step S308, and a manual inspection is performed.
  • the process proceeds to step S309, and an automatic inspection is performed.
  • the process proceeds to step S310.
  • step S310 it is determined whether the inspection has been completed. If it is determined in step S310 that the inspection has been completed, the present routine ends once. If it is determined that the inspection has not been completed, the process returns to step S304, and the inspection is continued. In this routine, if there are only three types of quality level data of the part number data group, “OK”, “TRY”, and “NG”, in step S306, the quality level of the part number data group is “TRY”. If it is determined that there is not, the process may proceed directly to step S308.
  • FIG. 9 shows an example of changing the part number reference data table when “missing” occurs in the inspection system 9 as described in FIGS. 7 and 8.
  • the part number data group of the revision 9 is referred to in the inspection program 3 and the part number data group of the revision 10 is referred to in the inspection program 3 for the part having the part number ID 003.
  • the quality level is set to OK and the availability of development is set to ON for both revision 9 and revision 10.
  • the latest revision is the revision 12
  • the quality level of the revision 12 is set to NG.
  • the status of the part number development is "update required".
  • the automatic inspection can be stopped in an emergency evacuation and the manual inspection can be performed. Then, it is possible to continue optimizing the inspection items and inspection standards in the part number data group without affecting the inspection quality in the manufacturing process.
  • the part number data group of the latest revision whose quality level is NG may be automatically referred to, or the output unit. Even if the user can manually display the part number data group of the latest revision whose quality level is NG on all inspection programs, the user can manually refer to the part number data group of the latest revision whose quality level is NG. Good.
  • the example has been described in which the part number data group is revision-managed and a new revision is created when the inspection information is changed.
  • the present invention is also applied to the case where the part number data group is only rewritten when the inspection information is changed and the part number data group of a new revision is not created, that is, the case where the part number data group is not revision-managed.
  • the part number data group is not revision-managed.
  • An inspection method for inspecting the article by an inspection program that determines the quality of the article on which the component is mounted A setting step (S101, S107, S113) in which inspection information including an inspection item and / or inspection standard of the component in the inspection is set for each component; A determination step (S106, S110, S112) in which the quality of the article is determined by the inspection program;
  • the inspection information further includes inspection quality level information that is an index of the reliability of the inspection information,
  • the inspection information is set based on a part number data group provided for each part number of the component and updated each time the inspection information is changed, The inspection method, wherein in the determining step, quality is determined for each of the parts based on the inspection information acquired with reference to the part number data group.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
  • Supply And Installment Of Electrical Components (AREA)
  • General Factory Administration (AREA)

Abstract

Provided is a technology with which inspection items and inspection standards in substrate inspections and the like can be optimized for each part, by enabling the quality of inspection items and/or inspection standards to be managed for each part. This inspection method involves using an inspection program to perform inspection of articles to which parts have been installed, and comprises: a setting step (S101) in which inspection information including inspection items and/or inspection standards for parts in inspections is set for each part; and an assessment step (S106) in which the quality of articles is assessed using the inspection program. Inspection information further includes inspection quality level information which is an indicator of the reliability of said inspection information. In the setting step, the inspection information is set on the basis of a part number data group which is provided for each part number of parts and is updated with each change in inspection information. In the assessment step, the quality of each part is assessed on the basis of inspection information acquired by referring to the part number data group.

Description

検査方法、検査システム及びプログラムInspection method, inspection system and program
 本発明は、部品が搭載される物品の検査に係る技術分野に属する。 The present invention belongs to the technical field related to inspection of articles on which components are mounted.
 基板に対する部品の実装状態などを検査する装置として、自動外観検査装置が広く使われている。このような装置では、部品が実装された基板(はんだ付けの前の状態のものも含む)の外観情報がセンサにより取得され、部品毎にその部品に応じた項目の計測が行われる。そして、得られた結果を所定の検査基準と照合することにより、良品・不良品の判別が行われる。 自動 Automatic visual inspection equipment is widely used as an equipment for inspecting the mounting state of components on a board. In such an apparatus, the appearance information of the board on which the component is mounted (including the board before soldering) is acquired by the sensor, and the measurement of items corresponding to the component is performed for each component. Then, by comparing the obtained result with a predetermined inspection standard, a non-defective product / defective product is determined.
 ここで、設定される検査項目や検査基準が適切なもので無ければ、実際には良品であるものを不良品と判断する「見過ぎ」や、実際には不良品であるものを良品と判断する「見逃し」が発生する。「見過ぎ」は検査効率の悪化を招き、「見逃し」は製造工程の信頼性を低下させ後工程における作業効率を悪化させる。そして、いずれも製造工程の費用を増大させる原因となるため、「見過ぎ」及び「見逃し」は最小化させることが望ましい。 Here, if the set inspection items and inspection criteria are not appropriate, it is judged that a product that is actually good is a defective product. "Missing" occurs. "Overlooking" causes deterioration of inspection efficiency, and "overlooking" lowers reliability of the manufacturing process and deteriorates work efficiency in a post-process. In addition, it is desirable to minimize “overlooking” and “overlooking” because each of these causes an increase in the cost of the manufacturing process.
 しかしながら、「見逃し」を減少させるために検査基準を厳しくすると「見過ぎ」が増加し、「見過ぎ」を減少させるために検査基準を緩和すると「見逃し」が増加することになるため、適切な検査項目及び検査基準を設定する必要がある。 However, if the inspection standards are tightened to reduce “oversight”, “oversight” will increase, and if the inspection standards are relaxed to reduce “oversight”, “oversight” will increase. Inspection items and inspection criteria need to be set.
 このため、量産品における検査の実施に先立ち、基板や部品の検証画像で検査項目や検査基準の調整が行われ、この調整の完了後に前述の検査項目や検査基準が実際の生産ラインに適用される。しかしながら、従来は、一つの基板上に配置された全ての部品品番に対する検査項目や検査基準の調整後に、量産検査で実施できるように量産プログラムに展開されていたため、部品品番によっては品質が一定しないものも存在し得、「見過ぎ」や「見逃し」が発生する場合があった。 For this reason, prior to conducting inspections on mass-produced products, inspection items and inspection standards are adjusted using verification images of boards and components, and after these adjustments are completed, the aforementioned inspection items and inspection standards are applied to actual production lines. You. However, conventionally, after adjusting the inspection items and inspection standards for all the part numbers arranged on one board, it is developed in a mass production program so that it can be executed in mass production inspection. Therefore, the quality is not constant depending on the part number. Things could also be present, and "too much" or "missing" could occur.
 ここで、部品毎のデータの信頼性を認識可能とする技術に関して、電子部品装着装置のパターンプログラムに使用する電子部品の部品ライブラリのデータを作成するときに、作成状態によって信頼度のランク分けを行い、ランク分けした作成状態を当該データに付加することで、段取り作業時等に、部品ライブラリを使用する場合に、どの電子部品が信頼できるものかどうかが一目で分かるようにする技術が提案されている(特許文献1参照)。しかしながら、上記の従来技術は、基板検査等における検査項目や検査基準を部品毎に最適化することを可能とするものではなかった。 Here, regarding the technology that enables the reliability of data for each component to be recognized, when creating data of a component library of electronic components used in a pattern program of an electronic component mounting apparatus, the reliability is classified according to the creation state. A technology has been proposed that adds a rank-classified creation status to the data to make it possible to see at a glance which electronic components are reliable when using a component library during setup work. (See Patent Document 1). However, the above-described conventional technology does not make it possible to optimize inspection items and inspection standards in substrate inspection and the like for each component.
特開2014-183216号公報(特許第6219579号公報)JP 2014-183216 A (Patent No. 6219579) 特開2008-45952号公報JP 2008-45952 A 特開2006-250610号公報JP 2006-250610 A 特開2001-24321号公報JP 2001-24321 A
 本発明は、上記のような実情に鑑みてなされたものであり、その目的は、部品毎に検査項目及び/又は検査基準の質を管理可能とすることで、基板検査等における検査項目や検査基準を部品毎に最適化可能とする技術を提供することである。 The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and an object of the present invention is to make it possible to manage the quality of inspection items and / or inspection standards for each component, thereby enabling inspection items and inspections in board inspection and the like. An object of the present invention is to provide a technology that enables a standard to be optimized for each part.
 前記の目的を達成するために、本発明は以下の構成を採用する。 た め In order to achieve the above object, the present invention employs the following configuration.
 本発明に係る検査方法は、部品が搭載された物品の品質を判定する検査プログラムにより、前記物品の検査を行う検査方法であって、
 前記検査における前記部品の検査項目及び/又は検査基準を含む検査情報が部品毎に設定される設定ステップと、
 前記検査プログラムにより、前記物品の品質が判定される判定ステップと、を有し、
 前記検査情報は、該検査情報の信頼性の指標である検査品質レベル情報をさらに含み、
 前記設定ステップにおいては、前記検査情報が、前記部品の品番毎に設けられ前記検査情報の変更毎に更新される品番データ群に基づいて設定され、
 前記判定ステップにおいては、前記品番データ群を参照して取得される前記検査情報に基づいて前記部品毎に品質が判定されることを特徴とする、検査方法である。
The inspection method according to the present invention is an inspection method for inspecting the article by an inspection program that determines the quality of the article on which the component is mounted,
A setting step in which inspection information including an inspection item and / or inspection standard of the component in the inspection is set for each component;
A determination step in which the quality of the article is determined by the inspection program,
The inspection information further includes inspection quality level information that is an index of the reliability of the inspection information,
In the setting step, the inspection information is set based on a part number data group provided for each part number of the component and updated each time the inspection information is changed,
The inspection method is characterized in that, in the determining step, quality is determined for each component based on the inspection information acquired with reference to the part number data group.
 これによれば、部品が搭載された物品の検査において、検査項目や検査基準を部品毎に最適化することが可能となり、検査品質を部品毎に管理することができる。また、部品毎に設定された検査情報を、検査品質レベル情報として設定された品質レベルに基づいて管理することが可能となる。 According to this, in the inspection of the article on which the parts are mounted, the inspection item and the inspection standard can be optimized for each part, and the inspection quality can be managed for each part. Further, the inspection information set for each component can be managed based on the quality level set as the inspection quality level information.
 本発明においては、前記検査品質レベル情報は、高い品質レベルを示す第1レベルと、低い品質レベルを示す第2レベルを含み、
 前記設定ステップにおいて、前記検査情報が変更され前記品番データ群が更新された際には、前記検査品質レベル情報は前記第2レベルに設定されるようにしてもよい。
In the present invention, the inspection quality level information includes a first level indicating a high quality level and a second level indicating a low quality level,
In the setting step, when the inspection information is changed and the part number data group is updated, the inspection quality level information may be set to the second level.
 これによれば、検査項目や検査基準が変更され、それらに基づく検査の品質レベルが不明の場合には、検査品質レベル情報が第2レベルに設定されるので、ユーザが当該検査項目や検査基準の品質レベルを容易に確認することができる。なお、例えば、検査品質レベル情報としては、第1レベルの場合「OK」、第2レベルの場合「NG」などと設定可能にしてもよい。そうすれば、ユーザが直観的に当該検査項目や検査基準の品質レベルを認識することが可能である。 According to this, if the inspection item or inspection standard is changed and the quality level of the inspection based on them is unknown, the inspection quality level information is set to the second level. Quality level can be easily checked. For example, the inspection quality level information may be set to “OK” for the first level, “NG” for the second level, and the like. Then, the user can intuitively recognize the inspection item and the quality level of the inspection standard.
 また、本発明においては、前記品質データ群における前記検査情報は、複数のユーザによって設定可能であり、
 前記設定ステップにおいて、前記検査品質レベル情報が所定のユーザにより前記第1レベル以外に設定された場合には、該所定のユーザ以外のユーザによる前記検査品質レベル情報の前記第1レベルへの変更が制限されるようにしてもよい。
In the present invention, the inspection information in the quality data group can be set by a plurality of users,
In the setting step, when the inspection quality level information is set to a level other than the first level by a predetermined user, a change of the inspection quality level information to the first level by a user other than the predetermined user is performed. You may make it restricted.
 そうすれば、検査情報が複数のユーザによって設定可能とされている場合に、所定のユーザによって検査品質が第1レベル以外(例えば「NG」)に設定された場合には、事情を知らない他のユーザによって検査品質が変更されることを抑制できる。そうすれば、品質レベルの低い検査項目や検査基準が意図せず検査に用いられてしまうことを抑制できる。 Then, when the inspection information is settable by a plurality of users and the inspection quality is set to a level other than the first level (for example, “NG”) by a predetermined user, the situation is not known. The inspection quality can be prevented from being changed by another user. By doing so, it is possible to prevent the inspection items and inspection standards with low quality levels from being used for inspection unintentionally.
 また、本発明においては、前記検査情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照の有無を示す参照有無情報をさらに含むようにしてもよい。そうすれば、検査プログラムは、この参照有無情報に基づいて、当該品番データ群における検査項目や検査基準を参照して検査するか否かを決定できる。また、ユーザは、この参照有無情報を変更することで、当該品番データ群における検査項目や検査基準を実際の検査に適用するか否かを容易に管理することができる。 In the present invention, the inspection information may further include reference presence / absence information indicating whether the inspection program refers to the part number data group. Then, based on the reference presence / absence information, the inspection program can determine whether or not to perform inspection by referring to inspection items and inspection standards in the part number data group. Further, by changing the reference presence / absence information, the user can easily manage whether or not to apply the inspection items and inspection criteria in the part number data group to the actual inspection.
 また、本発明においては、前記参照有無情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を有りとするON情報と、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を無しとするOFF情報とを含み、
 前記設定ステップにおいて、前記検査情報が変更され前記品番データ群が更新された際には、前記参照有無情報は前記OFF情報に設定されるようにしてもよい。
In the present invention, the reference presence / absence information includes ON information indicating that there is a reference to the part number data group by the inspection program, and OFF information indicating that there is no reference to the part number data group by the inspection program. Including
In the setting step, when the inspection information is changed and the part number data group is updated, the reference presence / absence information may be set to the OFF information.
 これによれば、検査項目や検査基準が変更され品番データ群が更新された際には、参照有無情報が自動的にOFF情報に設定され、不用意に未確認の検査項目や検査基準が検査に適用されてしまうことを抑制できる。 According to this, when the inspection item or inspection standard is changed and the part number data group is updated, the reference presence / absence information is automatically set to OFF information, and the unchecked inspection item or inspection standard is inadvertently set to the inspection. Application can be suppressed.
 また、本発明においては、前記品質データ群における前記検査情報は、複数のユーザによって設定可能であり、
 前記設定ステップにおいて、前記参照有無情報が所定のユーザによって前記OFF情報に設定された場合には、該所定のユーザ以外のユーザによる前記参照有無情報の前記ON情報への変更が制限されるようにしてもよい。
In the present invention, the inspection information in the quality data group can be set by a plurality of users,
In the setting step, when the reference presence / absence information is set to the OFF information by a predetermined user, a change of the reference presence / absence information to the ON information by a user other than the predetermined user is restricted. You may.
 これによれば、検査情報が複数のユーザによって設定可能とされている場合に、所定のユーザによって参照有無情報が「OFF」に設定された場合には、事情を知らない他のユーザによって参照有無情報が例えば「ON」に変更されることを抑制できる。そうすれば、品質レベルの低い検査項目や検査基準が意図せず検査プログラムにより参照されることが抑制され、品質レベルの低い検査項目や検査基準が実際の検査に用いられてしまうことを抑制できる。 According to this, when the inspection information is settable by a plurality of users, and when the reference presence / absence information is set to “OFF” by a predetermined user, the reference presence / absence is set by another user who does not know the circumstances. For example, it is possible to prevent information from being changed to “ON”. Then, it is possible to prevent the inspection item or the inspection standard having the low quality level from being unintentionally referred to by the inspection program, and to suppress the inspection item or the inspection standard having the low quality level from being used for the actual inspection. .
 また、本発明においては、前記検査品質レベル情報は、前記第1レベル及び前記第2レベルの他、特定の検査プログラムにおいて前記品番データ群に参照させることで該品番データ群における前記検査情報の検査品質レベルを確認中であることを示す第3レベルをさらに含み、
 前記設定ステップにおいて、前記品番データ群における検査品質レベル情報が前記第3レベルから前記第1レベルに変更された場合に、前記参照有無情報が前記ON情報に変更されるようにしてもよい。
Further, in the present invention, the inspection quality level information is obtained by referring to the part number data group in a specific inspection program in addition to the first level and the second level, so that the inspection information in the part number data group can be inspected. Further including a third level indicating that the quality level is being verified,
In the setting step, when the inspection quality level information in the part number data group is changed from the third level to the first level, the reference presence / absence information may be changed to the ON information.
 これによれば、当該品番データ群における検査項目や検査基準が、特定の検査プログラムによって確認中であることを、容易に判別することが可能となる。なお、その際の検査品質レベル情報を、第3レベルである「TRY」などと設定するようにしてもよい。また、これによれば、検査項目や検査基準が確認中の状態(例えば「TRY」に設定された状態)から高い品質を示す状態(例えば「OK」に設定された状態)に変更された場合に、参照有無情報が自動的に「ON」に変更され、高い品質の検査項目や検査基準が自動的に検査プログラムに適用されるようにすることができる。 According to this, it is possible to easily determine that the inspection item or inspection standard in the part number data group is being confirmed by a specific inspection program. Note that the inspection quality level information at that time may be set to “TRY”, which is the third level. Further, according to this, when the inspection item or inspection standard is changed from a state being checked (for example, a state set to “TRY”) to a state showing high quality (for example, a state set to “OK”) In addition, the reference presence / absence information is automatically changed to “ON”, and a high-quality inspection item or inspection standard can be automatically applied to the inspection program.
 また、本発明においては、前記検査品質レベル情報は、高い品質レベルを示す第1レベルと、低い品質レベルを示す第2レベルに設定可能であり、
 前記検査情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照の有無を示す参照有無情報をさらに含み、
 前記参照有無情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を有りとするON情報と、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を無しとするOFF情報に設定可能であり、
 前記設定ステップにおいて、前記品番データ群における前記検査品質レベル情報が前記第2レベルに設定されるとともに、前記参照有無情報が前記ON情報に設定されている場合に、
 前記判定ステップにおいては、該品番データ群に係る部品の検査は、前記検査プログラムによらないで行うようにしてもよい。
In the present invention, the inspection quality level information can be set to a first level indicating a high quality level and a second level indicating a low quality level,
The inspection information further includes reference presence / absence information indicating presence / absence of reference to the part number data group by the inspection program,
The reference presence / absence information can be set to ON information indicating that there is a reference to the part number data group by the inspection program, and OFF information indicating that there is no reference to the part number data group by the inspection program.
In the setting step, when the inspection quality level information in the part number data group is set to the second level and the reference presence / absence information is set to the ON information,
In the determining step, the inspection of the component related to the part number data group may be performed without using the inspection program.
 これによれば、検査項目や検査基準が低い品質を示す第2レベル(例えば「NG」)に設定され、且つ、参照有無情報が「ON」に設定されている場合には、当該検査項目や検査基準が適用される部品の検査は、検査プログラムにより自動検査により実施されずに、手動検査により実施されるようにできる。その結果、品質に低い検査項目や検査基準によって自動検査が行われて「見逃し」や「見過ぎ」が発生することを抑制できるとともに、手動検査により、当該検査項目や検査基準の品質を製造工程で確認することが可能である。 According to this, when the inspection item or inspection standard is set to the second level (for example, “NG”) indicating low quality and the reference presence / absence information is set to “ON”, the inspection item or inspection standard is not set. Inspection of a part to which the inspection standard is applied can be performed not by an automatic inspection by an inspection program but by a manual inspection. As a result, it is possible to suppress the occurrence of “overlooking” or “overlooking” due to automatic inspection performed based on low-quality inspection items and inspection standards, and to perform manual inspection to reduce the quality of the inspection items and inspection standards. It is possible to confirm with.
 また、本発明は、部品が搭載された物品の品質を判定する検査プログラムにより、前記物品の検査を行う検査システムであって、
 前記検査における、前記部品の検査項目及び/又は検査基準を含む検査情報が組み入れられた品番データ群を記憶する記憶部と、
 前記検査プログラムに前記物品の品質を判定させる処理部と、を備え、
 前記検査情報は、該検査情報の信頼性の指標である検査品質レベル情報をさらに含み、
 前記品番データ群は、前記部品の品番毎に設けられるとともに前記検査情報の変更毎に更新され、
 前記検査プログラムは、前記品番データ群を参照して取得される前記検査情報に基づいて前記部品毎に品質を判定する、検査システムであってもよい。
Further, the present invention is an inspection system for inspecting the article by an inspection program that determines the quality of the article on which the component is mounted,
A storage unit for storing a part number data group in which inspection information including inspection items and / or inspection standards of the component in the inspection is incorporated;
A processing unit that causes the inspection program to determine the quality of the article,
The inspection information further includes inspection quality level information that is an index of the reliability of the inspection information,
The part number data group is provided for each part number of the component and updated each time the inspection information is changed,
The inspection program may be an inspection system that determines quality for each component based on the inspection information acquired with reference to the part number data group.
 また、上記の検査システムにおいて、前記検査情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照の有無を示す参照有無情報をさらに含むようにしてもよい。 In the inspection system described above, the inspection information may further include reference presence / absence information indicating whether or not the inspection program refers to the part number data group.
 また、上記の検査システムにおいて、前記検査品質レベル情報は、高い品質レベルを示す第1レベルと、低い品質レベルを示す第2レベルを含み、
 前記検査情報が変更され前記品番データ群が更新された際には、前記検査品質レベル情報を前記第2レベルに設定するデータ管理部をさらに備えるようにしてもよい。
In the above inspection system, the inspection quality level information includes a first level indicating a high quality level and a second level indicating a low quality level,
When the inspection information is changed and the part number data group is updated, a data management unit that sets the inspection quality level information to the second level may be further provided.
 また、上記の検査システムにおいて、前記参照有無情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を有りとするON情報と、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を無しとするOFF情報とを含み、
 前記データ管理部は、前記検査情報が変更され前記品番データ群が更新された際には、前記参照有無情報を前記OFF情報に設定するようにしてもよい。
In the above inspection system, the reference presence / absence information includes ON information indicating that there is a reference to the part number data group by the inspection program, and OFF information indicating that there is no reference to the part number data group by the inspection program. And
The data management unit may set the reference presence / absence information in the OFF information when the inspection information is changed and the part number data group is updated.
 また、上記の検査システムにおいて、複数のユーザによる、前記品質データ群における前記検査情報の設定を受付ける情報設定部をさらに備え、
 前記情報設定部は、前記検査品質レベル情報が所定のユーザにより前記第1レベル以外に設定された場合には、該所定のユーザ以外のユーザによる前記検査品質レベル情報の前記第1レベルへの変更を制限するようにしてもよい。
Further, in the above inspection system, further comprising an information setting unit that receives a setting of the inspection information in the quality data group by a plurality of users,
When the inspection quality level information is set to a level other than the first level by a predetermined user, the information setting unit changes the inspection quality level information to the first level by a user other than the predetermined user. May be limited.
 また、上記の検査システムにおいて、複数のユーザによる、前記品質データ群における前記検査情報の設定を受付ける情報設定部をさらに備え、
 前記情報設定部は、前記参照有無情報が所定のユーザによって前記OFF情報に設定された場合には、該所定のユーザ以外のユーザによる前記参照有無情報の前記ON情報への変更を制限するようにしてもよい。
Further, in the above inspection system, further comprising an information setting unit that receives a setting of the inspection information in the quality data group by a plurality of users,
The information setting unit, when the reference presence / absence information is set to the OFF information by a predetermined user, restricts a user other than the predetermined user from changing the reference presence / absence information to the ON information. You may.
 また、上記の検査システムにおいて、前記検査品質レベル情報は、前記第1レベル及び前記第2レベルの他、特定の検査プログラムにおいて前記品番データ群に参照させることで該品番データ群における前記検査情報の検査品質レベルを確認中であることを示す第3レベルをさらに含み、
 前記データ管理部は、前記品番データ群における検査品質レベル情報が前記第3レベルから前記第1レベルに変更された場合に、前記参照有無情報を前記ON情報に変更するようにしてもよい。
Further, in the above-described inspection system, the inspection quality level information includes the first level and the second level, as well as the part number data group in a specific inspection program to refer to the inspection information in the part number data group. Further including a third level indicating that the inspection quality level is being verified;
The data management unit may change the reference presence information to the ON information when the inspection quality level information in the part number data group is changed from the third level to the first level.
 また、上記の検査システムにおいて、
 前記検査情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照の有無を示す参照有無情報をさらに含み、
 前記検査品質レベル情報は、高い品質レベルを示す第1レベルと、低い品質レベルを示す第2レベルを含み、
 前記参照有無情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を有りとするON情報と、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を無しとするOFF情報とを含み、
 前記品質データ群における前記検査情報の設定を受付ける情報設定部をさらに備え、
 前記情報設定部は、前記品番データ群における前記検査品質レベル情報が前記第2レベルに設定され、且つ、前記参照有無情報が前記ON情報に設定可能としてもよい。
In the above inspection system,
The inspection information further includes reference presence / absence information indicating presence / absence of reference to the part number data group by the inspection program,
The inspection quality level information includes a first level indicating a high quality level and a second level indicating a low quality level,
The reference presence / absence information includes ON information indicating that there is a reference to the part number data group by the inspection program, and OFF information indicating that there is no reference to the part number data group by the inspection program,
Further comprising an information setting unit for receiving the setting of the inspection information in the quality data group,
The information setting unit may be such that the inspection quality level information in the part number data group is set to the second level, and the reference presence / absence information can be set to the ON information.
 また、本発明は、上記の設定ステップおよび/または判定ステップをコンピューターに実行させるプログラムであってもよい。なお、上記の課題を解決するための手段は可能なかぎり、組み合わせて使用することが可能である。 The present invention may also be a program for causing a computer to execute the setting step and / or the determining step. Note that the means for solving the above problems can be used in combination as much as possible.
 本発明によれば、部品毎に検査項目及び/又は検査基準の質を管理可能とすることで、基板検査等における検査項目や検査基準を部品毎に最適化することができ、当該部品を搭載した物品の検査の信頼性を向上させることができる。 ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the inspection item and / or inspection standard in board | substrate inspection etc. can be optimized for every component by making the quality of the inspection item and / or inspection standard manageable for every component, and mounting the said component The reliability of the inspection of the manufactured article can be improved.
本発明の実施例に係る基板検査システムのハードウェア構成を示す図である。FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a hardware configuration of a board inspection system according to an embodiment of the present invention. 本発明の実施例に係る基板検査システムにおける機能を示すブロック図である。FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating functions of the board inspection system according to the embodiment of the present invention. 本発明の実施例における品質データテーブルの例を示す図である。It is a figure showing the example of the quality data table in the example of the present invention. 本発明の実施例における検査プログラムの品質参照データテーブルの例を示す図である。It is a figure showing an example of a quality reference data table of an inspection program in an example of the present invention. 本発明の実施例1における検査情報管理ルーチンの処理を示すフローチャートである。6 is a flowchart illustrating processing of a test information management routine according to the first embodiment of the present invention. 本発明の実施例1における検査プログラムの品質参照データテーブルの更新の態様例を示す図である。FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of an aspect of updating a quality reference data table of an inspection program in the first embodiment of the present invention. 本発明の実施例2における検査情報管理ルーチン2の処理を示すフローチャートである。9 is a flowchart illustrating processing of a test information management routine 2 according to the second embodiment of the present invention. 本発明の実施例2における検査システム制御ルーチンの処理を示すフローチャートである。8 is a flowchart illustrating a process of an inspection system control routine according to a second embodiment of the present invention. 本発明の実施例2における検査プログラムの品質参照データテーブルの更新の態様例を示す図である。It is a figure showing the example of a mode of updating of the quality reference data table of the inspection program in Example 2 of the present invention.
<適用例>
 以下に図面を参照して、この発明の適用例について説明する。なお、以下では本発明が、電子部品が搭載される基板の検査システムに適用された場合について説明するが、本発明の対象は基板の検査に限られず、他の物品を検査の対象とするものであっても構わない。また、この適用例に記載されている具体的な構成は、特に記載がない限りは、この発明の範囲をそれらのみに限定する趣旨のものではない。
<Application example>
Hereinafter, application examples of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In the following, a case will be described in which the present invention is applied to a board inspection system on which electronic components are mounted. However, the subject of the present invention is not limited to board inspection, and other articles are subject to inspection. It does not matter. Further, the specific configuration described in this application example is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention to only the configuration unless otherwise specified.
 図1は、本適用例に係る検査システム9のハードウェア構成例を示す。この実施例の検査システム9は、制御端末1、データ管理用サーバ2、基板検査装置3、が通信回線を介して相互に接続されることで構成されている。制御端末1は、ディスプレイモニタ、プリンタなどの出力部101、キーボードやマウスなどの入力部102、HDD、RAMなどのメモリ103、CPUなどの処理部104を備えた据え置き型の端末であるが、モバイル型、タブレット型の端末であっても構わないし、基板検査装置3と一体に構成されていてもよい。 FIG. 1 shows an example of a hardware configuration of an inspection system 9 according to this application example. The inspection system 9 of this embodiment is configured by connecting a control terminal 1, a data management server 2, and a board inspection device 3 to each other via a communication line. The control terminal 1 is a stationary terminal including an output unit 101 such as a display monitor and a printer, an input unit 102 such as a keyboard and a mouse, a memory 103 such as an HDD and a RAM, and a processing unit 104 such as a CPU. Or a tablet-type terminal, or may be configured integrally with the board inspection device 3.
 制御端末1は基板検査装置3において実行される検査プログラムの作成(修正を含む、以下同じ)や、各検査プログラムにおいて参照される品番データ群の設定・登録といった作業を実施するための端末である。品番データ群には部品について検査されるべき検査項目、各検査項目における検査基準、当該部品の寸法や部品種などの部品情報、当該部品に付された品番の情報等が含まれる。また、後述する各部品の検査項目や検査基準などの検査情報も含む。 The control terminal 1 is a terminal for performing operations such as creation (including modification) of an inspection program to be executed in the board inspection apparatus 3 and setting / registration of a part number data group referred to in each inspection program. . The part number data group includes inspection items to be inspected for components, inspection standards for each inspection item, component information such as dimensions and component types of the components, information on product numbers attached to the components, and the like. In addition, it also includes inspection information such as an inspection item and an inspection standard for each component described later.
 データ管理用サーバ2には、複数種類のデータが記憶されており、上記の検査プログラムや、品番データ群が保存されるほか、制御端末1における処理に必要な様々な情報が管理される。 (4) The data management server 2 stores a plurality of types of data, stores the above-described inspection program and part number data group, and manages various information necessary for processing in the control terminal 1.
 基板検査装置3(以下、単に「検査装置3」ともいう。)は、部品実装工程又はリフロー工程を経た部品実装基板を撮像し、生成された画像をあらかじめ登録された検査プログラムを用いて処理することにより、基板上の部品の実装状態の良・不良を判定する。そのためのハードウェア構成として、撮像センサ、照明装置、基板保持部、RAM、CPUなどを含む。また、検査装置3にもモニタなどの出力部や、マウス、キーボードなどの入力部を備えていてもよい。 The board inspection apparatus 3 (hereinafter, also simply referred to as “inspection apparatus 3”) captures an image of a component mounting board that has undergone a component mounting step or a reflow step, and processes the generated image using an inspection program registered in advance. Thereby, the quality of the mounted state of the components on the board is determined as good or bad. The hardware configuration for that includes an image sensor, a lighting device, a substrate holding unit, a RAM, a CPU, and the like. Further, the inspection device 3 may be provided with an output unit such as a monitor and an input unit such as a mouse and a keyboard.
 図2は、上記の検査内容データの作成に関わる制御端末1、データ管理用サーバ2および検査装置3の機能を示す機能ブロック図である。データ管理用サーバ2には、基板情報記憶部21、部品情報記憶部22、検査プログラム記憶部23、検査情報記憶部24、検査履歴記憶部25などが設けられる。 FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram showing functions of the control terminal 1, the data management server 2, and the inspection device 3 related to the creation of the inspection content data. The data management server 2 includes a board information storage unit 21, a component information storage unit 22, an inspection program storage unit 23, an inspection information storage unit 24, an inspection history storage unit 25, and the like.
 基板情報記憶部21には、基板色・搭載部品・部品位置などの情報を含む基板情報や、基板の良品モデル画像・不良品実績画像を含む基板画像などが保存されている。部品情報記憶部22には、部品品番・部品種・色・形状・電極情報・使用基板などの情報を含む部品情報、部品の品番毎の良品モデル画像、不良品実績画像を含む部品画像情報などが保存されている。検査プログラム記憶部23には、基板毎の検査プログラム、検査プログラムの変更履歴をリビジョン毎に蓄積する検査プログラム履歴情報などが保存されている。 (4) The board information storage unit 21 stores board information including information such as board colors, mounted components, and component positions, and board images including non-defective product model images and defective product performance images. The part information storage unit 22 includes part information including information such as part number, part type, color, shape, electrode information, and board used, non-defective model images for each part number, and part image information including defective result images. Has been saved. The inspection program storage unit 23 stores an inspection program for each board, inspection program history information for accumulating a change history of the inspection program for each revision, and the like.
 検査情報記憶部24には、部品の品番毎に設定された特徴量(検査項目ともいう)及び検査基準、検査項目及び検査基準の品質レベル情報(後述)、検査項目及び検査基準などの検査情報の検査プログラムへの展開可否情報(後述)、これらの情報の品番毎の設定履歴とそれに対応するコメントなどをリビジョン毎に蓄積する検査情報履歴情報などが保存されている。検査履歴記憶部25には、検査装置3により実施された検査結果、検査画像などが保存されている。そして、これらの各種情報は相互に参照・連動可能である、いわゆる関係データベースとして機能する。 The inspection information storage unit 24 stores characteristic amounts (also referred to as inspection items) and inspection standards, quality level information of the inspection items and inspection standards (described later), inspection information such as inspection items and inspection standards set for each part number of the component. (Hereinafter described), inspection history information for accumulating a setting history for each part number of such information and a comment corresponding thereto for each revision, and the like. The inspection history storage unit 25 stores inspection results, inspection images, and the like performed by the inspection device 3. These various pieces of information function as a so-called relational database that can be referred to and linked with each other.
 検査装置3では、検査プログラム記憶部23から検査対象の基板に対応する検査プログラムを、検査情報記憶部24から検査対象の基板に対応する検査情報を読み出して検査を実行する。一連の検査の結果や検査の際に生成された画像などは、検査装置3からデータ管理用サーバ2に送信されて、検査履歴記憶部25に格納される。 In the inspection apparatus 3, the inspection program corresponding to the substrate to be inspected is read from the inspection program storage unit 23, and the inspection information corresponding to the substrate to be inspected is read from the inspection information storage unit 24, and the inspection is executed. The results of a series of inspections, images generated at the time of inspection, and the like are transmitted from the inspection device 3 to the data management server 2 and stored in the inspection history storage unit 25.
 制御端末1の処理部104には、ユーザーインターフェース(以下、UI)制御部11、読出処理部12、品番データ処理部13、登録処理部14、検査プログラム処理部15などの機能が設定される。 (4) In the processing unit 104 of the control terminal 1, functions such as a user interface (hereinafter, UI) control unit 11, a reading processing unit 12, a part number data processing unit 13, a registration processing unit 14, and an inspection program processing unit 15 are set.
 UI制御部11は、作業画面を表示してユーザの操作を受け付け、他の処理部12~14と協働して操作に応じた処理を実行する。読出処理部12は、UI制御部11及び検査プログラム処理部15の処理に必要な情報を基板情報記憶部21、部品情報記憶部22から読み出して、UI制御部11及び検査プログラム処理部15に提供する。品番データ処理部13は、検査項目及び検査基準、検査項目及び検査基準の品質レベル情報(後述)、検査項目及び検査基準などの検査情報の検査プログラムへの展開可否情報(後述)、検査情報履歴情報などを、検査情報記憶部24から読み出す。また、部品情報などを部品情報記憶部22から読み出す。そして、これらの情報から品番データ群(後述)を作成してUI制御部11に提供する。また、登録処理部14から情報を受け取って品番データ群に係る情報を変更する。 The UI control unit 11 displays a work screen, accepts a user operation, and executes a process according to the operation in cooperation with the other processing units 12 to 14. The read processing unit 12 reads information necessary for processing by the UI control unit 11 and the inspection program processing unit 15 from the board information storage unit 21 and the component information storage unit 22 and provides the information to the UI control unit 11 and the inspection program processing unit 15. I do. The part number data processing unit 13 includes inspection item and inspection standard, quality level information of the inspection item and inspection standard (described later), information on whether the inspection information such as the inspection item and inspection standard can be developed into an inspection program (described later), and inspection information history. Information and the like are read from the test information storage unit 24. In addition, component information and the like are read from the component information storage unit 22. Then, a part number data group (described later) is created from these pieces of information and provided to the UI control unit 11. Further, it receives information from the registration processing unit 14 and changes information relating to the part number data group.
 登録処理部14は、UI制御部11から設定情報を受け取って、品番データ処理部13及び検査プログラム処理部15に渡すと共に、検査情報記憶部に記憶される各情報を変更する。検査プログラム処理部15は、読出処理部12から必要な情報を、登録処理部14から設定情報を受け取り、これらに基づいて基板の検査プログラムを作成したうえで、検査プログラム記憶部23に当該情報を登録する。なお、本実施例における検査プログラムは、品番データ群を紐付けた検査ロジックに基づいて基板の良・不良の判定を行うものである。 (4) The registration processing unit 14 receives the setting information from the UI control unit 11, passes the setting information to the part number data processing unit 13 and the inspection program processing unit 15, and changes each information stored in the inspection information storage unit. The inspection program processing unit 15 receives necessary information from the reading processing unit 12 and setting information from the registration processing unit 14, creates an inspection program for the board based on these, and stores the information in the inspection program storage unit 23. register. Note that the inspection program in the present embodiment is to judge whether the board is good or bad based on the inspection logic linked with the part number data group.
 本適用例に係る発明は、上記の検査システム9に適用されるものである。そして、上述のように、基板に搭載される部品の品番毎に設定された、部品情報、検査項目、検査基準に加え、検査項目及び検査基準の検査品質レベル情報、検査項目及び検査基準を含む検査情報の検査プログラムへの展開可否情報を品番データ群として、変更毎にリビジョン管理する。 The invention according to this application example is applied to the inspection system 9 described above. As described above, in addition to the component information, the inspection item, and the inspection standard, which are set for each product number of the component mounted on the board, the inspection item and the inspection quality level information of the inspection standard, the inspection item, and the inspection standard are included. Revision management is performed for each change as information on whether or not the inspection information can be developed into an inspection program as a part number data group.
 この品質レベル情報は、例えば、検査項目及び検査基準などの検査情報が作成中で信頼性を未確認の場合には「NG」、特定の検査プログラムのみに適用して確認中の場合には「TRY」、信頼性の確認が終了して量産に適用可能な場合には「OK」とされるものである。また、展開可否情報は、検査項目及び検査基準を含む検査情報を、当該品番データ群を参照する検査プログラムに適用しない場合には「OFF」、適用する場合には「ON」とされるものである。そして、各検査プログラムは、部品を検査する際に、展開可否情報が「ON」となっている中で最新リビジョンの品番データ群を参照し、その情報を用いて検査を実行する。 This quality level information is “NG” when inspection information such as inspection items and inspection standards is created and reliability is not confirmed, and “TRY” when applied only to a specific inspection program and is being confirmed. "OK" if the reliability has been confirmed and it is applicable to mass production. The deployment availability information is “OFF” when the inspection information including the inspection item and the inspection standard is not applied to the inspection program that refers to the part number data group, and is “ON” when it is applied. is there. Then, when inspecting a part, each inspection program refers to the part number data group of the latest revision while the development availability information is “ON”, and performs inspection using the information.
 本適用例においては、このように、検査システム9の検査装置3によって基板検査を行う際に、検査項目や検査基準を部品毎に最適化することができ、検査品質を部品毎に管理することができる。よって、複数の部品が搭載された基板検査において、全ての部品について最適な検査情報に基づいて検査を行うことができる。また、部品毎に設定された検査情報を、品質レベル情報に基づいて容易に管理することが可能となる。 In this application example, when the board inspection is performed by the inspection apparatus 3 of the inspection system 9, the inspection items and the inspection standards can be optimized for each part, and the inspection quality can be managed for each part. Can be. Therefore, in the board inspection on which a plurality of components are mounted, it is possible to perform an inspection for all the components based on the optimal inspection information. In addition, it is possible to easily manage the inspection information set for each component based on the quality level information.
 なお、本適用例において、品番データ群を構成する情報は、部品情報記憶部22及び、検査情報記憶部24に記憶されている。よって、部品情報記憶部22及び、検査情報記憶部24は記憶部に相当する。また、出力部101に表示した品番データ群をメモリ103にセーブするような場合には、メモリ103を記憶部とすることも可能である。また、本適用例における処理部104または、検査装置3におけるCPUは、処理部に相当する。また、本適用例における制御端末1は、データ管理部及び、情報設定部を構成する。 In this application example, information constituting the part number data group is stored in the component information storage unit 22 and the inspection information storage unit 24. Therefore, the component information storage unit 22 and the inspection information storage unit 24 correspond to storage units. In the case where the part number data group displayed on the output unit 101 is saved in the memory 103, the memory 103 may be used as a storage unit. Further, the processing unit 104 in this application example or the CPU in the inspection device 3 corresponds to a processing unit. Further, the control terminal 1 in this application example constitutes a data management unit and an information setting unit.
<実施例1>
 次に、本発明の実施例1について詳細に説明する。図3には、本実施例における品番データテーブル30の例を示す。この品番データテーブル30は、先述のように、データ管理用サーバ2の部品情報記憶部22及び、検査情報記憶部24に記憶された情報を基に、品番データ処理部13において作成し、出力部101により表示される。品番データテーブル30は、検査すべき基板に搭載される部品の各々に対応する品番IDと、各品番IDに対応する品番データ群が記録されたテーブルである。図3においては、品番ID001が付されたチップ抵抗である部品1608RSと、品番ID002が付されたQFP(QuadFlat Package)である部品QFP4848についての品番データ群が表示されている。このように、複数の品番IDに係る部品の品番データ群を合わせたものが本実施例における品番データテーブルである。
<Example 1>
Next, Embodiment 1 of the present invention will be described in detail. FIG. 3 shows an example of the product number data table 30 in the present embodiment. The part number data table 30 is created in the part number data processing unit 13 based on the information stored in the part information storage unit 22 and the inspection information storage unit 24 of the data management server 2 and output to the output unit as described above. Displayed by 101. The part number data table 30 is a table in which a part number ID corresponding to each component mounted on the board to be inspected and a part number data group corresponding to each part number ID are recorded. FIG. 3 shows a part number data group for a part 1608RS, which is a chip resistor with a part number ID001, and a part QFP4848, which is a QFP (QuadFlat Package) with a part number ID002. As described above, the combination of the part number data groups of the parts related to the plurality of part number IDs is the part number data table in the present embodiment.
 ここで、品番ID001に係る部品の品番データ群について詳細に説明する。本実施例では、品番ID001に係る部品について形状、部品種、検査項目、検査基準などが記録されている。検査基準は、検査における搭載部品の良・不良の判断の閾値や判断指標である。そして、品番ID001に係る部品について検査項目や検査基準が変更される毎に、品番データ群のリビジョンが更新され各品番IDに対応する欄の最上段に記載される。図3における品番ID001に係る部品については、検査項目や検査基準に対して11回の変更が加えられ、最新のリビジョンはリビジョン12であることが分かる。 Here, the part number data group of the part related to the part number ID001 will be described in detail. In the present embodiment, a shape, a component type, an inspection item, an inspection standard, and the like are recorded for the component associated with the part number ID001. The inspection criterion is a threshold or a judgment index for judging the quality of the mounted component in the inspection. Then, each time the inspection item or inspection standard is changed for the part related to the part number ID 001, the revision of the part number data group is updated and described at the top of the column corresponding to each part number ID. Regarding the part corresponding to the part number ID 001 in FIG. 3, the inspection item and the inspection standard are changed 11 times, and it can be seen that the latest revision is the revision 12.
 また、本実施例の品番データテーブルでは、各部品に対応する品番データ群には、各リビジョン毎に品質レベル及び展開可否のデータが含まれている。この品質レベルは、各リビジョンにおける品番データ群の検査項目や検査基準の品質または信頼性が、検査装置3における検査に使用し得るレベルか否かを示す指標である。例えば品質レベルがNGである場合とは、作成途中の品番データ群であり実際の検査には使用不可のレベルであることを示す。また、品質レベルがTRYである場合は、特定の検査プログラムに検査項目や検査基準の検査情報を展開して信頼性の確認をしている品番データ群であり、もうすぐ量産適用が可能となるレベルになることを示す。さらに、品質レベルがOKである場合は、特定の検査プログラムに検査項目や検査基準の検査情報が展開され信頼性の確認が終了した品番データ群であり、量産適用が可能なレベルであることを示す。 In the part number data table of the present embodiment, the part number data group corresponding to each component includes data of the quality level and the availability of development for each revision. This quality level is an index indicating whether the quality or reliability of the inspection item or inspection standard of the product number data group in each revision is at a level that can be used for inspection by the inspection device 3. For example, a case where the quality level is NG indicates that the part number data group is being created and cannot be used for actual inspection. When the quality level is TRY, it is a part number data group in which the inspection information of inspection items and inspection standards is developed in a specific inspection program and the reliability is confirmed, and the level at which mass production can be applied soon Indicates that Further, when the quality level is OK, it is a part number data group in which inspection information of inspection items and inspection standards is developed in a specific inspection program and the reliability has been confirmed, and it is a level that can be applied to mass production. Show.
 また、展開可否データは、各リビジョンの品番データ群を全ての検査プログラムに適用するか否かを示す指標である。展開可否データがOFFの場合には、当該リビジョンの品番データ群は全ての検査プログラムに適用されない。展開可否データがONの場合には、当該リビジョンの品番データ群は全ての検査プログラムに展開される。この展開可否データは、品質レベルデータとは独立にユーザが設定することができる。なお、図3において品質レベルデータは検査品質レベル情報に相当する。展開可否データは参照有無情報に相当する。 (4) The deployment availability data is an index indicating whether or not the part number data group of each revision is applied to all inspection programs. When the development availability data is OFF, the part number data group of the revision is not applied to all inspection programs. If the development availability data is ON, the part number data group of the revision is developed in all inspection programs. The development availability data can be set by the user independently of the quality level data. In FIG. 3, the quality level data corresponds to inspection quality level information. The expandability data corresponds to reference presence / absence information.
 次に、図4には、本実施例における検査プログラムに対する、品番参照データテーブルの例を示す。本実施例に係る検査システム9では、前述のように複数の検査プログラムを用いて、基板上の複数の部品についての検査を行っている。図4では、多くの検査プログラムのうち検査プログラム1及び2に対する品番参照データテーブル35a及び35bを示している。品番参照データテーブル35a、35bにおいては、基板における複数の回路に付された回路ID、各回路IDが付された回路に搭載された部品の品番ID、各品番IDが付された部品の搭載位置、各品番IDに係る品番データ群のうち参照するリビジョンである参照リビジョン、参照リビジョンの品番データ群における品質レベル、展開可否、各品番IDに係る品番データ群の最新リビジョン、最新リビジョンの品番データ群における品質レベル及び展開可否データ、品番データ群の状態である品番展開のステータスが表示されている。 FIG. 4 shows an example of a part number reference data table for the inspection program according to the present embodiment. In the inspection system 9 according to the present embodiment, a plurality of components are inspected on the board by using a plurality of inspection programs as described above. FIG. 4 shows part number reference data tables 35a and 35b for inspection programs 1 and 2 among many inspection programs. In the part number reference data tables 35a and 35b, the circuit IDs assigned to the plurality of circuits on the board, the part numbers of the parts mounted on the circuits assigned with the circuit IDs, and the mounting positions of the parts assigned with the part number IDs , A reference revision which is a revision to be referenced in the part number data group related to each part number ID, a quality level in the reference revision part number data group, expandability, a latest revision of the part number data group related to each part number ID, a part number data group of the latest revision , The status of the part number development, which is the state of the part number data group, is displayed.
 図4(a)に示す、検査プログラム1に対する品番参照データテーブル35aによれば、回路ID1~4に係る回路には、品番ID001に係る部品が使用されており、基板における当該部品の搭載位置がLeft、Topである点、当該部品についての品番データ群の最新リビジョンはリビジョン12である点が分かる。また、リビジョン12の品番データ群は、現在、品質レベルとしてNGであるが展開可否についてはONとされており、更新が必要である点が分かる。さらに、検査プログラム1は、最新リビジョンの品番データ群ではなく、リビジョン9の品番データ群を参照している点、リビジョン9の品番データ群は、現在、品質レベルとしてOKであり展開可否はONであることが分かる。 According to the part number reference data table 35a for the inspection program 1 shown in FIG. 4A, the parts corresponding to the part number ID001 are used in the circuits corresponding to the circuit IDs 1 to 4, and the mounting position of the part on the board is determined. It can be seen that they are Left and Top, and that the latest revision of the part number data group for the part is revision 12. Further, the part number data group of the revision 12 is currently NG as the quality level, but the ON / OFF is set as to whether or not the development is possible, and it can be seen that the update is necessary. In addition, the inspection program 1 refers to the part number data group of the revision 9 instead of the part number data group of the latest revision. The part number data group of the revision 9 is currently OK as the quality level, and the deployment possibility is ON. You can see that there is.
 すなわち、本実施例における検査システム9では、基板上の各部品に対する検査項目と検査基準は、品番データ群により管理されている。そして、品番データ群は、その検査項目、検査基準とともに、品番データ群自体の品質レベル、展開可否をリビジョン毎に管理されている。そして、各検査プログラムにおいて参照される品番データ群が、品番参照データテーブルにより管理されている。 In other words, in the inspection system 9 according to the present embodiment, the inspection items and the inspection criteria for each component on the board are managed by a part number data group. The part number data group is managed for each revision, along with the inspection items and inspection standards, the quality level of the part number data group itself, and whether or not it can be developed. A part number data group referred to in each inspection program is managed by a part number reference data table.
 次に、図5を用いて、本実施例の検査システム9における、品番データ群の品質レベル、展開可否の内容の管理フローについて説明する。本フローは制御端末1のメモリ103に記憶されるようにしてもよく、入力部102から、新規品番データ群を作成する旨の入力がなされた場合に全てのステップが自動的に実行されるようにしてもよい。図5は、検査情報管理ルーチンのフローチャートである。本フローが実行されると、まず、ステップS101において、新規の検査対象部品について品番が作成される。品番が作成されると、当該品番に対応する品番データ群が生成される。この状態の品番データ群においては、品番レベルはNG、展開可否はOFFに設定される。 Next, referring to FIG. 5, a description will be given of a management flow of the quality level of the part number data group and the contents of the possibility of development in the inspection system 9 of the present embodiment. This flow may be stored in the memory 103 of the control terminal 1, and all steps are automatically executed when an input to create a new part number data group is made from the input unit 102. It may be. FIG. 5 is a flowchart of the inspection information management routine. When this flow is executed, first, in step S101, a part number is created for a new inspection target component. When a product number is created, a product number data group corresponding to the product number is generated. In the part number data group in this state, the part number level is set to NG, and the availability is set to OFF.
 ステップS102においては、作成された品番データ群に対応するウィンドウ画面が自動的に作成され制御端末1の出力部101に表示される。さらにステップS103において作成された品番データ群に対応する部品の良品モデル画像、不良品実績画像の他、部品の形状、部品種、現時点で仮に設定された検査項目及び検査基準などが部品情報記憶部22に登録される。このことにより、図3の品番データテーブル30における品番名、形状、部品種、検査項目、検査基準等が表示される。 In step S102, a window screen corresponding to the created part number data group is automatically created and displayed on the output unit 101 of the control terminal 1. Further, in addition to the good part model image and the defective part result image of the part corresponding to the part number data group created in step S103, the part information, the part shape, the part type, the inspection item and the inspection reference temporarily set at the present time, and the like are stored. 22. As a result, the product name, shape, component type, inspection item, inspection standard, and the like in the product number data table 30 of FIG. 3 are displayed.
 次にステップS104においては、検証画像が登録される。より具体的には、ステップS103の処理において登録された検査項目及び検査基準によって「見過ぎ」または「見逃し」が発生するか否かを事前検証するためのサンプルの画像が登録される。ステップS104の処理が終了するとステップS105に進む。ステップS105においては、品番調整が行われる。すなわち、ステップS104で登録された検証画像に対して、適切と思われる検査項目及び検査基準が調整される。ステップS105の処理が終了するとステップS106に進む。 Next, in step S104, a verification image is registered. More specifically, a sample image for pre-verification as to whether “overlooking” or “overlooking” occurs according to the inspection item and inspection standard registered in the process of step S103 is registered. When the process in step S104 ends, the process proceeds to step S105. In step S105, a product number adjustment is performed. That is, the inspection item and the inspection standard that are considered appropriate are adjusted with respect to the verification image registered in step S104. When the process in step S105 ends, the process proceeds to step S106.
 ステップS106においては、ステップS104で登録した検証画面に対して「見過ぎ」あるいは「見逃し」がなかったか否かが判定される。ここで、「見過ぎ」あるいは「見逃し」が発生した場合には、品番データ群における検査項目または検査基準が適切ではないと判定されるので、ステップS105の処理の前に戻り、さらにこれらの調整が行われる。そして、ステップS106において、検証画面について「見過ぎ」も「見逃し」も発生しなくなるまで、ステップS105及びステップS106の処理が繰り返し行われる。 In step S106, it is determined whether or not “overlooked” or “missed” has not occurred on the verification screen registered in step S104. Here, if "overlooking" or "overlooking" occurs, it is determined that the inspection item or inspection standard in the part number data group is not appropriate, so that the process returns to the process of step S105, and further adjustment of these items is performed. Is performed. Then, in step S106, the processing of steps S105 and S106 is repeated until neither "overlooking" nor "missing" occurs on the verification screen.
 ステップS106において、検証画面について「見過ぎ」も「見逃し」も発生しなくなった際には、ステップS107に進む。ステップS107においては、ユーザにより、品質レベルがTRYに変更される。ステップS107の処理が終了するとステップS108に進む。ステップS108においては、品番データ群が、特定の検査プログラムに適用される。より詳細には、出力部101に表示された別ウィンドウにおいて、当該品番データ群が適用される特定の検査プログラムを指定するようにしてもよい。これにより、特定の検査プログラムの品番参照データテーブルにおいて、当該品番データ群に対応する展開可否がONに設定される。なお、特定の検査プログラムは一つであっても二つ以上であってもよい。 に お い て If no “overlook” or “overlook” has occurred in the verification screen in step S106, the process proceeds to step S107. In step S107, the quality level is changed to TRY by the user. When the process in step S107 ends, the process proceeds to step S108. In step S108, the part number data group is applied to a specific inspection program. More specifically, a specific inspection program to which the part number data group is applied may be specified in another window displayed on the output unit 101. As a result, in the part number reference data table of the specific inspection program, whether or not development is possible is set to ON corresponding to the part number data group. In addition, the specific inspection program may be one or two or more.
 ステップS108の処理が終了するとステップS109に進む。ステップS109においては、ステップS108において適用の処理がなされた検査プログラムを用いて検査装置3において基板検査が実施される。そして、ステップS110において、ステップS109で行われた検査で「見過ぎ」または「見逃し」が発生したか否かが判定される。ここで「見過ぎ」または「見逃し」が発生したと判定された場合には、ステップS109の処理に戻り、検査項目や検査基準の調整を再度行う。一方、「見過ぎ」または「見逃し」が発生しないと判定された場合には、ステップS111に進む。 す る と When the process of step S108 ends, the process proceeds to step S109. In step S109, a board inspection is performed in the inspection apparatus 3 using the inspection program subjected to the processing applied in step S108. Then, in step S110, it is determined whether or not “too much” or “missing” has occurred in the inspection performed in step S109. If it is determined that “overlook” or “overlook” has occurred, the process returns to step S109, and the inspection items and inspection standards are adjusted again. On the other hand, when it is determined that “too much” or “missing” does not occur, the process proceeds to step S111.
 ステップS111では、当該品番データをさらに多くの複数の検査プログラムに適用して、検査装置3において複数の検査を実施する。ステップS111の処理が終了するとステップS112に進む。そして、ステップS112においては、ステップS111の複数の検査において「見過ぎ」または「見逃し」が発生したか否かが判定される。ステップS112において「見過ぎ」または「見逃し」が発生した場合には、ステップS111の処理に戻り、検査項目や検査基準の調整を再度行う。一方、「見過ぎ」または「見逃し」が発生しないと判定された場合には、ステップS113に進む。 In step S111, the part number data is applied to a larger number of inspection programs, and the inspection device 3 performs a plurality of inspections. When the process in step S111 ends, the process proceeds to step S112. Then, in step S112, it is determined whether "overlooking" or "missing" has occurred in the plurality of inspections in step S111. If "too much" or "missing" has occurred in step S112, the process returns to step S111, and the inspection items and inspection standards are adjusted again. On the other hand, if it is determined that “too much” or “missing” does not occur, the process proceeds to step S113.
 ステップS113においては、当該品番データ群における品質レベルをOKに設定し、且つ展開可否をONに設定する。これで、当該品番データ群を参照すべき全ての検査プログラムに当該品番データ群が適用されるようになる。ステップS113の処理が終了すると、本ルーチンを一旦終了する。なお、本実施例における検査情報管理ルーチンのステップS101、S107、S113は設定ステップに相当する。また、ステップS106、S110、S112は判定ステップに相当する。 (4) In step S113, the quality level in the part number data group is set to OK, and whether or not development is set to ON. As a result, the part number data group is applied to all inspection programs to which the part number data group should be referred. When the process in step S113 ends, the present routine ends once. Steps S101, S107, and S113 of the inspection information management routine according to the present embodiment correspond to setting steps. Steps S106, S110, and S112 correspond to a determination step.
 図5に記載されたフローチャートの右側には、各ステップが実行される段階での品番データ群における品質レベル及び展開可否の設定について示す。これによると、ステップS101において新規品番が作成された際には、品質レベルはNG、展開可否はOFFに設定される。その後、ステップS105における、検証画像を用いた品番データ群の調整において、「見過ぎ」や「見逃し」が発生しなかった場合には、ステップS107において、品質レベルはTRYに、展開可否はOFFに設定される。そして、複数の検査プログラムにおいて「見過ぎ」や「見逃し」が発生しなかった場合には、ステップS113において、品質レベルはOKに、展開可否はONに設定される。 (5) The right side of the flowchart shown in FIG. 5 shows the setting of the quality level and the possibility of development in the part number data group at the stage when each step is executed. According to this, when a new product number is created in step S101, the quality level is set to NG, and the availability is set to OFF. Thereafter, in the adjustment of the part number data group using the verification image in step S105, if "overlooking" or "missing" has not occurred, in step S107, the quality level is set to TRY and the development possibility is set to OFF. Is set. Then, if “overlooking” or “overlooking” has not occurred in the plurality of inspection programs, in step S113, the quality level is set to “OK” and the development possibility is set to “ON”.
 図6には、上記のフローでも説明したように、品番データ群の検査項目や検査基準の調整検討を進め、品番の品質レベルがOKに達した場合の、品番参照データテーブルの変化について示す。図6は、検査プログラム1及び2についての品番参照データテーブルを示す。 FIG. 6 shows changes in the part number reference data table when the examination of the inspection items and inspection standards of the part number data group is advanced and the quality level of the part number reaches OK, as described in the above flow. FIG. 6 shows a part number reference data table for the inspection programs 1 and 2.
 図6(a)では、品番ID001に係る部品について、検査プログラム1においてはリビジョン5が参照され、検査プログラム2においては、リビジョン6が参照されている。そして、リビジョン5においては、品番データ群の品質レベルはTRYに設定されており、リビジョン6においては、品番データ群の品質レベルはOKに設定されている。また、リビジョン5においても、リビジョン6においても、展開可否はONに設定されていることが分かる。また、品番ID001の部品の品番データ群については、最新リビジョンがリビジョン7であり、リビジョン7の品質レベルは既にOK、展開可否は既にONに設定されている。すなわち、リビジョン7は既に完成した品番データ群であることが分かる。 6 (a), the inspection program 1 refers to the revision 5 and the inspection program 2 refers to the revision 6 for the part associated with the part number ID001. In revision 5, the quality level of the part number data group is set to TRY, and in revision 6, the quality level of the part number data group is set to OK. In addition, it can be seen that in both the revision 5 and the revision 6, the deployment availability is set to ON. As for the part number data group of the part having the part number ID 001, the latest revision is the revision 7, the quality level of the revision 7 has already been set to OK, and the availability of the development has already been set to ON. That is, it can be seen that the revision 7 is a completed product number data group.
 この状態で、品番ID001の品番データ群について、最新リビジョンの全検査プログラムへの適用を行う。より具体的には、別ウィンドウを出力部101に表示させ、当該別ウィンドウにおいて、検査プログラム1について、最新の参照リビジョン適用の指令を実行するようにしてもよい。そうすると、図6(b)に示すように、検査プログラム1においても、検査プログラム2においても、最新リビジョンであるリビジョン7の品番データ群が参照されるようになり、品質レベルはOKと変更される。このように、本実施例においては、完成した品番データ群については、一括して全検査プログラムに適用することが可能で、効率的に最適な検査項目と検査基準を適用することが可能となっている。 で In this state, the latest revision is applied to all the inspection programs for the item number data group of item number ID001. More specifically, another window may be displayed on the output unit 101, and an instruction to apply the latest reference revision for the inspection program 1 may be executed in the another window. Then, as shown in FIG. 6B, in the inspection program 1 and the inspection program 2, the part number data group of the latest revision 7 is referred to, and the quality level is changed to OK. . As described above, in the present embodiment, the completed part number data group can be collectively applied to all inspection programs, and the optimum inspection items and inspection standards can be efficiently applied. ing.
 なお、本実施例において、検査システム9が複数のユーザによって使用可能となっている場合に、特定のユーザによって品番データ群の品質レベルがNGまたは、TRYに設定された場合、他のユーザによって品質レベルがOKに変更されることを制限してもよい。より具体的には、特定のユーザ以外のユーザによって品質レベルがOKに変更されることを一切禁止してもよいし、特定の他のユーザ、例えば上記特定のユーザの上司等によってのみ、変更されることが許可されるようにしてもよい。 In the present embodiment, when the inspection system 9 is enabled by a plurality of users, when the quality level of the part number data group is set to NG or TRY by a specific user, the quality is set by another user. The change of the level to OK may be restricted. More specifically, the quality level may be prohibited from being changed to OK by a user other than the specific user at all, or may be changed only by a specific other user, for example, the manager of the specific user. May be permitted.
 また、同様に、検査システム9が複数のユーザによって使用可能となっている場合に、特定のユーザによって品番データ群の展開可否がOFFに設定された場合、他のユーザによって展開可否がONに変更されることを制限してもよい。より具体的には、特定のユーザ以外のユーザによって展開可否がONに変更されることを一切禁止してもよいし、特定の他のユーザ、例えば上記特定のユーザの上司等によってのみ、変更されることが許可されるようにしてもよい。 Similarly, when the inspection system 9 is available for use by a plurality of users, if the development permission / prohibition of the part number data group is set to OFF by a specific user, the development permission / prohibition is changed to ON by another user. May be restricted. More specifically, it is possible to completely prohibit the deployment permission / prohibition from being changed to ON by a user other than the specific user, or to be changed only by a specific other user, for example, the manager of the specific user. May be permitted.
 これにより、事情を知らない他のユーザによって品番データ群の品質レベルや展開可否の設定内容が変更されることを抑制できる。そうすれば、品質レベルの低い検査項目や検査基準が意図せず検査に用いられてしまうことを抑制できる。 (4) This prevents a user who does not know the circumstances from changing the quality level of the product number data group and the setting contents of whether or not it can be developed. By doing so, it is possible to prevent the inspection items and inspection standards with low quality levels from being used for inspection unintentionally.
<実施例2>
 次に、本発明の実施例2について説明する。実施例2においては、既に全ての検査プログラムに信頼性の確認済の品番データ群が適用されている状態で、製造工程において「見逃し」が発生した場合の処理について説明する。図7は、品番データ群における品番レベルがOKに設定され、展開可否はONに設定された状態において、検査時に「見逃し」が発生した場合に実行される検査情報管理ルーチン2の処理を示すフローチャートである。本フローは制御端末1のメモリ103に記憶されるようにしてもよく、検査装置3から「見逃し」検出のデータが送信された際に、自動的に実行されるようにしてもよい。なお、手動検査が行われるステップについては、検査プログラムは、作業者からの結果入力待ち状態となってもよい。
<Example 2>
Next, a second embodiment of the present invention will be described. In the second embodiment, a description will be given of a process in a case where “missing” occurs in the manufacturing process in a state where the part number data group whose reliability has been confirmed is already applied to all the inspection programs. FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a process of the inspection information management routine 2 executed when “missing” occurs during inspection in a state where the item number level in the item number data group is set to “OK” and the development possibility is set to “ON”. It is. This flow may be stored in the memory 103 of the control terminal 1, or may be automatically executed when the “missing” detection data is transmitted from the inspection device 3. In addition, regarding the step in which the manual inspection is performed, the inspection program may be in a state of waiting for a result input from an operator.
 本ルーチンが実行されると、まず、ステップS201において、検査時の「見逃し」が発生したことが検出される。この場合には、不良品が工程で発見されずに通過してしまう危険性があるので緊急の対応が必要になる。よって、ステップS202において、品番データ群の品質レベルはNGに設定される。ステップS202の処理が終了するとステップS203に進む。 When this routine is executed, first, in step S201, it is detected that "missing" at the time of inspection has occurred. In this case, there is a risk that the defective product will pass through without being found in the process, so urgent action is required. Therefore, in step S202, the quality level of the product number data group is set to NG. When the process in step S202 ends, the process proceeds to step S203.
 ステップS203においては、品番データ群が全検査プログラムに適用される。この場合には、全検査プログラムにおいて、品質レベルがNGの品番データ群が適用されることになる。本実施例における検査システム9では、このような場合には、「見逃し」が発生した品番データ群を参照する検査に関しては、検査プログラムによる自動検査は停止し、手動検査が行われる。その際の表示としては、検査システム9における出力部101に表示された品番データ群に係るウィンドウで品番の品質がNGと表示されるのみでも良いし、他に何等かのアラート表示がされてもよい。ステップS203の処理が終了するとステップS104に進む。 (4) In step S203, the part number data group is applied to all inspection programs. In this case, in all the inspection programs, a part number data group having a quality level of NG is applied. In such a case, the inspection system 9 according to the present embodiment stops the automatic inspection by the inspection program and performs the manual inspection for the inspection referring to the part number data group in which “missing” has occurred. As the display at that time, the quality of the product number may be simply displayed as NG in the window related to the product number data group displayed on the output unit 101 in the inspection system 9 or some other alert display may be performed. Good. When the process in step S203 ends, the process proceeds to step S104.
 ステップS104~ステップS113の処理において、図5に示した検査情報管理ルーチンとの相違点は、S206の処理において、ステップS104で登録した検証画面に対して「見過ぎ」あるいは「見逃し」がなかったか否かが手動検査にて判定される点である。また、ステップS210において、ステップS109で行われた検査で「見過ぎ」または「見逃し」が発生したか否かが手動検査で判定される点である。また、ステップS212においては、ステップS111の複数の検査において「見過ぎ」または「見逃し」が発生したか否かが手動検査にて判定される点である。 The difference between the processing of steps S104 to S113 and the inspection information management routine shown in FIG. 5 is that in the processing of step S206, there was no "overlooking" or "missing" for the verification screen registered in step S104. Is determined by a manual inspection. Further, in step S210, it is determined whether or not “too much” or “missing” has occurred in the inspection performed in step S109 by a manual inspection. In step S212, it is determined whether or not “overlooking” or “overlooking” has occurred in the plurality of inspections in step S111 by a manual inspection.
 図8には、上記のように、製造工程において「見過ぎ」が生じた場合に手動検査が行われるようにする、検査システム制御ルーチンについて説明する。本フローは検査プログラム記憶部23に記憶されるようにしてもよく、検査装置3による検査実施時に実行されるようにしてもよい。本ルーチンが実行されると、まず、ステップS301において、検査プログラムが読み込まれる。ステップS301が終了するとステップS302に進む。ステップS302においては、ステップS301で読み込まれた検査プログラムにおいて参照されている品番データ群が読み込まれる。ステップS302の処理が終了するとステップS303に進む。ステップS303においては検査画像が取得される。そして、ステップS304において検査が実施される。 FIG. 8 illustrates an inspection system control routine for performing a manual inspection when “overseeing” occurs in the manufacturing process as described above. This flow may be stored in the inspection program storage unit 23, or may be executed when the inspection is performed by the inspection device 3. When this routine is executed, first, in step S301, an inspection program is read. When step S301 ends, the process proceeds to step S302. In step S302, a part number data group referred to in the inspection program read in step S301 is read. When the process in step S302 ends, the process proceeds to step S303. In step S303, an inspection image is obtained. Then, an inspection is performed in step S304.
 次に、ステップS305では、品番データ群における品質レベルがOKに設定されているか否かが判定される。ここで、品番データ群における品質レベルがOKに設定されていれば、ステップS309に進み自動検査が実施される。一方、ステップS305において品番データ群における品質レベルがOKに設定されていないと判定された場合には、ステップS306に進む。ステップS306においては、品番データ群の品質レベルがTRYに設定されているか否かが判定される。ここで、品質レベルがTRYに設定されていると判定された場合には、ステップS309に進み自動検査が実施される。一方、品質レベルがTRYに設定されていないと判定された場合には、ステップS307に進む。 Next, in step S305, it is determined whether the quality level in the product number data group is set to OK. Here, if the quality level in the part number data group is set to OK, the process proceeds to step S309, and an automatic inspection is performed. On the other hand, if it is determined in step S305 that the quality level in the product number data group is not set to OK, the process proceeds to step S306. In step S306, it is determined whether or not the quality level of the product number data group is set to TRY. Here, if it is determined that the quality level is set to TRY, the process proceeds to step S309, and an automatic inspection is performed. On the other hand, if it is determined that the quality level is not set to TRY, the process proceeds to step S307.
 ステップS307においては、品番データ群の品質レベルがNGに設定されているか否かが判定される。ここで、品番データ群の品質レベルがNGに設定されていると判定された場合には、ステップS308に進み、手動検査が実施される。一方、品質レベルがNGに設定されていないと判定された場合には、ステップS309に進み、自動検査が実施される。ステップS309の自動検査または、ステップS308の手動検査が終了すると、ステップS310に進む。 In step S307, it is determined whether or not the quality level of the product number data group is set to NG. Here, when it is determined that the quality level of the part number data group is set to NG, the process proceeds to step S308, and a manual inspection is performed. On the other hand, if it is determined that the quality level is not set to NG, the process proceeds to step S309, and an automatic inspection is performed. When the automatic inspection in step S309 or the manual inspection in step S308 ends, the process proceeds to step S310.
 ステップS310においては検査が終了したか否かが判定される。ステップS310において検査が終了したと判定された場合には、一旦本ルーチンが終了する。検査が終了していないと判定された場合には、ステップS304の処理に戻り、検査が継続される。なお、本ルーチンにおいて、品番データ群の品質レベルのデータが、「OK」、「TRY」、「NG」の3通りしかない場合には、ステップS306において品番データ群の品質レベルが「TRY」ではないと判定された場合に、直接ステップS308の処理に進んでも構わない。 に お い て In step S310, it is determined whether the inspection has been completed. If it is determined in step S310 that the inspection has been completed, the present routine ends once. If it is determined that the inspection has not been completed, the process returns to step S304, and the inspection is continued. In this routine, if there are only three types of quality level data of the part number data group, “OK”, “TRY”, and “NG”, in step S306, the quality level of the part number data group is “TRY”. If it is determined that there is not, the process may proceed directly to step S308.
 図9は、図7及び図8において説明したように、検査システム9において「見逃し」が発生した場合の、品番参照データテーブルの変更の例について示している。図9(a)には、品番ID003の部品について、検査プログラム3においてはリビジョン9の品番データ群が参照され、検査プログラム4においては、リビジョン10の品番データ群が参照されている。そして、リビジョン9、リビジョン10ともに、品質レベルはOK、展開可否はONに設定されていることが分かる。また、品番ID003の部品の品番データ群については、最新リビジョンがリビジョン12であり、リビジョン12については品質レベルはNGに設定されている。そして、品番展開のステータスは、「要更新」とされていることが分かる。 FIG. 9 shows an example of changing the part number reference data table when “missing” occurs in the inspection system 9 as described in FIGS. 7 and 8. 9A, the part number data group of the revision 9 is referred to in the inspection program 3 and the part number data group of the revision 10 is referred to in the inspection program 3 for the part having the part number ID 003. Then, it can be seen that the quality level is set to OK and the availability of development is set to ON for both revision 9 and revision 10. For the part number data group of the part having the part number ID 003, the latest revision is the revision 12, and the quality level of the revision 12 is set to NG. Then, it can be seen that the status of the part number development is "update required".
 この状態で、いずれかの検査プログラムにおける検査で「見逃し」が発生した場合には、緊急な対応が必要なために、図9(b)に示すように、強制的に品番ID003の部品について最新リビジョン12の品番データが参照される。そして、その品質レベルはNGに設定されている。そうすると、図8のステップS307及びステップS308に示したとおり、品番ID001の部品については、自動検査ではなく手動検査が行われることになる。そして、品番展開のステータスとしては、見逃し対応中と表示される。 In this state, if “missing” occurs in the inspection in any of the inspection programs, urgent action is required, and as shown in FIG. 9B, the part with the part number ID 003 is forcibly updated to the latest. The part number data of the revision 12 is referred to. Then, the quality level is set to NG. Then, as shown in step S307 and step S308 in FIG. 8, for the part having the part number ID001, not the automatic inspection but the manual inspection is performed. Then, the status of the part number development is displayed as “overlooked”.
 これにより、検査システム9において「見逃し」が発生した場合には、緊急避難的に自動検査を中止し手動検査が行われるようにすることができる。そして、製造工程における検査品質に影響を及ぼすことなく、同時に品番データ群における検査項目や検査基準の最適化を継続することが可能となる。なお、本実施例において、いずれかの検査プログラムにおける検査で「見逃し」が発生した場合には、自動的に品質レベルがNGである最新リビジョンの品番データ群が参照されてもよいし、出力部101に、品質レベルがNGである最新リビジョンの品番データ群を全ての検査プログラムに適用可能な表示をさせ、ユーザが手動で、品質レベルがNGである最新リビジョンの品番データ群に参照させてもよい。なお、上記の適用例及び各実施例においては、品番データ群がリビジョン管理され、検査情報が変更された際には、新たなリビジョンが作成される例について説明した。しかしながら、本発明は、検査情報が変更された際にも、品番データ群が書き換えられるのみで、新たなリビジョンの品番データ群が作成されない場合、すなわち、品番データ群がリビジョン管理されない場合についても適用可能であることは当然である。 Accordingly, when "missing" occurs in the inspection system 9, the automatic inspection can be stopped in an emergency evacuation and the manual inspection can be performed. Then, it is possible to continue optimizing the inspection items and inspection standards in the part number data group without affecting the inspection quality in the manufacturing process. In this embodiment, if “missing” occurs in the inspection in any inspection program, the part number data group of the latest revision whose quality level is NG may be automatically referred to, or the output unit Even if the user can manually display the part number data group of the latest revision whose quality level is NG on all inspection programs, the user can manually refer to the part number data group of the latest revision whose quality level is NG. Good. In the above-described application examples and embodiments, the example has been described in which the part number data group is revision-managed and a new revision is created when the inspection information is changed. However, the present invention is also applied to the case where the part number data group is only rewritten when the inspection information is changed and the part number data group of a new revision is not created, that is, the case where the part number data group is not revision-managed. Of course it is possible.
 なお、以下には本発明の構成要件と実施例の構成とを対比可能とするために、本発明の構成要件を図面の符号付きで記載しておく。
<発明1>
 部品が搭載された物品の品質を判定する検査プログラムにより、前記物品の検査を行う検査方法であって、
 前記検査における前記部品の検査項目及び/又は検査基準を含む検査情報が部品毎に設定される設定ステップ(S101、S107、S113)と、
 前記検査プログラムにより、前記物品の品質が判定される判定ステップ(S106、S110、S112)と、を有し、
 前記検査情報は、該検査情報の信頼性の指標である検査品質レベル情報をさらに含み、
 前記設定ステップにおいては、前記検査情報が、前記部品の品番毎に設けられ前記検査情報の変更毎に更新される品番データ群に基づいて設定され、
 前記判定ステップにおいては、前記品番データ群を参照して取得される前記検査情報に基づいて前記部品毎に品質が判定されることを特徴とする、検査方法。
<発明9>
 部品が搭載された物品の品質を判定する検査プログラムにより、前記物品の検査を行う検査システム(9)であって、
 前記検査における、前記部品の検査項目及び/又は検査基準を含む検査情報が組み入れられた品番データ群を記憶する記憶部(22、24、104)と、
 前記検査プログラムに前記物品の品質を判定させる処理部(1、104)と、を備え、
 前記検査情報は、該検査情報の信頼性の指標である検査品質レベル情報をさらに含み、
 前記品番データ群は、前記部品の品番毎に設けられるとともに前記検査情報の変更毎に更新され、
 前記検査プログラムは、前記品番データ群を参照して取得される前記検査情報に基づいて前記部品毎に品質を判定することを特徴とする、検査システム。
Hereinafter, in order to make it possible to compare the configuration requirements of the present invention with the configurations of the embodiments, the configuration requirements of the present invention are described with reference numerals in the drawings.
<Invention 1>
An inspection method for inspecting the article by an inspection program that determines the quality of the article on which the component is mounted,
A setting step (S101, S107, S113) in which inspection information including an inspection item and / or inspection standard of the component in the inspection is set for each component;
A determination step (S106, S110, S112) in which the quality of the article is determined by the inspection program;
The inspection information further includes inspection quality level information that is an index of the reliability of the inspection information,
In the setting step, the inspection information is set based on a part number data group provided for each part number of the component and updated each time the inspection information is changed,
The inspection method, wherein in the determining step, quality is determined for each of the parts based on the inspection information acquired with reference to the part number data group.
<Invention 9>
An inspection system (9) for inspecting said article by an inspection program for judging the quality of an article on which parts are mounted,
A storage unit (22, 24, 104) for storing a part number data group in which inspection information including inspection items and / or inspection standards of the component in the inspection is incorporated;
A processing unit (1, 104) for causing the inspection program to determine the quality of the article;
The inspection information further includes inspection quality level information that is an index of the reliability of the inspection information,
The part number data group is provided for each part number of the component and updated each time the inspection information is changed,
An inspection system, wherein the inspection program determines quality for each of the parts based on the inspection information acquired by referring to the part number data group.
 1・・・制御端末
 2・・・データ管理用サーバ
 3・・・基板検査装置
 11・・・ユーザーインターフェース制御部
 12・・・読出処理部
 13・・・品番データ処理部
 14・・・登録処理部
 15・・・検査プログラム処理部
 21・・・基板情報記憶部
 22・・・部品情報記憶部
 23・・・検査プログラム記憶部
 24・・・検査情報記憶部
 25・・・検査履歴記憶部
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Control terminal 2 ... Data management server 3 ... Substrate inspection apparatus 11 ... User interface control part 12 ... Read-out processing part 13 ... Part number data processing part 14 ... Registration processing Unit 15: Inspection program processing unit 21: Board information storage unit 22: Component information storage unit 23: Inspection program storage unit 24: Inspection information storage unit 25: Inspection history storage unit

Claims (17)

  1.  部品が搭載された物品の品質を判定する検査プログラムにより、前記物品の検査を行う検査方法であって、
     前記検査における前記部品の検査項目及び/又は検査基準を含む検査情報が部品毎に設定される設定ステップと、
     前記検査プログラムにより、前記物品の品質が判定される判定ステップと、を有し、
     前記検査情報は、該検査情報の信頼性の指標である検査品質レベル情報をさらに含み、
     前記設定ステップにおいては、前記検査情報が、前記部品の品番毎に設けられ前記検査情報の変更毎に更新される品番データ群に基づいて設定され、
     前記判定ステップにおいては、前記品番データ群を参照して取得される前記検査情報に基づいて前記部品毎に品質が判定されることを特徴とする、検査方法。
    An inspection method for inspecting the article by an inspection program that determines the quality of the article on which the component is mounted,
    A setting step in which inspection information including an inspection item and / or inspection standard of the component in the inspection is set for each component;
    A determination step in which the quality of the article is determined by the inspection program,
    The inspection information further includes inspection quality level information that is an index of the reliability of the inspection information,
    In the setting step, the inspection information is set based on a part number data group provided for each part number of the component and updated each time the inspection information is changed,
    The inspection method, wherein in the determining step, quality is determined for each of the parts based on the inspection information acquired with reference to the part number data group.
  2.  前記検査品質レベル情報は、高い品質レベルを示す第1レベルと、低い品質レベルを示す第2レベルを含み、
     前記設定ステップにおいて、前記検査情報が変更され前記品番データ群が更新された際には、前記検査品質レベル情報は前記第2レベルに設定されることを特徴とする、請求項1に記載の検査方法。
    The inspection quality level information includes a first level indicating a high quality level and a second level indicating a low quality level,
    2. The inspection according to claim 1, wherein in the setting step, when the inspection information is changed and the part number data group is updated, the inspection quality level information is set to the second level. Method.
  3.  前記品質データ群における前記検査情報は、複数のユーザによって設定可能であり、
     前記設定ステップにおいて、前記検査品質レベル情報が所定のユーザにより前記第1レベル以外に設定された場合には、該所定のユーザ以外のユーザによる前記検査品質レベル情報の前記第1レベルへの変更が制限されることを特徴とする、請求項2に記載の検査方法。
    The inspection information in the quality data group can be set by a plurality of users,
    In the setting step, when the inspection quality level information is set to a level other than the first level by a predetermined user, a change of the inspection quality level information to the first level by a user other than the predetermined user is performed. 3. The inspection method according to claim 2, wherein the inspection method is restricted.
  4.  前記検査情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照の有無を示す参照有無情報をさらに含むことを特徴とする、請求項1から3のいずれか一項に記載の検査方法。 4. The inspection method according to claim 1, wherein the inspection information further includes reference presence / absence information indicating presence / absence of reference to the part number data group by the inspection program. 5.
  5.  前記参照有無情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を有りとするON情報と、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を無しとするOFF情報とを含み、
     前記設定ステップにおいて、前記検査情報が変更され前記品番データ群が更新された際には、前記参照有無情報は前記OFF情報に設定されることを特徴とする、請求項4に記載の検査方法。
    The reference presence / absence information includes ON information indicating that there is a reference to the part number data group by the inspection program, and OFF information indicating that there is no reference to the part number data group by the inspection program,
    The inspection method according to claim 4, wherein in the setting step, when the inspection information is changed and the part number data group is updated, the reference presence / absence information is set to the OFF information.
  6.  前記品質データ群における前記検査情報は、複数のユーザによって設定可能であり、
     前記設定ステップにおいて、前記参照有無情報が所定のユーザによって前記OFF情報に設定された場合には、該所定のユーザ以外のユーザによる前記参照有無情報の前記ON情報への変更が制限されることを特徴とする、請求項5に記載の検査方法。
    The inspection information in the quality data group can be set by a plurality of users,
    In the setting step, when the reference presence / absence information is set to the OFF information by a predetermined user, a change of the reference presence / absence information to the ON information by a user other than the predetermined user is restricted. The inspection method according to claim 5, characterized in that:
  7.  前記検査品質レベル情報は、前記第1レベル及び前記第2レベルの他、特定の検査プログラムにおいて前記品番データ群に参照させることで該品番データ群における前記検査情報の検査品質レベルを確認中であることを示す第3レベルをさらに含み、
     前記設定ステップにおいて、前記品番データ群における検査品質レベル情報が前記第3レベルから前記第1レベルに変更された場合に、前記参照有無情報が前記ON情報に変更されることを特徴とする、請求項5または6に記載の検査方法。
    The inspection quality level information is checking the inspection quality level of the inspection information in the part number data group by referring to the part number data group in a specific inspection program in addition to the first level and the second level. Further comprising a third level indicating that
    In the setting step, when the inspection quality level information in the part number data group is changed from the third level to the first level, the reference presence / absence information is changed to the ON information. Item 7. The inspection method according to Item 5 or 6.
  8.  前記検査品質レベル情報は、高い品質レベルを示す第1レベルと、低い品質レベルを示す第2レベルに設定可能であり、
     前記検査情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照の有無を示す参照有無情報をさらに含み、
     前記参照有無情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を有りとするON情報と、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を無しとするOFF情報に設定可能であり、
     前記設定ステップにおいて、前記品番データ群における前記検査品質レベル情報が前記第2レベルに設定されるとともに、前記参照有無情報が前記ON情報に設定されている場合に、
     前記判定ステップにおいては、該品番データ群に係る部品の検査は、前記検査プログラムによらないで行うことを特徴とする、請求項1に記載の検査方法。
    The inspection quality level information can be set to a first level indicating a high quality level and a second level indicating a low quality level,
    The inspection information further includes reference presence / absence information indicating presence / absence of reference to the part number data group by the inspection program,
    The reference presence / absence information can be set to ON information indicating that there is a reference to the part number data group by the inspection program, and OFF information indicating that there is no reference to the part number data group by the inspection program.
    In the setting step, when the inspection quality level information in the part number data group is set to the second level and the reference presence / absence information is set to the ON information,
    2. The inspection method according to claim 1, wherein, in the determining step, the inspection of the component related to the part number data group is performed without using the inspection program.
  9.  部品が搭載された物品の品質を判定する検査プログラムにより、前記物品の検査を行う検査システムであって、
     前記検査における、前記部品の検査項目及び/又は検査基準を含む検査情報が組み入れられた品番データ群を記憶する記憶部と、
     前記検査プログラムに前記物品の品質を判定させる処理部と、を備え、
     前記検査情報は、該検査情報の信頼性の指標である検査品質レベル情報をさらに含み、
     前記品番データ群は、前記部品の品番毎に設けられるとともに前記検査情報の変更毎に更新され、
     前記検査プログラムは、前記品番データ群を参照して取得される前記検査情報に基づいて前記部品毎に品質を判定することを特徴とする、検査システム。
    An inspection system that inspects the article by an inspection program that determines the quality of the article on which the component is mounted,
    A storage unit for storing a part number data group in which inspection information including inspection items and / or inspection standards of the component in the inspection is incorporated;
    A processing unit that causes the inspection program to determine the quality of the article,
    The inspection information further includes inspection quality level information that is an index of the reliability of the inspection information,
    The part number data group is provided for each part number of the component and updated each time the inspection information is changed,
    The inspection system, wherein the inspection program determines quality for each of the parts based on the inspection information acquired by referring to the part number data group.
  10.  前記検査情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照の有無を示す参照有無情報をさらに含むことを特徴とする、請求項9に記載の検査システム。 The inspection system according to claim 9, wherein the inspection information further includes reference presence / absence information indicating whether or not the inspection program refers to the part number data group.
  11.  前記検査品質レベル情報は、高い品質レベルを示す第1レベルと、低い品質レベルを示す第2レベルを含み、
     前記検査情報が変更され前記品番データ群が更新された際には、前記検査品質レベル情報を前記第2レベルに設定するデータ管理部をさらに備えることを特徴とする、請求項10に記載の検査システム。
    The inspection quality level information includes a first level indicating a high quality level and a second level indicating a low quality level,
    The inspection according to claim 10, further comprising a data management unit that sets the inspection quality level information to the second level when the inspection information is changed and the part number data group is updated. system.
  12.  前記参照有無情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を有りとするON情報と、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を無しとするOFF情報とを含み、
     前記データ管理部は、前記検査情報が変更され前記品番データ群が更新された際には、前記参照有無情報を前記OFF情報に設定することを特徴とする、請求項11に記載の検査システム。
    The reference presence / absence information includes ON information indicating that there is a reference to the part number data group by the inspection program, and OFF information indicating that there is no reference to the part number data group by the inspection program,
    The inspection system according to claim 11, wherein the data management unit sets the reference presence / absence information in the OFF information when the inspection information is changed and the part number data group is updated.
  13.  複数のユーザによる、前記品質データ群における前記検査情報の設定を受付ける情報設定部をさらに備え、
     前記情報設定部は、前記検査品質レベル情報が所定のユーザにより前記第1レベル以外に設定された場合には、該所定のユーザ以外のユーザによる前記検査品質レベル情報の前記第1レベルへの変更を制限することを特徴とする、請求項11または12に記載の検査システム。
    An information setting unit that receives a setting of the inspection information in the quality data group by a plurality of users,
    When the inspection quality level information is set to a level other than the first level by a predetermined user, the information setting unit changes the inspection quality level information to the first level by a user other than the predetermined user. The inspection system according to claim 11, wherein the inspection system is restricted.
  14.  複数のユーザによる、前記品質データ群における前記検査情報の設定を受付ける情報設定部をさらに備え、
     前記情報設定部は、前記参照有無情報が所定のユーザによって前記OFF情報に設定された場合には、該所定のユーザ以外のユーザによる前記参照有無情報の前記ON情報への変更を制限することを特徴とする、請求項12に記載の検査システム。
    An information setting unit that receives a setting of the inspection information in the quality data group by a plurality of users,
    The information setting unit, when the reference presence / absence information is set to the OFF information by a predetermined user, restricts a user other than the predetermined user from changing the reference presence / absence information to the ON information. 13. The inspection system according to claim 12, wherein the inspection system is characterized in that:
  15.  前記検査品質レベル情報は、前記第1レベル及び前記第2レベルの他、特定の検査プログラムにおいて前記品番データ群に参照させることで該品番データ群における前記検査情報の検査品質レベルを確認中であることを示す第3レベルをさらに含み、
     前記データ管理部は、前記品番データ群における検査品質レベル情報が前記第3レベルから前記第1レベルに変更された場合に、前記参照有無情報を前記ON情報に変更することを特徴とする、請求項11または12に記載の検査システム。
    The inspection quality level information is checking the inspection quality level of the inspection information in the part number data group by referring to the part number data group in a specific inspection program in addition to the first level and the second level. Further comprising a third level indicating that
    The data management unit, when the inspection quality level information in the part number data group is changed from the third level to the first level, changes the reference presence / absence information to the ON information. Item 13. The inspection system according to Item 11 or 12.
  16.  前記検査情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照の有無を示す参照有無情報をさらに含み、
     前記検査品質レベル情報は、高い品質レベルを示す第1レベルと、低い品質レベルを示す第2レベルを含み、
     前記参照有無情報は、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を有りとするON情報と、前記検査プログラムによる前記品番データ群への参照を無しとするOFF情報とを含み、
     前記品質データ群における前記検査情報の設定を受付ける情報設定部をさらに備え、
     前記情報設定部は、前記品番データ群における前記検査品質レベル情報が前記第2レベルに設定され、且つ、前記参照有無情報が前記ON情報に設定可能とすることを特徴とする、請求項9に記載の検査システム。
    The inspection information further includes reference presence / absence information indicating presence / absence of reference to the part number data group by the inspection program,
    The inspection quality level information includes a first level indicating a high quality level and a second level indicating a low quality level,
    The reference presence / absence information includes ON information indicating that there is a reference to the part number data group by the inspection program, and OFF information indicating that there is no reference to the part number data group by the inspection program,
    Further comprising an information setting unit for receiving the setting of the inspection information in the quality data group,
    10. The information setting unit according to claim 9, wherein the inspection quality level information in the part number data group is set to the second level, and the reference presence / absence information can be set to the ON information. Inspection system as described.
  17.  請求項1から8のいずれか一項に記載の検査方法における設定ステップおよび/または判定ステップをコンピューターに実行させるプログラム。 A program for causing a computer to execute a setting step and / or a determining step in the inspection method according to any one of claims 1 to 8.
PCT/JP2019/026288 2018-07-03 2019-07-02 Inspection method, inspection system and program WO2020009108A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE112019003395.6T DE112019003395T5 (en) 2018-07-03 2019-07-02 Test procedure, test system and program
CN201980039712.5A CN112272968B (en) 2018-07-03 2019-07-02 Inspection method, inspection system, and recording medium

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018127024A JP7035857B2 (en) 2018-07-03 2018-07-03 Inspection method, inspection system and program
JP2018-127024 2018-07-03

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2020009108A1 true WO2020009108A1 (en) 2020-01-09

Family

ID=69060370

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2019/026288 WO2020009108A1 (en) 2018-07-03 2019-07-02 Inspection method, inspection system and program

Country Status (5)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7035857B2 (en)
CN (1) CN112272968B (en)
DE (1) DE112019003395T5 (en)
TW (1) TWI723447B (en)
WO (1) WO2020009108A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2021172278A1 (en) * 2020-02-27 2021-09-02 パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 Inspection assistance apparatus and inspection assistance method
WO2022157994A1 (en) * 2021-01-22 2022-07-28 オムロン株式会社 Management system, management device, management method, and program

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH1164235A (en) * 1997-08-26 1999-03-05 Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd Automatic packaging parts inspection system and device and method for setting packaging parts inspecting standard
JP2002031606A (en) * 2000-05-12 2002-01-31 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Apparatus and method for evaluating quality, apparatus and method for displaying quality, and quality evaluation system
JP2006337132A (en) * 2005-06-01 2006-12-14 Fujitsu Ltd Monitoring device and program of visual inspection machine
JP2010199564A (en) * 2009-01-29 2010-09-09 Panasonic Corp Mounted component inspection apparatus, component mounting machine including the mounted component inspection apparatus, and mounted component inspection method
JP2013134560A (en) * 2011-12-26 2013-07-08 Hitachi Cable Ltd Quality management system and quality management program
JP2018077147A (en) * 2016-11-10 2018-05-17 オムロン株式会社 Inspection system, method for controlling inspection device, and program

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH10141929A (en) * 1996-11-12 1998-05-29 Hitachi Ltd Soldering inspection device
JP2005322662A (en) * 2004-05-06 2005-11-17 Shigeki Kobayashi Method for manufacturing mounting board
JP4552749B2 (en) * 2005-05-12 2010-09-29 オムロン株式会社 Inspection standard setting device and method, and process inspection device
JP5038191B2 (en) 2008-03-04 2012-10-03 有限会社共同設計企画 Electronic component inspection method and apparatus used therefor
US9488922B2 (en) * 2010-12-06 2016-11-08 Asml Netherlands B.V. Methods and apparatus for inspection of articles, EUV lithography reticles, lithography apparatus and method of manufacturing devices
JP5522065B2 (en) * 2011-01-18 2014-06-18 オムロン株式会社 Board inspection system
JP5748543B2 (en) * 2011-04-22 2015-07-15 富士機械製造株式会社 Component mounting management apparatus and component mounting management method
JP5861462B2 (en) * 2012-01-17 2016-02-16 オムロン株式会社 Inspection standard registration method for solder inspection and board inspection apparatus using the method
JP6413246B2 (en) * 2014-01-29 2018-10-31 オムロン株式会社 Quality control device and control method for quality control device
JP6624598B2 (en) * 2015-08-04 2019-12-25 株式会社Fuji Production control equipment for board production line
JP6877025B2 (en) * 2016-03-23 2021-05-26 ヤマハファインテック株式会社 Circuit board inspection methods, inspection equipment, and programs

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH1164235A (en) * 1997-08-26 1999-03-05 Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd Automatic packaging parts inspection system and device and method for setting packaging parts inspecting standard
JP2002031606A (en) * 2000-05-12 2002-01-31 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Apparatus and method for evaluating quality, apparatus and method for displaying quality, and quality evaluation system
JP2006337132A (en) * 2005-06-01 2006-12-14 Fujitsu Ltd Monitoring device and program of visual inspection machine
JP2010199564A (en) * 2009-01-29 2010-09-09 Panasonic Corp Mounted component inspection apparatus, component mounting machine including the mounted component inspection apparatus, and mounted component inspection method
JP2013134560A (en) * 2011-12-26 2013-07-08 Hitachi Cable Ltd Quality management system and quality management program
JP2018077147A (en) * 2016-11-10 2018-05-17 オムロン株式会社 Inspection system, method for controlling inspection device, and program

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2021172278A1 (en) * 2020-02-27 2021-09-02 パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 Inspection assistance apparatus and inspection assistance method
WO2022157994A1 (en) * 2021-01-22 2022-07-28 オムロン株式会社 Management system, management device, management method, and program
JP7484744B2 (en) 2021-01-22 2024-05-16 オムロン株式会社 Management system, management device, management method, and program

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE112019003395T5 (en) 2021-03-18
CN112272968A (en) 2021-01-26
JP7035857B2 (en) 2022-03-15
TWI723447B (en) 2021-04-01
CN112272968B (en) 2022-03-04
TW202006351A (en) 2020-02-01
JP2020009815A (en) 2020-01-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5767963B2 (en) Appearance inspection apparatus, appearance inspection method, and computer program
JP5776605B2 (en) Information display system for supporting analysis work of substrate inspection result and analysis work support method
US20160209207A1 (en) Board inspection method and board inspection system using the same
JP2013142558A (en) Visual inspection device, visual inspection method and computer program
CN110045688B (en) Inspection management system, inspection management device, and inspection management method
US11154001B2 (en) Inspection management system, inspection management apparatuses, and inspection management method
WO2020009108A1 (en) Inspection method, inspection system and program
EP3499330A1 (en) Management system, management device, management method, and program
CN111812118A (en) PCB detection method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium
CN108072399B (en) Inspection system, control method of inspection apparatus, and computer-readable storage medium
WO2020009109A1 (en) Inspection method, inspection system and program
JP2013140041A (en) Visual inspection device, visual inspection method and computer program
KR20150068705A (en) Method for inspecting design data of PCB(printed circuit board)
KR101572927B1 (en) Inspection method for remotely monitoring in inspection process
CN112035364B (en) Function test result evaluation method and device
CN115098527A (en) Test point inspection method, device, equipment and storage medium for printed circuit board
JP2005234979A (en) Quality management system and failure detection method
CN116739967A (en) Inspection system and AI model data management method
CN116563052A (en) Method, apparatus, electronic device and computer readable medium for product detection
KR20130081931A (en) Display module pcb inspection method
JP2006209493A (en) Device for designing electrical wiring board
Alex et al. POKA-YOKE SYSTEMS IN AUTOMOTIVE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTION; WEAK POINTS AND COUNTERMEASURES.
Mozar et al. Are printed circuit board assemblies overtested?
JP2007200162A (en) Inspection method and inspection system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 19831363

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 19831363

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1