WO2019196281A1 - 流行病分级预测方法及装置、计算机装置及可读存储介质 - Google Patents
流行病分级预测方法及装置、计算机装置及可读存储介质 Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2019196281A1 WO2019196281A1 PCT/CN2018/099649 CN2018099649W WO2019196281A1 WO 2019196281 A1 WO2019196281 A1 WO 2019196281A1 CN 2018099649 W CN2018099649 W CN 2018099649W WO 2019196281 A1 WO2019196281 A1 WO 2019196281A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- epidemic
- time point
- risk level
- period
- prediction model
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
- G16H50/80—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics, e.g. flu
Definitions
- the present application relates to the field of disease prediction technologies, and in particular, to a method and device for predicting epidemic grading, a computer device, and a non-volatile readable storage medium.
- the epidemic prediction and warning is based on the collected epidemiological epidemic reports and epidemic monitoring data, comprehensive assessment and prediction of the area and scale of the epidemic, and then, within a certain range, adopt appropriate methods to pre-release event threat warnings, and then timely Found outbreaks and epidemics.
- epidemic epidemic prediction has become an important part of the disease surveillance information system.
- a first aspect of the present application provides a method for predicting an epidemic grading, the method comprising:
- a second aspect of the present application provides an epidemic grading prediction apparatus, the apparatus comprising:
- a training unit configured to train the epidemic prediction model with the first training data
- a test unit configured to use the epidemiological prediction model to predict test data, determine whether the prediction result of the test data meets a preset condition, and if the predicted result of the test data does not satisfy a preset condition, Fine-tuning the epidemiological prediction model;
- a determining unit configured to determine, by using the second training data, a hierarchical time window size based on the epidemic risk prediction model for determining an epidemic risk level, and determining the time based on the epidemic prediction model as a medium risk level and a medium risk level or higher Point in the real epidemic epidemic period, based on the epidemiological prediction model, the time point determined as the low risk level and the medium risk level is within the real epidemic non-population period;
- a prediction unit configured to use the epidemiological prediction model to predict each time point in the grading time window size time before the time point to be measured, and divide the time in the grading time window size before the time point to be tested The epidemic epidemic period and the epidemic non-population period; calculating the mean and standard deviation of the epidemiological monitoring data of the epidemic non-epidemic period within the grading time window size time before the time point to be measured; according to the time point to be tested Calculating an epidemic risk level dividing threshold by using the mean and standard deviation of the epidemiological monitoring data of the non-epidemic period of the epidemic period in the classification time window size; determining the prevalence of the time point to be tested according to the threshold of the epidemic risk level Disease risk level.
- a third aspect of the present application provides a computer apparatus comprising a memory and a processor, the memory for storing at least one computer readable instruction, the processor for executing the at least one computer readable instruction
- a computer apparatus comprising a memory and a processor, the memory for storing at least one computer readable instruction, the processor for executing the at least one computer readable instruction
- a fourth aspect of the present application provides a non-volatile readable storage medium storing at least one computer readable instruction when executed by a processor Implement epidemiological grading prediction methods.
- the present application trains and tests the epidemic prediction model, obtains an optimized epidemiological prediction model, and uses the optimized epidemiological prediction model to predict the epidemiological monitoring data before the measurement time point, and determines based on the epidemic prediction model.
- the size of the time window is determined according to the prediction result at each time point before the time point to be measured and the size of the classification time window to determine the epidemic risk level of the time point to be measured. Since the time window size used for the epidemic risk level determination is determined based on the epidemiological prediction model, the present application can improve the accuracy of the epidemic risk level determination.
- FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method for predicting epidemic grading according to Embodiment 1 of the present application.
- step 105 of FIG. 1 is a detailed flow chart of step 105 of FIG. 1.
- FIG. 3 is a structural diagram of an epidemic grading prediction apparatus according to Embodiment 2 of the present application.
- FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a computer device according to Embodiment 3 of the present application.
- the epidemic grading prediction method of the present application is applied to one or more computer devices.
- FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method for predicting epidemic grading according to Embodiment 1 of the present application.
- the epidemic grading prediction method can predict an epidemic risk level at a time point to be tested according to epidemiological monitoring data before the time point to be measured.
- the epidemic grading prediction method specifically includes the following steps:
- step 101 an epidemic prediction model is established.
- the epidemiological prediction model is used to predict epidemic epidemics and epidemic non-epidemic periods based on epidemiological surveillance data.
- the epidemiological monitoring data is time series data.
- the epidemiological monitoring data may include epidemiological data such as the number of visits to the epidemic, the rate of visits, the number of cases, and the incidence rate.
- the number of daily visits to an epidemic eg, flu
- the number of daily visits to an epidemic can be obtained from a medical institution (eg, a hospital), and the number of daily visits to an epidemic (eg, flu) can be used as epidemiological surveillance data.
- the number of daily epidemics of a student's epidemic (eg, flu) can be obtained from the school, and the number of daily epidemics of an epidemic (eg, flu) can be used as epidemiological surveillance data.
- the number of daily visits to an epidemic eg, flu
- the number of daily visits to an epidemic can be obtained from a medical institution (eg, a hospital), and the number of daily visits to an epidemic (eg, flu) can be used as epidemiological surveillance data.
- An epidemiological monitoring network composed of a plurality of monitoring points may be established in a preset area (for example, a province, a city, a region), and the epidemiological monitoring data is obtained from the monitoring points.
- Medical institutions, schools and child care institutions, pharmacies, etc. can be selected as monitoring points to conduct epidemiological surveillance and data collection for the corresponding target population.
- a place that meets the preset conditions can be selected as the monitoring point.
- the preset condition may include a number of people, a scale, and the like. For example, select a school with a predetermined number of schools and child care institutions as monitoring points. Another example is to select a pharmacy that has reached the preset size (for example, by daily turnover) as a monitoring point. For another example, select a hospital (for example, the number of people who seek medical treatment in Japan) to reach a preset size as a monitoring point.
- Epidemiological data at different time points constitute the epidemiological surveillance data (ie, time series data).
- epidemiological data collected on a daily basis can be used as epidemiological surveillance data.
- epidemiological disease data collected on a weekly basis can be used as epidemiological surveillance data.
- medical institutions, schools, child care institutions, and pharmacies are mainly selected to collect epidemiological surveillance data.
- data sources does not limit the addition or replacement of other focused populations or sites in other embodiments as a source of data for monitoring.
- hotels can be included in the epidemiological surveillance area to obtain epidemiological surveillance data for hotel residents.
- epidemiological surveillance data collected by any type of monitoring point can be taken.
- any type of monitoring point such as a medical institution
- only epidemiological surveillance data collected by the hospital can be taken.
- epidemiological surveillance data collected from multiple types of monitoring points can be combined.
- epidemiological surveillance data collected by hospitals can be used as a supplement, supplemented by epidemiological surveillance data from pharmacies.
- the epidemic prediction model may include a CUSUM (Cumulative Sum) prediction model, an EWMA (Exponentially Weighted Moving-Average) prediction model, and a mobile percentile prediction model.
- CUSUM Cumulative Sum
- EWMA Exposurely Weighted Moving-Average
- mobile percentile prediction model The three models are introduced separately below.
- the CUSUM prediction model achieves the amplification effect by accumulating small deviations between the actual values (ie epidemiological monitoring data) and the reference values, and improves the sensitivity of small deviations in the prediction process.
- the deviations accumulate to a certain extent and exceed the threshold, then It is believed that there has been a turning point, that is, the epidemic has shifted from the non-popular period to the epidemic period.
- w is the time window size of the CUSUM prediction model.
- X is daily epidemiology data
- w can take 7 for 7 days (ie, one week).
- ⁇ w is the mean of time point tw to t-1 (length w) X
- ⁇ w is the standard deviation of time point tw to t-1 (length is w) X.
- K 1 is a tunable parameter and is generally taken in (0, 3).
- H t h ⁇ t , it is considered to enter the epidemic epidemic period.
- h is an adjustable parameter, generally taking 1, 2, and 3.
- ⁇ t is the standard deviation of the historical data at time point t.
- C t is the value of the next time point generated based on the value of the previous time point. According to C t and H t , the epidemic epidemic period and the beginning of the epidemic non-population period can be quickly determined. If the CUSUM value C t is greater than the threshold H t , then the epidemic epidemic period is entered. If the CUSUM value C t is less than or equal to the threshold H t , it enters the epidemic non-population period.
- EWMA is an exponentially decreasing weighted moving average.
- the weighted influence of each value decreases exponentially with time. The more recent the data weighting influence is, the older the data also gives a certain weight value.
- EWMA value Z t at time t is greater than UCL, it is considered to enter the epidemic epidemic period.
- the constant ⁇ is a weight coefficient and is generally taken within (0, 1).
- K 2 is a tunable parameter and is generally taken in (0, 3).
- Z t is based on the value of the previous time point to generate the value of the next time point. According to Z t and UCL, the start of the epidemic period and the non-popular period can be quickly determined. If Z t is greater than UCL, it enters the epidemic period. If the CUSUM value Z t is less than or equal to UCL, it enters the epidemic non-population period.
- the moving percentile prediction model is based on the epidemiological monitoring data of the observation week of the previous year and the pre-set weeks (for example, 2 weeks before and after) as the baseline data, and the specified percentiles are calculated (for example, P5, P10,... , P90, P95, P100) as a candidate early warning threshold, establish an early warning model.
- the P80 value of the influenza ILI index for the third week of 2014 represents the 80th percentile of the 10-week morbidity rate for the 1-5th week of 2012-2013, which is taken as the early warning threshold for the third week of 2014.
- the P75 value for the 20th week of 2014 represents the 75th percentile of the 10-week morbidity rate for the 18th to 22nd week of 2012-2013, which is taken as the warning threshold for the 3rd week of 2014.
- epidemiological surveillance data Compare epidemiological surveillance data with early warning thresholds and enter epidemic epidemic if epidemiological surveillance data is greater than the pre-warning threshold. If the epidemiological surveillance data is less than or equal to the warning threshold, it enters the epidemic non-population period.
- Step 102 Train the epidemic prediction model with the first training data.
- the first training data is epidemiological surveillance data.
- the training of the epidemic prediction model is performed by using the first training data, that is, the first training data is predicted by using the epidemic prediction model, and the parameters of the epidemic prediction model are adjusted or selected according to the prediction result of the first training data. .
- the first training data is subjected to epidemiological prediction using the CUSUM prediction model, and the time window size w, parameters k 1 and h of the CUSUM prediction model are adjusted according to the prediction result of the first training data.
- the EWMA prediction model is used to perform epidemiological prediction on the first training data, and the weight coefficient ⁇ and the parameter k 2 of the EWMA prediction model are adjusted according to the prediction result of the first training data.
- the first training data is subjected to epidemiological prediction by using the moving percentile prediction model, and the appropriate percentile (for example, the 80th percentile) is selected as the moving percentage according to the prediction result of the first training data.
- the warning threshold for the bit prediction model is selected as the appropriate percentile (for example, the 80th percentile) as the moving percentage according to the prediction result of the first training data.
- the first training data may be predicted by using the epidemic prediction model, and the prediction result of the first training data is compared with a real epidemic/non-period segmentation result, and the comparison result is adjusted or selected according to the comparison result.
- the parameters of the epidemic prediction model may be used to predict the epidemic prediction model.
- the real epidemic/non-epidemic period is defined by medical methods.
- the preset indicator of the prediction result of the epidemic prediction model on the first training data may be calculated, and the parameters of the epidemic prediction model are adjusted or selected according to the preset index. For example, three indicators of accuracy, specificity, and timeliness of the prediction result of the epidemic prediction model for the first training data may be calculated, and parameters of the epidemic prediction model are adjusted or selected based on the three indicators.
- Accuracy number of days of effective warning / total number of days of true epidemic epidemic x 100%;
- Timeliness (ie lag period) start date of the epidemic period of effective early warning - the start date of the real epidemic epidemic period.
- the epidemiological prediction model to predict the epidemic epidemic period for the first training data, if it is predicted that the epidemiological epidemic period is a certain day, and it falls within the range of the real epidemic epidemic period, it is recorded as an effective warning. .
- Step 103 The test data is predicted by using the epidemic prediction model, and it is determined whether the prediction result of the test data meets a preset condition. If the prediction result of the test data satisfies a preset condition, step 105 is performed.
- the test data is epidemiological surveillance data.
- the epidemiological prediction model is used to predict the test data, and the purpose is to verify whether the post-training epidemiological prediction model satisfies the requirements.
- Predetermining indicators (eg, accuracy, specificity, timeliness) of the prediction result of the test data may be calculated, and determining whether the post-training epidemic prediction model satisfies a preset condition according to a preset index of the prediction result of the test data . For example, determining whether the accuracy of the prediction result of the test data reaches a preset accuracy, and/or determining whether the specificity of the prediction result of the test data reaches a preset specificity, and/or determining the test data. Whether the timeliness of the forecast results reaches the preset timeliness.
- the accuracy of the prediction result of the test data reaches a preset accuracy, and/or the specificity of the prediction result of the test data reaches a preset specificity, and/or the timeliness of the prediction result of the test data reaches Predetermined timeliness, it is judged that the epidemic prediction model satisfies the preset condition, and an optimized epidemiological prediction model is obtained.
- Step 104 If the prediction result of the test data does not satisfy the preset condition, fine-tune the epidemic prediction model, and then perform step 105.
- the parameters of the epidemic prediction model are further adjusted.
- the time window size w, parameters k 1 and h of the CUSUM prediction model are further adjusted.
- the weight coefficient ⁇ and the parameter k 2 of the EWMA prediction model are further adjusted.
- the 75th percentile (the 80th percentile is adjusted to the 75th percentile) is taken as the The warning threshold for the moving percentile prediction model.
- Step 105 Determine, by using the second training data, a time window size (hereinafter referred to as a grading time window size) for determining an epidemic risk level based on the epidemic prediction model, so that the epidemic prediction model is determined to be a medium risk level and The time point above the risk level is within the real epidemic period, and the time point determined as the low risk level and the medium risk level based on the epidemic prediction model is within the real epidemic non-population period.
- a time window size hereinafter referred to as a grading time window size
- the second training data is epidemiological monitoring data.
- the second training data may be the same as or different from the first training data.
- the grading time window size is determined in order to ensure the accuracy of the epidemic risk level based on the epidemiological prediction model.
- the grading time window size is adjusted so that the time point determined as the medium risk level and the medium risk level or higher based on the epidemic prediction model is utilized during the real epidemic period.
- the epidemic prediction model determines that the time points of the low risk level and the medium risk level are within the real epidemic non-population period.
- determining the hierarchical time window size may specifically include the following steps:
- Step 201 Using the epidemic prediction model to predict each time point in the grading time window size time before the preset time point, and dividing the epidemic epidemic in the grading time window size time before the preset time point Period and epidemic period.
- the initial value of the hierarchical time window size is a preset value, for example, 3, and is adjusted to a suitable size through steps 201-205, for example, 7.
- Step 202 Calculate, according to the second training data, a mean and a standard deviation of epidemiological monitoring data of a non-epidemic epidemic period within the time-scale window size time before the preset time point.
- Step 203 Calculate an epidemic risk level division threshold according to the mean and standard deviation of the epidemic monitoring data of the non-epidemic period of the epidemic period before the preset time point size. This step can refer to the description of step 108 below.
- Step 204 Determine an epidemic risk level of the preset time point according to the epidemic risk level division threshold corresponding to the second training data. This step can refer to the description of step 109 below.
- Step 205 If the epidemic risk level of the preset time point is a medium risk level and a medium risk level, determine whether the preset time point is within a real epidemic period, or if the preset The epidemic risk level at the time point is a low risk and a medium risk level, and it is determined whether the preset time point is within a real epidemic non-popular period.
- Step 206 If the epidemic risk level of the preset time point is a medium risk level and a medium risk level, and the preset time point is within a real epidemic epidemic period, or if the preset time point The epidemic risk level is a low risk and a medium risk level, and the preset time point is within a real epidemic non-popular period, and the hierarchical time window size is adjusted.
- the hierarchical time window size may be adjusted multiple times in the manner described above using different second training data to adjust the hierarchical time window size to an optimal value.
- Step 106 predict, by using the epidemic prediction model, each time point in the grading time window size time before the time point to be measured, and divide the epidemic in the grading time window size time before the time point to be tested Epidemic period and non-epidemic period of epidemic disease.
- the CUSUM prediction model uses the CUSUM prediction model to predict each time point in the grading time window size time before the time point to be measured, and dividing the epidemic period and epidemic time in the grading time window size time before the time point to be measured The disease is not in epidemic.
- the mobile percentile model is used to predict each time point in the time window of the hierarchical time window before the time point is measured, and the epidemic epidemic time in the size time window size before the time point to be measured is divided. Period and epidemic period.
- Step 107 Calculate a mean value and a standard deviation of epidemiological monitoring data of a non-epidemic epidemic period within the size time window size period before the time point to be measured.
- step 107 all the epidemic non-population periods in the grading time window size time before the time point to be measured are counted, and all the epidemic diseases in the grading time window size time before the time point to be measured are calculated.
- the mean and standard deviation of epidemiological surveillance data during the epidemic For example, the three time epidemic non-population periods are included in the grading time window size time before the time point to be tested, and the mean and standard deviation of the epidemiological monitoring data of the three epidemics are calculated.
- the mean and standard deviation are a mean and a standard deviation calculated from epidemiological monitoring data of all epidemic non-epidemic periods within the grading time window size time before the time point to be measured.
- Step 108 Calculate an epidemic risk level division threshold according to the mean value and the standard deviation of the epidemic monitoring data of the non-epidemic period of the epidemic period in the time period of the classification time window before the time point to be measured.
- the epidemic risk level division threshold may include a high school level division threshold, a medium and low level division threshold, and a low/very low level division threshold.
- the high school level partitioning threshold is used to divide a high risk level and a medium risk level
- the low level ranking threshold is used to divide the medium risk level and the low risk level
- the low level ranking threshold is used to divide the low risk level and the pole. Low risk level.
- the mean value of the epidemiological monitoring data during the non-prevalence period is ⁇ w′
- the standard deviation is ⁇ w′
- the high school level dividing threshold is ⁇ w′ +k′ 1 * ⁇ w′
- the middle and low level partitioning threshold is ⁇ w′ + k 2 ′ * ⁇ w′
- the middle and low level partitioning threshold is ⁇ w′ + k 3 '* ⁇ w' , 2 ⁇ k' 3 ⁇ 4.
- the high school level dividing threshold is ⁇ w′ +6* ⁇ w′
- the middle and low level dividing threshold is ⁇ w′ +4* ⁇ w′
- the middle and low level dividing threshold is ⁇ w′ +2 * ⁇ w' .
- the epidemic risk level division threshold may include other quantities and types.
- the epidemic risk level division threshold may include a high school level division threshold and a medium and low level division threshold.
- the epidemic risk level division threshold may include a very high/high level division threshold, a high school level division threshold, a medium and low level division threshold, and a low/very low level division threshold.
- Step 109 Determine a prevalence risk level of the time point to be tested according to the epidemic risk level division threshold.
- the epidemic monitoring data at the time point to be tested is greater than or equal to the high school level dividing threshold, it is determined that the epidemic risk level of the time point to be tested is a high risk level. If the epidemic monitoring data at the time point to be tested is smaller than the high school level dividing threshold and greater than or equal to the high school level dividing threshold, it is determined that the epidemic risk level of the time point to be tested is a medium risk level. If the epidemiological monitoring data at the time point to be tested is smaller than the middle and low level dividing threshold and greater than or equal to the low/low level dividing threshold, it is determined that the epidemic risk level of the time point to be tested is a low risk level. If the epidemiological monitoring data at the time point to be tested is less than the low/very low level dividing threshold, it is determined that the epidemic risk level of the time point to be tested is an extremely low risk level.
- the CUSUM prediction model, the EWMA prediction model, and the moving percentile prediction model may be combined for epidemiological grading prediction. Specifically, according to the method of steps 101-109, determining, according to the CUSUM prediction model, the time point to be tested is the first epidemic risk level, and determining the time point to be tested as the second epidemic risk level based on the EWMA prediction model, based on the mobile percentile The predictive model determines that the time point to be tested is a third epidemic risk level, and the final epidemic risk level is obtained according to the first epidemic risk level, the second epidemic risk level, and the third epidemic risk level.
- the first epidemic risk level, the second epidemic risk level, and the third epidemic risk level have at least two epidemic risk levels consistent, if the first epidemic risk level, If at least two epidemiological risk levels are consistent between the second epidemic risk level and the third epidemic risk level, the consistent epidemic risk level is used as the final epidemic risk level.
- the epidemic grading prediction method of the first embodiment trains and tests the epidemic prediction model, obtains an optimized epidemiological prediction model, and uses the optimized epidemic prediction model to predict epidemiological monitoring data before the time point is measured, based on
- the epidemic prediction model determines the grading time window size, and determines the epidemic risk level of the time point to be measured according to the prediction result at each time point before the time point to be measured and the grading time window size. Since the time window size used for the epidemic risk level determination is determined based on the epidemiological prediction model, the first embodiment can improve the accuracy of the epidemiological risk level determination.
- FIG. 3 is a structural diagram of an epidemic grading prediction apparatus according to Embodiment 2 of the present application.
- the epidemic grading prediction apparatus 10 may include an establishing unit 301, a training unit 302, a testing unit 303, a determining unit 304, and a prediction unit 305.
- the establishing unit 301 is configured to establish an epidemic prediction model.
- the epidemiological prediction model is used to predict epidemic epidemics and epidemic non-epidemic periods based on epidemiological surveillance data.
- the epidemiological monitoring data is time series data.
- the epidemiological monitoring data may include epidemiological data such as the number of visits to the epidemic, the rate of visits, the number of cases, and the incidence rate.
- the number of daily visits to an epidemic eg, flu
- the number of daily visits to an epidemic can be obtained from a medical institution (eg, a hospital), and the number of daily visits to an epidemic (eg, flu) can be used as epidemiological surveillance data.
- the number of daily epidemics of a student's epidemic (eg, flu) can be obtained from the school, and the number of daily epidemics of an epidemic (eg, flu) can be used as epidemiological surveillance data.
- the number of daily visits to an epidemic eg, flu
- the number of daily visits to an epidemic can be obtained from a medical institution (eg, a hospital), and the number of daily visits to an epidemic (eg, flu) can be used as epidemiological surveillance data.
- An epidemiological monitoring network composed of a plurality of monitoring points may be established in a preset area (for example, a province, a city, a region), and the epidemiological monitoring data is obtained from the monitoring points.
- Medical institutions, schools and child care institutions, pharmacies, etc. can be selected as monitoring points to conduct epidemiological surveillance and data collection for the corresponding target population.
- a place that meets the preset conditions can be selected as the monitoring point.
- the preset condition may include a number of people, a scale, and the like. For example, select a school with a predetermined number of schools and child care institutions as monitoring points. Another example is to select a pharmacy that has reached the preset size (for example, by daily turnover) as a monitoring point. For another example, select a hospital (for example, the number of people who seek medical treatment in Japan) to reach a preset size as a monitoring point.
- Epidemiological data at different time points constitute the epidemiological surveillance data (ie, time series data).
- epidemiological data collected on a daily basis can be used as epidemiological surveillance data.
- epidemiological disease data collected on a weekly basis can be used as epidemiological surveillance data.
- medical institutions, schools, child care institutions, and pharmacies are mainly selected to collect epidemiological surveillance data.
- data sources does not limit the addition or replacement of other focused populations or sites in other embodiments as a source of data for monitoring.
- hotels can be included in the epidemiological surveillance area to obtain epidemiological surveillance data for hotel residents.
- epidemiological surveillance data collected by any type of monitoring point can be taken.
- any type of monitoring point such as a medical institution
- only epidemiological surveillance data collected by the hospital can be taken.
- epidemiological surveillance data collected from multiple types of monitoring points can be combined.
- epidemiological surveillance data collected by hospitals can be used as a supplement, supplemented by epidemiological surveillance data from pharmacies.
- the epidemic prediction model may include a CUSUM (Cumulative Sum) prediction model, an EWMA (Exponentially Weighted Moving-Average) prediction model, and a mobile percentile prediction model.
- CUSUM Cumulative Sum
- EWMA Exposurely Weighted Moving-Average
- mobile percentile prediction model The three models are introduced separately below.
- the CUSUM prediction model achieves the amplification effect by accumulating small deviations between the actual values (ie epidemiological monitoring data) and the reference values, and improves the sensitivity of small deviations in the prediction process.
- the deviations accumulate to a certain extent and exceed the threshold, then It is believed that there has been a turning point, that is, the epidemic has shifted from the non-popular period to the epidemic period.
- w is the time window size of the CUSUM prediction model.
- X is daily epidemiology data
- w can take 7 for 7 days (ie, one week).
- ⁇ w is the mean of time point tw to t-1 (length w) X
- ⁇ w is the standard deviation of time point tw to t-1 (length is w) X.
- K 1 is a tunable parameter and is generally taken in (0, 3).
- H t h ⁇ t , it is considered to enter the epidemic epidemic period.
- h is an adjustable parameter, generally taking 1, 2, and 3.
- ⁇ t is the standard deviation of the historical data at time point t.
- C t is the value of the next time point generated based on the value of the previous time point. According to C t and H t , the epidemic epidemic period and the beginning of the epidemic non-population period can be quickly determined. If the CUSUM value C t is greater than the threshold H t , then the epidemic epidemic period is entered. If the CUSUM value C t is less than or equal to the threshold H t , it enters the epidemic non-population period.
- EWMA is an exponentially decreasing weighted moving average.
- the weighted influence of each value decreases exponentially with time. The more recent the data weighting influence is, the older the data also gives a certain weight value.
- EWMA value Z t at time t is greater than UCL, it is considered to enter the epidemic epidemic period.
- the constant ⁇ is a weight coefficient and is generally taken within (0, 1).
- K 2 is a tunable parameter and is generally taken in (0, 3).
- Z t is based on the value of the previous time point to generate the value of the next time point. According to Z t and UCL, the start of the epidemic period and the non-popular period can be quickly determined. If Z t is greater than UCL, it enters the epidemic period. If the CUSUM value Z t is less than or equal to UCL, it enters the epidemic non-population period.
- the moving percentile prediction model is based on the epidemiological monitoring data of the observation week of the previous year and the pre-set weeks (for example, 2 weeks before and after) as the baseline data, and the specified percentiles are calculated (for example, P5, P10,... , P90, P95, P100) as a candidate early warning threshold, establish an early warning model.
- the P80 value of the influenza ILI index for the third week of 2014 represents the 80th percentile of the 10-week morbidity rate for the 1-5th week of 2012-2013, which is taken as the early warning threshold for the third week of 2014.
- the P75 value for the 20th week of 2014 represents the 75th percentile of the 10-week morbidity rate for the 18th to 22nd week of 2012-2013, which is taken as the warning threshold for the 3rd week of 2014.
- epidemiological surveillance data Compare epidemiological surveillance data with early warning thresholds and enter epidemic epidemic if epidemiological surveillance data is greater than the pre-warning threshold. If the epidemiological surveillance data is less than or equal to the warning threshold, it enters the epidemic non-population period.
- the training unit 302 is configured to train the epidemic prediction model with the first training data.
- the first training data is epidemiological surveillance data.
- the training of the epidemic prediction model is performed by using the first training data, that is, the first training data is predicted by using the epidemic prediction model, and the parameters of the epidemic prediction model are adjusted or selected according to the prediction result of the first training data. .
- the first training data is subjected to epidemiological prediction using the CUSUM prediction model, and the time window size w, parameters k 1 and h of the CUSUM prediction model are adjusted according to the prediction result of the first training data.
- the EWMA prediction model is used to perform epidemiological prediction on the first training data, and the weight coefficient ⁇ and the parameter k 2 of the EWMA prediction model are adjusted according to the prediction result of the first training data.
- the first training data is subjected to epidemiological prediction by using the moving percentile prediction model, and the appropriate percentile (for example, the 80th percentile) is selected as the moving percentage according to the prediction result of the first training data.
- the warning threshold for the bit prediction model is selected as the appropriate percentile (for example, the 80th percentile) as the moving percentage according to the prediction result of the first training data.
- the first training data may be predicted by using the epidemic prediction model, and the prediction result of the first training data is compared with a real epidemic/non-period segmentation result, and the comparison result is adjusted or selected according to the comparison result.
- the parameters of the epidemic prediction model may be used to predict the epidemic prediction model.
- the real epidemic/non-epidemic period is defined by medical methods.
- the preset indicator of the prediction result of the epidemic prediction model on the first training data may be calculated, and the parameters of the epidemic prediction model are adjusted or selected according to the preset index. For example, three indicators of accuracy, specificity, and timeliness of the prediction result of the epidemic prediction model for the first training data may be calculated, and parameters of the epidemic prediction model are adjusted or selected based on the three indicators.
- Accuracy number of days of effective warning / total number of days of true epidemic epidemic x 100%;
- Timeliness (ie lag period) start date of the epidemic period of effective early warning - the start date of the real epidemic epidemic period.
- the epidemiological prediction model to predict the epidemic epidemic period for the first training data, if it is predicted that the epidemiological epidemic period is a certain day, and it falls within the range of the real epidemic epidemic period, it is recorded as an effective warning. .
- the testing unit 303 is configured to use the epidemic prediction model to predict the test data, determine whether the prediction result of the test data meets a preset condition, and if the prediction result of the test data does not meet the preset condition, the test unit
- the epidemiological prediction model is fine-tuned.
- the test data is epidemiological surveillance data.
- the epidemiological prediction model is used to predict the test data, and the purpose is to verify whether the post-training epidemiological prediction model satisfies the requirements.
- Predetermining indicators (eg, accuracy, specificity, timeliness) of the prediction result of the test data may be calculated, and determining whether the post-training epidemic prediction model satisfies a preset condition according to a preset index of the prediction result of the test data . For example, determining whether the accuracy of the prediction result of the test data reaches a preset accuracy, and/or determining whether the specificity of the prediction result of the test data reaches a preset specificity, and/or determining the test data. Whether the timeliness of the forecast results reaches the preset timeliness.
- the accuracy of the prediction result of the test data reaches a preset accuracy, and/or the specificity of the prediction result of the test data reaches a preset specificity, and/or the timeliness of the prediction result of the test data reaches Predetermined timeliness, it is judged that the epidemic prediction model satisfies the preset condition, and an optimized epidemiological prediction model is obtained.
- the parameters of the epidemic prediction model are further adjusted.
- the time window size w, parameters k 1 and h of the CUSUM prediction model are further adjusted.
- the weight coefficient ⁇ and the parameter k 2 of the EWMA prediction model are further adjusted.
- the 75th percentile (the 80th percentile is adjusted to the 75th percentile) is taken as the The warning threshold for the moving percentile prediction model.
- a determining unit 304 configured to determine, by using the second training data, a time window size (hereinafter referred to as a hierarchical time window size) for determining an epidemic risk level based on the epidemic prediction model, so that the epidemiological prediction model is determined to be middle
- a time window size hereinafter referred to as a hierarchical time window size
- the time points of the risk level and the medium risk level are within the real epidemic period, and the time points determined as the low risk level and the medium risk level based on the epidemic prediction model are within the real epidemic non-population period.
- the second training data is epidemiological monitoring data.
- the second training data may be the same as or different from the first training data.
- the grading time window size is determined in order to ensure the accuracy of the epidemic risk level based on the epidemiological prediction model.
- the grading time window size is adjusted so that the time point determined as the medium risk level and the medium risk level or higher based on the epidemic prediction model is utilized during the real epidemic period.
- the epidemic prediction model determines that the time points of the low risk level and the medium risk level are within the real epidemic non-population period.
- the determining unit 304 can determine the hierarchical time window size as follows:
- the initial value of the hierarchical time window size is a preset value, for example, 3, and the determining unit 304 adjusts to a suitable size, for example, 7.
- the epidemic risk level of the preset time point is a medium risk level and a medium risk level or higher, determining whether the preset time point is within a real epidemic period, or if the preset The epidemic risk level at the time point is a low risk and a medium risk level, and it is determined whether the preset time point is within a real epidemic non-popular period.
- the epidemic risk level of the preset time point is a medium risk level and a medium risk level or higher, and the preset time point is within a real epidemic epidemic period, or if the preset time point is The epidemic risk level is a low risk and a medium risk level, and the preset time point is within a real epidemic non-popular period, and the hierarchical time window size is adjusted.
- the hierarchical time window size may be adjusted multiple times in the manner described above using different second training data to adjust the hierarchical time window size to an optimal value.
- the forecasting unit 305 is configured to use the epidemic prediction model to predict each time point in the grading time window size time before the time point to be measured, and divide the sizing time window size time before the time point to be tested The prevalence of epidemics and the epidemic period of epidemics.
- the CUSUM prediction model uses the CUSUM prediction model to predict each time point in the grading time window size time before the time point to be measured, and dividing the epidemic period and epidemic time in the grading time window size time before the time point to be measured The disease is not in epidemic.
- the mobile percentile model is used to predict each time point in the time window of the hierarchical time window before the time point is measured, and the epidemic epidemic time in the size time window size before the time point to be measured is divided. Period and epidemic period.
- the prediction unit 305 is further configured to calculate a mean value and a standard deviation of the epidemic monitoring data of the epidemic non-population period within the grading time window size time before the time point to be measured.
- the mean and standard deviation of the disease surveillance data For example, the three time epidemic non-population periods are included in the grading time window size time before the time point to be tested, and the mean and standard deviation of the epidemiological monitoring data of the three epidemics are calculated.
- the mean and standard deviation are a mean and a standard deviation calculated from epidemiological monitoring data of all epidemic non-epidemic periods within the grading time window size time before the time point to be measured.
- the prediction unit 305 is further configured to calculate an epidemic risk level division threshold according to the mean value and the standard deviation of the epidemic monitoring data of the non-epidemic period of the epidemic period before the time point of the classification time window.
- the epidemic risk level division threshold may include a high school level division threshold, a medium and low level division threshold, and a low/very low level division threshold.
- the high school level partitioning threshold is used to divide a high risk level and a medium risk level
- the low level ranking threshold is used to divide the medium risk level and the low risk level
- the low level ranking threshold is used to divide the low risk level and the pole. Low risk level.
- the mean value of the epidemiological monitoring data during the non-prevalence period is ⁇ w′
- the standard deviation is ⁇ w′
- the high school level dividing threshold is ⁇ w′ +k′ 1 * ⁇ w′
- the middle and low level partitioning threshold is ⁇ w′ + k 2 ′ * ⁇ w′
- the middle and low level partitioning threshold is ⁇ w′ + k 3 '* ⁇ w' , 2 ⁇ k' 3 ⁇ 4.
- the high school level dividing threshold is ⁇ w′ +6* ⁇ w′
- the middle and low level dividing threshold is ⁇ w′ +4* ⁇ w′
- the middle and low level dividing threshold is ⁇ w′ +2 * ⁇ w' .
- the epidemic risk level division threshold may include other quantities and types.
- the epidemic risk level division threshold may include a high school level division threshold and a medium and low level division threshold.
- the epidemic risk level division threshold may include a very high/high level division threshold, a high school level division threshold, a medium and low level division threshold, and a low/very low level division threshold.
- the predicting unit 305 is further configured to determine an epidemic risk level of the time point to be tested according to the epidemic risk level dividing threshold.
- the epidemic monitoring data at the time point to be tested is greater than or equal to the high school level dividing threshold, it is determined that the epidemic risk level of the time point to be tested is a high risk level. If the epidemic monitoring data at the time point to be tested is smaller than the high school level dividing threshold and greater than or equal to the high school level dividing threshold, it is determined that the epidemic risk level of the time point to be tested is a medium risk level. If the epidemiological monitoring data at the time point to be tested is smaller than the middle and low level dividing threshold and greater than or equal to the low/low level dividing threshold, it is determined that the epidemic risk level of the time point to be tested is a low risk level. If the epidemiological monitoring data at the time point to be tested is less than the low/very low level dividing threshold, it is determined that the epidemic risk level of the time point to be tested is an extremely low risk level.
- the epidemic grading prediction apparatus 10 may perform epidemiological grading prediction in combination with a CUSUM prediction model, an EWMA prediction model, and a mobile percentile prediction model. Specifically, the epidemic grading prediction apparatus 10 determines that the time point to be tested is the first epidemic risk level based on the CUSUM prediction model, and determines the time point to be tested as the second epidemic risk level based on the EWMA prediction model, based on the mobile percentile The predictive model determines that the time point to be tested is a third epidemic risk level, and the final epidemic risk level is obtained according to the first epidemic risk level, the second epidemic risk level, and the third epidemic risk level.
- the first epidemic risk level, the second epidemic risk level, and the third epidemic risk level have at least two consistency, if the first epidemic risk level, the second epidemic If at least two of the disease risk level and the third epidemic risk level are consistent, the consistent epidemiological risk level is used as the final epidemic risk level.
- the epidemic grading prediction device 10 of the second embodiment trains and tests the epidemic prediction model, obtains an optimized epidemic prediction model, and uses the optimized epidemic prediction model to predict epidemiological monitoring data before the time point is measured.
- the grading time window size is determined based on the epidemic prediction model, and the epidemic risk level of the time point to be measured is determined according to the prediction result at each time point before the time point to be measured and the grading time window size. Since the time window size used for the epidemic risk level determination is determined based on the epidemic prediction model, Embodiment 2 can improve the accuracy of the epidemic risk level determination.
- the computer device 1 includes a memory 20, a processor 30, and computer readable instructions 40 stored in the memory 20 and executable on the processor 30, such as an epidemic grading prediction program.
- the processor 30 executes the computer readable instructions 40 to implement the steps in the above-described epidemiological grading prediction method embodiment, such as steps 101-109 shown in FIG.
- the processor 30, when executing the computer readable instructions 40, implements the functions of the various modules/units of the apparatus embodiments described above, such as units 301-305 of FIG.
- the computer readable instructions 40 may be partitioned into one or more modules/units that are stored in the memory 20 and executed by the processor 30, To complete this application.
- the one or more modules/units may be a series of computer readable instruction segments capable of performing a particular function for describing the execution of the computer readable instructions 40 in the computer device 1.
- the computer readable instructions 40 may be divided into the establishing unit 301, the training unit 302, the testing unit 303, the determining unit 304, and the predicting unit 305 in FIG.
- the computer device 1 may be a computing device such as a desktop computer, a notebook, a palmtop computer, and a cloud server. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the schematic diagram 4 is merely an example of the computer device 1, and does not constitute a limitation of the computer device 1, and may include more or less components than those illustrated, or may combine some components, or different.
- the components, such as the computer device 1, may also include input and output devices, network access devices, buses, and the like.
- the processor 30 may be a central processing unit (CPU), or may be other general-purpose processors, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic device, discrete hardware components, etc.
- the general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor 30 may be any conventional processor or the like, and the processor 30 is a control center of the computer device 1, and connects the entire computer device 1 by using various interfaces and lines. Various parts.
- the memory 20 can be used to store the computer readable instructions 40 and/or modules/units by running or executing computer readable instructions and/or modules/units stored in the memory 20, and The various functions of the computer device 1 are realized by calling data stored in the memory 20.
- the memory 20 may mainly include a storage program area and a storage data area, wherein the storage program area may store an operating system, an application required for at least one function (such as a sound playing function, an image playing function, etc.), and the like; the storage data area may be Data (such as audio data, phone book, etc.) created according to the use of the computer device 1 is stored.
- the memory 20 may include a high-speed random access memory, and may also include a non-volatile memory such as a hard disk, a memory, a plug-in hard disk, a smart memory card (SMC), and a secure digital (Secure Digital, SD).
- a non-volatile memory such as a hard disk, a memory, a plug-in hard disk, a smart memory card (SMC), and a secure digital (Secure Digital, SD).
- SMC smart memory card
- SD Secure Digital
- Card flash card, at least one disk storage device, flash device, or other volatile solid-state storage device.
- the modules/units integrated by the computer device 1 can be stored in a computer readable storage medium if implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as a stand-alone product. Based on such understanding, the present application implements all or part of the processes in the foregoing embodiments, and may also be implemented by computer-readable instructions, which may be stored in a non-volatile manner. In reading a storage medium, the computer readable instructions, when executed by a processor, implement the steps of the various method embodiments described above. Wherein, the computer readable instructions comprise computer readable instruction code, which may be in the form of source code, an object code form, an executable file or some intermediate form or the like.
- the non-transitory readable medium may include any entity or device capable of carrying the computer readable instruction code, a recording medium, a USB flash drive, a removable hard disk, a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a computer memory, a read only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory), Random Access Memory (RAM), electrical carrier signals, telecommunications signals, and software distribution media.
- ROM Read Only memory
- RAM Random Access Memory
- the contents of the non-volatile readable medium may be appropriately increased or decreased according to the requirements of legislation and patent practice in the jurisdiction, for example, in some jurisdictions, according to legislation and patent practice, Volatile readable media does not include electrical carrier signals and telecommunication signals.
Landscapes
- Public Health (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Medical Treatment And Welfare Office Work (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (20)
- 一种流行病分级预测方法,其特征在于,所述方法包括:(1)建立流行病预测模型;(2)利用第一训练数据对所述流行病预测模型进行训练;(3)利用所述流行病预测模型对测试数据进行预测,判断所述测试数据的预测结果是否满足预设条件,若所述测试数据的预测结果满足预设条件,则执行(5);(4)若所述测试数据的预测结果不满足预设条件,则对所述流行病预测模型进行微调,然后执行(5);(5)利用第二训练数据确定基于所述流行病预测模型进行流行病风险等级判定的分级时间窗大小,使基于所述流行病预测模型判定为中风险等级及中风险以上等级的时间点在真实的流行病流行期内,基于所述流行病预测模型判定为低风险等级及中风险以下等级的时间点在真实的流行病非流行期内;(6)利用所述流行病预测模型对待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内的各个时间点进行预测,划分出所述待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内的流行病流行期与流行病非流行期;(7)计算所述待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内流行病非流行期的流行病监测数据的均值与标准差;(8)根据所述待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内流行病非流行期的流行病监测数据的均值与标准差计算流行病风险等级划分阈值;(9)根据所述流行病风险等级划分阈值判定所述待测时间点的流行病风险等级。
- 如权利要求1所述的方法,其特征在于,所述步骤(5)包括:利用所述流行病预测模型对预设时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内的各个时间点进行预测,划分出所述预设时间点之前分级时间窗大小时间内的流行病流行期与流行病非流行期;根据所述第二训练数据计算所述预设时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内流行病非流行期的流行病监测数据的均值与标准差;根据所述预设时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内流行病非流行期的流行病监测数据的均值与标准差,计算流行病风险等级划分阈值;根据所述流行病风险等级划分阈值判定所述预设时间点的流行病风险等级;若所述预设时间点的流行病风险等级为中风险等级及中风险以上等级,则判断所述预设时间点是否在真实的流行病流行期内,或者,若所述预设时间点的流行病风险等级为低风险及中风险以下等级,则判断所述预设时间点是否在真实的流行病非流行期内;若所述预设时间点的流行病风险等级为中风险等级及中风险以上等级,且所述预设时间点在真实的流行病流行期内,或者,若所述预设时间点的流 行病风险等级为低风险及中风险以下等级,且所述预设时间点在真实的流行病非流行期内,则调整所述分级时间窗大小。
- 如权利要求1所述的方法,其特征在于,所述流行病预测模型包括累积和预测模型、指数加权移动平均值预测模型和移动百分位预测模型。
- 如权利要求1至3中任一项所述的方法,其特征在于,所述步骤(2)包括:利用所述流行病预测模型对所述第一训练数据进行预测,将所述第一训练数据的预测结果与真实的流行病流行期/非流行期划分结果进行比较,根据比较结果调整或选取所述流行病预测模型的参数。
- 如权利要求4所述的方法,其特征在于,所述将所述第一训练数据的预测结果与真实的流行病流行期/非流行期划分结果进行比较,根据比较结果调整或选取所述流行病预测模型的参数包括:计算所述流行病预测模型对所述第一训练数据的预测结果的准确度、特异度、及时性,基于所述准确度、特异度、及时性调整或选取所述流行病预测模型的参数。
- 如权利要求1至3中任一项所述的方法,其特征在于,所述流行病监测数据通过在预设区域建立由多个监测点组成的流行病监测网络,从所述监测点获取得到。
- 如权利要求6所述的方法,其特征在于,所述监测点包括满足预设人数或规模的医疗机构、学校和幼托机构、药店。
- 一种流行病分级预测装置,其特征在于,所述装置包括:建立单元,用于建立流行病预测模型;训练单元,用于利用第一训练数据对所述流行病预测模型进行训练;测试单元,用于利用所述流行病预测模型对测试数据进行预测,判断所述测试数据的预测结果是否满足预设条件,若所述测试数据的预测结果不满足预设条件,则对所述流行病预测模型进行微调;确定单元,用于利用第二训练数据确定基于所述流行病预测模型进行流行病风险等级判定的分级时间窗大小,使基于所述流行病预测模型判定为中风险等级及中风险以上等级的时间点在真实的流行病流行期内,基于所述流行病预测模型判定为低风险等级及中风险以下等级的时间点在真实的流行病非流行期内;预测单元,用于利用所述流行病预测模型对待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内的各个时间点进行预测,划分出所述待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内的流行病流行期与流行病非流行期;计算所述待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内流行病非流行期的流行病监测数据的均值与标准差;根据所述待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内流行病非流行期的流行病监测数据的均值与标准差计算流行病风险等级划分阈值;根据所述流行病风险等级划分阈值判定所述待测时间点的流行病风险等级。
- 一种计算机装置,其特征在于,所述计算机装置包括存储器及处理器,所述存储器用于存储至少一个计算机可读指令,所述处理器用于执行所述至少 一个计算机可读指令以实现以下步骤:(1)建立流行病预测模型;(2)利用第一训练数据对所述流行病预测模型进行训练;(3)利用所述流行病预测模型对测试数据进行预测,判断所述测试数据的预测结果是否满足预设条件,若所述测试数据的预测结果满足预设条件,则执行(5);(4)若所述测试数据的预测结果不满足预设条件,则对所述流行病预测模型进行微调,然后执行(5);(5)利用第二训练数据确定基于所述流行病预测模型进行流行病风险等级判定的分级时间窗大小,使基于所述流行病预测模型判定为中风险等级及中风险以上等级的时间点在真实的流行病流行期内,基于所述流行病预测模型判定为低风险等级及中风险以下等级的时间点在真实的流行病非流行期内;(6)利用所述流行病预测模型对待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内的各个时间点进行预测,划分出所述待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内的流行病流行期与流行病非流行期;(7)计算所述待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内流行病非流行期的流行病监测数据的均值与标准差;(8)根据所述待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内流行病非流行期的流行病监测数据的均值与标准差计算流行病风险等级划分阈值;(9)根据所述流行病风险等级划分阈值判定所述待测时间点的流行病风险等级。
- 如权利要求9所述的计算机装置,其特征在于,所述步骤(5)包括:利用所述流行病预测模型对预设时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内的各个时间点进行预测,划分出所述预设时间点之前分级时间窗大小时间内的流行病流行期与流行病非流行期;根据所述第二训练数据计算所述预设时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内流行病非流行期的流行病监测数据的均值与标准差;根据所述预设时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内流行病非流行期的流行病监测数据的均值与标准差,计算流行病风险等级划分阈值;根据所述流行病风险等级划分阈值判定所述预设时间点的流行病风险等级;若所述预设时间点的流行病风险等级为中风险等级及中风险以上等级,则判断所述预设时间点是否在真实的流行病流行期内,或者,若所述预设时间点的流行病风险等级为低风险及中风险以下等级,则判断所述预设时间点是否在真实的流行病非流行期内;若所述预设时间点的流行病风险等级为中风险等级及中风险以上等级,且所述预设时间点在真实的流行病流行期内,或者,若所述预设时间点的流行病风险等级为低风险及中风险以下等级,且所述预设时间点在真实的流行病非流行期内,则调整所述分级时间窗大小。
- 如权利要求9所述的计算机装置,其特征在于,所述流行病预测模 型包括累积和预测模型、指数加权移动平均值预测模型和移动百分位预测模型。
- 如权利要求9至11中任一项所述的计算机装置,其特征在于,所述步骤(2)包括:利用所述流行病预测模型对所述第一训练数据进行预测,将所述第一训练数据的预测结果与真实的流行病流行期/非流行期划分结果进行比较,根据比较结果调整或选取所述流行病预测模型的参数。
- 如权利要求12所述的计算机装置,其特征在于,所述将所述第一训练数据的预测结果与真实的流行病流行期/非流行期划分结果进行比较,根据比较结果调整或选取所述流行病预测模型的参数包括:计算所述流行病预测模型对所述第一训练数据的预测结果的准确度、特异度、及时性,基于所述准确度、特异度、及时性调整或选取所述流行病预测模型的参数。
- 如权利要求9至11中任一项所述的计算机装置,其特征在于,所述流行病监测数据通过在预设区域建立由多个监测点组成的流行病监测网络,从所述监测点获取得到。
- 一种非易失性可读存储介质,其特征在于,所述非易失性可读存储介质存储有至少一个计算机可读指令,所述至少一个计算机可读指令被处理器执行时实现以下步骤:(1)建立流行病预测模型;(2)利用第一训练数据对所述流行病预测模型进行训练;(3)利用所述流行病预测模型对测试数据进行预测,判断所述测试数据的预测结果是否满足预设条件,若所述测试数据的预测结果满足预设条件,则执行(5);(4)若所述测试数据的预测结果不满足预设条件,则对所述流行病预测模型进行微调,然后执行(5);(5)利用第二训练数据确定基于所述流行病预测模型进行流行病风险等级判定的分级时间窗大小,使基于所述流行病预测模型判定为中风险等级及中风险以上等级的时间点在真实的流行病流行期内,基于所述流行病预测模型判定为低风险等级及中风险以下等级的时间点在真实的流行病非流行期内;(6)利用所述流行病预测模型对待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内的各个时间点进行预测,划分出所述待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内的流行病流行期与流行病非流行期;(7)计算所述待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内流行病非流行期的流行病监测数据的均值与标准差;(8)根据所述待测时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内流行病非流行期的流行病监测数据的均值与标准差计算流行病风险等级划分阈值;(9)根据所述流行病风险等级划分阈值判定所述待测时间点的流行病风险等级。
- 如权利要求15所述的存储介质,其特征在于,所述步骤(5)包括:利用所述流行病预测模型对预设时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内的各个时间点进行预测,划分出所述预设时间点之前分级时间窗大小时间内的流行病流行期与流行病非流行期;根据所述第二训练数据计算所述预设时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内流行病非流行期的流行病监测数据的均值与标准差;根据所述预设时间点之前所述分级时间窗大小时间内流行病非流行期的流行病监测数据的均值与标准差,计算流行病风险等级划分阈值;根据所述流行病风险等级划分阈值判定所述预设时间点的流行病风险等级;若所述预设时间点的流行病风险等级为中风险等级及中风险以上等级,则判断所述预设时间点是否在真实的流行病流行期内,或者,若所述预设时间点的流行病风险等级为低风险及中风险以下等级,则判断所述预设时间点是否在真实的流行病非流行期内;若所述预设时间点的流行病风险等级为中风险等级及中风险以上等级,且所述预设时间点在真实的流行病流行期内,或者,若所述预设时间点的流行病风险等级为低风险及中风险以下等级,且所述预设时间点在真实的流行病非流行期内,则调整所述分级时间窗大小。
- 如权利要求15所述的存储介质,其特征在于,所述流行病预测模型包括累积和预测模型、指数加权移动平均值预测模型和移动百分位预测模型。
- 如权利要求15至17中任一项所述的存储介质,其特征在于,所述步骤(2)包括:利用所述流行病预测模型对所述第一训练数据进行预测,将所述第一训练数据的预测结果与真实的流行病流行期/非流行期划分结果进行比较,根据比较结果调整或选取所述流行病预测模型的参数。
- 如权利要求18所述的存储介质,其特征在于,所述将所述第一训练数据的预测结果与真实的流行病流行期/非流行期划分结果进行比较,根据比较结果调整或选取所述流行病预测模型的参数包括:计算所述流行病预测模型对所述第一训练数据的预测结果的准确度、特异度、及时性,基于所述准确度、特异度、及时性调整或选取所述流行病预测模型的参数。
- 如权利要求15至17中任一项所述的存储介质,其特征在于,所述流行病监测数据通过在预设区域建立由多个监测点组成的流行病监测网络,从所述监测点获取得到。
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2019572829A JP6893259B2 (ja) | 2018-04-11 | 2018-08-09 | コンピューター装置による感染症クラス分け予測方法、感染症クラス分け予測装置、コンピューター装置、および記憶媒体 |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810322432.2 | 2018-04-11 | ||
| CN201810322432.2A CN108597617B (zh) | 2018-04-11 | 2018-04-11 | 流行病分级预测方法及装置、计算机装置和可读存储介质 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2019196281A1 true WO2019196281A1 (zh) | 2019-10-17 |
Family
ID=63622046
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CN2018/099649 Ceased WO2019196281A1 (zh) | 2018-04-11 | 2018-08-09 | 流行病分级预测方法及装置、计算机装置及可读存储介质 |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6893259B2 (zh) |
| CN (1) | CN108597617B (zh) |
| WO (1) | WO2019196281A1 (zh) |
Cited By (15)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111611297A (zh) * | 2020-05-21 | 2020-09-01 | 中南大学 | 顾及参数时变性的传播模型建立方法及其预测方法 |
| CN112117010A (zh) * | 2020-07-13 | 2020-12-22 | 北京大瑞集思技术有限公司 | 一种传染病智能预警系统及管理平台 |
| CN112509706A (zh) * | 2020-11-16 | 2021-03-16 | 鹏城实验室 | 传染病预警方法、装置、设备及计算机可读存储介质 |
| CN112669984A (zh) * | 2020-12-30 | 2021-04-16 | 华南师范大学 | 基于大数据人工智能的传染病协同递进监测预警应对方法 |
| CN113496780A (zh) * | 2020-03-19 | 2021-10-12 | 北京中科闻歌科技股份有限公司 | 传染病确诊者数量预测方法、装置、服务器及存储介质 |
| CN113793689A (zh) * | 2021-08-06 | 2021-12-14 | 兰州理工大学 | 一种基于累积和控制图的流行疾病监控方法 |
| CN113808755A (zh) * | 2020-06-17 | 2021-12-17 | 中移动信息技术有限公司 | 感染人群预测模型训练的方法、预测的方法、装置、设备 |
| CN114068032A (zh) * | 2021-10-20 | 2022-02-18 | 深圳市联影医疗数据服务有限公司 | 一种基于电子病历的传染性疾病预警方法及装置 |
| CN114724730A (zh) * | 2022-02-18 | 2022-07-08 | 平安国际智慧城市科技股份有限公司 | 基于人工智能的传染病预警方法、装置、电子设备及介质 |
| CN115171910A (zh) * | 2020-04-22 | 2022-10-11 | 第四范式(北京)技术有限公司 | 生成筛查模型、筛查传染病高风险感染人群的方法及系统 |
| CN115798734A (zh) * | 2023-01-09 | 2023-03-14 | 杭州杏林信息科技有限公司 | 基于大数据的新发突发传染病防控方法、装置及储存介质 |
| CN118446386A (zh) * | 2024-07-08 | 2024-08-06 | 北京融威众邦科技股份有限公司 | 一种基于大数据的医疗智能ai管理方法、系统及介质 |
| CN119851973A (zh) * | 2025-03-21 | 2025-04-18 | 广州市疾病预防控制中心(广州市卫生检验中心、广州市食品安全风险监测与评估中心、广州医科大学公共卫生研究院) | 基于神经网络的病毒传播预测方法 |
| CN120527028A (zh) * | 2025-07-24 | 2025-08-22 | 四川国际旅行卫生保健中心(成都海关口岸门诊部) | 流感流行强度阈值划分方法及装置、存储介质及电子设备 |
| CN120767003A (zh) * | 2025-09-03 | 2025-10-10 | 江西省儿童医院 | 基于人工智能的儿童感染性疾病早期预警及防控方法 |
Families Citing this family (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109979601B (zh) * | 2018-10-12 | 2020-10-02 | 东阳市菊苏科技有限公司 | 一种具有自动学习功能的流感预测摄像机 |
| CN109473180A (zh) * | 2018-11-20 | 2019-03-15 | 河南省疾病预防控制中心 | 一种基于b/s架构的疾控机构信息系统 |
| CN109817342A (zh) * | 2019-01-04 | 2019-05-28 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | 流行季预测模型的参数调整方法、装置、设备及存储介质 |
| CN110047593A (zh) * | 2019-04-12 | 2019-07-23 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | 疾病流行季等级的确定方法、装置、设备及可读存储介质 |
| CN111696682A (zh) * | 2020-05-26 | 2020-09-22 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | 数据处理方法、装置、电子设备及可读存储介质 |
| CN113707336B (zh) * | 2021-08-26 | 2024-06-21 | 深圳平安智慧医健科技有限公司 | 基于数据分析的传染病防治预警方法、装置、设备及介质 |
| CN113948219B (zh) * | 2021-10-26 | 2025-07-22 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | 传染病数据处理方法、装置、计算机及存储介质 |
| CN115206531A (zh) * | 2022-07-19 | 2022-10-18 | 杭州翔宇医学检验实验室有限公司 | 血管炎症相关风险指数的计算方法、装置、计算机设备和存储介质 |
| CN117095831B (zh) * | 2023-10-17 | 2024-01-16 | 厦门畅享信息技术有限公司 | 突发流行病趋势监测方法、系统、介质及电子设备 |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1881227A (zh) * | 2006-05-16 | 2006-12-20 | 中国人民解放军第三军医大学 | 传染病疫情诊断及危害度分类智能分析模型技术 |
| CN101894309A (zh) * | 2009-11-05 | 2010-11-24 | 南京医科大学 | 传染病疫情预测预警方法 |
| US20140095417A1 (en) * | 2012-10-01 | 2014-04-03 | Frederick S.M. Herz | Sdi (sdi for epi-demics) |
| CN105095614A (zh) * | 2014-04-18 | 2015-11-25 | 国际商业机器公司 | 更新预测模型的方法和装置 |
| CN107680676A (zh) * | 2017-09-26 | 2018-02-09 | 电子科技大学 | 一种基于电子病历数据驱动的妊娠期糖尿病预测方法 |
Family Cites Families (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101794342B (zh) * | 2009-09-30 | 2015-09-09 | 中国人民解放军防化指挥工程学院 | 一种基于考虑隔离措施的传染病疫情预测方法 |
| JP2011128935A (ja) * | 2009-12-18 | 2011-06-30 | Noriaki Aoki | 感染症予測システム |
| US10394776B2 (en) * | 2012-02-13 | 2019-08-27 | Bluedot Inc. | Warning system for infectious diseases and method therefor |
| CN103310083B (zh) * | 2012-03-09 | 2016-08-03 | 李晓松 | 一种传染病聚集性探测与早期预警系统 |
| CN103390091B (zh) * | 2012-05-08 | 2016-04-06 | 中国人民解放军防化学院 | 一种传染病疫情优化控制方法 |
| JP6823379B2 (ja) * | 2016-04-26 | 2021-02-03 | シスメックス株式会社 | モニタリング方法、情報処理装置、情報処理システム、及びコンピュータプログラム |
| CN107871538A (zh) * | 2016-12-19 | 2018-04-03 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | 基于宏观因子的大数据预测方法及系统 |
| CN107220482B (zh) * | 2017-05-09 | 2019-09-17 | 清华大学 | 呼吸道传染病风险评估系统及评估方法 |
| CN107688872A (zh) * | 2017-08-20 | 2018-02-13 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | 预测模型建立装置、方法及计算机可读存储介质 |
-
2018
- 2018-04-11 CN CN201810322432.2A patent/CN108597617B/zh active Active
- 2018-08-09 JP JP2019572829A patent/JP6893259B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2018-08-09 WO PCT/CN2018/099649 patent/WO2019196281A1/zh not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1881227A (zh) * | 2006-05-16 | 2006-12-20 | 中国人民解放军第三军医大学 | 传染病疫情诊断及危害度分类智能分析模型技术 |
| CN101894309A (zh) * | 2009-11-05 | 2010-11-24 | 南京医科大学 | 传染病疫情预测预警方法 |
| US20140095417A1 (en) * | 2012-10-01 | 2014-04-03 | Frederick S.M. Herz | Sdi (sdi for epi-demics) |
| CN105095614A (zh) * | 2014-04-18 | 2015-11-25 | 国际商业机器公司 | 更新预测模型的方法和装置 |
| CN107680676A (zh) * | 2017-09-26 | 2018-02-09 | 电子科技大学 | 一种基于电子病历数据驱动的妊娠期糖尿病预测方法 |
Cited By (22)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113496780A (zh) * | 2020-03-19 | 2021-10-12 | 北京中科闻歌科技股份有限公司 | 传染病确诊者数量预测方法、装置、服务器及存储介质 |
| CN113496780B (zh) * | 2020-03-19 | 2023-11-03 | 北京中科闻歌科技股份有限公司 | 传染病确诊者数量预测方法、装置、服务器及存储介质 |
| CN115171910A (zh) * | 2020-04-22 | 2022-10-11 | 第四范式(北京)技术有限公司 | 生成筛查模型、筛查传染病高风险感染人群的方法及系统 |
| CN111611297A (zh) * | 2020-05-21 | 2020-09-01 | 中南大学 | 顾及参数时变性的传播模型建立方法及其预测方法 |
| CN111611297B (zh) * | 2020-05-21 | 2023-09-15 | 中南大学 | 顾及参数时变性的传播模型建立方法及其预测方法 |
| CN113808755A (zh) * | 2020-06-17 | 2021-12-17 | 中移动信息技术有限公司 | 感染人群预测模型训练的方法、预测的方法、装置、设备 |
| CN112117010A (zh) * | 2020-07-13 | 2020-12-22 | 北京大瑞集思技术有限公司 | 一种传染病智能预警系统及管理平台 |
| CN112509706B (zh) * | 2020-11-16 | 2023-06-06 | 鹏城实验室 | 传染病预警方法、装置、设备及计算机可读存储介质 |
| CN112509706A (zh) * | 2020-11-16 | 2021-03-16 | 鹏城实验室 | 传染病预警方法、装置、设备及计算机可读存储介质 |
| CN112669984A (zh) * | 2020-12-30 | 2021-04-16 | 华南师范大学 | 基于大数据人工智能的传染病协同递进监测预警应对方法 |
| CN112669984B (zh) * | 2020-12-30 | 2023-09-12 | 华南师范大学 | 基于大数据人工智能的传染病协同递进监测预警应对方法 |
| CN113793689B (zh) * | 2021-08-06 | 2023-10-24 | 兰州理工大学 | 一种基于累积和控制图的流行疾病监控方法 |
| CN113793689A (zh) * | 2021-08-06 | 2021-12-14 | 兰州理工大学 | 一种基于累积和控制图的流行疾病监控方法 |
| CN114068032A (zh) * | 2021-10-20 | 2022-02-18 | 深圳市联影医疗数据服务有限公司 | 一种基于电子病历的传染性疾病预警方法及装置 |
| CN114724730A (zh) * | 2022-02-18 | 2022-07-08 | 平安国际智慧城市科技股份有限公司 | 基于人工智能的传染病预警方法、装置、电子设备及介质 |
| CN114724730B (zh) * | 2022-02-18 | 2024-04-30 | 深圳平安智慧医健科技有限公司 | 基于人工智能的传染病预警方法、装置、电子设备及介质 |
| CN115798734B (zh) * | 2023-01-09 | 2023-07-14 | 杭州杏林信息科技有限公司 | 基于大数据的新发突发传染病防控方法、装置及储存介质 |
| CN115798734A (zh) * | 2023-01-09 | 2023-03-14 | 杭州杏林信息科技有限公司 | 基于大数据的新发突发传染病防控方法、装置及储存介质 |
| CN118446386A (zh) * | 2024-07-08 | 2024-08-06 | 北京融威众邦科技股份有限公司 | 一种基于大数据的医疗智能ai管理方法、系统及介质 |
| CN119851973A (zh) * | 2025-03-21 | 2025-04-18 | 广州市疾病预防控制中心(广州市卫生检验中心、广州市食品安全风险监测与评估中心、广州医科大学公共卫生研究院) | 基于神经网络的病毒传播预测方法 |
| CN120527028A (zh) * | 2025-07-24 | 2025-08-22 | 四川国际旅行卫生保健中心(成都海关口岸门诊部) | 流感流行强度阈值划分方法及装置、存储介质及电子设备 |
| CN120767003A (zh) * | 2025-09-03 | 2025-10-10 | 江西省儿童医院 | 基于人工智能的儿童感染性疾病早期预警及防控方法 |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP6893259B2 (ja) | 2021-06-23 |
| CN108597617B (zh) | 2022-05-20 |
| CN108597617A (zh) | 2018-09-28 |
| JP2020527786A (ja) | 2020-09-10 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| WO2019196281A1 (zh) | 流行病分级预测方法及装置、计算机装置及可读存储介质 | |
| McGowan et al. | Collaborative efforts to forecast seasonal influenza in the United States, 2015–2016 | |
| Aziz et al. | Maternal outcomes by race during postpartum readmissions | |
| Chang et al. | Assessment of critical exposure and outcome windows in time-to-event analysis with application to air pollution and preterm birth study | |
| Warren et al. | Investigating the impact of maternal residential mobility on identifying critical windows of susceptibility to ambient air pollution during pregnancy | |
| US11276495B2 (en) | Systems and methods for predicting multiple health care outcomes | |
| WO2019196286A1 (zh) | 疾病预测方法及装置、计算机装置及可读存储介质 | |
| US20220415524A1 (en) | Machine learning-based adjustment of epidemiological model projections with flexible prediction horizon | |
| Rocha et al. | Data-driven risk stratification for preterm birth in Brazil: a population-based study to develop of a machine learning risk assessment approach | |
| WO2019196283A1 (zh) | 流行病预测方法、计算机装置及非易失性可读存储介质 | |
| Barrera et al. | County-level associations between pregnancy-related mortality ratios and contextual sociospatial indicators | |
| Plotkin et al. | Tracking facility-based perinatal deaths in Tanzania: Results from an indicator validation assessment | |
| WO2019196279A1 (zh) | 疾病异常数据检测方法及装置、计算机装置及存储介质 | |
| Bhuiyan et al. | AI-driven predictive analytics in healthcare: Evaluating impact on cost and efficiency | |
| Housseine et al. | Development of a clinical prediction model for perinatal deaths in low resource settings | |
| Yu et al. | Comparison of parametric and nonparametric estimators for the association between incident prepregnancy obesity and stillbirth in a population-based cohort study | |
| Aghajanian et al. | Prediction of post-delivery hemoglobin levels with machine learning algorithms | |
| Leonard et al. | Development of a low‐dimensional model to predict admissions from triage at a pediatric emergency department | |
| Chakraborty et al. | An early warning indicator trained on stochastic disease-spreading models with different noises | |
| Ansell et al. | A new data integration framework for Covid-19 social media information | |
| Gautam et al. | Effect of antenatal care on birth outcomes in the Gambia: A propensity score matching analysis | |
| Lagendijk et al. | Validation of a prognostic model for adverse perinatal health outcomes | |
| Tobin et al. | A modular approach to forecasting COVID-19 hospital bed occupancy | |
| Lim et al. | Density forecasting of conjunctivitis burden using high-dimensional environmental time series data | |
| AlKusayer et al. | Determining clinically relevant cutoff scores for the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scales among prenatal women in Canada |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 18914101 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2019572829 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| 32PN | Ep: public notification in the ep bulletin as address of the adressee cannot be established |
Free format text: NOTING OF LOSS OF RIGHTS PURSUANT TO RULE 112(1) EPC (EPO FORM 1205A DATED 19/01/2021) |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 18914101 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |

