WO2019051616A1 - Procédé et système permettant de réaliser une simulation de formation par martelage - Google Patents

Procédé et système permettant de réaliser une simulation de formation par martelage Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2019051616A1
WO2019051616A1 PCT/CA2018/051158 CA2018051158W WO2019051616A1 WO 2019051616 A1 WO2019051616 A1 WO 2019051616A1 CA 2018051158 W CA2018051158 W CA 2018051158W WO 2019051616 A1 WO2019051616 A1 WO 2019051616A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
peening
combinations
treatment
simulating
shape
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CA2018/051158
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Pierre Faucheux
Martin Levesque
Frédérick GOSSELIN
Original Assignee
Polyvalor, Limited Partnership
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Polyvalor, Limited Partnership filed Critical Polyvalor, Limited Partnership
Publication of WO2019051616A1 publication Critical patent/WO2019051616A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D7/00—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation
    • C21D7/02—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working
    • C21D7/04—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working of the surface
    • C21D7/06—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working of the surface by shot-peening or the like
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24C—ABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
    • B24C1/00—Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods
    • B24C1/10—Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods for compacting surfaces, e.g. shot-peening
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
    • G01B15/00—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electromagnetic waves or particle radiation, e.g. by the use of microwaves, X-rays, gamma rays or electrons
    • G01B15/06—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electromagnetic waves or particle radiation, e.g. by the use of microwaves, X-rays, gamma rays or electrons for measuring the deformation in a solid
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01L—MEASURING FORCE, STRESS, TORQUE, WORK, MECHANICAL POWER, MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY, OR FLUID PRESSURE
    • G01L1/00—Measuring force or stress, in general
    • G01L1/25—Measuring force or stress, in general using wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays, microwaves, neutrons

Definitions

  • the present application pertains to peen forming equipment and related process.
  • Peening processes are primarily used as cold-work surface treatments to improve material properties of a parts. There exist a variety of peening processes such as shot peening, laser peening, needle peening and ultrasonic peening.
  • All peening processes aim at plastically deforming a thin layer of material near the surface of the part.
  • the strain mismatch between this layer and the rest of the part - left unaffected by the treatment - induces a compressive residual stress field near the surface.
  • Compressive residual stresses can inhibit or delay the initiation or propagation of cracks, thus improving the fatigue life of the part.
  • the tools used to plastically deform the material may differ from one process to the other.
  • laser peening relies on shock waves generated by the expansion of a plasma generated near the surface of the part by a laser pulse
  • needle peening relies on a mechanical striker propelled at high velocity.
  • Shot peen forming is a particular peening process that consists in bombarding metal parts with small shots at high velocities.
  • Peen forming consists in the application of a peening process to a part with the intent of inducing such distortions.
  • Peen forming can be used to form parts.
  • aircraft lower wing panels are usually peen formed from an initially flat machined aluminum panel.
  • Fig. 1 shows schematically the application of the shot- peening process on a part, as well as typical peening-induced plastic strains and the associated residual stress field. It can also be used to correct small amplitude unwanted distortions. This latter application of the process is called distortion correction or straightening.
  • plates of uniform thickness may deform into hemispherical, elliptical or cylindrical shapes, as shown in Fig. 2.
  • more advanced peening strategies may be used. Varying the intensity of the treatment and/or the density of impacts (a.k.a. coverage) over the surface is one possible strategy.
  • Another technique, called stress-peen forming consists in elastically pre-straining the part. This results in larger plastic strains in the direction in which the part is being stretched. A combination of these techniques is usually required to form complex industrial parts.
  • peen forming has been used for numerous years, in particular in the aerospace industry to form wing and fuselage panels, process parameters are still determined most of the time either by a costly trial and error approach, or by analogy with existing peening recipes on similar parts. Moreover, peening processes may be operated in free-hand mode by operators. The introduction of simulation tools is desirable as it has the potential to shorten the time necessary to design new peening strategies and/or enable exploring new designs for which the entity performing the peening has limited experience, without the costly trial and error approach.
  • a system for producing a peening process model comprising: a processing unit; and a non-transitory computer-readable memory communicatively coupled to the processing unit and comprising computer-readable program instructions executable by the processing unit for: obtaining models of peening induced loads as a function of a plurality of peening treatments, obtaining models of a current shape and of a target shape of a part, using the models of the part, identifying a plurality of combinations of peening treatment and peening pattern to reach the target shape of the part, simulating a peening of the part with the plurality of combinations of peening treatment and peening pattern using the models of peening induced loads and the model of the current shape of the part, selecting
  • obtaining models of peening induced loads includes for instance generating the peening induced loads as a function of the plurality of peening treatments.
  • generating the peening induced loads includes for instance characterizing peening induced plastic strains using an inverse reconstruction procedure to compute plastic strains from curvature measurements and/or residual stresses.
  • the compute of plastic strains from curvature measurements and/or residual stresses includes for instance obtaining the curvature measurements and/or residual stresses with X-ray diffraction.
  • generating the peening induced loads includes for instance interpolating one of the peening induced loads from a database of characterized peening induced loads.
  • identifying a plurality of combinations of peening treatment and peening pattern includes for instance identifying one of the plurality of combinations with a maximum intensity for the peening treatment without any constraint on a peened area of the part.
  • simulating the peening of the part includes for instance beginning the simulating with the one of the plurality of combinations with a higher intensity for the peening treatment.
  • selecting one of the plurality of combinations of peening treatment and peening pattern from the simulating includes for instance discarding the target shape as unfeasible if the target shape is not achieved through the simulating with the one of the plurality of combinations with the higher intensity for the peening treatment.
  • simulating the peening of the part includes for instance simulating the peening of the part with a progressive decrease of an intensity of the peening treatment relative to the higher intensity to reach a simulated shape within tolerances of the target shape of the part for a lower intensity of the peening treatment.
  • simulating the peening of the part includes for instance simulating the peening of the part with a progressive decrease of an intensity of the peening treatment from the plurality of the combinations to reach a simulated shape within tolerances of the target shape of the part for a lower intensity of the peening treatment.
  • simulating the peening of the part includes for instance identifying a checkerboard pattern, and setting an upper bound constraint on a peened area for the simulating of peen only areas that have a more pronounced influence over the target shape.
  • the system is for producing for instance a peening process model for shot peening, and wherein the peening treatment includes for instance parameters including shot speed, type of shots and coverage.
  • obtaining the models of the current shape of the part includes for instance obtaining a model of a three- dimensional scan of the part.
  • outputting the peening process model includes for instance outputting the peening process model as human readable instructions for manually performing the peen form of the part.
  • outputting the peening process model as human readable instructions includes for instance maps of the part with intensity and/or coverage.
  • outputting the selected one of the combinations as a peening process model includes for instance driving the peening equipment to peen form the part from the current shape to the target shape.
  • obtaining the models of the peening induced loads includes for instance obtaining the models of the peening induced loads as eigenstrains as a function of the plurality of peening treatments.
  • an automated peening apparatus comprises for instance the system described above.
  • a system for producing a peening process model comprising: a peening load modeling module for obtaining models of peening induced loads as a function of a plurality of peening treatments; and a peening optimization module for obtaining models of a current shape and of a target shape of a part, identifying a plurality of combinations of peening treatment and peening pattern to reach the target shape of the part using the models of the part, simulating a peening of the part with the plurality of combinations of peening treatment and peening pattern using the models of peening induced loads and the model of the current shape of the part, selecting one of the plurality of combinations of peening treatment and peening pattern from the simulating, and whereby the system outputs the selected one of the combinations as a peening process model adapted to drive peening equipment to peen form the part from the current shape to the target shape.
  • the peening load modeling module generates for instance the peening induced loads as a function of the plurality of peening treatments.
  • the peening load modeling module characterizes for instance peening induced plastic strains using an inverse reconstruction procedure to compute plastic strains from curvature measurements and/or residual stresses to generates the peening induced loads.
  • the peening load modeling module computes for instance the plastic strains from curvature measurements and/or residual stresses by obtaining the curvature measurements and/or residual stresses with X-ray diffraction.
  • the peening load modeling module interpolates for instance at least one of the peening induced loads from a database of characterized peening induced loads to generate the peening induced loads.
  • the peening optimization module identifies for instance a plurality of combinations of peening treatment and peening pattern by identifying one of the plurality of combinations with a higher intensity for the peening treatment without any constraint on a peened area of the part.
  • the peening optimization module begins for instance the simulating with the one of the plurality of combinations with the higher intensity for the peening treatment.
  • the peening optimization module discards for instance the target shape as unfeasible if the target shape is not achieved through the simulating with the one of the plurality of combinations with the higher intensity for the peening treatment.
  • the peening optimization module simulates for instance the peening of the part with a progressive decrease of an intensity of the peening treatment from the plurality of the combinations to reach a simulated shape within tolerances of the target shape of the part for a lower intensity of the peening treatment.
  • the peening optimization module simulates for instance the peening of the part with a progressive decrease of an intensity of the peening treatment from the plurality of the combinations to reach a simulated shape within tolerances of the target shape of the part for a lower intensity of the peening treatment.
  • the peening optimization module identifies for instance a checkerboard pattern while simulating the peening of the part, and sets an upper bound constraint on a peened area for the simulating of peen only areas that have a more pronounced influence over the target shape.
  • the system outputs for instance a peening process model for shot peening, and wherein the peening treatment includes for instance parameters including shot speed, type of shots and coverage.
  • the peening load modeling module obtains for instance the models of the current shape of the part as a three-dimensional scan of the part.
  • the system outputs for instance the peening process model as human readable instructions for manually performing the peen form of the part.
  • the peening process model has for instance human readable instructions includes for instance maps of the part with intensity and/or coverage.
  • the peening equipment is for instance driven to peen form the part from the current shape to the target shape.
  • the peening equipment peen forms for instance the part from the current shape to the target shape.
  • the peening load modeling module obtains for instance the models of the peening induced loads as eigenstrains as a function of the plurality of peening treatments. DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic view showing (a) shot peen forming of a part and (b) typical peening-induced plastic strains and the associated residual stress field;
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of experimental deformed shapes for 1 x 1 m AA2024-T3 panels of varying thicknesses peened uniformly with the same treatment;
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a system for simulating and operating a peening process in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • Fig. 4 is a schematic view of (a) a model of an initially flat panel divided into a number of subdomains that can either be unpeened, peened on one side, or peened on both sides and (b) the section properties used for any domain.
  • the present disclosure pertains to a method and system for simulating and operating a peen forming process, the system being generally illustrated at 10 in Fig. 3.
  • the method and system determine a relationship between a part, a desired shape, a.k.a., a target shape for this part, and the peening parameters of a peening process, such as the type of shots, characteristics of the shot stream, peening trajectory, etc.
  • the method and system 10 of the present disclosure may be used to set peening equipment parameters and perform a peening process to obtain the target shape.
  • the method and system of the present disclosure may automatically compute optimal peening patterns that fit a given target shape of a part, and subsequently output a peening process model to peen the part into the target shape, or operate the peening equipment 30 to produce the part.
  • the system 10 is of the type including a processing unit (a.k.a., a controller), with one or more processors, generally shown at 20 that is devised to simulate a peening process on a part.
  • the processing unit 20 may be specifically dedicated to simulating the peening process, and may also be used to drive the peening equipment 30 to produce parts.
  • Part data is generally shown at A1 , A2 and is provided as an input in the processing unit 20.
  • A1 and A2 may be three-dimensional digital models of a part, with A1 being the current shape of the part (prior to peening) and A2 being the target shape of the part.
  • the current shape of the part A1 may result from technical drawings, from a 3D scan of the part A1 , or from other representation methods, for the model to reflect the current shape of the part A1.
  • the method and system 10 are consequently used either for distortion correction (e.g., when deflections are small), or for peen forming (e.g., when deflections are moderate or large) in simulating the peening of the part.
  • the target shape of the part A2 may be by design.
  • the 3D models of the parts A1 and A2 may be in any appropriate digital format.
  • the processing unit 20 may include a non-transitory computer-readable memory communicatively coupled to the processing unit 20 and comprising computer-readable program instructions executable by the processing unit 20 for performing various sequences of steps and/or functions by way of modules.
  • the processing unit 20 may have various modules by which various functions may be performed to achieve the simulation, and to operate peening equipment 30, if desired.
  • the processing unit 20 may output a peening process model M that may be used by peening equipment, such as that shown at 30, or other equipment.
  • the peening process model M may be part specific, i.e., for each part A1 a unique peening process model M is defined.
  • the peening equipment 30 has the capacity of operating with given process parameters to perform given process patterns, for instance by integrating the processing unit 20. It can be a fully automated peening equipment that controls peening intensity, coverage, relative position of the tools with respect to the part, etc.
  • the nozzle shown in Fig. 1 is part of the peening equipment 30.
  • a trained machine operator could also use the given process parameters to perform the peening process.
  • the peening process model M is output in the form of human readable instructions such as listings of peening parameters, peening intensity maps, coverage maps, etc.
  • the processing unit 20 may have a peening load modeling module 21.
  • the module 21 is used to link process parameters, such as shot speed, type of shots, coverage, to peening induced loads that will develop inside the part during peening.
  • the peening induced loads may be characterized in terms of plastic strains (also referred to as eigenstrains) or any derived quantity such as so-called induced residual stresses (i.e., residual stresses that would exist inside a part if it had not been allowed to deform after peening).
  • Plastic strains are a convenient way to model peening induced loads as they can usually be considered independent of the geometry of the part in typical applications of peen forming processes, i.e., applying the same peening treatment to two specimens made of the same material but whose geometries differ results in the same near-surface plastic strains.
  • peening induced loads are characterized for a given treatment, they can be used as an input in a model of the peen forming process to compute the deformed shape of random parts. This property is known in the art not to hold for very high intensity treatments (such as high intensity laser peening) or in the vicinity of geometric features such as holes and free edges.
  • Metric tensors are known to be functions taking as input a pair of tangent vectors at a point of a surface to produce a real number scalar to generalize many of the familiar properties of the dot product of vectors.
  • the module 21 can include a database of peening treatments, i.e. treatments for which the peening loads induced by the treatments in a given material were previously characterized. Interpolation in the database enables to approximate peening induced loads for new treatments. More data-points in the database may usually imply more accurate predictions. Data-points can be generated experimentally, or by any other method. For example, data-points can be generated by performing simulations by the module 21 , the results of which then populate the database for subsequent use.
  • the experimental characterization of peening induced plastic strains implies the use of an inverse reconstruction procedure to compute plastic strains from other measurable quantities, such as curvature measurements or residual stresses obtained by X-ray diffraction.
  • the method and system 10 may rely on the modeling of peening induced loads as eigenstrains, to enable the casting of the shape optimization of peen formed plates.
  • the module 21 can also consist of an analytical, semi-analytical, numerical, or empirical model of the peening process. For example, a finite-element simulation of the impact of shots on a representative volume of material can be used to obtain the peening load modeling of module 21 . In any case, these models of the peening process are process-specific, i.e. different models are required for different peening processes, whereas the same database structure can be used to store and interpolate peening induced loads for various peening treatments.
  • the processing unit 20 may also have a peening optimization module 22.
  • the peening optimization module 22 computes peening treatments liable to form part P1 into part P2.
  • the peening module 22 may consists of two interacting sub- modules: a peen forming model sub-module 22A and an optimization algorithm sub- module 22B.
  • the optimization algorithm sub-module 22B produces candidate peening treatments, the outcome of which (i.e. the deformed shape of the part peened with this specific treatment) is then simulated via peen forming model sub- module 22A and compared against the target shape. If the agreement between the computed deformed shape and the target shape A2 is unsatisfactory, another iteration is performed. The process is repeated until convergence, or until a stopping criterion is met. The latter case may correspond to a failure of the process.
  • the peen forming model in the sub-module 22A may consist in a structural model of part A1 which takes a peening treatment as an input, the sub-module 22A computing the deformed shape of part A1 for this specific treatment.
  • it can be a finite element model.
  • the model is partitioned in a number of domains. If a finite element module is used, each domain can be meshed with one or several elements.
  • the partition in domains is shown in (a) of Fig. 4. In the illustrated embodiment, each domain is assigned tri-layer laminate section properties as in (b) of Fig. 4. Peening induced loads are input in the upper and lower layers of the laminate in the form of an in- plane expansion (i.e.
  • eigenstrain This can be done via a thermal analogy commonly used in the art, by prescribing a through thickness distribution of non-zero thermal expansion coefficients, and by applying a unit increment of temperature.
  • the central layer does not expand.
  • the part is shown as being a thin-walled structure.
  • the system 10 may also perform simulations on massive structures by using appropriate 3D meshes.
  • each free surface of each domain that is allowed to be peened is linked to an optimization variable A i ⁇ - [0, 1] , where i is an integer used to index the faces.
  • the amplitude of the eigenstrain profile input in the model near the surface of domain i is equal to X i, where is an upper bound on the expansion set by the optimization module 22, as described below.
  • a peening pattern is completely characterized by the vector ⁇ with . V representing the number of faces) that collects all optimization variables.
  • the peening optimization module 22 performs an optimization procedure to find a combination of optimization variables that best fit the given target shape A2.
  • the optimization problem can be cast in the form
  • A is a vector that contains the area of the faces associated with each optimization variable, and ⁇ « ⁇ .' ⁇ ⁇ is an upper bound on the peened area that can either be user-defined, or set by the optimization module 22.
  • the constraint A ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ,, ⁇ is introduced as a remedy to pathological checkerboard patterns that typically arise with the unconstrained formulation. Depending on the problem at hand, it may be necessary to consider alternative expressions for the cost function and/or the constraints.
  • the model of the sub-module 22A used to compute the deformed shape A2 can be either geometrically linear (e.g., small deflections), or geometrically nonlinear (e.g., moderate to large deflections and rotations). If the model of the sub- module 22A is linear, the dependence of on X can be made explicit by using the superposition principle. If D is a matrix whose L column contains the nodes coordinates computed for ⁇
  • the optimization algorithm sub-module 22B can address the first form of the problem with generic gradient based algorithms. These algorithms exhibit fast convergence rate; usually, the overall shape of the pattern becomes apparent after a small number of iterations. Other optimization strategies known in the art might also be relevant, depending on the optimization algorithms available. If a linear peen forming model is used in sub- module 22A, the optimization problem is convex and can be addressed with more specific convex optimization algorithm. The second form can also be addressed with a constrained least square algorithm. This forms requires the assembly of the D matrix, which is time consuming for large models.
  • the peening optimization module 22 conducts a sequence of steps - an optimization loop - to compute peening patterns, based on the peening treatment and with a view to reaching the target shape A2.
  • the following sequence may be used by the peening optimization module 22 to iteratively identify suitable peening patterns and peening treatments from scratch, based on the optimization strategy presented above.
  • the target shape may most likely not be obtained, whereby the method and system 10 may discard the target shape as a feasible shape.
  • a peening treatment of higher intensity is identified, i.e., one that is evaluated to exceed the minimum intensity of peening treatment to produce the target piece.
  • Another expression for higher intensity is higher threshold intensity, upper threshold intensity, etc.
  • the peening optimization module 22 may re-run the analysis by progressively decreasing the intensity of the treatment (relative to the higher intensity) until the agreement becomes unacceptable, i.e., the simulated shape goes beyond the tolerances of the target shape A2. This gives a lower bound on the intensity of the treatment. A lower intensity treatment may result in lesser damage to the part.
  • an appropriate peening treatment is identified and selected for yielding a suitable expansion, by using the load modeling module 21.
  • the load modeling module 21 can identify an existing treatment, or suggest process parameters likely to yield the desired expansion, for example by interpolation in a database of treatments.
  • the sequence (i) to (iv) can be performed automatically to minimize human intervention.
  • a geometric-linear peen forming model in sub- module 22A which is fast to evaluate, and for which the optimization problem can be shown to be convex, with the associated advantages.
  • most quantities used during the optimization process can be computed once at the beginning of the analysis, outside of the optimization loop.
  • the stiffness matrix used by finite element models is an example of such quantities. This, together with the reordering and pre-factorization of all matrices in anticipation of solving large linear systems considerably speeds up the solution process.
  • the optimal pattern obtained at the end of the optimization process can then be used as an initial guess for a second optimization phase, this time with a geometrically non-linear model.
  • in-plane deformations are of secondary importance (for example at the beginning of the design process of a new part), it is possible to reduce the number of optimization variables by half by allowing only one of the layers of each element to expand at a time, instead of both at the same time. This comes from the fact that increasing the expansion in both layers by the same amount results in an in-plane expansion only (no additional bending). Halving the number of optimization variables in this manner reduces the computing cost of the optimization loop.
  • the optimization peening module 22 produces a peening process model M that includes the peening pattern to control the position of the nozzle relative to the part, and the peening treatment of the shot or like peening medium, for the part P2 to be peen formed from the shape A1 to the shape A2.
  • An equipment driver module 23 may be integral to the processing unit 20 and may use the peening process model M to peen form the part P2, by driving the peening equipment 30.
  • the method and system 10 of the present disclosure are able to compute 0-1 patterns which can be peened by masking the appropriate areas. It is also more flexible as it is not restricted to least square problems form, i.e., the procedure can handle various forms of the cost function and constraints.
  • the method and system may be used to compute peening patterns for distortion correction (i.e. small amplitude deformations), for instance on thin walled structures such as integrally stiffened panels.
  • the method and system may also be used to compute optimal peening patterns for peen forming applications when deflections are small to moderate, or when the parts are firmly held into place during peening (e.g., by some supporting device or clamps) and released afterwards.
  • the method and system 10 are occasionally described above as being used with shot peening. However, since the physical source of distortions (i.e., the expansion of subsurface plastically deformed layers of material) is the same for all peening processes, the method and system 10 of the present disclosure can also be applied to these processes.
  • the system 10 consequently produces a peening process model by obtaining models of peening induced loads as a function of a plurality of peening treatments, obtaining models of a current shape and of a target shape of a part, using the models of the part, identifying a plurality of combinations of peening treatment and peening pattern to reach the target shape of the part, simulating a peening of the part with the plurality of combinations of peening treatment and peening pattern using the models of peening induced loads and the model of the current shape of the part, selecting one of the plurality of combinations of peening treatment and peening pattern from the simulating, and outputting the selected one of the combinations as a peening process model adapted to drive peening equipment to peen form the part from the current shape to the target shape.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un système de production d'un modèle de traitement de martelage qui comprend un module de modélisation de charge de martelage pour obtenir des modèles de charges induites par martelage en tant que fonction d'une pluralité de traitements de martelage. Un module d'optimisation de martelage obtient des modèles d'une forme actuelle et d'une forme cible d'une pièce, identifie une pluralité de combinaisons de traitement de martelage et de motif de martelage afin d'atteindre la forme cible de la pièce à l'aide des modèles de la pièce, simule un martelage de la pièce au moyen la pluralité de combinaisons de traitement de martelage et de motif de martelage à l'aide des modèles de charges induites par martelage et du modèle de la forme actuelle de la pièce, et sélectionne une combinaison parmi la pluralité de combinaisons de traitement de martelage et de motif de martelage à partir de la simulation. Le système délivre la combinaison sélectionnée parmi les combinaisons en tant que modèle de traitement de martelage adapté à l'entraînement d'un équipement de martelage afin de former par martelage la pièce de la forme actuelle à la forme cible.
PCT/CA2018/051158 2017-09-18 2018-09-18 Procédé et système permettant de réaliser une simulation de formation par martelage WO2019051616A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201762559936P 2017-09-18 2017-09-18
US62/559,936 2017-09-18

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2019051616A1 true WO2019051616A1 (fr) 2019-03-21

Family

ID=65722341

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CA2018/051158 WO2019051616A1 (fr) 2017-09-18 2018-09-18 Procédé et système permettant de réaliser une simulation de formation par martelage

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2019051616A1 (fr)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111859729A (zh) * 2020-06-04 2020-10-30 北京航空航天大学 考虑多弹丸随机分布的喷丸模型对轮盘寿命的计算方法
CN112025561A (zh) * 2020-08-28 2020-12-04 中国航发贵阳发动机设计研究所 一种航空发动机涡轮盘表面完整性要求的确定方法
WO2020248661A1 (fr) * 2019-06-14 2020-12-17 广东镭奔激光科技有限公司 Procédé de martelage par chocs laser pour partie de rainure de tenon d'un disque de turbine de petite taille en alliage à haute température
WO2021148761A1 (fr) * 2020-01-24 2021-07-29 Safran Optimisation d'un procédé de détermination de paramètres de grenaillage par apprentissage
CN113221394A (zh) * 2021-02-08 2021-08-06 西北工业大学 一种飞机整体壁板激光喷丸成形的模拟方法
CN116595827A (zh) * 2023-05-04 2023-08-15 上海交通大学 无限维度条带喷丸成形工艺规划方法和系统

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110182499A1 (en) * 2010-01-27 2011-07-28 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co Kg Method for determining the surface coverage obtained by shot peening
US20130180969A1 (en) * 2012-01-18 2013-07-18 Purdue Research Foundation Laser shock peening apparatuses and methods
CA2890916A1 (fr) * 2012-11-09 2014-05-15 Shen SHEU Appareil et procede de communication de topographies selectionnees a un metal en feuille d'aluminium et applications pour ceux-ci
US20150151405A1 (en) * 2013-11-29 2015-06-04 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Method of pre-evaluating water jet peening, recording medium having program recorded thereon to execute the method, device for executing the method, and water jet peening method
US9084843B2 (en) * 2012-08-14 2015-07-21 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Alabama Biodegradable medical device having an adjustable degradation rate and methods of making the same

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110182499A1 (en) * 2010-01-27 2011-07-28 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co Kg Method for determining the surface coverage obtained by shot peening
US20130180969A1 (en) * 2012-01-18 2013-07-18 Purdue Research Foundation Laser shock peening apparatuses and methods
US9084843B2 (en) * 2012-08-14 2015-07-21 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Alabama Biodegradable medical device having an adjustable degradation rate and methods of making the same
CA2890916A1 (fr) * 2012-11-09 2014-05-15 Shen SHEU Appareil et procede de communication de topographies selectionnees a un metal en feuille d'aluminium et applications pour ceux-ci
US20150151405A1 (en) * 2013-11-29 2015-06-04 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Method of pre-evaluating water jet peening, recording medium having program recorded thereon to execute the method, device for executing the method, and water jet peening method

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020248661A1 (fr) * 2019-06-14 2020-12-17 广东镭奔激光科技有限公司 Procédé de martelage par chocs laser pour partie de rainure de tenon d'un disque de turbine de petite taille en alliage à haute température
WO2021148761A1 (fr) * 2020-01-24 2021-07-29 Safran Optimisation d'un procédé de détermination de paramètres de grenaillage par apprentissage
FR3106676A1 (fr) * 2020-01-24 2021-07-30 Safran Optimisation d’un procédé de détermination de paramètres de grenaillage par apprentissage
CN111859729A (zh) * 2020-06-04 2020-10-30 北京航空航天大学 考虑多弹丸随机分布的喷丸模型对轮盘寿命的计算方法
CN111859729B (zh) * 2020-06-04 2022-07-12 北京航空航天大学 考虑多弹丸随机分布的喷丸模型对轮盘寿命的计算方法
CN112025561A (zh) * 2020-08-28 2020-12-04 中国航发贵阳发动机设计研究所 一种航空发动机涡轮盘表面完整性要求的确定方法
CN112025561B (zh) * 2020-08-28 2022-11-18 中国航发贵阳发动机设计研究所 一种航空发动机涡轮盘表面完整性要求的确定方法
CN113221394A (zh) * 2021-02-08 2021-08-06 西北工业大学 一种飞机整体壁板激光喷丸成形的模拟方法
CN116595827A (zh) * 2023-05-04 2023-08-15 上海交通大学 无限维度条带喷丸成形工艺规划方法和系统
CN116595827B (zh) * 2023-05-04 2024-04-23 上海交通大学 无限维度条带喷丸成形工艺规划方法和系统

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2019051616A1 (fr) Procédé et système permettant de réaliser une simulation de formation par martelage
Ma et al. Effect of jig constraint position and pitch on welding deformation
Selvakumar et al. Design and optimization of machining fixture layout using ANN and DOE
CN110543654B (zh) 激光喷丸成形复杂曲面分布式工艺参数的确定方法
CN104899345A (zh) 用于确定复杂曲面形状工件激光喷丸成形工艺参数的方法
DeWald et al. Eigenstrain-based model for prediction of laser peening residual stresses in arbitrary three-dimensional bodies Part 1: Model description
Burchitz Improvement of springback prediction in sheet metal forming
CN111046609A (zh) 一种基于bp神经网络焊接工艺参数优化方法
Suman et al. Numerical prediction of welding distortion in submerged arc welded butt and fillet joints
Yang et al. Distortion control of thin sections by single-sided laser peening
Gao et al. Development of scan strategies for controlled 3D laser forming of sheet metal components
EP1423218B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif servant a deformer une piece
Valjavec A closed-loop shape control methodology for flexible stretch forming over a reconfigurable tool
US5528504A (en) Equivalent thickness bending analogy for integrally stiffened structures
EP3929792A1 (fr) Procédé de simulation et d'analyse d'un ensemble de pièces créé par un processus de formation
Sushitskii et al. Determination of optimal shot peen forming patterns using the theory of non-Euclidean plates
CN111199117B (zh) 用于加快显式有限元分析的自适应时间缩放
JP4481618B2 (ja) 大曲率曲面の加工に適した線状加熱方案の算出方法
Maqbool Targeted generation and suppression of the deformation mechanism and residual stresses in incremental sheet forming to improve the geometric accuracy
Reutzel et al. Development of a system for the laser assisted forming of plate
JP4704933B2 (ja) 金属部材の成形方法
Jiang et al. Process-based surface flattening method for laser peen forming of complex geometry
Nguyen et al. An artificial neural network system for heating-path prediction in induction heating process for concave curved surface forming
Shields Fracture prediction of hole patterns with multiple cracks using the finite element method
Suresh Topology Optimization for Additive Manufacturing Involving High-Cycle Fatigue

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 18856419

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1