WO2019037649A1

WO2019037649A1 - Method for evaluating user using shared item, apparatus, and device

Info

Publication number: WO2019037649A1
Application number: PCT/CN2018/100776
Authority: WO
Inventors: 汤宁; 蒋国飞
Original assignee: 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司; 汤宁; 蒋国飞
Priority date: 2017-08-21
Filing date: 2018-08-16
Publication date: 2019-02-28
Also published as: TWI718379B; TW201913511A; CN107609880A

Abstract

A method for evaluating a user using a shared item, an apparatus and a device thereof By means of acquiring shared item data and receiving usage data of a user, analyzing a degree of damage of a shared item near each site and a probability of losing the same, and scoring a determined area, thereby evaluating the user by combining site information in the user usage data.

Description

User evaluation method, device and device for using shared items

Technical field

The present specification relates to the field of computer technology, and in particular, to a user evaluation method, apparatus, and device for using shared items.

Background technique

With the development of technology, more and more forms of shared items appear in people's lives, such as sharing bicycles, sharing umbrellas, and so on.

Usually, the user can obtain the shared item from the public place by scanning the code, and after use, put the item back to a certain place so that other users can continue to use it. In this process, the management of the shared item usually only obtains the ID of the user, the time of use of the shared item, and the like, and has limited knowledge of the user.

Based on this, we need an effective user evaluation method.

Summary of the invention

The embodiments of the present specification provide a user evaluation method, apparatus, and device for using a shared item, which are used to solve the following problem: to provide an effective user evaluation method.

Based on this, the embodiment of the present specification provides a user evaluation method, device, and device for using a shared item, including:

Obtaining user usage data, wherein the usage record includes at least placement location information after the user uses the shared item;

Determining the multiple placements of the shared item and the rating of each placement;

For any user, the user is evaluated based on the score of the determined part or all of the placement location and the location information of the user.

Meanwhile, the embodiment of the present specification further provides a user evaluation apparatus for using a shared item, including:

Obtaining a module for acquiring user usage data, wherein the usage record includes at least placement location information after the user uses the shared item;

Determining a module to determine a plurality of placement locations of the shared item and a rating of each placement location;

The evaluation module evaluates the user for any user based on the score of the determined part or all of the delivery place and the location information of the user.

Correspondingly, the embodiment of the present specification further provides a user evaluation device for using a shared item, where the device includes:

a memory that stores a user evaluation program for using the shared item;

The processor, which invokes a user evaluation program of the shared item stored in the memory, and executes:

Correspondingly, an embodiment of the present specification further provides a non-volatile computer storage medium storing computer executable instructions, the computer executable instructions being set as:

The above at least one technical solution adopted by the embodiments of the present specification can achieve the following beneficial effects:

By collecting the shared item data and receiving the user's usage data, analyzing the state characteristics of the damage degree of the shared items at each place of delivery and the possibility of loss, and classifying the determined area, and then combining the location information in the user usage data to the user. Evaluation.

In the embodiment of the present specification, the evaluation is performed for the user by determining each placement place and its rating, and combining the user usage data including the placement location information. Therefore, the management of the shared item can effectively understand its own users, and is beneficial to the management of the shared item to further carry out the marketing business and the management business.

DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic structural diagram of an embodiment of the present disclosure;

2 is a schematic flow chart of a method provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure;

3 is a schematic flowchart of a part of a method provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure;

4 is a schematic diagram of implementation of a part of a method provided by an embodiment of the present specification;

FIG. 5 is a schematic flowchart of a part of a method provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 6 is a schematic structural diagram of a device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

Detailed ways

The technical solutions of the present application will be clearly and completely described in the following with reference to the specific embodiments of the present application and the corresponding drawings. It is apparent that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present application, and not all of them. All other embodiments obtained by a person of ordinary skill in the art based on the embodiments in the present specification without departing from the inventive scope are the scope of the application.

Based on the foregoing, the shared item may include a shared bicycle, a shared electric vehicle, a shared umbrella, a shared charging treasure, a shared book, and the like. The place of delivery is usually a certain area determined by the management in advance, and items in the same area will be considered to be at the same place. The placement location is usually one or more placement locations, or the placement location is not a delivery location, but there is some established relationship between the placement location and the delivery location (eg, the placement location and a placement location belong to The same residential area).

The placement location can be obtained directly by the user using the data. Usually, each time the user uses the shared item and places it, the shared object management party provides the client (the client usually installs and runs in the terminal used by the user), and can obtain the location information at the end of use and write. Enter the user usage record and upload it to the shared item management server (which can include: server). For example, the location information at the end can be obtained by a positioning module in the user terminal, for example, a GPS (Global Positioning System) module, an LBS (Location Based Service) module, or the like. That is, the place where the use ends can be considered as the place of placement after the user uses the shared item.

The feature data of the shared item can be generally obtained from offline collection, and may include the foregoing delivery place and the usage status of the shared item on the delivery place. The usage status of the shared item may include whether the shared item is damaged, whether it is stopped, whether it is lost, whether it is used twice, or the like, and the characteristic distribution of the shared item may include a proportion of damage/probability of the shared item, a random stop ratio/ Probability, loss ratio/probability, secondary usage ratio/probability, etc.

In the embodiment of the present specification, the data processing method may adopt an architecture as shown in FIG. 1 , in which the evaluation device may be various cluster/distributed servers, processors, and the like. In an actual application scenario, the evaluation device may belong to a shared item management party, or may belong to an independent third-party evaluation organization, and does not constitute a limitation on the present application.

The data processing procedure provided by the embodiment of the present specification is described in detail below based on the architecture shown in FIG. 1. The process specifically includes the following steps, as shown in FIG. 2:

Step S201: Acquiring user usage data, wherein the user usage data includes at least placement location information after the user uses the shared item.

In practical applications, user usage data is generated each time a user uses a shared item. In the embodiment of the present specification, the user usage data may be obtained through real-time acceptance (for example, receiving user usage data in real time through a service server of the service side and forwarding to the evaluation device), or may be user history data obtained in advance. . The user uses the data to record the usage of the user, that is, each usage record usually includes the ID of the user, the time and place of the current use, the time and place of the end of the use, and the like. The place where the use ends is considered to be the place of placement after the user uses the shared item.

In step S203, the scores of the plurality of placement locations and the placement locations are determined.

As described above, in an actual application, the shared item management party can generally designate a plurality of fixed places as the delivery place for serving the shared items, and a certain range of areas near each place is identified as the same place of delivery.

For example, specify the area within a circle with a radius of 50 meters centered on a subway exit as the same place of delivery.

As one of the embodiments in the present specification, the rating may be directly given according to experience, for example, directly designating a subway port score of 10 points, a mall outlet of 8 points, a park near 2 points, and the like.

As another mode in the embodiment of the present specification, the score of the designated placement place may also be determined by using an algorithm or a model by data statistics, and the specific implementation manner will be described later.

Step S205: For any user, the user is evaluated according to the score of the determined part or all of the delivery place and the placement location information of the user.

As described above, the placement location may be a subset of the plurality of placement locations or related to the placement location, such that each placement location may calculate a respective corresponding rating, and thus for each user, obtain the shared item for each user. The score corresponding to the multiple placement locations, the summation, the averaging, and the like are used to score the user to rate the user, judge the merits, and the like. In this process, for a single user, it may only be necessary to use a rating for a partial placement, but for a large number of users, the rating for each placement will be used.

In the embodiment of the present specification, each placement place and its rating are determined. Evaluate for users by combining user usage data that includes placement information. Therefore, the management party of the shared item knows more about its own users, and the management party that is beneficial to the shared item further develops the marketing business and the management business according to the evaluation result.

In an embodiment of the present specification, in step S203, determining the score of each placement location may adopt the following implementation manner, as shown in FIG. 3:

Step S301: Acquire feature distributions of the shared items on the plurality of placement locations.

As described above, the feature distribution of the shared item may include damage ratio/probability of the shared item, random ratio/probability, loss ratio/probability, secondary usage ratio/probability, and the like. It can be realized by offline acquisition and online acquisition of two parts, the specific way will be detailed later.

Step S303, determining a score of the plurality of placement locations according to the feature distribution.

Since the obtained feature distribution usually has multiple, and usually is in the form of proportional or probabilistic, in practical applications, the feature distribution can be normalized to make it more suitable for operation, and more intuitively display for a certain In terms of feature distribution, the relative position of the placement location in the whole is as shown in FIG.

For example, it has been determined that the damage ratio for a shared bicycle is 10% at placement A, 20% at location B, 40% at location C, 50% at location D, and 60% at location E, The above-mentioned damage ratio is normalized, and for the characteristic distribution of the damage ratio, the respective values of the points A to E are: 0, 0.2, 0.6, 0.8, 1. It is also possible to scale up or down the normalized values to generate a score, and more intuitively display the relative position of the damage of each place in the whole.

Further, normalization can be performed for each feature distribution, and weights of each feature distribution are set, and a plurality of normalized values are calculated, such as weighted summation and weighted average, for the plurality of Rate by location.

In the above scheme, the scores of the shared items are scored, so that the scores of the place of delivery are more in line with the actual situation, and can be corrected in time according to the change of the feature distribution.

In another embodiment of the present specification, in step S301, acquiring a feature distribution of the shared item on the plurality of placement locations may include the following two implementation forms:

The method for collecting the feature of the shared item in the plurality of locations according to the feature data of the shared item of the plurality of placement locations, and collecting the feature distribution of the shared item in the plurality of locations, where The feature data includes at least a damaged state of the shared item.

This method can usually obtain the proportion of damage of the shared items at each place of delivery or the random parking (ie, the proportion that does not stop within the specified place of delivery) ratio/probability, etc.

Secondly, according to the method of online collection, according to the user usage data, the time interval at which the same user continuously uses different shared items or the time interval during which the same shared item is continuously used can be determined at the same place, according to the time interval, the acquisition time is obtained. The distribution of features of shared items at multiple locations.

On the same placement location, the time interval between consecutive use of different shared items by the same user may be obtained, and the proportion/probability of the shared items at the delivery location may be obtained; and the time interval during which the same shared item is continuously used may be obtained, and the delivery location may be obtained. Proportion/probability of item loss; statistics on the number of shared items at different time periods on the same placement point and the flow of people near the location, the ratio/probability of the item being used twice at that place can be obtained. Wherein, the continuous use refers to two uses that occur sequentially in chronological order.

It should be noted that, in the foregoing determining the loss ratio/probability, for a shared item without a positioning module (for example, a GPS module), it may be determined by collecting a usage record of the user. Of course, for a shared item with a positioning module, in addition to using the user usage record to count, the positioning module can be directly used for positioning to determine the lost proportion.

Collecting data in different ways, obtaining the distribution of features of a variety of different shared items, reflecting the use of shared items at the same place of delivery from multiple aspects, provides more comprehensive parameter support for subsequent scoring based on feature distribution.

As an implementation manner of the embodiment of the present specification, in step S205, for any user, the user is evaluated according to the score of the determined part or all of the delivery place and the placement location information of the user, specifically Can include the following implementations:

In step S501, for any user, the scores of the placement locations of the user are determined according to the scores of the determined partial or all delivery locations.

It is easy to understand that when the placement location is a subset of the plurality of placement locations, the rating of the placement location can be determined directly.

When the placement location is only relevant to the determined placement location and not to the determined plurality of locations, certain algorithms may be employed to determine its rating. For example, the average score of the three placement locations closest to the placement location is used as the rating for the placement location. That is, for a certain user, it may be necessary to only score a part of the placement place to determine the rating of each placement place of the user.

Step S503, generating an evaluation result of the user according to the score of each placement place and the number of times the user uses.

The evaluation result can reflect the degree of risk of the user, and the user often stops the vehicle in a place with a high damage ratio, high possibility of loss, and low secondary usage rate, and the risk level is more than that of parking the vehicle in an orderly area. The user who is easy to use twice is high. As for whether the user score and the risk level are positive or negative, they can be adjusted according to the rules of the score, and are not specifically limited herein.

The evaluation results can be expressed in a variety of forms. Taking the score as an example, the score of a user can be determined by the sum of the points of the reviews. For example, it has been determined that a user has 10 uses, corresponding to 4 placement locations, 3 locations A, 2 locations B, 2 locations C, and 3 locations D. The corresponding scores for each placement location are 4, 6, 8, 10 (this score is obtained according to the damage ratio of the items at each location, and the higher the damage ratio, the higher the score). Then the user score = (3 * 4 + 2 * 6 + 2 * 8 + 3 * 10) / 10 = 7.

In practical applications, it is also possible to grade according to the score, judge the pros and cons, and the like. In the previous example, if user a to user e and their user ratings are 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10, respectively, it can be considered that user a puts the item at a place A with a low damage ratio each time, which belongs to a high-quality user. The user e places the item at a place D with a high damage ratio each time, which is a poor user.

As an implementable embodiment of the present specification, after obtaining the evaluation result, the foregoing method may further include: providing the specified service service to the user according to the evaluation result. The specified service service may include message push, subsidize the user, reward/punish the user, limit some or all of the application functions of the user, and the like. The subsidy method may include actual amount subsidies (for example, lottery, reduction, discount, rebate, red envelope, etc.) or virtual rights (for example, mileage reward, usage reward, grade reward, credit bonus, etc.) .

For the evaluation result, there is a following application method: a user who satisfies certain conditions (such as a certain condition that the score satisfies a certain condition, or the judgment result belongs to a high-quality user) is subsidized after completing one use; or, a certain condition is satisfied Users directly subsidize. After the user's evaluation result is determined by the scheme of the present specification, different degrees of subsidy are given according to the difference of the evaluation results of each user. For high-quality users, higher subsidies are given, which leads to more use; lower-grade subsidies are not even subsidized for inferior users, which can encourage high-quality users to use multiple times. That is, the user is encouraged to place the shared item in a place where the damage is lost and the loss ratio is low, thereby alleviating the possibility of parking, damage and loss, and reducing the operating cost.

Based on the same idea, the present invention also provides a user evaluation device for using a shared item. As shown in FIG. 6, the device includes:

The obtaining module 601 is configured to acquire user usage data, where the user usage data includes placement location information after the user uses the shared item;

The determining module 603 determines a plurality of placement locations of the shared item and a rating of each placement location;

The evaluation module 605 evaluates the user for any user based on the score of the determined part or all of the placement location and the location information of the user.

Further, the obtaining module 601 is configured to acquire feature distributions of the shared items on the plurality of placement locations, and the determining module determines the scores of the delivery locations according to the feature distribution.

Further, the acquiring module 601 acquires feature data of the shared item including the plurality of placement locations, and statistically acquires feature distributions of the shared items in the plurality of locations according to part or all of the feature data, where The feature data includes at least a damaged state of the shared item.

Further, the obtaining module 601 acquires, at the plurality of placement locations, a time interval in which the same user continuously uses different shared items or a time interval in which the same shared item is continuously used, and acquires the multiple according to the time interval. The distribution of features of shared items on the placement site.

Further, the evaluation module 605 determines, for any user, the scores of the placement locations of the user according to the scores of the determined partial or all delivery locations, and generates the user according to the scores of the placement locations and the number of times the users are used. Evaluation results.

Further, the device further includes a marketing module 607, and the marketing module 607 provides a specified service service to the user according to the evaluation result.

Correspondingly, the embodiment of the present application further provides a user evaluation device for using a shared item, where the device includes:

a memory, a user evaluation program that stores shared items;

Obtaining user usage data, wherein the usage record includes placement location information after the user uses the shared item;

Based on the same inventive concept, the embodiment of the present application further provides a corresponding non-volatile computer storage medium, where computer executable instructions are stored, and the computer executable instructions are set as:

The various embodiments in the specification are described in a progressive manner, and the same or similar parts between the various embodiments may be referred to each other, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from the other embodiments. In particular, for the device, the device, and the media type embodiment, since it is basically similar to the method embodiment, the description is relatively simple, and the relevant parts can be referred to the description of the method embodiment, which will not be repeated here.

The foregoing description of the specific embodiments of the specification has been described. Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims. In some cases, the acts or steps or modules recited in the claims can be performed in a different order than in the embodiments and the desired results can still be achieved. In addition, the processes depicted in the figures are not necessarily in a particular order or in a sequential order to achieve the desired results. In some embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are also possible or may be advantageous.

In the 1990s, improvements to a technology could clearly distinguish between hardware improvements (eg, improvements to circuit structures such as diodes, transistors, switches, etc.) or software improvements (for process flow improvements). However, as technology advances, many of today's method flow improvements can be seen as direct improvements in hardware circuit architecture. Designers almost always get the corresponding hardware circuit structure by programming the improved method flow into the hardware circuit. Therefore, it cannot be said that the improvement of a method flow cannot be implemented by hardware entity modules. For example, a Programmable Logic Device (PLD) (such as a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA)) is an integrated circuit whose logic function is determined by the user programming the device. Designers can program themselves to "integrate" a digital system on a single PLD without having to ask the chip manufacturer to design and fabricate a dedicated integrated circuit chip. Moreover, today, instead of manually making integrated circuit chips, this programming is mostly implemented using "logic compiler" software, which is similar to the software compiler used in programming development, but before compiling The original code has to be written in a specific programming language. This is called the Hardware Description Language (HDL). HDL is not the only one, but there are many kinds, such as ABEL (Advanced Boolean Expression Language). AHDL (Altera Hardware Description Language), Confluence, CUPL (Cornell University Programming Language), HDCal, JHDL (Java Hardware Description Language), Lava, Lola, MyHDL, PALASM, RHDL (Ruby Hardware Description Language), etc., are currently the most commonly used VHDL (Very-High-Speed Integrated Circuit Hardware Description Language) and Verilog. It should also be apparent to those skilled in the art that the hardware flow for implementing the logic method flow can be easily obtained by simply programming the method flow into the integrated circuit with a few hardware description languages.

The controller can be implemented in any suitable manner, for example, the controller can take the form of, for example, a microprocessor or processor and a computer readable medium storing computer readable program code (eg, software or firmware) executable by the (micro)processor. In the form of logic gates, switches, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), programmable logic controllers, and embedded microcontrollers, examples of controllers include, but are not limited to, the following microcontrollers: ARC 625D, Atmel AT91SAM, The Microchip PIC18F26K20 and the Silicone Labs C8051F320, the memory controller can also be implemented as part of the memory's control logic. Those skilled in the art will also appreciate that in addition to implementing the controller in purely computer readable program code, the controller can be logically programmed by means of logic gates, switches, ASICs, programmable logic controllers, and embedding. The form of a microcontroller or the like to achieve the same function. Such a controller can therefore be considered a hardware component, and the means for implementing various functions included therein can also be considered as a structure within the hardware component. Or even a device for implementing various functions can be considered as a software module that can be both a method of implementation and a structure within a hardware component.

The system, device, module or unit illustrated in the above embodiments may be implemented by a computer chip or an entity, or by a product having a certain function. A typical implementation device is a computer. Specifically, the computer can be, for example, a personal computer, a laptop computer, a cellular phone, a camera phone, a smart phone, a personal digital assistant, a media player, a navigation device, an email device, a game console, a tablet computer, a wearable device, or A combination of any of these devices.

For the convenience of description, the above devices are described separately by function into various units. Of course, the functions of the various units may be implemented in one or more software and/or hardware when implementing embodiments of the present specification.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that embodiments of the present invention can be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Accordingly, the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment, or a combination of software and hardware. Moreover, the invention can take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) including computer usable program code.

The present invention has been described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (system), and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each flow and/or block of the flowchart illustrations and/or FIG. These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, embedded processor, or other programmable data processing device to produce a machine for the execution of instructions for execution by a processor of a computer or other programmable data processing device. Means for implementing the functions specified in one or more of the flow or in a block or blocks of the flow chart.

The computer program instructions can also be stored in a computer readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing device to operate in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable memory produce an article of manufacture comprising the instruction device. The apparatus implements the functions specified in one or more blocks of a flow or a flow and/or block diagram of the flowchart.

These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device such that a series of operational steps are performed on a computer or other programmable device to produce computer-implemented processing for execution on a computer or other programmable device. The instructions provide steps for implementing the functions specified in one or more of the flow or in a block or blocks of a flow diagram.

In a typical configuration, a computing device includes one or more processors (CPUs), input/output interfaces, network interfaces, and memory.

The memory may include non-persistent memory, random access memory (RAM), and/or non-volatile memory in a computer readable medium, such as read only memory (ROM) or flash memory. Memory is an example of a computer readable medium.

Computer readable media includes both permanent and non-persistent, removable and non-removable media. Information storage can be implemented by any method or technology. The information can be computer readable instructions, data structures, modules of programs, or other data. Examples of computer storage media include, but are not limited to, phase change memory (PRAM), static random access memory (SRAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), other types of random access memory (RAM), read only memory. (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disk read only memory (CD-ROM), digital versatile disk (DVD) or other optical storage, Magnetic tape cartridges, magnetic tape storage or other magnetic storage devices or any other non-transportable media can be used to store information that can be accessed by a computing device. As defined herein, computer readable media does not include temporary storage computer readable media, such as modulated data signal numbers and carrier waves.

It is also to be understood that the terms "comprises" or "comprising" or "comprising" or any other variations are intended to encompass a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, Other elements not explicitly listed, or elements that are inherent to such a process, method, commodity, or equipment. An element defined by the phrase "comprising a ..." does not exclude the presence of additional equivalent elements in the process, method, item, or device that comprises the element, without further limitation.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that one or more embodiments of the present specification can be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Thus, embodiments of the present specification can take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or a combination of software and hardware aspects. Moreover, embodiments of the present specification can take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer usable storage media (including but not limited to disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) having computer usable program code embodied therein. .

Embodiments of the present description can be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions executed by a computer, such as a program module. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, and the like that perform particular transactions or implement particular abstract data types. Embodiments of the present specification may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where transactions are performed by remote processing devices that are connected through a communication network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules can be located in both local and remote computer storage media including storage devices.

The various embodiments in the specification are described in a progressive manner, and the same or similar parts between the various embodiments may be referred to each other, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from the other embodiments. In particular, for the system embodiment, since it is basically similar to the method embodiment, the description is relatively simple, and the relevant parts can be referred to the description of the method embodiment.

The above descriptions are only examples of the present specification and are not intended to limit the application. Various modifications and changes may be made to the embodiments of the present disclosure. Any modifications, equivalents, improvements, etc. made within the spirit and scope of the embodiments of the present invention are intended to be included in the scope of the present application.

Claims

A user assessment method for using shared items, including:

Obtaining user usage data, wherein the user usage data includes at least placement location information after the user uses the shared item;

Determining the multiple placements of the shared item and the rating of each placement;

For any user, the user is evaluated based on the rating of some or all of the placement locations that have been determined and the placement location information for that user.
The method of claim 1 wherein the ratings of each placement location are determined, including:

Obtaining a feature distribution of the shared items on the plurality of placement locations;

Determining a rating of each placement location based on the feature distribution;

The feature distribution includes at least one of a damage ratio or a loss ratio of the shared item.
The method of claim 2, obtaining a feature distribution of the shared items on the plurality of placement locations, comprising:

Obtaining feature data of the shared items of the plurality of placement locations;

Collecting, according to part or all of the feature data, a feature distribution of the shared items on the plurality of placement locations;

The feature data includes at least a damaged state of the shared item.
The method of claim 2, obtaining a feature distribution of the shared items on the plurality of placement locations, comprising:

Determining, according to the user usage data, a time interval in which the same user continuously uses different shared items or a time interval in which the same shared item is continuously used;

According to the time interval, a feature distribution of the shared items on the plurality of locations is acquired.
The method of claim 1, wherein the user is evaluated according to the score of the determined part or all of the placement locations and the location information of the user for any user, including:

For any user, based on the scores of some or all of the determined placement locations, determine the ratings for each placement location that the user corresponds to;

The evaluation result of the user is generated according to the rating of each placement place and the number of times the user uses.
The method of claim 5 further comprising:

According to the evaluation result, the specified business service is provided to the user.
A user evaluation device for using shared items, including:

Obtaining a module, acquiring user usage data, wherein the user usage data includes at least placement location information after the user uses the shared item;

Determining a module to determine scores for multiple locations and locations;

The evaluation module evaluates the user for any user based on the determined rating of each placement location and the location information of the user.
The device according to claim 7, wherein the acquiring module acquires a feature distribution of the shared items on the plurality of placement locations, and the determining module determines a score of the plurality of locations according to the feature distribution, The feature distribution includes at least one of a damage ratio or a loss ratio of the shared item.
The device of claim 8, the acquiring module acquires feature data of the shared item including the plurality of placement locations, and statistically acquires the shared items of the plurality of placement locations according to part or all of the feature data. A feature distribution, wherein the feature data includes at least a damaged state of the shared item.
The apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the obtaining module determines, at the plurality of placement locations, a time interval in which the same user continuously uses different shared items or a time interval in which the same shared item is continuously used, according to the time interval, Obtaining a feature distribution of the shared items at the plurality of locations.
The device of claim 7, wherein the evaluation module determines, for any user, the scores of the placement locations corresponding to the user according to the scores of the determined partial or all placement locations, according to the ratings and users of the placement locations. The number of uses, the evaluation result of the user is generated.
The apparatus of claim 11 further comprising a marketing module, said marketing module providing a specified business service to the user based on said evaluation result.
A user evaluation device for using a shared item, the device comprising:

a memory that stores a user evaluation program for using the shared item;

The processor, invoking a user evaluation program stored in the memory for using the shared item, and executing:

Obtaining user usage data, wherein the usage record includes placement location information after the user uses the shared item;

Determining the multiple placements of the shared item and the rating of each placement;

For any user, the user is evaluated based on the score of the determined part or all of the placement location and the location information of the user.