WO2019033790A1 - 项目信息处理方法、装置、服务器和存储介质 - Google Patents
项目信息处理方法、装置、服务器和存储介质 Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2019033790A1 WO2019033790A1 PCT/CN2018/085004 CN2018085004W WO2019033790A1 WO 2019033790 A1 WO2019033790 A1 WO 2019033790A1 CN 2018085004 W CN2018085004 W CN 2018085004W WO 2019033790 A1 WO2019033790 A1 WO 2019033790A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- review
- information
- reviewer
- project information
- project
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
Definitions
- the present application relates to a project information processing method, apparatus, server, and storage medium.
- New projects opened by enterprises shall comply with the relevant laws and policies.
- the regulatory bodies such as the China Insurance Regulatory Commission and the China Securities Regulatory Commission will review the compliance of new projects initiated by the company. Only after the review is passed can the company launch the new project. In the actual review process, the same new project often requires multiple reviewers to review.
- the inventor realized that at present, multiple reviewers can only review project information in turn according to the established review process. That is to say, only after the current reviewer has reviewed the project information, the project information flow is transferred to the next reviewer, which makes the review efficiency lower.
- a project information processing method, apparatus, server, and storage medium are provided.
- a project information processing method includes:
- the project information includes a project type; and using the project information to generate a corresponding review task;
- the review process includes a plurality of review links, each of the review links having a corresponding reviewer identification and a rating thereof;
- the review link corresponding to the reviewer identification is marked as a parallel review link
- the review task is sent to the review terminal corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers.
- the review information returned by the plurality of review terminals is received, and the review information is fed back to the enterprise terminal.
- a project information processing device comprising:
- Initiating a review module configured to receive project information sent by the enterprise terminal; the project information includes a project type; and use the project information to generate a corresponding review task;
- a process identification module configured to query a corresponding review process according to the item type;
- the review process includes a plurality of review links, each of the review links having a corresponding reviewer identifier and a level thereof;
- a process conversion module configured to mark a review link corresponding to the reviewer identifier as a parallel review link when the same level of reviewer identification exists in the review process; and the review process is performed by one or more parallel review links Converting;
- the submitting module is configured to send the review task to the review terminal corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers according to the converted review process; receive the review information returned by the plurality of review terminals, and feed the review information to the enterprise terminal.
- a computer device comprising a memory and one or more processors having stored therein computer readable instructions, the computer readable instructions being executable by the processor to cause the one or more processors to execute The following steps:
- the project information includes a project type; and using the project information to generate a corresponding review task;
- the review process includes a plurality of review links, each of the review links having a corresponding reviewer identification and a rating thereof;
- the review link corresponding to the reviewer identification is marked as a parallel review link
- the review task is sent to the review terminal corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers.
- the review information returned by the plurality of review terminals is received, and the review information is fed back to the enterprise terminal.
- One or more non-volatile storage media storing computer readable instructions, when executed by one or more processors, cause one or more processors to perform the following steps:
- the project information includes a project type; and using the project information to generate a corresponding review task;
- the review process includes a plurality of review links, each of the review links having a corresponding reviewer identification and a rating thereof;
- the review link corresponding to the reviewer identification is marked as a parallel review link
- the review task is sent to the review terminal corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers.
- the review information returned by the plurality of review terminals is received, and the review information is fed back to the enterprise terminal.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram of an application environment of a project information processing method in accordance with one or more embodiments.
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a method of processing item information in accordance with one or more embodiments.
- 3B is a schematic diagram of another review process transition process in accordance with one or more embodiments.
- 3C is a schematic diagram of yet another review process transition process in accordance with one or more embodiments.
- FIG. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of a project information processing apparatus according to one or more embodiments.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a server in accordance with one or more embodiments.
- first may be referred to as a second client
- second client may be referred to as a first client, without departing from the scope of the present application.
- Both the first client and the second client are clients, but they are not the same client.
- the project information processing method provided in the embodiment of the present application can be applied to an application environment as shown in FIG. 1.
- the enterprise terminal 102 is connected to the server 106 via a network.
- the review terminal 104 is connected to the server 106 via a network.
- Project information includes the type of project.
- the server 106 uses the project information to generate a corresponding review task.
- the server 106 queries the corresponding review process according to the item type.
- the review process includes multiple review sessions, each with a corresponding reviewer ID and its rating.
- the server 106 identifies whether there is a same level of reviewer identification in the reviewed review process, and if so, marks the review link corresponding to the same level of reviewer identification as a parallel review session.
- the server 106 converts the queried review process through one or more parallel review steps, so that the converted review process includes multiple review phases, each review phase includes a parallel review session or a reviewer logo that does not have the same level Corresponding review session. If the first review phase includes a parallel review session, the server sends the review tasks in parallel to the review terminals 104 corresponding to the parallel review sessions in the first review phase. If the first review phase includes an independent review session, the server 106 sends the review task to the review terminal 104 corresponding to the review session.
- the server 106 After receiving the review information returned by the one or more review terminals 104 corresponding to the first review phase, the server 106 identifies whether there is a next review phase, and if so, sends the review task to the next review phase according to the above manner.
- the one or more review terminals 104 after receiving the review information returned by the review terminal 104 corresponding to the next review phase, return a step of identifying whether there is a next review phase, and thus repeating until there is no next review phase. Indicates the end of the review.
- the server 106 queries the corresponding review process according to the item type, and converts the reviewed review process according to the level of the reviewer identification, and can send the review task to the same level of reviewers in parallel according to the converted review process. Identify the corresponding review terminal, which can improve the review efficiency.
- a method for processing a project information is provided.
- the method is applied to the server 106 in FIG. 1 as an example, and specifically includes the following steps:
- Step 202 Receive project information sent by the enterprise terminal; the project information includes a project type; and use the project information to generate a corresponding review task.
- the project manager of the enterprise can use the enterprise terminal to initiate a review to the server and send the project information to the server.
- Project information includes project types such as new products or new businesses.
- the server generates a corresponding review task based on the project information.
- Step 204 Query a corresponding review process according to the item type; the review process includes multiple review links, and each of the review links has a corresponding reviewer identifier and its rank.
- the server stores the review process corresponding to different project types.
- the new product X1 corresponds to the review process X1
- the new product X2 corresponds to the review process X2
- the new service Y1 corresponds to the review process Y1.
- the review process includes multiple review sessions, each with a corresponding reviewer ID and its rating.
- the new product X1 corresponding review process X1 can be: review link A (auditor identification A, level 3) ⁇ review link B (reviewer identification B, level 2) ⁇ review link C (review) Person identification C, level 2) ⁇ review link D (reviewer identification D, level 1) ⁇ review link E (reviewer identification E, level 1). Please refer to FIG.
- the new product X2 corresponding review process X2 can be: review link F (reviewer identification A, level 3) ⁇ review link G (reviewer identification E, level 3) ⁇ review link H (reviewer identification Having, Level 3) ⁇ Review Section I (Reviewer Identification B, Level 2) ⁇ Review Section J (Reviewer Identification D, Level 1).
- the new product Y1 corresponding review process Y1 can be: review link K (reviewer identification C, level 2) ⁇ review link L (reviewer identification D, level 1) ⁇ review link M (reviewer identification E, level 1) ⁇ review link N (reviewer identification G, level 1) ⁇ review link O (reviewer identification Xin, level 1).
- the server also stores review rules corresponding to different item types.
- the review rules may be formulated by the regulatory authorities such as the China Insurance Regulatory Commission in accordance with relevant legal policies.
- the review process and the review rule may be that the relevant personnel of the regulatory body (hereinafter referred to as the supervisor) are pre-sent to the server through the management terminal.
- the supervisor can send a configuration request to the server through the management terminal, and the server returns the first configuration page to the management terminal according to the configuration request.
- the supervisor can add one or more project types and their corresponding review processes and review rules on the configuration page, and send the added one or more project types and their corresponding review processes and review rules to the server.
- the supervisory personnel can also modify the review process and review rules corresponding to a certain project type through the management terminal.
- the supervisor can send a configuration update request to the server through the management terminal, and the server returns a second configuration page to the management terminal according to the configuration update request.
- the supervisor can input the type of the item to be modified on the second configuration page through the management terminal.
- the server queries the review process and the review rule corresponding to the item type, and sends the queried review process and the review rule to the management terminal, and the management terminal displays the queried review process and the review rule on the second configuration page, and obtains the user review process.
- the modification of the review rules, the modified review process and review rules are sent to the server.
- the server queries the corresponding review process and review rules according to the project type.
- the server can automatically identify the corresponding review process according to the project type, so that the project manager does not need to understand the review process, and only submits the project information to the server through the enterprise terminal to realize the review, which reduces the burden on the project manager to manually identify the review process. .
- step 206 when the same level of reviewer identification exists in the review process, the review link corresponding to the reviewer identification is marked as a parallel review link.
- step 208 the review process is converted through one or more parallel review sessions.
- the server identifies whether the same level of reviewer identification exists in the reviewed review process. If so, the server marks the review link corresponding to the same level of reviewer identification as a parallel review session. For example, in the above example, the review section B and the review section C are marked as parallel review sessions, and the review section E and the review section F are marked as parallel review sessions. There is no review process marked as a parallel review, such as review session A can be called an independent review process. Further, the server converts each independent review process into a review phase, and marks each parallel review process as a review phase to convert the original review process, so that the converted review process includes one or more During the review phase, each review phase includes an independent review session or a parallel review session. That is to say, each review phase includes one or more review sessions.
- the review process X1 can be converted into: review stage 1 (review link A) ⁇ review stage 2 (review link B, review link C) ⁇ review stage 3 (review link D, Review section E).
- the review process X2 can be converted into: review phase 1 (review link F, review link G, review link H) ⁇ review phase 2 (review link I) ⁇ review phase 3 (review link J).
- the review process Y1 can be converted into: the review process X2 can be converted into: review phase 1 (review link K) ⁇ review phase 2 (review link L, review link M, review link N, review link O).
- Step 210 Send the review task to the review terminal corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers according to the converted review process.
- Step 212 Receive review information returned by multiple review terminals, and feed the review information to the enterprise terminal.
- the server sends the review task generated based on all the project information to the review terminal corresponding to each reviewer identifier according to the converted review process.
- the server identifies whether the first review phase includes a parallel review session. If so, the server sends the review task in parallel to the review terminal corresponding to the parallel review session in the first review phase. Otherwise, it means that the first review phase includes an independent review session, and the server sends the review task to the review terminal corresponding to the review session.
- the server After receiving the review information returned by one or more review terminals corresponding to the first review phase, the server identifies whether there is a next review phase. If so, the server sends the review task and review information to one or more review terminals corresponding to the next review phase in the manner described above. After receiving the review information returned by the one or more review terminals corresponding to the next review phase, the server returns a step of identifying whether there is a next review phase. This is repeated until the next review phase does not exist, and the review ends.
- the first review phase includes an independent review session A, and the server sends the review task to the review terminal corresponding to the reviewer identification A.
- the second review phase includes a parallel review session B and C. After receiving the review information returned by the review terminal corresponding to the reviewer's logo A, the server sends the review task and the review information to the reviewer's logo B and the reviewer's logo. Corresponding review terminals.
- the third review phase includes a parallel review session D and E. After receiving the review information returned by the review terminal corresponding to the reviewer identification B and the reviewer identification C respectively, the server sends the review task and all the received review information in parallel.
- the review terminal corresponding to the reviewer's identification and the reviewer's logo After receiving the review information returned by the review terminal corresponding to the reviewer identification and the reviewer identification, the server identifies that there is no next review phase, and the review ends. The server feeds back all the review information received to the enterprise terminal, so that the project manager of the enterprise can timely understand the review result through the review terminal.
- the review task can be transferred to the reviewer corresponding to the next review link, so that the review efficiency is reduced.
- the server automatically identifies one or more reviewer identifiers that need to send the review task, and sends the project information to the review terminal corresponding to the identified reviewer identifier, which can reduce the need for the reviewer to manually identify the next.
- the cumbersomeness of the sequence reviewer and the manual transfer of project information to the next sequential reviewer allows the reviewer to focus on the review of the project information, thereby improving the efficiency of project review.
- the enterprise terminal initiates a review request to the server; the server may generate a corresponding review task by using the received project information; and the corresponding review process may be queried according to the project type in the project information; according to each review in the review process
- the level of the reviewer's identification corresponding to the link can be converted to the reviewed review process.
- the review link corresponding to the same level of reviewer identification is marked as a parallel review link, so that the server can send the review task to the review terminal corresponding to the same level of reviewer identification in parallel, so that multiple reviewers of the same level can perform the review task in parallel.
- the review process allows the converted review process to reduce the review time as a whole and thus improve the review efficiency.
- the review process further includes a review scope corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers, and the step of sending the review task to the review terminals corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers according to the converted review process, including: according to the converted review The review scope corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers corresponding to the process query; the review task is divided into multiple review subtasks according to the review scope corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers, and each review subtask is associated with one or more reviewer identifiers Corresponding; sending the review subtask to the review terminal corresponding to the corresponding reviewer ID.
- each reviewer can split the part of the project information that needs to be reviewed from the entire project information according to the review scope of each reviewer.
- the review process further includes a review scope corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers, and the review scope corresponding to each reviewer identifier includes one or more review items.
- Project information includes multiple review items.
- the server queries the corresponding review scope corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers according to the converted review process, and splits the review task into multiple review subtasks according to the subordinate relationship of the review scope corresponding to each review item and the reviewer identifier in the project information. .
- Each review subtask corresponds to one or more reviewer IDs.
- the server sends the review subtask to the review terminal corresponding to the corresponding reviewer ID.
- the server splits the review task according to the review scope of each reviewer, so that the review is more targeted, and the reviewer can conveniently focus on only the part that needs to be reviewed, and the reviewer can be omitted. It is necessary to find out the parts of the review from all the review tasks before actually starting the review, so that the review efficiency can be improved.
- the item information further includes a plurality of review items and a plurality of field values corresponding to each of the review items; and after receiving the item information sent by the enterprise terminal, the method further includes: querying the corresponding verification rule according to the item type
- the verification rule includes a plurality of required review items and a plurality of required fields corresponding to each required review item; if the required review item is empty in the item information, or the corresponding field value of the required field in the item information is If it is empty, it will generate prompt information with incomplete project information; send the prompt information to the enterprise terminal.
- the server After receiving the project information sent by the enterprise terminal, the server performs integrity verification on the project information.
- the project information further includes a plurality of review items, and each review item includes a plurality of field values.
- the server stores validation rules for multiple project types.
- the validation rule includes multiple required review items and multiple required fields for each required review item.
- the server queries the corresponding verification rule according to the item type, and detects whether the corresponding review item in the item information is empty according to the checked verification rule, and whether the corresponding field value of the required field in the item information is empty.
- the identification project information is incomplete, and the prompt information indicating that the project information is incomplete is generated, and the prompt information is sent to Enterprise terminals to enable enterprise terminals to supplement missing project information in a timely manner.
- the corresponding verification rule can be queried, and the integrity verification of the item information can be performed according to the queried verification rule. If the verification fails, the enterprise terminal is prompted to perform incomplete item information in time. In addition, to avoid the situation that the project information cannot be sent due to incomplete project information, the time from the initiation of the enterprise terminal to the actual delivery of the server can be reduced, and the evaluation efficiency can be improved.
- the method further comprises: crawling a legal policy related to the review process among the plurality of web pages; comparing the crawled legal policy with the stored legal policy; if the crawled legal policy occurs The change sends the crawled legal policy to the management terminal, so that the management terminal updates the corresponding review process according to the changed legal policy; and receives the updated review process sent by the management terminal.
- the review process and review rules are established by the regulatory body in accordance with relevant legal policies.
- relevant legal policies change, regulators need to adjust the corresponding review process and review rules.
- the tracking of changes in relevant laws and policies by humans has increased the workload of supervisors.
- the server crawls the relevant legal policies on the webpage corresponding to the plurality of review processes and the review rules according to the preset time frequency.
- the server compares the legal policies that are crawled with the recorded legal policies to determine whether the relevant legal policies have changed. If the relevant legal policy changes, the server uses the crawled legal policy to update the recorded legal policy, and sends the crawled legal policy to the management terminal corresponding to the supervisor in time to prompt the supervisor to update the
- the legal policy adjusts the review process and review rules in a timely manner.
- the management terminal returns the adjusted review process and review rules to the server, and the server replaces the review process and the review rules with the adjusted review process and the review rules, thereby updating the corresponding review process and review rules.
- the server updates the corresponding review process and the review rule according to the legal policy that is crawled, and sends the updated review process and the review rule to the management terminal, so that Regulators can confirm the updated review process and review rules through the management terminal.
- the supervisor can return the confirmation result to the server through the management terminal. If the confirmation result is a consent update, the server replaces the recorded review process and review rules with the updated review process and review rules. If the result of the confirmation is that the update is not agreed, the server receives the adjusted review process and the review rule sent by the management terminal, and replaces the review process and the review rule of the record by using the adjusted review process and the review rule as described above.
- the server automatically updates the corresponding review process and review rules according to the changed legal policy, which can reduce the burden on the supervisors to manually adjust the review process and the review rules; if the supervisors do not agree with the server update results, they can pass the management terminal pair.
- the review process and the review rules are re-adjusted, and can be further adjusted based on the update results of the server, thereby reducing the burden on the supervisors to adjust the review process and the review rules, and adjusting the review process and review rules in time to adapt to the actual situation. .
- the server automatically crawls relevant legal policies from a plurality of preset webpages. If the legal policy changes through comparison with the recorded legal policy, the crawled legal policy is sent to the management terminal, which may prompt supervision. The personnel update the corresponding review process in a timely manner, which can improve the efficiency of the review process update.
- the step of sending the review task to the review terminal corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers according to the converted review process includes: obtaining a preset plurality of keywords; and querying the project information including the number of keywords; The level of the item information is identified according to the quantity of the item information included in the item information; if the level of the item information reaches a preset level, the corresponding review task is encrypted, and the encrypted review task is sent to the plurality of reviewers according to the converted review process.
- the level of the project information may be that the project manager sends the server to the server in advance through the enterprise terminal, or may be identified by the server according to a preset level judgment criterion.
- the preset level judgment standard includes a plurality of keywords.
- the server query item information includes the number of keywords, and the level of the item information is identified according to the number of keywords included in the item information. It is easy to understand that the more the item information contains keywords, the higher the level of the corresponding item information, indicating the more important the item information.
- the server determines whether the level of the item information reaches a preset level.
- the preset level is a criterion for distinguishing the importance of project information. If the level of the project information is lower than the preset level, it indicates that the project information is of weak importance, and the project information can be routinely transmitted.
- the server establishes a regular channel between the review terminals corresponding to the corresponding reviewer identifiers through a TCP protocol, etc., and transmits the corresponding review tasks and corresponding review rules through the regular channels.
- Server encrypted transmission of project information includes a variety of embodiment approaches.
- the server encrypts the above-mentioned conventional channel and establishes an encrypted channel; according to the converted review process, the review task and the corresponding review rule are transmitted to the corresponding review terminal in the encrypted channel.
- the server may be based on the HTTPS protocol (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol over Secure Socket Layer), the SSL protocol (Secure Sockets Layer), the CA (Certificate Authority), and the VPN ( Encryption methods such as Virtual Private Network or RAR compression encryption encrypt regular channels.
- the server closes the encrypted channel to conserve network resources.
- the server encrypts the review task, and the encrypted review task and the corresponding review rule are transmitted to the review terminal corresponding to each reviewer identifier according to the converted review process.
- the server may be based on SSH protocol (Secure Shell, Secure Shell Protocol), PGP protocol (Pretty Good Privacy), RSA (Asymmetric Encryption Algorithm), key pair (public key and private key), or user password encryption, etc.
- the encryption method encrypts the project information. After receiving the encrypted review information returned by the review terminal, the server may decrypt the encrypted review information based on the stored decryption key.
- the decryption key may be a pre-agreed password, password, etc. between the project manager and the reviewer. This method is relatively easy to implement compared to the technical requirements for encrypting the transmission channel. Of course, there are still many ways to encrypt and transfer project information, which will not be repeated here.
- the item information is identified according to the number of preset keywords, and the importance of the item information is determined by the level of the item information, and the item information higher than the preset level is encrypted and transmitted, thereby avoiding illegal elements. Stealing important project information and causing unnecessary losses to the project manager.
- the method further includes: if the review information includes the digital signature and the answer to the random question, acquiring the pre-stored signature handwriting corresponding to the reviewer identifier, The signed signature handwriting is matched with the pre-stored signature handwriting to obtain a matching degree; if the matching degree reaches the first matching threshold, and the answer of the random question is consistent with the preset answer, the verification is passed.
- the server needs to verify the review information returned by each review terminal.
- the review information may include digital signatures, fingerprint information, face images, or answers to random questions.
- the random problem is randomly generated by the server based on the project information. For example, please enter your ID number.
- Each random question has a corresponding default answer.
- the server has a variety of ways to verify the review information.
- One of the verification methods is: if the review information includes the digital signature and the answer to the random question, the pre-stored signature handwriting corresponding to the reviewer identifier is obtained, and the signature signature of the digital signature is matched with the pre-stored signature handwriting; When the first matching threshold is reached, and the answer to the random question is consistent with the preset answer, the verification is passed.
- Another verification method is: if the review information includes the fingerprint information and the answer to the random question, the pre-stored fingerprint information corresponding to the reviewer identifier is obtained, and the fingerprint information in the review information is matched with the pre-stored fingerprint information; The degree reaches the second matching threshold, and the answer to the random question is consistent with the preset answer, and the verification is passed.
- Another verification method is: if the review information includes the face image and the answer to the random question, the pre-stored face image corresponding to the reviewer identifier is obtained, and the face image returned by the reviewer identification terminal and the pre-stored face are obtained. The image is matched; if the matching degree reaches the third matching threshold, and the answer of the random question is consistent with the preset answer, the verification is passed. Of course, there are still many ways to verify the review information, which will not be repeated here.
- the server resends the review task and the corresponding review rule to the corresponding review terminal to prompt the corresponding reviewer to re-evaluate the review task.
- verifying the review information returned by the review terminal can determine whether the returned review information is a legal reviewer's own review behavior, and can avoid maliciously replacing the reviewer's review of the project information, and improve the authenticity of the review information. Effectiveness.
- the method includes: receiving a review request sent by the enterprise terminal, returning a template email to the enterprise terminal according to the review request, so that the enterprise terminal enters the project information by calling the template mail; and receiving the project information sent by the enterprise terminal.
- Mail identifies whether the mail is a mail of a predetermined format; if yes, generates a corresponding review task according to the mail, and sends the review task to the review terminal corresponding to the reviewer identifier corresponding to the order.
- the server corresponding to the review platform may be referred to as a review server, and the review server is connected to the server corresponding to the plurality of mailbox platforms through the network, so that the review platform is docked with the enterprise terminal and the mailbox platform on the review terminal, so that the project manager can
- the submission of project information is carried out by means of mail transmission on the enterprise terminal, and the reviewer can implement the review of the project information by means of mail transmission on the review terminal.
- steps in the flowchart of FIG. 2 are sequentially displayed as indicated by the arrows, these steps are not necessarily performed in the order indicated by the arrows. Except as explicitly stated herein, the execution of these steps is not strictly limited, and the steps may be performed in other orders. Moreover, at least some of the steps in FIG. 2 may include a plurality of sub-steps or stages, which are not necessarily performed at the same time, but may be executed at different times, the execution of these sub-steps or stages The order is also not necessarily sequential, but may be performed alternately or alternately with other steps or at least a portion of the sub-steps or stages of the other steps.
- a project information processing apparatus including: an initiation review module 402, a process identification module 404, a process conversion module 406, and a delivery module 408, wherein:
- the initiating review module 402 is configured to receive project information sent by the enterprise terminal; the project information includes a project type; and the corresponding review task is generated by using the project information.
- the process identification module 404 is configured to query a corresponding review process according to the project type; the review process includes multiple review links, and each of the review links has a corresponding reviewer identifier and its rank.
- the process conversion module 406 is configured to mark the review link corresponding to the reviewer identifier as a parallel review link when the same level of the reviewer identifier exists in the review process; and convert the review process through one or more parallel review links.
- the submitting module 408 is configured to send the review task to the review terminal corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers according to the converted review process; receive the review information returned by the plurality of review terminals, and feed the review information to the enterprise terminal.
- the project information further includes a plurality of review items and a plurality of field values corresponding to each of the review items; the initiation review module 402 is further configured to query the corresponding verification rule according to the item type; the verification rule includes multiple The required review items and the multiple required fields corresponding to each required review item; if the required review item in the project information is empty, or the corresponding field value in the item information is empty, the generated project information is not generated.
- Complete prompt message ; send the prompt message to the enterprise terminal.
- the submitting module 408 is further configured to acquire a preset plurality of keywords; the query item information includes the number of keywords; and the item information includes the level of the item information according to the item information; if the item information When the level reaches the preset level, the corresponding review task is encrypted, and the encrypted review task is sent to the review terminal corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers according to the converted review process; or the review terminal corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers
- the transmission channel is separately established, and the transmission channel is encrypted, and the corresponding review task is sent to the plurality of review terminals in the encrypted transmission channel according to the converted review process.
- the above described item information processing apparatus can be implemented in the form of a computer readable instruction that can be run on a server as shown in FIG.
- a server is provided, as shown in FIG. 5, which includes a processor, a storage device, and a network interface connected by a system bus.
- the processor of the server is used to provide computing and control capabilities.
- the storage device of the server includes one or more non-volatile storage media, one or more internal storage devices.
- the server's non-volatile storage medium stores operating system and computer readable instructions.
- the internal storage of the server provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and computer readable instructions in the non-volatile storage medium.
- the network interface of the server is used for communicating with an external terminal through a network connection, for example, receiving project information and review information sent by the terminal.
- the computer readable instructions are executed by a processor to implement a project information processing method.
- FIG. 5 is only a block diagram of a part of the structure related to the solution of the present application, and does not constitute a limitation on the server to which the solution of the present application is applied.
- the specific server may include More or fewer components are shown in the figures, or some components are combined, or have different component arrangements.
- a computer device comprising a memory and one or more processors, the memory storing computer readable instructions, the computer readable instructions being executed by the processor, causing the one or more processors to perform the step of: receiving the transmission by the enterprise terminal Project information; project information includes project type; use project information to generate corresponding review tasks; query corresponding review process according to project type; review process includes multiple review links, each of which has corresponding reviewer identification and its rating When there is the same level of reviewer identification in the review process, the review link corresponding to the reviewer's logo is marked as a parallel review session; the review process is converted through one or more parallel review sessions; according to the converted review process, The review task is sent to the review terminal corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers; the review information returned by the plurality of review terminals is received, and the review information is fed back to the enterprise terminal.
- the project information further includes a plurality of review items and a plurality of field values corresponding to each of the review items; the processor executing the computer readable instructions further performing the following steps: querying the corresponding verification rules according to the item type; The verification rule includes multiple required review items and multiple required fields corresponding to each required review item; if the required review item is empty in the item information, or the corresponding field value in the item information is empty , generating prompt information with incomplete project information; sending the prompt information to the enterprise terminal.
- the processor when executing the computer readable instructions, further performs the steps of: crawling a legal policy related to the review process among the plurality of web pages; comparing the crawled legal policy with the stored legal policy; If the legal policy that has been crawled changes, the crawled legal policy is sent to the management terminal, so that the management terminal updates the corresponding review process according to the changed legal policy; and receives the updated review sent by the management terminal. Process.
- the method when the processor executes the computer readable instructions, the method further includes: acquiring a preset plurality of keywords; querying the item information to include the number of keywords; and identifying the item information according to the item information including the number of keywords Level; if the level of the project information reaches the preset level, the corresponding review task is encrypted, and the encrypted review task is sent to the review terminal corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers according to the converted review process; or with multiple reviews A transmission channel is established between the review terminals corresponding to the person identification, and the transmission channel is encrypted, and the corresponding review task is sent to the plurality of review terminals in the encrypted transmission channel according to the converted review process.
- the processor when executing the computer readable instructions, further performs the steps of: if the review information includes a digital signature and an answer to the random question, obtaining a pre-stored signature handwriting corresponding to the reviewer identification, the signature of the digital signature The handwriting is matched with the pre-stored signature handwriting to obtain a matching degree; if the matching degree reaches the first matching threshold, and the answer of the random question is consistent with the preset answer, the verification passes.
- One or more non-volatile storage media storing computer readable instructions, when executed by one or more processors, cause one or more processors to perform the steps of: receiving project information transmitted by the enterprise terminal
- the project information includes the project type; the project information is used to generate the corresponding review task; the corresponding review process is queried according to the project type; the review process includes multiple review links, each of which has a corresponding reviewer identification and its rank;
- the review link corresponding to the reviewer's logo is marked as a parallel review link; the review process is converted through one or more parallel review links; according to the converted review process, the review task will be reviewed.
- the project information further includes a plurality of review items and a plurality of field values corresponding to each of the review items; when the computer readable instructions are executed by the processor, the following steps are further performed: querying the corresponding verification rules according to the item type
- the verification rule includes a plurality of required review items and a plurality of required fields corresponding to each required review item; if the required review item is empty in the item information, or the corresponding field value of the required field in the item information is If it is empty, it will generate prompt information with incomplete project information; send the prompt information to the enterprise terminal.
- the computer readable instructions when executed by the processor, further perform the steps of: crawling legal policies related to the review process among the plurality of web pages; comparing the crawled legal policies with the stored legal policies If the legal policy that has been crawled changes, the legal policy that is crawled is sent to the management terminal, so that the management terminal updates the corresponding review process according to the changed legal policy; and receives the updated update sent by the management terminal. Review process.
- the computer readable instructions are further executed by the processor to: obtain a preset plurality of keywords; query the item information to include the number of keywords; and identify the item according to the number of the items including the number of keywords The level of the information; if the level of the item information reaches the preset level, the corresponding review task is encrypted, and the encrypted review task is sent to the review terminal corresponding to the plurality of reviewer identifiers according to the converted review process; or A transmission channel is established between the review terminals corresponding to the reviewer identifier, and the transmission channel is encrypted, and the corresponding review task is sent to the plurality of review terminals in the encrypted transmission channel according to the converted review process.
- the computer readable instructions are further executed by the processor to: if the review information includes a digital signature and an answer to the random question, obtain a pre-stored signature handwriting corresponding to the reviewer identification, digitally signed The signature handwriting is matched with the pre-stored signature handwriting to obtain a matching degree; if the matching degree reaches the first matching threshold, and the answer of the random question is consistent with the preset answer, the verification passes.
- the computer readable storage medium may be a non-volatile storage medium such as a magnetic disk, an optical disk, or a read-only memory (ROM).
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
一种项目信息处理方法，包括：接收企业终端发送的项目信息；项目信息包括项目类型；利用项目信息生成对应的评审任务；根据项目类型查询对应的评审流程；评审流程包括多个评审环节，每个评审环节具有对应的评审人标识及其等级；当评审流程中存在相同等级的评审人标识时，将评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节；通过一个或多个并行评审环节对评审流程进行转换；根据转换后的评审流程，将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；接收多个评审终端返回的评审信息，将评审信息反馈至企业终端。
Description
本申请要求于2017年8月18日提交中国专利局，申请号为2017107103958，申请名称为“项目信息处理方法、装置、服务器和存储介质”的中国专利申请的优先权，其全部内容通过引用结合在本申请中。
本申请涉及一种项目信息处理方法、装置、服务器和存储介质。
企业开设的新项目，如新产品或者新业务等，应当符合相关法律政策的规定。保监会、证监会等监管机构对企业开设的新项目的合规性进行评审，只有在评审通过之后，企业才能开展此项新项目。在实际的评审过程中，同一个新项目常常需要多个评审人进行评审。发明人意识到，目前，多个评审人只能按照已设定好的评审流程，依次对项目信息进行评审。也就是说，只有在当前的评审人对项目信息评审结束后，才将项目信息流转至下一个评审人，使得评审效率降低。
发明内容
根据本申请公开的各种实施例，提供一种项目信息处理方法、装置、服务器和存储介质。
一种项目信息处理方法，包括：
接收企业终端发送的项目信息；所述项目信息包括项目类型；利用所述项目信息生成对应的评审任务；
根据所述项目类型查询对应的评审流程；所述评审流程包括多个评审环节，每个所述评审环节具有对应的评审人标识及其等级；
当所述评审流程中存在相同等级的评审人标识时，将所述评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节；
通过一个或多个并行评审环节对所述评审流程进行转换；
根据转换后的评审流程，将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；及
接收多个评审终端返回的评审信息，将评审信息反馈至企业终端。
一种项目信息处理装置，包括：
发起评审模块，用于接收企业终端发送的项目信息；所述项目信息包括项目类型；利用所述项目信息生成对应的评审任务；
流程识别模块，用于根据所述项目类型查询对应的评审流程；所述评审流程包括多个评审环节，每个所述评审环节具有对应的评审人标识及其等级；
流程转换模块，用于当所述评审流程中存在相同等级的评审人标识时，将所述评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节；通过一个或多个并行评审环节对所述评审流程进行转换；及
送审模块，用于根据转换后的评审流程，将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；接收多个评审终端返回的评审信息，将评审信息反馈至企业终端。
一种计算机设备，包括存储器和一个或多个处理器，所述存储器中储存有计算机可读指令，所述计算机可读指令被所述处理器执行时，使得所述一个或多个处理器执行以下步骤：
接收企业终端发送的项目信息；所述项目信息包括项目类型；利用所述项目信息生成对应的评审任务；
根据所述项目类型查询对应的评审流程；所述评审流程包括多个评审环节，每个所述评审环节具有对应的评审人标识及其等级；
当所述评审流程中存在相同等级的评审人标识时，将所述评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节；
通过一个或多个并行评审环节对所述评审流程进行转换；
根据转换后的评审流程，将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；及
接收多个评审终端返回的评审信息，将评审信息反馈至企业终端。
一个或多个存储有计算机可读指令的非易失性存储介质，计算机可读指令被一个或多个处理器执行时，使得一个或多个处理器执行以下步骤：
接收企业终端发送的项目信息；所述项目信息包括项目类型；利用所述项目信息生成对应的评审任务；
根据所述项目类型查询对应的评审流程；所述评审流程包括多个评审环节，每个所述评审环节具有对应的评审人标识及其等级；
当所述评审流程中存在相同等级的评审人标识时，将所述评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节；
通过一个或多个并行评审环节对所述评审流程进行转换；
根据转换后的评审流程，将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；及
接收多个评审终端返回的评审信息，将评审信息反馈至企业终端。
本申请的一个或多个实施例的细节在下面的附图和描述中提出。本申请的其它特征和优点将从说明书、附图以及权利要求书变得明显。
为了更清楚地说明本申请实施例中的技术方案，下面将对实施例中所需要使用的附图作简单地介绍，显而易见地，下面描述中的附图仅仅是本申请的一些实施例，对于本领域普通技术人员来讲，在不付出创造性劳动的前提下，还可以根据这些附图获得其它的附图。
图1为根据一个或多个实施例中的项目信息处理方法应用环境图。
图2为根据一个或多个实施例中项目信息处理方法的流程图。
图3A为根据一个或多个实施例中一种评审流程转换过程的示意图。
图3B为根据一个或多个实施例中另一种评审流程转换过程的示意图。
图3C为根据一个或多个实施例中再一种评审流程转换过程的示意图。
图4为根据一个或多个实施例中项目信息处理装置的结构示意图。
图5为根据一个或多个实施例中服务器的框图。
为了使本申请的技术方案及优点更加清楚明白，以下结合附图及实施例，对本申请进行进一步详细说明。应当理解，此处描述的具体实施例仅仅用以解释本申请，并不用于限定本申请。
可以理解，本申请所使用的术语“第一”、“第二”等可在本文中用于描述各种元件，但这些元件不受这些术语限制。这些术语仅用于将第一个元件与另一个元件区分。举例来说，在不脱离本申请的范围的情况下，可以将第一客户端称为第二客户端，且类似地，可将第二客户端称为第一客户端。第一客户端和第二客户端两者都是客户端，但其不是同一客户端。
本申请实施例中所提供的项目信息处理方法可以应用于如图1所示的应用环境中。企业终端102通过网络与服务器106连接。评审终端104通过网络与服务器106连接。当需要对开设的项目进行评审时，企业的项目管理人可以利用企业终端102向服务器106发起评审，将项目信息发送至服务器106。项目信息包括项目类型。服务器106利用项目信息生成对应的评审任务。服务器106根据项目类型查询对应的评审流程。评审流程包括多个评审环节，每个评审环节具有对应的评审人标识及其等级。服务器106识别查询到的评审流程中是否存在相同等级的评审人标识，若是，将相同等级的评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节。服务器106通过一个或多个并行评审环节对查询到的评审流程进行转换，使得转换后的评审流程包括多个评审阶段，每个评审阶段包括一个并行评审环节或者一个不存在相同等级的评审人标识对应的评审环节。若第一个评审阶段包含一个并行评审环节，则服务器将评审任务并行发送至第一个评审阶段中并行评审环节分别对应的评审终端104。若第一个评审阶段包括一个独立的评审环节，服务器106将评审任务发送至该评审环节对应的评审终端104。服务器106在接收到第一个评审阶段对应的一个或多个评审终端104返回的评审信息之后，识别是否存在下一个评审阶段，若存在，则按照上述方式将评审任务发送至下一个评审阶段对应的一个或多个评审终端104，在接收到下一个评审阶段对应的评审终端104返回的评审信息之后，返回识别是否存在下一个评审阶段的步骤，如此重复，直至不存在下一个评审阶段时，表示评审结束。上述项目信息处理过程，服务器106根据项目类型查询对应的评审流程，根据评审人标识的等级对查询到的评审流 程进行转换，根据转换后的评审流程可以将评审任务并行发送至相同等级的评审人标识对应的评审终端，从而可以提高评审效率。
在其中一个实施例中，如图2所示，提供了一种项目信息处理方法，以该方法应用于图1中的服务器106为例进行说明，具体包括以下步骤：
步骤202，接收企业终端发送的项目信息；项目信息包括项目类型；利用项目信息生成对应的评审任务。
当需要对开设的项目进行评审时，企业的项目管理人可以利用企业终端向服务器发起评审，将项目信息发送至服务器。项目信息包括项目类型，如新产品或者新业务等。服务器根据项目信息生成对应的评审任务。
步骤204，根据项目类型查询对应的评审流程；评审流程包括多个评审环节，每个所述评审环节具有对应的评审人标识及其等级。
服务器存储了不同项目类型对应的评审流程，例如，新产品X1对应评审流程X1，新产品X2对应评审流程X2，新业务Y1对应评审流程Y1等。评审流程包括多个评审环节，每个评审环节具有对应的评审人标识及其等级。例如，请参阅图3A所示，新产品X1对应评审流程X1可以是：评审环节A(评审人标识甲，3级)→评审环节B(评审人标识乙，2级)→评审环节C(评审人标识丙，2级)→评审环节D(评审人标识丁，1级)→评审环节E(评审人标识戊，1级)。请参阅图3B所示，新产品X2对应评审流程X2可以是：评审环节F(评审人标识甲，3级)→评审环节G(评审人标识戊，3级)→评审环节H(评审人标识己，3级)→评审环节I(评审人标识乙，2级)→评审环节J(评审人标识丁，1级)。请参阅图3C所示，新产品Y1对应评审流程Y1可以是：评审环节K(评审人标识丙，2级)→评审环节L(评审人标识丁，1级)→评审环节M(评审人标识戊，1级)→评审环节N(评审人标识庚，1级)→评审环节O(评审人标识辛，1级)。
另一个实施例中，服务器还存储了不同项目类型对应的评审规则。评审规则可以是保监会等监管机构依据相关的法律政策制定的。评审流程和评审规则可以是监管机构的相关人员(以下简称监管人员)通过管理终端预先发送至服务器的。具体的，当需要添加评审流程和评审规则时，监管人员可以通过管理终端向服务器发送配置请求，服务器根据配置请求向管理终端返回第一配置页面。监管人员通过管理终端可以在配置页面添加一种或多种项目类型及其对应的评审流程和评审规则，将添加的一种或多种项目类型及其对应的评审流程和评审规则发送至服务器。监管人员还可以通过管理终端对某种项目类型对应的评审流程和评审规则进行修改。监管人员可以通过管理终端向服务器发送配置更新请求，服务器根据配置更新请求向管理终端返回第二配置页面。监管人员通过管理终端可以在第二配置页面输入需要修改的项目类型。服务器查询与该项目类型对应的评审流程和评审规则，将查询到的评审流程和评审规则发送至管理终端，管理终端在第二配置页面显示查询到的评审流程和评审规则，获取用户对评审流程和评审规则的修改，将修改后的评审流程和评审规则发送至服务器。
采用页面配置的方式添加或更新评审流程和评审规则，使得监管人员无需对代码进行修改，提高评审流程和评审规则设置过程中信息的可读性，可以降低对监管人员的技术要求，也可以提高评审流程和评审规则的添加效率以及更新效率。
服务器根据项目类型查询对应的评审流程和评审规则。服务器根据项目类型可以自动识别对应的评审流程，使得项目管理人无需了解评审流程，只需通过企业终端将项目信息提交至服务器即可实现送审，减少了项目管理人对评审流程进行人工识别的负担。
步骤206，当评审流程中存在相同等级的评审人标识时，将评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节。
步骤208，通过一个或多个并行评审环节对评审流程进行转换。
服务器识别查询到的评审流程中是否存在相同等级的评审人标识。若存在，则服务器将相同等级的评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节。例如，在上述举例中，评审环节B和评审环节C被标记为并行评审环节，评审环节E和评审环节F被标记为并行评审环节。没有被标记为并行评审环节的评审环节，如评审环节A可以称为独立的评审环节。进一步的，服务器通过将每个独立的评审环节标记为一个评审阶段，以及将每个并行评审环节标记为一个评审阶段对原有的评审流程进行转换，使得转换后的评审流程包括一个或多个评审阶段，每个评审阶段包括一个独立的评审环节或者一个并行评审环节。也就是说，每个评审阶段包括一个或多个评审环节。
例如，如图3A所示，在上述举例中，评审流程X1可以转换为：评审阶段1(评审环节A)→评审阶段2(评审环节B，评审环节C)→评审阶段3(评审环节D，评审环节E)。如图3B所示，评审流程X2可以转换为：评审阶段1(评审环节F,评审环节G,评审环节H)→评审阶段2(评审环节I)→评审阶段3(评审环节J)。如图3C所示，评审流程Y1可以转换为：评审流程X2可以转换为：评审阶段1(评审环节K)→评审阶段2(评审环节L,评审环节M,评审环节N,评审环节O)。
步骤210，根据转换后的评审流程，将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端。
步骤212，接收多个评审终端返回的评审信息，将评审信息反馈至企业终端。
当评审流程中每个评审人需要对全部的项目信息进行评审时，服务器根据转换后的评审流程，将根据全部的项目信息生成的评审任务发送至每个评审人标识对应的评审终端。
服务器识别第一个评审阶段是否包含一个并行评审环节。若是，则服务器将评审任务并行发送至第一个评审阶段中并行评审环节分别对应的评审终端。否则，表示第一个评审阶段包括一个独立的评审环节，服务器将评审任务发送至该评审环节对应的评审终端。服务器在接收到第一个评审阶段对应的一个或多个评审终端返回的评审信息之后，识别是否存在下一个评审阶段。若存在，则服务器按照上述方式将评审任务和评审信息发送至下一个评审阶段对应的一个或多个评审终端。服务器在接收到下一个评审阶段对应的一个或多个评审终端返回的评审信息之后，返回识别是否存在下一个评审阶段的步骤。如此重复， 直至不存在下一个评审阶段时，则评审结束。
例如，根据上述转换后的评审流程X1，第一个评审阶段包括一个独立的评审环节A，则服务器将评审任务发送至评审人标识甲对应的评审终端。第二个评审阶段包括一个并行评审环节B和C，服务器在接收到评审人标识甲对应的评审终端返回的评审信息之后，将评审任务和评审信息并行发送至评审人标识乙和评审人标识丙分别对应的评审终端。第三个评审阶段包括一个并行评审环节D和E，服务器在接收到评审人标识乙和评审人标识丙分别对应的评审终端返回的评审信息之后，将评审任务和接收到的所有评审信息并行发送至评审人标识丁和评审人标识戊分别对应的评审终端。在接收到评审人标识丁和评审人标识戊对应的评审终端返回的评审信息之后，服务器识别发现不存在下一个评审阶段，评审结束。服务器将接收到的所有评审信息反馈至企业终端，以便于企业的项目管理人通过评审终端及时了解评审结果。
在传统的方式中，即使相同等级的评审人标识也只有在当前评审环节对应的评审人对项目信息评审结束后，才能将评审任务流转至下一个评审环节对应的评审人，使得评审效率降低。根据转换后的评审流程，服务器对需要发送评审任务的一个或多个评审人标识进行自动识别，将项目信息发送给识别出的评审人标识对应的评审终端，可以减少评审人需要人工识别下一顺序评审人以及人工将项目信息转交给下一顺序评审人的繁琐，使得评审人只需专注对项目信息的评审，从而可以提高项目评审效率。
本实施例中，利用企业终端向服务器发起评审请求；服务器利用接收到的项目信息可以生成对应的评审任务；根据项目信息中的项目类型可以查询对应的评审流程；根据评审流程中的每个评审环节对应的评审人标识的等级可以对查询到的评审流程进行转换。将相同等级的评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节，使得服务器可以将评审任务并行发送至相同等级的评审人标识对应的评审终端，使得多个相同等级的评审人可以并行对评审任务进行评审，从而转换后的评审流程可以整体上缩短评审时间，进而可以提高评审效率。
在其中一个实施例中，评审流程还包括多个评审人标识对应的评审范围，根据转换后的评审流程将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端的步骤，包括：根据转换后的评审流程查询对应的多个评审人标识对应的评审范围；根据多个评审人标识对应的评审范围将评审任务拆分为多个评审子任务，每个评审子任务与一个或多个评审人标识相对应；将评审子任务发送至相应评审人标识对应的评审终端。
当评审人不需要对全部的项目信息进行评审时，可以根据各个评审人的评审范围针对每位评审人从全部的项目信息中拆分出需要评审的部分项目信息。具体的，评审流程还包括多个评审人标识对应的评审范围，每个评审人标识对应的评审范围包括一个或多个评审项。项目信息包括多个评审项。服务器根据转换后的评审流程查询对应的多个评审人标识对应的评审范围，根据项目信息中各个评审项与评审人标识对应的评审范围的从属关系，将评审任务拆分为多个评审子任务。每个评审子任务与一个或多个评审人标识相对应。服 务器将评审子任务发送至相应评审人标识对应的评审终端。
本实施例中，服务器根据各个评审人的评审范围，对评审任务进行拆分，使得评审更有针对性，也使得评审人可以方便只专注于自己需要评审的部分进行评审，可以省略评审人在实际开始评审之前需要从全部的评审任务中查找出评审的部分内容的步骤，从而可以提高评审效率。
在其中一个实施例中，项目信息还包括多个评审项以及每个评审项对应的多个字段值；接收企业终端发送的项目信息的步骤之后，还包括：根据项目类型查询对应的校验规则；校验规则包括多个必需评审项以及每个必需评审项对应的多个必需字段；若必需评审项在项目信息中对应的评审项为空，或者必需字段在项目信息中对应的字段值为空，则生成项目信息不完整的提示信息；将提示信息发送至企业终端。
服务器在接收到企业终端发送的项目信息之后，对项目信息进行完整性校验。具体的，项目信息还包括多个评审项，每个评审项包括多个字段值。服务器存储了多种项目类型对应的校验规则。校验规则包括多个必需评审项，以及每个必需评审项对应的多个必需字段。服务器根据项目类型查询对应的校验规则，根据查询到的校验规则检测必需评审项在项目信息中对应的评审项是否为空，以及必需字段在项目信息中对应的字段值是否为空。若必需评审项在项目信息中对应的评审项为空，或者必需字段在项目信息中对应的字段值为空，则标识项目信息不完整，生成项目信息不完整的提示信息，将提示信息发送至企业终端，以使得企业终端及时对缺少的项目信息进行补充。
本实施例中，根据项目类型可以查询到对应的校验规则，根据查询到的校验规则可以对项目信息进行完整性校验，若校验失败，提示企业终端及时对不完整的项目信息进行补充，避免因项目信息不完整而导致其无法发送评审的情况，可以减少从企业终端发起评审到服务器实际送审的时间，进而可以提高评审效率。
在其中一个实施例中，该方法还包括：在多个网页中爬取与评审流程相关的法律政策；将爬取到的法律政策与存储的法律政策进行比较；若爬取到的法律政策发生变化，则将爬取到的法律政策发送至管理终端，以使得管理终端根据变化后的法律政策对相应的评审流程进行更新；接收管理终端发送的更新后的评审流程。
评审流程和评审规则是监管机构依据相关的法律政策制定的。当相关的法律政策发生变更时，监管人员需要对相应的评审流程和评审规则作出调整。传统的方式中，通过人工对相关法律政策的变更进行跟踪，增加了监管人员的工作负担。
为了解决上述问题，服务器按照预设的时间频率在多个评审流程和评审规则对应的网页爬取相关的法律政策。服务器将爬取到的法律政策与记录的法律政策进行比较，以判断相关的法律政策是否发生变化。若相关的法律政策发生变化，则服务器利用爬取到的法律政策对记录的法律政策进行更新，将爬取到的法律政策及时发送至监管人员对应的管理终端，以提示监管人员根据更新后的法律政策对评审流程和评审规则及时调整。管理终端将调整后的评审流程和评审规则返回至服务器，服务器利用调整后的评审流程和评审规则替 换记录的评审流程和评审规则，从而对相应的评审流程和评审规则进行更新。另一个实施例中，若相关的法律政策发生变化，则服务器根据爬取到的法律政策对相应的评审流程和评审规则进行更新，将更新后的评审流程和评审规则发送至管理终端，以使得监管人员可以通过管理终端对更新后的评审流程和评审规则进行确认。监管人员可以通过管理终端向服务器返回确认结果。若确认结果为同意更新，则服务器采用更新后的评审流程和评审规则替换记录的评审流程和评审规则。若确认结果为不同意更新，则服务器接收管理终端发送的调整后的评审流程和评审规则，按照上述方式利用调整后的评审流程和评审规则替换记录的评审流程和评审规则。
服务器根据变化的法律政策，自动对相应的评审流程和评审规则进行更新，可以减少监管人员对评审流程和评审规则人工进行调整的负担；若监管人员不同意服务器的更新结果，可以通过管理终端对评审流程和评审规则重新进行调整，也可以在服务器的更新结果基础上进一步调整，从而既可以减少监管人员对评审流程和评审规则进行调整的负担，也可以适应实际情况及时调整评审流程和评审规则。
本实施例中，服务器从预设的多个网页自动爬取相关的法律政策，若通过与记录的法律政策比较发现法律政策发生变化，将爬取到的法律政策发送至管理终端，可以提示监管人员对相应的评审流程及时进行更新，可以提高评审流程更新效率。
在其中一个实施例中，根据转换后的评审流程将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端的步骤，包括：获取预设的多个关键词；查询项目信息中包含关键词的数量；根据项目信息包含关键词的数量识别项目信息的级别；若项目信息的级别达到预设级别，则对相应的评审任务进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程将加密后的评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；或者与多个评审人标识对应的评审终端之间分别建立传输通道，对传输通道进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程在加密后的传输通道将相应的评审任务发送至多个评审终端。
项目信息的级别可以是项目管理人通过企业终端预先发送至服务器的，也可以是服务器根据预设的级别判断标准识别出的。具体的，预设的级别判断标准包括多个关键词。服务器查询项目信息中包含关键词的数量，根据项目信息包含关键词的数量识别项目信息的级别。容易理解，项目信息包含关键词的数量越多，对应项目信息的级别越高，表示该条项目信息越重要。
服务器判断该项目信息的级别是否达到预设级别。预设级别为区分项目信息重要性的标准。若项目信息的级别低于预设级别，表示项目信息重要性弱，可以对该项目信息进行常规传输。具体的，服务器通过TCP协议等与对应的评审人标识对应的评审终端之间建立一条常规通道，通过该常规通道对相应的评审任务以及对应的评审规则进行传输。
若项目信息的级别达到预设级别，表示项目信息重要性强，需要保密传输该项目信息。服务器加密传输项目信息包括多种实施例方式。其中一种实施方式为服务器对上述常规通道加密，建立一条加密通道；根据转换后的评审流程，在加密通道将评审任务和对应的评 审规则传输至对应的评审终端。其中，服务器可以根据HTTPS协议(Hyper Text Transfer Protocol over Secure Socket Layer，基于SSL的超文本传输协议)、SSL协议(Secure Sockets Layer，安全套接层)、CA认证(Certificate Authority，认证授权)、VPN(Virtual Private Network，虚拟专用网)或RAR压缩加密等加密方式对常规通道加密。优选地，在评审结束时，服务器关闭该加密通道，以节约网络资源。
另一种实施方式为服务器对评审任务进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程在上述常规通道将加密后的评审任务和对应的评审规则传输至每一个评审人标识对应的评审终端。具体地，服务器可以根据SSH协议(SecureShell，安全外壳协议)、PGP协议(Pretty Good Privacy，安全加密)、RSA(非对称加密算法)、密钥对(公钥和私钥)或用户口令加密等加密方式对项目信息进行加密。当接收到评审终端返回的加密的评审信息之后，服务器可以根据存储的解密密钥，对加密的评审信息进行解密。解密密钥可以是项目管理人和评审人之间预先约定的口令、密码等。这种方式相比对传输通道进行加密的技术要求比较低，从而更容易实现。当然，对加密传输项目信息的方式还有很多，这里不再一一赘述。
本实施例中，根据项目信息包含预设的关键词的数量对其等级进行识别，通过项目信息的级别判断项目信息的重要性，对高于预设级别的项目信息加密传输，从而避免非法分子对重要的项目信息进行窃取，对项目管理人造成不必要的损失。
在其中一个实施例中，接收多个评审终端返回的评审信息的步骤之后，还包括：若评审信息包括数字签名和随机问题的答案，则获取评审人标识对应的预存储的签名笔迹，将数字签名的签名笔迹与预存储的签名笔迹进行匹配获得匹配度；若匹配度达到第一匹配阈值，且随机问题的答案与预设答案一致，则校验通过。
为了避免他人代替合法的评审人对项目信息进行恶意评审，服务器需要对每个评审终端返回的评审信息进行验证。评审信息可以包括数字签名、指纹信息、人脸图像或随机问题的答案等。随机问题是服务器根据项目信息随机生成的，例如，请输入您的身份证件号码等。每个随机问题具有对应的预设答案。
服务器对评审信息的验证方式包括多种。其中一种验证方式为：若评审信息包括数字签名和随机问题的答案，则获取评审人标识对应的预存储的签名笔迹，将数字签名的签名笔迹与预存储的签名笔迹进行匹配；若匹配度达到第一匹配阈值，且随机问题的答案与预设答案一致，则校验通过。另一种验证方式为：若评审信息包括指纹信息和随机问题的答案，则获取评审人标识对应的预存储的指纹信息，将评审信息中的指纹信息与预存储的指纹信息进行匹配；若匹配度达到第二匹配阈值，且随机问题的答案与预设答案一致，则校验通过。再一种验证方式为：若评审信息包括人脸图像和随机问题的答案，则获取评审人标识对应的预存储的人脸图像，将评审人标识终端返回的人脸图像与预存储的人脸图像进行匹配；若匹配度达到第三匹配阈值，且随机问题的答案与预设答案一致，则表示校验通过。当然，对评审信息的验证方式还有很多，这里不再一一赘述。
若校验失败，则服务器将评审任务和对应的评审规则重新发送至对应的评审终端，以 提示对应的评审人对该评审任务重新进行评审。
本实施例中，对评审终端返回的评审信息进行校验可以判断返回的评审信息是否为合法的评审人本人的评审行为，可以避免他人恶意代替评审人对项目信息进行评审，提高评审信息的真实有效性。
在其中一个实施例中，该方法包括：接收企业终端发送的评审请求，根据评审请求向企业终端返回模板邮件，以使得企业终端通过调用模板邮件录入项目信息；接收企业终端发送的包含项目信息的邮件；识别该邮件是否为预定格式的邮件；若是，则根据该邮件生成对应的评审任务，将评审任务发送至对应顺序的评审人标识对应的评审终端。
上述评审过程，不同的用户(项目管理人和评审人)在对应的终端(企业终端和评审终端)上登录同一评审平台，安装不同的插件，根据安装的插件通过不同的入口在该评审平台进行相应的业务操作(送审和评审)。为了加强评审平台与传统的业务平台的融合，也为了适应不同用户的业务习惯，本实施例将评审平台与邮箱平台进行对接。具体的，评审平台对应的服务器可以称为评审服务器，评审服务器通过网络与多个邮箱平台对应的服务器连接，从而评审平台与企业终端和评审终端上的邮箱平台进行对接，使得项目管理人可以在企业终端上以邮件发送的方式实现项目信息的送审，也使得评审人可以在评审终端上以邮件发送的方式实现项目信息的评审。
应该理解的是，虽然图2的流程图中的各个步骤按照箭头的指示依次显示，但是这些步骤并不是必然按照箭头指示的顺序依次执行。除非本文中有明确的说明，这些步骤的执行并没有严格的顺序限制，这些步骤可以以其它的顺序执行。而且，图2中的至少一部分步骤可以包括多个子步骤或者多个阶段，这些子步骤或者阶段并不必然是在同一时刻执行完成，而是可以在不同的时刻执行，这些子步骤或者阶段的执行顺序也不必然是依次进行，而是可以与其它步骤或者其它步骤的子步骤或者阶段的至少一部分轮流或者交替地执行。
在其中一个实施例中，如图4所示，提供了一种项目信息处理装置，包括：发起评审模块402，流程识别模块404，流程转换模块406和送审模块408，其中：
发起评审模块402，用于接收企业终端发送的项目信息；项目信息包括项目类型；利用项目信息生成对应的评审任务。
流程识别模块404，用于根据项目类型查询对应的评审流程；评审流程包括多个评审环节，每个所述评审环节具有对应的评审人标识及其等级。
流程转换模块406，用于当评审流程中存在相同等级的评审人标识时，将评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节；通过一个或多个并行评审环节对评审流程进行转换。
送审模块408，用于根据转换后的评审流程，将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；接收多个评审终端返回的评审信息，将评审信息反馈至企业终端。
在其中一个实施例中，项目信息还包括多个评审项以及每个评审项对应的多个字段 值；发起评审模块402还用于根据项目类型查询对应的校验规则；校验规则包括多个必需评审项以及每个必需评审项对应的多个必需字段；若必需评审项在项目信息中对应的评审项为空，或者必需字段在项目信息中对应的字段值为空，则生成项目信息不完整的提示信息；将提示信息发送至企业终端。
在其中一个实施例中，送审模块408还用于获取预设的多个关键词；查询项目信息中包含关键词的数量；根据项目信息包含关键词的数量识别项目信息的级别；若项目信息的级别达到预设级别，则对相应的评审任务进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程将加密后的评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；或者与多个评审人标识对应的评审终端之间分别建立传输通道，对传输通道进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程在加密后的传输通道将相应的评审任务发送至多个评审终端。
上述的项目信息处理装置可以实现为一种计算机可读指令的形式，计算机可读指令可在如图5所示的服务器上运行。
在其中一个实施例中，提供了一种服务器，如图5所示，该服务器包括通过系统总线连接的处理器、存储装置和网络接口。其中，该服务器的处理器用于提供计算和控制能力。该服务器的存储装置包括一个或多个非易失性存储介质、一个或多个内存储装置。该服务器的非易失性存储介质存储有操作系统和计算机可读指令。该服务器的内存储装置为非易失性存储介质中的操作系统和计算机可读指令的运行提供环境。该服务器的网络接口用于与外部的终端通过网络连接通信，比如，接收终端发送的项目信息以及评审信息等。该计算机可读指令被处理器执行时以实现一种项目信息处理方法。
本领域技术人员可以理解，图5中示出的结构，仅仅是与本申请方案相关的部分结构的框图，并不构成对本申请方案所应用于其上的服务器的限定，具体的服务器可以包括比图中所示更多或更少的部件，或者组合某些部件，或者具有不同的部件布置。
一种计算机设备，包括存储器和一个或多个处理器，存储器中储存有计算机可读指令，计算机可读指令被处理器执行时，使得一个或多个处理器执行以下步骤：接收企业终端发送的项目信息；项目信息包括项目类型；利用项目信息生成对应的评审任务；根据项目类型查询对应的评审流程；评审流程包括多个评审环节，每个所述评审环节具有对应的评审人标识及其等级；当评审流程中存在相同等级的评审人标识时，将评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节；通过一个或多个并行评审环节对评审流程进行转换；根据转换后的评审流程，将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；接收多个评审终端返回的评审信息，将评审信息反馈至企业终端。
在其中一个实施例中，项目信息还包括多个评审项以及每个评审项对应的多个字段值；处理器执行计算机可读指令时还执行以下步骤：根据项目类型查询对应的校验规则；校验规则包括多个必需评审项以及每个必需评审项对应的多个必需字段；若必需评审项在项目信息中对应的评审项为空，或者必需字段在项目信息中对应的字段值为空，则生成项目信息不完整的提示信息；将提示信息发送至企业终端。
在其中一个实施例中，处理器执行计算机可读指令时还执行以下步骤：在多个网页中爬取与评审流程相关的法律政策；将爬取到的法律政策与存储的法律政策进行比较；若爬取到的法律政策发生变化，则将爬取到的法律政策发送至管理终端，以使得管理终端根据变化后的法律政策对相应的评审流程进行更新；接收管理终端发送的更新后的评审流程。
在其中一个实施例中，处理器执行计算机可读指令时还执行以下步骤：获取预设的多个关键词；查询项目信息中包含关键词的数量；根据项目信息包含关键词的数量识别项目信息的级别；若项目信息的级别达到预设级别，则对相应的评审任务进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程将加密后的评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；或者与多个评审人标识对应的评审终端之间分别建立传输通道，对传输通道进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程在加密后的传输通道将相应的评审任务发送至多个评审终端。
在其中一个实施例中，处理器执行计算机可读指令时还执行以下步骤：若评审信息包括数字签名和随机问题的答案，则获取评审人标识对应的预存储的签名笔迹，将数字签名的签名笔迹与预存储的签名笔迹进行匹配获得匹配度；若匹配度达到第一匹配阈值，且随机问题的答案与预设答案一致，则校验通过。
一个或多个存储有计算机可读指令的非易失性存储介质，计算机可读指令被一个或多个处理器执行时，使得一个或多个处理器执行以下步骤：接收企业终端发送的项目信息；项目信息包括项目类型；利用项目信息生成对应的评审任务；根据项目类型查询对应的评审流程；评审流程包括多个评审环节，每个所述评审环节具有对应的评审人标识及其等级；当评审流程中存在相同等级的评审人标识时，将评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节；通过一个或多个并行评审环节对评审流程进行转换；根据转换后的评审流程，将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；接收多个评审终端返回的评审信息，将评审信息反馈至企业终端。
在其中一个实施例中，项目信息还包括多个评审项以及每个评审项对应的多个字段值；计算机可读指令被处理器执行时还执行以下步骤：根据项目类型查询对应的校验规则；校验规则包括多个必需评审项以及每个必需评审项对应的多个必需字段；若必需评审项在项目信息中对应的评审项为空，或者必需字段在项目信息中对应的字段值为空，则生成项目信息不完整的提示信息；将提示信息发送至企业终端。
在其中一个实施例中，计算机可读指令被处理器执行时还执行以下步骤：在多个网页中爬取与评审流程相关的法律政策；将爬取到的法律政策与存储的法律政策进行比较；若爬取到的法律政策发生变化，则将爬取到的法律政策发送至管理终端，以使得管理终端根据变化后的法律政策对相应的评审流程进行更新；接收管理终端发送的更新后的评审流程。
在其中一个实施例中，计算机可读指令被处理器执行时还执行以下步骤：获取预设的多个关键词；查询项目信息中包含关键词的数量；根据项目信息包含关键词的数量识别项目信息的级别；若项目信息的级别达到预设级别，则对相应的评审任务进行加密，根据转 换后的评审流程将加密后的评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；或者与多个评审人标识对应的评审终端之间分别建立传输通道，对传输通道进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程在加密后的传输通道将相应的评审任务发送至多个评审终端。
在其中一个实施例中，计算机可读指令被处理器执行时还执行以下步骤：若评审信息包括数字签名和随机问题的答案，则获取评审人标识对应的预存储的签名笔迹，将数字签名的签名笔迹与预存储的签名笔迹进行匹配获得匹配度；若匹配度达到第一匹配阈值，且随机问题的答案与预设答案一致，则校验通过。
本领域普通技术人员可以理解实现上述实施例方法中的全部或部分流程，是可以通过计算机可读指令来指令相关的硬件来完成，前述计算机可读指令可存储于一非易失性计算机可读取存储介质中，该计算机可读指令在执行时，可包括如上述各方法的实施例的流程。其中，前述计算机可读取存储介质可为磁碟、光盘、只读存储记忆体(Read-Only Memory，ROM)等非易失性存储介质。
以上实施例的各技术特征可以进行任意的组合，为使描述简洁，未对上述实施例中的各个技术特征所有可能的组合都进行描述，然而，只要这些技术特征的组合不存在矛盾，都应当认为是本说明书记载的范围。
以上实施例仅表达了本申请的几种实施方式，其描述较为具体和详细，但并不能因此而理解为对发明专利范围的限制。应当指出的是，对于本领域的普通技术人员来说，在不脱离本申请构思的前提下，还可以做出若干变形和改进，这些都属于本申请的保护范围。因此，本申请专利的保护范围应以所附权利要求为准。
Claims (20)
- 一种项目信息处理方法，包括：接收企业终端发送的项目信息；所述项目信息包括项目类型；利用所述项目信息生成对应的评审任务；根据所述项目类型查询对应的评审流程；所述评审流程包括多个评审环节，每个所述评审环节具有对应的评审人标识及其等级；当所述评审流程中存在相同等级的评审人标识时，将所述评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节；通过一个或多个并行评审环节对所述评审流程进行转换；根据转换后的评审流程，将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；及接收多个评审终端返回的评审信息，将评审信息反馈至企业终端。
- 根据权利要求1所述的方法，其特征在于，所述项目信息还包括多个评审项以及每个评审项对应的多个字段值；所述接收企业终端发送的项目信息之后，还包括：根据所述项目类型查询对应的校验规则；所述校验规则包括多个必需评审项以及每个必需评审项对应的多个必需字段；若必需评审项在项目信息中对应的评审项为空，或者必需字段在项目信息中对应的字段值为空，则生成项目信息不完整的提示信息；及将所述提示信息发送至所述企业终端。
- 根据权利要求1所述的方法，其特征在于，还包括：在多个网页中爬取与评审流程相关的法律政策；将爬取到的法律政策与存储的法律政策进行比较；若爬取到的法律政策发生变化，则将爬取到的法律政策发送至管理终端，以使得管理终端根据变化后的法律政策对相应的评审流程进行更新；及接收所述管理终端发送的更新后的评审流程。
- 根据权利要求1所述的方法，其特征在于，所述根据转换后的评审流程将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端，包括：获取预设的多个关键词；查询项目信息中包含关键词的数量；根据项目信息包含关键词的数量识别项目信息的级别；若项目信息的级别达到预设级别，则对相应的评审任务进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程将加密后的评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；或者与多个评审人标识对应的评审终端之间分别建立传输通道，对传输通道进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程在加密后的传输通道将相应的评审任务发送至多个评审终端。
- 根据权利要求1所述的方法，其特征在于，所述接收多个评审终端返回的评审信息之后，还包括：若评审信息包括数字签名和随机问题的答案，则获取评审人标识对应的预存储的签名笔迹，将数字签名的签名笔迹与预存储的签名笔迹进行匹配获得匹配度；及若匹配度达到第一匹配阈值，且随机问题的答案与预设答案一致，则校验通过。
- 一种项目信息处理装置，其特征在于，所述装置包括：发起评审模块，用于接收企业终端发送的项目信息；所述项目信息包括项目类型；利用所述项目信息生成对应的评审任务；流程识别模块，用于根据所述项目类型查询对应的评审流程；所述评审流程包括多个评审环节，每个所述评审环节具有对应的评审人标识及其等级；流程转换模块，用于当所述评审流程中存在相同等级的评审人标识时，将所述评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节；通过一个或多个并行评审环节对所述评审流程进行转换；送审模块，用于根据转换后的评审流程，将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；接收多个评审终端返回的评审信息，将评审信息反馈至企业终端。
- 根据权利要求6所述的装置，其特征在于，所述项目信息还包括多个评审项以及每个评审项对应的多个字段值；所述发起评审模块还用于根据所述项目类型查询对应的校验规则；所述校验规则包括多个必需评审项以及每个必需评审项对应的多个必需字段；若必需评审项在项目信息中对应的评审项为空，或者必需字段在项目信息中对应的字段值为空，则生成项目信息不完整的提示信息；将所述提示信息发送至所述企业终端。
- 根据权利要求6所述的装置，其特征在于，还包括评审流程更新模块，用于在多个网页中爬取与评审流程相关的法律政策；将爬取到的法律政策与存储的法律政策进行比较；若爬取到的法律政策发生变化，则将爬取到的法律政策发送至管理终端，以使得管理终端根据变化后的法律政策对相应的评审流程进行更新；及接收所述管理终端发送的更新后的评审流程。
- 根据权利要求6所述的装置，其特征在于，所述送审模块还用于获取预设的多个关键词；查询项目信息中包含关键词的数量；根据项目信息包含关键词的数量识别项目信息的级别；若项目信息的级别达到预设级别，则对相应的评审任务进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程将加密后的评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；或者与多个评审人标识对应的评审终端之间分别建立传输通道，对传输通道进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程在加密后的传输通道将相应的评审任务发送至多个评审终端。
- 根据权利要求6所述的装置，其特征在于，还包括评审验证模块，用于若评审信息包括数字签名和随机问题的答案，则获取评审人标识对应的预存储的签名笔迹，将数字签名的签名笔迹与预存储的签名笔迹进行匹配获得匹配度；及若匹配度达到第一匹配阈值，且随机问题的答案与预设答案一致，则校验通过。
- 一种服务器，包括存储器及一个或多个处理器，所述存储器中储存有计算机可读指令，所述计算机可读指令被所述一个或多个处理器执行时，使得所述一个或多个处理器 执行以下步骤：接收企业终端发送的项目信息；所述项目信息包括项目类型；利用所述项目信息生成对应的评审任务；根据所述项目类型查询对应的评审流程；所述评审流程包括多个评审环节，每个所述评审环节具有对应的评审人标识及其等级；当所述评审流程中存在相同等级的评审人标识时，将所述评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节；通过一个或多个并行评审环节对所述评审流程进行转换；根据转换后的评审流程，将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；及接收多个评审终端返回的评审信息，将评审信息反馈至企业终端。
- 根据权利要求11所述的服务器，其特征在于，所述项目信息还包括多个评审项以及每个评审项对应的多个字段值；所述处理器执行所述计算机可读指令时还执行以下步骤：根据所述项目类型查询对应的校验规则；所述校验规则包括多个必需评审项以及每个必需评审项对应的多个必需字段；若必需评审项在项目信息中对应的评审项为空，或者必需字段在项目信息中对应的字段值为空，则生成项目信息不完整的提示信息；及将所述提示信息发送至所述企业终端。
- 根据权利要求11所述的服务器，其特征在于，所述处理器执行所述计算机可读指令时还执行以下步骤：在多个网页中爬取与评审流程相关的法律政策；将爬取到的法律政策与存储的法律政策进行比较；若爬取到的法律政策发生变化，则将爬取到的法律政策发送至管理终端，以使得管理终端根据变化后的法律政策对相应的评审流程进行更新；及接收所述管理终端发送的更新后的评审流程。
- 根据权利要求11所述的服务器，其特征在于，所述处理器执行所述计算机可读指令时还执行以下步骤：获取预设的多个关键词；查询项目信息中包含关键词的数量；根据项目信息包含关键词的数量识别项目信息的级别；若项目信息的级别达到预设级别，则对相应的评审任务进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程将加密后的评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；或者与多个评审人标识对应的评审终端之间分别建立传输通道，对传输通道进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程在加密后的传输通道将相应的评审任务发送至多个评审终端。
- 根据权利要求11所述的服务器，其特征在于，所述处理器执行所述计算机可读 指令时还执行以下步骤：若评审信息包括数字签名和随机问题的答案，则获取评审人标识对应的预存储的签名笔迹，将数字签名的签名笔迹与预存储的签名笔迹进行匹配获得匹配度；及若匹配度达到第一匹配阈值，且随机问题的答案与预设答案一致，则校验通过。
- 一个或多个存储有计算机可读指令的非易失性计算机可读存储介质，所述计算机可读指令被一个或多个处理器执行时，使得所述一个或多个处理器执行以下步骤：接收企业终端发送的项目信息；所述项目信息包括项目类型；利用所述项目信息生成对应的评审任务；根据所述项目类型查询对应的评审流程；所述评审流程包括多个评审环节，每个所述评审环节具有对应的评审人标识及其等级；当所述评审流程中存在相同等级的评审人标识时，将所述评审人标识对应的评审环节标记为并行评审环节；通过一个或多个并行评审环节对所述评审流程进行转换；根据转换后的评审流程，将评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；及接收多个评审终端返回的评审信息，将评审信息反馈至企业终端。
- 根据权利要求16所述的存储介质，其特征在于，所述项目信息还包括多个评审项以及每个评审项对应的多个字段值；所述计算机可读指令被所述处理器执行时还执行以下步骤：根据所述项目类型查询对应的校验规则；所述校验规则包括多个必需评审项以及每个必需评审项对应的多个必需字段；若必需评审项在项目信息中对应的评审项为空，或者必需字段在项目信息中对应的字段值为空，则生成项目信息不完整的提示信息；及将所述提示信息发送至所述企业终端。
- 根据权利要求16所述的存储介质，其特征在于，所述计算机可读指令被所述处理器执行时还执行以下步骤：在多个网页中爬取与评审流程相关的法律政策；将爬取到的法律政策与存储的法律政策进行比较；若爬取到的法律政策发生变化，则将爬取到的法律政策发送至管理终端，以使得管理终端根据变化后的法律政策对相应的评审流程进行更新；及接收所述管理终端发送的更新后的评审流程。
- 根据权利要求16所述的存储介质，其特征在于，所述计算机可读指令被所述处理器执行时还执行以下步骤：获取预设的多个关键词；查询项目信息中包含关键词的数量；根据项目信息包含关键词的数量识别项目信息的级别；若项目信息的级别达到预设级别，则对相应的评审任务进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程将加密后的评审任务发送至多个评审人标识对应的评审终端；或者与多个评审人标识对应的评审终端之间分别建立传输通道，对传输通道进行加密，根据转换后的评审流程在加密后的传输通道将相应的评审任务发送至多个评审终端。
- 根据权利要求16所述的存储介质，其特征在于，所述计算机可读指令被所述处理器执行时还执行以下步骤：若评审信息包括数字签名和随机问题的答案，则获取评审人标识对应的预存储的签名笔迹，将数字签名的签名笔迹与预存储的签名笔迹进行匹配获得匹配度；及若匹配度达到第一匹配阈值，且随机问题的答案与预设答案一致，则校验通过。
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710710395.8A CN108256814A (zh) | 2017-08-18 | 2017-08-18 | 项目信息处理方法、装置、服务器和存储介质 |
| CN201710710395.8 | 2017-08-18 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2019033790A1 true WO2019033790A1 (zh) | 2019-02-21 |
Family
ID=62721952
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CN2018/085004 Ceased WO2019033790A1 (zh) | 2017-08-18 | 2018-04-28 | 项目信息处理方法、装置、服务器和存储介质 |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN108256814A (zh) |
| WO (1) | WO2019033790A1 (zh) |
Families Citing this family (14)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109190888A (zh) * | 2018-07-27 | 2019-01-11 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | 项目评估分配方法、装置、终端设备及存储介质 |
| CN109359939B (zh) * | 2018-09-26 | 2024-11-08 | 中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司 | 业务数据校验方法、装置、计算机设备和存储介质 |
| CN111369202A (zh) * | 2018-12-25 | 2020-07-03 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | 稿件的送审方法及稿件采编平台 |
| CN109727176A (zh) * | 2019-01-03 | 2019-05-07 | 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 | 企业监管处理方法、装置、计算机设备和存储介质 |
| CN111625855B (zh) * | 2020-05-27 | 2022-01-14 | 中信数智(武汉)科技有限公司 | 一种基于区块链的多个机构信息共享系统及方法 |
| CN111861380A (zh) * | 2020-06-24 | 2020-10-30 | 信达环境科技江苏有限公司 | 一种环保安全生产信息管理系统平台 |
| CN112949262B (zh) * | 2021-02-09 | 2024-05-28 | 中广核工程有限公司 | 评审单处理方法、装置、计算机设备和存储介质 |
| CN114399199A (zh) * | 2022-01-14 | 2022-04-26 | 中国建设银行股份有限公司 | 评审数据处理方法、装置、电子设备和存储介质 |
| CN115660391A (zh) * | 2022-05-30 | 2023-01-31 | 遵义强大博信知识产权服务有限公司 | 基于人工智能的科技项目精准匹配系统、方法及存储介质 |
| CN115269129A (zh) * | 2022-08-02 | 2022-11-01 | 中国建设银行股份有限公司 | 流程调用方法、装置、终端、服务器、介质以及程序产品 |
| CN115496354A (zh) * | 2022-09-16 | 2022-12-20 | 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 | 基于评级系统的用户识别方法、装置、设备及存储介质 |
| CN115829490A (zh) * | 2022-11-10 | 2023-03-21 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | 需求条目评审方法、装置、计算机系统和可读存储介质 |
| CN115545680A (zh) * | 2022-11-29 | 2022-12-30 | 广州嘉为科技有限公司 | 一种在线评审协作方法、装置及存储介质 |
| CN116308186A (zh) * | 2023-03-22 | 2023-06-23 | 卡斯柯信号有限公司 | 用于铁路信号系统的评审装置、方法及终端 |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1532753A (zh) * | 2003-03-24 | 2004-09-29 | 富士全�株式会社 | 服务处理装置及服务处理方法 |
| CN105139103A (zh) * | 2015-07-24 | 2015-12-09 | 广州支点网络科技有限公司 | 项目管理的流程流转控制方法、装置及终端设备 |
| CN106873957A (zh) * | 2016-06-23 | 2017-06-20 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | 一种业务流程的处理方法和设备 |
| CN106920034A (zh) * | 2017-02-07 | 2017-07-04 | 云南大学 | 一种挖掘bpmn编制流程并行性的方法及系统 |
| CN107316121A (zh) * | 2016-08-31 | 2017-11-03 | 天河大成建筑云科技（天津）有限公司 | 一种基于建筑信息模型(bim)的流程审批方法 |
Family Cites Families (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1928902A (zh) * | 2005-09-06 | 2007-03-14 | 廖吉安 | 项目评审方法及系统 |
| CN103473645A (zh) * | 2013-09-11 | 2013-12-25 | 冯新平 | 企业内部项目评审系统 |
| CN104133842A (zh) * | 2014-06-24 | 2014-11-05 | 国家电网公司 | 一种具有智能专家检测功能的数据处理方法及系统 |
| CN105930961A (zh) * | 2016-04-15 | 2016-09-07 | 深圳市金域文化传播有限公司 | 一种评审管理方法及装置 |
| CN106952191A (zh) * | 2017-03-09 | 2017-07-14 | 深圳市华第时代科技有限公司 | 提案自动评审方法和系统 |
-
2017
- 2017-08-18 CN CN201710710395.8A patent/CN108256814A/zh active Pending
-
2018
- 2018-04-28 WO PCT/CN2018/085004 patent/WO2019033790A1/zh not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1532753A (zh) * | 2003-03-24 | 2004-09-29 | 富士全�株式会社 | 服务处理装置及服务处理方法 |
| CN105139103A (zh) * | 2015-07-24 | 2015-12-09 | 广州支点网络科技有限公司 | 项目管理的流程流转控制方法、装置及终端设备 |
| CN106873957A (zh) * | 2016-06-23 | 2017-06-20 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | 一种业务流程的处理方法和设备 |
| CN107316121A (zh) * | 2016-08-31 | 2017-11-03 | 天河大成建筑云科技（天津）有限公司 | 一种基于建筑信息模型(bim)的流程审批方法 |
| CN106920034A (zh) * | 2017-02-07 | 2017-07-04 | 云南大学 | 一种挖掘bpmn编制流程并行性的方法及系统 |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| ZHANG, ZHIBO: "Modeling of Petri-net-based Document Circulation System Workflow", CJFD, 15 July 2010 (2010-07-15) * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN108256814A (zh) | 2018-07-06 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| WO2019033790A1 (zh) | 项目信息处理方法、装置、服务器和存储介质 | |
| US12388809B2 (en) | Blockchain systems and methods for user authentication | |
| US12093419B2 (en) | Methods and devices for managing user identity authentication data | |
| US10826708B2 (en) | Authenticating nonces prior to encrypting and decrypting cryptographic keys | |
| CN109274652B (zh) | 身份信息验证系统、方法及装置及计算机存储介质 | |
| US10142113B2 (en) | Identifying and maintaining secure communications | |
| CN108154038B (zh) | 数据处理方法及装置 | |
| US20140282840A1 (en) | Managing data handling policies | |
| WO2022001526A1 (zh) | 基于区块链的贸易数据处理方法及其相关设备 | |
| CN112070516A (zh) | 产品的溯源方法、装置和区块链系统 | |
| US10990692B2 (en) | Managing data handling policies | |
| US10616206B2 (en) | Digital certificate for verifying application purpose of data usage | |
| CN110049032A (zh) | 一种双向认证的数据内容加密方法及装置 | |
| CN116502732A (zh) | 基于可信执行环境的联邦学习方法以及系统 | |
| CN117595996A (zh) | 一种电子签名处理方法、装置、电子设备和存储介质 | |
| CN114091059B (zh) | 数据安全处理方法、装置、终端、介质和系统 | |
| CN110175471B (zh) | 一种档案的存储方法及系统 | |
| CN111125734A (zh) | 一种数据处理方法及系统 | |
| CN116346486A (zh) | 联合登录方法、装置、设备及存储介质 | |
| US12464354B2 (en) | Systems and methods for verifying candidate communications | |
| CN114090893A (zh) | 数据查询方法、系统、装置、计算机可读介质及电子设备 | |
| WO2021120229A1 (zh) | 一种数据处理方法、装置及系统 |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 18847045 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| 32PN | Ep: public notification in the ep bulletin as address of the adressee cannot be established |
Free format text: NOTING OF LOSS OF RIGHTS PURSUANT TO RULE 112(1) EPC (EPO FORM 1205A DATED 21/09/2020) |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 18847045 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |