WO2018151298A1

WO2018151298A1 - Analysis method, design method, production method, and program

Info

Publication number: WO2018151298A1
Application number: PCT/JP2018/005768
Authority: WO
Inventors: 聡北岡; 半谷　公司; 菅野　良一
Original assignee: 新日鐵住金株式会社
Priority date: 2017-02-17
Filing date: 2018-02-19
Publication date: 2018-08-23
Also published as: MY178003A; SG11201906406YA; JPWO2018151298A1; JP6414374B1

Abstract

Provided are an analysis method, a design method, a production method, and a program. The analysis method is for evaluation of a lateral-torsional buckling yield strength of a steel beam, and is characterized by calculating a lateral-torsional buckling yield strength Mcr of a beam (2), which is a shaped steel formed by coupling an upper flange (21) and a lower flange (22) by a web (23), from a prescribed formula under a condition wherein: both ends (2a, 2a) of the beam (2) in a material axial direction Z are fixed; at a middle section (2b) of the beam (2) in the member axial direction Z, lateral movement of the upper flange (21) in the width direction X is restrained, and an intermediate load is exerted on the upper flange (21) from above; and an end load is exerted on both ends of the beam (2) in the member axial direction Z.

Description

Analysis method, design method, manufacturing method, and program

The present invention relates to an analysis method for evaluating the lateral buckling strength of a steel beam, a steel beam design method, a steel beam manufacturing method, and a program.
This application claims priority based on Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-028462 for which it applied to Japan on February 17, 2017, and uses the content here.

The following formula (91) has been proposed as a conventional evaluation formula for lateral buckling strength of steel beams in buildings. Further, it is disclosed in Patent Document 1 for the purpose of making the design of a steel beam highly accurate by using an evaluation formula for lateral buckling strength using two moment correction factors according to the torsion conditions of the steel beam. Steel beam design methods have been proposed.

Here, the conventional basic equations for buckling (differential differential equations) are often not known correctly or are too complex, so the energy method is generally used to calculate the buckling load. Is used. In this energy method, assuming deformation of the member, the strain energy ΔU stored inside the member by this deformation and the work ΔT performed by the external force are obtained, and both are in a neutral equilibrium state (ΔU = ΔT) under a buckling load. ) To obtain a buckling load. However, the correct energy formula for lateral buckling when an intermediate load is applied has not been known so far, and the buckling load was calculated using an approximate energy formula. It could not be provided.

By the way, in the conventional basic equation of buckling, the lateral buckling of the beam is complicated by the deformation of the lateral buckling of the beam, where the lateral movement of the upper flange is constrained when an antisymmetric moment is applied during an earthquake. it is difficult further to obtain a solution of the closed form of Lateral Buckling force M _e Te. At this time, since the calculation of the lateral buckling strength M ₀ when the equal bending moment acts is simple, the approximate expression of the following equation (91) obtained by multiplying the lateral buckling strength M ₀ by the moment correction coefficient C _b is reversed. symmetric moments is adopted as an evaluation formula for Lateral Buckling force M _e of the beam when acting.

Then, correct the Lateral Buckling force M ₀ when the lateral movement of the upper flange acts like bending moment on the beam of the constrained ends fixed, Wagner twisting (warping torsional) resistance and San safe twist by (net twist ) Is given by the following equation (92). In the following (92) equation, E is Young's modulus, moment of inertia of area is I _f the lower flange, G is the shear modulus, J San-safe torsional constant, l is the beam length, d _b is This is the distance between the plate thickness centers of the upper flange and the lower flange.

The design method disclosed in Patent Document 1 is a steel beam design method for preventing lateral buckling of a steel beam in which the lateral movement of the upper flange is constrained. Design method disclosed in Patent Document 1, as an evaluation formula for elastic Lateral Buckling force M _e of steel beam, below (93) below, using (94) below, by the torsional resistance and San safe by twisting Wagner the resistance, respectively by multiplying a different moment correction factors C ₁ and C _2, and calculates the elastic Lateral Buckling force M _e. Also in the following (93) equation, E is Young's modulus, moment of inertia of area is I _f the lower flange, G is the shear modulus, J San-safe torsional constant, l is the beam length, d _b is This is the distance between the plate thickness centers of the upper flange and the lower flange.

However, the (91) equation, the evaluation formula of Lateral Buckling force M _e of the beam by (92) below, has the following problems. That is, the above equation (91) is an approximate solution based on experiments and analysis because the buckling load M ₀ when the equal bending moment is applied is multiplied by the moment correction coefficient C _b that takes into account the effect of the moment gradient. Since the approximation accuracy is low, a large safety factor is required for use as a design method, and there is room for improvement in that respect.

Further, the (91) equation is a evaluation formula using the single moment correction coefficient C _b. That is, it is an attempt to express the load condition as a linear influence coefficient, which is a factor that has low evaluation accuracy and hinders economic structural design. In contrast, the (93) equation (94) evaluation formula Lateral Buckling force M _e of the beam by the formula is an evaluation formula using two moment correction factors C ₁ and C _2, high precision steel beam You can design with. However, this evaluation formula corresponds only to the inverse symmetric moment, and cannot cope with the load on the steel beam of the actual building in which the vertical load and the horizontal load act in various ways.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2016-23446

Therefore, the present invention has been devised in view of the above-described problems, and the object of the present invention is an analysis method, a design method, and a method that can evaluate the lateral buckling strength of a steel beam with high accuracy. It is to provide a manufacturing method and a program.

(1) An analysis method according to an aspect of the present invention is an analysis method for evaluating the lateral buckling strength of a steel beam,
For beams that use steel beams with upper and lower flanges connected by webs, both ends of the beam in the axial direction of the beam are fixed, and the width of the upper flange at the intermediate portion in the axial direction of the beam The lateral buckling strength M _cr of the beam is expressed as follows under the condition that the lateral movement in the direction is constrained, an intermediate load is applied to the upper flange from above, and end loads are applied to both ends of the beam in the axial direction. It is calculated from the equations (12) to (16).

Here, β and γ are coefficients determined from the following equations (1) and (2) depending on the presupposed load conditions V and w. V is a shearing force acting on the end of the beam in the material axis direction, and w is an intermediate load acting on an intermediate portion of the beam in the material axis direction.
L is the length of the beam in the axial direction, E is the Young's modulus, I is the secondary moment of inertia around the weak axis of the lower flange, G is the shear elastic modulus, and J is the torsion of Saint-Bennan. constant, d _b is the thickness center distance between the upper and lower flanges, z is the length of up to any point in the timber axis direction of the beam from one end to the timber axis direction of the reference beam. φ is a torsion angle generated in the beam by lateral buckling. φ ′ represents the first derivative of φ, and φ ″ represents the second derivative of φ. t is an auxiliary variable for integration.

(2) In the analysis method according to another aspect of the present invention, in the analysis method described in (1) above, β and γ are determined as real numbers in a range according to the following equations (3a) and (3b).

(3) In the analysis method according to another aspect of the present invention, in the above (1) or (2), when both ends of the beam are fixed by rigid joining, φ is expressed by the following formula (10a) or (10b ).

Here, a _n is the unknown coefficients of the n items, in representing the φ a (10a) type or (10b) equation and represents the weight of each term constituting the series in these series.

(4) a method of designing a steel beam according to one embodiment of the present invention is based on the analysis method according to any one of the above (1) to (3), a step of calculating the M _cr, based on the M _cr Determining a cross-sectional dimension of the steel beam.

(5) The manufacturing method of the steel beam which concerns on 1 aspect of this invention is based on the process of calculating _Mcr based on the analysis method as described in any one of said (1) to (3), and _Mcr . The method includes a step of determining a cross-sectional dimension of the steel beam and a step of manufacturing the steel beam based on the determined cross-sectional dimension of the steel beam.

(6) The analysis method according to any one of (1) to (3) can be realized by executing the program according to one embodiment of the present invention by the CPU.

(7) By executing the program according to one embodiment of the present invention by the CPU, the design method described in (4) above can be realized.

The analysis method for evaluating the lateral buckling strength of a steel beam, the design method of the steel beam, the manufacturing method of the steel beam, and the program according to the present invention can evaluate the lateral buckling strength of the steel beam with high accuracy. It is possible to design a steel beam and to manufacture a steel beam based on this.

FIG. 1 is a perspective view showing a steel beam that is an object of the analysis method according to the present embodiment. Fig.2 (a) is a front view which shows the free body of the steel beam used as the object of the analysis method which concerns on this embodiment, FIG.2 (b) is the side view. FIG. 3A is a front view showing a state in which both ends of the steel beam to be subjected to the analysis method according to the present embodiment are fixed and the lateral movement of the upper flange is restricted. FIG. 3B is a side view of the steel beam shown in FIG. 3A. FIG. 3C is a front view showing an example in which an opening is provided in a part of the floor slab above the steel beam to be an object of the analysis method according to the present embodiment. FIG. 4A is a perspective view showing an example of a linear buckling analysis result by FEM of a steel beam in which the lateral movement of the upper flange is constrained, and FIG. 4B is a steel frame in which the lateral movement of the upper flange is not constrained. It is a perspective view which shows the example of a linear buckling analysis result by FEM of a beam. Fig.5 (a) is a side view which shows an example of the virtual displacement of the steel beam used as the object of the analysis method concerning this embodiment, FIG.5 (b) is the bottom view, FIG.5 (c) FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view taken along line AA ′ of FIG. FIG. 6A is a schematic side view showing a bending moment distribution in the material axis direction when both ends of the steel beam to be subjected to the analysis method according to the present embodiment are equally bent, and FIG. FIG. 6 (d) is a schematic side view showing a reverse symmetric moment or the like when both ends are not bent equally. FIG. 7A is a graph showing a calculation result using φ approximated by a predetermined series in the analysis method according to this embodiment, and FIG. 7B is a graph showing the fourth term approximation of the Fourier cosine series. It is a graph which shows the calculation result using (phi) approximated. FIG. 8 is a flowchart for explaining the flow of the analysis method according to the present embodiment. FIG. 9 is a flowchart for explaining the flow of the design method according to the embodiment of the present invention.

Hereinafter, embodiments for carrying out an analysis method to which the present invention is applied will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. The analysis method according to the present embodiment targets a steel beam that is a structural material such as a floor structure such as a building, a soil structure, or a frame structure as illustrated in FIG.

The analysis method according to the present embodiment is used for evaluating the lateral buckling strength of a steel beam, and mainly uses an H-section steel 20 in which an upper flange 21 and a lower flange 22 are connected by a web 23. This is intended to calculate the lateral buckling strength of the beam 2 with high accuracy.

As shown in FIG. 2A, the beam 2 includes a pair of upper and

lower flanges

21 and 22 extending in the width direction X, and a pair of upper and lower

upper flanges

21 and 22 is a web 23. Connected. The beam 2 is, for example, a steel beam having a substantially H-shaped cross section by connecting the upper and lower ends of the web 23 to the approximate center in the width direction X of the upper flange 21 and the lower flange 22.

2B, the entire beam 2 extends in the material axis direction Z and has a predetermined length L, as shown in FIG. In the beam 2, the distance in the height direction Y from the center of the plate thickness of the upper flange 21 to the center of the plate thickness of the lower flange 22 is the distance d _b between the plate thickness centers of the upper flange 21 and the lower flange 22. Become.

Incidentally, the distance d _b between the thickness center distance in the height direction Y from the upper surface of the upper flange 21 to the upper surface of the lower flange 22, or from the lower surface of the upper flange 21 and the lower surface of the lower flange 22 in the height direction Y It can also be handled as the same as the distance. Further, the thickness center distance d _b is the distance in the height direction Y from the lower surface of the upper flange 21 to the upper surface of the lower flange 22, or the RyoNaru in the height direction Y of the beam 2, treated as approximately the same You can also

Here, the beam 2 is formed such that the upper flange 21 and the lower flange 22 extend in the width direction X and the web 23 extends in the height direction Y, as shown in FIG. X is a strong axis (therefore, the rotation direction about the width direction X is around the strong axis), and the height direction Y is the weak axis (therefore, the rotation direction about the height direction Y is around the weak axis). . The beam 2 is laterally buckled when the lower flange 22 protrudes in the width direction X with respect to the material axis direction Z and the height direction Y.

Referring to FIG. 3B, the beam 2 that is the object of the analysis method according to the present embodiment has both

ends

2a, 2a of the beam 2 in the material axis direction Z fixed to the column 3 or the like by rigid joining. At this time, for example, when a square steel pipe is used as the column 3, the both

end portions

2 a and 2 a of the beam 2 are welded to the diaphragm 30 provided on the side surface of the square steel pipe, thereby being rigidly joined to the column 3. It will be fixedly supported.

Further, both

end portions

2a, 2a of the beam 2 may be welded to steel beams substantially orthogonal to each other inside the column 3 when a reinforced concrete column or an unreinforced concrete column is used as the column 3. Furthermore, both ends 2a and 2a of the beam 2 may be welded to a steel column extending in the height direction Y inside the column 3 when a steel reinforced concrete column is used as the column 3.

Both ends 2a, 2a of the beam 2 are fixed ends against lateral buckling deformation. That is, the beam 2 is joined to the column so that it does not rotate around the Y axis at its end, and the upper flange 21 of the beam 2 is joined to the column 3 so as not to rotate around the Z axis. . This condition is that the upper flange 21 is joined to the steel column at the end of the beam 2 by welding or the like, or a part including the end 2a of the beam 2 is embedded in the concrete column. It is realized by doing.

The beam 2 that is the object of the analysis method according to the present embodiment may be fixed to the pillar 3 or the like at both ends 2a and 2a in the material axis direction Z by semi-rigid bonding or pin bonding. The semi-rigid joint is a joint type in which the rotational movement of the beam 2 with respect to the column 3 is restricted to some extent, and the bending stress that can be transmitted between the column 3 and the beam 2 is smaller than that of a complete rigid joint. Say. The pin joint refers to a joint type that does not restrict the rotational movement of the beam 2 with respect to the column 3 and means that there is no or minimal bending stress that can be transmitted between the column 3 and the beam 2. The definitions of semi-rigid joint, pin joint and rigid joint shall conform to the European design standard (Eurocode 3, Part 1-8). However, as described above, the torsion at both ends 2a and 2a of the beam 2 in the material axis direction Z and the warpage of the upper flange 21 and the lower flange 22 need to be fixed.

Further, the beam 2 to be a target in the analysis method according to the present embodiment is provided with a floor slab 4 made of concrete or the like above the upper flange 21 in the intermediate portion 2b of the beam 2 in the material axis direction Z. As the floor slab 4, a concrete slab whose main structure is concrete is used, and a deck synthetic slab whose main structure is a deck plate made of concrete or steel is used.

In the following, the floor slab 4 is illustrated, but a part of the member constituting the roof is provided above the upper flange 21, an intermediate load due to the roof's own weight and load load acts, and the upper flange 21. The lateral movement in the width direction X may be constrained. In the analysis method according to the present embodiment, a portion excluding the end faces at both

end portions

2a and 2a is defined as an intermediate portion of the beam 2.

Further, in the beam 2 to be an object in the analysis method according to the present embodiment, one or a plurality of shear connectors 25 such as headed studs are provided on the upper surface of the upper flange 21 in the intermediate portion 2b of the beam 2 in the material axis direction Z. Provided at predetermined intervals. The shear connector 25 is provided so as to protrude upward from the upper surface of the upper flange 21 of the beam 2 and is embedded in the concrete or the like of the floor slab 4 above the upper flange 21 of the beam 2. At this time, the target beam 2 in the analysis method according to the present embodiment is shown in FIG. 3A in the intermediate portion 2b of the beam 2 in the material axis direction Z by the shear connector 25 being embedded in the floor slab 4 or the like. As described above, the lateral movement of the upper flange 21 in the width direction X is restricted.

In addition to the head studs that are widely used in general, lateral movement in the width direction X of the upper flange 21 of the beam 2 is restrained, such as punching plug welding when a deck composite slab is used as a driving rod or a floor slab 4. As long as the upper flange 21 of the beam 2 is fixed to the floor slab as much as possible, it can be used as the shear connector 25.

Further, as shown in FIG. 3C, even if there is an opening 40 in the floor slab 4 at 1/3 of the length l _b of the length L of the timber axis Z of the beam 2, the analysis method according to the present embodiment Can be applied. In this embodiment, the upper flange 21 of the beam 2 is appropriately restrained by the opening reinforcing material 41 and the straight beam on both sides of the opening 40 so that the upper flange 21 of the beam 2 does not move laterally around this section. Such an analysis method can be preferably used.

In addition, as shown in FIG. 3B, the beam 2 that is the object of the analysis method according to the present embodiment has an intermediate load due to the weight of the floor slab 4 and the load load at the intermediate portion 2 b of the beam 2 in the material axis direction Z. Act. At this time, in the intermediate portion 2b of the beam 2 in the material axis direction Z, an intermediate load acts on the upper flange 21 from above as an equally distributed load on the beam 2 that is the object of the analysis method according to the present embodiment.
Further, when each column 3 is inclined due to an earthquake or the like, an end load is applied from the column 3 to both ends 2 a and 2 a of the beam 2 in the material axis direction Z. In the beam 2 as an object in the analysis method according to the present embodiment, the bending moment about the axis in the width direction X, along the height direction Y, at each of both ends 2a and 2a of the beam 2 in the material axis direction Z When a shearing force or a load in which these are combined acts, an internal force along the material axis direction Z of the beam 2 is generated. Of course, the magnitude of one or more of these forces may be zero.
In addition, the target beam 2 in the analysis method according to the present embodiment is not subjected to reinforcement by a reinforcing member such as a secondary beam, but the analysis method according to the present embodiment is reinforced by a reinforcing member. Since the buckling strength of the beam made is evaluated on the safe side, this can also be targeted. Note that the reinforcing bars are not included in the reinforcing member.

In the analysis method according to the present embodiment, particularly, as shown in FIG. 4 (a), the lateral movement of the upper flange 21 in the width direction X is restricted by the floor slab 4, so that the beam 2 is buckled early. Not reach. The analysis method according to the present embodiment is a method for evaluating the lateral buckling suppression effect of the beam 2 using such lateral movement constraints.
On the other hand, when the lateral movement of the beam 2 in the width direction X is not constrained, the beam 2 undergoes lateral buckling as shown in FIG.

In the analysis method according to the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 5, both ends 2a and 2a of the beam 2 in the material axis direction Z are fixed with respect to the beam 2 in which the shape steel such as the H-section steel 20 is used. In addition, in the intermediate portion 2b of the beam 2 in the material axis direction Z, the lateral movement of the upper flange 21 in the width direction X is restricted, so that an intermediate load acts on the upper flange 21 from above, and the beam 2 in the material axis direction Z at both ends 2a, under conditions that effect the end load 2a, and calculates the Lateral Buckling force M _cr of the beam 2.

In FIG. 5, using the local coordinate system XYZ fixed at the left end 2a of the beam 2, the rotation of the beam 2 is positive in the direction in which the right screw advances. In FIG. 5, the solid line represents the free body of the beam 2, and the broken line represents an example of a virtual displacement that occurs in the free body of the beam 2 due to lateral buckling.

<Geometric boundary conditions>
The upper flange 21 of the beam 2 is assumed to be restrained from displacement (lateral movement) in the X direction on the center line 0-0 ′. The geometric boundary condition of the end 2a of the beam 2 is defined by a series of terminal conditions approximating lateral buckling deformation. The beam 2 undergoes bending torsion with 0-0 ′ as a predetermined rotation axis due to lateral buckling, and deflection occurs as a secondary minute deformation. In this analysis, the upper flange 21, the lower flange 22 and the web 23 are treated as flat plates. The strength of the beam 2 against lateral buckling is determined by the bending rigidity in the plane of the upper flange 21 and the lower flange 22, the upper flange 21, and the lower flange. It is assumed that it is governed by the torsional rigidity of the flange 22 and the web 23.

<Mechanical boundary conditions>
It is assumed that a vertical equally distributed load w acts as an intermediate load on 0-0 ′ at the intermediate portion 2b of the beam 2. Further, the moment acts M _cr and shear forces V bent right end 2a of the beam 2, the moment M ₁ and shear force V ₁ Bending these and balanced on the end portion 2a of the left beam 2 is intended to act . At this time, the relationship between _Mcr and V and w can be expressed by the following equations (1) and (2), respectively, based on the force balance condition.

Here, L is the length of the beam 2 in the material axis direction Z, and z is the beam 2 from one end (the left end 2a in the case of FIG. 5) which serves as a reference in the material axis direction Z of the beam 2. The length to an arbitrary point in the material axis direction Z. β and γ are coefficients determined by the load conditions of the material end load and the intermediate load, and represent the bending moment distribution of the beam 2. It can be obtained Lateral屈荷heavy M _cr considering a load condition of the beam by using β and gamma.

The relationship between the bending moment distribution of the beam 2 and β and γ is illustrated in FIG. As shown in FIG. 6A, when the bending moment distribution in the range of the real beam is equal bending at the left and right ends of the beam 2 (symmetric buckling), β is set to 0, and γ It can be expressed by adjusting the value.
Further, as shown in FIGS. 6B to 6D, when equal bending is not achieved at the left and right member ends of the beam 2 (asymmetric buckling), β is a real number in the range of 1 to 3 (however, FIGS. 6B to 6D illustrate cases where β is 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and can be expressed by adjusting the value of γ. In the analysis method according to the present embodiment, by using β and γ determined in this way, that is, by determining β and γ so as to correspond to the bending moment distribution generated in the real beam, the real beam is obtained. Analytical solution of lateral buckling strength corresponding to the bending moment distribution generated in

<Generalized displacement>
In order to treat the lateral buckling as a linear buckling problem, the deformation of each part of the beam 2 due to the lateral buckling is determined by the coordinate value in the material axis direction Z (that is, an arbitrary value in the material axis direction of the beam 2 from the left end 2a of the beam 2). It is expressed as a continuous function of (length to point) z. At this time, the torsion angle φ of the cross section generated in the beam 2 by the lateral buckling should be smoothly continuous in the material axis direction Z as shown in FIG.

In the analysis method according to the present embodiment, an analytical solution of the lateral buckling strength is derived by approximating the series deformation of each part of the beam 2 due to the lateral buckling. Since the lateral buckling does not involve the distortion of the cross section of the beam 2, other deformations necessary for deriving the analytical solution, that is, the deflection v of the beam 2 shown in FIG. 5 (the left side of the following equation (3)), the right end of the beam 2 And the deflection Δ at the right end of the beam 2 can be expressed by the following equations (3) to (5), respectively. Thus, deformation of each part of the beam 2 due to lateral buckling can be uniquely expressed by φ.

Here, d _b is the thickness center distance between the upper flange 21 and lower flange 22. φ ′ represents the first derivative of φ. t is an auxiliary variable for integration.

<Potential energy>
When the beam 2 undergoes lateral buckling, the total potential energy の of this system is given by the following equation (6).

Here, ΔU is the strain energy of the beam 2 and ΔT is the potential energy of the external force.

Next, ΔU is given by the following equation (7) as the sum of strain energy by bending torsion and strain energy by pure torsion.

Here, E is the Young's modulus, I is the secondary moment of inertia about the weak axis of the lower flange 22, G is the shear elastic modulus, and J is the torsional constant of Saint-Bennan. φ ″ represents the second derivative of φ.

Next, ΔT is given by the following equation (8) as the sum of potential energy of M _cr , V, and w.

<Approximation of lateral buckling deformation>
Arbitrary φ allowed for the beam 2 in which both ends 2a and 2a in the material axis direction Z are fixedly supported can be approximated with arbitrary accuracy by a finite series.

In other words, the Fourier series expansion given by the following equation (9) can be applied to most continuous functions, and the series calculation is simple. The buckling deformation is approximated by

Furthermore, in the analysis method according to the present embodiment, when both ends 2a, 2a of the beam 2 are fixed by rigid joining, the lateral buckling deformation of the beam 2 in which both ends 2a, 2a in the material axis direction Z are fixedly supported are supported. In particular, φ can be approximated by a series given by the following equation (10a) or (10b).

In the analysis method according to the present embodiment, the beam 2 having both

ends

2a and 2a as fixed ends with respect to lateral buckling is targeted, and a cosine function (cosine) is used for each term of the series to represent this. Thus, the condition of the fixed end against bending Lateral, it is possible to represent regardless of the value of a _n.

<Derivation of lateral buckling strength>
Based on the principle of minimum potential energy, the above formulas (7) and (8) are substituted into the following formula (11), and further, the above formulas (1) to (5) are substituted. As a result, the following expression (12) is obtained.

Here, A, B, C and D are functionals of φ shown in the following equations (13) to (16).

Here, β and γ are coefficients determined from the following equations (1) and (2) depending on the presupposed load conditions V and w. V is a shearing force acting on the end 2a of the beam 2 in the material axial direction Z, and w is an intermediate load acting on the intermediate portion 2b of the beam 2 in the material axial direction Z.
L is the length of the beam 2 in the axial direction Z, E is the Young's modulus, I is the secondary moment of inertia around the weak axis of the lower flange 22, G is the shear elastic modulus, J is the sun torsional constant of safe, d _b is the thickness center distance between the upper flange 21 and lower flange 22, z is from one end portion serving as a timber axis direction of the reference beam to any point of the timber axis beam length That's it. φ is a torsion angle generated in the beam 2 by lateral buckling. φ ′ represents the first derivative of φ, and φ ″ represents the second derivative of φ. t is an auxiliary variable for integration.

By the way, the above equation (12) is a linear sum of the yield strength against bending torsion and the yield strength against pure torsion, and generally B ≠ A. In addition, the design method disclosed in Patent Document 1 gives different correction factors to these two proof stresses when an antisymmetric bending moment acts on the beam 2 in which the lateral movement of the upper flange 21 is restricted. A high-precision approximate solution of lateral buckling strength is found.

<Minimum conditions>
An analytical solution of lateral buckling strength is obtained for the case where φ is approximated by the series of the above formulas (9), (10a) and (10b). Specifically, Equation (9), or (10a) below and in the case of approximating the φ by (10b) where the series, undetermined coefficient sequence that minimizes the equation (12) based on the retention principle (a _n ) To obtain the minimum analytical solution corresponding to the primary mode of lateral buckling, that is, the analytical solution of lateral buckling strength.
The necessary condition for minimizing the above equation (12) is the following equation (17), and the following equation (18) is obtained as an analytical solution of the lateral buckling strength by performing differentiation.

F _nm in the above formula (18) represents the following formula (19). N and m in the equations (17) to (23) represent tensor notation numbers for calculation.

Here, L _nm , M _nm , N _nm , and O _nm in the above formula (19) represent the following formulas (20) to (23). L _nm , M _nm , N _nm , and O _nm are determined by integrating φ in the equations (20) to (23).

Here, phi _n represents the n-th basis function of a power series that approximates the phi. For example, the following equation (24) is obtained with respect to the above equation (10a).

Here, φ _n ′ and φ _n ″ represent the first and second derivatives of φ _n , respectively. n and m correspond to the n-th and m-th terms in the series according to the formula (10a) or (10b), respectively.

<Analysis solution>
The above equation (17) represents an Nth order simultaneous equation. The (17) equation is undetermined coefficients _a _1, _a _{2, ...,} when providing a value other than 0 for at least one _{a n,} there is a possibility of Lateral屈変type. That is, equation (12), in order to be load when the beam 2 succumb lateral seat (= Lateral Buckling force), the equation (17) is undetermined coefficients _a _1, a 2, ..., at least one of _{a n} Must be given a value other than 0. For this purpose, the determinant of the coefficient matrix of the above equation (17) must be 0.
That is, the analytical solution of the lateral buckling strength can be obtained by solving the n-order equation of the following equation (25).

The analytical solution of lateral buckling strength when φ is approximated by the third term partial sum of the series of the above formulas (9), (10a) or (10b) is the following formulas (26) to (33): Given in.

By substituting β and γ, which are load conditions at the time of design, into the equation (32), various conditions of the beam 2 are E (Young's modulus), I (second moment of section around the weak axis of the lower flange 22), L (the length of the timber axis Z of the beam 2), d b _(the thickness center distance between the upper flange 21 and the lower flange 22), G (shear modulus), J (the torsional constant of San safe) ( By substituting into equation (33), an analytical solution for lateral buckling strength can be calculated.
In the equations (26) to (33), n and m represent tensor notation numbers for calculation.

At this time, the minimum positive value in the actual solution of the equation (26) is the primary lateral buckling strength of the beam 2. The analysis method according to this embodiment is directed to a beam 2 in which a shape steel in which an upper flange 21 and a lower flange 22 are connected by a web 23 is used, and both

ends

2a and 2a of the beam 2 in the material axis direction Z are fixed. In addition, in the intermediate portion 2b of the beam 2 in the material axis direction Z, the lateral movement of the upper flange 21 in the width direction X is restricted, so that an intermediate load acts on the upper flange 21 from above, and the material axis of the beam 2 The lateral buckling strength M _cr of the beam 2 is calculated from the following formulas (12) to (16) under the condition that end loads act on both

end portions

2a, 2a in the direction Z.

Here, β and γ are coefficients determined from the following equations (1) and (2) depending on the presupposed load conditions V and w. V is a shearing force acting on the end 2a of the beam 2 in the material axial direction Z, and w is an intermediate load acting on the intermediate portion 2b of the beam 2 in the material axial direction Z.
L is the length of the beam 2 in the axial direction Z, E is the Young's modulus, I is the secondary moment of inertia around the weak axis of the lower flange 22, G is the shear elastic modulus, J is the sun torsional constant of safe, d _b is the upper flange 21 and the plate thickness center distance z is the length of up to any point in the timber axis direction of the beam from one end to the timber axis direction of the reference beam and the lower flange 22 It is. φ is a torsion angle generated in the beam 2 by lateral buckling. φ ′ represents the first derivative of φ, and φ ″ represents the second derivative of φ. t is an auxiliary variable for integration.

In the analysis method according to the present embodiment, the lateral buckling deformation of the beam 2 constrained by the lateral movement is complicated, but the lateral movement of the beam 2 is constrained and an intermediate load acts on the upper flange 21 from above. and, and wood-axis direction Z of the both end portions 2a of the beam 2, under conditions which effect the end load 2a, the Lateral Buckling force M _cr of the beam 2 by calculating from the equation (12) - (16) Thus, it is possible to evaluate the lateral buckling strength of such a steel beam with high accuracy.

In the analysis method according to the present embodiment, β and γ are determined as real numbers according to equations (3a) and (3b).
In the analysis method according to the present embodiment, β is 0 when the intermediate load is equal in the material axial direction Z of the beam 2 (symmetric buckling), and the intermediate load is equal in the material axial direction Z of the beam 2. If it is not necessary (asymmetric buckling), β is a real number in the range of 1 to 3, so that the intermediate load is an equal bending moment where the bending is equal and the case where the intermediate load is an antisymmetric moment where the intermediate load is not equal. In any case, it is possible to evaluate the lateral buckling strength of the steel beam while considering various load conditions assumed for the actual steel beam by using the above equations (12) to (16). It becomes possible.

In the analysis method according to the present embodiment, when both ends of the beam are fixed by rigid joining, when approximating φ, it is more preferable to approximate by the series of the above formula (10a) or (10b).
In the analysis method according to the present embodiment, when φ is approximated by the third term partial sum of the series of the above formula (9), (10a), or (10b), the lateral buckling strength is expressed as a total plastic bending moment. When the dimensionless lateral buckling strength (= M _cr / M _p ) divided by the vertical axis and the slenderness ratio λ _b (= (M _cr / M _p ) ^0.5 ) as the horizontal axis, the analytical solution of the lateral buckling strength One example is shown in FIG. 7A or 7B. FIG. 7A and FIG. 7B are plots of analysis results with different cross sections, lengths, and load conditions.

At this time, when the series of the above formula (10a) or (10b) is used, as shown in FIG. 7 (a), the analytical solution of the lateral buckling strength with respect to various conditions is arranged substantially in one line. It can be seen that the lateral buckling strength of can be evaluated with higher accuracy.

Further, as shown in FIG. 7B, when the fourth term partial sum of the Fourier cosine series of the above equation (9) is used, the analytical solution of the lateral buckling strength varies.
If the bending moment of the end 2a of the beam 2 is greater than the bending moment that the building receives, the beam will not buckle. Therefore, as a realistic design, a safe design can be achieved by setting M _cr sufficiently higher than the load applied to the building. In order to evaluate the lateral buckling strength with high accuracy using the Fourier series of the above equation (9), for example, φ is approximated by the 10th term partial sum.

As described above, the analysis method according to the present embodiment avoids the calculation calculation of the lateral buckling strength from becoming more complicated than necessary by approximating φ by the series of the above formula (10a) or (10b). However, the lateral buckling strength of the steel beam can be evaluated with higher accuracy. For example, by approximating φ by the series of the above formula (10a) or (10b), it is possible to evaluate the lateral buckling strength of the steel beam with higher accuracy without performing complicated calculations.

According to the analysis method according to the present embodiment, although the lateral buckling deformation of the beam whose lateral movement is restricted becomes complicated, both ends of the beam are fixed and the lateral movement of the beam is restricted, and the upper flange The lateral buckling strength M _cr of the beam is calculated from the above equations (12) to (16) under the condition that an intermediate load acts on the beam from above and an end load acts on both ends of the beam in the material axis direction. Thus, it becomes possible to evaluate the lateral buckling strength of such a steel beam with high accuracy.

(Other embodiments)
According to the present invention, the design of a steel beam includes a step of calculating M _cr based on the analysis method according to the above embodiment, and further includes a step of designing a steel beam based on M _cr obtained by the analysis method. A method is provided.
According to the steel beam design method, both lateral ends of the beam are fixed and the lateral movement of the beam is constrained, even though the lateral buckling deformation of the beam is restricted. From the above formulas (12) to (16), the intermediate buckling strength M _cr of the beam is calculated from the above formulas (12) to (16). Thus, it is possible to evaluate the lateral buckling strength of such a steel beam with high accuracy.

Therefore, in the process of designing a steel beam, based on the lateral buckling strength M _cr , various conditions of the beam, E (Young's modulus), I (second moment of section around the weak axis of the lower flange), L (beam the length of the axis of member direction Z), by determining the like d b _(the thickness center distance between the upper and lower flanges), does not cause Lateral buckling in those loading conditions given in basic design It is possible to select an optimal cross section for the purpose. As a result, it is possible to prevent the weight and cross section of the beam from becoming unnecessarily large, and the steel beam can be designed without impairing the habitability and economy of the building.

Further, according to the present invention, based on the analysis method according to the above embodiment, the method includes a step of calculating M _cr and a step of determining a cross-sectional dimension of the steel beam based on M _cr , and determined by these steps. A method of manufacturing a steel beam is provided that includes a step of manufacturing a steel beam based on a cross-sectional dimension of the beam.

In the process of designing a steel beam, an appropriate steel beam can be designed by manufacturing the steel beam based on the determination items related to the above conditions.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart for explaining the flow of the analysis method according to the embodiment. FIG. 9 is a flowchart for explaining the flow of the design method according to the embodiment of the present invention.

A series of flows of the analysis method according to the embodiment will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. First, in the analysis method according to the above embodiment, a structural plan of a target building is performed. That is, the arrangement of columns, beams, walls, floors, etc. and their joining method are determined (S801). In addition, an assumed external force such as a load load, a wind load, an earthquake load, and a snow load is set (S802). In addition, a cross section of a column, beam, wall, floor or the like is assumed (S803).
Next, based on the information of S801 to S803, a frame analysis is performed, and a basic design for calculating an end load acting on the target beam is performed (S804). The order of S801 to S803 does not matter.

Then, by performing the analysis method according to the above embodiment, I (second moment of inertia around the weak axis of the lower flange), L (material axis direction Z of the beam) based on the cross-sectional shape of the beam assumed in S803. ) And d _b (distance between the center thicknesses of the upper flange and the lower flange), and M _cr is calculated using these numerical values (S805).

A series of flows of the design method according to the embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. First, the structural plan of the target building is performed in the same manner as the above analysis method. That is, the arrangement of columns, beams, walls, floors, etc. and their joining method are determined (S901). In addition, an assumed external force such as a load load, a wind load, an earthquake load, and a snow load is set (S902). In addition, a cross section of a column, beam, wall, floor or the like is assumed (S903).
Next, based on the information in S901 to S903, frame analysis is performed, and a basic design for calculating an end load acting on the target beam is performed (S904). Note that the order of S901 to S903 does not matter.

Then, by executing the analysis method according to the above embodiment, the M _cr of the cross section of the beam assumed in S903 is calculated (S905).

Next, the bending moment M as the end load obtained in S904 is compared with _Mcr obtained in S905, and a determination is made (S906). In this determination, M and M _cr are compared, and if the determination is “YES (M _cr slightly exceeds M)”, the cross-sectional dimension of the beam is determined as a set value (S907).

When the determination is “NO (M _cr is smaller than M)” or when the determination is “excess (M _cr is too larger than M)”, the process returns to S903 and the beam cross-section is assumed again. .
In S906, determination may be performed by comparing M with a value obtained by multiplying M _cr by the safety factor (or adding the safety factor) in consideration of the safety factor.

The analysis method or design method described above is preferably realized by a computer device (not shown) that executes a program recorded on a tangible recording medium (not shown) that is not temporary, by a CPU (not shown). In this case, it is preferable that the computer device executes the analysis method described above in response to a command from the input device operated by the operator, and outputs the M _cr calculated in S805 of FIG. 8 as the analysis result. .

Alternatively, the computer device preferably executes the design method described above in response to a command from an input device operated by an operator, and outputs the comparison result of the determination in S906 of FIG. 9 as the design result. Or it is preferable that the cross-sectional dimension of the beam of S907 of FIG. 9 is output as a design result.
The analysis result or the output design result is preferably output so as to be visible via an output device (not shown).

It is preferable to manufacture a steel beam by an existing technique according to the design result (cross-sectional dimension of the beam) set by executing the design method described above. Thereby, the H-section steel of the structure (arrangement, size) according to the design result set by the design method mentioned above can be obtained.

The analysis method, the design method, the manufacturing method, and the program according to the above embodiment are used in a building such as a house, a school, an office, or a hospital facility, or a building such as a low-rise building, a high-rise building, or a high-rise building. Steel beams that are structural materials such as floor structures such as buildings, soil structures, or frame structures can be targeted.

As mentioned above, although the example of embodiment of this invention was demonstrated in detail, all the embodiment mentioned above showed only the example of actualization in implementing this invention, and these are the technical aspects of this invention. The range should not be interpreted in a limited way.

For example, the analysis method according to the present embodiment can be preferably applied to I-shaped steel as well as a steel beam using an H-shaped steel in which an upper flange and a lower flange are connected to a web at the approximate center in the width direction X.

According to the present invention, it is possible to evaluate the lateral buckling strength of a steel beam with high accuracy while considering various load conditions assumed for a real steel beam, a method for designing a steel beam, Since a manufacturing method and a program can be provided, it is industrially useful.

2: Beam 2a: End 2b: Intermediate part 20: H-shaped steel 21: Upper flange 22: Lower flange 23: Web 25: Shear connector 3: Column 30: Diaphragm 4: Floor slab 40: Opening 41: Opening reinforcement X : Width direction Y: Height direction Z: Material axis direction

Claims

An analysis method for evaluating the lateral buckling strength of a steel beam,
For a beam in which a shape steel in which an upper flange and a lower flange are connected by a web is used, both ends of the beam in the material axis direction are fixed, and in the intermediate part of the beam in the material axis direction, the upper Lateral buckling of the beam is performed under the condition that lateral movement in the width direction of the flange is restricted, an intermediate load is applied to the upper flange from above, and end loads are applied to both ends of the beam in the axial direction. An analysis method characterized in that the proof stress M cr is calculated from the following formulas (12) to (16).

Here, β and γ are coefficients determined from the following equations (1) and (2) depending on the presupposed load conditions V and w. V is a shearing force acting on the end of the beam in the material axis direction, and w is an intermediate load acting on an intermediate portion of the beam in the material axis direction.
L is the length of the beam in the axial direction, E is the Young's modulus, I is the secondary moment of inertia around the weak axis of the lower flange, G is the shear elastic modulus, and J is the torsion of Saint-Bennan. constant, d b is the thickness center distance between the upper and lower flanges, z is the length of up to any point in the timber axis direction of the beam from one end to the timber axis direction of the reference beam. φ is a torsion angle generated in the beam by lateral buckling. φ ′ represents the first derivative of φ, and φ ″ represents the second derivative of φ. t is an auxiliary variable for integration.
The analysis method according to claim 1, wherein β and γ are determined as real numbers in a range according to the following formulas (3a) and (3b).
The analysis method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the φ is calculated by the following equation (10a) or (10b) when both ends of the beam are fixed by rigid joining.

Here, a n is the undetermined coefficients of the n items.
A step of calculating the M cr based on the analysis method according to claim 1;
Determining a cross-sectional dimension of the steel beam based on the M cr ;
A method for designing a steel beam, comprising:
A step of calculating the M cr based on the analysis method according to claim 1;
Determining a cross-sectional dimension of the steel beam based on the M cr ;
Producing a steel beam based on the determined cross-sectional dimensions of the steel beam;
The manufacturing method of the steel beam characterized by including.
A program for causing a computer device to execute the analysis method according to any one of claims 1 to 3.
A program for causing a computer device to execute the design method according to claim 4.