WO2017036586A1

WO2017036586A1 - Smoking article

Info

Publication number: WO2017036586A1
Application number: PCT/EP2016/001448
Authority: WO
Inventors: Silvia DELGADO; Noritoshi Fujita; Hiroyoshi Ono
Original assignee: Jt International S.A.
Priority date: 2015-08-28
Filing date: 2016-08-26
Publication date: 2017-03-09
Also published as: JP2020096617A; UA120553C2; JP7481375B2; EA201890550A1; ES2768980T3; BR112018003916A2; EA034059B1; CN108024569A; PL3340813T3; KR20200044129A; US20180325166A1; KR20180044372A; EP3340813B1; MX2018002274A; JP2022058733A; EP3340813A1; JP2018531621A; PH12018500326A1

Abstract

The present invention relates to a smoking article (100) comprising a tobacco rod, a filter comprising at least one plug of filtration material wrapped with one or more filter wrappers (102), and a tipping material (101) attaching the tobacco rod and the filter, wherein the tipping material has a basis weight of at least 50 grams per square metre, and a thickness of between about 40 and about 55 microns.

Description

Smoking article

Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a smoking article comprising a filter. Background of the Invention

Smoking articles such as cigarettes usually comprise a rod of tobacco or other aerosol forming material wrapped in a combustible wrapper, usually cigarette paper, and a filter aligned in end-to- end relationship with said tobacco rod. The filter may include at least one plug of cellulose acetate tow attached to the tobacco rod or other aerosol forming material by tipping paper which overlies the filter and an adjacent end of the tobacco rod against which the filter is placed in abutment. Perforations may further be provided in the filter through the tipping paper to allow ventilation of the smoke drawn by consumers through the filter upon smoking.

Consumers nowadays expect from any consumer goods products of the best possible quality for the best consumer experience possible and they pay more and more attention to perceived quality in the presentation and look and feel of the products, which becomes sometimes as important as other features like the taste or functional benefits of products. This holds true for smoking articles as for any other consumer good product and a particular area of focus from consumers to judge the quality of smoking articles lies in the visual appearance and physical behavior thereof when consumers hold it in their hands and mouth before and during consumption.

In particular consumers expect smoking articles to present uniform density in the tobacco or other aerosol generating material rod as well as substantial rigidity or firmness of the filter when hold between fingers or the lips, altogether with a nice uniform rounded shape of the filter and smoking article as a whole. Appropriate firmness of the filter is particularly important to provide consumers perception of increased quality through resistance of the filter to crushing strength between the fingers and lips. At the same time, firmness must not be too high to keep a certain softness in the mouth and comfort during use for consumers. Regular, uniform roundness of the filter and smoking article is also important for perceived quality as uneven shapes give an impression of lower quality of the products.

There are multiple factors that influence both the firmness and roundness of smoking articles filters, including among others cellulose acetate tow weight, plasticizer content and filter wrappers qualities (basis weight, thickness, porosity). All these factors need to be adjusted appropriately to provide the appropriate level of firmness and roundness while at the same time meeting expected sensory and taste targets for the products. In particular, only increasing the quantity of plasticizer such as triacetin used to form the cellulose acetate filter plug(s) in order to increase the firmness thereof will be effective but to the detriment of the taste neutrality of the product. Indeed, in high concentration triacetin tends to degrade into acetic acid, which consumer can feel and smell in the smoking articles.

There have been attempts in the prior art to increase filter firmness by essentially using thicker filter plug wrappers such as disclosed in WO 2015007399 A1 , WO 2015007400 A1 and WO 2015007401 A1. Those documents disclose smoking articles comprising a tobacco rod and a filter having a plug of filtration material extending to the furthest downstream end, also called mouth end of the filter, the plug being surrounded by one or more filter wrappers; and tipping material attaching the tobacco rod and the filter. The one or more filter wrappers have a basis weight between about 50 grams per square metre and about 100 grams per square metre, the hardness of the filter consequently achieved being of at least 90%.

The above cited patent applications basically propose to use thick filter wrappers having a basis weight between about 50 grams per square metre and about 100 grams per square metre such as known and used in the prior art for manufacturing recessed filters (see for example WO 20 1/117584 A1). This indeed provides, exactly like expected and achieved with recess filters, an increased resistance to crush at the mouth end of the filter due to the higher basis weight and thickness of the filter wrappers, further increased by the cellulose acetate extending to the end of the mouth end of the filter.

However, such filter configuration with thick, heavy basis weight filter wrappers has several drawbacks, in particular in terms of manufacturing and costs. Indeed, the use of thick filter wrappers having a basis weight between about 50 grams per square metre and about 100 grams per square metre requires substantial speed reduction, up to 25-30%, compared to the nominal speeds of filter making machines for standard filter wrappers of between 20 and 30 grams per square metre. Further adjustments on the filter maker during brand changes are required, or even specific machine parts have to be changed, reducing the productivity and increasing the production cost.

Use of thicker filter wrappers also requires more frequent cleaning of the filter makers due to dust generation during processing which further impacts negatively the manufacturing efficiency and costs. Finally thick filter wrappers show less elasticity than standard thinner filter wrappers what generates lesser rounded filter once the filter wrappers are wrapped around the cellulose acetate plugs of the filter due to the innate rigidity of the wrappers.

There's consequently a need for a smoking article having another filter configuration showing at the same time increased firmness and uniform roundness for increased quality perception by consumers with limited, if any, impact on manufacturing speeds and costs compared to the prior art previously described.

The object of the present invention is to provide an improved smoking article comprising a filter solving the above needs. Summary of the Invention

The inventors found that the disadvantages of the prior art smoking articles can be overcome by a smoking article, for example, a cigarette, comprising:

a tobacco rod;

a filter comprising at least one plug of filtration material wrapped with one or more filter wrappers; and

a tipping material attaching the tobacco rod and the filter;

wherein the tipping material has a basis weight of at least 50 grams per square metre, and a thickness of between about 40 to about 55 microns.

The hardness of the smoking article measured at any point of the filter when attached to the tobacco rod by tipping material may be of between about 85% and about 95%. For example, the hardness of the smoking article measured at any point of the filter when attached to the tobacco rod by tipping material may be less than about 90%.

Advantageously, the inventors have found that hardness values of below 90% can be achieved by merely using a tipping material having a basis weight of 50 grams per square metre or more without increasing the content of plasticizer used in the filtration material nor using very thick filter wrappers of 50 grams per square metre or more as taught in the prior art.

The further advantage of using such tipping material is that it is easy to process during manufacturing of the smoking articles, thereby not increasing the machine costs, and further compatible with online laser perforation of the filter without substantially increasing laser power as opposed to filters using thick filter wrappers are of 50 grams per square metre and higher because said tipping material is the first to be perforated at the outside of the filter of the smoking article.

Such range of thickness for the tipping material is preferred to ensure easy machinability of the smoking article's filter. Additionally, this thickness range contributes to provide a proper roundness of the filter in the finished smoking article.

Further exemplary embodiments of the invention are indicated in the dependent claims and the following detailed description, which, however, do not restrict the scope of the invention and only help to understand and explain the features of the present invention. Deviations and modifications on these particular features, particular in regard to other aspects of the invention, can be made without departing from the scope of the invention. Description of the figures

Figure 1 illustrates the definition of the hardness value as used throughout the description.

Figure 2 illustrates a perspective view of an apparatus for determining the hardness of a filter or a smoking article, in a first configuration;

Figure 3 illustrates a side view of the apparatus of Figure 2, in a first configuration; Figure 4 illustrates a side view of the apparatus of Figure 2, in a second configuration.

Detailed description

All ranges disclosed herein are to be considered to be supplemented by the term "about", unless clearly defined to the contrary or otherwise clear from the context.

All numbers or percentages relating to amounts of a substance within this application are given in wt.%, unless clearly defined to the contrary or otherwise clear from the context.

The invention relates to a smoking article, for example, a cigarette, comprising:

a tobacco rod;

a filter comprising at least one plug of filtration material wrapped with one or more filter wrappers; and a tipping material attaching the tobacco rod and the filter;

The hardness of the smoking article measured at any point of the filter when attached to the tobacco rod by tipping material may be of between about 85% and about 95%.

Advantageously, the inventors have found that desired hardness values, such as of below 90%, can be achieved by using merely a tipping material having a basis weight of 50 grams per square metre or more without increasing the content of plasticizer used in the filtration material nor using very thick filter wrappers of 50 grams per square metre or more as taught in the prior art. The further advantage of using such tipping material is that it is easy to process during manufacturing of the smoking articles, thereby not increasing the machine costs, and further compatible with online laser perforation of the filter without substantially increasing laser power as opposed to filters using thick filter wrappers are of 50 grams per square metre and higher because said tipping material is the first to be perforated at the outside of the filter of the smoking article. Use of a standard porous filter wrapper then allows for adjustment of the filter ventilation if necessary.

Throughout the present disclosure the hardness values specified for the smoking articles according to the invention correspond to hardness measurements obtained submitting the smoking articles to the DD60A test, i.e. using a known DD60A Densimeter (manufactured and made commercially available by Heinr. Borgwaldt GmbH, Germany) device.

The term "hardness" as used throughout the present disclosure characterizes the resistance to deform. Hardness values are generally expressed as percentage. Figure 1 shows a cigarette 100, comprising a filter wrapper 102 and a tipping material 101 , before applying a load F and the same cigarette 110 whilst applying load F. The cigarette 100 before the load F has been applied has a diameter D_s. The cigarette 110 after applying a set load for a set duration (but with the load still applied) has a (reduced) diameter D_F. The reduction of the diameter (r) is r = D_S - DF. Referring to Figure 1 , the hardness is defined as follows:

Hardness(%) =— x 100% wherein Ds is the initial (non-depressed) diameter of the cigarette, and D_F is the depressed diameter after applying a set load for a set duration. The harder the material, the closer the hardness is to 100%.

As is described in more detail below, and generally known in the art, to determine the hardness of a portion (such as a filter) of a smoking article, smoking articles should be aligned parallel in a plane and the same portion of each smoking article to be tested should be subjected to a set load for a set duration. This test is performed using a known DD60A Densimeter device (manufactured and made commercially available by Heinr. Borgwaldt GmbH, Germany), which is fitted with a measuring head for cigarettes and with a cigarette receptacle. The load is applied using two load applying cylindrical rods, which extend across the diameter of all of the smoking articles at once. According to the standard test method for this instrument, the test should be performed such that twenty contact points occur between the smoking articles and the load applying cylindrical rods. In some cases, the filters to be tested may be long enough such that only ten smoking articles are needed to form twenty contact points, with each smoking article contacting both load applying rods (because they are long enough to extend between the rods). In other cases, if the filters are too short to achieve this, then twenty smoking articles should be used to form the twenty contact points, with each smoking article contacting only one of the load applying rods, as further discussed below.

Two further stationary cylindrical rods are located underneath the smoking articles, to support the smoking articles and counteract the load applied by each of the load applying cylindrical rods. Such an arrangement is described in more detail below, and shown in Figures 2 to 4, which represent a known prior art arrangement as disclosed e.g. in WO 2015/007400 A1 and WO 2015/007401 A1.

For the standard operating procedure for such an apparatus, an overall load of 2 kg is applied for a duration of 20 seconds. After 20 seconds have elapsed (and with the load still being applied to the smoking articles), the reduction of the diameter (r) in the load applying cylindrical rods is determined, and then used to calculate the hardness from the above equation. The temperature is kept in the region of 22°C ± 2°. The test described above is referred to as the DD60A Test. The DD60A Test and corresponding apparatus are described in more detail below in relation to Figures 2 to 4. As discussed in more detail below, the hardness of a filter portion of a smoking article does not greatly differ when the smoking article is smoked rather than unsmoked. However, the standard way to measure the filter hardness is when the smoking article is unsmoked.

In an embodiment of the invention, the hardness of the smoking article measured at any point of the filter when attached to the tobacco rod by tipping material is less than about 90% but higher than about 85%; for example the hardness is in the range of between about 86% to about 88%.

The inventors have interestingly found out through consumer studies and experimentation of various filter structure that consumers could actually feel an increase in filter hardness in their fingers and on their lips only once the hardness value reached 85% and more compared with standard filter cigarettes available, i.e. cigarettes having filters comprising filter wrappers on between about 20 grams per square metre and 30 grams per square metre, which allow to achieve hardness of about 85 % in combination with standard plasticizer contents of about 4 to 6% by weight of filter tow material. Even more interestingly studies carried out by the inventors have shown that consumers did not substantially perceive an increase in filter hardness above 90%, and certainly not perceive filters having a hardness of above 90% has of having an increased quality compared to those having only a hardness of between 85% and 90%.

Smoking articles showing a hardness of 90% or more require the use of either thicker filter wrappers of at least 50 grams per square metre or more and/or the use of higher contents of plasticizer in the filter tow material, with the downsides mentioned above. However, the combination of the relatively thick tipping material with a thicker filter wrapper of at least 50 grams per square metre or with a higher plasticizer content, show a hardness above 90% while mitigating the downsides.

The one or more filter wrappers may comprise any suitable material or combination of materials. Examples of suitable materials include, but are not limited to, cellulose based materials, cellulose based film, cardboard, paper, recon, and combinations thereof. According to certain embodiments, the one or more filter wrappers comprise paper.

In an embodiment of the invention, one or more filter wrappers have a basis weight of between about 20 and about 50 grams per square metre, preferably between about 25 and about 30 grams per square metre, and most preferably the one or more filter wrappers have a basis weight of about 27.

The one or more filter wrappers of the filter may be non-porous wrappers. The filtration material may comprise any suitable material or combination of materials. The type of filtration material may be selected to provide the desired hardness. Examples of suitable materials include, but are not limited to, cellulose acetate, cellulose, reconstituted cellulose, polylactic acid, polyvinyl alcohol, nylon, polyhydroxybutyrate, thermoplastic material, such as starch, non- woven materials, longitudinally oriented fibres and randomly oriented fibres, paper, crepe, PLA fibres, and combinations thereof. All or part of the filter may include activated carbon or other sorbent material. The filter may include an adhesive or plasticizer or a combination thereof. According to certain embodiments the filtration material comprises cellulose acetate.

The filtration material may have any suitable denier per filament (dpf) and total denier (td). In certain embodiments, the filtration material has a denier per filament (dpf) of between 1.5 to 6.0, such as 2.0 to 5.0, such as 3.0 to 5.0, for example of about 3.8. The filter segment may have a total denier of less than about 40,000, such as less than about 38,000, such as less than about 35,000, such as less than about 33,000, for example of about 30,000.

In an embodiment where the filter has a length of between about 20 mm to 30 mm and a circumference of between about 20 mm to about 25 mm, the filter has a tow weight in the range from about 90 mg to about 160 mg, such as in the range from about 100 mg to about 150 mg, such as in the range from about 120 mg to about 140 mg, such as in the range from about 130 mg to about 138 mg, for example of about 137.25 mg.

The at least one plug of filtration material forming the filter may have a plasticizer content of between about 5% and 10% per weight of filtration material, such as about 6 to 9%, such as about 7 to 9% or 6 to 8%. For example, the plasticizer content may be about 8%. According to certain embodiments, as plasticizer triacetin is used.

The tipping material may comprise any suitable material or combination of materials. Examples of suitable materials include, but are not limited to, cellulose based materials, cellulose based film, cardboard, paper, recon, and combinations thereof. According to certain embodiments, the tipping material comprises paper.

In an embodiment, the filtration material comprises cellulose acetate, having triacetin as plasticizer, the one or more filter wrappers comprise paper, and the tipping material comprises paper.

The tipping material has a basis weight of at least 50 grams per square metre. In an embodiment, the tipping paper has a basis weight in a range from at least 50 grams per square meter to about 80 grams per square meter. In another embodiment, the upper limit of the basis weight is about 70 grams per square meter, i.e., the tipping paper has a basis weight in a range from at least 50 grams per square meter to about 70 grams per square meter. In a further embodiment, the upper limit of the basis weight is about 60 grams per square meter, such that the tipping paper has a basis weight in a range from at least 50 grams per square meter to about 60 grams per square meter.

The tipping material has a thickness of between about 40 to about 55 microns, and may be between about 45 to about 52 microns, for example, the tipping material may have a thickness of about 50 microns. Such range of thickness for the tipping material further eases machinability of the smoking article's filter and additionally contributes to provide a proper roundness of the filter in the finished smoking article.

The tipping material may include a ventilation zone at a location about the filter. The ventilation zone may comprise perforations through the tipping material. The amount of ventilation, including the number, layout, position and size of perforations, may be selected to provide the desired level of ventilation.

The perforations may extend through the filter wrapper or wrappers surrounding the plug of filtration material. Alternatively, the filter wrapper or wrappers may be porous. The tipping material may be standard pre-perforated tipping material. Alternatively, the tipping material may be perforated in-line (for example, using a laser) during the manufacturing process according to the desired number, size and position of the perforations. When in-line perforations are made on the tipping material, these may be made simultaneously on the filter wrapper or wrappers.

In one embodiment the filter comprises a single plug of filtration material wrapped with a single filter wrapper. In such embodiment the plug of filtration material extends along the whole length of the filter.

In a further embodiment of the smoking article of the present invention the filter comprises at least one first plug of non-wrap acetate filtration material. Non-wrap acetate filter plugs are particularly advantageous as they show an innate hardness and roundness compared to standard cellulose acetate filter plugs, which is conferred by steam hardening the outer surface of the acetate plug during filter making. Thereby use of a thick filter wrapper is not necessary to provide increased filter rigidity.

Where at least one non-wrap acetate filter plug is used it is further advantageous in another embodiment of the invention to provide the filter with at least one second plug of non-wrap acetate filtration material, the first and second plugs of non-wrap acetate filtration material being overwrapped by a single filter wrapper holding both first and second plugs in a spaced relationship to define a cavity there between. Using two non-wrap acetate filtration material plug is particularly advantageous as it allows formation of cavity filters having a single filter wrapper of relatively low basis weight as proposed by the invention while still providing increased rigidity, where usually multi-plug filters require two or more filter wrapper layers.

In one embodiment, the filter of the smoking article of the invention comprises at least one fluid-releasing member positioned in the cavity, preferably a breakable capsule containing an oil- or water-based liquid.

In an embodiment, particularly when the filter comprises a fluid-releasing member, the one or more filter wrappers comprises a waterproof non-porous wrapper.

The length of the filter (which is the total length of the filter, including the plug of filtration material, measured in a direction substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the smoking article) may have any suitable value. However, it may be convenient for the filter length to be substantially the same as in conventional smoking articles. Therefore, the smoking article may comprise a filter with a length of between about 20 mm to 30 mm.

The circumference of the filter (which is the total circumference of the plug of filtration material together with the tipping material and the one or more filter wrappers) may have any suitable value. However, it may be convenient for the diameter to be substantially the same as in conventional smoking articles.

The filter may have, at any part thereof, a circumference of between about 20 mm to about 25 mm. Therefore, a diameter of the filter may be of between about 6.4 mm and about 8.0 mm, where the diameter of the smoking article is the total diameter of the plug of filtration material together with the tipping material and the one or more filter wrappers, measured in a direction substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the smoking article.

The filter may have a pressure drop, or resistance to draw, of between about 20 mmWC and about 140 mmWC, such as of between about 40 mmWC and about 120 mmWC, such as of between about 50 mmWC and about 100 mmWC, for example, of about 70 mmWC.

The tobacco rod may comprise any suitable type or types of tobacco material or tobacco substitute, in any suitable form. The tobacco can be a single type of tobacco or a blend of two or more types of tobacco. The tobacco may be in the form of cut filler (cut and conditioned tobacco). The tobacco rod is wrapped in a combustible wrapper, usually cigarette paper.

Examples

The present invention will now be described with reference to examples thereof, without limiting the scope of the invention to these particular examples.

The hardness of various types of smoking article was tested using a known DD60A Densimeter (manufactured and made commercially available by Heinr. Borgwaldt GmbH, Germany) device, which was fitted with a measuring head for cigarettes and with a cigarette receptacle, as described above. The samples were tested by following the method which is recommended for the known DD60A Densimeter device (manufactured and made commercially available by Heinr. Borgwaldt GmbH, Germany). That is, a sample of smoking articles were held in parallel alignment, and subjected to an overall load of 2 kg, for a period of 20 seconds, and the diameters of the smoking articles before and after compression were recorded. The depression was used to determine the hardness (%) of each smoking article. The apparatus for testing the hardness of the smoking articles filters is shown in Figures 2, 3 and 4.

Figure 2 is a perspective view of an apparatus 4, such as a DD60A Densimeter device, for determining the hardness of a filter of a smoking article. The apparatus includes two parallel load applying rods 24 positioned over a support plate 30. The support plate 30 includes two parallel, spaced apart walls 12, with each wall 12 having ten equally spaced recesses. The recesses are arranged to prevent the smoking articles 10 from contacting one another during testing.

As can be seen in Figure 2, ten identically designed smoking articles 10 are aligned parallel in a plane, and placed on underlying cylindrical rods 14. The smoking articles 10 extend between corresponding recesses in the walls 12 to hold the smoking articles in place. The underlying cylindrical rods 14 extend parallel to the walls 12. Each smoking article 10 contacts the underlying rods 14 at two points, making for twenty total points of contact between the smoking articles to be tested and the underlying rods 14.

To test the hardness of a smoking article's filter, the smoking articles should be positioned such that the portion of the filter to be tested is in contact with the underlying rods 14. If filter is too short and the portion of the filter to be tested either does not contact both rods or contacts the rods very close to the ends of the portion of the filter to be tested, then it would appreciated that this could be achieved by using twenty cigarettes in a back-to-back configuration, such as that shown in Figure 3.

As shown, the concept of the DD60A Test is that the underlying cylindrical rods contact the sample material to be tested at twenty contact points. If the filter is sufficiently long to extend across the underlying rods, then the twenty contact points can be provided with ten samples (as shown in Figure 2). If the filter is not sufficiently long, then the twenty contact points can be provided with twenty samples, as shown in Figure 3. As can be seen in Figure 3, portions of the tobacco rods have been removed from each smoking article 10, and the filter portion of each smoking article 10 rests on a respective cylindrical rod 14. In the present case, the hardness of the mouth end segment is being tested, and therefore it is this portion of the filter which rests on the rod 14, and the mouth end segment is approximately centered on the rods 14. If the filter comprises a single plug of filtration material, the filter is approximately centered on the rods 14, e.g. if a filter with a length of 24 mm is used the rod 14 is applied at a position located about 12 mm from the mouth end of the filter. If a filter comprising two plugs of filtration material is used the filter is located on the rod 14 in such a way that at least one of the plugs is centered on the rod 14, and in particular the rod 14 is not located at a position between the two plugs of filtration material. If necessary, the tips of the smoking articles extending away from the cylindrical rods 14 may be supported by an underlying supporting means to prevent pivoting of the smoking articles.

The apparatus is shown in Figure 3 in a first configuration, in which the two load applying cylindrical rods 24 are raised above and out of contact from the smoking articles 10. To test the hardness of the smoking articles, the load applying cylindrical rods 24 are lowered to a second configuration, to come into contact with the smoking articles 10, as shown in Figure 4. When in contact with the smoking articles 0, the load applying rods 24 impart an overall load of 2kg across the twenty contact points of the smoking articles 10 for a duration of 20 seconds. After 20 seconds have elapsed (and with the load still being applied to the smoking articles), the depression in the load applying cylindrical rods 24 across the smoking articles is determined, and then used to calculate the hardness.

Example 1

A filter cigarette with a monoacetate filter having 3.80 denier per filament and 30,000 total denier, comprising 8.0 wt% triacetin as plasticizer and having a cellulose acetate tow weight of 137,25 mg. The filtration material is wrapped with a non-porous filter wrapper, having a basis weight of 27 g/m² and a thickness of 43 micron.

The filter is attached in end-to-end relationship with a tobacco rod by tipping paper having a basis weight of 50 g/m².

The filter has a length of 27mm and a circumference (Laser) of 24.2 mm. The filter shows pressure drop of 70 mmWC.

The filter cigarette was tested using the above described method and apparatus, and a hardness value of 89 % was measured.

Claims

1. A smoking article comprising:

a tobacco rod;

a tipping material attaching the tobacco rod and the filter;

wherein the tipping material has a basis weight of at least 50 grams per square metre, and a thickness of between about 40 and about 55 microns.

2. A smoking article according to claim 1 , wherein the hardness of the smoking article measured at any point of the filter when attached to the tobacco rod by tipping material is less than about 90%.

3. A smoking article according to any preceding claim, wherein the hardness of the smoking article measured at any point of the filter when attached to the tobacco rod by tipping material is higher than about 85%.

4. A smoking article according to any preceding claim, wherein the hardness of the smoking article measured at any point of the filter when attached to the tobacco rod by tipping material is of between about 85% and about 95%.

5. A smoking article according to any preceding claim, wherein the tipping material has a basis weight of between about 50 and about 80 grams per square metre.

6. A smoking article according to any preceding claim, wherein the one or more filter wrappers have a basis weight of between about 20 and about 50 grams per square metre.

7. A smoking article according to any preceding claim, wherein the one or more filter wrappers are non-porous wrappers.

8. A smoking article according to any preceding claim, wherein the at least one plug of filtration material forming the filter has a plasticizer content of between about 5% and 10%.

9. A smoking article according to any preceding claim, wherein the tipping material has a thickness of between about 45 to 52 microns.

10. A smoking article according to any preceding claim, wherein the filter comprises a single plug of filtration material wrapped with a single filter wrapper.

11. A smoking article according claim 10, wherein the plug of filtration material extends along the whole length of the filter.

12. A smoking article according to any of claims 1 to 11 , wherein the filter comprises at least one first plug of non-wrap acetate filtration material.

13. A smoking article according to claim 12, wherein the filter comprises at least one second plug of non-wrap acetate filtration material, the first and second plugs of non-wrap acetate filtration material being overwrapped by a single filter wrapper holding both first and second plugs in a spaced relationship to define a cavity there between.

14. A smoking article according to claim 13, wherein the filter comprises at least one fluid-releasing member positioned in the cavity.

15. A smoking article according to any preceding claim, wherein the one or more filter wrappers comprises a waterproof non-porous wrapper.