WO2017023504A1 - Dispositif et procédé d'inspection de matériau polymère à renforcement ferreux - Google Patents

Dispositif et procédé d'inspection de matériau polymère à renforcement ferreux Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2017023504A1
WO2017023504A1 PCT/US2016/042186 US2016042186W WO2017023504A1 WO 2017023504 A1 WO2017023504 A1 WO 2017023504A1 US 2016042186 W US2016042186 W US 2016042186W WO 2017023504 A1 WO2017023504 A1 WO 2017023504A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
magnetic flux
inspection device
array
dimensional array
inspection
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2016/042186
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Frank Gramling
Bradley SCHOBER
David Judd
Original Assignee
Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin
Michelin Recherche Et Technique, S.A.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin, Michelin Recherche Et Technique, S.A. filed Critical Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin
Publication of WO2017023504A1 publication Critical patent/WO2017023504A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N27/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
    • G01N27/72Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating magnetic variables
    • G01N27/82Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating magnetic variables for investigating the presence of flaws
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/44Resins; rubber; leather
    • G01N33/445Rubber
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R33/00Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
    • G01R33/0094Sensor arrays
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R33/00Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
    • G01R33/02Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R33/00Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
    • G01R33/02Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux
    • G01R33/10Plotting field distribution ; Measuring field distribution
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M17/00Testing of vehicles
    • G01M17/007Wheeled or endless-tracked vehicles
    • G01M17/02Tyres

Definitions

  • the subject matter of the present disclosure relates generally to the detection of damage to elongated, ferrous reinforcement of polymeric materials and articles constructed from such materials.
  • Polymeric materials reinforced with ferrous material such as steel cables or cords are commonly used in the construction of tires, belts, and other articles of manufacture.
  • tissues, belts, or sheets constructed of rubber-based materials with ferrous reinforcements are commonly used in one or more layers that are joined together to manufacture a tire.
  • One known tire construction uses a body ply having reinforcement elements that extend from bead portion to bead portion through opposing sidewall portions, and a crown portion of the tire.
  • the carcass ply or reinforcing ply the body ply is typically anchored at the beads and maintains the overall shape of the tire as the tire is inflated and used.
  • elongated reinforcement elements are arranged in a parallel manner within the body ply are usually oriented substantially along the radial direction (a direction orthogonal to the axis of rotation) of the tire.
  • the reinforcement elements commonly include e.g., a ferrous metal.
  • Inspection of the elongated, ferrous reinforcements may be desirable during manufacture of an article or during its use. For example, in manufacturing a tire from reinforced sheets or layers, it may be useful to inspect the ferrous reinforcements during the manufacturing process.
  • these reinforcement elements (sometimes referred to as cords) may be damaged e.g., from impact with objects in the roadway, travel over curbs, and other damaging events. In some situations, the reinforcement elements may be completely broken as a result of such an event.
  • some inspection devices for ferrous-reinforced polymeric articles may require relative movement of the inspection device and the article being inspected.
  • some tire inspection devices may require the tire to be rotated past the inspection device in order to detect defects along the tire surface or hidden components such as the reinforcements.
  • this may not be desirable or practical in all applications.
  • only a portion of the tire may need inspection or a machine for rotating the tire relative to the sensor may be available or affordable.
  • inspection only at certain locations along the sheet may be all that is needed. With a tire, inspection may only be needed at certain locations of the tire such as e.g., locations where breaks in the reinforcements are suspected.
  • a device and method for inspection of an article constructed of a polymeric material having ferrous reinforcement would be useful. Such a device and method that can be used to detect damage to such ferrous reinforcement at select locations on the article would also be useful. Such a device and method that can be used without necessarily rotating or moving the article relative the inspection device would also be beneficial.
  • the present invention provides a device and method for inspection of an article constructed from a polymeric material having elongated, ferrous
  • the present invention provides an inspection device for inspecting a polymeric material that includes one or more elongated, ferrous reinforcements.
  • the inspection device includes an inspection surface and a two-dimensional array of magnetic flux sensors positioned at the inspection surface that are configured for placing along a surface of the polymeric material. At least one magnet is positioned adjacent to the inspection surface with the inspection surface and the array of magnetic flux sensors located between at least a portion of the magnet and the polymeric material when the device is positioned for inspection of the polymeric material.
  • the present invention provides a method of inspecting a polymeric material that includes one or more elongated, ferrous reinforcements.
  • the steps includes applying a magnetic field to the ferrous reinforcements so as to cause a change in magnetic flux polarity at a break in one or more of the ferrous reinforcements; positioning a two-dimensional array of magnetic flux sensors near the break; and detecting the change in magnetic flux polarity.
  • FIG. 1 provides a front view of an exemplary embodiment of an inspection device of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is partial, cross-sectional side view of the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 1 with partial cross-section taken along line 2-2 of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 3 is a perspective, back view of the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 4 is another side view of the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 1 taken along line 5-5 of FIG. 4.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic view of an exemplary two-dimensional array of magnetic flux sensors inspecting a broken reinforcement.
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic view of the magnetic fields created by the presence of a magnet near an example of a damaged reinforcement.
  • FIGS. 8 and 9 are schematic views of sensor arrays as may be used in exemplary embodiments of an inspection device of the present invention.
  • FIG. 10 is a schematic representation of an exemplary processing system device as may be used with the present invention.
  • FIGS. 11, 12, and 13 are data plots as more fully described herein.
  • FIGS. 1 through 5 are various views of an exemplary inspection device 100 of the present invention.
  • Device 100 can be used to detect damage such as e.g., breaks in elongated, ferrous reinforcements in a variety of polymeric materials.
  • device 100 could be used on a sheet or tissue of rubber material that has one or more ferrous reinforcements arranged or extending along a direction of the material.
  • Device 100 could be used to inspect a tire or other article of manufacture constructed from such polymeric materials.
  • certain layers of the tire such as the carcass may be constructed from rubber materials containing multiple elongated, ferrous reinforcements arranged in an adjacent and substantially parallel manner along a portion of the tire such as e.g., the sidewall.
  • a similar construction may be used in other ferrous-reinforced, polymeric articles.
  • Inspection device 100 can be used to detect breaks in the elongated, ferrous reinforcements.
  • accuracy can be improved as relative movement between inspection device 100 and the tire or article is not required: Device 100 must only be placed adjacent to a select point on the tire or other article where inspection is desired. By moving the inspection device 100 to different places on the tire or other article, multiple locations may be inspected. However, movement for purposes of inspection at a particular location along the article is not required.
  • device 100 includes an inspection surface 102 onto which a two-dimensional array 104 of magnetic flux sensors 106 has been positioned as shown.
  • magnetic flux sensors 106 are mounted on a circuit board 142 that is attached to a body 112 of device 100 using fasteners 144 as shown.
  • Other constructions may be used as well.
  • sensors 106 could be mounted directly onto inspection surface 102, or circuit board 142 could be adhered or integrally formed with body 112.
  • Body 112 is formed from a series of stacked plates 112a, 112b, 112c, and 112d attached to each other.
  • a recess 114 (FIGS. 2, 4, and 5) is formed in plates 112b and 112c.
  • a plurality of magnets 108 are included in recess 114. More particularly, a first plurality of magnets 108b are located in recess 114b of plate 112b, and a second plurality of magnets 108c are located in recess 114c of plate 112c.
  • the magnets 108 are positioned adjacent to inspection surface 102. The arrangement is such that, during use, array 104 of magnetic flux sensors 106 and inspection surface 102 will be between magnets 108 and an article to be inspected such as e.g., rubber sheet 132 with ferrous reinforcements 130 as shown in FIG. 3.
  • body 112 may be formed as e.g., a single piece, a chambered housing, or other constructions as well.
  • the present invention does not require a plurality of magnets 108 as shown. Instead, only one magnet (i.e. at least one magnet) or a magnetic field producing device may be used provided an amount of magnetic flux sufficient to identify damage can be applied to the ferrous reinforcement(s) of the article to be inspected. Additionally, the magnet or device may be straight or shaped as needed depending upon e.g., the shape of the articles to be inspected. For the embodiment shown in FIG.
  • a wedge 110 constructed from a ferrous material is used to bridge or communicate magnetic flux between a first portion FP and second portion SP of magnets 108.
  • a plurality of magnets 108 are used in order to provide for a non-linear shape for body 112. Again, however, other constructions may be used as well.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates the positioning of inspection device 100 onto an inspection surface 134 of a sheet 132 of polymeric material having multiple, ferrous reinforcements 130.
  • body 112 includes a recess 116 into which array 104 of sensors 106 is positioned.
  • Such configuration can be conducive to the use of inspection device 100 for inspecting articles that are not flat e.g., tires.
  • Recess 116 allows e.g., a closer positioning of array 104 and magnets 108 - particularly for non-planar surfaces such as e.g., a tire bead or tire shoulder.
  • magnets 108 extend along a magnet axis MA between a first end 126 having a north pole (N) polarity and a second end 128 having a south pole (S) polarity.
  • ends 126 and 128 extend past the outermost rows 122 and 124 of the sensor array 104 along a longitudinal direction L of body 112. More specifically, as shown in FIG. 2, the pair of outermost rows 122 and 124 of array 104 are separated from each other by a first distance D 1 .
  • First end 126 and second end 128 of array 104 are separated from each other by a second distance D 2 that is greater than the first distance D 1 .
  • magnet axis MA follows the centerline of magnets 108 and, for this exemplary embodiment, forms an acute angle a that faces array 104. Along with recess 116, such construction further facilitates the inspection of articles having non-planar surface or shapes. However, in other embodiments of the invention, magnet axis MA may be linear and recess 116 can be eliminated. The value used for angle a and the depth of recess 116 along transverse direction T can vary and will depend upon the shapes of the articles for which inspection is needed as will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art using the teachings disclosed herein.
  • magnet axis MA is also separated from the two- dimensional array 104 of sensors 106 by a distance D 3 . Due to angle a and recess 116, such distance D 3 varies depending upon the location along magnet axis MA at which such distance is determined. Regardless, depending upon the sensitivity of sensors 106, angle a and the distance D 3 between magnets 108 relative to the array 104 of sensors 106 may need adjustment to prevent saturation of sensor 106 by the magnetic flux provided by magnets 108.
  • sensors 106 have a sensitivity range between a certain minimum and maximum level of magnetic flux (measured in e.g., units of Gauss), placing magnets 108 too close or too distant from array 104 of sensors 106 can preclude proper operation and detection.
  • the amount of separation or distance D 3 needed will depend upon e.g., the relative strength of magnets 108 and the sensitivity range of sensors 106.
  • sensors 106 are constructed as Hall effect sensors.
  • Hall effect sensors can detect magnetic flux and provide a signal indicative of the amount of magnetic flux.
  • Hall effect sensors can provide a voltage output that increases as the strength of the magnetic field increases in a South polarity (or deflects from a North polarity) and decreases as the strength of the magnetic field increases in a North Polarity (or deflects from a South polarity).
  • FIG. 6 provides a schematic representation of a two-dimensional array 204 of magnetic flux sensors 206 as may be used with exemplary embodiments (such as device 100) of an inspection device of the present invention.
  • two-dimensional array 204 is an eight by eight array that includes 64 magnetic flux sensors 206 arranged along eight rows (Rl, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, and R8) and eight columns (CI, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, and C8).
  • the rows and columns are linear and are orthogonal to one another.
  • the present invention is not limited to an eight by eight array and other arrays with a different number of sensors and an unequal number of columns and rows may be used as well.
  • a three by three array 304 (FIG. 8), two by three array 404 (FIG. 9) and arrays of other configurations may be used as well.
  • arrays where the sensors are not linearly arranged along orthogonal rows and columns may also be used.
  • a magnet such as e.g., magnet 208 (or multiple magnets or another magnetic device) is used to apply a magnetic field F to one or more ferrous reinforcements 230.
  • Magnet 208 has a North Pole N and a South Pole S.
  • inspection device 100 with magnets 108 could be used to apply magnetic field F.
  • Such magnetic field F will be transmitted to one or more ferrous reinforcements such as ferrous reinforcement 230.
  • the magnet axis MA extends more or less parallel to the longitudinal axis LFR of the one or more ferrous reinforcements 230 to be inspected.
  • magnet 208 is positioned to apply a magnetic field F to reinforcement 230, if ferrous reinforcement 230 has a break 236, plumes 248 and 250 (FIG. 7) of opposing magnetic flux polarity will be generated about the ends 252 and 254 created by break 236. Along the length (or longitudinal axis L F R) of ferrous reinforcement 230 this creates a change in magnetic flux polarity (from North to South, or South to North) in the vicinity of break 236. The detection of the change in the polarity of the magnetic flux or magnetic flux intensity can be used to identify and locate break 236 even though ferrous reinforcement 230 is otherwise hidden within a polymeric material.
  • the two-dimensional array 204 of magnetic flux sensors 206 is also placed or positioned near break 236 to detect magnetic flux on both sides of the break with different polarities.
  • the location of break 236 may not be known beforehand.
  • the positioning of magnetic flux sensors such as found in array 104 or array 204 may be part of an inspection process where the inspection device (e.g., device 100) is repeatedly positioned at multiple locations along a ferrous- reinforced, polymeric material in order to inspect for breaks.
  • each sensor 206 provides a signal.
  • signal may be a voltage output that varies based on the magnetic flux intensity of the field in which it is placed.
  • magnetic flux sensors are used that provide a signal that increases in voltage as the magnetic flux intensity changes from a North polarity to a South polarity with the magnitude of the increase depending upon e.g., the intensity of the field of magnetic flux.
  • the signal decreases as the magnetic flux intensity changes from a South polarity to a North polarity.
  • FIG. 10 provides a schematic example of a detection system that could be employed with inspection device 100.
  • Array 104 of sensors 106 provides multiple signals Si to at least one processing device 138.
  • device 138 compares these signals to determine if a break has been detected as will be further described.
  • One or more outputs Oi can provided to e.g., a display device 140 or other indicator 140 (visual or audible) to indicate e.g., whether a break has been detected, where the break is located, or both.
  • FIGS. 11, 12, and 13 provide plots of data from a sensor array of an inspection device used to inspect a sheet of polymeric material having ferrous reinforcements.
  • the inspection device had a construction similar to device 100 and included an array of 64 sensors arranged in an eight by eight array 204 as depicted schematically in FIG. 6.
  • the magnetic flux sensors used for testing were Hall effect sensors, model number A1395SEHLT-T, manufactured by Allegro Microsystems, Inc. of 115 Northeast Cutoff, Worcester, MA 01606.
  • the inspection device was placed against a surface of a sheet of polymeric material in a manner similar to the positioning of inspection device 100 on surface 132 as shown in FIG. 3 and at a location where a known break in a ferrous reinforcement (such as e.g., break 236) was located.
  • Each sensor 206 provided a signal in the form of a voltage output indicative of the level of magnetic flux intensity detected as previously described.
  • FIG. 1 1 provides a 3 -dimensional plot of signal output received from an array 204 of sensors 206.
  • Rl through R8 represents the eight sensor rows while CI through C8 represents the eight sensor columns.
  • intersection represents the output of one sensor 206 - each of which is uniquely located along the intersection of one row and one column.
  • the orientation of the array 204 relative to the ferrous reinforcement 236 was such that columns C I through C8 were parallel to longitudinal axis LFR and rows Rl through R8 were orthogonal to longitudinal axis LFR as noted on FIG. 1 1.
  • the nomenclature of rows and columns is arbitrary and array 204 could also be positioned at an angle of ⁇ 90 degrees from what is shown.
  • a peak occurs at intersection C and a reverse peak occurs at intersection D, which represents a change in flux polarity that is in turn indicative of a break in ferrous reinforcement 236 that has been subjected to magnetic field F.
  • FIG. 12 is a two-dimensional plot of the same data from array 204 as shown in FIG. 1 1.
  • the output of each sensor 206 by columns in array 204 is shown.
  • the x-axis of the plot in FIG. 12 is labeled "Parallel Columns" because as shown in FIG. 6, the inspection device with array 204 was positioned knowing that columns CI through C8 were parallel to the longitudinal direction of axis L F R ferrous
  • each line representing the output of each sensor 206 in column R2.
  • a peak occurs at points C and D.
  • a change in direction of the slope of the plot occurs at points C and D.
  • the slope changes from a negative slope Ml to a positive slope M2
  • the slope changes from a positive slope M2 to a negative slope M3.
  • the pair of changes in the direction of the slope between sensor columns parallel to longitudinal direction L F R indicates that a change in the polarity of the magnetic flux field has been detected. In turn, this change indicates a break in the ferrous reinforcement located between row R4 and row R5 as shown in FIG. 6.
  • processor 138 receives signals Si from array 204 indicating at least two changes (e.g., either a) from increasing to decreasing to increasing or b) from decreasing to increasing to decreasing) in the magnitude of the signals between sensors 206 in different rows, then a break in reinforcement 230 is indicated.
  • FIG. 13 is a two-dimensional plot of the same data from array 204 as shown in FIG. 1 1.
  • the output of each sensor 206 by rows in array 204 is shown.
  • the x-axis of the plot in FIG. 13 is labeled "Orthogonal Rows" because as shown in FIG. 6, the inspection device with array 204 was positioned knowing that rows Rl through R8 were orthogonal to the longitudinal direction of axis LFR ferrous reinforcement 230
  • each line representing the output of each sensor 206 in row R3.
  • a peak occurs point C and a peak occurs at point D - albeit in an opposing manner.
  • a change in direction of the slope of the plots occurs at both points C and D.
  • the slope changes from a positive slope SI to a negative slope S2 while at point D the slope changes from a negative slope S3 to a positive slope S4.
  • a break in ferrous reinforcement 230 is located between column 4 and column 6 as shown in FIG. 6.
  • processor 138 receives signals Si from array 204 indicating at least 2 sets of row data have waveforms characterized by opposing peaks, then damage in reinforcement 230 is indicated.
  • the line formed by the R5 data set has local peak (maximum) C at the intersection of opposing slopes S I and S2.
  • Data set R4 has local peak (minimum) D at the intersection of slopes S3 and S4.

Abstract

L'invention concerne un dispositif et un procédé d'inspection d'un article constitué d'un matériau polymère ayant des renforts ferreux allongés, tels que, par exemple, une feuille, une bande, un pneu, ou d'autres articles. Un réseau de capteurs de flux magnétique fournissent de multiples signaux qui peuvent être comparés pour déterminer si un ou plusieurs renforts sont endommagés. Le réseau peut être positionné à des emplacements sélectionnés le long de l'article et peut être utilisé pour détecter des dommages sans qu'il soit nécessaire de déplacer l'article et le dispositif d'inspection l'un par rapport à l'autre de telle sorte que des artefacts indésirables peuvent être évités ou réduits.
PCT/US2016/042186 2015-07-31 2016-07-14 Dispositif et procédé d'inspection de matériau polymère à renforcement ferreux WO2017023504A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
USPCT/US2015/043047 2015-07-31
PCT/US2015/043047 WO2017023235A1 (fr) 2015-07-31 2015-07-31 Dispositif et procédé pour l'inspection de matériau polymère à renfort ferreux

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2017023504A1 true WO2017023504A1 (fr) 2017-02-09

Family

ID=57943513

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2015/043047 WO2017023235A1 (fr) 2015-07-31 2015-07-31 Dispositif et procédé pour l'inspection de matériau polymère à renfort ferreux
PCT/US2016/042186 WO2017023504A1 (fr) 2015-07-31 2016-07-14 Dispositif et procédé d'inspection de matériau polymère à renforcement ferreux

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2015/043047 WO2017023235A1 (fr) 2015-07-31 2015-07-31 Dispositif et procédé pour l'inspection de matériau polymère à renfort ferreux

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (2) WO2017023235A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107917952A (zh) * 2017-11-15 2018-04-17 四川钜莘信合科技有限公司 油气管道检测设备及方法
WO2023055822A1 (fr) * 2021-09-30 2023-04-06 United States Pipe And Foundry Company, Llc Procédé et appareil pour identification de discontinuité dans une paroi d'objet ferreux

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11175262B2 (en) 2017-06-30 2021-11-16 Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin Method for inspection of polymeric material with ferrous reinforcement to determine presence of reinforcement joint or damage

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3750129A (en) * 1970-09-07 1973-07-31 Tadashi Wakabayoshi Kowa Conveyor belt apparatus
US5336998A (en) * 1992-06-22 1994-08-09 United States Pipe And Foundry Company Sensor for detecting faults in a magnetized ferrous object using hall effect elements
US20090027048A1 (en) * 2005-03-17 2009-01-29 Hideki Sato Three-Axis Magnetic Sensor and Method for Manufacturing the Same
US20140084906A1 (en) * 2012-09-26 2014-03-27 Nxp B.V. Magnetic field sensor system with a biasing magnet producing a spatially symmetric magnetic field within a plane being defined by magnetoresistive sensor elements

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ZA871964B (fr) * 1986-03-25 1987-09-07
US5570017A (en) * 1992-09-30 1996-10-29 Canada Conveyor Belt Co., Inc. Apparatus and method of damage detection for magnetically permeable members using an alternating magnetic field and hall effect sensors
DE10215018A1 (de) * 2002-04-05 2003-10-23 Moeller Gmbh Gleichstrom-Elektromagnet
EP2814708B1 (fr) * 2012-02-14 2020-01-15 Continental Teves AG & Co. OHG Maître-cylindre de frein comprenant un dispositif permettant une surveillance sans contact de la position et du déplacement d'un piston linéairement mobile

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3750129A (en) * 1970-09-07 1973-07-31 Tadashi Wakabayoshi Kowa Conveyor belt apparatus
US5336998A (en) * 1992-06-22 1994-08-09 United States Pipe And Foundry Company Sensor for detecting faults in a magnetized ferrous object using hall effect elements
US20090027048A1 (en) * 2005-03-17 2009-01-29 Hideki Sato Three-Axis Magnetic Sensor and Method for Manufacturing the Same
US20140084906A1 (en) * 2012-09-26 2014-03-27 Nxp B.V. Magnetic field sensor system with a biasing magnet producing a spatially symmetric magnetic field within a plane being defined by magnetoresistive sensor elements

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107917952A (zh) * 2017-11-15 2018-04-17 四川钜莘信合科技有限公司 油气管道检测设备及方法
WO2023055822A1 (fr) * 2021-09-30 2023-04-06 United States Pipe And Foundry Company, Llc Procédé et appareil pour identification de discontinuité dans une paroi d'objet ferreux

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2017023235A1 (fr) 2017-02-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10113855B2 (en) System for determining the thickness of a layer of rubber for a tire
CN105980823B (zh) 具有磁体的传感器装置和用于轮胎检查的传感器阵列
WO2017023504A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé d'inspection de matériau polymère à renforcement ferreux
WO2018181050A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de détection de marqueurs
US11181591B2 (en) Multiple row sensing device for a tire
EP3117199B1 (fr) Dispositif de détection pour l'inspection de pneus
EP1516794B1 (fr) Procede de mesure des forces exercees sur un pneumatique et dispositif de mesure des forces exercees sur un pneumatique
US10315471B2 (en) Sensing device with proximity detection for tire inspection
CN107110742B (zh) 对轮胎使用多行传感装置的方法
EP1512557A1 (fr) Pneu magnetique
JP4243249B2 (ja) タイヤ、タイヤの形成方法、タイヤ外部磁界低減装置およびタイヤを装着した車両
WO2021201095A1 (fr) Dispositif de mesure d'usure pour pneu et broche intégrée pour dispositif de mesure d'usure
CN110832316B (zh) 对具有铁质增强件的聚合物材料检查以确定增强件接头或损坏是否存在的方法
JP7387023B2 (ja) タイヤ摩耗測定装置、空気入りタイヤおよびタイヤ摩耗測定方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 16833490

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 16833490

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1