WO2017000828A1

WO2017000828A1 - Rule-based data object verification method, apparatus, system and electronic device

Info

Publication number: WO2017000828A1
Application number: PCT/CN2016/086867
Authority: WO
Inventors: 欧舟
Original assignee: 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司; 欧舟
Priority date: 2015-07-02
Filing date: 2016-06-23
Publication date: 2017-01-05
Also published as: CN106326776A

Abstract

A rule-based data object verification method, apparatus, system and electronic device. The rule-based data object verification method comprises: acquiring a data object to be verified and a validation rule corresponding thereto (S101); ranking the execution sequence of each sub-validation-rule included in the validation rule according to a preset ranking standard, so as to obtain the execution sequence of the sub-validation-rule (S103); according to the execution sequence of the sub-validation-rule, sequentially judging whether the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-validation-rules, until a preset verification stopping condition corresponding to the ranking standard is reached or all the sub-validation-rules are executed (S105); and according to a logical relationship between the judgement result and the sub-validation-rules, conducting calculation to acquire a verification result of the data object to be verified (S107). A sub-validation-rule capable of quickly determining a verification result is preferentially executed, so as to prevent executing all the sub-validation-rules, thereby achieving the effect of improving the data validation speed.

Description

Rule-based data object verification method, device, system and electronic device

Technical field

The present application relates to the field of data verification technologies, and in particular, to a rule-based data object verification method and apparatus. The application also relates to a rule-based data object verification system and an electronic device.

Background technique

When applying the preset verification rule to verify the data object to be verified, the existing method includes the following steps: 1) applying each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule one by one to verify the data object to be verified, and obtaining the verification result corresponding to each sub-verification rule; 2) Calculate and obtain the verification result corresponding to the entire verification rule according to the verification result corresponding to each sub-verification rule and the logical relationship between each sub-validation rule.

The inventors have found through analysis that since the above methods need to execute each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule one by one, the calculation amount in the whole verification process is large, which brings about a problem of slow verification speed, high system load, and high computational resource consumption.

In summary, when applying the preset verification rule to verify the verification data object, the prior art has a problem that the verification data object needs to execute all the sub-validation rules included in the verification rule.

Summary of the invention

The present application provides a rule-based data object verification method and apparatus, in order to solve the application of the preset verification rule to verify the data object to be verified, the existing technology to be verified data object needs to execute all the children included in the verification rule Verify the problem with the rule. The application additionally provides a rule based data object verification system, and an electronic device.

The application provides a rule-based data object verification method, including:

Obtaining the data object to be verified and its corresponding verification rule;

Sorting the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule by a preset sorting criterion to obtain an execution order of the sub-verification rule; the sorting criterion refers to the sub-query enabling the sub-verification result to be quickly determined The sorting criteria that the validation rules are prioritized;

Determining, according to the execution order of the sub-verification rules, whether the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule until a preset stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is reached or all sub-verification rules are executed;

Calculating and obtaining the pending test according to the logical relationship between the judgment result and the sub-verification rule The verification result of the data object.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

If the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is an AND relationship, the sub-verification rule having a low verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule is preferentially executed; the atomic verification rule refers to a verification rule including only one comparison relationship;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the performing the order of execution of the sub-verification rules included in the verification rule by using a preset sorting criterion, and obtaining an execution sequence of the sub-verification rules, including:

Parsing the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the sub-validation rules;

Starting from the first level sub-verification rule, it is determined step by step to determine whether the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules of the predetermined level is a relationship;

If yes, the execution order of the sub-verification rules is sorted in an ascending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is an AND relationship, the sub-verification rules with low verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rules are preferentially executed;

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.

Parsing the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules;

Determining whether the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship;

If yes, the execution order of the first-level sub-verification rules is sorted in an ascending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is an AND relationship, the sub-verification rule having a low verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule and a short response time of the dependent data object attribute value; the atomic verification A rule is a verification rule that includes only one comparison relationship;

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.

If yes, sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the first comprehensive priority score corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules;

The first comprehensive priority score is generated by the following calculation formula:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Where W is the first integrated priority score, X is a normalized value of the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule, and Y is a normalized response time of the data object attribute value dependent on the sub-verification rule. The value, N1 is the weight of the verification pass rate, and N2 is the weight of the response time.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is an AND relationship, the sub-verification that the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule is low and the response time of the dependent data object attribute value is short is preferentially performed. rule;

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.

If yes, sorting the execution order of the first level sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the first integrated priority score corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules;

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Wherein, W is the first comprehensive priority score, and X is a verification pass corresponding to the sub-verification rule. The normalized value of the overshoot, Y is the normalized value of the response time of the data object attribute value that the sub-verification rule depends on, N1 is the weight of the verification pass rate, and N2 is the weight of the response time.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

And if the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is or a relationship, the sub-verification rule having a high verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule is preferentially executed; and the atomic verification rule refers to a verification rule including only one comparison relationship;

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Starting from the first level sub-verification rule, determining whether the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules of the predetermined level is determined to be a relationship or a relationship;

If yes, the execution order of the sub-verification rules is sorted in a descending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship, the sub-verification rules with high verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rules are preferentially executed;

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Determining whether the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is or is a relationship;

If yes, the execution order of the first level sub-verification rules is sorted in a descending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is or is related, the sub-verification rule having a high verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule and a short response time of the dependent data object attribute value is performed. The atomic verification rule refers to a verification rule that includes only one comparison relationship;

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

If yes, sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules;

The second comprehensive priority score is generated by the following calculation formula:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Where W is the second comprehensive priority score, X is a normalized value of the verification failure rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule, and Y is a normalization of the response time of the data object attribute value dependent on the sub-verification rule. The value, N1 is the weight of the verification pass rate, and N2 is the weight of the response time.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is or is related, the sub-verification that the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule is high and the response time of the dependent data object attribute value is short is preferentially executed. rule;

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

If yes, sorting the execution order of the first level sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules;

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

If the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is a relationship, the sub-verification rules with low verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule are preferentially executed; if the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is or The sub-verification rule having a high verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule is preferentially executed; the atomic verification rule is a verification rule including only one comparison relationship;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is determined according to a logical relationship between the sub-verification rules;

Specifically include:

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is an AND relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule;

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is or a relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Parsing the verification rule, constructing a rule tree; the root node and the intermediate node of the rule tree are logical relationships, the leaf node is the sub-verification rule, and the child node of the root node or the intermediate node is the root node or The sub-verification rule or the next-level intermediate node related to the logical relationship of the intermediate node;

Starting from the root node of the rule tree, sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules step by step according to the logical relationship between the sorting criterion and the root node or the intermediate node, and obtaining the execution order of the sub-verification rules .

Optionally, starting from the root node of the rule tree, according to the logical relationship between the sorting criterion and the root node or the intermediate node, sequentially sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules to obtain The order in which sub-verification rules are executed, including:

Using the root node as a current node;

Determining whether the logical relationship of the current node is a relationship; if yes, sorting the execution order of each atomic verification rule under the current node in an ascending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule;

If the logical relationship of the current node is a relationship, the execution order of each atomic verification rule under the current node is sorted in a descending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule;

Determining whether the child node of the current node includes an intermediate node; if yes, using the child node of the current node as a child node of the intermediate node as the current node, and returning to determine whether the logical relationship of the current node is For the step of the relationship, the order of execution of the atomic verification rules under each intermediate node of the rule tree is sorted.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

Priorityly verifying the sub-verification rule that the response time of the data object attribute value that the atomic verification rule depends on is short; the atomic verification rule refers to a verification rule that includes only one comparison relationship;

Specifically include:

Starting from the first level sub-verification rule, the sub-verification rules for each level of the predetermined number of stages are stepped down, in accordance with the ascending order of the response time of the data object attribute values that the atomic verification rule depends on, and the sub-verification rules are The execution order is sorted to obtain the execution order of the sub-verification rules.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

Preferably, the sub-verification rule having a short response time of the data object attribute value that the first-level sub-verification rule depends on is verified;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is determined according to a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules;

Specifically include:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is an AND relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule;

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is or a relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

The execution order of the first level sub-verification rules is sorted in an ascending manner of the response time of the data object attribute values that the first-level sub-verification rules depend on, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.

Optionally, the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule is calculated by using the following steps:

Obtaining a data object to which the sub-verification rule can be applied;

Traversing each of the data objects to which the sub-verification rule is applicable, and acquiring, from the currently verified data object, a data object attribute value that the sub-verification rule depends on;

Determining whether the data object attribute value causes the sub-verification rule to be established;

If the result of the above determination is yes, the number of verification passes corresponding to the sub-verification rule is cumulatively increased by one;

After traversing all the data objects to which the sub-verification rule can be applied, the ratio of the cumulative number of verification passes to the number of data objects to which the sub-verification rule can be applied is used as the verification corresponding to the sub-verification rule. Passing rate.

Optionally, the data object to which the sub-verification rule is applicable includes all data objects to which the sub-verification rule can be applied, or a preset sampling sampled from all data objects to which the sub-verification rule can be applied. Part of the data object of the scale.

Obtaining a sampling data verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule of a preset number of times;

Calculating a weighted average value of the verification pass rate of each sampling data according to a preset weight of each sampling data for each sub-sample data corresponding to the sub-validation rule;

The weighted average obtained by the calculation is used as the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sampling data verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule is generated by the following steps:

Extracting a partial data object of a preset sampling ratio from all data objects to which the sub-verification rule can be applied;

Traversing a partial data object of each of the preset sampling ratios, and acquiring, from the currently verified data object, a data object attribute value that the sub-verification rule depends on;

After traversing all the partial data objects of the preset sampling ratio, the ratio of the cumulative number of verification passes to the number of partial data objects of the preset sampling ratio is used as the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.

Obtaining a real-time verification pass rate corresponding to the preset number of times of the sub-verification rule within a preset time interval;

Calculating a weighted average of the respective real-time verification pass rates according to weights respectively preset for each real-time verification pass rate;

Optionally, the corresponding real-time verification pass rate of the sub-verification rule in the preset time interval is generated by the following steps:

Acquiring the number of real-time verification passes and the number of real-time verification runs corresponding to the pre-generated sub-verification rules in the preset time interval range;

The ratio of the real-time verification pass times to the real-time verification run times is used as a real-time verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rules in the preset time interval range.

Optionally, the real-time verification pass times and the real-time verification run times are generated by the following steps:

When a data object to which the sub-verification rule can be applied is added within the preset time interval, it is determined whether the newly added data object satisfies the sub-verification rule;

If the result of the foregoing determination is yes, the real-time verification pass times of the sub-verification rules in the preset time interval range are cumulatively increased by one;

The number of real-time verification runs of the sub-verification rule within the preset time interval is cumulatively increased by one.

Optionally, when the preset condition is met, the verification pass rate of each sub-verification rule is calculated.

Optionally, the preset condition is as follows:

The time interval between the current time and the last verification of the verification pass rate of each sub-verification rule is greater than the preset time interval.

Optionally, the calculating, according to the logical relationship between the foregoing judgment result and the sub-verification rule, the verification result of acquiring the data object to be verified, adopting one of the following rules:

If the result of the determination is no and the logical relationship is a relationship, the verification result is that the data object to be verified does not meet the verification rule;

If the result of the determination is yes and the logical relationship is or relationship, the verification result is that the data object to be verified conforms to the verification rule.

Correspondingly, the present application also provides a rule-based data object verification apparatus, including:

An obtaining unit, configured to obtain a data object to be verified and a corresponding verification rule thereof;

a sorting unit, configured to sort an execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule by a preset sorting criterion, to obtain an execution order of the sub-verification rule; and the sorting standard refers to enabling quick verification a sorting criterion in which the sub-verification rules of the result are preferentially executed;

a verification unit, configured to sequentially determine, according to an execution order of the sub-verification rules, whether the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule until a preset stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is reached or is performed All sub-validation rules;

And a calculating unit, configured to calculate, according to the logical relationship between the foregoing judgment result and the sub-verification rule, a verification result of acquiring the data object to be verified.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit includes:

a parsing subunit, configured to parse the verification rule, and obtain a logical relationship between the sub-verification rules;

The determining subunit is configured to start from the first level sub-verification rule, and determine, step by step, whether the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules of the predetermined level is a relationship;

Judging is a subunit, if used, the rise of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atom verification rule In the order mode, the execution order of the sub-verification rules is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit includes:

a parsing subunit, configured to parse the verification rule, and acquire a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules;

a determining subunit, configured to determine whether a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship;

The determining is a subunit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the first level sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and obtaining the execution order of the sub-verification rules .

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit includes:

The determining is a subunit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the first comprehensive priority score corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules;

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit includes:

The determining is a sub-unit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the first-level sub-verification rule in an ascending manner of the first comprehensive priority score corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and obtaining a sub-verification rule Order of execution;

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit includes:

The determining subunit is configured to start from the first level sub-verification rule, and determine, step by step, whether the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules of the predetermined level is a or relationship;

The determining is a subunit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules in a descending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit includes:

a determining subunit, configured to determine whether a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship or a relationship;

The determining is a subunit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the first level sub-verification rules in a descending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and obtaining the execution order of the sub-verification rules .

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is or is related, the sub-verification rule having a high verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule and a short response time of the dependent data object attribute value; the atomic verification A rule is a verification rule that includes only one comparison relationship;

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit includes:

The determining is a subunit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules;

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit includes:

The determining is a sub-unit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the first-level sub-verification rule in an ascending manner of the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and obtaining the sub-verification rule Order of execution;

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

Specifically include:

Optionally, the sorting unit includes:

a parsing subunit, configured to parse the verification rule, construct a rule tree; a root node and an intermediate node of the rule tree are logical relationships, a leaf node is the sub-verification rule, and a child node of the root node or an intermediate node is The sub-verification rule or the next-level intermediate node related to the logical relationship of the root node or the intermediate node;

a sorting subunit, configured to start from a root node of the rule tree, and sequentially sort the execution order of the sub-verification rules step by step according to the logical relationship between the sorting criterion and the root node or the intermediate node The order in which sub-verification rules are executed.

Optionally, the ordering subunit includes:

Setting a subunit for using the root node as a current node;

a first determining subunit, configured to determine whether a logical relationship of the current node is a relationship;

The determining is a subunit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of each atomic verification rule under the current node in an ascending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule;

Determining a non-subunit, wherein, if the logical relationship of the current node is a relationship, the execution order of each atomic verification rule under the current node is performed in a descending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule Sort

a second determining subunit, configured to determine whether the child node of the current node includes an intermediate node; If yes, the child node of the current node is the child node of the intermediate node as the current node, and returns a step of determining whether the logical relationship of the current node is a relationship, and each step of the rule tree The execution order of the atomic verification rules under the intermediate nodes is sorted.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

Specifically include:

Optionally, the sorting unit includes:

a sorting sub-unit for starting from the first-level sub-verification rule, stepping down the sub-verification rules of the predetermined level of the sub-levels, in accordance with the ascending order of the response time of the data object attribute values of the atomic verification rule, The execution order of the sub-verification rules is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

Specifically include:

Optionally, the sorting unit includes:

a sorting sub-unit, configured to sort the execution order of the first-level sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the response time of the data object attribute values that the first-level sub-verification rule depends on, and obtain the execution order of the sub-verification rules .

Optionally, the device further includes:

The verification pass rate unit is configured to calculate a verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the calculating the verification pass rate unit includes:

Obtaining a subunit, configured to acquire a data object to which the sub-verification rule can be applied;

Traversing the sub-units, traversing each of the data objects to which the sub-verification rules are applicable, and acquiring data object attribute values that the sub-verification rules depend on from the currently verified data objects;

a determining subunit, configured to determine whether the data object attribute value causes the sub-verification rule to be established;

The determining is a subunit, and if the result of the foregoing determination is yes, the verification pass number corresponding to the sub-verification rule is cumulatively increased by one;

a calculating subunit, configured to, when traversing all the data objects to which the sub-verification rule is applicable, a ratio of the cumulative number of verification passes to the number of data objects to which the sub-verification rule is applicable The verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the calculating the verification pass rate unit includes:

Obtaining a subunit, configured to obtain a sampling data verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule of a preset number of times;

a calculating subunit, configured to calculate a weighted average value of the pass rate of each of the sampled data according to a preset weight of each pass sampling data corresponding to the sub-verification rule;

The assignment sub-unit is configured to use the weighted average obtained by the calculation as the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the calculating the verification pass rate unit further includes:

Generating a subunit, configured to generate a sampling data verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule;

The generating subunit includes:

a sampling subunit for sampling out all data objects to which the sub-verification rule can be applied a partial data object of a preset sampling ratio;

Traversing the subunits, traversing the partial data objects of each of the preset sampling ratios, and acquiring the data object attribute values that the sub-verification rules depend on from the currently verified data objects;

a calculating subunit, configured to, when traversing all the partial data objects of the preset sampling ratio, a ratio of the cumulative number of verification passes to the number of partial data objects of the preset sampling ratio as the sub-verification rule Verification pass rate.

Optionally, the calculating the verification pass rate unit includes:

Obtaining a sub-unit, configured to obtain a real-time verification pass rate corresponding to the preset number of times of the sub-verification rule within a preset time interval;

a calculating subunit, configured to calculate a weighted average value of each real-time verification pass rate according to weights respectively preset for each real-time verification pass rate;

Optionally, the calculating the verification pass rate unit further includes:

Generating a subunit, configured to generate a real-time verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule within a preset time interval;

The generating subunit includes:

Obtaining a sub-unit, configured to obtain a real-time verification pass number and a real-time verification run count corresponding to the pre-generated sub-verification rule within the preset time interval;

a calculation subunit, configured to use a ratio of the number of real-time verification passes to the number of real-time verification runs as a real-time verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule within the preset time interval.

Optionally, the generating subunit further includes:

a first generation subunit, configured to generate the real-time verification pass times and the real-time verification run times;

The first generating subunit includes:

a determining subunit, configured to determine whether the newly added data object satisfies the sub-verification rule when a data object to which the sub-verification rule is applicable is added within the preset time interval;

The determining is a sub-unit, configured to: if the result of the foregoing determination is yes, accumulating the number of real-time verification passes of the sub-verification rule within the preset time interval range by one;

And a counting subunit, configured to add one of the real-time verification running times of the sub-verification rule within the preset time interval.

Correspondingly, the present application further provides a rule-based data object verification system, comprising: the above rule-based data object verification apparatus.

Correspondingly, the present application further provides an electronic device, including:

monitor;

Processor;

a memory for storing a rule-based data object verification device, when the rule-based data object verification device is executed by the processor, comprising the steps of: acquiring a data object to be verified and a corresponding verification rule thereof; The sorting criterion sorts the execution order of the respective sub-verification rules included in the verification rule to obtain an execution order of the sub-verification rules; the sorting criterion refers to the sub-verification rule that enables the quick determination of the verification result to be prioritized Execution of the sorting criteria; determining, according to the execution order of the sub-verification rules, whether the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule until the preset stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is reached or the execution is completed All the sub-verification rules are calculated according to the logical relationship between the judgment result and the sub-validation rule, and the verification result of the data object to be verified is obtained.

Optionally, the rule-based data object verification apparatus includes:

a sorting unit, configured to sort an execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule by a preset sorting criterion, to obtain an execution order of the sub-verification rule; and the sorting standard refers to enabling the priority execution to be fast Determining an ordering criterion of the sub-verification rules of the verification result;

Compared with the prior art, the present application has the following advantages:

The rule-based data object verification method, device, system, and electronic device provided by the present application sort the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule corresponding to the verification data object by using a preset sorting criterion, and obtain sub-verification. The execution order of the rules; and according to the execution order of the sub-verification rules, sequentially determining whether the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule until the preset stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting standard is reached or all sub-verification rules are executed; The logical relationship between the judgment result and the sub-validation rule is obtained, and the verification result of the data object to be verified is obtained. Since the method provided by the present application preferentially executes the sub-verification rule capable of quickly determining the verification result, the execution quantity and execution time of the sub-validation rule are greatly reduced in probability, and all sub-verification rules are avoided, thereby improving data verification speed and reducing System load and save the effect of computing resources.

DRAWINGS

1 is a flow chart of an embodiment of a rule-based data object verification method of the present application;

2 is a specific flowchart of step S103 in Embodiment A of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application;

3 is a specific flowchart of step S103 in Embodiment B of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application;

4 is a specific flowchart of step S103 in Embodiment C of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application;

5 is a specific flowchart of step S103 in Embodiment D of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application;

6 is a specific flowchart of a verification pass rate corresponding to a calculation sub-verification rule in Embodiment A of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application;

7 is a specific flowchart of a verification pass rate corresponding to a calculation sub-verification rule in Embodiment B of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application;

8 is a specific flowchart of the sampling data verification pass rate corresponding to the calculation sub-verification rule of the embodiment B of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application;

9 is a specific flowchart of a verification pass rate corresponding to a calculation sub-verification rule in Embodiment C of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application;

FIG. 10 is a specific flowchart of a real-time verification pass rate corresponding to a calculated sub-verification rule in a preset time interval according to Embodiment C of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application; FIG.

11 is a specific flowchart of the real-time verification pass times and the real-time verification run times of the calculation sub-verification rule of the embodiment of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application in a preset time interval;

12 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a rule-based data object verification apparatus of the present application;

13 is a detailed schematic diagram of an embodiment of a rule-based data object verification apparatus of the present application;

14 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of an electronic device of the present application.

detailed description

Numerous specific details are set forth in the description below in order to provide a thorough understanding of the application. However, the present application can be implemented in many other ways than those described herein, and those skilled in the art can make similar promotion without departing from the scope of the present application, and thus the present application is not limited by the specific embodiments disclosed below.

In the present application, a rule-based data object verification method, apparatus and system, and an electronic device are provided. Detailed description will be made one by one in the following embodiments.

The core idea of the rule-based data object verification method provided by the present application is: when applying the preset verification rule to verify the data object to be verified, the sub-verification rule included in the verification rule capable of quickly determining the verification result is preferentially executed. Reduce the number of executions and execution time of sub-verification rules, and avoid executing all sub-verification rules, thereby improving data verification speed, reducing system load, and saving computing resources.

Please refer to FIG. 1 , which is a flowchart of an embodiment of a rule-based data object verification method according to the present application. The method includes the following steps:

Step S101: Acquire a data object to be verified and its corresponding verification rule.

The data object to be verified described in the embodiment of the present application represents a thing having a series of different properties or attributes, rather than a thing having only a single value. A data object can be an external entity (eg, anything that generates or uses information), a thing (eg, a report), an action (eg, a phone call), an event (eg, an alarm), a role (eg, a teacher, a student), Unit (for example, accounting), location (for example, warehouse) or structure (for example, file), etc. In summary, an entity that can be defined by a set of attributes can be considered a data object, for example, defining a data object to be verified including attribute 1 to attribute 20.

The verification rule corresponding to the data object to be verified described in the embodiment of the present application refers to the verification rule to be applied when verifying the data object to be verified. The verification rule described in the embodiment of the present application includes one or more sub-verification rules, and the verification rules are formed by each sub-validation rule and a logical relationship between them. The sub-verification rules described in the embodiments of the present application may be an atomic verification rule or a composite verification rule. Atomic verification A rule is a validation rule that includes only one comparison relationship, and a composite verification rule is a validation rule that includes at least two atomic verification rules. The logical relationship between sub-validation rules can be a logical relationship with AND, OR, and NOT.

In summary, the verification rule corresponding to the data object to be verified is essentially composed of multiple atomic verification rules through different logical relationships. When multiple logical operators are used in a validation rule, the order of calculation is: non, AND, or , and the arithmetic operators and bit operators take precedence over logical operators. In addition, the parentheses have the effect of changing the order of operations, and those with parentheses are preferred for calculation. For example, the verification rule is: sub-verification rule 1or sub-verification rule 2 and sub-verification rule 3, the verification order of the verification rule is first calculated and the relationship "sub-validation rule 2 and sub-verification rule 3", and then count or relationship; Parentheses, the verification rules are changed to: (sub-verification rule 1or sub-verification rule 2) and sub-verification rule 3, the verification order of this verification rule is to first calculate the relationship or relationship in the parentheses, and then calculate the relationship between the parentheses; The order of operations before and after the parentheses changed.

According to the priority of the logical operation, the verification rule described in the embodiment of the present application is expanded step by step until it is expanded to each atom verification rule, and then a verification rule can be converted into a tree, and the root node of the tree is the first level. The logical relationship between the sub-validation rules, the internal nodes of the tree correspond to the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules of the various levels, and the leaf nodes of the tree are atomic verification rules. The sub-verification rules located at different levels are referred to as the first-level sub-verification rules, the second-level sub-verification rules, and the N-th sub-verification rules according to the number of layers of the sub-validation rules relative to the verification rules.

For example, for the data object to be verified including the attribute 1 to the attribute 20 defined in the above example, the corresponding verification rule is set to: (attribute 2>=value 1) and (attribute 5=value 2or attribute 5=value 3or not attribute 5=value 4)and...and (attribute 20>value 20or attribute 3=value 3) or (attribute 9>value 9) and (attribute 3<value 11), where "attribute 2>=value 1", "attribute 5 = value 2 "..." attribute 3 < value 11" and the like is an atomic verification rule, and (attribute 5 = value 2or attribute 5 = value 3or not attribute 5 = value 4) is a compound verification rule. According to the logical relationship of each sub-verification rule, the above-mentioned verification rule can be obtained by including two first-level sub-verification rules, which are: first-level sub-verification rule 1 "(attribute 2>=value 1) and (attribute 5=value 2or) Attribute 5 = value 3or not attribute 5 = value 4) and...and (attribute 20 > value 20or attribute 3 = value 3)", and first level sub-verification rule 2 "(attribute 9>value 9) and (attribute 3< The value 11)", the logical relationship between the above two first-level sub-verification rules is OR. Further, the first level sub-verification rule 1 further includes a plurality of second-level sub-verification rules, respectively: (attribute 2>=value 1), (attribute 5=value 2or attribute 5=value 3or not attribute 5=value 4 ) (attribute 20 > value 20or attribute 3 = value 3); the first level sub-verification rule 2 also includes two second-level sub-verification rules, namely: (attribute 9 > value 9) and (attribute 3 < value 11) ).

To implement the method provided by the present application, first, the data object to be verified and its corresponding verification rule are obtained. The data object to be verified may be derived from the retrieval result of the database, the structured data transmitted by the World Wide Web (for example, XML document, JSON data, etc.), and the electronic form. The verification rule may be directly written into the verification program or may be stored in the file. In order to actually verify the rules by reading the file. The different data sources of the data objects to be verified and the different storage methods of the verification rules are only changes of the specific implementation manner, and do not deviate from the core of the present application, and therefore are all within the protection scope of the present application.

Step S103: Sort the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule by using a preset sorting criterion, and obtain an execution order of the sub-verification rules.

The sorting standard described in the embodiment of the present application refers to a sorting criterion that enables the sub-verification rule that can quickly determine the verification result to be preferentially executed. To build the above sorting criteria, you first need to analyze the validation rules to find the various factors that affect the speed of data validation.

1) One of the various factors affecting the speed of data verification is: the verification pass rate of the sub-verification rules.

The verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule described in the embodiment of the present application refers to the proportion of the data object that can pass the sub-verification rule among the data objects of the pre-stored applicable sub-verification rule.

Typically, a validation rule will contain several, dozens, or even hundreds of atomic validation rules, each of which is a constraint or threshold for the data object to be validated. In fact, different atomic verification rules have different degrees of constraint on the data objects to be validated. For example, the atomic verification rule 1 is: 30 days of trading volume > 100, if the number of data objects in the massive data object that meet this atomic verification rule is 70% of the total data object, and atomic verification rule 2: medal level = 5A If the number of data objects conforming to this atomic verification rule is 20% of the total data object, then it can be considered that the data object rule 2 is more difficult to verify than the data object rule 1 on the probability, which is a relatively stricter constraint.

It can be known from the analysis in step S103 that the verification rule is composed of multiple atomic verification rules through different logical relationships, and the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules can be a logical relationship of AND, OR, and NOT. In a logical operation, if the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules of a verification rule is AND, as long as the verification result of one of the sub-validation rules is false, the verification result of the entire verification rule is also false; if a verification rule is The logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is or, as long as the verification result of one of the sub-validation rules is true, the verification result of the entire verification rule is also true.

It can be seen that when the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is unequal, if the sub-verification rule with a large probability that the verification result is false is prioritized, the verification result of the entire verification rule can be quickly determined; When the logical relationship between the verification rules is or, the verification result of the entire verification rule can be quickly determined if the sub-verification rule with the greater probability that the verification result is true is performed preferentially.

Therefore, one of the factors affecting the speed of data verification is: the verification pass rate of the sub-verification rules. If the verification pass rate of the sub-verification rule is high, it indicates that the verification result of the sub-validation rule has a large probability of being true; if the verification pass rate of the sub-validation rule is low, it indicates that the verification result of the sub-validation rule has a large probability false.

2) One of the various factors affecting the speed of data verification is: the response time of the data object attribute value associated with the sub-validation rule.

An atomic validation rule consists of three parts: the attribute name, the operator, and the comparison value. For example, an atomic verification rule: 30 days of trading volume > 100, the attribute name is "30 days of trading volume", the operator is ">", and the comparison value is "100". When applying the atomic verification rule to verify the data object, firstly, a 30-day transaction amount of a data object to be verified needs to be obtained from the business system. If the actual value of the attribute is 200, by comparing the actual value with the comparison value, It can be determined that the verification result of the verification rule is true. Through the above analysis of the verification process of the atom verification rule, it can be known that the response time of the data object attribute value has an influence on the data verification speed. It can be seen that the second factor affecting the speed of data verification is the response time of the data object attribute value associated with the sub-validation rule.

In summary, the factors affecting the speed of data verification include at least two aspects: 1) the verification pass rate of the sub-verification rule; 2) the response time of the data object attribute value associated with the sub-validation rule. According to various factors affecting the data verification speed, the preset sorting criteria are determined, and the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted according to a preset sorting criterion, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.

In practical applications, it is possible to combine various factors that affect the speed of data verification, select one or several factors to combine, and reasonably set the preset sorting criteria. The combination of different factors can produce a variety of specific ordering criteria, and these specific sorting standards are only changes of the specific embodiments, and do not deviate from the core of the present application, and therefore are within the protection scope of the present application.

Some specific criteria that are optional in this embodiment are listed below.

1) Sorting criteria one

The sorting criterion 1 includes: if the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is a relationship, the sub-verification rules corresponding to the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule are preferentially executed. According to the sorting standard, the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in a pair of verification rules is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained, first First, you need to calculate the verification pass rate corresponding to each atom verification rule.

The theoretical basis for adopting the standard is: if the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules of a verification rule is AND, then if the verification result of one sub-validation rule is false, the verification result of the entire verification rule is also false, thus, The sub-verification rules with low verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule are preferentially executed, which helps to quickly determine the verification result of the verification rule. If the verification pass rate corresponding to the atom verification rule is low, it indicates that the verification result of the sub-validation rule has a large probability of being false.

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes: the data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule. When a sub-verification rule is applied to verify a data object, if the data object does not satisfy the sub-verification rule, and the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is AND, the parent verification rule to which the sub-validation rule belongs may be directly determined. The verification result is false, that is, the data object to be verified does not satisfy the parent verification rule to which the sub-validation rule belongs.

Please refer to FIG. 2 , which is a specific flowchart of step S103 in Embodiment A of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application. Specifically, the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted according to the sorting criterion, and the execution order of the sub-verification rule is obtained, including:

Step S201: Parse the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the sub-validation rules.

Based on the logical operator's operation priority, parsing the validation rules and obtaining the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules. In a specific implementation, the verification rule may be represented by a tree structure or the like. When the tree structure is used to represent the verification rule, the root node of the tree is the logical relationship between the first level of sub-verification rules, and the internal nodes of the tree correspond to the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules of the levels, and the leaf nodes of the tree are atomic verification. rule. After the resolution of the verification rule is calculated, the logical relationship between each sub-validation rule can be obtained.

Step S203: Starting from the first level sub-verification rule, determining whether the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules of the predetermined level is a relational relationship.

The first level sub-verification rule described in the embodiment of the present application refers to a sub-verification rule directly included in the verification rule. For example, a tree structure indicates a verification rule, and each sub-node of the root node is a first-level sub-verification rule. The root node is the logical relationship between each first-level sub-verification rule. The first-level sub-verification rule can be either an atomic verification rule or a composite verification rule.

In practical applications, according to the sorting criterion, only the first-level atomic verification rules included in the verification rule may be sorted, and the atomic verification rule in the composite verification rules included in the verification rule may be the composite verification rule to which the verification rule belongs. The groups are sorted separately, and finally the order of execution of all atomic verification rules is obtained. If only the first-level atomic verification rules included in the validation rule are sorted, the predetermined number of levels Is 1; if only the first two levels of atomic verification rules included in the verification rule are sorted, the predetermined number of levels is 2, and so on, and the number of sub-validation rules that are valid for sorting can be arbitrarily set.

Step S205: If yes, sort the execution order of the sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and obtain an execution order of the sub-verification rules.

If the logical relationship between each sub-validation rule included in a composite verification rule is a relationship, according to the sorting criterion 1, the execution order of the sub-verification rules is sorted in an ascending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and obtained. The execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the composite verification rule.

Since the sorting criterion firstly performs the sub-verification rule with low verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule when the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is a relationship, the verification speed of the data object can be effectively improved.

2) Sorting criteria 2

The sorting criterion 2 includes: if the logical relationship between the first-level sub-verification rules is a relationship, the sub-verification rules having a low verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rules are preferentially executed. According to the sorting criterion 2, the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained. First, the verification pass rate corresponding to each first-level sub-verification rule needs to be calculated.

The sorting criterion 2 is basically consistent with the theoretical basis of the sorting criterion 1. The difference between the two is that the sorting criterion only performs the sub-verification rules with low verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and the sub-verification of the sorting standard two is preferentially executed. Rules can be either atomic verification rules or compound verification rules.

Since the sorting criterion 2 is also for the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules to perform the sorting process of the sub-verification rule execution priority with the relationship, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion 2 is that the data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.

Please refer to FIG. 3 , which is a specific flowchart of step S103 in Embodiment B of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application. Specifically, the execution order of the sub-verification rules included in the verification rule is sorted according to the sorting criterion 2, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained, including:

Step S301: Parse the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules.

The operation priority rule based on the logical operator, parsing the verification rule, and obtaining the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules. After the resolution of the verification rule is calculated, the first one can be obtained. The logical relationship between the level verification rules.

Step S303: Determine whether the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship.

The sorting criterion 2 is only for the first level sub-verification rules included in the verification rule, and judges whether the logical relationship between them is a relationship, and the sorting criterion 1 needs to respectively judge each sub-inclusion of the multi-level verification rule according to the predetermined level. Verify the logical relationship between the rules.

Step S305: If yes, sort the execution order of the first-level sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level verification rule, and obtain an execution order of the first-level sub-verification rules.

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship, according to the sorting criterion 2, the execution order of the sub-verification rules is sorted in an ascending manner corresponding to the verification pass rate of the sub-verification rules, and the sub-verification rules are obtained. Execution order.

Compared with the data object verification speed of the sorting criterion one, since the sorting criterion 2 preferentially executes the sub-verification rules with low verification pass rate corresponding to all the first-level sub-verification rules, the sorting criterion 2 is faster than the sorting standard one. Faster. However, to obtain the execution order of the sub-verification rules by using the sorting criterion 2, the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level compound verification rule needs to be calculated in advance, and therefore, the pre-calculation amount corresponding to the sorting criterion 2 is larger than the sorting standard.

3) Sorting criteria three

The sorting criterion 3 includes: if the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is a relationship, the sub-verification rule having a low response pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule and a short response time of the dependent data object attribute value is preferentially executed.

The method provided by the embodiment of the present application comprehensively scores the response pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule and the response time of the dependent data object attribute value by using the first integrated priority score. The first comprehensive priority score described in the embodiment of the present application refers to a weighted average of various factors that affect the verification speed of the data object. The lower the first comprehensive priority score, the lower the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule and the shorter the response time of the data object attribute value that the sub-verification rule depends on; otherwise, if the comprehensive priority score is higher, the sub-representation is The higher the verification pass rate corresponding to the verification rule and the longer the response time of the data object attribute value that the sub-validation rule depends on. Specifically, the first comprehensive priority score is generated by using the following calculation formula:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Where W is the first comprehensive priority score and X is the return of the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule A value, Y is the normalized value of the response time of the data object attribute value that the sub-validation rule depends on, N1 is the weight of the verification pass rate, and N2 is the weight of the response time.

In order to comprehensively score the response pass rate corresponding to the sub-validation rule and the response time of the dependent data object attribute value, that is, to calculate the first comprehensive priority score, firstly, the verification pass rate and the response time are respectively normalized. In order to be able to weight the two calculations. In practical applications, the verification pass rate and response time can be normalized in a variety of normalized manners, for example, the normalized value of the verification pass rate = (verification pass rate - all verification pass rates) Minimum) / (maximum of all verification pass rates - minimum of all verification pass rates), or normalized pass rate of verification pass = (verified pass rate in ascending position in all verification pass rates) / all Verify the total number of pass rates and other methods. The different ways of the normalization process described above are only the modifications of the specific embodiments, and do not deviate from the core of the present application, and therefore are within the protection scope of the present application.

According to the sorting standard three, the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained. First, the first comprehensive priority score corresponding to each atom verification rule needs to be calculated.

The sorting criterion 3 is basically consistent with the theoretical basis of the sorting criterion 1. The difference between the two is that the sorting criterion first performs the sub-verification rules with low verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and the sorting standard three performs the atomic verification rule correspondingly. The sub-verification rule with low response pass rate and short response time of the dependent data object attribute value, that is, the sub-verification rule with the first comprehensive priority score corresponding to the atomic verification rule is preferentially executed.

Since the sorting criterion 3 is also for the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules to perform the sorting process of the sub-verification rule execution priority with the relationship, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion three is that the data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.

Specifically, the method for sorting the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule according to the sorting criterion three is basically the same as the method for sorting the execution order of each sub-verification rule according to the sorting criterion, wherein the first step It is exactly the same as step 2. The similarities are not repeated here. For details, see the corresponding part in Sorting Standard 1. The only difference between the two is that in the third step, the sorting criterion 3 is an ascending order of the first comprehensive priority score corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and the order of execution of the sub-verification rules is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained. .

Relative to the data object verification speed of the sorting criterion 1, the response time of the data object attribute value that is dependent on the sub-verification rule and the sub-verification rule-dependent data object attribute value is low due to the sorting criterion Short sub-verification rules, so the sorting criteria 3 is faster than the sorting standard one for data objects. However, to obtain the execution order of the sub-verification rules by using the sorting criterion three, it is necessary to calculate the first comprehensive priority score corresponding to each atom verification rule in advance, and therefore, the sorting standard 3 has a larger pre-calculation amount corresponding to the sorting standard.

4) Sorting criteria four

The sorting criterion 4 includes: if the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship, the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule is preferentially executed, and the response time of the dependent data object attribute value is short. The sub-verification rules. The first comprehensive priority score in the ranking criterion 4 is the same as the first comprehensive priority score in the ranking criterion 3, and will not be described here. For details, see the corresponding part in the sorting criterion 1.

According to the sorting criteria, the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained. First, the first comprehensive priority score corresponding to each first-level sub-verification rule needs to be calculated.

The sorting criterion 4 is basically consistent with the theoretical basis of the sorting criterion 3. The difference between the two is that the sorting criterion 3 only preferentially executes the sub-verification rule with the first comprehensive priority score corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and the sorting criterion 4 is preferentially executed. The sub-verification rules can be either atomic verification rules or compound verification rules.

Since the sorting criterion 4 is also for the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules to perform the sorting process of the sub-verification rule execution priority with the relationship, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion 4 is that the data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.

Specifically, the method for sorting the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule according to the sorting criterion 4 is basically the same as the method for sorting the execution order of each sub-verification rule according to the sorting criterion 2, wherein the first step It is exactly the same as step 2. The similarities are not repeated here. For details, see the corresponding part in Sorting Standard 2. The difference between the two is only that in the third step, the sorting criterion 4 is an ascending manner of the first comprehensive priority score corresponding to the sub-verification rule, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained. .

Relative to the data object verification speed of the sorting criteria 1 to 3, the sub-verification of the response time of the data object attribute value which is low by the first-level sub-verification rule and the response time of the data object attribute value of the sub-verification rule is short Rules, so sorting standard four is faster than data object validation from one to three standard criteria. However, to use the sorting criteria four to obtain the order of execution of the sub-verification rules, The first comprehensive priority score corresponding to the first level sub-verification rule needs to be calculated in advance, and therefore, the ranking standard 4 is larger than the pre-calculation amount corresponding to the sorting standard one to the standard three.

5) Sorting criteria five

The sorting criterion 5 includes: if the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is or a relationship, the sub-verification rules corresponding to the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule are preferentially executed. According to the sorting criterion 5, the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained. First, the verification pass rate corresponding to each atom verification rule needs to be calculated.

The sorting criterion 5 corresponds to the sorting standard. The theoretical basis for adopting the standard is: if the logical relationship between the sub-verifying rules of a verification rule is OR, then the verification is true as long as the verification result of one sub-verification rule is true. The verification result of the rule is also true. Therefore, the sub-verification rule with high verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule is preferentially executed, which helps to quickly determine the verification result of the verification rule. If the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule is high, it indicates that the verification result of the sub-verification rule has a large probability of being true.

Since the sorting criterion 5 is to perform the sorting process of the sub-verification rule execution priority for the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules or the relationship, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion 5 is that the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule. It can be seen that the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion five is different from the stop verification condition corresponding to the above sorting criteria one to four.

Specifically, the method for sorting the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule according to the sorting criterion 5 is basically the same as the method for sorting the execution order of each sub-verification rule according to the sorting standard, and the same is true. It will not be repeated here. For details, please refer to the corresponding part in Sorting Standard 1. The difference between the two is only: in the second step, the sorting criterion 5 is to determine whether the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is or is related; in the third step, the sorting criterion 5 is the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule. In descending mode, the execution order of the sub-verification rules is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.

Since the sorting criterion 5 is that the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is or is related, the sub-verification rule with high verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule is preferentially executed, so that the verification speed of the data object can be effectively improved.

6) Sorting criteria six

The sorting criterion 6 includes: if the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is or a relationship, the sub-verification rules corresponding to the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rules are preferentially executed. According to the sorting criteria The order of execution of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained. First, the verification pass rate corresponding to each first-level sub-verification rule needs to be calculated.

The sorting criterion 6 is basically consistent with the theoretical basis of the sorting criterion 5. The difference between the two is that the sorting criterion 5 only performs the sub-verification rules with high verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and the sub-verification of the sorting standard six priority execution. Rules can be either atomic verification rules or compound verification rules.

Since the sorting criterion 6 is also a sorting process for performing the priority of the sub-verification rule execution for the logical relationship or relationship between the sub-verification rules, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion 6 is that the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Specifically, the method for sorting the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule according to the sorting criterion 6 is basically the same as the method for sorting the execution order of each sub-verification rule according to the sorting criterion 2, and the same is the same. It will not be repeated here. For details, please refer to the corresponding part in Sorting Standard 2. The difference between the two is only: in the second step, the sorting criterion 6 is to determine whether the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is or is related; in the third step, the sorting criterion 6 is the verification corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rules. Through the descending order of the rate, the execution order of the first level sub-verification rules is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.

Compared with the data object verification speed of the sorting standard five, since the sorting criterion 6 preferentially executes the sub-verification rules with high verification pass rate corresponding to all the first-level sub-verification rules, the sorting standard 6 compares the data object verification speed of the sorting standard five. Faster. However, to obtain the execution order of the sub-verification rules by using the sorting criterion 6, it is necessary to calculate the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level compound verification rule in advance, and therefore, the sorting criterion 6 is larger than the pre-calculation amount corresponding to the sorting standard five.

7) Sorting criteria seven

The sorting criterion 7 includes: if the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is or is related, the sub-verification rule having a high response pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule and a short response time of the dependent data object attribute value is preferentially executed.

The method provided by the embodiment of the present application performs a comprehensive evaluation of the response time of the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule and the response time of the dependent data object attribute value by the second comprehensive priority score. The second comprehensive priority score described in the embodiment of the present application refers to another weighted average value of each factor that affects the verification speed of the data object. The lower the second comprehensive priority score, the higher the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule and the shorter the response time of the data object attribute value that the sub-verification rule depends on; Conversely, if the composite priority score is higher, it means that the lower the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule and the longer the response time of the data object attribute value that the sub-verification rule depends. Specifically, the second comprehensive priority score is generated by using the following calculation formula:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Where W is the second comprehensive priority score, X is the normalized value of the verification failure rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule, and Y is the normalized value of the response time of the data object attribute value dependent on the sub-validation rule, and N1 is the verification The weight of the pass rate, N2 is the weight of the response time.

The verification failure rate described in the embodiment of the present application refers to the supplementary value of the verification pass rate. For example, if the verification pass rate is 20%, the verification failure rate is 80%. In order to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the response time of the verification pass rate and the dependent data object attribute value of the sub-verification rule, that is, to calculate the second comprehensive priority score, the verification failure rate and the response time are respectively required. Normalization is performed to enable weighting calculations for both. In practical applications, the verification failure rate and the response time can be normalized in a plurality of normalized manners, for example, the normalized value of the verification failure rate = (verification failure rate - all verification failure rates) Minimum) / (the maximum of all verification failure rates - the minimum of all verification failure rates), or the normalized value of the verification failure rate = (the verification failure rate is in ascending position in all verification failure rates) / all The total number of verification failure rates, etc. The different ways of the normalization process described above are only the modifications of the specific embodiments, and do not deviate from the core of the present application, and therefore are within the protection scope of the present application.

According to the sorting criterion, the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained. First, the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to each atom verification rule needs to be calculated.

The sorting criterion 7 is basically consistent with the theoretical basis of the sorting criterion five. The difference between the two is that the sorting standard five preferentially executes the sub-verification rules corresponding to the high verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and the sorting standard seven performs the atomic verification rule correspondingly. The sub-verification rule with high response pass rate and short response time of the dependent data object attribute value, that is, the sub-verification rule with the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to the atomic verification rule is preferentially executed.

Since the sorting criterion 7 is also a sorting process for performing the priority of the sub-verification rule execution for the logical relationship or relationship between the sub-verification rules, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting standard seven is: the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Specifically, according to the sorting criterion, the execution of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is performed. The method of ordering is basically the same as the method of sorting the execution order of each sub-verification rule according to the sorting criteria. The first step and the second step are completely identical, and the similarities are not repeated here. Sort the corresponding part of the standard one. The only difference is that in the third step, the sorting criterion 7 is an ascending order of the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained. .

Compared with the data object verification speed of the sorting standard five, the sorting standard 7 performs the sub-verification rule corresponding to the sub-verification rule corresponding to the high verification pass rate and the sub-validation rule-dependent data object attribute value has a short response time, so the sorting criterion Seven data objects with sorting criteria of five are faster. However, to obtain the execution order of the sub-verification rules by using the sorting criterion 7, it is necessary to calculate the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to each atom verification rule in advance, and therefore, the sorting criterion 7 is larger than the pre-calculation amount corresponding to the sorting standard five.

8) Sorting criteria eight

The sorting criterion 8 includes: if the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is or is related, the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule is preferentially executed, and the response time of the dependent data object attribute value is short. The sub-verification rules. The second comprehensive priority score in the ranking criterion 8 is the same as the second comprehensive priority score in the ranking criterion 7, and will not be described here. The related description items are detailed in the corresponding part of the sorting standard 7.

According to the sorting criterion, the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained. First, the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to each first-level sub-verification rule needs to be calculated.

The sorting criterion 8 is basically consistent with the theoretical basis of the sorting criterion 7. The difference between the two is that the sorting criterion 7 only preferentially executes the sub-verification rule with the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and the sorting criterion is prioritized. The sub-verification rules can be either atomic verification rules or compound verification rules.

Since the sorting criterion 8 is also a sorting process for performing the priority of the sub-verification rule execution for the logical relationship or relationship between the sub-verification rules, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion eight is that the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Specifically, the method for sorting the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule according to the sorting criterion eight is basically the same as the method for sorting the execution order of each sub-verification rule according to the sorting criterion, wherein the first step It is exactly the same as step 2. The same thing is not repeated here. See the corresponding section in Sorting Standard 6 for details. The only difference between the two is that in the third step, the sorting criterion 8 is an ascending manner of the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to the sub-verification rule, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained. .

Compared with the data object verification speed of the sorting standard five to seven, the sorting criterion eight preferentially executes the sub-authentication rule corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule and the sub-validation rule depends on the data object attribute value with a short response time. Validation rules, so the sorting criteria eight are faster than the data objects of the sorting criteria five to seven. However, to obtain the execution order of the sub-verification rules by using the sorting criterion eight, the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule needs to be calculated in advance, and therefore, the pre-calculation amount corresponding to the sorting criterion 8 to the sorting standard 5 to the standard 7 is required. Bigger.

9) Sorting criteria nine

The sorting criterion 9 includes: the sub-verification rule that prioritizes that the response time of the data object attribute value on which the atomic verification rule depends is short. According to the sorting criteria, the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained. First, the response time of the data object attribute value that each atom verification rule depends on is obtained.

The theoretical basis for adopting this standard is that the shorter the response time of the data object attribute value that the atomic verification rule depends on, the faster the verification result of the sub-verification rule is obtained.

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion nine is determined according to a logical relationship between the sub-verification rules. Specifically, if the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is a relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule; if the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules For the relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Please refer to FIG. 4 , which is a specific flowchart of step S103 in Embodiment C of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application. Specifically, the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted according to the sorting criterion, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained, including:

Step S401: Parse the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the sub-validation rules.

This step is the same as the corresponding step in the sorting standard one, and will not be described here. For details, refer to the corresponding part in the sorting standard 1.

Step S403: Starting from the first-level sub-verification rule, step-by-step down to the sub-verification rules of the predetermined level of the sub-verification rules, in accordance with the ascending order of the response time of the data object attribute values that the atomic verification rule depends on, The execution order of the verification rules is sorted to obtain the execution order of the sub-validation rules.

The first-level sub-verification rule in the sorting standard nine is the same concept as the first-level sub-verification rule in the sorting standard one, and is not described here again. For related description items, see the corresponding part in the sorting standard one.

In practical applications, according to the sorting criterion, only the first-level atomic verification rules included in the verification rule may be sorted, and the atomic verification rule in the composite verification rules included in the verification rule may be the composite verification rule to which the verification rule belongs. The groups are sorted separately, and finally the order of execution of all atomic verification rules is obtained. If only the first-level atomic verification rules included in the verification rule are sorted, the predetermined number of levels is 1; if only the first two levels of atomic verification rules included in the verification rule are sorted, the predetermined number of levels is 2, and so on. The number of sub-validation rules that are valid for sorting can be arbitrarily set.

Since the sorting criterion 9 firstly verifies the sub-verification rule that the response time of the data object attribute value that the atomic verification rule depends on is short, the verification speed of the data object can be effectively improved.

10) Sorting criteria ten

The sorting criterion ten includes: the sub-verification rule that preferentially verifies that the response time of the data object attribute value that the first-level sub-verification rule depends on is short. According to the sorting criteria, the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained. First, the response time of the data object attribute values that each first-level sub-verification rule depends on is obtained.

The sorting standard ten is basically consistent with the theoretical basis of the sorting criterion. The difference between the two is that the sorting criterion 9 only preferentially executes the sub-verification rules with short response time of the data object attribute values that the atomic verification rule depends on, and the sorting criterion is ten. The sub-verification rules that are executed can be either atomic verification rules or compound verification rules.

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion ten is determined according to the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules; specifically: if the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules For the relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule; if the logical relationship between the first-level sub-validation rules is or a relationship, the stop verification condition is The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Please refer to FIG. 5 , which is a specific flowchart of step S103 in Embodiment D of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application. Specifically, the order of execution of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted by the sorting criterion, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained, including:

Step S501: Parse the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules.

This step is the same as the corresponding step in the sorting standard 2, and will not be described here. See the corresponding part of Sorting Standard 2.

Step S503: Sort the execution order of the first-level sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the response time of the data object attribute values that the first-level sub-verification rule depends on, and obtain the execution order of the sub-verification rules.

It should be noted that if a first-level sub-verification rule is a composite verification rule, the response time of the data object attribute value that the first-level sub-verification rule depends on is: each sub-validation rule included in the first-level sub-verification rule. The maximum response time of the dependent data object property value.

Compared with the data object verification speed of the sorting standard nine, since the sorting criterion ten performs the sub-verification rules with short response time of the data object attribute values that all the first-level sub-verification rules depend on, the sorting criterion is ten compared to the sorting standard nine Data object validation is faster. However, to obtain the execution order of the sub-verification rules by using the sorting criterion ten, it is necessary to calculate in advance the response time of the data object attribute values that the first-level compound verification rule depends on, and therefore, the sorting standard ten is larger than the pre-calculation amount corresponding to the sorting standard nine. .

11) Sorting criteria XI

The sorting criterion 11 includes: if the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is a relationship, the sub-verification rules corresponding to the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule are preferentially executed; if the logic between the sub-verification rules If the relationship is or relationship, the sub-verification rule having a high verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule is preferentially executed. The sorting criterion eleven is essentially a combination of the sorting standard one and the sorting standard five, so that all the sub-verifying rules can be comprehensively sorted.

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion eleven is determined according to the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules. Specifically, if the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is a relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule; if the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules For the relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Specifically, the execution order of the sub-verification rules included in the verification rule is sorted according to the sorting criterion eleven, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained, including: 1) parsing the verification rule, constructing a rule tree; The root node and the intermediate node of the rule tree are logical relationships, the leaf node is the sub-verification rule, and the child node of the root node or the intermediate node is the sub-verification related to the logical relationship of the root node or the intermediate node a rule or a lower-level intermediate node; 2) starting from the root node of the rule tree, stepping down the execution order of the sub-verification rules step by step according to the logical relationship between the sorting criterion and the root node or the intermediate node Sort and get the execution order of the sub-verification rules.

In this embodiment, starting from the root node of the rule tree, sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules step by step according to the sorting criterion and the logical relationship of the root node or the intermediate node Obtaining the execution order of the sub-verification rules, including: 1) determining the root node as the current node; 2) determining whether the logical relationship of the current node is a relationship; if so, verifying by the atom verification rule Rate ascending mode, sorting the execution order of each atomic verification rule under the current node; if the logical relationship of the current node is or a relationship, the descending order of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule is Sorting the execution order of each atomic verification rule under the current node; 3) determining whether the child node of the current node includes an intermediate node; if so, the child node of the current node is a child node of the intermediate node one by one As the current node, and returning to the step of determining whether the logical relationship of the current node is a relationship, for the rule tree Validation rules execution order of atoms in the intermediate nodes are sorted.

Since the sorting standard eleven is essentially a combination of the sorting standard one and the sorting standard five, the same points are not repeated here, and the related descriptions are detailed in the corresponding parts of the sorting standard one and the sorting standard five.

The above-mentioned sorting standards one to eleven are only some of the specific standards that are optional in the embodiment. In practical applications, various factors affecting the data verification speed can be combined, one or several factors are selected for combination, and the pre-setting is reasonably set. The sorting criteria set. The combination of different factors can produce a variety of specific ordering criteria, and these specific sorting standards are only changes of the specific embodiments, and do not deviate from the core of the present application, and therefore are within the protection scope of the present application.

In addition, in the above-mentioned sorting criteria 1 to 11, the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule can also be obtained by a plurality of different specific calculation methods. The following part of the specific calculation method optional in the embodiment is listed below.

1) Method 1

Please refer to FIG. 6 , which is a specific flowchart of the verification pass rate corresponding to the calculation sub-verification rule in the method A of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application. In the first method, the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule includes the following steps:

Step S601: Acquire a data object to which the sub-verification rule can be applied.

The verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule described in the embodiment of the present application refers to the proportion of the data object that can pass the sub-verification rule among the data objects of the pre-stored applicable sub-verification rule. Therefore, to calculate the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule, it is first necessary to obtain a data object to which the sub-verification rule can be applied.

Specifically, the data object to which the sub-verification rule is applicable includes an applicable sub-verification rule Then, all data objects, or partial data objects of a preset sampling ratio selected from all data objects to which the sub-verification rules can be applied.

If the data object of the applicable sub-validation rule includes all data objects to which the sub-verification rule can be applied, the number of data objects passing through the sub-validation rule in all data objects needs to be calculated in advance. As you can see, selecting all data objects for calculation will result in a larger amount of offline calculations. As an optional optimization scheme, when verifying the pass rate, the verification pass rate of the sub-verification rule is not calculated according to all the data objects, but a partial data object of a preset sampling ratio is sampled from all data objects, for example, random. Take out 5% of the data objects to calculate the verification pass rate of the sub-verification rules. In an actual application, the data object included in the data object of the applicable sub-verification rule may be determined according to a specific application requirement.

Step S602: Traversing the data objects to which the sub-verification rules are applicable, and acquiring data object attribute values that the sub-verification rules depend on from the currently verified data objects.

After obtaining the data object to which the sub-verification rule can be applied, the sub-verification rules are applied to each data object for each of the data objects, and the data objects that can pass the sub-verification rule are obtained. Specifically, when performing rule verification on a data object, it is first necessary to obtain a data object attribute value that the sub-validation rule depends on in the data object.

Step S603: Determine whether the data object attribute value makes the sub-verification rule establish.

Step S604: If the result of the above determination is yes, the number of verification passes corresponding to the sub-verification rule is increased by one.

After obtaining the data object attribute value that the sub-verification rule depends on in the data object, the sub-verification rule may be applied to determine whether the data object attribute value makes the sub-verification rule establish, and if the judgment result in step S603 is yes, the sub-verification is performed. The number of verification passes corresponding to the rule is increased by one.

Step S605: After traversing all the data objects to which the sub-verification rules are applicable, the ratio of the cumulative number of verification passes to the number of data objects to which the sub-verification rules are applicable is used as the sub-verification rule. Corresponding verification pass rate.

When each of the data objects in the data object to which the sub-verification rule is applicable is applied, the sub-verification rule is used to perform rule verification on each data object, and the cumulative number of verification passes is obtained, and the cumulative number of verification passes and the applicable sub-validation rule are obtained. The ratio of the number of data objects is used as the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.

2) Method 2

In the above manner 1, if the data object to which the sub-verification rule can be applied includes the sub-authentication rule from the applicable sub-verification Then, part of the data objects of the preset sampling ratios selected by all the data objects saves a lot of offline calculations, but brings about the error of the calculation results.

The basic idea of the second method is: to overcome the error problem of the verification pass rate obtained by calculating the sampled data object, the weighted average of the multiple known verification pass rates calculated according to the sampled data object is used as the sub-verification rule Pass verification pass rate. For example, the daily verification pass rate is calculated according to the sampled data object, and a predetermined number of verification pass rate sequences are obtained, and the weighted average of the known verification pass rates in the pass rate sequence is verified as the sub-verification rule. Verify the pass rate.

Please refer to FIG. 7 , which is a specific flowchart of the verification pass rate corresponding to the calculation sub-verification rule in the method B of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application. In the second method, the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule includes the following steps:

Step S701: Acquire a sampling data verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule of a preset number of times.

The sampling data verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule described in the embodiment of the present application refers to the verification pass rate corresponding to the obtained sub-verification rule calculated according to the sampled data object.

Please refer to FIG. 8 , which is a specific flowchart of the sampling data verification pass rate corresponding to the calculation sub-verification rule of the embodiment B of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application. Specifically, the sampling data verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule is generated by the following steps:

Step S801: sampling a partial data object of a preset sampling ratio from all data objects to which the sub-verification rule is applicable.

Step S802: traverse the partial data objects of each of the preset sampling ratios, and obtain the data object attribute values that the sub-verification rules depend on from the currently verified data objects.

Step S803: Determine whether the data object attribute value makes the sub-verification rule establish.

Step S804: If the result of the above determination is YES, the number of verification passes corresponding to the sub-verification rule is increased by one.

Step S805: After traversing all the partial data objects of the preset sampling ratio, the ratio of the cumulative number of verification passes to the number of partial data objects of the preset sampling ratio is used as the verification corresponding to the sub-verification rule. rate.

Step S801 to step S805 and the optimized embodiment in the first mode, that is, the data object on which the verification pass rate is calculated is a partial data object of a preset sampling ratio selected from all data objects of the applicable sub-verification rule, wherein Steps S802 to S805 are in one-to-one correspondence with steps S602 to S605 in the first mode, and the same portions are not described herein again. For details, refer to the embodiment in the first method. section.

Step S703: Calculate a weighted average of the verification pass rates of the subsampled data according to the weights respectively determined by the verification of the pass rates for the subsample data corresponding to the sub-verification rules.

It should be noted that when setting the weight of each sampled data verification pass rate, in general, the recent sampling data verification pass rate has a greater impact on the current calculation result, so it can be given to the recent sampling data verification pass rate. Larger weights give less weight to the earlier sample data validation pass rate. If the difference in the effect of the sampling data verification pass rate at different times is relatively small, it can be simplified, that is, the same weight is taken. In the present embodiment, in order to simplify the explanation, the same weight is taken.

Step S705: Calculate the obtained weighted average value as the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.

The method 2 calculates the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule. On the one hand, since the data object on which the pass-through rate is verified by each offline calculation is a sampled data object, the number of data objects is not large, thereby reducing offline resources. Consumption; on the other hand, since each calculation is based on the sampled data object, and then the current pass rate is dynamically predicted by the moving weighted average, the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule can be continuously updated and corrected, thereby Make the verification pass rate consistent with the real trend. In summary, the application method 2 calculates the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule, which can reduce the calculation cost of the verification pass rate, and can also take into account the accuracy and dynamic trend change.

3) Method 3

The calculation methods of modes one and two are all offline and calculate the verification pass rate of the sub-verification rules, both of which result in consumption of certain offline computing resources. In order to overcome the shortcomings of the first and second modes, the verification pass rate of the sub-verification rule is calculated by using the third method.

The basic idea of the third method is: verifying the newly added data object in real time, accumulating the number of newly added data objects within the preset time interval and the number of newly added data objects that have passed the verification, and at the end of the time interval range, according to The number of verified data objects in real time and the number of validated data objects, and the corresponding verification pass rate of the sub-verification rules within the time interval.

Please refer to FIG. 9 , which is a specific flowchart of the verification pass rate corresponding to the calculation sub-verification rule in the method C of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application. In the third mode, the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule is calculated and obtained by the following steps:

Step S901: Acquire a real-time verification pass rate corresponding to the preset number of times of the sub-verification rule within a preset time interval.

To implement the basic idea of the third method, firstly, two parameters need to be preset: 1) a preset time interval range, for each data object that is added within the time interval to which the sub-verification rule can be applied, when newly added The data object is verified in real time, and the number of data objects verified in the time interval and the number of data objects verified by the time interval are accumulated; 2) the preset number of times, when the preset number of times is 1, the sub-verification rule corresponds The verification pass rate is: the real-time verification pass rate of the sub-verification rule within the preset time interval. When the preset number of times is greater than 1, the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule is: each sub-validation rule is at the preset time interval. A weighted average of the corresponding real-time verification pass rates within the range.

For example, if the preset time interval range is set to be daily, and the preset number of times is set to 5 times, the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule obtained by the mode 3 calculation is: real-time verification corresponding to the daily sub-verification rule in the past 5 days. The weighted average of the pass rates.

Please refer to FIG. 10 , which is a specific flowchart of the real-time verification pass rate of the calculation sub-verification rule in the preset time interval range in the method C of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application. Specifically, the corresponding real-time verification pass rate of the sub-verification rule in the preset time interval is generated by the following steps:

Step S1001: Acquire a real-time verification pass number and a real-time verification run count corresponding to the pre-generated sub-verification rule in the preset time interval range.

Please refer to FIG. 11 , which is a specific flowchart of the real-time verification pass times and the real-time verification run times of the calculation sub-verification rules in the preset time interval of the embodiment C of the rule-based data object verification method of the present application. Specifically, the real-time verification pass times and the real-time verification run times are generated by the following steps:

Step S1101: When a data object to which the sub-verification rule can be applied is added within the preset time interval, it is determined whether the newly added data object satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Step S1103: If the result of the above determination is yes, the real-time verification pass times of the sub-verification rules in the preset time interval range are cumulatively increased by one.

Step S1105: Accumulate the number of real-time verification runs of the sub-verification rule within the preset time interval by one.

Through the step S1101 to the step S1105, when a data object to which the sub-verification rule can be applied is added within the preset time interval, the real-time verification pass times and the real-time verification run times are accumulated in real time.

Step S1003: taking the ratio of the number of real-time verification passes to the number of real-time verification runs as The sub-verification rule corresponds to a real-time verification pass rate within the preset time interval.

Through the steps S1001 and S1003, the ratio of the real-time verification pass times to the real-time verification run times can be calculated, and the real-time verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rules in the preset time interval range is calculated.

Step S903: Calculate a weighted average value of each real-time verification pass rate according to weights respectively preset for each real-time verification pass rate.

Step S905: Calculate the obtained weighted average value as the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.

It should be noted that when setting the weight of each real-time verification pass rate, in general, the recent verification pass rate has a greater impact on the calculation result, so it can give greater weight to the recent verification pass rate. Give less weight to earlier verification pass rates. If the difference in the verification pass rate at different times is relatively small, it can be simplified, that is, the same weight is taken. In the present embodiment, in order to simplify the explanation, the same weight is taken.

The advantage of the third method is that a large amount of offline calculation is not required in advance, so that offline resources can be saved. In an actual application, any one of the foregoing methods 1 to 3 may be selected according to specific application requirements, and the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule is calculated.

In an actual application, when the preset condition is established, the verification pass rate of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is calculated. Specifically, the preset condition adopts the condition that the current time and the time interval of verifying the verification pass rate of each sub-verification rule are greater than a preset time interval. In general, the preset time interval can be set to days or weeks, that is, the verification pass rate of each sub-verification rule is updated daily or weekly.

Step S105: sequentially determining, according to the execution order of the sub-verification rules, whether the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule until a preset stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is reached or all sub-executions are performed. Verify the rules.

In step S103, the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted by a preset sorting criterion, and after the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained, the execution order of the obtained sub-verification rules may be sequentially determined to be verified. Whether the data object satisfies the sub-verification rule until the preset stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting standard is reached or all sub-verification rules are executed.

The sorting standard described in the embodiment of the present application refers to a sorting criterion that enables priority execution of a sub-verification rule capable of quickly determining a verification result, and thus different sorting standards correspond to different stopping verification conditions. In essence, for any composite verification rule, if the logical relationship between the first-level sub-validation rules included is the same, the stop verification condition of the composite verification rule is as long as one of the first-level sub-validation rules If the verification result is false, the verification result of the composite verification rule is also false; if the logical relationship between the first-level sub-validation rules included is OR, the stop verification condition of the composite verification rule is: as long as one of them If the verification result of the first-level sub-verification rule is true, the verification result of the composite verification rule is also true.

When the above-mentioned various sorting standards are described in detail, different stopping verification conditions corresponding to the respective sorting standards have been given, and details are not described herein again. For details, refer to the description of the related embodiments.

If, according to the execution order of the obtained sub-verification rules, it is determined in turn whether the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule, and the preset stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is not reached, only after all the sub-verification rules are executed According to the verification result of each sub-verification rule and the logical relationship between each sub-validation rule, it is finally determined whether the data object to be verified passes the verification rule.

Step S107: Calculate the verification result of acquiring the data object to be verified according to the logical relationship between the foregoing judgment result and the sub-verification rule.

When the step S105 is executed, if the preset stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is reached or all the sub-verification rules are executed, according to the logical relationship between the judgment result and the sub-verification rule, whether the data object to be verified passes the verification may be finally determined. Rule, obtain the verification result of the data object to be verified.

Specifically, the calculating, according to the logical relationship between the foregoing judgment result and the sub-verification rule, the verification result of acquiring the data object to be verified, adopting one of the following rules: 1) if the judgment result is no and If the logical relationship is a relationship, the verification result is that the data object to be verified does not meet the verification rule; 2) if the determination result is yes and the logical relationship is or relationship, the verification result is The data object to be verified complies with the validation rules.

In the above embodiment, a rule-based data object verification method is provided. Correspondingly, the present application further provides a rule-based data object verification apparatus. The device corresponds to an embodiment of the above method.

Please refer to FIG. 12, which is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a rule-based data object verification apparatus of the present application. Since the device embodiment is basically similar to the method embodiment, the description is relatively simple, and the relevant parts can be referred to the description of the method embodiment. The device embodiments described below are merely illustrative.

A rule-based data object verification apparatus of this embodiment includes:

The obtaining unit 101 is configured to obtain a data object to be verified and a corresponding verification rule thereof;

The sorting unit 103 is configured to sort the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule by using a preset sorting criterion, and obtain an execution order of the sub-verification rule; the sorting standard refers to enabling quick determination a sorting criterion in which the sub-verification rules of the verification result are preferentially executed;

The verification unit 105 is configured to sequentially determine, according to the execution order of the sub-verification rules, whether the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule until a preset stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is reached or executed Complete all sub-verification rules;

The calculating unit 107 is configured to calculate, according to the logical relationship between the foregoing judgment result and the sub-verification rule, a verification result of acquiring the data object to be verified.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit 103 includes:

The determining is a subunit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit 103 includes:

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit 103 includes:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit 103 includes:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit 103 includes:

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is or relationship, the first level is preferentially executed. The sub-verification rule having a high verification pass rate corresponding to the verification rule;

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit 103 includes:

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit 103 includes:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Where W is the second integrated priority score, X is a normalized value of the verification failure rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule, and Y is the response time of the data object attribute value dependent on the sub-verification rule. A value, N1 is the weight of the verification pass rate, and N2 is the weight of the response time.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the sorting unit 103 includes:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

Specifically include:

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is an AND relationship, the stop verification condition is the The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule;

Optionally, the sorting unit 103 includes:

Optionally, the ordering subunit includes:

Setting a subunit for using the root node as a current node;

a second determining subunit, configured to determine whether the child node of the current node includes an intermediate node; if yes, the child node of the current node is a child node of the intermediate node as the current node, and returns the judgment Whether the logical relationship of the current node is a step of relationship, and sorting the execution order of the atomic verification rules under each intermediate node of the rule tree.

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

Specifically include:

Optionally, the sorting unit 103 includes:

Optionally, the sorting criteria include:

Specifically include:

Optionally, the sorting unit 103 includes:

Please refer to FIG. 13, which is a specific schematic diagram of an embodiment of a rule-based data object verification apparatus according to the present application. Optionally, the device further includes:

Calculating the verification pass rate unit 201, configured to calculate and obtain the verification corresponding to the sub-verification rule rate.

Optionally, the calculating the verification pass rate unit 201 includes:

Optionally, the calculating the verification pass rate unit 201 further includes:

The generating subunit includes:

a sampling subunit, configured to sample a partial data object of a preset sampling ratio from all data objects to which the sub-verification rule is applicable;

Calculating a subunit for use after traversing all of the data objects of the preset sampling ratio The ratio of the cumulative number of verification passes to the number of partial data objects of the preset sampling ratio is used as the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.

Optionally, the calculating the verification pass rate unit 201 includes:

The generating subunit includes:

Optionally, the generating subunit further includes:

The first generating subunit includes:

The present application also provides a rule-based data object verification system, comprising: the rule-based data object verification apparatus of claim 32.

In the above embodiment, a rule-based data object verification method and corresponding device are provided. The application also provides an electronic device. The device corresponds to the embodiment of the above method and corresponding device.

Please refer to FIG. 14, which is a flowchart of an embodiment of an electronic device of the present application. Since the device embodiment is basically similar to the method embodiment, the description is relatively simple, and the relevant parts can be referred to the description of the method embodiment. The device embodiments described below are merely illustrative.

The present application also provides an electronic device, including: a display 301; a processor 302; and a memory 303, configured to store a rule-based data object verification device, wherein the rule-based data object verification device is When the processor 302 is executed, the method includes the following steps: acquiring a data object to be verified and a corresponding verification rule thereof; sorting an execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule by using a preset sorting criterion, and obtaining the sub-verification The order of execution of the rules; the sorting criterion refers to a sorting criterion that enables the sub-verification rules that can quickly determine the verification result to be preferentially executed; and sequentially determines whether the data object to be verified is in accordance with the execution order of the sub-verification rules Satisfying the sub-verification rule until the preset stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is reached or all sub-verification rules are executed; and the acquisition relationship is calculated according to the logical relationship between the judgment result and the sub-verification rule Describe the verification result of the verification data object.

Optionally, the rule-based data object verification apparatus includes:

The electronic device according to the embodiment of the present application includes a terminal device such as a personal computer, a PAD, an iPad, and a mobile communication device, that is, a so-called mobile phone or a smart phone. In summary, the electronic device described in this embodiment of the present application may be any electronic device capable of running a verification based on a verification rule to verify a data object.

The rule-based data object verification method, device, system and electronic device provided by the present application treat each sub-verification included in the verification rule corresponding to the data object by using a preset sorting criterion The execution order of the rules is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained; and according to the execution order of the sub-verification rules, it is sequentially determined whether the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule until the preset stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting standard is reached. Or executing all the sub-verification rules; obtaining the verification result of the data object to be verified according to the logical relationship between the above judgment result and the sub-validation rule. Since the method provided by the present application preferentially executes the sub-verification rule capable of quickly determining the verification result, the execution quantity and execution time of the sub-validation rule are greatly reduced in probability, and all sub-verification rules are avoided, thereby improving data verification speed and reducing System load and save the effect of computing resources.

The present application is disclosed in the above preferred embodiments, but it is not intended to limit the present application, and any person skilled in the art can make possible changes and modifications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present application. The scope of protection should be based on the scope defined by the claims of the present application.

In a typical configuration, a computing device includes one or more processors (CPUs), input/output interfaces, network interfaces, and memory.

The memory may include non-persistent memory, random access memory (RAM), and/or non-volatile memory in a computer readable medium, such as read only memory (ROM) or flash memory. Memory is an example of a computer readable medium.

1. Computer readable media including both permanent and non-persistent, removable and non-removable media may be implemented by any method or technology. The information can be computer readable instructions, data structures, modules of programs, or other data. Examples of computer storage media include, but are not limited to, phase change memory (PRAM), static random access memory (SRAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), other types of random access memory (RAM), read only memory. (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disk read only memory (CD-ROM), digital versatile disk (DVD) or other optical storage, Magnetic tape cartridges, magnetic tape storage or other magnetic storage devices or any other non-transportable media can be used to store information that can be accessed by a computing device. As defined herein, computer readable media does not include non-transitory computer readable media, such as modulated data signals and carrier waves.

2. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that embodiments of the present application can be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Thus, the present application can take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment in combination of software and hardware. Moreover, the application can take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) including computer usable program code.

Claims

A rule-based data object verification method, comprising:

Obtaining the data object to be verified and its corresponding verification rule;

Sorting the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule by a preset sorting criterion to obtain an execution order of the sub-verification rule; the sorting criterion refers to the sub-query enabling the sub-verification result to be quickly determined The sorting criteria that the validation rules are prioritized;

Determining, according to the execution order of the sub-verification rules, whether the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule until a preset stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is reached or all sub-verification rules are executed;

And obtaining, according to the logical relationship between the foregoing judgment result and the sub-verification rule, a verification result of acquiring the data object to be verified.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 1, wherein the sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is an AND relationship, the sub-verification rule having a low verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule is preferentially executed; the atomic verification rule refers to a verification rule including only one comparison relationship;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 2, wherein the order of execution of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted by a preset sorting criterion, and the sub-verification rule is obtained. The order of execution, including:

Parsing the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the sub-validation rules;

Starting from the first level sub-verification rule, it is determined step by step to determine whether the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules of the predetermined level is a relationship;

If yes, the execution order of the sub-verification rules is sorted in an ascending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 1, wherein the sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship, the first level is preferentially executed. The sub-verification rule having a low verification pass rate corresponding to the verification rule;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 4, wherein the order of execution of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted by a preset sorting criterion, and the sub-verification rule is obtained. The order of execution, including:

Parsing the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules;

Determining whether the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship;

If yes, the execution order of the first-level sub-verification rules is sorted in an ascending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 1, wherein the sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is an AND relationship, the sub-verification rule having a low verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule and a short response time of the dependent data object attribute value; the atomic verification A rule is a verification rule that includes only one comparison relationship;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 6, wherein the order of execution of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted by a preset sorting criterion, and the sub-verification rule is obtained. The order of execution, including:

Parsing the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the sub-validation rules;

Starting from the first level sub-verification rule, it is determined step by step to determine whether the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules of the predetermined level is a relationship;

If yes, sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the first comprehensive priority score corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules;

The first comprehensive priority score is generated by the following calculation formula:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Wherein, W is the first comprehensive priority score, X is a normalized value of the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule, and Y is a response time of the data object attribute value dependent on the sub-verification rule. A value, N1 is the weight of the verification pass rate, and N2 is the weight of the response time.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 1, wherein the sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is an AND relationship, the sub-verification that the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule is low and the response time of the dependent data object attribute value is short is preferentially performed. rule;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 8, wherein the order of execution of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted by a preset sorting criterion, and the sub-verification rule is obtained. The order of execution, including:

Parsing the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules;

Determining whether the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship;

If yes, sorting the execution order of the first level sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the first integrated priority score corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules;

The first comprehensive priority score is generated by the following calculation formula:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Where W is the first integrated priority score, X is a normalized value of the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule, and Y is a normalized response time of the data object attribute value dependent on the sub-verification rule. The value, N1 is the weight of the verification pass rate, and N2 is the weight of the response time.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 1, wherein the sorting criteria comprises:

And if the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is or a relationship, the sub-verification rule having a high verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule is preferentially executed; and the atomic verification rule refers to a verification rule including only one comparison relationship;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 10, wherein the execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is performed by a preset sorting criterion Sorting, obtaining the execution order of the sub-verification rules, including:

Parsing the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the sub-validation rules;

Starting from the first level sub-verification rule, determining whether the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules of the predetermined level is determined to be a relationship or a relationship;

If yes, the execution order of the sub-verification rules is sorted in a descending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 1, wherein the sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship, the sub-verification rules with high verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rules are preferentially executed;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 12, wherein the order of execution of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted by a preset sorting criterion, and the sub-verification rule is obtained. The order of execution, including:

Parsing the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules;

Determining whether the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is or is a relationship;

If yes, the execution order of the first level sub-verification rules is sorted in a descending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 1, wherein the sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is or is related, the sub-verification rule having a high verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule and a short response time of the dependent data object attribute value; the atomic verification A rule is a verification rule that includes only one comparison relationship;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 14, wherein the order of execution of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted by a preset sorting criterion, and the sub-verification rule is obtained. The order of execution, including:

Parsing the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the sub-validation rules;

Starting from the first level sub-verification rule, determining whether the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules of the predetermined level is determined to be a relationship or a relationship;

If yes, sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules;

The second comprehensive priority score is generated by the following calculation formula:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Where W is the second comprehensive priority score, X is a normalized value of the verification failure rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule, and Y is a normalization of the response time of the data object attribute value dependent on the sub-verification rule. The value, N1 is the weight of the verification pass rate, and N2 is the weight of the response time.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 1, wherein the sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is or is related, the sub-verification that the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule is high and the response time of the dependent data object attribute value is short is preferentially executed. rule;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 16, wherein the order of execution of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted by a preset sorting criterion, and the sub-verification rule is obtained. The order of execution, including:

Parsing the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules;

Determining whether the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is or is a relationship;

If yes, sorting the execution order of the first level sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules;

The second comprehensive priority score is generated by the following calculation formula:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Where W is the second comprehensive priority score, X is a normalized value of the verification failure rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule, and Y is a normalization of the response time of the data object attribute value dependent on the sub-verification rule. The value, N1 is the weight of the verification pass rate, and N2 is the weight of the response time.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 1, wherein the sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is a relationship, the sub-verification rules with low verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule are preferentially executed; if the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is or The sub-verification rule having a high verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule is preferentially executed; the atomic verification rule is a verification rule including only one comparison relationship;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is determined according to a logical relationship between the sub-verification rules;

Specifically include:

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is an AND relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule;

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is or a relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 18, wherein the order of execution of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted by a preset sorting criterion, and the sub-verification rule is obtained. The order of execution, including:

Parsing the verification rule, constructing a rule tree; the root node and the intermediate node of the rule tree are logical relationships, the leaf node is the sub-verification rule, and the child node of the root node or the intermediate node is the root node or The sub-verification rule or the next-level intermediate node related to the logical relationship of the intermediate node;

Starting from the root node of the rule tree, sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules step by step according to the logical relationship between the sorting criterion and the root node or the intermediate node, and obtaining the execution order of the sub-verification rules .
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 19, wherein the step starts from a root node of the rule tree, and is stepwise according to the sorting criterion and a logical relationship between the root node or an intermediate node. Sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules downward, and obtaining the execution order of the sub-validation rules, including:

Using the root node as a current node;

Determining whether the logical relationship of the current node is a relationship; if yes, sorting the execution order of each atomic verification rule under the current node in an ascending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule;

If the logical relationship of the current node is a relationship, the execution order of each atomic verification rule under the current node is sorted in a descending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule;

Determining whether the child node of the current node includes an intermediate node; if yes, using the child node of the current node as a child node of the intermediate node as the current node, and returning to determine whether the logical relationship of the current node is For the step of the relationship, the order of execution of the atomic verification rules under each intermediate node of the rule tree is sorted.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 1, wherein the sorting criteria comprises:

Priorityly verifying the sub-verification rule that the response time of the data object attribute value that the atomic verification rule depends on is short; the atomic verification rule refers to a verification rule that includes only one comparison relationship;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is determined according to a logical relationship between the sub-verification rules;

Specifically include:

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is an AND relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule;

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is or a relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 21, wherein the order of execution of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted by a preset sorting criterion, and the sub-verification rule is obtained. The order of execution, including:

Parsing the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the sub-validation rules;

Starting from the first level sub-verification rule, the sub-verification rules for each level of the predetermined number of stages are stepped down, in accordance with the ascending order of the response time of the data object attribute values that the atomic verification rule depends on, and the sub-verification rules are The execution order is sorted to obtain the execution order of the sub-verification rules.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 1, wherein the sorting criteria comprises:

Preferably, the sub-verification rule having a short response time of the data object attribute value that the first-level sub-verification rule depends on is verified;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is determined according to a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules;

Specifically include:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is an AND relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule;

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is or a relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 23, wherein the order of execution of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule is sorted by a preset sorting criterion, and the sub-verification rule is obtained. The order of execution, including:

Parsing the verification rule to obtain a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules;

The execution order of the first level sub-verification rules is sorted in an ascending manner of the response time of the data object attribute values that the first-level sub-verification rules depend on, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.
The rule-based data object verification method according to any one of claims 2 to 20, wherein the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule is calculated and obtained by the following steps:

Obtaining a data object to which the sub-verification rule can be applied;

Traversing each of the data objects to which the sub-verification rule is applicable, and acquiring, from the currently verified data object, a data object attribute value that the sub-verification rule depends on;

Determining whether the data object attribute value causes the sub-verification rule to be established;

If the result of the above determination is yes, the number of verification passes corresponding to the sub-verification rule is cumulatively increased by one;

After traversing all the data objects to which the sub-verification rule can be applied, the ratio of the cumulative number of verification passes to the number of data objects to which the sub-verification rule can be applied is used as the verification corresponding to the sub-verification rule. Passing rate.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 25, wherein the data object to which the sub-verification rule is applicable includes all data objects to which the sub-verification rule can be applied, or A partial data object of a preset sampling ratio selected from all data objects of the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to any one of claims 2 to 20, wherein the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule is calculated and obtained by the following steps:

Obtaining a sampling data verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule of a preset number of times;

Calculating a weighted average value of the verification pass rate of each sampling data according to a preset weight of each sampling data for each sub-sample data corresponding to the sub-validation rule;

The weighted average obtained by the calculation is used as the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 27, wherein the sampling data verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule is generated by the following steps:

Extracting a partial data object of a preset sampling ratio from all data objects to which the sub-verification rule can be applied;

Traversing a partial data object of each of the preset sampling ratios, and acquiring, from the currently verified data object, a data object attribute value that the sub-verification rule depends on;

Determining whether the data object attribute value causes the sub-verification rule to be established;

If the result of the above determination is yes, the number of verification passes corresponding to the sub-verification rule is cumulatively increased by one;

After traversing all the partial data objects of the preset sampling ratio, the ratio of the cumulative number of verification passes to the number of partial data objects of the preset sampling ratio is used as the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to any one of claims 2 to 20, wherein the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule is calculated and obtained by the following steps:

Obtaining a real-time verification pass rate corresponding to the preset number of times of the sub-verification rule within a preset time interval;

Calculating a weighted average of the respective real-time verification pass rates according to weights respectively preset for each real-time verification pass rate;

The weighted average obtained by the calculation is used as the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 29, wherein the corresponding real-time verification pass rate of the sub-verification rule within a preset time interval is generated by the following steps:

Acquiring the number of real-time verification passes and the number of real-time verification runs corresponding to the pre-generated sub-verification rules in the preset time interval range;

The ratio of the real-time verification pass times to the real-time verification run times is used as a real-time verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rules in the preset time interval range.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 30, wherein the real-time verification pass times and the real-time verification run times are generated by the following steps:

When a data object to which the sub-verification rule can be applied is added within the preset time interval, it is determined whether the newly added data object satisfies the sub-verification rule;

If the result of the foregoing determination is yes, the real-time verification pass times of the sub-verification rules in the preset time interval range are cumulatively increased by one;

The number of real-time verification runs of the sub-verification rule within the preset time interval is cumulatively increased by one.
The rule-based data object verification method according to any one of claims 2 to 20, characterized in that, when the preset condition is established, the verification pass rate of each sub-verification rule is calculated.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 32, wherein the preset condition adopts the following conditions:

The time interval between the current time and the last verification of the verification pass rate of each sub-validation rule is greater than the preset time interval.
The rule-based data object verification method according to any one of claims 2 to 24, wherein the calculating the acquired data object to be verified according to the logical relationship between the determination result and the sub-verification rule The verification result uses one of the following rules:

If the result of the determination is no and the logical relationship is a relationship, the verification result is that the data object to be verified does not meet the verification rule;

If the result of the determination is yes and the logical relationship is or relationship, the verification result is that the data object to be verified conforms to the verification rule.
A rule-based data object verification apparatus, comprising:

An obtaining unit, configured to obtain a data object to be verified and a corresponding verification rule thereof;

a sorting unit, configured to sort an execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule by a preset sorting criterion, to obtain an execution order of the sub-verification rule; and the sorting standard refers to enabling quick verification a sorting criterion in which the sub-verification rules of the result are preferentially executed;

a verification unit, configured to sequentially determine, according to an execution order of the sub-verification rules, whether the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule until a preset stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is reached or is performed All sub-validation rules;

And a calculating unit, configured to calculate, according to the logical relationship between the foregoing judgment result and the sub-verification rule, a verification result of acquiring the data object to be verified.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 35, wherein said sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is an AND relationship, the sub-verification rule having a low verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule is preferentially executed; the atomic verification rule refers to a verification rule including only one comparison relationship;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 35, wherein the sorting unit comprises:

a parsing subunit, configured to parse the verification rule, and obtain a logical relationship between the sub-verification rules;

The determining subunit is configured to start from the first level sub-verification rule, and determine, step by step, whether the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules of the predetermined level is a relationship;

The determining is a subunit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 35, wherein said sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is an AND relationship, the sub-verification rules with low verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rules are preferentially executed;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 38, wherein the sorting unit comprises:

a parsing subunit, configured to parse the verification rule, and acquire a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules;

a determining subunit, configured to determine whether a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship;

The determining is a subunit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the first level sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and obtaining the execution order of the sub-verification rules .
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 35, wherein said sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is an AND relationship, the sub-verification rule having a low verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule and a short response time of the dependent data object attribute value; the atomic verification A rule is a verification rule that includes only one comparison relationship;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 40, wherein the sorting unit comprises:

a parsing subunit, configured to parse the verification rule, and obtain a logical relationship between the sub-verification rules;

The determining subunit is configured to start from the first level sub-verification rule, and determine, step by step, whether the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules of the predetermined level is a relationship;

The determining is a subunit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the first comprehensive priority score corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules;

The first comprehensive priority score is generated by the following calculation formula:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Where W is the first integrated priority score, X is a normalized value of the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule, and Y is a normalized response time of the data object attribute value dependent on the sub-verification rule. The value, N1 is the weight of the verification pass rate, and N2 is the weight of the response time.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 35, wherein said sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is an AND relationship, the sub-verification that the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule is low and the response time of the dependent data object attribute value is short is preferentially performed. Rule

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 42, wherein the sorting unit comprises:

a parsing subunit, configured to parse the verification rule, and acquire a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules;

a determining subunit, configured to determine whether a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship;

The determining is a sub-unit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the first-level sub-verification rule in an ascending manner of the first comprehensive priority score corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and obtaining a sub-verification rule Order of execution;

The first comprehensive priority score is generated by the following calculation formula:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Where W is the first integrated priority score, X is a normalized value of the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule, and Y is a normalized response time of the data object attribute value dependent on the sub-verification rule. The value, N1 is the weight of the verification pass rate, and N2 is the weight of the response time.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 35, wherein said sorting criteria comprises:

And if the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is or a relationship, the sub-verification rule having a high verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule is preferentially executed; and the atomic verification rule refers to a verification rule including only one comparison relationship;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 42, wherein the sorting unit comprises:

a parsing subunit, configured to parse the verification rule, and obtain a logical relationship between the sub-verification rules;

The determining subunit is configured to start from the first level sub-verification rule, and determine, step by step, whether the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules of the predetermined level is a or relationship;

The determining is a subunit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules in a descending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 35, wherein said sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship, the sub-verification rules with high verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rules are preferentially executed;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 46, wherein the sorting unit comprises:

a parsing subunit, configured to parse the verification rule, and acquire a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules;

a determining subunit, configured to determine whether a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship or a relationship;

The determining is a subunit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the first level sub-verification rules in a descending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and obtaining the execution order of the sub-verification rules .
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 35, wherein said sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is or is related, the sub-verification rule having a high verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule and a short response time of the dependent data object attribute value; the atomic verification A rule is a verification rule that includes only one comparison relationship;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 48, wherein the sorting unit comprises:

a parsing subunit, configured to parse the verification rule, and obtain a logical relationship between the sub-verification rules;

a judging subunit for starting from the first level sub-verification rule and judging each step of the predetermined number of stages step by step Whether the logical relationship between the level verification rules is or is related;

The determining is a subunit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to the atomic verification rule, and obtaining an execution order of the sub-verification rules;

The second comprehensive priority score is generated by the following calculation formula:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Where W is the second comprehensive priority score, X is a normalized value of the verification failure rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule, and Y is a normalization of the response time of the data object attribute value dependent on the sub-verification rule. The value, N1 is the weight of the verification pass rate, and N2 is the weight of the response time.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 35, wherein said sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is or is related, the sub-verification that the verification pass rate corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule is high and the response time of the dependent data object attribute value is short is preferentially executed. rule;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion includes:

The data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 50, wherein the sorting unit comprises:

a parsing subunit, configured to parse the verification rule, and acquire a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules;

a determining subunit, configured to determine whether a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is a relationship or a relationship;

The determining is a sub-unit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of the first-level sub-verification rule in an ascending manner of the second comprehensive priority score corresponding to the first-level sub-verification rule, and obtaining the sub-verification rule Order of execution;

The second comprehensive priority score is generated by the following calculation formula:

W=X*N1+Y*N2

Where W is the second integrated priority score, X is a normalized value of the verification failure rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule, and Y is the response time of the data object attribute value dependent on the sub-verification rule. A value, N1 is the weight of the verification pass rate, and N2 is the weight of the response time.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 35, wherein the sorting criteria comprises:

If the logical relationship between the sub-verification rules is a relationship, the sub-verification rules with low verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule are preferentially executed; if the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is or The sub-verification rule having a high verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule is preferentially executed; the atomic verification rule is a verification rule including only one comparison relationship;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is determined according to a logical relationship between the sub-verification rules;

Specifically include:

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is an AND relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule;

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is or a relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 52, wherein the sorting unit comprises:

a parsing subunit, configured to parse the verification rule, construct a rule tree; a root node and an intermediate node of the rule tree are logical relationships, a leaf node is the sub-verification rule, and a child node of the root node or an intermediate node is The sub-verification rule or the next-level intermediate node related to the logical relationship of the root node or the intermediate node;

a sorting subunit, configured to start from a root node of the rule tree, and sequentially sort the execution order of the sub-verification rules step by step according to the logical relationship between the sorting criterion and the root node or the intermediate node The order in which sub-verification rules are executed.
The rule-based data object verification method according to claim 53, wherein the ordering subunit comprises:

Setting a subunit for using the root node as a current node;

a first determining subunit, configured to determine whether a logical relationship of the current node is a relationship;

The determining is a subunit, and if yes, sorting the execution order of each atomic verification rule under the current node in an ascending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule;

Determining a non-subunit, wherein, if the logical relationship of the current node is a relationship, the execution order of each atomic verification rule under the current node is performed in a descending manner of the verification pass rate corresponding to the atomic verification rule Sort

a second determining subunit, configured to determine whether the child node of the current node includes an intermediate node; if yes, the child node of the current node is a child node of the intermediate node as the current node, and returns the judgment Whether the logical relationship of the current node is a step of relationship, and sorting the execution order of the atomic verification rules under each intermediate node of the rule tree.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 35, wherein said sorting criteria comprises:

Priorityly verifying the sub-verification rule that the response time of the data object attribute value that the atomic verification rule depends on is short; the atomic verification rule refers to a verification rule that includes only one comparison relationship;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is determined according to a logical relationship between the sub-verification rules;

Specifically include:

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is an AND relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule;

If the logical relationship between the sub-validation rules is or a relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 55, wherein the sorting unit comprises:

a parsing subunit, configured to parse the verification rule, and obtain a logical relationship between the sub-verification rules;

a sorting sub-unit for starting from the first-level sub-verification rule, stepping down the sub-verification rules of the predetermined level of the sub-levels, in accordance with the ascending order of the response time of the data object attribute values of the atomic verification rule, The execution order of the sub-verification rules is sorted, and the execution order of the sub-verification rules is obtained.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 35, wherein said sorting criteria comprises:

Preferably, the sub-verification rule having a short response time of the data object attribute value that the first-level sub-verification rule depends on is verified;

Correspondingly, the stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is determined according to a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules;

Specifically include:

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is an AND relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified does not satisfy the sub-verification rule;

If the logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules is or a relationship, the stop verification condition is that the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 57, wherein the sorting unit comprises:

a parsing subunit, configured to parse the verification rule, and acquire a logical relationship between the first level sub-verification rules;

a sorting sub-unit, configured to sort the execution order of the first-level sub-verification rules in an ascending manner of the response time of the data object attribute values that the first-level sub-verification rule depends on, and obtain the execution order of the sub-verification rules .
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to any one of claims 36 to 54, wherein the apparatus further comprises:

The verification pass rate unit is configured to calculate a verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 59, wherein the calculating the verification pass rate unit comprises:

Obtaining a subunit, configured to acquire a data object to which the sub-verification rule can be applied;

Traversing the sub-units, traversing each of the data objects to which the sub-verification rules are applicable, and acquiring data object attribute values that the sub-verification rules depend on from the currently verified data objects;

a determining subunit, configured to determine whether the data object attribute value causes the sub-verification rule to be established;

The determining is a subunit, and if the result of the foregoing determination is yes, the verification pass number corresponding to the sub-verification rule is cumulatively increased by one;

a calculating subunit, configured to, when traversing all the data objects to which the sub-verification rule is applicable, a ratio of the cumulative number of verification passes to the number of data objects to which the sub-verification rule is applicable The verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.
A rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 59, wherein: The calculation verification pass rate unit includes:

Obtaining a subunit, configured to obtain a sampling data verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule of a preset number of times;

a calculating subunit, configured to calculate a weighted average value of the pass rate of each of the sampled data according to a preset weight of each pass sampling data corresponding to the sub-verification rule;

The assignment sub-unit is configured to use the weighted average obtained by the calculation as the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 61, wherein the calculating the verification pass rate unit further comprises:

Generating a subunit, configured to generate a sampling data verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule;

The generating subunit includes:

a sampling subunit, configured to sample a partial data object of a preset sampling ratio from all data objects to which the sub-verification rule is applicable;

Traversing the subunits, traversing the partial data objects of each of the preset sampling ratios, and acquiring the data object attribute values that the sub-verification rules depend on from the currently verified data objects;

a determining subunit, configured to determine whether the data object attribute value causes the sub-verification rule to be established;

The determining is a subunit, and if the result of the foregoing determination is yes, the verification pass number corresponding to the sub-verification rule is cumulatively increased by one;

a calculating subunit, configured to, when traversing all the partial data objects of the preset sampling ratio, a ratio of the cumulative number of verification passes to the number of partial data objects of the preset sampling ratio as the sub-verification rule Verification pass rate.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 61, wherein the calculating the verification pass rate unit comprises:

Obtaining a sub-unit, configured to obtain a real-time verification pass rate corresponding to the preset number of times of the sub-verification rule within a preset time interval;

a calculating subunit, configured to calculate a weighted average value of each real-time verification pass rate according to weights respectively preset for each real-time verification pass rate;

The assignment sub-unit is configured to use the weighted average obtained by the calculation as the verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 63, wherein the calculating the verification pass rate unit further comprises:

Generating a subunit, configured to generate a real-time verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule within a preset time interval;

The generating subunit includes:

Obtaining a sub-unit, configured to obtain a real-time verification pass number and a real-time verification run count corresponding to the pre-generated sub-verification rule within the preset time interval;

a calculation subunit, configured to use a ratio of the number of real-time verification passes to the number of real-time verification runs as a real-time verification pass rate corresponding to the sub-verification rule within the preset time interval.
The rule-based data object verification apparatus according to claim 64, wherein the generating sub-unit further comprises:

a first generation subunit, configured to generate the real-time verification pass times and the real-time verification run times;

The first generating subunit includes:

a determining subunit, configured to determine whether the newly added data object satisfies the sub-verification rule when a data object to which the sub-verification rule is applicable is added within the preset time interval;

The determining is a sub-unit, configured to: if the result of the foregoing determination is yes, accumulating the number of real-time verification passes of the sub-verification rule within the preset time interval range by one;

And a counting subunit, configured to add one of the real-time verification running times of the sub-verification rule within the preset time interval.
A rule-based data object verification system, comprising: the rule-based data object verification apparatus of claim 32.
An electronic device, comprising:

monitor;

Processor;

a memory for storing a rule-based data object verification device, when the rule-based data object verification device is executed by the processor, comprising the steps of: acquiring a data object to be verified and a corresponding verification rule thereof; The sorting criterion sorts the execution order of the respective sub-verification rules included in the verification rule to obtain an execution order of the sub-verification rules; the sorting criterion refers to the sub-verification rule that enables the quick determination of the verification result to be prioritized Execution sorting criteria; follow the child Verifying the execution order of the rules, and sequentially determining whether the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule until the preset stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is reached or all sub-verification rules are executed; And the logical relationship between the sub-validation rule and the verification result of obtaining the data object to be verified.
The electronic device according to claim 67, wherein the rule-based data object verification device comprises:

An obtaining unit, configured to obtain a data object to be verified and a corresponding verification rule thereof;

a sorting unit, configured to sort an execution order of each sub-verification rule included in the verification rule by a preset sorting criterion, to obtain an execution order of the sub-verification rule; and the sorting standard refers to enabling the priority execution to be fast Determining an ordering criterion of the sub-verification rules of the verification result;

a verification unit, configured to sequentially determine, according to an execution order of the sub-verification rules, whether the data object to be verified satisfies the sub-verification rule until a preset stop verification condition corresponding to the sorting criterion is reached or is performed All sub-validation rules;

And a calculating unit, configured to calculate, according to the logical relationship between the foregoing judgment result and the sub-verification rule, a verification result of acquiring the data object to be verified.