WO2016025672A1 - Procédé de traitement d'une formation souterraine présentant une stimulation à point unique - Google Patents

Procédé de traitement d'une formation souterraine présentant une stimulation à point unique Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2016025672A1
WO2016025672A1 PCT/US2015/044980 US2015044980W WO2016025672A1 WO 2016025672 A1 WO2016025672 A1 WO 2016025672A1 US 2015044980 W US2015044980 W US 2015044980W WO 2016025672 A1 WO2016025672 A1 WO 2016025672A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
fracturing
data
wellbore
treatment
section
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2015/044980
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Dmitriy POTAPENKO
J. Ernest Brown
Matthew Robert GILLARD
Leland K. RAMSEY
Original Assignee
Schlumberger Canada Limited
Services Petroliers Schlumberger
Schlumberger Holdings Limited
Schlumberger Technology B.V.
Prad Research And Development Limited
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Schlumberger Canada Limited, Services Petroliers Schlumberger, Schlumberger Holdings Limited, Schlumberger Technology B.V., Prad Research And Development Limited, Schlumberger Technology Corporation filed Critical Schlumberger Canada Limited
Priority to CA2957931A priority Critical patent/CA2957931A1/fr
Publication of WO2016025672A1 publication Critical patent/WO2016025672A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/14—Obtaining from a multiple-zone well
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/25—Methods for stimulating production
    • E21B43/26—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
    • E21B47/10—Locating fluid leaks, intrusions or movements
    • E21B47/11—Locating fluid leaks, intrusions or movements using tracers; using radioactivity

Definitions

  • Wellbore treatment methods often are used to increase hydrocarbon production by using a treatment fluid to affect a subterranean formation in a manner that increases oil or gas flow from the formation to the wellbore for removal to the surface.
  • Treatment operations may include fracturing operations, matrix acidizing fracturing, and injection of chelating agents.
  • Hydraulic fracturing involves injecting fluids into a subterranean formation at pressures sufficient to form fractures in the formation, with the fractures increasing flow from the formation to the wellbore.
  • flow capacity is improved by using chemicals to alter formation properties, such as increasing effective permeability by dissolving materials in or etching the subterranean formation.
  • Wellbore treatments may be applied in open or cased hole in which a metal casing has been cemented in place in a drilled hole.
  • the casing and cement if present
  • the casing may be perforated in specified locations to allow hydrocarbon flow into the wellbore or to permit treatment fluids to flow from the wellbore to the formation.
  • treatment fluids may be directed to multiple zones of interest in a given wellbore passing through a formation.
  • Methods of targeting multiple zones often involve treating single or multiple zones within the well at time through the use of various fracturing technologies.
  • methods may involve multiple steps such as running a perforating gun down the wellbore to the target zones, perforating the target zones, removing the perforating gun, treating the target zones with a hydraulic fracturing fluid, and then isolating the perforated target zones. This process may then subsequently repeated for all the target zones or a subset of target zones of interest until all the target zones are treated.
  • methods of the present disclosure are directed to methods of treating an underground formation, including: obtaining logging data for at least a section of a wellbore; treating a plurality of zones in at least a section of the wellbore using the multi-stage single-point fracturing operation; obtaining one or more of treatment data, flowback data, or production data for the treated plurality of zones; defining one or more dependencies between the obtained logging data and one or more of treatment data, flowback data, or production data; and using the dependencies to design and perform subsequent operations on the at least a section of a wellbore or in another wellbore.
  • methods of the present disclosure are directed to methods of designing a completion string including: obtaining logging data from at least a section of a wellbore; performing a multi-stage single-point fracturing treatment on a plurality of zones in the at least a section of a wellbore; obtaining one or more selected from a group of treatment data, flowback data, and production data; defining one or more dependencies between the obtained logging data and the one or more selected from a group of treatment data, flowback data, and production data; designing a completion string using the defined one or more dependencies, and emplacing the designed completion string.
  • Figure 1 is an example of a workflow demonstrating processes included in methods in accordance with embodiments described herein.
  • Figure 2 is an example of a workflow that includes providing a design for multi-stage completion system based on acquired logging data in accordance with embodiments described herein.
  • Figure 3 is an example of a workflow with a pre-defined design for a multistage completion system in accordance with embodiments described herein.
  • compositions used/disclosed for use in the methods described herein can also include some components other than those cited.
  • embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to methods of treating an underground formation penetrated by a well that utilize single-point fracturing techniques to stimulate the production of formation fluids and/or generate information regarding the fractured intervals of the wellbore.
  • single- point fracturing refers to a technique in which a targeted interval of a formation is treated through a single opening at a time, thus providing better control of the flow rate of the treatment fluid and allowing a direct opportunity to measure the changes in the formation associated with the single point of fracture the formation.
  • an opening through which treatments may be delivered include a fracturing sleeve, kick-start valve, single perforated cluster, open hole wellbore interval isolated between two packers, including inflatable packers, and the like.
  • suitable lengths or diameter of the opening may be within in the range 0.03-20ft (0.001-6. lm), 0.03-5ft (0.001-1.5m), or 0.03-2ft (0.001-0.61m); however, the ranges provided are merely guidelines and do not limit the present disclosure.
  • Single-point fracturing as used in methods in accordance with the present disclosure may enable diagnostics to be performed on a single wellbore in a formation, creating a convenient laboratory for the analysis of a range of treatments on similar intervals within a formation having similar mineralogical composition and physical characteristics, or using assaying a single treatment against intervals having differing composition and properties.
  • the use of single-point fracturing may also translate to a decrease of the volume of a terminal flush substage required to clean the wellbore of particles (often referred to as overflush) prior to initiation of fracturing a successive wellbore treatment stage, or may even eliminate overflushing altogether in some instances.
  • Single-point fracturing may be contrasted with other fracturing techniques such as "plug-and-perf.”
  • plug-and-perf fracturing operation involves lowering a perforating gun loaded with explosive to a zone, igniting the gun(s) thus creating perforation through the tubing and the near wellbore.
  • plug-and-perf fracturing operation involves lowering a perforating gun loaded with explosive to a zone, igniting the gun(s) thus creating perforation through the tubing and the near wellbore.
  • plug-and-perf fracturing operation involves lowering a perforating gun loaded with explosive to a zone, igniting the gun(s) thus creating perforation through the tubing and the near wellbore.
  • plug-and-perf fracturing operation involves lowering a perforating gun loaded with explosive to a zone, igniting the gun(s) thus creating perforation through the tubing and the near wellbore.
  • Embodiments herein relate to a method for completing a well including completing a zone of a first well using a single-point fracturing technique, acquiring data from the completion of the first well, interpreting the data, tailoring an optimized design for completing a further well, and completing a further well with the tailored design.
  • Some embodiments may benefit from drilling and acquiring data during the drilling of the first well (i.e., logging while drilling).
  • a plurality of zones (and at least three zones in more particular embodiments) are completed with single-point fracturing.
  • the data acquired includes injection flow rate, flow back rate, and/or production rate.
  • the drilling data (i.e., logging data) acquired are correlated with completion data including injection flow rate, flow back rate, and/or production rate.
  • the further wells are also completed using single-point fracturing workstring; however, the disclosure is not limited to the use of single-point fracturing alone, and other embodiments may use other fracturing techniques, such as plug-and-perf.
  • the tailoring includes modifying at least one of the following: drilling and landing another well, cementing another well, treating another well, flowing back another well, and producing another well.
  • Embodiments herein relate to methods for designing a well treatment including completing a zone of a first well, prior to or after, using a single-point fracturing technique, acquiring data from the completion of the first well, interpreting the data, and tailoring an optimized design for completing one further zone.
  • the optimized design includes at least one of the following: modifying the fracturing fluid composition, pumping acid, modifying the injection flow rate, drilling and landing another well, cementing another well, treating another well, flowing back another well, and producing another well.
  • Embodiments herein relate to a method for designing a completion string that includes completing a plurality of zones of a first well using a single-point fracturing technique, acquiring data from the completion of the first well, interpreting the data, and tailoring an optimized design for the completion string to be used in a further well.
  • the single-point fracturing string embeds sliding sleeves and the tailoring includes modifying the spacing of the sleeves. In some embodiments, the number of sleeves is reduced.
  • Methods of treating a wellbore in accordance with the present disclosure may include acquiring logging data along a wellbore section, treating the section using single-point fracturing methodology (treating one zone per stage), and then determining dependencies that exist between the acquired logging data and the data acquired during or after subsequent treatment operations. For example, data obtained from the treatment operation itself, such as changes in pressure or near-well permeability, or from subsequent operations including flowback operations in which data is acquired from injecting tracer fluids and measuring the return flow, or from the rate of fluid flow from production operations carried out in the treated wellbore.
  • dependencies established from single-point fracturing operations in one or more intervals may be used to design subsequent operations for other wells drilled in the same or similar underground formations.
  • variations between the zonal response to the performed treatment and zonal properties may be detected.
  • the combination of the data obtained during the single-point fracturing operation may yield zonal mechanical properties such as Young's modulus, Poisson ratio, in situ stresses, including minimum in situ stress, mineralogy composition, hydrocarbon content, rock density, resistivity, particulate emission factor (PEF), and the like.
  • Gathered data may be interpreted using computer-based systems in some embodiments, including commercially available software packages such as fracCADE available from Schlumberger, Petrel, Advanta, and the like.
  • Performing multi-stage single-point fracturing to prepare a sequence of clusters in a wellbore may be useful as a diagnostic operation in some embodiments, and may be used to acquire information on formation response to a given treatment based on the composition of a particular zone or interval. The data may then be used to tailor or optimize future treatment for additional wells that may be stimulated using a single-point treatment methodology or any other stimulation technique.
  • data obtained through the multi-stage single-point stimulation of a wellbore may be used to design completion strings and stimulation jobs for use in subsequent wellbores in the same formation or formations of similar composition and physical properties.
  • methods in accordance with the present disclosure may also be applied to wellbores and wellbore sections that are substantially horizontal.
  • a horizontal well may be interpreted as including a substantially horizontal portion, which may be a cased or completed open hole, wherein the fracture is transversely or longitudinally oriented and thus generally vertical or sloped with respect to horizontal.
  • Single-point fracturing in accordance with embodiments disclosed herein may involve pumping a fluid above the fracturing pressure of the formation to be treated through a single entry to the formation.
  • the entry may be a perforation, a valve, a sleeve, or a sliding sleeve.
  • sliding sleeves in the closed position are fitted to the production liner, and the production liner is then placed in a hydrocarbon-bearing formation.
  • the sliding sleeves may be opened and closed by a coil-tubing (CT) mounted shifting tool in some embodiments.
  • CT coil-tubing
  • Tools equipped with sliding sleeves may also include one or more packers that may be set below an opened sleeve providing a seal between the operating sleeve and other sleeves below.
  • treatments may be performed by pumping fracturing fluid either down the annulus between CT string and wellbore tubular (e.g. casing) or by down the CT string or both.
  • the sleeve or device controlling the treatment opening is activated by an object, such as a frac ball or dart, which is introduced into the wellbore from surface and the object is transported to the target zone by the flow field or mechanically, for example, using a wireline or coiled tubing.
  • an object such as a frac ball or dart
  • the object is caught by the sliding sleeve or device and shifts the sleeve to the open position.
  • the object remains in the sleeve, obstructing hydraulic communication from above to below.
  • a fracture treatment is then circulated down the wellbore to the formation adjacent the open sleeve.
  • a sealing device such as a packer or cups, may be positioned below a sleeve on a completion string in order to isolate the lower portion of the wellbore.
  • the sealing device is set and fluid is pumped into the fracture. Once pumping is completed, then the sealing device is unset and moved below the next zone (or sleeve) to be treated.
  • Representative examples of sleeve-based systems are disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 7,387,165, U.S. Patent No. 7,322,417, U.S. Patent No. 7,377,321, U.S. Patent No. 2007/0107908, U.S. Patent No. 2007/0044958, U.S. Patent No.
  • methods in accordance with the present disclosure include well completions in which a zone of a first well is stimulated using single-point fracturing techniques; acquiring data from the completion of the first well; interpreting the data; and using the data optimize the design for subsequent operations such as the completion and stimulation of additional wells.
  • FIG. 1 an embodiment of a possible workflow is shown. The method may begin at 100 by establishing an initial reservoir model by obtaining the initial parameters of the wellbore, which may be obtained by logging a wellbore through use of dedicated logging tools or drill string equipped for logging-while-drilling (LWD). Information from the wellbore may then be compiled and used to design an appropriate completions or treatment operation for the well.
  • LWD logging-while-drilling
  • a multi-stage treatment is designed based on the generated reservoir model and executed on distinct zones of the well using a single-point treatment methodology.
  • data gathered during single-point treatment may be used to determine the effectiveness of the treatment. If necessary, the collected data may also be used to update the reservoir model to account for changes from fracturing or the presence of natural features such as faults, zonal variations, etc.
  • the collected data is mapped to the logging data from the wellbore and used in 108 to design, execute, or evaluate subsequent wellbore operations. Subsequent operations may include, for example, drilling and landing additional wells, cementing jobs for another wells, planning treatments for other wells in the formation, flowing back into another well, or determining production parameters for another wells.
  • FIG. 2 a flowchart showing a method for executing the single-point fracturing technique in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure is shown in which completions operations may be finalized prior to initiating the multi-stage single -point fracturing operation.
  • an operator may begin at 202 by drilling a well having at least one substantially horizontal trajectory while logging the well using logging-while-drilling or logging the well in a separate operation subsequent to drilling.
  • the wellbore is then completed at 212 using techniques that are compatible with subsequent operations utilizing a single-point methodology.
  • the logging data 204 obtained is then used to develop and supplement an initial reservoir model 200 at 208.
  • the initial reservoir model may in some cases be generated from existing data known for the formation.
  • the updated reservoir model 210 is then used to design a multi-stage treatment using single-point fracturing methodologies.
  • a multi-stage treatment is designed on the basis of the logging information and executed on a plurality of distinct zones of the well at 218.
  • the operation may proceed by optionally initiating flow back into the well 222, e.g., after the injection of a chemical tracers, to obtain flowback data 224 regarding the fracture flow performance and the frac fluid returning from various stages in the multi-stage treatment.
  • optional production from the well may also be initiated at 226 following treatment or after testing flowback of the well in order to generate production data 228.
  • the treatment data 220, the flowback data 224, and the production data 228 obtained after single-point fracturing treatment may then be used in a number of subsequent operations in the same or other wells, including, but not limited to, drilling and landing, cementing operations, additional fracturing or refracturing treatments, flowback operations, and production.
  • FIG. 3 a more detailed flowchart showing a method for executing the single-point fracturing technique is shown.
  • an operator may begin at 302 by drilling a well and logging the well using logging-while-drilling or logging the well in a separate operation subsequent to drilling.
  • the logging data 304 obtained is then used to develop and supplement an initial reservoir model 300 at 306.
  • the initial reservoir model may be generated from existing data known for the formation in some cases.
  • the updated reservoir model 308 is then used to design a multi-stage treatment using single-point fracturing methodologies.
  • a completion string adapted for multi-stage fracturing is designed to fracture one or more intervals of the formation at 314 prior to performing single-point fracturing on a plurality of distinct zones of the well.
  • an operator may move directly to 318 and initiate the process of designing the multi-stage treatment using a single-point fracturing methodology.
  • the operation optionally may proceed by initiating flow back into the well 322, e.g., after the injection of a radioactive tracer, in order to obtain flowback data 324 regarding the fluid conductivity throughout the near-wellbore formation.
  • optional production from the well may also be initiated at 326 following treatment or after testing flowback of the well in order to generate production data 328.
  • dependencies may be established by comparing the logging data 304 and at least one of the treatment data 320, the flowback data 324, and the production data 328 obtained after single-point treatment. The dependencies obtained from the comparison of the available data may then be used in a number of subsequent operations in the same or another wells, including, but not limited to, drilling and landing, cementing operations, additional fracturing or refracturing treatments, flowback operations, and production.
  • Methods in accordance with the present disclosure may include the drilling a well prior to or during the logging of the well.
  • mud logging or logging while drilling, or subsequent logging operations may be used to define formation characteristics for at least one section of the drilled well as a function of depth.
  • well logs may be obtained through well logging techniques that are routinely employed including logging-while-drilling (LWD), by analyzing cuttings suspended carried to the surface by drilling fluid, or by using a memory logging tool (or real-time logging tool) that may be pumped down the drillstring after drilling the well to some target depth and then be retrieved to the surface with a drill bit assembly (e.g.
  • LWD logging-while-drilling
  • formation characteristics may be acquired after drilling by using open-hole logs such as resistivity logs, gamma-ray logs, density logs, neutron logs, photoelectric index logs, image logs, sonic scanner, cased-hole logging techniques such as the Sonic ScannerTM acoustic scanning platform commercially available from Schlumberger, induced resistivity logging, and other available well logging techniques.
  • open-hole logs such as resistivity logs, gamma-ray logs, density logs, neutron logs, photoelectric index logs, image logs, sonic scanner, cased-hole logging techniques such as the Sonic ScannerTM acoustic scanning platform commercially available from Schlumberger, induced resistivity logging, and other available well logging techniques.
  • Methods in accordance with the present disclosure may include completing at least one section of a drilled wellbore with a completion string that enables performing a single-point treatment sequence on that section of the well.
  • the completion string may be casing (cemented or including packers such as swellable packers).
  • the casing may also include single-point fracturing ports such as sliding sleeves, burst-disks, or any other devices to create a single-point opening in a completion to establish communication with the formation.
  • the formation characteristics involving post treatment may also be used after the completion, for example, using cased hole logging after completing the well with a completion string, e.g., Sonic ScannerTM, induction logging, and the like.
  • a reservoir model may be constructed and updated as additional logging data for the formation is obtained.
  • the reservoir model may then be used to design a multi-stage single-point treatment for at least three sequential zones contained in one or more sections of a first drilled well.
  • Such a treatment design may be based on usage of updated formation model or results of evaluation of the collected zonal information as discussed above.
  • a multi-stage single-point treatment may be designed on pre-determined zonal characteristics that allow an operator to select zones to be treated or avoided.
  • single-point fracturing treatments may be performed to enable access to the target formation zones.
  • the first step may be to create a single perforating cluster on the tubing or casing string.
  • the perforating cluster may be created using a perforating gun, a jetting tool, casing cutting, sawing, filing, laser perforating, and the like.
  • the cluster is already present in the tubing such as when involving a sliding sleeve system, in such instance the sleeve is active or shifted to be in an open position.
  • Fracturing fluids may be pumped down above the fracturing pressure in some embodiments, and may include viscosified hydraulic fracturing fluid, slick water, foam, energized fluid, fluid containing viscoelastic surfactants (VES fluids), linear gels, crosslinked fluids, gelled acid, gelled oils, liquefied gas, in-situ channelization fluids, and the like.
  • VES fluids viscoelastic surfactants
  • Fracturing treatments in accordance with the present disclosure may also include proppant stages wherein proppant may be sand, ceramic glass beads, mica, and the like.
  • the treatment fluid may be pumped into the target zone below the fracturing pressure.
  • chemical fracturing treatments may be applied at or below fracturing pressure and may include matrix acidizing treatments such as hydrochloric acid, citric acid, acetic acid, and mud acid; chelating agents; scale inhibitors, and the like.
  • Treatment fluids in accordance with the present disclosure may also include friction reducers, clay stabilizers, biocides, crosslinkers, breakers, corrosion inhibitors, and/or proppant fiowback control additives.
  • the treatment fluid may further include a product formed from degradation, hydrolysis, hydration, chemical reaction, or other process that occur during preparation of the treatment fluid or during the fracturing operation.
  • Treatment fluids in accordance with the present disclosure may also be modified to obtain additional formation related parameters.
  • the treatment design may include injecting tracing agents including radioactive and chemical tracers into the formation and measuring the rate of return of the tracing agent as a method to define the effectiveness of the treatment.
  • tracers may be complexes of radioactive materials such as rare earth metals that are injected in various zones in order to evaluate fiowback and production performance of the zones through radiometric analysis of fluids as they flow back from the formation.
  • the treatment designs may further include diagnostic tests to improve analysis of formation characteristics.
  • diagnostic tests are injectivity tests performed above and below fracturing pressure, drawdown tests, cycled injections/drawdowns, formation breakdown, step-up rate test, step down tests, fiowback and pressure rebound tests, calibration injections with registration of pressure decline, injection of "calibration slugs of solids," and the like.
  • the single-point treated zone is then isolated and access to the following zone in the sequence is enabled.
  • perforation may be made or the next sleeve may be opened.
  • a coiled tubing CT is used to open a CT actuated fracturation sleeve in the next zone, still involving a sealing element to be set through or below the sleeve to be treated.
  • the previous zone that was treated is isolated using for example bridge plug, ball sealers, sand plug, or by pumping zonal isolating bridging material such as particulates, fiber, flakes, and combination thereof.
  • treatment fluids may also be modified between zones to optimize data gathering or to obtain different data from the formation.
  • a sequence of clusters may be designed such that a first single-point fracture and data collection is performed using a first treatment formulation or condition, and when the sequence progresses to the next region of interest, a second treatment or condition is used during the fracturing operation. While such approaches may find utility for treating formations containing zones of differing composition and physical characteristics, it is also envisioned that such an approach may be useful for diagnostic purposes in a formation having a homogenous composition and structure to assay optimal treatment conditions by varying treatments in a sequence of clusters.
  • multi-stage single-point treatments may be repeated in additional zones or other wells of similar composition until sufficient confidence of the accuracy of the data has been established.
  • the spacing between the clusters may also be used to modify the design of the completion string in some embodiments.
  • the space between single-point clusters, or sleeves in a wellbore may be arranged geometrically, for example, at an equidistant spacing that is every 50 feet, every 20 feet, every 10 feet, or every 2 feet.
  • geometric spacing of the clusters may be used in the event that the available data sets do not provide sufficient data regarding formation composition, where the formation is homogeneous, or where time is a constraining factor.
  • clusters may be placed according to pre-determined engineering criterion, at non-equidistant spacing, including placing clusters where it is anticipated that formation intervals will have similar or different mineralogy, near regions of general interest, or at intervals determined to be maximal production targets.
  • a multi-stage single-point fracturing job may be designed such that clusters are spaced within zones having different composition in order to assay the efficacy of a particular treatment on the type of rock or structure in the zone.
  • Multi-stage operation may occur in the same well or in other wells.
  • experimental treatments may be applied at varying points in the well, or alternatively the treatment may be repeated at several intervals to determine the heterogeneity of the response to treatment across intervals.
  • Single-point fracturing allows measurement before, during, and after fracturing operations, allowing greater control over the information obtained from the formation. Characteristics obtained for the formation may include mechanical or mineralogical properties, breakdown pressure, logging and comparison to pressure data.
  • treatment of a single-point fracturing zone may be monitored using a number of measuring techniques in order to determine the dependencies between defined formation parameters and the results for each treated zone. Depending on the type of a treatment, measurements may depend on the nature of the fracturing treatment and may include measurement of pressure level, maximum injection rate achieved, Instantaneous Shut In Pressure (ISIP), fracture geometry, pressure evaluation, and the like.
  • ISIP Instantaneous Shut In Pressure
  • measurements may include analysis of bottomhole pressure data, including bottomhole pressure calculated from "deadstring” measurements, in which the level of bottomhole pressure is compared to that of the treated interval.
  • Real-time microseismic diagnostics may also be used wherein microseismic events generated during fracturing are registered to provide an understanding of the position and geometry of the fractured zone.
  • Real-time temperature logging methods in which distributed temperature sensors indicate the portion of a wellbore is being treated, such as fiber optic probes to measure the temperature profile during treatment, may also be used.
  • radioactive logging may be used in which a radioactive sensor is positioned in a wellbore prior running a treatment, and then detecting a signal from radioactive tracers added in the treatment fluid during the job.
  • low frequency pressure wave (tubewave) analysis may be used to monitor fractures, obstacles in the wellbore, completion segments, etc., by measuring the decay rates and resonant frequencies of free and forced pressure oscillations to determine the characteristic impedance and the depth of each reflection in the well.
  • additional monitoring techniques may be used including bottomhole pressure gauges including real-time measurements and memory gauges, using microseismic monitoring, tiltimetry, real-time logging including temperature and gamma ray logging, monitoring pressure in surrounding wells for defining communication events, measuring fluid flow using in-line spinning flowmeters, and the like.
  • measurements obtained from at least one of prior, during, or after single-point treatment may be used to establish dependencies or correlations between defined formation parameters and the treatment results for each affected zone.
  • revealed dependencies may include: dependence of formation breakdown pressure or any other treatment pressure parameters on zone mineralogy, mechanical properties, or zonal logging data; dependencies of fracture geometry on injection pattern; presence of natural fractures; dependencies on leak off coefficients defined during diagnostic tests on rock fabric characteristics which may include presence of natural fractures; zone permeability; and the like.
  • information obtained from one or more zones of a primary well may be used to design post-job well logging operations in the treated primary well or the information may be used to refine designs for treatments in neighboring or other wells, including those in formations having similar properties to those observed in the first well.
  • Some examples may include temperature logging; this may be used for defining fracture height (typically for vertical well section); gamma ray logging in the case of injection of a radioactive sand that, for example, may be used for defining fracture height, or gamma ray logging of neighbor wells for establishing injection pattern in the formation for example when radioactive tracers were used.
  • flowback may be combined with wellbore clean out, drilling out operation (e.g. when frac plugs were used for zonal isolation between stages), nitrogen injection for unloading the well, workover operation typically performed on a well after treatment completion.
  • Analysis of flowback fluid may include salinity, chloride content, elemental analysis and other parameters all of which can be used for making conclusion about percentage of fluid return, content of formation fluid in the flowback fluid, fracture height (e.g. in the case of presence of elements in a flowback fluid which are specific to some formation layers).
  • Flowback operation may also be combined with logging the well.
  • One of the examples may be production logging done for defining individual zone flowback rates and initial production profile. Results of evaluation of information collected during well flowback period can be used for further update of the formation model, defining dependencies with the results of the performed treatment in a manner described herein.
  • Production operations may include installation of production string, change of wellhead equipment, installation of production tree, installation of wellbore equipment (e.g., artificial lift equipment such as nitrogen/natural gas injectors or electric submersible pumps), and the like.
  • wellbore equipment e.g., artificial lift equipment such as nitrogen/natural gas injectors or electric submersible pumps
  • Production data in accordance with the present disclosure may be obtained by monitoring of fluid flow rates, including production rates, fluid composition, pressure including surface and bottomhole pressure, and the like.
  • Production operations may also be combined with logging operations, such as production logging, and may be performed on a treated well one or several times to define production rates and produced fluid composition for treated zones, in addition to any changes in production from treated zones.
  • Production data logging in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure may also include defining production profile and fluid composition for each treated zone. Obtained production results may define dependencies between zonal production characteristics, previous formation parameters for each zone, treatment parameters, results of the performed treatment that were defined from post-treatment evaluation, treatment volumes, and the like.
  • Methods in accordance with the present disclosure may carry advantages over standard fracturing techniques in which multiple fracturing clusters are generated in a single operation, because single-point fracturing allows information from the formation to be gathered after each fracture stage, which in turn may be correlated with logging data obtained from the well. Thus, increased amounts of information regarding formation composition, formation pressure, and production volume may be gathered from a single well.
  • data acquired by drilling, completing, and measuring data from a first well may be used to enable a further optimization of a fracturing process.
  • using single-point fracturing and obtaining relevant data for establishing dependencies will help in the choice of fluid flow rate and treatment fluid composition.
  • data acquired from single-point fracturing may enable optimization of completion string design, because dependencies may be used to optimize perforation depending on the zone, which may in turn contribute to more efficient hydrocarbon production.
  • an operator may tailor the placement and number of fracturing ports on a completion string depending on data obtained from a first diagnostic well, which can minimize sleeve shifting time, manufacturing cost, and fracturing fluid consumption.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Geophysics (AREA)
  • Physical Or Chemical Processes And Apparatus (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne des procédés de traitement d'une formation souterraine qui peuvent comprendre : obtenir des données de diagraphie pour au moins une section d'un puits de forage, traiter une pluralité de zones dans au moins une section du puits du forage à l'aide d'une opération de fracturation à point unique, à plusieurs stades, obtenir une ou plusieurs parmi des données de traitement, des données de reflux ou des données de production pour la pluralité de zones traitées, définir une ou plusieurs dépendances entre les données de diagraphie obtenues et une ou plusieurs parmi des données de traitement, des données de reflux ou des données de production, et utiliser les dépendances pour effectuer des opérations ultérieures sur ladite section d'un puits de forage ou dans un autre puits de forage. Les procédés peuvent également consister à concevoir une colonne de complétion à l'aide des dépendances définies à partir de données obtenues par mise en œuvre d'un traitement de fracturation à point unique, à plusieurs stades, sur une pluralité de zones dans ladite section d'un puits de forage.
PCT/US2015/044980 2014-08-15 2015-08-13 Procédé de traitement d'une formation souterraine présentant une stimulation à point unique WO2016025672A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA2957931A CA2957931A1 (fr) 2014-08-15 2015-08-13 Procede de traitement d'une formation souterraine presentant une stimulation a point unique

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201462037873P 2014-08-15 2014-08-15
US62/037,873 2014-08-15

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2016025672A1 true WO2016025672A1 (fr) 2016-02-18

Family

ID=55304609

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2015/044980 WO2016025672A1 (fr) 2014-08-15 2015-08-13 Procédé de traitement d'une formation souterraine présentant une stimulation à point unique

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CA (1) CA2957931A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2016025672A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2019005776A1 (fr) * 2017-06-30 2019-01-03 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Optimisation de l'opération d'intervention dans un fond de puits
WO2023023521A1 (fr) * 2021-08-17 2023-02-23 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Maintien de l'intégrité d'une complétion inférieure pour une fracturation hydraulique en plusieurs étapes

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090119082A1 (en) * 2007-11-01 2009-05-07 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Reservoir fracture simulation
US20100314105A1 (en) * 2009-06-12 2010-12-16 Rose Peter E Injection-backflow technique for measuring fracture surface area adjacent to a wellbore
US20110308817A1 (en) * 2009-07-27 2011-12-22 John Edward Ravensbergen Multi-Zone Fracturing Completion
WO2012087864A2 (fr) * 2010-12-20 2012-06-28 Schlumberger Technology Coproration Procédé d'utilisation des données relatives aux formations souterraines pour améliorer les opérations de traitement
US20140067353A1 (en) * 2012-09-05 2014-03-06 Stratagen Wellbore completion and hydraulic fracturing optimization methods and associated systems

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090119082A1 (en) * 2007-11-01 2009-05-07 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Reservoir fracture simulation
US20100314105A1 (en) * 2009-06-12 2010-12-16 Rose Peter E Injection-backflow technique for measuring fracture surface area adjacent to a wellbore
US20110308817A1 (en) * 2009-07-27 2011-12-22 John Edward Ravensbergen Multi-Zone Fracturing Completion
WO2012087864A2 (fr) * 2010-12-20 2012-06-28 Schlumberger Technology Coproration Procédé d'utilisation des données relatives aux formations souterraines pour améliorer les opérations de traitement
US20140067353A1 (en) * 2012-09-05 2014-03-06 Stratagen Wellbore completion and hydraulic fracturing optimization methods and associated systems

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2019005776A1 (fr) * 2017-06-30 2019-01-03 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Optimisation de l'opération d'intervention dans un fond de puits
US10480311B2 (en) 2017-06-30 2019-11-19 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Downhole intervention operation optimization
WO2023023521A1 (fr) * 2021-08-17 2023-02-23 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Maintien de l'intégrité d'une complétion inférieure pour une fracturation hydraulique en plusieurs étapes
US11719083B2 (en) 2021-08-17 2023-08-08 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Maintaining integrity of lower completion for multi-stage fracturing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2957931A1 (fr) 2016-02-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9822626B2 (en) Planning and performing re-fracturing operations based on microseismic monitoring
US9803467B2 (en) Well screen-out prediction and prevention
RU2663011C2 (ru) Система и способ выполнения операции интенсификации скважины
Cipolla et al. Diagnostic techniques to understand hydraulic fracturing: what? why? and how?
US20160061026A1 (en) Interacting hydraulic fracturing
EP2427788B1 (fr) Appareil et procédé permettant de prédire les propriétés de formations terrestres
WO2016122792A1 (fr) Procédé de réalisation d'opérations de fracture sur site de forage avec des incertitudes statistiques
CA2881718A1 (fr) Systeme et procede d'execution d'operations de stimulation
US9695681B2 (en) Use of real-time pressure data to evaluate fracturing performance
Cramer et al. Pumpdown Diagnostics for Plug-and-Perf Treatments
WO2019191349A1 (fr) Plate-forme entraînée par des données intégrée pour optimisation de complétion et caractérisation de réservoir
US11753919B2 (en) Method to improve hydraulic fracturing in the near wellbore region
Retnanto et al. Managing uncertainty of reservoir heterogeneity and optimizing acid placement in thick carbonate reservoirs
WO2018049086A1 (fr) Communication zonale et procédés d'évaluation de communication zonale
WO2016025672A1 (fr) Procédé de traitement d'une formation souterraine présentant une stimulation à point unique
Yoshida et al. Unlocking the Potential of Acid Stimulation in Volcanic Rocks: A Successful Case with Integrated Analysis in Minami-Nagaoka Gas Field, Japan
US12006819B2 (en) Hydraulic integrity analysis
US20220228484A1 (en) Hydraulic integrity analysis
von Flatern The science of oil and gas well construction
Malhotra et al. Coiled Tubing Horizontal Well Fracturing in the Low Young's Modulus, Low Permeability Belridge Diatomite: Challenges Faced and Lessons Learned
Ramadan et al. Formation Sampling in Ultra-Low Mobility Reservoirs with the Aid of Targeted Stimulation Utilizing Wireline Formation Testing Tool
Nygaard et al. Improved Methods and Workflows for Multi-Zone Stimulation
Kennedy Gas Shale Challenges Over the Asset Life Cycle
Abdelaziz et al. Successful Application of Platform Based Hydraulic Fracturing in High-Pressure/High-Temperature Tight Gas Sand in North Malay Basin
CA3062303A1 (fr) Selection de systemes de fluide fondee sur des caracteristiques de frottement d'un puits

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 15831856

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2957931

Country of ref document: CA

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 15831856

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1