WO2015185980A1 - Système expert d'innovation pouvant générer de manière semi-automatique et solliciter toutes les chaînes d'arguments juridiques dans une invention revendiquée - Google Patents

Système expert d'innovation pouvant générer de manière semi-automatique et solliciter toutes les chaînes d'arguments juridiques dans une invention revendiquée Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2015185980A1
WO2015185980A1 PCT/IB2015/000828 IB2015000828W WO2015185980A1 WO 2015185980 A1 WO2015185980 A1 WO 2015185980A1 IB 2015000828 W IB2015000828 W IB 2015000828W WO 2015185980 A1 WO2015185980 A1 WO 2015185980A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
les
user
uie
ast
ies
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IB2015/000828
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Sigram Schindler
Original Assignee
Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft Mbh
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US14/294,825 external-priority patent/US20140365385A1/en
Application filed by Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft Mbh filed Critical Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft Mbh
Priority to EP15738968.5A priority Critical patent/EP3152709A1/fr
Priority to CN201580037875.1A priority patent/CN106489160A/zh
Priority to JP2016570866A priority patent/JP6480473B2/ja
Publication of WO2015185980A1 publication Critical patent/WO2015185980A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N5/00—Computing arrangements using knowledge-based models
    • G06N5/04—Inference or reasoning models

Definitions

  • LAC Any instantiation of it - when invoked (and created by the lES for its partial existence during the execution of the UIE.Y defining it) on direct or indirect request by an lES user - responds to one of the finitely many questions (anticipated in its config-mode) by an answer potentially in multimedia presentation (determined in its config-mode) instantly, correctly, completely, concisely, and to some degree user controllable by an lES user as to this answer's presentation and/or its logics.
  • the occurrence of this question, raised by an lES user intentionally or not, is the reason of this instantiation's invocation.
  • the issue addressed by this question is one of the finitely many aspects of testing a given CI for its satisfying the requirement(s) stated by the given respective FFOLLIN instantiation.
  • the set of all LACs defined, for a given FFOLLIN and its CI in config-mode, establishes the total usefulness of this CI provided by the so configured IES in this FFOLLIN.
  • AST Any instantiation of it enables accessing a specific part of the FSTP-DS - potentially finer than that of an FSTP-test.o and/or stretching over parts of several FSTP-test.o - whereby all ASTs, for a given CI and its FFOLLIN, in total cover this Cl's
  • the usefulness of an AST instantiation consists in its providing access, in the Cl's test for satisfying its given FFOLLIN, to that part of the FSTP FF0LLIN -Test represented by this AST instantiation.
  • IC-UIE Any instantiation of it enables structuring and controlling the presentation of any part of any LAC.
  • H-UIE Any instantiation of it enables determining the multimedia aspects and didactic presentation of any LAC.
  • KR-UIE Any instantiation of it enables supporting the presentation of any LAC by an appropriate choice of the logics of the AST.
  • Models are e.g.: The "ISO/OSI” model of telecommunications, "molecular bonding forces” models of nano-technology, “RNA/DNA” models of genetics, “Natural Language” models of Advanced IT - some standardized, all implicitly used by SPL precedents without being aware of this.
  • the philosophical synonym of the term model is "paradigm”, the scientific one "reference system”, e.g. "coordinate system”. Using a model often enables describing a CI precisely on top of it, though it itself is not understood precisely - as practiced with mathematics' “axioms/theorems/proofs”, with physics' “laws of nature”, and here with SPL's “claimed inventions”.
  • the here claimed invention is applicable to all model based Cls.
  • a system based on a Cl's alias TT.O's PTR SPL -DS [6,7] - which stores all SPL-relevant functional and nonfunctional properties of this CI - is called an "Innovation Expert System, IES", iff it has a "User Interface Entity, UIE” enabling its user(s) to access of this CI all (legally nonredundant) LACs showing its satisfying SPL.
  • An IES leverages on its PTR-DS embodying, by all results of its Cl's FSTP- Test, all "Arguable Subtests, ASTs" - these being the blueprints of all LACs of this CI. Automatic LACs generation according to this invention is not limited to Cls' tests under SPL, as shown in Section II.
  • An IES or a user of it invokes between them an "interaction”.
  • In config-mode an interaction serves for generating or modifying of a UIE.Y by a user at least 1 of its just quoted 3 components.
  • an interaction serves for invoking, controlled by its IC-UIE.Y, the presentation of a HI-UIE.Y.
  • a UIE.Y may be subdivided into (potentially nested) "UIE.Y Steps"; invoking a UIE.Y causes at least executing one of them partially.
  • An AST.X may be used in at least 1 "logics presentation", tied to at least 1 HI-UIE.Y by its own IC-UIE.Y, as customized by an IES user in config-mode - between which a user may toggle by invoking these IC-UIE.Ys.
  • any AST is (semi-)automatically transformable into its 1 or more LAC.Zs, being AST's in various logics presentations translated into multimedia presentations by UIE.Ys - as needed by a judge, examiner, lawyer, inventor
  • any AST is (semi-)automatically transformable into its 1 or more LAC.Zs, being AST's in various logics presentations translated into multimedia presentations by UIE.Ys - as needed by a judge, examiner, lawyer, inventor
  • realtime-mode a user may toggle between these
  • FIG1 shows an AST.1 translated into 3 LAC.a/b/c by their UIE.1a/1b/1c of 1/2/3 sequential UIE.IaM/lb ⁇ lciw ] steps semi-automatically generated/customized in config-mode by defining by an IES user their respective 6 ⁇ HI-UIE.Ys, KR-UIE.Ys, IC-UIE.Ys>.
  • FIG2 shows that AST.1 may have 2 logics presentations, leading to 3 more powerful LAC.d/e/f by their UIE.1d/1 e/1f, again based on 6 steps (lines) in total. More information about the FIGs 1/2 is provided by the end of Section II.
  • the below bullet points specify technical features of an lES enabling a user of it to configure alias calibrate alias customize it according to the needs of its user(s) in its realtime-mode.
  • a user of it may use the lES simultaneously in config- and/or realtime-mode, thus directly or indirectly communicating with each other.
  • the understanding of the working of the lES in realtime-mode immediately follows from its config-mode understanding. They add such features sometimes redundantly, as explained already above and/or by these publications.
  • Section III defining the meanings of this Cl's inCs and of the claims as wholes - if not evident already from the inCs' definitions - then leverages on these explanations in Section II, as they provide the interpretation basis of these meanings. These bullet points thus also disclose the scope of this CI.
  • the complete FSTP-Test is a program evaluating, for a CI under SPL test, the whole FFOL expression modeling the logics (see below) of and between the 1 1 concerns embodied by the 35 USC SPL over the mirror predicates of BED-inCs of this CI, the conjunctions of these BED-inCs' mirror predicates modeling the properties of the elements of the CI.
  • Their peers in prior art TTs may or may not exist - as decided by an FSTP-Test user (and confirmed by the pose) - forming the ANC matrix.
  • Any AST is a lexically and syntactically correct "sentence” alias FFOL term from within this whole FFOL expression. Hence, for any CI, there are only finitely many ASTs, and for any AST its semantic is evident (except the semantics of the above properties and the relations between them that the user/pose has input into the PTR-DS when generating it - here assumed to be correct).
  • Any UIE.Y for any AST.X may be generated in config-mode by an lES user by its invoking the "UIE-stub" provided by any lES implementation and delivering to it this UIE.Y, depending on the parameters of this invocation being a fresh UIE.Y or an existing and defined UIE.Y for checking or changing the result of preceding input, or the interworking between presenting several UIE.Y invocations of LAC.Z, or its interworking with other LAC.Z' presentations.
  • any UIE.Y may be composed by the user of one or several sequential "UIE steps, UIESes", whereby any UIES again may be composed by the user of one or several sequential such steps ("nested UIE.Ys").
  • Any UIE.Y and UIES.Y must be specified by the user - except automatic ones, depending on the particular lES implementation and/or configuration - as to the functionalities of their 3 resp. KR-/HI-/IC-UIE.Ys or KR-/HI-/IC-UIES.Ys.
  • any UIEs may vastly be generated automatically by the lES or interactively generated by a user guided by the lES - not elaborated on in this patent application - and would basically be the same or similar, i.e. are principally stereotypical.
  • Pertinent ordinary skill knows, e.g. from IVR systems and their audio pattern spotting and matching functionalities, how in principle to (semi-)automatically identify in realtime LACs to be instantly invoked, as the dialog just taking place generates an appropriate pattern.
  • LAC identification and invocation processes in realtime-mode may be substantially supported by the lES calibration providing resp. hints to these processes, e.g. leveraging on graphical and/or acoustic patterns embodied by a related multimedia thesaurus construction based on "AST patterns”.
  • the complete FSTP-Test of a CI for its satisfying 35 USC SPL comprises the 10 FSTP-test.o, 1 ⁇ o ⁇ 10 of FIG 3. It is executed for the "set v claim interpretations, Sol" of the CI, selected in (b)/(c) therein, i.e. all TT.Os of this CI - a CI may enable several interpretations, if disclosed by its patent's (application's) specification [71 ,78].
  • the term/notion "technical teaching 0, TT.O" [6,7,1 1 ] then stands for one them [71 ,78], I.e.:
  • the TT.Os are the elements of the Cl's "set of interpretations, Sol".
  • LAC legal argument chain
  • the claimed invention has been invented, in particular, for thus enabling the IES to present automatically or interactively a LAC in response to a question being asked, as if this response were provided by a human being of total knowledge about the TT.O being SPL tested.
  • this response must be represented by the IES - by having the person speaking and showing what it graphically uses for support of its presentation, both in reality or on a screen, anyway all media used in synchrony, what would be the normal cases in realtime mode use of the IES - as it were presented without the support by the lES.
  • the lES enables a user first to acoustically and/or graphically input fragments of the arguments it later intends to present in its personalized fashion, then to combine these fragments into what it considers to be a complete legal argument chain, and finally to invoke the automatic reproduction of this argument.
  • the lES would execute many steps of such a whole process automatically or interactively, as outlined in ⁇ )- ⁇ ) below.
  • the lES may basically:
  • a) recognize by/for which "high level user interaction" - due to the FFOL nature of the problem only finitely many such user interactions are required by an lES - this invocation occurred, then ⁇ ) derive, for this interaction, which technical items and/or legal items from the FSTP-DS it needs, ⁇ ) determine, by which "basic AST arguments, BASTAs" (see below) they are covered - due to the FFOL nature of the problem, i.e.
  • TT.O independent BASTAs would be provided by the lES, and the TT.O dependent BASTAs would be input by an lES user into the lES under the latter's guidance being controlled by the PTR-DS prior to using the lES as outlined by ⁇ )- ⁇ ) - then
  • ⁇ determine, for any HI-UIE instantiation of ⁇ ), when in the future (if working in config-mode) or actually (if working in realtime-mode) on what event how to output on what I/O devices which part of this or another one of these HI-UIE instantiations of ⁇ ), and have for this HI-UIE instantiation its specific IC-UIE instantiation represent these future/actual interaction controls - thus linking, to commands of IES users, not only parts of HI-UIE instantiations of ⁇ ) but also what any latter part needs for its execution from a KR-UIE.
  • Any step requires some interactive input from or control by an IES user or executes fully automatic. These steps differ when invoked in different modes, e.g. i) in explorative/calibrating/config-mode, ii) in reply-testing-mode, iii) in "one-way”-reply-mode, iv) in "two-way”- alias "interactive"-reply-mode, v) in some "consolidation"-reply mode
  • basic has the meaning that it deals with only a single factual alias "technical” and/or legal question as to one of the 10 FSTP-test.o (which enables dealing e.g. with the finitely many such details or evaluations or relations of some kinds of inCs or the FSTP- test.o at issue), and the term “argument" indicates that the BASTAs are translated into the basic building blocks also of the LACs.
  • an embodiment of the claimed invention may provide "prototypes" of all user interactions and modes it provides, as well as macros for the stereotypically recurring parts when invoking them, such as repeating some passage in other words or particularly slowly, or skipping momentarily boring details, or prompting a user to continue, or asking for confirmation the understanding of the just said, or ... .
  • LACs may also be presented by their default configurations coming with user interactions specific for models of application areas (see Section I). These prototype interactions are fine for inputting/defining/configuring specific UIE instantiations by a user for its personalization of the IES and/or its LACs for adapting them to the specificities of the actual PTR-DS under test - but normally these prototypes' functioning is not yet what an IES user ideally would like to use.
  • any instantiation of a FFOLLN would occur by means of a subject matter being a CI of FFOL, thus by means of a finite set of BED SCL -inCs generative for this CI [71].
  • this instantiation - being a subject matter defined by this CI of this FFOLLN - is called "finite FOL legal invention norm, FFOLLIN".
  • An IES SPL defined by a CI SPL 's BED SPL -inCs and the FSTP SPL -Test is all knowing about Cl SPL 's satisfying this SPL. • This enables several very interesting conclusions showing the total unreasonableness of trying to reason about model based Cls without scientizing this reasoning. Namely, that
  • any FFOL CI from a FFOLLN area creates, by its FSTP FF0LLIN -Test, its specific compound metric for any prior just as posteriori art over the pose underlying this FFOLLN area.
  • the 5 inCs are references to information (sometimes dealt with as if they contained them), which the IES (semi-)automatically generates and uses, as defined in much detail in this specification.
  • the claims hence, contribute to disclosing/describing this Cl's inventive concepts, in particular their respective incremental contributions to the usefulness of this CI.
  • Some of the dependent Cls are based on further disclosed inCs, not elaborated on, here.
  • the incremental usefulness of these 5 inCs (in realtime-mode) is here defined - as their manifestation by means of an IES comprising its at least one instantiation or capable of creating it as well as invoking it instantly, not by means of the method controlling it and enabling the same definition, but being totally intangible/invisible - for the
  • LAC • LAC as follows: Any instantiation of it - when invoked (and created by the IES for its partial existence during the execution of the UIE.Y defining it) on direct or indirect request by an IES user - responds to one of the finitely many questions (anticipated in its config-mode) by an answer potentially in multimedia presentation (determined in its config-mode) instantly, correctly, completely, concisely, and to some degree user controllable by an IES user as to this answer's presentation and/or its logics. The occurrence of this question, raised by an IES user intentionally or not, is the reason of this instantiation's invocation.
  • the issue addressed by this question is one of the finitely many aspects of testing a given CI for its satisfying the requirement(s) stated by the given respective FFOLLIN instantiation.
  • the set of all LACs defined, for a given FFOLLIN and its CI in config-mode, establishes the total usefulness of this CI provided by the so configured IES in this FFOLLIN.
  • AST as follows: Any instantiation of it enables accessing a specific part of the FSTP-DS - potentially finer than that of an FSTP-test.o and/or stretching over parts of several FSTP-test.o - whereby all ASTs, for a given CI and its FFOLLIN, in total cover this Cl's FSTP FF0LUN -DS.
  • the usefulness of an AST instantiation consists in its providing access, in the Cl's test for satisfying its given FFOLLIN, to that part of the FSTP FF0LLIN -Test represented by this AST instantiation.
  • IC-UIE as follows: Any instantiation of it enables structuring and controlling the presentation of any part of any LAC.
  • HI-UIE as follows: Any instantiation of it enables determining the multimedia aspects and didactic presentation of any LAC.
  • KR-UIE as follows: Any instantiation of it enables supporting the presentation of any LAC by an appropriate choice of the logics of the AST.
  • the term "automatically identifies" means that the IES, when intending to invoke another user interaction, always first checks whether a user request is pending. If so, it serves this request, otherwise it checks whether it may prompt the user to request a user interaction, and if so, it issues this prompt.
  • the here claimed invention satisfies the 35 USC ⁇ 101/102/103/1 12 as it passes all 10 FSTP tests. o outlined by FIG 3. It namely passes 3)
  • FSTP test 7 The claimed invention passes the NAIO test, as its total usefulness is outlined in Section
  • FSTP test 10 The claimed invention is not idempotent, because none of its 5 inCs is trivial.
  • the here claimed invention satisfies 35 USC's SPL.
  • FIG1 shows an AST.1 translated into 3 LAC.a/b/c by their UIE.1a/1b/1c of 1/2/3 sequential UIE.1at ) /1 b[ ' 2 V1ci 1 ' 2 3 ) steps semi-automatically generated/customized in config-mode by defining by an IES user their respective 6 ⁇ HI-UIE.Ys, KR-UIE.Ys, IC-UIE.Ys>.
  • FIG2 shows that AST.1 may have 2 logics presentations, leading to 3 more powerful LAC.d/e/f by their UIE.1 d/1 e/1 f, again based on 6 steps (lines) in total.
  • FIG3 shows the FSTP-Test, consisting of the 10 FSTP-test.o.
  • FIG4 shows the compound USC SPL expressed by the elementary FSTP tests.
  • Advanced IT denotes IT research areas, e.g. Al, Semantics, KR, DL, NL, ..

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Stored Programmes (AREA)
  • Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne et un procédé et un système expert d'innovation (IES) présentant un mode de configuration et un mode en temps réel, qui soutient la création, la modification et la présentation de chaînes d'arguments juridiques (LAC) représentant des sous-tests défendables (AST) inclus dans une structure de données (DS) quelconque déterminée par un test FSTPFFOLLIN d'une invention revendiquée (CI) en vue de satisfaire une norme d'invention juridique finie logique de premier ordre (FFOLLIN). Des interactions sont sollicitées pour exécuter une entité d'interface utilisateur (UIE) composée de UIE.Y, Y=1,2,3,..., chaque UIE.Y comprenant trois composantes, chacune étant séparée en mode de configuration et étant synchrone en mode en temps réel: une représentation des connaissances (KR-UIE), une interaction humaine (HI-UIE) et une commande d'interaction (IC-UIE). Une interaction identifie un AST fourni par une structure de données (DS) déterminée par un test Cl's FSTPFFOLLIN ou une LAC ou une composante d'UIE.Y. En mode configuration, l'interaction détermine quel AST doit être présenté comme une LAC à un utilisateur d'IES, comment présenter l'AST, et sous quelle commande, par génération/modification/gestion de ces articles en conséquence. En mode en temps réel, l'interaction présente instantanément une LAC ainsi déterminée.
PCT/IB2015/000828 2014-06-03 2015-06-03 Système expert d'innovation pouvant générer de manière semi-automatique et solliciter toutes les chaînes d'arguments juridiques dans une invention revendiquée WO2015185980A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP15738968.5A EP3152709A1 (fr) 2014-06-03 2015-06-03 Système expert d'innovation pouvant générer de manière semi-automatique et solliciter toutes les chaînes d'arguments juridiques dans une invention revendiquée
CN201580037875.1A CN106489160A (zh) 2014-06-03 2015-06-03 能半自动产生及在要求保护的发明调用所有法律论证链的创新专家系统
JP2016570866A JP6480473B2 (ja) 2014-06-03 2015-06-03 請求項にかかる発明における法律的な文法項連鎖の半自動での生成及び起動が可能なイノベーションエキスパートシステム

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/294,825 2014-06-03
US14/294,825 US20140365385A1 (en) 2009-04-09 2014-06-03 Ies capable of semi-automatically generating/ invoking all legal argument chains (lacs) in the spl test of a claimed invention (ci), as enabled by its inventive concepts (incs)

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2015185980A1 true WO2015185980A1 (fr) 2015-12-10

Family

ID=53674216

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2015/000828 WO2015185980A1 (fr) 2014-06-03 2015-06-03 Système expert d'innovation pouvant générer de manière semi-automatique et solliciter toutes les chaînes d'arguments juridiques dans une invention revendiquée

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3152709A1 (fr)
JP (2) JP6480473B2 (fr)
CN (1) CN106489160A (fr)
WO (1) WO2015185980A1 (fr)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6954453B1 (en) 1996-10-07 2005-10-11 Teles Ag Informationstechnologien Method for transmitting data in a telecommunications network and switch for implementing said method
US20080086507A1 (en) * 2006-10-06 2008-04-10 Intelligent Process Expert Systems, Llc Automated Letters Patent Analysis Support System and Method
US20130179386A1 (en) * 2009-04-09 2013-07-11 Sigram Schindler Innovation expert system, ies, and its ptr data structure, ptr-ds

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009501974A (ja) * 2005-07-13 2009-01-22 トムソン グローバル リソーシーズ 法律判例履歴のためのユーザインターフェース
US20140012766A1 (en) * 2009-04-09 2014-01-09 Sigram Schindler Inventive concepts enabled semi-automatic tests of patents
CN103189881B (zh) * 2010-08-17 2019-06-18 西格拉姆申德勒有限公司 Fstp专家系统
WO2012022612A1 (fr) * 2010-08-17 2012-02-23 Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft Mbh Fstp expert system

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6954453B1 (en) 1996-10-07 2005-10-11 Teles Ag Informationstechnologien Method for transmitting data in a telecommunications network and switch for implementing said method
US7145902B2 (en) 1996-10-07 2006-12-05 Teles Ag Informations-Technologien Method for transmitting data in a telecommunications network and switch for implementing said method
US20080086507A1 (en) * 2006-10-06 2008-04-10 Intelligent Process Expert Systems, Llc Automated Letters Patent Analysis Support System and Method
US20130179386A1 (en) * 2009-04-09 2013-07-11 Sigram Schindler Innovation expert system, ies, and its ptr data structure, ptr-ds

Non-Patent Citations (57)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"2014 Procedure For Subject Matter Eligibility Analysis Of Claims Reciting Or Involving Laws Of Nature/Natural Principles, Natural Phenomena, And/Or Natural Products", USPTO/MPEP, 2014
"As to Copyrightability of the Java Platform", 6 December 2013, CAFC
"FACT SHEET", 2014, WHITE HOUSE, article "the President's Call to Strength. Our Patent System and Foster Innovation"
"Official Transcript of the oral argument in U.S. Supreme Court, Alice Corp. v CLS Bank, Case 13-298 - Subject to final Review", 31 March 2014, ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY
"The Description Logic Handbook", 2010
A. PASCHKE: "Rules and Logic Programming in the Web", vol. 7., 2011, ISS, GALWAY
AI, SEMANTICS: "Advanced IT", DENOTES IT RESEARCH AREAS
AMAZON ET AL., AB, 2014
B. FIACCO: "Amicus Brief to the CAFC in VERSATA v", SAP&USPTO, 24 March 2014 (2014-03-24)
B. WEGNER; S. SCHINDLER, THE MATHEMATICAL STRUCTURE FOR MODELING THE REFINED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
B. WEGNER; S. SCHINDLER: "A Mathematical Structure for Modeling Inventions", 2014, CICM
BIOSIG, RESPONDENT, 2013
C. CORREA: "Res. Handbook on Protection of IP under WTO Rules", 2010
CAFC, THERASENSE VS. BECTON & BAYER DECISION, 25 May 2011 (2011-05-25)
CAFC, VEDERI VS. GOOGLE DECISION, 14 March 2014 (2014-03-14)
D. CROUCH, EN BANC FEDERAL CIRCUIT PANEL CHANGES THE LAW OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION, 13 July 2005 (2005-07-13)
D.-M. BEY; C. COTROPIA: "The Unreasonableness of the BRI Standard", 2009, AIPLA
H. WEGNER, INDEFINITENESS, THE SLEEPING GIANT IN PATENT LAW, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:www.laipla.net/ hal-wegners-top-ten-patent-cases>
J. DAILY; S. KIEFF: "Anything under the Sun Made by Humans SPL Doctrine as Endogenous Institutions for Commercial Innovation", STANFORD AND GWU
J. SCHULZE, TECHNICAL REPORT #1.V1 ON THE '882 PTR AND THE UI OF THE IES PROTOTYPE
K. ASHLEY; V. WALKER: "From Information Retrieval to Arg. Retrieval for Legal Cases: .....", 2013, BOLOGNA, JURIX
K. O'MALLEY, KEYNOTE ADDRESS, IPO, 2013
M. ADELMAN; R. RADER; J. THOMAS: "Cases and Materials on Patent Law", WEST AP, 2009
N. FUCHS; R. SCHWITTER, ATTEMPT TO CONTROLLED ENGLISH, 1996
N. KLUNKER: "Harmonisierungsbestr. im mat. Patentrecht", MPI, MUNICH, 2010
NAUTILUS V., BIOSIG, PFC, 2013
PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE, AB, 2014
R. BRACHMANN; H. LEVESQUE: "Knowledge Representation & Reasoning", 2004, ELSEVIER
R. RADER, KEYNOTE SPEECHES AT GTIF, GENEVA, 2014 AND LESI, 2014
R. RADER: "Patent on Life Sciences", PANEL DISCUSSION, 28 November 2012 (2012-11-28)
R. RADER; KEYNOTE SPEECH: "Patent Law and Litigation Abuse", ED TEX BENCH AND BAR CONF., 1 November 2013 (2013-11-01)
S. SCHINDLER, AUTOM. DERIV. OF LEG. ARG. CHAINS (LACS) FROM ARGUABLE SUBTESTS (ASTS) OF A CLAIMED INVENTION'S TEST FOR SATISFYING. SPL, 24 May 2014 (2014-05-24)
S. SCHINDLER, KR SUPPORT FOR SPL PRECEDENTS, 2014
S. SCHINDLER, MATH. MODEL. SUBSTANTIVE PATENT LAW (SPL) TOP-DOWN VS. BOTTOM-UP, 2013
S. SCHINDLER, PATENT BUSINESS - BEFORE SHAKE-UP, 2013
S. SCHINDLER, SUBSTANTIVE TRADEMARK LAW STL), SUBSTANTIVE COPYRIGHT LAW (SCL), AND SPL - STL TESTS ARE TRUE SCL SUBTESTS, AND SCL TESTS ARE TRUE SPL SUBTESTS
S. SCHINDLER, THE IES AND ITS IN-C ENABLED SPL TESTS, 2013
S. SCHINDLER, THE VIEW OF AN INVENTOR AT THE GRACE PERIOD, 2013
S. SCHINDLER, US HIGHEST COURTS' PATENT PRECEDENTS IN MAYO/MYRIAD/CLS/ ULTRAMERCIAL/LBC: 'INVENTIVE CONCEPTS' ACCEPTED - 'ABSTRACT IDEAS' NEXT? PATENTING EMERGING TECH. INVENTIONS NOW WITHOUT INTRICACIES
S. SCHINDLER: "A KR Based Innovation Expert System (IES) for US SPL Precedents", 2014, PHUKET, ICIM
S. SCHINDLER: "Auto. Gen. of All ASTs for an Inv.' s SPL Test", SUBM. FOR PUBLIC
S. SCHINDLER: "Boon and Bane of Inventive Concepts and Refined Claim Construction in the Supreme Court's New Patent Precedents", 2014, HAWAII, IAM
S. SCHINDLER: "On the BRI-Schism in the US National Patent System (NPS), A Challenge for the US Highest Courts", 22 May 2014
S. SCHINDLER: "Status Report about the FSTP Prototype", 2014, HYDERABAD, GIPC
S. SCHINDLER: "Status Report about the FSTP Prototype", 2014, MOSCOW, LESI
S. SCHINDLER: "The Supreme Court's 'SPL Initiative': Scientizing Its SPL Interpretation Clarifies Three Initially Evergreen SPL Obscurities", 2014
S. SCHINDLER: "Two Fundamental Theorems of Math. Innovation Science", 2013, ECM
S. SCHINDLER; A. PASCHKE; S. RAMAKRISHNA: "Form. Legal Reason. that an Invention Sat. SPL", 2013, JURIX
S. SCHINDLER; KEYNOTE SPEECH: "eKnowledge About Substantive Patent Law (SPL) - Trail Blazer into the Innovation Age", 2014, EKNOW
SSBG'S AB TO THE SUPREME COURT AS TO THE CII QUESTION, 28 January 2014 (2014-01-28)
SSBG'S, PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT IN THE '902 CASE
SSBG'S, PETITION TO THE CAFC FOR REHEARING EN BANC IN THE '902, 18 April 2014 (2014-04-18)
SSBG'S: "Amicus Brief to the Supreme Court as to its", DEFINITENESS QUESTIONS, 3 March 2014 (2014-03-03)
T. BENCH-CAPON; F. COENEN: "Isomorphism. and Legal Knowl. Based Systems", AI&LAW, 1992
USPTO, INTELL. PROP. AND THE US ECONOMY: INDUSTR. IN FOCUS, 2012
USPTO/MPEP, 2012 ... PROC. FOR SUBJ. MATTER ELIGIBILITY ... OF PROCESS CLAIMS INVOLVING LAWS OF NATURE, 2012
USPTO/MPEP: "Guidelines 35 U.S.C. 112(2), Federal Register", MPEP 2171, REV. 9, vol. 76, no. 27, August 2012 (2012-08-01)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6480473B2 (ja) 2019-03-13
JP2019106196A (ja) 2019-06-27
JP6891200B2 (ja) 2021-06-18
EP3152709A1 (fr) 2017-04-12
CN106489160A (zh) 2017-03-08
JP2017525012A (ja) 2017-08-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Mahowald et al. Info/information theory: Speakers choose shorter words in predictive contexts
Wagner Prosody and recursion in coordinate structures and beyond
Duran et al. ALIGN: Analyzing linguistic interactions with generalizable techNiques—A Python library.
Sidnell Comparative studies in conversation analysis
Khan et al. BlindSense: An Accessibility-inclusive Universal User Interface for Blind People.
US20050119892A1 (en) Method and arrangement for managing grammar options in a graphical callflow builder
JP2007122747A (ja) ダイアログフローインタプリタ
Gnjatović et al. Cognitively-inspired representational approach to meaning in machine dialogue
Stone Intention, interpretation and the computational structure of language
Lachgar et al. Modeling and generating native code for cross-platform mobile applications using DSL
Soares et al. VoiceToModel: an approach to generate requirements models from speech recognition mechanisms
Pineda et al. The dime project
WO2015185980A1 (fr) Système expert d&#39;innovation pouvant générer de manière semi-automatique et solliciter toutes les chaînes d&#39;arguments juridiques dans une invention revendiquée
US20140365385A1 (en) Ies capable of semi-automatically generating/ invoking all legal argument chains (lacs) in the spl test of a claimed invention (ci), as enabled by its inventive concepts (incs)
Maynard et al. Ethnomethodology's Legacies and Prospects
Schindler IES’s UIEs for Generating LACs for Arguing that a CI Satisfies SPL
Leuteritz et al. Development of open platform based adaptive HCI concepts for elderly users
Church et al. Breaking down and making up-a lens for conversing with compilers
Salvador et al. Requirement engineering contributions to voice user interface
Cowling Modelling: a neglected feature in the software engineering curriculum
Tuffley Human intelligence+ artificial intelligence= human potential
US20150161751A1 (en) Semi-automatic generation / customization of (all) confirmative legal argument chains (lacs) in a claimed invention&#39;s spl test, as enabled by its &#34;inventive concepts&#34;
CN106462805B (zh) 通过创新专家系统的法律论据链的计算机实作方法与系统
Neto et al. Multimodal interfaces design issues: the fusion of well-designed voice and graphical user interfaces
Jaber Towards Designing Better Speech Agent Interaction: Using Eye Gaze for Interaction

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 15738968

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

REEP Request for entry into the european phase

Ref document number: 2015738968

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2015738968

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2016570866

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE