WO2014183255A1

WO2014183255A1 - Group appraisal system and method therefor

Info

Publication number: WO2014183255A1
Application number: PCT/CN2013/075573
Authority: WO
Inventors: 李明宗
Original assignee: 欣亚数位股份有限公司
Priority date: 2013-05-14
Filing date: 2013-05-14
Publication date: 2014-11-20

Abstract

A group appraisal system and a method therefor. The group appraisal system comprises: an appraisee end, a first appraiser end, a second appraiser end, and an appraisal device. The first appraiser end receives state data of the appraisee end to execute a first state appraisal step and determines whether or not the state data satisfies at least one appraisal criterion to generate a first appraisal result. The appraisal device records the first appraisal result and generates a first appraisal symbol on the basis of the first appraisal result. The second appraiser end receives the state data of the appraisee end to execute a second state appraisal step and determines whether or not the state data satisfies at least one appraisal criterion to generate a second appraisal result. The appraisal device records the second appraisal result and selectively changes the first appraisal symbol into a second appraisal symbol on the basis of the second appraisal result.

Description

Group evaluation system and method thereof

The invention relates to an evaluation system and a method thereof, in particular to a method for allowing a plurality of users to separately evaluate the same evaluator, and further integrating the education training system to recommend that the same evaluator can reinforce his function A group assessment system and method for gap education training courses. Background technique

In the network architecture, the Client/Server architecture is the most common form. Since the client and the server can be distributed in different areas, for large-scale or international companies, the managers of the company can easily manage employees in different regions through the network.

Performance management is a very important part of the company's corporate management. However, as the company's enterprise scale continues to expand, the evaluation system can only make it impossible for a single supervisor to evaluate the company's staff, and if the supervisors are not effectively utilized. The result of the evaluation by the staff

It is a pity that the results of the evaluation between the two departments are combined with the education and training system to recommend the education training courses suitable for each staff member to help each job to strengthen its functional gap. Summary of the invention

In view of this, the inventors of the present invention have conceived and designed a group evaluation system and a method thereof to improve the defects of the prior art, thereby enhancing the industrial use and utilization.

In view of the above problems of the prior art, an object of the present invention is to provide a group evaluation system and a method for solving the problem that the existing evaluation system cannot make multiple supervisors review the same job, and The results of the assessment of the supervisors mine the same staff

The gap is provided to provide an education training course suitable for the same staff member.

According to the purpose of the present invention, a group evaluation system is proposed, which includes a rating end, a first evaluation second evaluation end and an assessment device. The evaluated end has status data. The first evaluation end receives the evaluated status data to perform a first status evaluation step, and determines whether the status data meets at least one evaluation criterion to generate a first evaluation result. The assessment device records the first assessment result and generates a first assessment symbol based on the first assessment result. The second evaluation end receives the status data of the evaluated end, Performing a second state evaluation step, and determining whether the state data meets at least one evaluation criterion to generate a second evaluation result, causing the evaluation device to record the second evaluation result, and selectively selecting according to the second evaluation result The first assessment symbol is changed to the second assessment symbol.

Preferably, the group assessment system may further include a third assessment end, and the third assessment end may receive status data of the evaluated end to perform a third state evaluation step, and determine whether the status data meets at least one evaluation criterion, A third assessment result is generated: the assessment device records the third assessment result, and selectively changes the first assessment symbol or the second assessment symbol to the third assessment symbol according to the third assessment result.

Preferably, the evaluation device further determines whether the evaluated end has a functional gap according to the first evaluation symbol and the second evaluation symbol, and if so, the evaluation device transmits the course recommendation instruction to the education training system, so that the education training system transmits the corresponding Educational training courses with functional gaps to the evaluation end.

Preferably, the first state assessment step and the second state assessment step are respectively a general assessment, a compulsory credit assessment, an elective credit assessment, or a combination thereof, and a general assessment, compulsory credit assessment, and elective credit assessment. Can include multiple assessment items.

Preferably, the evaluation device further generates a long trajectory map according to the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the working year asset of the evaluated end.

According to the object of the present invention, a group evaluation method is also proposed, which is applicable to a group assessment system, and the group assessment system includes a rating end, a first evaluation end, a second evaluation end and an assessment device, and a group evaluation method. The method includes the following steps: receiving, by the first evaluation end, status data of the evaluated end, performing a first status evaluation step, and determining whether the status data meets at least one evaluation criterion to generate a first evaluation result; using the assessment device to record a first evaluation result, and generating a first evaluation symbol according to the first evaluation result; and receiving, by the second evaluation end, status data of the evaluated end to perform a second state evaluation step, and determining whether the status data meets at least An evaluation criterion to generate a second assessment result, causing the assessment device to record the second assessment result, and selectively changing the first assessment symbol to the second assessment symbol based on the second assessment result.

Preferably, the group assessment system further includes a third assessment end, and the group assessment method further comprises the steps of: receiving the status data of the evaluated end by the third evaluation end, performing the third status evaluation step, and determining the status Whether the data meets at least one evaluation criterion to produce a third assessment result, the assessment device records the third assessment result, and selectively changes the first assessment symbol or the second assessment symbol according to the third assessment result. For the third assessment symbol. Preferably, the group evaluation method further comprises the following steps: determining, by the evaluation device, whether the evaluated end has a functional gap according to the first evaluation symbol and the second evaluation symbol, and if so, the evaluation device transmits the course recommendation instruction to the education Training system, so that the education training system transmits the corresponding functions

P's education training course to the evaluation end.

Preferably, the first state assessment step and the second state assessment step are respectively a general assessment, a compulsory credit assessment, an elective credit assessment or a combination thereof, and a general assessment of the compulsory credit assessment and the elective credit assessment. Contains multiple assessment items.

Preferably, the group assessment method further comprises the following steps: generating, by the evaluation device, a long trajectory map according to the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the working year asset of the evaluated end.

In summary, the group evaluation system and method thereof according to the present invention may have one or more of the following advantages:

(1) The group evaluation system and method of the present invention can quickly, conveniently, and intuitively use graphics to enable company supervisors to query the comprehensive information of each employee.

(2) The group assessment system and method of the present invention enable multiple supervisors to evaluate the same staff member, and store the evaluation results in the assessment equipment through the network, so that the assessment device integrates the evaluation results of the respective supervisors. To vertically integrate the company's assessment mechanism

(3) The group assessment system and method of the present invention can be used to judge whether each staff member has a functional gap, and to recommend an appropriate education and training course for each job in conjunction with the education and training system to assist the staff to reinforce the functional gap. DRAWINGS

Figure 1 is a block diagram of a first embodiment of the group evaluation system of the present invention

Figure 2 is a block diagram of a second embodiment of the group evaluation system of the present invention

Figure 3 is a flow chart of the method of group evaluation of the present invention. Description of the reference numerals:

1 Group assessment system

1 1 rated end

1 1 1 Status data

1 12 Function gap 1 13 First status data

1 14 second status data

1 15 Third status data

12 Assessment device

121 First assessment symbol

122 Second Assessment Symbol

123 Third Assessment Symbol

124 Course Recommendations

13 First evaluation end

13 1, 141 Evaluation criteria

132 First Assessment Results

133 First evaluation criteria

14 Second evaluation end

142 Second Assessment Results

143 Second evaluation criteria

15 Third assessment end

15 1 Third evaluation criteria

152 Third Assessment Results

16 Education and Training System

161 Education Training Course

S 1 1 -S 13 Steps Detailed Description

The present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, and the accompanying drawings, The use of the present invention for the purpose of illustration and the accompanying description is not necessarily the true proportion and precise configuration of the present invention. Therefore, the scope of the present invention should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention.

Embodiments of the group evaluation system and method thereof according to the present invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. For ease of understanding, the same components in the following embodiments are denoted by the same reference numerals. Referring to Figure 1, there is shown a block diagram of a first embodiment of a group evaluation system of the present invention. As shown, the group assessment system 1 of the present invention includes a rating end 11, a first assessment end 13, a second assessment end 14, and an assessment device 12. The evaluation end 11 may be an employee, and the first evaluation end 13, the second evaluation end 14 and the evaluation device 12 may be a server, a tablet computer, a smart phone or a personal digital assistant, but are not limited thereto.

In this embodiment, the supervisor of the evaluated end 11 can receive the status data 111 of the evaluated end 11 using the first evaluation end 13 to perform a first status evaluation step (not shown) and determine the status. The data 111 conforms to at least one evaluation criterion 131 to produce a first assessment result 132. Specifically, if the rating end 11 is an employee, the supervisor can use the first assessment end 13 to read the employee's usual performance data, educational training assessment data or performance data as the status data 111, and evaluate whether the data conforms to the company. The specified evaluation criteria 131, which may be a fractional or fractional interval, but are not limited thereto. In a specific embodiment, the first rating end 13 determines which fractional interval the status data 111 of the evaluated end 11 conforms to as the first evaluation result 132, wherein the fractional interval may be A, B, C, etc. Grading, or grading colors such as green, yellow, and red. In addition, a check box or an input box may be built in the first evaluation end 13 to enable the supervisor to input the first evaluation result 132 by ticking or inputting, but the present invention does not evaluate the first evaluation. The result of 132 is limited by the way it is indexed.

Then, the first evaluation end 13 can transmit the first evaluation result 132 to the evaluation device 12 via the network or various communication protocols, and cause the evaluation device 12 to generate a corresponding first evaluation according to the first evaluation result 132. The nuclear symbol 121, that is, the above-mentioned English hierarchical symbol or color code and symbol, is displayed on the evaluation device 12. In a preferred embodiment, each employee of the company can use a computer or smart phone to connect to the assessment device 12 to read the first assessment symbol 121 of each employee to view their performance evaluation results.

Then, at or after the first evaluation end 13 performs the first state evaluation step on the evaluated end 11, the high-level supervisor of the evaluated end 11 can also receive the evaluated end 11 using the second evaluation end 14. The status data 111, and the second status evaluation step (not shown) is performed on the evaluated end 11 to determine whether the status data 111 of the evaluated end 11 conforms to the evaluation criteria 141, and generates a second evaluation result 142. If the second evaluation end 14 and the first evaluation end 13 simultaneously evaluate the status data 111 of the evaluated end 11, the status data 111 of the evaluated end 11 is the same. However, if the second rating end 14 and the first rating end 13 evaluate the status data 111 of the evaluated end 11 at different points in time, At this time, the state data 1 1 1 evaluated by the second evaluated end 14 may be different from the state data 1 1 1 evaluated by the first evaluated end 13. In addition, the evaluation criteria 131 of the first assessment end 13 and the second assessment end 14 may be the same or different from the evaluation criteria 141, that is, the severity of the evaluation of the employee by the senior executive and the general supervisor may be different. The invention is not limited thereto.

Then, the second evaluation end 14 can also make the second evaluation result through the network or various communication protocols.

The 142 is transmitted to the assessment device 12 for storage, and causes the assessment device 12 to generate a corresponding second assessment symbol 122 based on the second assessment result 142. Wherein, if the second assessment result 142 is the same as the first assessment result 132, the assessment device 12 does not need to change the first assessment symbol 121. If the second assessment result 142 is different from the first assessment result 132, the assessment device 12 changes the first assessment symbol 121 to the second assessment symbol 122. For example, if the score of the first evaluation result 121 falls within the green light interval, that is, the first evaluation symbol 121 is a green light, and the score of the second evaluation result 122 falls within the red light interval, the second evaluation symbol 122 It may be a red light, or half of the green light is red, to simultaneously display the first evaluation result 132 and the second evaluation result 142 of the first evaluation end 13 and the second evaluation end 14, but is not limited thereto. .

It is worth mentioning that the evaluation device 12 can further generate a long trajectory map according to the first evaluation result 132, the second evaluation result 142 and the working year asset of the evaluated end 1 1 , so that the evaluated end 1 1 , the first The assessment end 13 and the second assessment end 14 examine whether the evaluated end 1 1 is aggressive, and whether the evaluated end 1 1 has grown during the period of employment of the company.

It is to be noted that after the first evaluation symbol 121 and the second evaluation symbol 122 are generated, the evaluation device 12 can further determine whether the evaluated terminal 1 1 has a function gap 1 12 according to the generated evaluation symbol. If so, the course recommendation instruction 124 is transmitted to the educational training system 16 to cause the educational training system 16 to transmit the educational training course 161 corresponding to the functional gap 1 12 to the evaluated end 1 1 . Therefore, the group assessment system 1 of the present invention can automatically mine the function gap 112 of the rating end 1 1 and assist the evaluation end 1 1 to reinforce its functional gap 1 12 , which can improve the general evaluation system only to provide evaluation Nuclear function issues.

Incidentally, the first state assessment step and the second state assessment step evaluated by the first assessment end 13 and the second assessment end 14 may be general assessment, compulsory credit assessment, and elective credit assessment. The core or its combination, ie the first state assessment step and the second state assessment step may be one of a general assessment, a compulsory credit assessment or an elective credit assessment, or a general assessment, compulsory credit assessment and elective Credit rating. In addition, the general assessment, the compulsory credit assessment, and the elective credits The assessment can include multiple assessment items. For example, the general assessment may be an assessment item related to the normal performance of the rated end. Compulsory credit assessment and elective credit assessment can be an assessment project related to employee education and training. For example, a sales clerk's sales Bible course can have the following assessment items as shown in Table 1: Table 1: Sales Bible Assessment Program

The above assessment items are for illustrative purposes only and are not limiting. The assessment items for general assessment, compulsory credit assessment and elective credit assessment may be designed according to user requirements, and the present invention does not limit this.

Further, the evaluation device 12 may further be provided with a function library (not shown), which includes the functional items required by the evaluation end 1 1 , and the above function gap 1 12 indicates that the evaluated end 11 is in the function The results of the evaluation of a functional project in the library did not meet the evaluation criteria set by the company. Therefore, the group assessment system 1 of the present invention can be combined with the education training system 16 to actively recommend the education training course 161 corresponding to the function gap 1 12 of the rated end 1 1 to reinforce the functional gap 1 12 of the rated end 11 . It can effectively improve the functional level of the company's overall employees. For example, the functional library can have the functional items shown in Table 2 below: Table 2: Functional Projects of the Functional Library

The functional libraries described above are merely exemplary and not limiting, and functional items of the functional library may be designed according to user requirements, and the present invention does not limit this.

In another embodiment, the first rating end 13 and the second rating end 14 may also be the supervisor of the evaluated end 11. For example, the first evaluation end 13 can directly perform the first state evaluation step according to the performance of the evaluated end 11 as the status data 111, and determine whether the performance of the evaluated end 11 conforms to the setting of the company. The criteria 131 are evaluated to generate a first assessment result 132, and the first assessment result 132 is entered at the assessment device 12, causing the assessment device 12 to generate a first assessment symbol 121 based on the first assessment result 132. Alternatively, the first evaluation end 13 may also obtain the status data 111 of the evaluated end 11 in the manner of on-the-spot interview or oral test, and then perform the first state evaluation step described above. In another embodiment, the first rating end 13 and the second rating end 14 may be operated without a user. That is, the first evaluation end 13 and the second evaluation end 14 may be hard devices such as a server or a computer, so the first evaluation end 13 and the second evaluation end 14 are receiving the status data 1 1 of the evaluated end 1 1 . 1 (After an online or written exam), the first status assessment step is performed automatically. At this time, the evaluation criteria 131 and the evaluation criteria 141 may be standard answers for the online exam or the written exam, so the first assessment end 13 and the second assessment end 14 may calculate the test score of the evaluated end 1 1 as the first assessment. Results 132 and second assessment results 142.

Referring to Figure 2, a block diagram of a second embodiment of the group evaluation system of the present invention. The second embodiment is similar to the first embodiment, and the same portions are not described herein. The difference between the second embodiment and the first embodiment is that the group evaluation system 1 in the second embodiment further has a third rating end 15, and the first rating end 13, the second rating end 14 and the third rating The core end 15 performs a first state evaluation step, a second state evaluation step, and a third state evaluation step (not shown) on the evaluated end 11 at different time points, respectively, and thus the status data of the evaluated end 1 1 1 1 1 is the first state data 113, the second state data 114, and the third state data 1 15 at different time points. In addition, the first evaluation criterion 133 of the first assessment end 13 and the second evaluation criterion 143 of the second assessment end 14 are different from the third evaluation criterion 15 1 of the third assessment end 15 . In addition, the third rating end 15 may be an evaluation end used by a supervisor of a higher level than the first evaluation end 13 and the second evaluation end 14, such as a general manager or a district manager, and thus the third evaluation end After the third evaluation result 152 is generated, the evaluation device 12 can determine whether the first evaluation symbol 121 or the second evaluation symbol 122 needs to be changed to the third evaluation symbol 123 according to the third evaluation result 152.

Referring to FIG. 3, it is a flowchart of the group evaluation method of the present invention. The group assessment method is applicable to the group assessment system. The group assessment system includes the evaluation end, the first assessment end, the second assessment end and the assessment device. As shown, the group evaluation method of the present invention comprises the following steps:

(51 1) receiving status data of the evaluated end by the first evaluation end to perform a first status evaluation step, and determining whether the status data meets at least one evaluation criterion to generate a first evaluation result.

( 512 ) The first assessment result is recorded using the assessment device and the first assessment symbol is generated based on the first assessment result.

(513) receiving status data of the evaluated end by the second evaluation end to perform a second status evaluation step, and determining whether the status data meets at least one evaluation criterion to generate a second evaluation result, The assessment device records the second assessment result and selectively changes the first assessment symbol to the second assessment symbol based on the second assessment result.

The detailed description and embodiments of the group evaluation method of the present invention have been described above in the block diagram and the embodiment of the group evaluation system, and will not be described here for the sake of brevity.

In summary, the group evaluation system and method thereof of the present invention enable multiple evaluation terminals to perform status assessment on a single evaluated end, and transmit the evaluation result to the evaluation device for storage, and use the evaluation device. Integrate the evaluation results of each assessment end to generate corresponding evaluation symbols, and graphically display and more intuitively enable employees and supervisors to query the evaluation results. In addition, the group assessment system and method of the present invention can be further combined with educational training. In addition to assessing the rated end, the system can further recommend the education and training courses required by the appraisal end to help the appraisal end to reinforce its functional gap.

The foregoing is illustrative only and not limiting. Equivalent modifications or variations of the present invention are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

Claim

1. A group assessment system, characterized in that it comprises:

The evaluated end has status data;

The first evaluation end, the first evaluation end receives the status data of the evaluated end to perform a status evaluation step, and determines whether the status data meets at least one evaluation criterion to generate a first evaluation Nuclear result

Evaluating the nuclear clothing, and the evaluation device records the first evaluation result and generates a first evaluation symbol according to the first evaluation result;

a second evaluation end, the second evaluation end receiving the status data of the evaluated end to perform a two-state evaluation step, and determining whether the status data meets the at least one evaluation criterion to generate a The second evaluation result causes the evaluation device to record the second evaluation result, and selectively change the first evaluation symbol to the second evaluation symbol according to the second evaluation result.

2. The group assessment system according to claim 1, further comprising a third evaluation end, wherein the third evaluation end receives the status data of the evaluated end to perform a second status evaluation a nuclear step, and determining whether the status data meets the at least one evaluation criterion to generate a third assessment result, causing the assessment device to record the second assessment result, and according to the

The second evaluation result selectively changes the first evaluation symbol or the second evaluation symbol to the first evaluation symbol.

The group evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation device further determines, according to the first evaluation symbol and the second evaluation symbol, whether the evaluated end has a functional gap, If yes, the evaluation device transmits the course recommendation instruction to the education training system, so that the education training system transmits the education training course corresponding to the function gap to the evaluated end

4. The group assessment system according to claim 1, wherein the first state assessment step and the second state assessment step are a general assessment, a compulsory credit assessment, and an elective credit assessment, respectively. Or a combination thereof, and the general assessment, the compulsory credit assessment, and the elective credit assessment comprise a plurality of assessment items.

The group evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation device further generates the length of the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result, and the working year asset according to the evaluated end. Track map.

6. A method for group assessment, characterized in that it is applicable to a group assessment system, wherein the group assessment system comprises a rating end, a first evaluation end, a second evaluation end, and an assessment device, the group The assessment method consists of the following steps:

Receiving, by the first evaluation end, the status data of the evaluated end to perform a first status evaluation step, and determining whether the status data meets at least one evaluation criterion to generate a first evaluation result,

Recording, by the evaluation device, the first evaluation result, and generating a first evaluation symbol according to the first evaluation result;

Receiving, by the second evaluation end, the status data of the evaluated end to perform a first status evaluation step, and determining whether the status data meets the at least one evaluation criterion to generate a second evaluation result And causing the evaluation device to record the second evaluation result, and selectively changing the first evaluation symbol to the second evaluation symbol according to the second evaluation result.

The group evaluation method according to claim 6, wherein the group assessment system further comprises a third assessment end, and the group assessment method further comprises the following steps:

Receiving, by the third evaluation end, the status data of the evaluated end to perform a second status evaluation step, and determining whether the status data meets the at least one evaluation criterion to generate a third evaluation result And causing the evaluation device to record the third evaluation result, and selectively changing the first evaluation symbol or the second evaluation symbol to the first evaluation symbol according to the two or three evaluation results.

8. The method of group evaluation according to claim 6, further comprising the steps of:

Determining, by the evaluation device, whether the evaluated end has a functional gap according to the first evaluation symbol and the second evaluation symbol, and if so, the evaluation device transmits the course recommendation instruction to the education training system, The educational training system transmits an educational training course corresponding to the functional gap to the evaluated end.

9. The method of group assessment according to claim 6, wherein the first state assessment and the second state assessment are a general assessment, a compulsory credit assessment, an elective credit assessment, or The combination, and the general assessment, the compulsory credit assessment, and the elective credit assessment comprise a plurality of assessment items.

The group evaluation method according to claim 6, further comprising Column steps:

And generating, by the evaluation device, a long trajectory map according to the first evaluation result of the evaluated end, the second evaluation result, and the working year asset.