WO2014170537A1 - A method and a device for cross-talk correction of measured intensities - Google Patents

A method and a device for cross-talk correction of measured intensities Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2014170537A1
WO2014170537A1 PCT/FI2014/050246 FI2014050246W WO2014170537A1 WO 2014170537 A1 WO2014170537 A1 WO 2014170537A1 FI 2014050246 W FI2014050246 W FI 2014050246W WO 2014170537 A1 WO2014170537 A1 WO 2014170537A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
probe
detection wavelength
cross
talk
wavelength bands
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/FI2014/050246
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Ville Laitala
Raimo Harju
Original Assignee
Wallac Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Wallac Oy filed Critical Wallac Oy
Priority to BR112015025832-8A priority Critical patent/BR112015025832B1/en
Priority to US14/784,768 priority patent/US9736555B2/en
Priority to CN201480033905.7A priority patent/CN105324493B/en
Priority to EP14721911.7A priority patent/EP2986737A1/en
Publication of WO2014170537A1 publication Critical patent/WO2014170537A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04Q—SELECTING
    • H04Q11/00—Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems
    • H04Q11/0001—Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems using optical switching
    • H04Q11/0005—Switch and router aspects
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6813—Hybridisation assays
    • C12Q1/6816—Hybridisation assays characterised by the detection means
    • C12Q1/6818—Hybridisation assays characterised by the detection means involving interaction of two or more labels, e.g. resonant energy transfer
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
    • G01N21/25—Colour; Spectral properties, i.e. comparison of effect of material on the light at two or more different wavelengths or wavelength bands
    • G01N21/27—Colour; Spectral properties, i.e. comparison of effect of material on the light at two or more different wavelengths or wavelength bands using photo-electric detection ; circuits for computing concentration
    • G01N21/274—Calibration, base line adjustment, drift correction
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/62—Systems in which the material investigated is excited whereby it emits light or causes a change in wavelength of the incident light
    • G01N21/63—Systems in which the material investigated is excited whereby it emits light or causes a change in wavelength of the incident light optically excited
    • G01N21/64—Fluorescence; Phosphorescence
    • G01N21/645—Specially adapted constructive features of fluorimeters
    • G01N21/6452—Individual samples arranged in a regular 2D-array, e.g. multiwell plates
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04Q—SELECTING
    • H04Q11/00—Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems
    • H04Q11/0001—Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems using optical switching
    • H04Q11/0003—Details
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2537/00—Reactions characterised by the reaction format or use of a specific feature
    • C12Q2537/10—Reactions characterised by the reaction format or use of a specific feature the purpose or use of
    • C12Q2537/101—Homogeneous assay format, e.g. one pot reaction
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/62—Systems in which the material investigated is excited whereby it emits light or causes a change in wavelength of the incident light
    • G01N21/63—Systems in which the material investigated is excited whereby it emits light or causes a change in wavelength of the incident light optically excited
    • G01N21/64—Fluorescence; Phosphorescence
    • G01N2021/6417—Spectrofluorimetric devices
    • G01N2021/6421—Measuring at two or more wavelengths
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/62—Systems in which the material investigated is excited whereby it emits light or causes a change in wavelength of the incident light
    • G01N21/63—Systems in which the material investigated is excited whereby it emits light or causes a change in wavelength of the incident light optically excited
    • G01N21/64—Fluorescence; Phosphorescence
    • G01N21/6428—Measuring fluorescence of fluorescent products of reactions or of fluorochrome labelled reactive substances, e.g. measuring quenching effects, using measuring "optrodes"
    • G01N2021/6439—Measuring fluorescence of fluorescent products of reactions or of fluorochrome labelled reactive substances, e.g. measuring quenching effects, using measuring "optrodes" with indicators, stains, dyes, tags, labels, marks
    • G01N2021/6441—Measuring fluorescence of fluorescent products of reactions or of fluorochrome labelled reactive substances, e.g. measuring quenching effects, using measuring "optrodes" with indicators, stains, dyes, tags, labels, marks with two or more labels
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04Q—SELECTING
    • H04Q11/00—Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems
    • H04Q11/0001—Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems using optical switching
    • H04Q11/0005—Switch and router aspects
    • H04Q2011/0037—Operation
    • H04Q2011/0049—Crosstalk reduction; Noise; Power budget

Definitions

  • the disclosure of this document relates to a method for cross-talk correction of in- tensities measured on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample. Furthermore, the disclosure relates to a device and to a computer program for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample. Furthermore, the disclosure relates to a measurement instrument provided with cross-talk correction. Background
  • a widely used principle in multianalyte assays is to use labeled analyte-specific tracer molecules where concentrations of analytes in a sample can be detected on the basis of changes taking place in fluorescence-based emission signals that may be dependent on one or more excitation wavelengths used.
  • fluorescence-based emission signals related to different analytes occur on non- overlapping detection wavelength bands and therefore the emission signals can be separated from each other with straightforward optical filtering.
  • one or more of the spectra of the fluorescence-based emission signals related to different analytes is/are so wide and spectrally overlapping that it is not possible to select such detection wavelength bands that all emission signals measured on these detection wavelength bands would be free from cross-talk.
  • a simple principle for cross-talk correction is applicable in two-analyte assays where intensity of one of the emission signals can be measured cross-talk free using a suitable temporal detection window and/or a suitable detection wavelength band.
  • the measured intensity of the other emission signal is corrected using the measured intensity of the first emission signal and an empirical cross-talk parameter which indicates the relation between the intensity occurring in the detection wavelength band of the first emission signal and intensity occurring in the detection wavelength band of the other emission signal in a test situation where only the analyte causing the first emission signal is present.
  • the measured intensity of the first emission signal may be at least partially caused by a background signal that is present also when the first emission signal is not generated in detection reactions.
  • the contribution of the background signal should be sufficiently eliminated from the measured intensity of the first emission signal prior to the cross-talk correction.
  • the contribution of the background signal and the cross-talk parameter can be determined on the basis of intensities measured from appropriate test samples. In many cases the situation is, however, more complicated so that none of the emission signals can be measured cross-talk free, i.e. the emission signals are spectrally and temporally so overlapping that it is not possible to select such temporal detection windows and/or detection wavelength bands so that at least one of the emission signals could be measured cross-talk free.
  • each FRET-probe comprises a donor, an acceptor, and a reactive region capable of specifically hybridizing with its complementary target sequence, i.e.
  • the time-resolved fluorescence emission signal of a population of probes of a given type comprises two signal components: a first signal component belonging to the acceptors excited due to the energy transfer from the excited donors and a second signal component belonging to the excited donors which do not participate to the energy transfer.
  • the acceptor is preferably selected so that its emission spectrum has a maximum at a wavelength where the donor has a local minimum in its emission spectrum.
  • the decay time of the energy transfer induced acceptor emission is dependent on the energy transfer efficiency, which in turn is inversely proportional to distance between the acceptor and the donor.
  • Decay time of energy transfer induced acceptor emission is significantly faster when the probes are unhybridized, i.e. a short donor-acceptor distance, than when the probes are hybridized with the target analyte, i.e. a longer donor-acceptor distance.
  • acceptor emission signal of hybridized probes can be separated from acceptor emission signal of unhybridized probes using a suitable temporal detection window.
  • Acceptor emission signals of different probes hybridized with different target analytes can be separated from each other by using appropriate detection wavelength bands but, as mentioned above, the cross-talk complicates the situation. The situation is further complicated by the fact that the background emission caused by excited donors that do not participate to the energy transfer is dependent on the percentage of hybridized probes from all probes in a sample under consideration.
  • each detection wavelength band relates to one of analyte-specific probe-populations contained by the sample, and each probe-population is, after excitation, capable of emitting a first signal component and a second signal component whose spectra are mutually different and at least the first signal component is dependent on presence of analyte detectable with that probe-population.
  • sample means substance that comprises one or more analytes to be detected and assay reagents needed for the detection, said assay reagents containing the above-mentioned probe-populations.
  • the method comprises: - computing estimates of cross-talk intensities occurring on the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components emitted by the probe-populations on the basis of: a) first cross-talk parameters and b) at least one value indicative of at least one intensity occurring on at least one auxiliary wavelength band outside the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and
  • each of the first cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and b) intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and
  • each of the second cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to one of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by another of the probe-populations, and b) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to the other of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the other of the probe-populations.
  • the probe-populations can be, for example but not necessarily, populations of probes based on the fluorescence resonance energy transfer "FRET".
  • the method for cross-talk correction can be used, for example, in conjunction with time- resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer "TR-FRET" based multianalyte detections that are suitable for e.g. Severe Combined Immunodeficiency "SCID" assays.
  • the value indicative of the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components has a value measured from the sample on the auxiliary wavelength band.
  • the dependency of the background emission on the percentage of hybridized probes from all probes can be taken into account in the cross-talk correction.
  • the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components is preferably measured from each sample well separately.
  • a device for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample to be analyzed comprises a computing system configured to:
  • each of the second cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to one of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by another of the probe-populations, and b) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to the other of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the other of the probe-populations.
  • an instrument comprising:
  • a computer program for for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more detection wave- length bands from a sample to be analyzed.
  • the computer program comprises computer executable instructions for controlling a programmable processor to:
  • each of the first cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and b) intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and
  • each of the second cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) in- tensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to one of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by another of the probe-populations, and b) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to the other of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the other of the probe-populations.
  • a computer program product according to the disclosure comprises a non-volatile computer readable medium, e.g. a compact disc ("CD”), encoded with a computer program according to the disclosure.
  • a non-volatile computer readable medium e.g. a compact disc (“CD")
  • figure 1 shows a flow chart of a method according to an exemplifying embodiment for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample to be analyzed
  • figure 2 illustrates emission spectra of two probe-populations in an exemplifying case where a method according to an exemplifying embodiment for cross-talk cor- rection is applicable
  • figure 3a shows a schematic illustration of an optical measurement instrument comprising a device according to an exemplifying embodiment for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample to be analyzed
  • figure 3b shows schematic illustration of a view seen downwards from the line A-A of figure 3a.
  • Figure 1 shows a flow chart of a method according to an exemplifying embodiment for cross-talk correction of intensities measured, from a sample to be analyzed, on mutually non-overlapping detection wavelength bands.
  • Each of the detection wavelength bands relates to one of analyte-specific probe-populations contained by the sample.
  • An emission signal of each probe-population contains a first signal component whose spectrum has a maximum at a wavelength specific to that probe-population and which is dependent on concentration of analyte detectable with that probe-population and a second signal component whose spectrum is different from the spectrum of the above-mentioned first signal component.
  • Figure 2 illustrates emission spectra in an exemplifying case where there are probe- populations Pi and P 2 .
  • a solid line 213 provided with circles represents the aggregate, i.e. the sum, of the emission spectra of the probe-populations Pi and P 2 .
  • the aggregate of the emission spectra represents the spectrum of the signal that can be measured from the sample when using a certain excitation wavelength.
  • a solid line 201 represents the spectrum of the first signal component emitted by the probe-population P-i
  • a solid line 202 represents the spectrum of the second signal component emitted by the probe-population P-i.
  • a dashed line 21 1 represents the spectrum of the first signal component emitted by the probe-population P 2 and a dashed line 212 represents the spectrum of the second signal component emitted by the probe-population P 2 .
  • a wavelength band 220 shown in figure 2 represents the detection wavelength band related to the probe-population P-i
  • a wavelength band 221 represents the detection wavelength band related to the probe-population P 2 .
  • the probe-populations Pi and P 2 can be, for example but not necessarily, populations, i.e. groups, of probes based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer "FRET" where each probe may comprise at least one donor, at least one acceptor, and at least one reactive region capable of interacting with the analyte to be detected with that probe.
  • the donor and the acceptor of a probe can be attached to a same molecule but it is also possible that a probe comprises a donor attached to a first molecule and an acceptor attached to a second, separate, molecule. In this case, the mutually separate donor and acceptor can interact with the analyte to be detected and thereby form a donor-acceptor pair suitable for e.g. the fluorescence resonance energy transfer "FRET".
  • the donor can be a luminescent label having luminescent lifetime longer than e.g. 1 ⁇ .
  • Each of the probes may comprise, for example, a lanthanide chelate donor and an organic fluorophore acceptor.
  • the lanthanide can be, for example, europium "Eu”, terbium “Tb”, dysprosium “Dy”, or samarium “Sm”.
  • the acceptor of the probe-population Pi can be, for example, Alexa Fluor® 647 dye and the acceptor of the probe-population P 2 can be, for example, Alexa Fluor® 750 dye.
  • ⁇ 0 , ⁇ - ⁇ , and ⁇ 2 shown in figure 2 would be ⁇ 0 s 615 nm, ⁇ « 665 nm, and ⁇ 2 « 780 nm, where ⁇ 0 is the center point of a 610-620 nm auxiliary wavelength band 230 shown in figure 2, ⁇ is the center point of the 660-670 nm detection wavelength band 220, and ⁇ 2 is the center point of the 775-785 nm detection wavelength band 221 .
  • the spectrum depicted with the solid line 201 is caused by the Alexa Fluor® 647 acceptors of the probes of the probe-population Pi excited due to the energy transfer from the excited Eu donors of these probes, and the spectrum depicted with the solid line 202 is caused by the excited Eu donors of the probes of the probe-population P not participating to the energy transfer.
  • the spectrum depicted with the dashed line 21 1 is caused by the Alexa Fluor® 750 acceptors of the probes of the probe-population P 2 excited due to the energy transfer from the excited Eu donors of the probes of the probe-population P 2
  • the spectrum depicted with the dashed line 21 2 is caused by the excited Eu donors of the probes of the probe- population P 2 not participating to the energy transfer.
  • Figure 2 can be deemed to represent a time instant after donor excitation when signals emitted by acceptors of unhybridized, i.e. free, probes have already been decayed off sufficiently from the viewpoint of detection.
  • a method according to an exemplifying embodiment for cross-talk correction of intensities I MI and IM2 measured on the detection wavelength bands 220 and 221 , respectively, comprises the following actions:
  • figure 1 computing estimates of cross-talk intensities C B i and C B 2 occurring on the detection wavelength bands 220 and 221 and at least partially caused by the second signal components emitted by the probe-populations Pi and P 2 on the basis of : a) first cross-talk parameters R B i and R B2 and b) a value l BM indicative of intensity at least partially caused by the second signal components and occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band 230, figure 2, outside the detection wavelength bands 220 and 221 , and
  • figure 1 computing cross-talk corrected intensities l C i and l C 2 of the detection wavelength bands 220 and 221 on the basis of: a) the intensities IMI and I M2 measured on the detection wavelength bands 220 and 221 , b) the computed estimates of the cross-talk intensities C B i and C B2 , and c) second cross-talk parameters R-
  • the above-mentioned cross-talk intensities CBI and C B2 can be called “background” intensities so as to be coherent with phraseology related to TR-FRET.
  • the cross-talk parameter R B i indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band 220 and at least partially caused by the second signal components emitted by the probe-populations Pi and P 2 , and b) intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band 230 and at least partially caused by the second signal components.
  • the cross-talk parameter R B 2 indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band 221 and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and b) intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band 230 and at least partially caused by the second signal components.
  • the spectra of the second signal components emitted by different probe-populations are different from each other, e.g. the spectrum of the second signal component of the probe-population P can be different from that of the second signal component of the probe-population P 2 .
  • the cross-talk parameter Ri 2 indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band 220 and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population P 2 , and b) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band 221 and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population P 2 .
  • the cross-talk parameter R 2 i indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band 221 and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population P ; and b) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band 220 and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population P-i .
  • the value I B M indicative of the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band 230 and at least partially caused by the second signal components of the probe-populations Pi and P 2 is a value measured on the auxiliary wavelength band from the sample to be analyzed. Therefore, for example in conjunction with FRET-based assays where the intensity of signal caused by the second signal components is at least partially dependent on the concentrations of the analytes present in the sample, the IBM can be measured and taken into account in the cross-talk correction from each sample well separately.
  • the value IBM indicative of the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band 230 and at least partially caused by the second signal components is a same pre- determined value in conjunction with several samples, e.g. a same value IBM can be used for many sample wells.
  • the estimates of the crosstalk intensities CBI and CB2 are computed according to the following equation:
  • the cross-talk corrected intensities Id and Ic2 of the detection wavelength bands 220 and 221 are solved from the following pair of equations:
  • the cross-talk corrected intensities of the detection wavelength bands can be solved from the following set of equations:
  • n is the number of the analyte-specific probe-populations
  • lci and lq are the cross-talk corrected intensities of the i th and j th ones of the detection wavelength bands, respectively
  • I MI is the intensity measured on the i th one of the detection wavelength bands
  • Cej is the estimate of the cross-talk intensity occurring on the j th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components
  • R is the second cross-talk parameter that indicates a ratio between a) intensity occurring on the i th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the j th one of the detection wavelength bands and b) intensity occurring on the j th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the j th one of the detection wavelength bands.
  • a method according to an exemplifying embodiment comprises determining the first cross-talk parameters on the basis of first test intensities measured from one or more first model samples each of which contains one or more of the probe- populations and is free from analytes detectable with the probe-populations.
  • the first cross-talk parameters can be computed, for example, according to the equation:
  • i 1 , 2, the number of the analyte-specific probe-populations
  • RB I is the first cross-talk parameter related to the i th one of the detection wavelength bands, e.g. one of the wavelength bands 220 and 221 shown in figure 2
  • l M odeio,i is the first test intensity occurring on i th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured from such a first model sample that contains the probe-populations
  • iModeio.B is the first test intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band, e.g. the wavelength band 230 shown in figure 2, and at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured from the first model sample.
  • a method comprises determining the second cross-talk parameters on the basis of second test intensities measured from second model samples, where each of the second model samples contains one or more of the probe-populations and analyte detectable with one of the probe-populations and is free from analytes detectable with the other probe- populations.
  • R is the second cross-talk parameter related to the i th and j th ones of the detec- tion wavelength bands, e.g. the wavelength bands 220 and 221 shown in figure 2,
  • i Modei, ij is the second test intensity occurring on the i th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the j th one of the detection wavelength bands and measured from a such second model sample that contains analyte detectable with the probe-population related to the j th one of the detection wavelength bands and is free from analytes detectable with the other probe-populations,
  • IModei, jj is the second test intensity occurring on the j th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the j th one of the detection wavelength bands and measured from the above-mentioned second model sample, and
  • Ci and Cj are real valued adjustment terms.
  • C is test intensity I Modeio occurring on i th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components
  • Cj is test intensity IModeio occurring on j th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components
  • the real valued adjustment terms C, and C j 0.
  • the first and second crosstalk parameters are selected from among pre-determined values on the basis of at least one of the following: ways of conduct of intensity measurements, information identifying a measurement instrument used for the intensity measurements.
  • a way of conduct of intensity measurement can be characterized by, for example but not necessarily, the number of successive excitation-counting cycles used in detection of intensity on a certain measurement wavelength band, where each excitation- counting cycle contains an excitation phase and a subsequent counting phase.
  • the information identifying a measurement instrument can be, for example, a serial number of the measurement instrument used for the intensity measurements.
  • a computer program according to an exemplifying embodiment comprises computer executable instructions for controlling a programmable processor to carry out a method according to any of the above-described exemplifying embodiments.
  • the computer executable instructions can be generated with a suitable programming language.
  • a computer program product according to an exemplifying embodiment comprises a non-volatile computer readable medium, e.g. a compact disc ("CD"), encoded with a computer program according to an embodiment.
  • CD compact disc
  • a signal according to an exemplifying embodiment is encoded to carry information defining a computer program according to an embodiment.
  • Figure 3a shows a schematic illustration of an optical measurement instrument that comprises a device according to an exemplifying embodiment for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more wavelength bands from a sample to be analyzed.
  • Figure 3b shows schematic illustration of a view seen downwards from the line A-A of figure 3a.
  • the measurement instrument comprises me- chanical support elements arranged to support a sample plate 308 that can be e.g. a microtitration plate.
  • the sample plate comprises sample wells which contain samples 351 , 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, and 357 to be analyzed.
  • the samples have been arranged to comprise analyte-specific probe-populations, e.g. FRET-probes, in order to detect presence of two or more analytes from each sample.
  • the me- chanical support elements comprise a support rail 306 and guide elements 309 shown in figure 3b.
  • the support rail 306 is supported relative to a body of the measurement instrument with the aid of the guide elements 309 in such a way that the support rail 306 is movable in the directions of a two-headed arrow 310 shown in figure 3b.
  • the mechanical support elements comprise a sledge 307 capable of receiving the sample plate 308.
  • the sledge is connected to the support rail 306 in such a way that the sledge is capable of sliding along the support rail in the longitudinal direction of the support rail, i.e. the sledge is movable with respect to the support rail 306 in the directions of a two-headed arrow 31 1 shown in figure 3b.
  • the sample plate 308 is movable in the xy-plane defined by a co-ordinate system 390. Due to the fact that the sample wells are movable in the xy-plane, the contents of different sample wells can be measured in a temporally successive manner so that each sample well is in turn the sample well whose content is being measured.
  • the measurement instrument comprises measurement equipment for measuring intensities on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample to be analyzed.
  • Each detection wavelength band relates to one of analyte-specific probe- populations contained by the sample, and each probe-population is, after excitation, capable of emitting at least a first signal component and a second signal component whose spectra have maxima at different wavelengths and at least the first signal component is dependent on presence of analyte detectable with that probe-population.
  • the measurement equipment comprises an excitation light source 303, figure 3a, and a light guide 304 for directing excitation radiation to the sample 352 being measured.
  • the measurement equipment comprises a detector 302 for measuring, on appropriate wavelength bands, the emission radiation emit- ted by the sample 352 and for producing a signal indicative of intensities of the emission radiation measured on the wavelength bands.
  • the detector 309 can be based on, for example, a photodiode or a photomultiplier tube.
  • the measurement instrument comprises a controller 301 for controlling the operation of the excitation light source 303 and the detector 302.
  • the excitation light source 303, the detector 302, and/or the light guide 304 can be either integral or replaceable components of the measurement instrument.
  • the controller 301 can be can be implemented with one or more programmable processor circuits, one or more dedicated hardware circuits such as an application specific integrated circuit "ASIC", one or more field programmable logic circuits such as a field programmable gate array "FPGA”, or a combination of these.
  • the optical measurement instrument may comprise an optical filtering device with the aid of which an appropriate wave- length band can be selected for each measurement.
  • the measurement instrument comprises a device for cross-talk correction of the intensities measured on the two or more detection wavelength bands from the sample 352.
  • the device comprises:
  • the controller 301 comprises a computing system that is configured to constitute the device for cross- talk correction.
  • the device for cross-talk correction is implemented with a separate computing system.
  • the computing system is configured to compute the estimates of the cross-talk intensities occurring on the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components according to the following equation : where CBI is the estimate of the cross-talk intensity occurring on the i th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, R B i is the first cross-talk parameter related to the i th one of the detection wavelength bands, and I BM is the value indicative of the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components.
  • the computing system is configured to solve the cross-talk corrected intensities of the detection wavelength bands from the following set of equations: where:
  • I ci and lq are the cross-talk corrected intensities of the i th and j th ones of the detection wavelength bands, respectively, I MI is the intensity measured on the i th one of the detection wavelength bands,
  • C B j is the estimate of the cross-talk intensity occurring on the j th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components
  • R is the second cross-talk parameter that indicates a ratio between a) intensity occurring on the i th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the j th one of the detection wavelength bands and b) intensity occurring on the j th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the j th one of the detection wavelength bands.
  • the computing system is configured determine the first cross-talk parameters on the basis of first test intensities measured from one or more first model samples each of which contains one or more of the probe-populations and is free from analytes detectable with the probe-populations.
  • the computing system is configured to compute the first cross-talk parameters according to the equation : p _ ⁇ ModelO, i
  • R B i is the first cross-talk parameter related to the i th one of the detection wavelength bands
  • iModeio.i is the first test intensity occurring on i th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured from such a first model sample that contains the probe-populations
  • iModeio.B is the first test intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured from the first model sample.
  • the computing system is configured determine the second cross-talk parameters on the basis of second test intensities measured from second model samples, where each of the second model samples contains one or more of the probe-populations and analyte detectable with one of the probe-populations and is free from analytes detectable with the other probe-populations.
  • the computing system is configured to compute the second cross-talk parameters according to the equa- tion: p I
  • R is the second cross-talk parameter related to the i th and j th ones of the detection wavelength bands
  • I Model, i,j is the second test intensity occurring on the i th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the j th one of the detection wavelength bands and measured from the second model sample that contains analyte detectable with the probe-population related to the j th one of the detection wavelength bands and is free from analytes detectable with the other probe-populations,
  • I Model, j,j is the second test intensity occurring on the j th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the j th one of the detection wave- length bands and measured from the second model sample, and
  • Ci and Cj are real valued adjustment terms.
  • the computing system is configured to set the adjustment terms so that C, is test intensity occurring on i th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and Cj is test intensity occurring on j th one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, where the test intensities C, and Cj are measured from a model sample that contains the probe-populations and is free from analytes detectable with the probe- populations.
  • the measurement equipment is configured to measure the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components from the sample 352, and the device for cross-talk correction is config- ured to use the measured intensity when computing the estimates of the cross-talk intensities occurring on the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components.
  • the device for cross-talk correction is configured to select the first and second cross-talk parameters from among pre-determined values on the basis of at least one of the following: ways of conduct of intensity measurements, information identifying the measurement instrument from among similar measurement instruments.
  • the information identifying a measurement instrument can be, for example, a serial number of the measurement instrument.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Investigating, Analyzing Materials By Fluorescence Or Luminescence (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Materials By The Use Of Chemical Reactions (AREA)
  • Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)

Abstract

A method for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on mutually separate detection wavelength bands is presented. Each detection wavelength band relates to one of analyte-specific probe-populations contained by a sample to be analyzed. Each probe-population is capable of emitting a first signal component and a second signal component whose spectra have maxima at different wavelengths and at least the first signal component is dependent on presence of analyte detectable with that probe-population. Cross-talk corrected intensities are computed on the basis of a) the intensities measured on the detection wavelength bands, b) a value indicative of intensity occurring on an auxiliary wavelength band outside the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and c) pre-determined cross-talk parameters. For example in con- junction with FRET-based assays, the dependency of a background signal on the percentage of hybridized probes can be taken into account in the cross-talk correction.

Description

A method and a device for cross-talk correction of measured intensities
Field of the disclosure
The disclosure of this document relates to a method for cross-talk correction of in- tensities measured on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample. Furthermore, the disclosure relates to a device and to a computer program for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample. Furthermore, the disclosure relates to a measurement instrument provided with cross-talk correction. Background
A widely used principle in multianalyte assays is to use labeled analyte-specific tracer molecules where concentrations of analytes in a sample can be detected on the basis of changes taking place in fluorescence-based emission signals that may be dependent on one or more excitation wavelengths used. In an ideal case, fluo- rescence-based emission signals related to different analytes occur on non- overlapping detection wavelength bands and therefore the emission signals can be separated from each other with straightforward optical filtering. However, in many cases, one or more of the spectra of the fluorescence-based emission signals related to different analytes is/are so wide and spectrally overlapping that it is not possible to select such detection wavelength bands that all emission signals measured on these detection wavelength bands would be free from cross-talk.
A simple principle for cross-talk correction is applicable in two-analyte assays where intensity of one of the emission signals can be measured cross-talk free using a suitable temporal detection window and/or a suitable detection wavelength band. The measured intensity of the other emission signal is corrected using the measured intensity of the first emission signal and an empirical cross-talk parameter which indicates the relation between the intensity occurring in the detection wavelength band of the first emission signal and intensity occurring in the detection wavelength band of the other emission signal in a test situation where only the analyte causing the first emission signal is present. When using this method it is worth noticing that the measured intensity of the first emission signal may be at least partially caused by a background signal that is present also when the first emission signal is not generated in detection reactions. Thus, in order to avoid too strong cross-talk correction especially in situations where the first emission signal is not generated, or generated only in a small extent, in detection reactions, the contribution of the background signal should be sufficiently eliminated from the measured intensity of the first emission signal prior to the cross-talk correction. The contribution of the background signal and the cross-talk parameter can be determined on the basis of intensities measured from appropriate test samples. In many cases the situation is, however, more complicated so that none of the emission signals can be measured cross-talk free, i.e. the emission signals are spectrally and temporally so overlapping that it is not possible to select such temporal detection windows and/or detection wavelength bands so that at least one of the emission signals could be measured cross-talk free. Exemplifying cases where a situation of the kind described above is present are, for example, assays based on time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer "TR-FRET" based multi- analyte detection. Details about exemplifying FRET-based detection methods can be found for example from publications US20060147954 and V. Laitala et al., Time-resolved detection probe for homogeneous nucleic acid analyses in one-step format, Analytical Biochemistry 361 (2007) 126-131 . In the method described by V. Laitala et al., each FRET-probe comprises a donor, an acceptor, and a reactive region capable of specifically hybridizing with its complementary target sequence, i.e. the target analyte to be detected with the probe under consideration. In the method described by V. Laitala et al., the time-resolved fluorescence emission signal of a population of probes of a given type comprises two signal components: a first signal component belonging to the acceptors excited due to the energy transfer from the excited donors and a second signal component belonging to the excited donors which do not participate to the energy transfer. The acceptor is preferably selected so that its emission spectrum has a maximum at a wavelength where the donor has a local minimum in its emission spectrum. The decay time of the energy transfer induced acceptor emission is dependent on the energy transfer efficiency, which in turn is inversely proportional to distance between the acceptor and the donor. Decay time of energy transfer induced acceptor emission is significantly faster when the probes are unhybridized, i.e. a short donor-acceptor distance, than when the probes are hybridized with the target analyte, i.e. a longer donor-acceptor distance. Thus, acceptor emission signal of hybridized probes can be separated from acceptor emission signal of unhybridized probes using a suitable temporal detection window. Acceptor emission signals of different probes hybridized with different target analytes can be separated from each other by using appropriate detection wavelength bands but, as mentioned above, the cross-talk complicates the situation. The situation is further complicated by the fact that the background emission caused by excited donors that do not participate to the energy transfer is dependent on the percentage of hybridized probes from all probes in a sample under consideration.
Summary
The following presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basic under- standing of some aspects of various exemplifying embodiments. The summary is not an extensive overview of the disclosure of this document. It is neither intended to identify key or critical elements of exemplifying embodiments nor to delineate the protection scope. The following summary merely presents some concepts in a simplified form as a prelude to a more detailed description of exemplifying embod- iments.
In accordance with the disclosure, there is provided a method for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample to be analyzed. Each detection wavelength band relates to one of analyte- specific probe-populations contained by the sample, and each probe-population is, after excitation, capable of emitting a first signal component and a second signal component whose spectra are mutually different and at least the first signal component is dependent on presence of analyte detectable with that probe-population. In this document, the word "sample" means substance that comprises one or more analytes to be detected and assay reagents needed for the detection, said assay reagents containing the above-mentioned probe-populations.
The method comprises: - computing estimates of cross-talk intensities occurring on the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components emitted by the probe-populations on the basis of: a) first cross-talk parameters and b) at least one value indicative of at least one intensity occurring on at least one auxiliary wavelength band outside the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and
- computing cross-talk corrected intensities of the detection wavelength bands on the basis of: a) the intensities measured on the detection wavelength bands, b) the computed estimates of the cross-talk intensities, and c) second cross-talk parameters, wherein:
- each of the first cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and b) intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and
- each of the second cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to one of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by another of the probe-populations, and b) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to the other of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the other of the probe-populations.
The probe-populations can be, for example but not necessarily, populations of probes based on the fluorescence resonance energy transfer "FRET". The method for cross-talk correction can be used, for example, in conjunction with time- resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer "TR-FRET" based multianalyte detections that are suitable for e.g. Severe Combined Immunodeficiency "SCID" assays. In a method according to an advantageous but non-limiting embodiment, the value indicative of the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components has a value measured from the sample on the auxiliary wavelength band. Therefore, for example in conjunction with FRET-based assays, the dependency of the background emission on the percentage of hybridized probes from all probes can be taken into account in the cross-talk correction. In a case, where assay is carried out in mictotiter wells containing samples, the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components is preferably measured from each sample well separately.
In accordance with the disclosure, there is provided also a device for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample to be analyzed. Each detection wavelength band relates to one of analyte-specific probe-populations contained by the sample, and each probe- population is, after excitation, capable of emitting a first signal component and a second signal component whose spectra are mutually different and at least the first signal component is dependent on presence of analyte detectable with that probe-population. The device comprises a computing system configured to:
- compute estimates of cross-talk intensities occurring on the detection wave- length bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components emitted by the probe-populations on the basis of: a) first cross-talk parameters and b) at least one value indicative of at least one intensity occurring on at least one auxiliary wavelength band outside the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and - compute cross-talk corrected intensities of the detection wavelength bands on the basis of: a) the intensities measured on the detection wavelength bands, b) the computed estimates of the cross-talk intensities, and c) second crosstalk parameters, wherein: - each of the first cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and b) intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and
- each of the second cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to one of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by another of the probe-populations, and b) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to the other of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the other of the probe-populations.
In accordance with the disclosure, there is provided also an instrument comprising:
- measurement equipment for measuring intensities on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample to be analyzed, and
- a device according to the disclosure for cross-talk correction of the intensities measured on the two or more detection wavelength bands from the sample.
In accordance with the disclosure, there is provided also a computer program for for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more detection wave- length bands from a sample to be analyzed. The computer program comprises computer executable instructions for controlling a programmable processor to:
- compute estimates of cross-talk intensities occurring on the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components emitted by the probe-populations on the basis of: a) first cross-talk parameters and b) at least one value indicative of at least one intensity occurring on at least one auxiliary wavelength band outside the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and compute cross-talk corrected intensities of the detection wavelength bands on the basis of: a) the intensities measured on the detection wavelength bands, b) the computed estimates of the cross-talk intensities, and c) second crosstalk parameters, wherein:
- each of the first cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and b) intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and
- each of the second cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) in- tensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to one of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by another of the probe-populations, and b) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to the other of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the other of the probe-populations.
A computer program product according to the disclosure comprises a non-volatile computer readable medium, e.g. a compact disc ("CD"), encoded with a computer program according to the disclosure.
A number of exemplifying embodiments are described in accompanied dependent claims.
Various exemplifying embodiments both as to constructions and to methods of operation, together with additional objects and advantages thereof, will be best understood from the following description of specific exemplifying embodiments when read in connection with the accompanying drawings. The verbs "to comprise" and "to include" are used in this document as open limitations that neither exclude nor require the existence of unrecited features. The features recited in depending claims are mutually freely combinable unless otherwise explicitly stated. Brief description of the figures
The exemplifying embodiments and their advantages are explained in greater detail below in the sense of examples and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: figure 1 shows a flow chart of a method according to an exemplifying embodiment for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample to be analyzed, figure 2 illustrates emission spectra of two probe-populations in an exemplifying case where a method according to an exemplifying embodiment for cross-talk cor- rection is applicable, figure 3a shows a schematic illustration of an optical measurement instrument comprising a device according to an exemplifying embodiment for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample to be analyzed, and figure 3b shows schematic illustration of a view seen downwards from the line A-A of figure 3a.
Description of exemplifying embodiments
Figure 1 shows a flow chart of a method according to an exemplifying embodiment for cross-talk correction of intensities measured, from a sample to be analyzed, on mutually non-overlapping detection wavelength bands. Each of the detection wavelength bands relates to one of analyte-specific probe-populations contained by the sample. An emission signal of each probe-population contains a first signal component whose spectrum has a maximum at a wavelength specific to that probe-population and which is dependent on concentration of analyte detectable with that probe-population and a second signal component whose spectrum is different from the spectrum of the above-mentioned first signal component. Figure 2 illustrates emission spectra in an exemplifying case where there are probe- populations Pi and P2. A solid line 213 provided with circles represents the aggregate, i.e. the sum, of the emission spectra of the probe-populations Pi and P2. The aggregate of the emission spectra represents the spectrum of the signal that can be measured from the sample when using a certain excitation wavelength. A solid line 201 represents the spectrum of the first signal component emitted by the probe-population P-i , and a solid line 202 represents the spectrum of the second signal component emitted by the probe-population P-i. A dashed line 21 1 represents the spectrum of the first signal component emitted by the probe-population P2 and a dashed line 212 represents the spectrum of the second signal component emitted by the probe-population P2. A wavelength band 220 shown in figure 2 represents the detection wavelength band related to the probe-population P-i, and a wavelength band 221 represents the detection wavelength band related to the probe-population P2.
The probe-populations Pi and P2 can be, for example but not necessarily, populations, i.e. groups, of probes based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer "FRET" where each probe may comprise at least one donor, at least one acceptor, and at least one reactive region capable of interacting with the analyte to be detected with that probe. The donor and the acceptor of a probe can be attached to a same molecule but it is also possible that a probe comprises a donor attached to a first molecule and an acceptor attached to a second, separate, molecule. In this case, the mutually separate donor and acceptor can interact with the analyte to be detected and thereby form a donor-acceptor pair suitable for e.g. the fluorescence resonance energy transfer "FRET". The donor can be a luminescent label having luminescent lifetime longer than e.g. 1 με. Each of the probes may comprise, for example, a lanthanide chelate donor and an organic fluorophore acceptor. The lanthanide can be, for example, europium "Eu", terbium "Tb", dysprosium "Dy", or samarium "Sm". The acceptor of the probe-population Pi can be, for example, Alexa Fluor® 647 dye and the acceptor of the probe-population P2 can be, for example, Alexa Fluor® 750 dye. In this case, the values of λ0, λ-ι, and λ2 shown in figure 2 would be λ0 s 615 nm, λ « 665 nm, and λ2 « 780 nm, where λ0 is the center point of a 610-620 nm auxiliary wavelength band 230 shown in figure 2, λ is the center point of the 660-670 nm detection wavelength band 220, and λ2 is the center point of the 775-785 nm detection wavelength band 221 . The spectrum depicted with the solid line 201 is caused by the Alexa Fluor® 647 acceptors of the probes of the probe-population Pi excited due to the energy transfer from the excited Eu donors of these probes, and the spectrum depicted with the solid line 202 is caused by the excited Eu donors of the probes of the probe-population P not participating to the energy transfer. Correspondingly, the spectrum depicted with the dashed line 21 1 is caused by the Alexa Fluor® 750 acceptors of the probes of the probe-population P2 excited due to the energy transfer from the excited Eu donors of the probes of the probe-population P2, and the spectrum depicted with the dashed line 21 2 is caused by the excited Eu donors of the probes of the probe- population P2 not participating to the energy transfer. Figure 2 can be deemed to represent a time instant after donor excitation when signals emitted by acceptors of unhybridized, i.e. free, probes have already been decayed off sufficiently from the viewpoint of detection.
A method according to an exemplifying embodiment for cross-talk correction of intensities I MI and IM2 measured on the detection wavelength bands 220 and 221 , respectively, comprises the following actions:
- action 1 01 , figure 1 : computing estimates of cross-talk intensities CBi and CB2 occurring on the detection wavelength bands 220 and 221 and at least partially caused by the second signal components emitted by the probe-populations Pi and P2 on the basis of : a) first cross-talk parameters RBi and RB2 and b) a value lBM indicative of intensity at least partially caused by the second signal components and occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band 230, figure 2, outside the detection wavelength bands 220 and 221 , and
- action 1 02, figure 1 : computing cross-talk corrected intensities lCi and lC2 of the detection wavelength bands 220 and 221 on the basis of: a) the intensities IMI and I M2 measured on the detection wavelength bands 220 and 221 , b) the computed estimates of the cross-talk intensities CBi and CB2, and c) second cross-talk parameters R-|2 and R2i .
In conjunction with the time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer "TR- FRET" based multianalyte detection, the above-mentioned cross-talk intensities CBI and CB2 can be called "background" intensities so as to be coherent with phraseology related to TR-FRET. The cross-talk parameter RBi indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band 220 and at least partially caused by the second signal components emitted by the probe-populations Pi and P2, and b) intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band 230 and at least partially caused by the second signal components. Correspondingly, the cross-talk parameter RB2 indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band 221 and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and b) intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band 230 and at least partially caused by the second signal components. In a more general case, it is possible that the spectra of the second signal components emitted by different probe-populations are different from each other, e.g. the spectrum of the second signal component of the probe-population P can be different from that of the second signal component of the probe-population P2. In this case, better cross-talk correction accuracy can be achieved if it is possible to find such auxiliary wavelength bands so that the in- tensities occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and caused by the second signal components are sufficiently free from mutual cross-talk and from cross-talk from the first signal components. The above-presented principle for defining the first cross-talk parameters can be used also in this case but, naturally, when there is more than one the auxiliary wavelength band, the number of the first cross-talk parameters is higher.
The cross-talk parameter Ri2 indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band 220 and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population P2, and b) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band 221 and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population P2. Correspondingly, the cross-talk parameter R2i indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band 221 and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population P ; and b) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band 220 and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population P-i .
In a method according to an exemplifying embodiment, the value I BM indicative of the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band 230 and at least partially caused by the second signal components of the probe-populations Pi and P2 is a value measured on the auxiliary wavelength band from the sample to be analyzed. Therefore, for example in conjunction with FRET-based assays where the intensity of signal caused by the second signal components is at least partially dependent on the concentrations of the analytes present in the sample, the IBM can be measured and taken into account in the cross-talk correction from each sample well separately. In a method according to another exemplifying embodiment, the value IBM indicative of the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band 230 and at least partially caused by the second signal components is a same pre- determined value in conjunction with several samples, e.g. a same value IBM can be used for many sample wells.
In a method according to an exemplifying embodiment, the estimates of the crosstalk intensities CBI and CB2 are computed according to the following equation:
CBI = RBI X I BM and CB2 = RB2 χ IBM- (1 ) In a general case, where there can be two or more analyte-specific probe- populations, the estimate of the cross-talk intensity occurring on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components of the two or more probe-populations can be computed according to the following equation:
Figure imgf000013_0001
where i = 1 , 2, the number of the analyte-specific probe-populations, CBI is the estimate of the cross-talk intensity occurring on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and RBi is the first cross-talk parameter indicating a relation between a) intensity occur- ring on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and b) intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band 230 and at least partially caused by the second signal components.
In a method according to an exemplifying embodiment, the cross-talk corrected intensities Id and Ic2 of the detection wavelength bands 220 and 221 are solved from the following pair of equations:
Figure imgf000014_0001
In a general case, where there can be three or more analyte-specific probe- populations, the cross-talk corrected intensities of the detection wavelength bands can be solved from the following set of equations:
Figure imgf000014_0002
where: n is the number of the analyte-specific probe-populations, lci and lq are the cross-talk corrected intensities of the ith and jth ones of the detection wavelength bands, respectively, I MI is the intensity measured on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands,
Cej is the estimate of the cross-talk intensity occurring on the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and
R is the second cross-talk parameter that indicates a ratio between a) intensity occurring on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and b) intensity occurring on the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands. A method according to an exemplifying embodiment comprises determining the first cross-talk parameters on the basis of first test intensities measured from one or more first model samples each of which contains one or more of the probe- populations and is free from analytes detectable with the probe-populations. The first cross-talk parameters can be computed, for example, according to the equation:
R ^ModelO, i
Bi =i (5)
1 ModelO, B where: i = 1 , 2, the number of the analyte-specific probe-populations, RBI is the first cross-talk parameter related to the ith one of the detection wavelength bands, e.g. one of the wavelength bands 220 and 221 shown in figure 2, lModeio,i is the first test intensity occurring on ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured from such a first model sample that contains the probe-populations, and iModeio.B is the first test intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band, e.g. the wavelength band 230 shown in figure 2, and at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured from the first model sample.
A method according to an exemplifying embodiment comprises determining the second cross-talk parameters on the basis of second test intensities measured from second model samples, where each of the second model samples contains one or more of the probe-populations and analyte detectable with one of the probe-populations and is free from analytes detectable with the other probe- populations. The second cross-talk parameters can be computed, for example, according to the equation: where: i = 1 , 2, the number of the analyte-specific probe-populations, j = 1 , 2, the number of the analyte-specific probe-populations, and i≠ j,
R is the second cross-talk parameter related to the ith and jth ones of the detec- tion wavelength bands, e.g. the wavelength bands 220 and 221 shown in figure 2, i Modei, ij is the second test intensity occurring on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and measured from a such second model sample that contains analyte detectable with the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and is free from analytes detectable with the other probe-populations,
IModei, jj is the second test intensity occurring on the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and measured from the above-mentioned second model sample, and
Ci and Cj are real valued adjustment terms.
In a method according to an exemplifying embodiment, the above-mentioned C, = RBi x test intensity lM0dei, B J at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured on the auxiliary wavelength band from the above-mentioned second model sample, and the above-mentioned Cj = Rej χ the test intensity IModei B,j, where RBi and RBj are the first cross-talk parameters related to the ith and jth ones of the detection wavelength bands, respectively. In a method according to an exemplifying embodiment, C, is test intensity I Modeio occurring on ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and Cj is test intensity IModeio occurring on jth one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, where the test intensities C, and Cj are measured from a model sample that contains the probe-populations and is free from analytes detectable with the probe-populations.
In a method according to an exemplifying embodiment, the real valued adjustment terms C, and Cj = 0. In a method according to an exemplifying embodiment, the first and second crosstalk parameters are selected from among pre-determined values on the basis of at least one of the following: ways of conduct of intensity measurements, information identifying a measurement instrument used for the intensity measurements. A way of conduct of intensity measurement can be characterized by, for example but not necessarily, the number of successive excitation-counting cycles used in detection of intensity on a certain measurement wavelength band, where each excitation- counting cycle contains an excitation phase and a subsequent counting phase. The information identifying a measurement instrument can be, for example, a serial number of the measurement instrument used for the intensity measurements. A computer program according to an exemplifying embodiment comprises computer executable instructions for controlling a programmable processor to carry out a method according to any of the above-described exemplifying embodiments. The computer executable instructions can be generated with a suitable programming language. A computer program product according to an exemplifying embodiment comprises a non-volatile computer readable medium, e.g. a compact disc ("CD"), encoded with a computer program according to an embodiment.
A signal according to an exemplifying embodiment is encoded to carry information defining a computer program according to an embodiment. Figure 3a shows a schematic illustration of an optical measurement instrument that comprises a device according to an exemplifying embodiment for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more wavelength bands from a sample to be analyzed. Figure 3b shows schematic illustration of a view seen downwards from the line A-A of figure 3a. The measurement instrument comprises me- chanical support elements arranged to support a sample plate 308 that can be e.g. a microtitration plate. The sample plate comprises sample wells which contain samples 351 , 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, and 357 to be analyzed. The samples have been arranged to comprise analyte-specific probe-populations, e.g. FRET-probes, in order to detect presence of two or more analytes from each sample. The me- chanical support elements comprise a support rail 306 and guide elements 309 shown in figure 3b. The support rail 306 is supported relative to a body of the measurement instrument with the aid of the guide elements 309 in such a way that the support rail 306 is movable in the directions of a two-headed arrow 310 shown in figure 3b. The mechanical support elements comprise a sledge 307 capable of receiving the sample plate 308. The sledge is connected to the support rail 306 in such a way that the sledge is capable of sliding along the support rail in the longitudinal direction of the support rail, i.e. the sledge is movable with respect to the support rail 306 in the directions of a two-headed arrow 31 1 shown in figure 3b. Hence, the sample plate 308 is movable in the xy-plane defined by a co-ordinate system 390. Due to the fact that the sample wells are movable in the xy-plane, the contents of different sample wells can be measured in a temporally successive manner so that each sample well is in turn the sample well whose content is being measured.
The measurement instrument comprises measurement equipment for measuring intensities on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample to be analyzed. Each detection wavelength band relates to one of analyte-specific probe- populations contained by the sample, and each probe-population is, after excitation, capable of emitting at least a first signal component and a second signal component whose spectra have maxima at different wavelengths and at least the first signal component is dependent on presence of analyte detectable with that probe-population. The measurement equipment comprises an excitation light source 303, figure 3a, and a light guide 304 for directing excitation radiation to the sample 352 being measured. The measurement equipment comprises a detector 302 for measuring, on appropriate wavelength bands, the emission radiation emit- ted by the sample 352 and for producing a signal indicative of intensities of the emission radiation measured on the wavelength bands. The detector 309 can be based on, for example, a photodiode or a photomultiplier tube. The measurement instrument comprises a controller 301 for controlling the operation of the excitation light source 303 and the detector 302. The excitation light source 303, the detector 302, and/or the light guide 304 can be either integral or replaceable components of the measurement instrument. The controller 301 can be can be implemented with one or more programmable processor circuits, one or more dedicated hardware circuits such as an application specific integrated circuit "ASIC", one or more field programmable logic circuits such as a field programmable gate array "FPGA", or a combination of these. Furthermore, the optical measurement instrument may comprise an optical filtering device with the aid of which an appropriate wave- length band can be selected for each measurement.
The measurement instrument comprises a device for cross-talk correction of the intensities measured on the two or more detection wavelength bands from the sample 352. The device comprises:
- means for computing estimates of cross-talk intensities occurring on the detec- tion wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components emitted by the probe-populations on the basis of: a) first cross-talk parameters and b) at least one value indicative of at least one intensity each occurring on one of auxiliary wavelength bands outside the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and - means for computing cross-talk corrected intensities of the detection wavelength bands on the basis of: a) the intensities measured on the detection wavelength bands, b) the computed estimates of the cross-talk intensities, and c) second cross-talk parameters, where: - each of the first cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and b) intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and - each of the second cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to one of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by another of the probe-populations, and b) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to the other of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the other of the probe-populations.
In the measurement instrument illustrated in figures 3a and 3b, the controller 301 comprises a computing system that is configured to constitute the device for cross- talk correction. In a measurement instrument according to another exemplifying embodiment, the device for cross-talk correction is implemented with a separate computing system.
In a device according to an exemplifying embodiment, the computing system is configured to compute the estimates of the cross-talk intensities occurring on the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components according to the following equation :
Figure imgf000020_0001
where CBI is the estimate of the cross-talk intensity occurring on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, RBi is the first cross-talk parameter related to the ith one of the detection wavelength bands, and I BM is the value indicative of the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components.
In a device according to an exemplifying embodiment, the computing system is configured to solve the cross-talk corrected intensities of the detection wavelength bands from the following set of equations:
Figure imgf000021_0001
where:
I ci and lq are the cross-talk corrected intensities of the ith and jth ones of the detection wavelength bands, respectively, I MI is the intensity measured on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands,
CBj is the estimate of the cross-talk intensity occurring on the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and
R is the second cross-talk parameter that indicates a ratio between a) intensity occurring on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and b) intensity occurring on the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands.
In a device according to an exemplifying embodiment, the computing system is configured determine the first cross-talk parameters on the basis of first test intensities measured from one or more first model samples each of which contains one or more of the probe-populations and is free from analytes detectable with the probe-populations.
In a device according to an exemplifying embodiment, the computing system is configured to compute the first cross-talk parameters according to the equation : p _ ^ModelO, i
Bi !
'ModelO, B where:
RBi is the first cross-talk parameter related to the ith one of the detection wavelength bands, iModeio.i is the first test intensity occurring on ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured from such a first model sample that contains the probe-populations, and iModeio.B is the first test intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured from the first model sample.
In a device according to an exemplifying embodiment, the computing system is configured determine the second cross-talk parameters on the basis of second test intensities measured from second model samples, where each of the second model samples contains one or more of the probe-populations and analyte detectable with one of the probe-populations and is free from analytes detectable with the other probe-populations.
In a device according to an exemplifying embodiment, the computing system is configured to compute the second cross-talk parameters according to the equa- tion: p I
_ 'Modelj, j - r
'j _ I _ p
■Model,], j uj where:
R is the second cross-talk parameter related to the ith and jth ones of the detection wavelength bands, I Model, i,j is the second test intensity occurring on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and measured from the second model sample that contains analyte detectable with the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and is free from analytes detectable with the other probe-populations,
I Model, j,j is the second test intensity occurring on the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wave- length bands and measured from the second model sample, and
Ci and Cj are real valued adjustment terms.
In a device according to an exemplifying embodiment, the computing system is configured to set the adjustment terms so that the above-mentioned C, = RBI χ intensity at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured on the auxiliary wavelength band from the above-mentioned second model sample, and the above-mentioned Cj = RBj χ intensity at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured on the auxiliary wavelength band from the second model sample, where RBI and Rej are the first cross-talk parameters related to the ith and jth ones of the detection wavelength bands, respectively. In a device according to an exemplifying embodiment, the computing system is configured to set the adjustment terms so that C, is test intensity occurring on ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and Cj is test intensity occurring on jth one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, where the test intensities C, and Cj are measured from a model sample that contains the probe-populations and is free from analytes detectable with the probe- populations.
In a device according to an exemplifying embodiment, the computing system is configured to set the adjustment terms so that C, = Cj = 0. In a measurement instrument according to an exemplifying embodiment, the measurement equipment is configured to measure the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components from the sample 352, and the device for cross-talk correction is config- ured to use the measured intensity when computing the estimates of the cross-talk intensities occurring on the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components.
In a measurement instrument according to an exemplifying embodiment, the device for cross-talk correction is configured to select the first and second cross-talk parameters from among pre-determined values on the basis of at least one of the following: ways of conduct of intensity measurements, information identifying the measurement instrument from among similar measurement instruments. The information identifying a measurement instrument can be, for example, a serial number of the measurement instrument. The specific examples provided in the description given above should not be construed as limiting. Therefore, the protection scope is not limited merely to the embodiments described above.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1 . A method for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample, each detection wavelength band relating to one of analyte-specific probe-populations contained by the sample and each probe-population being capable of emitting a first signal component and a second signal component whose spectra are mutually different and at least the first signal component being dependent on presence of analyte detectable with that probe- population, characterized in that the method comprises:
- computing (101 ) estimates of cross-talk intensities occurring on the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components emitted by the probe-populations on the basis of: a) first cross-talk parameters and b) at least one value indicative of at least one intensity occurring on at least one auxiliary wavelength band outside the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and - computing (102) cross-talk corrected intensities of the detection wavelength bands on the basis of: a) the intensities measured on the detection wavelength bands, b) the computed estimates of the cross-talk intensities, and c) second cross-talk parameters, wherein: - each of the first cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and b) intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and - each of the second cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to one of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by another of the probe-populations, and b) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to the other of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the other of the probe-populations.
2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the estimates of the cross-talk intensities occurring on the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by
5 the second signal components are computed according to the following equation:
Figure imgf000026_0001
where CBi is the estimate of the cross-talk intensity occurring on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, RBI is the first cross-talk parameter related to the ith one of the detec- 1 0 tion wavelength bands, and I BM is the value indicative of the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the cross-talk corrected intensities of the detection wavelength bands are solved from the following set of equations: n
'ci = 'MI _∑^ij ('cj - CBj )
j=2
^ 'ci = 'MI— ∑R ('cj _ CBj )
Figure imgf000026_0002
where: lci and lq are the cross-talk corrected intensities of the ith and jth ones of the detection wavelength bands, respectively,
I MI is the intensity measured on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands,
20 CBj is the estimate of the cross-talk intensity occurring on the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and R is the second cross-talk parameter that indicates a ratio between a) intensity occurring on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and b) intensity occurring on the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands.
4. A method according to any of claims 1 -3, wherein the method comprises determining the first cross-talk parameters on the basis of first test intensities measured from one or more first model samples each of which contains one or more of the probe-populations and is free from analytes detectable with the probe-populations.
5. A method according to claim 4, wherein the first cross-talk parameters are computed according to the equation :
R _ ^ModelO, i
Bi - -j
' ModelO, B where:
RBi is the first cross-talk parameter related to the ith one of the detection wavelength bands, iModeio.i is the first test intensity occurring on ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured from the such first model sample that contains the probe- populations, and iModeio.B is the first test intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured from the first model sample.
6. A method according to any of claims 1 -5, wherein the method comprises determining the second cross-talk parameters on the basis of second test intensities measured from second model samples, each of the second model samples con- taining one or more of the probe-populations and analyte detectable with one of the probe-populations and being free from analytes detectable with the other probe-populations.
7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the second cross-talk parameters are computed according to the equation : p _ LodelJ, j _
ij ~~ I - Γ
' Model,], j °j where:
R is the second cross-talk parameter related to the ith and jth ones of the detection wavelength bands, I Model, ij is the second test intensity occurring on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and measured from the second model sample that contains analyte detectable with the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and is free from analytes detectable with the other probe-populations,
I Model, j,j is the second test intensity occurring on the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and measured from the second model sample, and Ci and Cj are real valued adjustment terms.
8. A method according to claim 7, wherein C, = Cj = 0.
9. A method according to claim 7, wherein C, is test intensity occurring on ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and Cj is test intensity occurring on jth one of the detection wave- length bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, the test intensities C, and Cj being measured from a model sample that contains one or more of the probe-populations and is free from analytes detectable with the probe-populations.
10. A method according to claim 7, wherein C, = RBI χ intensity that is at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured on the auxiliary wavelength band from the second model sample, and Cj = RBj χ intensity at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured on the auxiliary wavelength band from the second model sample, where RBi and RBj are the first cross-talk parameters related to the ith and jth ones of the detection wavelength bands, respectively.
1 1 . A method according to any of claims 1 -10, wherein the value indicative of the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components is a value measured from the sample on the auxiliary wavelength band.
12. A method according to any of claims 1 -1 1 , wherein the first and second cross- talk parameters are selected from among pre-determined values on the basis of at least one of the following: ways of conduct of intensity measurements, information identifying a measurement instrument used for the intensity measurements.
13. A method according to any of claims 1 -12, wherein the probe-populations are populations of probes based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer where each probe comprises at least one donor, at least one acceptor, and at least one reactive region capable of interacting with analyte to be detected with that probe.
14. A method according to claim 13, wherein the donor is a luminescent label having luminescent lifetime longer than 1 με.
15. A method according to claim 13, wherein the donor is a lanthanide chelate do- nor and the acceptor is an organic fluorophore acceptor.
16. A method according to claim 15, wherein the lanthanide is europium, terbium, dysprosium, or samarium.
17. A device for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample, each detection wavelength band relating to one of analyte-specific probe-populations contained by the sample and each probe-population being capable of emitting a first signal component and a second signal component whose spectra are mutually different and at least the first signal component being dependent on presence of analyte detectable with that probe- population, characterized in that the device comprises a computing system (301 ) configured to:
- compute estimates of cross-talk intensities occurring on the detection wave- length bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components emitted by the probe-populations on the basis of: a) first cross-talk parameters and b) at least one value indicative of at least one intensity occurring on at least one auxiliary wavelength band outside the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and - compute cross-talk corrected intensities of the detection wavelength bands on the basis of: a) the intensities measured on the detection wavelength bands, b) the computed estimates of the cross-talk intensities, and c) second crosstalk parameters, wherein: - each of the first cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and b) intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and - each of the second cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to one of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by another of the probe-populations, and b) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to the other of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the other of the probe-populations.
18. A device according to claim 17, wherein the computing system is configured to compute the estimates of the cross-talk intensities occurring on the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components according to the following equation :
Figure imgf000031_0001
where CBi is the estimate of the cross-talk intensity occurring on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, RBI is the first cross-talk parameter related to the ith one of the detection wavelength bands, and I BM is the value indicative of the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components.
1 9. A device according to claim 1 7 or 1 8, wherein the computing system is config- ured to solve the cross-talk corrected intensities of the detection wavelength bands from the following set of equations:
Figure imgf000031_0002
where:
I ci and lq are the cross-talk corrected intensities of the ith and jth ones of the de- tection wavelength bands, respectively,
I MI is the intensity measured on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands, Cej is the estimate of the cross-talk intensity occurring on the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and
R is the second cross-talk parameter that indicates a ratio between a) intensity occurring on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and b) intensity occurring on the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands.
20. A device according to any of claims 17-19, wherein the computing system is configured determine the first cross-talk parameters on the basis of first test intensities measured from one or more first model samples each of which contains one or more of the probe-populations and is free from analytes detectable with the probe-populations.
21 . A device according to claim 20, wherein the computing system is configured to compute the first cross-talk parameters according to the equation:
R _ ^ModelO, i
Bi - -j
' ModelO, B where: RBi is the first cross-talk parameter related to the ith one of the detection wavelength bands, iModeio.i is the first test intensity occurring on ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured from the such first model sample that contains the probe- populations, and iModeio.B is the first test intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured from the first model sample.
22. A device according to any of claims 1 7-21 , wherein the computing system is configured determine the second cross-talk parameters on the basis of second test intensities measured from second model samples, each of the second model samples containing one or more of the probe-populations and analyte detectable with one of the probe-populations and being free from analytes detectable with the other probe-populations.
23. A device according to claim 22, wherein the computing system is configured to compute the second cross-talk parameters according to the equation: p _ LodelJ, j _
ij ~~ I - Γ
' Model,], j °j where:
R is the second cross-talk parameter related to the ith and jth ones of the detec- tion wavelength bands,
I Model, ij is the second test intensity occurring on the ith one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and measured from the second model sample that contains analyte detectable with the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and is free from analytes detectable with the other probe-populations,
I Model, j,j is the second test intensity occurring on the jth one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the probe-population related to the jth one of the detection wave- length bands and measured from the second model sample, and
Ci and Cj are real valued adjustment terms.
24. A device according to claim 23, wherein the computing system is configured to set the adjustment terms so that C, = Cj = 0.
25. A device according to claim 23, wherein the computing system is configured to set the adjustment terms so that C, is test intensity occurring on ith one of the de- tection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and Cj is test intensity occurring on jth one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, the test intensities Ci and Cj being measured from a model sample that contains one or more of the probe-populations and is free from analytes detectable with the probe- populations.
26. A device according to claim 23, wherein the computing system is configured to set the adjustment terms so that C, = RBI χ intensity at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured on the auxiliary wavelength band from the second model sample, and Cj = Rej χ intensity at least partially caused by the second signal components and measured on the auxiliary wavelength band from the second model sample, where RBi and RBj are the first cross-talk parameters related to the ith and jth ones of the detection wavelength bands, respectively.
27. A device according to claim 17, wherein the computing system comprises:
- a processor for executing instructions, and - a memory for storing a computer program defining a set of instructions for controlling the processor to compute the estimates of the cross-talk intensities occurring on the detection wavelength bands and to compute the crosstalk corrected intensities of the detection wavelength bands.
28. A measurement instrument comprising: - measurement equipment (302, 303, 304) for measuring intensities on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample, each detection wavelength band relating to one of analyte-specific probe-populations contained by the sample and each probe-population being capable of emitting a first signal component and a second signal component whose spectra are mutually dif- ferent and at least the first signal component being dependent on presence of analyte detectable with that probe-population, and
- a device according to any of claims 17-26 for cross-talk correction of the intensities measured on the two or more detection wavelength bands from the sample.
29. A measurement instrument according to claim 28, wherein the measurement equipment is configured to measure the intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components from the sample, and the device for cross-talk correction is configured to use the meas- ured intensity when computing the estimates of the cross-talk intensities occurring on the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components.
30. A measurement instrument according to claim 28 or 29, wherein the device for cross-talk correction is configured to select the first and second cross-talk parame- ters from among pre-determined values on the basis of at least one of the following: ways of conduct of intensity measurements, information identifying the measurement instrument from among similar measurement instruments.
31 . A computer program for cross-talk correction of intensities measured on two or more detection wavelength bands from a sample, each detection wavelength band relating to one of analyte-specific probe-populations contained by the sample and each probe-population being capable of emitting a first signal component and a second signal component whose spectra are mutually different and at least the first signal component being dependent on presence of analyte detectable with that probe-population, characterized in that the computer program comprises computer executable instructions for controlling a programmable processor to:
- compute estimates of cross-talk intensities occurring on the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components emitted by the probe-populations on the basis of: a) first cross-talk parameters and b) at least one value indicative of at least one intensity occurring on at least one auxiliary wavelength band outside the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and
- compute cross-talk corrected intensities of the detection wavelength bands on the basis of: a) the intensities measured on the detection wavelength bands, b) the computed estimates of the cross-talk intensities, and c) second crosstalk parameters, wherein:
- each of the first cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on one of the detection wavelength bands and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and b) intensity occurring on the auxiliary wavelength band and at least partially caused by the second signal components, and
- each of the second cross-talk parameters indicates a relation between a) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to one of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by another of the probe-populations, and b) intensity occurring on the detection wavelength band related to the other of the probe-populations and at least partially caused by the first signal component emitted by the other of the probe-populations.
32. A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium encoded with a computer program according to claim 31 .
PCT/FI2014/050246 2013-04-15 2014-04-08 A method and a device for cross-talk correction of measured intensities WO2014170537A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
BR112015025832-8A BR112015025832B1 (en) 2013-04-15 2014-04-08 Method and device for crosstalk correction and measuring instrument
US14/784,768 US9736555B2 (en) 2013-04-15 2014-04-08 Method and a device for cross-talk correction of measured intensities
CN201480033905.7A CN105324493B (en) 2013-04-15 2014-04-08 The method and apparatus that crosstalk for measurement intensity is calibrated
EP14721911.7A EP2986737A1 (en) 2013-04-15 2014-04-08 A method and a device for cross-talk correction of measured intensities

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201361811847P 2013-04-15 2013-04-15
FI20135367 2013-04-15
FI20135367 2013-04-15
US61/811,847 2013-04-15

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2014170537A1 true WO2014170537A1 (en) 2014-10-23

Family

ID=51730861

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/FI2014/050246 WO2014170537A1 (en) 2013-04-15 2014-04-08 A method and a device for cross-talk correction of measured intensities

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US9736555B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2986737A1 (en)
CN (1) CN105324493B (en)
BR (1) BR112015025832B1 (en)
TW (1) TWI611174B (en)
WO (1) WO2014170537A1 (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050123957A1 (en) * 2003-10-01 2005-06-09 Wallac Oy Homogeneous time-resolved energy transfer assay
US20060147954A1 (en) 2004-10-19 2006-07-06 Wallac Oy Novel probe and its use in bioaffinity assays
US20110301062A1 (en) * 2008-06-11 2011-12-08 Jiang Zhu Reliable fluorescence correction method for two-color measurement fluorescence system

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FI963989A (en) 1996-10-04 1998-04-05 Wallac Oy Homogeneous methods of determination based on the transmission of luminescence energy
US7209836B1 (en) 1999-07-16 2007-04-24 Perkinelmer Las, Inc. Method and system for automatically creating crosstalk-corrected data of a microarray
US6763149B2 (en) 2001-04-25 2004-07-13 Amnis Corporation Method and apparatus for correcting crosstalk and spatial resolution for multichannel imaging
EP1288308A1 (en) 2001-08-28 2003-03-05 Roche Diagnostics GmbH A method for the determination of multiple analytes
FI20095302A0 (en) * 2009-03-24 2009-03-24 Arctic Partners Oy Ab Luminesenssimääritysmenetelmä
US8435738B2 (en) * 2011-09-25 2013-05-07 Theranos, Inc. Systems and methods for multi-analysis

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050123957A1 (en) * 2003-10-01 2005-06-09 Wallac Oy Homogeneous time-resolved energy transfer assay
US20060147954A1 (en) 2004-10-19 2006-07-06 Wallac Oy Novel probe and its use in bioaffinity assays
US20110301062A1 (en) * 2008-06-11 2011-12-08 Jiang Zhu Reliable fluorescence correction method for two-color measurement fluorescence system

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ELDER A D ET AL: "A quantitative protocol for dynamic measurements of protein interactions by Forster resonance energy transfer-sensitized fluorescence emission", JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY. INTERFACE, THE ROYAL SOCIETY, LONDON, GB, vol. 6, no. Suppl. 1, 2009, pages S59 - S81, XP009168413, ISSN: 1742-5689, [retrieved on 20090206], DOI: 10.1098/RSIF.2008.0381.FOCUS *
MASILAMANI ELANGOVAN ET AL: "Characterization of one- and two-photon excitation fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy", METHODS, vol. 29, no. 1, 2003, pages 58 - 73, XP055121552, ISSN: 1046-2023, DOI: 10.1016/S1046-2023(02)00283-9 *
TAKANISHI C L ET AL: "GFP-based FRET analysis in live cells", BRAIN RESEARCH, ELSEVIER, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 1091, no. 1, 26 May 2006 (2006-05-26), pages 132 - 139, XP027917893, ISSN: 0006-8993, [retrieved on 20060526] *
V. LAITALA ET AL.: "Time-resolved detection probe for homogeneous nucleic acid analyses in one-step format", ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, vol. 361, 2007, pages 126 - 131, XP005733813, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.ab.2006.11.015
YE CHEN ET AL: "Quantitative FRET data analysis: protein localization in living specimens", PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE, vol. 6089, 9 February 2006 (2006-02-09), pages 60891W - 60891W-9, XP055121557, ISSN: 0277-786X, DOI: 10.1117/12.658170 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TWI611174B (en) 2018-01-11
CN105324493B (en) 2018-02-23
US9736555B2 (en) 2017-08-15
TW201447275A (en) 2014-12-16
BR112015025832A2 (en) 2017-07-25
BR112015025832B1 (en) 2022-03-15
CN105324493A (en) 2016-02-10
US20160066072A1 (en) 2016-03-03
BR112015025832A8 (en) 2019-12-24
EP2986737A1 (en) 2016-02-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Zhou et al. Design principles of spectroscopic probes for biological applications
US8625100B2 (en) Method for the optical determining of a measured variable of a medium
JP7038158B2 (en) Methods and systems for fluorescence detection
US8729502B1 (en) Simultaneous, single-detector fluorescence detection of multiple analytes with frequency-specific lock-in detection
Sutariya et al. A unique fluorescence biosensor for selective detection of tryptophan and histidine
CN101788479A (en) Method for carrying out high sensitivity detection on fluorescence resonance energy transfer based on quantum dots
Hoffmann et al. Nanoparticle-encapsulated vis-and NIR-emissive fluorophores with different fluorescence decay kinetics for lifetime multiplexing
JP2010511148A (en) Multivariate detection of molecules in bioassays
US20220196561A1 (en) Optical sensor element, optical ph sensor and method for monitoring the function of an optical ph sensor
JP2005513497A (en) Method and / or apparatus for identification of fluorescent, luminescent and / or light-absorbing substances on and / or in a sample carrier
JP2009250721A (en) Analyzing method of intermolecular interaction
US20040023229A1 (en) Direct detection of individual molecules
JPWO2004090517A1 (en) Reagent, method and apparatus for quantitative determination of substances using fluorescence lifetime
Sutariya et al. A pyrenyl linked calix [4] arene fluorescence probe for recognition of ferric and phosphate ions
US9736555B2 (en) Method and a device for cross-talk correction of measured intensities
CN1142423C (en) Method for quantitatively measuring transferring efficiency of fluorescence resonance energy
US20200003765A1 (en) Method and apparatus for detecting an analyte
US11971354B2 (en) Methods and systems for fluorescence detection using infrared dyes
Ma et al. Time-resolved fluorescence assays
US20060115842A1 (en) Highly sensitive homogeneous assay based on anti-Stokes' shift FRET measurement
Prakash et al. White light excitation fluorescence (WLEF) Part II. Analysis of complex multifluorophoric systems
JP5208774B2 (en) Fluorescence spectrophotometer
EP3161456B1 (en) A device and a method for detecting a sample contained by a sample well
US20240302279A1 (en) Optochemical sensor and method for measuring luminescing analytes in a measurement medium
KR102077775B1 (en) Method for in vitro diagnostic device by measuring fluorescence lifetime and in vitro diagnostic device for performing the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 201480033905.7

Country of ref document: CN

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 14721911

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 14784768

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2014721911

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01A

Ref document number: 112015025832

Country of ref document: BR

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 112015025832

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20151009