WO2014140522A2 - A method of generating predetermined luminance levels across an electronic visual display - Google Patents

A method of generating predetermined luminance levels across an electronic visual display Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2014140522A2
WO2014140522A2 PCT/GB2014/050558 GB2014050558W WO2014140522A2 WO 2014140522 A2 WO2014140522 A2 WO 2014140522A2 GB 2014050558 W GB2014050558 W GB 2014050558W WO 2014140522 A2 WO2014140522 A2 WO 2014140522A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
luminance
levels
display
visual display
electronic visual
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/GB2014/050558
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2014140522A3 (en
Inventor
Antonios PERPERIDIS
Harry Brash
Robert Minns
Brian Fleck
Alice MCTRUSTY
Lorraine Cameron
Jane ANDREWS
Ian Murray
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Edinburgh
Original Assignee
University of Edinburgh
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Edinburgh filed Critical University of Edinburgh
Publication of WO2014140522A2 publication Critical patent/WO2014140522A2/en
Publication of WO2014140522A3 publication Critical patent/WO2014140522A3/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09GARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G3/00Control arrangements or circuits, of interest only in connection with visual indicators other than cathode-ray tubes
    • G09G3/006Electronic inspection or testing of displays and display drivers, e.g. of LED or LCD displays
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/10Complex mathematical operations
    • G06F17/17Function evaluation by approximation methods, e.g. inter- or extrapolation, smoothing, least mean square method
    • G06F17/175Function evaluation by approximation methods, e.g. inter- or extrapolation, smoothing, least mean square method of multidimensional data
    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09GARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G2320/00Control of display operating conditions
    • G09G2320/02Improving the quality of display appearance
    • G09G2320/0233Improving the luminance or brightness uniformity across the screen
    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09GARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G2320/00Control of display operating conditions
    • G09G2320/02Improving the quality of display appearance
    • G09G2320/0285Improving the quality of display appearance using tables for spatial correction of display data
    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09GARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G2320/00Control of display operating conditions
    • G09G2320/02Improving the quality of display appearance
    • G09G2320/029Improving the quality of display appearance by monitoring one or more pixels in the display panel, e.g. by monitoring a fixed reference pixel
    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09GARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G2320/00Control of display operating conditions
    • G09G2320/02Improving the quality of display appearance
    • G09G2320/029Improving the quality of display appearance by monitoring one or more pixels in the display panel, e.g. by monitoring a fixed reference pixel
    • G09G2320/0295Improving the quality of display appearance by monitoring one or more pixels in the display panel, e.g. by monitoring a fixed reference pixel by monitoring each display pixel
    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09GARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G2320/00Control of display operating conditions
    • G09G2320/06Adjustment of display parameters
    • G09G2320/0693Calibration of display systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09GARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
    • G09G2360/00Aspects of the architecture of display systems
    • G09G2360/14Detecting light within display terminals, e.g. using a single or a plurality of photosensors
    • G09G2360/145Detecting light within display terminals, e.g. using a single or a plurality of photosensors the light originating from the display screen

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to luminance characterisation and compensation for Electronic Visual Displays (EVDs), for example including but not limited to liquid crystal displays (LCD), cathode ray tube (CRT) displays, light emitting diode (LED) displays, organic light emitting diode (OLED) displays and video projection devices.
  • EVDs Electronic Visual Displays
  • LCD liquid crystal displays
  • CRT cathode ray tube
  • LED light emitting diode
  • OLED organic light emitting diode
  • video projection devices for example including but not limited to liquid crystal displays (LCD), cathode ray tube (CRT) displays, light emitting diode (LED) displays, organic light emitting diode (OLED) displays and video projection devices.
  • the present invention relates to a purpose-specific method that characterises EVDs to accurately and precisely replicate a set of required luminance levels at any location across the entire electronic visual display. The technique is applicable on both the grey and coloured light emitted by an EVD.
  • EMDs Electronic Visual Displays
  • personal/portable devices such as mobile phones and tablets
  • specialised applications such as medical, industrial and commercial.
  • Different applications require a different set of characteristics from the EVD in use. Characteristics of common interest include spatial and temporal resolution, brightness, contrast and colour-depth.
  • luminance non-uniformity which is manifested as a variable set of luminances being displayed across a display for a given, uniform colour-lightness level (e.g. grey-level).
  • This luminance non-uniformity across EVDs limits, and sometimes restricts, their suitability in some specialised applications.
  • various visual field and other visual performance tests crucial in the management of a wide range of ophthalmic and neurological disorders, as well as other vision research applications.
  • a common technique for visual field examination termed "differential light sensitivity" presents a series of light stimuli (grey or coloured) of known luminance on a uniform background. Stimuli are presented at predetermined locations across the visual field.
  • HFA Humphrey Field Analyser
  • Twinfield perimeter Optus
  • Goldmann and Octopus perimeters are commonly used instruments for differential light sensitivity examinations.
  • Luminance levels employed by these devices are expressed as attenuation levels, in decibels (dBs), with respect to a maximum luminance (0 dB).
  • dBs decibels
  • the required luminance difference between the background and light stimuli during differential light sensitivity examinations can be very small, for example, down to 0.10cd/m 2 are necessary. As such, accurate and precise representation of each luminance level is essential for an accurate and reliable visual field test.
  • SVOP Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry
  • SVOP utilises an EVD to display bright stimuli on a darker background.
  • Suprathreshold SVOP is designed as a screening test to detect near absolute visual field defects and does not require representation of multiple luminance levels with high precision.
  • SVOP In order for SVOP to detect subtle changes in visual field function (such as those associated with early stage glaucoma) it must be able to reliably produce accurate and precise representation of many luminance levels across a display screen.
  • Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry can utilise the method described in this patent produce a reliable threshold perimetry test suitable for detecting subtle changes from normal visual field function such as thoise found in early stage glaucoma.
  • a first aspect of the present invention provides a method of characterising an electronic visual display to substantially accurately and substantially precisely replicate a set of required luminance levels at any location across the electronic visual display; the method comprises the steps of: a) selecting a set of Control Points (CPs) across the electronic visual display; b) selecting a set of colour-lightness levels (e.g.
  • CPs Control Points
  • colour-lightness levels e.g.
  • the method is applicable on both grey and coloured light emitted by the EVD.
  • substantially accurately and substantially precisely may be understood to mean towards 100% accuracy. More particularly, substantially accurately and substantially precisely may be understood to mean towards 98% to 99% accuracy.
  • the method may further comprise: f) Utilizing the look-up-table to substantially accurately and substantially precisely generate application-specific luminance levels across a characterised electronic visual display
  • Selection of the set of Control Points may be across a regular grid.
  • the selection of the set of Control Points (CPs) may be positioned in a display specific arrangement.
  • a display specific arrangement may require acquiring an image of a display and analysing the image.
  • the image may be acquired by a camera.
  • the analysis may comprise analysis of the acquired image and display gamma. Analysis of the image may further comprise low pass filtering and contrast enhancement such that unwanted noise can be removed.
  • a display specific arrangement of CPs provides an irregular sampling approach and thereby reduces acquisition and processing requirements by more than 60% compared with a regular sampling grid.
  • Step (c) measuring luminance at the selected control points may comprise a luminance meter. More particularly, step (c) measuring luminance at the selected control points may comprise a scientific grade luminance meter.
  • An example of a scientific grade luminance meter is a Konica Minolta LS-100.
  • An additional step before step (b) may comprise measuring an exhaustive set of luminance values for a greater number of colour lightness levels about the centre of the display in order to determine the appropriate set of colour-lightness levels for any particular display (step (b)).
  • the method according to the present invention characterises an EVD in order to accurately and precisely replicate predetermined luminance levels at any location across the entire display.
  • the present invention may also achieve luminance uniformity in the region of 98-99% (depending on the initial quality of the characterised EVD). This is a marked improvement on existing methods, where luminance uniformity is generally a maximum of 95%-96%.
  • the method according to the present invention allows expansion of the use of existing commercial EVDs to specialised scientific applications, for example visual field tests and other vision research applications, aiming at the assessment of glaucoma, cataract, stroke, brain tumours, etc.
  • TSVOP technology for a reliable threshold perimetry test suitable for detecting early stage visual field loss
  • TSVOP is required to accurately (down to 1-2% non-uniformity) and precisely replicate any required stimuli luminance levels across the entire display.
  • CTR Cathode Ray Tube
  • any vision test or other application which requires the generation of specific luminance (background, stimulus or otherwise) at any particular screen locations.
  • the method may also allow extension of the application of the TSVOP technique to a wider range of visual field tests.
  • the TSVOP instrument, described above, utilises an EVD.
  • the display may have a colour-depth of 8-bit or higher (e.g. 10-bit, 12-bit, etc.)
  • a second aspect of the present invention provides a data acquisition rig, configured to characterise an electronic visual display device to substantially accurately and substantially precisely replicate a set of required luminance levels at any location across the electronic visual display.
  • the rig may comprise a luminance meter configured to perform a sequence of measurements on selected control points across the electronic visual display device.
  • the luminance meter may be a scientific grade luminance meter.
  • An example of a suitable luminance meter is a Konica Minolta LS-100 model.
  • the rig may comprise positional control means configured to control position of the EVD relative to the luminance meter.
  • the positional control means may comprise means to control linear translation, means to control level of the EVD and means to control angular position of the EVD relative to the luminance meter.
  • the positional control means may comprise one or more of the following: rails for linear translation, levelling device and a three-axis rotational device.
  • aspects of the present invention provide a cost effective system which is applicable to a range of visual field, vision and psychophysics tests because the method according to the present invention facilitates the replacement of out dated technologies, for example cathode ray tube displays, and facilitates replacement of expensive light projection systems, for example Humphrey Field Analyser and Octopus 300 instruments and also facilitates replacement of presently used expensive (circa 85000) LCD equipment that inherently has limited applicability in visual field testing.
  • the luminance non-uniformity characterisation and compensation method and system according to aspects of the present invention shall therefore expand the usability of mid- range EVDs in specialised applications such as visual field tests normally associated with instruments such as the Humphrey Field analyser and the Octopus 300.
  • Screen luminance uniformity and the ability to create accurate stimuli are particularly important for applications such as visual field testing.
  • the embodiments of the present invention create a specialised display which enhances existing EVD technologies and expands their use to fields where previously EVDs would not have been considered appropriate.
  • the characterisation and compensation method and system according to embodiments of the present invention shall therefore enable a wider range of tests to be performed on a single calibrated EVD without a requirement for integrated specialised hardware.
  • a calibrated EVD device can be used in applications that require a uniform luminance background and/or the accurate reproduction of stimuli with specific luminance, for example including but not limited to differential light sensitivity tests, vision science research employing psychophysics experimentation, which currently uses dated CRT displays and simple tests, such as preferential looking for infants and contrast sensitivity testing to assess various aspects of visual function e.g. cataract, which currently primarily use printed cards.
  • Figure 1 illustrates a graphical representation of a data acquisition rig used in the application of the method of the present invention
  • Figure 2 illustrates a graphical representation of the steps comprising the present invention
  • Figure 3a illustrates a graphical representation of EVD gamma through multiple luminance measurements across the full range of colour-lightness levels (grey scale in the specific example) (0 -2 N -1 for N-bit colour depth);
  • Figure 3b illustrates a graphical representation of a set of control points selected to characterise luminance non-uniformity across an EVD
  • Figure 4a illustrates a graphical representation of interpolated non-uniformity across an assessed LCD. Representation is contrast enhanced for illustration purposes;
  • Figure 4b illustrates a graphical representation of dithered colour-lightness levels (e.g. grey levels) required to produce a uniform background luminance of 10cd/m 2 . Representation is contrast enhanced for illustration purposes;
  • Figure 4c illustrates a graphical representation of uniform background luminance reproduced by the compensated EVD. Representation is contrast enhanced for illustration purposes; and
  • Figure 5 illustrates a graphical representation of how specific luminance levels are utilised during a visual field differential light sensitivity test.
  • Embodiments of the present invention provide a purpose-specific method that characterises an electronic visual display (EVD), for example a liquid crystal display device to accurately and precisely replicate a set of required luminance levels at any location across the entire display.
  • ELD electronic visual display
  • the field of application for existing uncompensated EVDs can be expanded, for example into areas of visual field testing normally associated with instruments such as the Humphrey Field Analyser and the Octopus 300.
  • Figure 1 provides a graphical representation of a data acquisition rig 10, configured to characterise an EVD 12.
  • an 8-bit EVD 12 is characterised using grey-level information.
  • the technique is applicable to displays with higher colour depths (e.g. 10bit or more) and can characterise light of various chromaticity levels.
  • the rig 10 comprises a scientific luminance meter 14, for example a Konica Minolta model no LS100.
  • the luminance meter 14 performs a sequence of measurements on a number of control points across the EVD being assessed (see Figure 3b).
  • Linear translation of the EVD 12 relative to the luminance meter 14 is controlled by two rails 16.
  • Levelling devices 18, such as spirit levels, were employed together with a three-axis rotating stage 20 to ensure that the measurement axis was perpendicular to the EVD.
  • Step 1 100 includes the selection of a set of control points across the EVD as well as across the entire grey-level range (0 to 2 n -1 for n-bit colour depth). A regular and/or a display-specific control point grid or arrangement may be employed.
  • the method according to the present invention includes, but it is not limited to, a display-specific sampling approach which accurately and efficiently represents luminance variations across the display over a range of grey levels (0 to 2 n -1), from the darkest black (0) to the brightest white (2 n -1).
  • an exhaustive set of luminance measurements are performed at the centre of the display as illustrated in Figure 3a, and an algorithm is used to identify an optimal set of grey levels. Starting from grey level 0 and progressing to grey level 2 n -1 , the algorithm automatically identifies the largest step for which the difference between the original and interpolated gamma curves is less than 20% of the corresponding inter-level step.
  • an image of the display at a suitable fixed grey level for example 2 2 (i.e. 128 for 8-bit EVD)
  • a suitable camera for example a 24.2MPixel camera
  • This image is then low-pass filtered and contrast enhanced to further remove unwanted noise and highlight areas with high non-uniformity, enabling the selection of a representative set of control points across the EVD as illustrated in Figure 3b.
  • the process could be iterative and control point selection can be refined in regions demonstrating large differences between the original acquired image and the interpolated image.
  • a display-specific, irregular sampling arrangement reduces the acquisition and processing requirements, for example greater than 60% reduction in the total number of samples, and also enhances the accuracy of the interpolated profiles, for example greater than 60% reduction on maximum difference between the original and the interpolated profiles.
  • step 2 110 a sequence of luminance measurements, required to characterise the EVD, were performed on the control points and grey-levels derived through the above. It will be appreciated that alternative processes could be adopted to derive the control points and the grey levels.
  • step 3 120 interpolating splines are used to derive all intermediate luminance values amongst the sample grid.
  • one-dimensional interpolating cubic fa- splines are used to derive the Gamma corresponding to each control point across the EVD as illustrated in Figure 3a.
  • Given control points Pi to P n a set of points S, are derived defining a relaxed uniform cubic B- Spline interpolating through Pi to P n :
  • FIG. 4a illustrates the interpolated luminance variability across the assessed display for a given, uniform grey- level. In Figure 4a the graphical representation is contrast enhanced for illustration purposes.
  • a luminance estimate is derived for each pixel and each grey-level across the display.
  • step 4 130 a binary search is performed to identify the grey-levels that produced a uniform luminance representation to each luminance level required throughout the characterised EVD for a specific application: where LH (N) corresponds to the N cd/m 2 luminance required during a specific application, while LD (/ ' ,j, k) denotes the luminance generated by the characterised EVD at pixel (/ ' , j) and grey-level k e [0: 2 n -1].
  • LH (N) corresponds to the N cd/m 2 luminance required during a specific application
  • LD (/ ' ,j, k) denotes the luminance generated by the characterised EVD at pixel (/ ' , j) and grey-level k e [0: 2 n -1].
  • a sequence of 2D matrices (each with grey-level values for every pixel of the EVD) is generated, see Figure 4b.
  • the graphical representation
  • a dithering algorithm for example Floyd-Steingerg is employed to diffuse quantisation errors along the grey-level boundaries to neighbouring pixels generating visually smoother transitions.
  • the graphical representation is also contrast enhanced.
  • Figure 5 illustrates a graphical representation of how the specific luminance levels stored in look-up tables during Step 4 130 are utilised in Step 5 140 (described above with reference to Figure 2) during a visual field differential light sensitivity test.
  • Background luminance 22 is displayed across the entire EVD 24.
  • the stimulus luminance 28 is displayed generating an instant 30 during a differential light sensitivity test.
  • the non-uniformity characterisation and the compensation approach utilised a mid-range 8-bit EVD as well as two high end graphics EVDs with native 10-bit support (1024 grey-levels). Characterising a display that provides a native 10-bit support (1024 grey-levelsincreases the available search-space enhancing the capabilities of the present approach and consequently and consequently increases the accuracy and precision of the visual field threshold examinations.
  • the luminance non-uniformity characterisation and compensation approach provided by embodiments of the present invention expands the use and application of EVD devices and therefore creates a new specialised display to meet a new requirement which has previously not been achievable using existing display technologies.
  • the luminance non-uniformity characterisation and compensation approach provided by embodiments of the present invention enable off-the-shelf, mid-range EVDs, which cost in the region of £500 to achieve better uniformity than high-end medical displays, which can cost in excess of £000. Furthermore, it enables higher-end 10-bit EVDs to accurately and precisely reproduce a set of luminance levels required for specialised visual field examinations and other vision tests. Using the approach of the present invention shall enable a range of medical, scientific and ophthalmic tests to be performed on a single computing device, along with a calibrated EVD without the need for additional hardware.
  • visual field differential light sensitivity tests For example: visual field differential light sensitivity tests, vision science research employing psychophysics experimentation, preferential looking test for infants and contrast sensitivity testing to assess various aspects of visual function e.g. cataract, and any vision test or other application which requires the generation of specific luminance (background, stimulus or otherwise) at any particular screen locations.
  • the luminance characterisation and compensation approach provided by embodiments of the present invention can further improve the performance of high-end medical displays.
  • the description of the present invention refers specifically to the characterisation and derivation of luminance with grey levels, the present invention may also be applied (or extended) to the characterisation and derivation of other properties of colour on EVDs, for example hue, saturation and lightness.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Algebra (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Control Of Indicators Other Than Cathode Ray Tubes (AREA)
  • Controls And Circuits For Display Device (AREA)

Abstract

A method of characterising an electronic visual display to substantially accurately and substantially precisely replicate a set of required luminance levels at any location across the electronic visual display is provide. The method comprises the steps of selecting a set of control points across the electronic visual display; selecting a colour-lightness levels (e.g. grey-level) range between 0 to2n-1 for a n-bit colour depth; measuring luminance at the selected control points and the selected colour-lightness levels; interpolating measured luminance levels at selected control points and the selected colour-lightness levels thereby deriving luminance at each pixel and each colour-lightness level of the display;generating a look-up-table, which comprises pairing colour-lightness levels to corresponding predetermined luminance levels. The method is applicable on both the grey and coloured light emitted by the EVD. A data acquisition rig for characterising an electronic visual display is also provided.

Description

A METHOD OF GENERATING PREDETERMINED LUMINANCE LEVELS ACROSS AN
ELECTRONIC VISUAL DISPLAY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to luminance characterisation and compensation for Electronic Visual Displays (EVDs), for example including but not limited to liquid crystal displays (LCD), cathode ray tube (CRT) displays, light emitting diode (LED) displays, organic light emitting diode (OLED) displays and video projection devices. In particular, the present invention relates to a purpose-specific method that characterises EVDs to accurately and precisely replicate a set of required luminance levels at any location across the entire electronic visual display. The technique is applicable on both the grey and coloured light emitted by an EVD.
BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION
In modern society, Electronic Visual Displays (EVDs) are used in a wide range of applications, from personal/portable devices, such as mobile phones and tablets, to specialised applications, such as medical, industrial and commercial. Different applications require a different set of characteristics from the EVD in use. Characteristics of common interest include spatial and temporal resolution, brightness, contrast and colour-depth.
Display technology has improved considerably over the years; however, EVDs still suffer from luminance non-uniformity, which is manifested as a variable set of luminances being displayed across a display for a given, uniform colour-lightness level (e.g. grey-level). This luminance non-uniformity across EVDs limits, and sometimes restricts, their suitability in some specialised applications. For example, various visual field and other visual performance tests, crucial in the management of a wide range of ophthalmic and neurological disorders, as well as other vision research applications. A common technique for visual field examination termed "differential light sensitivity" presents a series of light stimuli (grey or coloured) of known luminance on a uniform background. Stimuli are presented at predetermined locations across the visual field. By varying the luminance and location of the stimuli throughout the test, an accurate assessment of the visual field can be achieved. Currently, stimuli of known luminance are generated through the use of a projection system and a series of light-attenuation filters. Such systems are large, expensive and based on out-dated mechanical projection technologies.
The Humphrey Field Analyser (HFA) (Carl Zeiss), the Twinfield perimeter (Oculus) and the Goldmann and Octopus perimeters (Haag Streit International) are commonly used instruments for differential light sensitivity examinations. Luminance levels employed by these devices are expressed as attenuation levels, in decibels (dBs), with respect to a maximum luminance (0 dB). The required luminance difference between the background and light stimuli during differential light sensitivity examinations can be very small, for example, down to 0.10cd/m2 are necessary. As such, accurate and precise representation of each luminance level is essential for an accurate and reliable visual field test.
More recently developed techniques, such as the Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP), enable a user-friendly supra-threshold assessment of visual fields. SVOP utilises an EVD to display bright stimuli on a darker background. Suprathreshold SVOP is designed as a screening test to detect near absolute visual field defects and does not require representation of multiple luminance levels with high precision. In order for SVOP to detect subtle changes in visual field function (such as those associated with early stage glaucoma) it must be able to reliably produce accurate and precise representation of many luminance levels across a display screen. Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (TSVOP) can utilise the method described in this patent produce a reliable threshold perimetry test suitable for detecting subtle changes from normal visual field function such as thoise found in early stage glaucoma.
US8177915, US201 1007090 and US2007132895 each detail a different approach to the compensation of non-uniformities across one example of electronic visual displays; namely computer Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) systems. In each case, characterisation and compensation of the non-uniformities is: (i) performed during the manufacturing process, and (ii) requires specialised hardware and signal processing on the original video signal. Similar approaches are currently employed by high-end display manufacturers in order to improve luminance non-uniformity across LCDs. However, such approaches are not of great use in a wide range of applications in vision testing (such as differential light sensitivity visual field assessment) and vision science research that require accurate and precise generation of predetermined luminance levels across flat panel displays. While they improve the luminance uniformity across the display to around 95%, the compensated displays still cannot offer sufficient level of luminance accuracy and precision for the intended application (up to 99% luminance uniformity), Furthermore, additional display characterisation would be necessary in order to match colour-lightness levels (display) to luminance-levels (application).
Much of the prior art in this area relates to image adjustment and correction for specific grey- levels and do not provide means of accurately, generating specific luminance levels across any display for specific applications which require this form of display output. Accordingly, it is desirable to provide a system that can accurately generate specific luminance levels across any display for specific applications which require this form of display output.
It is also desirable to provide a system that is applicable on both grey and coloured light emitted by an EVD. It is further desirable to provide a system that is capable of accurately and precisely generating specific luminance levels across an electronic visual display.
It is further desirable to provide a system that improves background luminance uniformity of EVDs. It is further desirable to provide a system that facilitates expansion of the application of EVDs in a wider area of medical, scientific and ophthalmic applications.
It is further desirable to provide a system that does not require any specialised integrated hardware or dedicated signal processing requirements such that it is applicable to any EVD.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A first aspect of the present invention provides a method of characterising an electronic visual display to substantially accurately and substantially precisely replicate a set of required luminance levels at any location across the electronic visual display; the method comprises the steps of: a) selecting a set of Control Points (CPs) across the electronic visual display; b) selecting a set of colour-lightness levels (e.g. grey-levels)between 0 to 2n-1 for a n-bit colour depth; c) measuring luminance at the selected control points and colour-lightness levels ; d) interpolating measured luminance levels between selected control points and between each selected colour-lightness level thereby deriving luminance at each pixel of the display and every possible colour-lightness levels ; e) generating a look-up-table, which comprises pairing colour-lightness levels (e.g. grey-levels) to corresponding predetermined luminance levels. Colour lightness levels referenced above may comprise grey levels.
The method is applicable on both grey and coloured light emitted by the EVD.
In the above, substantially accurately and substantially precisely may be understood to mean towards 100% accuracy. More particularly, substantially accurately and substantially precisely may be understood to mean towards 98% to 99% accuracy.
The method may further comprise: f) Utilising the look-up-table to substantially accurately and substantially precisely generate application-specific luminance levels across a characterised electronic visual display
Selection of the set of Control Points may be across a regular grid. Alternatively or in addition the selection of the set of Control Points (CPs) may be positioned in a display specific arrangement. A display specific arrangement may require acquiring an image of a display and analysing the image. The image may be acquired by a camera. The analysis may comprise analysis of the acquired image and display gamma. Analysis of the image may further comprise low pass filtering and contrast enhancement such that unwanted noise can be removed.
A display specific arrangement of CPs provides an irregular sampling approach and thereby reduces acquisition and processing requirements by more than 60% compared with a regular sampling grid.
Step (c) measuring luminance at the selected control points may comprise a luminance meter. More particularly, step (c) measuring luminance at the selected control points may comprise a scientific grade luminance meter. An example of a scientific grade luminance meter is a Konica Minolta LS-100.
An additional step before step (b) may comprise measuring an exhaustive set of luminance values for a greater number of colour lightness levels about the centre of the display in order to determine the appropriate set of colour-lightness levels for any particular display (step (b)).
The method according to the present invention characterises an EVD in order to accurately and precisely replicate predetermined luminance levels at any location across the entire display. In addition to accurate replication of specific luminance levels, the present invention may also achieve luminance uniformity in the region of 98-99% (depending on the initial quality of the characterised EVD). This is a marked improvement on existing methods, where luminance uniformity is generally a maximum of 95%-96%. As such, the method according to the present invention allows expansion of the use of existing commercial EVDs to specialised scientific applications, for example visual field tests and other vision research applications, aiming at the assessment of glaucoma, cataract, stroke, brain tumours, etc.
Examples to which the method according to the present invention is therefore applicable is, for example, TSVOP technology for a reliable threshold perimetry test suitable for detecting early stage visual field loss, TSVOP is required to accurately (down to 1-2% non-uniformity) and precisely replicate any required stimuli luminance levels across the entire display. Other applications that would benefit from the accurate and precise representation of a predetermined set of luminance levels, as provided by the method of the present invention, include, but are not limited to the following:
(i) vision science research employing psychophysical experimentation that usually rely on Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) displays to reproduce visual stimuli of specific luminance with sufficient accuracy. However, it will be appreciated that CRTs are being phased out, generally, because of the introduction and advancing development of other display devices which meet most mass market applications;
(ii) tests that assess vision, such as preferential looking and contrast sensitivity that are currently primarily performed by the use of printed cards; (iii) multi-test platforms (visual tests) using portable computing devices for home visits by optometrists/ophthalmologists; and
(iv) any vision test or other application which requires the generation of specific luminance (background, stimulus or otherwise) at any particular screen locations.
The method may also allow extension of the application of the TSVOP technique to a wider range of visual field tests. The TSVOP instrument, described above, utilises an EVD.
The display may have a colour-depth of 8-bit or higher (e.g. 10-bit, 12-bit, etc.)
By using a 10-bit display, the method (i) achieves higher levels of accuracy and precision in the generation of specific luminance levels, and (ii) achieves luminance uniformity in the region of 98-99%, which has not been achieved before. A second aspect of the present invention provides a data acquisition rig, configured to characterise an electronic visual display device to substantially accurately and substantially precisely replicate a set of required luminance levels at any location across the electronic visual display.
The rig may comprise a luminance meter configured to perform a sequence of measurements on selected control points across the electronic visual display device. The luminance meter may be a scientific grade luminance meter. An example of a suitable luminance meter is a Konica Minolta LS-100 model. The rig may comprise positional control means configured to control position of the EVD relative to the luminance meter. The positional control means may comprise means to control linear translation, means to control level of the EVD and means to control angular position of the EVD relative to the luminance meter. The positional control means may comprise one or more of the following: rails for linear translation, levelling device and a three-axis rotational device.
Aspects of the present invention provide a cost effective system which is applicable to a range of visual field, vision and psychophysics tests because the method according to the present invention facilitates the replacement of out dated technologies, for example cathode ray tube displays, and facilitates replacement of expensive light projection systems, for example Humphrey Field Analyser and Octopus 300 instruments and also facilitates replacement of presently used expensive (circa £3000) LCD equipment that inherently has limited applicability in visual field testing.
The luminance non-uniformity characterisation and compensation method and system according to aspects of the present invention shall therefore expand the usability of mid- range EVDs in specialised applications such as visual field tests normally associated with instruments such as the Humphrey Field analyser and the Octopus 300.
Screen luminance uniformity and the ability to create accurate stimuli are particularly important for applications such as visual field testing. The embodiments of the present invention create a specialised display which enhances existing EVD technologies and expands their use to fields where previously EVDs would not have been considered appropriate.
The characterisation and compensation method and system according to embodiments of the present invention shall therefore enable a wider range of tests to be performed on a single calibrated EVD without a requirement for integrated specialised hardware. For example, such a calibrated EVD device can be used in applications that require a uniform luminance background and/or the accurate reproduction of stimuli with specific luminance, for example including but not limited to differential light sensitivity tests, vision science research employing psychophysics experimentation, which currently uses dated CRT displays and simple tests, such as preferential looking for infants and contrast sensitivity testing to assess various aspects of visual function e.g. cataract, which currently primarily use printed cards.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Embodiments of the present invention are described below, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 illustrates a graphical representation of a data acquisition rig used in the application of the method of the present invention;
Figure 2 illustrates a graphical representation of the steps comprising the present invention;
Figure 3a illustrates a graphical representation of EVD gamma through multiple luminance measurements across the full range of colour-lightness levels (grey scale in the specific example) (0 -2N-1 for N-bit colour depth);
Figure 3b illustrates a graphical representation of a set of control points selected to characterise luminance non-uniformity across an EVD;
Figure 4a illustrates a graphical representation of interpolated non-uniformity across an assessed LCD. Representation is contrast enhanced for illustration purposes; Figure 4b illustrates a graphical representation of dithered colour-lightness levels (e.g. grey levels) required to produce a uniform background luminance of 10cd/m2. Representation is contrast enhanced for illustration purposes; Figure 4c illustrates a graphical representation of uniform background luminance reproduced by the compensated EVD. Representation is contrast enhanced for illustration purposes; and
Figure 5 illustrates a graphical representation of how specific luminance levels are utilised during a visual field differential light sensitivity test. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Embodiments of the present invention provide a purpose-specific method that characterises an electronic visual display (EVD), for example a liquid crystal display device to accurately and precisely replicate a set of required luminance levels at any location across the entire display. As such, the field of application for existing uncompensated EVDs can be expanded, for example into areas of visual field testing normally associated with instruments such as the Humphrey Field Analyser and the Octopus 300.
Figure 1 provides a graphical representation of a data acquisition rig 10, configured to characterise an EVD 12. In the illustrated example an 8-bit EVD 12 is characterised using grey-level information. However, the technique is applicable to displays with higher colour depths (e.g. 10bit or more) and can characterise light of various chromaticity levels.
The rig 10 comprises a scientific luminance meter 14, for example a Konica Minolta model no LS100. The luminance meter 14 performs a sequence of measurements on a number of control points across the EVD being assessed (see Figure 3b).
Linear translation of the EVD 12 relative to the luminance meter 14 is controlled by two rails 16. Levelling devices 18, such as spirit levels, were employed together with a three-axis rotating stage 20 to ensure that the measurement axis was perpendicular to the EVD.
All of the data acquisition parameters are set in accordance with Video Electronics Standards Association's (VESA) Flat Panel Display Measurements Standard (FPDM) Version 2.0. Luminance measurements are performed in darkroom conditions with ambient light below VESAs suggested upper limit. However, could be performed in other conditions more relevant to the intended end-purpose of the luminance generation technique Figure 2 provides a graphical representation of the steps used in the method according to embodiments of the present invention. Step 1 100 includes the selection of a set of control points across the EVD as well as across the entire grey-level range (0 to 2n-1 for n-bit colour depth). A regular and/or a display-specific control point grid or arrangement may be employed. The method according to the present invention includes, but it is not limited to, a display-specific sampling approach which accurately and efficiently represents luminance variations across the display over a range of grey levels (0 to 2n-1), from the darkest black (0) to the brightest white (2n-1).
To determine an optimal set of grey levels, which upon interpolation accurately represent the display gamma (nonlinear operation used to code and decode luminance), an exhaustive set of luminance measurements are performed at the centre of the display as illustrated in Figure 3a, and an algorithm is used to identify an optimal set of grey levels. Starting from grey level 0 and progressing to grey level 2n-1 , the algorithm automatically identifies the largest step for which the difference between the original and interpolated gamma curves is less than 20% of the corresponding inter-level step.
To determine an optimal set of control points which, upon interpolation, accurately represents luminance non-uniformity across the EVD (see Figure 3b) an image of the display at a suitable fixed grey level, for example 2 2 (i.e. 128 for 8-bit EVD), is acquired using a suitable camera, for example a 24.2MPixel camera, This image is then low-pass filtered and contrast enhanced to further remove unwanted noise and highlight areas with high non-uniformity, enabling the selection of a representative set of control points across the EVD as illustrated in Figure 3b. The process could be iterative and control point selection can be refined in regions demonstrating large differences between the original acquired image and the interpolated image.
While, a regular control point sampling grid may be employed in Step 1 , a display-specific, irregular sampling arrangement reduces the acquisition and processing requirements, for example greater than 60% reduction in the total number of samples, and also enhances the accuracy of the interpolated profiles, for example greater than 60% reduction on maximum difference between the original and the interpolated profiles.
Referring to Figure 2, in step 2 110 a sequence of luminance measurements, required to characterise the EVD, were performed on the control points and grey-levels derived through the above. It will be appreciated that alternative processes could be adopted to derive the control points and the grey levels.
At each control point luminance measurements were performed at the identified specific grey- levels over the 0 to 2n-1 range. The data acquisition rig illustrated in Figure 1 is employed for the data acquisition.
In step 3 120 (see Figure 2) interpolating splines are used to derive all intermediate luminance values amongst the sample grid. Initially, one-dimensional interpolating cubic fa- splines are used to derive the Gamma corresponding to each control point across the EVD as illustrated in Figure 3a. Given control points Pi to Pn, a set of points S, are derived defining a relaxed uniform cubic B- Spline interpolating through Pi to Pn:
Figure imgf000014_0001
with Si = Pi and Sn = Pn. Subsequently, a set of two-dimensional interpolating b-splines are used to derive the luminance at each pixel across the display and for each grey-level.
Figure imgf000015_0001
where /' = {1 , ... ,n}, u e {0, ... ,1} and Bi represented the /-th basis function of the B-Spline.
Such cubic splines generate smooth, 2nd order continuous interpolations providing closer representations of the actual gamma curves, and luminance non-uniformity across the assessed EVD, when compared to the corresponding linear interpolations. Fig. 4a illustrates the interpolated luminance variability across the assessed display for a given, uniform grey- level. In Figure 4a the graphical representation is contrast enhanced for illustration purposes.
By the end of the interpolation process, a luminance estimate is derived for each pixel and each grey-level across the display.
In step 4 130 (see Figure 2) a binary search is performed to identify the grey-levels that produced a uniform luminance representation to each luminance level required throughout the characterised EVD for a specific application:
Figure imgf000015_0002
where LH (N) corresponds to the N cd/m2 luminance required during a specific application, while LD (/' ,j, k) denotes the luminance generated by the characterised EVD at pixel (/', j) and grey-level k e [0: 2n-1]. At the end of the process, a sequence of 2D matrices (each with grey-level values for every pixel of the EVD) is generated, see Figure 4b. In Figure 4b the graphical representation is contrast enhanced for illustration purposes. In step 5 140 (see Figure 2) the matrices generated in Step 4 130 provide a device, for example TSVOP, with the closest and most uniform representation of each required luminance level achievable. This uniform luminance representation is illustrated in Figure 4c.
A dithering algorithm, for example Floyd-Steingerg is employed to diffuse quantisation errors along the grey-level boundaries to neighbouring pixels generating visually smoother transitions. In Figure 4c the graphical representation is also contrast enhanced.
Figure 5 illustrates a graphical representation of how the specific luminance levels stored in look-up tables during Step 4 130 are utilised in Step 5 140 (described above with reference to Figure 2) during a visual field differential light sensitivity test. Background luminance 22 is displayed across the entire EVD 24. At the stimulus location 26, the stimulus luminance 28 is displayed generating an instant 30 during a differential light sensitivity test.
Quantitative assessment verifies the suitability of the present approach, demonstrating that compensated EVDs can provide the accuracy and precision required during visual field differential light sensitivity tests. By employing the non-uniformity compensation approach described, the luminance-levels required for assessing visual fields are reproducible with a non-uniformity of 3.63%±0.42% for mid-range 8-bit EVDs and less than 1 % for high end 10-bit graphics EVDs. The non- uniformity is independent of the corresponding luminance level. The mean luminance across the compensated LCD provides a very accurate representation (±0.6% of actual value) for each required luminance level.
The characterisation and the compensation approach provided by embodiments of the present invention has been clinically assessed. Clinical testing demonstrated that a substantial decrease of luminance non-uniformity enables accurate and precise examination of visual field thresholds using a compensated display. Performing such threshold tests was previously not possible with current display technology.
The non-uniformity characterisation and the compensation approach according to embodiments of the present invention utilised a mid-range 8-bit EVD as well as two high end graphics EVDs with native 10-bit support (1024 grey-levels). Characterising a display that provides a native 10-bit support (1024 grey-levelsincreases the available search-space enhancing the capabilities of the present approach and consequently and consequently increases the accuracy and precision of the visual field threshold examinations. The luminance non-uniformity characterisation and compensation approach provided by embodiments of the present invention expands the use and application of EVD devices and therefore creates a new specialised display to meet a new requirement which has previously not been achievable using existing display technologies.
The luminance non-uniformity characterisation and compensation approach provided by embodiments of the present invention enable off-the-shelf, mid-range EVDs, which cost in the region of £500 to achieve better uniformity than high-end medical displays, which can cost in excess of £3000. Furthermore, it enables higher-end 10-bit EVDs to accurately and precisely reproduce a set of luminance levels required for specialised visual field examinations and other vision tests. Using the approach of the present invention shall enable a range of medical, scientific and ophthalmic tests to be performed on a single computing device, along with a calibrated EVD without the need for additional hardware. For example: visual field differential light sensitivity tests, vision science research employing psychophysics experimentation, preferential looking test for infants and contrast sensitivity testing to assess various aspects of visual function e.g. cataract, and any vision test or other application which requires the generation of specific luminance (background, stimulus or otherwise) at any particular screen locations.
The luminance characterisation and compensation approach provided by embodiments of the present invention can further improve the performance of high-end medical displays. Although the description of the present invention refers specifically to the characterisation and derivation of luminance with grey levels, the present invention may also be applied (or extended) to the characterisation and derivation of other properties of colour on EVDs, for example hue, saturation and lightness.
Whilst specific embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it will be appreciated that departures from the described embodiments may still fall within the scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method of characterising an electronic visual display to substantially accurately and substantially precisely replicate a set of required luminance levels at any location across the electronic visual display; the method comprises the steps of: a) selecting a set of control points across the electronic visual display; b) selecting a set of colour-lightness levels between 0 to 2n-1 for a n-bit colour depth; c) measuring luminance at the selected control points and lightness levels; d) interpolating measured luminance levels between selected control points and between each selected lightness level thereby deriving luminance at each pixel of the display for every possible lightness level; e) generating a look-up-table, which comprises pairing colour lightness levels to corresponding predetermined luminance levels.
2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein step (b) selecting a colour-lightness level between 0 to 2n-1 for an n-bit colour depth, comprises analysis of an exhaustive colour- lightness level range across the electronic visual display.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, further comprising: f) Utilising the look-up-table to substantially accurately and substantially precisely generate application-specific luminance levels across the characterised electronic visual display.
4. A method according to claim 1 , 2, or 3, wherein step (a) selecting a set of control points across the electronic visual display is across a regular grid.
5. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein step (a) selecting a set of control points across the electronic visual display is across a display specific grid.
6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the display specific grid comprises further steps of acquiring an image of a display and analysing the image.
7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the image is acquired by a camera.
8. A method according to claim 6 or 7, wherein analysing the image may comprise analysis of the acquired image and display gamma.
9. A method according to claim 8, further comprising low pass filtering and contrast enhancement of the acquired image.
10. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein step (c) measuring luminance at the selected control points comprises use of a luminance meter.
11. A method according to claim 10, wherein step (c) measuring luminance at the selected control points comprises a scientific grade luminance meter.
12. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein step (c) measuring luminance at the selected control points comprises an exhaustive set about the centre of the display.
13. A data acquisition rig, configured to characterise an electronic visual display device to substantially accurately and substantially precisely replicate a set of required luminance levels at any location across the electronic visual display, the data acquisition rig comprises a luminance meter configured to perform a sequence of measurements on selected control points across the electronic visual display device and positional control means configured to control position of the EVD relative to the luminance meter.
14. A data acquisition rig according to claim 13, wherein the luminance meter is a scientific grade luminance meter.
15. A data acquisition rig according to claim 13 or 14, wherein the positional control means comprise means to control linear translation, means to control level of the EVD and means to control angular position of the EVD relative to the luminance meter.
16. A data acquisition rig according to claim 15, wherein the positional control means comprise one or more of the following: rails for linear translation, a levelling device and a three-axis rotational device.
17. A method of characterising an electronic visual display as hereinbefore described and with reference to the accompanying drawings.
18. A data acquisition rig as hereinbefore described and with reference to the
accompanying drawings.
PCT/GB2014/050558 2013-03-14 2014-02-25 A method of generating predetermined luminance levels across an electronic visual display Ceased WO2014140522A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1304623.0 2013-03-14
GB201304623A GB201304623D0 (en) 2013-03-14 2013-03-14 A method of generating predetermined luminance levels across an electronic visual display

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2014140522A2 true WO2014140522A2 (en) 2014-09-18
WO2014140522A3 WO2014140522A3 (en) 2014-12-18

Family

ID=48226335

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2014/050558 Ceased WO2014140522A2 (en) 2013-03-14 2014-02-25 A method of generating predetermined luminance levels across an electronic visual display

Country Status (2)

Country Link
GB (1) GB201304623D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2014140522A2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20160078749A (en) * 2014-12-24 2016-07-05 엘지디스플레이 주식회사 Organic light emitting diode display device and method of sensing device characteristic
CN109949725A (en) * 2019-03-06 2019-06-28 武汉精立电子技术有限公司 A kind of AOI system image grayscale standardized method and system
CN119889232A (en) * 2025-03-28 2025-04-25 昇显微电子(苏州)股份有限公司 OLED display screen Demura method based on iteration

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6177915B1 (en) 1990-06-11 2001-01-23 International Business Machines Corporation Display system having section brightness control and method of operating system
US20070132895A1 (en) 2005-12-12 2007-06-14 Novatek Microelectronics Corp. Compensation device for non-uniform regions in flat panel display and method thereof
US20110007090A1 (en) 2005-10-25 2011-01-13 Lg Display Co., Ltd. Flat display apparatus capable of compensating a panel defect electrically and picture quality controlling method thereof

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003071794A1 (en) * 2002-02-19 2003-08-28 Olympus Corporation Image correction data calculation method, image correction data calculation device, and projection system
JP2010243775A (en) * 2009-04-06 2010-10-28 Canon Inc Correction value acquisition method, correction method, and image display apparatus

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6177915B1 (en) 1990-06-11 2001-01-23 International Business Machines Corporation Display system having section brightness control and method of operating system
US20110007090A1 (en) 2005-10-25 2011-01-13 Lg Display Co., Ltd. Flat display apparatus capable of compensating a panel defect electrically and picture quality controlling method thereof
US20070132895A1 (en) 2005-12-12 2007-06-14 Novatek Microelectronics Corp. Compensation device for non-uniform regions in flat panel display and method thereof

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20160078749A (en) * 2014-12-24 2016-07-05 엘지디스플레이 주식회사 Organic light emitting diode display device and method of sensing device characteristic
EP3038091A3 (en) * 2014-12-24 2016-08-03 LG Display Co., Ltd. Organic light emitting diode display and method for sensing characteristic thereof
US9922598B2 (en) 2014-12-24 2018-03-20 Lg Display Co., Ltd. Organic light emitting diode display and method for sensing characteristic thereof
KR102322708B1 (en) * 2014-12-24 2021-11-09 엘지디스플레이 주식회사 Organic light emitting diode display device and method of sensing device characteristic
CN109949725A (en) * 2019-03-06 2019-06-28 武汉精立电子技术有限公司 A kind of AOI system image grayscale standardized method and system
CN109949725B (en) * 2019-03-06 2022-09-20 武汉精立电子技术有限公司 Image gray level standardization method and system for AOI system
CN119889232A (en) * 2025-03-28 2025-04-25 昇显微电子(苏州)股份有限公司 OLED display screen Demura method based on iteration

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2014140522A3 (en) 2014-12-18
GB201304623D0 (en) 2013-05-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Cooper et al. Assessment of OLED displays for vision research
CN110085166B (en) Bright spot compensation method and device for curved screen
US11074882B2 (en) Method and device for adjusting grayscale of display panel
RU2678644C2 (en) Method of setting display parameter and system of liquid crystal display
CN108962179B (en) Display panel brightness adjusting method and assembly and display device
US7710433B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for calibrating a color display
CN102629379B (en) Image quality evaluation method based on visual characteristic
CN106205459B (en) Correction method and correction device for display equipment
Tahir et al. Optimisation and assessment of three modern touch screen tablet computers for clinical vision testing
KR20200079920A (en) Mura compensation system
JP2009122690A (en) Method for reducing mura defect and display
CN101621699A (en) Method for correcting uneven video display and projecting device
WO2008044437A1 (en) Image processing method and image processing device
JP5227539B2 (en) Output value setting method, output value setting device, and display device
EP3136379A1 (en) Image processing apparatus and display determination method
WO2014140522A2 (en) A method of generating predetermined luminance levels across an electronic visual display
Perperidis et al. Correcting LCD luminance non-uniformity for threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP)
Klein et al. Photometric and colorimetric measurements of CRT and TFT monitors for vision research
CN118781985A (en) Grayscale debugging method for display panel and display panel
Bhaumik et al. Analyzing colorimetric characterization models for virtual reality headsets: a comparative study
US20250078696A1 (en) System and Method for Calibration of Head Mounted Digital Displays for Medical Imaging
US12056913B2 (en) System for luminance qualified chromaticity
Seybold et al. Visibility of spatiotemporal noise in digital video
CN115588393B (en) Test method and debugging method of silicon-based display screen
KR20160059240A (en) A representation method and apparatus for color gamut

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 14711557

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

122 Ep: pct app. not ent. europ. phase

Ref document number: 14711557

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2