WO2014014377A1 - Procédé destiné au traitement de mesures d'une pluralité de capteurs installés au niveau d'un système technique - Google Patents

Procédé destiné au traitement de mesures d'une pluralité de capteurs installés au niveau d'un système technique Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2014014377A1
WO2014014377A1 PCT/RU2012/000589 RU2012000589W WO2014014377A1 WO 2014014377 A1 WO2014014377 A1 WO 2014014377A1 RU 2012000589 W RU2012000589 W RU 2012000589W WO 2014014377 A1 WO2014014377 A1 WO 2014014377A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
sensors
classifiers
partial measurement
classifier
operation condition
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/RU2012/000589
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Ilya Igorevich MOKHOV
Alexander Leonidovich PYAYT
Original Assignee
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Aktiengesellschaft filed Critical Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
Priority to PCT/RU2012/000589 priority Critical patent/WO2014014377A1/fr
Publication of WO2014014377A1 publication Critical patent/WO2014014377A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0218—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
    • G05B23/0224—Process history based detection method, e.g. whereby history implies the availability of large amounts of data
    • G05B23/024—Quantitative history assessment, e.g. mathematical relationships between available data; Functions therefor; Principal component analysis [PCA]; Partial least square [PLS]; Statistical classifiers, e.g. Bayesian networks, linear regression or correlation analysis; Neural networks

Definitions

  • the invention refers to a method for processing measurements of a plurality of sensors installed at a technical system.
  • Complex technical systems e.g. dams, dikes, bridges, gas turbines and the like
  • a network of a plurality of sensors measuring different parameters that can characterize the behavior of a technical system.
  • This behavior can be assigned to an abnormal operation condition in case that measured signals of the sensors deviate from his- torical measurements related to a normal behavior.
  • Such an abnormal behavior can be a sign of developing fault or failure, e.g. dike break or crack in a bridge.
  • a one- dimensional anomaly of the technical system i.e. an anomaly where single measured signals of one or more sensors are out of range
  • uni-variate data analysis methods which are usually not able to detect and interpret multi—dimensional anomalies where several measured signals lead to the anomaly.
  • multi-variate data analysis e.g. multi-dimensional classifiers
  • Those classifiers are trained by appropriate training data. After training, the classifier is applied to the measured signals of a plurality of sensors and gives an output indicating whether the underlying technical system shows a normal or an abnormal op- eration condition.
  • the use of a multi-dimensional classifier has the disadvantage that it is not clear which sensors lead to the detected anomaly. Only the technical system as a whole is classified in the category of a normal or an abnormal operation condition.
  • the measurements being processed are represented by one or more measurement vectors for one or more points in time, where a measurement vector at a respective point in time includes a measured signal for each sensor of the plurality of sensors.
  • a first classifier trained by training data and designed for output- ting a normal or an abnormal operation condition of the tech- nical system is applied to the measurement vector for a corresponding point in time. I.e., the first classifier receives measured signals of all sensors as an input and provides as an output whether the technical system shows a normal or abnormal behavior.
  • the term "normal or abnormal operation condition” always refers to a normal or abnormal operation condition of the technical system.
  • a core partial measurement vector comprises the following features:
  • the second classifier applied to the core partial measurement vector outputs an abnormal operation condition; ii) no smaller partial measurement vector exists which includes a subset of the measured signals from the core partial measurement vector, where the second classifier applied to the smaller partial measurement vector outputs an abnormal operation condition.
  • the smallest subsets of measured signals leading to a classification in an abnormal operation condition are identified as core partial measurement vectors.
  • all sensors which have meas- ured signals within the core partial measurement vectors are identified as core sensors providing measured signals leading to the abnormal operation condition.
  • the method of the invention has the advantage that - besides a classification in a normal and an abnormal operation condition - core sensors are identified which indicate the locations in the technical system where the cause of the abnormal behavior shall be present. Hence, those core sensors give an important information in order to further analyze the tech- nical system, e.g. by checking the section of the technical system where the core sensors are located. Thus, developing faults or failures in the technical system can be detected in an easy and efficient manner.
  • the first and the second classifiers are so-called one-sided classifiers.
  • a one-sided classifier is characterized by the feature that this classifier can only be trained by training data referring to the normal operation condition of the technical system.
  • those clas- sifiers can also be used for complex technical systems where training data referring to an abnormal operation condition are rare.
  • the one-sided classifiers used in the method of the invention are based on Neural Clouds and/or Gaussian Mixture Models and/or hypercubes .
  • the second classifiers are applied to partial measurement vectors based on a scheme of several hierarchical levels of first and second classifiers, where the uppermost hierarchical level consists of the first classifier applied to the measurement vector and where a hierarchical level directly below the next higher hierarchical level includes all second classifiers applied to smaller partial measurement vectors comprising exactly one measured signal less than the partial measurement vectors to which the second classifiers of the next higher hierarchical level are applied.
  • the second classifiers are applied subsequently from one hierarchical level to the next lower hierarchical level.
  • the method of the invention terminates in case that all second classifiers in a hi- erarchical level output a normal operation condition.
  • the above described hierarchical application of second classifiers enables a fast and efficient detection of core partial measurement vectors and core sensors.
  • one or more of the second classifiers and particularly all second classifiers have been trained before processing the measurements of the plurality of sensors. This enables a fast detection of core sensors. Nevertheless, in another embodiment, one or more of the second classifiers and particularly all second classifiers are trained when needed during processing the measurements of the plurality of sensors.
  • the training of the second classifiers only takes place on demand, i.e. in case that a classification based on the respective second classifier is to be performed in the method of the invention.
  • additional (one- dimensional) third classifiers are applied to each single measured signal of at least a part of the measured signals for identifying single core sensors each providing a measured signal classified as an abnormal operation condition by the respective third classifier.
  • no or only some core sensors found by the second classifiers are also identified by the third classifiers.
  • the uni-variate analysis based on third classifiers may be used in parallel to the above described classification scheme based on second classifiers.
  • the measured signals of those sensors can be forwarded for further analysis to corresponding third classifiers .
  • the plurality of sensors refers to a subset of sensors installed at the technical system, where the subset of sensors is installed at a predetermined part of the technical system.
  • the method for processing the measurements is preferably performed separately for several subsets of sensors.
  • the method of the invention can be implemented efficiently by applying the steps of the method separately to subsets of sensors.
  • one or more sensors of the plurality of sensors each are sensing means comprising several sub- sensors, where the measured signal of a sensing means is a combination of measured signals of the sub- sensors.
  • sensors having similar output form sub- sensors of a sensing means.
  • the average value of the measured signals of the sub-sensors may be used.
  • the technical system is a structure, particularly a dam or building or bridge, where the sensors are preferably pore pressure sensors and/or inclination sensors and/or displacement sensors installed at the structure.
  • the technical system may also be a turbine, particularly a gas turbine.
  • the invention also refers to an apparatus for processing measurements of a plurality of sensors installed at a technical system, where the measurements are represented by one or more measurement vectors for one or more points in time, where a measurement vector at a respective point in time includes a measured signal for each sensor of the plurality of sensors.
  • the apparatus includes a compu- ting means which is arranged to perform the steps of the method of the invention or one or more preferred embodiments of the method of the invention.
  • the invention also refers to a computer program product di- rectly loadable into the internal memory of a digital computer, comprising software code portions for performing the method of the invention or one or more preferred embodiments of the method of the invention when said product is run on a computer.
  • the invention refers to a computer program for controlling a computer to perform the method of the invention or one or more preferred embodiments of the method of the invention .
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic view of a dam with sensors installed therein where the sensor data can be processed according to an embodiment of the invention
  • Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating the processing of measurements according to an embodiment of the invention
  • Fig. 3 shows a schematic diagram of another embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 1 is the cross-sectional view of such a dam 1 with four pore pressure sensors SI, S2, S3 and S4 installed at the dam. Those four sensors SI to S4 are just shown as an example and the dam usually includes a much higher number of those sensors which are arranged at different positions along the dam.
  • the dam 1 as shown in Fig. 1 prohibits water W on the left side of the dam having the water level WL1 to pass to the right side of the dam where the water W has the lower water level WL2.
  • the processing of the sensor data can determine an abnormal behavior or operation condition of the dam 1 in combination with an identification of core sensors.
  • the positions of those core sensors correspond to the locations at the dam where the abnormal behavior occurs so that those locations can be checked by service staff and appropriate counter measures can be initiated.
  • the time series of several sensors installed at the corresponding technical system is analyzed by the method of the invention. For each point in time of the time series, a measurement vector including measured values for all sensors or a part of the sensors of the technical system is processed by the method of the invention. In the embodiment shown in Fig.
  • the measurement vector for a corresponding point in time of a technical system with sensors SI, S2, Sn is designated as MV and includes the measured values or signals pi, p2 , pn of the respective sensors SI, S2 , Sn.
  • the measurement vector is classified by a one-sided classifier CL(pl, p2, pn) which is also designated as CL1 and corresponds to a first classifier in the terminology of the claims.
  • This multi -dimensional classifier has been trained beforehand by appropriate training data of historical measurements. Due to the use of a onesided classifier, only training data referring to the normal behavior of the technical system can be used.
  • the classifier CL1 and also the classifiers CL2 described in the following usually output a confidence value, e.g. a nor- malized confidence value between zero and one.
  • a confidence value e.g. a nor- malized confidence value between zero and one.
  • the confidence value exceeds a certain threshold, the operation state or condition of the technical system is classified as normal. Contrary to that, if the confidence value does not exceed the threshold, the operation state or condition of the technical system is classified as abnormal.
  • the embodiment of Fig. 2 includes a scheme of several hierarchical levels HO, H(m-l), Hm where the uppermost hierarchical level HO is represented by the classifier CL1.
  • the lower levels succeeding this level HO include classifiers CL2 corresponding to second classifiers in the terminology of the claims.
  • a corresponding hierarchical level includes all classifiers which use as an input a number of measured signals including one measured signal less than the input of the classifiers of the next higher hierarchical level.
  • the lowest hierarchical level Hm includes the second classifiers having two measured values as an input.
  • Fig. 2 shows the structure of the hierarchical level H(ra-l) and the lowest hierarchical level Hra.
  • level H(m-l) three classifiers CL(pl, p2 , p3 ) , CL(pl, p2 , p4) and CL(p(n-2), p(n-l), pn) are illustrated.
  • level Hm three classifiers CL(pl, p2) , CL(pl, p3) and CL(p(n-l), pn) are shown.
  • Both hierarchical levels H(m-l) and Hm include more than those classifiers because there are more combinations of two or three measured signals out of the measured signals of all sensors.
  • the meas- ured values forming an input of classifiers CL2 are designated as partial measurement vectors MV' .
  • the classifiers CL2 and partial measurement vectors MV' are indicated by those reference numerals.
  • all second classifiers CL2 have been learned beforehand by using the same training data as for the first classifier CL1. This offline training enables a fast processing of sensor data, e.g. during monitoring of the corresponding technical system.
  • the second classifiers CL2 in the lower hierarchical levels are applied to the corresponding partial measurement vectors MV' in case that the first classifier CL1 outputs an abnormal operation condition based on the measurement vector MV.
  • those sensors which are responsible for the abnormal operation condition or behavior can be isolated out of the plurality of sensors as will be described in the following.
  • the lower diagram shows the step of applying the classifiers to the measured signals for a particular example.
  • all classifiers which output an abnormal operation condition are surrounded by a frame F.
  • the second classifiers are applied for one hierarchical level to the next in the direction to lower hierarchical levels, i.e. all classifiers CL2 in one hierarchical level are applied to the partial measurement vectors MV' before the classifiers of the next lower hierarchical level are used.
  • the hierarchical application of the classifiers has the advantage that the method can be stopped in case that all second classifiers in one hierarchical level output a normal operation condition. According to Fig.
  • the classifiers CL(pl, p2 , p3), CL(pl, p2, p4) and CL(p(n-2), p(n-l), pn) in the hierarchical level H(m-l) and the classifier CL(pl, p2) in the hierarchical level Hm output an abnormal operation condition.
  • the other classifiers in the levels Hm and H(m-l) output a normal operation condition.
  • those classi- fiers in the hierarchical levels between HO and H(m-l) which include all measured signals of one or more classifiers outputting an abnormal operation condition in the hierarchical level H(m-l) also output an abnormal operation condition.
  • the partial meas- urement vectors (pi, p2) included in the classifier CL(pl, p2) in the hierarchical level Hm and the partial measurement vector (p(n-2), p(n-l), pn) included in the classifier CL(p(n-2), p(n-l), pn) in the hierarchical level H(m-l) cannot be associated with a smaller partial measurement vector according to the above definition.
  • those partial measurement vectors form core measurement vectors which are indi- cated by reference numerals MV' ' in Fig. 2.
  • all measured signals included in the core partial measurement vectors MV' ' refer to core sensors. I.e., in the embodiment shown in Fig.
  • sensors SI, S2, S(n-2), S(n-l) and Sn are core sensors which provide signals leading to an abnormal op- eration condition of the technical system.
  • those core sensors can be investigated or analyzed further in order to find the causes for the abnormal behavior and initiate corresponding counter measurements, e.g. the repairment of the dam as shown in Fig. 1 or positions of abnormal behav- ior.
  • all second classifiers have been trained before performing the method of the invention.
  • the corresponding second classifiers are not trained beforehand but only on demand, i.e. in case that the respective classifier CL2 shall be applied to the partial measurement vector.
  • This embodiment of the invention may be used in case that the response time for identifying core sen- sors is not a critical target.
  • the number of second classifiers used in the method of the invention may be very large.
  • a straightforward calculation leads to the result that (2 n -l-n) first and second classifiers shall be constructed for n sensors.
  • the technical system may be divided into several sections, each section only including a part of the classifiers where the method of the invention is applied separately to each section.
  • sensors in different cross-sections can be identified and processed sep- arately based on the method of the invention.
  • other technical systems e.g.
  • the sensor data of several sensors may be combined to one (virtual) sensing device. This will also reduce the number of classifiers. E.g., adjacent sensors usually having similar measured values can be combined to one sensing device providing a measured value which is the average value of the measured signals of the combined sensors.
  • Fig. 3 shows another embodiment of the method of the invention.
  • one-dimensional classifiers CL3 are used in addition to the above described multi-dimensional classifiers CLl and CL2.
  • the method pro- Determinations the corresponding measured signals pi, p2, pn of a plurality of sensors at a corresponding point in time .
  • the method as described with respect to Fig. 2 based on the classifiers CLl and CL2 is performed leading to an output 01 indicating the core sensors.
  • the measured signal of each sensors is processed by a separate one-dimensional classifier indicated by CL3.
  • This processing is performed in block B2 of Fig. 3.
  • As an output 02 sensors are identified having a measured value classified as an abnormal operation condition by a classifier CL3.
  • the outputs 01 and 02 are further processed in order to combine the results of the multi-dimensional classifiers with the results of the one-dimensional classifiers.
  • the one-dimensional classifiers may be classifiers giving an abnormal operation condition in case that the measured signal lies outside certain limits, thus indicating a malfunction of the corresponding sensor.
  • those core sensors of the output 01 can be identified which do not work properly.
  • the result 03 of block B3 also indicates which of the core sensors are defect.
  • a multi-dimensional classification method not only determines whether a complex technical system shows a normal or an abnormal behavior but also gives information with respect to core sensors. At the locations of those core sensor, the causes of the abnormal operation con- dition of the technical system shall be present.

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un procédé destiné au traitement de mesures d'une pluralité de capteurs installés au niveau d'un système technique. L'invention concerne un procédé de traitement de mesures d'une pluralité de capteurs (S1, S2, S3, S4) installés au niveau d'un système technique (1), les mesures étant représentées par un ou plusieurs vecteurs de mesure (MV) pour un ou plusieurs points temporels, un vecteur de mesure (MV) au niveau d'un point temporel respectif comprenant un signal mesuré (p1, p2, …, pn) pour chaque capteur (S1, S2, S3, S4) de la pluralité de capteurs (S1, S2, S3, S4). Un premier classificateur (CL1) permettant de sortir une condition de fonctionnement normal ou anormal du système technique (1) est appliqué au vecteur de mesure (MV) pour un point temporel correspondant. Dans le cas d'une condition de fonctionnement anormal sortie par le premier classificateur (CL1), des seconds classificateurs (CL2) permettant de sortir une condition de fonctionnement normal ou anormal sont appliqués à des vecteurs de mesure partiels (MV') comprenant un sous-ensemble d'au moins deux signaux mesurés à partir du vecteur de mesure (MV) jusqu'à ce que tous les vecteurs de mesure partiels (MV') principaux en dehors des vecteurs de mesure partiels (MV) soient identifiés. Un vecteur de mesure partiel (MV') principal comprend la fonctionnalité selon laquelle un second classificateur (CL2) appliqué au vecteur de mesure partiel (MV') principal sort une condition de fonctionnement anormal. En outre, le vecteur de mesure partiel (MV') principal comprend la fonctionnalité selon laquelle aucun vecteur de mesure partiel (MV) plus petit qui comprend un sous-ensemble des signaux mesurés (p1, p2, …, pn) à partir du vecteur de mesure partiel (MV') principal n'existe, où le second classificateur (CL2) appliqué au vecteur de mesure partiel (MV) plus petit sort une condition de fonctionnement anormal. Tous les capteurs (S1, S2, S3, S4) qui possèdent des signaux mesurés (p1, p2, …, pn) dans les vecteurs de mesure partiels (MV'') principaux sont identifiés comme des capteurs principaux.
PCT/RU2012/000589 2012-07-19 2012-07-19 Procédé destiné au traitement de mesures d'une pluralité de capteurs installés au niveau d'un système technique WO2014014377A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/RU2012/000589 WO2014014377A1 (fr) 2012-07-19 2012-07-19 Procédé destiné au traitement de mesures d'une pluralité de capteurs installés au niveau d'un système technique

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/RU2012/000589 WO2014014377A1 (fr) 2012-07-19 2012-07-19 Procédé destiné au traitement de mesures d'une pluralité de capteurs installés au niveau d'un système technique

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2014014377A1 true WO2014014377A1 (fr) 2014-01-23

Family

ID=48045011

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/RU2012/000589 WO2014014377A1 (fr) 2012-07-19 2012-07-19 Procédé destiné au traitement de mesures d'une pluralité de capteurs installés au niveau d'un système technique

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2014014377A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3312695A1 (fr) * 2016-10-12 2018-04-25 Yokogawa Electric Corporation Système de traitement d'informations, procédé de traitement d'informations, programme de traitement d'informations et support d'enregistrement

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007137132A2 (fr) * 2006-05-17 2007-11-29 Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation Système d'analyse probabiliste des ondes de contrainte, et procédé associé
WO2009105112A1 (fr) * 2008-02-22 2009-08-27 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Détection d’anomalies dans un environnement mis en réseau de capteurs
US20110040496A1 (en) * 2009-08-13 2011-02-17 Banerjee Sourav Method and apparatus for estimating damage in a structure

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007137132A2 (fr) * 2006-05-17 2007-11-29 Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation Système d'analyse probabiliste des ondes de contrainte, et procédé associé
WO2009105112A1 (fr) * 2008-02-22 2009-08-27 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Détection d’anomalies dans un environnement mis en réseau de capteurs
US20110040496A1 (en) * 2009-08-13 2011-02-17 Banerjee Sourav Method and apparatus for estimating damage in a structure

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
D. REYNOLDS, GAUSSIAN MIXTURE MODELS, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.ll.mit.edu/mission/communications/ist/publica tions/0802_Reynolds Biometrics-GMM.pdf>
LANG, B; POPPE, T; MININ, A.; MOKHOV, I.; KUPERIN, Y.; MEKLER, A.; LIAPAKINA, I.: "Neural Clouds for Monitoring Complex Systems", OPTICAL MEMORY AND NEURAL NETWORKS (INFORMATION OPTICS, vol. 17, no. 3, 2008, pages 183 - 192, XP055049602

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3312695A1 (fr) * 2016-10-12 2018-04-25 Yokogawa Electric Corporation Système de traitement d'informations, procédé de traitement d'informations, programme de traitement d'informations et support d'enregistrement
US10331090B2 (en) 2016-10-12 2019-06-25 Yokogawa Electric Corporation Information processing system, information processing method, and recording medium

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP7069269B2 (ja) デジタル・ツイン・シミュレーション・データを利用した時系列データに基づく、大規模な産業用監視システム向けの半教師あり深層異常検出のための方法およびシステム
WO2017191872A1 (fr) Procédé et système de détection d&#39;anomalies de plante
CN109154236B (zh) 考虑传感器故障来控制燃气涡轮
KR101978569B1 (ko) 플랜트 데이터 예측 장치 및 방법
KR20190025474A (ko) 플랜트 데이터 예측 장치 및 방법
JP2006105142A (ja) 装置の障害検出方法および障害検出／切離しシステム
KR20170031985A (ko) 공기조화시스템의 고장 검출 및 진단 방법
WO2016133121A1 (fr) Procédé de diagnostic d&#39;anomalie et système de diagnostic d&#39;anomalie
CN107710089B (zh) 工厂设备诊断装置以及工厂设备诊断方法
GB2476246A (en) Diagnosing an operation mode of a machine
CN103412220A (zh) 一种基于数据融合的船舶电站故障诊断方法
US20210224383A1 (en) Abnormality detection device
KR20210017651A (ko) 반도체 제조 공정에서 고장 검출 및 불량 원인 진단을 위한 방법
CN111506049A (zh) 基于aann网络系统的航空发动机控制系统多重故障诊断方法
CN110878983B (zh) 空调故障的确定方法和装置
KR20200010671A (ko) 기계 학습 기반의 설비 이상 진단 시스템 및 방법
CN109990803B (zh) 检测系统异常的方法、装置及传感器处理的方法、装置
CN114553681A (zh) 设备状态异常检测方法、装置和计算机设备
US20220371745A1 (en) Apparatus, method and computer program for monitoring an aircraft engine
CN113253059A (zh) 一种利用温度突变量的海缆故障检测方法
KR101808461B1 (ko) 기계의 잔여수명 예측 방법 및 장치
WO2014014377A1 (fr) Procédé destiné au traitement de mesures d&#39;une pluralité de capteurs installés au niveau d&#39;un système technique
EP2956751B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de surveillance pour surveiller une structure
CN114755036B (zh) 磁浮列车悬浮系统的故障检测方法、装置、设备及介质
US11836057B2 (en) Fault location in a redundant acquisition system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12837669

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12837669

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1