WO2013076077A1 - Warning system of a vehicle - Google Patents

Warning system of a vehicle Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2013076077A1
WO2013076077A1 PCT/EP2012/073103 EP2012073103W WO2013076077A1 WO 2013076077 A1 WO2013076077 A1 WO 2013076077A1 EP 2012073103 W EP2012073103 W EP 2012073103W WO 2013076077 A1 WO2013076077 A1 WO 2013076077A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
warning system
vehicle
threshold
speed
steering angle
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2012/073103
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Adam GELENCSER
Alain Dunoyer
Original Assignee
Jaguar Cars Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Jaguar Cars Ltd filed Critical Jaguar Cars Ltd
Publication of WO2013076077A1 publication Critical patent/WO2013076077A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60TVEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T8/00Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force
    • B60T8/17Using electrical or electronic regulation means to control braking
    • B60T8/1755Brake regulation specially adapted to control the stability of the vehicle, e.g. taking into account yaw rate or transverse acceleration in a curve
    • B60T8/17557Brake regulation specially adapted to control the stability of the vehicle, e.g. taking into account yaw rate or transverse acceleration in a curve specially adapted for lane departure prevention
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60RVEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B60R21/00Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
    • B60R21/01Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
    • B60R21/013Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
    • B60R21/0132Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to vehicle motion parameters, e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W30/00Purposes of road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. of systems using conjoint control of vehicle sub-units
    • B60W30/08Active safety systems predicting or avoiding probable or impending collision or attempting to minimise its consequences
    • B60W30/09Taking automatic action to avoid collision, e.g. braking and steering
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W30/00Purposes of road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. of systems using conjoint control of vehicle sub-units
    • B60W30/10Path keeping
    • B60W30/12Lane keeping
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W50/00Details of control systems for road vehicle drive control not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. process diagnostic or vehicle driver interfaces
    • B60W50/08Interaction between the driver and the control system
    • B60W50/10Interpretation of driver requests or demands
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W50/00Details of control systems for road vehicle drive control not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. process diagnostic or vehicle driver interfaces
    • B60W50/08Interaction between the driver and the control system
    • B60W50/14Means for informing the driver, warning the driver or prompting a driver intervention
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/16Anti-collision systems
    • G08G1/167Driving aids for lane monitoring, lane changing, e.g. blind spot detection
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60TVEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T2201/00Particular use of vehicle brake systems; Special systems using also the brakes; Special software modules within the brake system controller
    • B60T2201/08Lane monitoring; Lane Keeping Systems
    • B60T2201/082Lane monitoring; Lane Keeping Systems using alarm actuation
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W50/00Details of control systems for road vehicle drive control not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. process diagnostic or vehicle driver interfaces
    • B60W2050/0062Adapting control system settings
    • B60W2050/0075Automatic parameter input, automatic initialising or calibrating means
    • B60W2050/0095Automatic control mode change
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2520/00Input parameters relating to overall vehicle dynamics
    • B60W2520/10Longitudinal speed
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2540/00Input parameters relating to occupants
    • B60W2540/18Steering angle
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2552/00Input parameters relating to infrastructure
    • B60W2552/05Type of road, e.g. motorways, local streets, paved or unpaved roads

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and system of active determination of a classification of a road and to a vehicle warning system associated with lane departure, and a method of enabling such a warning system. Aspects of the invention relate to a system, to a controller, to a method and to a vehicle. BACKGROUND
  • Determination of the classification of a road enables vehicle systems to be automatically optimized.
  • a highway may be broadly differentiated from a minor road by the extent and frequency of the bends and gradients thereof.
  • Active monitoring from the vehicle permits the changing nature of a road to be accommodated so that, for example, the formal classification of a road by a highway authority is not important.
  • the nature of the road is sensed from the vehicle, and classified accordingly to pre-determined parameters, which may vary between vehicle types.
  • An alternative means of determining road classification is by reference to map information, for example via a GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) system.
  • On-board active monitoring of road type avoids the need for map/GPS data, and is appropriate where such data is not available or is not accurate.
  • Lane departure warning systems are well-known and comprise camera or other recognition apparatus for sensing departure of a vehicle from a lane. Such systems may for example use lane markings as a reference for sensing lane departure, and are usually automatically enabled above a reference speed appropriate for highway driving, typically 60 kph.
  • Such systems provide an audible and/or visual indicator to the driver to warn of unintentional lane departure.
  • the main reason for lane departure warning is to alert a driver who may be sleepy or inattentive, and thus be allowing a vehicle to wander across the highway at speed.
  • These systems have the greatest application in highway driving where roads tend to be relatively straight and featureless.
  • a related kind of lane departure warning system relates to imminent side-swipe conditions. Rear facing vehicle cameras or other sensors monitor following vehicles Should a driver begin to change lanes, for example for overtaking, a warning will be given in the event that a following vehicle appears to be approaching in the lane to which movement is intended. Side-swipe warning is useful in multi-lane highway driving, where significant differences in vehicle speed are common.
  • warning systems of this kind are the frequency with which false alerts may be sounded during intentional lane change. Such alerts can be a considerable annoyance on, for example, a twisting or switchback road, so that the tendency is for the vehicle driver to disable the system by switching it off. The benefit of such systems as an aid to safety is thereby negated. Where a vehicle is driven by several drivers, awareness of a disabled system may not be apparent. If disabled, a driver may neglect or forget to re-enable the system.
  • lane departure warning system a warning is suppressed when steering inputs are high; nevertheless such a system gives a warning when the vehicle crosses a lane boundary in a straight line, for example when cutting a corner on a twisting road.
  • a warning may be given on a twisting road if a following vehicle appears to be a potential threat as the vehicles cut corners and thereby cross a lane boundary.
  • What is required is a means and method of active determination of a road classification from a vehicle, and of automatically enabling a vehicle warning system such as a lane departure warning system or a side-swipe warning system, when appropriate.
  • a vehicle warning system such as a lane departure warning system or a side-swipe warning system
  • a vehicle warning system associated with lane departure comprising:
  • the steering condition includes a first condition whereby steering angle is within a pre-determined angular range; a second condition whereby the standard deviation of the moving average of changing rate of steering angle is less than a pre-determined numerical threshold; and a third condition whereby the rate of change of steering angle is less than a pre-determined rate threshold.
  • steering angle may be meant an angle of the steering wheel, an angle of the steered wheels or a combination to the two.
  • An aspect of the invention automatically enables the warning system after the predetermined period, so as to confirm that the vehicle is within an envelope of speed and steering appropriate to highway driving. Should any of the parameters fall below a prescribed threshold, or fall outside a prescribed band, the warning system is in one embodiment immediately disabled to eliminate warnings.
  • the invention thus enables the warning system only when speed and steering conditions are satisfied. Accordingly such systems need not be enabled continuously, resulting in a potential savings in electronic processing demand and heat generation within the warning system devices.
  • the invention provides a method and system of enabling a warning system associated with lane departure or lane change of a vehicle by determining continuous substantially straight line travel of the vehicle for a pre-determined period.
  • the warning system is immediately disabled should substantially straight line travel cease.
  • substantially straight line travel we mean travel associated with highway driving and major roads, in which grades and curves of the highway are modest and thus suitable for high speed travel.
  • Such highway driving is typically associated with the highest road classification, and exemplified by multi-lane highways, motorways, auto routes and certain toll roads.
  • a vehicle speed threshold must be exceeded in order to enable the warning system.
  • the pre-determined speed threshold is greater than 80 kph.
  • the speed threshold is one of 90 kph or 100 kph.
  • the speed threshold may be settable or fixed (embedded).
  • the steering angle is within a pre-determined angular range of ⁇ 30° or ⁇ 25° or ⁇ 20 ° or ⁇ 15°.
  • the angular range may be normalized so as to indicate an angular range about the straight ahead condition of less than 20° or less than 15° or less than 10°; normalization takes into account a long highway curve where the steering angle may be maintained at a deviation from the centre position for a period of time. The period of time for which normalization is effected may be limited, for example less than 20 seconds.
  • the predetermined angular range may be fixed or settable.
  • the standard deviation of the moving average of changing steering wheel angle is less than 5, and may be less than 4 or less than 3 or less than 2.
  • the standard deviation may be fixed or settable.
  • the period over which data is retained for calculation of the standard deviation may be limited, to for example 40, 30, 20, or 10 seconds. This period may be settable.
  • the rate of change of steering wheel angle (speed) may be less than 6° per second, or less than 5° per second, or less than 4° per second, or less than 3° per second or less than 2 ° per second; this rate of change may be fixed or settable.
  • the pre-determined waiting time period before enabling the system is 30 seconds, or 45 seconds, or 60 seconds or 90 seconds or 120 seconds. This pre-determined time period may be fixed or settable.
  • the pre-determined time period may also be referred to as analogue of time, for example an equivalent number of pulses of a clock signal of the vehicle electronic control system.
  • a 10Hz clock signal has 600 pulses in a period of 60 seconds.
  • An aspect of the method of the invention permits the reference values quoted above to be held in a read only memory by reference to a look-up table, and different values may be assigned depending on, for example, the operating condition of the vehicle.
  • An algorithm may be provided to calculate a reference value according to appropriate input parameters of, for example vehicle speed, gear ratio, gear range etc. Alternatively the reference values may be settable by the vehicle driver, or by a technician having appropriate skill and equipment.
  • An aspect of the invention is typically embodied in a control system of the vehicle, for example an ECU comprising a processor and memory, and is repeatedly or continually refreshed at a suitable refresh rate, exceeding for example 10Hz.
  • the warning system is disabled if any input variable fails to meet the reference value when checked at the system refresh rate.
  • the warning system may be a lane departure warning system, or a side-swipe warning system, or another kind of warning system associated with change of lanes or lane departure. Such warning systems may be enabled separately or together in any combination.
  • aspects of the invention also provide a vehicle having the control system described above, or a vehicle embodying the method as described above.
  • Fig. 1 is an embodiment of an algorithm for determining whether a lane departure warning system should be on or off.
  • Fig. 2 is a detailed schematic of inputs and reference values for the algorithm of Fig. 1 .
  • a vehicle CAN BUS is indicated by conduit (1 1 ) along which electrical signals pass. Such signals are indicative of many vehicle conditions, and are generated by suitable sensors.
  • CAN controller area network
  • CAN controller area network
  • Three generally universally available CAN signals are vehicle speed (12), steering wheel angle (13) and rate of change of steering wheel angle (14).
  • the invention uses these three signals in an algorithm (15) to determine automatically whether or not to enable a lane departure warning (LDW) system (16).
  • the algorithm is typically implemented in an electronic control unit associated with an LDW system.
  • raw vehicle data is fed to the algorithm (15) from the CAN BUS, not shown for clarity.
  • the algorithm (15) comprises a decision module (51 ), which determines whether or not to enable the LDW, based on inputs of vehicle speed (12), steering wheel angle (13) and rate of change of steering wheel angle (14).
  • Raw vehicle speed signal (12) is provided to the algorithm in both filtered and unfiltered forms (31 , 32).
  • An electronic filter (21 ) of known kind smoothes the raw speed signal to reduce or eliminate transients, and thereby produced the filtered input (31 ).
  • the signal of steering wheel angle (13) is provided to the algorithm as a normalized and filtered input (33), and as moving average and filtered input (34).
  • Normalization ensures that a steady departure of the steering wheel from the straight ahead position, for example during a high speed curve on a highway, is not interpreted as lane departure. Any suitable normalization technique may be applied, for example by comparing a raw signal with a filtered signal. The normalized signal is filtered at (23) to reduce or remove transients.
  • a moving average of steering wheel angle is determined at (25) for example over a period of 20 seconds (as indicated in Fig. 2). This moving average is filtered at (26) to reduce or remove transients.
  • the signal (14) of rate of change of steering wheel angle is filtered at (27) to reduce or remove transients.
  • Reference inputs to the algorithm comprise minimum speed (41 ), live speed limit 'on' (42); live speed limit 'off (43); speed off motorway (48); maximum steering wheel angle (44) in degrees; standard deviation (45) of steering wheel angle; speed of steering wheel (46) in degrees per second, and wait time (47) in seconds.
  • Typical values for each reference input are given in each box (41 -48) as shown in Fig. 2, and may be fixed or settable according to the vehicle and/or requirements of the user.
  • the inputs (31 -35) and reference inputs are provided to the decision module (51 ) from which a binary on/off signal is provided to the LDW system (16).
  • the settable variables of Fig. 2 comprise the period for determining the moving average of steering wheel angle (20 seconds); the minimum vehicle speed for enabling LDW (60kph); the enabling speed for LDW (60kph); the disabling speed for LDW (also 60kph); the maximum steering wheel angle for enabling LDW (10 degrees); the standard deviation associated with the moving average of steering wheel angle (3.9); the maximum speed of change of steering wheel angle (4.64 degrees per second) and the waiting time for enabling LDW (40 seconds).
  • the decision module tests for satisfaction of inputs associated with the reference values (41 - 48), so that if all tests are satisfied, LDW is automatically enabled. Failure of any variable to satisfy the relevant test results in disabling of LDW.
  • LDW will have an on/off state which may be manually set by a vehicle driver. LDW may automatically be switched on each time the vehicle engine is started.
  • the tests for automatic enabling of LDW are:
  • Minimum vehicle speed must exceed input value (41 ) [60kph].
  • the filtered speed signal (31 ) is used to avoid repeated change of state at or about the trigger speed (41 ) as a result of slight variations in vehicle speed.
  • Vehicle speed must exceed input value (42) [60kph].
  • the raw speed signal (32) is used.
  • Vehicle speed must not be at or below input value (43) [60kph].
  • Tests 2 and 3 permit different speeds to be set; thus the enabling speed of test 2 may be higher than the disabling speed of test 3.
  • Normalized steering wheel angle must be less than input value (44) [10°] departure from the straight ahead condition; a greater angle would not be indicative of conditions for LDW.
  • Standard deviation of the moving average of steering wheel angle should not exceed input value (45) [3.9].
  • settable value could be in the range 0-5 where 0 is indicative of no steering wheel movement, and 5 is still indicative of substantially straight line driving. A standard deviation greater than 5 could indicate conditions unsuitable for LDW.
  • Steering wheel speed should not exceed input value (46) [4.64 degrees per second].
  • the settable value could be in the range 0-5 degrees per second, and is indicative of nonviolent movements in highway driving. Speeds greater than 5 degrees per second could indicate conditions unsuitable for LDW.
  • Conditions 1 -6 should be continually satisfied during the wait time input value (47) of [40 seconds], and if so LDW is automatically enabled.
  • the time period is settable, and may of course be defined by counting an alternative reference, such as the refresh rate of the algorithm.
  • condition 7 ensures not only that highway driving is detected with confidence, but that repeated enable/disable cannot occur very frequently.
  • the system can allow for a harsh movement of the steering wheel whilst LDW is enabled.
  • condition 6 only is breached whilst LDW is enabled, a further test may determine if raw vehicle speed exceeds the speed off motorway (48). If so LDW, remains enabled so as to avoid sudden unnecessary disabling of LDW.
  • LDW requires a check of raw speed to ensure that enabling of LDW is appropriate.
  • Continual testing of the inputs is carried out at the selected refresh rate, which may be 10Hz or greater, to the intent that disabling of LDW is immediately upon detection of an input associated with non-highway driving.
  • This embodiment is described with reference to a CAN signal of rate of change of steering wheel position (14). It will however be appreciated that this input can also be derived from the CAN signal of steering wheel position (13) by reference to a clock signal.
  • the invention has a 10Hz refresh rate, which provides a clock signal at 0.1 second intervals; accordingly the wait time reference value (47) may be defined as a count of clock signals which in this example is 400 for a forty second delay.
  • Filters 21 , 23, 26, 27 are provided for each input 31 , 33, 34, 35 so as to smooth the electronic signal, both to deal with minor changes of the raw signal and to accommodate electronic noise and the like. It will of course be understood that the nature and effect of such filters is within the knowledge of the skilled person, and an appropriate filter and range will be selected according to characteristics of the raw signal. If, in any particular case, the raw signal is sufficiently smooth, it will be further understood that the respective filter may be dispensed with.
  • This aspect of the invention relates to a lane departure warning (LDW) system.
  • LDW lane departure warning
  • the present invention obviates such false warnings by using a combination of steering inputs to enable the side-swipe warning system only when conditions of substantially straight line travel are present for a pre-determined period.
  • This invention is described in relation to a lane departure warning system and a side-swipe warning system.
  • the system allows determination of a classification of road according to the frequency and rate of steering input having regard to vehicle speed.
  • classification may be useful in automatically placing the vehicle in an operating mode appropriate to the conditions of use, such as adapting different suspension settings for highway and country road conditions.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Transportation (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

A method and system of active determination of a road class from a vehicle, suitable for enabling a lane departure warning system or a side-swipe warning system, continually tests inputs of speed and steering against threshold values. If the threshold values are satisfied for a pre-determined period, a warning system is enabled. Any failure to satisfy any threshold values may cause immediate disabling of the warning system. Lane departure warning and side-swipe warning may thus be disabled on a tortuous road, but automatically enabled on a straight highway. Other systems may be enabled/selected upon determination of a class of road.

Description

Warning System of a Vehicle
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to a method and system of active determination of a classification of a road and to a vehicle warning system associated with lane departure, and a method of enabling such a warning system. Aspects of the invention relate to a system, to a controller, to a method and to a vehicle. BACKGROUND
Determination of the classification of a road enables vehicle systems to be automatically optimized. Thus a highway may be broadly differentiated from a minor road by the extent and frequency of the bends and gradients thereof. Active monitoring from the vehicle permits the changing nature of a road to be accommodated so that, for example, the formal classification of a road by a highway authority is not important. Thus the nature of the road is sensed from the vehicle, and classified accordingly to pre-determined parameters, which may vary between vehicle types.
An alternative means of determining road classification is by reference to map information, for example via a GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) system. On-board active monitoring of road type avoids the need for map/GPS data, and is appropriate where such data is not available or is not accurate.
Lane departure warning systems are well-known and comprise camera or other recognition apparatus for sensing departure of a vehicle from a lane. Such systems may for example use lane markings as a reference for sensing lane departure, and are usually automatically enabled above a reference speed appropriate for highway driving, typically 60 kph.
In operation such systems provide an audible and/or visual indicator to the driver to warn of unintentional lane departure. The main reason for lane departure warning is to alert a driver who may be sleepy or inattentive, and thus be allowing a vehicle to wander across the highway at speed. These systems have the greatest application in highway driving where roads tend to be relatively straight and featureless. A related kind of lane departure warning system relates to imminent side-swipe conditions. Rear facing vehicle cameras or other sensors monitor following vehicles Should a driver begin to change lanes, for example for overtaking, a warning will be given in the event that a following vehicle appears to be approaching in the lane to which movement is intended. Side-swipe warning is useful in multi-lane highway driving, where significant differences in vehicle speed are common. One problem with warning systems of this kind is the frequency with which false alerts may be sounded during intentional lane change. Such alerts can be a considerable annoyance on, for example, a twisting or switchback road, so that the tendency is for the vehicle driver to disable the system by switching it off. The benefit of such systems as an aid to safety is thereby negated. Where a vehicle is driven by several drivers, awareness of a disabled system may not be apparent. If disabled, a driver may neglect or forget to re-enable the system.
In one prior art lane departure warning system a warning is suppressed when steering inputs are high; nevertheless such a system gives a warning when the vehicle crosses a lane boundary in a straight line, for example when cutting a corner on a twisting road.
In one prior art side swipe warning system, a warning may be given on a twisting road if a following vehicle appears to be a potential threat as the vehicles cut corners and thereby cross a lane boundary.
Such nuisance warnings should be obviated if possible.
What is required is a means and method of active determination of a road classification from a vehicle, and of automatically enabling a vehicle warning system such as a lane departure warning system or a side-swipe warning system, when appropriate.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to one aspect of the invention there is provided a method of operating a vehicle warning system associated with lane departure, the method comprising:
satisfying a speed condition whereby road speed of the vehicle exceeds a predetermined speed threshold;
satisfying a steering condition whereby steering of the vehicle is below a predetermined steering movement threshold; and
enabling said warning system if the speed and steering conditions are both satisfied for a pre-determined time period. In one embodiment, the steering condition includes a first condition whereby steering angle is within a pre-determined angular range; a second condition whereby the standard deviation of the moving average of changing rate of steering angle is less than a pre-determined numerical threshold; and a third condition whereby the rate of change of steering angle is less than a pre-determined rate threshold.
By steering angle may be meant an angle of the steering wheel, an angle of the steered wheels or a combination to the two. An aspect of the invention automatically enables the warning system after the predetermined period, so as to confirm that the vehicle is within an envelope of speed and steering appropriate to highway driving. Should any of the parameters fall below a prescribed threshold, or fall outside a prescribed band, the warning system is in one embodiment immediately disabled to eliminate warnings.
The invention thus enables the warning system only when speed and steering conditions are satisfied. Accordingly such systems need not be enabled continuously, resulting in a potential savings in electronic processing demand and heat generation within the warning system devices.
In one aspect the invention provides a method and system of enabling a warning system associated with lane departure or lane change of a vehicle by determining continuous substantially straight line travel of the vehicle for a pre-determined period. In one aspect, the warning system is immediately disabled should substantially straight line travel cease.
By substantially straight line travel we mean travel associated with highway driving and major roads, in which grades and curves of the highway are modest and thus suitable for high speed travel. Such highway driving is typically associated with the highest road classification, and exemplified by multi-lane highways, motorways, auto routes and certain toll roads.
In contrast minor roads, town roads and rural roads of a generally single lane character would not tend to give substantially straight line travel. Such roads are of a lower classification.
In one embodiment a vehicle speed threshold must be exceeded in order to enable the warning system. In one embodiment the pre-determined speed threshold is greater than 80 kph. In one embodiment the speed threshold is one of 90 kph or 100 kph. The speed threshold may be settable or fixed (embedded).
In one embodiment the steering angle is within a pre-determined angular range of ± 30° or ± 25° or ± 20 ° or ± 15°. The angular range may be normalized so as to indicate an angular range about the straight ahead condition of less than 20° or less than 15° or less than 10°; normalization takes into account a long highway curve where the steering angle may be maintained at a deviation from the centre position for a period of time. The period of time for which normalization is effected may be limited, for example less than 20 seconds. The predetermined angular range may be fixed or settable.
In one embodiment the standard deviation of the moving average of changing steering wheel angle is less than 5, and may be less than 4 or less than 3 or less than 2. The standard deviation may be fixed or settable.
The period over which data is retained for calculation of the standard deviation may be limited, to for example 40, 30, 20, or 10 seconds. This period may be settable.
In one embodiment the rate of change of steering wheel angle (speed) may be less than 6° per second, or less than 5° per second, or less than 4° per second, or less than 3° per second or less than 2 ° per second; this rate of change may be fixed or settable. In one embodiment the pre-determined waiting time period before enabling the system is 30 seconds, or 45 seconds, or 60 seconds or 90 seconds or 120 seconds. This pre-determined time period may be fixed or settable.
The pre-determined time period may also be referred to as analogue of time, for example an equivalent number of pulses of a clock signal of the vehicle electronic control system. Thus a 10Hz clock signal has 600 pulses in a period of 60 seconds.
An aspect of the method of the invention permits the reference values quoted above to be held in a read only memory by reference to a look-up table, and different values may be assigned depending on, for example, the operating condition of the vehicle. An algorithm may be provided to calculate a reference value according to appropriate input parameters of, for example vehicle speed, gear ratio, gear range etc. Alternatively the reference values may be settable by the vehicle driver, or by a technician having appropriate skill and equipment.
An aspect of the invention is typically embodied in a control system of the vehicle, for example an ECU comprising a processor and memory, and is repeatedly or continually refreshed at a suitable refresh rate, exceeding for example 10Hz.
According to embodiments of the invention the warning system is disabled if any input variable fails to meet the reference value when checked at the system refresh rate.
The warning system may be a lane departure warning system, or a side-swipe warning system, or another kind of warning system associated with change of lanes or lane departure. Such warning systems may be enabled separately or together in any combination.
Aspects of the invention also provide a vehicle having the control system described above, or a vehicle embodying the method as described above.
Other features of the invention will be apparent from the claims appended hereto.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which :- Fig. 1 is an embodiment of an algorithm for determining whether a lane departure warning system should be on or off.
Fig. 2 is a detailed schematic of inputs and reference values for the algorithm of Fig. 1 . DETAILED DESCRIPTION
With reference to Fig. 1 a vehicle CAN BUS is indicated by conduit (1 1 ) along which electrical signals pass. Such signals are indicative of many vehicle conditions, and are generated by suitable sensors. CAN (controller area network) systems are well-known and need not be further described here; they are widely used individually and in combination to control many aspects of vehicle operation. Three generally universally available CAN signals are vehicle speed (12), steering wheel angle (13) and rate of change of steering wheel angle (14). The invention uses these three signals in an algorithm (15) to determine automatically whether or not to enable a lane departure warning (LDW) system (16). The algorithm is typically implemented in an electronic control unit associated with an LDW system.
With reference to Fig. 2, raw vehicle data is fed to the algorithm (15) from the CAN BUS, not shown for clarity. The algorithm (15) comprises a decision module (51 ), which determines whether or not to enable the LDW, based on inputs of vehicle speed (12), steering wheel angle (13) and rate of change of steering wheel angle (14). Raw vehicle speed signal (12) is provided to the algorithm in both filtered and unfiltered forms (31 , 32). An electronic filter (21 ) of known kind smoothes the raw speed signal to reduce or eliminate transients, and thereby produced the filtered input (31 ). The signal of steering wheel angle (13) is provided to the algorithm as a normalized and filtered input (33), and as moving average and filtered input (34).
Normalization (22) ensures that a steady departure of the steering wheel from the straight ahead position, for example during a high speed curve on a highway, is not interpreted as lane departure. Any suitable normalization technique may be applied, for example by comparing a raw signal with a filtered signal. The normalized signal is filtered at (23) to reduce or remove transients.
A moving average of steering wheel angle is determined at (25) for example over a period of 20 seconds (as indicated in Fig. 2). This moving average is filtered at (26) to reduce or remove transients.
The signal (14) of rate of change of steering wheel angle is filtered at (27) to reduce or remove transients.
Reference inputs to the algorithm, for example retained in a memory of an electronic control unit, comprise minimum speed (41 ), live speed limit 'on' (42); live speed limit 'off (43); speed off motorway (48); maximum steering wheel angle (44) in degrees; standard deviation (45) of steering wheel angle; speed of steering wheel (46) in degrees per second, and wait time (47) in seconds. Typical values for each reference input are given in each box (41 -48) as shown in Fig. 2, and may be fixed or settable according to the vehicle and/or requirements of the user. The inputs (31 -35) and reference inputs are provided to the decision module (51 ) from which a binary on/off signal is provided to the LDW system (16).
Thus the settable variables of Fig. 2 comprise the period for determining the moving average of steering wheel angle (20 seconds); the minimum vehicle speed for enabling LDW (60kph); the enabling speed for LDW (60kph); the disabling speed for LDW (also 60kph); the maximum steering wheel angle for enabling LDW (10 degrees); the standard deviation associated with the moving average of steering wheel angle (3.9); the maximum speed of change of steering wheel angle (4.64 degrees per second) and the waiting time for enabling LDW (40 seconds).
The decision module tests for satisfaction of inputs associated with the reference values (41 - 48), so that if all tests are satisfied, LDW is automatically enabled. Failure of any variable to satisfy the relevant test results in disabling of LDW.
Thus in an example installation LDW will have an on/off state which may be manually set by a vehicle driver. LDW may automatically be switched on each time the vehicle engine is started.
In the present, non-limiting embodiment, the tests for automatic enabling of LDW are:
1 . Minimum vehicle speed must exceed input value (41 ) [60kph]. For this purpose the filtered speed signal (31 ) is used to avoid repeated change of state at or about the trigger speed (41 ) as a result of slight variations in vehicle speed.
2. Vehicle speed must exceed input value (42) [60kph]. For this purpose the raw speed signal (32) is used.
3. Vehicle speed must not be at or below input value (43) [60kph]. For this purpose the raw speed signal is used. Tests 2 and 3 permit different speeds to be set; thus the enabling speed of test 2 may be higher than the disabling speed of test 3. 4. Normalized steering wheel angle must be less than input value (44) [10°] departure from the straight ahead condition; a greater angle would not be indicative of conditions for LDW. 5. Standard deviation of the moving average of steering wheel angle should not exceed input value (45) [3.9]. Thus settable value could be in the range 0-5 where 0 is indicative of no steering wheel movement, and 5 is still indicative of substantially straight line driving. A standard deviation greater than 5 could indicate conditions unsuitable for LDW.
6. Steering wheel speed should not exceed input value (46) [4.64 degrees per second]. The settable value could be in the range 0-5 degrees per second, and is indicative of nonviolent movements in highway driving. Speeds greater than 5 degrees per second could indicate conditions unsuitable for LDW.
7. Conditions 1 -6 should be continually satisfied during the wait time input value (47) of [40 seconds], and if so LDW is automatically enabled. The time period is settable, and may of course be defined by counting an alternative reference, such as the refresh rate of the algorithm.
In the event that any one of the conditions 1 -6 fails to be met, and speed is below speed off motorway (48), LDW is automatically disabled, and not again enabled until conditions 1 -6 and condition 7 are met. The time limit of condition 7 ensures not only that highway driving is detected with confidence, but that repeated enable/disable cannot occur very frequently.
In a refinement, the system can allow for a harsh movement of the steering wheel whilst LDW is enabled. Thus if condition 6 only is breached whilst LDW is enabled, a further test may determine if raw vehicle speed exceeds the speed off motorway (48). If so LDW, remains enabled so as to avoid sudden unnecessary disabling of LDW.
Likewise LDW requires a check of raw speed to ensure that enabling of LDW is appropriate.
Continual testing of the inputs is carried out at the selected refresh rate, which may be 10Hz or greater, to the intent that disabling of LDW is immediately upon detection of an input associated with non-highway driving.
This embodiment is described with reference to a CAN signal of rate of change of steering wheel position (14). It will however be appreciated that this input can also be derived from the CAN signal of steering wheel position (13) by reference to a clock signal. Typically the invention has a 10Hz refresh rate, which provides a clock signal at 0.1 second intervals; accordingly the wait time reference value (47) may be defined as a count of clock signals which in this example is 400 for a forty second delay.
Filters 21 , 23, 26, 27 are provided for each input 31 , 33, 34, 35 so as to smooth the electronic signal, both to deal with minor changes of the raw signal and to accommodate electronic noise and the like. It will of course be understood that the nature and effect of such filters is within the knowledge of the skilled person, and an appropriate filter and range will be selected according to characteristics of the raw signal. If, in any particular case, the raw signal is sufficiently smooth, it will be further understood that the respective filter may be dispensed with.
This aspect of the invention relates to a lane departure warning (LDW) system. Thus on a twisting or switchback road, the LDW system is automatically disabled so that crossing a lane boundary, for example when cutting a corner, does not trigger a warning.
In the alternative of a side-swipe warning system, the same method may be used to obviate false warnings. Thus two cars following closely on a twisting road may occasionally depart from lanes whilst cutting corners. This may appear to a conventional side-swipe warning system as a threat, as the following vehicle appears to the side of the leading vehicle when the leading vehicle crosses a lane marking.
The present invention obviates such false warnings by using a combination of steering inputs to enable the side-swipe warning system only when conditions of substantially straight line travel are present for a pre-determined period.
This invention is described in relation to a lane departure warning system and a side-swipe warning system. However it will be understood that, in general, the system allows determination of a classification of road according to the frequency and rate of steering input having regard to vehicle speed. Such classification may be useful in automatically placing the vehicle in an operating mode appropriate to the conditions of use, such as adapting different suspension settings for highway and country road conditions.

Claims

Claims
1 . A method of operating a vehicle warning system associated with lane departure, the method comprising:
satisfying a speed condition whereby road speed of the vehicle exceeds a predetermined speed threshold;
satisfying a steering condition whereby steering of the vehicle is below a predetermined steering movement threshold; and
enabling said warning system if the speed and steering conditions are both satisfied for a pre-determined time period.
2. A method according to claim 1 wherein said steering movement threshold is satisfied by one or more of:
determining whether a steering angle of the vehicle is within a pre-determined angular range;
determining whether a standard deviation of the moving average of the steering angle is less than a pre-determined numerical threshold; and
determining whether a rate of change of the steering angle is less than a predetermined rate threshold.
3. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein said pre-determined period exceeds 30 seconds.
4. A method according to any preceding claim, and comprising the step of disabling said lane departure warning system in the event that one of said conditions is no longer satisfied.
5. A method according to claim 4, comprising the step of preventing disabling of said lane departure warning system if the rate of change of steering angle exceeds a pre- determined rate threshold and road speed exceeds a pre-determined speed threshold.
6. A method according to any of claims 1 -3, comprising the step of disabling said warning system in the event that one of said conditions is not satisfied for a period exceeding 3 seconds.
7. A method according to any preceding claim, comprising the step of obtaining signals indicative of road speed and steering angle from a vehicle CAN BUS.
8. A method according to claim 7, comprising the step of obtaining a signal of rate of change of steering angle from a vehicle CAN-BUS.
9. A method according to any of claims 1 -6, comprising the steps of obtaining signals indicative of road speed and steering angle from a road speed sensor and a steering angle sensor, and computing rate of change of steering angle with respect to a clock signal.
10. A method according to any of claims 7-9, wherein said signals have a refresh rate of 5Hz or greater.
1 1 . A method according to any preceding claim, wherein said speed threshold, and said steering movement threshold are each variable.
12. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein said speed threshold is greater than 60 kph.
13. A method according to any preceding claim wherein said warning system is one of a lane departure warning system and a side-swipe warning system.
14. A controller for a warning system adapted to perform a method according to any preceding claim.
15. A vehicle warning system associated with lane departure, comprising a controller arranged to receive input signals indicative of road speed, steering angle and rate of change of steering angle and to enable or activate said warning system if said input signals satisfy predetermined threshold measures for a pre-determined period.
16. A system according to claim 15 comprising a memory arranged to retain threshold measures of road speed, steering angle, a moving average of changing steering wheel angle, and rate of change of steering angle.
17. A system according to claim 15 or claim 16 wherein the controller is arranged to disable said lane departure warning system if any of said signals fail to satisfy said threshold measures.
18. A system according to claims 15 to 17 comprising a clock signal defining a refresh rate for testing said input signals against said threshold measures.
19. A system according to any of claims 15-18, wherein said threshold measures comprise numerical values.
20. A vehicle having a controller or a system as claimed in any of claims 14 - 19, or adapted to perform a method as claimed in any of claims 1 - 13.
PCT/EP2012/073103 2011-11-22 2012-11-20 Warning system of a vehicle WO2013076077A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1120115.9 2011-11-22
GBGB1120115.9A GB201120115D0 (en) 2011-11-22 2011-11-22 Determination of road classification

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2013076077A1 true WO2013076077A1 (en) 2013-05-30

Family

ID=45475521

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2012/073103 WO2013076077A1 (en) 2011-11-22 2012-11-20 Warning system of a vehicle

Country Status (2)

Country Link
GB (3) GB201120115D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2013076077A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10037630B2 (en) 2016-01-04 2018-07-31 Deere & Company Agricultural machine performance improvement system
CN108791286A (en) * 2018-06-21 2018-11-13 奇瑞汽车股份有限公司 Driving collision avoidance method and apparatus

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6993441B2 (en) * 2020-01-31 2022-01-13 本田技研工業株式会社 Vehicle control device, vehicle, operation method and program of vehicle control device
EP4101713A1 (en) * 2021-06-08 2022-12-14 Volvo Truck Corporation A method for automatically reactivating a lane departure warning and/or lane keeping driver assistance system of a vehicle

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1350707A2 (en) * 2002-04-03 2003-10-08 Robert Bosch Gmbh Lateral guiding assistance device for vehicles
EP1422586A2 (en) * 2002-11-20 2004-05-26 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft Method and device to monitor a car driver by using lane recognition
DE10311241A1 (en) * 2003-03-14 2004-09-23 Robert Bosch Gmbh Track-guiding of vehicle, e.g. for controlling road traffic, using onboard guiding device combined with video camera and GPS navigation system to warn driver about detection of tracks
DE102005057251A1 (en) * 2005-11-29 2007-06-06 Daimlerchrysler Ag Drive assistance system e.g. lane keeping system, operating method for use in motor vehicle, involves automatically deactivating system by boundary condition during exceedance or falling below of threshold value

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH1123715A (en) * 1997-07-01 1999-01-29 Aqueous Res:Kk Device for detecting state around vehicle
DE10244557A1 (en) * 2002-09-25 2004-04-08 Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg Method for improving the driving properties of a vehicle
DE10342528A1 (en) * 2003-09-12 2005-04-14 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and device for driver assistance
JP4496759B2 (en) * 2003-10-29 2010-07-07 日産自動車株式会社 Lane departure prevention device

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1350707A2 (en) * 2002-04-03 2003-10-08 Robert Bosch Gmbh Lateral guiding assistance device for vehicles
EP1422586A2 (en) * 2002-11-20 2004-05-26 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft Method and device to monitor a car driver by using lane recognition
DE10311241A1 (en) * 2003-03-14 2004-09-23 Robert Bosch Gmbh Track-guiding of vehicle, e.g. for controlling road traffic, using onboard guiding device combined with video camera and GPS navigation system to warn driver about detection of tracks
DE102005057251A1 (en) * 2005-11-29 2007-06-06 Daimlerchrysler Ag Drive assistance system e.g. lane keeping system, operating method for use in motor vehicle, involves automatically deactivating system by boundary condition during exceedance or falling below of threshold value

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10037630B2 (en) 2016-01-04 2018-07-31 Deere & Company Agricultural machine performance improvement system
CN108791286A (en) * 2018-06-21 2018-11-13 奇瑞汽车股份有限公司 Driving collision avoidance method and apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB201320615D0 (en) 2014-01-08
GB2496975A (en) 2013-05-29
GB2496975B (en) 2014-06-11
GB201220840D0 (en) 2013-01-02
GB2506289A (en) 2014-03-26
GB201120115D0 (en) 2012-01-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7737832B2 (en) Assistance system for motor vehicles
US9290174B1 (en) Method and system for mitigating the effects of an impaired driver
US8583341B2 (en) Method for the open-loop and closed-loop control of traffic flow
US7719431B2 (en) Systems, methods and computer products for drowsy driver detection and response
US8711003B2 (en) Vehicle location information-based abnormal driving determination and warning system
US20130057397A1 (en) Method of operating a vehicle safety system
US7424364B2 (en) Method and device for warning a driver of lane departure
CN107438546B (en) Control system and control method
US20090237230A1 (en) Lane change turn signal appropritate use reminder system
JP2008276327A (en) Vehicular warning apparatus
US20220144269A1 (en) Method for securing a vehicle
JP2006343904A (en) Driving support device
CN110914127A (en) Driving assistance method and driving assistance device
US20190243361A1 (en) Drive switching determination apparatus, drive switching determination method, and program for drive switching determination
US7292920B2 (en) Method and device for lateral guidance of a vehicle
WO2013076077A1 (en) Warning system of a vehicle
AU2011312938B2 (en) Method and system for warning of objects in the vicinity of a motor vehicle
JP4696831B2 (en) Vehicle driving support device
US9205741B2 (en) Management of speed regulation of a vehicle
KR101839978B1 (en) Apparatus and method for determining traveling status of vehicle
JP5500963B2 (en) Collision damage reduction device
JPH1086697A (en) Warning device for vehicle control system
KR20210043066A (en) Intersection signal violation vehicle warning device and method
US11760416B2 (en) Lane detection and alert system
WO2018168099A1 (en) Concentration degree determination device, concentration degree determination method, and program for determining concentration degree

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12797796

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12797796

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1