WO2013022180A1 - Method for calculating a road quality performance index, method for evaluating road quality, apparatus for evaluating road quality, and recording medium therefor - Google Patents

Method for calculating a road quality performance index, method for evaluating road quality, apparatus for evaluating road quality, and recording medium therefor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2013022180A1
WO2013022180A1 PCT/KR2012/004400 KR2012004400W WO2013022180A1 WO 2013022180 A1 WO2013022180 A1 WO 2013022180A1 KR 2012004400 W KR2012004400 W KR 2012004400W WO 2013022180 A1 WO2013022180 A1 WO 2013022180A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
evaluation
quality
road
performance index
index
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/KR2012/004400
Other languages
French (fr)
Korean (ko)
Inventor
이상근
이청
김동수
장기영
조진옥
이덕일
오인환
Original Assignee
한국도로공사
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 한국도로공사 filed Critical 한국도로공사
Publication of WO2013022180A1 publication Critical patent/WO2013022180A1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/08—Construction

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for calculating a road quality performance index, a road quality evaluation method, and a road quality evaluation apparatus.
  • Road quality performance index calculation method, road quality evaluation method, road quality evaluation device which can be judged by
  • the quality control in the construction process to determine the quality of the structure is not focused on the step-by-step quality control in the construction process rather than the quality of the finished structure, and thus does not overcome the continuous defects.
  • the quality performance index which is a quantitative index that can measure the level of construction objects. Development of quality performance evaluation method was required.
  • Patent Document 1 In the method for establishing the optimal maintenance management strategy of the infrastructure based on life cycle performance and cost (Registration No. 10-0748078), the repair, reinforcement and replacement time satisfying the maximum performance and minimum cost for the target bridge at the same time.
  • the present invention relates to an invention that enables the practical implementation of a preventive maintenance system for bridges and the establishment of a reasonable budget by determining the repair and reinforcement methods.
  • the present invention was created in order to solve the problems as described above, to prepare a detailed quality performance evaluation criteria for road quality management and to evaluate based on this to ensure the reliability of quality management and the objectivity and fairness of quality performance evaluation
  • the purpose is to provide.
  • the road quality performance index calculation method may be achieved by providing a road quality performance index.
  • step S610 is to classify the work; Classifying the durability index and the functional index by the classified types of work; And classifying the evaluation item based on the durability index and the functional index.
  • the ball is characterized in that at least one of earthwork, drain hole, bridge ball, paver, tunnel ball, and auxiliary hole.
  • the paver is characterized by being divided into concrete pavement and ascon pavement.
  • the weight is a weight for the evaluation item is characterized in that it is determined corresponding to the evaluation item of high importance of quality management.
  • the evaluation grade is characterized in that it is calculated as a score between 50 and 100 points based on any one of the design criteria, specification standards, and management standards for each model.
  • an object of the present invention is to classify the evaluation items for each type according to the road construction, calculating the evaluation grade for each type (S710); Calculating a quality performance index, which is a quantitative evaluation index for the road construction object, by using the evaluation grade and the weight determined for each type of construction (S720); And evaluating the quality of the construction object according to the calculated quality performance index (S730).
  • the road quality evaluation method may be achieved.
  • the evaluation grade is characterized in that it is calculated as a score between 50 and 100 points based on any one of the design criteria, specification standards, and management standards for each model.
  • the weight is a weight for the evaluation item is characterized in that it is determined corresponding to the evaluation item of high importance of quality management.
  • the quality evaluation of the construction target is characterized in that the quality evaluation only for the construction target when the predetermined process rate or more.
  • the object of the present invention is to calculate the evaluation grade and weight according to the evaluation items for each category as a different category, the calculation means for calculating the quality performance index, which is a quantitative evaluation index for the construction target according to the road construction using the evaluation grade and weight 100; And evaluation means 200 for evaluating the quality of the construction object.
  • the electronic device 400 receiving the quality evaluation result for the construction object using the communication network 300; characterized in that it further comprises.
  • the evaluation grade is characterized in that it is calculated as a score between 50 and 100 points based on any one of the design criteria, specification standards, and management standards for each model.
  • the weight is a weight for the evaluation item is characterized in that it is determined corresponding to the evaluation item of high importance of quality management.
  • the object of the present invention can be achieved by providing a computer-readable recording medium having recorded thereon a program for executing the road quality evaluation method as another category.
  • according to the present invention can improve the quality due to the evaluation of the quality performance index, thereby reducing the maintenance cost of the road construction object.
  • FIG. 1 is a flow chart sequentially showing a road quality performance index calculation method according to the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a view showing the evaluation grade (grade distribution) of earthwork according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 and 6 is a view showing the evaluation grade (grade distribution) of the bridge ball according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 13 is a flowchart sequentially showing a road quality evaluation method according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 14 is a configuration diagram showing the configuration of a road quality evaluation apparatus according to the present invention.
  • the road quality performance index calculation method may be achieved by providing a road quality performance index.
  • a step of classifying the evaluation items for each work type which is an evaluation item for each work type according to the road construction, is performed (S610).
  • Work type refers to the type of construction carried out according to the road construction and in the present invention mainly earthwork (land construction), drainage (drainage), bridge (bridge), paving (paving), tunnel (tunnel) It refers to at least one of, and auxiliary construction (construction work).
  • the earthwork, drainage, bridge, paver, tunnel ball, and auxiliary hole classified by the type of work are classified into durability index and functional index.
  • Each model classified into durability index and functional index is again classified into evaluation items for each model.
  • the selection of evaluation items for each type of work can be selected through expert road construction site evaluation or by questionnaire or expert consultation. It is preferable to select the quality evaluation items of earthworks by considering the importance of earthworks and the frequency of defect occurrence as the first considerations, and the selection of the quality evaluation items of drainage holes by considering the importance and frequency of defects in drainage facilities as the first consideration. It is desirable to.
  • the durability indicators of the evaluation items of earthworks are classified into a stack slope slope, a cut slope slope, and a back compaction strain coefficient ratio, and the functional indicators are classified into a stack slope slope aesthetic and a cut slope slope aesthetics.
  • the durability index of the evaluation items of the drain hole is classified into culvert wall crack rate, side joint joint crack rate, and the functional index is classified into sealant finish.
  • the durability indicators of the evaluation items of bridge holes are classified into reinforcing bar thickness, alternating wall crack ratio, concrete bubble spacing, and steel bridge coating thickness, and functional indexes are classified into flatness index and expansion joint construction adequacy.
  • the evaluation items of pavers are classified into concrete pavement and ascon pavement, and each concrete pavement and ascon pavement is classified into durability index and functional index.
  • the durability index in the case of concrete pavement is classified into compressive strength, concrete bubble interval, pavement thickness, and the functional index is classified into flatness.
  • durability indicators are classified into compaction, aggregate granularity, asphalt content, pavement thickness, aggregate granularity and flatness, and functional indicators are classified into flatness.
  • the durability index of tunnel hole evaluation items is classified into shotcrete thickness, shotcrete compressive strength, steel fiber content, rock bolt pullout strength, shotcrete irregularities, and functional indexes are classified into B / P and C / R management.
  • weight for each evaluation item described above is as shown in FIG. At this time, instead of the term weight is shown as a specific gravity, the parenthesis means the weight when the concrete pavement and asphalt pavement at the same time the construction site. As for the weight, the higher the evaluation item, the higher the weight.
  • the evaluation of the evaluation grade as shown in Figures 3 to 12 set the evaluation method according to the evaluation items for each type of work, classify the classification criteria into design criteria, specification standards or management standards, and the evaluation grades according to the grading criteria (Rating distribution in FIGS. 3-12) is calculated.
  • the evaluation grade for earthwork shown in Figure 3 is given 100 points if the average slope slope is within n ⁇ 0.01, and 90 points are given within n ⁇ 0.02. At this time, the graded evaluation grade is divided into 6 levels (100 points, 90 points, 80 points, 70 points, 60 points, 50 points).
  • the quality performance index which is a quantitative evaluation index for the construction object, is calculated using the evaluation grade and the weight (S630).
  • the quality performance index is calculated by using Equations 1 and 2 below using Tables 1 to 3 below.
  • the durability index (Q d ) and the functional index (Q f ) of [Table 1] is calculated by applying the weight of [Table 2], the quality performance index is calculated as shown in [Equation 1].
  • Q d is the durability index and Q f is the functional index.
  • Q e is the earthwork index
  • Q d is the drainage index
  • Q b is the bridge index
  • Q p is the paving index
  • Q t is the tunnel index
  • Q f is the incident index
  • the quality performance index shown in [Equation 1] is a collective weighting method for the durability index and the functional index for each work type, and the quality performance index shown in [Equation 2] is applied to the durability index and the functional index according to the work type. It is a method of giving weight to
  • Step S710 and S720 are steps for calculating the quality performance index, and thus, it is possible to perform objective quality history management through quality performance evaluation by escaping from the conventional inspection-oriented one-time quality management. Since the method for calculating the quality performance index is the same as the method for calculating the quality performance index described above, a detailed description thereof will be omitted.
  • the step of evaluating the quality of the construction target in accordance with the calculated quality performance index (S730).
  • the evaluation of the quality of the construction objects is carried out using the calculated quality performance index, and as an example, it is possible to set a target quality performance index for each year, and to evaluate the cases where the target quality performance index is not met and the target value is exceeded.
  • the quality evaluation for these construction objects is divided into regular evaluation and regular evaluation, and the regular evaluation is for the entire road construction site, except for tools with a process rate of less than 10%.
  • the regular evaluation is carried out by selecting three to four representative tools, it is preferable to evaluate after selecting the top tool, the lowest tool, and one or two tools by drawing results. However, tools with less than 10% process rate are excluded from the evaluation.
  • the tools that fall below the target score for the current year and the lower 10% of the tools can be set to reach the quality control and the target quality through a special theme check.
  • each contractor transmitting the evaluated quality evaluation results to each construction (S740), each contractor to be reflected in the construction evaluation itself, it is possible to induce responsible construction according to the quality evaluation results. In addition, contractors who have achieved their targets may later reflect additional incentives.
  • the road quality evaluation apparatus may be constituted by the calculation means 100, the evaluation means 200, the communication network 300, and the electronic device 400.
  • the configuration of the road quality evaluation apparatus according to the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. 14.
  • the calculating means 100 receives and stores evaluation grades and weights according to evaluation items for each type of industry, and calculates a quality performance index using the input evaluation grades and weights.
  • the quality performance index is calculated based on [Equation 1] or [Equation 2].
  • Evaluation means 200 receives the calculated quality performance index to evaluate the quality of the construction target.
  • the quality evaluation of the construction object can be evaluated by comparing the stored quality performance index and the calculated quality performance index to be achieved as an example.
  • the quality performance indexes calculated for each year may be compared with each other to evaluate the quality of the construction object.
  • the calculation means 100 and the evaluation means 200 described above may be implemented by a computer capable of calculation and storage, and the storage may be provided outside the computer as necessary.
  • the calculation means 100 and the evaluation means 200 have been described separately by the need of explanation, but the function may be performed by one computer as necessary.
  • the electronic device 400 receives the quality evaluation result for the construction object by using the communication network 300.
  • the electronic device 400 when the electronic device 400 is located at a road construction site or a management office for each construction site, the electronic device 400 may be a computer connected to the Internet.
  • the electronic device 400 when the electronic device 400 is a portable terminal, the electronic device 400 may be transmitted to a supervisor or a manager corresponding to each construction site of the road construction site. Therefore, the communication network 300 may be changed according to the type of the electronic device 400.
  • the invention can also be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable recording medium.
  • Computer-readable recording media include all kinds of recording devices that store data that can be read by a computer system. Examples of computer-readable recording media include ROM, RAM, CD-ROM, magnetic tape, floppy disks, optical data storage devices, and the like, which are also implemented in the form of carrier waves (for example, transmission over the Internet). Include.
  • the computer readable recording medium can also be distributed over network coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.
  • functional programs, codes, and code segments for implementing the present invention can be easily inferred by programmers in the art to which the present invention belongs.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Road Repair (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for calculating a road quality performance index, to a method for evaluating road quality, and to an apparatus for evaluating road quality, that use a quality performance index, i.e. quantified quality evaluation standards, so as to objectively determine the quality of each construction goal of a road to be constructed. To this end, the method for calculating the road quality performance index is characterized by comprising: a step (S610) of classifying evaluation items for construction work types, i.e. evaluation items for each construction work type in the road to be constructed; a step (S620) of calculating evaluation grades and weighted values for the classified evaluation items for each construction work type; and a step (S630) of calculating a quality performance index, i.e. a quantified evaluation index, for the construction goals using the evaluation grades and weighted values.

Description

도로 품질성능지수 산출방법, 도로 품질 평가방법, 도로 품질 평가장치, 및 그 기록매체Road quality performance index calculation method, road quality evaluation method, road quality evaluation device, and its recording medium
본 발명은 도로 품질성능지수 산출방법, 도로 품질 평가방법, 도로 품질 평가장치에 관한 것으로서, 보다 상세하게는 정량화된 품질 평가기준인 품질성능지수를 도입함으로써 도로 건설에 따른 각 시공 목적물의 품질을 객관적으로 판단할 수 있는 도로 품질성능지수 산출방법, 도로 품질 평가방법, 도로 품질 평가장치에 관한 것이다.The present invention relates to a method for calculating a road quality performance index, a road quality evaluation method, and a road quality evaluation apparatus. Road quality performance index calculation method, road quality evaluation method, road quality evaluation device which can be judged by
최근 지속적인 도로의 확충에 따른 물동량 증가와 공용기간 증가로 인해 도로의 내구성 저하와 취약구간의 반복적인 하자 발생 등에 의한 품질관리의 중요성이 대두되고 있으며, 이에 따라 최근의 도로는 장수명 품질의 도로 건설이 추세이다.Recently, the importance of quality management is increasing due to the deterioration of road durability and the occurrence of repetitive defects in vulnerable areas due to the increase in traffic volume and the increase in the period of use due to the continuous expansion of roads. It is a trend.
그러나 구조물의 품질을 결정하는 시공과정에서의 품질관리는 완성된 구조물의 품질보다는 시공 과정상의 단계적인 품질 관리에 집중되어 지속적인 하자 발생을 극복하지 못하고 있다.However, the quality control in the construction process to determine the quality of the structure is not focused on the step-by-step quality control in the construction process rather than the quality of the finished structure, and thus does not overcome the continuous defects.
따라서, 최근의 건설 품질관리 추세인 객관적이고 효율적인 성과물 위주의 품질관리를 위해서는 정량화된 품질 평가기준에 따라 계량적 평가가 필요하고 이를 위하여 시공 목적물의 수준 측정이 가능한 정량적 지수인 품질성능지수를 활용한 품질성능 평가방법의 개발을 요하고 있었다.Therefore, for objective and efficient performance-oriented quality management, which is a recent trend of construction quality management, quantitative evaluation is required according to quantitative quality evaluation criteria. For this, the quality performance index, which is a quantitative index that can measure the level of construction objects, is used. Development of quality performance evaluation method was required.
(특허문헌 1) 생애주기 성능 및 비용에 기초한 사회기반구조물의 최적유지관리전략 수립 방법(등록번호 제10-0748078)에서는 대상 교량에 대한 최대성능과 최소 비용을 동시에 만족하는 보수·보강 및 교체 시기와 보수·보강 공법을 결정함으로써 교량의 예방적 유지관리체계의 실제적인 실현과 합리적인 예산 수립 등을 수행할 수 있도록 하는 발명에 관한 것이다.(Patent Document 1) In the method for establishing the optimal maintenance management strategy of the infrastructure based on life cycle performance and cost (Registration No. 10-0748078), the repair, reinforcement and replacement time satisfying the maximum performance and minimum cost for the target bridge at the same time. The present invention relates to an invention that enables the practical implementation of a preventive maintenance system for bridges and the establishment of a reasonable budget by determining the repair and reinforcement methods.
따라서, 본 발명은 전술한 바와 같은 문제점을 해결하기 위하여 창출된 것으로서, 도로 품질관리를 위하여 세부 품질성능 평가기준을 마련하고 이를 토대로 평가하여 품질관리의 신뢰도를 확보하고 품질성능평가의 객관성과 공정성을 제공하는데 그 목적이 있다.Therefore, the present invention was created in order to solve the problems as described above, to prepare a detailed quality performance evaluation criteria for road quality management and to evaluate based on this to ensure the reliability of quality management and the objectivity and fairness of quality performance evaluation The purpose is to provide.
그러나, 본 발명의 목적들은 상기에 언급된 목적으로 제한되지 않으며, 언급되지 않은 또 다른 목적들은 아래의 기재로부터 당업자에게 명확하게 이해될 수 있을 것이다.However, the objects of the present invention are not limited to the above-mentioned objects, and other objects not mentioned will be clearly understood by those skilled in the art from the following description.
전술한 본 발명의 목적은, 도로 건설에 따른 각 공종의 평가항목인 공종별 평가항목을 분류하는 단계(S610); 분류된 공종별 평가항목에 따른 평가등급 및 가중치를 산출하는 단계(S620); 및 평가등급 및 가중치를 이용하여 시공 목적물에 대한 정량적 평가지수인 품질성능지수를 산출하는 단계(S630);를 포함하는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질성능지수 산출방법을 제공함으로써 달성될 수 있다.An object of the present invention described above, the step of classifying the evaluation items for each type of the evaluation item of each type of work according to the road construction (S610); Calculating evaluation ratings and weights according to the classified evaluation items for each type of work (S620); And calculating a quality performance index, which is a quantitative evaluation index for a construction object, using the evaluation grade and the weight (S630). The road quality performance index calculation method may be achieved by providing a road quality performance index.
또한, S610 단계는 공종을 분류하는 단계; 분류된 공종별로 내구성 지표 및 기능성 지표로 분류하는 단계; 및 내구성 지표 및 기능성 지표에 기초하여 평가항목을 분류하는 단계;를 포함하는 것을 특징으로 한다.In addition, step S610 is to classify the work; Classifying the durability index and the functional index by the classified types of work; And classifying the evaluation item based on the durability index and the functional index.
또한, 공종은 토공, 배수공, 교량공, 포장공, 터널공, 및 부대공 중 적어도 하나인 것을 특징으로 한다.In addition, the ball is characterized in that at least one of earthwork, drain hole, bridge ball, paver, tunnel ball, and auxiliary hole.
또한, 포장공은 콘크리트 포장과 아스콘 포장으로 나누어지는 것을 특징으로 한다.In addition, the paver is characterized by being divided into concrete pavement and ascon pavement.
또한, 가중치는 평가항목에 대한 가중치로서 품질관리의 중요도가 높은 평가항목에 상응하여 결정되는 것을 특징으로 한다.In addition, the weight is a weight for the evaluation item is characterized in that it is determined corresponding to the evaluation item of high importance of quality management.
또한, 평가등급은 공종별 설계기준, 시방기준, 및 관리기준 중 어느 하나에 기초하여 50점 내지 100점 사이의 점수로 산정되는 것을 특징으로 한다.In addition, the evaluation grade is characterized in that it is calculated as a score between 50 and 100 points based on any one of the design criteria, specification standards, and management standards for each model.
한편, 본 발명의 목적은 도로 건설에 따른 공종별 평가항목을 분류하고, 공종별 평가등급을 산출하는 단계(S710); 평가등급 및 공종별 기 결정된 가중치를 이용하여 도로 시공 목적물에 대한 정량적 평가지수인 품질성능지수를 산출하는 단계(S720); 및 산출된 품질성능지수에 따라 시공 목적물에 대한 품질을 평가하는 단계(S730):를 포함하는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질 평가방법을 제공함으로써 달성될 수 있다.On the other hand, an object of the present invention is to classify the evaluation items for each type according to the road construction, calculating the evaluation grade for each type (S710); Calculating a quality performance index, which is a quantitative evaluation index for the road construction object, by using the evaluation grade and the weight determined for each type of construction (S720); And evaluating the quality of the construction object according to the calculated quality performance index (S730). The road quality evaluation method may be achieved.
또한, S730 단계에서 평가된 품질 평가결과를 각 시공현장에 전송하는 단계(S740);를 더 포함하는 것을 특징으로 한다.In addition, the step of transmitting the quality evaluation result evaluated in step S730 to each construction site (S740); characterized in that it further comprises.
또한, 평가등급은 공종별 설계기준, 시방기준, 및 관리기준 중 어느 하나에 기초하여 50점 내지 100점 사이의 점수로 산정되는 것을 특징으로 한다.In addition, the evaluation grade is characterized in that it is calculated as a score between 50 and 100 points based on any one of the design criteria, specification standards, and management standards for each model.
또한, 가중치는 평가항목에 대한 가중치로서 품질관리의 중요도가 높은 평가항목에 상응하여 결정되는 것을 특징으로 한다.In addition, the weight is a weight for the evaluation item is characterized in that it is determined corresponding to the evaluation item of high importance of quality management.
또한, 시공 목적물에 대한 품질평가는 기 결정된 공정률 이상인 경우의 시공 목적물에 대해서만 품질평가를 하는 것을 특징으로 한다.In addition, the quality evaluation of the construction target is characterized in that the quality evaluation only for the construction target when the predetermined process rate or more.
한편, 본 발명의 목적은 다른 카테고리로서 공종별 평가항목에 따른 평가등급 및 가중치를 산출하고, 평가등급 및 가중치를 이용하여 도로 건설에 따른 시공 목적물에 대한 정량적 평가지수인 품질성능지수를 산출하는 산출수단(100); 및 시공 목적물에 대한 품질을 평가하는 평가수단(200):을 포함하는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질 평가장치를 제공함으로써 달성할 수 있다.On the other hand, the object of the present invention is to calculate the evaluation grade and weight according to the evaluation items for each category as a different category, the calculation means for calculating the quality performance index, which is a quantitative evaluation index for the construction target according to the road construction using the evaluation grade and weight 100; And evaluation means 200 for evaluating the quality of the construction object.
또한, 시공 목적물에 대한 품질 평가결과를 통신망(300)을 이용하여 전송받는 전자기기(400);를 더 포함하는 것을 특징으로 한다.In addition, the electronic device 400 receiving the quality evaluation result for the construction object using the communication network 300; characterized in that it further comprises.
또한, 평가등급은 공종별 설계기준, 시방기준, 및 관리기준 중 어느 하나에 기초하여 50점 내지 100점 사이의 점수로 산정되는 것을 특징으로 한다.In addition, the evaluation grade is characterized in that it is calculated as a score between 50 and 100 points based on any one of the design criteria, specification standards, and management standards for each model.
또한, 가중치는 평가항목에 대한 가중치로서 품질관리의 중요도가 높은 평가항목에 상응하여 결정되는 것을 특징으로 한다.In addition, the weight is a weight for the evaluation item is characterized in that it is determined corresponding to the evaluation item of high importance of quality management.
한편, 본 발명의 목적은 다른 카테고리로서 도로 품질 평가방법을 실행하기 위한 프로그램이 기록된 컴퓨터 판독 가능한 기록매체를 제공함으로써 달성될 수 있다.On the other hand, the object of the present invention can be achieved by providing a computer-readable recording medium having recorded thereon a program for executing the road quality evaluation method as another category.
전술한 바와 같은 본 발명에 의하면 점검위주의 일회성 품질관리에서 탈피하여 품질성능평가를 통한 품질이력관리를 할 수 있는 효과가 있다.According to the present invention as described above, there is an effect that the quality history management through the quality performance evaluation to escape from the inspection-oriented one-time quality control.
또한, 본 발명에 의하면 품질성능지수의 평가로 인한 품질향상을 도모할 수 있으며 이에 따라 도로 시공 목적물의 유지관리비용을 절감할 수 있는 효과가 있다.In addition, according to the present invention can improve the quality due to the evaluation of the quality performance index, thereby reducing the maintenance cost of the road construction object.
그리고, 본 발명에 의하면 도로 시공 목적물의 하자감소를 통한 연간 유지보수비를 절감할 수 있는 효과가 있다.In addition, according to the present invention there is an effect that can reduce the annual maintenance cost by reducing the defects of the road construction object.
본 명세서에 첨부되는 다음의 도면들은 본 발명의 바람직한 일실시예를 예시하는 것이며, 발명의 상세한 설명과 함께 본 발명의 기술적 사상을 더욱 이해시키는 역할을 하는 것이므로, 본 발명은 그러한 도면에 기재된 사항에만 한정되어 해석 되어서는 아니 된다.The following drawings, which are attached to this specification, illustrate one preferred embodiment of the present invention, and together with the detailed description thereof, serve to further understand the technical spirit of the present invention. It should not be construed as limited.
도 1은 본 발명에 따른 도로 품질성능지수 산출방법을 순차적으로 나타낸 순서도이고,1 is a flow chart sequentially showing a road quality performance index calculation method according to the present invention,
도 2는 본 발명에 따른 품질성능지수 평가기준을 나타낸 도면이고,2 is a view showing the evaluation criteria of the quality performance index according to the present invention,
도 3은 본 발명에 따른 토공의 평가등급(등급분포)을 나타낸 도면이고,3 is a view showing the evaluation grade (grade distribution) of earthwork according to the present invention,
도 4는 본 발명에 따른 배수공의 평가등급(등급분포)을 나타낸 도면이고,4 is a view showing the evaluation grade (grade distribution) of the drain hole according to the present invention,
도 5 및 도 6은 본 발명에 따른 교량공의 평가등급(등급분포)을 나타낸 도면이고,5 and 6 is a view showing the evaluation grade (grade distribution) of the bridge ball according to the present invention,
도 7은 본 발명에 따른 콘크리트 포장의 평가등급(등급분포)을 나타낸 도면이고,7 is a view showing the evaluation grade (grade distribution) of the concrete pavement according to the present invention,
도 8 및 도 9는 본 발명에 따른 아스콘 포장의 평가등급(등급분포)을 나타낸 도면이고,8 and 9 is a view showing the evaluation grade (grade distribution) of the asphalt concrete packaging according to the present invention,
도 10 및 도 11은 본 발명에 따른 터널공의 평가등급(등급분포)을 나타낸 도면이고,10 and 11 is a view showing the evaluation grade (grade distribution) of the tunnel hole according to the present invention,
도 12는 본 발명에 따른 부대공의 평가등급(등급분포)을 나타낸 도면이고,12 is a view showing the evaluation grade (grade distribution) of the secondary hole according to the present invention,
도 13은 본 발명에 따른 도로 품질 평가방법을 순차적으로 나타낸 순서도이고,13 is a flowchart sequentially showing a road quality evaluation method according to the present invention;
도 14는 본 발명에 따른 도로 품질 평가장치의 구성을 나타낸 구성도이다.14 is a configuration diagram showing the configuration of a road quality evaluation apparatus according to the present invention.
[부호의 설명][Description of the code]
100 : 산출수단100: calculation means
200 : 평가수단200: evaluation means
300 : 통신망300: communication network
400 : 전자기기400: electronic equipment
도로 건설에 따른 각 공종의 평가항목인 공종별 평가항목을 분류하는 단계(S610); 분류된 공종별 평가항목에 따른 평가등급 및 가중치를 산출하는 단계(S620); 및 평가등급 및 가중치를 이용하여 시공 목적물에 대한 정량적 평가지수인 품질성능지수를 산출하는 단계(S630);를 포함하는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질성능지수 산출방법을 제공함으로써 달성될 수 있다.Classifying evaluation items for each industry, which is an evaluation item for each industry according to road construction (S610); Calculating evaluation ratings and weights according to the classified evaluation items for each type of work (S620); And calculating a quality performance index, which is a quantitative evaluation index for a construction object, using the evaluation grade and the weight (S630). The road quality performance index calculation method may be achieved by providing a road quality performance index.
이하, 도면을 참조하여 본 발명의 바람직한 일실시예에 대해서 설명한다. 또한, 이하에 설명하는 일실시예는 특허청구범위에 기재된 본 발명의 내용을 부당하게 한정하지 않으며, 본 실시 형태에서 설명되는 구성 전체가 본 발명의 해결 수단으로서 필수적이라고는 할 수 없다.Hereinafter, with reference to the drawings will be described a preferred embodiment of the present invention. In addition, one Example described below does not unduly limit the content of this invention described in the Claim, and the whole structure demonstrated by this Embodiment is not necessarily required as a solution of this invention.
<도로 품질성능지수 산출방법><Calculation method of road quality performance index>
본 발명에 따른 도로 품질성능지수 산출방법을 도 1 내지 도 12를 참조하여 설명하기로 한다.Road quality performance index calculation method according to the present invention will be described with reference to Figs.
본 발명에 따른 도로 품질성능지수를 산출하기 위하여 먼저 도로 건설에 따른 각 공종의 평가항목인 공종별 평가항목을 분류하는 단계를 수행한다(S610). 공종은 도로 건설에 따라 수행되는 공사의 종류를 일컬으며 본 발명에서는 주로 토공(토지공사), 배수공(배수공사), 교량공(교량공사), 포장공(포장공사), 터널공(터널공사), 및 부대공(부대시설 공사) 중 적어도 하나 이상을 일컫는다. In order to calculate the road quality performance index according to the present invention, first, a step of classifying the evaluation items for each work type, which is an evaluation item for each work type according to the road construction, is performed (S610). Work type refers to the type of construction carried out according to the road construction and in the present invention mainly earthwork (land construction), drainage (drainage), bridge (bridge), paving (paving), tunnel (tunnel) It refers to at least one of, and auxiliary construction (construction work).
이때 공종별로 분류된 토공, 배수공, 교량공, 포장공, 터널공, 및 부대공 각각을 내구성 지표와 기능성 지표로 분류한다. 내구성 지표와 기능성 지표로 분류된 각각의 공종은 다시 각 공종별 평가항목으로 분류된다. At this time, the earthwork, drainage, bridge, paver, tunnel ball, and auxiliary hole classified by the type of work are classified into durability index and functional index. Each model classified into durability index and functional index is again classified into evaluation items for each model.
각 공종별 평가항목의 선정은 전문가의 도로 시공현장 평가를 통하여 선정되거나 설문조사 또는 전문가의 자문에 의해 선정될 수 있다. 토공의 품질평가 항목의 선정은 토공사의 중요도와 하자발생 빈도를 우선 고려사항으로 하여 선정하는 것이 바람직하며, 배수공의 품질평가 항목의 선정은 배수시설의 중요도와 하자발생 빈도를 우선 고려사항으로 하여 선정하는 것이 바람직하다. The selection of evaluation items for each type of work can be selected through expert road construction site evaluation or by questionnaire or expert consultation. It is preferable to select the quality evaluation items of earthworks by considering the importance of earthworks and the frequency of defect occurrence as the first considerations, and the selection of the quality evaluation items of drainage holes by considering the importance and frequency of defects in drainage facilities as the first consideration. It is desirable to.
도 2에 도시된 바와 같이 토공의 평가항목의 내구성 지표는 쌓기부 비탈면 경사도, 깍기부 비탈면 경사도, 뒤채움 다짐 변형계수비로 분류되고, 기능성 지표는 쌓기부 비탈면 미관, 깍기부 비탈면 미관으로 분류된다.As shown in FIG. 2, the durability indicators of the evaluation items of earthworks are classified into a stack slope slope, a cut slope slope, and a back compaction strain coefficient ratio, and the functional indicators are classified into a stack slope slope aesthetic and a cut slope slope aesthetics.
또한, 배수공의 평가항목의 내구성 지표는 암거 벽체 균열률, 측구 줄눈 균열률로 분류되고, 기능성 지표는 실런트 마감으로 분류된다.In addition, the durability index of the evaluation items of the drain hole is classified into culvert wall crack rate, side joint joint crack rate, and the functional index is classified into sealant finish.
또한, 교량공의 평가항목의 내구성 지표는 철근 피복두께, 교대 벽체 균열률, 콘크리트 기포간격, 강교 도막두께로 분류되고, 기능성 지표는 평탄성 지수, 신축이음 시공 적정성으로 분류된다.In addition, the durability indicators of the evaluation items of bridge holes are classified into reinforcing bar thickness, alternating wall crack ratio, concrete bubble spacing, and steel bridge coating thickness, and functional indexes are classified into flatness index and expansion joint construction adequacy.
또한, 포장공의 평가항목은 콘크리트 포장과 아스콘 포장으로 분류되며, 각각의 콘크리트 포장과 아스콘 포장은 다시 내구성 지표와 기능성 지표로 분류된다. 먼저, 콘크리트 포장인 경우의 내구성 지표는 압축강도, 콘크리트 기포간격, 포장두께로 분류되고, 기능성 지표는 평탄성으로 분류된다. 그리고 아스콘 포장인 경우의 내구성 지표는 다짐도, 골재입도, 아스팔트 함량, 포장두께, 골재입형, 평탄성으로 분류되며, 기능성 지표는 평탄성으로 분류된다.In addition, the evaluation items of pavers are classified into concrete pavement and ascon pavement, and each concrete pavement and ascon pavement is classified into durability index and functional index. First, the durability index in the case of concrete pavement is classified into compressive strength, concrete bubble interval, pavement thickness, and the functional index is classified into flatness. In the case of ascon pavement, durability indicators are classified into compaction, aggregate granularity, asphalt content, pavement thickness, aggregate granularity and flatness, and functional indicators are classified into flatness.
또한, 터널공의 평가항목의 내구성 지표는 숏크리트 두께, 숏크리트 압축강도, 강섬유 함유량, 록볼트 인발내력, 숏크리트 요철량으로 분류되며, 기능성 지표는 B/P, C/R 관리로 분류된다. In addition, the durability index of tunnel hole evaluation items is classified into shotcrete thickness, shotcrete compressive strength, steel fiber content, rock bolt pullout strength, shotcrete irregularities, and functional indexes are classified into B / P and C / R management.
다음으로, 전문가의 자문, 설문조사 또는 현장평가를 통해 공종별 평가항목을 분류한 후 분류된 공종별 평가항목에 따른 평가등급 및 가중치를 산출하는 단계를 수행한다(S620). Next, after classifying the evaluation items for each type of work through an expert's consultation, survey or on-site evaluation, a step of calculating evaluation grades and weights according to the classified item for each type of work is performed (S620).
상술한 각 공종별 평가항목에 대한 가중치는 도 2에 도시된 바와 같다. 이때 도 2에는 가중치라는 용어 대신 비중으로 표시되어 있으며, 괄호는 평가현장 내 콘크리트 포장과 아스팔트 포장이 동시 시공된 경우의 가중치를 의미한다. 가중치는 중요도가 높은 평가항목일수록 가중치를 더 높게 부여하는 것이 바람직하다.The weight for each evaluation item described above is as shown in FIG. At this time, instead of the term weight is shown as a specific gravity, the parenthesis means the weight when the concrete pavement and asphalt pavement at the same time the construction site. As for the weight, the higher the evaluation item, the higher the weight.
한편, 평가등급의 산정은 도 3 내지 도 12에 도시된 바와 같이 각 공종별 평가항목에 따른 평가방법을 설정하고, 등급기준을 설계기준, 시방기준 또는 관리기준으로 구분하고, 등급기준에 따라 평가등급(도 3 내지 도 12에서의 등급분포)을 산정한다.On the other hand, the evaluation of the evaluation grade, as shown in Figures 3 to 12 set the evaluation method according to the evaluation items for each type of work, classify the classification criteria into design criteria, specification standards or management standards, and the evaluation grades according to the grading criteria (Rating distribution in FIGS. 3-12) is calculated.
일예로서, 도 3에 도시된 토공에 대한 평가등급의 산정은 평균 비탈면 경사가 n±0.01 이내인경우에는 100점을 부여하고, n±0.02 이내인 경우에는 90점을 부여한다. 이때 점수화된 평가등급은 6단계(100점, 90점, 80점, 70점, 60점, 50점)로 구분된다.As an example, the evaluation grade for earthwork shown in Figure 3 is given 100 points if the average slope slope is within n ± 0.01, and 90 points are given within n ± 0.02. At this time, the graded evaluation grade is divided into 6 levels (100 points, 90 points, 80 points, 70 points, 60 points, 50 points).
마지막으로, 평가등급 및 가중치를 이용하여 시공 목적물에 대한 정량적 평가지수인 품질성능지수를 산출한다(S630). 품질성능지수는 다음의 [표 1] 내지 [표 3]을 이용하여 아래의 [수학식 1] 및 [수학식 2]와 같이 산출된다.Finally, the quality performance index, which is a quantitative evaluation index for the construction object, is calculated using the evaluation grade and the weight (S630). The quality performance index is calculated by using Equations 1 and 2 below using Tables 1 to 3 below.
[규칙 제91조에 의한 정정 20.06.2012]　
표 1
Figure WO-DOC-TABLE-1
 [Revisions under Rule 91 20.06.2012]
Table 1
Figure WO-DOC-TABLE-1
[규칙 제91조에 의한 정정 20.06.2012]　
표 2
Figure WO-DOC-TABLE-2
 [Revisions under Rule 91 20.06.2012]
TABLE 2
Figure WO-DOC-TABLE-2
[규칙 제91조에 의한 정정 20.06.2012]　
표 3
Figure WO-DOC-TABLE-3
 [Revisions under Rule 91 20.06.2012]
TABLE 3
Figure WO-DOC-TABLE-3
먼저 [표 1]의 내구성지수(Qd)와 기능성지수(Qf)를 [표 2]의 가중치를 적용하여 계산하면 품질성능지수는 다음의 [수학식 1]과 같이 산출된다.First, the durability index (Q d ) and the functional index (Q f ) of [Table 1] is calculated by applying the weight of [Table 2], the quality performance index is calculated as shown in [Equation 1].
[규칙 제91조에 의한 정정 20.06.2012]　
수학식 1
Figure WO-DOC-MATHS-1
 [Revisions under Rule 91 20.06.2012]
Equation 1
Figure WO-DOC-MATHS-1
(여기서, Qd는 내구성지수이고, Qf는 기능성지수이다)Where Q d is the durability index and Q f is the functional index.
한편, 도 2에 도시된 가중치(비중)와 [표 3]의 공종별 지수를 적용하면 품질성능지수는 다음의 [수학식 2]와 같이 산출된다. On the other hand, if the weight (weight) shown in Figure 2 and the sector-specific index of [Table 3] is applied, the quality performance index is calculated as shown in Equation 2 below.
[규칙 제91조에 의한 정정 20.06.2012]　
수학식 2
Figure WO-DOC-MATHS-2
 [Revisions under Rule 91 20.06.2012]
Equation 2
Figure WO-DOC-MATHS-2
(여기서, Qe는 토공지수이고, Qd는 배수공지수이고, Qb는 교량공지수이고, Qp는 포장공지수이고, Qt는 터널공지수이고, Qf는 부대공지수이다)(Where Q e is the earthwork index, Q d is the drainage index, Q b is the bridge index, Q p is the paving index, Q t is the tunnel index, and Q f is the incident index)
이때, 일예로서 [표 1]에 나타난 "콘크리트포장" 및 [표 3]에 나타난 토공지수의 수식중 "쌓기부 비탈면 경사도"는 앞서 설명한 평가등급의 점수를 의미한다. 따라서 [표 1] 및 [표 3]의 지수 산출식에서는 가중치와 평가등급을 적용하게 된다.At this time, as an example, "concrete pavement" shown in [Table 1] and "stack slope slope" of the formula of earthwork index shown in [Table 3] means the score of the above-described evaluation grade. Therefore, in the exponential calculation formulas of [Table 1] and [Table 3], weights and evaluation grades are applied.
상술한 [수학식 1]에 나타난 품질성능지수는 공종별 내구성지수와 기능성지수에 대한 일괄적인 가중치 부여방식이고 [수학식 2]에 나타난 품질성능지수는 공종별 특성을 고려하여 공종별 내구성지수와 기능성지수에 대한 가중치를 부여하는 방식이다.The quality performance index shown in [Equation 1] is a collective weighting method for the durability index and the functional index for each work type, and the quality performance index shown in [Equation 2] is applied to the durability index and the functional index according to the work type. It is a method of giving weight to
<도로 품질 평가방법><Road Quality Evaluation Method>
본 발명에 따른 도로 품질 평가방법을 도 13을 참조하여 설명하기로 한다. Road quality evaluation method according to the present invention will be described with reference to FIG.
먼저, 도로 건설에 따른 공종별 평가항목을 분류하고, 공종별 평가등급을 산출하는 단계를 수행한다(S710). First, classify the evaluation items for each type according to the road construction, and performs the step of calculating the evaluation grade for each type (S710).
다음으로, 평가등급 및 공종별 기 결정된 가중치를 이용하여 도로 시공 목적물에 대한 정량적 평가지수인 품질성능지수를 산출하는 단계를 수행한다(S720). 상술한 S710 단계와 S720 단계는 품질성능지수를 산출하기 위한 단계로서 종래의 점검위주의 일회성 품질관리에서 탈피하여 품질성능평가를 통한 객관적인 품질이력관리를 할 수 있다. 이러한 품질성능지수 산출방법은 앞서 설명한 품질성능지수 산출방법과 동일하므로 자세한 설명을 생략하기로 한다. Next, a step of calculating the quality performance index, which is a quantitative evaluation index for the road construction object, is performed using the evaluation grade and the weights determined for each type of construction (S720). Steps S710 and S720 are steps for calculating the quality performance index, and thus, it is possible to perform objective quality history management through quality performance evaluation by escaping from the conventional inspection-oriented one-time quality management. Since the method for calculating the quality performance index is the same as the method for calculating the quality performance index described above, a detailed description thereof will be omitted.
다음으로, 산출된 품질성능지수에 따라 시공 목적물에 대한 품질을 평가하는 단계를 수행한다(S730). 시공 목적물에 대한 품질의 평가는 산출된 품질성능지수를 활용하여 평가하며, 일예로서 연도별 목표 품질성능지수를 설정하고 이에 미달이 되는 경우와 목표치를 넘어서는 경우에 대한 평가를 예상할 수 있다.Next, the step of evaluating the quality of the construction target in accordance with the calculated quality performance index (S730). The evaluation of the quality of the construction objects is carried out using the calculated quality performance index, and as an example, it is possible to set a target quality performance index for each year, and to evaluate the cases where the target quality performance index is not met and the target value is exceeded.
이러한 시공 목적물에 대한 품질평가는 상시평가와 정기평가로 구분되며, 상시평가는 전체 도로 공사 현장을 대상으로 하며 다만 공정률이 10% 미만인 공구는 평가에서 제외한다.The quality evaluation for these construction objects is divided into regular evaluation and regular evaluation, and the regular evaluation is for the entire road construction site, except for tools with a process rate of less than 10%.
또한, 정기평가는 3 내지 4개의 대표 공구를 선정하여 시행하는데 상시평가 결과 최상위 공구와 최하위 공구, 그리고 1 내지 2개 공구를 추첨하여 선정 후 평가 하는 것이 바람직하다. 다만, 공정률이 10% 미만인 공구는 평가에서 제외한다.In addition, the regular evaluation is carried out by selecting three to four representative tools, it is preferable to evaluate after selecting the top tool, the lowest tool, and one or two tools by drawing results. However, tools with less than 10% process rate are excluded from the evaluation.
상술한 상시평가와 정기평가 후 당해년도 목표점수 미달 공구 및 하위 10% 공구에 대하여는 특별 테마점검을 통하여 품질관리 및 목표 품질에 도달하도록 할 수 있다.After the above-mentioned regular evaluation and the regular evaluation, the tools that fall below the target score for the current year and the lower 10% of the tools can be set to reach the quality control and the target quality through a special theme check.
마지막으로, 평가된 품질 평가결과를 각 시공사에 전송(S740)함으로써 각 시공사는 자체적으로 시공평가에 반영하도록 하고, 품질 평가결과에 따른 책임시공을 유도할 수 있도록 한다. 또한, 목표치를 달성한 시공사는 추가적인 인센티브를 추후 반영할 수도 있다.Finally, by transmitting the evaluated quality evaluation results to each construction (S740), each contractor to be reflected in the construction evaluation itself, it is possible to induce responsible construction according to the quality evaluation results. In addition, contractors who have achieved their targets may later reflect additional incentives.
<도로 품질 평가장치>Road Quality Evaluation System
본 발명에 따른 도로 품질 평가장치는 도 14에 도시된 바와 같이 대략 산출수단(100), 평가수단(200), 통신망(300), 및 전자기기(400)로 구성할 수 있다. 이하에서는 도 14를 참조하여 본 발명에 따른 도로 품질 평가장치의 구성을 설명하기로 한다.As shown in FIG. 14, the road quality evaluation apparatus according to the present invention may be constituted by the calculation means 100, the evaluation means 200, the communication network 300, and the electronic device 400. Hereinafter, the configuration of the road quality evaluation apparatus according to the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. 14.
본 발명에 따른 산출수단(100)은 공종별 평가항목에 따른 평가등급 및 가중치를 입력받아 저장하며, 입력된 평가등급 및 가중치를 이용하여 품질성능지수를 산출한다. 품질성능지수의 산출은 [수학식 1] 또는 [수학식 2]에 기초하여 산출된다.The calculating means 100 according to the present invention receives and stores evaluation grades and weights according to evaluation items for each type of industry, and calculates a quality performance index using the input evaluation grades and weights. The quality performance index is calculated based on [Equation 1] or [Equation 2].
본 발명에 따른 평가수단(200)은 산출된 품질성능지수를 입력받아 시공 목적물에 대한 품질을 평가한다. 이때 시공 목적물의 품질 평가는 일예로서 당해 연도에 달성해야할 기 저장된 품질성능지수와 산출된 품질성능지수를 서로 비교함으로써 평가될 수 있다. 또한, 연도별 산출된 품질성능지수를 서로 비교함으로써 시공 목적물의 품질에 대한 평가를 수행할 수도 있다.Evaluation means 200 according to the present invention receives the calculated quality performance index to evaluate the quality of the construction target. At this time, the quality evaluation of the construction object can be evaluated by comparing the stored quality performance index and the calculated quality performance index to be achieved as an example. In addition, the quality performance indexes calculated for each year may be compared with each other to evaluate the quality of the construction object.
상술한 산출수단(100) 및 평가수단(200)은 연산 및 저장이 가능한 컴퓨터에 의해 구현될 수 있으며, 필요에 따라 저장은 컴퓨터 외부에 구비될 수 있다. 이때 산출수단(100) 및 평가수단(200)은 설명의 필요에 의해 구분하여 기능을 설명하였으나 필요에 따라 하나의 컴퓨터에 의해 수행될 수 있다.The calculation means 100 and the evaluation means 200 described above may be implemented by a computer capable of calculation and storage, and the storage may be provided outside the computer as necessary. In this case, the calculation means 100 and the evaluation means 200 have been described separately by the need of explanation, but the function may be performed by one computer as necessary.
본 발명에 따른 전자기기(400)는 시공 목적물에 대한 품질 평가결과를 통신망(300)을 이용하여 전송받는다. 이때 전자기기(400)가 도로 시공현장 또는 각 시공사별 관리사무소에 위치하는 경우에는 인터넷이 연결된 컴퓨터가 될 수 있다. 또한, 전자기기(400)가 휴대용 단말기인 경우에는 도로 시공현장의 각 시공사별 관리감독자 또는 이에 준하는 관리자에게 전송될 수 있다. 따라서 전자기기(400)의 종류에 따라 통신망(300)이 바뀔 수 있다.The electronic device 400 according to the present invention receives the quality evaluation result for the construction object by using the communication network 300. In this case, when the electronic device 400 is located at a road construction site or a management office for each construction site, the electronic device 400 may be a computer connected to the Internet. In addition, when the electronic device 400 is a portable terminal, the electronic device 400 may be transmitted to a supervisor or a manager corresponding to each construction site of the road construction site. Therefore, the communication network 300 may be changed according to the type of the electronic device 400.
이러한 평가결과를 전송함으로써 각 시공사의 시공 목적물에 대한 책임시공을 유도할 수 있으며 시공능력을 자연스럽게 향상시킬 수 있다.By sending these evaluation results, it is possible to induce responsible construction for each construction object and to improve construction ability naturally.
<기록매체><Recording medium>
본 발명은 또한 컴퓨터로 읽을 수 있는 기록매체에 컴퓨터가 읽을 수 있는 코드로서 구현하는 것이 가능하다. 컴퓨터가 읽을 수 있는 기록매체는 컴퓨터 시스템에 의해 읽혀질 수 있는 데이터가 저장되는 모든 종류의 기록장치를 포함한다. 컴퓨터가 읽을 수 있는 기록매체의 예로는 ROM, RAM, CD-ROM, 자기 테이프, 플로피 디스크, 광데이터 저장장치 등이 있으며, 또한 케리어 웨이브(예를 들어 인터넷을 통한 전송)의 형태로 구현되는 것도 포함한다. 또한, 컴퓨터가 읽을 수 있는 기록매체는 네트워크로 연결된 컴퓨터 시스템에 분산되어, 분산방식으로 컴퓨터가 읽을 수 있는 코드가 저장되고 실행될 수 있다. 그리고, 본 발명을 구현하기 위한 기능적인(functional) 프로그램, 코드 및 코드 세그먼트들은 본 발명이 속하는 기술분야의 프로그래머들에 의해 용이하게 추론될 수 있다.The invention can also be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable recording medium. Computer-readable recording media include all kinds of recording devices that store data that can be read by a computer system. Examples of computer-readable recording media include ROM, RAM, CD-ROM, magnetic tape, floppy disks, optical data storage devices, and the like, which are also implemented in the form of carrier waves (for example, transmission over the Internet). Include. The computer readable recording medium can also be distributed over network coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion. In addition, functional programs, codes, and code segments for implementing the present invention can be easily inferred by programmers in the art to which the present invention belongs.
이상, 본 발명의 일실시예를 참조하여 설명했지만, 본 발명이 이것에 한정되지는 않으며, 다양한 변형 및 응용이 가능하다. 즉, 본 발명의 요지를 일탈하지 않는 범위에서 많은 변형이 가능한 것을 당업자는 용이하게 이해할 수 있을 것이다.As mentioned above, although demonstrated with reference to one Embodiment of this invention, this invention is not limited to this, A various deformation | transformation and an application are possible. That is, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible without departing from the spirit of the invention.

Claims (16)

  1. 도로 건설에 따른 각 공종의 평가항목인 공종별 평가항목을 목록화하는 단계(S610);Listing the evaluation items for each industry, which are evaluation items of each industry according to road construction (S610);
    분류된 상기 공종별 평가항목에 따른 평가등급 및 가중치를 산출하는 단계(S620); 및Calculating evaluation grades and weights according to the classified evaluation items for each type of work (S620); And
    상기 평가등급 및 가중치를 이용하여 시공 목적물에 대한 정량적 평가지수인 품질성능지수를 산출하는 단계(S630);를 포함하는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질성능지수 산출방법.Calculating a quality performance index, which is a quantitative evaluation index for a construction object by using the evaluation grade and weights (S630); road quality performance index calculation method comprising a.
  2. 제 1 항에 있어서,The method of claim 1,
    상기 S610 단계는,The step S610,
    상기 공종을 분류하는 단계; Classifying the work;
    분류된 상기 공종별로 내구성 지표 및 기능성 지표로 분류하는 단계; 및Classifying the durability index and the functional index by the classified types of work; And
    상기 내구성 지표 및 기능성 지표에 기초하여 상기 평가항목을 분류하는 단계;를 포함하는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질성능지수 산출방법.And classifying the evaluation item based on the durability index and the functional index.
  3. 제 1 항에 있어서,The method of claim 1,
    상기 공종은 토공, 배수공, 교량공, 포장공, 터널공, 및 부대공 중 적어도 하나인 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질성능지수 산출방법.The work type is a road quality performance index calculation method, characterized in that at least one of earthwork, drain hole, bridge ball, paver, tunnel ball, and the auxiliary hole.
  4. 제 3 항에 있어서,The method of claim 3, wherein
    상기 포장공은 콘크리트 포장과 아스콘 포장으로 나누어지는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질성능지수 산출방법.The paver is divided into concrete pavement and asphalt concrete pavement, characterized in that the road quality performance index calculation method.
  5. 제 1 항에 있어서,The method of claim 1,
    상기 가중치는 상기 평가항목에 대한 가중치로서 품질관리의 중요도가 높은 상기 평가항목에 상응하여 결정되는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질성능지수 산출방법.The weighting method is a weighting factor for the evaluation item, characterized in that the road quality performance index calculation method, characterized in that determined in accordance with the high importance of the quality management.
  6. 제 1 항에 있어서,The method of claim 1,
    상기 평가등급은 상기 공종별 설계기준, 시방기준, 및 관리기준 중 어느 하나에 기초하여 50점 내지 100점 사이의 점수로 산정되는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질성능지수 산출방법.The evaluation grade is a road quality performance index calculation method characterized in that it is calculated by a score between 50 and 100 points based on any one of the design criteria, specification standards, and management standards for each type of work.
  7. 도로 건설에 따른 공종별 평가항목을 분류하고, 상기 공종별 평가등급을 산출하는 단계(S710);Classifying evaluation items for each type according to road construction, and calculating an evaluation level for each type of work (S710);
    상기 평가등급 및 상기 공종별 기 결정된 가중치를 이용하여 도로 시공 목적물에 대한 정량적 평가지수인 품질성능지수를 산출하는 단계(S720); 및Calculating a quality performance index, which is a quantitative evaluation index for a road construction object, by using the evaluation grade and the weight determined for each type of work (S720); And
    산출된 상기 품질성능지수에 따라 상기 시공 목적물에 대한 품질을 평가하는 단계(S730):를 포함하는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질 평가방법.And evaluating the quality of the construction target object according to the calculated quality performance index (S730).
  8. 제 7 항에 있어서,The method of claim 7, wherein
    상기 S730 단계에서 평가된 품질 평가결과를 각 시공사에 전송하는 단계(S740);를 더 포함하는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질 평가방법.And a step (S740) of transmitting the quality evaluation result evaluated in step S730 to each contractor.
  9. 제 7 항에 있어서,The method of claim 7, wherein
    상기 평가등급은 상기 공종별 설계기준, 시방기준, 및 관리기준 중 어느 하나에 기초하여 50점 내지 100점 사이의 점수로 산정되는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질 평가방법.The evaluation grade is a road quality evaluation method characterized in that it is calculated by a score between 50 and 100 points based on any one of the design criteria, specification standards, and management standards for each type of work.
  10. 제 7 항에 있어서,The method of claim 7, wherein
    상기 가중치는 상기 평가항목에 대한 가중치로서 품질관리의 중요도가 높은 상기 평가항목에 상응하여 결정되는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질 평가방법.The weight is a weight for the evaluation item, the road quality evaluation method characterized in that it is determined corresponding to the evaluation item of high importance of quality management.
  11. 제 7 항에 있어서,The method of claim 7, wherein
    상기 시공 목적물에 대한 품질평가는 기 결정된 공정률 이상인 경우의 상기 시공 목적물에 대해서만 품질평가를 하는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질 평가방법.The quality evaluation of the construction object is the quality evaluation method for the road, characterized in that the quality evaluation only for the construction object when the predetermined process rate or more.
  12. 공종별 평가항목에 따른 평가등급 및 가중치를 산출하고, 상기 평가등급 및 가중치를 이용하여 도로 건설에 따른 시공 목적물에 대한 정량적 평가지수인 품질성능지수를 산출하는 산출수단(100); 및Calculating means (100) for calculating evaluation grades and weights according to evaluation items for each type of work, and calculating a quality performance index, which is a quantitative evaluation index for construction objects according to road construction, using the evaluation grades and weights; And
    상기 시공 목적물에 대한 품질을 평가하는 평가수단(200):을 포함하는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질 평가장치.Road quality evaluation apparatus comprising: an evaluation means for evaluating the quality of the construction object (200).
  13. 제 12 항에 있어서,The method of claim 12,
    상기 시공 목적물에 대한 품질 평가결과를 통신망(300)을 이용하여 전송받는 전자기기(400);를 더 포함하는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질 평가장치.Road quality evaluation device further comprises; an electronic device (400) receiving the quality evaluation result for the construction object using a communication network (300).
  14. 제 12 항에 있어서,The method of claim 12,
    상기 평가등급은 상기 공종별 설계기준, 시방기준, 및 관리기준 중 어느 하나에 기초하여 50점 내지 100점 사이의 점수로 산정되는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질 평가장치.The evaluation grade is a road quality evaluation apparatus, characterized in that calculated based on any one of the design criteria, specification standards, and management standards for each type of the score between 50 and 100 points.
  15. 제 12 항에 있어서,The method of claim 12,
    상기 가중치는 상기 평가항목에 대한 가중치로서 품질관리의 중요도가 높은 상기 평가항목에 상응하여 결정되는 것을 특징으로 하는 도로 품질 평가장치.The weight is a weight for the evaluation item, the road quality evaluation apparatus, characterized in that corresponding to the evaluation item having a high importance of quality management.
  16. 제 7 항 내지 제 11 항 중 어느 한 항의 도로 품질 평가방법을 실행하기 위한 프로그램이 기록된 컴퓨터 판독 가능한 기록매체.12. A computer-readable recording medium having recorded thereon a program for executing the method for evaluating road quality according to any one of claims 7 to 11.
PCT/KR2012/004400 2011-08-09 2012-06-04 Method for calculating a road quality performance index, method for evaluating road quality, apparatus for evaluating road quality, and recording medium therefor WO2013022180A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR10-2011-0078983 2011-08-09
KR1020110078983A KR20130026592A (en) 2011-08-09 2011-08-09 Calculating method of quality performance index, evaluation method, evaluation apparatus, and recording medium thereof

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2013022180A1 true WO2013022180A1 (en) 2013-02-14

Family

ID=47668659

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/KR2012/004400 WO2013022180A1 (en) 2011-08-09 2012-06-04 Method for calculating a road quality performance index, method for evaluating road quality, apparatus for evaluating road quality, and recording medium therefor

Country Status (2)

Country Link
KR (1) KR20130026592A (en)
WO (1) WO2013022180A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107563669A (en) * 2017-09-24 2018-01-09 武汉武大卓越科技有限责任公司 A kind of highway maintenance method of decision analysis based on learning model
CN110543997A (en) * 2018-05-29 2019-12-06 北京国铁盛阳技术有限公司 Method and device for quantifying equipment quality, computer equipment and storage medium
CN112734301A (en) * 2021-02-03 2021-04-30 四川川交路桥有限责任公司 Road surface rolling operation supervision system and method based on Internet of things
CN112948746A (en) * 2021-01-15 2021-06-11 中建路桥集团有限公司 Composite roadbed post-construction settlement prediction method based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
CN116090909A (en) * 2023-04-07 2023-05-09 青岛旭华建设集团有限公司 Construction quality management system for building construction project
CN117495151A (en) * 2023-09-19 2024-02-02 中科微易(苏州)智能科技有限公司 Automatic quality assessment method and system for highway engineering

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102492168B1 (en) * 2020-11-06 2023-01-27 (주)피플앤드테크놀러지 Integration management system for pavement quality management based on iot

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004157788A (en) * 2002-11-06 2004-06-03 Ntt Power & Building Facilities Inc Building performance comprehensive assessment system and method thereof
JP2004334376A (en) * 2003-05-01 2004-11-25 Ohbayashi Corp Apparatus for evaluating building performance, building performance evaluating method, computer program, and recording medium with the program stored thereon
JP2005316642A (en) * 2004-04-28 2005-11-10 Taisei Corp Building evaluation system
JP2008033677A (en) * 2006-07-28 2008-02-14 Shimizu Corp Universal design comprehensive evaluation device and universal design comprehensive evaluation program

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004157788A (en) * 2002-11-06 2004-06-03 Ntt Power & Building Facilities Inc Building performance comprehensive assessment system and method thereof
JP2004334376A (en) * 2003-05-01 2004-11-25 Ohbayashi Corp Apparatus for evaluating building performance, building performance evaluating method, computer program, and recording medium with the program stored thereon
JP2005316642A (en) * 2004-04-28 2005-11-10 Taisei Corp Building evaluation system
JP2008033677A (en) * 2006-07-28 2008-02-14 Shimizu Corp Universal design comprehensive evaluation device and universal design comprehensive evaluation program

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107563669A (en) * 2017-09-24 2018-01-09 武汉武大卓越科技有限责任公司 A kind of highway maintenance method of decision analysis based on learning model
CN107563669B (en) * 2017-09-24 2022-03-08 武汉光谷卓越科技股份有限公司 Highway maintenance decision analysis method based on learning model
CN110543997A (en) * 2018-05-29 2019-12-06 北京国铁盛阳技术有限公司 Method and device for quantifying equipment quality, computer equipment and storage medium
CN112948746A (en) * 2021-01-15 2021-06-11 中建路桥集团有限公司 Composite roadbed post-construction settlement prediction method based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
CN112948746B (en) * 2021-01-15 2022-11-22 中建路桥集团有限公司 Composite roadbed post-construction settlement prediction method based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
CN112734301A (en) * 2021-02-03 2021-04-30 四川川交路桥有限责任公司 Road surface rolling operation supervision system and method based on Internet of things
CN116090909A (en) * 2023-04-07 2023-05-09 青岛旭华建设集团有限公司 Construction quality management system for building construction project
CN117495151A (en) * 2023-09-19 2024-02-02 中科微易(苏州)智能科技有限公司 Automatic quality assessment method and system for highway engineering
CN117495151B (en) * 2023-09-19 2024-04-26 中科微易(苏州)智能科技有限公司 Automatic quality assessment method and system for highway engineering

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20130026592A (en) 2013-03-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2013022180A1 (en) Method for calculating a road quality performance index, method for evaluating road quality, apparatus for evaluating road quality, and recording medium therefor
Akanbi et al. Reusability analytics tool for end-of-life assessment of building materials in a circular economy
Lipscomb et al. Injuries from slips and trips in construction
Selezneva et al. Characterization of transverse cracking spatial variability: use of long-term pavement performance data for continuously reinforced concrete pavement design
WO2022059868A1 (en) Method for managing construction process on basis of weather forecast
JP4829440B2 (en) Noise and vibration monitoring reduction method
Lipscomb et al. Analysis of text from injury reports improves understanding of construction falls
CN110827186A (en) Highway maintenance management system
CN116957322A (en) Method and device for risk assessment of drainage pipe network
CN115526523A (en) Evaluation method for intelligent construction site
CN118150088A (en) Intelligent monitoring acquisition station for bridge health monitoring system
CN113987727A (en) Big data based cable laying planning system and method in slope environment
Debees et al. Investigating the Increase in Load Rating and Reliability of a Prestressed Concrete Bridge When Utilizing Field-Derived Distribution and Impact Factors
CN113155181B (en) Intelligent monitoring collaborative early warning system and method for underground structure health
WO2013165030A2 (en) Comprehensive web-based environmental impact analysis system to reduce greenhouse gases and life cycle cost of building
Bendtsen Highway noise abatement: Planning tools and Danish examples
CN112982184A (en) Road and bridge disease analysis and maintenance decision method based on big data
Lyu et al. Research on the Propagation of Urban Road Traffic Noise Based on Cadna/A
Machfudiyanto et al. Development of a Risk-Control Safety Program as an Architectural Contractor Guideline on Flats Project.
CN117351367B (en) Highway maintenance inspection method, medium and equipment
Jiang et al. Safety Management and Control Measures of Expressway Bridge Construction Under the Background of Big Data
CN118261763B (en) Digital twin city people flow simulation display method and system
Matos et al. An overview of performance indicators for arch bridges in Europe
Landers et al. Cohen’s Weighted Kappa Statistic in Quality Control–Quality Assurance Procedures: Application to Network-Level Contract Pavement Surface Condition Surveys in British Columbia, Canada
Banica et al. From vulnerability towards resilience approach in water distribution network-the issue of asbestos cement pipes

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12821443

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12821443

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1