WO2013005046A1 - Smb process - Google Patents

Smb process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2013005046A1
WO2013005046A1 PCT/GB2012/051591 GB2012051591W WO2013005046A1 WO 2013005046 A1 WO2013005046 A1 WO 2013005046A1 GB 2012051591 W GB2012051591 W GB 2012051591W WO 2013005046 A1 WO2013005046 A1 WO 2013005046A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
zone
column
eluent
pufa product
stream
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2012/051591
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Adam Kelliher
Angus Morrison
Anil Oroskar
Rakesh Vikraman Nair Rema
Abhilesh Agarwal
Original Assignee
Basf Pharma (Callanish) Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Basf Pharma (Callanish) Limited filed Critical Basf Pharma (Callanish) Limited
Priority to JP2014517953A priority Critical patent/JP6153519B2/en
Priority to EP12735932.1A priority patent/EP2613858B1/en
Priority to KR1020147003080A priority patent/KR101594722B1/en
Priority to CN201280033624.2A priority patent/CN103764242B/en
Priority to AU2012280065A priority patent/AU2012280065B2/en
Priority to US13/880,150 priority patent/US9370730B2/en
Priority to CA2815296A priority patent/CA2815296C/en
Priority to BR112014000163A priority patent/BR112014000163A2/en
Priority to ES12735932.1T priority patent/ES2536911T3/en
Publication of WO2013005046A1 publication Critical patent/WO2013005046A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D15/00Separating processes involving the treatment of liquids with solid sorbents; Apparatus therefor
    • B01D15/08Selective adsorption, e.g. chromatography
    • B01D15/10Selective adsorption, e.g. chromatography characterised by constructional or operational features
    • B01D15/18Selective adsorption, e.g. chromatography characterised by constructional or operational features relating to flow patterns
    • B01D15/1814Selective adsorption, e.g. chromatography characterised by constructional or operational features relating to flow patterns recycling of the fraction to be distributed
    • B01D15/1821Simulated moving beds
    • B01D15/185Simulated moving beds characterized by the components to be separated
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D15/00Separating processes involving the treatment of liquids with solid sorbents; Apparatus therefor
    • B01D15/08Selective adsorption, e.g. chromatography
    • B01D15/10Selective adsorption, e.g. chromatography characterised by constructional or operational features
    • B01D15/18Selective adsorption, e.g. chromatography characterised by constructional or operational features relating to flow patterns
    • B01D15/1892Selective adsorption, e.g. chromatography characterised by constructional or operational features relating to flow patterns the sorbent material moving as a whole, e.g. continuous annular chromatography, true moving beds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11BPRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
    • C11B3/00Refining fats or fatty oils
    • C11B3/10Refining fats or fatty oils by adsorption
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11BPRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
    • C11B7/00Separation of mixtures of fats or fatty oils into their constituents, e.g. saturated oils from unsaturated oils
    • C11B7/0008Separation of mixtures of fats or fatty oils into their constituents, e.g. saturated oils from unsaturated oils by differences of solubilities, e.g. by extraction, by separation from a solution by means of anti-solvents
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11BPRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
    • C11B7/00Separation of mixtures of fats or fatty oils into their constituents, e.g. saturated oils from unsaturated oils
    • C11B7/0008Separation of mixtures of fats or fatty oils into their constituents, e.g. saturated oils from unsaturated oils by differences of solubilities, e.g. by extraction, by separation from a solution by means of anti-solvents
    • C11B7/0033Separation of mixtures of fats or fatty oils into their constituents, e.g. saturated oils from unsaturated oils by differences of solubilities, e.g. by extraction, by separation from a solution by means of anti-solvents in solvents containing other heteroatoms in their molecule
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11CFATTY ACIDS FROM FATS, OILS OR WAXES; CANDLES; FATS, OILS OR FATTY ACIDS BY CHEMICAL MODIFICATION OF FATS, OILS, OR FATTY ACIDS OBTAINED THEREFROM
    • C11C1/00Preparation of fatty acids from fats, fatty oils, or waxes; Refining the fatty acids
    • C11C1/005Splitting up mixtures of fatty acids into their constituents
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11CFATTY ACIDS FROM FATS, OILS OR WAXES; CANDLES; FATS, OILS OR FATTY ACIDS BY CHEMICAL MODIFICATION OF FATS, OILS, OR FATTY ACIDS OBTAINED THEREFROM
    • C11C1/00Preparation of fatty acids from fats, fatty oils, or waxes; Refining the fatty acids
    • C11C1/007Preparation of fatty acids from fats, fatty oils, or waxes; Refining the fatty acids using organic solvents

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an improved chromatographic fractionation process for purifying polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and derivatives thereof.
  • PUFAs polyunsaturated fatty acids
  • the present invention relates to an improved simulated or actual moving bed chromatographic separation process for purifying PUFAs and derivatives thereof.
  • Fatty acids in particular PUFAs, and their derivatives are precursors for biologically important molecules, which play an important role in the regulation of biological functions such as platelet aggregation, inflammation and immunological responses.
  • PUFAs and their derivatives may be therapeutically useful in treating a wide range of pathological conditions including CNS conditions; neuropathies, including diabetic neuropathy; cardiovascular diseases; general immune system and
  • inflammatory conditions including inflammatory skin diseases.
  • PUFAs are found in natural raw materials, such as vegetable oils and marine oils. Such PUFAs are however, frequently present in such oils in admixture with saturated fatty acids and numerous other impurities. PUFAs should therefore desirably be purified before nutritional or pharmaceutical uses.
  • PUFAs are extremely fragile. Thus, when heated in the presence of oxygen, they are prone to isomerization, peroxidation and oligomerization. The fractionation and purification of PUFA products to prepare pure fatty acids is therefore difficult. Distillation, even under vacuum, can lead to non-acceptable product degradation.
  • the column contains a packing of a porous material (generally called the stationary phase) exhibiting a high permeability to fluids.
  • the percolation velocity of each component of the mixture depends on the physical properties of that component so that the components exit from the column successively and selectively. Thus, some of the components tend to fix strongly to the stationary phase and thus will percolate slowly, whereas others tend to fix weakly and exit from the column more quickly.
  • Many different stationary bed chromatographic systems have been proposed and are used for both analytical and industrial production purposes.
  • a simulated moving bed system consists of a number of individual columns containing adsorbent which are connected together in series. Eluent is passed through the columns in a first direction. The injection points of the feedstock and the eluent, and the separated component collection points in the system, are periodically shifted by means of a series of valves. The overall effect is to simulate the operation of a single column containing a moving bed of the solid adsorbent.
  • a simulated moving bed system consists of columns which, as in a conventional stationary bed system, contain stationary beds of solid adsorbent through which eluent is passed, but in a simulated moving bed system the operation is such as to simulate a continuous countercurrent moving bed.
  • An actual moving bed system is similar in operation to a simulated moving bed system. However, rather than shifting the injection points of the feed mixture and the eluent, and the separated component collection points by means of a system of valves, instead a series of adsorption units (i.e. columns) are physically moved relative to the feed and drawoff points. Again, operation is such as to simulate a continuous countercurrent moving bed. Processes and equipment for actual moving bed chromatography are described in several patents, including US 6,979,402, US 5,069,883 and US 4,764,276, the entirety of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • Simulated and actual moving bed technology is generally only suitable for separating binary mixtures. Thus, a more polar component will move with the eluent, and be collected as a raffinate stream, and a less polar component will move with the adsorbent, and be collected as an extract stream. It is therefore difficult to use simulated or actual moving bed technology to separate a desired product from a crude mixture containing both polar and non-polar impurities. This limits the applicability of such techniques in purifying PUFA products from fish oils, for example.
  • Fig. 1 schematically illustrated in Fig. 1 is limited to binary fractionation.
  • a PUFA product can be effectively purified with a single simulated or actual moving bed apparatus using an aqueous organic solvent eluent.
  • the present invention therefore provides a chromatographic separation process for recovering a polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) product, from a feed mixture, which process comprises introducing the feed mixture to a simulated or actual moving bed chromatography apparatus having a plurality of linked
  • chromatography columns containing, as eluent, an aqueous organic solvent
  • the apparatus has a plurality of zones comprising at least a first zone and second zone, each zone having an extract stream and a raffinate stream from which liquid can be collected from said plurality of linked chromatography columns, and wherein (a) a raffinate stream containing the PUFA product together with more polar components is collected from a column in the first zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the second zone, and/or (b) an extract stream containing the PUFA product together with less polar components is collected from a column in the second zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the first zone, said PUFA product being separated from different components of the feed mixture in each zone, and wherein the aqueous organic solvent is other than aqueous alcohol.
  • PUFA product obtainable by the process of the present invention.
  • the PUFA products produced by the process of the present invention are produced in high yield, and have high purity. Further, the content of the distinctive impurities which typically arise from distillation of PUFAs is very low. As used herein, the term "isomeric impurities" is used to denote those impurities typically produced during the distillation of PUFA-containing natural oils. These include PUFA isomers, peroxidation and oligomerization products.
  • Figure 1 illustrates the basic principles of a simulated or actual moving bed process for separating a binary mixture.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a first preferred embodiment of the invention which is suitable for separating EPA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities).
  • Figure 3 illustrates a second preferred embodiment of the invention which is suitable for separating DHA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities).
  • Figure 4 illustrates in more detail the first preferred embodiment of the invention which is suitable for separating EPA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities).
  • Figure 5 illustrates in more detail the second preferred embodiment of the invention which is suitable for separating DHA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities).
  • Figure 6 illustrates in more detail an alternative method for the first preferred embodiment of the invention which is suitable for separating EPA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities).
  • Figure 7 illustrates in more detail an alternative method for the second preferred embodiment of the invention which is suitable for separating DHA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities).
  • Figure 8 illustrates a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention for purifying EPA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities).
  • Figure 9 illustrates an alternative method for a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention for purifying EPA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities).
  • Figure 10 illustrates a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention for purifying EPA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities).
  • Figure 11 shows a GC analysis of an EPA product produced by SMB.
  • Figure 12 shows GC FAMES traces of first extract and raffinate streams obtained in an SMB process.
  • Figure 13 shows GC FAMES traces of second extract and raffinate streams obtained in an SMB process.
  • Figure 14 shows a GC FAMES trace of a DHA product produced by SMB.
  • Figure 15 shows a GC FAMES trace of a DHA product produced by distillation.
  • Figure 16 shows a GC trace of an EPA product produced using a chromatographic technique in which the eluent was aqueous acetonitrile.
  • PUFA polyunsaturated fatty acid
  • PUFA derivative is a PUFA in the form of a mono-, di- or triglyceride, ester, phospholipid, amide, lactone, or salt.
  • Triglycerides and esters are preferred.
  • Esters are more preferred.
  • Esters are typically alkyl esters, preferably Ci- C 6 alkyl esters, more preferably C 1 -C4 alkyl esters. Examples of esters include methyl and ethyl esters. Ethyl esters are most preferred.
  • PUFA product refers to a product comprising one or more polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), and/or derivatives thereof, typically of nutritional or pharmaceutical significance.
  • PUFA product is a single PUFA or derivative thereof.
  • the PUFA product is a mixture of two or more PUFAs or derivatives thereof, for example two.
  • zone refers to a plurality of linked chromatography columns containing, as eluent, an aqueous organic solvent, and having one or more injection points for a feed mixture stream, one or more injection points for water and/or organic solvent, a raffinate take-off stream from which liquid can be collected from said plurality of linked chromatography columns, and an extract take-off stream from which liquid can be collected from said plurality of linked chromatography columns.
  • each zone has only one injection point for a feed mixture.
  • each zone has only one injection point for the aqueous organic solvent eluent.
  • each zone has two or more injection points for water and/or organic solvent.
  • raffmate is well known to the person skilled in the art. In the context of actual and simulated moving bed chromatography it refers to the stream of components that move more rapidly with the liquid eluent phase compared with the solid adsorbent phase. Thus, a raffmate stream is typically enriched with more polar components, and depleted of less polar components compared with a feed stream.
  • extract is well known to the person skilled in the art. In the context of actual and simulated moving bed chromatography it refers to the stream of components that move more rapidly with the solid adsorbent phase compared with the liquid eluent phase. Thus, an extract stream is typically enriched with less polar components, and depleted of more polar components compared with a feed stream.
  • nonadjacent when applied to columns in the same apparatus refers to columns separated by one or more columns, preferably 3 or more columns, more preferably 5 or more columns, most preferably about 5 columns.
  • the raffmate stream collected from the first zone is the feed mixture for the second zone.
  • an extract stream containing the PUFA product together with less polar components is collected from a column in the second zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the first zone, the extract stream collected from the second zone is the feed mixture in the first zone.
  • the PUFA product comprises at least one co-3 or co-6 PUFA, preferably at least one co-3 PUFA.
  • co-3 PUFAs include alpha- lino lenic acid (ALA), stearidonic acid (SDA), eicosatrienoic acid (ETE), eicosatetraenoic acid (ETA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).
  • ALA alpha- lino lenic acid
  • SDA stearidonic acid
  • ETE eicosatrienoic acid
  • ETA eicosatetraenoic acid
  • EPA eicosapentaenoic acid
  • DPA docosapentaenoic acid
  • DHA docosahexaenoic acid
  • SDA, EPA, DPA and DHA are preferred. EPA and DHA are more preferred
  • co-6 PUFAs examples include linoleic acid (LA), gamma- lino lenic acid (GLA), eicosadienoic acid, dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA), arachidonic acid (ARA), docosadienoic acid, adrenic acid and docosapentaenoic (co-6) acid.
  • LA, ARA, GLA and DGLA are preferred.
  • the PUFA product is EPA and/or EPA ethyl ester (EE)
  • the PUFA product is DHA and/or EPA ethyl ester (EE).
  • the PUFA product is a mixture of EPA and DHA and/or EPA EE and DHA EE.
  • Suitable feed mixtures for fractionating by the process of the present invention may be obtained from natural sources including vegetable and animal oils and fats, and from synthetic sources including oils obtained from genetically modified plants, animals and micro organisms including yeasts.
  • Examples include fish oils, algal and microalgal oils and plant oils, for example borage oil, Echium oil and evening primrose oil.
  • the feed mixture is a fish oil.
  • the feed mixture is an algal oil.
  • Algal oils are particularly suitable when the desired PUFA product is EPA and/or DHA.
  • Genetically modified Safflower oil is particularly suitable when the desired PUFA product is GLA.
  • Genetically modified yeast is particularly suitable when the desired PUFA product is EPA.
  • the feed mixture may undergo chemical treatment before fractionation by the process of the invention.
  • it may undergo glyceride transesterification or glyceride hydrolysis followed in certain cases by selective processes such as crystallisation, molecular distillation, urea fractionation, extraction with silver nitrate or other metal salt solutions, iodolactonisation or supercritical fluid fractionation.
  • the feed mixtures typically contain the PUFA product and at least one more polar component and at least one less polar component.
  • the less polar components have a stronger adherence to the adsorbent used in the process of the present invention than does the PUFA product.
  • such less polar components typically move with the solid adsorbent phase in preference to the liquid eluent phase.
  • the more polar components have a weaker adherence to the adsorbent used in the process of the present invention than does the PUFA product.
  • such more polar components typically move with the liquid eluent phase in preference to the solid adsorbent phase.
  • more polar components will be separated into a raffinate stream, and less polar components will be separated into an extract stream.
  • Examples of the more and less polar components include (1) other compounds occurring in natural oils (e.g. marine oils or vegetable oils), (2) byproducts formed during storage, refining and previous concentration steps and (3) contaminants from solvents or reagents which are utilized during previous concentration or purification steps.
  • Examples of (1) include other unwanted PUFAs; saturated fatty acids; sterols, for example cholesterol; vitamins; and environmental pollutants, such as
  • PCB polychlorobiphenyl
  • PAH polyaromatic hydrocarbon
  • Examples of (2) include isomers and oxidation or decomposition products from the PUFA product, for instance, auto-oxidation polymeric products of fatty acids or their derivatives.
  • Examples of (3) include urea which may be added to remove saturated or mono- unsaturated fatty acids from the feed mixture.
  • the feed mixture is a PUFA-containing marine oil, more preferably a marine oil comprising EPA and/or DHA.
  • a typical feed mixture for preparing concentrated EPA by the process of the present invention comprises 50-75% EPA, 0 to 10% DHA, and other components including other essential co-3 and co-6 fatty acids.
  • a preferred feed mixture for preparing concentrated EPA by the process of the present invention comprises 55% EPA, 5% DHA, and other components including other essential co-3 and co-6 fatty acids.
  • DHA is less polar than EPA.
  • a typical feed mixture for preparing concentrated DHA by the process of the present invention comprises 50-75% DHA, 0 to 10% EPA, and other components including other essential co-3 and co-6 fatty acids.
  • a preferred feed mixture for preparing concentrated DHA by the process of the present invention comprises 75% DHA, 7% EPA and other components including other essential co-3 and co-6 fatty acids.
  • EPA is more polar than DHA.
  • a typical feed mixture for preparing a concentrated mixture of EPA and DHA by the process of the present invention comprises greater than 33% EPA, and greater than 22% DHA.
  • the process of the invention requires a plurality of zones in said chromatography apparatus. Typically, two or more zones are used.
  • the number of zones is not particularly limited, but in general there are 2 to 5 zones.
  • the components separated in each zone of the apparatus used in the process of the present invention have different polarities.
  • a) the aqueous organic solvent eluent present in each zone has a different water: organic solvent ratio; and/or
  • the present invention typically provides a chromatographic separation process for recovering a polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) product, from a feed mixture, which process comprises introducing the feed mixture to a simulated or actual moving bed chromatography apparatus having a plurality of linked chromatography columns containing, as eluent, an aqueous organic solvent, wherein the apparatus has a first zone and a second zone, each zone having an extract stream and a raffinate stream from which liquid can be collected from said plurality of linked chromatography columns, and wherein (a) a raffinate stream containing the PUFA product together with more polar components is collected from a column in the first zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the second zone, and/or (b) an extract stream containing the PUFA product together with less polar components is collected from a column in the second zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the first zone, said PUFA product being separated from
  • the apparatus used in the process of the present invention contains two zones
  • the eluent in the first zone contains more organic solvent than the eluent in the second zone
  • the second zone is downstream of the first zone with respect to the flow of eluent in the system.
  • the eluent in the system typically moves from the first zone to the second zone.
  • the solid adsorbent phase typically moves from the second zone to the first zone.
  • the two zones do not overlap, i.e. there are no chromatographic columns which are in both zones.
  • the apparatus has a first zone, a second zone and a third zone.
  • the water:organic solvent ratios of the aqueous organic solvent eluent present in the first, second and third zones are typically different. As will be evident to one skilled in the art, this has the consequence that impurities having different polarities can be removed in each zone.
  • the eluent in the first zone contains more organic solvent than the eluent in the second zone and the third zone and the first zone is upstream of the second and third zones with respect to the flow of eluent in the system.
  • the eluent in the second zone contains more organic solvent than the eluent in the third zone and the second zone is upstream of the third zone with respect to the flow of eluent in the system.
  • said PUFA product is separated from components of the feed mixture which are less polar than the PUFA product.
  • said PUFA product is separated from components of the feed mixture which are less polar than the PUFA product but more polar than the components separated in the first zone.
  • said PUFA product is separated from components of the feed mixture which are more polar than the PUFA product.
  • said PUFA product is separated from components of the feed mixture which are less polar than the PUFA product, in the second zone, said PUFA product is separated from components of the feed mixture which are more polar than the PUFA product, and in the third zone, said PUFA product is separated from components of the feed mixture which are more polar than the PUFA product and also more polar than the components separated in the second zone.
  • Such a setup having three zones would be suitable for separating EPA and DHA from a mixture containing impurities which are less polar than DHA and EPA and also containing impurities which are more polar than EPA.
  • the components which are less polar than DHA and EPA are removed as an extract stream and a raffmate stream comprising DHA, EPA and components which are more polar than EPA is collected and introduced into the second zone.
  • DHA is removed as an extract stream and a raffmate stream comprising EPA and components which are more polar than EPA is collected and introduced into the third zone.
  • the components which are more polar than EPA are removed as a raffmate stream and purified EPA is collected as an extract stream.
  • the purified EPA is the purified PUFA product.
  • a secondary PUFA may also be recovered.
  • the secondary PUFA is the DHA collected as the extract stream from the second zone.
  • an additional secondary PUFA product is collected in the chromatographic separation process of the invention.
  • the PUFA product is EPA and the additional secondary PUFA product is DHA.
  • the apparatus is configured to collect a PUFA product which is a concentrated mixture of EPA and DHA.
  • a feed mixture is used which contains EPA, DHA, components which are more polar than EPA and DHA, and components which are less polar than EPA and DHA.
  • EPA EPA
  • DHA components which are more polar than EPA and DHA
  • components which are less polar than EPA and DHA are less polar than EPA and DHA.
  • In the second zone material which is more polar than EPA and DHA is removed, and a concentrated mixture of EPA and DHA is collected as the PUFA product.
  • Any known simulated or actual moving bed chromatography apparatus may be utilised for the purposes of the method of the present invention, as long as the apparatus is configured with the multiple, in particular two, zones which characterise the process of the present invention.
  • Those apparatuses described in US 2,985,589, US 3,696,107, US 3,706,812, US 3,761,533, FR-A-2103302, FR-A-2651148, FR-A- 2651149, US 6,979,402, US 5,069,883 and US 4,764,276 may all be used if configured in accordance with the process of the present invention.
  • the number of columns used in the apparatus is not particularly limited. A skilled person would easily be able to determine an appropriate number of columns to use.
  • the number of columns is typically 8 or more, preferably 15 or more. In a more preferred embodiment 15 or 16 columns are used. In another more preferred embodiment, 19 or 20 columns are used. In other more preferred embodiments, 30 or more columns are used. Typically, there are no more than 50 columns, preferably no more than 40.
  • Each zone typically consists of an approximately equal share of the total number of columns.
  • each zone typically consists of approximately half of the total number of chromatographic columns in the system.
  • the first zone typically comprises 4 or more, preferably 8 or more, more preferably about 8 columns.
  • the second zone typically comprises 4 or more, preferably 7 or more, more preferably 7 or 8 columns.
  • the dimensions of the columns used in the apparatus are not particularly limited, and will depend on the volume of feed mixture to be purified. A skilled person would easily be able to determine appropriately sized columns to use.
  • the diameter of each column is typically between 10 and 500mm, preferable between 25 and 250mm, more preferable between 50 and 100 mm, and most preferably between 70 and 80 mm.
  • the length of each column is typically between 10 and 200 cm, preferably between 25 and 150cm, more preferably between 70 and 110 cm, and most preferably between 80 and 100 cm.
  • the columns in each zone typically have identical dimensions but may, for certain applications, have different dimensions.
  • the flow rates to the column are limited by maximum pressures across the series of columns and will depend on the column dimensions and particle size of the solid phases.
  • One skilled in the art will easily be able to establish the required flow rate for each column dimension to ensure efficient desorption. Larger diameter columns will in general need higher flows to maintain linear flow through the columns.
  • the flow rate of eluent into the first zone is from 1 to 4.5L/min, preferably from 1.5 to 2.5 L/min.
  • the flow rate of the extract from the first zone is from 0.1 to 2.5L/min, preferably from 0.5 to 2.25 L/min.
  • the flow rate of recycle is typically from 0.7 to 1.4 L/min, preferably about 1 L/min.
  • the flow rate of the raffmate from the first zone is from 0.2 to 2.5 L/min, preferably from 0.3 to 2.0 L/min.
  • the flow rate of recycle is typically from 0.3 to 1.0 L/min, preferably about 0.5 L/min.
  • the flow rate of introduction of the feed mixture into the first zone is from 5 to 150 mL/min, preferably from 10 to 100 mL/min, more preferably from 20 to 60 mL/min.
  • the flow rate of eluent into the second zone is from 1 to 4 L/min, preferably from 1.5 to 3.5 L/min.
  • the flow rate of the extract from the second zone is from from 0.5 to 2 L/min, preferably from 0.7 to 1.9 L/min.
  • the flow rate of recycle is typically from 0.6 to 1.4 L/min, preferably from 0.7 to 1.1 L/min, more preferably about 0.9 L/min.
  • the flow rate of the raffinate from the second zone is from 0.5 to 2.5 L/min, preferably from 0.7 to 1.8 L/min, more preferably about 1.4 L/min.
  • references to rates at which liquid is collected or removed via the various extract and raffinate streams refer to volumes of liquid removed in an amount of time, typically L/minute.
  • references to rates at which liquid is recycled back into the same zone, typically to an adjacent column in the same zone refer to volumes of liquid recycled in an amount of time, typically L/minute.
  • part of one or more of the extract stream from the first zone, the raffinate stream from the first zone, the extract stream from the second zone, and the raffinate stream from the second zone are recycled back into the same zone, typically into an adjacent column in the same zone.
  • This recycle is different from the feeding of an extract or raffinate stream into a non- adjacent column in another zone. Rather, the recycle involves feeding part of the extract or raffinate stream out of a zone back into the same zone, typically into an adjacent column in the same zone.
  • the rate at which liquid collected via the extract or raffinate stream from the first or second zones is recycled back into the same zone is the rate at which liquid collected via that stream is fed back into the same zone, typically into an adjacent column in the same zone.
  • the rate of recycle of extract in the first zone is the rate at which extract collected from the bottom of column 2 is fed into the top of column 3, i.e. the flow rate of liquid into the top of column 3.
  • the rate of recycle of extract in the second zone is the rate at which extract collected at the bottom of column 10 is fed into the top of column 11, i.e. the flow rate of liquid into the top of column 11.
  • Recycle of the extract and/or raffinate streams is typically effected by feeding the liquid collected via that stream into a container, and then pumping an amount of that liquid from the container back into the same zone.
  • the rate of recycle of liquid collected via a particular extract or raffinate stream, typically back into an adjacent column in the same zone is the rate at which liquid is pumped out of the container back into the same zone, typically into an adjacent column.
  • the amount of liquid being introduced into a zone via the eluent and feedstock streams is balanced with the amount of liquid removed from a zone, and recycled back into the same zone.
  • the flow rate of eluent (desorbent) into the first or second zone (D) is equal to the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from that zone accumulates in a container (E1/E2) added to the rate at which extract is recycled back into the same zone (D-E1/D-E2).
  • the rate at which extract is recycled back into a zone (D-E1/D-E2) added to the rate at which feedstock is introduced into a zone (F/Rl) is equal to the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from that zone accumulates in a container (R1/R2) added to the rate at which raffinate is recycled back into the same zone (D+F-El- R1/D+R1-E2-R2).
  • the rate at which liquid collected from a particular extract or raffinate stream from a zone accumulates in a container can also be thought of as the net rate of removal of that extract or raffinate stream from that zone.
  • the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream out of the first zone is recycled back into the first zone differs from the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream out of the second zone is recycled back into the second zone, and/or the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream out of the first zone is recycled back into the first zone differs from the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream out of the second zone is recycled back into the second zone.
  • Varying the rate at which liquid collected via the extract and/or raffinate streams in each zone is recycled back into the same zone has the effect of varying the amount of more polar and less polar components present in the other extract and raffinate streams.
  • a lower extract recycle rate results in fewer of the less polar components in that zone being carried through to the raffinate stream in that zone.
  • a higher extract recycle rate results in more of the less polar components in that zone being carried through to the raffinate stream in that zone. This can be seen, for example, in the specific embodiment of the invention shown in figure 6.
  • the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream in the first zone is recycled back into the same zone (D-El) will affect to what extent any of component A is carried through to the raffinate stream in the first zone (Rl).
  • the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone is faster than the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone.
  • a raffinate stream containing the PUFA product together with more polar components is collected from a column in the first zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the second zone, and the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone is faster than the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone.
  • the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone is slower than the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone.
  • the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone is faster than the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone.
  • an extract stream containing the PUFA product together with less polar components is collected from a column in the second zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the first zone, and the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone is faster than the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone.
  • the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone is slower than the rate at which liquid collected via the raffmate stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone.
  • the step time i.e. the time between shifting the points of injection of the feed mixture and eluent, and the various take off points of the collected fractions, is not particularly limited, and will depend on the number and dimensions of the columns used, and the flow rate through the apparatus. A skilled person would easily be able to determine appropriate step times to use in the process of the present invention.
  • the step time is typically from 100 to 1000 seconds, preferably from 200 to 800 seconds, more preferably from about 250 to about 750 seconds. In some embodiments, a step time of from 100 to 400 seconds, preferably 200 to 300 seconds, more preferably about 250 seconds, is appropriate. In other embodiments, a step time of from 600 to 900 seconds, preferably 700 to 800 seconds, more preferably about 750 seconds is appropriate.
  • Each chromatographic column may contain the same or a different adsorbent.
  • each column contains the same adsorbent.
  • Examples of such commonly used materials are polymeric beads, preferably polystyrene reticulated with DVB (divinylbenzene); and silica gel, preferably reverse phase bonded silica gel with C8 or CI 8 alkanes, especially CI 8. CI 8 bonded reverse phase silica gel is preferred.
  • the adsorbent used in the process of the present invention is preferably non-polar.
  • the shape of the adsorbent stationary phase material may be, for example, spherical or nonspherical beads, preferably substantially spherical beads.
  • Such beads typically have a diameter of 5 to 500 microns, preferably 10 to 500 microns, more preferably 15 to 500 microns, more preferably 40 to 500 microns, more preferably 100 to 500 microns, more preferably 250 to 500 microns, even more preferably 250 to 400 microns, most preferably 250 to 350 microns.
  • beads with a diameter of 5 to 35 microns may be used, typically 10 to 30 microns, preferably 15 to 25 microns.
  • Some preferred particle sizes are somewhat larger than particle sizes of beads used in the past in simulated and actual moving bed processes.
  • adsorbent beads of large particle size may be used in the process of the present invention (with their associated advantages) without any loss in resolution.
  • the adsorbent typically has a pore size of from 10 to 50 nm, preferably 15 to 45 nm, more preferably 20 to 40 nm, most preferably 25 to 35 nm.
  • the eluent used in the process of the present invention is an aqueous organic solvent other than aqueous alcohol.
  • the aqueous organic solvent typically comprises water and one or more ethers, esters, ketones or nitriles, or mixtures thereof.
  • Ether solvents are well known to the person skilled in the art. Ethers are typically short chain ethers. Ethers typically are of formula R-O-R', wherein R and R are the same or different and represent a straight or branched Ci-C 6 alkyl group. The Ci-C 6 alkyl group is preferably unsubstituted. Preferred ethers include diethylether, diisopropylether, and methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE).
  • MTBE methyl t-butyl ether
  • Ester solvents are well known to the person skilled in the art.
  • Esters are typically short chain esters.
  • Preferred esters include methylacetate and ethylacetate.
  • MIBK methyl isobutyl ketone
  • Nitrile solvents are well known to the person skilled in the art. Nitriles are typically short chain nitriles. Nitriles typically are of formula R-CN, wherein R represents a straight or branched Ci-C 6 alkyl group. The Ci-C 6 alkyl group is preferably unsubstituted. Preferred nitriles include acetonitrile.
  • the aqueous organic solvent is preferably aqueous acetonitrile.
  • the eluent typically contains up to 30 wt% water, remainder acetonitrile.
  • the eluent contains from 5 to 25 wt% water, remainder acetonitrile. More preferably, the eluent contains from 10 to 20 wt% water, remainder acetonitrile. Even more preferably, the eluent contains from 15 to 25 wt% water, remainder acetonitrile.
  • the aqueous alcohol typically comprises water and one or more short chain alcohols.
  • the short chain alcohol typically has from 1 to 6 carbon atoms.
  • alcohols include methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, i-propanol, n-butanol, i-butanol, s-butanol and t-butanol.
  • the eluent is not in a supercritical state.
  • the eluent is a liquid.
  • the average watenorganic solvent ratio of the eluent in the entire apparatus is from 0.1 :99.9 to 30:70 parts by volume, preferably 0.1 :99.9 to 9:91 parts by volume, more preferably from 0.25 :99.75 to 7:93 parts by volume, even more preferably from 0.5 :99.5 to 6:94 parts by volume.
  • the eluting power of the eluent in each of the zones is typically different.
  • the eluting power of the eluent in the first zone is greater than that of the eluent in the second and subsequent zones.
  • this is achieved by varying the relative amounts of water and organic solvent in each zone. Depending on the choice of organic solvent, they may be more powerful desorbers than water. Alternatively, they may be less powerful desorbers than water. Acetonitrile, for example, is a more powerful desorber than water.
  • the amount of acetonitrile in the eluent in the first zone is typically greater than the amount of acetonitrile in the eluent of the second and subsequent zones.
  • the watenorganic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone is typically from 5:95 to 25:75 parts by volume, preferably 10:90 to 15:85 parts by volume.
  • the watenorganic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone may be from 0: 100 to 5:95 parts by volume, preferably from 0.1 :99.9 to 2.5:97.5 parts by volume, more preferably from 0.25:99.75 to 2:98 parts by volume, and most preferably from 0.5:99.5 to 1.5:98.5 parts by volume.
  • the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the second zone is typically from 10:90 to 30:70 parts by volume, preferably 15 :85 to 20:80 parts by volume.
  • the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the second zone may be from 3:97 to 7:93 parts by volume, preferably from 4:96 to 6:94 parts by volume, more preferably from 4.5:95.5 to 5.5:94.5 parts by volume.
  • the water: organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone is from 0.5:99.5 to 1.5:98.5 parts by volume
  • the watenorganic solvent ratio of the eluent in the second zone is from 4.5:95:5 to 5.5:94.5 parts by volume.
  • the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluents in each zone may be the same or different.
  • the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in each zone is from 0.5:99.5 to 5.5:94.5 parts by volume.
  • the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone is lower than the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the second zone.
  • the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone is higher than the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the second zone.
  • the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone is the same as the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the second zone. It will be appreciated that the ratios of water and organic solvent in each zone referred to above are average ratios within the totality of the zone.
  • the watenorganic solvent ratio of the eluent in each zone is controlled by introducing water and/or organic solvent into one or more columns in the zones.
  • water is typically introduced more slowly into the first zone than the second zone.
  • essentially pure organic solvent and essentially pure water may be introduced at different points in each zone. The relative flow rates of these two streams will determine the overall solvent profile across the zone.
  • different organic solvent/water mixtures may be introduced at different points in each zone. That will involve introducing two or more different organic solvent/water mixtures into the zone, each organic solvent/water mixture having a different organic solven water ratio. The relative flow rates and relative concentrations of the organic solvent/water mixtures in this embodiment will determine the overall solvent profile across the zone.
  • the same organic solvent/water mixture is introduced to each zone.
  • the process of the present invention is conducted at from 15 to 55°C, preferably at from 20 to 40°C, more preferably at about 30°C.
  • the process is typically carried out at room temperature, but may be conducted at elevated temperatures.
  • the process of the present invention involves introducing a feed stream into one zone (for example the first zone), collecting a first intermediate stream enriched with the PUFA product and introducing the first intermediate stream into another zone (for example the second zone).
  • the process involves either (a) collecting a first intermediate stream from the first zone and introducing it into the second zone, or (b) collecting a first intermediate stream from the second zone and introducing it into the first zone.
  • the PUFA product can be separated from both more and less polar components in a single process.
  • the apparatus has two zones, and the process of the present invention comprises:
  • This particularly preferred embodiment is suitable for purifying EPA from a feed mixture.
  • a feed mixture F comprising the PUFA product (B) and more polar (C) and less polar (A) components is introduced into the first zone.
  • the less polar components (A) are removed as extract stream El .
  • the PUFA product (B) and more polar components (C) are removed as raffmate stream Rl .
  • Raffmate stream Rl is then introduced into the second zone.
  • the more polar components (C) are removed as raffmate stream R2.
  • the PUFA product (B) is collected as extract stream E2.
  • FIG 4 is identical to Figure 2, except that the points of introduction of the organic solvent desorbent (D) and water (W) into each zone are shown.
  • the organic solvent desorbent (D) and water (W) together make up the eluent.
  • the (D) phase is typically essentially pure organic solvent, but may, in certain embodiments be an organic solvent/water mixture comprising mainly organic solvent.
  • the (W) phase is typically essentially pure water, but may, in certain embodiments be an organic solvent/water mixture comprising mainly water, for example a 98%water/2% acetonitrile mixture.
  • FIG 6. Here there is no separate water injection point, and instead an aqueous organic solvent desorbent is injected at (D).
  • the separation into raffinate and extract stream can be aided by varying the desorbing power of the eluent within each zone. This can be achieved by introducing the organic solvent (or organic solvent rich) component of the eluent and the water (or water rich) component at different points in each zone. Thus, typically, the organic solvent is introduced upstream of the extract take-off point and the water is introduced between the extract take-off point and the point of introduction of the feed into the zone, relative to the flow of eluent in the system. This is shown in Figure 4.
  • the separation can be aided by varying the rates at which liquid collected via the extract and raffinate streams from the two zones is recycled back into the same zone.
  • the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone is faster than the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone; or the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone is lower than that in the second zone.
  • the first raffinate stream in the first zone is typically removed downstream of the point of introduction of the feed mixture into the first zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone.
  • the first extract stream in the first zone is typically removed upstream of the point of introduction of the feed mixture into the first zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone.
  • the second raffinate stream in the second zone is typically removed downstream of the point of introduction of the first raffinate stream into the second zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone.
  • the second extract stream in the second zone is typically collected upstream of the point of introduction of the first raffinate stream into the second zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone.
  • the organic solvent or aqueous organic solvent is introduced into the first zone upstream of the point of removal of the first extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone.
  • the water is introduced into the first zone upstream of the point of introduction of the feed mixture but downstream of the point of removal of the first extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone.
  • the organic solvent or aqueous organic solvent is introduced into the second zone upstream of the point of removal of the second extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone.
  • the water when water is introduced into the second zone, the water is introduced into the second zone upstream of the point of introduction of the first raffinate stream but downstream of the point of removal of the second extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone.
  • the apparatus has two zones, and the process comprises:
  • This particularly preferred embodiment is suitable for purifying DHA from a feed mixture.
  • This embodiment is illustrated in Figure 3.
  • a feed mixture F comprising the PUFA product (B) and more polar (C) and less polar (A) components is introduced into the second zone.
  • the more polar components (C) are removed as raffinate stream Rl .
  • the PUFA product (B) and less polar components (A) are collected as extract stream El .
  • Extract stream El is then introduced to the first zone.
  • the less polar components (A) are removed as extract stream E2.
  • the PUFA product (B) is collected as raffinate stream R2.
  • This embodiment is illustrated in more detail in Figure 5.
  • Figure 5 is identical to Figure 3, except that the points of introduction of the organic solvent desorbent (D) and water (W) into each zone are shown.
  • the (D) phase is typically essentially pure organic solvent, but may, in certain embodiments be an organic solvent/water mixture comprising mainly organic solvent.
  • the (W) phase is typically essentially pure water, but may, in certain embodiments be an organic solvent/water mixture comprising mainly water, for example a 98%water/2% acetonitrile mixture.
  • FIG. 7 A further illustration of this particularly preferred embodiment is shown in Figure 7. Here there is no separate water injection point, and instead an aqueous organic solvent desorbent is injected at (D).
  • the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from the second zone is reintroduced into the second zone is faster than the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from the first zone is
  • the watenorganic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone is lower than that in the second zone.
  • the first raffinate stream in the second zone is typically removed downstream of the point of introduction of the feed mixture into the second zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone.
  • the first extract stream in the second zone is typically collected upstream of the point of introduction of the feed mixture into the second zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone.
  • the second raffinate stream in the first zone is typically collected downstream of the point of introduction of the first extract stream into the first zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone.
  • the second extract stream in the first zone is typically removed upstream of the point of introduction of the first extract stream into the first zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone.
  • the organic solvent or aqueous organic solvent is introduced into the second zone upstream of the point of removal of the first extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone.
  • water when water is introduced into the second zone, the water is introduced into the second zone upstream of the point of introduction of the feed mixture but downstream of the point of removal of the first extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone.
  • the organic solvent or aqueous organic solvent is introduced into the first zone upstream of the point of removal of the second extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone.
  • the water is introduced into the first zone upstream of the point of introduction of the first raffinate stream but downstream of the point of removal of the second extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone.
  • the simulated or actual moving bed chromatography apparatus consists of fifteen chromatographic columns. These are referred to as columns 1 to 15.
  • the fifteen columns are arranged in series so that the bottom of column 1 is linked to the top of column 2, the bottom of column 2 is linked to the top of column 3 etc. This may optionally be via a holding container, with a recycle stream into the next column.
  • the flow of eluent through the system is from column 1 to column 2 to column 3 etc.
  • the flow of adsorbent through the system is from column 15 to column 14 to column 13 etc.
  • the first zone typically consists of eight adjacent columns, columns 1 to 8, which are connected as discussed above.
  • the second zone typically consists of seven columns, columns 9 to 15, which are connected as discussed above. For the avoidance of doubt, the bottom of column 8 in the first zone is linked to the top of column 9 in the second zone.
  • a feed mixture F comprising the PUFA product (B) and more polar (C) and less polar (A) components is introduced into the top of column 5 in the first zone.
  • Organic solvent desorbent is introduced into the top of column 1 in the first zone. Water is introduced into the top of column 4 in the first zone.
  • the less polar components (A) are removed as extract stream El from the bottom of column 2.
  • the PUFA product (B) and more polar components (C) are removed as raffmate stream Rl from the bottom of column 7.
  • Raffmate stream Rl is then introduced into the second zone at the top of column 13.
  • Organic solvent desorbent is introduced into the top of column 9 in the second zone. Water is introduced into the top of column 12 in the second zone. In the second zone, the more polar components (C) are removed as raffmate stream R2 at the bottom of column 15.
  • the PUFA product (B) is collected as extract stream E2 at the bottom of column 10.
  • organic solvent is typically introduced into the top of column 1 in the first zone.
  • water is typically introduced into the top of column 4 in the first zone.
  • organic solvent is typically introduced into the top of column 9 in the second zone. In this most preferred embodiment, organic solvent is typically introduced into the top of column 12 in the second zone.
  • the feed stream is typically introduced into the top of column 5 in the first zone.
  • a first raffmate stream is typically collected from the bottom of column 7 in the first zone and introduced into the top of column 13 in the second zone.
  • the first raffmate stream may optionally be collected in a container before being introduced into column 13.
  • a first extract stream is typically removed from the bottom of column 2 in the first zone.
  • the first extract stream may optionally be collected in a container and reintroduced into the top of column 3 in the first zone.
  • a second raffmate stream is typically removed from the bottom of column 15 in the second zone.
  • a second extract stream is typically collected from the bottom of column 10 in the second zone.
  • This second extract stream typically contains the purified PUFA product.
  • the second extract stream may optionally be collected in a container and reintroduced into the top of column 11 in the second zone.
  • the watenorganic solvent ratio in the first zone is lower than the water:organic solvent ratio in the second zone.
  • a feed mixture F comprising the PUFA product (B) and more polar (C) and less polar (A) components is introduced into the top of column 5 in the first zone.
  • Aqueous organic solvent desorbent is introduced into the top of column 1 in the first zone.
  • the less polar components (A) are removed as extract stream El from the bottom of column 2.
  • the PUFA product (B) and more polar components (C) are removed as raffmate stream Rl from the bottom of column 7.
  • Raffmate stream Rl is then introduced into the second zone at the top of column 12.
  • Aqueous organic solvent desorbent is introduced into the top of column 9 in the second zone.
  • the more polar components (C) are removed as raffinate stream R2 at the bottom of column 14.
  • the PUFA product (B) is collected as extract stream E2 at the bottom of column 10.
  • aqueous organic solvent is typically introduced into the top of column 1 in the first zone.
  • aqueous organic solvent is typically introduced into the top of column 9 in the second zone.
  • the feed stream is typically introduced into the top of column 5 in the first zone.
  • a first raffinate stream is typically collected from the bottom of column 7 in the first zone and introduced into the top of column 12 in the second zone.
  • the first raffinate stream may optionally be collected in a container before being introduced into column 12.
  • a first extract stream is typically removed from the bottom of column 2 in the first zone.
  • the first extract stream may optionally be collected in a container and a portion reintroduced into the top of column 3 in the first zone.
  • the rate of recycle of liquid collected via the extract stream from the first zone back into the first zone is the rate at which liquid is pumped from this container into the top of column 3.
  • a second raffinate stream is typically removed from the bottom of column 14 in the second zone.
  • a second extract stream is typically collected from the bottom of column 10 in the second zone.
  • This second extract stream typically contains the purified PUFA product.
  • the second extract stream may optionally be collected in a container and a portion reintroduced into the top of column 11 in the second zone.
  • the rate of recycle of liquid collected via the extract stream from the second zone back into the second zone is the rate at which liquid is pumped from this container into the top of column 11.
  • the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone is typically faster than the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone.
  • the aqueous organic solvent eluent is substantially the same in each zone.
  • the simulated or actual moving bed chromatography apparatus consists of nineteen chromatographic columns. These are referred to as columns 1 to 19.
  • the fifteen columns are arranged in series so that the bottom of column 1 is linked to the top of column 2, the bottom of column 2 is linked to the top of column 3 etc.
  • the flow of eluent through the system is from column 1 to column 2 to column 3 etc.
  • the flow of adsorbent through the system is from column 19 to column 18 to column 17 etc.
  • the first zone typically consists of ten adjacent columns, columns 1 to 10, which are connected as discussed above.
  • the second zone typically consists of eight columns, columns 1 1 to 19, which are connected as discussed above.
  • a feed mixture F comprising the PUFA product (B) and more polar (C) and less polar (A and A') components is introduced into the top of column 7 in the first zone.
  • a first desorbent (Dl) comprising 100% organic solvent is introduced into the top of column 1 in the first zone.
  • a second desorbent (D2) comprising a water/organic solvent mixture (preferably 2% acetonitrile and 98% water) is introduced into the top of column 5 in the first zone.
  • less polar components ( ⁇ ') and (A) are removed as extract streams ⁇ and El from the bottoms of columns 1 and 4, respectively.
  • the PUFA product (B) and more polar components (C) are removed as raffmate stream Rl from the bottom of column 10.
  • Raffmate stream Rl is then introduced into the second zone at the top of column 17.
  • a second desorbent (D2) comprising a water/organic solvent mixture (preferably 2% acetonitrile and 98% water) is introduced into the top of column 11 in the second zone.
  • the more polar components (C) are removed as raffinate stream R2 at the bottom of column 19.
  • the PUFA product (B) is collected as extract stream E2 at the bottom of column 14.
  • organic solvent is typically introduced into the top of column 1 in the first zone.
  • a 2% MeCN/98% water mixture is typically introduced into the top of column 5 in the first zone.
  • a 2% MeCN/98% water mixture is typically introduced into the top of column 11 in the second zone.
  • the feed stream is typically introduced into the top of column 7 in the first zone.
  • a first raffinate stream is typically collected from the bottom of column 10 in the first zone and introduced into the top of column 17 in the second zone.
  • the first raffinate stream may optionally be collected in a container before being introduced into column 17.
  • extract streams are typically removed from the bottoms of columns 1 and 4 in the first zone.
  • the extract stream collected from the bottom or column 4 may optionally be collected in a container and reintroduced into the top of column 5 in the first zone.
  • a second raffinate stream is typically removed from the bottom of column 19 in the second zone.
  • a second extract stream is typically collected from the bottom of column 14 in the second zone.
  • This second extract stream typically contains the purified PUFA product.
  • the second extract stream may optionally be collected in a container and reintroduced into the top of column 15 in the second zone.
  • the water:organic solvent ratio in the first zone is lower than the water:organic solvent ratio in the second zone.
  • the process of the invention allows much higher purities of PUFA product to be achieved than have been possible with conventional chromatographic techniques.
  • PUFA products produced by the process of the invention also have particularly advantageous impurity profiles, which are quite different from those observed in oils prepared by known techniques.
  • the present invention therefore also relates to compositions comprising a PUFA product, for example one obtainable by the process of the present invention.
  • the process of the present invention will generally be controlled by a computer.
  • the present invention therefore also provides a computer program for controlling a chromatographic apparatus as defined herein, the computer program containing code means that when executed instruct the apparatus to carry out the process of the invention.
  • Reference Example 1 A fish oil derived feedstock (55weight% EPA EE, 5 weight% DHA EE) is fractionated using an actual moving bed chromatography system using bonded CI 8 silica gel (particle size 300 ⁇ ) as stationary phase and aqueous methanol as eluent according to the system schematically illustrated in Figure 8. 15 columns (diameter: 76.29mm, length: 914.40mm) are connected in series as shown in Figure 8.
  • EPA EE is produced at a high level of purity (85 to 98% by GC FAMES).
  • GC FAMES traces of the zone 1 extract and raffmate, and of the zone 2 extract and raffmate are shown as Figures 11 and 12 respectively.
  • Feedstock (F) feed rate 70 ml/min
  • Feedstock (F) feed rate 210 ml/min
  • Feedstock (F) feed rate 25 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone 2050 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone 1700 ml/min
  • Feedstock (F) feed rate 50 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone 4125 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone 3375 ml/min
  • Extract container accumulation rate (E2) in second zone 1800 ml/min
  • Feedstock (F) feed rate 50 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone 4000 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone 3200 ml/min
  • Feedstock (F) feed rate 100 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone 4050 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone 3300 ml/min
  • Extract recycle rate (D2-E2) in second zone 1600 ml/min
  • Feedstock (F) feed rate 25 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone 1275 ml/min
  • Extract container accumulation rate (El) in first zone 750 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone 1275 ml/min
  • Extract recycle rate (D2-E2) in second zone 325 ml/min
  • Feedstock (F) feed rate 50 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone 2550 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone 2000 ml/min
  • Extract recycle rate (D2-E2) in second zone 600 ml/min
  • a fish oil derived feedstock comprising eicosatetraenoic acid ethyl ester (ETA EE), EPA EE, isomers thereof and DHA EE was fractionated using an actual moving bed chromatography system using bonded CI 8 silica gel (particle size 40-60 ⁇ ) as stationary phase and aqueous methanol as eluent according to the system
  • Feedstock (F) feed rate 0.5 ml/min
  • Extract (El) rate from the first zone 1.9 ml/min
  • EPA EE was produced at a high level of purity (greater than 90 weight%, greater than 95 weight%, greater than 98 weight%).
  • a fish oil derived feedstock (55weight% EPA EE, 5 weight% DHA EE) was fractionated using an actual moving bed chromatography system using bonded C 18 silica gel (particle size 300 ⁇ , particle porosity 150 angstroms) as stationary phase and aqueous methanol as eluent according to the system schematically illustrated in Figure 8. 15 columns (diameter: 10 mm, length: 250 mm) are connected in series as shown in Figure 8.
  • Feedstock (F) feed rate 0.5 ml/min
  • Extract (El) rate from the first zone 4 ml/min
  • Extract (E2) rate from the second zone 4.1 ml/min
  • a fish oil derived feedstock (70weight% DHA EE, 7 weight% EPA EE) is fractionated using an actual moving bed chromatography system using bonded CI 8 silica gel (particle size 300 ⁇ ) as stationary phase and aqueous methanol as eluent according to the system schematically illustrated in Figure 8. 15 columns (diameter: 76.29mm, length: 914.40mm) are connected in series as shown in Figure 8.
  • Feedstock (F) feed rate 25 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone 2062.5 ml/min
  • Extract rate (El) in first zone 900 ml/min
  • Raffmate rate (Rl) in first zone 1187.5 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone 1500 ml/min
  • Extract rate (E2) in second zone 450 ml/min
  • Raffmate rate (R2) in second zone 1050 ml/min
  • DHA EE is produced at a high level of purity (>97% by GC FAMES).
  • a GC FAMES trace of the zone 2 extract is shown as Figure 14.
  • a fish oil derived feedstock (33 weight% EPA EE, 22 weight% DHA EE) is fractionated using an actual moving bed chromatography system using bonded CI 8 silica gel (particle size 300 ⁇ ) as stationary phase and aqueous methanol as eluent according to the system schematically illustrated in Figure 8. 15 columns (diameter: 76.29mm, length: 914.40mm) are connected in series as shown in Figure 8.
  • Feedstock (F) feed rate 40 ml/min
  • Extract rate (El) in first zone 825 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone 1425 ml/min
  • Extract rate (E2) in second zone 787.5 ml/min
  • a mixture of EPA EE and DHA EE is produced at a high level of purity (>80% total EPA EE and DHA EE).
  • Dioxin limits include the sum of polychlorinated dibenzeno-para-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and expressed in World Health Organisation (WHO) toxic equivalents using WHO-toxic equivalent factors (TEFs). This means that analytical results relating t 17 individual dioxin congeners of toxicological concern are expressed in a single quantifiable unit: TCDD toxic equivalent concentration or TEO
  • a GC trace of the oil prepared by distillation is shown as Figure 15.
  • the four peaks with longer elution times than the DHA peak correspond to DHA isomers. From the GC trace it can be seen that the oil prepared by distillation contains about 1.5 wt% of isomeric impurities.
  • a fish oil derived feedstock (55weight% EPA EE, 5 weight% DHA EE) was fractionated using a fixed bed chromatography system on a single chromatographic column (diameter 30cm, length 60cm) packed with C18 silica gel (particle size 20 microns, particle porosity 60 angstroms) as stationary phase and aqueous acetonitrile (19 weight % water, 81 wt% acetonitrile) as eluent.
  • 900ml of feedstock was purified using 22L of eluent, which was passed through the column at a flow rate of 2200 ml/min.
  • a fish oil derived feedstock (55weight% EPA EE, 5 weight% DHA EE) is fractionated using an actual moving bed chromatography system using bonded C 18 silica gel (particle size 300microns, particle porosity 150 angstroms) as stationary phase and aqueous acetonitrile as eluent according to the system schematically illustrated in Figure 8. 15 columns (diameter: 76.29mm, length: 914.40mm) are connected in series as shown in Figure 8.
  • Feedstock (F) feed rate 55 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone 3000 ml/min
  • Extract rate (El) in first zone 1800 ml/min
  • Raffmate rate (Rl) in first zone 1455 ml/min
  • Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone 1400 ml/min
  • Extract rate (E2) in second zone 600 ml/min
  • Raffmate rate (R2) in second zone 945 ml/min

Abstract

The present invention provides a chromatographic separation process for recovering a polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) product, from a feed mixture, which process comprises introducing the feed mixture to a simulated or actual moving bed chromatography apparatus having a plurality of linked chromatography columns containing, as eluent, an aqueous organic solvent, wherein the apparatus has a plurality of zones comprising at least a first zone and second zone, each zone having an extract stream and a raffinate stream from which liquid can be collected from said plurality of linked chromatography columns, and wherein (a) a raffinate stream containing the PUFA product together with more polar components is collected from a column in the first zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the second zone, and/or (b) an extract stream containing the PUFA product together with less polar components is collected from a column in the second zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the first zone, said PUFA product being separated from different components of the feed mixture in each zone, and wherein the aqueous organic solvent is other than aqueous alcohol.

Description

SMB PROCESS
The present invention relates to an improved chromatographic fractionation process for purifying polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and derivatives thereof. In particular, the present invention relates to an improved simulated or actual moving bed chromatographic separation process for purifying PUFAs and derivatives thereof.
Fatty acids, in particular PUFAs, and their derivatives are precursors for biologically important molecules, which play an important role in the regulation of biological functions such as platelet aggregation, inflammation and immunological responses. Thus, PUFAs and their derivatives may be therapeutically useful in treating a wide range of pathological conditions including CNS conditions; neuropathies, including diabetic neuropathy; cardiovascular diseases; general immune system and
inflammatory conditions, including inflammatory skin diseases.
PUFAs are found in natural raw materials, such as vegetable oils and marine oils. Such PUFAs are however, frequently present in such oils in admixture with saturated fatty acids and numerous other impurities. PUFAs should therefore desirably be purified before nutritional or pharmaceutical uses.
Unfortunately, PUFAs are extremely fragile. Thus, when heated in the presence of oxygen, they are prone to isomerization, peroxidation and oligomerization. The fractionation and purification of PUFA products to prepare pure fatty acids is therefore difficult. Distillation, even under vacuum, can lead to non-acceptable product degradation.
Simulated and actual moving bed chromatography are known techniques, familiar to those of skill in the art. The principle of operation involves countercurrent movement of a liquid eluent phase and a solid adsorbent phase. This operation allows minimal usage of solvent making the process economically viable. Such separation technology has found several applications in diverse areas, including hydrocarbons, industrial chemicals, oils, sugars and APIs. Such separation technology has also been applied to purify PUFAs and their derivatives. As is well known, in a conventional stationary bed chromatographic system, a mixture whose components are to be separated percolates through a container. The container is generally cylindrical, and is typically referred to as the column. The column contains a packing of a porous material (generally called the stationary phase) exhibiting a high permeability to fluids. The percolation velocity of each component of the mixture depends on the physical properties of that component so that the components exit from the column successively and selectively. Thus, some of the components tend to fix strongly to the stationary phase and thus will percolate slowly, whereas others tend to fix weakly and exit from the column more quickly. Many different stationary bed chromatographic systems have been proposed and are used for both analytical and industrial production purposes.
In contrast, a simulated moving bed system consists of a number of individual columns containing adsorbent which are connected together in series. Eluent is passed through the columns in a first direction. The injection points of the feedstock and the eluent, and the separated component collection points in the system, are periodically shifted by means of a series of valves. The overall effect is to simulate the operation of a single column containing a moving bed of the solid adsorbent. Thus, a simulated moving bed system consists of columns which, as in a conventional stationary bed system, contain stationary beds of solid adsorbent through which eluent is passed, but in a simulated moving bed system the operation is such as to simulate a continuous countercurrent moving bed.
Processes and equipment for simulated moving bed chromatography are described in several patents, including US 2,985,589, US 3,696,107, US 3,706,812, US 3,761,533, FR-A-2103302, FR-A-2651148 and FR-A-2651149, the entirety of which are incorporated herein by reference. The topic is also dealt with at length in "Preparative and Production Scale Chromatography", edited by Ganetsos and Barker, Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, 1993, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
An actual moving bed system is similar in operation to a simulated moving bed system. However, rather than shifting the injection points of the feed mixture and the eluent, and the separated component collection points by means of a system of valves, instead a series of adsorption units (i.e. columns) are physically moved relative to the feed and drawoff points. Again, operation is such as to simulate a continuous countercurrent moving bed. Processes and equipment for actual moving bed chromatography are described in several patents, including US 6,979,402, US 5,069,883 and US 4,764,276, the entirety of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Simulated and actual moving bed technology is generally only suitable for separating binary mixtures. Thus, a more polar component will move with the eluent, and be collected as a raffinate stream, and a less polar component will move with the adsorbent, and be collected as an extract stream. It is therefore difficult to use simulated or actual moving bed technology to separate a desired product from a crude mixture containing both polar and non-polar impurities. This limits the applicability of such techniques in purifying PUFA products from fish oils, for example.
Accordingly, when simulated or actual moving bed technology has been used to separate PUFAs from natural oils in the past, it is generally necessary first to subject the natural oil to a preliminary separation step (e.g. fixed column chromatography) before purifying the intermediate product obtained using simulated or actual moving bed technology (see, for example, EP-A-0697034). Typically, the initial purification step removes polar or non-polar components, thus creating an essentially binary mixture which is then subjected to moving bed chromatography. This process of separating a binary mixture is illustrated with reference to Figure 1. The concept of a simulated or actual continuous countercurrent chromatographic separation process is explained by considering a vertical chromatographic column containing stationary phase S divided into sections, more precisely into four superimposed sub-zones I, II, III and IV going from the bottom to the top of the column. The eluent is introduced at the bottom at IE by means of a pump P. The mixture of the components A and B which are to be separated is introduced at IA + B between sub-zone II and sub-zone III. An extract containing mainly B is collected at SB between sub-zone I and sub-zone II, and a raffinate containing mainly A is collected at SA between sub-zone III and sub-zone IV. In the case of a simulated moving bed system, a simulated downward movement of the stationary phase S is caused by movement of the introduction and collection points relative to the solid phase. In the case of an actual moving bed system, downward movement of the stationary phase S is caused by movement of the various
chromatographic columns relative to the introduction and collection points. In Figure 1, eluent flows upward and mixture A + B is injected between sub-zone II and sub- zone III. The components will move according to their chromatographic interactions with the stationary phase, for example adsorption on a porous medium. The component B that exhibits stronger affinity to the stationary phase (the slower running component) will be more slowly entrained by the eluent and will follow it with delay. The component A that exhibits the weaker affinity to the stationary phase (the faster running component) will be easily entrained by the eluent. If the right set of parameters, especially the flow rate in each zone, are correctly estimated and controlled, the component A exhibiting the weaker affinity to the stationary phase will be collected between sub-zone III and sub-zone IV as a raffinate and the component B exhibiting the stronger affinity to the stationary phase will be collected between sub- zone I and sub-zone II as an extract. It will therefore be appreciated that the conventional moving bed system
schematically illustrated in Fig. 1 is limited to binary fractionation.
Accordingly, there is a need for a single simulated or actual moving bed
chromatographic separation process that can separate PUFAs or their derivatives from both faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities), to produce an essentially pure PUFA or derivative thereof. It is further desirable that the process should involve inexpensive eluents which operate under standard temperature and pressure conditions. It has now been surprisingly found that a PUFA product can be effectively purified with a single simulated or actual moving bed apparatus using an aqueous organic solvent eluent. The present invention therefore provides a chromatographic separation process for recovering a polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) product, from a feed mixture, which process comprises introducing the feed mixture to a simulated or actual moving bed chromatography apparatus having a plurality of linked
chromatography columns containing, as eluent, an aqueous organic solvent, wherein the apparatus has a plurality of zones comprising at least a first zone and second zone, each zone having an extract stream and a raffinate stream from which liquid can be collected from said plurality of linked chromatography columns, and wherein (a) a raffinate stream containing the PUFA product together with more polar components is collected from a column in the first zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the second zone, and/or (b) an extract stream containing the PUFA product together with less polar components is collected from a column in the second zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the first zone, said PUFA product being separated from different components of the feed mixture in each zone, and wherein the aqueous organic solvent is other than aqueous alcohol.
Also provided is a PUFA product obtainable by the process of the present invention.
The PUFA products produced by the process of the present invention are produced in high yield, and have high purity. Further, the content of the distinctive impurities which typically arise from distillation of PUFAs is very low. As used herein, the term "isomeric impurities" is used to denote those impurities typically produced during the distillation of PUFA-containing natural oils. These include PUFA isomers, peroxidation and oligomerization products.
Figure 1 illustrates the basic principles of a simulated or actual moving bed process for separating a binary mixture.
Figure 2 illustrates a first preferred embodiment of the invention which is suitable for separating EPA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities). Figure 3 illustrates a second preferred embodiment of the invention which is suitable for separating DHA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities). Figure 4 illustrates in more detail the first preferred embodiment of the invention which is suitable for separating EPA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities). Figure 5 illustrates in more detail the second preferred embodiment of the invention which is suitable for separating DHA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities).
Figure 6 illustrates in more detail an alternative method for the first preferred embodiment of the invention which is suitable for separating EPA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities).
Figure 7 illustrates in more detail an alternative method for the second preferred embodiment of the invention which is suitable for separating DHA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities).
Figure 8 illustrates a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention for purifying EPA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities).
Figure 9 illustrates an alternative method for a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention for purifying EPA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities). Figure 10 illustrates a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention for purifying EPA from faster and slower running components (i.e. more polar and less polar impurities).
Figure 11 shows a GC analysis of an EPA product produced by SMB.
Figure 12 shows GC FAMES traces of first extract and raffinate streams obtained in an SMB process. Figure 13 shows GC FAMES traces of second extract and raffinate streams obtained in an SMB process.
Figure 14 shows a GC FAMES trace of a DHA product produced by SMB.
Figure 15 shows a GC FAMES trace of a DHA product produced by distillation.
Figure 16 shows a GC trace of an EPA product produced using a chromatographic technique in which the eluent was aqueous acetonitrile.
The term "polyunsaturated fatty acid" (PUFA) refers to fatty acids that contain more than one double bond. Such PUFAs are well known to the person skilled in the art. As used herein, a PUFA derivative is a PUFA in the form of a mono-, di- or triglyceride, ester, phospholipid, amide, lactone, or salt. Triglycerides and esters are preferred. Esters are more preferred. Esters are typically alkyl esters, preferably Ci- C6 alkyl esters, more preferably C1-C4 alkyl esters. Examples of esters include methyl and ethyl esters. Ethyl esters are most preferred.
As used herein, the term "PUFA product" refers to a product comprising one or more polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), and/or derivatives thereof, typically of nutritional or pharmaceutical significance. Typically, the PUFA product is a single PUFA or derivative thereof. Alternatively, the PUFA product is a mixture of two or more PUFAs or derivatives thereof, for example two. As used herein, the term "zone" refers to a plurality of linked chromatography columns containing, as eluent, an aqueous organic solvent, and having one or more injection points for a feed mixture stream, one or more injection points for water and/or organic solvent, a raffinate take-off stream from which liquid can be collected from said plurality of linked chromatography columns, and an extract take-off stream from which liquid can be collected from said plurality of linked chromatography columns. Typically, each zone has only one injection point for a feed mixture. In one embodiment, each zone has only one injection point for the aqueous organic solvent eluent. In another embodiment, each zone has two or more injection points for water and/or organic solvent. The term "raffmate" is well known to the person skilled in the art. In the context of actual and simulated moving bed chromatography it refers to the stream of components that move more rapidly with the liquid eluent phase compared with the solid adsorbent phase. Thus, a raffmate stream is typically enriched with more polar components, and depleted of less polar components compared with a feed stream.
The term "extract" is well known to the person skilled in the art. In the context of actual and simulated moving bed chromatography it refers to the stream of components that move more rapidly with the solid adsorbent phase compared with the liquid eluent phase. Thus, an extract stream is typically enriched with less polar components, and depleted of more polar components compared with a feed stream.
As used herein the term "nonadjacent" when applied to columns in the same apparatus refers to columns separated by one or more columns, preferably 3 or more columns, more preferably 5 or more columns, most preferably about 5 columns.
Thus, where (a) a raffmate stream containing the PUFA product together with more polar components is collected from a column in the first zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the second zone, the raffmate stream collected from the first zone is the feed mixture for the second zone. Where (b) an extract stream containing the PUFA product together with less polar components is collected from a column in the second zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the first zone, the extract stream collected from the second zone is the feed mixture in the first zone.
Typically, the PUFA product comprises at least one co-3 or co-6 PUFA, preferably at least one co-3 PUFA. Examples of co-3 PUFAs include alpha- lino lenic acid (ALA), stearidonic acid (SDA), eicosatrienoic acid (ETE), eicosatetraenoic acid (ETA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). SDA, EPA, DPA and DHA are preferred. EPA and DHA are more preferred. Examples of co-6 PUFAs include linoleic acid (LA), gamma- lino lenic acid (GLA), eicosadienoic acid, dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA), arachidonic acid (ARA), docosadienoic acid, adrenic acid and docosapentaenoic (co-6) acid. LA, ARA, GLA and DGLA are preferred.
In one embodiment, the PUFA product is EPA and/or EPA ethyl ester (EE)
In another embodiment, the PUFA product is DHA and/or EPA ethyl ester (EE).
In a yet further embodiment, the PUFA product is a mixture of EPA and DHA and/or EPA EE and DHA EE.
Suitable feed mixtures for fractionating by the process of the present invention may be obtained from natural sources including vegetable and animal oils and fats, and from synthetic sources including oils obtained from genetically modified plants, animals and micro organisms including yeasts. Examples include fish oils, algal and microalgal oils and plant oils, for example borage oil, Echium oil and evening primrose oil. In one embodiment, the feed mixture is a fish oil. In another embodiment, the feed mixture is an algal oil. Algal oils are particularly suitable when the desired PUFA product is EPA and/or DHA. Genetically modified Safflower oil is particularly suitable when the desired PUFA product is GLA. Genetically modified yeast is particularly suitable when the desired PUFA product is EPA.
The feed mixture may undergo chemical treatment before fractionation by the process of the invention. For example, it may undergo glyceride transesterification or glyceride hydrolysis followed in certain cases by selective processes such as crystallisation, molecular distillation, urea fractionation, extraction with silver nitrate or other metal salt solutions, iodolactonisation or supercritical fluid fractionation.
The feed mixtures typically contain the PUFA product and at least one more polar component and at least one less polar component. The less polar components have a stronger adherence to the adsorbent used in the process of the present invention than does the PUFA product. During operation, such less polar components typically move with the solid adsorbent phase in preference to the liquid eluent phase. The more polar components have a weaker adherence to the adsorbent used in the process of the present invention than does the PUFA product. During operation, such more polar components typically move with the liquid eluent phase in preference to the solid adsorbent phase. In general, more polar components will be separated into a raffinate stream, and less polar components will be separated into an extract stream.
Examples of the more and less polar components include (1) other compounds occurring in natural oils (e.g. marine oils or vegetable oils), (2) byproducts formed during storage, refining and previous concentration steps and (3) contaminants from solvents or reagents which are utilized during previous concentration or purification steps.
Examples of (1) include other unwanted PUFAs; saturated fatty acids; sterols, for example cholesterol; vitamins; and environmental pollutants, such as
polychlorobiphenyl (PCB), polyaromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) pesticides, chlorinated pesticides, dioxines and heavy metals. PCB, PAH, dioxines and chlorinated pesticides are all highly non-polar components.
Examples of (2) include isomers and oxidation or decomposition products from the PUFA product, for instance, auto-oxidation polymeric products of fatty acids or their derivatives.
Examples of (3) include urea which may be added to remove saturated or mono- unsaturated fatty acids from the feed mixture.
Preferably, the feed mixture is a PUFA-containing marine oil, more preferably a marine oil comprising EPA and/or DHA.
A typical feed mixture for preparing concentrated EPA by the process of the present invention comprises 50-75% EPA, 0 to 10% DHA, and other components including other essential co-3 and co-6 fatty acids. A preferred feed mixture for preparing concentrated EPA by the process of the present invention comprises 55% EPA, 5% DHA, and other components including other essential co-3 and co-6 fatty acids. DHA is less polar than EPA. A typical feed mixture for preparing concentrated DHA by the process of the present invention comprises 50-75% DHA, 0 to 10% EPA, and other components including other essential co-3 and co-6 fatty acids.
A preferred feed mixture for preparing concentrated DHA by the process of the present invention comprises 75% DHA, 7% EPA and other components including other essential co-3 and co-6 fatty acids. EPA is more polar than DHA.
A typical feed mixture for preparing a concentrated mixture of EPA and DHA by the process of the present invention comprises greater than 33% EPA, and greater than 22% DHA.
The process of the invention requires a plurality of zones in said chromatography apparatus. Typically, two or more zones are used. The number of zones is not particularly limited, but in general there are 2 to 5 zones. Preferably, there are two or three zones, more preferably there are two zones.
Typically, the components separated in each zone of the apparatus used in the process of the present invention have different polarities. Typically, a) the aqueous organic solvent eluent present in each zone has a different water: organic solvent ratio; and/or
(b) the rate at which liquid collected via the extract and raffinate streams in each zone is recycled back into the same zone is adjusted such that the PUFA product can be separated from different components of the feed mixture in each zone.
When the apparatus used in the process of the present invention has two zones, the present invention typically provides a chromatographic separation process for recovering a polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) product, from a feed mixture, which process comprises introducing the feed mixture to a simulated or actual moving bed chromatography apparatus having a plurality of linked chromatography columns containing, as eluent, an aqueous organic solvent, wherein the apparatus has a first zone and a second zone, each zone having an extract stream and a raffinate stream from which liquid can be collected from said plurality of linked chromatography columns, and wherein (a) a raffinate stream containing the PUFA product together with more polar components is collected from a column in the first zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the second zone, and/or (b) an extract stream containing the PUFA product together with less polar components is collected from a column in the second zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the first zone, said PUFA product being separated from less polar components of the feed mixture in the first zone, and said PUFA product being separated from more polar components of the feed mixture in the second zone, and wherein the aqueous organic solvent is other than aqueous alcohol
Typically, when the apparatus used in the process of the present invention contains two zones, the eluent in the first zone contains more organic solvent than the eluent in the second zone, and the second zone is downstream of the first zone with respect to the flow of eluent in the system. Thus, the eluent in the system typically moves from the first zone to the second zone. Conversely, the solid adsorbent phase typically moves from the second zone to the first zone. Typically, the two zones do not overlap, i.e. there are no chromatographic columns which are in both zones. In a further embodiment of the invention, the apparatus has a first zone, a second zone and a third zone. The water:organic solvent ratios of the aqueous organic solvent eluent present in the first, second and third zones are typically different. As will be evident to one skilled in the art, this has the consequence that impurities having different polarities can be removed in each zone.
Preferably, when the apparatus has three zones, the eluent in the first zone contains more organic solvent than the eluent in the second zone and the third zone and the first zone is upstream of the second and third zones with respect to the flow of eluent in the system. Typically, the eluent in the second zone contains more organic solvent than the eluent in the third zone and the second zone is upstream of the third zone with respect to the flow of eluent in the system. Typically, in the first zone, said PUFA product is separated from components of the feed mixture which are less polar than the PUFA product. Typically, in the second zone, said PUFA product is separated from components of the feed mixture which are less polar than the PUFA product but more polar than the components separated in the first zone. Typically, in the third zone, said PUFA product is separated from components of the feed mixture which are more polar than the PUFA product. In a further embodiment, in the first zone, said PUFA product is separated from components of the feed mixture which are less polar than the PUFA product, in the second zone, said PUFA product is separated from components of the feed mixture which are more polar than the PUFA product, and in the third zone, said PUFA product is separated from components of the feed mixture which are more polar than the PUFA product and also more polar than the components separated in the second zone.
Such a setup having three zones would be suitable for separating EPA and DHA from a mixture containing impurities which are less polar than DHA and EPA and also containing impurities which are more polar than EPA. In the first zone, the components which are less polar than DHA and EPA are removed as an extract stream and a raffmate stream comprising DHA, EPA and components which are more polar than EPA is collected and introduced into the second zone. In the second zone, DHA is removed as an extract stream and a raffmate stream comprising EPA and components which are more polar than EPA is collected and introduced into the third zone. In the third zone, the components which are more polar than EPA are removed as a raffmate stream and purified EPA is collected as an extract stream. In this embodiment, the purified EPA is the purified PUFA product. Such a setup has an advantage that a secondary PUFA may also be recovered. In this case, the secondary PUFA is the DHA collected as the extract stream from the second zone.
Typically, in addition to said PUFA product, an additional secondary PUFA product is collected in the chromatographic separation process of the invention. Preferably, the PUFA product is EPA and the additional secondary PUFA product is DHA. In a further embodiment of the invention, the apparatus is configured to collect a PUFA product which is a concentrated mixture of EPA and DHA. Thus, a feed mixture is used which contains EPA, DHA, components which are more polar than EPA and DHA, and components which are less polar than EPA and DHA. In the first zone, less polar material than EPA and DHA is removed. In the second zone, material which is more polar than EPA and DHA is removed, and a concentrated mixture of EPA and DHA is collected as the PUFA product. Any known simulated or actual moving bed chromatography apparatus may be utilised for the purposes of the method of the present invention, as long as the apparatus is configured with the multiple, in particular two, zones which characterise the process of the present invention. Those apparatuses described in US 2,985,589, US 3,696,107, US 3,706,812, US 3,761,533, FR-A-2103302, FR-A-2651148, FR-A- 2651149, US 6,979,402, US 5,069,883 and US 4,764,276 may all be used if configured in accordance with the process of the present invention.
The number of columns used in the apparatus is not particularly limited. A skilled person would easily be able to determine an appropriate number of columns to use. The number of columns is typically 8 or more, preferably 15 or more. In a more preferred embodiment 15 or 16 columns are used. In another more preferred embodiment, 19 or 20 columns are used. In other more preferred embodiments, 30 or more columns are used. Typically, there are no more than 50 columns, preferably no more than 40.
Each zone typically consists of an approximately equal share of the total number of columns. Thus, in the case of an apparatus configured with two zones, each zone typically consists of approximately half of the total number of chromatographic columns in the system. Thus, the first zone typically comprises 4 or more, preferably 8 or more, more preferably about 8 columns. The second zone typically comprises 4 or more, preferably 7 or more, more preferably 7 or 8 columns.
The dimensions of the columns used in the apparatus are not particularly limited, and will depend on the volume of feed mixture to be purified. A skilled person would easily be able to determine appropriately sized columns to use. The diameter of each column is typically between 10 and 500mm, preferable between 25 and 250mm, more preferable between 50 and 100 mm, and most preferably between 70 and 80 mm. The length of each column is typically between 10 and 200 cm, preferably between 25 and 150cm, more preferably between 70 and 110 cm, and most preferably between 80 and 100 cm.
The columns in each zone typically have identical dimensions but may, for certain applications, have different dimensions.
The flow rates to the column are limited by maximum pressures across the series of columns and will depend on the column dimensions and particle size of the solid phases. One skilled in the art will easily be able to establish the required flow rate for each column dimension to ensure efficient desorption. Larger diameter columns will in general need higher flows to maintain linear flow through the columns.
For the typical column sizes outlined above, and for an apparatus having two zones, typically the flow rate of eluent into the first zone is from 1 to 4.5L/min, preferably from 1.5 to 2.5 L/min. Typically, the flow rate of the extract from the first zone is from 0.1 to 2.5L/min, preferably from 0.5 to 2.25 L/min. In embodiments where part of the extract from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone, the flow rate of recycle is typically from 0.7 to 1.4 L/min, preferably about 1 L/min. Typically, the flow rate of the raffmate from the first zone is from 0.2 to 2.5 L/min, preferably from 0.3 to 2.0 L/min. In embodiments where part of the raffmate from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone, the flow rate of recycle is typically from 0.3 to 1.0 L/min, preferably about 0.5 L/min. Typically, the flow rate of introduction of the feed mixture into the first zone is from 5 to 150 mL/min, preferably from 10 to 100 mL/min, more preferably from 20 to 60 mL/min. For the typical column sizes outlined above, and for an apparatus having two zones, typically the flow rate of eluent into the second zone is from 1 to 4 L/min, preferably from 1.5 to 3.5 L/min. Typically, the flow rate of the extract from the second zone is from from 0.5 to 2 L/min, preferably from 0.7 to 1.9 L/min. In embodiments where part of the extract from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone, the flow rate of recycle is typically from 0.6 to 1.4 L/min, preferably from 0.7 to 1.1 L/min, more preferably about 0.9 L/min. Typically, the flow rate of the raffinate from the second zone is from 0.5 to 2.5 L/min, preferably from 0.7 to 1.8 L/min, more preferably about 1.4 L/min.
As the skilled person will appreciate, references to rates at which liquid is collected or removed via the various extract and raffinate streams refer to volumes of liquid removed in an amount of time, typically L/minute. Similarly, references to rates at which liquid is recycled back into the same zone, typically to an adjacent column in the same zone, refer to volumes of liquid recycled in an amount of time, typically L/minute.
Typically, part of one or more of the extract stream from the first zone, the raffinate stream from the first zone, the extract stream from the second zone, and the raffinate stream from the second zone are recycled back into the same zone, typically into an adjacent column in the same zone.
This recycle is different from the feeding of an extract or raffinate stream into a non- adjacent column in another zone. Rather, the recycle involves feeding part of the extract or raffinate stream out of a zone back into the same zone, typically into an adjacent column in the same zone.
The rate at which liquid collected via the extract or raffinate stream from the first or second zones is recycled back into the same zone is the rate at which liquid collected via that stream is fed back into the same zone, typically into an adjacent column in the same zone. This can be seen with reference to Figure 9. The rate of recycle of extract in the first zone is the rate at which extract collected from the bottom of column 2 is fed into the top of column 3, i.e. the flow rate of liquid into the top of column 3. The rate of recycle of extract in the second zone is the rate at which extract collected at the bottom of column 10 is fed into the top of column 11, i.e. the flow rate of liquid into the top of column 11.
Recycle of the extract and/or raffinate streams is typically effected by feeding the liquid collected via that stream into a container, and then pumping an amount of that liquid from the container back into the same zone. In this case, the rate of recycle of liquid collected via a particular extract or raffinate stream, typically back into an adjacent column in the same zone, is the rate at which liquid is pumped out of the container back into the same zone, typically into an adjacent column.
As the skilled person will appreciate, the amount of liquid being introduced into a zone via the eluent and feedstock streams is balanced with the amount of liquid removed from a zone, and recycled back into the same zone. Thus, with reference to Figure 9, for the extract stream, the flow rate of eluent (desorbent) into the first or second zone (D) is equal to the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from that zone accumulates in a container (E1/E2) added to the rate at which extract is recycled back into the same zone (D-E1/D-E2). For the raffinate stream in a zone, the rate at which extract is recycled back into a zone (D-E1/D-E2) added to the rate at which feedstock is introduced into a zone (F/Rl) is equal to the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from that zone accumulates in a container (R1/R2) added to the rate at which raffinate is recycled back into the same zone (D+F-El- R1/D+R1-E2-R2).
The rate at which liquid collected from a particular extract or raffinate stream from a zone accumulates in a container can also be thought of as the net rate of removal of that extract or raffinate stream from that zone.
Typically, the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream out of the first zone is recycled back into the first zone differs from the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream out of the second zone is recycled back into the second zone, and/or the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream out of the first zone is recycled back into the first zone differs from the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream out of the second zone is recycled back into the second zone. Varying the rate at which liquid collected via the extract and/or raffinate streams in each zone is recycled back into the same zone has the effect of varying the amount of more polar and less polar components present in the other extract and raffinate streams. Thus, for example, a lower extract recycle rate results in fewer of the less polar components in that zone being carried through to the raffinate stream in that zone. A higher extract recycle rate results in more of the less polar components in that zone being carried through to the raffinate stream in that zone. This can be seen, for example, in the specific embodiment of the invention shown in figure 6. The rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream in the first zone is recycled back into the same zone (D-El) will affect to what extent any of component A is carried through to the raffinate stream in the first zone (Rl).
Typically, the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone is faster than the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone.
Preferably, a raffinate stream containing the PUFA product together with more polar components is collected from a column in the first zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the second zone, and the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone is faster than the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone.
Alternatively, the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone is slower than the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone.
Typically, the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone is faster than the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone. Preferably, an extract stream containing the PUFA product together with less polar components is collected from a column in the second zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the first zone, and the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone is faster than the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone.
Alternatively, the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone is slower than the rate at which liquid collected via the raffmate stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone.
The step time, i.e. the time between shifting the points of injection of the feed mixture and eluent, and the various take off points of the collected fractions, is not particularly limited, and will depend on the number and dimensions of the columns used, and the flow rate through the apparatus. A skilled person would easily be able to determine appropriate step times to use in the process of the present invention. The step time is typically from 100 to 1000 seconds, preferably from 200 to 800 seconds, more preferably from about 250 to about 750 seconds. In some embodiments, a step time of from 100 to 400 seconds, preferably 200 to 300 seconds, more preferably about 250 seconds, is appropriate. In other embodiments, a step time of from 600 to 900 seconds, preferably 700 to 800 seconds, more preferably about 750 seconds is appropriate.
In the process of the present invention, actual moving bed chromatography is preferred.
Conventional adsorbents known in the art for actual and simulated moving bed systems may be used in the process of the present invention. Each chromatographic column may contain the same or a different adsorbent. Typically, each column contains the same adsorbent. Examples of such commonly used materials are polymeric beads, preferably polystyrene reticulated with DVB (divinylbenzene); and silica gel, preferably reverse phase bonded silica gel with C8 or CI 8 alkanes, especially CI 8. CI 8 bonded reverse phase silica gel is preferred. The adsorbent used in the process of the present invention is preferably non-polar.
The shape of the adsorbent stationary phase material may be, for example, spherical or nonspherical beads, preferably substantially spherical beads. Such beads typically have a diameter of 5 to 500 microns, preferably 10 to 500 microns, more preferably 15 to 500 microns, more preferably 40 to 500 microns, more preferably 100 to 500 microns, more preferably 250 to 500 microns, even more preferably 250 to 400 microns, most preferably 250 to 350 microns. In some embodiments, beads with a diameter of 5 to 35 microns may be used, typically 10 to 30 microns, preferably 15 to 25 microns. Some preferred particle sizes are somewhat larger than particle sizes of beads used in the past in simulated and actual moving bed processes. Use of larger particles enables a lower pressure of eluent to be used in the system. This, in turn, has advantages in terms of cost savings, efficiency and lifetime of the apparatus. It has surprisingly been found that adsorbent beads of large particle size may be used in the process of the present invention (with their associated advantages) without any loss in resolution.
The adsorbent typically has a pore size of from 10 to 50 nm, preferably 15 to 45 nm, more preferably 20 to 40 nm, most preferably 25 to 35 nm.
The eluent used in the process of the present invention is an aqueous organic solvent other than aqueous alcohol. The aqueous organic solvent typically comprises water and one or more ethers, esters, ketones or nitriles, or mixtures thereof.
Ether solvents are well known to the person skilled in the art. Ethers are typically short chain ethers. Ethers typically are of formula R-O-R', wherein R and R are the same or different and represent a straight or branched Ci-C6 alkyl group. The Ci-C6 alkyl group is preferably unsubstituted. Preferred ethers include diethylether, diisopropylether, and methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE).
Ester solvents are well known to the person skilled in the art. Esters are typically short chain esters. Esters typically are of formula R-(C=0)0-R, wherein R and R are the same or different and represent a straight or branched Ci-C6 alkyl group.
Preferred esters include methylacetate and ethylacetate.
Ketone solvents are well known to the person skilled in the art. Ketones are typically short chain ketones. Ketones typically are of formula R-(C=0)-R, wherein R and R are the same or different and represent a straight or branched Ci-C6 alkyl group. The Ci-C6 alkyl group is preferably unsubstituted. Preferred ketones include acetone, methylethylketone and methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK). Nitrile solvents are well known to the person skilled in the art. Nitriles are typically short chain nitriles. Nitriles typically are of formula R-CN, wherein R represents a straight or branched Ci-C6 alkyl group. The Ci-C6 alkyl group is preferably unsubstituted. Preferred nitriles include acetonitrile.
The aqueous organic solvent is preferably aqueous acetonitrile.
When the aqueous organic solvent is aqueous acetonitrile, the eluent typically contains up to 30 wt% water, remainder acetonitrile. Preferably, the eluent contains from 5 to 25 wt% water, remainder acetonitrile. More preferably, the eluent contains from 10 to 20 wt% water, remainder acetonitrile. Even more preferably, the eluent contains from 15 to 25 wt% water, remainder acetonitrile.
The aqueous alcohol typically comprises water and one or more short chain alcohols. The short chain alcohol typically has from 1 to 6 carbon atoms. Examples of alcohols include methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, i-propanol, n-butanol, i-butanol, s-butanol and t-butanol.
Typically, the eluent is not in a supercritical state. Typically, the eluent is a liquid.
Typically, the average watenorganic solvent ratio of the eluent in the entire apparatus is from 0.1 :99.9 to 30:70 parts by volume, preferably 0.1 :99.9 to 9:91 parts by volume, more preferably from 0.25 :99.75 to 7:93 parts by volume, even more preferably from 0.5 :99.5 to 6:94 parts by volume.
The eluting power of the eluent in each of the zones is typically different. Preferably, the eluting power of the eluent in the first zone is greater than that of the eluent in the second and subsequent zones. In practice this is achieved by varying the relative amounts of water and organic solvent in each zone. Depending on the choice of organic solvent, they may be more powerful desorbers than water. Alternatively, they may be less powerful desorbers than water. Acetonitrile, for example, is a more powerful desorber than water. Thus, when the aqueous organic solvent is acetonitrile, the amount of acetonitrile in the eluent in the first zone is typically greater than the amount of acetonitrile in the eluent of the second and subsequent zones. In embodiments where the aqueous organic solvent present in each zone has a different water organic solvent content, the watenorganic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone is typically from 5:95 to 25:75 parts by volume, preferably 10:90 to 15:85 parts by volume. Alternatively, the watenorganic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone may be from 0: 100 to 5:95 parts by volume, preferably from 0.1 :99.9 to 2.5:97.5 parts by volume, more preferably from 0.25:99.75 to 2:98 parts by volume, and most preferably from 0.5:99.5 to 1.5:98.5 parts by volume. In these embodiments, the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the second zone is typically from 10:90 to 30:70 parts by volume, preferably 15 :85 to 20:80 parts by volume. Alternatively, the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the second zone may be from 3:97 to 7:93 parts by volume, preferably from 4:96 to 6:94 parts by volume, more preferably from 4.5:95.5 to 5.5:94.5 parts by volume.
In a particularly preferred embodiment where the aqueous organic solvent present in each zone has a different water organic solvent content, the water: organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone is from 0.5:99.5 to 1.5:98.5 parts by volume, and the watenorganic solvent ratio of the eluent in the second zone is from 4.5:95:5 to 5.5:94.5 parts by volume.
In embodiments where the rate at which liquid collected via the extract and raffinate streams in each zone is recycled back into the same zone is adjusted such that the PUFA product can be separated from different components of the feed mixture in each zone, the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluents in each zone may be the same or different. Typically, the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in each zone is from 0.5:99.5 to 5.5:94.5 parts by volume. In one embodiment, the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone is lower than the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the second zone. In another embodiment, the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone is higher than the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the second zone. In a further embodiment, the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone is the same as the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the second zone. It will be appreciated that the ratios of water and organic solvent in each zone referred to above are average ratios within the totality of the zone.
Typically, the watenorganic solvent ratio of the eluent in each zone is controlled by introducing water and/or organic solvent into one or more columns in the zones.
Thus, for example, to achieve a lower watenorganic solvent ratio in the first zone than in the second zone, water is typically introduced more slowly into the first zone than the second zone. In some embodiments, essentially pure organic solvent and essentially pure water may be introduced at different points in each zone. The relative flow rates of these two streams will determine the overall solvent profile across the zone. In other embodiments, different organic solvent/water mixtures may be introduced at different points in each zone. That will involve introducing two or more different organic solvent/water mixtures into the zone, each organic solvent/water mixture having a different organic solven water ratio. The relative flow rates and relative concentrations of the organic solvent/water mixtures in this embodiment will determine the overall solvent profile across the zone. In other embodiments where the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in each zone is the same, the same organic solvent/water mixture is introduced to each zone. Typically, the process of the present invention is conducted at from 15 to 55°C, preferably at from 20 to 40°C, more preferably at about 30°C. Thus, the process is typically carried out at room temperature, but may be conducted at elevated temperatures. The process of the present invention involves introducing a feed stream into one zone (for example the first zone), collecting a first intermediate stream enriched with the PUFA product and introducing the first intermediate stream into another zone (for example the second zone). Thus, when the apparatus has two zones, the process involves either (a) collecting a first intermediate stream from the first zone and introducing it into the second zone, or (b) collecting a first intermediate stream from the second zone and introducing it into the first zone. In this way, the PUFA product can be separated from both more and less polar components in a single process. Either (a) a raffmate stream containing the PUFA product together with more polar components is collected from a column in the first zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the second zone, or (b) an extract stream containing the PUFA product together with less polar components is collected from a column in the second zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the first zone.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the apparatus has two zones, and the process of the present invention comprises:
(i) introducing the feed mixture into the first zone, and removing a first raffmate stream enriched with the PUFA product and a first extract stream depleted of the PUFA product, and
(ii) introducing the first raffmate stream into the second zone, removing a second raffmate stream depleted of the PUFA product, and collecting a second extract stream to obtain the PUFA product.
This particularly preferred embodiment is suitable for purifying EPA from a feed mixture.
This particularly preferred embodiment is illustrated in Figure 2. A feed mixture F comprising the PUFA product (B) and more polar (C) and less polar (A) components is introduced into the first zone. In the first zone, the less polar components (A) are removed as extract stream El . The PUFA product (B) and more polar components (C) are removed as raffmate stream Rl . Raffmate stream Rl is then introduced into the second zone. In the second zone, the more polar components (C) are removed as raffmate stream R2. The PUFA product (B) is collected as extract stream E2.
This embodiment is illustrated in more detail in Figure 4. Figure 4 is identical to Figure 2, except that the points of introduction of the organic solvent desorbent (D) and water (W) into each zone are shown. The organic solvent desorbent (D) and water (W) together make up the eluent. The (D) phase is typically essentially pure organic solvent, but may, in certain embodiments be an organic solvent/water mixture comprising mainly organic solvent. The (W) phase is typically essentially pure water, but may, in certain embodiments be an organic solvent/water mixture comprising mainly water, for example a 98%water/2% acetonitrile mixture. A further illustration of this particularly preferred embodiment is shown in Figure 6. Here there is no separate water injection point, and instead an aqueous organic solvent desorbent is injected at (D).
The separation into raffinate and extract stream can be aided by varying the desorbing power of the eluent within each zone. This can be achieved by introducing the organic solvent (or organic solvent rich) component of the eluent and the water (or water rich) component at different points in each zone. Thus, typically, the organic solvent is introduced upstream of the extract take-off point and the water is introduced between the extract take-off point and the point of introduction of the feed into the zone, relative to the flow of eluent in the system. This is shown in Figure 4.
Alternatively, the separation can be aided by varying the rates at which liquid collected via the extract and raffinate streams from the two zones is recycled back into the same zone.
Typically, in this particularly preferred embodiment, the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone is faster than the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone; or the water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone is lower than that in the second zone.
In this particularly preferred embodiment the first raffinate stream in the first zone is typically removed downstream of the point of introduction of the feed mixture into the first zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone.
In this particularly preferred embodiment, the first extract stream in the first zone is typically removed upstream of the point of introduction of the feed mixture into the first zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone.
In this particularly preferred embodiment, the second raffinate stream in the second zone is typically removed downstream of the point of introduction of the first raffinate stream into the second zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone. In this particularly preferred embodiment, the second extract stream in the second zone is typically collected upstream of the point of introduction of the first raffinate stream into the second zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone.
Typically in this particularly preferred embodiment, the organic solvent or aqueous organic solvent is introduced into the first zone upstream of the point of removal of the first extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone. Typically in this particularly preferred embodiment, when water is introduced into the first zone, the water is introduced into the first zone upstream of the point of introduction of the feed mixture but downstream of the point of removal of the first extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone. Typically in this particularly preferred embodiment, the organic solvent or aqueous organic solvent is introduced into the second zone upstream of the point of removal of the second extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone.
Typically in this particularly preferred embodiment, when water is introduced into the second zone, the water is introduced into the second zone upstream of the point of introduction of the first raffinate stream but downstream of the point of removal of the second extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone.
In another particularly preferred embodiment, the apparatus has two zones, and the process comprises:
(i) introducing the feed mixture into the second zone, and removing a first raffinate stream depleted of the PUFA product and a first extract stream enriched in the PUFA product, and
(ii) introducing the first extract stream into the first zone, removing a
second extract stream depleted of the PUFA product, and collecting a second raffinate stream to obtain the PUFA product.
This particularly preferred embodiment is suitable for purifying DHA from a feed mixture. This embodiment is illustrated in Figure 3. A feed mixture F comprising the PUFA product (B) and more polar (C) and less polar (A) components is introduced into the second zone. In the second zone, the more polar components (C) are removed as raffinate stream Rl . The PUFA product (B) and less polar components (A) are collected as extract stream El . Extract stream El is then introduced to the first zone. In the first zone, the less polar components (A) are removed as extract stream E2. The PUFA product (B) is collected as raffinate stream R2. This embodiment is illustrated in more detail in Figure 5. Figure 5 is identical to Figure 3, except that the points of introduction of the organic solvent desorbent (D) and water (W) into each zone are shown. As above, the (D) phase is typically essentially pure organic solvent, but may, in certain embodiments be an organic solvent/water mixture comprising mainly organic solvent. The (W) phase is typically essentially pure water, but may, in certain embodiments be an organic solvent/water mixture comprising mainly water, for example a 98%water/2% acetonitrile mixture.
A further illustration of this particularly preferred embodiment is shown in Figure 7. Here there is no separate water injection point, and instead an aqueous organic solvent desorbent is injected at (D).
Typically in this embodiment, the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from the second zone is reintroduced into the second zone is faster than the rate at which liquid collected via the raffinate stream from the first zone is
reintroduced into the first zone; or the watenorganic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone is lower than that in the second zone.
In this second particularly preferred embodiment, the first raffinate stream in the second zone is typically removed downstream of the point of introduction of the feed mixture into the second zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone.
In this second particularly preferred embodiment, the first extract stream in the second zone is typically collected upstream of the point of introduction of the feed mixture into the second zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone. In this second particularly preferred embodiment, the second raffinate stream in the first zone is typically collected downstream of the point of introduction of the first extract stream into the first zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone.
In this second particularly preferred embodiment, the second extract stream in the first zone is typically removed upstream of the point of introduction of the first extract stream into the first zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone. Typically in this second particularly preferred embodiment, the organic solvent or aqueous organic solvent is introduced into the second zone upstream of the point of removal of the first extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone. Typically in this second particularly preferred embodiment, when water is introduced into the second zone, the water is introduced into the second zone upstream of the point of introduction of the feed mixture but downstream of the point of removal of the first extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the second zone. Typically in this second particularly preferred embodiment, the organic solvent or aqueous organic solvent is introduced into the first zone upstream of the point of removal of the second extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone. Typically in this second particularly preferred embodiment, when water is introduced into the first zone, the water is introduced into the first zone upstream of the point of introduction of the first raffinate stream but downstream of the point of removal of the second extract stream, with respect to the flow of eluent in the first zone. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the simulated or actual moving bed chromatography apparatus consists of fifteen chromatographic columns. These are referred to as columns 1 to 15. The fifteen columns are arranged in series so that the bottom of column 1 is linked to the top of column 2, the bottom of column 2 is linked to the top of column 3 etc. This may optionally be via a holding container, with a recycle stream into the next column. The flow of eluent through the system is from column 1 to column 2 to column 3 etc. The flow of adsorbent through the system is from column 15 to column 14 to column 13 etc. In a most preferred embodiment, the first zone typically consists of eight adjacent columns, columns 1 to 8, which are connected as discussed above. In this most preferred embodiment, the second zone typically consists of seven columns, columns 9 to 15, which are connected as discussed above. For the avoidance of doubt, the bottom of column 8 in the first zone is linked to the top of column 9 in the second zone.
A most preferred embodiment is illustrated in Figure 8. A feed mixture F comprising the PUFA product (B) and more polar (C) and less polar (A) components is introduced into the top of column 5 in the first zone. Organic solvent desorbent is introduced into the top of column 1 in the first zone. Water is introduced into the top of column 4 in the first zone. In the first zone, the less polar components (A) are removed as extract stream El from the bottom of column 2. The PUFA product (B) and more polar components (C) are removed as raffmate stream Rl from the bottom of column 7. Raffmate stream Rl is then introduced into the second zone at the top of column 13. Organic solvent desorbent is introduced into the top of column 9 in the second zone. Water is introduced into the top of column 12 in the second zone. In the second zone, the more polar components (C) are removed as raffmate stream R2 at the bottom of column 15. The PUFA product (B) is collected as extract stream E2 at the bottom of column 10.
In this most preferred embodiment, organic solvent is typically introduced into the top of column 1 in the first zone.
In this most preferred embodiment, water is typically introduced into the top of column 4 in the first zone.
In this most preferred embodiment, organic solvent is typically introduced into the top of column 9 in the second zone. In this most preferred embodiment, organic solvent is typically introduced into the top of column 12 in the second zone.
In this most preferred embodiment, the feed stream is typically introduced into the top of column 5 in the first zone.
In this most preferred embodiment, a first raffmate stream is typically collected from the bottom of column 7 in the first zone and introduced into the top of column 13 in the second zone. The first raffmate stream may optionally be collected in a container before being introduced into column 13.
In this most preferred embodiment, a first extract stream is typically removed from the bottom of column 2 in the first zone. The first extract stream may optionally be collected in a container and reintroduced into the top of column 3 in the first zone.
In this most preferred embodiment, a second raffmate stream is typically removed from the bottom of column 15 in the second zone.
In this most preferred embodiment, a second extract stream is typically collected from the bottom of column 10 in the second zone. This second extract stream typically contains the purified PUFA product. The second extract stream may optionally be collected in a container and reintroduced into the top of column 11 in the second zone.
Typically, in this most preferred embodiment, the watenorganic solvent ratio in the first zone is lower than the water:organic solvent ratio in the second zone.
A further most preferred embodiment is illustrated in Figure 9. A feed mixture F comprising the PUFA product (B) and more polar (C) and less polar (A) components is introduced into the top of column 5 in the first zone. Aqueous organic solvent desorbent is introduced into the top of column 1 in the first zone. In the first zone, the less polar components (A) are removed as extract stream El from the bottom of column 2. The PUFA product (B) and more polar components (C) are removed as raffmate stream Rl from the bottom of column 7. Raffmate stream Rl is then introduced into the second zone at the top of column 12. Aqueous organic solvent desorbent is introduced into the top of column 9 in the second zone. In the second zone, the more polar components (C) are removed as raffinate stream R2 at the bottom of column 14. The PUFA product (B) is collected as extract stream E2 at the bottom of column 10.
In this most preferred embodiment, aqueous organic solvent is typically introduced into the top of column 1 in the first zone.
In this most preferred embodiment, aqueous organic solvent is typically introduced into the top of column 9 in the second zone.
In this most preferred embodiment, the feed stream is typically introduced into the top of column 5 in the first zone. In this most preferred embodiment, a first raffinate stream is typically collected from the bottom of column 7 in the first zone and introduced into the top of column 12 in the second zone. The first raffinate stream may optionally be collected in a container before being introduced into column 12. In this most preferred embodiment, a first extract stream is typically removed from the bottom of column 2 in the first zone. The first extract stream may optionally be collected in a container and a portion reintroduced into the top of column 3 in the first zone. The rate of recycle of liquid collected via the extract stream from the first zone back into the first zone is the rate at which liquid is pumped from this container into the top of column 3.
In this most preferred embodiment, a second raffinate stream is typically removed from the bottom of column 14 in the second zone. In this most preferred embodiment, a second extract stream is typically collected from the bottom of column 10 in the second zone. This second extract stream typically contains the purified PUFA product. The second extract stream may optionally be collected in a container and a portion reintroduced into the top of column 11 in the second zone. The rate of recycle of liquid collected via the extract stream from the second zone back into the second zone is the rate at which liquid is pumped from this container into the top of column 11.
In this most preferred embodiment, the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone is typically faster than the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone.
In this most preferred embodiment, the aqueous organic solvent eluent is substantially the same in each zone.
In a further preferred embodiment of the invention, the simulated or actual moving bed chromatography apparatus consists of nineteen chromatographic columns. These are referred to as columns 1 to 19. The fifteen columns are arranged in series so that the bottom of column 1 is linked to the top of column 2, the bottom of column 2 is linked to the top of column 3 etc. The flow of eluent through the system is from column 1 to column 2 to column 3 etc. The flow of adsorbent through the system is from column 19 to column 18 to column 17 etc. In this embodiment, the first zone typically consists of ten adjacent columns, columns 1 to 10, which are connected as discussed above. The second zone typically consists of eight columns, columns 1 1 to 19, which are connected as discussed above.
This further preferred embodiment is illustrated in Figure 10. A feed mixture F comprising the PUFA product (B) and more polar (C) and less polar (A and A') components is introduced into the top of column 7 in the first zone. A first desorbent (Dl) comprising 100% organic solvent is introduced into the top of column 1 in the first zone. A second desorbent (D2) comprising a water/organic solvent mixture (preferably 2% acetonitrile and 98% water) is introduced into the top of column 5 in the first zone. In the first zone, less polar components (Α') and (A) are removed as extract streams ΕΓ and El from the bottoms of columns 1 and 4, respectively. The PUFA product (B) and more polar components (C) are removed as raffmate stream Rl from the bottom of column 10. Raffmate stream Rl is then introduced into the second zone at the top of column 17. A second desorbent (D2) comprising a water/organic solvent mixture (preferably 2% acetonitrile and 98% water) is introduced into the top of column 11 in the second zone. In the second zone, the more polar components (C) are removed as raffinate stream R2 at the bottom of column 19. The PUFA product (B) is collected as extract stream E2 at the bottom of column 14.
In this preferred embodiment, organic solvent is typically introduced into the top of column 1 in the first zone.
In this preferred embodiment, a 2% MeCN/98% water mixture is typically introduced into the top of column 5 in the first zone.
In this preferred embodiment, a 2% MeCN/98% water mixture is typically introduced into the top of column 11 in the second zone. In this preferred embodiment, the feed stream is typically introduced into the top of column 7 in the first zone.
In this preferred embodiment, a first raffinate stream is typically collected from the bottom of column 10 in the first zone and introduced into the top of column 17 in the second zone. The first raffinate stream may optionally be collected in a container before being introduced into column 17.
In this preferred embodiment, extract streams are typically removed from the bottoms of columns 1 and 4 in the first zone. The extract stream collected from the bottom or column 4 may optionally be collected in a container and reintroduced into the top of column 5 in the first zone.
In this preferred embodiment, a second raffinate stream is typically removed from the bottom of column 19 in the second zone.
In this preferred embodiment, a second extract stream is typically collected from the bottom of column 14 in the second zone. This second extract stream typically contains the purified PUFA product. The second extract stream may optionally be collected in a container and reintroduced into the top of column 15 in the second zone. Typically, in this most preferred embodiment, the water:organic solvent ratio in the first zone is lower than the water:organic solvent ratio in the second zone. The process of the invention allows much higher purities of PUFA product to be achieved than have been possible with conventional chromatographic techniques. PUFA products produced by the process of the invention also have particularly advantageous impurity profiles, which are quite different from those observed in oils prepared by known techniques. The present invention therefore also relates to compositions comprising a PUFA product, for example one obtainable by the process of the present invention.
In practice, the process of the present invention will generally be controlled by a computer. The present invention therefore also provides a computer program for controlling a chromatographic apparatus as defined herein, the computer program containing code means that when executed instruct the apparatus to carry out the process of the invention.
The following Examples illustrate the invention.
EXAMPLES
Reference Example 1 A fish oil derived feedstock (55weight% EPA EE, 5 weight% DHA EE) is fractionated using an actual moving bed chromatography system using bonded CI 8 silica gel (particle size 300μιη) as stationary phase and aqueous methanol as eluent according to the system schematically illustrated in Figure 8. 15 columns (diameter: 76.29mm, length: 914.40mm) are connected in series as shown in Figure 8.
The operating parameters and flowrates are as follows for eight different cases. For the conditions below, EPA EE is produced at a high level of purity (85 to 98% by GC FAMES). GC FAMES traces of the zone 1 extract and raffmate, and of the zone 2 extract and raffmate are shown as Figures 11 and 12 respectively.
Reference Example la
Step time: 750 sees
Cycle time: 200 mins
Feedstock (F) feed rate: 70 ml/min
Desorbent (D) feed rate: 850 ml/min
Extract rate: 425 ml/min
Raffmate rate: 495 ml/min Reference Example lb
Step time: 250 sees
Cycle time: 66.67 mins
Feedstock (F) feed rate: 210 ml/min
Desorbent (D) feed rate: 2550ml/min
Extract rate: 1275 ml/min
Raffmate rate: 1485 ml/min Reference Example lc
Step time: 500 sees
Cycle time: 133.33 mins
Feedstock (F) feed rate: 25 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone: 2050 ml/min
Extract container accumulation rate (El) in first zone: 1125 ml/min Extract recycle rate (Dl-El) in first zone: 925 ml/min
Raffinate rate (Rl) in first zone: 950 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone: 1700 ml/min
Extract container accumulation rate (E2) in second zone: 900 ml/min Extract recycle rate (D2-E2) in second zone: 800 ml/min
Raffinate rate (R2) in second zone: 800 ml/min Reference Example Id
Step time: 250 sees
Cycle time: 66.67 mins
Feedstock (F) feed rate: 50 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone: 4125 ml/min
Extract container accumulation rate (El) in first zone: 2250 ml/min
Extract recycle rate (Dl-El) in first zone: 1875 ml/min
Raffinate rate (Rl) in first zone: 1925 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone: 3375 ml/min
Extract container accumulation rate (E2) in second zone: 1800 ml/min
Extract recycle rate (D2-E2) in second zone: 1575 ml/min
Raffinate rate (R2) in second zone: 1575 ml/min
Reference Example le
Step time: 500 sees
Cycle time: 133.33 mins
Feedstock (F) feed rate: 50 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone: 4000 ml/min
Extract container accumulation rate (El) in first zone: 2250 ml/min Extract recycle rate (Dl-El) in first zone: 1750 ml/min
Raffinate rate (Rl) in first zone: 1800 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone: 3200 ml/min
Net extract accumulation rate (E2) in second zone: 1750 ml/min Extract recycle rate (D2-E2) in second zone: 1450 ml/min
Raffinate rate (R2) in second zone: 1450 ml/min
Reference Example If Step time: 250 sees
Cycle time: 66.67 mins
Feedstock (F) feed rate: 100 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone: 4050 ml/min
Extract container accumulation rate (El) in first zone: 2100 ml/min Extract recycle rate (Dl-El) in first zone: 1950 ml/min
Raffinate rate (Rl) in first zone: 2050 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone: 3300 ml/min
Net extract accumulation rate (E2) in second zone: 1700 ml/min
Extract recycle rate (D2-E2) in second zone: 1600 ml/min
Raffinate rate (R2) in second zone: 1600 ml/min
Reference Example 1 g
Step time: 500 sees
Cycle time: 133.33 mins
Feedstock (F) feed rate: 25 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone: 1275 ml/min
Extract container accumulation rate (El) in first zone: 750 ml/min
Extract recycle rate (Dl-El) in first zone: 550 ml/min
Raffinate rate (Rl) in first zone: 575 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone: 1275 ml/min
Net extract accumulation rate (E2) in second zone: 950 ml/min
Extract recycle rate (D2-E2) in second zone: 325 ml/min
Raffinate rate (R2) in second zone: 325 ml/min Reference Example lh
Step time: 250 sees
Cycle time: 66.67 mins
Feedstock (F) feed rate: 50 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone: 2550 ml/min
Extract container accumulation rate (El) in first zone: 1500 ml/min
Extract recycle rate (Dl-El) in first zone: 950 ml/min
Raffinate rate (Rl) in first zone: 1000 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone: 2000 ml/min
Net extract accumulation rate (E2) in second zone: 900 ml/min
Extract recycle rate (D2-E2) in second zone: 600 ml/min
Raffinate rate (R2) in second zone: 600 ml/min
Reference Example 2
A fish oil derived feedstock comprising eicosatetraenoic acid ethyl ester (ETA EE), EPA EE, isomers thereof and DHA EE was fractionated using an actual moving bed chromatography system using bonded CI 8 silica gel (particle size 40-60μιη) as stationary phase and aqueous methanol as eluent according to the system
schematically illustrated in Figure 10. 19 columns (diameter: 10 mm, length: 250 mm) are connected in series as shown in Figure 10. The operating parameters and flowrates are as follows.
Cycle time: 600 sees
Feedstock (F) feed rate: 0.5 ml/min
Desorbent (Dl, 100% methanol) feed rate into the first zone: 6 ml/min
Desorbent (D2, 99% methanol/1% water) feed rate into the first zone: 6 ml/min Extract (Ε ) rate from the first zone: 3 ml/min
Extract (El) rate from the first zone: 1.9 ml/min
Raffinate (Rl) rate from the first zone: 4.6 ml/min
Desorbent (D2, 97% methanol/3% water) feed rate into the second zone: 6 ml/min Extract (E2) rate from the second zone: 2.4 ml/min
Raffinate (R2) rate from the second zone: 4.6 ml/min
Again, EPA EE was produced at a high level of purity (greater than 90 weight%, greater than 95 weight%, greater than 98 weight%).
Reference Example 3
A fish oil derived feedstock (55weight% EPA EE, 5 weight% DHA EE) was fractionated using an actual moving bed chromatography system using bonded C 18 silica gel (particle size 300μιη, particle porosity 150 angstroms) as stationary phase and aqueous methanol as eluent according to the system schematically illustrated in Figure 8. 15 columns (diameter: 10 mm, length: 250 mm) are connected in series as shown in Figure 8.
The operating parameters and flowrates are as follows.
Cycle time: 380 sees
Feedstock (F) feed rate: 0.5 ml/min
Desorbent (D, 98.5% methanol/1.5% water) feed rate into the first zone: 9 ml/min Water rich phase (W, 85% methanol/15% water) feed rate into the first zone: 3.1 ml/min
Extract (El) rate from the first zone: 4 ml/min
Raffinate (Rl) rate from the first zone: 8.6 ml/min
Desorbent (D, 97% methanol/3% water) feed rate into the second zone: 10.8 ml/min Water rich phase (W, 85% methanol/15% water) feed rate into the second zone: 3.1 ml/min
Extract (E2) rate from the second zone: 4.1 ml/min
Raffinate (R2) rate from the second zone: 10.3 ml/min
EPA EE was produced at a high level of purity (>95% purity). A GC trace of the product is shown as Figure 13 Reference Example 4
A fish oil derived feedstock (70weight% DHA EE, 7 weight% EPA EE) is fractionated using an actual moving bed chromatography system using bonded CI 8 silica gel (particle size 300μιη) as stationary phase and aqueous methanol as eluent according to the system schematically illustrated in Figure 8. 15 columns (diameter: 76.29mm, length: 914.40mm) are connected in series as shown in Figure 8.
The operating parameters and flowrates are as follows.
Step time: 600 sees
Cycle time: 160 mins
Feedstock (F) feed rate: 25 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone: 2062.5 ml/min
Extract rate (El) in first zone: 900 ml/min
Raffmate rate (Rl) in first zone: 1187.5 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone: 1500 ml/min
Extract rate (E2) in second zone: 450 ml/min
Raffmate rate (R2) in second zone: 1050 ml/min
DHA EE is produced at a high level of purity (>97% by GC FAMES). A GC FAMES trace of the zone 2 extract is shown as Figure 14.
Reference Example 5
A fish oil derived feedstock (33 weight% EPA EE, 22 weight% DHA EE) is fractionated using an actual moving bed chromatography system using bonded CI 8 silica gel (particle size 300μιη) as stationary phase and aqueous methanol as eluent according to the system schematically illustrated in Figure 8. 15 columns (diameter: 76.29mm, length: 914.40mm) are connected in series as shown in Figure 8.
The operating parameters and flowrates are as follows. Step time: 380 sees
Cycle time : 101.33 mins
Feedstock (F) feed rate: 40 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone: 1950 ml/min
Extract rate (El) in first zone: 825 ml/min
Raffinate rate (Rl) in first zone: 1165 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone: 1425 ml/min
Extract rate (E2) in second zone: 787.5 ml/min
Raffinate rate (R2) in second zone: 637.5 ml/min
A mixture of EPA EE and DHA EE is produced at a high level of purity (>80% total EPA EE and DHA EE).
Reference Example 6
An experiment was carried out to compare the amount of environmental pollutants present in two PUFA products produced by SMBwith similar oils prepared by distillation. The pollutant profiles of the oils are shown in Table 1 below.
Table 1
Figure imgf000044_0001
1) Dioxin limits include the sum of polychlorinated dibenzeno-para-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and expressed in World Health Organisation (WHO) toxic equivalents using WHO-toxic equivalent factors (TEFs). This means that analytical results relating t 17 individual dioxin congeners of toxicological concern are expressed in a single quantifiable unit: TCDD toxic equivalent concentration or TEO
2) Maximum for dioxin and Furans remains at 2pg/g
Reference Example 7
An experiment was carried out to determine the amount of isomeric impurities present in an oil prepared by SMB compared with an equivalent oil prepared by distillation.
A GC trace of the DHA-rich oil prepared by SMB is shown as Figure 14. There is no evidence of isomeric impurities in the GC trace.
A GC trace of the oil prepared by distillation is shown as Figure 15. The four peaks with longer elution times than the DHA peak correspond to DHA isomers. From the GC trace it can be seen that the oil prepared by distillation contains about 1.5 wt% of isomeric impurities.
Reference Example 8
Two EPA-rich products produced by SMB were compared with EPA-rich oils produced by distillation. The wt% analysis of their component PUFAs is shown below.
Fatty Acid PUFA product PUFA product Distilled oil [1] Distilled oil [2] producedby produced by
SMB [1] SMB [2]
EPA (C20:5n-3) 98.33 97.04 98.09 98.14
DHA (C22:6n-3) 0.15 <LOD 0.34 < LOD
C18:3 n-3 < LOD 0.28 0.24 < LOD
C18:4 n-3 0.33 0.20 0.14 0.26
C20:4 n-3 0.14 0.45 0.18 0.46
C21:5 n-3 < LOD < LOD < LOD < LOD
C22:5 n-3 0.32 <LOD < LOD < LOD
Total Omega-3 99.27 97.97 98.94 98.86
C18:3n-6 < LOD < LOD 0.05 < LOD
C20:3 n-6 < LOD < LOD 0.13 0.11
C20:4 n-6 < LOD 0.21 0.26 0.37
Total Omega-6 < LOD 0.21 0.44 0.48 Reference Example 9
An EPA/DHA-rich product produced by SMB was compared with an EPA/DHA-rich oil produced by distillation. The wt% analysis of their component PUFAs is shown below.
Figure imgf000046_0001
Reference Example 10
A fish oil derived feedstock (55weight% EPA EE, 5 weight% DHA EE) was fractionated using a fixed bed chromatography system on a single chromatographic column (diameter 30cm, length 60cm) packed with C18 silica gel (particle size 20 microns, particle porosity 60 angstroms) as stationary phase and aqueous acetonitrile (19 weight % water, 81 wt% acetonitrile) as eluent. 900ml of feedstock was purified using 22L of eluent, which was passed through the column at a flow rate of 2200 ml/min.
A GC FAMES traces of the EPA fraction collected is shown as Figure 16. Example 1
A fish oil derived feedstock (55weight% EPA EE, 5 weight% DHA EE) is fractionated using an actual moving bed chromatography system using bonded C 18 silica gel (particle size 300microns, particle porosity 150 angstroms) as stationary phase and aqueous acetonitrile as eluent according to the system schematically illustrated in Figure 8. 15 columns (diameter: 76.29mm, length: 914.40mm) are connected in series as shown in Figure 8.
The operating parameters and flow rates are as follows.
Step time: 600 sees
Cycle time: 160 mins
Feedstock (F) feed rate: 55 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (Dl) in first zone: 3000 ml/min
Extract rate (El) in first zone: 1800 ml/min
Raffmate rate (Rl) in first zone: 1455 ml/min
Desorbent feed rate (D2) in second zone: 1400 ml/min
Extract rate (E2) in second zone: 600 ml/min
Raffmate rate (R2) in second zone: 945 ml/min

Claims

1. A chromatographic separation process for recovering a polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) product, from a feed mixture, which process comprises introducing the feed mixture to a simulated or actual moving bed
chromatography apparatus having a plurality of linked chromatography columns containing, as eluent, an aqueous organic solvent, wherein the apparatus has a plurality of zones comprising at least a first zone and second zone, each zone having an extract stream and a raffinate stream from which liquid can be collected from said plurality of linked chromatography columns, and wherein (a) a raffinate stream containing the PUFA product together with more polar components is collected from a column in the first zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the second zone, and/or (b) an extract stream containing the PUFA product together with less polar components is collected from a column in the second zone and introduced to a nonadjacent column in the first zone, said PUFA product being separated from different components of the feed mixture in each zone, and wherein the aqueous organic solvent is other than aqueous alcohol
2. A process according to claim 1 , wherein part of one or more of the extract stream from the first zone, the raffinate stream from the first zone, the extract stream from the second zone, and the raffinate stream from the second zone are recycled back into the same zone, typically into an adjacent column in the same zone.
3. A chromatographic separation process according to claim 1 or 2 wherein (a) the aqueous organic solvent eluent present in each zone has a different water: organic solvent ratio; and/or
(b) the rate at which liquid collected via the extract and raffinate streams in each zone is recycled back into the same zone is adjusted such that the PUFA product can be separated from different components of the feed mixture in each zone.
4. A chromatographic separation process according to claim 3, wherein the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream out of the first zone is recycled back into the first zone differs from the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream out of the second zone is recycled back into the second zone, and/or the rate at which liquid collected via the raffmate stream out of the first zone is recycled back into the first zone differs from the rate at which liquid collected via the raffmate stream out of the second zone is recycled back into the second zone.
5. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the apparatus has a first zone and a second zone, said PUFA product being separated from less polar components of the feed mixture in the first zone, and said PUFA product being separated from more polar components of the feed mixture in the second zone.
6. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the PUFA product comprises at least one co-3 PUFA.
7. A process according to claim 6, wherein the PUFA product comprises EPA and/or DHA.
8. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein in addition to said PUFA product, an additional secondary PUFA product is recovered in the chromatographic separation process.
9. A process according to claim 8, wherein the PUFA product is EPA and the additional secondary PUFA product is DHA.
10. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the
chromatography columns contain, as adsorbent, substantially spherical beads.
11. A process according to claim 10, wherein the beads are formed from C 18 bonded silica gel.
12. A process according to claim 10 or 11, wherein the substantially spherical beads have a diameter of from 250 to 500 μιη.
13. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the eluent is a mixture of water and an ether, an ester, a ketone or a nitrile.
14. A process according to claim 13, wherein the eluent is a mixture of water and acetonitrile.
15. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the eluent in the first zone contains more organic solvent than the eluent in the second zone, and wherein the second zone is downstream of the first zone, with respect to the flow of eluent in the system.
16. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the water: organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first zone is from 10:90 to 15:85 parts by volume, and the watenorganic solvent ratio of the eluent in the second zone is from 15:85 to 20:80 parts by volume.
17. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the
water:organic solvent ratio of the eluent in the first and second zones is controlled by introducing water and/or organic solvent into one or more columns in the first and second zones.
18. A process according to any one of claims 2 to 17 wherein the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the first zone is recycled back into the first zone is faster than the rate at which liquid collected via the extract stream from the second zone is recycled back into the second zone.
19. A process according to any one of claims 5 to 18, comprising: (i) introducing the feed mixture into the first zone, and removing a first raffinate stream enriched with the PUFA product and a first extract stream depleted of the PUFA product, and
(ii) introducing the first raffinate stream into the second zone, removing a second raffinate stream depleted of the PUFA product, and collecting a second extract stream to obtain the PUFA product.
20. A process according to any one of claims 5 to 18, comprising:
(i) introducing the feed mixture into the second zone, and removing a first raffinate stream depleted of the PUFA product and a first extract stream enriched in the PUFA product, and
(ii) introducing the first extract stream into the first zone, removing a
second extract stream depleted of the PUFA product and collecting a second raffinate stream to obtain the PUFA product.
21. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the simulated or actual moving bed chromatography apparatus has fifteen chromatographic columns 1 to 15.
22. A process according to any one of claims 5 to 21 wherein the first zone
consists of eight adjacent columns 1 to 8.
23. A process according to any one of claims 5 to 22, wherein the second zone consists of seven adjacent columns, 9 to 15.
24. A process according to any one of claims 21 to 23, wherein (a) organic solvent is introduced into column 1, and/or (b) organic solvent is introduced into column 9, and/or (c) water is introduced into column 4, and/or (d) water is introduced into column 12.
25. A process according to any one of claims 21 to 23, wherein aqueous organic solvent is introduced into column 1 and/or column 9.
26. A process according to any one of claims 21 to 25, wherein a first raffinate stream is collected from column 7 and introduced into column 13.
27. A process according to claim 1, wherein the apparatus has a first zone, a
second zone and a third zone and wherein (a) the eluent in the first zone contains more organic solvent than the eluent in the second and third zones and the first zone is upstream of the second and third zones with respect to the flow of eluent in the system and (b) the eluent in the second zone contains more organic solvent than the eluent in the third zone and the second zone is upstream of the third zone with respect to the flow of eluent in the system, said PUFA product being separated in the first zone from components of the feed mixture which are less polar than the PUFA product, said PUFA product being separated in the second zone from components of the feed mixture which are less polar than the PUFA product but more polar than the components separated in the first zone, and said PUFA product being separated in the third zone from components of the feed mixture which are more polar than the PUFA product.
28. A computer program for controlling a chromatography apparatus as defined in any one of claims 1 to 27, which computer program contains code means that, when executed, instructs the apparatus to carry out a process according to any one of claims 1 to 27.
PCT/GB2012/051591 2011-07-06 2012-07-06 Smb process WO2013005046A1 (en)

Priority Applications (9)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2014517953A JP6153519B2 (en) 2011-07-06 2012-07-06 SMB method
EP12735932.1A EP2613858B1 (en) 2011-07-06 2012-07-06 Smb process for the recovery of a polyunsaturated fatty acid product
KR1020147003080A KR101594722B1 (en) 2011-07-06 2012-07-06 Smb process
CN201280033624.2A CN103764242B (en) 2011-07-06 2012-07-06 Smb process
AU2012280065A AU2012280065B2 (en) 2011-07-06 2012-07-06 SMB process
US13/880,150 US9370730B2 (en) 2011-07-06 2012-07-06 SMB process
CA2815296A CA2815296C (en) 2011-07-06 2012-07-06 Smb process
BR112014000163A BR112014000163A2 (en) 2011-07-06 2012-07-06 chromatographic separation process, powder product, and storage medium.
ES12735932.1T ES2536911T3 (en) 2011-07-06 2012-07-06 SMB process for the recovery of a polyunsaturated fatty acid product

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1111601.9 2011-07-06
GBGB1111601.9A GB201111601D0 (en) 2011-07-06 2011-07-06 New process

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2013005046A1 true WO2013005046A1 (en) 2013-01-10

Family

ID=44544346

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2012/051591 WO2013005046A1 (en) 2011-07-06 2012-07-06 Smb process

Country Status (13)

Country Link
US (1) US9370730B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2613858B1 (en)
JP (2) JP6153519B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101594722B1 (en)
CN (1) CN103764242B (en)
AU (1) AU2012280065B2 (en)
BR (1) BR112014000163A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2815296C (en)
CL (1) CL2013003796A1 (en)
ES (1) ES2536911T3 (en)
GB (1) GB201111601D0 (en)
PE (1) PE20142016A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2013005046A1 (en)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014108686A1 (en) * 2013-01-09 2014-07-17 Basf Pharma (Callanish) Limited Multi-step separation process
US8802880B1 (en) 2013-05-07 2014-08-12 Group Novasep Chromatographic process for the production of highly purified polyunsaturated fatty acids
US9150816B2 (en) 2013-12-11 2015-10-06 Novasep Process Sas Chromatographic method for the production of polyunsaturated fatty acids
US9234157B2 (en) 2011-07-06 2016-01-12 Basf Pharma Callanish Limited SMB process
KR20160005046A (en) * 2013-05-07 2016-01-13 그룹 노바셉 Chromatographic process for the production of highly purified polyunsaturated fatty acids
US9260677B2 (en) 2011-07-06 2016-02-16 Basf Pharma Callanish Limited SMB process
US9315762B2 (en) 2011-07-06 2016-04-19 Basf Pharma Callanish Limited SMB process for producing highly pure EPA from fish oil
US9347020B2 (en) 2011-07-06 2016-05-24 Basf Pharma Callanish Limited Heated chromatographic separation process
US9370730B2 (en) 2011-07-06 2016-06-21 Basf Pharma Callanish Limited SMB process
US9428711B2 (en) 2013-05-07 2016-08-30 Groupe Novasep Chromatographic process for the production of highly purified polyunsaturated fatty acids
US20160297746A1 (en) * 2015-04-10 2016-10-13 Invista North America S.A.R.L. Process for separation of diamines and/or omega-aminoacids from a feed fixture
US9790162B2 (en) 2009-12-30 2017-10-17 Basf Pharma (Callanish) Limited Simulated moving bed chromatographic separation process
US10975031B2 (en) 2014-01-07 2021-04-13 Novasep Process Method for purifying aromatic amino acids
US10974168B2 (en) 2015-04-08 2021-04-13 Inv Nylon Chemicals Americas, Llc Materials and methods for the selective recovery of monovalent products from aqueous solutions using continuous ion exchange
EP3839497A4 (en) * 2018-11-16 2022-05-18 Organo Corporation Chromatographic separation method using simulated moving-bed technique, and chromatographic separation system using simulated moving-bed technique
WO2023111317A1 (en) 2021-12-17 2023-06-22 Basf Se Chromatographic separation process for efficient purification of polyunsaturated fatty acids

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10071947B2 (en) * 2014-09-02 2018-09-11 INVISTA North America S.à.r.l. Purification of long chain diacids
TWI648393B (en) * 2017-08-15 2019-01-21 喬璞科技有限公司 Method for purifying unsaturated fatty acid and purifying linolenic acid
EP3586640A1 (en) 2018-06-21 2020-01-01 Nuseed Pty Ltd Dha enriched polyunsaturated fatty acid compositions
CN112169373B (en) * 2019-07-05 2022-03-11 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for adsorbing and separating target product by simulated moving bed
CN113831244A (en) * 2020-06-24 2021-12-24 北京创新通恒科技有限公司 Separation equipment and process method for purifying high-purity EPA-ee
CN115073292B (en) * 2022-07-01 2023-10-03 江苏汉邦科技股份有限公司 Preparation method of eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2985589A (en) 1957-05-22 1961-05-23 Universal Oil Prod Co Continuous sorption process employing fixed bed of sorbent and moving inlets and outlets
FR2103302A5 (en) 1970-07-23 1972-04-07 Toray Industries
US3696107A (en) 1971-05-27 1972-10-03 Richard W Neuzil Improved hydrocarbon separation process
US3706812A (en) 1970-12-07 1972-12-19 Universal Oil Prod Co Fluid-solid contacting apparatus
US4764276A (en) 1984-07-30 1988-08-16 Advanced Separation Technologies Incorporated Device for continuous contacting of fluids and solids
FR2651149A1 (en) 1989-08-28 1991-03-01 Inst Francais Du Petrole CONTINUOUS PROCESS AND DEVICE FOR CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATION OF A MIXTURE OF AT LEAST THREE CONSTITUENTS IN THREE PURIFIED EFFLUENTS USING A SINGLE SOLVENT AT TWO TEMPERATURES AND / OR AT TWO DIFFERENT PRESSURES.
FR2651148A1 (en) 1989-08-28 1991-03-01 Inst Francais Du Petrole CONTINUOUS PROCESS AND DEVICE FOR CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATION OF A MIXTURE OF AT LEAST THREE CONSTITUENTS IN THREE EFFLUENTS PURIFIED BY TWO SOLVENTS.
US5069883A (en) 1989-10-20 1991-12-03 Progress Water Technologies Corp. Device for continuous contacting of liquids and solids
EP0697034A1 (en) 1993-04-29 1996-02-21 Norsk Hydro As Processes for chromatographic fractionation of fatty acids and their derivatives
US6979402B1 (en) 2003-12-19 2005-12-27 Uop Llc Miniature actual moving bed assembly
WO2007075499A2 (en) * 2005-12-16 2007-07-05 Archer-Daniels-Midland Company Method of preparing a composition using argentation chromatography
WO2009105351A1 (en) * 2008-02-21 2009-08-27 Dow Global Technologies Inc. Separation of natural oil-derived aldehydes or hydroxy methyl esters using process chromatography

Family Cites Families (123)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US571930A (en) * 1896-11-24 Tension device for wire fences
US4048111A (en) 1975-06-12 1977-09-13 Uop Inc. Method for manufacturing an adsorbent useful for olefin separation
US4036745A (en) 1975-09-24 1977-07-19 Uop Inc. Process for separating normal and isoparaffins
US4048205A (en) 1976-08-02 1977-09-13 Uop Inc. Process for separating an ester of a monoethanoid fatty acid
US4049688A (en) 1976-08-02 1977-09-20 Uop Inc. Process for separating esters of fatty acids by selective adsorption
US4313015A (en) 1980-02-07 1982-01-26 Uop Inc. Separation process
US4353838A (en) 1981-02-13 1982-10-12 Uop Inc. Process for separating a monoethanoid fatty acid
US4353839A (en) 1981-02-25 1982-10-12 Uop Inc. Process for separating saturated fatty acids
US4404145A (en) 1981-04-10 1983-09-13 Uop Inc. Process for separating fatty acids from rosin acids
US4519952A (en) 1981-04-10 1985-05-28 Uop Inc. Process for separating fatty acids from unsaponifiables
US4524030A (en) 1981-04-10 1985-06-18 Uop Inc. Process for separating fatty acids
US4329280A (en) 1981-04-10 1982-05-11 Uop Inc. Process for separating esters of fatty and rosin acids
US4511514A (en) 1981-04-10 1985-04-16 Uop Inc. Process for separating oleic acid from linoleic acid
US4522761A (en) 1981-04-10 1985-06-11 Uop Inc. Process for separating fatty acids from rosin acids
IN158368B (en) 1981-04-10 1986-11-01 Uop Inc
US4486618A (en) 1981-07-30 1984-12-04 Uop Inc. Process for separating C6 olefin hydrocarbons
JPS5888339U (en) 1981-12-10 1983-06-15 株式会社 カネノ製作所 Item storage device with opaque sheet
JPS58109444U (en) 1982-01-20 1983-07-26 ミサワホ−ム株式会社 Dust collection device
US4560675A (en) 1982-08-13 1985-12-24 Uop Inc. Adsorbent for separating fatty acids from rosin acids
US4495106A (en) 1982-08-13 1985-01-22 Uop Inc. Adsorbent and process for separating fatty acids from rosin acids
US4521343A (en) 1983-02-04 1985-06-04 Uop Inc. Process for separating fatty acids from rosin acids with phosphorus modified alumina molecular sieve
US4433195A (en) 1983-03-02 1984-02-21 Uop Inc. Separation of trans- and cis-olefins
US4524029A (en) 1983-09-22 1985-06-18 Uop Inc. Process for separating fatty acids
JPS60208940A (en) 1984-03-31 1985-10-21 Nippon Zeon Co Ltd Separation and purification of long-chain saturated acid
US4605783A (en) 1985-03-21 1986-08-12 Uop Inc. Process for separating monoterpenes
JPH0317755Y2 (en) 1985-05-24 1991-04-15
NO157302C (en) 1985-12-19 1988-02-24 Norsk Hydro As PROCEDURE FOR THE PREPARATION OF A FISH OIL CONCENTRATE.
JPS6388159U (en) 1986-11-27 1988-06-08
US4720579A (en) 1986-12-18 1988-01-19 Uop Inc. Separation of citric acid from fermentation broth with a neutral polymeric adsorbent
US5068419A (en) 1986-12-18 1991-11-26 Uop Separation of an organic acid from a fermentation broth with an anionic polymeric adsorbent
US4882065A (en) 1987-12-11 1989-11-21 Uop Purification of sterols with activated carbon as adsorbent and chlorobenzene as desorbent
JPH0692595B2 (en) 1988-02-01 1994-11-16 鐘淵化学工業株式会社 Separation method of fatty acid and triglyceride
US4961881A (en) 1988-02-17 1990-10-09 Uop Process for separating triglycerides and regenerating absorbent used in said separation process
GB8819110D0 (en) 1988-08-11 1988-09-14 Norsk Hydro As Antihypertensive drug & method for production
US4902829A (en) 1988-11-16 1990-02-20 Uop Process for the adsorptive separation of hydroxy paraffinic dicarboxylic acids from olefinic dicarboxylic acids
US5068418A (en) 1989-05-08 1991-11-26 Uop Separation of lactic acid from fermentation broth with an anionic polymeric absorbent
US5225580A (en) 1990-08-16 1993-07-06 Uop Process for separating fatty acids and triglycerides
US5179219A (en) 1990-11-19 1993-01-12 Uop Process for separating fatty acids and triglycerides
JPH07106281B2 (en) 1991-01-16 1995-11-15 綜研化学株式会社 Method and apparatus for separating and purifying multi-component mixture
WO1993022022A1 (en) 1992-04-29 1993-11-11 Institut Français Du Petrole Method and device for fractionating a mixture in a simulated fluidized bed in the presence of a compressed gas, a supercritical fluid or a subcritical fluid
JP3025590B2 (en) 1992-10-14 2000-03-27 エーザイ株式会社 Crude purification method
GB9404483D0 (en) 1994-03-08 1994-04-20 Norsk Hydro As Refining marine oil compositions
JPH08218091A (en) * 1995-02-17 1996-08-27 Maruha Corp Production of high-purity highly unsaturated fatty acid and its derivative
DE59610489D1 (en) 1995-08-17 2003-07-10 Hoffmann La Roche Chromatography methods
FR2740451B1 (en) 1995-10-27 1998-01-16 Seripharm NOVEL INTERMEDIATES FOR THE HEMISYNTHESIS OF TAXANES, THEIR PREPARATION METHODS AND THEIR USE IN THE GENERAL SYNTHESIS OF TAXANES
JPH09157684A (en) 1995-12-08 1997-06-17 Chlorine Eng Corp Ltd Purification of highly unsaturated fatty acid ester
US5917068A (en) 1995-12-29 1999-06-29 Eastman Chemical Company Polyunsaturated fatty acid and fatty acid ester mixtures free of sterols and phosphorus compounds
FR2754731B1 (en) 1996-10-18 1999-07-02 Novasep Sa IMPROVEMENT IN METHODS FOR ENRICHING OPTICAL ISOMERS BY SIMULATED MOBILE BED
GB9701705D0 (en) 1997-01-28 1997-03-19 Norsk Hydro As Purifying polyunsatured fatty acid glycerides
JP4185572B2 (en) 1997-01-29 2008-11-26 アマルガメイテッド リサーチ インコーポレイテッド Displacement chromatography method
JPH10310555A (en) 1997-05-12 1998-11-24 Y M Shii:Kk Separation and purification of polybasic unsaturated fatty acid ester
US6063284A (en) 1997-05-15 2000-05-16 Em Industries, Inc. Single column closed-loop recycling with periodic intra-profile injection
FR2764822B1 (en) 1997-06-19 1999-08-13 Novasep METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING THE OPERATION OF A MIXTURE CONSTITUENT SEPARATION SYSTEM
FR2766385B1 (en) 1997-07-24 1999-09-03 Novasep METHOD FOR CONTROLLING PRESSURE IN A SIMULATED MOBILE BED SEPARATION SYSTEM
US5840181A (en) 1997-10-14 1998-11-24 Uop Llc Chromatographic separation of fatty acids using ultrahydrophobic silicalite
JP2002521030A (en) 1998-07-22 2002-07-16 セラニーズ ベンチャーズ ゲー・エム・ベー・ハー Production scale production of fatty acids from biomass by extraction, reaction and chromatography in the same apparatus using compressed gas
FR2781388B1 (en) 1998-07-24 2000-08-25 Inst Francais Du Petrole DEVICE FOR THE CONTINUOUS REGULATION OF THE COMPOSITION OF A MIXTURE OF COMPONENTS AND SYSTEM FOR SEPARATING CONSTITUENTS INCORPORATING THIS ANALYSIS DEVICE
FR2785196B1 (en) 1998-10-29 2000-12-15 Inst Francais Du Petrole METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SEPARATION WITH VARIABLE LENGTH CHROMATOGRAPHIC AREAS
US6413419B1 (en) 1998-10-29 2002-07-02 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process and device for separation with variable-length chromatographic
DK1128881T3 (en) 1998-10-29 2005-10-03 Inst Francais Du Petrole Method of separation with chromatographic regions of variable length
IT1308613B1 (en) 1999-02-17 2002-01-09 Pharmacia & Upjohn Spa ESSENTIAL FATTY ACIDS IN THE PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS.
NO312973B1 (en) 1999-02-17 2002-07-22 Norsk Hydro As Lipase-catalyzed esterification of marine oils
JP2000280663A (en) 1999-03-30 2000-10-10 Dainippon Printing Co Ltd Id card and method for discriminating it
CA2311974A1 (en) 1999-06-28 2000-12-28 Nisshin Flour Milling Co., Ltd. Processes of selectively separating and purifying eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids or their esters
EP1178308A4 (en) 1999-11-02 2005-01-19 Daicel Chem Simulated moving bed device
JP4170542B2 (en) 1999-11-18 2008-10-22 日油株式会社 Process for producing highly unsaturated fatty acid derivative and high-purity eicosapentaenoic acid derivative
CA2290885A1 (en) 1999-12-02 2001-06-02 Universite De Sherbrooke Method for processing harbour seal tissues
EP1106602B1 (en) 1999-12-09 2008-08-27 Archer-Daniels-Midland Company Simulated moving bed chromatographic purification of amino acids
JP5096656B2 (en) 2000-01-14 2012-12-12 フジャルタソン・バルドゥル Marine lipid composition for aquatic feeding
ES2324975T3 (en) 2000-01-14 2009-08-21 Epax As METHOD FOR THE CROP OF ADA RICH ORGANISMS IN ADH FOR AQUATIC SPECIES.
AU2001274836A1 (en) 2000-05-16 2001-11-26 Purdue Research Foundation Standing wave design of a nine-zone smb for the recovery of a solute with intermediate affinity in a ternary mixture
ES2284653T3 (en) 2000-05-16 2007-11-16 Purdue Research Foundation INSULIN PURIFICATION USING SIMULATED MOBILE MILK TECHNOLOGY.
WO2001087452A2 (en) * 2000-05-16 2001-11-22 Purdue Research Foundation Standing wave design of single and tandem simulated moving beds for resolving multicomponent mixtures
DK1157692T3 (en) 2000-05-22 2006-02-06 Pro Aparts Investimentos E Con Composition of fatty acids containing at least 80% by weight of EPA and DHA, derivatives thereof and pharmaceutical use thereof
FR2810897B1 (en) 2000-06-28 2002-10-11 Novasep MOBILE BED SEPARATION METHOD AND DEVICE SIMULATES AT LEAST ONE CONSTITUENT IN COLUMNS HAVING AN APPROPRIATE LENGTH TO DIAMETER RATIO
FR2823134B1 (en) 2001-04-10 2003-09-19 Novasep CHROMATOGRAPHIC BED PROTECTION DEVICE IN CHROMATOGRAPHIC COLUMNS WITH DYNAMIC AXIAL COMPRESSION
FI20010977A (en) 2001-05-09 2002-11-10 Danisco Sweeteners Oy Chromatographic separation method
US20030216543A1 (en) 2001-05-16 2003-11-20 Wang Nien-Hwa Linda Insulin purification using simulated moving bed technology
DE10151155A1 (en) 2001-10-19 2003-05-08 Nutrinova Gmbh Native PUFA triglyceride mixtures with a high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids as well as processes for their production and their use
FR2836230B1 (en) 2002-02-15 2004-04-23 Novasep PROTECTION OF THE CHROMATOGRAPHIC BED IN CHROMATOGRAPHY DEVICES WITH DYNAMIC AXIAL COMPRESSION
FR2836396B1 (en) 2002-02-22 2004-06-18 Novasep METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH SOLVENT RECOVERY
SE0202188D0 (en) 2002-07-11 2002-07-11 Pronova Biocare As A process for decreasing environmental pollutants in an oil or a fat, a volatile fat or oil environmental pollutants decreasing working fluid, a health supplement, and an animal feed product
EP2295529B2 (en) 2002-07-11 2022-05-18 Basf As Use of a volatile environmental pollutants-decreasing working fluid for decreasing the amount of pollutants in a fat for alimentary or cosmetic use
KR100481663B1 (en) 2002-09-24 2005-04-08 김희찬 Biosensor contained mesoporous platinum and method of determining concentration using same
DK1549753T3 (en) 2002-10-11 2010-10-18 Nippon Suisan Kaisha Ltd Process for producing microbial fat or oil with reduced unsaponifiable content
FR2846252B1 (en) 2002-10-29 2005-07-01 Novasep CHROMATOGRAPHY METHOD AND DEVICE INTEGRATING A CONCENTRATION STEP
NO319194B1 (en) 2002-11-14 2005-06-27 Pronova Biocare As Lipase-catalyzed esterification process of marine oils
US7114844B2 (en) 2003-03-03 2006-10-03 Spx Corporation Aeration apparatus and method
ITMI20032247A1 (en) 2003-11-19 2005-05-20 Tiberio Bruzzese INTERACTION OF POLAR DERIVATIVES OF COMPOUNDS INSATURATED WITH INORGANIC SUBSTRATES
DE602004029090D1 (en) 2003-12-30 2010-10-21 Dsm Ip Assets Bv BLEEDING PROCEDURE
MY150129A (en) 2004-04-09 2013-11-29 Archer Daniels Midland Co Method of preparing fatty acid alkyl esters from waste or recycled fatty acid stock
US20060086667A1 (en) 2004-09-13 2006-04-27 Cephalon, Inc., U.S. Corporation Methods for the separation of enantiomeric sulfinylacetamides
FR2889077B1 (en) 2005-07-26 2007-10-12 Novasep Soc Par Actions Simpli METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATION OF FRACTIONS OF A MIXTURE
ITMI20051560A1 (en) 2005-08-10 2007-02-11 Tiberio Bruzzese COMPOSITION OF N-3 FATTY ACIDS WITH HIGH CONCENTRATION OF EPA AND E-O DHA AND CONTAINING N-6 FATTY ACIDS
PE20070482A1 (en) 2005-08-26 2007-06-08 Ocean Nutrition Canada Ltd METHOD TO REMOVE AND / OR REDUCE STEROLS FROM OILS
US7544293B2 (en) 2005-09-26 2009-06-09 Semba Inc. Valve and process for interrupted continuous flow chromatography
US7828978B2 (en) 2006-01-11 2010-11-09 Doug Geier Simultaneous synthesis and purification of a fatty acid monoester biodiesel fuel
FR2897277B1 (en) 2006-02-10 2008-04-18 Novasep Soc Par Actions Simpli METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SEPARATION
FR2897238A1 (en) 2006-02-15 2007-08-17 Novasep Soc Par Actions Simpli Method of extraction and purification of thaumatin comprises clarification, enzymatic treatment and passage of thaumatin on strong anion exchange resin, followed by ultrafiltration/diafiltration, crystallization and drying
FR2898064A1 (en) 2006-03-03 2007-09-07 Novasep Soc Par Actions Simpli MODULAR CHROMATOGRAPHY DEVICE
FR2898283B1 (en) 2006-03-08 2011-07-15 Novasep METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SEPARATING FRACTIONS FROM A MIXTURE
JP5111363B2 (en) 2006-04-13 2013-01-09 日本水産株式会社 Method for producing highly unsaturated fatty acid concentrated oil
WO2008149177A2 (en) 2006-05-05 2008-12-11 Natural Asa Marine lipid compositions and uses thereof
WO2007144476A1 (en) 2006-06-16 2007-12-21 Groupe Novasep Multi-column sequence separation method
EP2040810B1 (en) 2006-06-19 2019-04-17 K.D. Pharma Bexbach GmbH Improved chromatography process for recovering a substance or a group of substances from a mixture
CA2656311C (en) 2006-07-05 2016-06-21 Photonz Corporation Limited Ultra pure epa and polar lipids produced in largely heterotrophic culture
WO2008025887A1 (en) 2006-08-28 2008-03-06 Novasep Method for enriching one or more compounds of a mixture using a liquid mobile phase containing a gas
FR2911793B1 (en) 2007-01-26 2010-07-30 Novasep CHROMATOGRAPHY SEPARATION PROCESS
DE502007004854D1 (en) 2007-04-17 2010-10-07 Max Planck Gesellschaft Method and apparatus for the chromatographic separation of components with partial recycling of mixture fractions
WO2008153472A1 (en) * 2007-06-15 2008-12-18 Ge Healthcare Bio-Sciences Ab Chromatography method
JP2010532418A (en) 2007-06-29 2010-10-07 マーテック バイオサイエンシーズ コーポレーション Process for producing and purifying ester of polyunsaturated fatty acid
CA2694054C (en) 2007-07-25 2015-11-17 Epax As Omega-3 fatty acid fortified composition
FR2919200B1 (en) 2007-07-27 2009-10-30 Novasep CONTINUOUS CRYSTALLIZATION PROCESS
US9556401B2 (en) 2007-07-30 2017-01-31 Nippon Suisan Kaisha, Ltd. Method for producing EPA-enriched oil and DHA-enriched oil
FR2929533B1 (en) 2008-04-03 2010-04-30 Novasep MULTICOLOUR GRADIENT SEPARATION PROCESS.
KR101357298B1 (en) 2008-06-20 2014-01-28 에이케이 앤 엠엔 바이오팜 주식회사 Purification and concentration method of high purity omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids
WO2010018422A1 (en) 2008-08-14 2010-02-18 Novasep Process for the enrichment of isotopes
WO2010103402A1 (en) 2009-03-09 2010-09-16 Pronova Biopharma Norge As Compositions comprising a fatty acid oil mixture comprising epa and dha in free acid form and a surfactant, and methods and uses thereof
BR112012016308B1 (en) 2009-12-30 2020-03-31 Basf Pharma (Callanish) Limited CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATION PROCESS TO RECOVER A POLY-INSATURATED FATTY ACID (PUFA) PRODUCT AND COMPOSITION
GB201111589D0 (en) 2011-07-06 2011-08-24 Equateq Ltd New modified process
GB201111591D0 (en) 2011-07-06 2011-08-24 Equateq Ltd Further new process
GB201111601D0 (en) * 2011-07-06 2011-08-24 Equateq Ltd New process
GB201111595D0 (en) 2011-07-06 2011-08-24 Equateq Ltd Improved process

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2985589A (en) 1957-05-22 1961-05-23 Universal Oil Prod Co Continuous sorption process employing fixed bed of sorbent and moving inlets and outlets
FR2103302A5 (en) 1970-07-23 1972-04-07 Toray Industries
US3761533A (en) 1970-07-23 1973-09-25 Toray Industries Separation process of components of feed mixture utilizing solid sorbent
US3706812A (en) 1970-12-07 1972-12-19 Universal Oil Prod Co Fluid-solid contacting apparatus
US3696107A (en) 1971-05-27 1972-10-03 Richard W Neuzil Improved hydrocarbon separation process
US4764276A (en) 1984-07-30 1988-08-16 Advanced Separation Technologies Incorporated Device for continuous contacting of fluids and solids
FR2651149A1 (en) 1989-08-28 1991-03-01 Inst Francais Du Petrole CONTINUOUS PROCESS AND DEVICE FOR CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATION OF A MIXTURE OF AT LEAST THREE CONSTITUENTS IN THREE PURIFIED EFFLUENTS USING A SINGLE SOLVENT AT TWO TEMPERATURES AND / OR AT TWO DIFFERENT PRESSURES.
FR2651148A1 (en) 1989-08-28 1991-03-01 Inst Francais Du Petrole CONTINUOUS PROCESS AND DEVICE FOR CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATION OF A MIXTURE OF AT LEAST THREE CONSTITUENTS IN THREE EFFLUENTS PURIFIED BY TWO SOLVENTS.
US5069883A (en) 1989-10-20 1991-12-03 Progress Water Technologies Corp. Device for continuous contacting of liquids and solids
EP0697034A1 (en) 1993-04-29 1996-02-21 Norsk Hydro As Processes for chromatographic fractionation of fatty acids and their derivatives
US5719302A (en) * 1993-04-29 1998-02-17 Pronova A.S Processes for chromatographic fractionation of fatty acids and their derivatives
US6979402B1 (en) 2003-12-19 2005-12-27 Uop Llc Miniature actual moving bed assembly
WO2007075499A2 (en) * 2005-12-16 2007-07-05 Archer-Daniels-Midland Company Method of preparing a composition using argentation chromatography
WO2009105351A1 (en) * 2008-02-21 2009-08-27 Dow Global Technologies Inc. Separation of natural oil-derived aldehydes or hydroxy methyl esters using process chromatography

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Preparative and Production Scale Chromatography", 1993, MARCEL DEKKER INC
SZEPESY L ET AL: "Continuous liquid chromatography", JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHERS B.V, NL, vol. 108, no. 2, 21 May 1975 (1975-05-21), pages 285 - 297, XP026553991, ISSN: 0021-9673, [retrieved on 19750521], DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)84671-3 *

Cited By (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9790162B2 (en) 2009-12-30 2017-10-17 Basf Pharma (Callanish) Limited Simulated moving bed chromatographic separation process
US9370730B2 (en) 2011-07-06 2016-06-21 Basf Pharma Callanish Limited SMB process
US9771542B2 (en) 2011-07-06 2017-09-26 Basf Pharma Callanish Ltd. Heated chromatographic separation process
US9234157B2 (en) 2011-07-06 2016-01-12 Basf Pharma Callanish Limited SMB process
US9695382B2 (en) 2011-07-06 2017-07-04 Basf Pharma (Callanish) Limited SMB process for producing highly pure EPA from fish oil
US9260677B2 (en) 2011-07-06 2016-02-16 Basf Pharma Callanish Limited SMB process
US9315762B2 (en) 2011-07-06 2016-04-19 Basf Pharma Callanish Limited SMB process for producing highly pure EPA from fish oil
US9347020B2 (en) 2011-07-06 2016-05-24 Basf Pharma Callanish Limited Heated chromatographic separation process
US9694302B2 (en) 2013-01-09 2017-07-04 Basf Pharma (Callanish) Limited Multi-step separation process
US10723973B2 (en) 2013-01-09 2020-07-28 Basf Pharma (Callanish) Limited Multi-step separation process
US10214475B2 (en) 2013-01-09 2019-02-26 Basf Pharma (Callanish) Limited Multi-step separation process
US10179759B2 (en) 2013-01-09 2019-01-15 Basf Pharma (Callanish) Limited Multi-step separation process
EP3170543A1 (en) * 2013-01-09 2017-05-24 BASF Pharma (Callanish) Limited Multi-step separation process
WO2014108686A1 (en) * 2013-01-09 2014-07-17 Basf Pharma (Callanish) Limited Multi-step separation process
US8802880B1 (en) 2013-05-07 2014-08-12 Group Novasep Chromatographic process for the production of highly purified polyunsaturated fatty acids
KR20160005046A (en) * 2013-05-07 2016-01-13 그룹 노바셉 Chromatographic process for the production of highly purified polyunsaturated fatty acids
US9428711B2 (en) 2013-05-07 2016-08-30 Groupe Novasep Chromatographic process for the production of highly purified polyunsaturated fatty acids
KR102263760B1 (en) 2013-05-07 2021-06-11 그룹 노바셉 Chromatographic process for the production of highly purified polyunsaturated fatty acids
JP2016523826A (en) * 2013-05-07 2016-08-12 グループ ノヴァセップGroupe Novasep A chromatographic process to produce highly purified polyunsaturated fatty acids.
US9150816B2 (en) 2013-12-11 2015-10-06 Novasep Process Sas Chromatographic method for the production of polyunsaturated fatty acids
US10975031B2 (en) 2014-01-07 2021-04-13 Novasep Process Method for purifying aromatic amino acids
US10974168B2 (en) 2015-04-08 2021-04-13 Inv Nylon Chemicals Americas, Llc Materials and methods for the selective recovery of monovalent products from aqueous solutions using continuous ion exchange
US20160297746A1 (en) * 2015-04-10 2016-10-13 Invista North America S.A.R.L. Process for separation of diamines and/or omega-aminoacids from a feed fixture
US10343084B2 (en) 2015-04-10 2019-07-09 Invista North America S.A.R.L. Process for separation of diamines and/or omega-aminoacids from a feed mixture
US10265642B2 (en) * 2015-04-10 2019-04-23 Invista North America S.A.R.L. Process for separation of diamines and/or omega-aminoacids from a feed fixture
EP3839497A4 (en) * 2018-11-16 2022-05-18 Organo Corporation Chromatographic separation method using simulated moving-bed technique, and chromatographic separation system using simulated moving-bed technique
US11839835B2 (en) 2018-11-16 2023-12-12 Organo Corporation Simulated moving-bed type chromatographic separation method and simulated moving-bed type chromatographic separation system
WO2023111317A1 (en) 2021-12-17 2023-06-22 Basf Se Chromatographic separation process for efficient purification of polyunsaturated fatty acids

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2613858A1 (en) 2013-07-17
EP2613858B1 (en) 2015-03-18
CA2815296A1 (en) 2013-01-10
CN103764242B (en) 2015-07-15
BR112014000163A2 (en) 2017-02-07
JP2017020031A (en) 2017-01-26
AU2012280065A1 (en) 2013-05-09
US20140194636A1 (en) 2014-07-10
CL2013003796A1 (en) 2014-07-04
GB201111601D0 (en) 2011-08-24
KR101594722B1 (en) 2016-02-16
PE20142016A1 (en) 2014-12-30
AU2012280065B2 (en) 2015-07-09
JP2014518312A (en) 2014-07-28
KR20140034920A (en) 2014-03-20
ES2536911T3 (en) 2015-05-29
CA2815296C (en) 2015-02-10
JP6153519B2 (en) 2017-06-28
US9370730B2 (en) 2016-06-21
CN103764242A (en) 2014-04-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2815296C (en) Smb process
CA2815301C (en) New smb process
US9695382B2 (en) SMB process for producing highly pure EPA from fish oil
CA2815302C (en) Improved smb process
CA3000662C (en) Polyunsaturated fatty acid (pufa) composition comprising docosahexaenoic acid
EP2613859A1 (en) Heated chromatographic separation process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12735932

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2012735932

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2815296

Country of ref document: CA

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2012280065

Country of ref document: AU

Date of ref document: 20120706

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 000008-2014

Country of ref document: PE

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2014517953

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 20147003080

Country of ref document: KR

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 13880150

Country of ref document: US

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01A

Ref document number: 112014000163

Country of ref document: BR

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 112014000163

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20140103