WO2012153157A2 - Method for optimizing cutting forces in a milling process and computer-controlled milling machine using the same method - Google Patents

Method for optimizing cutting forces in a milling process and computer-controlled milling machine using the same method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012153157A2
WO2012153157A2 PCT/HU2012/000035 HU2012000035W WO2012153157A2 WO 2012153157 A2 WO2012153157 A2 WO 2012153157A2 HU 2012000035 W HU2012000035 W HU 2012000035W WO 2012153157 A2 WO2012153157 A2 WO 2012153157A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
milling
cutting
workpiece
force
tool
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/HU2012/000035
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2012153157A3 (en
Inventor
Balázs TUKORA
Original Assignee
Pécsi Tudományegyetem
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Pécsi Tudományegyetem filed Critical Pécsi Tudományegyetem
Publication of WO2012153157A2 publication Critical patent/WO2012153157A2/en
Publication of WO2012153157A3 publication Critical patent/WO2012153157A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B17/00Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
    • G05B17/02Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems electric
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/33Director till display
    • G05B2219/33301Simulation during machining
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/37Measurements
    • G05B2219/37355Cutting, milling, machining force
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/37Measurements
    • G05B2219/37437Prediction of cutting force with flexible ball end milling model
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/49Nc machine tool, till multiple
    • G05B2219/49099Cutting force, torque

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for optimizing cutting forces in a milling process and computer-controlled milling machine using the same method.
  • MRR Media Removal Rate
  • the mechanistic model incorporates the geometrical attributes of the cutting process into the simulation. It extends the fundamental cutting force equations, which describe the effect of shearing and ploughing along an elemental cutting edge, to the complex geometry of the milling tool.
  • the original theory of the mechanistic modelling has been further developed to the conditions of milling in several ways. Many of the researchers have been focusing on the exact description of the geometrical relations during the cutting process. Analytical solutions were born for face milling (see e.g. K.A. Desai, P.K.Agarwal, P. V.M. Rao, Process geometry modeling with cutter runout for milling of curved surfaces, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 49 (2009) 1015-1028), ball-end milling (see e.g.
  • a measuring unit for measuring the cutting forces exerted by the milling tool to the workpiece
  • a simulation module for simulating the milling process to determine a contact area between the workpiece and the milling tool by using a multi-dexel representation of the workpiece
  • a prediction module for receiving the milling force measurements and the simulated geometrical data, and for generating predicted cutting forces from the measured cutting forces and the simulated cutting forces, and
  • control unit for receiving the predicted cutting forces and for adjusting the operational parameters of the milling process according to the predicted cutting forces so as to reach optimum values for the actual cutting forces acting to milling tool.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram depicting the basic steps of the method according to the invention.
  • Figure 3 illustrates organization of a memory block used in the simulation of the cutting forces, in a preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram of the computer-controlled milling machine according to the invention.
  • Figures 5a and 5b illustrate a milling test configuration with ball-end cutter and a cylindrical workpiece in a perspective view and a schematic view, respectively
  • Figure 6a to 6f show test results of the examined milling test configuration illustrated in Figures 4a and 4b, using 0 s force prediction delay
  • FIG. 7a to 7f show test results of the examined milling test configuration illustrated in Figures 4a and 4b, using 0,5 s force prediction delay.
  • a cutting force prediction method will be first introduced as a first aspect of the present invention. This method abandons applying the prior art force prediction models, in which elementary force components are numerically integrated along the active parts of the cutting edge. Instead, elementary (average) force components are calculated for a plurality of elementary (i.e. arbitrarily small) surface segments of the contact area between the tool and the workpiece, and then these elementary forces are summed along a cutting edge for a particular section of the entire turn of the tool.
  • the surface segments are obtained directly from a multi-dexel description of the workpiece volume, which is continuously simulated during the milling process.
  • a suitable method for generating the multi-dexel representation of the workpiece is disclosed in B. Tukora, T. Szalay, Fully GPU-based volume representation and material removal simulation of free-form objects (Innovative Developments in Design and Manufacturing: Advanced research in virtual and rapid prototyping (2009) 609- 614), which is incorporated herein as a reference.
  • FIGS. 1a to 1c illustrate a ball-end milling tool
  • the cutting force prediction method will be detailed below for ball-end tools, however, the method can be easily adapted to general-end milling tools.
  • the cutting force coefficients can be determined from instantaneous or average orthogonal forces measured on the tool during multi- axis machining, irrespectively of whether instantaneous or average estimated forces are calculated.
  • the cutting force prediction method is based on the mechanistic force model presented in P.Lee, Y. Altintas, Prediction of ball-end milling forces from orthogonal cutting data, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 36 (1996) 1059- 1072.
  • a cutting edge is described as a sequence of linear segments. For each elementary edge segments a tangential, a radial and an axial elementary force component, dF t> dF r and dF a , respectively, are calculated as shown in Eq. 1.
  • K te , K re , K ae (N/mm) are the edge specific coefficients
  • K tc , K rc , K ac (N/mm2) are the shear specific coefficients
  • dS (mm) is the length of an elementary edge section of a cutting edge
  • t n (mm) is the undeformed chip thickness
  • db is the projected length of the edge segment in the direction of the cutting velocity (also referred to as the chip width).
  • the force components related to the tool coordinate system (x, y, z) can be obtained by Eq. 3 resulted by the transformation in Eq. 2.
  • the contact area between the workpiece and the milling tool is composed of a plurality of elementary surface segments that are associated with the intersections of the workpiece's dexels and the surface of the tool's swept volume.
  • t n is determined on the basis of the removed portion of the dexels in the actual simulation step, and dSj for ball-end tool is:
  • the average force components acting to a particular cutting edge while sweeping through the k ⁇ elementary circle section can be determined as: where 5, is the surface area of the /th elementary surface segment of the contact area (along the cutting edge concerned) and is the length of the elementary
  • Equation 7 allows to simultaneously calculate the force components associated with different elementary surface segments for a whole turn, which is preferably carried out by means of a general-purpose graphics processing unit (GPGPU).
  • GPGPU general-purpose graphics processing unit
  • Equations 1 to 3 and thus Equations 4 to 7 can be applied not only to a ball-end milling tool (leading to Eq. 7), but also to general-end milling tools, depending on the calculation method of dS.
  • dS As disclosed in the prior art (e.g in A. Lamikiz, L.N. Lopez de Lacalle, J. A. Sanches, U.
  • Eq. 8 can be written as K 0 ... K 3(n+2) , respectively.
  • Eq. 9 can be written as follows: wherein the values can be directly gained from the cutting geometry in every simulation step performed to determined the actual contact area between the workpiece and the milling tool.
  • the form of Eq. 10 allows to determine the K s cutting force coefficient components using the least square (LS) method.
  • Q denote the difference between the calculated force and the measured force. As Q has to be minimized during a given measuring sequence, the following expression can be written for each K s .
  • K s coefficients can be determined by measuring the x-directional cutting force component only. Nevertheless, for the y and z-directional cutting force components, similar equations can be created in the same way, and those may also be involved in the computations of the cutting force coefficients so as to improve the accuracy of the cutting force estimation.
  • the form of the proposed force equations allows to express the shearing and ploughing cutting force coefficients in such a way that they can be determined from measured forces even in case of continuously altering cutting geometry. This makes it possible to determine the coefficients and to estimate the forthcoming forces in the same time, during the actual manufacturing process. To this end, an appropriate look-forward algorithm is proposed that will be described later.
  • step S100 the real three-dimensional cutting forces exerted by the milling tool to the workpiece are measured in a tool coordinate system (shown in Fig. 1a). Measurements of the real cutting forces are carried out in a conventional manner by means of an appropriate measuring device coupled to the milling tool.
  • step S110 the milling process is simulated to determine the actual contact area between the workpiece and the milling tool by using a multi-dexel representation of the workpiece.
  • various geometrical parameters of the elementary surface segments of the contact area such as t n and position of the elementary surface segments, are computed. For an exact simulation of the milling process, it is preferred that position of the milling tool is also measured continuously and forwarded to the simulation module.
  • an elementary cutting force of the milling process is predicted on the basis of the measured cutting force in step S120.
  • the calculated cutting force is determined from a plurality of cutting force coefficients that are determined from the mechanistic force model of the milling tool, the mechanistic model using all necessary geometrical information of the contact area obtained from the simulation of the milling process.
  • step S130 the predicted cutting force components are determined for an entire turn of the tool for each cutting edge.
  • the elementary cutting force components associated with the subsequent elementary circle sections of a turn of the tool may computed simultaneously, which makes it possible to significantly reduce the computing time, thus allowing a real time prediction of the cutting force.
  • step S140 the operational parameters (e.g. the feed-rate) of the milling process are adjusted according to the predicted cutting force so as to reach an optimum value for the actual cutting force acting to the milling tool.
  • the cutting force adjustment may be carried out immediately (i.e. without substantial delay) after the force prediction, adjustment of the actual cutting forces is preferably delayed by a predetermined time period, i.e.
  • look-forward period after the prediction of the cutting force in order to reduce the required computational power.
  • a delay ranging from a few tenths of a second up to a few seconds seems to be appropriate for most milling processes.
  • a preferred range of the look-forward period includes 0,1 to 2 seconds, and a more preferred range of the look-forward period includes 0,5 to 1 second.
  • the aforementioned zero delay is preferably used only for test purposes to validate the simulation model.
  • the method of the determination of the coefficients does not require keeping to special cutting conditions during the measuring sequence, it can be applied directly at the machining process, just before the cutting forces are needed to be predicted. The best result can be reached if the elapsed time between the coefficient determination and the force prediction is short. To this end, continuous cutting force measurements and a synchronized simulation are carried out in the course of the milling process, wherein the forthcoming cutting forces are instantly predicted with an appropriate look-forward algorithm as described below.
  • three pointers may be used to point to various locations in the memory block, namely a simulation_time_pointer, a manufacturing_time_pointer and a time_window_pointer.
  • the simulation_time_pointer is synchronized with the simulation of the milling process and the cutting force estimation process, this latter also being performed in the simulation module.
  • the simulation always goes ahead of the manufacturing, i.e. the current time of the simulation is ahead of the current time of the manufacturing.
  • actual values for the geometrical parameters of the workpiece and the milling tool i.e. the values, are calculated and pushed into the memory block at the position of the simulation_time_pointer.
  • updated cutting forces are predicted and if necessary, the feed rate is adjusted accordingly, thus providing a feed rate optimization.
  • the estimated cutting force is regarded as a predicted cutting force.
  • their values may be put into the memory together with the related values at the manufacturing_time_pointer, and all these values may be added to the matrix which describes the linear equation system of Eq. 12.
  • the actual cutting force coefficients K s are determined at this time by solving the matrix. (It should be noted that the geometrical data have already been added to the matrix at the simulation phase, which is antecedent to the measurement of the actual cutting forces.)
  • the time_window_pointer may be optional. After a certain elapsed time the A's and the measured force values can be subtracted from the matrix describing Eq. 12, so they do not take part in the force coefficient calculation any more. In this way the force coefficients may be adapted to the altering machining conditions (e.g. caused by tool wearing) during long manufacturing processes as well.
  • the aforementioned look-forward algorithm makes it possible also to conclude to the degree of wearing of the milling tool through the observation of the changes in the values of the force coefficients during a milling process.
  • the present invention relates to a computer-controlled milling machine.
  • a CNC milling tool 210 is numerically controlled by a control unit 220, in which a conventional CAM software is used for setting the operational parameters of the tool (e.g. rotational speed of the spindle, feed-rate, position of the milling end, etc.) to perform the milling processes.
  • operational parameters of the tool e.g. rotational speed of the spindle, feed-rate, position of the milling end, etc.
  • a measuring unit 230 is coupled to the milling tool 210.
  • the measuring unit may comprise any suitable measuring device.
  • the milling process is continuously simulated in a simulation module 250 to determine the contact area between the workpiece and the milling tool.
  • the simulation module 240 uses a multi-dexel representation of the workpiece to calculate the actual values of the geometrical parameters of the elementary surface segments of said contact area. To achieve the most accurate simulation as possible the simulation module 240 is coupled to the measuring unit 230 to collect certain pieces of position information with respect to the milling tool 210.
  • a prediction module 250 is used to generate estimated cutting forces from the measured cutting forces and the simulated cutting forces. To this end the prediction module is coupled to the measuring unit 230 and the simulation module 240.
  • the control unit 220 is adapted for receiving the predicted cutting forces from the prediction module 250 and for adjusting the operational parameters of the milling process according to the predicted cutting forces so as to reach optimum values for the actual cutting forces acting to milling tool 210.
  • the control unit 220 is preferably configured to perform the cutting force adjustments using a predetermined delay after receiving the predicted cutting forces, resulting in a predictive cutting force adjustment.
  • Either or both of the simulation module 240 and the prediction module 250 may be integrated into the control unit 220 in the form of additional software.
  • the advantage of executing the force calculations (i.e. prediction) within the control unit 220 is that some important information is still not available at the off-line state, but it can be gained during the machining process. This means that the control unit 220 may take over certain functions that conventionally belong to the CAM software. The integration of these functions may hide some difficult software technology problems.
  • the simulation was off-line due to technical limitations, i.e. the measured force values were first stored by the Kistler's Dynoware software and then they were read from a text file for the computations. In spite of this, the simulation software perceived and computed as if direct connection had been established with the measuring system.
  • the cutting force coefficients were determined on the basis of instantaneous measured forces.
  • the applied method required the knowledge of the exact tool positions and spindle turning positions during the whole machining process.
  • the measurements showed that the difference between the programmed and real spindle speed was about 0.46%, while the real feed rate followed the programmed feed-rate at about 2% accuracy.
  • the test configuration enclosed only the measuring of the three force components (along the three tool axes x, y and z) as a function of time, meaning that subsequent manual adjustments were needed for the exact synchronization of the simulation and the machining process.
  • FIG. 5a and 5b one of the test configurations is illustrated in a perspective view and a simplified schematic view, respectively, for a rather simple milling process, in which a multi-axis machining was tested with continuously changing cutting geometry along the tool path.
  • a slot with a maximum depth of 4 mm was milled into a cylindrical blank, at 45 degrees to its symmetry axis.
  • the cutting parameters applied in this test are listed in Table 1.
  • the look-forward period was set to zero second, which means that the forces were predicted just for the same moment when they were measured. In reality, howvere, there would be no point of this, it has been performed only for validating the simulation model.
  • Figures 6a to 6f show the measured and predicted forces along each tool axis, respectively, during the machining process in this case. In the figures, it can be observed that the predicted force values flutter at the beginning of the milling process due to the lack of the a priori knowledge of the cutting force coefficients. However, after a very short time (ca. 0,5 second in this example), when enough information has been gained and consumed for the calculation of the cutting force coefficients, the curves of the predicted forces tend to approach the curves of the measured forces with rather high accuracy.

Abstract

The present invention relates to a computer-controlled milling machine comprising a milling tool (210) for machining a workpiece, a measuring unit (230) for measuring the cutting forces exerted by the milling tool (210) to the workpiece, a simulation module (240) for simulating the milling process to determine a contact area between the workpiece and the milling tool (210) by using a multi-dexel representation of the workpiece, a prediction module (250) for receiving the milling force measurements and the simulated geometrical data, and for generating predicted cutting forces from the measured cutting forces and the simulated cutting forces, and a control unit (220) for receiving the predicted cutting forces and for adjusting the operational parameters of the milling process according to the predicted cutting forces so as to reach optimum values for the actual cutting forces acting to milling tool (210).The invention also relates to a method of optimizing cutting forces in a milling process using the aforementioned computer-controlled milling machine.

Description

Method for optimizing cutting forces in a milling process and computer- controlled milling machine using the same method
The present invention relates to a method for optimizing cutting forces in a milling process and computer-controlled milling machine using the same method.
For improving the effectiveness of milling processes, the prediction of cutting forces plays an important role. The accurate knowledge of the particular forces to be applied for the milling tool gives the basis of the feed rate optimization, which leads to a reduction of machining time while increasing the tool lifetime.
Two computing models are commonly applied for the instant cutting force prediction, one is the so called MRR (Material Removal Rate) model, which is rather simple, and the other one is the more sophisticated mechanistic model.
In the MRR model, which is introduced, for example, in K.K. Wang, Solid modeling for optimizing metal removal of 3_D NC end milling, Journal of Manufacturing Systems 7/1 (1998) 57-65, it is assumed that the cutting forces are proportional to the amount of the material momentary being removed. The main disadvantage of this method is that it provides only average force values without showing the direction of the forces, instead of determining instantaneous force vectors, which would be necessary to exactly determine wearing, deflection or chattering of the milling tool. However, owing to its simplicity and robustness, the MRR method is widely used in computer-aided machining (CAM) systems for feed rate optimization.
The mechanistic model incorporates the geometrical attributes of the cutting process into the simulation. It extends the fundamental cutting force equations, which describe the effect of shearing and ploughing along an elemental cutting edge, to the complex geometry of the milling tool. The original theory of the mechanistic modelling has been further developed to the conditions of milling in several ways. Many of the researchers have been focusing on the exact description of the geometrical relations during the cutting process. Analytical solutions were born for face milling (see e.g. K.A. Desai, P.K.Agarwal, P. V.M. Rao, Process geometry modeling with cutter runout for milling of curved surfaces, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 49 (2009) 1015-1028), ball-end milling (see e.g. P.Lee, Y. Altintas, Prediction of ball- end milling forces from orthogonal cutting data, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 36 (1996) 1059-1072), and also for general-end cutters and inserted cutters. Due to the recent development of the simulation technologies, the way of determination of the contact area between the workpiece and the milling tool has also been changed. The use of analytical calculations has been replaced by approximating methods, including the most commonly applied z-map (see e.g. G.M. Kim, P.J. Cho, C.N. Chu, Cutting force prediction of sculptured surface ball-end milling using Z-map, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 40 (2000) 277-291) and other techniques, which involve the swept volume of not only the whole milling tool but each of the cutter teeth into the computation.
In case of the mechanistic model, however, the determination of the cutting force coefficients is a critical issue. For getting coefficients which are independent from the cutting conditions, the evaluation of a set of experiments with well-defined technological parameters is usually proposed. Such a solution is disclosed, for example, in the US Pat. No. 7,050,883.
Though various solutions have been elaborated to simplify the tests with reservation of accuracy and generality, the main problem related to the coefficients has not been solved yet. The known solutions are valid only for a certain workpiece materials and milling tool geometries, however, these parameters usually change during the machining process due to the wearing of the tool, thus setting up any usable database of coefficients, even for the most common cases, is practically impossible. This causes that the mechanistic cutting force model, in spite of being more accurate and providing more information than the MRR model, has not been used in practice.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an improved method for determining the cutting forces to be applied to the tool in a milling process by using an enhanced mechanistic force model for calculating the various force coefficients and by continuously measuring the real cutting forces exerted by the tool to the workpiece during machining. It is another object of the present invention to allow the use of a milling tool of any shape and the application of any kind of feeding path for the milling tool without restrictions in respect of milling geometry and accuracy. It is also an object of the present invention to provide a method for determining the cutting forces in a milling process wherein the cutting force coefficients can be adapted to the wearing, the deflection or other changes of the tool during the milling process.
These and other objects are achieved by a method for optimizing cutting forces in a milling process of machining a workpiece by means of a milling tool, the method comprising the steps of:
- in a tool coordinate system, continuously measuring the real three-dimensional cutting force exerted by the milling tool to the workpiece,
- simulating the milling process to determine a contact area between the workpiece and the milling tool by using a multi-dexel representation of the workpiece,
- for each elementary section of an entire turn of the milling tool, predicting a forthcoming instantaneous elementary cutting force from said measured cutting force, said calculated cutting force being determined using a plurality of cutting force coefficients resulted from a mechanistic force model of the milling tool, wherein the mechanistic force model is provided with geometrical information of said contact area obtained from the milling process simulation, and wherein the prediction uses a predetermined look-forward period,
- determining the predicted instantaneous cutting force components for an entire turn of the milling tool for each cutting edge, and
- according to the predicted cutting force, adjusting the operational parameters of the milling process so as to reach an optimum value for the actual cutting force acting to the milling tool. The above object are further achieved a computer-controlled milling machine comprising
- a milling tool for machining a workpiece,
- a measuring unit for measuring the cutting forces exerted by the milling tool to the workpiece, - a simulation module for simulating the milling process to determine a contact area between the workpiece and the milling tool by using a multi-dexel representation of the workpiece,
- a prediction module for receiving the milling force measurements and the simulated geometrical data, and for generating predicted cutting forces from the measured cutting forces and the simulated cutting forces, and
- a control unit for receiving the predicted cutting forces and for adjusting the operational parameters of the milling process according to the predicted cutting forces so as to reach optimum values for the actual cutting forces acting to milling tool.
The present invention will be now described through preferred embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which Figures 1a to 1c schematically illustrate the head of a milling tool with depicting the geometrical and mechanical parameters used in the mechanistic force model,
Figure 2 is a flow diagram depicting the basic steps of the method according to the invention,
Figure 3 illustrates organization of a memory block used in the simulation of the cutting forces, in a preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention,
Figure 4 is a schematic block diagram of the computer-controlled milling machine according to the invention,
Figures 5a and 5b illustrate a milling test configuration with ball-end cutter and a cylindrical workpiece in a perspective view and a schematic view, respectively, Figure 6a to 6f show test results of the examined milling test configuration illustrated in Figures 4a and 4b, using 0 s force prediction delay, and
Figure 7a to 7f show test results of the examined milling test configuration illustrated in Figures 4a and 4b, using 0,5 s force prediction delay. With reference to Figures 1a to 1c, a cutting force prediction method will be first introduced as a first aspect of the present invention. This method abandons applying the prior art force prediction models, in which elementary force components are numerically integrated along the active parts of the cutting edge. Instead, elementary (average) force components are calculated for a plurality of elementary (i.e. arbitrarily small) surface segments of the contact area between the tool and the workpiece, and then these elementary forces are summed along a cutting edge for a particular section of the entire turn of the tool. The surface segments, more particularly their geometrical parameters, are obtained directly from a multi-dexel description of the workpiece volume, which is continuously simulated during the milling process. A suitable method for generating the multi-dexel representation of the workpiece is disclosed in B. Tukora, T. Szalay, Fully GPU-based volume representation and material removal simulation of free-form objects (Innovative Developments in Design and Manufacturing: Advanced research in virtual and rapid prototyping (2009) 609- 614), which is incorporated herein as a reference.
As Figures 1a to 1c illustrate a ball-end milling tool, the cutting force prediction method will be detailed below for ball-end tools, however, the method can be easily adapted to general-end milling tools. The cutting force coefficients can be determined from instantaneous or average orthogonal forces measured on the tool during multi- axis machining, irrespectively of whether instantaneous or average estimated forces are calculated.
The cutting force prediction method is based on the mechanistic force model presented in P.Lee, Y. Altintas, Prediction of ball-end milling forces from orthogonal cutting data, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 36 (1996) 1059- 1072. In this model, a cutting edge is described as a sequence of linear segments. For each elementary edge segments a tangential, a radial and an axial elementary force component, dFt> dFr and dFa, respectively, are calculated as shown in Eq. 1.
Figure imgf000006_0001
where Kte, Kre, Kae (N/mm) are the edge specific coefficients, Ktc, Krc, Kac (N/mm2) are the shear specific coefficients, dS (mm) is the length of an elementary edge section of a cutting edge, tn (mm) is the undeformed chip thickness, and db is the projected length of the edge segment in the direction of the cutting velocity (also referred to as the chip width).
The force components related to the tool coordinate system (x, y, z) can be obtained by Eq. 3 resulted by the transformation in Eq. 2.
Figure imgf000007_0001
The contact area between the workpiece and the milling tool is composed of a plurality of elementary surface segments that are associated with the intersections of the workpiece's dexels and the surface of the tool's swept volume. Let denote
Figure imgf000007_0003
the three-dimensional cutting force that acts to an elementary cutting edge at the yth intersection point of the workpiece dexels and the tool surface, presuming that this elementary edge segment produces unit chip thickness, i.e. db = 1. From Eq. 1 and Eq. 3:
Figure imgf000007_0002
where tn is determined on the basis of the removed portion of the dexels in the actual simulation step, and dSj for ball-end tool is:
Figure imgf000008_0001
Furthermore, let us divide a whole turn of the rotating milling tool into P elementary sections (sections of a circle), so that the turning angle of the tool will be 2π/Ρ during each elementary circle section. The average force components acting to a particular cutting edge while sweeping through the k\ elementary circle section can be determined as:
Figure imgf000008_0002
where 5, is the surface area of the /th elementary surface segment of the contact area (along the cutting edge concerned) and is the length of the elementary
Figure imgf000008_0003
circle section along which the point of the edge, which touches the /th intersection point, sweeps during the elementary surface segment. If P is equal to 1 , than Fxyz Q gives the average force vector which acts to the particular cutting edge during a whole turn of the tool. The greater the number of the elementary circle sections is, the more the force values approach the instantaneous forces. The forces acting along other cutting edges can be calculated in the same way, considering that the related spindle rotation angle must be increased with the angle between the first andth cutting edge.
The formulation of Eq. 7 allows to simultaneously calculate the force components associated with different elementary surface segments for a whole turn, which is preferably carried out by means of a general-purpose graphics processing unit (GPGPU). It is obvious for a skilled person that Equations 1 to 3, and thus Equations 4 to 7 can be applied not only to a ball-end milling tool (leading to Eq. 7), but also to general-end milling tools, depending on the calculation method of dS. As disclosed in the prior art (e.g in A. Lamikiz, L.N. Lopez de Lacalle, J. A. Sanches, U. Bravo, Calculation of the specific cutting coefficients and geometrical aspects in sculptured surface machining, Machining Science and Technology 9 (2005) 411- 436), the most accurate estimation of the cutting force can be achieved by using constant ploughing coefficients and polynomial shearing coefficients depending on the position of the elementary surface segment in the z-direction (see Figures 1a to 1c). The shearing coefficients may be expressed as follows:
Figure imgf000009_0001
Substituting Eq. 4, 5 and 8 into Eq. 7, the x-component of the cutting force for the kth elementary circle section is:
Figure imgf000009_0002
Let us denote the components
Figure imgf000009_0004
in Eq. 8 as K0 ... K3(n+2), respectively. In this case, Eq. 9 can be written as follows:
Figure imgf000009_0003
wherein the values can be directly gained from the cutting geometry in every simulation step performed to determined the actual contact area between the workpiece and the milling tool. The form of Eq. 10 allows to determine the Ks cutting force coefficient components using the least square (LS) method. Let Q denote the difference between the calculated force and the measured force. As Q has to be minimized during a given measuring sequence, the following expression can be written for each Ks.
Figure imgf000010_0002
Eq. 11 describes a linear equation system of t = 3(n + 2) equations, which can be solved by using the Gaussian elimination method for every Ks, resulting in:
Figure imgf000010_0001
It should be noted that the above Ks coefficients can be determined by measuring the x-directional cutting force component only. Nevertheless, for the y and z-directional cutting force components, similar equations can be created in the same way, and those may also be involved in the computations of the cutting force coefficients so as to improve the accuracy of the cutting force estimation.
The form of the proposed force equations allows to express the shearing and ploughing cutting force coefficients in such a way that they can be determined from measured forces even in case of continuously altering cutting geometry. This makes it possible to determine the coefficients and to estimate the forthcoming forces in the same time, during the actual manufacturing process. To this end, an appropriate look-forward algorithm is proposed that will be described later.
Now, reference is made to Figure 2 in order to describe the basic steps of a method for optimizing cutting forces in a milling process, in accordance with the present invention. In step S100, the real three-dimensional cutting forces exerted by the milling tool to the workpiece are measured in a tool coordinate system (shown in Fig. 1a). Measurements of the real cutting forces are carried out in a conventional manner by means of an appropriate measuring device coupled to the milling tool. In step S110, the milling process is simulated to determine the actual contact area between the workpiece and the milling tool by using a multi-dexel representation of the workpiece. In each simulation step, various geometrical parameters of the elementary surface segments of the contact area, such as tn and position of the elementary surface segments, are computed. For an exact simulation of the milling process, it is preferred that position of the milling tool is also measured continuously and forwarded to the simulation module.
Using the geometrical information of the milling tool and the workpiece produced by the simulation, for each elementary section of an entire turn of the tool an elementary cutting force of the milling process is predicted on the basis of the measured cutting force in step S120. The calculated cutting force is determined from a plurality of cutting force coefficients that are determined from the mechanistic force model of the milling tool, the mechanistic model using all necessary geometrical information of the contact area obtained from the simulation of the milling process.
Next, in step S130, the predicted cutting force components are determined for an entire turn of the tool for each cutting edge. In this step, the elementary cutting force components associated with the subsequent elementary circle sections of a turn of the tool may computed simultaneously, which makes it possible to significantly reduce the computing time, thus allowing a real time prediction of the cutting force. Finally, in step S140, the operational parameters (e.g. the feed-rate) of the milling process are adjusted according to the predicted cutting force so as to reach an optimum value for the actual cutting force acting to the milling tool. Although the cutting force adjustment may be carried out immediately (i.e. without substantial delay) after the force prediction, adjustment of the actual cutting forces is preferably delayed by a predetermined time period, i.e. a so-called look-forward period, after the prediction of the cutting force in order to reduce the required computational power. In practice, a delay ranging from a few tenths of a second up to a few seconds seems to be appropriate for most milling processes. A preferred range of the look-forward period includes 0,1 to 2 seconds, and a more preferred range of the look-forward period includes 0,5 to 1 second. The aforementioned zero delay is preferably used only for test purposes to validate the simulation model.
As the method of the determination of the coefficients does not require keeping to special cutting conditions during the measuring sequence, it can be applied directly at the machining process, just before the cutting forces are needed to be predicted. The best result can be reached if the elapsed time between the coefficient determination and the force prediction is short. To this end, continuous cutting force measurements and a synchronized simulation are carried out in the course of the milling process, wherein the forthcoming cutting forces are instantly predicted with an appropriate look-forward algorithm as described below.
A proposed look-forward algorithm for the cutting force adjustment will now be described with reference to Figure 3, in which an exemplary organization of a memory block used in the simulation of the cutting forces is illustrated.
As shown in Figure 3, three pointers may be used to point to various locations in the memory block, namely a simulation_time_pointer, a manufacturing_time_pointer and a time_window_pointer.
The simulation_time_pointer is synchronized with the simulation of the milling process and the cutting force estimation process, this latter also being performed in the simulation module. The simulation always goes ahead of the manufacturing, i.e. the current time of the simulation is ahead of the current time of the manufacturing. In every simulation step, actual values for the geometrical parameters of the workpiece and the milling tool, i.e. the
Figure imgf000012_0001
values, are calculated and pushed into the memory block at the position of the simulation_time_pointer. On the basis of the cutting geometry provided by the milling process simulation and the calculated cutting force coefficients (when they already exist), updated cutting forces are predicted and if necessary, the feed rate is adjusted accordingly, thus providing a feed rate optimization. For example, when according to the estimated cutting forces, an increased feed rate can be used without causing damage for the tool, whereas in case the estimated cutting forces are qualified as excessive, the feed rate of the tool should be reduced. (If the feed rate is changed, updated values thereof should be also written into the memory block.)
When a delay is applied between the cutting force estimation and the force adjustment of the milling tool, which is a preferred way of milling, the estimated cutting force is regarded as a predicted cutting force. After the real cutting forces have been measured, their values may be put into the memory together with the related values at the manufacturing_time_pointer, and all these values may be added to the matrix which describes the linear equation system of Eq. 12. The actual cutting force coefficients Ks are determined at this time by solving the matrix. (It should be noted that the geometrical data have already been added to the matrix at the simulation phase, which is antecedent to the measurement of the actual cutting forces.)
The time_window_pointer may be optional. After a certain elapsed time the A's and the measured force values can be subtracted from the matrix describing Eq. 12, so they do not take part in the force coefficient calculation any more. In this way the force coefficients may be adapted to the altering machining conditions (e.g. caused by tool wearing) during long manufacturing processes as well.
Theoretically, the aforementioned look-forward algorithm makes it possible also to conclude to the degree of wearing of the milling tool through the observation of the changes in the values of the force coefficients during a milling process.
In a second aspect, the present invention relates to a computer-controlled milling machine. As shown in Figure 4, which schematically illustrates the configuration of a milling machine 200 according to the invention, a CNC milling tool 210 is numerically controlled by a control unit 220, in which a conventional CAM software is used for setting the operational parameters of the tool (e.g. rotational speed of the spindle, feed-rate, position of the milling end, etc.) to perform the milling processes.
To obtain the instantaneous cutting force exerted by the milling tool 210 to the workpiece (not shown), a measuring unit 230 is coupled to the milling tool 210. The measuring unit may comprise any suitable measuring device.
The milling process is continuously simulated in a simulation module 250 to determine the contact area between the workpiece and the milling tool. The simulation module 240 uses a multi-dexel representation of the workpiece to calculate the actual values of the geometrical parameters of the elementary surface segments of said contact area. To achieve the most accurate simulation as possible the simulation module 240 is coupled to the measuring unit 230 to collect certain pieces of position information with respect to the milling tool 210. A prediction module 250 is used to generate estimated cutting forces from the measured cutting forces and the simulated cutting forces. To this end the prediction module is coupled to the measuring unit 230 and the simulation module 240.
The control unit 220 is adapted for receiving the predicted cutting forces from the prediction module 250 and for adjusting the operational parameters of the milling process according to the predicted cutting forces so as to reach optimum values for the actual cutting forces acting to milling tool 210. The control unit 220 is preferably configured to perform the cutting force adjustments using a predetermined delay after receiving the predicted cutting forces, resulting in a predictive cutting force adjustment.
Either or both of the simulation module 240 and the prediction module 250 may be integrated into the control unit 220 in the form of additional software. The advantage of executing the force calculations (i.e. prediction) within the control unit 220 is that some important information is still not available at the off-line state, but it can be gained during the machining process. This means that the control unit 220 may take over certain functions that conventionally belong to the CAM software. The integration of these functions may hide some difficult software technology problems.
Example
For validating the above introduced mechanistic force model, different tests have been completed, wherein a well-machinable AIMgSil aluminium alloy blank was cut with cooling by a two-fluted HSS ball-end cutter having 12 mm diameter, 30° nominal helix angle and 0° rake angle. The milling processes were performed on a Kondia B640 machining center with NCT control. The cutting forces were measured by a Kistler 9257B dynamometer. The sampling rate was set to 3000Hz; ±1000N measuring range and no filtering were applied to a connected Kistler 5019 Multichannel Charge Amplifier. A GPGPU-based machining simulation was run on a NVIDIA Geforce 480GTX graphics card as fast as the real machining process. The simulation was off-line due to technical limitations, i.e. the measured force values were first stored by the Kistler's Dynoware software and then they were read from a text file for the computations. In spite of this, the simulation software perceived and computed as if direct connection had been established with the measuring system. The cutting force coefficients were determined on the basis of instantaneous measured forces.
The applied method required the knowledge of the exact tool positions and spindle turning positions during the whole machining process. The measurements showed that the difference between the programmed and real spindle speed was about 0.46%, while the real feed rate followed the programmed feed-rate at about 2% accuracy. The test configuration enclosed only the measuring of the three force components (along the three tool axes x, y and z) as a function of time, meaning that subsequent manual adjustments were needed for the exact synchronization of the simulation and the machining process.
In Figure 5a and 5b, one of the test configurations is illustrated in a perspective view and a simplified schematic view, respectively, for a rather simple milling process, in which a multi-axis machining was tested with continuously changing cutting geometry along the tool path. A slot with a maximum depth of 4 mm was milled into a cylindrical blank, at 45 degrees to its symmetry axis. The cutting parameters applied in this test are listed in Table 1.
Figure imgf000015_0001
At first, the look-forward period was set to zero second, which means that the forces were predicted just for the same moment when they were measured. In reality, howvere, there would be no point of this, it has been performed only for validating the simulation model. Figures 6a to 6f show the measured and predicted forces along each tool axis, respectively, during the machining process in this case. In the figures, it can be observed that the predicted force values flutter at the beginning of the milling process due to the lack of the a priori knowledge of the cutting force coefficients. However, after a very short time (ca. 0,5 second in this example), when enough information has been gained and consumed for the calculation of the cutting force coefficients, the curves of the predicted forces tend to approach the curves of the measured forces with rather high accuracy.
In Figures 7a to 7f, the result of the same test configuration using a 0.5 second look- forward period can be seen. In this case, the simulation precedes the real machining, and the cutting forces are predicted by 0.5 second in advance to their measurement. In the first 0.5 second the force prediction does not provide any result due to the lack of the measured values. After this period the predicted force values shortly approach the measured force values and application of a look-forward period of 0.5 second did not significantly reduce the accuracy of the method.
Although in the foregoing, several preferred embodiments of the method and the milling machine according to the invention have been illustrated, the present invention is not in any way limited to the exemplary embodiments shown in the description and the drawings and many variations thereof are possible within the scope of the invention defined by the appended claims.

Claims

Claims
1. A method for optimizing cutting forces in a milling process of machining a workpiece by means of a milling tool, the method comprising the steps of:
- in a tool coordinate system, continuously measuring the real three-dimensional cutting force exerted by the milling tool to the workpiece (S100),
- simulating the milling process to determine a contact area between the workpiece and the milling tool by using a multi-dexel representation of the workpiece (S110),
- for each elementary section of an entire turn of the milling tool, predicting a forthcoming instantaneous elementary cutting force from said measured cutting force, said calculated cutting force being determined using a plurality of cutting force coefficients resulted from a mechanistic force model of the milling tool, wherein the mechanistic force model is provided with geometrical information of said contact area obtained from the milling process simulation and wherein the prediction uses a predetermined look-forward period (S120),
- determining the predicted instantaneous cutting force components for an entire turn of the milling tool for each cutting edge (S130), and
- according to the predicted cutting force, adjusting the operational parameters of the milling process so as to reach an optimum value for the actual cutting force acting to the milling tool (S140).
2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein look-forward period of the prediction ranges between 0,1 to 2 seconds, preferably between 0,5 to 1 second.
3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the elementary cutting force components associated with the subsequent elementary sections of a turn of the tool are computed simultaneously.
4. A computer-controlled milling machine comprising
- a milling tool (210) for machining a workpiece,
- a measuring unit (230) for measuring the cutting forces exerted by the milling tool (210) to the workpiece, - a simulation module (240) for simulating the milling process to determine a contact area between the workpiece and the milling tool (210) by using a multi-dexel representation of the workpiece,
- a prediction module (250) for receiving the milling force measurements and the simulated geometrical data, and for generating predicted cutting forces from the measured cutting forces and the simulated cutting forces, and
- a control unit (220) for receiving the predicted cutting forces and for adjusting the operational parameters of the milling process according to the predicted cutting forces so as to reach optimum values for the actual cutting forces acting to milling tool (210).
5. The milling machine according to claim 4, wherein the control unit (220) is adapted to adjust the cutting force to the predicted cutting force after a predetermined look- forward period upon receiving the predicted cutting force.
PCT/HU2012/000035 2011-05-09 2012-05-08 Method for optimizing cutting forces in a milling process and computer-controlled milling machine using the same method WO2012153157A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
HUP1100243 2011-05-09
HU1100243A HUP1100243A2 (en) 2011-05-09 2011-05-09 Method for optimizing cutting forces in a milling process and computer controlled milling machine using the same method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012153157A2 true WO2012153157A2 (en) 2012-11-15
WO2012153157A3 WO2012153157A3 (en) 2013-03-07

Family

ID=89990278

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/HU2012/000035 WO2012153157A2 (en) 2011-05-09 2012-05-08 Method for optimizing cutting forces in a milling process and computer-controlled milling machine using the same method

Country Status (2)

Country Link
HU (2) HUP1100243A2 (en)
WO (1) WO2012153157A2 (en)

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104462775A (en) * 2014-11-12 2015-03-25 天津大学 Five-axis machining center milling force calculating method
CN105538050A (en) * 2016-01-28 2016-05-04 南京理工大学 Prediction method of cutting force of ultrasonic vibration side face grinding of brittle material
CN106406239A (en) * 2016-11-29 2017-02-15 沈阳黎明航空发动机(集团)有限责任公司 Method of machining complicated surface efficiently
CN107168245A (en) * 2017-05-04 2017-09-15 武汉理工大学 A kind of accurate Forecasting Methodology of chamfered edge circular bit cutting force for considering cutting edge effect
CN109408866A (en) * 2018-09-12 2019-03-01 南京艾提瑞精密机械有限公司 A kind of vibration auxiliary milling cutting force modeling method
CN110270705A (en) * 2019-06-26 2019-09-24 东北大学 Consider that the micro-milling of cutter jumping effect processes cutting forces simulation prediction technique
CN111553032A (en) * 2020-04-27 2020-08-18 湖北文理学院 Blisk milling temperature prediction method, blisk milling temperature prediction device, blisk milling temperature prediction equipment and storage medium
CN111651868A (en) * 2020-05-15 2020-09-11 西北工业大学 Groove machining milling force prediction method based on material plastic constitutive
EP3715978A1 (en) 2019-03-26 2020-09-30 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Machine tool and method for operating it
CN112182877A (en) * 2020-09-27 2021-01-05 江苏恒宝智能系统技术有限公司 Intelligent cutting optimization method and system for composite material
CN112347585A (en) * 2020-11-12 2021-02-09 北京交通大学 Analytical calculation method for contact area between ball-end milling cutter and workpiece
CN112613150A (en) * 2020-12-31 2021-04-06 华中科技大学 Image expression method of cutting geometry
CN112859754A (en) * 2019-11-28 2021-05-28 智能云科信息科技有限公司 Machine tool machining control method, machine tool machining control device, storage medium, edge device and server
CN112935414A (en) * 2021-03-09 2021-06-11 湖北工业大学 Method for optimizing motion speed fluctuation of gear hobbing electronic gear box
CN113177280A (en) * 2021-05-20 2021-07-27 重庆大学 Method for calibrating cutting force coefficient of ball cutter
CN114633152A (en) * 2022-05-05 2022-06-17 陕西科技大学 Virtual cutter device under machine tool milling process and loading method
EP4083728A1 (en) * 2021-04-29 2022-11-02 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Methods and systems for adapting a feed rate of a feed control on numerically controlled machine tools

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7050883B2 (en) 2003-11-20 2006-05-23 Postech Foundation Off-line feed rate scheduling for reduction of machining time and enhancement of machining accuracy in CNC machining

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102005013290B4 (en) * 2005-03-22 2007-04-05 Siemens Ag Method for the electronic operation of a machine tool
DE102005025338B4 (en) * 2005-05-31 2019-03-14 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 08.Method for machining a workpiece
DE102006025165A1 (en) * 2006-05-30 2007-10-18 Siemens Ag Machine part`s e.g. rotating printer roller, movement guiding device for e.g. printing machine, has reference value calculating unit for determining reference value and outputting reference value to drive device for regulating motor

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7050883B2 (en) 2003-11-20 2006-05-23 Postech Foundation Off-line feed rate scheduling for reduction of machining time and enhancement of machining accuracy in CNC machining

Non-Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
A. LAMIKIZ; L.N. LOPEZ DE LACALLE; J.A. SANCHES; U. BRAVO: "Calculation of the specific cutting coefficients and geometrical aspects in sculptured surface machining", MACHINING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, vol. 9, 2005, pages 411 - 436
B. TUKORA; T. SZALAY: "Fully GPU-based volume representation and material removal simulation of free-form objects", INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENTS IN DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING: ADVANCED RESEARCH IN VIRTUAL AND RAPID PROTOTYPING, 2009, pages 609 - 614
G.M. KIM; P.J. CHO; C.N. CHU: "Cutting force prediction of sculptured surface ball-end milling using Z-map", INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, vol. 40, 2000, pages 277 - 291
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, vol. 36, 1996, pages 1059 - 1072
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS -& -MARUFACTURE, vol. 49, 2009, pages 1015 - 1028
K.K. WANG: "Solid modeling for optimizing metal removal of 3 D NC end milling", JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, vol. 7/1, 1998, pages 57 - 65
P.LEE; Y: "Altintas, Prediction of ball-end milling forces from orthogonal cutting data", INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, vol. 36, 1996, pages 1059 - 1072

Cited By (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104462775A (en) * 2014-11-12 2015-03-25 天津大学 Five-axis machining center milling force calculating method
CN105538050A (en) * 2016-01-28 2016-05-04 南京理工大学 Prediction method of cutting force of ultrasonic vibration side face grinding of brittle material
CN106406239A (en) * 2016-11-29 2017-02-15 沈阳黎明航空发动机(集团)有限责任公司 Method of machining complicated surface efficiently
CN107168245A (en) * 2017-05-04 2017-09-15 武汉理工大学 A kind of accurate Forecasting Methodology of chamfered edge circular bit cutting force for considering cutting edge effect
CN107168245B (en) * 2017-05-04 2019-08-23 武汉理工大学 A kind of accurate prediction technique of chamfered edge circular bit cutting force considering cutting edge effect
CN109408866A (en) * 2018-09-12 2019-03-01 南京艾提瑞精密机械有限公司 A kind of vibration auxiliary milling cutting force modeling method
EP3715978A1 (en) 2019-03-26 2020-09-30 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Machine tool and method for operating it
WO2020193356A1 (en) 2019-03-26 2020-10-01 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for operating a machine tool, and machine tool
CN110270705A (en) * 2019-06-26 2019-09-24 东北大学 Consider that the micro-milling of cutter jumping effect processes cutting forces simulation prediction technique
CN110270705B (en) * 2019-06-26 2020-07-28 东北大学 Micro-milling machining cutting force simulation prediction method considering cutter bounce influence
CN112859754B (en) * 2019-11-28 2022-06-17 智能云科信息科技有限公司 Machine tool machining control method, machine tool machining control device, storage medium, edge device, and server
CN112859754A (en) * 2019-11-28 2021-05-28 智能云科信息科技有限公司 Machine tool machining control method, machine tool machining control device, storage medium, edge device and server
CN111553032A (en) * 2020-04-27 2020-08-18 湖北文理学院 Blisk milling temperature prediction method, blisk milling temperature prediction device, blisk milling temperature prediction equipment and storage medium
CN111553032B (en) * 2020-04-27 2023-09-15 湖北文理学院 Blisk milling temperature prediction method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN111651868A (en) * 2020-05-15 2020-09-11 西北工业大学 Groove machining milling force prediction method based on material plastic constitutive
CN112182877A (en) * 2020-09-27 2021-01-05 江苏恒宝智能系统技术有限公司 Intelligent cutting optimization method and system for composite material
CN112182877B (en) * 2020-09-27 2024-02-23 江苏恒宝智能系统技术有限公司 Intelligent cutting processing optimization method and system for composite material
CN112347585A (en) * 2020-11-12 2021-02-09 北京交通大学 Analytical calculation method for contact area between ball-end milling cutter and workpiece
CN112347585B (en) * 2020-11-12 2024-01-02 北京交通大学 Analytical calculation method for contact area between ball end mill and workpiece
CN112613150A (en) * 2020-12-31 2021-04-06 华中科技大学 Image expression method of cutting geometry
CN112613150B (en) * 2020-12-31 2023-12-26 华中科技大学 Image expression method of cutting geometry
CN112935414B (en) * 2021-03-09 2022-10-04 湖北工业大学 Method for optimizing movement speed fluctuation of gear hobbing electronic gear box
CN112935414A (en) * 2021-03-09 2021-06-11 湖北工业大学 Method for optimizing motion speed fluctuation of gear hobbing electronic gear box
EP4083728A1 (en) * 2021-04-29 2022-11-02 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Methods and systems for adapting a feed rate of a feed control on numerically controlled machine tools
WO2022229076A1 (en) * 2021-04-29 2022-11-03 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Methods and systems for adapting a feed rate of a feed control on numerically controlled machine tools
CN113177280B (en) * 2021-05-20 2022-10-25 重庆大学 Ball cutter cutting force coefficient calibration method
CN113177280A (en) * 2021-05-20 2021-07-27 重庆大学 Method for calibrating cutting force coefficient of ball cutter
CN114633152A (en) * 2022-05-05 2022-06-17 陕西科技大学 Virtual cutter device under machine tool milling process and loading method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
HU4590U (en) 2016-01-28
HUP1100243A2 (en) 2012-11-28
WO2012153157A3 (en) 2013-03-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2012153157A2 (en) Method for optimizing cutting forces in a milling process and computer-controlled milling machine using the same method
Imani et al. An improved process simulation system for ball-end milling of sculptured surfaces
Erdim et al. Feedrate scheduling strategies for free-form surfaces
Fussell et al. Robust feedrate selection for 3-axis NC machining using discrete models
Kiswanto et al. An analytical method for obtaining cutter workpiece engagement during a semi-finish in five-axis milling
Tukora et al. Real-time determination of cutting force coefficients without cutting geometry restriction
Ferry et al. Virtual five-axis flank milling of jet engine impellers—Part I: mechanics of five-axis flank milling
Merdol et al. Virtual cutting and optimization of three-axis milling processes
Li et al. Mechanistic modeling of five-axis machining with a general end mill considering cutter runout
CN104239720B (en) Complicated surface cutting force prediction method and parameter adjustment and tool path planning method
Hoon Ko et al. 3D ball-end milling force model using instantaneous cutting force coefficients
Erdim et al. Offline force control and feedrate scheduling for complex free form surfaces in 5-axis milling
US20150088301A1 (en) System and Method for Determining Feedrates of Machining Tools
Perez et al. An enhanced method for cutting force estimation in peripheral milling
Artetxe et al. Solid subtraction model for the surface topography prediction in flank milling of thin-walled integral blade rotors (IBRs)
Lee et al. A 3D predictive cutting-force model for end milling of parts having sculptured surfaces
Ko et al. Off-line feed rate scheduling using virtual CNC based on an evaluation of cutting performance
Pelayo Modelling of static and dynamic milling forces in inclined operations with circle-segment end mills
Sun et al. Chatter stability of orthogonal turn-milling analyzed by complete discretization method
Berglind et al. Discrete cutting force model for 5-axis milling with arbitrary engagement and feed direction
Wang et al. A novel 3D surface topography prediction algorithm for complex ruled surface milling and partition process optimization
Ma et al. Tool posture dependent chatter suppression in five-axis milling of thin-walled workpiece with ball-end cutter
Zhang et al. A force-measuring-based approach for feed rate optimization considering the stochasticity of machining allowance
Kukreja et al. Estimation of scallop height in freeform surface CNC Machining
Wang et al. A method for the prediction of cutting force for 5-axis ball-end milling of workpieces with curved surfaces

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12759502

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12759502

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2