WO2012146092A1 - Procédé et système de contrôle de politique pour mesurer la mobilité d'un flux ip - Google Patents

Procédé et système de contrôle de politique pour mesurer la mobilité d'un flux ip Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012146092A1
WO2012146092A1 PCT/CN2012/072330 CN2012072330W WO2012146092A1 WO 2012146092 A1 WO2012146092 A1 WO 2012146092A1 CN 2012072330 W CN2012072330 W CN 2012072330W WO 2012146092 A1 WO2012146092 A1 WO 2012146092A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
entity
flow
flow migration
pcrf
routing rule
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CN2012/072330
Other languages
English (en)
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
周晓云
毕以峰
卢飞
Original Assignee
中兴通讯股份有限公司
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 中兴通讯股份有限公司 filed Critical 中兴通讯股份有限公司
Publication of WO2012146092A1 publication Critical patent/WO2012146092A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/302Route determination based on requested QoS
    • H04L45/306Route determination based on the nature of the carried application

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of communications technologies, and in particular, to a policy control method and system for IP flow migration.
  • the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) evolved Evolved Packet System is mainly composed of the Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network).
  • E-UTRAN Mobility Management Entity
  • S-GW Serving Gateway
  • P-GW or PDN Packet Data Network Gateway
  • HSS Home Subscriber Server
  • PCRF Policy and Charging Rules
  • PCRF Policy and Charging Rules Function
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the system architecture of EPS.
  • the MME is responsible for control planes such as mobility management, non-access stratum signaling processing, and user mobility management context management;
  • the S-GW is an access gateway device connected to the E-UTRAN, in the E-UTRAN and P-GW forwards data and is responsible for buffering paging waiting data.
  • P-GW is a border gateway between EPS and Packet Data Network (PDN), which is responsible for PDN access and EPS.
  • PDN Packet Data Network
  • PCRF Policy and charging rule function entity, which is connected to the service network protocol (Internet Protocol, IP for short) service network through the receiving interface Rx to obtain service information.
  • the PCRF also passes Gx or The Gxa or Gxc interface is connected to the gateway device in the network, and is responsible for initiating the establishment of the IP bearer, ensuring the quality of service (QoS) of the service data, and performing charging control.
  • QoS quality of service
  • EPS supports interworking with non-3GPP systems, and interworking with non-3GPP systems is implemented through the S2a/b/c interface, which is an anchor point between 3GPP and non-3GPP systems.
  • non-3GPP systems are classified into a trusted non-3GPP IP access network and an untrusted non-3GPP IP access network.
  • the trusted non-3GPP IP access network can be directly connected to the P-GW through the S2a interface; the untrusted non-3GPP IP access needs to be connected to the P-GW through an Evolved Packet Data Gateway (E-PDG).
  • E-PDG Evolved Packet Data Gateway
  • the interface between the E-PDG and the P-GW is S2b.
  • the S2c provides user plane-related control and mobility support between the User Equipment (UE) and the P-GW.
  • the protocol is IPv6 Support for Dual Stack Hosts and Routers (referred to as DSMIPv6)
  • the Policy and Charging Enforcement Function (PCEF) entity exists in the P-GW, and the PCRF and the P-GW exchange information through the Gx interface.
  • PCEF Policy and Charging Enforcement Function
  • the S-GW also has a Bearer Binding and Event Report Function (BBERF) entity for performing QoS control on the service data flow.
  • BBERF Bearer Binding and Event Report Function
  • the S-GW exchanges information with the PCRF through the Gxc interface.
  • the BBERF is also resident in the trusted non-3GPP access gateway.
  • the trusted non-3GPP access gateway exchanges information with the PCRF through the Gxa interface.
  • the service function (Application Function, referred to as AF) for the UE is sent to the PCRF through the Rx interface to send service information for the Policy and Charging Control (PCC) policy.
  • PCC Policy and Charging Control
  • the corresponding PDN network can be found by the Access Point Name (APN).
  • APN Access Point Name
  • IP-CAN IP Connectivity Access Network
  • the UE accesses a PDN network through multiple access networks at the same time (that is, the network where the operator provides the IP service), which can also be called IP flow mobility. As shown in FIG. 2, the UE accesses the PDN network through the same P-GW through the non-3GPP IP access network and the 3GPP access network under the coverage of the non-3GPP access network and the 3GPP access network.
  • the P-GW allocates an IP address to the UE, that is, there is only one IP-CAN session between the UE and the PDN.
  • the UE, the P-GW, or the PCRF determines which access network connection the IP data stream is transmitted according to different characteristics of the service. For example, when the non-3GPP access network is Wireless Fidelity (WiFi), the service data stream of the Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP) and the File Transfer Protocol (FTP) can be used.
  • HTTP Hyper Text Transfer Protocol
  • FTP File Transfer Protocol
  • VoIP Voice Over Internet Protocol
  • the service can take advantage of the lower WiFi tariff; while the services with higher real-time requirements such as VoIP can take advantage of 3GPP QoS control and better mobility management.
  • FIG. 3 shows a process in which the UE first establishes a PDN connection through a 3GPP access network access and then establishes a PDN connection through non-3GPP access, and simultaneously uses the two access networks to connect using the PDN.
  • Dynamic Policy and Charging Control (PCC) is deployed in the network.
  • PCC Dynamic Policy and Charging Control
  • the UE uses the DSMIPv6 protocol.
  • the process mainly includes the following steps:
  • Step S301 The UE accesses an evolved packet core network (Evolved Packet Core, referred to as EPC) through the 3GPP access network.
  • EPC evolved Packet Core
  • a tunnel is established between the S-GW and the P-GW through a General Packet Radio Service Tunneling Protocol (GTP) or a Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) protocol, and may have been established. There is traffic on the tunnel.
  • GTP General Packet Radio Service Tunneling Protocol
  • PMIPv6 Proxy Mobile IPv6
  • the UE accesses the service provided by the AF through the established IP-CAN session, and the AF request PCRF reports the IP-CAN type of the access network connection through which the service data stream of the AF-provided service passes (further may also include the RAT type), and the PCRF according to the request
  • the IP-CAN type reported to the AF is 3GPP-EPS, and the RAT type is E-UTRAN.
  • SDF service data flows
  • Step S302 the UE discovers the non-3GPP access network and decides to initiate multiple access.
  • the UE performs access authentication and authorization in the trusted non-3GPP access network, and the UE performs layer 3 attachment and obtains the local IP address IP Address 1 as the care-of address (Care of Address) , referred to as CoA).
  • the UE will establish an IPSec (IP Security) tunnel with the ePDG. During the tunnel establishment process, the ePDG assigns the IP address IP Address 1 to the UE as a CoA.
  • IP Security IP Security
  • Step S303 the bearer binding and event reporting function (BBERF) located in the trusted non-3GPP access network or the ePDG sends a gateway control session establishment message to the PCRF, and establishes a request to establish a gateway control. Session, carrying the user ID and IP Addressl.
  • BBERF bearer binding and event reporting function
  • Step S304 the PCRF returns an acknowledgement message to the BBERF.
  • Step 305 The UE finds the P-GW selected during the 3GPP access by using a mobile IPv6 (Mobile IPv6, MIPv6 for short) self-boot process.
  • a mobile IPv6 Mobile IPv6, MIPv6 for short
  • a security association is established between the UE and the PDN.
  • UE uses network key exchange 2 (Internet Key
  • IKEv2 The Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) is used for authentication on top of IKEv2.
  • EAP Extensible Authentication Protocol
  • the P-GW interacts with AAA to complete EAP authentication. And in the process, the P-GW returns the IP address IP Address2 allocated by the P-GW when the UE accesses the 3GPP, and the UE uses the IP address as the Home of Address (HoA) when the DSMIPv6 is bound. At this time, the P-GW performs the function of Home Agent (HA).
  • HA Home Agent
  • Step S306 The UE sends a DSMIPv6 binding update message to the P-GW/HA, where the binding update message carries a HoA, a CoA, a BID (Banding Identification), and a FID (Flow Identification).
  • HoA, CoA, BID, FID is a correspondence.
  • the value of the HoA can be determined by the value of the HoA.
  • the value of the CoA is the value of the CoA.
  • IP Address 1 indicates that the corresponding BID is a binding through non-3GPP access, and a certain data flow of the user access service uniquely identified by the FID is bound to the connection through the non-3GPP access.
  • the binding update message may be the IP address of the HoA, and the value of the CoA is the IP address2, indicating that the corresponding BID is a binding through the 3GPP access, and the service data flow identified by the FID is bound to the 3GPP. On the connection.
  • Step S307 After receiving the binding update message, the P-GW/HA performs multiple registration flow binding according to the parameters HoA, CoA, BID, FID, and Routing Filters carried in the message. That is, the P-GW simultaneously maintains the GTP/PMIPv6 tunnel with the S-GW and the DSMIPv6 tunnel with the UE, and binds the service data flow to the 3GPP access or the non-3GPP access.
  • the PCEF located at the P-GW sends an IP-CAN session modification request indication to the PCRF, and the PCEF will send an event trigger routing rule modification (ROUTING_RULE_CHANGE) and IP flow migration routing rule information to the PCRF (for the process)
  • the IP flow migration routing rule information includes installing and/or modifying an IP flow migration routing rule, where the IP flow migration routing rule is a correspondence between a service data flow and an access, and corresponds to a Routing Address by Routing Filters. The relationship is identified. When the value of the Routing Address is IP Address 1, it indicates that it is through non-3GPP access. When the value of the Routing Address is IP Address2, it indicates that it is accessed through 3GPP.
  • the message includes the default IP flow migration routing rules, namely Routing Filters.
  • the UE migrates the service data flow SDF1 from the 3GPP access network connection to the non-3GPP access network connection, and the PCEF will provide the PCRF with the IP flow migration routing rule corresponding to the SDF1 to notify the PCRF of the service data flow.
  • Routing Filters is the IP quintuple of the service data flow, and the Routing Address takes the value of IP Address 1.
  • Step S308 The PCRF reports the IP-CAN type (and possibly the RAT type (radio access type)) of the access network connection that the SDF1 passes to the AF according to the request of the AF.
  • the IP-CAN type takes the value of Non-3GPP-EPS.
  • Step S309 The AF returns an acknowledgement message to the PCRF.
  • Step S310 the PCRF installs and/or modifies an IP flow migration routing rule. If the service data flow corresponding to the IP flow migration routing rule is migrated (that is, the migration from the 3GPP access network connection to the non-3GPP access network connection), the PCRF updates the PCC rule correspondingly and returns it to the PCEF.
  • the IP flow migration routing rule modified by the PCRF may cause the service data flow corresponding to the IP flow migration routing rule to be migrated from the source routing path to the new routing path.
  • the PCC rules for the service data flow from the transmission of the 3GPP access to the non-3GPP access are updated and returned to the PCEF.
  • the process of updating the PCC rules for transporting the service data stream from the non-3GPP access to the 3GPP access is similar to this process, and therefore will not be described again.
  • Step S311 The P-GW/HA returns a binding acknowledgement message to the UE, where the message carries the HoA, the CoA, the BID, and the FID to confirm that the UE is successfully registered with multiple registrations, or the multiple registrations are flow binding and the flow migration is successful.
  • Step S312 since the SDF1 is migrated from the 3GPP access to the non-3GPP access, the PCRF will formulate a QoS rule according to the PCC rule updated by the service data flow, and provide the QoS rule to the trusted non-3GPP access network or the BBERF in the ePDG. .
  • Step S313 the non-3GPP access network performs a specific process for resource allocation or modification.
  • Step S314 the BBERF returns an acknowledgement message to the PCRF.
  • Step S315 since the SDF1 is migrated from the 3GPP access to the non-3GPP access, and if the PMIPv6 tunnel is established between the S-GW and the P-GW, the PCRF deletes the QoS rule corresponding to the service data flow.
  • the PCRF provides the QoS rule to be deleted to the BBERF in the S-GW through the gateway control session established by the UE during 3GPP access.
  • Step S316 The BBERF in the S-GW deletes the QoS rule, performs the bearer modification or release process of the 3GPP, and releases the resource of the migrated service data flow.
  • Step S317 the BBERF returns an acknowledgement message to the PCRF.
  • the P-GW will initiate a 3GPP bearer modification or release process after the S10 step, and release the resources of the migrated service data stream. S315-S317 will not be executed.
  • Step S318 The UE completes the multi-registration flow binding and the possible flow migration.
  • a DSMIPv6 tunnel exists between the UE and the P-GW/HA, and a GTP/PMIPv6 tunnel exists between the S-GW and the P-GW.
  • the UE or the network can determine which access the service data is transmitted according to the policy.
  • FIG. 4 shows a process in which the UE first establishes a PDN connection through a non-3GPP access network access and then establishes the same PDN connection through 3GPP access, and simultaneously uses the two access networks to connect using the PDN.
  • Dynamic PCC is deployed in the network.
  • the UE uses the DSMIPv6 protocol when trusted non-3GPP access is used.
  • the process mainly includes the following steps S401 to S413:
  • Step S401 The UE accesses the EPC through the DSMIPv6 protocol through the non-3GPP access network, and the DSMIPv6 tunnel is established between the UE and the P-GW/HA, and the existing service is transmitted on the tunnel.
  • the address assigned by the non-3GPP access network to the UE is IP Address 1 as the CoA, and the IP address assigned by the P-GW to the UE is IP Address 2 as the HoA.
  • the UE accesses the service provided by the AF through the established IP-CAN session, and the service provided by the AF includes two service data flows (SDF), which are respectively represented as SDF1 and SDF2, and the AF request PCRF reports the service data flow of the service.
  • SDF service data flows
  • the IP-CAN type of the access network connection that is transmitted (further may also include the RAT class Type), the IP-CAN type reported by the PCRF to the AF according to the request is 3GPP-EPS, and the RAT type is E-UTRAN.
  • Step S402 the UE discovers the 3GPP access network and decides to initiate multiple access.
  • the UE establishes a PDN connection to the same PDN through the 3GPP attach procedure.
  • the P-GW allocates an IP address to the UE as an IP Address2 to ensure that the same PDN connection is established through different accesses.
  • Step S403 The UE sends a DSMIPv6 binding update message to the P-GW/HA, where the binding update message carries (HoA, CoA, BID, FID). (HoA, CoA, BID, FID) is a correspondence.
  • the message is IP Address 2 and the CoA value is IP Address 1 , indicating that the corresponding BID is a binding through non-3GPP access, and a certain data flow of the user ID access service uniquely identified by the FID is bound to the non-3GPP.
  • the message is IP Address2 and the CoA value is IP Address2, indicating that the corresponding BID is a binding through 3GPP access, and the service data flow identified by the FID is bound to the connection through 3GPP access.
  • the UE requests to migrate the service data stream SDF1 transmitted through the non-3GPP access to the 3GPP access network.
  • Step S404 after receiving the binding update message, the P-GW/HA, according to the carried parameter HoA,
  • CoA, BID, FID, and Routing Filters perform multiple registration flow bindings.
  • the P-GW simultaneously maintains the GTP/PMIPv6 tunnel with the S-GW and the DSMIPv6 tunnel with the UE, and binds the service data flow to the 3GPP access or the non-3GPP access.
  • the PCEF located at the P-GW sends an IP-CAN session modification request indication to the PCRF, and the PCEF will send an event trigger ROUTING_RULE_CHANGE and IP flow migration routing rule information to the PCRF (for the case of the migrated IP flow in the flow, IP)
  • the flow migration routing rule information is to install and/or modify the IP flow migration routing rule, and the IP flow migration routing rule is the correspondence between the service data flow and the access, and the correspondence between the Routing Filters and the Routing Address is identified, and the Routing Address takes the value of IP Address.
  • Routing Filters is a wildcard.
  • the UE migrates the SDF1 from the non-3GPP access to the 3GPP access, and the PCEF provides the IPF migration routing rule corresponding to the service data flow to the PCRF to notify the PCRF of the migration of the routing of the service data flow.
  • Routing Filters is the IP quintuple of the service data flow, and the Routing Address takes the value of IP Address2.
  • Step S405 The PCRF reports the IP-CAN type (and possibly the RAT type) of the access network connection that SDF1 passes to the AF according to the request of the AF.
  • the IP-CAN type takes the value of Non-3GPP-EPS.
  • Step S406 The AF returns an acknowledgement message to the PCRF.
  • Step S407 The PCRF installs and/or modifies an IP flow migration routing rule.
  • the PCRF Since SDF1 has migrated (ie, migrated from non-3GPP access to 3GPP access), the PCRF updates the corresponding PCC rules and returns them to the PCEF.
  • the IP flow migration routing rule that is newly installed in the PCRF may cause the service data flow corresponding to the IP flow migration routing rule to be migrated from the default route to the route specified by the IP flow migration routing rule.
  • the service data flow corresponding to the IP flow migration routing rule may be migrated from the source routing path to the new routing path.
  • the PCC rules of the service data stream migrated from the non-3GPP access to the 3GPP access are updated and returned to the PCEF.
  • Step S408 The P-GW/HA returns a binding acknowledgement message to the UE, where the message carries the HoA, CoA, BID, and FID to confirm that the UE has multiple registrations, that is, the flow binding is successful or the multiple registration is flow binding and the flow migration succeeds.
  • the step S408 is performed after the step S403, and there is no certain order between the steps S404 and S407.
  • Step S409 since the SDF1 is migrated from the non-3GPP access to the 3GPP access, and if the PMIPv6 tunnel is established between the S-GW and the P-GW, the PCRF will formulate a QoS rule according to the PCC rule updated by the service data flow, and The QoS rule is provided to the BBERF in the S-GW.
  • Step S410 the BBERF installs the QoS rule, and the S-GW initiates execution of the 3GPP bearer modification or establishment process for resource allocation or modification.
  • Step S411 the BBERF returns an acknowledgement message to the PCRF.
  • the P-GW will initiate a 3GPP bearer modification or establishment process after the step S407, and allocate resources of the migrated service data stream. S409-S411 will not be executed.
  • Step S412 since the SDF1 is migrated from the non-3GPP access to the 3GPP access, the PCRF deletes the QoS rule corresponding to the service data flow in the non-3GPP access network or the ePDG.
  • PCRF The QoS rule to be deleted is provided to the BBERF in the non-3GPP access network or the ePDG by the gateway control session established by the UE during non-3GPP access.
  • Step S413 the BBERF deletes the QoS rule, and initiates a specific resource tampering or release process of the non-3GPP.
  • Step S414 the BBERF returns an acknowledgement message to the PCRF.
  • Step S415 The UE completes the multi-registration flow binding and the flow migration, and the DSMIPv6 tunnel exists between the UE and the P-GW/HA, and the GTP/PMIPv6 tunnel exists between the S-GW and the P-GW.
  • the UE or the network can decide which access the service data is transmitted through according to the policy.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart of data flow migration between two access networks after the UE implements multiple registration flow binding in the related art, where the service data flow migrated by the UE relates to two SDFs of the service provided by the AF ( Represented as one of SDF1 and SDF2 respectively, and a dynamic PCC is deployed in the network.
  • the process mainly includes the following steps S501 to S511:
  • Step S501 The UE simultaneously connects to the 3GPP access and the non-3GPP access, and performs multiple registration flow binding. And the two SDFs of the UE accessing the service provided by the AF (represented as SDF1 and SDF2, respectively) are transmitted through the non-3GPP access network.
  • Step S502 The UE sends a DSMIPv6 binding update message to the P-GW/HA, where the binding update message carries (HoA, BID, FID).
  • the UE may request to transmit through the non-3GPP access.
  • the service data stream SDF1 (represented by FID) is migrated to the 3GPP access network (represented by BID). That is, the FID is used to represent the SDF, the BID is used to represent the 3GPP access network, and the binding relationship between the FID and the BID is updated. Indicates that SDF1 is migrated to the 3GPP access network.
  • Step S503 After receiving the binding update message, the P-GW/HA performs flow binding update, that is, flow migration, according to the carried parameters HoA, BID, and FID.
  • the PCEF located in the P-GW sends an IP-CAN session modification request indication to the PCRF, and the PCEF sends an event trigger ROUTING_RULE_CHANGE and IP flow migration routing rule information to the PCRF, including modifying the IP flow migration routing rule corresponding to SDF1.
  • IP Address1 indicates that the currently transmitted access network is non-3GPP
  • IP Address2 indicates that the currently transmitted access network is 3GPP.
  • Use Routing Filters to represent the business data stream SDF1.
  • Step S504 The PCRF reports the IP-CAN type (and possibly the RAT type) of the access network connection that SDF1 passes to the AF according to the request of the AF.
  • the IP-CAN type takes the value of Non-3GPP-EPS.
  • Step S505 The AF returns an acknowledgement message to the PCRF.
  • Step S506 the PCRF modifies the IP flow migration routing rule.
  • the PCRF updates the PCC rules corresponding to SDF1 according to the IP flow migration routing rule.
  • Step S507 The P-GW/HA returns a binding acknowledgement message to the UE, where the message carries HoA, BID and FID to confirm that the UE routing rule is updated successfully.
  • Step S508 if a ⁇ tunnel is established between the S-GW and the P-GW, then the PCRF step S509, the BBERF installs a QoS rule, and the S-GW initiates a 3GPP bearer establishment, modification, or deletion process for resource allocation, modification, or release. .
  • Step S510 the BBERF returns an acknowledgement message to the PCRF.
  • the P-GW will initiate the establishment and modification of the bearer of the 3GPP after the step S506, and the S508-S510 will not execute.
  • Step S511 The PCRF deletes the QoS rule corresponding to the SDF1 on the BBERF in the trusted non-3GPP access network or the ePDG according to the rule reported by the PCEF.
  • Step S512 the BBERF deletes the QoS rule, and initiates a specific resource allocation, tampering or release process of the non-3GPP.
  • Step S513 the BBERF returns an acknowledgement message to the PCRF.
  • the PCRF needs to transmit the IP-CAN type (or RAT) of each IP flow.
  • the type is notified to the AF separately, so that the AF can provide the charging system with the IP-CAN type (or RAT type) transmitted by different IP flows, thereby implementing differentiated charging, or AF for related policy decisions.
  • the PCRF reports the IP-CAN type (or RAT type) of the access network connection transmitted by different IP flows to the AF, the AF must support the IP flow migration, that is, the AF needs to be able to distinguish the IP corresponding to each IP flow reported by the PCRF.
  • CAN type (or RAT type).
  • the PCRF can only use one IP-CAN type (or RAT type).
  • the IP-CAN type (or RAT type) that will cause the UE to access certain IP flows of the AF service to be transmitted is inconsistent with the IP-CAN type (or RAT type) reported by the PCRF. This inconsistency may result in billing errors.
  • BBAI Broadband Access Interworking
  • FMC Fixed Mobile Convergence
  • BBF Broadband Forum
  • BBAI Broadband Access Interworking
  • the Broadband Policy Control Framework (BPCF) in the BBF is connected to the BBF through the PCRF to implement QoS guarantee.
  • the BPCF is a policy control architecture in the BBF access.
  • the BPCF For the resource request message of the PCRF, the BPCF performs resource admission control according to the network policy and the subscription information of the BBF access, or forwards the resource request message to the network element of the other BBF access network ( For example, BNG), and other network elements perform resource admission control (that is, entrust other network elements to perform resource admission control).
  • BNG wireless local area network
  • the UE accesses the 3GPP core network through a wireless local area network (WLAN)
  • WLAN wireless local area network
  • the maximum physical agent of the PCRF needs to interact with the BPCF when performing QoS authorization, so that the BBF access network performs resource admission control.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of an architecture of a UE accessing a 3GPP core network through a BBF WLAN in the related art.
  • the BBF WLAN access network acts as an untrusted non-3GPP access.
  • the Broadband Access Server (BRAS)/BNG Broadband Network Gateway
  • BRAS Broadband Access Server
  • BNG Broadband Network Gateway
  • the PCRF can interact with the BPCF when performing QoS authorization, and the BPCF performs admission control of resources or entrusts other network elements to perform resource admission control (ie, the BBF access network performs resource admission control).
  • the PCRF needs to reserve the IP flow in the BBF access network). Resources
  • the following problems are not solved: After receiving the IP stream migration request from the UE (for example, migrating IP flows from 3GPP to WLAN), the PCEF provides IP flow routing rule information to the PCRF, and the PCRF requests access to the BBF according to the routing rule. The network requests resource admission control. If the BBF access network refuses at this time, how should the PCRF be handled? The corresponding solution is not given in the prior art.
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing the architecture of a UE through a home base station (H(e)NB) access policy control in the related art.
  • the HeNB usually accesses the core network of the EPS through a leased fixed line (also called Broadband Access (BBF)).
  • BBF Broadband Access
  • the QoS (Quality of Service) of the fixed line connected to the H(e)NB is usually restricted by the contract between the owner of the H(e)NB and the fixed network operator. Therefore, when the 3GPP UE accesses the 3GPP core network access service through the H(e)NB, the required QoS cannot exceed the contracted QoS of the fixed network line that the fixed network operator can provide.
  • the QoS of the UE access service will not be guaranteed, especially the Guaranteed Bitrate (GBR). Therefore, for the 3GPP network, the total QoS requirement for the service access of all UEs accessed through the H(e)NB must not exceed the QoS guarantee of the fixed line subscription of the H(e)NB access.
  • GLR Guaranteed Bitrate
  • the PCRF needs to reserve the IP flow in the HBF eNodeB-connected BBF access network.
  • the PCEF After the PCEF receives the IP flow migration request from the UE (for example, when migrating the IP flow from the non-3GPP to the H(e)NB), the PCEF provides the IPF routing rule information to the PCRF, and the PCRF according to the route The rule request requests resource admission control from the BBF access network. If the BBF access network refuses at this time, how should the PCRF be handled, and no corresponding solution is given in the prior art.
  • the technical problem to be solved by the embodiments of the present invention is to provide a policy control method and system for IP flow migration, and provide a policy control processing mechanism in a specific scenario when the IP flow of the AF service is migrated.
  • an embodiment of the present invention provides a policy control method for IP flow migration, where the method includes:
  • IP flow migration routing rule information is connected to the BBF
  • the network access request resource admission control when the BBF access network rejects the request
  • the method further includes: the AF entity indicating to the PCRF entity whether the AF has the capability of supporting IP flow migration.
  • the step of the AF entity indicating to the PCRF entity whether the AF has the capability of supporting IP flow migration includes:
  • the indication bit that supports the IP flow migration is included in the list, and the AF entity has the capability of supporting IP flow migration, and is not included in the list.
  • the indicator bit that supports the IP flow migration indicates that the AF entity does not have the capability of supporting IP flow migration.
  • the method further includes: the gateway where the PCEF entity is located, after receiving the PCRF entity, rejecting the
  • an indication of rejecting the IP flow migration routing rule information is returned to the UE.
  • the method further includes: sending, by the gateway where the PCEF entity is located, the IP flow migration routing rule information to the PCRF entity by using a session modification request message when receiving the IP flow migration routing rule information provided by the user equipment (UE);
  • the PCRF entity After receiving the session modification request message, the PCRF entity returns a session modification confirmation message to the PCEF, and includes an indication of accepting or rejecting the IP flow migration routing rule information in the session modification confirmation message;
  • the gateway where the PCEF entity is located After receiving the session modification confirmation message returned by the PCRF entity, the gateway where the PCEF entity is located returns an indication of accepting or rejecting the IP flow migration routing rule information to the UE.
  • the above method can also have the following characteristics:
  • the indication that the gateway that the PCEF entity is located to return to the UE and rejects the IP flow migration routing information is: does not carry a binding confirmation message of HoA, CoA, BID, and FID.
  • the IP flow migration routing rule information includes installing and/or modifying an IP flow migration routing rule.
  • a policy control system for IP flow migration the system includes an IP flow migration policy control unit in a PCRF entity, where the IP flow migration policy control unit is configured to: when receiving the IP flow migration routing rule information sent by the PCEF entity,
  • the IP flow migration policy control unit is further configured to: determine, according to the indication of the received AF entity, whether the AF entity has the capability of supporting IP flow migration.
  • the IP flow migration policy control unit is configured to: determine whether the AF entity indicates that the supported function list includes an indication bit that supports IP flow migration, and if yes, determine that the AF has the capability of supporting IP flow migration, and if not, It is determined that the AF entity has the capability of supporting IP flow migration.
  • the system further includes an IP flow migration indication unit in the PCEF entity,
  • the IP stream migration indication unit is configured to: when receiving the IP flow migration routing rule information provided by the user equipment (UE), send the IP flow migration routing rule information to the PCRF entity by using a session modification request message; After receiving the session modification confirmation message returned by the PCRF entity, returning an indication to the UE to accept or reject the IP flow migration routing rule information; the IP flow migration policy control unit is configured to: receive the After the session modification request message, returning a session modification confirmation message to the PCEF entity, and packaging the session modification confirmation message Contains an indication to accept or reject the IP flow migration routing rule information.
  • the indication that the IP flow migration indication unit returns the IP flow migration routing rule information returned to the UE is: does not carry a binding acknowledgement message of HoA, CoA, BID, and FID.
  • the foregoing method and system have at least the following beneficial effects: 1) Resolving the actual transmission of some IP flows caused when the AF does not support IP flow migration and the UE performs the migration operation of the IP flows related to the AF providing services.
  • the IP-CAN type (or further RAT type) is inconsistent with the PCRF reporting the IP-CAN type (or further RAT type) to the AF; 2)
  • the PCRF migrates the routing rule information according to the IPEF provided by the PCEF, requests the resource from the BBF access network.
  • the BBF access network Upon admission, if the BBF access network rejects the request, it returns a rejection indication to the PCEF; 3) after receiving the binding update message, the P-GW/HA does not immediately return an acknowledgement message to the HAUE, and the PGW/HA may according to the feedback of the PCRF. Decide whether to accept the flow migration of the UE.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a system architecture of an EPS in the related art
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a multi-access scenario of a user equipment in the related art
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart 1 of establishing an IP flow migration connection in a non-roaming scenario according to the related art
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart 2 of establishing an IP flow migration connection in a non-roaming scenario according to the related art
  • Flowchart 3 of implementing IP flow migration in a roaming scenario
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic structural diagram of a policy control system for implementing BBF WLAN access in the related art
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic structural diagram of a policy control system for implementing H(e)NB access in the related art
  • FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a first embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 10 is a flow chart according to a third embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 11 is a schematic structural diagram of a policy control system for IP flow migration according to an embodiment of the present invention. Preferred embodiment of the invention
  • the related technologies mainly have the following problems:
  • the IP-CAN type (or RAT type) actually transmitted by some IP flows is caused. Reporting to the AF entity that the IP-CAN type (or RAT type) is inconsistent with the PCRF;
  • the PCRF entity when the PCRF entity receives the IP flow migration routing rule provided by the PCEF entity, if it is determined that part of the service data flow of the service provided by the AF entity needs to be migrated, the IP is rejected.
  • the flow migration routing rule or, when requesting the resource admission control from the BBF access network according to the IP flow migration routing rule information, if the BBF access network rejects, the PCRF entity returns a rejection of the IP flow migration routing rule to the PCEF entity. An indication of the information.
  • the AF entity may indicate to the PCRF entity whether it has the capability of supporting IP flow migration in the process of initially providing service information to the PCRF entity. Specifically, the AF entity may indicate whether it has the capability of supporting IP flow migration by: indicating a supported function list Feature List to the PCRF entity, and including an indication bit supporting IP flow migration in the list, indicating the AF entity IP flow migration is supported. If the indicator bit that supports IP flow migration is not included in the list, it indicates that the AF entity does not support IP flow migration.
  • the gateway (such as the P-GW) where the PCEF entity is located does not immediately return an acknowledgment message to the UE when receiving the IP stream migration routing rule information provided by the UE, and waits until the acknowledgment message of the PCRF entity is received, and then returns an acknowledgment to the UE. Message.
  • the UE first establishes a PDN connection through the 3GPP access network access, and then establishes the same PDN connection through the non-3GPP access, and simultaneously uses the flow of the two accesses to use the PDN connection.
  • Dynamic PCC Policy and Charging Control
  • the UE uses the DSMIPv6 protocol.
  • the process of this embodiment mainly includes the following steps:
  • Step S801 The UE accesses the EPC through the 3GPP access network, where the S-GW and the P-GW establish a tunnel through the GTP or the PMIPv6 protocol, and the existing service is transmitted on the tunnel.
  • the UE accesses the service provided by the AF entity through the established IP-CAN session, and the service provided by the AF entity includes two Service Data Flows (SDFs), which are respectively represented as SDF1 and SDF2, and the AF entity requests the PCRF to report the service.
  • SDFs Service Data Flows
  • the IP-CAN type (which may also include the RAT type) of the access network connection through which the service data stream is transmitted, and the IP-CAN type of the PCRF entity to the PCRF entity according to the request is 3GPP-EPS, and the RAT type is E-UTRAN.
  • the AF entity In the process of initially providing the service information to the PCRF, the AF entity indicates to the PCRF entity the feature list Feature List that is supported by the AF entity. If the indicator bit that supports the IP flow migration is included in the list, the AF entity supports the IP flow. Migration, if the indicator bit that supports IP flow migration is not included, indicates that the AF entity does not support IP flow migration.
  • Step S802 the UE discovers the non-3GPP access network and decides to initiate multiple access.
  • the UE performs access authentication and authorization in the trusted non-3GPP access network, and the UE performs layer 3 attachment and obtains the local IP address IP Address1 as the care-of address (Care of Address, referred to as CoA).
  • the UE will establish an IPSec tunnel with the ePDG. During the tunnel establishment process, the ePDG allocates the IP address IP Address1 to the UE as a CoA.
  • Step S803 The bearer binding and event reporting function (BBERF) entity located in the trusted non-3GPP access network or the ePDG sends a gateway control session establishment message to the PCRF entity, establishes a request to establish a gateway control session, and carries the user identifier and the IP Address1.
  • BBERF bearer binding and event reporting function
  • Step S804 the PCRF entity returns an acknowledgement message to the BBERF entity.
  • Step S805 The UE finds a P-GW between the UE and the PDN that is selected during the 3GPP access by using the self-starting process of the MIPv6.
  • the UE initiates the establishment of the security association by using the IKEv2.
  • the EAP is used for authentication on the IKEv2.
  • - GW interacts with AAA to complete EAP authentication.
  • the P-GW returns the IP address IP Address2 allocated by the P-GW when the UE accesses the 3GPP, and the UE uses the IP address as the HoA when the DSMIPv6 is bound.
  • P-GW is in charge It is the function of the home HA.
  • Step S806 The UE sends a DSMIPv6 binding update message to the P-GW/HA, where the binding update message carries (HoA, CoA, BID, FID). (HoA, CoA, BID, FID) is a correspondence.
  • the value of HoA in the binding update message is IP Address2, and the value of CoA is IP.
  • Address 1 indicates that the corresponding BID is a binding through non-3GPP access, and a certain data stream uniquely identified by the FID user is bound to a connection through non-3GPP access.
  • the value of the HoA in the binding update message is IP Address2, and the value of the CoA is IP Address2, indicating that the corresponding BID is a binding through the 3GPP access, and the service data flow identified by the FID is bound to the connection through the 3GPP access. on.
  • the UE provides IP flow migration routing rule information to the P-GW/HA, requesting to migrate a service data flow (SDF1) transmitted through the 3GPP access to the non-3GPP access network.
  • SDF1 service data flow
  • Step S807 Different from the prior art, after receiving the binding update message, the P-GW/HA does not immediately return an acknowledgment message to the UE, but determines whether to accept the IP stream migration of the UE according to the feedback of the PCRF entity.
  • the PCEF entity located at the P-GW sends an IP-CAN session modification request indication to the PCRF entity, and the PCEF will send an event trigger routing rule modification (ROUTING RULE CHANGE) and IP flow migration routing rule information to the PCRF (for the migration IP in the process)
  • the IP flow migration routing rule information is to install and/or modify the IP flow migration routing rule
  • the IP flow migration routing rule is the correspondence between the service data flow and the access, and is identified by the correspondence between the Routing Filters and the Routing Address.
  • the value of Address is IP Address 1
  • it indicates that it is through non-3GPP access and when the value of Routing Address is IP Address2, it is indicated as access through 3GPP.
  • This message includes the default IP flow migration routing rules, ie Routing Filters are wildcards.
  • the UE migrates the service data stream SDF1 from the 3GPP access to the non-3GPP access, and the PCEF entity provides the IPF migration routing rule corresponding to the SDF1 to the PCRF to notify the PCRF entity of the migration of the route of the service data flow.
  • Routing Filters is the IP quintuple of the service data flow
  • the Routing Address takes the value of IP Address 1.
  • the PCRF entity further determines, according to the capability of the AF entity, that the AF entity does not support IP flow migration, and therefore the PCRF entity decides to reject the flow migration of the UE.
  • the PCRF entity returns an acknowledgment message to the PCEF entity, and carries an indication that the UE is to perform SML1 flow migration (ie, an indication of refusing the IP flow migrating routing rule information sent by the PCEF entity to the PCRF entity).
  • Step S809 The P-GW/HA returns a binding acknowledgement message to the UE, and rejects the flow migration request of the UE.
  • the specific implementation is that the message does not carry the HoA, CoA, BID, and FID to notify the UE that the multiple registration and flow binding fails.
  • the PCRF entity receives the IP flow migration rule reported by the PCEF entity to migrate the SDF1 from the 3GPP to the non-3GPP or adds a service data flow to the non-3GPP access network (for the BBAI).
  • the PCRF entity sends a message to the BPCF entity requesting admission control of the BBF access network. If the BBF access network returns a rejection, the PCRF entity will reject the UE's flow migration or new service data flow.
  • the PCRF entity returns an acknowledgment message to the PCEF entity, carrying an indication of rejecting the UE to perform SMF1 flow migration or adding a service data flow (ie, rejecting the indication of the IP flow migration routing rule information sent by the PCEF entity to the PCRF entity).
  • the P-GW/HA returns a binding acknowledgement message to the UE, and the message does not carry the HoA, CoA, BID, and FID to notify the UE that the multiple registration and flow binding fails.
  • the UE first establishes a PDN connection through a non-3GPP access network, and then establishes the same PDN connection through 3GPP access, and simultaneously uses two accesses to use the PDN connection process.
  • Dynamic PCC is deployed in the network.
  • the UE uses the DSMIPv6 protocol.
  • the process of this embodiment mainly includes the following steps:
  • Step S901 The UE accesses the EPC through the DSMIPv6 protocol through the non-3GPP access network, and the DSMIPv6 tunnel is established between the UE and the P-GW/HA, and the existing service is transmitted on the tunnel.
  • the address assigned by the non-3GPP access network to the UE is IP Address 1 as the CoA
  • the IP address assigned by the P-GW to the UE is IP Address 2 as the HoA.
  • the UE accesses the service provided by the AF entity through the established IP-CAN session, and the service provided by the AF entity includes two Service Data Flows (SDFs), which are respectively represented as SDF1 and SDF2, and the AF requests the PCRF entity to report the service.
  • SDFs Service Data Flows
  • the IP-CAN type of the access network connection (which may further include the RAT type) through which the service data stream is transmitted, and the IP-CAN type reported by the PCRF entity to the PCRF entity according to the request is 3GPP EPS, and the RAT type is E-UTRAN.
  • the AF entity indicates to the PCRF entity the feature list Feature List that it supports, and the indication bit that does not include the IP flow migration support indicates that the AF entity does not support the IP flow. migrate.
  • Step S902 the UE discovers the 3GPP access network and decides to initiate multiple access.
  • the UE establishes a PDN connection to the same PDN through the 3GPP attach procedure.
  • the P-GW allocates an IP address to the UE as an IP Address2 to ensure that the same PDN connection is established through different accesses.
  • Step S903 The UE sends a DSMIPv6 binding update message to the P-GW/HA, where the binding update message carries (HoA, CoA, BID, FID).
  • the message is IP Address 2 and the CoA value is IP Address 1 , indicating that the corresponding BID is a binding through non-3GPP access, and a certain data flow of the user ID access service uniquely identified by the FID is bound to the non-3GPP.
  • the message is IP Address2 and the CoA value is IP Address2, indicating that the corresponding BID is a binding through the 3GPP access, and the service data flow identified by the FID is bound to the connection through the 3GPP access.
  • the UE provides IP flow migration routing rule information to the P-GW/HA, and requests to migrate the service data flow SDF1 transmitted through the non-3GPP access to the 3GPP access network.
  • Step S904 After receiving the binding update message, the P-GW/HA does not immediately return an acknowledgement message to the UE.
  • the PCEF located at the P-GW sends an IP-CAN session modification request indication to the PCRF, and the PCEF entity will send an event trigger ROUTING_RULE_CHANGE and IP flow migration routing rule information to the PCRF entity (for the case of the migrated IP flow in the flow)
  • the IP flow migration routing rule information is to install and/or modify the IP flow migration routing rule, and the IP flow migration routing rule is the correspondence between the service data flow and the access, and the correspondence between the Routing Filters and the Routing Address is identified, and the value of the Routing Address is IP Address 1, expressed as non-3GPP access, Routing Address When the value is IP Address2, it is indicated as being accessed through 3GPP.
  • the UE migrates the SDF1 from the non-3GPP access to the 3GPP access, and the PCEF entity provides the IPF migration routing rule corresponding to the service data flow to the PCRF entity to notify the PCRF entity of the migration of the route of the service data flow.
  • Routing Filters is the IP quintuple of the service data flow
  • Routing Address value is IP Address2.
  • Step S905 The PCRF entity determines, according to the IP flow migration routing rule, that the UE requests to move one SDF of the two SDFs of the service provided by the AF to the 3GPP access. In this way, the two SDFs that the AF entity provides for the service will be transmitted on different access networks.
  • the PCRF entity further determines that the AF entity does not support IP flow migration according to the capability of the AF entity. Therefore, the PCRF entity decides to reject the flow migration of the UE.
  • the PCRF entity returns an acknowledgment message to the PCEF entity, carrying an indication that the UE is to perform SDF1 flow migration (ie, an indication of refusing the IPEF migration routing rule information sent by the PCEF entity to the PCRF entity).
  • Step S906 The P-GW/HA returns a binding acknowledgement message to the UE, and rejects the flow migration request of the UE, which is implemented by not carrying the HoA, CoA, BID, and FID in the message to notify the UE that the multiple registration and flow binding fails.
  • the PCRF entity when the IP stream migration is applied to the BBAI, when the PCRF entity receives the IP flow migration rule reported by the PCEF entity, the SDF1 is migrated from the non-3GPP to the 3GPP or a service data flow is added to the 3GPP access network (for the BBAI, When 3GPP is H(e)NB access), the PCRF entity sends a message to the BPCF entity requesting admission control of the BBF access network. If the BBF access network returns a refusal, the PCRF entity will reject the UE's stream migration or add a new service data stream.
  • the PCRF entity returns an acknowledgment message to the PCEF entity, carrying an indication that the UE is to perform SMF1 flow migration or to add a service data flow (ie, an indication of refusing the IP flow migration routing rule information sent by the PCEF entity to the PCRF entity).
  • the P-GW/HA returns a binding acknowledgement message to the UE, and the message does not carry the HoA, CoA, BID, and FID to notify the UE that the multiple registration and flow binding fails.
  • a flow chart of data flow migration between two access networks after the UE implements multiple registration flow binding where the service data flow migrated by the UE involves two SDFs of services provided by the AF entity.
  • One of (represented as SDF1 and SDF2, respectively).
  • Dynamic PCC is deployed in the network.
  • the process of this embodiment mainly includes the following steps:
  • Step S1001 The UE simultaneously connects to the 3GPP access and the non-3GPP access, and performs multi-registration flow binding. And the two SDFs (represented by SDF1 and SDF2, respectively) of the service provided by the UE to the AF entity are transmitted through the non-3GPP access network.
  • Step S1002 The UE sends a DSMIPv6 binding update message to the P-GW/HA, where the binding update message carries (HoA, BID, FID).
  • the UE provides IP flow migration routing rule information to the P-GW/HA, and may request to migrate the service data flow SDF1 (represented by FID) transmitted through the non-3GPP access to the 3GPP access network (using the BID) Express).
  • Step S1003 After receiving the binding update message, the P-GW/HA does not immediately return an acknowledgement message to the HA.
  • the PCEF entity located at the P-GW sends an IP-CAN session modification request indication to the PCRF entity, and the PCEF entity sends an event trigger ROUTING_RULE_CHANGE and IP flow migration routing rule information to the PCRF entity, including modifying the IP flow migration corresponding to the SDF1. Routing rules. In the routing rule, IP Address1 is used to indicate that the currently transmitted access network is non-3GPP, and IP Address2 indicates that the currently transmitted access network is 3GPP. Use Routing Filters to represent the business data stream SDF1.
  • Step S1004 The PCRF entity migrates the routing rule according to the IP flow, and determines that the UE requests to move one SDF of the two SDFs of the service provided by the AF entity to the 3GPP access. In this way, the two SDFs that the AF entity provides for the service will be transmitted on different access networks.
  • the PCRF further determines that the AF entity does not support IP flow migration according to the capability of the AF entity. Therefore, the PCRF entity decides to reject the flow migration of the UE.
  • the PCRF entity returns an acknowledgment message to the PCEF entity, carrying an indication that the UE is to perform SDF1 flow migration (ie, an indication of refusing the IPEF migration routing rule information sent by the PCEF entity to the PCRF entity).
  • Step S1005 The P-GW/HA returns a binding acknowledgement message to the UE, and rejects the flow migration request of the UE.
  • the specific implementation is that the message does not carry the HoA, CoA, BID, and FID to notify the UE of multiple registration, that is, the flow binding fails.
  • the PCRF receives the IP flow migration rule reported by the PCEF to migrate SDF1 from non-3GPP to 3GPP (for BBAI, 3GPP is H(e)NB
  • the PCRF entity sends a message to the BPCF entity requesting admission control of the BBF access network. If the BBF access network returns a rejection, the PCRF entity will reject the flow migration of the UE or add a new service data flow to the 3GPP access network.
  • the PCRF entity returns an acknowledgment message to the PCEF entity, and carries an indication that the UE rejects the SDF1 to perform the flow migration or adds a service data flow (that is, the indication of refusing the IP flow migration routing rule information sent by the PCEF entity to the PCRF entity).
  • the P-GW/HA returns a binding acknowledgement message to the UE, and the message does not carry the HoA, CoA, BID, and FID to notify the UE that the multiple registration and flow binding fails.
  • the embodiment of the present invention further provides a policy control system for IP flow migration.
  • the system mainly includes an IP flow migration policy control unit 1101 in a PCRF entity, where: the IP flow migration policy control The unit 1101 is configured to: when receiving the IP flow migration routing rule information sent by the PCEF entity, if it is determined that part of the service data flow of the service provided by the AF entity needs to be migrated, and the AF entity does not support the IP flow migration;
  • the IP flow migration routing rule information requests resource admission control to the BBF access network, and when the BBF access network rejects the request, returns an indication to the PCEF entity to reject the IP flow migration routing rule information.
  • the IP flow migration policy control unit 1101 is further configured to: determine, according to the indication of the received AF entity, whether the AF entity has the capability of supporting IP flow migration.
  • the IP stream migration policy control unit 1101 is configured to determine whether the AF entity has support according to whether the function list (Feature List) supported by the AF entity indicates that an indicator bit supporting IP flow migration is included. IP flow migration capability.
  • the system further includes an IP flow migration indication unit 1102 in the PCEF entity, where the IP flow migration indication unit 1102 is configured to: when receiving the IP flow migration routing rule information provided by the UE, through the session modification request message. Sending the IP flow migration routing rule information to the PCRF entity; and after receiving the session modification confirmation message returned by the PCRF entity, returning an indication to the UE to accept or reject the IP flow migration routing rule information ;
  • the IP stream migration policy control unit 1101 is configured to: after receiving the session modification request message, return a session modification confirmation message to the PCEF, and include accepting or rejecting the IP flow in the session modification confirmation message.
  • An indication to migrate routing rule information is: does not carry a binding confirmation message of the HoA, CoA, BID, and FID.
  • modules or steps of the embodiments of the present invention can be implemented by a general computing device, which can be concentrated on a single computing device or distributed in multiple computing devices. Alternatively, they may be implemented by program code executable by the computing device, such that they may be stored in the storage device by the computing device and, in some cases, may be different from The steps shown or described are performed sequentially, or they are separately fabricated into individual integrated circuit modules, or a plurality of modules or steps thereof are fabricated into a single integrated circuit module. Thus, the invention is not limited to any specific combination of hardware and software.
  • the embodiments of the present invention have at least the following beneficial effects: 1) Resolving some IPs caused when the AF does not support IP flow migration and the UE performs the migration operation of the IP flow related to the AF providing service.
  • the IP-CAN type (or further RAT type) actually transmitted by the stream is inconsistent with the PCRF reporting the IP-CAN type (or further RAT type) to the AF; 2)
  • the PCRF migrates the routing rule information according to the IP flow provided by the PCEF to the BBF
  • the network access request resource is accepted, if the BBF access network rejects the request, it returns a rejection indication to the PCEF; 3) after receiving the binding update message, the P-GW/HA does not immediately return an acknowledgement message to the HAUE, and the PGW/HA may be based on The feedback of the PCRF determines whether to accept the flow migration of the UE.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention se rapporte à un procédé et à un système de contrôle de politique pour mesurer la mobilité d'un flux IP (Internet Protocol). Le procédé selon l'invention comprend les étapes suivantes : quand une entité de fonction d'imputation et de règles (PCRF, Policy and Charging Rules Function) reçoit des informations de règle de routage relatives à la mobilité d'un flux IP, lesdites informations étant envoyées par une entité de fonction d'imputation et de mise en œuvre (PCEF, Policy and Charging Enforcement Function), si l'entité PCRF a déterminé qu'une partie d'un flux de données de service du service fourni par une entité de fonction d'application (AF, Application Function) devait être transférée mais que l'entité de fonction AF ne prend pas en charge la mobilité du IP flux, ou si l'entité PCRF demande un contrôle d'acceptation de ressource d'un réseau d'accès Broad Band Forum (BBF) sur la base des informations de règle de routage relatives à la mobilité d'un flux IP mais que le réseau d'accès BBF refuse la demande, l'entité PCRF retourne une indication selon laquelle les informations de règle de routage relatives à la mobilité d'un flux IP sont refusées à l'entité PCEF.
PCT/CN2012/072330 2011-04-29 2012-03-14 Procédé et système de contrôle de politique pour mesurer la mobilité d'un flux ip WO2012146092A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201110111826.1 2011-04-29
CN201110111826.1A CN102761932B (zh) 2011-04-29 2011-04-29 一种ip流迁移的策略控制方法及系统

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012146092A1 true WO2012146092A1 (fr) 2012-11-01

Family

ID=47056220

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CN2012/072330 WO2012146092A1 (fr) 2011-04-29 2012-03-14 Procédé et système de contrôle de politique pour mesurer la mobilité d'un flux ip

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CN (1) CN102761932B (fr)
WO (1) WO2012146092A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104080073B (zh) * 2013-03-29 2018-03-23 电信科学技术研究院 一种实现ip流移动性的方法、装置及系统
US9930716B2 (en) * 2014-06-30 2018-03-27 Apple Inc. Methods and apparatus to support network-based IP flow mobility via multiple wireless accesses for a wireless device
CN105392177A (zh) * 2014-09-09 2016-03-09 中兴通讯股份有限公司 一种实现流迁移的方法和装置

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101325547A (zh) * 2007-06-15 2008-12-17 日立通讯技术株式会社 通信系统、服务器、控制装置及通信装置
WO2010022374A1 (fr) * 2008-08-22 2010-02-25 Qualcomm Incorporated Protocole internet mobile mandataire (pmip) dans un environnement de communication à plusieurs interfaces
CN101940039A (zh) * 2008-02-06 2011-01-05 高通股份有限公司 移动ip多注册和pcc交互

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101325547A (zh) * 2007-06-15 2008-12-17 日立通讯技术株式会社 通信系统、服务器、控制装置及通信装置
CN101940039A (zh) * 2008-02-06 2011-01-05 高通股份有限公司 移动ip多注册和pcc交互
WO2010022374A1 (fr) * 2008-08-22 2010-02-25 Qualcomm Incorporated Protocole internet mobile mandataire (pmip) dans un environnement de communication à plusieurs interfaces

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN102761932A (zh) 2012-10-31
CN102761932B (zh) 2017-03-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9137652B2 (en) Method for implementing policy and charging control in a roaming scene
US9351325B2 (en) Policy control method and system for converged network
KR101340496B1 (ko) 차징 시스템 및 방법
US9380446B2 (en) Policy and charging control method supporting IP flow mobility in roaming scenario
US8849273B2 (en) Method and system for reporting fixed network access information
US20120102174A1 (en) Policy And Charging Control Method And System For Multi-PDN Connections Of Single APN
CN102378280B (zh) 一种实现bbf接入的策略控制方法及系统
WO2011011943A1 (fr) Procédé pour la ré-sélection de fonction de liaison de support et de rapport d’événements
WO2010081329A1 (fr) Procédé et système pour réguler des ressources de réseau pendant une procédure de migration de flux de services
CN102457444B (zh) 一种融合固定网络与移动网络的系统及方法
WO2011009257A1 (fr) Système de resélection pour fonction de liaison de porteuse et de rapport d'événement et procédé associé
US20120113968A1 (en) Multiple access method and system of terminal in evovled packet system
EP2854448B1 (fr) Procédé, appareil et système pour contrôle de politique
WO2009059544A1 (fr) Procédé, dispositif et système permettant de mettre en œuvre la commutation entre des réseaux
WO2011006317A1 (fr) Procédé et système permettant d'effacer des informations redondantes d'une fonction d’imputation et de règles domestique
WO2014173340A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de politique de facturation d'autorisation d'abonnement interréseau
CN102421155A (zh) 一种实现流迁移的方法及系统
WO2012003770A1 (fr) Système, dispositif et procédé permettant à un équipement utilisateur d'accéder à un réseau mobile
WO2012003760A1 (fr) Procédé et système de transmission d'informations
US20190089843A1 (en) Method and device for processing pcc rule
CN102958046A (zh) 一种移动终端访问业务的控制方法、系统及dra
WO2010078761A1 (fr) Procédé, appareil et système de détermination de la politique et de la facturation
WO2013016967A1 (fr) Procédé et système d'accès, et point d'accès intelligent mobile
CN102098653A (zh) 一种实现服务质量控制的方法及系统
Ahmed et al. Multi access data network connectivity and IP flow mobility in Evolved Packet System (EPS)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12776244

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12776244

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1