WO2012125256A1 - Procédé d'injection d'un solvant dans un réservoir souterrain pour faciliter la récupération d'hydrocarbures - Google Patents

Procédé d'injection d'un solvant dans un réservoir souterrain pour faciliter la récupération d'hydrocarbures Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012125256A1
WO2012125256A1 PCT/US2012/025649 US2012025649W WO2012125256A1 WO 2012125256 A1 WO2012125256 A1 WO 2012125256A1 US 2012025649 W US2012025649 W US 2012025649W WO 2012125256 A1 WO2012125256 A1 WO 2012125256A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
injection
solvent
reservoir
volume
cycle
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2012/025649
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Matthew A. Dawson
Ivan J. Kosik
Original Assignee
Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company filed Critical Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company
Publication of WO2012125256A1 publication Critical patent/WO2012125256A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/16—Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates generally to the recovery of in-situ hydrocarbons. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to the use of a cyclic solvent-dominated recovery process (CSDRP) to recover in-situ hydrocarbons including bitumen.
  • CDRP cyclic solvent-dominated recovery process
  • SDRPs solvent-dominated recovery processes
  • CSDRP solvent-dominated recovery processes
  • CDRPs Cyclic solvent-dominated recovery processes
  • a CSDRP is typically, but not necessarily, a non-thermal recovery method that uses a solvent to mobilize viscous oil by cycles of injection and production.
  • Solvent-dominated means that the injectant comprises greater than 50% by mass of solvent or that greater than 50% of the produced oil's viscosity reduction is obtained by chemical solvation rather than by thermal means.
  • One possible laboratory method for roughly comparing the relative contribution of heat and dilution to the viscosity reduction obtained in a proposed oil recovery process is to compare the viscosity obtained by diluting an oil sample with a solvent to the viscosity reduction obtained by heating the sample.
  • a viscosity-reducing solvent is injected through a well into a subterranean viscous-oil reservoir, causing the pressure to increase.
  • the pressure is lowered and reduced-viscosity oil is produced to the surface through the same well through which the solvent was injected. Multiple cycles of injection and production are used.
  • CSDRPs may be particularly attractive for thinner or lower-oil-saturation reservoirs.
  • thermal methods utilizing heat to reduce viscous oil viscosity may be inefficient due to excessive heat loss to the overburden and/or underburden and/or reservoir with low oil content.
  • the family of processes within the Lim et al. references describe embodiments of a particular SDRP that is also a cyclic solvent-dominated recovery process (CSDRP). These processes relate to the recovery of heavy oil and bitumen from subterranean reservoirs using cyclic injection of a solvent in the liquid state which vaporizes upon production.
  • CSPTM processes The family of processes within the Lim et al. references may be referred to as CSPTM processes.
  • FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram based on Canadian Patent No. 2,349,234 (Lim et al.), one CSPTM process embodiment is described as a single well method for cyclic solvent stimulation, the single well preferably having a horizontal wellbore portion and a perforated liner section.
  • a vertical wellbore (1 ) driven through overburden (2) into reservoir (3) is connected to a horizontal wellbore portion (4).
  • the horizontal wellbore portion (4) comprises a perforated liner section (5) and an inner bore (6).
  • the horizontal wellbore portion comprises a downhole pump (7).
  • solvent or viscosified solvent is driven down and diverted through the perforated liner section (5) where it percolates into reservoir (3) and penetrates reservoir material to yield a reservoir penetration zone (8).
  • Oil dissolved in the solvent or viscosified solvent flows into the well and is pumped by downhole pump through an inner bore (6) through a motor at the wellhead (9) to a production tank (10) where oil and solvent are separated and the solvent is recycled.
  • the present disclosure relates to a method of controlling a cyclic solvent-dominated recovery process (CSDRP) for recovering viscous oil from a subterranean reservoir of the viscous oil.
  • the cyclic solvent process involves using an injection well to inject a viscosity-reducing solvent into a subterranean viscous oil reservoir. Reduced viscosity oil is produced to the surface using the same well used to inject solvent.
  • the process of alternately injecting solvent and producing a solvent/viscous oil blend through the same wellbore continues in a series of cycles until additional cycles are no longer economical.
  • the injection includes at least one restriction duration, where injection is restricted, between two continuous injection periods.
  • a method of controlling a cyclic solvent injection and production process to aid recovery of hydrocarbons from an underground reservoir comprising: (a) injecting a volume of fluid comprising greater than 50 mass % of a viscosity-reducing solvent into an injection well completed in the reservoir; (b) halting injection into the injection well and subsequently producing at least a fraction of the injected fluid and the hydrocarbons from the reservoir through a production well; (c) halting production through the production well; and (d) subsequently repeating the cycle of steps (a) to (c); wherein step (a) comprises at least one restriction duration, where injection is restricted, between two continuous injection periods, for improving the efficiency of the solvent.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic of a CSPTM process in accordance Canadian Patent No. 2,349,234 (Lim et al.);
  • FIG. 2 is a flow chart depicting a strategy for the operation of a CSDRP in accordance with a disclosed embodiment
  • FIGs. 3A, 3B, and 3C show flow charts depicting sub-schemes of the strategy shown in Fig. 2 in accordance with a disclosed embodiment
  • Fig. 4 is a graph of pore volume versus pressure, illustrating dilation
  • Fig. 5 is a flow chart depicting certain CSDRP production steps in accordance with a disclosed embodiment
  • Fig. 6A show an injection scheme example with injection rate plotted as a function of time in a given cycle
  • Fig. 6B shows an injection scheme example with injection rate plotted as a function of time in a given cycle
  • Fig. 6C shows an injection scheme example with injection rate plotted as a function of time in a given cycle.
  • viscous oil means a hydrocarbon, or mixture of hydrocarbons, that occurs naturally and that has a viscosity of at least 10 cP (centipoise) at initial reservoir conditions. Viscous oil includes oils generally defined as “heavy oil” or “bitumen”. Bitumen is classified as an extra heavy oil, with an API gravity of about 10° or less, referring to its gravity as measured in degrees on the American Petroleum Institute (API) Scale. Heavy oil has an API gravity in the range of about 22.3° to about 10°. The terms viscous oil, heavy oil, and bitumen are used interchangeably herein since they may be extracted using similar processes.
  • in situ is a Latin phrase for "in the place” and, in the context of hydrocarbon recovery, refers generally to a subsurface hydrocarbon-bearing reservoir.
  • in situ temperature means the temperature within the reservoir.
  • an in situ oil recovery technique is one that recovers oil from a reservoir within the earth.
  • a “restriction duration” is a time during which injection is restricted, where “restricted” includes fully restricted, that is, where injection does not occur. This concept is explained further herein.
  • a “continuous injection period” is a time during which injection occurs continuously although not necessarily at the same rate. This concept is explained further herein.
  • a reservoir accommodates the injected solvent and non-solvent fluid by compressing the pore fluids and, more importantly in some embodiments, by dilating the reservoir pore space when sufficient injection pressure is applied.
  • Pore dilation is a particularly effective mechanism for permitting solvent to enter into reservoirs filled with viscous oils when the reservoir comprises largely unconsolidated sand grains. Injected solvent fingers into the oil sands and mixes with the viscous oil to yield a reduced viscosity mixture with significantly higher mobility than the native viscous oil.
  • the primary mixing mechanism is thought to be dispersive mixing, not diffusion.
  • injected fluid in each cycle replaces the volume of previously recovered fluid and then adds sufficient additional fluid to contact previously uncontacted viscous oil.
  • the injected fluid comprises greater than 50% by mass of solvent.
  • the volume of produced oil should be above a minimum threshold to economically justify continuing operations.
  • the oil should also be recovered in an efficient manner.
  • One measure of the efficiency of a CSDRP is the ratio of produced oil volume to injected solvent volume over a time interval, called the OISR (produced Oil to Injected Solvent Ratio).
  • the time interval is one complete injection/production cycle.
  • the time interval may be from the beginning of first injection to the present or some other time interval.
  • the exact OISR threshold depends on the relative price of viscous oil and solvent, among other factors. If either the oil production rate or the OISR becomes too low, the CSDRP may be discontinued. Even if oil rates are high and the solvent use is efficient, it is also important to recover as much of the injected solvent as possible if it has economic value. Depending on the physical properties of the injected solvent, the remaining solvent may be recovered by producing to a low pressure to vaporize the solvent in the reservoir to aid its recovery. One measure of solvent recovery is the percentage of solvent recovered divided by the total injected. In addition, rather than abandoning the well, another recovery process may be initiated.
  • the OISR is one measure of solvent efficiency.
  • solvent efficiency is just one measure of solvent recovery.
  • solvent recovery is just one measure of solvent recovery.
  • solvent recovery is just one measure of solvent recovery.
  • OLSR volume of unrecovered solvent per volume of recovered oil, or its inverse, the volume of produced oil to volume of lost solvent ratio
  • the Solvent Storage Ratio is also a common measure of solvent efficiency.
  • the SSR is a measure of the solvent fraction unrecovered from the reservoir divided by the in situ oil produced from the reservoir. SSR is more explicitly defined as the ratio of the cumulative solvent injected into the reservoir minus the cumulative solvent produced from the reservoir to the cumulative in situ oil produced from the reservoir. A lower SSR indicates lower solvent losses per volume of in situ oil recovered, and thus, better total solvent recovery per volume of in situ oil produced. Therefore, a lower SSR would indicate an improvement in solvent efficiency.
  • improving solvent efficiency means (a) improving the OISR, or (b) improving the SSR, or (c) improving both the OISR and the SSR.
  • the solvent may be a light, but condensable, hydrocarbon or mixture of hydrocarbons comprising ethane, propane, or butane.
  • Additional injectants may include C0 2 , natural gas, C 3+ hydrocarbons, ketones, and alcohols.
  • Non-solvent co-injectants may include steam, hot water, non-condensable gas, or hydrate inhibitors.
  • Viscosifiers may be useful in adjusting solvent viscosity to reach desired injection pressures at available pump rates and may include diesel, viscous oil, bitumen, or diluent.
  • the injection of a solvent slurry may provide further means to reach the desired injection pressure by viscosifying the injectant, reducing the effective permeability of the formation to the injectant, or a combination thereof.
  • the solids suspended in the solvent slurry could comprise biodegradable solid particles, salt, water soluble solid particles, or solvent soluble solid particles.
  • Viscosifiers may be in the liquid, gas, or solid phases.
  • viscosifers would be soluble in either one of the components of the injected solvent and water and transition to the liquid phase in the reservoir before or during production, reducing their ability to increase the viscosity of the produced fluids and/or decrease the effective permeability of the formation to the produced fluids.
  • the viscosifiers may also reduce the average distance solvent travels from the well during an injection period. Viscosifiers may also act as solvents and therefore may provide flow assurance near the wellbore and in the surface facilities in the event of asphaltene precipitation or solvent vaporization during shut-in periods. Carbon dioxide or hydrocarbon mixtures comprising carbon dioxide may also be desirable to use as a solvent.
  • the solvent comprises greater than 50% C 2 -C 5 hydrocarbons on a mass basis.
  • the solvent is primarily propane, optionally with diluent when it is desirable to adjust the properties of the injectant to improve performance.
  • wells may be subjected to compositions other than these main solvents to improve well pattern performance, for example C0 2 flooding of a mature operation.
  • the solvent is injected into the well at a pressure in the underground reservoir above a liquid/vapor phase change pressure such that at least 25 mass % of the solvent enters the reservoir in the liquid phase.
  • a liquid/vapor phase change pressure such that at least 25 mass % of the solvent enters the reservoir in the liquid phase.
  • at least 50, 70, or even 90 mass % of the solvent may enter the reservoir in the liquid phase.
  • Injection as a liquid may be preferred for achieving high pressures because pore dilation at high pressures is thought to be a particularly effective mechanism for permitting solvent to enter into reservoirs filled with viscous oils when the reservoir comprises largely unconsolidated sand grains.
  • Injection as a liquid also may allow higher overall injection rates than injection as a gas.
  • less than 20 mass % of the injectant enters the reservoir in the solid phase.
  • less than 10 mass % or less than 50 mass % of the injectant enters the reservoir in the solid phase.
  • the solid phase of the injectant would transition to a liquid phase before or during production to prevent or mitigate reservoir permeability reduction during production.
  • the solvent volume is injected into the well at rates and pressures such that immediately after completing injection into the injection well during an injection period at least 25 mass % of the injected solvent is in a liquid state in the underground reservoir.
  • Injection of the injectant as a vapor may be preferred in order to enable more uniform solvent distribution along a horizontal well, particularly when variable injection rates are targeted. Vapor injection in a horizontal well may also facilitate an upsize in the port size of installed inflow control devices (ICDs) that minimizes the risk of plugging the ICDs. Injecting as a vapor may increase the ability to pressurize the reservoir to a desired pressure by lower effective permeability of an injected vapor in a formation comprising liquid viscous oil.
  • ICDs installed inflow control devices
  • a non-condensable gas is injected to achieve a desired pressure, followed by injection of a solvent.
  • Alternating periods of a primarily non-condensable gas with primarily solvent injection may provide a means of maintaining the desired injection pressure target.
  • the primarily gas injection period may offset the pressure leak off observed during primarily solvent injection to reestablish the desired injection pressure.
  • this alternating strategy of gas to liquid solvent injection periods may result in non-condensable gas accumulations in the previous established solvent pathways.
  • the accumulation of non-condensable gas may divert the subsequent primarily solvent injection to bypassed viscous oil thereby increasing the mixing of solvent and oil in the producing well's drainage area.
  • an injectant in the vapor phase such as C0 2 or natural gas
  • a solvent such as C0 2 or natural gas
  • Downhole pressure gauges and/or reservoir simulation may be used to estimate the phase of the solvent and other co-injectants at downhole conditions and in the reservoir.
  • a reservoir simulation may be carried out using a reservoir simulator, a software program for mathematically modeling the phase and flow behavior of fluids in an underground reservoir.
  • a reservoir simulator a software program for mathematically modeling the phase and flow behavior of fluids in an underground reservoir.
  • Those skilled in the art understand how to use a reservoir simulator to determine if 25% of the injectant would be in the liquid phase immediately after the completion of an injection period.
  • Those skilled in the art may rely on measurements recorded using a downhole pressure gauge in order to increase the accuracy of a reservoir simulator. Alternatively, the downhole pressure gauge measurements may be used to directly make the determination without the use of reservoir simulation.
  • a CSDRP is predominantly a non-thermal process in that heat is not used principally to reduce the viscosity of the viscous oil, the use of heat is not excluded. Heating may be beneficial to improve performance, improve process start-up, or provide flow assurance during production. For start-up, low-level heating (for example, less than 100 °C) may be appropriate. Low-level heating of the solvent prior to injection may also be performed to prevent hydrate formation in tubulars and in the reservoir. Heating to higher temperatures may benefit recovery.
  • Two non-exclusive scenarios of injecting a heated solvent are as follows. In one scenario, vapor solvent would be injected and would condense before it reaches the bitumen. In another scenario, a vapor solvent would be injected at up to 200 °C and would become a supercritical fluid at downhole operating pressure. A: Injection Restriction and Determining the Volume of Solvent to Inject
  • the spatial distribution of the injected solvent may be difficult to ascertain without the use of expensive surveillance techniques such as seismic surveys, real time passive seismic monitoring and/or subsurface electrical resistivity imaging; and therefore methods for judging when solvent has mixed with viscous oil sufficiently to obtain an economic OISR and oil production rate are not readily available.
  • surveillance techniques such as seismic surveys, real time passive seismic monitoring and/or subsurface electrical resistivity imaging; and therefore methods for judging when solvent has mixed with viscous oil sufficiently to obtain an economic OISR and oil production rate are not readily available.
  • Disclosed below are methods for estimating the optimal solvent injection volumes during continuous injection periods and restriction durations in each cycle.
  • Injection of a solvent-containing fluid into a well is the first step of a CSDRP and the rates and volumes of injected fluid are an integral part of any CSDRP.
  • CSDRP injection rates may have considerable flexibility to either reduce and/or increase injection rate depending on specific reservoir conditions, in particular the level of reservoir depletion. Rate flexibility allows the operator to optimize the distribution of solvent among wells in order to balance field injection/production volumes and surface gathering system constraints.
  • Three non-limiting options for determining the volume of solvent-containing injectant to inject are: a purely volume-based approach, a hybrid volume and pressure approach, and a purely pressure-based approach. Each of these three approaches are described below and referred to as A1 , A2, and A3.
  • One method of managing fluid injection in a CSDRP is for the cumulative volume injected over all continuous injection periods in a given cycle to equal the net reservoir voidage resulting from previous injection and production cycles plus an additional volume, for example approximately 2-15%, or approximately 3-8% of the pore volume (PV) of the reservoir volume associated with the well pattern.
  • One way to approximate the net in situ volume of fluids produced is to determine the total volume of non-solvent liquid hydrocarbon fractions and aqueous fractions produced minus the net injectant fractions produced. For example, in the case where 100% of the injectant is solvent and the reservoir contains only oil and water, an equation that represents the net in situ volume of fluids produced is,
  • Fluid volume may be calculated at in situ conditions, which take into account reservoir temperatures and pressures.
  • the "pore volume of the reservoir" is defined by an inferred drainage radius region around the well which is approximately equal to the distance that solvent fingers are expected to travel during the injection cycle (for example, about 30-200m).
  • Such a distance may be estimated by reservoir surveillance activities, reservoir simulation or reference to prior observed field performance.
  • the pore volume may be estimated by direct calculation using the estimated distance, and injection ceased when the associated injection volume (2- 15% PV) has been reached.
  • the sum of the volume of solvent injected for each continuous injection period in a given cycle would be the cumulative volume of solvent injected in that cycle.
  • the number of continuous injection periods in each cycle should be specified, for example, between 2 and 8 continuous injection periods could occur in each cycle.
  • One method of determining the volume of solvent injected in each continuous injection period would then, for example, be to divide the additional injection volume by the number of continuous injection periods in that cycle and inject this volume into the reservoir during each continuous injection period, with the first continuous injection period in a cycle also injecting a volume equal to the net reservoir voidage resulting from previous injection and production cycles.
  • the first continuous injection period would inject a volume equal to the additional injection volume divided by the number of continuous injection periods in that cycle plus the net reservoir voidage resulting from previous injection and production cycles while each subsequent continuous injection period in that cycle would inject a volume equal to the additional injection volume divided by the number of continuous injection periods in that cycle.
  • the volume of solvent injected during each restriction duration should be less than the volume of solvent injected in each immediately previous continuous injection period.
  • the volume of solvent injected during each restriction duration could be approximately 0 - 25% of the volume of solvent injected during the previous continuous injection period.
  • a primary threshold pressure which must be obtained during each continuous injection period before injecting a predetermined additional volume. For example in each continuous injection period a primary threshold pressure would be achieved and the solvent volume injected after achieving said threshold pressure could be determined, as in the previous example, by dividing the cumulative additional volume of solvent to be injected in the given cycle, approximately equal to 2-15% of the volume injected to reach the primary threshold pressure in the first continuous injection period in the given cycle, or 3-8% of the pore volume, by the number of continuous injection periods in the given cycle.
  • the primary threshold pressure may have to be continually monitored and adjusted as the reservoir is depleted. In particular, the level of communication amongst adjacent wells may impact the ability to achieve a targeted primary threshold pressure.
  • the volume of solvent injected during each restriction duration should be less than the volume of solvent injected in each immediately previous continuous injection period.
  • the volume of solvent injected during each restriction duration could be approximately 0 - 25% of the volume of solvent injected during the previous continuous injection period.
  • A3: Pressure-Based Determination of Injection Volume An alternative to a volume-based scheme is one based on pressure measurements. In this approach, the solvent injection in each continuous injection period continues until an approximately predetermined time after the injection pressure during said injection period first passes from less than to greater than a designated primary threshold injection pressure. In some cases, it may be desirable to continue injection past the primary threshold pressure for only a minimal amount of time before switching to the restriction duration. In other cases, it may be desirable to switch to the restriction duration once the primary threshold pressure is met.
  • the volume of solvent injected during each restriction duration should be less than the volume of solvent injected in each immediately previous continuous injection period.
  • the volume of solvent injected during each restriction duration could be approximately 0 - 25% of the volume of solvent injected during the previous continuous injection period.
  • the volume of solvent injected during each restriction duration could be designed to maintain the injection pressure above a secondary threshold pressure, which is not necessarily different from the primary threshold pressure.
  • the designated primary and secondary threshold injection pressures are pressures close to but below fracture pressure, for example above 90% of fracture pressure, or above 80% of fracture pressure, or above 95% of fracture pressure.
  • the primary and secondary threshold injection pressures are pressures within 1 MPa of, and below, the fracture pressure.
  • fracture pressure is the pressure at which injection fluids will cause the formation to fracture.
  • the secondary threshold injection pressure is below the primary threshold injection pressure, for example within 1 MPa of, and below, the primary threshold pressure, or within 6 MPa of, and below, the primary threshold pressure, or within 2 MPa of, and below, the primary threshold pressure.
  • the primary threshold injection pressure be above the dilation pressure of the formation.
  • dilation pressure refers to the onset of in-elastic dilation, the yielding of the geo-materials, or the onset of non-linear elastic deformation.
  • geomechanical formation dilation means the tendency of a geomechanical formation to dilate as the pore pressure is raised towards the formation minimum in-situ stress, typically by injecting a liquid or a gas.
  • Fig. 4 illustrates reservoir dilation in the elastic compressibility (400) and the dilation compressibility (401 ) regimes. As illustrated in Fig.
  • the change of pore volume (porosity) with change in pressure markedly increases.
  • This pressure may be referred to as the dilation pressure, although strictly speaking dilation occurs above and below the dilation pressure, albeit at a lower level when below the dilation pressure. If the pressure is subsequently reduced after dilation, the pore volume may decrease along a path (402) that is different from the path followed when pressure was rising.
  • the formation in situ stress can be determined in a well test in which water is injected into the formation at high rates while bottom-hole pressure response is recorded. Alternatively, the stress may be measured during the first cycle injection of solvent. Analysis of the pressure response would reveal the conditions at which formation failure occurs (the pressure at which the in situ stress is exceeded).
  • Pore fluid compression means compression of a pore fluid by pressure. In the field, the operator can obtain pore fluid compression by multiplying pressure increase by fluid compressibility, which is a fluid property measurable in laboratory tests by procedures known to those skilled in the art. Pore dilation refers to dilation of pores in rock or soil. However, it may also be desirable for the primary threshold pressure to be close to or at the fracture pressure or be below the dilation pressure, depending on the specific reservoir characteristics and overall depletion plan. The benefits of reaching facture pressure or being below dilation pressure are discussed below.
  • Fig. 2 provides an outline of a process according to one disclosed embodiment and Figs. 3A, 3B, and 3C provide additional details of three sub-schemes thereof.
  • solid lines represent the process steps of one embodiment and dashed lines represent the process steps of alternative embodiments.
  • A1 , A2, or A3 are used to determine the volume of fluid to inject in each continuous injection period and in each restriction duration.
  • the injected volume of fluid contains greater than 50% by mass solvent.
  • Either a volume of solvent is injected (204) or injection continues until the designated primary threshold pressure is achieved (206).
  • the fluid volume (204) is the approximate net in situ volume of fluids produced in a previous cycle or cycles.
  • an additional volume of solvent is injected (208) (e.g. about 2-15% of the net in situ volume of fluids produced from the previous cycle or about 3-8% of PV divided by the number of continuous injection periods as described above) or injection continues for an additional amount of time (210), after which the number of continuous injection periods in the cycle is compared with the desired total number of continuous injection periods in the cycle (212). If the number of continuous injection periods equals the desired number of continuous injection periods in a cycle, injection ceases (218).
  • the process enters the restriction duration.
  • a net volume of solvent is injected which is less than that injected in the previous continuous injection period (e.g., 0- 25% of the net volume of solvent injected in the previous continuous injection period) (214) or solvent is injected to maintain an injection pressure above a secondary threshold pressure (e.g., between 6 MPa below the primary threshold pressure up to the primary threshold pressure) for an additional amount of time (216), after which the process enters the continuous solvent injection period (208) or (210).
  • a secondary threshold pressure e.g., between 6 MPa below the primary threshold pressure up to the primary threshold pressure
  • the well may be suspended or abandoned (238). If it will be economic, production at blowdown pressure is continued or reused as per the specific depletion plan (i.e. recompleted to different hydrocarbon interval or converted to an alternative service such as dedicated injection or disposal). Production at blowdown pressure is continued if deemed to be economic (234).
  • the primary threshold pressure may be about equal to the fracture pressure or be below the dilation pressure.
  • An example field deployment would be the installation of a surge tank at surface.
  • the surface storage would allow injected fluids to flow back into the well and be stored in the surge tank before reestablishing injection.
  • the reinjection of flowback viscous oil may have the added benefit of a viscosifier to the injected solvent stream.
  • practical size constraints of the surge tank defines the fixed volume of the flowback and therefore may limit injection cycles interrupted by periodic surge flowbacks to only the early cycles of CSDRP for maximum effectiveness.
  • An alternative to an installed surge tank would be flowback of a solvent rich stream to feed the injection stream into an adjacent well. This would require additional process piping and perhaps booster pumps but eliminates or mitigates any surface storage.
  • the instantaneous injection rate need not be constant throughout the injection of the volume in a given cycle or from continuous injection period to continuous injection period or from restriction duration to restriction duration.
  • tailoring the injection rate throughout the cycle volume may enhance solvent conformance. Rate control provides the practitioner with a means of optimizing oil production by designed solvent conformance for the given target reservoir.
  • solvent can finger into the reservoir in fine fingers due to the adverse mobility contrast between the injected solvent and in situ oil. Too severe of fingering can result in poor sweep of the reservoir and poor recovery of solvent in a given cycle, and thus poor recovery of oil and inefficient solvent utilization. It is preferred that the solvent injected in each cycle be utilized as efficiently as possible in reducing the viscosity of in situ oil and allowing the maximum amount of oil to flow back to the production well in the minimum time. Therefore, maintaining solvent in contact with in situ oil in a zone near enough to the production well to allow the in situ oil to be produced in a timely fashion is important in a CSDRP.
  • restriction durations between continuous injection periods is thought to allow solvent to stay in contact with in situ oil in a more desirable zone. It is thought that restriction durations, where the injection rates and volumes are significantly reduced below those in the immediately preceding continuous injection period, allow for solvent fingers to spread in directions that are not necessarily collinear with the direction of primary finger growth by means of the pressure gradient between solvent and the surrounding in situ fluids as well as countercurrent, gravity mixing as well as diffusion among other physical phenomena. This finger spreading results in a thicker zone of lower viscosity fluid.
  • the solvent fingers Upon switching back to a continuous injection period, it is thought that the solvent fingers will conform more to the solvent influenced, thicker zones due to the reduced viscosity contrast between the injectant and solvent influenced zone, keeping a larger fraction of solvent in a more favorable location, closer to the production well where the contacted in situ oil can be efficiently produced in the same cycle as demonstrated in the modeled example discussed below.
  • the periodic surge flowback to reverse flow direction in solvent fingers may assist finger spreading and further ensure injected solvent is closer to the production well.
  • the amount of time for each continuous injection period after the first injection period is constant and specified, for example 1 day or 6 hours or 3 days.
  • the amount of time for the first continuous injection period is the amount of time required to inject the net reservoir voidage resulting from previous injection and production cycles plus a specified period, where the specified period, for example is 1 day or 6 hours, or 3 days.
  • the amount of time in a given cycle of each continuous injection period, after a cumulative cycle volume equal to the net reservoir voidage resulting from previous injection and production cycles has been injected increases for each subsequent injection period.
  • the amounts of time, after a cumulative cycle volume equal to the net reservoir voidage resulting from previous injection and production cycles has been injected are 1 day, 2 days, and 3 days respectively.
  • the amount of time for each restriction duration is constant and specified, for example 1 day, 6 hours, or 3 days.
  • the amount of time for each restriction duration is greater than the amount of time for the immediately previous continuous injection period measured after a cumulative cycle volume equal to the net reservoir voidage resulting from previous injection and production cycles has been injected, for example for a continuous injection period of 1 day after a cumulative cycle volume equal to the net reservoir voidage resulting from previous injection and production cycles has been injected the amount of time for the restriction duration could be 1 .01 days, 3 days, or 2 days.
  • the amount of time for each restriction duration is more than twice the amount of time for the immediately previous continuous injection period measured after a cumulative cycle volume equal to the net reservoir voidage resulting from previous injection and production cycles has been injected, for example for a continuous injection period of 1 day after a cumulative cycle volume equal to the net reservoir voidage resulting from previous injection and production cycles has been injected the amount of time for the restriction duration could be 3 days or 2 days.
  • the duration of time for a restriction duration and the period of time for a continuous injection period can be determined a number of ways including methods based on computational reservoir simulation, methods based on field measurements of bottom hole pressure, produced fluid composition, produced fluid rate, injection pressure, or injection rate, or methods based on analytical scaling arguments.
  • Figs. 6A, 6B, and 6C show three injection scheme examples with injection rate plotted as a function of time in a given cycle.
  • Figs. 6A, 6B, and 6C illustrate continuous injection periods ((602), (604), and (606)) as well as restriction durations ((608), (610), (612)) in a cycle.
  • the schedule is very regular in both time and rate and shows the restriction duration as zero injection.
  • the schedule of Fig. 6B is more irregular since both the injection rate and the length of the continuous injection periods decrease over time.
  • the injection rate during the restricted duration is not zero.
  • Fig. 6C illustrates irregular restriction duration in terms of length of time.
  • the injection pressure can be monitored to determine the amount of time for each restriction duration. By reducing or halting the injection rate the injection pressure will decline as the pressure in the finger network leaks off to the formation matrix.
  • a threshold pressure drop and/or rate of pressure decline can be specified to optimally control the restriction duration to enhance mixing of solvent and oil.
  • the threshold pressure drop and/or rate of pressure decline can be derived by reservoir simulation, experimental measurements or observed field performance in similar well operations either in the same formation or in an analogous formation.
  • CSDRP performance is expected to be relatively unaffected by short production cycle and/or large delays in solvent injection; this offers the operator significant depletion plan flexibility.
  • CSDRP operation cycle length can be adapted to unusual market conditions such as commodity price fluctuations in order to maximize economic performance.
  • a low oil rate criterion is used, production is halted when the oil production rate falls to a specified percentage of the average rate obtained during a cycle, for example a value between 60% and 90%.
  • a cutoff generally allows production of the majority of mobilized heavy oil from cyclic solvent injection and halts the production when the rate is about equal to or somewhat below the expected average rate over the next cycle, resulting in minimum oil production deferral.
  • This is shown in scheme 3B of Fig. 3, where the current oil rate is measured (307), and the average daily rate obtained during the cycle is recorded (308) and using these values, the ratio of current oil rate to average rate is calculated (310). If the ratio is below a cutoff ratio (312 and 313), the oil rate is too low (314), and production may be stopped.
  • production may be halted if the current oil rate falls to less than a predetermined percentage (e.g. 30%, or 20 to 40%) of the maximum oil rate for the cycle.
  • a predetermined percentage e.g. 30%, or 20 to 40%
  • a predetermined percentage e.g. 30%, or 20 to 40%
  • a gas to oil ratio (GOR) is computed (320).
  • GOR gas to oil ratio
  • An artificial lift and/or surface facility gas handling capacity is determined (322) and is compared with the computed GOR (320) on the same basis, such as downhole or surface conditions. If the GOR is higher than the handling capacity (324), the gas rate is too high (326) and the production phase of the cycle is stopped.
  • Cyclic injection- production may be halted due to a criterion of the oil rate falling below a specified absolute level indicative of an insufficient rate to be economic.
  • cyclic injection-production may cease if the produced oil to injected solvent ratio (OISR) for the cycle is too low.
  • Fig. 3A illustrates the steps for determining if another cycle should be started using the OISR-based criterion. The volume of oil produced over a cycle (302) and the volume of solvent injected over a cycle (303) are measured, and using these measurements, the OISR is calculated (304).
  • the calculated OISR is compared with an economic OISR value (305) and an assessment is made as to whether the next cycle will be economic (306). If it is determined that another cycle would not be economic, all further injection of solvent ceases and any remaining solvent in the reservoir is partially recovered by allowing the production pressure to decrease to much lower levels (e.g., 100-300 kPa), typically termed the abandonment pressure (228, see Figure 2). Even at abandonment pressure, eventually the oil rate is uneconomic and the well may be permanently shut in or suspended (232, see Figure 2). [0070] All criteria for ceasing production and switching to injection discussed thus far have applied to all cycles and use data measured in the oilfield.
  • Reservoir surveillance activities and numerical simulation programs provide another tool for developing optimal production rate cutoff criteria on a cycle-by-cycle basis.
  • One method of optimization is to simulate a CSDRP and then choose switch points where the production rate meets the criteria discussed above. This simulation may be updated based on actual field performance data. The anticipated production rate for the next cycle can be estimated using reservoir simulation using the existing production data.
  • collection of historical production data through reservoir surveillance can lead to development of empirical performance curves whereby historical performance of mature wells is used to predict performance of similar wells yet to be drilled and/or in early state of depletion. Reservoir surveillance, numerical simulation studies, and evolving geologic understanding may improve field depletion strategies.
  • a well typically produces at a bottomhole pressure low enough to result in solvent vaporization and the formation of a secondary gas cap.
  • low pressures may not be preferred, especially in early cycles.
  • solvent vaporization may necessitate increased facilities costs to handle the produced gas as well as necessitate complex solvent management strategies to efficiently satisfy the highly dynamic solvent requirements.
  • some solvent blends may introduce additional facilities and operational complexities due to their tendency to enter the reservoir at low pressures and as a multi-phase fluid.
  • a method involves injecting solvent into an underground reservoir in a liquid state and producing at a bottomhole pressure above the bubble point of the injected solvent. Producing at bottomhole pressures above the bubble point of the solvent results primarily in the production of the viscous oil and the solvent in the liquid phase, potentially eliminating, or reducing, the need for additional costs associated with gas handling facilities. Since operating at production pressures above the solvent bubble point does not create as large of a pressure drop as operating below the bubble point, it is may be preferred to operate at a higher cycle frequency to maintain acceptable recovery rates of the viscous oil.
  • a well's production rate may be constrained by facility design and artificial lift capacity. If the well is producing at lower than its maximum production rate, the producing pressure may be progressively lowered until it reaches some minimum threshold pressure or the maximum design production capacity is achieved.
  • the bottomhole pressure of the well may be controlled by means of choking flow to keep the bottomhole pressure above a specified producing pressure, for example, 300-1000 kPa.
  • the minimum producing pressure controls whether or not the produced fluid is produced primarily as a liquid or primarily as a gas. In one embodiment, the minimum pressure is less than the vapor pressure of the produced fluid, causing the production of a principally gaseous fluid. In an alternative embodiment, the minimum pressure is above the vapor pressure of the produced fluid, causing the produced fluid to be produced primarily as a liquid.
  • Figure 5 illustrates an example of a production process.
  • the production rate is measured (502).
  • decision points (504) and (506) if the measured production rate is less than the maximum production rate, and the producing pressure is greater than a minimum pressure, the producing pressure is decreased (508). If the measured production rate is less than the maximum production rate, but the producing pressure is already at the minimum pressure, production is continued (510). Also, if the measured production rate is at the maximum production rate, production is also continued (510).
  • the bottomhole-producing pressure of the well is between 500 and 1500 kPa. These values are specific to a reservoir in Cold Lake, Alberta, and are based on depth, reservoir temperature, and injectant composition. The particular choice of bottomhole pressure is depth, reservoir temperature, and injectant composition dependant.
  • Modeled Example [0076] A two-dimensional, fine grid reservoir simulation model was built with geological and geomechanical properties representative of shallow in-situ bitumen deposits in a subterranean reservoir (1 1 ° API) near Cold Lake.
  • the solvent was modeled as propane.
  • solvent was injected for a continuous injection period, as in (208) of Fig. 2, and allowed to finger into the reservoir.
  • the specified number of continuous injection periods was not exceeded (212), and a restriction duration was then implemented, as in (216) of Fig. 2, where the injection rate and volume of injected solvent over the restriction duration were both zero.
  • Continuous injection was then restarted (208).
  • a second computer simulation was performed with corresponding injection volumes but no restriction durations. The computer simulations showed that the average distance of solvent from the wellbore was reduced when implementing the method shown in Fig. 2 when compared to continuous injection of comparable volumes of solvent.
  • Method A As is evident from Table 1 , using the method shown in Fig.2 ("Method A") is expected to result in substantial improvements in both the OISR and the SSR when compared to CSDRP methods that do not implement a restriction duration (“Method B").
  • Table 2 outlines the operating ranges for CSDRPs of some embodiments. The present invention is not intended to be limited by such operating ranges.
  • Injectant Main solvent (>50 mass%)
  • C 2 - Main solvent (>50 mass%) is composition, main C 5 .
  • wells may be propane (C 3 ).
  • Injectant Additional injectants may Only diluent, and only when composition, include C0 2 (up to about 30 needed to achieve adequate additive mass%), C 3 +, viscosifiers (e.g. injection pressure.
  • Well length As long of a horizontal well as 500m - 1500m (commercial can practically be drilled; or well).
  • the range of the A low pressure below the vapor pressure (MPP) MPP should be, on the low pressure of the main solvent, end, a pressure significantly ensuring vaporization, or, in the below the vapor pressure, limited vaporization scheme, a ensuring vaporization; and, on high pressure above the vapor the high-end, a high pressure pressure.
  • MPa low
  • high 1.5 MPa (high) values that perhaps 0.1 MPa - 5 MPa, bound the 800 kPa vapor depending on depth and mode pressure of propane.
  • rate Switch when e.g. total oil/total cycle length.
  • absolute rate equals a pre-set Likely most economically optimal value.
  • well is when the oil rate is at about 0.8 unable to sustain hydrocarbon x CDOR.
  • switch to flow continuously or injection when rate equals 20- intermittent) by primary 40% of the max rate obtained production against during the cycle.
  • Well is unable to During production, an optimal sustain hydrocarbon flow strategy is one that limits gas (continuous or intermittent) by production and maximizes liquid primary production against from a horizontal well.
  • OISR of the just completed of the just completed cycle is cycle is above 0.15 or above 0.3.
  • embodiments may be formed by combining two or more parameters and, for brevity and clarity, each of these combinations will not be individually listed.
  • diluent means a liquid compound that can be used to dilute the solvent and can be used to manipulate the viscosity of any resulting solvent-bitumen mixture.
  • the diluent is typically a viscous hydrocarbon liquid, especially a C 4 to C 2 o hydrocarbon, or mixture thereof, is commonly locally produced and is typically used to thin bitumen to pipeline specifications. Pentane, hexane, and heptane are commonly components of such diluents. Bitumen itself can be used to modify the viscosity of the injected fluid, often in conjunction with ethane solvent.
  • the diluent may have an average initial boiling point close to the boiling point of pentane (36 °C) or hexane (69 °C) though the average boiling point (defined further below) may change with reuse as the mix changes (some of the solvent originating among the recovered viscous oil fractions).
  • more than 50% by weight of the diluent has an average boiling point lower than the boiling point of decane (174 °C). More preferably, more than 75% by weight, especially more than 80% by weight, and particularly more than 90% by weight of the diluent, has an average boiling point between the boiling point of pentane and the boiling point of decane.
  • the diluent has an average boiling point close to the boiling point of hexane (69 °C) or heptane (98 °C), or even water (100 °C).
  • more than 50% by weight of the diluent (particularly more than 75% or 80% by weight and especially more than 90% by weight) has a boiling point between the boiling points of pentane and decane. In other embodiments, more than 50% by weight of the diluent has a boiling point between the boiling points of hexane (69 °C.) and nonane (151 °C), particularly between the boiling points of heptane (98 °C) and octane (126 °C).
  • boiling point of the diluent we mean the boiling point of the diluent remaining after half (by weight) of a starting amount of diluent has been boiled off as defined by ASTM D 2887 (1997), for example.
  • the average boiling point can be determined by gas chromatographic methods or more tediously by distillation. Boiling points are defined as the boiling points at atmospheric pressure.
  • the at least one restriction duration may be for a longer time than at least one of the two continuous injection periods.
  • the at least one restriction duration may be for a predetermined duration of time greater than 4 hours.
  • the at least one restriction duration may be for at least twice as long a time as at least one of the two continuous injection periods.
  • the at least one of the two continuous injection periods may be predetermined periods of time greater than 4 hours.
  • a peak injection rate during at least one of the two continuous injection periods may be at least 4 times (or at least 10 times, or at least 100 times) greater than an average injection rate during the at least one restriction duration.
  • An average injection rate during at least one of the two continuous injection periods may be at least 4 times (or at least 10 times, or at least 100 times) greater than an average injection rate during the at least one restriction duration.
  • a volume of solvent injected during the at least one restriction duration may be 0- 25 % of a volume of solvent injected during at least one of the two continuous injection periods.
  • Step (a) may comprise alternating between continuous injection periods and restriction durations.
  • the at least one restriction duration may comprise ceasing injection.
  • an in situ volume of fluid injected in steps (a) to (c) may be equal to a net in situ volume of fluids produced from the production well in an immediately preceding cycle plus an additional volume of fluid.
  • At least one of the two continuous injection periods may be for a predetermined period of time after an estimated bottomhole pressure reaches a primary threshold pressure.
  • the at least one restriction duration may be for a predetermined duration of time after an estimated bottomhole pressure reaches a secondary threshold pressure.
  • At least one restriction duration may be determined by a time required to inject a predetermined volume of fluid after an estimated bottomhole pressure reaches a secondary threshold pressure. At least one of the two continuous injection periods may be determined by a time required to inject a predetermined volume of fluid after an estimated bottomhole pressure reaches a primary threshold pressure. At least one of the two continuous injection periods may be determined by a time required to inject a predetermined volume of fluid after an injection rate reaches a target injection rate. [0094] The at least one restriction duration may be 1 to 9 restriction durations.
  • One or each of the two continuous injection periods may be greater than 1 hour and less than 10 days, or greater than 6 hours and less than 72 hours.
  • the at least one restriction duration may be greater than 1 hour and less than 10 days, or greater than 6 hours and less than 72 hours.
  • a duration of time for the at least one restriction duration may be determined by a time required for an estimated bottomhole pressure to drop to a secondary threshold pressure.
  • An injection pressure during the at least one restriction duration may be equal to a secondary threshold pressure above an initial reservoir pressure.
  • the method may be operated using a plurality of wells, each undergoing the cycles of injection and production according to substantially the same schedule.
  • the injection well and the production well may utilize a common wellbore.
  • the hydrocarbons may be a viscous oil having a viscosity of at least 10 cP at initial reservoir conditions.
  • the solvent may comprise, ethane, propane, butane, pentane, carbon dioxide, or a combination thereof.
  • the injected fluid may comprise diesel, viscous oil, natural gas, bitumen, diluent, C 5+ hydrocarbons, ketones, alcohols, non-condensable gas, water, biodegradable solid particles, salt, water soluble solid particles, solvent soluble solid particles, or a combination thereof.
  • the injected fluid may comprise at least 25 mass % liquid at the end of an injection cycle.
  • the injected fluid may comprise less than 50 mass % solid at the end of an injection cycle.
  • At least 75 mass % of fluid injected in a solid phase may transition to a liquid phase by the end of a subsequent production cycle.
  • At least 75 mass % of fluid injected in a solid phase may dissolve into a liquid phase by the end of a subsequent production cycle.
  • the phase of the injected fluid entering the reservoir may transition from greater than 75 mass % in the vapor phase to greater than 75 mass % in the liquid phase.
  • the phase of the injected fluid entering the reservoir may alternate between greater than 75 mass % in the vapor phase to greater than 75 mass % in the liquid phase.
  • the injected fluid may be heated such that it is injected into the underground reservoir at a temperature greater than 20 °C.
  • At least 25 mass % of the solvent in an injection cycle may enter the reservoir as a liquid. At least 25 mass % of the solvent at the end of an injection cycle may be a liquid.
  • An in situ volume of fluid injected over a cycle may be equal to a net in situ volume of fluids produced from the production well summed over all preceding cycles plus an additional in situ volume of fluid.
  • the additional in situ volume of fluid may be, at reservoir conditions, equal to 2% to 15% of a pore volume within the reservoir zone around the injection well within which solvent fingers are expected to travel during the cycle.
  • the injected fluid may comprises a diesel, viscous oil, bitumen, or diluent to increase the viscosity of the injected fluid.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention porte sur un procédé d'utilisation d'un processus de récupération dominé par un solvant cyclique (CSDRP) pour récupérer des hydrocarbures visqueux à partir d'un réservoir souterrain d'hydrocarbures visqueux. Le processus à solvant cyclique met en œuvre l'utilisation d'un puits d'injection pour injecter un solvant de réduction de viscosité dans un réservoir d'hydrocarbures visqueux souterrain. Les hydrocarbures à viscosité réduite sont produits à la surface à l'aide du même puits que celui utilisé pour injecter un solvant. Le processus d'injection d'un solvant et de production d'un mélange solvant/hydrocarbures visqueux en alternance à travers le même puits de forage se poursuit dans une série de cycles jusqu'à ce que des cycles additionnels ne soient plus économiques. Pour améliorer l'efficacité du solvant, l'injection comprend au moins une durée de restriction, pendant laquelle l'injection est restreinte, entre deux périodes d'injection continue.
PCT/US2012/025649 2011-03-15 2012-02-17 Procédé d'injection d'un solvant dans un réservoir souterrain pour faciliter la récupération d'hydrocarbures WO2012125256A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA2734170 2011-03-15
CA2734170A CA2734170C (fr) 2011-03-15 2011-03-15 Methode pour injecter du solvant dans un reservoir souterrain pour faciliter la recuperation d'hydrocarbures

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012125256A1 true WO2012125256A1 (fr) 2012-09-20

Family

ID=46827141

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2012/025649 WO2012125256A1 (fr) 2011-03-15 2012-02-17 Procédé d'injection d'un solvant dans un réservoir souterrain pour faciliter la récupération d'hydrocarbures

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20120234535A1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2734170C (fr)
WO (1) WO2012125256A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110244382A (zh) * 2019-06-27 2019-09-17 中国石油化工股份有限公司 盆缘见油追气的浅层气藏勘探方法

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10385677B2 (en) * 2012-04-05 2019-08-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Formation volumetric evaluation using normalized differential data
US20130268201A1 (en) * 2012-04-05 2013-10-10 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Formation compositional evaluation using normalized differential data
CA2886212C (fr) * 2012-11-16 2018-03-13 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Procedes et systemes integres d'ascension artificielles liquide-a-gaz et de dilution du bitume
CA2836528C (fr) 2013-12-03 2016-04-05 Imperial Oil Resources Limited Processus de recuperation d'hydrocarbures de solvant cyclique au moyen d'un mouvement de retrait avance de l'element injectant
US10233727B2 (en) * 2014-07-30 2019-03-19 International Business Machines Corporation Induced control excitation for enhanced reservoir flow characterization
CA2972203C (fr) 2017-06-29 2018-07-17 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Solvant de chasse destine aux procedes ameliores de recuperation
CA2974712C (fr) 2017-07-27 2018-09-25 Imperial Oil Resources Limited Methodes ameliorees de recuperation d'hydrocarbures visqueux d'une formation souterraine comme etape qui suit des procedes de recuperation thermique
CA2978157C (fr) 2017-08-31 2018-10-16 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Methodes de recuperation thermique servant a recuperer des hydrocarbures visqueux d'une formation souterraine
CA2983541C (fr) 2017-10-24 2019-01-22 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Systemes et methodes de surveillance et controle dynamiques de niveau de liquide
US20240013120A1 (en) * 2022-07-08 2024-01-11 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Development of potential readiness advisory tool (prat)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030015321A1 (en) * 2001-05-31 2003-01-23 Lim Git B. Cyclic solvent process for in-situ bitumen and heavy oil production
US20050145383A1 (en) * 2001-06-21 2005-07-07 John Nenniger Method and apparatus for stimulating heavy oil production
US20050211434A1 (en) * 2004-03-24 2005-09-29 Gates Ian D Process for in situ recovery of bitumen and heavy oil
US20060254769A1 (en) * 2005-04-21 2006-11-16 Wang Dean C Systems and methods for producing oil and/or gas
WO2009067418A1 (fr) * 2007-11-19 2009-05-28 Shell Oil Company Systèmes et procédés permettant de produire du pétrole et/ou du gaz
US20110264373A1 (en) * 2010-04-26 2011-10-27 Hehmeyer Owen J Method For The Management of Oilfields Undergoing Solvent Injection

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4319635A (en) * 1980-02-29 1982-03-16 P. H. Jones Hydrogeology, Inc. Method for enhanced oil recovery by geopressured waterflood
CA2764343A1 (fr) * 2011-01-04 2012-07-04 Conocophillips Company Recuperation d'hydrocarbures amelioree dans des reservoirs de faible mobilite

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030015321A1 (en) * 2001-05-31 2003-01-23 Lim Git B. Cyclic solvent process for in-situ bitumen and heavy oil production
US20050145383A1 (en) * 2001-06-21 2005-07-07 John Nenniger Method and apparatus for stimulating heavy oil production
US20050211434A1 (en) * 2004-03-24 2005-09-29 Gates Ian D Process for in situ recovery of bitumen and heavy oil
US20060254769A1 (en) * 2005-04-21 2006-11-16 Wang Dean C Systems and methods for producing oil and/or gas
WO2009067418A1 (fr) * 2007-11-19 2009-05-28 Shell Oil Company Systèmes et procédés permettant de produire du pétrole et/ou du gaz
US20110264373A1 (en) * 2010-04-26 2011-10-27 Hehmeyer Owen J Method For The Management of Oilfields Undergoing Solvent Injection

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110244382A (zh) * 2019-06-27 2019-09-17 中国石油化工股份有限公司 盆缘见油追气的浅层气藏勘探方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2734170A1 (fr) 2012-09-15
CA2734170C (fr) 2013-09-24
US20120234535A1 (en) 2012-09-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2734170C (fr) Methode pour injecter du solvant dans un reservoir souterrain pour faciliter la recuperation d'hydrocarbures
CA2836528C (fr) Processus de recuperation d'hydrocarbures de solvant cyclique au moyen d'un mouvement de retrait avance de l'element injectant
US20120325467A1 (en) Method of Controlling Solvent Injection To Aid Recovery of Hydrocarbons From An Underground Reservoir
CA2707283C (fr) Procede d'extraction d'une huile visqueuse par chauffage electrique et injection de solvant
US6769486B2 (en) Cyclic solvent process for in-situ bitumen and heavy oil production
CA2696638C (fr) Utilisation d'une emulsion dont la phase externe est un solvant pour la recuperation in situ de petrole
CA2738364C (fr) Methode pour ameliorer l'efficacite d'un procede d'injection de solvant cyclique pour la recuperation d'hydrocarbures
US20150345268A1 (en) Applications of ultra-low viscosity fluids to stimulate ultra-tight hydrocarbon-bearing formations
US8602098B2 (en) Hydrate control in a cyclic solvent-dominated hydrocarbon recovery process
Sahin et al. A quarter century of progress in the application of CO2 immiscible EOR project in Bati Raman heavy oil field in Turkey
CA2703319C (fr) Exploitation de puits en groupes dans un contexte de procedes d'extraction recourant principalement a l'injection de solvants
CA2872120C (fr) Recuperation d'hydrocarbures dans un reservoir souterrain
EP2347094B1 (fr) Procédé de récupération d'huiles lourdes/visqueuses à partir d'une formation souterraine
CA2900179C (fr) Recuperation d'hydrocarbures d'un reservoir sous-terrain
CA2900178C (fr) Recuperation d'hydrocarbures d'un reservoir sous-terrain
US9328592B2 (en) Steam anti-coning/cresting technology ( SACT) remediation process
WO2013166587A1 (fr) Procédé de remédiation utilisant la technologie d'anti-formation de cône/crête de vapeur (sact)
US9702236B2 (en) Heat-assisted steam-based hydrocarbon recovery method
CA2968392A1 (fr) Sagd a pression variable (sagd-pv) destine a la recuperation de petrole brut
CA3102853A1 (fr) Solvant dynamique : gestion de la vapeur dans la recuperation d`huiles lourdes
CA2815410A1 (fr) Procede d'assainissement a technologie anti-cone/crete a vapeur

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12757039

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12757039

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1